Skip to main content
Frontiers in Immunology logoLink to Frontiers in Immunology
. 2026 Jul 15;17:1879446. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1879446

Inflammatory-neurological deficit versus metabolic dysregulation: unsupervised clustering and SHAP analysis

Ziying Wang 1, Lingling Wang 2,*
PMCID: PMC13414985  PMID: 42528690

Abstract

Objective

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 20,538 middle-aged and older patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) to identify immune-metabolic clinical subtypes by unsupervised clustering, to examine the differential association between subtype characteristics and post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) susceptibility, and to clarify immune-related threshold biomarkers for individualized PSE risk stratification.

Methods

Seven standardized variables were used for K-means clustering: age; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score; lipid profile components (triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-c], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-c]); glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); and the immune-inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP). Two immune-metabolic subtypes were determined. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to quantify the association between Cluster and PSE. An Extra Trees–based SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was used to interpret the hierarchical contribution of immune and metabolic indicators to PSE risk within each subtype.

Results

Clustering produced two clinically distinct subtypes. Cluster 1, the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster (n = 7,790), had older age, higher NIHSS scores, higher CRP, and higher HDL-c. Cluster 2, the metabolic dysregulation cluster (n = 12,748), had higher HbA1c, LDL-c, and triglycerides (TG). The incidence of PSE was substantially higher in the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster than in the metabolic dysregulation cluster (7.2% vs. 2.4%, P < 0.001). After full adjustment, membership in the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster was associated with 4.31-fold higher odds of PSE. Extra Trees–based SHAP analysis identified distinct drivers in each cluster. In the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster, CRP emerged as the leading predictor with a risk-acceleration threshold above 24 mg/L. In the metabolic dysregulation cluster, NIHSS was the top predictor, and HbA1c values below 7% were associated with a protective effect.

Conclusion

Unsupervised clustering separated AIS patients into two subtypes. The inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster had higher PSE risk. Cluster-specific SHAP results suggested candidate thresholds for individualized risk assessment.

Keywords: C-reactive protein, inflammation, ischemic stroke, middle-aged and elderly, national institutes of health stroke scale

Introduction

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of death and long-term disability worldwide. In 2020, the global prevalence of all stroke subtypes reached 89.13 million, of which 68.16 million were AIS. Incident strokes totaled 11.71 million and AIS accounted for about 65% of new cases (1). Post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) is a serious complication of ischemic stroke. Reported cumulative incidence after AIS ranges from about 6.4% to 15% (2).

AIS is not only a focal brain injury but also a manifestation of systemic metabolic imbalance (3, 4). Core components of metabolic syndrome, including hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia, can significantly impair neurological recovery after stroke (5, 6). Systemic inflammatory markers contribute to metabolic disease progression and may promote epileptogenesis by disrupting the blood–brain barrier (7). Age and stroke severity are well-established predictors of outcome after AIS (2, 8). These risk factors often co-occur in patients with AIS. However, it remains unclear how they interact to cause PSE across different metabolic phenotypes, and there is a lack of large-sample studies that systematically stratify these phenotypes. Cluster analysis provides an alternative approach by grouping patients based on multiple variables to reveal potential synergistic patterns. Specifically, K-means clustering is one of the most robust and widely used methods within machine learning for data modeling (9–13). However, the interpretability of clustering results—the so-called “black box” problem—remains a major barrier to applying precision medicine (14). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) uses a game-theoretic framework to quantify feature contributions to model outputs, thereby improving the interpretability of cluster analyses (15).

In this cohort study of patients aged 45 years or older with AIS, we performed clustering using the following variables: age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and C-reactive protein (CRP). We selected the 45-year threshold because stroke incidence increases markedly after this age (8). Multivariable regression was applied to evaluate the predictive value of clusters for PSE. Mediation analysis and subgroup analyses were explored. Finally, cluster-specific SHAP analyses were used to quantify each variable’s contribution, to enhance interpretability, and to support individualized assessment of PSE risk and prevention.

Methods

Study design and participants

The retrospective study initially enrolled all stroke patients admitted to the Chongqing Emergency Center between June 2017 and June 2022 (https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.w0vt4b92c) (16). The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chongqing University Center Hospital. Eligible patients met two inclusion criteria: (1) age 18–90 years at admission and (2) a diagnosis of AIS that required hospitalization. Exclusion criteria were: (1) a prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA); (2) conditions known to independently cause epilepsy (for example, traumatic brain injury, intracranial tumors, or cerebral vascular malformations); (3) a history of epilepsy or prior use of antiseizure medications for seizure prevention or for other indications (e.g., migraine or psychiatric disorders); (4) death within 72 hours of stroke onset; and (5) loss to follow-up (no outpatient records or unable to be contacted by telephone) or death within three months after stroke onset. For the present analysis, we limited the study population to adults aged 45 years or older to focus on the middle-aged and older group in which AIS incidence peaks (Figure 1) (8).

Figure 1.

Infographic provides an overview of a study on acute ischemic stroke patients in China, details patient selection, K-means clustering analysis of clinical and metabolic variables, associations between clusters and post-stroke epilepsy via regression analyses, and interprets results through SHAP plots highlighting key predictors such as CRP and NIHSS.

Overall flowchart of the study.

Data collection

The following data were systematically collected at hospital admission for this study: clinical, imaging, and laboratory information. All variables were entered into the electronic medical record database within 24 hours of admission by the on-call neurologist or trained research staff, and were subsequently extracted and quality-checked centrally by the study team. Extracted items comprised demographic and clinical features (age, sex, NIHSS score on admission); past medical history (diabetes, hypertension, coronary disease, atrial fibrillation); complications (hydrocephalus); imaging information (cortical involvement, large vessel disease); and laboratory parameters (TG, LDL-c, HDL-c, HbA1c, CRP, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], alanine aminotransferase, urea, blood uric acid, platelet count, red blood cell count, activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT], D-dimer). The definitions and measurement methods were as follows. NIHSS score was assessed and recorded on admission by neurologists who had received standardized training. Diabetes, hypertension, and coronary disease were identified from prior inpatient or outpatient records. Atrial fibrillation was defined by a prior diagnosis or by atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter on the admission electrocardiogram. Hydrocephalus was defined by imaging evidence of ventricular enlargement with corresponding clinical signs. Large vessel disease was determined according to TOAST classification principles combined with vascular imaging (CTA, MRA, or DSA). “Cortical involvement” was recorded if the infarct affected any of the frontal, parietal, temporal, or occipital lobes, or the insula.

AIS constitutes an acute exacerbation of chronic systemic processes (17). NIHSS and CRP capture the acute pathophysiological state at admission, while HbA1c and the lipid profile indicate chronic metabolic traits. By integrating these dimensions at the critical time of stroke onset, we aim to capture the convergence of acute injury severity and underlying metabolic susceptibility. All blood samples were collected within 24 hours of admission, and laboratory parameters were obtained from the first measurements performed at admission. These first tests most closely represent the baseline inflammatory and metabolic status prior to fluid resuscitation or pharmacological therapy, thereby minimizing the influence of early clinical interventions on the laboratory results. Lipids (TG, LDL-c, HDL-c) were measured by isotopic methods or routine enzymatic colorimetry. HbA1c was measured by high−performance liquid chromatography. CRP was measured by immunoturbidimetry or high-sensitivity CRP assays. Creatinine was measured by an IDMS-traceable enzymatic method or by the Jaffe method. Alanine aminotransferase, urea, blood uric acid, and other biochemical parameters were measured on the hospital central laboratory’s automated biochemistry analyzers, and blood cell counts were performed on automated hematology analyzers. APTT and D-dimer were measured on automated coagulation analyzers according to the manufacturers’ instructions. eGFR was calculated using the revised Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation with adjustment for the Chinese population and is reported in mL/min/1.73 m2 (18).

Outcome

The primary outcome was PSE occurring within one year after AIS. PSE was defined as two or more unprovoked seizures occurring after the acute phase of stroke. Under the updated International League Against Epilepsy criteria, a single unprovoked seizure with a high risk of recurrence was also considered PSE (19). PSE was identified during follow-up and confirmed through outpatient re-evaluations and telephone interviews conducted by neurologists. Patients were excluded from the PSE endpoint analysis if they were lost to follow-up (no outpatient records or unable to be contacted by telephone) or if they died within three months of stroke onset.

Statistical analysis

Indicators with more than 10% missing data were excluded. Remaining indicators with missing values were imputed using the random forest algorithm with default parameters. Features were processed in order of increasing missingness to minimize imputation complexity. During imputation, missing values in other features were temporarily replaced with 0, and predicted values were inserted into the original feature matrix before moving to the next feature. This process continued until all features were complete.

Prior to clustering, the seven clustering variables (age, NIHSS, TG, LDL-c, HDL-c, HbA1c, and CRP) were standardized using Z-scores to remove scale differences. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce the dimensionality of the dataset. After dimensionality reduction using PCA, K-means clustering was applied to group patients based on the similarity of their feature profiles. The optimal cluster number was identified using a consensus strategy integrating results from easystats, NbClust, and mclust. Internal validity indices (Silhouette, Calinski–Harabasz, Davies–Bouldin, and Gap statistics), majority-rule criteria from NbClust, and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)-based model selection from Gaussian mixture models were jointly considered, and the cluster solution supported by the majority of methods was retained. Clinical interpretability was also taken into account when selecting the final solution.

Continuous variables with approximate normal distributions are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Skewed continuous variables are reported as median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables are presented as counts and percentages (%). Between-group or between-cluster comparisons of continuous variables used the independent samples Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U-test as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test.

Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Covariates included in the multivariable models were selected based on prior literature and clinical relevance (8, 16, 20–28). To evaluate robustness, we specified three hierarchical adjustment models. Model 1 was adjusted for sex, diabetes, hypertension, coronary disease, atrial fibrillation, and hydrocephalus. Model 2 included the covariates in Model 1 and additionally adjusted for cortical involvement and large vessel disease. Model 3 further adjusted for eGFR, alanine aminotransferase, urea, blood uric acid, platelet count, red blood cell count, and APTT.

Subgroup effects were examined using likelihood ratio tests. After observing interactions between Cluster and sex, and between Cluster and age, we cross-classified participants by age, sex, and Cluster. Then a multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to estimate ORs for each resulting stratum. A mediation analysis was conducted using bootstrap resampling (1,000 iterations) to estimate the mediating effect of D-dimer on the association between Cluster and PSE.

For each cluster, the input features comprised age, NIHSS, TG, LDL-c, HDL-c, HbA1c, and CRP. Four diverse machine learning algorithms were implemented to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis in each cluster: Extra Trees (ET), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Random Forest (RF), and CatBoost. Model performance was assessed using a multi-metric framework. Sensitivity, specificity, F1 score (the harmonic mean of precision and recall), and overall accuracy were calculated to assess classification performance across different aspects. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) evaluated the models’ ability to distinguish between positive and negative cases across various decision thresholds. The area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) specifically focused on positive-case identification, which is particularly important for imbalanced datasets. PSE constitutes a minority-class outcome. To address class imbalance, we used the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), which generates synthetic minority-class samples rather than duplicating existing records. SMOTE generally outperforms simple oversampling and is widely used for imbalanced datasets (29). A dual validation strategy (stratified 5-fold cross-validation on the training set and evaluation on an independent test set) was used to mitigate overfitting.

To quantify the contribution of each input feature to PSE risk prediction within each cluster, Kernel SHAP was applied to compute SHAP values. Three complementary visualization methods were used: (1) SHAP feature importance and summary dot plots to show the distribution and relative importance of features across the training set; (2) partial dependence plots using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) to explore potential non-linear relationships between individual features and their SHAP values; and (3) SHAP force plots to decompose individual-level predictions and visually demonstrate how each feature shifted the prediction.

Two sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of our clustering results. First, to reduce the influence of extreme values, we winsorized NIHSS, CRP, and TG at the 99th percentile and repeated K-means clustering. Second, to address distributional skewness, we applied natural log transformations to NIHSS, CRP, and TG and repeated K-means clustering. In both analyses, the number of clusters was fixed a priori at two. Concordance between the primary clustering and each sensitivity-derived solution was assessed using Cohen’s kappa; we reran the multivariable logistic regression models to verify whether the associations remained consistent.

Analysis was performed using R 4.2.2 (http://www.Rproject.org; The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria) and the Free Statistics software (version 2.5; Beijing FreeClinical Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China). A two-tailed P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Basic characteristics of the population

Supplementary Table 1 summarizes the clinical characteristics of the cohort stratified by PSE status. At one year, among 20,538 middle-aged and older AIS patients, 867 developed PSE. Compared with patients who did not develop PSE, PSE cases were more often female, had higher stroke severity as measured by NIHSS, and had higher TG, CRP, and D-dimer levels (P < 0.001).

Clinical characteristics of the two clusters

The consensus strategy shows that the optimal cluster number was 2 (Supplementary Figure 1). Furthermore, solutions with three or more clusters produced subgroups with sparse outcome events, reducing their clinical usefulness. We therefore selected a two-cluster solution (k = 2) as optimal by balancing the consensus strategy with practical clinical considerations.

As shown in Figure 2, Cluster 1 had older age, higher NIHSS, higher CRP, and higher HDL-c. Cluster 2 had higher HbA1c, LDL-c, and TG. Cluster 1 was characterized as the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster. Cluster 2 was characterized as the metabolic dysregulation cluster.

Figure 2.

Panel A shows a PCA biplot with vectors for variables including Age, NIHSS, HbA1c, CRP, TG, LDL-c, and HDL-c, and data points scattered across Dim1 and Dim2. Panel B presents a cluster plot on the same axes, with Cluster 1 labeled in red circles and Cluster 2 in blue triangles. Panel C features a line chart comparing the cluster center mean (zoomed) for each variable by cluster, with Cluster 1 and Cluster 2 shown in red and blue, respectively. Panel D contains radar charts for Clusters 1 and 2, displaying normalized values for Age, NIHSS, HbA1c, CRP, TG, LDL-c, and HDL-c. Panel E is a bar graph showing PSE distribution by cluster, indicating counts and percentages for “No” (red) and “Yes” (blue) in each cluster, with Cluster 1 having more “Yes” responses and Cluster 2 having more “No” responses.

Identification of subtypes in middle-aged and older patients with AIS. PCA biplot (A); K-means clustering results (k = 2) (B); Cluster profiles (C, D); Cluster 1, inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster, showed older age, higher CRP, higher HDL-c, and higher NIHSS; Cluster 2, metabolic dysregulation cluster, showed higher HbA1c, higher LDL-c, and higher TG; PSE distribution by Cluster (E). AIS, acute ischemic stroke; PCA, Principal Component Analysis; CRP, C-reactive protein; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; PSE, post-stroke epilepsy.

Table 1 presents clinical characteristics for the 20,538 participants by Cluster (inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster, n = 7,790; metabolic dysregulation cluster, n = 12,748). Except for large vessel disease (P = 0.12), all between-cluster differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.001). Compared with the metabolic dysregulation cluster, the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster had higher proportions of males, coronary disease, atrial fibrillation, hydrocephalus, and cortical involvement, while the proportions with diabetes and hypertension were significantly lower. Biochemically, the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster had lower eGFR, blood uric acid, platelet count, and red blood cell count, and higher alanine aminotransferase, urea, D-dimer, and APTT. The incidence of PSE was 7.2% in the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster, significantly higher than 2.4% in the metabolic dysregulation cluster (P < 0.001, Figure 2E).

Table 1.

Comparative analysis of relevant features between clusters.

Variables Total Cluster 1 Cluster 2 P
(n = 20,538) (n = 7,790) (n = 12,748)
Sex (Female), n (%) 10,260 (49.96) 3,679 (47.23) 6,581 (51.62) < 0.001
Diabetes, n (%) 7,167 (34.90) 1,770 (22.72) 5,397 (42.34) < 0.001
Hypertension, n (%) 14,308 (69.67) 4,789 (61.48) 9,519 (74.67) < 0.001
Coronary disease, n (%) 9,521 (46.36) 4,045 (51.93) 5,476 (42.96) < 0.001
Atrial fibrillation, n (%) 2,024 (9.85) 1,386 (17.79) 638 (5.00) < 0.001
Hydrocephalus, n (%) 250 (1.22) 168 (2.16) 82 (0.64) < 0.001
Cortical involvement, n (%) 1,255 (6.11) 658 (8.45) 597 (4.68) < 0.001
Large vessel disease, n (%) 5,401 (26.30) 2,001 (25.69) 3,400 (26.67) 0.120
eGFR (mL/min/1.73m²), Mean ± SD 88.82 ± 29.20 84.08 ± 28.29 91.72 ± 29.37 < 0.001
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L), Mean ± SD 24.28 ± 10.29 24.71 ± 10.57 24.01 ± 10.11 < 0.001
Urea (mmol/L), Mean ± SD 6.47 ± 1.41 6.58 ± 1.21 6.40 ± 1.51 < 0.001
Blood uric acid (µmol/L), Mean ± SD 343.15 ± 58.62 328.35 ± 55.87 352.20 ± 58.42 < 0.001
Platelet count (109/L), Mean ± SD 189.62 ± 26.86 180.38 ± 23.16 195.26 ± 27.40 < 0.001
Red blood cell count (1012/L), Mean ± SD 4.31 ± 0.32 4.21 ± 0.30 4.36 ± 0.32 < 0.001
APTT (s), Mean ± SD 35.67 ± 2.32 36.54 ± 2.46 35.14 ± 2.06 < 0.001
D-dimer (µg/mL), Median (IQR) 0.91 (0.65, 1.50) 1.34 (0.87, 2.10) 0.77 (0.55, 1.11) < 0.001

Cluster 1, inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster; Cluster 2, metabolic dysregulation cluster; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; PSE, post-stroke epilepsy.

Association between cluster and PSE

As shown in Table 2, in the unadjusted model, the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster had 3.14-fold higher odds of PSE than the metabolic dysregulation cluster (OR 3.14, 95% CI 2.72–3.62, P < 0.001). This association remained significant in Model 3, with the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster demonstrating 4.31-fold higher odds of PSE compared with the metabolic dysregulation cluster (OR 4.31, 95% CI 3.61–5.15, P < 0.001).

Table 2.

Association between cluster and PSE.

Variable Crude Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95%CI) P OR (95%CI) P OR (95%CI) P OR (95%CI) P
Metabolic dysregulation cluster 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
Inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster 3.14 (2.72~3.62) <0.001 3.74 (3.21~4.36) <0.001 3.66 (3.14~4.27) <0.001 4.31 (3.61~5.15) <0.001

Model 1: Adjusted for sex, diabetes, hypertension, coronary disease, atrial fibrillation, and hydrocephalus.

Model 2: Adjusted for sex, diabetes, hypertension, coronary disease, atrial fibrillation, hydrocephalus, cortical involvement, and large vessel disease.

Model 3: Adjusted for sex, diabetes, hypertension, coronary disease, atrial fibrillation, hydrocephalus, cortical involvement, large vessel disease, eGFR, alanine aminotransferase, urea, blood uric acid, platelet count, red blood cell count, and APTT. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; PSE, post-stroke epilepsy.

Subgroup and mediation analysis

Subgroup analyses revealed interactions between Cluster and sex and between Cluster and age (Figure 3). After cross-classification, ORs for PSE, from highest to lowest, were as follows: younger males with inflammatory-neurological deficits; younger females with inflammatory-neurological deficits; younger males with metabolic dysregulation; older females with inflammatory-neurological deficits; older males with inflammatory-neurological deficits; older males with metabolic dysregulation; younger females with metabolic dysregulation; and older females with metabolic dysregulation (Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Forest plot displaying adjusted odds ratios with ninety-five percent confidence intervals for event rates by subgroup, listing age, sex, large vessel disease, and coronary disease. Significant interaction for both age and sex subgroups.

Subgroup analyses. Adjusted for sex, diabetes, hypertension, coronary disease, atrial fibrillation, hydrocephalus, cortical involvement, large vessel disease, eGFR, alanine aminotransferase, urea, blood uric acid, platelet count, red blood cell count, and APTT. For subgroup analyses conducted within levels of a categorical variable, that variable was not included as a covariate. Cluster 1, inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster; Cluster 2, metabolic dysregulation cluster; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; PSE, post-stroke epilepsy.

Figure 4.

Heatmap displaying odds ratios (OR) across age and sex groups for two clusters. Younger males and females show higher OR in cluster 1 (30.3 and 19.4) with red to orange shading, while older groups and cluster 2 have lower OR, indicated by blue to light blue shading. The legend shows a gradient from low (blue) to high (red) values.

Impact of combining cluster with age and sex on the risk of PSE. Adjusted for diabetes, hypertension, coronary disease, atrial fibrillation, hydrocephalus, cortical involvement, large vessel disease, eGFR, alanine aminotransferase, urea, blood uric acid, platelet count, red blood cell count, and APTT. All P < 0.05. Cluster 1, inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster; Cluster 2, metabolic dysregulation cluster; Younger, 45–65 years old; Older, ≥65 years old; OR, odds ratio; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; PSE, post-stroke epilepsy.

Supplementary Figure 2 illustrates a potential mediating role of D-dimer in the association between Cluster and PSE. Compared with the metabolic dysregulation cluster, the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster was associated with higher D-dimer levels (β = 0.63, 95% CI 0.59–0.68). Higher D-dimer was independently associated with increased PSE risk (OR = 2.13, 95% CI 2.02–2.25). Exploratory mediation analysis suggested that D-dimer may account for a proportion of the association between Cluster and PSE (mediated proportion 34.38%, 95% CI 28.88%–42.01%, P < 0.001).

Cluster-specific SHAP interpretability analysis

Benchmarking evaluations on the training set across the four algorithms showed that the ET model achieved the highest AUROC in both clusters (metabolic dysregulation: 0.99; inflammatory-neurological deficit: 0.97), indicating superior discriminative performance relative to the other algorithms (Supplementary Figures 3, 4). AUPRC values further supported the ET model’s clinical utility in both clusters. The ET model also demonstrated strong performance across multiple evaluation metrics, with consistent results between training and test evaluations (Supplementary Figures 5–8). Based on these overall performance assessments, the ET model was chosen for the final SHAP interpretability analysis.

SHAP analysis based on the ET model was used to evaluate the relative importance and directional effects of the seven variables for PSE prediction within each cluster. The model’s hyperparameters are listed in Supplementary Table 2. In the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster, SHAP feature importance ranked CRP as the most influential variable, followed by NIHSS, age, and TG (Figure 5A). The SHAP summary dot plot (Figure 5B) showed that higher CRP, NIHSS, and TG values were associated with increased PSE risk. In the metabolic dysregulation cluster, NIHSS was the most important predictor, followed by CRP, HbA1c, and age (Figure 5C). The summary dot plot (Figure 5D) indicated that higher NIHSS, CRP, and HbA1c were associated with increased PSE risk.

Figure 5.

Composite scientific figure illustrating SHAP value analyses for health predictors. Panels A and C present bar charts ranking variable importance by mean SHAP values; panels B and D show corresponding violin plots for SHAP values, colored by relative feature value. Panels E–L contain scatter plots of individual SHAP values versus predictor variables such as CRP, NIHSS, age, TG, and HbA1c, showing feature impact patterns. Panels M–P display force plots visualizing the individual-level contributions of each variable to the model’s prediction.

Cluster-specific SHAP interpretability analysis. SHAP feature importance plots in inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster (A) and metabolic dysregulation cluster (C); SHAP summary dot plots in inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster (B) and metabolic dysregulation cluster (D); SHAP dependence plots in inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster (E–H) and metabolic dysregulation cluster (I–L); SHAP force plots for non-PSE in inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster (M); SHAP force plots for PSE in inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster (N); SHAP force plots for non-PSE in metabolic dysregulation cluster (O); SHAP force plots for PSE in metabolic dysregulation cluster (P). SHAP, SHapley Additive exPlanations; CRP, C-reactive protein; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; PSE, post-stroke epilepsy.

The SHAP dependence plots revealed clinically relevant threshold effects. In the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster (Figures 5E–H), CRP exhibited a positive relationship with PSE risk that accelerated above 24 mg/L. NIHSS demonstrated a threshold effect near 11. Age showed a protective effect above 79 years. TG conferred protection most substantially at values below 1.4 mmol/L. In the metabolic dysregulation cluster (Figures 5I–L), NIHSS demonstrated a threshold effect near 8. CRP exhibited a positive relationship with PSE risk that accelerated above 10.1 mg/L. HbA1c showed a protective effect at values below 7%.

SHAP force plots illustrated additive explanations for two contrasting individual predictions (Figures 5M–P). For example, in the metabolic dysregulation cluster, for a representative participant with a predicted PSE probability close to 0 (Figure 5P), the force plot shows how individual factors influenced that prediction: elevated HbA1c (8%) increased PSE risk, whereas lower NIHSS (7), lower CRP (6.6 mg/L), lower LDL-c (2.7 mmol/L), lower TG (1.5 mmol/L), and moderate age (58 years) and HDL-c (1.3 mmol/L) collectively exerted protective effects.

Sensitivity analysis

The clustering solutions after winsorization and after log transformation showed high agreement with the primary clustering (Cohen’s kappa = 0.977 and 0.866, respectively) (Supplementary Figures 9, 10). These kappa values indicate that cluster membership remained largely unchanged when outliers were down-weighted or when skewness was addressed. The multivariable regression results were broadly consistent across sensitivity analyses (Supplementary Tables 3, 4), supporting the robustness of the associations identified in the primary analysis.

Discussion

In this large cohort of middle-aged and older adults with AIS, unsupervised clustering identified two subtypes. The associations of these subtypes with PSE were investigated. Cluster 1, the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster (n = 7,790) had older age, higher NIHSS, higher CRP, and higher HDL-c. Cluster 2, the metabolic dysregulation cluster, (n = 12,748) had higher HbA1c, LDL-c, and TG. After adjustment for covariates, patients in the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster had 4.31 times the risk of PSE compared with patients in the metabolic dysregulation cluster. Subgroup analyses revealed interactions between Cluster and sex and between Cluster and age. After cross-stratifying by Cluster, sex, and age, OR for PSE was highest among younger males in the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster. Exploratory mediation analysis suggested that D-dimer may partially mediate the association, with an estimated mediated proportion of 34.38%. Explainable machine learning models were validated within each cluster. The models showed that CRP and NIHSS were the most important predictors in the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster and in the metabolic dysregulation cluster. SHAP analysis identified threshold values for these markers that may be clinically useful.

The inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster had older age, higher NIHSS, higher CRP, and higher HDL-c. The higher PSE risk in the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster may arise from neuroinflammation combined with more severe ischemic injury. Elevated CRP indicated a strong systemic inflammatory response. This response can worsen blood-brain barrier disruption. It can also promote glutamate excitotoxicity and drive epileptogenesis through cytokine pathways (30). Higher NIHSS on admission indicated larger or more severe infarction. The risk of acute symptomatic seizures after ischemic stroke rises with higher NIHSS on admission (31). HDL-c is usually seen as protective. Its elevation in this cluster may reflect a compensatory anti-inflammatory response that is insufficient to counter the proinflammatory state. The metabolic dysregulation cluster showed higher HbA1c, LDL-c, and TG. These findings indicate metabolic dysregulation. Increased LDL-c and TG have been linked to epileptogenesis through mechanisms such as ferroptosis, autophagy and lysosomal dysfunction, and changes in the gut microbiota (32). Elevated HbA1c signaled poor recent glycemic control. Hyperglycemia can worsen ischemic injury by producing reactive oxygen species, promoting cerebral edema and reperfusion damage, and impairing mitochondrial function. These effects can increase infarct size and raise the risk of hemorrhagic transformation (20).

It has long been thought that females have a lower risk of developing epilepsy than males (21–23, 33, 34). However, among elderly patients in the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster, advanced age and the age−related decline in estrogen levels may attenuate estrogen−mediated neuroprotection, thereby exacerbating inflammatory responses, disrupting blood–brain barrier homeostasis, and perturbing downstream processes of neuronal injury and repair (35), resulting in a higher risk of PSE in females than in males. In clinical practice, emphasis should be placed on heightened vigilance, early screening, and individualized interventions for high−risk groups. For stroke patients with a high overall inflammatory burden and severe neurological deficits, the risk of seizures should be closely monitored regardless of age or sex. For the metabolic dysregulation subtype, although the overall risk is relatively low, attention should still be paid to the potential risk in younger males. D-dimer emerged as a potential intermediate biomarker linking the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster to PSE. This cluster, characterized by inflammation and a high injury phenotype, may contribute to PSE risk, possibly through coagulation activation reflected by D-dimer. Although preliminary, these exploratory findings raise the possibility that anticoagulant strategies could be investigated for PSE prevention in high-risk groups. Further interventional studies are needed before any clinical application.

ET model with SHAP explainability was used to rank predictors and to reveal threshold effects. In the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster, CRP emerged as the most influential predictor. CRP surpassed even the traditional neurological deficit score, NIHSS. This result underscores the central role of systemic inflammation in PSE pathogenesis for this subtype. The effect of CRP on PSE risk was nonlinear. Risk accelerated when CRP exceeded 24 mg/L, providing a potential clinical high-risk alert threshold. Patients older than 79 years had reduced PSE risk in this cluster. This finding is consistent with reports that younger patients may have relatively higher PSE risk (36–38). By contrast, in the metabolic dysregulation cluster, NIHSS replaced CRP as the primary predictor. This indicates that PSE risk in this subtype is more dependent on the severity of initial brain injury. HbA1c was also substantially important in the metabolic dysregulation cluster. Values below 7% were protective, supporting the clinical value of glycemic control for preventing PSE in metabolically dysregulated patients. The CRP risk acceleration threshold in the metabolic dysregulation cluster was 10.1 mg/L. This threshold was much lower than the 24 mg/L threshold for the inflammatory-neurological deficit cluster, indicating that metabolically dysregulated patients have lower tolerance to inflammatory perturbations and that even modest CRP elevations can markedly increase PSE risk. These findings collectively emphasize the need for cluster-based individualized risk assessment and suggest that metabolic dysregulation may reduce the brain’s tolerance to inflammatory injury. For example, in a metabolically imbalanced environment, even mild systemic inflammation can trigger a pronounced pro-epileptogenic effect.

Nevertheless, several limitations merit consideration. First, the retrospective design restricted analyses to recorded variables. Important confounders such as medication use were unavailable and thus unadjusted. To assess potential unmeasured confounding, we computed the E-value, which was 8.09 overall and 6.68 for the lower confidence limit. Hence, the observed OR of 4.31 could be explained only by an unmeasured confounder linked to both Cluster and PSE with an OR ≥ 8.09 beyond measured covariates, whereas weaker confounding could not account for it. Second, biomarker measurements were confined to the first 24 hours post-admission, capturing initial inflammatory and metabolic states but not their longitudinal changes. D-dimer and the clustering variables were measured simultaneously, and therefore the mediation findings may decompose associations without proving temporal causality. Third, although we applied multiple optimization measures to address class imbalance, the SHAP analysis remains exploratory and requires prospective validation. Fourth, data from Dryad had prior imputation, precluding precise missingness reporting and complete-case sensitivity analyses, though original exclusions and random forest imputation likely reduced bias. Finally, excluding prior stroke or TIA limits generalizability to first-ever ischemic stroke, and broader cohorts are needed. Regional recruitment in southwest China may constrain applicability and necessitates replication in multiethnic populations.

Conclusion

Unsupervised clustering separated AIS patients into two reproducible subtypes with different PSE risks. One subtype showed inflammatory features and severe neurological deficit and had high PSE risk. The other subtype showed metabolic dysregulation and had lower PSE risk. The findings highlight systemic inflammation and stroke severity as important factors for PSE. Cluster-specific SHAP analysis suggested thresholds may support individualized risk assessment and prevention.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Free Statistics Team for technical assistance and for providing tools for data analysis and visualization. We thank Dr. Haibo Li (Division of Birth Cohort Study, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University) for helping with the revision. We also thank Dr. Jie Liu (Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital) for his statistical consultation and advice on study design.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This project was supported by the Jilin Provincial Department of Education (JJKH20210062KJ), Development and Reform Commission of Jilin Province (2021C018) to Lingling-Wang. The supporting source had no involvement or restrictions regarding publication.

Footnotes

Edited by: Eric J Tschirhart, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Reviewed by: Ji Wu, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China

Yupei Cheng, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China

Data availability statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.w0vt4b92c.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of Chongqing University Center Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The ethics committee/institutional review board waived the requirement of written informed consent for participation from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because the data were anonymized and study procedures complied with regulatory standards.

Author contributions

ZW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LW: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1879446/full#supplementary-material

DataSheet1.docx (8.1MB, docx)

References

  • 1. Capirossi C, Laiso A, Renieri L, Capasso F, Limbucci N. Epidemiology, organization, diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Eur J Radiol Open. (2023) 11:100527. doi:  10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Phan J, Ramos M, Soares T, Parmar MS. Poststroke seizure and epilepsy: A review of incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, pathophysiology, and pharmacological therapies. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2022) 2022:7692215. doi:  10.1155/2022/7692215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wesley UV, Bhute VJ, Hatcher JF, Palecek SP, Dempsey RJ. Local and systemic metabolic alterations in brain, plasma, and liver of rats in response to aging and ischemic stroke, as detected by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Neurochem Int. (2019) 127:113–24. doi:  10.1016/j.neuint.2019.01.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Baranovicova E, Dluha J, Kurca E, Nosal V, Babalova L, Sivak S, et al. Time-dependent plasma metabolic shifts and mechanistic insights into systemic consequences of cerebral ischemia in middle-aged patients. Metabolomics. (2026) 22:57. doi:  10.1007/s11306-026-02439-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bernoud-Hubac N, Lo Van A, Lazar AN, Lagarde M. Ischemic brain injury: Involvement of lipids in the pathophysiology of stroke and therapeutic strategies. Antioxidants (Basel). (2024) 13:634. doi:  10.3390/antiox13060634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dong N, Shen X, Wu X, Guo X, Fang Q. Elevated glycated hemoglobin levels are associated with poor outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Front Aging Neurosci. (2022) 13:821336. doi:  10.3389/fnagi.2021.821336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zhong R, Chen Q, Li M, Zhang X, Lin W. Elevated blood C-reactive protein levels in patients with epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:974. doi:  10.3389/fneur.2019.00974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Galovic M, Ferreira-Atuesta C, Abraira L, Döhler N, Sinka L, Brigo F, et al. Seizures and epilepsy after stroke: Epidemiology, biomarkers and management. Drugs Aging. (2021) 38:285–99. doi:  10.1007/s40266-021-00837-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Tsoi KKF, Chan NB, Yiu KKL, Poon SKS, Lin B, Ho K. Machine learning clustering for blood pressure variability applied to systolic blood pressure intervention trial (SPRINT) and the Hong Kong Community Cohort. Hypertension. (2020) 76:569–76. doi:  10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Fujiwara G, Okada Y, Shiomi N, Sakakibara T, Yamaki T, Hashimoto N. Derivation of coagulation phenotypes and the association with prognosis in traumatic brain injury: A cluster analysis of nationwide multicenter study. Neurocrit Care. (2024) 40:292–302. doi:  10.1007/s12028-023-01712-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gao Y, Li Z, Zhai X, Zhang G, Zhang L, Huang T, et al. MRI-based habitat radiomics combined with vision transformer for identifying vulnerable intracranial atherosclerotic plaques and predicting stroke events: A multicenter, retrospective study. EClinicalMedicine. (2025) 82:103186. doi:  10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Han S, Zhou Y, Sturkenboom M, Biessels GJ, Ahmadizar F. Data-driven subtypes of type 2 diabetes and risk of dementia, stroke, and brain structural changes in the UK Biobank. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2026) 237:113311. doi:  10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zou X, Zhou C, Zhou R, Zhu T, Zhao J, Qing W, et al. The joint association of the combined triglyceride-glucose index and atherogenic index of plasma with hypertension on stroke risk across different glycemic status: A prospective cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2026) 25:141. doi:  10.1186/s12933-026-03080-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Yang B, Lu H, Ran Y. Advancing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prediction: A comprehensive machine learning approach integrating SHAP interpretability and multi-cohort validation. Front Endocrinol. (2024) 15:1450317. doi:  10.3389/fendo.2024.1450317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Prendin F, Pavan J, Cappon G, Del Favero S, Sparacino G, Facchinetti A. The importance of interpreting machine learning models for blood glucose prediction in diabetes: An analysis using SHAP. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:16865. doi:  10.1038/s41598-023-44155-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Liu J, He H, Wang Y, Du J, Liang K, Xue J, et al. Predictive models for secondary epilepsy in patients with acute ischemic stroke within one year. Elife. (2024) 13:RP98759. doi:  10.7554/eLife.98759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Balch MHH, Nimjee SM, Rink C, Hannawi Y. Beyond the brain: The systemic pathophysiological response to acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke. (2020) 22:159–72. doi:  10.5853/jos.2019.02978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lu TY, Zhang WS, Zhu T, Jiang CQ, Zhu F, Jin YL, et al. Associations of meat, fish and seafood consumption with kidney function in middle-aged to older Chinese: A cross-sectional study based on the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study. BMJ Open. (2023) 13:e073738. doi:  10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Beghi E, Carpio A, Forsgren L, Hesdorffer DC, Malmgren K, Sander JW, et al. Recommendation for a definition of acute symptomatic seizure. Epilepsia. (2010) 51:671–5. doi:  10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02285.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Rodríguez KM, Falcon MÁ, Reinoso A. Predictive factors for early post-stroke seizures in a Hispanic population. Seizure. (2025) 133:202–7. doi:  10.1016/j.seizure.2025.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Mohamed AA, Tan JK, Tan MM, Khoo CS, Wan Yahya WNN, Abd Rahman MSH, et al. Risk factors for post-stroke seizures in a tertiary care center: A case-control study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2024) 20:1615–28. doi:  10.2147/NDT.S473483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Sarfo FS, Akassi J, Obese V, Adamu S, Agbenorku M, Ovbiagele B. Prevalence and predictors of post-stroke epilepsy among Ghanaian stroke survivors. J Neurol Sci. (2020) 418:117138. doi:  10.1016/j.jns.2020.117138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kim HJ, Park KD, Choi KG, Lee HW. Clinical predictors of seizure recurrence after the first post-ischemic stroke seizure. BMC Neurol. (2016) 16:212. doi:  10.1186/s12883-016-0729-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Pozo Putalivo JA, Fariña S, Sol P, Grecco M, Sampaio M, Povedano GP. Identifying clinical and imaging predictors of post stroke epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. (2025) 173:110574. doi:  10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Naylor J, Churilov L, Johnstone B, Guo R, Xiong Y, Koome M, et al. The association between atrial fibrillation and poststroke seizures is influenced by ethnicity and environmental factors. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2018) 27:2755–60. doi:  10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.05.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Zhang Y, Chen X. Correlation between liver function and risk of post-stroke epilepsy. J Multidiscip Healthc. (2025) 18:7375–82. doi:  10.2147/JMDH.S530478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Park ES, Shin HM, Kim SW, Kim WJ, Hwang H. Clinical and hematologic predictors of early intensive care unit admission in seizure patients presenting to the emergency room. Epilepsy Res. (2026) 221:107752. doi:  10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2026.107752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Pande SD, Lwin MT, Kyaw KM, Khine AA, Thant AA, Win MM, et al. Post-stroke seizure-do the locations, types and managements of stroke matter? Epilepsia Open. (2018) 3:392–8. doi:  10.1002/epi4.12249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kivrak M, Avci U, Uzun H, Ardic C. The impact of the SMOTE method on machine learning and ensemble learning performance results in addressing class imbalance in data used for predicting total testosterone deficiency in type 2 diabetes patients. Diagnostics (Basel). (2024) 14:2634. doi:  10.3390/diagnostics14232634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Tröscher AR, Gruber J, Wagner JN, Böhm V, Wahl AS, von Oertzen TJ. Inflammation mediated epileptogenesis as possible mechanism underlying ischemic post-stroke epilepsy. Front Aging Neurosci. (2021) 13:781174. doi:  10.3389/fnagi.2021.781174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Zöllner JP, Misselwitz B, Kaps M, Stein M, Konczalla J, Roth C, et al. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on admission predicts acute symptomatic seizure risk in ischemic stroke: A population-based study involving 135,117 cases. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:3779. doi:  10.1038/s41598-020-60628-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Wang C, Zhai J, Zhou X, Chen Y. Lipid metabolism: Novel approaches for managing idiopathic epilepsy. Neuropeptides. (2024) 108:102475. doi:  10.1016/j.npep.2024.102475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Isah FM, Wang S, Djatche WHB, Song M, Li CX. Incidence and influencing factors of post-stroke seizure after endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2025) 252:108846. doi:  10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Somannagari N, Kasagga A, Sapkota A, Changaramkumarath G, Abucha JM, Wollel MM, et al. Risk factors associated with post-stroke epilepsy: A narrative review. Cureus. (2025) 17:e92134. doi:  10.7759/cureus.92134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Sohrabji F. Estrogen-IGF-1 interactions in neuroprotection: Ischemic stroke as a case study. Front Neuroendocrinol. (2015) 36:1–14. doi:  10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Graham NS, Crichton S, Koutroumanidis M, Wolfe CD, Rudd AG. Incidence and associations of poststroke epilepsy: The prospective South London Stroke Register. Stroke. (2013) 44:605–11. doi:  10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Galovic M, Döhler N, Erdélyi-Canavese B, Felbecker A, Siebel P, Conrad J, et al. Prediction of late seizures after ischaemic stroke with a novel prognostic model (the SeLECT): A multivariable prediction model development and validation study. Lancet Neurol. (2018) 17:143–52. doi:  10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30404-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Zelano J, Redfors P, Åsberg S, Kumlien E. Association between poststroke epilepsy and death: A nationwide cohort study. Eur Stroke J. (2016) 1:272–8. doi:  10.1177/2396987316669000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

DataSheet1.docx (8.1MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.w0vt4b92c.


Articles from Frontiers in Immunology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES