Skip to main content
Medicina logoLink to Medicina
editorial
. 2026 Jun 30;62(7):1260. doi: 10.3390/medicina62071260

Recent Developments in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Jimmy Efird 1,2,*, Tithi Biswas 2,3
PMCID: PMC13413539  PMID: 42512803

The field of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment has experienced significant advances, leading to a decreasing mortality trajectory. An estimated 27 deaths per 100,000 resident U.S. population were reported in the year 2000, steadily declining to less than 10 by 2025 (Figure 1). However, the reduction is not uniform across demographic groups, with non-Hispanic Black females still dying at a rate of 26 per year. Geographic variability also exists in the age-adjusted annual death rate for breast cancer, with evident clusters occurring in the Southeast and lower Mississippi river regions (Figure 2). The differences in death rates likely reflect variable access and utilization to care, social economic position, genetics, environmental exposures, diet, exercise, mental health, and other medical and social determinants of health.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Breast cancer mortality by year of death among female residents (all ages) in the United States. Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 27 May 2026.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Age-adjusted annual breast cancer death rates (females, all ages) per 100,000 for the United States by county. Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 27 May 2026.

On the global front, breast cancer persists as a common cancer in women, with an estimated 670,000 deaths per year, but unequal distribution [1]. Among those living in a country at the upper end of the Human Development Index (HDI), 1 in 12 women will be diagnosed with this cancer during their lifetime, with a 1 in 71 mortality rate. On the other hand, in countries with a low HDI, 1 in 27 women will be diagnosed, with a 1 in 48 mortality rate. Like in the United States, early and timely diagnosis, effective interventions, and advances in research play a critical role in reducing breast cancer morbidity and mortality. Nonetheless, among women under the age of 50, a global increase of early-onset breast cancer has manifested as a prominent rise in cancer-related disability-adjusted life years [2].

Consisting of 20 papers published in Medicina, the Special Issue “Recent Developments in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment” focuses on reducing breast cancer risk through targeted screening, treatment advances, and novel research efforts [contributions 1–20]. Together, these manuscripts provide an informative overview of recent developments in the field with the aim of filling in knowledge gaps and stimulating future research. Overall, this information helps to establish a more refined risk profile for breast cancer, leading to better prevention, earlier detection, and superior treatment.

We wish to express our gratitude to the authors who have contributed to this Special Issue and hope that their insights and dedication in combatting breast cancer will help to save lives and enhance survivors’ quality of life. Breast cancer remains a perplexing challenge, requiring the deployment and scalability of multiple strategies to improve outcomes. Foremost, as illustrated in this collection of papers, is the integration of basic and medical sciences, community outreach, and culturally aligned education efforts. The systemic improvement of existing technologies, coupled with those on the emerging forefront of science, paints a bright future for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.

As healthcare systems face a critical inflection point in terms of population growth and financial sustainability, the transformation of research into action, provider awareness, and stakeholder commitment will be pivotal as we advance into the future of this field. This will involve carefully targeting breast cancer resources while recognizing and overcoming structural barriers. Leveraging evidence-based approaches, predicated on sound science and trusted research, remains an important path forward.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.E. and T.B.; writing—original draft preparation, J.E. and T.B.; writing—review and editing, J.E. and T.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

List of Contributions

  1. Toyran, T.; Bayram, E.; Camadan, Y.; Sahin, B.; Dalcı, K.; Arslan, Y.; Ergin, M. The correlation between PD-l1 expression in metaplastic breast cancer and clinical-pathological features and prognosis. Medicina 2026, 62, 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62040726.

  2. Gurau, A.; Mihalache, D.; Satala, C.; Rață, A.; Rebegea, L. HER2-low breast cancer: Biological framework and determinants of HER2 instability. Medicina 2026, 62, 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62020304.

  3. Bedir, S.; Yeşilova, U.; Tokoçin, M.; Demirel, B.; Bozkaya, Y.; Oyman, A.; Guliyev, M.; Abbasov, H.; Demirci, N.; Değerli, E.; et al. Clinicopathological predictors of axillary pathological complete response and its prognostic significance in clinically node-positive (CN+), HER2-positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant therapy. Medicina 2026, 62, 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62010200.

  4. Tan, D.; Zhai, Y.; Hu, Z.; Sun, D.; Zheng, T. A multimodal diagnostic model for breast cancer invasiveness based on ultrasound imaging and serum biomarkers. Medicina 2025, 61, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61112010.

  5. Birsin, Z.; Bükün, H.; Nazlı, I.; Alkan, O.; Günaltılı, M.; Çerme, E.; Aliyev, V.; Cebeci, S.; Jeral, S.; Abbasov, H.; et al. Is body mass index a prognostic factor in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer? A real-world multicenter study. Medicina 2025, 61, 1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091604.

  6. Abuaisha, A.; Kaya, M.; Suer, I.; Emiroglu, S.; Bayram, A.; Tukenmez, M.; Cabioglu, N.; Muslumanoglu, M.; Nazligul, E.; Papila, B.; et al. Curcumin as an epigenetic modulator: Suppression of breast cancer via the hsa_circ_0001946/mir-7-5p/target gene axis. Medicina 2025, 61, 1600. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091600.

  7. Saray, S.; Yılmaz, T.; Kanmaz, H.; İriağaç, Y. Androgen receptor: Clinical importance in breast cancer patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment. Medicina 2025, 61, 1464. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081464.

  8. İşleyen, Z.; Muğlu, H.; Topçu, Z.; Beşiroğlu, M.; Yasin, A.; Topçu, A.; Şimşek, M.; Şeker, M.; Türk, H. Factors affecting the survival of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Medicina 2025, 61, 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071279.

  9. İlhan, N.; Doğan, A.; Erölmez, H.; Atalah, F.; Baş, S.; Yasar, S.; Odabaş, H.; Gümüş, M. The incidence and clinical characteristics of interstitial lung disease associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer patients: A retrospective multicenter study. Medicina 2025, 61, 549. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030549.

  10. Choi, J.; Kim, J.; Jung, Y.; Park, J.; Lee, J. Neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 3 as a prognostic biomarker in breast cancer using bioinformatic analysis. Medicina 2025, 61, 474. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030474.

  11. Suzuki, S.; Saito, Y. Genomic analysis of advanced phyllodes tumors using next-generation sequencing and their chemotherapy response: A retrospective study using the C-CAT database. Medicina 2024, 60, 1898. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111898.

  12. Ma, J.; Fu, Y.; Chen, X.; Lin, Y.; Zeng, L.; Mei, F.; Cui, L Utilizing the postvascular phase of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict breast cancer lymph node metastasis. Medicina 2024, 60, 1780. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111780.

  13. Evsei, A.; Birceanu-Corobea, A.; Ghita, G.; Copca, N. Secretory carcinoma of the breast with apocrine differentiation—A peculiar entity. Medicina 2024, 60, 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60060924.

  14. Filip, C.; Cătană, A.; Kutasi, E.; Roman, S.; Militaru, M.; Risteiu, G.; Dindelengan, G. Breast cancer screening and prophylactic mastectomy for high-risk women in Romania. Medicina 2024, 60, 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60040570.

  15. Record, S.; Chanenchuk, T.; Parrish, K.; Kaplan, S.; Kimmick, G., Plichta, J. Prognostic tools for older women with breast cancer: A systematic review. Medicina 2023, 59, 1576. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091576.

  16. Lee, K.; Jeong, Y.; Choo, K.; Nam, S.; Kim, H.; Jung, Y.; Lee, S.; Joo, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.; et al. Comparison of fused diffusion-weighted imaging using unenhanced mri and abbreviated post-contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with breast cancer. Medicina 2023, 59, 1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091563.

  17. Ajabnoor, G. The molecular and genetic interactions between obesity and breast cancer risk. Medicina 2023, 59, 1338. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59071338.

  18. Akgun, Z.; Cakir, A.; Sağlam, E.; Demirel, S.; Igci, A.; Keskin, S. A hypofractionated radiotherapy schedule with a simultaneous integrated boost for breast cancer: Outcomes including late toxicity and health quality. Medicina 2023, 59, 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040675.

  19. Saavedra-Leos, M.; Jordan-Alejandre, E.; Puente-Rivera, J.; Silva-Cázares, M. Molecular pathways related to sulforaphane as adjuvant treatment: A nanomedicine perspective in breast cancer. Medicina 2022, 58, 1377. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101377.

  20. Efird, J.; Jindal, C.; Biswas, T. On the frontiers of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment: Current and future directions in a rapidly changing field. Medicina 2022, 58, 1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58081026.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References


Articles from Medicina are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES