ABSTRACT
Tetrahydroserpentine (ThS), an indole alkaloid and α1‑adrenergic receptor blocker, is used for treating hypertension, a condition often linked with diabetic pathophysiology. However, its toxicological profile and safety under hyperglycemic conditions remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the antioxidant activity, subacute toxicity, and effect of ThS under hyperglycemic conditions using in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approaches. In vitro toxicity analysis demonstrated that ThS exhibited dose‐dependent cytotoxicity in both cancerous and noncancerous cells at ≥ 25 µM. It showed moderate antioxidant activity by reducing H2O2‐induced ROS, although its antioxidant effect declined with time. In silico network pharmacology predicted 110 targets involved in metabolic, inflammatory, and proliferative pathways. In vivo subacute toxicity studies in mice showed that oral doses ≥ 5.0 mg/kg/day led to liver and kidney damage, as evidenced by altered hematological, biochemical, and histological parameters. A lower dose (2.5 mg/kg/day) was identified as non‐toxic and used in streptozotocin‐induced hyperglycemic mice. At this dose, ThS did not improve hyperglycemia‐induced liver and kidney damage and, notably, worsened serum SGOT and urea levels. These findings highlight that while ThS possesses limited antioxidant capacity, it can be toxic at higher doses and harmful under hyperglycemic conditions. Further studies are required to ensure its safe therapeutic use in hyperglycemic conditions.
Keywords: Hepatotoxicity, Nephrotoxicity, Network pharmacology, Raubasine, Rauwolfia serpentina
Integrated in vitro, in silico, and in vivo analyses show that tetrahydroserpentine (ThS) exhibits dose‐dependent cytotoxicity and limited, time‐dependent antioxidant activity. Network pharmacology identified 110 protein targets. Subacute dosing (≥5.0 mg/kg/day) caused liver and kidney damage, while a lower dose (2.5 mg/kg/day) failed to improve hyperglycemia and worsened organ injury, indicating potential risk under hyperglycemic conditions.

1. Introduction
Plants are the greatest source of certain types of secondary metabolites, including alkaloids (e.g., caffeine, nicotine), terpenoids (e.g., essential oils, carotenoids), and phenolics (e.g., flavonoids, lignins), having various functions, including defense against herbivores and pathogens, attracting pollinators, and adaptation to environmental stress [1]. Among them, alkaloids (20% of all secondary metabolites) are nitrogen‐containing compounds derived from amino acids and have been well studied for their numerous therapeutic potentials, such as anesthetic, cardioprotective, antioxidant, and anti‐inflammatory activities [2, 3, 4]. Tetrahydroserpentine (ThS) (also known as ajmalicine or raubasine) is one of the indole alkaloids found in Catharanthus roseus and Rauwolfia serpentina. Due to its antihypertensive effect [5, 6], an estimated 3500 kg of ThS is being isolated annually by pharmaceutical companies either from Rauwolfia or Catharanthus spp. [7]. ThS showcases its antihypertensive effect by blocking the α1‑adrenergic receptor [6, 8, 9]. In combination with almitrine, ThS was reported to improve cognitive disorders and cerebral impairments by enhancing arterial oxygen level, cerebral oxygen and glucose uptake, mitochondrial function, redox homeostasis, and by modulating noradrenergic activity [10, 11]. The oxidized form of ThS, serpentine, has been reported to reduce reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and to inhibit NF‐κB activation by interfering with p65 translocation to the nucleus in HABP1‐overexpressing murine fibroblast F111 cells [12]. Furthermore, ThS was reported to induce pyroptosis by inducing oxidative stress in hepatoma H22 cells [13], indicating its potential in anticancer therapy.
Apart from the hypotensive activity, α1‐adrenergic receptor blockers are now being studied for metabolic benefits, including reductions in blood glucose and lipid levels, by improving insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance [14]. This is particularly relevant in hyperglycemic patients, where 80% of Type 1 diabetic patients develop hypertension due to diabetic nephropathy and microalbuminuria. In contrast, Type 2 diabetic patients often develop hypertension even in the absence of kidney disease and are at a higher risk of chronic cardiovascular complications [15]. Apart from this, diabetes is associated with liver damage [16]. A major concern regarding ThS is its ability to inhibit CYP2D6, a key liver enzyme that metabolizes ∼20% of drugs, raising the possibility of significant drug interactions and systemic toxicity [17, 18, 19]. However, the toxicological profile of ThS is not well explored [20]. Only a single study reported that ThS up to 40 mg/kg body weight (BW)‐day oral doses to rats (the strain was not specified) for 24 weeks did not show any sign of intoxication [21]. Considering these facts, the main objective of this study is to investigate the effects of ThS under hyperglycemic conditions, specifically its impact on the liver and kidney, an area that has not been explored.
Taking all of these into account, the present study investigated the antioxidant potential, toxicity, and effects of ThS under hyperglycemic conditions. Antioxidant activity was evaluated in F111 murine fibroblast cells exposed to H2O2, while in vivo toxicity and the effects of ThS in hyperglycemic conditions were evaluated in Swiss albino mice. In addition, in silico network pharmacology approaches were employed to predict its toxicity before in vivo experimentation. This research may help to determine whether ThS should be taken (as a hypotensive agent) in hyperglycemic conditions.
2. Results
2.1. Cytotoxicity Assessment of ThS
Cytotoxicity of ThS was investigated in murine fibroblast (F111), human liver (HepG2 and WRL‐68), and human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells. Results indicated that ThS induced a dose‐dependent cytotoxicity in all cells. Significant cell death was observed at ≥ 50 µM concentration in F111 (Figure 1A), HepG2 (Figure 1B), and HEK293 cells (Figure 1D), whereas it was observed at ≥ 250 µM in WRL‐68 cells (Figure 1C). The IC50 values were found to be 741.37 µM for F111 (Figure S1A), 316.22 µM for HepG2 (Figure S1B), 338.47 µM for WRL‐68 (Figure S1C), and 299.58 µM for HEK293 (Figure S1D). As with ThS ≤ 25 µM, no cytotoxicity was observed in any of the cells. Further in vitro experiments were conducted at this concentration.
FIGURE 1.

Effect of tetrahydroserpentine on cell viability. Bar graphs display changes in cell viability after 24 h exposure to varying concentrations of ThS in (A) F111, (B) HepG2, (C) WRL‐68, and (D) HEK293 cells. VCmax = vehicle control (DMSO) concentration equal to its concentration in the treatment group having maximum selected ThS concentration (750 µM). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001 versus control or between the indicated groups.
2.2. ThS Had In Vitro Antioxidant Capacity
The antioxidant potential of ThS was assessed through two methods. First, its capacity to scavenge radicals was evaluated by reacting with DPPH radicals [22]. ThS exhibited concentration‐dependent DPPH free radical scavenging, with an IC50 value of 720 µM (Figure 2A). As ThS showed the least cytotoxicity in F111 and HepG2 cells, further cellular antioxidant assays were performed in these cells. In F111 cells, 50 and 100 µM H2O2 increased intracellular ROS levels by 2.93‐ and 3.57‐fold, respectively, which was reduced by 1.70‐ and 1.48‐fold (Figure 2B) by 25 µM ThS (2 h pretreatment). Similarly, in HepG2 cells, 50 and 100 µM H2O2 led to an increase in ROS by 1.40‐fold and 2.22‐fold, respectively, while ThS significantly reduced this effect by 1.44‐fold and 2.01‐fold (Figure 2C). These observations indicated that 25 µM ThS exhibited antioxidant activity against H2O2‐induced ROS.
FIGURE 2.

Antioxidant activity and effect of tetrahydroserpentine on H2O2‐induced ROS production and cell death. (A) Bar graph displays the DPPH free radical scavenging capacity of ThS across 100–1000 µM; positive control = Ascorbic acid (Asc. A). (B, C) Detection of ROS levels in (B) F111 cells and (C) HepG2 cells after 2 h of pretreatment with tetrahydroserpentine, followed by treatment with H2O2 for 15 min. (D–F) Cell viability in F111 cells after 2 h of pretreatment with ThS, followed by (D) 3 h, (E) 6 h, and (F) 12 h of treatment with H2O2. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001 versus control or between the indicated groups.
2.3. ThS Reduced H2O2‐Induced Cell Death in F111 Cells
Since ThS exhibited antioxidant activity, its protective effect against H2O2‐induced cytotoxicity was further evaluated in noncancer‐origin F111 cells. No significant change in cell viability was observed across any treatment group at 3 h (Figure 2D). After 6 h, 100 µM H2O2 significantly reduced cell viability to 71.25%, whereas 25 µM ThS pretreatment improved viability to 94% (Figure 2E). At 12 h, H2O2 further decreased cell viability to 37.25%, and ThS partially restored viability to 56% (p < 0.01). Despite this partial protection, cell viability remained significantly lower (p < 0.0001) in the ThS + H2O2‐treated group compared to the control (Figure 2F), indicating that ThS failed to completely prevent H2O2‐induced cytotoxicity during prolonged exposure. Collectively, these findings suggest that although ThS exerts early antioxidant protection, its efficacy diminishes over time under sustained oxidative stress.
2.4. Effect of ThS on H2O2‐Induced Cell Cycle Arrest
H2O2 has been reported to alter the cell cycle progression [23]. Furthermore, we decided to investigate how ThS affects the H2O2‐induced cell cycle arrest. It was observed that H2O2 (100 µM) induced a G2/M and S phase arrest. However, ThS significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the G2/M phase arrest in H2O2‐treated cells but was found to increase (p < 0.05) the percentage of S phase arrest significantly (Figure 3A,B). This indicated that ThS might interfere with the transition from the S phase to the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. N‐acetyl cysteine (NAC) 50 µM, used as a positive control, significantly reduced G2/M arrest but did not alter H2O2‐induced S‐phase arrest.
FIGURE 3.

Effect of tetrahydroserpentine on cell cycle profile of F111 cells exposed to H2O2. (A) Flow cytometry histograms illustrate DNA content variations across cell cycle phases in different treatment groups after 12 h. (B) Statistical analysis demonstrates the significance level of the alterations in the distribution of cell cycle phase and sub‐G0/G1 cell populations. N‐Acetyl cysteine (NAC), 50 µM used as a positive control. Significance is denoted as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001 versus control or between the indicated groups; n = 3.
2.5. Network Pharmacology Revealed the Top Target for ThS
The probable gene targets for ThS were identified using SwissTargetPrediction (swisstargetprediction.ch) and STITCH (stitch.embl.de) databases. A number of total 110 potential targets were predicted by these databases, which were, ADRA2C, ADRA2B, CYP2D10, CYP2D26, CYP2D22, ADRA2A, CYP2D12, CYP2D11, CYP2D9, CYP2D34, BCHE, OPRD1, DRD2, HTR1A, SLC6A1, NPY5R, HCRTR2, HCRTR1, PREP, PDE10A, MAPK14, ACHE, JAK3, HRH4, TNKS, SLC6A9, CTSG, JAK2, TNKS2, P2RX7, WNT3A, CTSL, NOS3, EGFR, GSK3B, GCK, MAOB, SCD1, PDE7A, SLC27A1, DYRK1A, IMPDH2, AKT1, MMP13, BDKRB1, LCK, CES1D, MCL1, FAAH, CSF1R, F2, AURKB, CDK1, MAPK9, LTA4H, MGAT2, TYMS, ADORA2A, AOC3, CDC25B, GSK3A, MDM2, OPRM1, CTSS, HIF1A, FLT1, NAT2, ADORA1, PORCN, TGFBR1, ALK, KCNA3, PIK3CA, NAMPT, HTR4, EPHX2, DHODH, STAT3, DRD1, HSD11B2, mTOR, AR, KDR, TAAR1, ALOX5, DAGLA, PARP1, ABL1, SLC5A2, CA13, MAPK11, CA7, AVPR1A, RAPGEF4, HTR7, ALPL, INSR, ALOX12, PTAFR, ADORA2B, S1PR1, TRHR, TRH‐R2, SCN10A, SHH, SMO, HCAR2, OPRK1, PPARA, TGM2. A protein–protein interaction (PPI) network between these genes was analyzed using the String database (string‐db.org) and visualized by Cytoscape software (Figure 4A). Furthermore, using the CytoHubba plug‐in, top hub proteins were identified in the Cytoscape platform, which were AKT1, STAT3, GSK3B, EGFR, mTOR, HIF1A, MAPK14, PARP1, PIK3CA, and MCL1 (Figure 4B). Furthermore, using the Metascape platform (metascape.org) association analysis was conducted using PaGenBase, TRRUST ontology (criteria‐terms with a p < 0.01, a minimum count of 3, and an enrichment factor > 1.5) and found that genes were liver tissue and mast cell‐associated (Figure 4C); and linked with several transcription factors including SP1, NF‐κB1, NR2F2, and STAT3 (Figure 4D).
FIGURE 4.

Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network and association analysis of tetrahydroserpentine targeted genes (A, B) PPI network shows interactions among (A) all potential protein targets, and (B) hub (key) protein targets of ThS. (C) Gene‐target tissue association analysis (D) ThS target genes‐transcription factor association.
2.6. Function Analysis of the ThS Targeted Genes
All the ThS targeted genes were subjected to functional analysis using the Metascape platform (metascape.org). Enrichment analysis was conducted using GO Biological Processes, KEGG Pathway, Reactome Gene Sets, CORUM, WikiPathways, and PANTHER Pathway. Terms (pathways and processes) meeting certain criteria, including a p value below 0.01, a minimum count of 3, and an enrichment factor greater than 1.5, were collected. These terms were then grouped into clusters based on their similarities in membership. To calculate p values, the cumulative hypergeometric distribution [24] was employed, while q values were determined using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure [24] to correct for multiple testing. Hierarchical clustering of enriched terms was performed using kappa scores [24] as the similarity metric. Sub‐trees with a similarity exceeding 0.3 were considered as clusters. Within each cluster, the most statistically significant term was selected to represent the cluster. The top 20 clusters were as follows: GPCRs non‐odorant, circulatory system process, response to the hormone, positive regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferation, response to organic cyclic compound, positive regulation of phosphorylation, behavior, regulation of secretion, regulation of monoatomic ion transport, phospholipase C‐activating G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathway, regulation of growth, Serotonergic synapse—Mus musculus, regulation of muscle system process, Pathways in cancer—M. musculus, regulation of blood pressure, PD‐L1 expression and PD‐1 checkpoint pathway in cancer—M. musculus, rhythmic process, regulation of body fluid levels, proteoglycans in cancer—M. musculus, multicellular organismal‐level homeostasis. Figure 5A describes the p values along with all of the terms. In addition, a subset of enriched terms (referring to pathways and processes) was meticulously chosen based on specific criteria to enhance our understanding of the relationships between pathways and processes. The best p values were chosen from each of the 20 clusters, ensuring that no cluster contained more than 15 terms and the total number of terms did not surpass 250. Thereafter, these terms were rendered as a network plot where terms with a similarity exceeding 0.3 were connected by edges (Figure 5B).
FIGURE 5.

Analysis of the functionality of tetrahydroserpentine targeted genes using GO biological processes, KEGG pathways, Reactome gene sets, CORUM, WikiPathways, and PANTHER pathways via the Metascape platform. (A) Bar graph illustrates the top 20 clusters of enriched pathways and processes among the genes. (B) Network analysis of the top biological processes and pathways in each of the clusters mentioned in Figure A, with nodes colored by cluster ID, indicating nodes with the same cluster ID are usually in close proximity.
2.7. Subacute Administration of ThS Altered BW and Daily Food and Water Uptake in Mice
Daily BW and food, and water uptake were monitored throughout the experiment. Results revealed an increase in BW percentage (relative to Day 0) in a dose‐dependent manner. Notably, the maximum BW percentage increase was recorded with the 10 mg/kg BW‐day dose (Figure 6B and Figure S1E). In terms of food uptake, the group receiving a 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day dose exhibited an increase in their daily food intake. Conversely, the groups administered with 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day showed a decrease in their daily food consumption (Figure 6C and Figure S1F). Simultaneously, an elevated daily water intake was observed in all ThS doses, with a maximum in the 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day‐dosed group compared to those mice receiving 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day ThS (Figure 6D and Figure S1G). These findings underscore that ThS affected the food and water uptake patterns in mice.
FIGURE 6.

Toxicity assessment of tetrahydroserpentine in mice. (A) The schematic diagram shows the plan of the ThS administration and selected parameters for toxicity assessment. (B) The bar graph shows the change in body weight at the end of the treatment period. (C, D) Line graphs illustrate day‐wise variation in (C) food, and (D) water intake after treatment, relative to the control group (control group's body weight normalized to zero for each day). (E) The bar graph shows variation in fasting blood glucose levels after 14 days of treatment (F). The bar graph shows blood glucose levels in different groups subjected to an oral glucose tolerance test (G). Change in liver and kidney weight, relative to body weight, in control and treated groups. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001 versus control or between the indicated groups; n = 5.
2.8. Higher Dose of ThS Altered Fasting Blood Glucose in Mice
After 14 days of ThS treatment, a significantly elevated blood glucose level was observed in the mice receiving 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day ThS (Figure 6E). Furthermore, the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) revealed that blood glucose levels at this dose were significantly elevated at both 1 and 2 h post‐glucose administration, indicating slower glucose metabolism (Figure 6F).
2.9. Higher Dose of ThS Decreased Liver and Kidney Weight
At 10 mg/kg BW‐day ThS, a significant decrease in the relative liver and kidney weight (%) was observed (Figure 6G). Conversely, no significant changes were observed in the relative spleen, pancreas, and testis weight across any of the administered doses (Figure S1H).
2.10. Hematological Analysis Indicated Blood Parameter Alteration at a Higher ThS Dose
Notable alterations in serum parameters were observed in ThS‐dosed mice compared to the control mice. Specifically, there was a significant decrease in total leukocyte count observed in the 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day group but a significant increase in 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day‐dosed mice. Neutrophil counts, including absolute neutrophil numbers, were significantly elevated in the 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day groups, while lymphocyte percentages were significantly reduced at these doses. A significant decrease in absolute lymphocyte count was also observed in the 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day group. Furthermore, hematocrit % was found notably higher (with a p < 0.05) in the 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day group (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Hematological parameters of control and tetrahydroserpentine (2.5–10.0 mg/kg) orally administered mice.
| Hematological parameters | Control | 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day | 5.0 mg/kg BW‐day | 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 14.67 ± 0.78 | 15.4 ± 0.14 | 15.23 ± .0.38 | 16.13 ± 0.67 |
| Total leucocyte count (cumm) | 5300 ± 600 | 4600 ± 424.26* | 5500 ± 435.89 | 6300 ± 1374.77*** |
| Neutrophil (%) | 11 ± 1 | 20 ± 7.07 | 29 ± 6.56** | 31.67 ± 2.89*** |
| Lymphocytes (%) | 68.33 ± .3.06 | 63.00 ± 9.89 | 58.67 ± 3.21* | 53.33 ± 2.89** |
| Eosinophil (%) | 9.33 ± 0.58 | 8 ± 8.48 | 5.0 ± 3.0 | 6.33 ± 3.21 |
| Monocytes (%) | 11.33 ± 2.31 | 9 ± 8.48 | 7.33 ± 4.62 | 8.67 ± 2.31 |
| Basophils (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| RBC (millions/cumm) | 9.07 ± 0.53 | 9.54 ± 0.13 | 9.5 ± 0.40 | 10.11 ± 0.36 |
| Haematocrit (%) | 48.4 ± 2.87 | 53.5 ± 2.12 | 53.23 ± 1.24 | 54.9 ± 2.34* |
| Mean corpuscular volume (fL) | 53.35 ± 0.96 | 57.07 ± 3.01 | 56.10 ± 2.80 | 54.32 ± 2.07 |
| Mean corpuscular haemoglobin (pg) | 16.17 ± 0.43 | 16.13 ± 0.77 | 16.04 ± 0.33 | 15.96 ± 0.55 |
| Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (g/dL) | 30.31 ± 0.35 | 28.81 ± 1.41 | 28.63 ± 1.17 | 29.39 ± 0.13 |
| Platelet count (103/cumm) | 848 ± 424.43 | 934.5 ± 27.58 | 1131.67 ± 89.54 | 729.33 ± 394.51 |
| Absolute neutrophil/cumm | 581 ± 60.00 | 905 ± 240.42 | 1581.33 ± 283.52*** | 2020 ± 629.52**** |
| Absolute lymphocyte/cumm | 3633.67 ± 567.36 | 2877 ± 188.09* | 3320 ± 186.82 | 3380 ± 872.75 |
| Absolute eosinophil/cumm | 492.67 ± 33.38 | 388 ± 424.26 | 282 ± 178.13 | 374 ± 117.93 |
| Absolute monocyte/cumm | 592.67 ± 64.04 | 432 ± 428.51 | 416.67 ± 274.29 | 526 ± 67.44 |
Note: Statistical significance was assessed utilizing a two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) coupled with Tukey's multiple comparison test.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001 compared to control group (n = 5 mice per group).
2.11. Serum Biochemical Analysis Revealed an Alteration in Liver and Kidney Parameters at Higher ThS Dose
Serum biochemical analysis of liver function parameters revealed increased total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total protein, albumin, and globulin levels in 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day ThS‐dosed groups. In addition, these two groups exhibited a significant increase in urea, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and the BUN:creatinine ratio. Moreover, a significantly higher uric acid level was noted in mice treated with 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day ThS (Table 2). These observations indicated liver and kidney impaired liver and kidney function [25]. Conversely, in the 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day ThS group, only the BUN level was found to be significantly higher, with no significant alteration observed in the BUN:creatinine ratio.
TABLE 2.
Serum parameters of control and tetrahydroserpentine (2.5–10.0 mg/kg) orally administered mice.
| Serum parameters | Control | 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day | 5.0 mg/kg BW‐day | 10 mg/kg BW‐day |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bilirubin total (mg/dL) | 1.07 ± 0.32 | 1.20 ± 0.20 | 5.30 ± 0.70** | 18.0 ± 1.85*** |
| Bilirubin direct (mg/dL) | 0.8 ± 0.36 | 0.70 ± 0.40 | 5.00 ± 0.70** | 16.90 ± 2.26*** |
| Bilirubin indirect (mg/dL) | 0.27 ± 0.07 | 0.5 ± 0.20 | 0.3 | 1.10 ± 0.50 |
| SGOT (U/L) | 147.33 ± 14.66 | 192.0 ± 15.00 | 248.0 ± 36.0*** | 362.00 ± 46.36.00**** |
| SGPT (U/L) | 57.67 ± 12.33 | 57 | 64.5 ± 7.50 | 69.67 ± 5.80 |
| SGOT: SGPT | 2.72 ± 0.50 | 3.37 ± 0.80 | 3.83 ± 0.11 | 5.16 ± 0.24* |
| ALP (U/L) | 74.33 ± 4.26 | 56.00 ± 11.00 | 26.5 ± 6.50** | 41.0 ± 0.60** |
| Total protein (g/dL) | 5.2 ± 0.20 | 5.05 ± 0.15 | 7.65 ± 0.05**** | 11.00**** |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 2.63 ± 0.19 | 2.55 ± 0.05 | 4.30 ± 0.20*** | 6.00**** |
| Globulin (g/dL) | 2.57 ± 0.03 | 2.5 ± 0.10 | 3.35 ± 0.15*** | 5.00**** |
| Albumin: Globulin | 1.02 ± 0.07 | 1.02 ± 0.02 | 1.29 ± 0.12 | 1.2 |
| Urea (mg/dL) | 33.17 ± 5.35 | 48.85 ± 13.91 | 67.41 ± 7.50** | 56.35 ± 2.60** |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.05 | 0.2 | 0.20 ± 0.01 |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 3.4 ± 0.17 | 4.75 ± 0.75 | 4.9 | 6.10 ± 0.70* |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 15.5 ± 2.50 | 27.5 ± 6.50** | 31.50 ± 3.50** | 26.33 ± 1.20** |
| BUN: Creatinine | 85.44 ± 10.44 | 120.0 ± 30.0 | 157.50 ± 17.50*** | 127.42 ± 4.33** |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001 compared to control group (n = 5 mice per group).
2.12. Histomorphology Examination of Liver and Kidney
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of liver sections revealed no significant alteration of morphology in the 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day ThS‐dosed group. However, in the 5.0 mg/kg BW‐day group, a widened sinusoid along with diffuse microvascular degeneration of hepatocytes (yellow arrow) [26] was observed (Figure 7A). In the 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day ThS‐dosed group, degenerated hepatocytes and cytoplasmic vacuolar degeneration (red arrow) were visualized [27, 28]. In terms of kidney morphology, at 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day dose, no significant alterations were observed (Figure 7B). But, at 5.0 mg/kg BW‐day ThS dose, tubular vacuolization (as described by Celikel et al. [29]), acute tubular lesions with loss of brush border (yellow arrow, as described by Vidal et al. [30]), enlarged Bowman's capsules (orange arrow) with degenerated glomeruli (red arrow), and widened urinary space (green arrow) were visualized. In 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day ThS‐dosed mice, degenerated glomeruli (red arrow), degenerated tubular regions (purple arrow, as described by Al‐Sadoon et al. [31]), isometric vacuolization [32] with widened urinary space (green arrow) were observed.
FIGURE 7.

Histological analysis of mice liver and kidney treated with tetrahydroserpentine. (A, B) Images of hematoxylin and eosin stained mice tissue section showing histomorphological characteristics of control and ThS‐treated groups: (A) Liver: CV = central vein, PV = portal vein, BD = bile duct, HA = hepatic artery, S = sinusoid, H = hepatocytes, black arrow = normal morphology, yellow arrow = microvascular degeneration of hepatocytes, green arrow = widened sinusoids, red arrow = degenerated hepatocytes, orange arrow = indistinctive sinusoids; and (B) Kidney: BC = Bowman's capsule, G = glomerulus, PT = proximal convoluted tubule, DT = distal convoluted tubule, PC = peritubular capillary. Black arrow = normal morphology, yellow arrow = severe tubular vacuolation plus tubular brush border damage, red arrow = degenerated glomeruli, orange arrow = enlarged Bowman's capsule, green arrow = widened peritubular capillaries (urinary space), progressive loss of tubular brush (purple arrow).
2.13. Effect of ThS on the Blood Sugar Level and BW in Hyperglycemic Mice
Subacute toxicity assessment revealed that ThS > 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day dose, caused liver and kidney damage. Therefore, considering 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day as a safer dose, we investigated its effect on streptozotocin (STZ)‐induced hyperglycemic mice. The results showed that ThS did not reduce blood glucose in hyperglycemic mice (Figure 8B). Furthermore, ThS did not prevent the decrease in BW observed in STZ‐induced hyperglycemic mice (Figure 8C). These findings demonstrate that 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day of ThS failed to ameliorate both hyperglycemia and associated weight loss in STZ‐induced hyperglycemic mice.
FIGURE 8.

Effect of tetrahydroserpentine on body weight, blood sugar, and liver and kidney function in hyperglycemic mice. (A) The schematic diagram shows the plan of STZ and ThS administration and selected parameters for toxicity assessment. (B) The bar graph shows changes in whole blood glucose after 14 days of treatment. (C) The line graph shows the variation in body weight after STZ and/or ThS treatment. (D–H) Bar graphs show changes in the levels of markers of liver and kidney function: (D) SGOT, (E) SGPT, (F) SGOT to SGPT ratio, (G) ALP, and (H) urea. STZ: streptozotocin, ip: intraperitoneal, ThS: thyro serpentine, HyG: hyperglycemia, SGOT: serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, SGPT: serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase, ALP: alkaline phosphatase. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001 versus control or between the indicated groups; n = 5.
2.14. Effect of ThS on Liver and Kidney Function Parameters in Hyperglycemic Conditions
Liver and kidney function parameters were assessed through serum biochemical analysis. Hyperglycemic mice exhibited significantly elevated levels of serum glucose, SGOT, SGPT, ALP, and urea (Table 3). Furthermore, ThS was found to exacerbate SGOT (Figure 8D) and urea levels (Figure 8H) in hyperglycemic mice. Although it notably decreased SGPT levels (Figure 8E) in hyperglycemic mice, the SGOT:SGPT ratio was considerably higher than that of the hyperglycemic mice (Figure 8F), indicating increased liver damage. However, in hyperglycemic mice, the lack of a significant increase in the SGOT: SGPT ratio might be attributed to the elevation of both enzymes simultaneously. ThS appeared to significantly decrease ALP levels (p < 0.05), although they remained substantially higher compared to the control (p < 0.05) (Figure 8G). Therefore, ThS at 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day dose had no beneficial effects on STZ‐induced hyperglycemic mice, but rather worsened liver and kidney parameters.
TABLE 3.
Serum biochemical analysis comparing the impact of tetrahydroserpentine (2.5 mg/kg BW‐day) on hyperglycemic (STZ‐induced) mice.
| Serum biochemical parameters | Control | ThS 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day | Hyperglycemic mice | Hyperglycemic + ThS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting serum glucose (mg/dL) | 130.3 ± 15.50 | 165.5 ± 30.1 | 477 ± 35.5**** | 413.5 ± 40.5**** |
| Bilirubin total (mg/dL) | 0.70 | 0.85 ± 0.07 | 0.85 ± 0.07 | 0.70 |
| Bilirubin direct (mg/dL) | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.25 ± 0.07 | 0.25 ± 0.71 |
| Bilirubin indirect (mg/dL) | 0.40 | 0.55 ± 0.07 | 0.60 | 0.45 ± 0.07 |
| SGOT (U/L) | 143.5 ± 15.5 | 162.8 ± 40.3 | 270.5 ± 20.4**** | 324.0 ± 25.4**** |
| SGPT (U/L) | 55.0 ± 7.5 | 50 ± 9.55 | 94.5 ± 5.5* | 50 ± 10.25 |
| SGOT: SGPT | 2.6 ± 0.45 | 3.25 ± 0.50 | 2.86 ± 0.85 | 6.48 ± 1.2*** |
| ALP (U/L) | 87.0 ± 5.5 | 81.0 ± 10.3 | 156 ± 15.25*** | 119.0 ± 12.85* |
| Total protein (g/dL) | 5.6 ± 0.28 | 5.5 ± 0.30 | 5.2 ± 0.29 | 4.85 ± 0.70 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 3.5 ± 0.85 | 3.0 ± 0.28 | 2.9 ± 0.28 | 2.45 ± 0.07 |
| Globulin (g/dL) | 2.1 ± 0.56 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.4 |
| Albumin: Globulin | 1.8 ± 0.88 | 1.2 ± 0.011 | 1.26 ± 0.13 | 1.02 ± 0.03 |
| Urea (mg/dL) | 28.8 ± 2.5 | 34.2 ± 0.42 | 38.52 ± 3.32* | 44.944 ± 0.22** |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.15 ± 0.04 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 0.18 |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 4.4 ± 1.77 | 3.7 ± 0.14 | 3.6 | 3.3 ± 0.57 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 15.5 ± 3.53 | 16.0 ± 2.33 | 18.0 | 20 ± 1.41 |
Note: Statistical significance levels are denoted as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001, with comparisons made against the control group (n = 5 mice per group).
2.15. Effect of ThS on Liver and Kidney Morphology of Hyperglycemic Mice
Histomorphological analysis using H&E staining clearly revealed well‐structured hepatocytes, bile ducts, hepatic arteries, and sinusoids in the control group and mice treated only with ThS (2.5 mg/kg BW‐day) (Figure 9A,B). Conversely, degenerated hepatocytes were observed in the liver of both hyperglycemic and ThS‐treated hyperglycemic mice (red arrow, Figure 9C,D). This indicated that ThS did not improve liver damage in the hyperglycemic mice. H&E analysis of kidney sections showed normal kidney histology in the control group and mice administered with ThS (2.5 mg/kg BW‐day) (Figure 10A,B). On the contrary, hyperglycemic mice displayed tubular vacuolation and damaged brush borders in the tubular areas, degenerated glomeruli in enlarged Bowman's capsules, and complete abolition of glomeruli (Figure 10C). ThS‐treated hyperglycemic mice also displayed degenerated glomeruli, tubular vacuolation in both distal and proximal convoluted regions, degenerated brush borders, and widened peritubular capillaries (Figure 10D). This observation suggests that ThS failed to ameliorate kidney damage in hyperglycemic mice.
FIGURE 9.

Effect of tetrahydroserpentine on hyperglycemic mice liver. (A–D) Images of hematoxylin and eosin‐stained liver sections show histomorphological characteristics of control and ThS‐treated groups. CV = central vein, PV = portal vein, BD = bile duct, HA = hepatic artery, S = sinusoid, H = Hepatocytes. Black arrow = normal morphology, red arrow = degenerated hepatocytes. Image magnification 40×, scale bar = 20 µm.
FIGURE 10.

Effect of tetrahydroserpentine on hyperglycemic mice kidney. (A–D) Images of hematoxylin and eosin‐stained kidney sections show histomorphological features of control and ThS‐treated groups. BC Bowman's capsule, G = glomerulus, PT = proximal convoluted tubule, DT = distal convoluted tubule, PC = peritubular capillary. Black arrow = normal and well‐structured morphology, yellow arrow = significant tubular vacuolation, red arrow = degenerated glomeruli, orange arrow = enlarged Bowman's capsule, blue arrow = glomerular abolition, and green arrow = widened peritubular capillaries.
3. Discussion
High blood pressure (hypertension)is linked to a higher chance of death from 17 out of 67 causes, mostly related to heart attacks and strokes [33]. It is closely associated with hyperglycemia, one of the world's most prevalent chronic diseases. According to the WHO, almost 830 million people worldwide are living with diabetes. Diabetes can cause hypertension either through diabetic nephropathy, which impairs kidney function and leads to sodium and fluid retention [34], or by damaging arteries, causing them to narrow and stiffen [35]. Worldwide mortality due to diabetes is associated with the combined effects of both hyperglycemia and hypertension, leading to cardiovascular failure [36]. ThS, an indole alkaloid, is well known for its pharmaceutical benefits for high blood pressure and has been well studied for its antihypertensive effect [5, 37]. Previous studies reported that almitrine–ThS combination treatment raised arterial oxygen partial pressure and hemoglobin oxygen saturation and thus increased oxygen content in arterial blood [10]. This combination is also being used for improving mental condition in elderly people [38]. The reported LD50 (acute) toxicity dose of ThS was 20 mg/kg (iv) and 400–450 mg/kg (oral) in mice, and 750 mg/kg (oral) and 20–26 mg/kg (iv) in rats [21]. While these studies primarily focused on acute toxicity, there is limited information on chronic toxicity. In a single study, it was reported that ThS showed no evidence of chronic toxicity up to 40 mg/kg over a 24‐week period in mice and rats (which strain not specified in either case) [21].
ThS was also reported to strongly inhibit CYP2D6 at a very low concentration of 3.30 nM [17]. CYP2D6 comes under the large family of CYP P450 enzymes responsible for metabolizing both exogenous compounds (such as drugs, toxins, and carcinogens) and endogenous compounds (including hormones and steroids). CYP2D6 metabolizes around 20% of commonly used drugs and is primarily found in the liver but also highly expressed in the central nervous system [18, 39]. Therefore, inhibition of any CYP450 enzymes (including CYP2D6) can result in increased plasma concentrations of the affected drugs, harmful intermediates, and endogenous metabolites, potentially leading to higher systemic exposure, impaired detoxification, and prolonged effect [19, 41]. This indicates that, despite having therapeutic benefits, ThS may have systemic toxicity in the body. Especially under hyperglycemic conditions, where liver and kidney functions may already be compromised, the use of ThS to control hypertension could be detrimental. Considering these facts, the present study aimed to investigate the antioxidant, toxicity, and the potential effects of ThS on hyperglycemic conditions.
At first, the vitro cytosafety assessment of ThS was performed in various mammalian cell types, including F111, HepG2, WRL‐68, and HEK293. ThS beyond 25 µM concentration showed cytotoxicity in all cell types, though at 25 µM ThS showed antioxidant activity against H2O2‐induced intracellular ROS generation. However, its antioxidant activity diminished over time, as 25 µM ThS failed to prevent H2O2 cell death at the later (12 h) time point (Figure 2D–F). H2O2 was reported to induce cell death by inducing oxidative stress [40, 41] and cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 [42] or G2/M [43], or even multifaceted cell cycle arrest in G0/G1, G2/M and S phase simultaneously [23]. Here, ThS was found to marginally reduce this H2O2‐induced G2/M phase arrest but significantly intensified the H2O2‐induced S phase arrest. Therefore, the results suggested that ThS is not a strong antioxidant. Considering its cytotoxicity across both cancer and noncancerous cell types, its toxicity was further analyzed in depth using in silico and in vivo approaches.
From the network pharmacology analysis, it was found that ThS could regulate a total of 110 genes, and among them, AKT1, STAT3, GSK3B, EGFR, mTOR, HIF1A, MAPK14, PARP1, PIK3CA, and MCL1 were the hub genes. This suggests that ThS can influence biological pathways linked to these genes. Specifically, Akt1 supports neuronal survival [44], GSK3B regulates insulin signaling and glycogen metabolism while promoting inflammation via AMPK inhibition [46, 47], and EGFR drives cell growth and proliferation [46]. Hence, it can be inferred that ThS possesses the ability to regulate a broad spectrum of pathways, spanning from cell proliferation to immunity. To gain further insight into the potential outcomes associated with ThS, we conducted a functional analysis and the results indicated that ThS could regulate several pathways, including non‐odorant GPCRs, circulatory system processes, response to hormone, and positive regulation of phosphorylation. Non‐odorant GPCRs regulate diverse physiological functions, including hemostasis, metabolism, and neurotransmission [47], and their dysregulation is associated with various diseases such as liver disease, hepatic steatosis, chronic kidney disease, diabetic nephropathy, lupus nephritis, and liver and renal cell carcinomas. As GPCRs were identified as the most highly regulated pathway by ThS according to functional analysis, close clinical monitoring of ThS's effects is required. ThS was predicted to positively regulate phosphorylation, whose dysregulation is often implicated in a range of chronic diseases, including cancer [49], steatotic liver disease [50], and chronic kidney disease [51]. Also, it was found that ThS could impact behavior and serotonergic synapse that plays an overarching role in various physiological functions, including appetite, body temperature, learning and memory, cognitive control, motor activity, and motor function [52]. Furthermore, association analysis indicated that the primary target tissue for ThS is the liver.
Following this, we conducted in vivo toxicity assessments in Swiss albino male mice, a strain widely used for toxicological evaluation [53, 54, 55], to determine a safe dose for hyperglycemic mice. The recommended adult daily dose of ThS is 20 mg/24 h [37, 56], which corresponds to 4.02 mg/kg BW‐day in mice, calculated using the standard body surface area normalization method [57]. Based on this, in this study, mice were administered with three ThS doses: 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day for 14 consecutive days, covering both lower and higher ranges relative to the mice‐equivalent human recommended dose. It was observed that 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day ThS caused a notable increase in mice's BW and fasting blood glucose, and a reduction in the liver and kidney weight. A decrease in the liver and kidney weight indicated significant alterations in liver and kidney function [58]. Variations in food and water intake were also observed following ThS administration. A slight increase in food intake occurred at 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day, whereas reduced intake was noted at 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day. In contrast, all treated groups showed consistently higher water consumption. These behavioral alterations may be associated with the predicted interaction of ThS with the serotonergic system, as indicated by our in silico analysis. ThS (ajmalicine) has been reported to interact with serotonergic receptors, including 5‐HT1A [59], although its specific functional role at these receptors remains to be clarified. In addition to these behavioral changes, a notable increase in total leukocyte (WBC) count at 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day, together with elevated neutrophil and lymphocyte levels in the 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day groups, indicated a treatment‐related activation of immune or inflammatory responses.
The elevated levels of bilirubin, SGOT, and the SGOT/SGPT ratio in mice treated with 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day suggest ThS‐induced hepatic injury [60]. In contrast, ALP levels were significantly reduced in these groups, indicating altered liver function at higher doses. Although an increase in ALP activity is commonly associated with hepatic dysfunction [60], decreased ALP activity has also been reported in chronic liver disease [61]. The underlying mechanisms remain unclear, but may involve severe malnutrition [61] or secondary drug interactions [62]. Moreover, a reduction in ALP may further aggravate liver damage, as ALP contributes to endotoxin inactivation and hepato‐protection [61]. Further histopathological evaluation of the liver in the 5.0 mg/kg BW‐day group revealed diffuse microvesicular degeneration of hepatocytes and sinusoidal enlargement, indicative of hepatocellular injury and impaired systemic or portal venous flow that may drive chronic liver damage [26, 63]. These structural disruptions reflect early pathological alterations that could progress with continued exposure. Consistently, the more extensive hepatocyte degeneration and indistinct sinusoidal architecture observed in the 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day group indicate a greater severity of injury at higher doses, supporting a dose‐dependent hepatotoxic response to ThS.
In terms of kidney function, the increases in serum urea, BUN, and the BUN/creatinine ratio observed in the 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day groups suggested a decline in renal filtration efficiency and the onset of treatment‐related renal stress. Elevated serum urea is widely recognized as a biomarker of chronic kidney dysfunction [64], with reduced levels reflecting improved pathological status [65]. Similarly, increased BUN is associated with chronic kidney disease progression [66], while a higher BUN/creatinine ratio has been linked to acute tubular injury and impaired renal function [67]. Kidney histopathology further confirmed loss of the tubular brush border and enlarged Bowman's capsules, accompanied by glomerular degeneration in the 5.0 mg/kg BW‐day group, indicating early renal injury [30, 68, 69]. Enlargement of Bowman's capsules is linked to altered filtration dynamics in kidney stress conditions, including obesity‐related nephropathy [70, 71]. In the 10.0 mg/kg BW‐day group, more pronounced tubular degeneration, isometric vacuolization, glomerular damage, and widened peritubular capillaries suggested aggravated renal pathology consistent with acute injury [31, 32, 68, 69]. Collectively, these observations indicate a dose‐dependent hepatotoxic and nephrotoxic effect of ThS at higher doses, whereas 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day appears comparatively safer. Therefore, in this study effect of ThS on hyperglycemic mice was evaluated at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day. However, ThS did not improve hyperglycemia‐related conditions, including elevated blood glucose or loss of BW. Metformin (250 mg/kg BW‐day), used as a reference hypoglycaemic agent, also showed no noticeable improvement in glycemic status in the hyperglycemic mice (data not shown), aligning with previous observations by Oliveira [72]. Analysis of liver and kidney function markers revealed elevated serum glucose, along with significantly increased SGOT, SGPT, ALP, and urea levels in hyperglycemic mice, confirming the onset of hepatic and renal impairment, consistent with previous reports [60, 64]. SGOT:SGPT ratio did not rise markedly due to the concurrent elevation of both enzymes; however, overall biochemical alterations clearly indicated liver dysfunction. Treatment with ThS failed to mitigate these changes. Instead, ThS further increased serum SGOT and urea levels in hyperglycemic mice, suggesting an exacerbation of liver and kidney injury. Despite a reduction in SGPT levels following ThS administration, the SGOT:SGPT ratio remained elevated relative to hyperglycemic controls, signifying no functional improvement. These biochemical findings were corroborated by histomorphological evaluation of liver and kidney tissues, which demonstrated persistent structural damage without evidence of protection or recovery in ThS‐treated hyperglycemic mice. Overall, ThS did not show any protective effect; instead, it appeared to further exacerbate hyperglycemia‐induced liver and kidney dysfunction, as evidenced by additional elevations in SGOT and serum urea levels and the lack of histological recovery. The lack of any beneficial effect of ThS and the appearance of dose‐dependent organ toxicity indicate that ThS offers no therapeutic benefit under hyperglycemic conditions and may, in fact, worsen hepatic and renal outcomes. Therefore, its use under such conditions should be approached with caution, and further mechanistic and safety evaluations are essential.
In summary, this study offers a comprehensive evaluation of ThS by assessing its antioxidant and toxicological profiles in both normal and hyperglycemic conditions using in silico in vitro and in vivo approaches. Recognizing its potential to interfere with the CYP2D6 liver enzyme can be a concern about hepatotoxicity under hyperglycemic stress. While ThS showed moderate in vitro antioxidant activity, the protective effects were limited during prolonged exposure. Although ThS interacted with a broad network of molecular targets, including those linked to metabolism, inflammation, and cell survival, this did not translate into meaningful therapeutic benefit in hyperglycemic mice. Significantly, ThS exhibited dose‐dependent toxicological effects; at higher concentrations, it adversely altered liver and kidney function markers and induced histological damage in these organs. In hyperglycemic mice, ThS failed to improve metabolic dysfunction or organ damage and, in fact, exacerbated elevated liver enzyme levels. These findings highlight ThS as a bioactive compound but one with a narrow safety margin and limited suitability for therapeutic use in chronic metabolic disorders such as diabetes. Further mechanistic investigations and chemical optimizations are therefore essential before ThS can be considered for broader pharmacological applications.
4. Experimental Section
4.1. Chemicals
DMEM (Sigma‐Aldrich‐D7777, D5030), fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco‐10270106), streptomycin–penicillin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 15140122), 3‐(4,5‐dimethyl‐2‐thiazolyl)‐2,5‐diphenyl‐2H‐tetrazolium bromide (SRL chemicals‐33611), 2′,7′‐dichlorofluorescin diacetate (Sigma‐Aldrich‐D6883), DPPH (SRL‐29128), propidium iodide (PI) (Sigma‐Aldrich‐P4170), dimethyl sulfoxide (SRL‐66120), H2O2 (Merck 107209, STZ (Sigma‐Aldrich S0130), ThS or ajmalicine (Sigma‐Aldrich R751618, CID 441975), carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC) (Sigma‐Aldrich C5678), mice feed (Golden Feeds Ltd., India), sucrose solution (Sigma‐Aldrich S5016), formalin (SRL chemicals 15776), hematoxylin (SRL chemicals 28394), and eosin (SRL chemcials 56605)
4.2. Cell Culture Maintenance and Treatment
Mammalian cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37°C under a CO2 (5%) atmosphere according to the standard protocol [73]. Murine fibroblast F111 (RRID: CVCL_6C52) cells were kindly provided by Kasturi Datta, DBT Distinguished Biotechnology Professor at Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India. Human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 (RRID: CVCL_0027), Human embryonic kidney HEK293 (RRID: CVCL_0045), and Human embryonic liver WRL‐68 (RRID: CVCL_0581) cell lines were obtained from the National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India. Murine fibroblast F111 cells were cultured in low‐glucose DMEM, while HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells and human hepatic cells were maintained in high‐glucose DMEM. All media were supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 10 µg/mL streptomycin. Cells were grown up to 80% confluency and then trypsinized with trypsin‐EDTA (trypsin 0.25% + EDTA 0.50 mM in phosphate buffer saline [PBS]) solution and subcultured. All experiments involved treatment at 50%–60% cell confluency. ThS stock solution (prepared in DMSO) was freshly diluted in serum‐free DMEM (SFM) for treatments, and all exposures were performed in SFM with a final DMSO concentration maintained at < 0.03%. In experiments assessing the effect of ThS against H2O2‐induced cellular stress, cells were pretreated with ThS for 2 h before H2O2 exposure. In all experiments, cells were washed with PBS, pH 7.2, before and after treatment and dye addition.
4.3. Maintenance of Animals
Animals were maintained in standard conditions in CLAR‐JNU (Central Laboratory Animal Resources‐Jawaharlal Nehru University). Swiss albino male mice were provided by CLAR‐JNU (Ethical clearance certificate no‐27/2019). Mice were maintained at 23°C–25°C, 50% humidity, and a 12‐h light/dark cycle. Standard feed (purchased from Golden Feeds Ltd.) was provided to the mice. Mice were acclimatized for 14 days before the experiment and were maintained under identical temperature and humidity conditions, housed in the same room and at the same rack height. The number of animals per group (n = 5; total N = 20 across four groups [74]) was determined using the resource‐equation method [75] (calculated DF = 16, which falls within the acceptable range of 10–20).
4.4. Cell Viability Assay
For cell viability assessment, 10 × 103 cells per well were grown in a 96‐well plate for 24 h, followed by treatment with ThS and/or H2O2 in serum‐free DMEM media (SFM). After completion of treatment, cell viability was measured with MTT dye as per the protocol mentioned by Roy et al. [76].
4.5. Intracellular ROS Measurement
Intracellular ROS was measured with H2DCFDA fluorescent dye by fluorimetry. H2O2 was used to induce intracellular ROS in the cells, a reliable and widely used method for triggering oxidative stress in vitro [77, 78]. Briefly, cells at ∼60% confluency were pretreated with ThS and then incubated with 100 µM H2O2 for 10 min. Thereafter, cells were washed twice with 1X PBS (room temperature) and incubated with 10 µM H2DCFDA dye (in SFM) for half an hour. Following, intracellular ROS was measured by fluorometry at λ ex = 488 nm, λ em = 500–550 [76] using a Spectro‐fluorophotometer (RF‐5301PC, Shimadzu). Maximum fluorescence intensities (arbitrary units) were recorded for each sample for further statistical calculation. Fold changes in ROS levels, both increases and reductions, were calculated using the previously described formula [79].
4.6. Cell Cycle Analysis
Cell cycle analysis was done to investigate the alterations in cell cycle progression due to the treatments. At 50% confluency, cells were treated with ThS and/or H2O2 for 12 h. After treatment, cells were harvested and fixed in 70% (v/v) pre‐chilled ethanol to prepare a single‐cell suspension. After fixation, the ethanol solution was discarded and washed twice with precooled 1X PBS buffer. Cells were stained with PI staining buffer containing 50 µg/mL of PI and 40 µg/mL RNAse and incubated in a 37°C water bath for 30 min. Then, PI fluorescence intensity of a minimum of 1 × 104 cells was acquired with a BD FACSVerse flow cytometer. ModFit LT 5.0 software (VSH, USA) was used to analyze the distributions of cells at different cell cycle stages [80].
4.7. In Silico Analysis
Network pharmacology was utilized to predict the toxicology of ThS. For this, gene targets of ThS were identified through SwissTargetPrediction (http://swisstargetprediction.ch/) and STITCH (http://stitch.embl.de/) database [81]. While selecting the target genes, Homo sapiens was chosen as the target organism, and the probability score was set at 0.30. Genes with a probability score of less than 0.30 were excluded from the analysis. A PPI network was constructed using the String 12.0 (https://string‐db.org/) platform, with a threshold score > 0.7 and H. sapiens as the model organism. After that, this was visualized in Cytoscape_v3.10.1, and the key targeted pathways were identified using the CytoHubba v0.1 plugin [82]. Furthermore, the ThS targeted genes were annotated and analyzed using the Metascape tool for functional enrichment analysis [83].
4.8. Subacute Oral Toxicity of ThS
For 15 days, subacute oral toxicity [84], three different doses of ThS 2.5, 5.0, and 10 mg/kg BW‐day were administered orally in Swiss albino male mice (8‐week‐old, weight 25 ± 2.5 g). The treatment groups included: control, ThS at 2.5 mg/kg BW‐day, ThS at 5.0 mg/kg BW‐day, and ThS at 10 mg/kg BW/day, with five animals in each group. ThS solution was prepared freshly by suspending it in 0.5% CMC. Control mice were fed with 0.5% CMC. Treatment was performed every 24 h, and mice were monitored closely for 2 h after every treatment. Daily food and water uptake per group was monitored.
4.9. Induction of Hyperglycemia and ThS Intervention
Hyperglycemic mice were established using STZ administered intraperitoneally (ip) as described in the protocol by Furman [85]. For this study, a total of 20 mice aged 6–8 weeks and weighing approximately 20–24 g were divided into control and treatment groups (five mice per group), with equal average BW in each group. The treatment groups were: ThS (2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg/day), hyperglycemia (HyG), and HyG + ThS (2.5 mg/kg/day). For the generation of hyperglycemia, the mice were fasted overnight (with food but not water) before the administration of STZ. The next morning, STZ was administered at a dose of 50 mg/kg BW ip, and the mice were immediately provided with a 10% sucrose solution instead of water. This treatment was continued for five consecutive days. On the sixth day, the sucrose solution was replaced with regular water. Blood glucose levels were monitored at regular intervals (every 3 days) by Control D Glucometer (Haiden Technology Private Ltd., New Delhi, India). During blood glucose measurement, the blood sample (approximately 10 µL) was collected from the tail vein by a glucometer lancet. After 2 weeks, mice with blood glucose levels exceeding 200 mg/dL were considered hyperglycemic. Thereafter, ThS (2.5 mg/kg/day) was administered to mice for 15 days to check the effect of ThS on hyperglycemic mice.
4.10. OGTT in Mice
OGTT in mice was conducted according to the protocol described by Andrikopoulos et al. [86]. Briefly, mice were fasted (food only) for 6 h, and then 2 g/kg BW of glucose was administered orally. Thereafter, blood glucose level was measured at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min by Control D Glucometer (Haiden Technology Private Ltd.).
4.11. Terminal Blood Collection and Analysis
Terminal blood collection from the mice after the end of the experiment was done according to the protocol as described by Sahagun et al. [87]. Briefly, immediately after the euthanizing of mice by CO2, blood was collected by cardiac puncture. For hematological analysis, blood was collected in an EDTA‐containing vial, whereas for serum analysis, blood was collected in a normal vial and analyzed with an automated blood counter in a standard veterinary laboratory. For serum parameter analysis, blood was kept for 20 min at room temperature and then centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 5 min at 4°C to obtain serum. The serum samples were outsourced to AM Thyrovision Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, for the measurement of glucose, total protein, albumin, ALP, AST, SGPT, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, creatinine, and uric acid.
4.12. Histomorphology Analysis of Mice Tissue
Mice liver and kidney histology were analyzed to investigate tissue morphological changes. Initially, the tissues were fixed in a 10% formalin solution to preserve their cellular architecture and prevent decomposition. Following fixation, the tissues underwent a series of processing steps, including dehydration (removal of water), clearing (replacement of dehydrating agents with a substance like xylene), and infiltration with paraffin wax. Then, tissues were embedded in paraffin wax. Thereafter, thin sections of the tissues, each 50‐µm thick, were meticulously cut using a microtome. These sections were then stained with H&E, a widely used technique where hematoxylin stains cell nuclei blue–purple and eosin stains the cytoplasm and extracellular matrix pink–red, providing a clear contrast between different cellular components. The stained sections were mounted on glass slides with a permanent mounting medium. After that, the tissue sections were analyzed with a microscope equipped with a camera, and images were captured at 10× and 40× magnifications [88].
4.13. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was done using GraphPad Prism 8.0 software. One or two‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test was applied to compare between groups [89]. Statistical significance was denoted as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001 versus control, or between the indicated groups.
Author Contributions
Ashim Chandra Roy: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources, data curation, writing – original draft, review and editing, validation, formal analysis, visualization, software. Komal Priya: methodology, investigation, data curation, validation, formal analysis, visualization, software. Abhinav Prasad: investigation, writing – review and editing, validation, formal analysis, visualization, software. Prabhat Kumar: investigation, validation, formal analysis, software. Ramandeep Sharma: investigation, validation, formal analysis, software. Anuradha Pandey: investigation, validation, formal analysis, software. Ilora Ghosh: conceptualization, resources, writing – review and editing, validation, supervision, project administration.
Consent
The authors have nothing to report.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
Supporting File 1: cbdv70849‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx
Acknowledgments
A.C.R. thanks DBT (Government of India) and K.P. thanks CSIR (Government of India), for providing Senior Research Fellowships. We are thankful to CIF‐SES, and AIRF, JNU for providing the research facilities. IG received funding from DST‐PURSE, and UGC UPE‐II, Government of India via JNU, New Delhi, India. The funding agencies had no role in study design, data acquisition, analysis, the decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.
References
- 1. Kasote D. M., Katyare S. S., Hegde M. V., and Bae H., “Significance of Antioxidant Potential of Plants and Its Relevance to Therapeutic Applications,” International Journal of Biological Sciences 11 (2015): 982–991, 10.7150/ijbs.12096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Heinrich M., Mah J., and Amirkia V., “Alkaloids Used as Medicines: Structural Phytochemistry Meets Biodiversity—An Update and Forward Look,” Molecules 26 (2021): 1836, 10.3390/molecules26071836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sirin S., Nigdelioglu Dolanbay S., and Aslim B., “Role of Plant Derived Alkaloids as Antioxidant Agents for Neurodegenerative Diseases,” Health Sciences Review 6 (2023): 100071, 10.1016/j.hsr.2022.100071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Aryal B., Raut B. K., Bhattarai S., et al., “Potential Therapeutic Applications of Plant‐Derived Alkaloids Against Inflammatory and Neurodegenerative Diseases,” Evidence‐Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2022 (2022): 7299778, 10.1155/2022/7299778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Feng M., Zhao M., Wang Y., Xu S., Wang M., and Zhao C., “ 1H‐NMR Metabonomics Study of the Therapeutic Mechanism of Total Alkaloids and Ajmalicine From Rauvolfia verticillata in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats,” Analytical Methods 6 (2014): 6473–6482, 10.1039/C4AY00851K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Pereira D. M., Ferreres F., Oliveira J. M. A., et al., “Pharmacological Effects of Catharanthus roseus Root Alkaloids in Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition and Cholinergic Neurotransmission,” Phytomedicine 17 (2010): 646–652, 10.1016/j.phymed.2009.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Evans W. C. and Evans D., in Trease Evans' Pharmacognosy (Elsevier, 2009), 353–415. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Roquebert J. and Demichel P., “Inhibition of the α1‐ and α2‐Adrenoceptor‐Mediated Pressor Response in Pithed Rats by Raubasine, Tetrahydroalstonine and Akuammigine,” European Journal of Pharmacology 106 (1984): 203–205, 10.1016/0014-2999(84)90698-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Demichel P., Gomond P., and Roquebert J., “α‐Adrenoceptor Blocking Properties of Raubasine in Pithed Rats,” British Journal of Pharmacology 77 (1982): 449–454, 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1982.tb09317.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Benzi G., “Pharmacological Features of an Almitrine‐Raubasine Combination,” European Neurology 39 (1998): 31–38, 10.1159/000052068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Allain H. and Bentué‐Ferrer D., “Clinical Efficacy of Almitrine‐Raubasine,” European Neurology 39 (1998): 39–44, 10.1159/000052069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Dutta S., Chowdhury A. R., Srivastava S. K., Ghosh I., and Datta K., “Evidence for Serpentine as a Novel Antioxidant by a Redox Sensitive HABP1 Overexpressing Cell Line by Inhibiting Its Nuclear Translocation of NF‐κB,” Free Radical Research 45 (2011): 1279–1288, 10.3109/10715762.2011.610794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sun Z., Ma C., and Zhan X., “Ajmalicine Induces the Pyroptosis of Hepatoma Cells to Exert the Antitumor Effect,” Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology 38, no. 1 (2024), 10.1002/jbt.23614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Li H., Xu T., Li Y., et al., “Role of α1‐Blockers in the Current Management of Hypertension,” Journal of Clinical Hypertension 24 (2022): 1180–1186, 10.1111/jch.14556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Jia G. and Sowers J. R., “Hypertension in Diabetes: An Update of Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Disease,” Hypertension 78 (2021): 1197–1205, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Forbes J. M. and Cooper M. E., “Mechanisms of Diabetic Complications,” Physiological Reviews 93 (2013): 137–188, 10.1152/physrev.00045.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Strobl G. R., von Kruedener S., Stoeckigt J., Guengerich F. P., and Wolff T., “Development of a Pharmacophore for Inhibition of Human Liver Cytochrome P‐450 2D6: Molecular Modeling and Inhibition Studies,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 36 (1993): 1136–1145, 10.1021/jm00061a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wang B., Yang L.‐P., Zhang X.‐Z., Huang S.‐Q., Bartlam M., and Zhou S.‐F., “New Insights Into the Structural Characteristics and Functional Relevance of the Human Cytochrome P450 2D6 Enzyme,” Drug Metabolism Reviews 41 (2009): 573–643, 10.1080/03602530903118729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kumar S., Sharma R., and Roychowdhury A., “Modulation of Cytochrome‐P450 Inhibition (CYP) in Drug Discovery: A Medicinal Chemistry Perspective,” Current Medicinal Chemistry 19 (2012): 3605–3621, 10.2174/092986712801323180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources Added to Food (ANS) . “Scientific Opinion on the Evaluation of the Safety in use of Yohimbe (Pausinystalia yohimbe (K. Schum.) Pierre ex Beille),” EFSA Journal 11, no. 7 (2013): 3302, 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3302. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kronberg G., “Pharmakologie des Rauwolfia‐Alkaloids Raubasin (δ‐Yohimbin‐Ajmalicin),” Naunyn‐Schmiedebergs Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie 233 (1958): 72–97, 10.1007/BF00245787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Das P., Roy A. C., Ghosh I., and Ghosh C., “Variation in Leaf Morphology and Architecture, Phytochemical Content, and Antioxidant Capacity Among 36 Camellia Sinensis Clones of the Indiansub‐Himalayan Region,” Plant Biosystems—An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology 158, no. 5 (2024): 877–893, 10.1080/11263504.2024.2374331. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Barnouin K., Dubuisson M. L., and Child E. S., et al., “H2O2 Induces a Transient Multi‐Phase Cell Cycle Arrest in Mouse Fibroblasts Through Modulating Cyclin D and p21Cip1 Expression,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 277 (2002): 13761–13770, 10.1074/jbc.M111123200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zhou Y., Zhou B., Pache L., et al., “Metascape Provides a Biologist‐Oriented Resource for the Analysis of Systems‐Level Datasets,” Nature Communications 10 (2019): 1523, 10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Afolayan A. J. and Yakubu M. T., “Effect of Bulbine natalensis Baker Stem Extract on the Functional Indices and Histology of the Liver and Kidney of Male Wistar Rats,” Journal of Medicinal Food 12 (2009): 814–820, 10.1089/jmf.2008.0221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Konstantopoulos P., Doulamis I., Tzani A., et al., “Metabolic Effects of Crocus Sativus and Protective Action Against Non‐Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Diabetic Rats,” Biomed Reports (2017), 10.3892/br.2017.884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Badr O., Shirefa E., and Khamis O., “The Curative Role of Curcumin and Flaxseed Extracts in Mice Inoculated with Eac: Biochemical and Histological Study,” Research Journal of Applied Biotechnology 2 (2016): 46–59, 10.21608/rjab.2016.59548. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Alkhatib M. H., Alkreathy H. M., Al Omar M. I., Balamash K. S., Abdu F., and Esmat A., “Doxorubicin Supplemented With Pravastatin in Lipid Nanoemulsion Induces Antineoplastic Activity With Limited Hepatotoxicity and Cardiotoxicity in Tumor‐Bearing Mice,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care 13 (2021): 17–29, 10.18311/ajprhc/2021/26066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Celikel E., Arslan E. D., Yilmaz F., et al. Acta Medica Mediterranea 30 (2014): 1279–1283. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Vidal E., Miorin E., Zucchetta P., et al., “Usefulness of 99mTc‐Dimercaptosuccinic Acid Renal Scan in the Diagnosis and Follow‐Up of Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis in Children,” Clinical Kidney Journal 10 (2017): 655–660, 10.1093/ckj/sfx041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Al‐Sadoon M. K., Abdel Moneim A. E., Diab M. S., and Bauomy A. A., “Hepatic and Renal Tissue Damages Induced by Cerastes Cerastes Gasperetti Crude Venom,” Life Science Journal 10, no. 4 (2013): 191–197. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kiss N. and Hamar P., “Histopathological Evaluation of Contrast‐Induced Acute Kidney Injury Rodent Models,” BioMed Research International 2016 (2016): 3763250, 10.1155/2016/3763250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Aune D., Huang W., Nie J., and Wang Y., “Hypertension and the Risk of All‐Cause and Cause‐Specific Mortality: An Outcome‐Wide Association Study of 67 Causes of Death in the National Health Interview Survey,” BioMed Research International 2021, no. 1 (2021), 10.1155/2021/9376134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Van Buren P. N. and Toto R., “Hypertension in Diabetic Nephropathy: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Management,” Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease 18 (2011): 28–41, 10.1053/j.ackd.2010.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Petrie J. R., Guzik T. J., and Touyz R. M., “Diabetes, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease: Clinical Insights and Vascular Mechanisms,” Canadian Journal of Cardiology 34, no. 5 (2018): 575–584, 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Haile T. G., Mariye T., Tadesse D. B., Gebremeskel G. G., Asefa G. G., and Getachew T., “Prevalence of Hypertension Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” International Health 15 (2023): 235–241, 10.1093/inthealth/ihac060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Li S., Long J., Ma Z., Xu Z., Li J., and Zhang Z., “Assessment of the Therapeutic Activity of a Combination of Almitrine and Raubasine on Functional Rehabilitation Following Ischaemic Stroke,” Current Medical Research and Opinion 20 (2004): 409–415, 10.1185/030079904125003080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Basha M. A., Younes K. M., Mickael H. K., El Aziz F. A., and Salem M. Y., “Development and Validation of Two Chromatographic Methods for the Simultaneous Determination of Raubasine and Almitrine Besmesylate in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form,” Bulletin of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University 51 (2013): 89–94, 10.1016/j.bfopcu.2013.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Wang X., Li J., Dong G., and Yue J., “The Endogenous Substrates of Brain CYP2D,” European Journal of Pharmacology 724 (2014): 211–218, 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Chidawanyika T. and Supattapone S., “Hydrogenperoxide‐Induced Cell Death in Mammalian Cells,” Journal of Cellular Signaling 2, no. 3 (2021): 206, 10.33696/signaling.2.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Villalpando‐Rodriguez G. E. and Gibson S. B., “Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Regulates Different Types of Cell Death by Acting as a Rheostat,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2021 (2021): 9912436, 10.1155/2021/9912436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Zhan G., Long M., Shan K., Xie C., and Yang R., “Antioxidant Effect of Chrysanthemum morifolium (Chuju) Extract on H2O2‐Treated L‐O2 Cells as Revealed by LC/MS‐Based Metabolic Profiling,” Antioxidants 11 (2022): 1068, 10.3390/antiox11061068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Tong Z., Yan H., and Liu W., “Interleukin‐17F Attenuates H2O2‐Induced Cell Cycle Arrest,” Cellular Immunology 287 (2014): 74–77, 10.1016/j.cellimm.2013.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Sahlberg S. H., Mortensen A. C., Haglöf J., et al., “Different Functions of AKT1 and AKT2 in Molecular Pathways, Cell Migration and Metabolism in Colon Cancer Cells,” International Journal of Oncology 50 (2017): 5–14, 10.3892/ijo.2016.3771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Teli D. M. and Gajjar A. K., “Glycogen Synthase Kinase‐3: A Potential Target for Diabetes,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 92 (2023): 117406, 10.1016/j.bmc.2023.117406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Murphrey M. B., Quaim L., and Varacallo M., 2025. [PubMed]
- 47. Komatsu H., Maruyama M., Yao S., et al., “Anatomical Transcriptome of G Protein‐Coupled Receptors Leads to the Identification of a Novel Therapeutic Candidate GPR52 for Psychiatric Disorders,” PLoS One 9 (2014): e90134, 10.1371/journal.pone.0090134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Heng B. C., Aubel D., and Fussenegger M., “An Overview of the Diverse Roles of G‐Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) in the Pathophysiology of Various human Diseases,” Biotechnology Advances 31 (2013): 1676–1694, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Ardito F., Giuliani M., Perrone D., Troiano G., and Muzio L. L., “The Crucial Role of Protein Phosphorylation in Cell Signaling and Its Use as Targeted Therapy (Review),” International Journal of Molecular Medicine 40 (2017): 271–280, 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Lv T., Lou Y., Yan Q., Nie L., Cheng Z., and Zhou X., “Phosphorylation: New Star of Pathogenesis and Treatment in Steatotic Liver Disease,” Lipids Health and Disease 23 (2024): 50, 10.1186/s12944-024-02037-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Nadkarni G. N. and Uribarri J., “Phosphorus and the Kidney: What Is Known and What Is Needed,” Advances in Nutrition 5 (2014): 98–103, 10.3945/an.113.004655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Švob Štrac D., Pivac N., and Mück‐Šeler D., “The Serotonergic System and Cognitive function,” Translational Neuroscience 7, no. 1 (2016): 35–49, 10.1515/tnsci-2016-0007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Brígido H. P. C., Varela E. L. P., and Gomes A. R. Q., et al., “Evaluation of Acute and Subacute Toxicity of Ethanolicextract and Fraction of Alkaloids from Bark of Aspidosperma Nitidum Inmice,” Scientific Reports 11, no. 1 (2021): 18283, 10.1038/s41598-021-97637-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Anifowoshe A. T., Abdulkareem A. O., Opeyemi O. A., et al., “Evaluation of Cytogenotoxic Potential of Morinda Lucida Leaf Extract on Swiss Albino Male Mice Using two Bioassays,” Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology 31, no. 1 (2020), 10.1515/jbcpp-2019-0079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Al‐Majed A. A., Al‐Yahya A. A., Al‐Bekairi A. M., Al‐Shabanah O. A., and Qureshi S., “Reproductive, Cytological and Biochemical Toxicity of Yohimbe in Male Swiss Albino Mice,” Asian Journal of Andrology 8 (2006): 469–476, 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2006.00174.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Sebban C. and Berthaux P. La Presse Medicale 12 (1983): 847–848. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Reagan‐Shaw S., Nihal M., and Ahmad N., “Dose Translation From Animal to Human Studies Revisited,” FASEB Journal 22 (2008): 659–661, 10.1096/fj.07-9574LSF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Lazic S. E., Semenova E., and Williams D. P., “Determining Organ Weight Toxicity With Bayesian Causal Models: Improving on the Analysis of Relative Organ Weights,” Scientific Reports 10 (2020): 6625, 10.1038/s41598-020-63465-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Ellis C. R., Racz R., and Kruhlak N. L., et al., “Evaluating Kratom Alkaloids Using PHASE,” PLoS One 15 (2020): e0229646, 10.1371/journal.pone.0229646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Sharma P., “Value of Liver Function Tests in Cirrhosis,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology 12 (2022): 948–964, 10.1016/j.jceh.2021.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Iluz‐Freundlich D., Grubert Van Iderstine M., Uhanova J., Zhang M., Knowles C., and Minuk G. Y., “Low Serum Alkaline Phosphatase Levels in Patients With Chronic Liver Diseases: Possible Contributions to Disease Pathogenesis,” Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology 45 (2021): 101694, 10.1016/j.clinre.2021.101694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Riancho J. A., “Diagnostic Approach to Patients With Low Serum Alkaline Phosphatase,” Calcified Tissue International 112 (2022): 289–296, 10.1007/s00223-022-01039-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Brunt E. M., Gouw A. S. H., Hubscher S. G., et al., “Pathology of the Liver Sinusoids,” Histopathology 64 (2014): 907–920, 10.1111/his.12364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Vanholder R., Gryp T., and Glorieux G., “Urea and Chronic Kidney Disease: The Comeback of the Century? (in Uraemia Research),” Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 33 (2018): 4–12, 10.1093/ndt/gfx039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Chávez‐Íñiguez J. S., Maggiani‐Aguilera P., González‐Barajas D., et al., “Urea Reduction in Acute Kidney Injury and Mortalityrisk,” Kidney & Blood Pressure Research 48, no. 1 (2023): 357–366, 10.1159/00053023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Seki M., Nakayama M., Sakoh T., et al., “Blood Urea Nitrogen Is Independently Associated With Renal Outcomes in Japanese Patients With Stage 3–5 Chronic Kidney Disease: A Prospective Observational Study,” BMC Nephrology 20 (2019): 115, 10.1186/s12882-019-1306-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Uchino S., Bellomo R., and Goldsmith D., “The Meaning of the Blood Urea Nitrogen/Creatinine Ratio in Acute Kidney Injury,” Clinical Kidney Journal 5 (2012): 187–191, 10.1093/ckj/sfs013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Nauta F. L., Boertien W. E., Bakker S. J. L., et al., “Glomerular and Tubular Damage Markers are Elevated in Patients With Diabetes,” Diabetes Care 34 (2011): 975–981, 10.2337/dc10-1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Couser W., “Pathogenesis of Glomerular Damage in Glomerulonephritis,” Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 13 (1998): 10–15, 10.1093/ndt/13.suppl_1.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Sasaki T., Tsuboi N., Haruhara K., et al., “Bowman Capsule Volume and Related Factors in Adults With Normal Renal Function,” Kidney International Reports 3 (2018): 314–320, 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Henegar J. R., Bigler S. A., Henegar L. K., Tyagi S. C., and Hall J. E., “Functional and Structural Changes in the Kidney in the Early Stages of Obesity,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 12 (2001): 1211–1217, 10.1681/ASN.V1261211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Oliveira W. H., Nunes A. K., França M. E. R., et al., “Effects of Metformin on Inflammation and Short‐Term Memory in Streptozotocin‐Induced Diabetic Mice,” Brain Research 1644 (2016): 149–160, 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Prasad A., Khatua A., Mohanta Y. K., Saravanan M., Meena R., and Ghosh I., “Low‐Dose Exposure to Phytosynthesized Gold Nanoparticles Combined With Glutamine Deprivation Enhances Cell Death in the Cancer Cell Line HeLa via Oxidative Stress‐mediated Mitochondrial Dysfunction and G0/G1 Cell Cycle Arrest,” Nanoscale 14 (2022): 10399–10417, 10.1039/D2NR02150A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Tang J., Zhou Z., Wang G., et al., “Induction and Characterization of Oral Submucous Fibrosis Model With Different Pathological Stages in Rats and Mice,” Scientific Reports 15 (2025): 31128, 10.1038/s41598-025-16715-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Arifin N., Hasbollah H. R., Hanafi M. H., Ibrahim A. H., Wan Abdul Rahman W. A., and Che Aziz R., “Provision of Prosthetic Services Following Lower Limb Amputation in Malaysia,” Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences 24 (2017): 106–111, 10.21315/mjms2017.24.5.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Roy A. C., Prasad A., and Ghosh I., “Phytochemical Profiling of Tupistra nutans Wall. Ex Lindl. Inflorescence Extract and Evaluation of Its Antioxidant Activity and Toxicity in Hepatocarcinoma (HepG2) and Fibroblast (F111) Cells,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 195 (2023): 172–195, 10.1007/s12010-022-04145-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Hu W., Zhang J., Wang H., et al., “Protective Effects of Isorhamnetin Against H2O2‐Induced Oxidative Damage in HaCaT Cells and Comprehensive Analysis of Key Genes,” Scientific Reports 13 (2023): 2498, 10.1038/s41598-023-27575-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Zhang X., Wang L., Lu H., et al., “Preservation of Hydrogen Peroxide‐Induced Oxidative Damage in HepG‐2 Cells by Rice Protein Hydrolysates Pretreated With Electron Beams,” Scientific Reports 10 (2020): 8415, 10.1038/s41598-020-64814-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Roy A. C., Prasad A., Priya K., et al., “Anticancer Effect of Antioxidant‐Rich Methanolic Extract of Rauvolfia serpentina (L.) Benth. Ex Kurz Leaves in HepG2 and HeLa Cells: A Mechanistic Insight,” Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 50 (2023): 102674, 10.1016/j.bcab.2023.102674. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Roy A. C., Singh K., Prasad A., et al., “Enhancing Anticancer Activity of Clerodendrum viscosum Vent. Extracts by Solvent Fractionation: An In Vitro and In Silico Mechanistic Study,” Process Biochemistry 145 (2024): 320–339, 10.1016/j.procbio.2024.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Sun R., Liu C., Liu J., et al., “Integrated Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation to Explore the Mechanisms Underlying Naringenin Treatment of Chronic Wounds,” Scientific Reports 13 (2023): 132, 10.1038/s41598-022-26043-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Priya K., Roy A. C., Prasad A., Kumar P., and Ghosh I., “Naringenin Against Cadmium Toxicity in Fibroblast Cells: An Integrated Network Pharmacology and In Vitro Metabolomics Approach,” Environmental Toxicology 39, no 11 (2024): 5124–5139, 10.1002/tox.24388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Altaie A. M., Venkatachalam T., Samaranayake L. P., Soliman S. S. M., and Hamoudi R., “Comparative Metabolomics Reveals the Microenvironment of Common T‐Helper Cells and Differential Immune Cells Linkedto Unique Periapical Lesions,” Frontiers in Immunology 12 (2021): 707267, 10.3389/fimmu.2021.707267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Roy S., Ukil B., and Lyndem L. M., “Acute and Sub‐Acute Toxicity Studies on the Effect of Senna alata in Swiss Albino Mice,” Cogent Biology 2 (2016): 1272166, 10.1080/23312025.2016.1272166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Furman B. L., “Streptozotocin‐Induced Diabetic Modelsin Mice and Rats,” Current Protocols 1, no. 14 (2021), 10.1002/cpz1.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Andrikopoulos S., Blair A. R., Deluca N., Fam B. C., and Proietto J., “Evaluating the Glucose Tolerance Test in Mice,” American Journal of Physiology‐Endocrinology and Metabolism 295, no. 6 (2008): E1323–E1332, 10.1152/ajpendo.90617.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Sahagun D. A., Lopuszynski J. B., Feldman K. S., Pogodzinski N., and Zahid M., “Toxicity Studies of Cardiac‐Targeting Peptide Reveal a Robust Safety Profile,” Pharmaceutics 16 (2024): 73, 10.3390/pharmaceutics16010073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Kumar M., Kaur P., Chandel M., Singh A. P., Jain A., and Kaur S., “Antioxidant and Hepatoprotective Potential of Lawsonia inermis L. Leaves Against 2‐Acetylaminofluorene Induced Hepatic Damage in Male Wistar Rats,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 17 (2017): 56, 10.1186/s12906-017-1567-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Prasad A., Roy A. C., Priya K., Meena R., and Ghosh I., “Effect of Differential Deprivation of Nutrients on Cellular Proliferation, Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial Function, and Cell Migration in MDA‐MB‐231, HepG2, and HeLa cells,” 3 Biotech 13, no. 10 (2023), 10.1007/s13205-023-03759-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting File 1: cbdv70849‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.
