Skip to main content
Pharmaceutics logoLink to Pharmaceutics
. 2026 Jul 13;18(7):851. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics18070851

Advances in Dendrimer-Based Anti-Infective Systems: In Vivo Insights and Perspectives

Charlotte Aparici 1,2, Kevin Antraygues 1,2, Vania Bernardes-Génisson 1,2, Manuel S Rodriguez 1,2, Cédric-Olivier Turrin 1,2,3,*, Valérie Maraval 1,2, Anne-Marie Caminade 1,2,*
Editor: Melgardt de Villiers
PMCID: PMC13414964  PMID: 42514929

Abstract

The rise of antimicrobial resistance and the persistence of difficult-to-treat infections have stimulated interest in new strategies to overcome these problems. Among these strategies, dendrimers, which are highly branched monodisperse macromolecules, have emerged as innovative antimicrobial and anti-infective platforms. Dendrimers can act as intrinsic antimicrobial agents through multivalent interactions or membrane disruption or serve as nanocarriers for antibiotics, antiviral agents, antibiofilm compounds, gas-releasing active molecules, or photosensitizers. This review analyzes dendrimer-based anti-infective systems for which in vivo or clinical evaluation has been reported. The literature covers diverse platforms, including PAMAM, poly(L-lysine), peptide, carbosilane, phosphorhydrazone, polyglycerol, polyester, and other dendritic architectures. The available evidence includes infected animal models, pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies, local tolerance studies, and clinical trials. PAMAM systems are the most extensively explored preclinically, whereas poly(L-lysine) dendrimer astodrimer/SPL7013 remains the most clinically advanced example. Overall, dendrimers provide a chemically tunable and biologically versatile approach to anti-infective research, but the current evidence remains heterogeneous. Direct comparison across studies is limited by differences in dendrimer scaffold, generation, surface chemistry, formulation, pathogen, infection model, administration route, dosing regimen, and biological endpoint. Future development will require better-defined in vivo models, more systematic safety and biodistribution studies, clearer structure–activity relationships, and stronger links between in vitro activity and clinically relevant efficacy.

Keywords: dendrimer, antimicrobial resistance, anti-infective therapy, in vivo, bacterial vaginosis, wound infection, tuberculosis, antiviral

1. Introduction

Antibiotics transformed modern medicine following Alexander Fleming’s serendipitous discovery of penicillin in 1928 [1]. The subsequent expansion of the antibiotic arsenal rendered previously fatal infections treatable, saving millions of lives [2]. However, the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains, particularly those exhibiting multidrug resistance (MDR) [3], i.e., resistance to at least three different classes of antimicrobials [4,5], has undermined this progress, necessitating innovative strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance [6,7,8].

Dendrimers [9,10,11,12,13], highly branched and monodisperse macromolecules, have emerged as promising tools in this fight. Dendrimers, as well as dendrons, which are dendritic wedges [14], offer both intrinsic antimicrobial activity and the ability to enhance the efficacy of existing drugs [15,16]. Their unique architecture—a central core, branching units, and functional surface groups—enables precise modification and targeted delivery, making them attractive for in vivo applications (Figure 1). Certain dendrimers, such as cationic PAMAM (polyamidoamine) [17] and peptide-based dendrimers [18,19,20], exhibit intrinsic antibacterial and antitoxin effects [21]. Their positive charge can disrupt bacterial membranes and induce cell lysis. This membrane-targeting mode of action may reduce the likelihood of target-specific resistance compared to single-enzyme inhibitors, although bacterial adaptation to cationic membrane-active compounds, including quaternary ammonium antiseptics and disinfectants, can occur through mechanisms such as cell-envelope remodeling, changes in membrane structure or function, efflux pumps, and biofilm formation [22]. Beyond direct action, dendrimers and dendrons can encapsulate or be conjugated with antimicrobial agents, enhancing their solubility, stability, and bioavailability. Advanced dendrimer designs now incorporate environmental responsiveness (e.g., pH, redox conditions), enabling targeted drug release at infection sites and minimizing off-target effects. Dendritic materials appear as an innovative tool in the clinical management of infectious diseases and many other health issues [23].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematization of dendrimers and dendrons (dendritic wedges). Both are represented as the full structure and the abbreviated chemical structure, in a linear form, with parentheses after each branching point, which define the number of generations (red points: surface functions; blue points: core).

While numerous studies and reviews have described the antimicrobial potential of dendritic molecules [24,25,26,27], most have focused primarily on chemical design, structure–activity relationships, and in vitro activity. However, moving from promising in vitro results to potential clinical development requires in vivo studies, which provide essential information on efficacy, tolerability, biodistribution, administration routes, and biological outcomes in complex organisms [28]. These data remain scattered across heterogeneous studies involving different dendrimer scaffolds, pathogens, infection models, dosing regimens, and endpoints, making direct comparison difficult. This review primarily focuses on dendrimer-based antimicrobial systems evaluated in vivo, including dendrimers with intrinsic antibacterial or antibiofilm activity and dendrimer-based carriers of antimicrobial agents. Antiviral examples are included when they involve dendritic systems developed as anti-infective agents, particularly when in vivo or clinical data are available. Studies mainly addressing wound healing, tissue regeneration, or inflammation are discussed only when they are directly associated with infection control, antimicrobial activity, or the delivery of anti-infective agents.

The in vivo models discussed in this review should not be interpreted as providing equivalent levels of translational evidence. At the same time, their value cannot be ranked solely according to the animal species used. As summarized by Box’s aphorism that “all models are wrong, but some are useful” [29], each model should be considered according to its fitness for the biological question being asked. Invertebrate models such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Galleria mellonella can be informative for early antimicrobial screening, host survival, and preliminary toxicity assessment. Zebrafish larvae may provide useful information on infection-site accumulation and whole-organism biodistribution in a lower vertebrate model. Rodent models are more relevant for evaluating mammalian infection biology, local and systemic efficacy, tissue distribution, and route-dependent pharmacology. Non-human primate studies provide the closest translational evidence but remain available for only a small number of dendrimer systems. Finally, clinical trials are the first evaluation in humans, performed with a limited sample of volunteers. Therefore, rather than ranking studies only by species, this review considers whether the model is fit for the intended biological question, including infection site, pathogen, immune context, route of administration, dosing regimen, comparator, and endpoint.

This review is organized according to dendrimer family, including PAMAM dendrimers and dendrons, poly(L-lysine) and other peptide dendrimers, and miscellaneous dendritic architectures. For each family, we discuss both dendrimers acting as antimicrobial agents themselves and systems used to deliver or potentiate antimicrobial compounds.

2. Literature Search Strategy and Scope of the Review

This review focuses on dendrimer-based anti-infective systems for which at least one in vivo or clinical evaluation has been reported. Literature searches were performed using Web of Science and to a lesser extent SciFinder, using combinations of the following keywords: dendrimer, dendron, anti-infective, in vivo. The search covered the literature available up to April 2026.

Studies were included when they described dendrimer or dendron systems with anti-infective relevance and included at least one in vivo or clinical evaluation. In vivo evidence was defined broadly as data obtained in living organisms or human subjects, including infected animal models, clinical trials, pharmacokinetic or biodistribution studies, local tolerance studies, or in vivo delivery studies when the dendrimer system was designed for anti-infective use. In vitro data were discussed when they were necessary to introduce the antimicrobial activity, mechanism of action, drug-loading strategy, antibiofilm effect, cytotoxicity, or release behavior of systems subsequently evaluated in vivo. Dendrimer systems supported exclusively by in vitro data were not considered within the main scope of this review.

Antiviral examples were included when they involved dendrimer-based anti-infective systems evaluated in vivo or clinically, particularly when they illustrated clinically advanced dendrimer platforms. Studies mainly addressing wound healing, tissue regeneration, or inflammation were included only when they were directly associated with infection control, antimicrobial activity, local tolerance, or delivery of anti-infective agents. This review was not designed as a systematic review, a regulatory assessment, or a pharmaceutical development review. Its objective is to provide a chemistry-guided overview of dendrimer-based antimicrobial and anti-infective systems evaluated in vivo, while highlighting the main biological and translational limitations emerging from these studies.

3. Poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) Dendrimers and Dendrons

Poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers, pioneered by D.A. Tomalia et al. [30], are the most widely used type of dendrimers. They possess either carboxylic acids or primary amines as terminal functions, depending on the synthesis step considered, or can be modified to alcohols. Both the full structure and the corresponding linear representation for PAMAM-G4-NH2 are shown in Figure 2, together with the linear structures of PAMAM-G4-OH and PAMAM-G3.5-CO2. The relatively large number of PAMAM examples discussed below reflects their predominant place in the dendrimer literature and, more specifically, their frequent use in in vivo anti-infective studies.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Full chemical structure and linear representation of PAMAM-G4-NH2 and linear representation of other PAMAM dendrimers. Surface functions in red.

3.1. PAMAM Dendrimers and Dendrons as Antimicrobial Drugs by Themselves

The three dendrimers shown in Figure 2 were tested as antimicrobial agents against Escherichia coli. PAMAM-G4-NH2 showed high antibacterial activity, with an IC50 value (half maximal inhibitory concentration, corresponding to the concentration of dendrimer necessary to kill 50% of the bacteria) of 3.8 μg·mL−1, but was toxic to a human cervical epithelial cell line above 10 μg·mL−1. On the contrary, PAMAM-G4-OH was non-cytotoxic up to 1 mg·mL−1, while exhibiting good antibacterial activity, inhibiting E. coli growth at concentrations as low as 3.13 mg·mL−1. Thus, this dendrimer was used to treat pregnant guinea pigs with intra-cervical E. coli infection (model of chorioamnionitis). The treatment consisted of topically applying the PAMAM-G4-OH dendrimer to the cervical endometrium of guinea pigs at a dose of 625 μg·kg−1. The amniotic fluid samples from different fetuses were collected after 48 h and did not show any bacterial growth (0%), unlike untreated animals, for which 57.1% of the amniotic fluid samples from different fetuses tested positive for bacterial growth. The proposed mechanism of action involved binding of PAMAM-G4-OH via hydrogen bonds to the hydrophilic O-antigens of the outer membrane of E. coli [31]. This pregnancy-associated infection model is relevant because it evaluates the ability of locally administered PAMAM-G4-OH to prevent bacterial growth in the amniotic environment. However, in such a gestational setting, antibacterial efficacy alone is not sufficient to support translation. Placental transfer, fetal exposure, reproductive safety, and long-term developmental outcomes should be specifically investigated in future studies.

In addition to the intrinsic activity of native PAMAM dendrimers, they were also partly functionalized on their surface with different types of drug-related molecules. PAMAM-G5-NH2 was partly functionalized with dopamine attached to the dendrimer via a succinyl linker (10 equiv. per PAMAM molecule), affording PAMAM-G5-NH2-DOP (Figure 3A). Dopamine is a derivative of catechol 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine, which is contained in adhesion proteins secreted by mussels. The resulting dendrimer adhered strongly to titanium alloy surfaces, which displayed antimicrobial and osteogenic activities. The same properties were observed in vivo for bone implants in rats, significantly enhancing the long-term stability of implants [32].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) PAMAM-G5-NH2 partly covalently functionalized by reaction with a dopamine derivative. (B) PAMAM-G3-NH2 partly covalently functionalized with borneol.

A very recent example of PAMAM-G3-NH2 partial functionalization was carried out with a derivative of borneol (a bicyclic monoterpene extracted from medicinal plants that can interact with bacterial surfaces), affording PAMAM-G3-BN (Figure 3B). This dendrimer was tested first against the oral bacteria Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis. PAMAM-G3-BN reduced bacterial adhesion and viability, neutralized surface charge, and affected the integrity of the bacterial membrane, thus resulting in almost complete disintegration of biofilms. Male Sprague–Dawley rats (8 weeks) received human pre-demineralized enamel blocks (~3 × 3 × 1 mm) fixed to the maxillary molars, then were inoculated with S. mutans twice a day for 3 days, to establish a cariogenic environment. PAMAM-G3-BN (50 µL) was applied topically twice a day for 3 weeks. The shallowest lesion depth, the greatest remineralization performance, and tunable bactericidal activity were observed when using PAMAM-G3-BN. This dendrimer exhibited both antibacterial and enamel-preserving effects [33].

PAMAM-G4-NH2 was partly covalently functionalized with the antibiotic tedizolid (TDZ) and interacted electrostatically with either cis-aconitic anhydride-modified D-tyrosine (CA-Tyr) or succinic anhydride-D-tyrosine (SA-Tyr), affording PAMAM-G4-NH2-TDZ/CA-Tyr or PAMAM-G4-NH2-TDZ/SA-Tyr particles able to penetrate biofilms (Scheme 1A). TDZ is a drug approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection caused by Gram-positive bacteria, but it is inactive against biofilms due to its poor penetration ability. D-amino acids were shown to interfere with biofilm matrix protein synthesis, thus preventing biofilm development. In an acidic environment, the immediate release of D-Tyr damaged the matrix of the biofilm, enabling the penetration of PAMAM-G4-NH2-TDZ. In response to lipase, sustained release of TDZ was observed for a long time, leading to the biofilm eradication. These concepts were then applied in vivo against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-induced subcutaneous abscess in mice, using dendritic compounds labelled with a few Cy-5 dyes. After intravenous (i.v.) injection, the dendrimer/CA-Tyr electrostatic assembly appeared in the subcutaneous abscess within 1 h and remained there for more than 24 h, as shown by fluorescence. This formulation induced the disappearance of 99% of bacteria, which were killed by the treatment. On the contrary, the fluorescence of the dendrimer/SA-Tyr electrostatic assembly labelled with Cy-5 was very weak at the infected site and disappeared after 12 h [34]. This example illustrates the pharmacological interest of combining biofilm matrix disruption, improved penetration into infected tissue, and antibiotic delivery within a single dendrimer-based formulation. However, its translational interpretation remains limited by the complexity of the electrostatic assembly, the absence of long-term toxicity data, and the lack of direct comparison with clinically used anti-MRSA regimens.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

(A) PAMAM G4-NH2 dendrimer partly covalently functionalized with tedizolid and interacting with CA-Tyr or SA-Tyr. (B) PAMAM dendrimer covalently functionalized with azithromycin and interacting with 2,3-dimethyl maleic anhydride modified by poly(ethylene glycol)-block-polylysine. (C) Synthesis of a hydrogel by thiol-disulfide exchange between partly functionalized PAMAM and a dendritic PEG.

PAMAM G4-NH2 was partly covalently functionalized with an average of six azithromycin molecules (AZM) per dendrimer and interacted electrostatically with 2,3-dimethyl maleic anhydride (DA) modified by poly(ethylene glycol)-block-polylysine polymers (PEG-PLys) (Scheme 1B). The resulting electrostatically associated PAMAM-G4-NH2-AZM/DA-PEG-PLys can be disassembled at acidic pH, in particular at pH 6.0, which is typical in biofilm microenvironment. The released PAMAM-G4-NH2-AZM penetrated inside biofilms and increased internalization of AZM, compared to free AZM. Furthermore, this dendrimer effectively alleviated the occurrence of AZM resistance. This process was used in mice suffering from chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection of the lungs. The level of inflammation factors was significantly reduced in treated mice, which was consistent with a decrease in bacterial burden [35].

PAMAM G4-NH2 was also partly functionalized with thiopyridyl terminations by reaction with N-succinimidyl 3-(2-thiopyridyl)propionate (SPDP), affording a dendrimer having 49 NH2 and 15 NH-PDP. This dendrimer was then reacted with two equivalents of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and finally reacted with branched thiol-terminated PEG polymer (8-arm-PEGSH, 20 kDa), using a thiol-disulfide exchange to produce a hydrogel (Scheme 1C). This hydrogel was used to encapsulate amoxicillin, and the release was studied in vitro. Sustained release of the antibiotic and intrinsic antibacterial activity exhibited by the amine-terminated dendrimer were expected. The in vivo studies in pregnant guinea pig consisted of local intravaginal insertion of the hydrogel without the amoxicillin drug. Tissues were tolerant to the gel, and the gel was located on the superficial mucified epithelial layer [36]. The release of the antibiotic from the gels was evaluated in vitro and was shown to be slower (over 240 h) when a higher polymer concentration is used, due to the smaller pores formed in this case.

PAMAM G4-OH was partly functionalized with N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), known for attenuating neuroinflammation, to generate PAMAM-NAC, as shown in Scheme 2. This example illustrates a different type of clinical anti-infective relevance, in which the dendrimer platform is used to attenuate infection-associated inflammation and neurological injury rather than to directly inhibit viral replication. A disulfide linkage was used for grafting the NAC, which can be rapidly released in the brain in the presence of glutathione [37]. This dendrimer was tested in different animal models for treating inflammation, which is outside the scope of this review, but it was also used in a Phase 2a clinical trial as nanotherapy against severe COVID-19 infection. PAMAM-NAC was not directly used against the coronavirus; rather, it was used to attenuate inflammation and neurological injury. Twenty-four patients with severe COVID-19 infection received a single intravenous injection of PAMAM-NAC or of a placebo. Sixty days later, 3 of 7 patients receiving placebo and 14 of 17 patients treated with PAMAM-NAC were alive, and no-drug related adverse event was reported [38].

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

PAMAM G4-OH partly functionalized with N-acetyl cysteine (NAC). DIEA: diisopropylethylamine; PyBOP: benzotriazole-1-yloxytripyrrolidinophosphonium.

Another type of PAMAM dendrimer was synthesized by grafting seven PAMAM dendrons having an alkyne as the core to a β-cyclodextrin (CD) core functionalized with seven azides via a “click” reaction, which is frequently used for the synthesis and functionalization of dendrimers [39]. This dendrimer was then treated with nitric oxide (NO) under pressure (80 psi NO for 3 days) in the presence of MeOH/MeONa to react with the NH functions of the PAMAM dendrimer. A kind of NO dimer was thus created, with the aim of using the modified dendrimer as an NO reservoir, as NO is considered an interesting antibacterial agent [40]. The PAMAM dendrimer shown in Figure 4 was first shown to inhibit and disperse Staphylococcus aureus biofilms, thanks to the release of NO; then it was administered intranasally using a spray to rats inoculated with S. aureus. An excellent therapeutic effect was observed, with significant improvement of the symptoms [41].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

β-cyclodextrin as the core of the PAMAM dendrimer, and a proposed structure of its NO complex.

Different types of PAMAM dendrons were synthesized and identified as efficient antibacterial tools. A series of PAMAM dendrons having a hydrophobic alkyl chain (C6, C12, or C18) at the core and ammonium groups on the surface (2, or 4 NH3+) was synthesized and tested first on solutions of S. aureus and E. coli, including resistant strains. The best antibacterial activities were obtained using the compound with the C18 chain and 2 NH3+ (C18-G1 Figure 5A). This compound was tested on healthy mice to evaluate its in vivo safety compared to that of methicillin, at a concentration of 0.6 mg·mL−1 in both cases. All the blood biochemical indices of mice from the dendron group were consistent with those from the methicillin groups, demonstrating the biocompatibility of dendron C18-G1. The in vivo antimicrobial efficacy of cationic dendron C18-G1 was evaluated using a wound created on the back of the mice and infected with MRSA. An optimal wound healing rate reaching 65% on Day 7 was observed only with C18-G1 [42].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A) PAMAM dendron C18-G1. (B) Two examples of third-generation PAMAM dendrons.

A related compound with the same C18 alkyl chain at the core, but linked to the PAMAM part by a triazole ring, was synthesized by a “click” reaction. In a first example, the surface groups were eight primary amines, which can be easily protonated (compound C18-G3-NH2 Figure 5B) [43]. It was shown that this compound binds to the bacterial membrane and that the hydrophobic tail of the dendron is inserted into this membrane, thereby inducing bacterial cell lysis. This dendron is thus mimicking the antibacterial activity of amphiphilic antimicrobial peptides. Dendron C18-G3-NH2 was tested in vivo using mouse models of human infectious diseases (acute pneumonia and bacteremia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa). After intraperitoneal injection, it was found to be efficient at 10-fold lower therapeutic concentrations than specific antibiotics (methicillin and carbapenem), displaying a favorable safety profile in the reported study. Furthermore, the survival of mice during lethal bacteremia challenge was largely improved, with no death observed, unlike the 80% death rate observed for untreated mice [44].

An analogous dendron, in which the primary amines were transformed into tertiary amines, was also synthesized (C18-G3-Me). It was tested and found to be efficient towards a panel of Gram-positive and -negative bacterial strains, including resistant strains of S. aureus, Enterococcus faecium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, E. coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Enterobacter species. C18-G3-Me was also found to be effective in vivo in mouse models of bacteremia, acute pneumonia, and peritonitis-sepsis, with infection models based on E. coli and A. baumannii (both resistant strains). At a dose of 5.0 mg·kg−1, a significant decrease (1000-fold) of the bacterial burden, compared to tigecycline at the high dose of 50 mg·kg−1, was observed. The same efficacy was observed in the case of acute pneumonia. A notably higher survival rate was observed in the case of peritonitis-sepsis (90% survival in the case of E. coli and 80% in the case of A. baumannii) to be compared to untreated mice (12% survival in the case of E. coli, and less than 10% in the case of A. baumannii) [45].

PAMAM dendrons bearing an alkyne group at the core were also grafted onto azide-functionalized chitosan through click reactions. Some of the dendron amino groups were then reacted with methicillin, while nitric oxide (NO) was conjugated both at the surface and within the dendrons, affording CS-PAMAM-MET-NO (Scheme 3). This system combined the antibacterial effect of methicillin and NO and showed activity against E. coli and S. aureus in vitro. In a rat model of wounds infected by MRSA, CS-PAMAM-MET-NO effectively accelerated wound healing in vivo [46].

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Chitosan functionalized with PAMAM dendrons, and grafting of methicillin and NO.

A hydrothermal carbonization process was applied to CS-PAMAM (Scheme 3) dissolved in acetic acid solution and heated at 180 °C for 12 h in a furnace, followed by centrifugation. Only the fluorescent deposits were taken, affording functionalized carbon dots (CPA-CD), further functionalized with NO, as shown in Scheme 3, to afford CPA-CD-NO. This material was used as an NO-releasing platform against P. aeruginosa, decreasing both the bacterial viability and biofilm, as demonstrated by images obtained thanks to the bright blue fluorescence of CPA-CD-NO. In vivo theranostic assays were carried out to evaluate the treatment of bacteria-infected rat wounds, with eradication of the severe infection and inflammation [47].

PAMAM-Alk (Scheme 3) was functionalized with 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonyl chloride, affording PAMAM-Alk-Dns. This compound was found to be suitable for releasing SO2 in the presence of glutathione. It was grafted to CS-N3, affording CS-PAMAM-Dns (Scheme 4). This functionalized polymer, when tested in vitro, displayed antibacterial activity against the Gram-positive bacterium S. aureus and its methicillin-resistant strain MRSA, as well as the Gram-negative bacteria E. coli and P. aeruginosa. The in vivo efficacy of CS-PAMAM-Dns was tested in the small, transparent nematode Caenorhabditis elegans infected with MRSA. The survival rate of untreated C. elegans was only 49.7%, whereas for those treated with CS-PAMAM-Dns at concentrations of 1 and 2 mg·mL−1, the survival rates were 84.6% and 90.3% at 24 h, respectively [48].

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Chitosan functionalized with PAMAM dendrons, suitable for releasing SO2.

3.2. PAMAM Dendrimers and Dendrons as Non-Covalent Carriers of Antimicrobial Drugs

Examples of antibacterial drugs covalently linked to PAMAM dendrimers have been shown in the previous paragraphs. This new part concerns the non-covalent encapsulation or entrapping of antimicrobial drugs by PAMAM dendrimers, for which examples are shown in Figure 3 and Scheme 1. Generation 4 with 64 NH2 terminal groups (PAMAM-G4-NH2) and generation 4.5 with 128 carboxylate terminal groups (PAMAM-G4.5-CO2H) were used for the encapsulation of sulfadiazine (SDZ) (Figure 6A), a drug used for the treatment of toxoplasmosis, an infection caused by the Toxoplasma gondii parasite. However, this drug induces severe collateral effects; thus, it was encapsulated inside PAMAM dendrimers in the hope of limiting its unwanted effects and increasing the drug delivery efficiency. No large difference was observed between the free drug and its association with the dendrimers when they were administered orally to rats. On the contrary, after i.v. administration, the plasma concentration of SDZ was higher when complexed with PAMAM dendrimers than when injected free, and increased delivery was also observed to muscles, kidneys, and brain. These effects were more significant with PAMAM-G4-NH2 than with PAMAM-G4.5-CO2H [49].

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Antibacterial drugs encapsulated inside PAMAM dendrimers. (A,B) Miscellaneous examples. (C,D) Dendrimer associations used to treat dental infections.

Platensimycin (PTM) is a promising drug against Gram-positive bacteria, including many drug-resistant bacteria, but it is hampered by its too-rapid renal clearance. PTM was formulated with PAMAM-G4-NH2 to try to enhance its antibacterial properties (Figure 6A). Treatment by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection in a mouse peritonitis model of MRSA using PTM encapsulated in PAMAM-G4-NH2 led to full survival of the mice. On the contrary, all infected mice treated with free PTM only died, demonstrating the great usefulness of this encapsulation strategy [50].

Rifampicin (RIF) is a first-line drug for the treatment of tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. This pulmonary disease results in severe morbidity and mortality [51]. A review has recently emphasized the role of some dendrimers, tested essentially in vitro, against M. tuberculosis [52]. Generations 1, 2, and 3 of PAMAM dendrimers were used for the encapsulation of rifampicin and co-spray-dried to produce inhalable microspheres for pulmonary delivery (Figure 6B). These microspheres were administered to healthy rats via the intratracheal route. The peak plasma concentration time of rifampicin depended on the generation of the dendrimer: 12 h for PAMAM-G1-NH2 and PAMAM-G2-NH2 and 24 h for PAMAM-G3-NH2 [53]. Thus, the work mainly supports the feasibility of PAMAM-based inhalable rifampicin delivery and prolonged pulmonary/systemic exposure but does not demonstrate antimicrobial efficacy in an infected tuberculosis model.

Meropenem (MPN) is an antibiotic that is hydrolyzed by New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) produced by superbugs during infections, which are particularly difficult to treat. To test whether encapsulation of MPN could restore its activity, an MPN-loaded PAMAM dendrimer was produced (Figure 6B) and then subjected to ultrasonication into platelet membrane nanovesicles (PMVs). Such nanovesicles have pH-responsive properties to precisely deliver both PAMAM and MPN to bacterial infection sites. PAMAM-G5-NH2 inhibits NDM activity by removing zinc ions, thus preventing hydrolysis of MPN and boosting its efficacy. First, in vivo experiments were carried out with bacterial-enriched foci of zebrafish larvae, in which the loaded PMV specifically accumulated. In mouse models of E. coli-induced pneumonia or muscle sepsis, the delivery of loaded PMV by injection into the tail vein resulted in accumulation of MPN-loaded PAMAM at the infections sites. This method efficiently protected all infected mice from death [54].

Several recent papers concern the treatment of dental infections with PAMAM dendrimers interacting with drugs. A first example was a PAMAM dendrimer (generation and type of end groups unknown) loaded with dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate (DMADDM) (Figure 6C), a strong but cytotoxic antibacterial agent. Encapsulation decreased DMADDM toxicity, and encapsulation rate was 31%. PAMAM/DMADDM was used for treatment with micro-arc oxidation (MAO), which has antibacterial and osteogenic properties. This concept was used for a treatment in a model of severe peri-implantitis. Female rats that were highly infected with the micromycete Candida albicans and the Gram-positive bacterium S. aureus received an implant in the femur made of titanium coated or not with PAMAM/DMADDM, using the MAO process or not. It was shown that this association both decreased the development of microorganisms and promoted osteogenesis and osteointegration [55].

Honokiol (HNK) is a plant-derived lignan with antibacterial properties that is able to inhibit the growth of many cariogenic pathogens, but its water-insolubility limits its application. Encapsulation of HNK in PAMAM dendrimers functionalized with 128 carboxylates (PAMAM-G4.5-CO2H) (Figure 6D) endowed HNK with long-term antibacterial activity. It was shown that the release rate of HNK depended on the pH. Male rats fed a cariogenic diet developed a bacterial infection. Those that received PAMAM-G4.5-CO2H/HNK every 3 days developed significantly fewer pits and fissure lesions than the untreated group and exhibited decreased levels of S. mutans, one of the major cariogenic pathogens. This treatment induced enamel remineralization and effectively inhibited caries lesions in rats [56].

Another example concerned loading of the antibiotic minocycline hydrochloride (Mino), commonly used in clinical periodontal treatment, and the antioxidant α-lipoic acid (ALA) into PAMAM-G4-NH2 functionalized with hydrophobic lipid formed by 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-poly(ethylene glycol) (Figure 7A). In this system, ALA could be delivered under lipase stimulation, whereas Mino could be delivered at low pH. This system was tested in diabetic rats to evaluate its antibacterial efficacy and its periodontal regeneration ability. Periodontitis (periodontal bone loss) is a complication of diabetes. The system was found to disrupt dental plaque biofilms and suppress periodontal bone loss in diabetic rats [57].

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(A) PAMAM-NH2 dendrimers covalently functionalized and encapsulating antibiotics. (B) PAMAM-CO2H dendrimers covalently functionalized and encapsulating antibiotics.

Epigallocatechin gallate (EG), a bioactive polyphenol, inhibits matrix metalloproteinases in saliva through zinc chelation and disintegrates biofilm architecture. EG was encapsulated within PAMAM-G3.5 having at the periphery 32 synthetic antimicrobial peptides (G(IIKK)4I–NH2, AMP), attached covalently by amide bonds and 32 CO2H for Ca2+ and PO43− sequestration (Figure 7B). This assembly displayed both biofilm disintegration and collagen protection for comprehensive prevention and treatment of dentin caries. Antimicrobial assays demonstrated a bactericidal efficacy of 99.75% in vitro. In vivo experiments with a rat caries model demonstrated both decreased salivary S. mutans counts and increased molar mineral density for the rats treated with PAMAM-G3.5-AMP/EG compared to untreated rats [58].

PAMAM-G3-CO2H was partly functionalized with CD at the periphery, then used to entrap gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), before being further covalently functionalized with the oligoarginine peptide (Arg8), and finally used to encapsulate either dexamethasone (DEX) or dexamethasone fluoresceine (DEX-FITC) (Figure 8). CD was chosen to enhance the biocompatibility, AuNPs to measure the distribution of the dendrimer in important organs using ICP-AES (inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy), and Arg8 to improve cellular internalization. Male mice with streptomycin (SM)-induced ototoxicity were injected with either DEX alone or DEX encapsulated in PAMAM-G3-CD-Arg8/AuNP/DEX. It was shown that improvement of metabolism in the cochlea was greatest with the intratympanic injection route, followed by the intravenous, intramuscular, and retro-auricular sulcus injection routes. In all cases, PAMAM-G3-CD-Arg8/AuNP/DEX was more efficient than DEX alone [59]. Thus, the study mainly illustrates the potential of PAMAM-based delivery to improve local dexamethasone exposure in a model of anti-infective drug-associated ototoxicity, rather than direct antimicrobial efficacy.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

PAMAM covalently functionalized with β-cyclodextrin (CD) and the oligoarginine peptide Arg8 and encapsulating Au nanoparticles and dexamethasone.

A pH-responsive hydrogel was obtained by condensation of PAMAM-G5-NH2 encapsulating silver nanoparticles, with oxidized dextran functionalized with aldehydes (Scheme 5). The Schiff bases (C=N linkages) can be reversibly cleaved in acidic media, in particular generated by growing bacteria. The released silver nanoparticles and the cationic PAMAM dendrimers exhibited a synergistic effect, displaying strong antibacterial activity against both Gram-negative (E. coli and P. aeruginosa) and Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus epidermidis and S. aureus). Mice were treated (or not) with this hydrogel, then were infected with S. aureus via direct injection at the hydrogel sites. The treated mice exhibited a much lower bacterial burden in the skin lesion than those untreated or treated with a commercial Ag gel [60].

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Hydrogel formed by condensation reactions between PAMAM and oxidized dextran.

A PAMAM dendron with a triethoxysilyl (TES) group at the core and eight NH2 functions on the surface (TES-PAMAM-G3) was used to coat different types of metal oxide nanoparticles (MO-NP) with sizes from 12 to 25 nm (Fe3O4, TiO2, ZnO, SiO2, CeO2). These coated NPs were then covalently cross-linked with triple-helical collagen through EDC-NHS (1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide and N-hydroxysuccinimide) coupling with the NH2 functions (Scheme 6). These assemblies were used for skin regeneration of wounds in Wistar albino rats. The best antibacterial activity was obtained with the ZnO-TES-PAMAM-G3-NP-collagen scaffold, which accelerated skin regeneration compared to all the other cases studied in the paper [61].

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

PAMAM dendrons used for coating metal oxide NPs that were then cross-linked with collagen.

Another PAMAM dendron with a long alkyl chain at the core, linked through copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) click chemistry and functionalized with eight primary amines (NH2) or tertiary amines (NMe2), self-assembled in water to form nanomicelles. These nanomicelles were used as carriers of oligonucleotides based on nucleic acid mimics (NAMs), in particular for the delivery of antisense NAMs in E. coli, selected for their ability to target the essential acpP gene in E. coli. These NAMs were peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-modified ribose entities, such as 2′-O-methyl RNA (2′O-Me) or locked nucleic acid (LNA) (Figure 9). The most efficient formulation was the one based on the tertiary amine dendron associated with PNA. This association was tested in a greater wax moth (Galleria mellonella) larva model. No significant toxicity was found regarding either survival or the overall health of the larvae [62].

Figure 9.

Figure 9

PAMAM dendron and oligonucleotides based on nucleic acid mimics (NAMs).

3.3. Overall Assessment of PAMAM Dendrimers

Overall, PAMAM dendrimers and dendrons represent one of the most extensively explored dendritic platforms for antimicrobial applications in vivo. Their main strengths are their structural versatility, the availability of multiple terminal functions, and their ability to act either as antimicrobial agents themselves or as carriers for antibiotics, antibiofilm agents, nitric oxide, or other therapeutic payloads. The in vivo studies summarized above highlight their potential for the treatment of local infections, biofilm-associated infections, and pulmonary infections, but also for wound healing, dental applications, and selected systemic models. However, the biological outcome strongly depends on the dendrimer generation, surface charge, terminal groups, route of administration, and formulation. In particular, cationic PAMAM dendrimers may display potent antimicrobial effects but also raise toxicity concerns, whereas neutral or anionic derivatives generally show improved tolerability but may require additional functionalization to achieve strong antimicrobial activity. Thus, PAMAM-based systems appear to be highly adaptable, but their further development will require careful optimization of safety, biodistribution, degradability, physicochemical characterization, and reproducibility.

4. Peptide Dendrimers

Even though numerous types of peptide dendrimers were synthesized, the most studied derivatives were those based on L-Lysine.

4.1. Poly(L-Lysine) Dendrimers

Poly(L-Lysine) (P-Lys) dendrimers were the first large dendrimers patented [63] and are the most widely used type of dendrimers in clinical trials [64], essentially carried out by/for the Starpharma company. A review has emphasized the early instances of their use for HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) and STI (sexually transmitted infection) prevention [65].

The fourth-generation P-Lys dendrimer functionalized with naphthyl disodium disulfonate (BRI-2999/SPL299 in Figure 10) and the fifth generation functionalized with phenyl disodium dicarboxylate were evaluated as topical microbicides in a mouse model of genital HSV-2 (herpes simplex virus) infection. It was shown that BRI-2999 was the most active, but it should be used before and not after contact with the virus [66]. Three new microbicidal candidates from the same family were further identified, named SPL7013, SPL7015, and SPL7032 (Figure 10). These compounds were tested either unformulated or included in three different formulations of gels in mouse and guinea pig models of HSV-2. Similar results were obtained with the four dendrimers, but, due to easier manufacturing, lower cost, and better stability, SPL7013 was selected for further development. The concentrations of the active ingredient (SPL7013) in the gel were between 1 and 5%. Evaluation in a mouse model of genital HSV infection permitted the most active formulation to be chosen. This formula, based on Carbopol® gel, was then tested in a guinea pig model of genital herpes, a better mimic of human disease. Concentrations of 3% or higher of the formulated product were found to be necessary for optimal protection [67]. SPL7013 was then tested in cell cultures infected with HIV strains and showed high antiretroviral efficacy; thus, it was tested in a gel as topical microbicide for the prevention of vaginal transmission of SHIV89.6P in 44 adult female pigtailed macaques. Dose-dependent protection from HIV infection was observed, with all six macaques (6/6) treated with 5% w/w SPL7013 gel protected from vaginal transmission of HIV, unlike only two of six macaques treated with 1% w/w SPL7013 gel. Importantly, all SPL7013-protected macaques remained virus-negative throughout the 36-week follow-up period [68]. The next step consisted of repeated vaginal and rectal applications in pigtailed macaque, which were shown to be nonirritating [69]. Dendrimer SPL7013 and the corresponding second generation were tested against HIV-1 and HSV-2. SPL7013 was the most efficient and provided at least 12 h of protection against HSV-2 in the mouse vagina [70].

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Poly(L-Lysine) dendrimer functionalized with aromatic-sulfonic acids on the surface through different types of linkers. SPL7013 is the lead compound, used in many clinical trials.

The first clinical trial (Phase 1) with this P-Lys dendrimer SPL7013 concerned safety for men. They were asked to apply the gel to their penis and to abstain from all sexual activity for 7 days. Great interest in the concept of microbicides was the main conclusion of the study [71,72]. A randomized trial was carried out with 3% SPL7013 gel or placebo gel. No safety or tolerability issues with SPL7013 gel were observed (36 healthy men were involved) [73]. Clinical trials with healthy women focused first on safety, with randomized vaginal application of SPL7013 gel (concentrations of 0.5% to 3%) or placebo gel once daily for 7 consecutive days. No evidence of systemic toxicity or absorption was observed [74]. This gel was then named VivaGel® and was used in a clinical Phase 1 dose-ranging study involving 37 women for 7 days. It was also tested in 54 young women (placebo-controlled) who used it vaginally twice daily for 14 days. Mild epithelial irritation and inflammation occurred more commonly among women using VivaGel® [75]. Cervical specimens were collected for analysis of cytokines, chemokines, T cells, and dendritic cells. Several mucosal immune parameters were increased in the VivaGel®-treated group compared with the placebo group [76]. The samples were also used to test inhibition of E. coli, but no clear trends could be inferred [77]. A second Phase 1 trial involved 61 young women (placebo controlled) using this gel vaginally twice daily for 14 days. This trial led to the same conclusion [78,79]. In another trial, young women received five single doses of the product, with at least 5 days between doses, and cervicovaginal fluid samples were collected to test the antiviral activity against HIV-1 and HSV-2 in vitro. For samples taken 3 h after application of VivaGel®, the inhibition of HIV-1 was 96%, and that of HSV-2 was 94% [80].

A Phase 2 placebo-controlled clinical trial was initiated to determine the dose ranging efficacy and safety. A new name for the gel containing the SPL7013 dendrimer was proposed: astodrimer. The doses of the dendrimer were 0.5%, 1%, or 3%, and the gel was applied vaginally once daily for 7 days by 132 women with bacterial vaginosis. Treatment with the dendrimer was superior to the placebo and was well tolerated. The strongest efficacy for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis was obtained with the 1% dose [81]. Two Phase 3 clinical trials were carried out in parallel for women with bacterial vaginosis, one in the United States for astodrimer 1% at a dose of 5 g vaginally once daily for 7 days (N = 127) or placebo (N = 123), and the second one in the United States, Germany, and Belgium using the same treatment conditions (N = 128) or placebo (N = 123). The primary endpoint was defined as absence of bacterial vaginosis vaginal discharge at Day 9–12, whereas the secondary endpoint included clinical cure at Day 21–30. The conclusion was that this treatment is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for women with bacterial vaginosis [82].

Another Phase 3 clinical trial concerned the prevention of bacterial vaginosis recurrence. It involved 864 women with a diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis and a history of recurrent bacterial vaginosis who first received oral treatment with metronidazole. Women successfully treated with metronidazole then used astodrimer (N = 295) or placebo (N = 291) vaginally every second day for 16 weeks (56 doses total). At the end of the treatment with astodrimer, bacterial vaginosis recurred in 44.2%, whereas the rate of recurrence was 54.3% for those receiving placebo. Recurrence of subject-reported vaginosis up to 8 weeks after cessation of therapy was significantly lower in the astodrimer group than in the placebo group (36.1% versus 45.5%, respectively) [83]. A review has gathered all these clinical trials for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis with the astodrimer gel [84]. Overall, these clinical studies support the efficacy and tolerability of astodrimer 1% gel for the treatment and prevention of recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Astodrimer-containing products have subsequently been marketed in several regions, particularly in Europe, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand, under different product names depending on the market.

The antiviral activity of the same astodrimer gel was also tested in other diseases, in particular ocular adenovirus infection and SARS-CoV-2. In the first case, the ocular tolerability and anti-adenoviral efficacy were tested in a rabbit model. It was shown that this gel was non-toxic to rabbit eyes and had anti-adenoviral activity, albeit slightly lower than that of the reference treatment cidofovir [85]. The astodrimer gel was reformulated in a mucoadhesive nasal spray and used against SARS-CoV-2. Mice received astodrimer sodium 1% nasal spray or PBS intranasally, or intranasally and intratracheally, for 7 days. They were infected intranasally with SARS-CoV-2 at Day 0, just after the first treatment. Astodrimer significantly reduced the number of viral genome copies (>99.9%) and the levels of infectious virus (~95%) in the lung and trachea of mice versus PBS (phosphate-buffered saline). Thus, astodrimer blocked or reduced SARS-CoV-2 replication and its sequelae in a mouse model [86]. In view of this interesting result, a Phase 1 clinical trial was designed to assess the safety, tolerability, and absorption of astodrimer sodium 1% antiviral nasal spray, carried out with 40 healthy volunteers. Thirty received astodrimer, and ten a placebo. They self-administered the spray four times daily for 14 days. No systemic absorption of astodrimer sodium via the nasal mucosa was detected, and it was well tolerated [87]. The efficacy was demonstrated in a Phase 2 clinical trial involving non-hospitalized adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection who used a nasal spray of astodrimer (N = 109) or placebo (N = 113) four times daily from Day 1 to Day 7. The reduction in SARS-CoV-2 load was statistically significant for all age groups, and the effect increased in older age groups (65 years and older) [88]. To provide a more synthetic overview of the largely chronological clinical development of SPL7013/astodrimer, the main preclinical and clinical studies are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Main clinical and advanced translational studies involving SPL7013/astodrimer.

Dendrimer/Formulation Indication/Study Aim Study Type/Phase Subject or Model Main Outcome Reference
SPL7013 vaginal gel HSV/HIV
prevention
Preclinical studies Mouse, guinea pig, and macaque models Protection against HSV or SHIV transmission in relevant models [66,67,68,69,70]
SPL7013 penile gel Male genital
tolerability
Phase 1 Healthy men Acceptable local safety/tolerability [71,72,73]
SPL7013 vaginal gel Vaginal safety Phase 1 Healthy women Local tolerability evaluated, with mild irritation reported in some studies [74,75,76,77,78,79,80]
SPL7013 vaginal gel Bacterial
vaginosis
Phase 2/3 Women with bacterial vaginosis Superior efficacy versus placebo and good tolerability [81,82]
SPL7013 vaginal gel Bacterial
vaginosis
Phase 3 Women with recurrent bacterial vaginosis Reduced recurrence versus placebo [83]
SPL7013
nasal spray
SARS-CoV-2
infection
Preclinical mouse and Phase 1/2 studies Mouse model, healthy volunteers, and non-hospitalized adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection Well tolerated and reduced viral load in the clinical study [86,87,88]

The clinical progression of astodrimer also provides important lessons for dendrimer translation. This progression is probably not explained only by intrinsic antiviral or antibacterial potency, but also by the suitability of the product concept for clinical development. Astodrimer is administered locally, mainly as a vaginal gel or nasal spray, thereby limiting systemic exposure and reducing the burden associated with systemic biodistribution and long-term organ accumulation. Its polyanionic surface also differs from many strongly cationic antimicrobial dendrimers, which are often more potent against bacterial membranes but raise greater cytotoxicity concerns. In addition, bacterial vaginosis and topical antiviral indications provide accessible clinical endpoints and allow local formulations with a comparatively simpler development path than systemic anti-infective nanomedicines. Thus, astodrimer illustrates that successful translation of dendrimers depends not only on antimicrobial activity, but also on route of administration, formulation simplicity, safety margin, indication selection, and regulatory feasibility.

A recent example of P-Lys dendrimer was synthesized from a polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) core up to generation three, with 64 peripheral amine groups. This dendrimer was then randomly functionalized with mannose at 80.69%, affording PO-Lys-G3-Man (Scheme 7A). Mixing this dendrimer with PP-IX-Ga (protoporphyrin IX complexing gallium) resulted in self-assembly to afford nanoparticles of PO-Lys-G3-Man@PP-IX-Ga (mean diameter 282.7 nm, as evidenced by dynamic light scattering (DLS)), with gallium uniformly distributed, as shown by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The presence of mannose enables targeted delivery to macrophages via mannose receptor recognition, whereas the positive charges (protonated amines) facilitate endosomal escape and release of PP-IX-Ga in the acidic intracellular environment. In this environment, free iron ions compete with gallium ions to form the iron−protoporphyrin IX complex (PP-IX-Fe), inducing iron metabolism-dependent bacterial death. Furthermore, laser activation of PP-IX-Ga generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), further amplifying bacterial killing. This process was tested at a dose of 50 mg·kg−1 in mice infected with S. aureus (intracellular form). All the treated mice survived to Day 10, whereas all the untreated mice died on Day 5 or before [89].

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7

(A) Design of PO-Lys-G3-Man@PP-IX-Ga nanoparticles. (B) Reversible cross-linking of PO-Lys-G3 and encapsulation of CORM-401 to form nanogel CMPs. (C) Encapsulation of Ce6 in PDNs, followed by conjugation with DpSpSEEKC to form nanogel CP-SAP.

The PO-Lys-G3 dendrimer was used in another experiment. It was first cross-linked via reversible disulfide bonds to form poly(L-Lysine) dendrimer-based nanogels (PDNs). The surface of the PDNs was decorated with mannose, and they were internally loaded with CORM-401 (a CO-releasing molecule), to afford the CORM-mannose dendritic polymers (CMPs, Scheme 7B). CORM-401, even when encapsulated, can release numerous CO molecules in response to high reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. CMPs were found to be efficient against S. aureus, Citrobacter rodentium, and E. coli. The therapeutic efficacy of CMPs was assessed in mice with dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis infected with S. aureus, C. rodentium, and E. coli. Mice received rectal administration of 150 μL of CMPs-1.5 (1.5 mg·mL−1) or CMPs-3 (3 mg·mL−1) on Days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9. CMPs scavenged ROS, suppressed inflammatory responses, eliminated pathogens, and alleviated colitis in the mouse model. Furthermore, CMPs could remodel gut flora composition by restraining detrimental bacterial communities and augmenting beneficial bacterial abundance [90].

A recent use of PDNs consisted of loading it with the photosensitizer Ce6 then functionalizing it with saliva-acquired peptide (SAP, sequence DpSpSEEKC) to confer wet adhesion properties to the resulting CP-SAP (Scheme 7C). This functionalized nanogel was tested as a photodynamic antimicrobial and an in situ remineralization agent for dental caries prevention. It was first tested against S. mutans, Streptococcus sanguis, and C. albicans, then in a rat caries model against S. mutans. Caries development was induced in rat teeth, after which the nanogel CP-SAP was deposited and irradiated with a 665 nm laser. The degree of caries in the CP-SAP group was significantly lower than that in the other treatment groups, and higher enamel density was also observed after 21 days of treatment [91].

A partly fluorinated amphiphilic dendritic peptide based on Lysine (FADP) was able to self-assemble in water and was loaded with Ce6 (chlorin e6, Phytochlorin, a photosensitizer) and CORM-401 (Figure 11). This assembly (Ce6&CORM@FADP) was used in photodynamic therapy (PDT) to generate both 1O2 from Ce6 and CO from CORM-401 using near-infrared (NIR) light irradiation. The association of 1O2 with CO displayed synergistic antibacterial and biofilm ablation effects against S. aureus and E. coli, with a survival rate of 0.5% after only 8 min of irradiation. This assembly effectively inhibited biofilm formation and was also capable of efficiently eradicating existing biofilms. It was then used in vivo in mice with E. coli-infected subcutaneous wounds. Almost no E. coli survived after treatment with Ce6&CORM@FADP and two rounds of NIR light irradiation, and the inflammatory response was strongly suppressed. In another experiment, a catheter was pre-colonized with S. aureus biofilms and implanted subcutaneously into the inner thighs of mice. After treatment with Ce6&CORM@FADP plus NIR light irradiation, all the wounds healed well, without signs of swelling or purulence. Almost no biofilm remained on the surface of the catheters, demonstrating the efficacy of Ce6&CORM@FADP in eradicating existing biofilms in vivo [92].

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Self-assembled partly fluorinated amphiphilic Lysine dendron (FADP), for encapsulating Ce6 and CORM-401.

A barbell-like peptide dendrimer based on generation three Lysine dendrons and PEG2000 at the core (Lys-G3-PEG2000) was associated with an oxidized carboxymethyl cellulose (OCMC) to generate a hydrogel (Figure 12A). OCMC forms imine bonds with endogenous amines of the extracellular matrix (ECM) via a Schiff base reaction, affording adhesive properties and innate hemostatic capability. The amines of Lys-G3-PEG2000 were also able to react with the aldehydes of OCMC, strengthening the adhesive properties. Furthermore, the remaining unreacted amines displayed antimicrobial activities. This hydrogel was tested in vivo on a female rat liver hemorrhage model. The hydrogel was applied to the surface of the trauma site immediately after the injury (a bleeding puncture created with an 18G needle (1.2 mm)), and the hemostatic performance was assessed. The bleeding was stopped in 30 s and was efficiently reduced compared with the control groups. Another in vivo assay involved lacerations on the dorsum of rats. The skin defects treated with the hydrogel exhibited complete wound closure after 2 weeks, with no scars observed. Furthermore, good anti-infective activity of the hydrogel was observed compared to the untreated group [93].

Figure 12.

Figure 12

(A) Pegylated Lysine dendrimer (Lys-G3-PEG2000) and oxidized carboxymethyl cellulose (OCMC). (B) Lysine dendrimer complexing Zn and tamarind seed polysaccharide (TSP).

A small Lysine dendrimer was used for complexing Zn, and the complex was then formulated with tamarind seed polysaccharide (TSP) (Figure 12B). This association exhibited antibacterial activity against Propionibacterium acnes, S. epidermidis, S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa in vitro. In vivo wound healing studies were carried out by creating, on the dorsal thoracic region of rats, an open excision circular wound with a diameter of 1.6 cm. In comparison with a marketed product (Erytop®), the hydrogel of the metallo-dendrimer displayed significant performance with respect to percent re-epithelization and wound contracture [94].

4.2. Other Types of Peptide Dendritic Structures

In addition to Lysine dendrimers, peptide dendrimers display highly diverse structures, depending on both the type of peptides and the degree of branching. Several reviews have gathered the antimicrobial properties of dendrimeric peptides [95], and more precisely of antibacterial dendrimeric peptides [96].

A dendron with triolyl branches and six surface guanidine groups (DP-6) was used as a vehicle for gatifloxacin (GFX, Figure 13), an antibiotic for treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis caused by aerobic Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. Increased solubility of the drug in aqueous solution was observed. DP-6/GFX formulations were suitable for ocular administration in rabbits, in particular to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters, and also for determining the effect of multiple doses for 7 days (21 doses in total). A higher drug concentration in the conjunctiva was observed compared to free GFX, as well as in all the ocular tissues, demonstrating enhanced drug delivery efficiency with the dendron [97].

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Dendron made of triolyl branches and six surface guanidine groups, used as a carrier for GFX.

A series of generation-two dendritic peptides bearing a fatty acid chain at the core was prepared by solid-phase peptide synthesis (two examples are shown in Figure 14). These dendrimers were tested against P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and Bacillus subtilis, and all of them were active. The compound bearing the C10 chain was the most efficient (TNS03). Then, a library of 1936 dendritic peptides was built using split-and-mix synthesis, out of which compound TNS18 and two other dendritic peptides emerged as the most effective. Compound TNS18 (acetate form) was used to treat mice intraperitoneally infected with a MDR E. coli strain. Only 20% of untreated mice survived, whereas 100% survived when treated with TNS18. This compound was better than a third-generation cephalosporin antibiotic, ceftriaxone (40% survival), and a carbapenem-class antibiotic, imipenem (80% survival) [98].

Figure 14.

Figure 14

Generation-two dendritic peptides (O = ornithine; F = phenyl alanine; B = diaminobutyric acid; L = leucine; K = Lysine; K = branching Lysine; K(C10) = side-chain decanoylated Lysine). The core is in blue, the first generation in black, and the second generation in red.

An even larger library of 50,625 dendritic peptides featuring all possible permutations of up to three residues of Lys or Leu in the branches was virtually designed, starting from dendrimer G3KL, which was previously shown to display antibacterial properties in vitro [99]. A few dendrimers from this virtual library were tested against P. aeruginosa, then against K. pneumoniae strains. Compound T7 (Figure 15) was the only one that combined significant activity across all strains tested and negligible hemolysis. Both dendrimers G3KL and T7 were tested in mice infected with a MDR A. baumannii strain. Surprisingly, dendrimer G3KL was totally inactive: all mice treated with this compound died after a few hours. On the contrary, 70% of the mice treated with T7 were alive after 72 h [100]. Dendrimers TNS18 and G3KL were tested in vivo in G. mellonella wax-moth larvae infected with P. aeruginosa strains, killing ≥ 97.5% of the larvae within 24 h. However, treatment with dendritic peptides did not provide any protection against P. aeruginosa infection. Mortality rates were comparable with the positive control (infected but not treated) [101].

Figure 15.

Figure 15

Third-generation peptide dendritic structures (core in blue, first generation in green, second generation in black, and third generation in red) and the principle of a virtual library of 50,625 dendrimers.

Peptide dendrons equipped with a C8, C12, or C18 alkyl chain at the core and with two (2RP) or three (3RP) arms were shown to self-assemble in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to form spherical nanoparticles with diameters ranging from 5 to 45 nm (Figure 16A). Further aggregation into larger, irregular clusters was observed, leading to an average hydrodynamic diameter of approximately 302 nm, for the C16-3RP cluster, which was the most active compound against a range of bacteria, including E. coli, P. aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica, Salmonella typhimurium, S. aureus, S. epidermis, and Enterococcus faecalis. In vivo experiments were carried out with model mice injected with E. coli injection in the peritoneal cavity to induce acute peritonitis. One hour after infection, the mice were treated with 10 mg·kg−1 of C16-3RP. The treatment resulted in a perceptible reduction in the bacterial burden in the liver, spleen, lung, and kidney tissues. The levels of serum proinflammatory cytokines in the C16-3RP-treated group were significantly lower than those in the untreated group [102].

Figure 16.

Figure 16

Peptide dendrons self-assembling in buffer. (A) Spherical nanoparticles. (B) Nanofibers.

A related peptide dendron was functionalized with a hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol) chain on the surface (Figure 16B). Due to the presence of a hydrophobic chain at the core and a hydrophilic chain on the surface, this compound self-assembled into nanofibers, which formed aggregates. These aggregates were tested in a peritonitis-sepsis mouse model (MDR E. coli infection). Unlike various conventional antibiotics, these peptide aggregates were efficient for treating this infection, as shown by a significant decrease in the bacterial burden in all tissues examined [103].

A series of peptide dendrons based on a non-natural amino acid (diaminobutanoic acid (DAB)), with antisense antibacterial peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) at the core, was chosen for targeting the translation start of the acpP mRNA, which codes for an essential gene required for fatty acid synthesis (match or mismatch). The surface was functionalized with eight moieties of guanidinobutanoic acid (Gbu)8-DAB-PNA, guanidinopentanoic acid (Gpn)8-DAB-PNA, guanidinohexanoic acid (Ghx)8-DAB-PNA, guanidinoheptanoic acid (Ghp)8-DAB PNA, or guanidinooctanoic acid (Goc)8-DAB PNA (Figure 17). The compound with the longest chain on the surface ((Goc)8-DAB PNA) was the most active against E. coli and K. pneumoniae. This compound was tested in vivo against MDR E. coli EC-106-09 in a neutropenic murine peritonitis model established by i.p. inoculation with E. coli. The mice were treated with 10 mg·kg−1 or 25 mg·kg−1 of either match or mismatch (Goc)8-DAB PNA. The match PNA was significantly more effective than the mismatch PNA in reducing the infection burden [104].

Figure 17.

Figure 17

Non-natural peptide dendrons functionalized with antisense antibacterial peptide nucleic acids at the core (match or mismatch).

Two tri-branched dendritic peptides (αRn(εRn)KWm and αWn(εWn)KRm) were synthesized from a Lysine core (K) using a combination of arginine (R) and tryptophan (W) (Figure 18). The n and m values were n = 1 for m = 1, 2, or 3; n = 2 for m = 3, 4, or 5; and n = 3 for m = 5, 6, or 7, thus affording 18 dendritic peptides composed of 4 to 14 amino acids. In vitro experiments against S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii showed that the dendritic peptide R2(R2)KW4 was the most efficient. It was then tested in vivo in a murine pulmonary infection model induced by E. coli and compared with the efficacy of polymyxin B treatment. Mice that received the R2(R2)KW4 peptide showed reduced infiltration of pneumonia cells and a little liver hemorrhage compared to those that received polymyxin B [105].

Figure 18.

Figure 18

Two tri-branched peptides based on a Lysine core and composed of 4 to 14 amino acids, depending on the length of the branches.

4.3. Overall Assessment of Peptide Dendrimers

Overall, peptide and poly(L-lysine) dendrimers are notable in this review primarily because they include SPL7013/VivaGel®/astodrimer, the most clinically advanced antimicrobial dendrimer described here. Other peptide dendrimers and dendrons broaden this family to include antimicrobial peptide-inspired compounds, amphiphilic derivatives bearing fatty-acid or alkyl chains, self-assembled nanostructures, and delivery systems. Several have shown efficacy in animal infection models, including models involving MDR Gram-negative bacteria, but the evidence remains heterogeneous and mostly preclinical. Further comparison across standardized infection models, administration routes, toxicity endpoints, and pharmacokinetic parameters will be needed to assess their therapeutic potential.

5. Miscellaneous Dendrimers

In addition to the two main families of dendrimers used for treating infections, PAMAM and peptide dendrimers, in particular poly(Lysine) dendrimers, many different types of dendrimers have been proposed for the same purpose. The following paragraphs concern poly(carbosilane) (CSi), poly(phosphorhydrazone) (PPH), poly(glycerol) (PGL), polyester (PED) dendrimers, and different types of dendritic–linear-dendritic compounds.

5.1. Carbosilane Dendrimers (CSi)

CSi dendrimers [106] are characterized by a hydrophobic internal structure, unlike PAMAM and peptide dendrimers. Very small CSi dendrimers were functionalized with modified trisaccharides (Figure 19) and were tested in mice infected with the Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing E. coli O157:H7, which causes fatal diarrhea and hemorrhagic colitis. The smaller compound (CSi-6) was the most efficient when administered intravenously to mice. Indeed, all mice treated with CSi-6 survived more than 2 months without any symptoms, even at a dose of 5.0 μg·g−1 of body weight, and even when administered after establishment of the infection. On the contrary, none of the mice treated with CSi-12 survived more than 7 days. It should be noted that this in vivo result contrasts with the in vitro results, where CSi-12 inhibited Stx more effectively than CSi-6 [107]. This discrepancy suggests that factors other than intrinsic Stx inhibition may influence in vivo efficacy. In this model, parameters such as biodistribution, tissue penetration, toxin accessibility, clearance, steric constraints, or aggregation may have contributed to the superior protection observed with CSi-6. The smaller CSi-6 compound may therefore have reached or neutralized the relevant toxin more efficiently in vivo than CSi-12, despite its lower Stx-inhibitory activity in vitro. This example highlights the limits of extrapolating directly from in vitro potency to in vivo efficacy, since dendrimer size, architecture, and multivalency may influence not only target binding, but also biodistribution, accessibility to the toxin, clearance, and overall biological performance in a living organism.

Figure 19.

Figure 19

Carbosilane dendrimers functionalized with modified trisaccharides.

5.2. Poly(phosphorhydrazone) (PPH) Dendrimers

PPH dendrimers [108] have also a hydrophobic internal structure, like CSi dendrimers. Among the numerous properties of PPH dendrimers [109], one can cite their effectiveness against M. tuberculosis. Different generations of PPH dendrimers were synthesized and functionalized on their surface with different types of cyclic ammoniums. These dendrimers were tested in vitro against three bacterial strains: attenuated M. tuberculosis H37Ra, virulent M. tuberculosis H37Rv, and Mycobacterium bovis BCG. A negative dendritic effect was observed, ongoing from generation zero to generation four. Only the most active compounds are shown in Figure 20. As compound PPH-G0b had a much better safety index (16.02) than compound PPH-G0a (3.1), it was selected for in vivo tests in mice infected with the H37Ra strain of M. tuberculosis. Compound PPH-G0b administered orally very significantly reduced the mean bacterial count in the lungs of infected mice, with a greater efficacy than that observed with rifampicin (RIF) and ethambutol (ETB), two reference drugs used against tuberculosis [110]. The same compound was tested against drug-resistant mycobacterial strains in combination with multiple classes of antibiotics, with the aim of potentiating their activity. A murine neutropenic bacteremia model was used for testing different combinations of antibiotics with PPH-G0b against non-tubercular mycobacterial pathogens. The use of PPH-G0b alone or in combination with the drugs (rifampicin, bedaquiline, linezolid, or clofazimine) led to a highly significant reduction in bacterial counts in all organs as compared with any of the individual treatments [111].

Figure 20.

Figure 20

Influence of the generation of PPH dendrimers on efficacy against tuberculosis.

A series of small (generation zero) PPH dendrimers functionalized with acetyl hydrazide derivatives of trimethyl ammonium (Girard T reagent), triethyl ammonium, pyridinium (Girard P reagent), piperidinium and methyl piperidinium, or pyrrolidinium and methyl pyrrolidinium (Figure 21) was synthesized. These compounds were tested against S. aureus and Enterococcus species. Compound PPH-G0Me was efficient and exhibited the highest selectivity index (>62.5); thus, it was tested in vivo. A murine skin model of infection with gentamicin-resistant S. aureus NRS119 was used for testing PPH-G0Me alone or associated with gentamicin. It was shown that the combination had better efficacy than the individual components used separately (PPH-G0Me and gentamicin) [112].

Figure 21.

Figure 21

Generation-zero PPH dendrimers functionalized with different types of acetyl hydrazones.

5.3. Poly(glycerol ether) (PGL) Dendrimers

PGL dendrimers are hyperbranched polymers that can be prepared by a controlled synthetic approach. The first synthesis was based on the use of latent ABm monomers, wherein B-groups were set free only upon reaction of the A group [113], but several other methods have been proposed and reviewed [114]. Despite being less rigorously defined than classical dendrimers, PGL dendrimers (proposed structure in Scheme 8, left part) have many biomedical applications, as they are composed of a stable and biocompatible polyether scaffold [115]. They were covalently associated with O-carboxymethylated chitosan. The reaction of such materials with boric acid for improving biocompatibility [116] induced a marked increase in the bulk viscosity of PGL-Ch-B. Antibacterial studies against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa showed significant suppression of bacterial proliferation, due to the delivery of boron and the cationic nature of PGL-Ch-B. This material was used to prepare artificial membranes, which were used for coating wounds on female rats. Histological evaluations were performed to assess tissue response to the membranes used and progression of healing at Days 3, 7, 15, and 30. Complete healing was observed in all cases at 30 days post-operation, and the degradation of the membrane was complete (no evidence of fragments of the PGL-Ch-B membranes was found) [117].

Scheme 8.

Scheme 8

Schematized polyglycerol dendritic structures associated with chitosan and boric acid.

Another example of PGL dendritic structure concerned six cationic dendrons with either a C12 or a C18 chain linked to the core via a CuAAC reaction, which were used as surfactants (Figure 22). These dendrons were tested against Gram-positive (MRSA) and Gram-negative (E. coli) bacteria, including drug-resistant strains, as well as for preventing biofilm formation and eradicating pre-existing biofilms. The most effective compound in all tests was Gly-G1-C12, which was then tested in vivo in wounds infected with MRSA to evaluate its ability to inhibit wound infections in mice. It was found that optimal collagen recovery and accelerated tissue healing were induced by compound Gly-G1-C12. The Gly-G1-C12 dendron induced the fastest recovery (faster than vancomycin), achieving complete wound closure by Day 14. The survival rate was 100% for the treated mice, but also for those which were not treated [118].

Figure 22.

Figure 22

Cationic PGL dendrons with either a C12 or C18 chain at the core.

5.4. Poly(ester) Dendrimers (PEDs)

Unlike glycerol ether derivatives, which are stable compounds, the main properties of PEDs are their hydrolytic instability and high biodegradability, resulting in inherent low toxicity and good biocompatibility [119]. A first-generation poly(ester-amine) dendrimer was functionalized with three arms composed of diblock copolymer of methoxy poly(ethyleneglycol)-b-poly(ε-caprolactone) (mPEG-b-PCL) (Figure 23). This star polymer formed nanovesicles suitable for efficient drug (vancomycin) delivery. The encapsulation rate inside the nanovesicles was 76.49 ± 2.4%. The proportion of vancomycin released from the drug-loaded nanovesicles was 65.8% over a period of 48 h. The drug-loaded nanovesicles exhibited 8- and 16-fold lower minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains compared to free vancomycin. A murine model of in vivo skin infection showed a 20-fold reduction in MRSA load in groups treated with the drug-loaded nanovesicles compared to free vancomycin. This was proof that the nanovesicles enhanced the activity of vancomycin. The mice with untreated skin displayed evidence of tissue inflammation and abscess formation [120].

Figure 23.

Figure 23

The star polymer mPEG-b-PCL created from a first-generation dendrimer (in blue) for drug delivery.

A series of dendritic–linear-dendritic (DLD) hybrids based on a PEG core (PEG10k or PEG20k, molecular weights of 10 or 20 kg·mol−1) and polyester branches was synthesized from generation one to generation six, having from 4 to 128 ammonium groups on the surface, based on β-alanine (Figure 24A). The antibacterial properties of the amine-functionalized PEG20k-based DLDs were evaluated against different bacterial strains. Generation six (G6-DLD-20k) was found to be the most effective against E. faecalis, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, MRSA, S. epidermidis, and Propionibacterium acnes (now Cutibacterium acnes) at a minimum microbicidal concentration (MMC) of around 1 μM and a MIC below 1 nM. These dendrimers can be cross-linked using N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) PEG-based cross-linkers (Figure 24B) of type PEG2k, PEG6k, or PEG10k, used in different molar ratios, to form hydrogels. This cross-linking process was carried out in an in vivo setting using a two-component syringe delivery system to generate the hydrogels. Statistically, 4, 8, 16, and 32 (n) amines out of the total 128 for G6-DLD-20k were used for cross-linking. A cross-linking density of 8 out of the 128 amines was determined as optimal. Studies of the hydrogel degradation demonstrated that the ester bonds were primarily degraded by a hydrolytic rather than an enzymatic process. The dual syringe was used to induce the formation of hydrogel for surgical site application in an in vivo animal mouse model of an S. aureus-infected suture. An 80% reduction in the number of bacteria was observed 4 h post-infection, and a 90% reduction 6 h post-infection, in vivo [121].

Figure 24.

Figure 24

(A) Polyester dendrimer (G3) built on a PEG core. (B) NHS-PEG cross-linker.

5.5. Other Types of Dendrimers

Another type of DLD hybrid was prepared by linking, to a PEG600 core, dendrimers made of citric acid derivatives, from generation one to generation five (G2-DLD-600, Figure 25). These DLDs were used for the encapsulation of cefotaxime sodium (CFTX) and tested against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae to assess the antibacterial activity. G5-DLD-600-CFTX exhibited a 92.4% encapsulation efficacy and displayed an 83.8% drug release in 48 h, along with a synergistic effect between CFTX and the hyperbranched structure. Pharmacokinetic investigations were conducted by intramuscular administration to rats, but no antimicrobial test was carried out in vivo [122].

Figure 25.

Figure 25

Different generations of DLD used to encapsulate the CFTX antibiotic.

A related example of DLD concerned PEG-2k functionalized at each end with three branches composed of amphiphilic cholic acids (CAs) modified with quaternary ammoniums (Figure 26). This compound self-assembled into nanostructured micelles in aqueous solution and displayed potent antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli, with MIC values of 7.50 and 7.79 μM, respectively. In vivo studies were performed with mice that had two wounds with a diameter of 10 mm on their backs infected with S. aureus. It was shown that CA-DLD-2k injected inside wounds 24 h after infection was much more effective and safer than penicillin G in treating S. aureus infection and promoted more rapid wound healing. Furthermore, evaluation of toxicity in the main organs proved the excellent biosafety of CA-DLD-2k [123].

Figure 26.

Figure 26

DLD functionalized with ammoniums derivatives of cholic acid.

The periphery of poly(urea) (PUREs) dendrimers [124] was functionalized with 48 linear oligoethyleneimines (OEIs). The surface and the internal structure were easily protonated, affording a highly cationic dendritic structure of generations three, four, and five (G4-PURE-OEI in Figure 27). Compounds G3-PURE-OEI and G4-PURE-OEI were tested against a collection of both Gram-positive (S. aureus MRSA, Streptococcus pneumoniae) and Gram-negative (P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and S. enterica, Burkholderia cenocepacia) bacteria and fungi (C. albicans and Candida glabrata; for a review about the use of dendrimers against fungi, see [125]). Generation four displayed highly efficient antimicrobial and anticandidal activity and was tested in vivo on G. mellonella larvae infected with a lethal dose of S. aureus or P. aeruginosa. It was shown that G4-PURE-OEI clearly improved larva survival [126].

Figure 27.

Figure 27

Poly(urea) dendrimer (generation four) functionalized with oligo(ethyleneimine).

5.6. Comparative Analysis of Miscellaneous Dendrimers

The miscellaneous dendrimer families discussed above should not be considered as a homogeneous group. Carbosilane dendrimers illustrate the potential of hydrophobic scaffolds for multivalent toxin neutralization, but the available in vivo evidence remains limited and indication-specific. Phosphorhydrazone dendrimers are interesting for antimycobacterial activity and antibiotic potentiation; however, despite encouraging early in vivo results in mouse models, they remain at a very early preclinical stage, with limited pharmacokinetic, biodistribution, safety, and comparative efficacy data. Polyglycerol- and polyester-based systems offer attractive biocompatibility or biodegradability features and are often used in hydrogels, membranes, or coatings, where antimicrobial and regenerative effects may be combined. However, in such systems, the contribution of the dendrimer itself to direct antimicrobial efficacy can be difficult to separate from wound-healing, drug-release, or material-related effects. Poly(urea) dendrimers show broad antimicrobial potential, but the in vivo evidence is still limited to early infection models. Thus, these platforms broaden the chemical diversity of antimicrobial dendrimers, but their translational maturity remains highly variable.

6. Conclusions

Dendrimers have demonstrated significant potential as antimicrobial agents, both independently and as nanocarriers for existing drugs, which can be either encapsulated within the dendritic structure or covalently attached to its periphery, offering a promising strategy to combat antibiotic resistance. In vivo studies spanning diverse animal models —from larvae to macaques, most commonly mice and rats—have underscored their efficacy. These studies cover a broad range of infection-related models, including bacterial vaginosis, wound and skin infections, dental and periodontal infections, pulmonary infections, tuberculosis, biofilm-associated infections, and selected viral infection models. To facilitate comparison among the different dendrimer families, Table 2 summarizes representative antimicrobial dendrimer-based systems for which in vitro activity was reported and further evaluated in vivo. The table highlights the active role of each system, the main in vitro target or activity, the in vivo model, the route of administration, and the principal biological outcome. The activity can arise from different mechanisms, including membrane disruption, multivalent interactions with microbial or toxin targets, antibiofilm effects, delivery of antibiotics or antimicrobial peptides, release of gaseous mediators such as NO, CO, or SO2, and modulation of the local inflammatory environment.

Table 2.

Representative antimicrobial dendrimer-based systems, the main in vitro target or activity, the in vivo model, the route of administration, and the principal biological outcome.

Dendrimer Family Dendrimer/System Active Role Main In Vitro Target/Activity In Vivo Model Route/Administration Main In Vivo Outcome Ref.
PAMAM PAMAM G4-OH Intrinsic antibacterial activity Activity against E. coli; lower cytotoxicity than PAMAM G4-NH2 Pregnant guinea pig model of intra-cervical E. coli infection/chorioamnionitis Topical cervical application No bacterial growth detected in amniotic fluid samples after treatment [31]
PAMAM PAMAM G5-NH2-DOP coating Antimicrobial and osteogenic surface coating Antimicrobial activity on titanium alloy surfaces Rat Ti6Al4V tibial implant model with S. aureus-infected implants Implant coating Improved antimicrobial performance and long-term implant stability [32]
PAMAM PAMAM G3-BN Antibacterial and enamel-preserving dendrimer Reduced adhesion, viability, and biofilm formation of S. mutans and S. sanguinis Rat dental caries model with human enamel blocks Topical oral application Reduced lesion depth and improved enamel remineralization [33]
PAMAM TDZ-G4@CA
(PAMAM-G4-NH2-TDZ/CA-Tyr)
Antibiotic delivery/antibiofilm system MRSA biofilm disruption and pH/lipase-responsive release of D-Tyr and tedizolid Mouse MRSA subcutaneous abscess model I.v. administration Accumulated at infected site and induced strong bacterial reduction [34]
PAMAM PAMAM-G4-NH2-AZM/DA-PEG-PLys pH-responsive antibiotic delivery Biofilm penetration and azithromycin release in acidic biofilm microenvironment Mouse chronic P. aeruginosa lung infection I.v. administration Reduced bacterial burden and inflammatory markers [35]
PAMAM PAMAM-PEG hydrogel Local hydrogel/antimicrobial delivery platform Sustained antibiotic release and intrinsic antibacterial activity expected from amine-terminated PAMAM Pregnant guinea pig vaginal tolerance model Local intravaginal insertion Well tolerated and localized on the superficial mucified epithelial layer; no infected in vivo efficacy model reported [36]
PAMAM dendrimer β-cyclodextrin-graft-PAMAM-NO NO delivery/antibiofilm system Inhibition and dispersion of S. aureus biofilm Rat chronic rhinosinusitis model Intranasal spray Improved symptoms and therapeutic effect against S. aureus infection [41]
PAMAM dendron C18-G1 Intrinsic antibacterial amphiphilic dendron Activity against S. aureus, E. coli, and resistant strains Mouse MRSA-infected wound model Local wound treatment Accelerated wound healing; optimal healing rate at Day 7 [42]
PAMAM dendron C18-G3-NH2 Intrinsic antibacterial amphiphilic dendron Membrane insertion and lysis of bacteria Mouse acute pneumonia and bacteremia models with P. aeruginosa I.p. administration Effective at lower therapeutic concentrations than reference antibiotics in the reported models [44]
PAMAM dendron C18-G3-Me Intrinsic antibacterial amphiphilic dendron Broad activity against resistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria Mouse bacteremia, pneumonia, and peritonitis-sepsis models Systemic treatment Reduced bacterial burden and improved survival in severe infection models [45]
PAMAM/chitosan Cs-PAMAM-MET-NO Combined antibiotic and NO delivery Activity against E. coli and S. aureus Rat MRSA-infected wound model Local wound treatment Accelerated wound healing [46]
PAMAM/chitosan-derived carbon dots CPA-CD-NO NO delivery/imaging/antibacterial platform Reduced P. aeruginosa viability and biofilm; fluorescent bacterial imaging Rat infected wound model Local wound treatment Eradicated severe infection and inflammation [47]
PAMAM/chitosan CS-PAMAM-Dns Glutathione-responsive SO2 delivery Activity against S. aureus, MRSA, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa C. elegans infected with MRSA Treatment in infected nematodes Improved survival of infected C. elegans [48]
PAMAM PAMAM/SDZ Non-covalent drug carrier Sulfadiazine encapsulation Rat pharmacokinetic/biodistribution study Oral or i.v. administration Increased plasma and tissue delivery after intravenous administration; no in vivo anti-infective efficacy model reported [49]
PAMAM PTM-loaded PLGA/PAMAM nanoparticles Antibiotic carrier Platensimycin encapsulation Mouse MRSA peritonitis model I.p. administration Full survival of treated infected mice, unlike free platensimycin [50]
PAMAM PAMAM/RIF microspheres Pulmonary drug delivery Rifampicin encapsulation in inhalable microspheres Healthy rat pulmonary delivery model Intratracheal administration Altered rifampicin pharmacokinetics after pulmonary delivery; no in vivo infection efficacy reported [53]
PAMAM/biomimetic vesicles MPN-loaded PAMAM in platelet membrane nanovesicles Antibiotic adjuvant/pH-responsive delivery PAMAM-G5-NH2 inhibits NDM activity; meropenem protection/delivery Zebrafish larvae infection foci; mouse E. coli pneumonia and muscle sepsis I.v. administration Accumulation at infection sites and protection of infected mice from death [54]
PAMAM PAMAM/DMADDM coating Dental implant coating/antibacterial delivery Antimicrobial activity against C. albicans and S. aureus biofilms Rat peri-implantitis model Coated titanium implant Reduced microbial development and promoted osseointegration [55]
PAMAM PAMAM-G4.5-CO2H/HNK Antibacterial and remineralizing drug carrier Honokiol delivery against cariogenic bacteria Rat dental caries model Topical oral treatment Reduced caries lesions, decreased S. mutans, and promoted enamel remineralization [56]
PAMAM PAMAM-based Mino/ALA nanocarrier Dual pH/lipase-responsive drug delivery Biofilm disruption and antioxidant/antibacterial delivery Diabetic rat periodontitis model Local periodontal treatment Suppressed dental plaque biofilms and periodontal bone loss [57]
PAMAM PAMAM-G3.5-AMP/EG Antimicrobial peptide-functionalized carrier High bactericidal efficacy and biofilm disintegration Rat dentin caries model with oral S. mutans infection Topical dental treatment Reduced salivary S. mutans and increased molar mineral density [58]
PAMAM hydrogel PAMAM/oxidized dextran/AgNP hydrogel pH-responsive antibacterial hydrogel Broad-spectrum antibacterial activity from AgNPs and cationic PAMAM Mouse S. aureus skin infection model Local subcutaneous hydrogel injection followed by bacterial inoculation at the gel site Lower bacterial burden than untreated or commercial Ag gel groups [60]
PAMAM dendron/collagen ZnO-TES-PAMAM-G3-NP-collagen scaffold Antibacterial regenerative scaffold Antibacterial activity of metal oxide-dendrimer collagen scaffolds Rat non-infected excisional wound healing model Local scaffold application Accelerated wound closure and skin regeneration; no infected in vivo efficacy model [61]
PAMAM dendron Amphiphilic PAMAM dendron/PNA Carrier for antisense nucleic acid mimics Delivery of antisense PNA targeting essential E. coli gene and antibacterial activity of the carrier/PNA system G. mellonella larvae toxicity model Intra-hemocoelic injection No significant toxicity; no infected in vivo efficacy model reported [62]
Poly(L-Lysine) BRI-2999/SPL299 Topical antiviral microbicide HSV-2 inhibition Mouse genital HSV-2 infection model Vaginal topical application Protection when applied before viral exposure [66]
Poly(L-Lysine) SPL7013/astodrimer Antiviral and antimicrobial topical dendrimer Broad antiviral and antibacterial activity; clinical development mainly for bacterial vaginosis and viral infections Mouse, guinea pig, macaque, rabbit, and human studies Topical vaginal/rectal/penile gel; nasal spray in SARS-CoV-2 studies Demonstrated efficacy in bacterial vaginosis trials; antiviral activity shown in multiple preclinical and clinical settings [67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88]
Poly(L-Lysine) PO-Lys-G3-Man@PP-IX-Ga Macrophage-targeted antibacterial nanostructure Intracellular antibacterial activity with gallium and photodynamic effect Mouse intracellular S. aureus infection model I.v. administration PG3M@GaPP 50 mg.kg−1 achieved 100% survival, weight recovery, reduced organ bacterial burden, and limited relapse after treatment cessation [89]
Poly(L-Lysine) nanogel CMPs CO-releasing immunomodulatory antibacterial nanomedicine Activity against S. aureus, C. rodentium, and E. coli Mouse DSS-induced colitis with bacterial infection Rectal administration Reduced pathogens, inflammation, ROS, and remodeled gut microbiota [90]
Poly(L-Lysine) nanogel CP-SAP Photodynamic antibacterial and remineralizing nanogel Activity against S. mutans, S. sanguis, and C. albicans Rat dental caries model Topical dental application plus laser irradiation Reduced caries severity and increased enamel density [91]
Lysine dendron Ce6&CORM@FADP Photodynamic and CO gas antibacterial therapy Synergistic killing and biofilm ablation against S. aureus and E. coli Mouse infected wound and catheter biofilm models Local treatment plus NIR irradiation Eradicated bacterial burden and biofilm in vivo [92]
Lysine dendrimer hydrogel Lys-G3-PEG2000/OCMC hydrogel Antimicrobial adhesive hydrogel Antimicrobial activity from residual amines Rat liver hemorrhage and skin wound models Local hydrogel application Rapid hemostasis, wound closure, and anti-infection effect [93]
Lysine metallodendrimer Zn–lysine dendrimer/TSP hydrogel Antibacterial wound-healing hydrogel Activity against P. acnes, S. epidermidis, S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa Rat excision wound model Topical hydrogel application Improved re-epithelialization and wound contraction; no infected in vivo model reported [94]
Peptide dendron DP-6/GFX Ocular antibiotic carrier Enhanced gatifloxacin solubility/permeability Rabbit ocular pharmacokinetic and tolerability model Ocular administration Increased ocular tissue levels compared with free gatifloxacin; no infected ocular model reported [97]
Peptide dendrimer TNS18 Intrinsic antibacterial peptide dendrimer Activity against MDR E. coli and other bacteria Mouse MDR E. coli peritonitis model I.p. administration 100% survival, outperforming ceftriaxone and imipenem in this model [98]
Peptide dendrimer T7 Intrinsic antibacterial peptide dendrimer Activity against P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae strains with low hemolysis Mouse MDR A. baumannii infection model I.p. administration Improved survival compared with inactive G3KL [100]
Peptide dendrimers TNS18 and G3KL Antibacterial peptide dendrimers Activity against P. aeruginosa strains G. mellonella infection model Larval treatment No protection despite in vitro activity [101]
Peptide dendron C16-3RP Self-assembled antibacterial aggregates Broad activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria Mouse E. coli acute peritonitis model I.p. administration Reduced bacterial burden and inflammatory cytokines [102]
Peptide dendron C16-2RP-PEG8/C16-3RP-PEG8 Self-assembled antibacterial aggregates Activity against MDR Gram-negative bacteria Mouse MDR E. coli peritonitis-sepsis model I.p. administration C16-2RP-PEG8 reduced bacterial burden in major organs; C16-3RP-PEG8 was inactive in vivo despite in vitro activity [103]
Peptide dendron-PNA (Goc)8-DAB-PNA Antisense antibacterial dendron conjugate PNA targeting acpP mRNA in Gram-negative bacteria Neutropenic mouse peritonitis model with MDR E. coli I.p. administration; i.v. used for tolerance/biodistribution Match PNA significantly reduced infection burden compared with mismatch PNA [104]
Dendritic peptide R2(R2)KW4 Membrane-disruptive antimicrobial peptide Activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria Mouse E. coli pulmonary infection model I.p. administration Reduced pulmonary inflammatory infiltration and liver hemorrhage compared with polymyxin B [105]
Carbosilane CSi-6 trisaccharide dendrimer Shiga toxin neutralization Shiga toxin neutralization Mouse E. coli O157:H7 infection model I.v. administration Protected mice from fatal infection and symptoms [107]
PPH PPH-G0b Intrinsic antimycobacterial dendrimer Activity against M. tuberculosis strains and M. bovis BCG Mouse M. tuberculosis H37Ra infection model Oral administration Reduced lung bacterial counts more efficiently than reference drugs in the reported model [110]
PPH PPH-G0b + antibiotics Antibiotic potentiator Potentiation of rifampicin, bedaquiline, linezolid, and clofazimine against drug-resistant mycobacteria Murine neutropenic bacteremia model Oral administration Combination treatments reduced bacterial counts in organs more than individual treatments [111]
PPH PPH-G0Me ± gentamicin Intrinsic antibacterial/antibiotic potentiator Activity against S. aureus and Enterococcus species Mouse gentamicin-resistant S. aureus skin infection model Topical skin application Combination with gentamicin was more effective than either component alone [112]
Polyglycerol/chitosan PGL-Ch-B membrane Antibacterial wound-healing membrane Suppressed S. aureus and P. aeruginosa proliferation Rat wound model Wound membrane coating Complete healing by Day 30 with membrane degradation, no infected in vivo model reported [117]
Polyglycerol dendron Gly-G1-C12 Intrinsic antibacterial cationic surfactant Activity against MRSA and E. coli, including biofilms Mouse MRSA-infected wound model Local wound treatment Accelerated wound closure and collagen recovery [118]
Polyester dendrimer mPEG-b-PCL/G1-PEA vancomycin nanovesicles Antibiotic delivery Lower MIC against MSSA and MRSA than free vancomycin Mouse MRSA skin infection model Local intradermal administration at infection site Reduced MRSA load more than free vancomycin [120]
Polyester DLD G6-DLD-20k hydrogel Antibiotic-free antibacterial hydrogel coating Broad antibacterial activity against multiple strains, including MRSA Mouse S. aureus-infected suture model In situ hydrogel coating Reduced bacterial load post-infection [121]
Citric acid DLD G5-DLD-600-CFTX Antibiotic carrier Cefotaxime encapsulation and antibacterial activity Rat pharmacokinetic study Intramuscular administration Improved pharmacokinetic profile; no in vivo antimicrobial efficacy test [122]
Cholic acid DLD CA-DLD-2k Intrinsic antibacterial amphiphilic dendrimer Activity against S. aureus and E. coli Mouse S. aureus-infected wound model Intrawound injection More effective than penicillin G in this model and promoted wound healing [123]
Poly(urea) G4-PURE-OEI Broad-spectrum antibacterial and antifungal dendrimer Activity against Gram-positive, Gram-negative bacteria and Candida spp. G. mellonella infected with S. aureus or P. aeruginosa Larval treatment Improved larvae survival [126]

Despite these promising results, comparison across studies remains difficult. The reported systems differ widely in dendrimer scaffold, generation, surface chemistry, payload, formulation, route of administration, dosing regimen, infection model, and biological endpoint. In addition, some studies provide clear evidence of antimicrobial efficacy in infected animal models, whereas others mainly report pharmacokinetic, biodistribution, local tolerance, or wound-healing outcomes. Future work would benefit from more standardized in vivo models, systematic toxicity and pharmacokinetic studies, and direct comparison with clinically relevant antimicrobial treatments. This last point remains particularly important, because some studies compare dendrimer-based systems with antibiotics or reference treatments, whereas others evaluate efficacy without a standard-of-care control. Such comparisons are needed to determine whether dendrimers offer a true therapeutic advantage rather than only activity in isolated experimental models.

This heterogeneity also prevents any simple ranking of dendrimer families according to therapeutic performance. Across dendrimer families, the current evidence does not allow definitive classification of platforms according to efficacy/safety ratio, manufacturability, or biodegradability. Nevertheless, several broad trends can be identified. PAMAM dendrimers are the most extensively explored and highly versatile, but cationic derivatives raise recurring toxicity concerns. Poly(L-Lysine) dendrimers, especially astodrimer, provide the clearest clinical precedent, largely in locally administered formulations. Peptide dendrimers and amphiphilic dendrons show strong discovery-stage antimicrobial potential, particularly against resistant bacteria, but remain heterogeneous in design and evaluation. Polyester and polyglycerol-based systems may offer advantages in biodegradability or biocompatibility, especially for hydrogels and coatings, whereas carbosilane and phosphorhydrazone dendrimers remain promising but less clinically advanced. Thus, the optimal platform depends on the intended indication, route of administration, payload, local versus systemic exposure, and required safety profile.

Establishing clear structure–activity relationships for antimicrobial dendrimers remains challenging. Even in classical small-molecule QSAR, closely related analogs can display unexpectedly large differences in biological activity, a phenomenon known as “activity cliffs” [127,128]. This limitation may be even more pronounced for dendrimer-based systems, where biological performance depends not only on the chemical structure, but also on macromolecular aspects such as dendrimer-specific parameters, including generation, surface charge, multivalency, architecture [129], functionalization density, aggregation state, formulation, payload loading, release behavior, and the way these parameters interact with the infection model used. Therefore, the available studies do not support definitive predictive SAR rules. Several structure–activity trends nevertheless emerge from the systems reviewed here. Cationic surfaces often favor interaction with bacterial membranes and can provide strong antimicrobial activity, but they may also increase cytotoxicity and safety concerns. Neutral or anionic dendrimers generally show improved tolerability but often require additional functionalization, payload delivery, or multivalent interactions to achieve strong antimicrobial effects. Amphiphilic dendrons bearing hydrophobic chains can mimic antimicrobial peptides and promote membrane insertion, but their in vivo behavior depends on aggregation, formulation, and route of administration. Higher generation is not necessarily associated with better activity, as illustrated by examples in which smaller dendrimers or lower generations performed better in vivo. These trends should be interpreted cautiously, because they arise from heterogeneous studies rather than from systematic head-to-head comparisons.

Consistent with these limitations, clinical translation remains limited. To date, only a small number of dendrimer-based anti-infective systems have reached the stage of clinical evaluation. Astodrimer/SPL7013 provides the clearest example of successful translation, probably because it combines local administration, limited systemic exposure, a polyanionic surface associated with favorable local tolerability, a favorable safety profile, relatively simple topical formulations, and clinically accessible indications such as bacterial vaginosis and topical antiviral prevention. PAMAM-NAC represents a different clinical example, in which a dendrimer nanotherapy was evaluated in the context of severe infection-associated inflammation rather than direct antimicrobial activity. By contrast, most other dendrimer families, including peptide, carbosilane, phosphorhydrazone, polyglycerol, polyester, and poly(urea) dendrimers, remain mainly preclinical.

Overall, dendrimers offer a versatile and chemically tunable platform for antimicrobial and anti-infective applications. Their value lies not only in intrinsic antimicrobial activity, but also in multivalent pathogen or toxin binding, antibiofilm activity, drug delivery, local formulation, and modulation of infection-associated inflammation. However, their future development will require better-defined infection models, appropriate clinical comparators, systematic safety and biodistribution studies, clearer but cautiously interpreted structure–activity trends, and reproducible formulations. For complex formulations involving partial functionalization, supramolecular assembly, drug encapsulation, hydrogels, coatings, or hybrid nanomaterials, translation will also require robust physicochemical characterization and quality control, including batch-to-batch reproducibility, degree of substitution, purity, size distribution, payload loading, release kinetics, sterility, and stability, to name a few. Safety remains particularly important for highly cationic architectures, for which hemolysis, membrane disruption, cytokine release, complement activation, organ accumulation, and long-term clearance should be more systematically evaluated. Under these conditions, dendrimer-based systems may continue to provide useful tools for difficult-to-treat infections, particularly when their architecture, route of administration, and safety profile are matched to a well-defined clinical indication.

Acknowledgments

We thank the CNRS and the University of Toulouse for financial support.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

ALA α-Lipoic acid
AMP Antimicrobial peptide
AMR Antimicrobial resistance
Arg8 Oligoarginine peptide
AZM Azithromycin
BCG Bacille Calmet–Guérin
BN Borneol
BV Bacterial vaginosis
CA Cis-aconit or cholic acid
CD Cyclodextrin or carbon dots
CFTX Cefotaxime sodium
Ch O-carboxymethylated chitosan
CMP CORM-mannose dendritic polymer
CO Carbon monoxide
CORM CO-releasing molecule
COVID Coronavirus disease
CS Chitosan
CSi Carbosilane dendrimer
CuAAC Copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition
DA 2,3-Dimethyl maleic anhydride
DAB Diaminobutanoic acid
DEX Dexamethasone
DLD Dendritic–linear-dendritic hybrid
DLS Dynamic light scattering
DMADDM Dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate
Dns 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonyl chloride
DOP Dopamine
DSS Dextran sulfate sodium
EDC 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide
EG Epigallocatechin gallate
ETB Ethambutol
FADP Fluorinated amphiphilic dendritic peptide
FITC Fluorescein isothiocyanate
Gbu Guanidinobutanoic acid
GFX Gatifloxacin
Ghp Guanidinoheptanoic acid
Ghx Guanidinohexanoic acid
Goc Guanidinooctanoic acid
Gpn Guanidinopentanoic acid
HIV Human immunodeficiency virus
HNK Honokiol
HPV Human papillomavirus
HSV Herpes simplex virus
I.p. Intraperitoneal
I.v. Intravenous
LNA Locked nucleic acid
Lys L-Lysine
Man Mannose
MAO Micro-arc oxidation
MDR Multidrug resistance
MET Methicillin
MIC Minimum inhibitory concentration
Mino Minocycline hydrochloride
MMC Minimal microbicidal concentration
MO Metal oxide
MPN Meropenem
MRSA Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
NAC N-acetyl cysteine
NAM Nucleic acid mimic
NDM New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase
NHS N-hydroxysuccinimide
NIR Near-infrared
NO Nitric oxide
NP Nanoparticle
OCMC Oxidized carboxymethyl cellulose
OEI Oligoethyleneimine
PAMAM Poly(amidoamine)
PBS Phosphate-buffered saline
PCL Poly(ε-caprolactone)
PDN Poly(L-Lysine) dendrimer-based nanogel
PED Polyester dendrimer
PEG Poly(ethylene glycol)
PGL Polyglycerol
P-Lys Poly(L-Lysine)
PMV Platelet membrane nanovesicle
PNA Peptide nucleic acid
POSS Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane
PPH Poly(phosphorhydrazone)
PP-IX Protoporphyrin IX
PTM Platensimycin
PURE Poly(urea)
RIF Rifampicin
ROS Reactive oxygen species
SA Succinic anhydride
SAP Saliva-acquired peptide
SARS-CoV Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus
SDZ Sulfadiazine
SHIV Simian-human immunodeficiency virus
SM Streptomycin
SPDP N-succinimidyl 3-(2-thiopyridyl)propionate
SPL7013 Astodrimer sodium, VivaGel
STI Sexually transmitted infection
Stx Shiga toxin
TDZ Tedizolid
TEM Transmission electron microscopy
TES Triethoxysilyl
TSP Tamarind seed polysaccharide

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.-M.C.; methodology, A.-M.C. and C.-O.T.; supervision, V.M.; validation, K.A., V.B.-G. and M.S.R.; formal analysis, C.A., K.A., V.B.-G. and M.S.R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.-M.C. and C.-O.T.; writing—review and editing, C.A., K.A., V.B.-G., M.S.R., C.-O.T., V.M. and A.-M.C.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

C.-O.T. is affiliated with IMD-Pharma. The company had no role in the conception, preparation, writing, or decision to submit this review. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Fleming A. On the antibacterial action of cultures of a Penicillium, with special reference to their use in the isolation of B. influenzae. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1980;2:129–139. doi: 10.1093/clinids/2.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aminov R.I. A brief history of the antibiotic era: Lessons learned and challenges for the future. Front. Microbiol. 2010;1:134. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2010.00134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Muteeb G., Rehman M.T., Shahwan M., Aatif M. Origin of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance, and their impacts on drug development: A narrative review. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16:1615. doi: 10.3390/ph16111615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Galanakou C., Dhumal D., Peng L. Amphiphilic dendrimers against antibiotic resistance: Light at the end of the tunnel? Biomater. Sci. 2023;11:3379–3393. doi: 10.1039/d2bm01878k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alfei S., Caviglia D. Prevention and eradication of biofilm by dendrimers: A possibility still little explored. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:2016. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14102016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Salam M.A., Al-Amin M.Y., Salam M.T., Pawar J.S., Akhter N., Rabaan A.A., Alqumber M.A.A. Antimicrobial resistance: A growing serious threat for global public health. Healthcare. 2023;11:1946. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Okeke I.N., de Kraker M.E.A., Van Boeckel T.P., Kumar C.K., Schmitt H., Gales A.C., Bertagnolio S., Sharland M., Laxminarayan R. The scope of the antimicrobial resistance challenge. Lancet. 2024;403:2426–2438. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00876-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ho C.S., Wong C.T.H., Aung T.T., Lakshminarayanan R., Mehta J.S., Rauz S., McNally A., Kintses B., Peacock S.J., de la Fuente-Nunez C., et al. Antimicrobial resistance: A concise update. Lancet Microbe. 2025;6:100947. doi: 10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tomalia D.A., Naylor A.M., Goddard W.A. Starburst dendrimers—Molecular level control of size, shape, surface chemistry, topology, and flexibility from atoms to macroscopic matter. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1990;29:138–175. doi: 10.1002/anie.199001381. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bosman A.W., Janssen H.M., Meijer E.W. About dendrimers: Structure, physical properties, and applications. Chem. Rev. 1999;99:1665–1688. doi: 10.1021/cr970069y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Newkome G.R., Shreiner C. Dendrimers derived from 1 -> 3 branching motifs. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:6338–6442. doi: 10.1021/cr900341m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Astruc D., Boisselier E., Ornelas C. Dendrimers designed for functions: From physical, photophysical, and supramolecular properties to applications in sensing, catalysis, molecular electronics, photonics, and nanomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:1857–1959. doi: 10.1021/cr900327d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Caminade A.M. Inorganic dendrimers: Recent advances for catalysis, nanomaterials, and nanomedicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016;45:5174–5186. doi: 10.1039/c6cs00074f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hawker C.J., Frechet J.M.J. Preparation of polymers with controlled molecular architecture—A new convergent approach to dendritic macromolecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990;112:7638–7647. doi: 10.1021/ja00177a027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Serri A., Mahboubi A., Zarghi A., Moghimi H.R. PAMAM-dendrimer enhanced antibacterial effect of Vancomycin hydrochloride against Gram-negative bacteria. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2018;22:10–21. doi: 10.18433/jpps29659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Almuqbil R.M., Heyder R.S., Bielski E.R., Durymanov M., Reineke J.J., da Rocha S.R.P. Dendrimer conjugation enhances tumor penetration and efficacy of doxorubicin in extracellular matrix-expressing 3D lung cancer models. Mol. Pharm. 2020;17:1648–1662. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pan J.Y., Mendes L.P., Yao M.M., Filipczak N., Garai S., Thakur G.A., Sarisozen C., Torchilin V.P. Polyamidoamine dendrimers-based nanomedicine for combination therapy with siRNA and chemotherapeutics to overcome multidrug resistance. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2019;136:18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sadler K., Tam J.P. Peptide dendrimers: Applications and synthesis. J. Biotechnol. 2002;90:195–229. doi: 10.1016/S1389-0352(01)00061-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reymond J.-L. Peptide dendrimers: From enzyme models to antimicrobials and transfection reagents. Chimia. 2021;75:535–538. doi: 10.2533/chimia.2021.535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lyu Y., Xue M., Huang X., Bian Y., Li P., Yang C., Zhang L., Shan A. Peptide dendrimers: Novel therapeutic opportunities for peptide-based biomaterials in biomedicine. J. Control. Release. 2025;388:114322. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Filipczak N., Yalamarty S.S.K., Li X., Parveen F., Torchilin V. Developments in treatment methodologies using dendrimers for infectious diseases. Molecules. 2021;26:3304. doi: 10.3390/molecules26113304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Boyce J.M. Quaternary ammonium disinfectants and antiseptics: Tolerance, resistance and potential impact on antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2023;12:32. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01241-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ortega M.A., Guzman Merino A., Fraile-Martinez O., Recio-Ruiz J., Pekarek L., Guijarro L.G., Garcia-Honduvilla N., Alvarez-Mon M., Bujan J., Garcia-Gallego S. Dendrimers and dendritic materials: From laboratory to medical practice in infectious diseases. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:874. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12090874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mintzer M.A., Dane E.L., O’Toole G.A., Grinstaff M.W. Exploiting dendrimer multivalency to combat emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Mol. Pharm. 2012;9:342–354. doi: 10.1021/mp2005033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Garcia-Gallego S., Franci G., Falanga A., Gomez R., Folliero V., Galdiero S., Javier de la Mata F., Galdiero M. Function oriented molecular design: Dendrimers as novel antimicrobials. Molecules. 2017;22:1581. doi: 10.3390/molecules22101581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alfei S., Schito A.M. From nanobiotechnology, positively charged biomimetic dendrimers as novel antibacterial agents: A review. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:2022. doi: 10.3390/nano10102022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Abd-El-Aziz A., Fouda M.M.G., Sharaby C.M., Xiao O., Zhang X., Alzahrany Y.A., Ahmed S.A., Ma N., Abd-El-Aziz A.S. Recent developments in antimicrobial and antiviral agents based on natural/synthetic polymers and dendrimers: Design and therapeutic applications. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2024;225:2400123. doi: 10.1002/macp.202400123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sztandera K., Rodriguez-Garcia J.L., Cena V. In Vivo Applications of Dendrimers: A Step toward the Future of Nanoparticle-Mediated Therapeutics. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16:439. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16040439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Box G.E.P. Science and statistics. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 1976;71:791–799. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1976.10480949. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tomalia D.A., Baker H., Dewald J., Hall M., Kallos G., Martin S., Roeck J., Ryder J., Smith P. A new class of polymers—Starburst-dendritic macromolecules. Polym. J. 1985;17:117–132. doi: 10.1295/polymj.17.117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang B., Navath R.S., Menjoge A.R., Balakrishnan B., Bellair R., Dai H., Romero R., Kannan S., Kannan R.M. Inhibition of bacterial growth and intramniotic infection in a guinea pig model of chorioamnionitis using PAMAM dendrimers. Int. J. Pharm. 2010;395:298–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.05.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang M., Li J., Geng M., Yang Z., Xi A., Yu Y., Liu B., Tay F.R., Gou Y. Mussel-inspired bifunctional coating for long-term stability of oral implants. Acta Biomater. 2024;188:138–156. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Qin Z., Sha Y., Sun S., Li M., Jiang F., Zong Y., Li J., Zhang G. Borneol-grafted poly(amidoamine) dendrimer with dual antimicrobial and enamel-remineralizing activities against early-stage dental caries. Dent. Mater. J. 2026;45:300–312. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2025-317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jiang X., Li W., Chen X., Wang C., Guo R., Hong W. On-demand multifunctional electrostatic complexation for synergistic eradication of MRSA biofilms. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022;14:10200–10211. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c00658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gao Y., Wang J., Chai M., Li X., Deng Y., Jin Q., Ji J. Size and charge adaptive clustered nanoparticles targeting the biofilm microenvironment for chronic lung infection management. ACS Nano. 2020;14:5686–5699. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c00269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Navath R.S., Menjoge A.R., Dai H., Romero R., Kannan S., Kannan R.M. Injectable PAMAM dendrimer-PEG hydrogels for the treatment of genital infections: Formulation and in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Mol. Pharm. 2011;8:1209–1223. doi: 10.1021/mp200027z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mishra M.K., Beaty C.A., Lesniak W.G., Kambhampati S.R., Zhang F., Wilson M.A., Blue M.E., Troncoso J.C., Kannan S., Johnston M.V., et al. Dendrimer brain uptake and targeted therapy for brain injury in a large animal model of hypothermic circulatory arrest. ACS Nano. 2014;8:2134–2147. doi: 10.1021/nn404872e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gusdon A.M., Faraday N., Aita J.S., Kumar S., Mehta I., Choi H.A., Cleland J.L., Robinson K., McCullough L.D., Ng D.K., et al. Dendrimer nanotherapy for severe COVID-19 attenuates inflammation and neurological injury markers and improves outcomes in a phase2a clinical trial. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022;14:eabo2652. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abo2652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Franc G., Kakkar A.K. “Click” methodologies: Efficient, simple and greener routes to design dendrimers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:1536–1544. doi: 10.1039/b913281n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Poh W.H., Rice S.A. Recent developments in nitric oxide donors and delivery for antimicrobial and anti-biofilm applications. Molecules. 2022;27:674. doi: 10.3390/molecules27030674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liu T., Li G., Wu X., Chen S., Zhang S., Han H., Zhang H., Luo X., Cai X., Ma D. Β-Cyclodextrin-graft-poly(amidoamine) dendrons as the nitric oxide deliver system for the chronic rhinosinusitis therapy. Drug Deliv. 2021;28:306–318. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1876183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Guo W., Wang Y., Wan P., Wang H., Chen L., Zhang S., Xiao C., Chen X. Cationic amphiphilic dendrons with effective antibacterial performance. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2022;10:456–467. doi: 10.1039/d1tb02037d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dhumal D., Maron B., Malach E., Lyu Z., Ding L., Marson D., Laurini E., Tintaru A., Ralahy B., Giorgio S., et al. Dynamic self-assembling supramolecular dendrimer nanosystems as potent antibacterial candidates against drug-resistant bacteria and biofilms. Nanoscale. 2022;14:9286–9296. doi: 10.1039/d2nr02305a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.King N., Dhumal D., Lew S.Q., Kuo S.H., Galanakou C., Oh M.W., Chong S.Y., Zhang N., Lee L.T.O., Hayouka Z., et al. Amphiphilic dendrimer as potent antibacterial against drug-resistant bacteria in mouse models of human infectious diseases. ACS Infect. Dis. 2024;10:453–466. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.3c00425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang N., Dhumal D., Kuo S.H., Lew S.Q., Patil P.D., Taher R., Vaidya S., Galanakou C., Elkihel A., Oh M.W., et al. Targeting the phosphatidylglycerol lipid: An amphiphilic dendrimer as a promising antibacterial candidate. Sci. Adv. 2024;10:8117. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn8117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu S., Cai X., Xue W., Ma D., Zhang W. Chitosan derivatives co-delivering nitric oxide and methicillin for the effective therapy to the methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020;234:115928. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu S., Lv K., Chen Z., Li C., Chen T., Ma D. Fluorescent carbon dots with a high nitric oxide payload for effective antibacterial activity and bacterial imaging. Biomater. Sci. 2021;9:6486–6500. doi: 10.1039/d1bm01077h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yu H., Liu J., Lin Q., Liu J., Yu S., Sun P., Lin J. Glutathione-responsive sulfur dioxide-releasing dendronized chitooligosaccharide polymer for effective treatment of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;474:145316. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.145316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Prieto M., Schilrreff P., Tesoriero M.V.D., Morilla M.J., Romero E.L. Brain and muscle of Wistar rats are the main targets of intravenous dendrimeric sulfadiazine. Int. J. Pharm. 2008;360:204–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.04.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liu X., Wang Z., Feng X., Bai E., Xiong Y., Zhu X., Shen B., Duan Y., Huang Y. Platensimycin-encapsulated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) and poly(amidoamine) dendrimers nanoparticles with enhanced anti-staphylococcal activity in vivo. Bioconjugate Chem. 2020;31:1425–1437. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.World Health Organization Global Tuberculosis Report 2025. [(accessed on 25 March 2026)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/global-programme-on-tuberculosis-and-lung-health/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2025.
  • 52.Sanhueza C., Vergara D., Chavez-Aravena C., Galvez-Jiron F., Chavez-Angel E., Castro-Alvarez A. Functionalizing dendrimers for targeted delivery of bioactive molecules to macrophages: A potential treatment for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection—A review. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16:1428. doi: 10.3390/ph16101428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rajabnezhad S., Casettari L., Lam J.K.W., Nomani A., Torkamani M.R., Palmieri G.F., Rajabnejad M.R., Darbandi M.A. Pulmonary delivery of rifampicin microspheres using lower generation polyamidoamine dendrimers as a carrier. Powder Technol. 2016;291:366–374. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.12.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wu S., Yu T., Zhou R., Liang Y., Li Y., Yang J., Wang Y., An J., Qin S., Zhang Z., et al. Adjuvant-like biomimetic nanovesicles combat New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs) producing superbugs infections. Nano Today. 2021;38:101185. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101185. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Huang X., Ge Y., Yang B., Han Q., Zhou W., Liang J., Li M., Peng X., Ren B., Yang B., et al. Novel dental implant modifications with two-staged double benefits for preventing infection and promoting osseointegration in vivo and in vitro. Bioact. Mater. 2021;6:4568–4579. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tao S., Yang X., Liao L., Yang J., Liang K., Zeng S., Zhou J., Zhang M., Li J. A novel anticaries agent, honokiol-loaded poly(amido amine) dendrimer, for simultaneous long-term antibacterial treatment and remineralization of demineralized enamel. Dent. Mater. 2021;37:1337–1349. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang L., Li Y., Ren M., Wang X., Li L., Liu F., Lan Y., Yang S., Song J. pH and lipase-responsive nanocarrier-mediated dual drug delivery system to treat periodontitis in diabetic rats. Bioact. Mater. 2022;18:254–266. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Liu M., Li J., Wang Z., Chen M., Yi J., Zhao Z., Liang K. Multifunctional PAMAM nanoparticles with sequential antimicrobial-remineralization therapy for dentin caries management. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2025;13:12085–12100. doi: 10.1039/d5tb01477h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Luo J., Lin X., Li L., Tan J., Li P. β-Cyclodextrin and oligoarginine peptide-based dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles for improving drug delivery to the inner ear. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022;10:844177. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.844177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dai T., Wang C., Wang Y., Xu W., Hu J., Cheng Y. A nanocomposite hydrogel with potent and broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10:15163–15173. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b02527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Vedhanayagam M., Kumar A.S., Nair B.U., Sreeram K.J. Dendrimer-functionalized metal oxide nanoparticle-mediated self-assembled collagen scaffold for skin regenerative application: Function of metal in metal oxides. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2022;194:266–290. doi: 10.1007/s12010-021-03764-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gomes M., Resende I., Zamoshchak Y., Araujo D., Castro J., Dhumal D., Peng L., Santos R.S., Azevedo N.F. Amphiphilic dendrimer-assisted delivery of antisense nucleic acid mimics against E. coli. J. Control. Release. 2025;384:113850. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.113850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Denkewalter R.G., Jaroslav K., Lukasavage W.J. Macromolecular Highly Branched Homogeneous Compound Based on Lysine Units. US4289872A. U.S. Patent. 1979 April 6;
  • 64.Caminade A.-M. Dendrimers, an emerging opportunity in personalized medicine? J. Pers. Med. 2022;12:1334. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.McCarthy T.D., Karellas P., Henderson S.A., Giannis M., O’Keefe D.F., Heery G., Paull J.R.A., Matthews B.R., Holan G. Dendrimers as drugs: Discovery and preclinical and clinical development of dendrimer-based microbicides for HIV and STI prevention. Mol. Pharm. 2005;2:312–318. doi: 10.1021/mp050023q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bourne N., Stanberry L.R., Kern E.R., Holan G., Matthews B., Bernstein D.I. Dendrimers, a new class of candidate topical microbicides with activity against herpes simplex virus infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000;44:2471–2474. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.9.2471-2474.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bernstein D.I., Stanberry L.R., Sacks S., Ayisi N.K., Gong Y.H., Ireland J., Mumper R.J., Holan G., Matthews B., McCarthy T., et al. Evaluations of unformulated and formulated dendrimer-based microbicide candidates in mouse and guinea pig models of genital herpes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003;47:3784–3788. doi: 10.1128/aac.47.12.3784-3788.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Jiang Y.H., Emau P., Cairns J.S., Flanary L., Morton W.R., McCarthy T.D., Tsai C.C. SPL7013 gel as a topical microbicide for prevention of vaginal transmission of SHIV89.6P in macaques. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 2005;21:207–213. doi: 10.1089/aid.2005.21.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Patton D.L., Sweeney Y.T.C., McCarthy T.D., Hillier S.L. Preclinical safety and efficacy assessments of dendrimer-based (SPL7013) microbicide gel formulations in a nonhuman primate model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006;50:1696–1700. doi: 10.1128/aac.50.5.1696-1700.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tyssen D., Henderson S.A., Johnson A., Sterjovski J., Moore K., La J., Zanin M., Sonza S., Karellas P., Giannis M.P., et al. Structure activity relationship of dendrimer microbicides with dual action antiviral activity. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Holmes W.R., Maher L., Rosenthal S.L. Attitudes of men in an Australian male tolerance study towards microbicide use. Sex. Health. 2008;5:273–278. doi: 10.1071/SH07093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Rosenthal S.L., Holmes W., Maher L. Australian men’s experiences during a microbicide male tolerance study. AIDS Care-Psychol. Socio-Med. Asp. AIDS/HIV. 2009;21:125–130. doi: 10.1080/09540120802084958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Chen M.Y., Millwood I.Y., Wand H., Poynten M., Law M., Kaldor J.M., Wesselingh S., Price C.F., Clark L.J., Paull J.R.A., et al. A randomized controlled trial of the safety of candidate microbicide SPL7013 gel when applied to the penis. JAIDS-J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2009;50:375–380. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318198a7e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.O’Loughlin J., Millwood I.Y., McDonald H.M., Price C.F., Kaldor J.M., Paull J.R.A. Safety, Tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of SPL7013 gel (VivaGel (R)): A dose ranging, Phase I study. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2010;37:100–104. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181bc0aac. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Cohen C.R., Brown J., Moscicki A.B., Bukusi E.A., Paull J.R.A., Price C.F., Shiboski S. A Phase I randomized placebo controlled trial of the safety of 3% SPL7013 gel (VivaGel (R)) in healthy young women administered twice daily for 14 days. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Moscicki A.B., Kaul R., Ma Y., Scott M.E., Daud I.I., Bukusi E.A., Shiboski S., Rebbapragada A., Huibner S., Cohen C.R. Measurement of mucosal biomarkers in a Phase 1 trial of intravaginal 3% StarPharma LTD 7013 gel (VivaGel) to assess expanded safety. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2012;59:134–140. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31823f2aeb. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Madan R.P., Dezzutti C.S., Rabe L., Hillier S.L., Marrazzo J., McGowan I., Richardson B.A., Herold B.C. Soluble immune mediators and vaginal bacteria impact innate genital mucosal antimicrobial activity in young women. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2015;74:323–332. doi: 10.1111/aji.12412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.McGowan I., Gomez K., Bruder K., Febo I., Chen B.A., Richardson B.A., Husnik M., Livant E., Price C., Jacobson C. Phase 1 randomized trial of the vaginal safety and acceptability of SPL7013 gel (VivaGel) in sexually active young women (MTN-004) AIDS. 2011;25:1057–1064. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328346bd3e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Carballo-Dieguez A., Giguere R., Dolezal C., Chen B.A., Kahn J., Zimet G., Mabragana M., Leu C.S., McGowan I. “Tell Juliana”: Acceptability of the candidate microbicide VivaGel® and two placebo gels among ethnically diverse, sexually active young women participating in a Phase 1 microbicide study. AIDS Behav. 2012;16:1761–1774. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-0028-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Price C.F., Tyssen D., Sonza S., Davie A., Evans S., Lewis G.R., Xia S., Spelman T., Hodsman P., Moench T.R., et al. SPL7013 gel (VivaGel (R)) retains potent HIV-1 and HSV-2 inhibitory activity following vaginal administration in humans. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Waldbaum A.S., Schwebke J.R., Paull J.R.A., Price C.F., Edmondson S.R., Castellarnau A., McCloud P., Kinghorn G.R. A phase 2, double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of the efficacy and safety of Astodrimer Gel for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0232394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chavoustie S.E., Carter B.A., Waldbaum A.S., Donders G.G.G., Peters K.H., Schwebke J.R., Paull J.R.A., Price C.F., Castellarnau A., McCloud P., et al. Two phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of the efficacy and safety of Astodrimer 1% Gel for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020;245:13–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Schwebke J.R., Carter B.A., Waldbaum A.S., Agnew K.J., Paull J.R.A., Price C.F., Castellarnau A., McCloud P., Kinghorn G.R. A phase 3, randomized, controlled trial of Astodrimer 1% Gel for preventing recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.-X. 2021;10:100121. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2021.100121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Mendling W., Holzgreve W. Astodrimer sodium and bacterial vaginosis: A mini review. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2022;306:101–108. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06429-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Romanowski E.G., Yates K.A., Paull J.R.A., Heery G.P., Shanks R.M.Q. Topical Astodrimer sodium, a non-toxic polyanionic dendrimer, demonstrates antiviral activity in an experimental ocular adenovirus infection model. Molecules. 2021;26:3419. doi: 10.3390/molecules26113419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Paull J.R.A., Luscombe C.A., Castellarnau A., Heery G.P., Bobardt M.D., Gallay P.A. Protective effects of Astodrimer sodium 1% nasal spray formulation against SARS-CoV-2 nasal challenge in K18-hACE2 mice. Viruses. 2021;13:1656. doi: 10.3390/v13081656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Castellarnau A., Heery G.P., Seta A., Luscombe C.A., Kinghorn G.R., Button P., McCloud P., Paull J.R.A. Astodrimer sodium antiviral nasal spray for reducing respiratory infections is safe and well tolerated in a randomized controlled trial. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:10210. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14601-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Winchester S., Castellarnau A., Jabbar K., Nadir M., Ranasinghe K., Masramon X., Kinghorn G.R., John I., Paull J.R.A. Astodrimer sodium nasal spray versus placebo in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19: A randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16:1173. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16091173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Zhou Y., Chen Y., Zhao W., Wang J., Chen Y., Wen H., He Y., Li N., Mao H., Cui Y., et al. Nanoflower-mediated gallium-protoporphyrin IX complex for intracellular antibacterial and immunomodulatory effects in macrophage-targeted therapy. ACS Nano. 2025;19:23659–23679. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c02488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zeng Y., Fan M., Zhou Q., Chen D., Jin T., Mu Z., Li L., Chen J., Qiu D., Zhang Y., et al. Reactive oxygen species-activated CO versatile nanomedicine with innate gut immune and microbiome remodeling effects for treating inflammatory bowel disease. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023;33:2304381. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202304381. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Shi J., Qi X., Ran Y., Zhou Q., Ding Y., Li L., Zeng Y., Qiu D., Cai Z., Cai X., et al. Saliva-acquired pellicle inspired multifunctional gargle with wet adhesion, photodynamic antimicrobial, and in situ remineralization properties for dental caries prevention. Bioact. Mater. 2025;47:212–228. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ma W., Chen X., Fu L., Zhu J., Fan M., Chen J., Yang C., Yang G., Wu L., Mao G., et al. Ultra-efficient antibacterial system based on photodynamic therapy and CO gas therapy for synergistic antibacterial and ablation biofilms. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:22479–22491. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c01967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Zhu H., Mei X., He Y., Mao H., Tang W., Liu R., Yang J., Luo K., Gu Z., Zhou L. Fast and high strength soft tissue bioadhesives based on a peptide dendrimer with antimicrobial properties and hemostatic ability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:4241–4253. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b18720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Pukale S., Pandya A., Patravale V. Synthesis, characterization and topical application of novel bifunctional peptide metallodendrimer. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021;66:102925. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102925. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Scorciapino M.A., Serra I., Manzo G., Rinaldi A.C. Antimicrobial dendrimeric peptides: Structure, activity and new therapeutic applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:542. doi: 10.3390/ijms18030542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Paul S., Verma S., Chen Y.-C. Peptide dendrimer-based antibacterial agents: Synthesis and applications. ACS Infect. Dis. 2024;10:1034–1055. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.3c00624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Durairaj C., Kadam R.S., Chandler J.W., Hutcherson S.L., Kompella U.B. Nanosized dendritic polyguanidilyated translocators for enhanced solubility, permeability, and delivery of gatifloxacin. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51:5804–5816. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Siriwardena T.N., Stach M., He R., Gan B.-H., Javor S., Heitz M., Ma L., Cai X., Chen P., Wei D., et al. Lipidated peptide dendrimers killing multidrug-resistant bacteria. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:423–432. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b11037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Stach M., Siriwardena T.N., Kohler T., van Delden C., Darbre T., Reymond J.L. Combining topology and sequence design for the discovery of potent antimicrobial peptide dendrimers against multidrug-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:12827–12831. doi: 10.1002/anie.201409270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Siriwardena T.N., Capecchi A., Gan B.-H., Jin X., He R., Wei D., Ma L., Koehler T., van Delden C., Javor S., et al. Optimizing antimicrobial peptide dendrimers in chemical space. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018;57:8483–8487. doi: 10.1002/anie.201802837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Pompilio A., Geminiani C., Mantini P., Siriwardena T.N., Di Bonaventura I., Reymond J.L., Di Bonaventura G. Peptide dendrimers as “lead compounds” for the treatment of chronic lung infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis patients: In vitro and in vivo studies. Infect. Drug Resist. 2018;11:1767–1782. doi: 10.2147/idr.s168868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Lai Z., Jian Q., Li G., Shao C., Zhu Y., Yuan X., Chen H., Shan A. Self-assembling peptide dendron nanoparticles with high stability and a multimodal antimicrobial mechanism of action. ACS Nano. 2021;15:15824–15840. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c03301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Lai Z., Yuan X., Li G., Chen H., Cheng B., Shan A. Nontoxic and proteolytic-resistant self-assembled peptide dendrimer aggregates to combat multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections. Chem. Eng. J. 2024;496:154171. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.154171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Iubatti M., Gabas I.M., Cavaco L.M., Mood E.H., Lim E., Bonanno F., Yavari N., Brolin C., Nielsen P.E. Antisense peptide nucleic acid-diaminobutanoic acid dendron conjugates with SbmA-independent antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative bacteria. ACS Infect. Dis. 2022;8:1098–1106. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Yang Y., Yu Z., Ba Z., Ouyang X., Li B., Yang P., Zhang J., Wang Y., Liu Y., Yang T., et al. Arginine and tryptophan-rich dendritic antimicrobial peptides that disrupt membranes for bacterial infection in vivo. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2024;271:116451. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Zhou L.L., Roovers J. Synthesis of novel carbosilane dendritic macromolecules. Macromolecules. 1993;26:963–968. doi: 10.1021/ma00057a013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Nishikawa K., Matsuoka K., Kita E., Okabe N., Mizuguchi M., Hino K., Miyazawa S., Yamasaki C., Aoki J., Takashima S., et al. A therapeutic agent with oriented carbohydrates for treatment of infections by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157: H7. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:7669–7674. doi: 10.1073/pnas.112058999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Launay N., Caminade A.M., Lahana R., Majoral J.P. A general synthetic strategy for neutral phosphorus-containing dendrimers. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. Engl. 1994;33:1589–1592. doi: 10.1002/anie.199415891. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Turrin C.-O., Laurent R., Maraval V., Hameau A., Delavaux-Nicot B., Caminade A.-M. Phosphorus-containing dendrimers: Another type of phosphorus polymers, and their properties. Eur. Polym. J. 2025;239:114296. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2025.114296. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Mignani S., Tripathi V.D., Soam D., Tripathi R.P., Das S., Singh S., Gandikota R., Laurent R., Karpus A., Caminade A.-M., et al. Safe polycationic dendrimers as potent oral in vivo inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A new therapy to take down tuberculosis. Biomacromolecules. 2021;22:2659–2675. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Imran M., Singh S., Ahmad M.N., Malik P., Mukhopadhyay A., Yadav K.S., Gupta U.D., Mugale M.N., Mitra K., Srivastava K.K., et al. Polycationic phosphorous dendrimer potentiates multiple antibiotics against drug-resistant mycobacterial pathogens. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024;173:116289. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Apartsin E., Akhir A., Kaul G., Saxena D., Laurent R., Srivastava K.K., Mignani S., Majoral J.-P., Chopra S. Low-generation cationic phosphorus dendrimers: Novel approach to tackle drug-resistant S. aureus in vitro and in vivo. Biomacromolecules. 2023;24:3215–3227. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c00266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Sunder A., Hanselmann R., Frey H., Mulhaupt R. Controlled synthesis of hyperbranched polyglycerols by ring-opening multibranching polymerization. Macromolecules. 1999;32:4240–4246. doi: 10.1021/ma990090w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Frey H., Haag R. Dendritic polyglycerol: A new versatile biocompatible-material. Rev. Mol. Biotechnol. 2002;90:257–267. doi: 10.1016/s1389-0352(01)00063-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Calderon M., Quadir M.A., Sharma S.K., Haag R. Dendritic polyglycerols for biomedical applications. Adv. Mater. 2010;22:190–218. doi: 10.1002/adma.200902144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Lopalco A., Lopedota A.A., Laquintana V., Denora N., Stella V.J. Boric acid, a Lewis acid with unique and unusual properties: Formulation implications. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020;109:2375–2386. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Alencar de Queiroz A.A., Abraham G.A., Pires Camillo M.A., Higa O.Z., Silva G.S., Fernandez M.D.M., San Roman J. Physicochemical and antimicrobial properties of boron-complexed polyglycerol-chitosan dendrimers. J. Biomater. Sci.-Polym. Ed. 2006;17:689–707. doi: 10.1163/156856206777346313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Hanheiser N., Jiang Y., Zoister C., Dimde M., Achazi K., Nie C., Li Y., Haag R., Singh A.K. Modular synthesis of dendritic oligo-glycerol cationic surfactants for enhanced antibacterial efficacy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025;64:e202425069. doi: 10.1002/anie.202425069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Zamboulis A., Nakiou E.A., Christodoulou E., Bikiaris D.N., Kontonasaki E., Liverani L., Boccaccini A.R. Polyglycerol hyperbranched polyesters: Synthesis, properties and pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:6210. doi: 10.3390/ijms20246210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Omolo C.A., Kalhapure R.S., Agrawal N., Jadhav M., Rambharose S., Mocktar C., Govender T. A hybrid of mPEG-b-PCL and G1-PEA dendrimer for enhancing delivery of antibiotics. J. Control. Release. 2018;290:112–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Andren O.C.J., Ingverud T., Hult D., Hakansson J., Bogestal Y., Caous J.S., Blom K., Zhang Y., Andersson T., Pedersen E., et al. Antibiotic-free cationic dendritic hydrogels as surgical-site-infection-inhibiting coatings. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019;8:1801619. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201801619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Valikala V., Santhakumar I., Kannappan S. Synthesis and effect of pegylation on citric acid dendritic nano architectures anchored with cefotaxime sodium. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B-Biol. 2019;201:111683. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.111683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Le M., Huang W., Ma Z., Shi Z., Li Q., Lin C., Wang L., Jia Y.-G. Facially amphiphilic skeleton-derived antibacterial cationic dendrimers. Biomacromolecules. 2023;24:269–282. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c01128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Restani R.B., Morgado P.I., Ribeiro M.P., Correia I.J., Aguiar-Ricardo A., Bonifacio V.D.B. Biocompatible polyurea dendrimers with pH-dependent fluorescence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:5162–5165. doi: 10.1002/anie.201200362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Mlynarczyk D.T., Dlugaszewska J., Kaluzna-Mlynarczyk A., Goslinski T. Dendrimers against fungi—A state of the art review. J. Control. Release. 2021;330:599–617. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Pinto S.N., Mil-Homens D., Pires R.F., Alves M.M., Serafim G., Martinho N., Melo M., Fialho A.M., Bonifacio V.D.B. Core-shell polycationic polyurea pharmadendrimers: New-generation of sustainable broad-spectrum antibiotics and antifungals. Biomater. Sci. 2022;10:5197–5207. doi: 10.1039/d2bm00679k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Stumpfe D., Hu H., Bajorath J. Evolving concept of activity cliffs. ACS Omega. 2019;4:14360–14368. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Maggiora G.M. On outliers and activity cliffs—Why QSAR often disappoints. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006;46:1535. doi: 10.1021/ci060117s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Caminade A.M., Fruchon S., Turrin C.O., Poupot M., Ouali A., Maraval A., Garzoni M., Maly M., Furer V., Kovalenko V., et al. The key role of the scaffold on the efficiency of dendrimer nanodrugs. Nat. Comm. 2015;6:7722. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.


Articles from Pharmaceutics are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES