Abstract
This study investigated the microplastics (MPs) release in chicken sausages before and after packaging for 180 days of storage at -18 °C–4 °C. Samples were digested in 10% KOH at 50 °C, filtered (0.6 μm), and MPs characteristics (color, shape and size) were determined by optical microscope. The polymer type and elemental composition of MPs were determined by Confocal-Raman-Spectroscopy and SEM-EDX, respectively. MPs release was significantly higher at 4 °C than at -18 °C. The isolated MPs were in fibrous shape ranging from 50 to 1500 μm in length; and transparent color constituted the predominant fraction. Detected polymers were polypropylene, polycarbonate and polyamide. The highest estimated daily intake (EDI) corresponded to sausages held at 4 °C with 55% meat content. MPs release was influenced by meat percentage, storage time and temperature. These findings underline the need for further research on the long-term health implications of MPs exposure through processed meat products.
Keywords: Microplastics, Sausage, Confocal Raman Spectroscopy, SEM-EDX
Subject terms: Chemistry, Environmental sciences, Materials science, Nanoscience and technology
Introduction
Plastics due to durability and cost-effectiveness, light weight, easy application, and high performance are widely used in the production of clothing, transportation, cosmetics and, hygiene products, especially in food packaging1. The widespread use of plastic resulted in the formation of Microplastics (MPs), small particles ranging from 1 μm to 5 mm. These particles are generated by various environmental factors including ultraviolet radiation, mechanical effects, temperature fluctuations, biological activities, erosion and weathering, and atmospheric pollutants2. Studies indicate that while larger MPs (> 150 μm) are secreted in feces, smaller particles (0.1–10 μm) can penetrate the blood-brain and placental barriers. MPs of 15–20 μm, considered highly toxic, can enter the circulatory and lymphatic systems3. The distribution of MPs in body resulted in oxidative stress and inflammation, which leads to cytotoxic effects and manifests as organ-specific damage, including liver inflammation, kidney dysfunction, heart circulatory issues, and endocrine disruption causing infertility and metabolic disorders4,5. Also, MPs could be carrier of toxic materials (heavy metals, benzo(α) pyrene and phthalates) which could be toxicant for vital human body resulted in endocrine disruption, abnormal growth patterns, and oxidative stress6.
Plants are susceptible to MPs contamination through several agricultural pathways including irrigation with contaminated water, soil, and the use of plastic mulches to preserve agricultural soil. Also, MPs can enter animal products like poultry and livestock from contaminated soil, water, feed stocks7, processing methods (cutting boards), food packaging8. In recent years, consumption of fast foods including sausages has been increased9. The sausage production involved preparation (meat cutting, addition of ice, additives and spices, stuffing), packaging, and heat processing of packed sausages (72 °C for 2 h) which rise concerns about the probability of MPs contamination10. Sausages could be an excellent model system for a broader category of processed foods which can provide insights on MPs release relevant to other similar products. In some studies, the effect of temperature in release of MPs from different packaging including food and drink containers11, and take-out food containers12 has been well documented. Although, there is a lack of data concerning about (1) how internal product composition (e.g., meat content and additive profile) influences MPs release, (2) the long-term release under actual food storage conditions, and (3) the MPs risks posed by processed meat products, which undergo extensive mechanical processing and packaging. It should be mentioned that the selection of 70 and 55% sausages were due to the fact that 70% sausage is a common benchmark for many premium or standard meat products. The 55% sausage was selected to represent economic value or highly processed products, which often contain a higher proportion of non-meat ingredients (fillers, binders, extenders) where the potential for MPs contamination from these additives might be higher. Therefore, the present study evaluates the simultaneous influence of formulation (55% and 70% meat content) and extended storage (1 to 180 days) at two standard temperatures (4 and − 18 °C) on MPs release in sausages. The selection of the temperature (4 and − 18 °C) and time (1, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 180 days) was owing to model the realistic and recommended storage conditions for food product to understand the MPs release during storage. Therefore, the current study was aimed to investigate the effect of meat percentage (70% and 55%) and temperature (-18 °C and 4 °C) on MPs release in sausage during 180 days’ storage.
Materials and methods
Chemical and reagents
Analytical-grade potassium hydroxide (KOH) pellets (Merck/Germany, prepared 10% (w/w) KOH aqueous solution), copper adhesive, and Whatman filter paper (0.6 μm pore size) (Cytiva/Germany) were prepared. Also, standard MPs (polycarbonate, polypropylene, and polyamide with size of 45–53 μm) were prepared.
Quality assurance and control
To minimize aerial deposition of fibers, particles, and airborne contamination, all sample preparation steps were performed under a certified laminar flow hood. Also, Researchers wore 100% cotton lab coats, which are known to shed fewer synthetic fibers than polyester blends. To avoid cross-contamination, all solutions (Potassium hydroxide solution 10%, ethanol and distilled water) were filtered through a filter membrane (Whatman filters with a diameter of 0.6 μm). Also, the working surface was cleaned with filtered ethanol and all glassware’s were thoroughly rinsed three times with filtered distilled water before each use13.
Sample preparation
Sausage was prepared with 2% chicken meat (70 and 55%) according to Iran National Standards Organization 230314 (INSO, 1402). The samples were packed in commercial 5-layer polyamide coatings and heated at 75–80 °C for 2 h. The commercial 5-layer polyamide/ Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol/ Polyethylene coatings are multilayer polymer films commonly used for sausage and processed-meat products. They typically consist of alternating layers of polyamide which have high mechanical strength, puncture resistance, and a strong barrier against oxygen.
Additive and sausage sampling
All ingredients used to prepare sausages including water, raw chicken meat, spices and oil were collected for analysis. The additives used in the preparation of the sausages included water, ice, vegetable oil, salt, egg white, wheat flour, starch, sodium polyphosphate, gluten, spices, garlic, nitrite, and ascorbic acid in the amounts specified by the Iran National Standards Organization (INSO, 1402).
Approximately, 20 mL aliquots of the water, 10 mL of the vegetable oil, 5 g of additive, and 5 g of raw chicken meat were gathered in solvent-rinsed amber-glass containers before production, transported on ice to the laboratory and stored at -20 °C until analysis. Sausages samples including before and after packaging (200 ± 5 g of each sausage) was stored at both 4 °C and − 18 °C. Sub-samples (5 g, 3 samples) were aseptically cut and placed in solvent-rinsed glass jars for MPs analysis on days 1, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 180.
Sample analysis for MPs
Sample preparation and filtration
Sub-samples of sausage, chicken, and additives were taken for digestion and filtration. Preliminary experiments (1–20 g) demonstrated ≥ 95% MPs recovery for masses ≥ 5 g; however, 10 g and 20 g yielded viscous solution that obstructed the 0.6 μm filter. Therefore, 5 g was selected as the standard test portion for sausage analysis. To remove organic components, sausage, chicken, and additives samples were mixed with 40 mL of KOH (10%) and kept at 50 °C until the digestion was completed. The complete digestion was confirmed by both visual and chemical endpoints, specifically indicated by a clear and transparent solution, and the absence of visible solid organic matter (ranging from 72 to 96 h). To determine MPs particles in water samples, approximately 20 ml of water was passed through a filtration setup equipped with a vacuum pump, and the sampling was performed in triplicates. The digested samples were filtered using a filtration device connected to a vacuum pump. The filters were placed in a glass plate in an air-free place until they were dried15.
To confirm that the digestion procedure did not compromise the integrity of MPs, positive controls (2.0 × 10³ microspheres mL− 1, 1 ml) spiked with PC, PP, PA polymer (certified reference microspheres 45–53 μm in ultrapure water) was processed in parallel, consistently yielding high recovery rates (> 95%).
Detection of MPs characteristics by optical microscope
The MPs characteristic (color, shape, and size) and numbers were investigated under a microscope at 32× magnification using a 100 µ insulin needle to confirm the nature of MPs16.
Detection of MPs polymer type by confocal raman spectroscopy
To determine the type of MPs, a Confocal Raman Spectroscopy was performed in the range of 400–1800 cm− 1 with a 633 nm laser diode. Also, images of the identified MPs are presented at two magnifications of ×10 and ×5017. For validation of polymer identification, all preprocessed spectra were compared against the Bio-Rad reference library using Lab Spec 6. A match-score threshold of greater than 80% was employed, and only spectra exceeding this criterion were accepted as reliable identifications. Spectra with lower match scores or ambiguous spectral characteristics were excluded from the quantitative analysis.
Scanning Electron Microscopy-Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (SEM-EDX)
Scanning Electron Microscopy-Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) is a technique for imaging a sample and characterizing the surface morphology of the sample. The voltage of 20 kV, the beam current to 1.00 nA, magnification to 500, and exposure time of 30 s was used.
Estimated Daily Intake (EDI)
The Estimated daily intake (EDI) can be used to determine the level of exposure to a pollutant. The daily intake of MPs in humans through the consumption of sausages was calculated by the following formula18.
![]() |
Where IR, BW and C represent the sausage consumption per day (6 kg/year), the body weight (70 kg for adults and 16 kg for children), and the number of MPs in sausage (particles/kg), respectively.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V18. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) and repeated measures tests were employed, with a significance level set at 0.05. Post hoc pairwise comparisons utilized paired-samples t-tests with Bonferroni correction.
Result and discussion
MPs in water
According to Table 1, three transparent fibers in 20 mL water, two 700 μm and one 400 μm in length, were identified as polypropylene by confocal Raman spectroscopy (library match ≥ 80%). The SEM images displayed grooves on the surfaces of MPs which revealed longitudinal scratches, consistent with mechanical abrasion (Figs. 1 and 2). The study of Pironti et al., on drinking water showed 700 MPs particles/L, which 90% were polypropylene and polyethylene fragments ranging from 50 to 150 μm19. Boyakanal et al., reported the presence of MPs in various water sources, predominantly as fibers and fragments composed of ethylene propylene and neoprene which attributed to the extensive use of polypropylene and other plastic polymers in the manufacture of bottles and food packaging20. According to Danopoulos et al.,21, the MPs found in drinking water were composed of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP), with sizes ranging from 1 to 100 μm21. Polypropylene, a frequently detected polymer in water, can be sourced from various origins, including agricultural activities and urban sewage22, industrial purification process23, distribution system, and packaging materials.
Table 1.
The MPs in raw chicken meat, additives, and water used in sausage preparation.
| Samples | Number, shape and size of MPs | Polymer Type |
|---|---|---|
| Raw chicken meat (5 g) | 3 Transparent fiber (200, 300, and 600 μm) | Polypropylene, Polycarbonate |
| 1 black fiber (200 μm) | ||
| Additives (5 g) | 6 transparent fiber (300, 400, 500, 600, 700, and 800 μm) | polypropylene |
| Water (20 ml) | 2 transparent fiber (400 and 700 μm) | polypropylene |
Fig. 1.
Images of selected MPs in sausages under optical microscope. Transparent Fiber (a), Transparent Fiber, 1200 μm (b, e), red fiber, 300 μm (c), black fiber, 700 μm (d), black fiber, 200 μm, (f).
Fig. 2.
Images and Raman Shift of MPs in sausage samples by confocal Raman spectroscopy. Polypropylene (A and B), Polycarbonate (C and D), Polyamide (E and F).
MPs in chicken meat
In the present study, 3 MPs particles were found in 5 g of raw chicken which were 2 transparent and 1 black fibers ranged from 200 to 600 μm (Fig. 1). According to Fig. 2, the MPs polymer types were polypropylene and polycarbonate (Table 1). In Velebit et al., study, the MPs particles in packaged chicken were estimated 1.19 particles/g with majority of fiber shapes5 which is higher than results of the current study. In Bahrani et al., study the MPs were 0.14 and 0.13 particles/g in edible tissues of cattle and sheep, respectively15 which is lower than results of the current study.
Bilal et al., identified MPs in chicken gizzards, predominantly in the 300 to 500 μm size range and exhibiting yellow and red colors. The detected polymer types were polyvinyl chloride (51.2%), low-density polyethylene (30.7%), polystyrene (13.6%), and polypropylene (4.5%), which was attributed to the chickens’ diet24. In Habib et al., study the MPs in fish and chicken ranged from 0.03 ± 0.04 to 1.19 ± 0.72 particles/g in meat in chicken and 0.014 ± 0.024 to 2.6 ± 2.8 particles/g in fish. Also, the polyethylene-based plastic cutting board used for cutting food could be the source of MPs8. In Chen et al., study the polystyrene and polyamide particles were found in the chickens’ small intestine, liver, and skeletal muscles which was related to chicken manure25. The polymers such as polypropylene, polyethylene, and polycarbonate were detected in animal feed (soybean, fish meal, corn meal)26. Also, the food production chain is susceptible to MPs contamination from different sources including contamination of water containers, antibiotics used for medication and feed27, as well as dust contamination of farms28. In addition, food processing introduces additional MPs through abrasion of conveyor belts, machines, worker’s textile fabrics29, and food preparation surfaces such as cutting boards8.
MPs in additives
According to the results, 6 transparent fibers with polymer type of polypropylene, ranged from 300 to 800 μm, were found in 5 g of additives (including salt and spices). In Sharma et al., study, 681 MPs particles/kg showed in 15 different brands of sea salt30 which was lower than the results of the present study. In Binh et al., study, 320 to 1880 MPs were found in salt and spices which were fibers (99%) and fragments (1%) possessing different colors, predominantly red, blue, and black7. The number of MPs particles in salt and spices of Binh et al., research is relatively in the range of the current study. Spices could be contaminated during different drying process31, packaging (polyethylene bags)32, and irradiation (polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene, ethyl vinyl alcohol copolymer-polyethylene release by multilayer packaging)33.
MPs release in sausage during storage
After 180 days’ storage, the MPs were 15.44 ± 0.40, 33.66 ± 0.57, 52 ± 0.49 and 36.66 ± 0.5 MPs/5 g in 70 and 55% sausages stored at -18 and 4 °C, respectively (Tables 2 and 3). The MPs particles in the current study were evaluated higher than the results of Pirsaheb et al., (25.7 ± 21.68 particles/kg) in sausage18 and Akhbarizadeh et al., (tuna and mackere 0.05 ± 0.01 and 0.22 ± 0.02 particles/g, respectively) in canned fish1. The presence of MPs in meat products could be related to release of MPs through packaging of bacon, mortadella, and salami34. Also, the presence of MPs particles in salt-cooked fish was attributed to water and salt used for cooking, fish feeding conditions and the living environment35. In the sausage production process, heat (75–80 °C for 2 h) is applied to packed sausages in polyamide coating which may results in the loosen of plastic coatings chains and release MPs particles into the food12 which is in agreement with the results of the present study.
Table 2.
The MPs in sausage samples (55 and 70%) during 180 days storage at -18 and 4 °C.
| Sausage (5 g) |
Storage Temperature | Storage Time (Day) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before Packaging | 1 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | 180 | ||
| 70% | -18 | 10.45±0.31B, d | 10.45±0.31B, d | 11.61±0.51C, c | 11.61±0.51C, c | 11.66±0.51D, c | 12.66±0.45D, b | 15.44±0.4D, a |
| 4 | 10.45±0.31B, f | 10.45±0.31B, f | 12.66±0.3B, e | 19.33±0.45B, d | 26.51±0.4B, c | 27.45±0.31B, b | 33.66±0.57B, a | |
| 55% | -18 | 18.66±0.52A, e | 18.66±0.52A, e | 20.54±0.51A, d | 21.66±0.51A, c | 21.66±0.57C, c | 25.54±0.51C, b | 27.52±0.49C, a |
| 4 | 18.66±0.52A, d | 18.66±0.52A, d | 21.63±0.57A, c | 21.66±0.53A, c | 29.63±0.61A, b | 30.66±0.57A, b | 36.66±0.50A, a | |
Different Lowercase letters in each row means significant difference (p≤0.05).
Different capital letters in each column means significant difference (p≤0.05).
Table 3.
the number and polymer type of MPs in sausage samples (55 and 70%) during 180 days storage at -18 and 4 °C.
| Sausage (5 g) |
Storage Temperature | Storage Time (Day) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before Packaging | 1 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | 180 | ||
| 70% | -18 | 10 PP, 1 PC | 10 PP, 1 PC | 11 PP, 1 PC | 11 PP, 1 PC | 11 PP, 1 PC | 12 PP, 1 PC | 12 PP, 3 PC, 1 PA |
| 4 | 12 PP, 1 PC | 19 PP, 1 PC | 25 PP, 1 PC, 1 PA | 25 PP, 2 PC, 1 PA | 25 PP, 4 PC, 5 PA | |||
| 55% | -18 | 18 PP, 1 PP | 18 PP, 1 PP | 19 PP, 2 PC | 20 PP, 2 PC | 20 PP, 2 PC | 24 PP, 2 PC | 24 PP, 4 PC |
| 4 | 21 PP, 1 PC | 21 PP, 1 PC | 29 PP, 1 PC | 29 PP, 1 PC, 1 PA | 29 PP, 6 PC, 2 PA | |||
PP: Polypropylene, PC: Polycarbonate, PA: Polyamide.
According to the results, the release of MPs was significantly higher at 4 °C compared to -18 °C (P ≤ 0.05) which could be related to the structural and chemical changes occurred by storage temperature36, which is in agreement with results of Hussain et al.,36, and Hee et al.,11. Also, long time storage can release millions to billions of MPs and nanoplastic (NPs) particles37.
MPs characteristics (size, shape, color)
According to Fig. 1, the variation in MPs size was 50 to 200 μm (19.13%), 300 to 500 μm (48.70%), 500 to 800 μm (26.96%), and 900 to 1500 μm (5.22%). In the study of Akhbarizadeh et al., the size of the fibers (54%), fragments (38%) and films (8%) found in canned fish were in the range of 100 to 8000 μm, 10 to 1100, and 70 to 1000 μm, respectively1. MPs particles are susceptible to breaking down into smaller fragments through processes including crushing, preparation, cooking, and frying. High temperatures, specifically at or above 65 °C, contribute to the destruction of the polymer8, the different extraction and analysis method38, and variation of the shape and size. The limitation of the current study was that data does not capture the potential abundance of smaller particles (< 50 μm) and nanoplastics (< 1 μm).
In the present study, the colors of MPs particles were transparent (76.62%), black (14.78%), red/orange (3.48%), blue (3.48%), and brown (1.74%). In Pirsaheb et al., research, the colors of MPs particles in 7 brands of sausages were white, blue, green, and red18. Studies by Alak et al., on salmon fillets revealed that blue and black MPs were the most abundant2. Similarly, Bilal et al., found yellow and red MPs to be most prevalent in chicken gizzards24. The variation in MPs colors could be related to discoloration by absorbed pollutants39 and different digestion methods40.
MPs particles can be found in various forms such as pellets, fibers, films, and fragments41. According to the results, all MPs particles in sausage samples (70 and 55%) were in the form of fibers which is compatible with result of Pirsaheb et al., research in sausages. The presence of fiber forms may be attributed to textiles, plastic bags and food containers, as well as agricultural mulches and soil amendments18.
Polymer type of MPs
The Raman peaks in the regions of 850 –840 cm-1 and 1375 cm-1 indicate the CH3 vibration groups and symmetric CH vibrations, respectively which belong to polypropylene (Figures A and B). Also, polycarbonate has distinct peaks in the regions of 830 –825 cm and 1600 cm-1, which are associated with stretching vibrations of aromatic rings (Figures C and D). The Raman spectra at the 1650 cm-1 (vibrations associated with the amide C = O stretching), 2900–2950 cm-1 (vibrations associated with the CH2 stretching), and the 1260 cm (C = N stretching) are associated with polyamide which is compatible with the coating of sausage. According to the results, polymers types of polypropylene (74%), polycarbonate (14%), and polyamide (12%) were identified in sausage that contained 70% meat. In other words, the transparent and brown fibers, black, red-orange and blue MPs were polypropylene, polycarbonate, and polyamide, respectively. In the 55% sausage samples, the polymer types were polycarbonate (81.54%), polycarbonate (15.38%), and polyamide (3.08%). According to Fig. 2, all transparent fibers, black fibers, red-orange and blue fibers were polypropylene, polycarbonate, and polyamide, respectively. The MPs particles identified within the sausage samples exhibited characteristics consistent with those detected in both the ingredients employed in sausage manufacturing and the outer coating. In the study conducted by Pirsaheb et al., the presence of polystyrene and polyethylene was confirmed in seven brands of commercially available sausages in Iran market18. The research by Akhbarizadeh et al., indicated polyethylene terephthalate as the predominant MPs in canned fish which was attributed to the fish type, the additives employed, and the production processes (cleaning and canning procedures)1. The polymer types found in canned sardines were polypropylene polymer, which were related to factory production utilities24.
Surface morphology and elemental composition of MPs by SEM-EDX
According to SEM results, some of the MPs have smooth surfaces and some have grooves (Fig. 3). The presence of fractures on the surfaces, indicating polymer erosion, and mechanical degradation42. In the MPs of sausage samples, the structure of MPs particles can be influenced by different stages of processing and preparation, and separation from the coating during storage and cutting18 which resulted in mechanical breakage of larger plastic particles43.
Fig. 3.
Images of the surface morphology and elemental composition of MPs in sausage using SEM-EDX.
According to EDX results, elements such as carbon (C), oxygen (O), potassium (K), sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), silicon (Si), and aluminum (Al) were found in the MPs surface. The surface porosity of MPs enables adsorption of ambient heavy metals and organic pollutants44. The presence of elements such as silicon, chlorine, and calcium could be related to plastic additives or environmental contamination15. Elements such as sodium, potassium, silicon, sulfur, calcium, magnesium, and aluminum originate from various sources including additives used in plastic structure or in sausage production. For instance, sodium and calcium serve as antioxidants in polypropylene and polyethylene45. The detection of potassium was attributed to the chemicals used to sample digestion46.
Estimated Daily Intake (EDI) of MPs
It should be mentioned that there is no definite information regarding to the MPs limits (maximum residue limits) or threshold in different foods. At the end of storage time, the Estimated Daily Intake (EDI) of MPs by consumption of 70% and 55% sausage samples at -18 °C and 4 °C in adults and children were 1.56, 1.43, 2.88, 6.28, 1.17, 1.56, 5.14 and 6.84 particles/kg BW/day (Table 4). In Pirsaheb et al., research the estimated yearly intake of MPs by sausage consumption was 804 and 3517 particles/kg BW/year in adults and children, respectively18. In Bahrani et al., study, the EDI of MPs by consumption of edible tissues of cattle and sheep ranged from 0.001 to 0.192 and 0.0007 to 0.096 particles/kg BW/day in children and adult, respectively15 which was much lower than the results of the current study. In a study of Makhdoumi et al., the EDI of MPs by fish fillet consumption was reported to range from 0.016 to 6.06 particles/kg BW/day47. The variation between EDI of different studies could be related to sausage consumption rate, using plastic coating, quality of packaging materials, type of spices and its contamination rate, storage condition, MPs detection method48.
Table 4.
Estimated Daily Intake (EDI) of MPs (particles/kg BW/day) by sausage consumption in adults and children.
| Sausage (5 g) |
Age group | Storage Temperature | Storage Time (Day) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| before packaging | 1 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | 180 | |||
| 70% | Adult | -18 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.65 |
| +4 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.88 | 1.13 | 1.24 | 1.43 | ||
| Child | -18 | 1.94 | 2.10 | 2.22 | 2.24 | 2.22 | 2.53 | 2.88 | |
| +4 | 1.94 | 2.09 | 2.36 | 3.88 | 4.95 | 5.46 | 6.28 | ||
| 55% | Adult | -18 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 1.11 | 1.17 |
| +4 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.56 | ||
| Child | -18 | 3.61 | 3.77 | 3.9 | 4.04 | 4.12 | 4.85 | 5.14 | |
| +4 | 3.61 | 3.42 | 4.11 | 3.83 | 5.85 | 5.83 | 6.84 | ||
Conclusion
The increasing consumption of sausages and other processed meat products has heightened concerns regarding MPs contamination during production and storage. The current study demonstrates that the raw materials used in sausage formulation including chicken meat, spices, and water contains MPs, primarily polycarbonate and polypropylene. Storage time was significantly associated with elevated MPs counts, indicating additional release from the packaging materials. Notably, sausages containing 55% meat and stored at 4 °C exhibited the highest MPs levels. The polymers identified in sausage samples were polypropylene, polycarbonate, and polyamide which correspond to raw ingredients and the multilayer plastic coatings, supporting the role of packaging as a secondary MPs source during storage. These findings highlight the necessity of routine MPs monitoring in processed foods and emphasize the need for further research into packaging-derived contamination pathways.
Acknowledgements
All authors appreciate the attempts made by Shahid Sadoughi University of medical sciences, Yazd, Iran. This study has ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences (IR.SSU.SPH.REC.1403.063).
Abbreviations
- MPs
Microplastics
- KOH
Potassium hydroxide
- INSO
Iran National Standards Organization
- SEM-EDX
Scanning Electron Microscopy-Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy
- PP
Polypropylene
- PC
Polycarbonate
- PA
Polyamide
- EDI
Estimated daily intake
Author contributions
Conflict of Interest and Authorship Conformation FormPlease check the following as appropriate: Elham Khalili Sadrabad and Hossein Arfaeinia conceived of the presented idea. Zahra Asadi Qajarloo, Hossein Arfaeinia, Maliheh Jahanara, Amin Safaei, Marjan Jafari and Elham Khalili Sadrabad developed the theory and performed the experiments. Zahra Asadi Qajarloo and Arefeh Dehghani-tafti developed the theoretical formalism, performed the analytic calculations and performed the numerical simulation. All authors have participated in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and approval of the final version. o This manuscript has not been submitted to, nor is under review at, another journal or other publishing venue.o We also declare no conflict of interest.Author’s name Zahra Asadi Qajarloo Hossein ArfaeiniaMaliheh JahanaraAmin SafaeiMarjan JafariArefeh Dehghani-taftiElham Khalili SadrabadSincerely Yours, Elham khalili sadrabad.
Funding
The work was supported by Shahid Sadoughi University of medical sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Data availability
Data statementThe datasets used and analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Akhbarizadeh, R. et al. Abundance, composition, and potential intake of microplastics in canned fish. Mar. Pollut. Bull.160, 111633 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alak, G., KöKTURK, M. & Atamanalp, M. Evaluation of different packaging methods and storage temperature on MPs abundance and fillet quality of rainbow trout. J. Hazard. Mater.420, 126573 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dash, A. K., Pradhan, A. & Sukla, L. B. Environmental occurrence and contemporary health issues of micro plastics (Renewable Energy Generation and Value Addition from Environmental Microfiber Pollution Through Advanced Greener Solution. Springer, 2024). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lee, Y., Cho, J., Sohn, J. & Kim, C. Health effects of microplastic exposures: Current issues and perspectives in South Korea. Yonsei Med. J.64, 301 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Velebit, B., Janković, V., Milojević, L., Baltić, T. & Ćirić, J. Overview of microplastics in the meat: Occurrence, detection methods and health effects. Meat Technology64, 36–41 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li, Y. et al. Microplastics in the human body: A comprehensive review of exposure, distribution, migration mechanisms, and toxicity. Sci. Total Environ.946, 174215 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Binh, P. T. X. et al. Preliminary observation of microplastic contamination in some spice-salt samples purchased in Hanoi city. Vietnam J. Food Control5, 207–216 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Habib, R. Z. et al. Microplastic contamination of chicken meat and fish through plastic cutting boards. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health19, 13442 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rosenheck, R. Fast food consumption and increased caloric intake: A systematic review of a trajectory towards weight gain and obesity risk. Obes. Rev.9, 535–547 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bai, F. et al. Understanding the effect of plastic food packaging materials on food flavor: A critical review. Trends Food Sci. Technol.10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104502 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hee, Y. Y., Weston, K. & Suratman, S. The effect of storage conditions and washing on microplastic release from food and drink containers. Food Packag. Shelf Life32, 100826 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hu, J.-L. et al. Analysis of microplastics released from plastic take-out food containers based on thermal properties and morphology study. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Expo. Risk Assess.40, 305–318 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lopes, C., Fernández-González, V., Muniategui-Lorenzo, S., Caetano, M. & Raimundo, J. Improved methodology for microplastic extraction from gastrointestinal tracts of fat fish species. Mar. Pollut. Bull.181, 113911 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.INSO 1402. Iran National Standards Organization.
- 15.Bahrani, F. et al. R. Accumulation of microplastics in edible tissues of livestock (cow and sheep). (2023). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 16.Avio, C. G., Gorbi, S. & Regoli, F. Experimental development of a new protocol for extraction and characterization of microplastics in fish tissues: First observations in commercial species from Adriatic Sea. Mar. Environ. Res.111, 18–26 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Araujo, C. F., Nolasco, M. M., Ribeiro, A. M. & Ribeiro-Claro, P. J. Identification of microplastics using Raman spectroscopy: Latest developments and future prospects. Water Res.142, 426–440 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pirsaheb, M., Nouri, M., Massahi, T., Makhdoumi, P., Baban, N. A & Hossini, H. Microplastics contamination in the most popular brands of Iranian sausages and evaluation of its human exposure. Heliyon, 10. (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Pironti, C. et al. Microplastics in the environment: Intake through the food web, human exposure and toxicological effects. Toxics9, 224 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Buyukunal, S. K., Koluman, A. & Muratoglu, K. Microplastic pollution of drinking water in a metropolis. J. Water Health21, 687–701 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Danopoulos, E., Twiddy, M. & Rotchell, J. M. Microplastic contamination of drinking water: A systematic review. PLoS ONE15, e0236838 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee, J.-Y., Cha, J., Ha, K. & Viaroli, S. Microplastic pollution in groundwater: A systematic review. Environ. Pollut. Bioavailab.36, 2299545 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zahari, I., Östbring, K., Purhagen, J. K. & Rayner, M. Plant-based meat analogues from alternative protein: A systematic literature review. Foods11, 2870 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bilal, M. et al. First report on microplastics quantification in poultry chicken and potential human health risks in Pakistan. Toxics11, 612 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen, J. et al. Microplastic exposure induces muscle growth but reduces meat quality and muscle physiological function in chickens. Sci. Total Environ.882, 163305 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sharma, P. & Vidyarthi, V. K. Impact of microplastic intake via poultry products: Environmental toxicity and human health. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv.14, 100426 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shruti, V. C. & Kutralam-Muniasamy, G. Migration testing of microplastics in plastic food-contact materials: Release, characterization, pollution level, and influencing factors. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.170, 117421 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jiang, B. et al. Health impacts of environmental contamination of micro- and nanoplastics: A review. Environ. Health Prev. Med.25, 29 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Milne, M. H. et al. Exposure of U.S. adults to microplastics from commonly-consumed proteins. Environ. Pollut.343, 123233 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sharma, R. & Kaushik, H. Micro-plastics: An invisible danger to human health. Cgc International Journal Of Contemporary Technology And Research3, 182–186 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bostan, N. et al. Toxicity assessment of microplastic (MPs); a threat to the ecosystem. Environ. Res.234, 116523 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rajathi, A. A., Sundarraj, A. A., Leslie, S. & Shree, M. P. Processing and medicinal uses of cardamom and ginger–a review. J. Pharm. Sci. Res.9, 2117–2122 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kirkin, C., Mitrevski, B., Gunes, G. & Marriott, P. J. Combined effects of gamma-irradiation and modified atmosphere packaging on quality of some spices. Food Chem.154, 255–261 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Katsara, K., Kenanakis, G., Alissandrakis, E. & Papadakis, V. M. Low-density polyethylene migration from food packaging on cured meat products detected by micro-Raman spectroscopy. Microplastics1, 428–439 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gunawan, G., Effendi, H. & Warsiki, E. The socio-economic effect on microplastic pollution of boiled salted fish. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 012015. (2021).
- 36.Hussain, M. A. Food Contamination: Major Challenges of the Future (MDPI, 2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hussain, K. A. et al. Assessing the release of microplastics and nanoplastics from plastic containers and reusable food pouches: Implications for human health. Environ. Sci. Technol.57, 9782–9792 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shruti, V., Perez-Guevara, F., ELIZALDE-MARTíNEZ, I. & Kutralam-Muniasamy, G. First study of its kind on the microplastic contamination of soft drinks, cold tea and energy drinks-future research and environmental considerations. Sci. Total Environ.726, 138580 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dziobak, M. K. et al. First evidence of microplastic inhalation among free-ranging small cetaceans. PLoS ONE19, e0309377 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Xiong, X. et al. Ingestion and egestion of polyethylene microplastics by goldfish (Carassius auratus): Influence of color and morphological features. Heliyon10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03063 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bucci, K., Tulio, M. & Rochman, C. What is known and unknown about the effects of plastic pollution: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Ecol. Appl.30, e02044 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Massahi, T., Sharafi, M., Ahmadi, B., Parnoon, K. & Hossini, H. Microplastic pollution in compost derived from mixed municipal waste in Kermanshah City: Abundance, characteristics, and ecological risk evaluation. Water Air Soil Pollut.235, 545 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mariano, S., Tacconi, S., Fidaleo, M., Rossi, M. & Dini, L. Micro and nanoplastics identification: Classic methods and innovative detection techniques. Front. Toxicol.3, 636640 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kumar, M. et al. Microplastics as pollutants in agricultural soils. Environ. Pollut.265, 114980 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ebere, E. C. & Ngozi, V. E. Microplastics, an emerging concern: A review of analytical techniques for detecting and quantifying microplatics. Analytical methods in environmental chemistry journal2, 13–30 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang, Z.-M., Wagner, J., Ghosal, S., Bedi, G. & Wall, S. SEM/EDS and optical microscopy analyses of microplastics in ocean trawl and fish guts. Sci. Total Environ.603, 616–626 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Makhdoumi, P., Hossini, H. & Pirsaheb, M. A review of microplastic pollution in commercial fish for human consumption. Rev. Environ. Health38, 97–109 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Soudavari, A., Barari, F., Ehsani, E., Bonyadi, Z. & Davoudi, M. Occurrence and health risk assessment of microplastics in beverages and ice packs. Sci. Rep.15, 23584 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data statementThe datasets used and analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.




