Skip to main content
Frontiers in Veterinary Science logoLink to Frontiers in Veterinary Science
. 2026 Jul 17;13:1895496. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1895496

Prevalence of equine lungworm (Dictyocaulus arnfieldi) infection and associated risk factors in Egypt

Hattan S Gattan 1,2,*, Mohamed Marzok 3,*, Mohammed H Alruhaili 2,4, Hesham Ismail 5, Adel I Almubarak 3, Abdelfattah Selim 6,*
PMCID: PMC13423701  PMID: 42539482

Abstract

Introduction

Dictyocaulus arnfieldi infection is a common parasitic respiratory disease of equines that can adversely affect animal health, welfare, and productivity. However, epidemiological information on this infection remains limited in many regions of Egypt. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of D. arnfieldi infection and identify associated risk factors among equines in three Egyptian governorates.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 415 equines, including 150 donkeys, 55 mules, and 210 horses. Animals were examined for D. arnfieldi infection, and data on species, age, body condition, and deworming history were collected. Associations between infection and potential risk factors were evaluated using appropriate statistical analyses.

Results

The overall prevalence of D. arnfieldi infection was 41% (170/415). Donkeys had the highest prevalence (51.3%), whereas mules showed the lowest prevalence (20%). Significant associations (p < 0.05) were observed between infection and age, body condition, and deworming history. Equines older than 8 years exhibited the highest prevalence (54.7%), followed by animals with poor body condition (52.4%) and those with no history of deworming (54.6%).

Discussion

The high prevalence of D. arnfieldi, particularly among donkeys, confirms their important role as the primary reservoir host, contributing to sustained transmission among equine populations. These findings highlight the need for targeted parasite control strategies, including routine deworming, improved veterinary care, and better management practices, especially for donkeys, to reduce lungworm infection and improve equine health and productivity.

Keywords: Dictyocaulus arnfieldi, Egypt, equine, prevalence, risk factors

1. Introduction

Donkeys, mules, and horses play important roles as working animals in Egypt, particularly in transportation and agricultural activities. Maintaining their health and productivity is therefore essential. However, parasitic diseases, including lungworm infection caused by Dictyocaulus arnfieldi, can adversely affect respiratory health, welfare, and work performance, highlighting the need for epidemiological studies and effective control measure (1).

Parasitic infections represent a significant cause of morbidity in equines, compromising their health and productivity in many regions of the world (2). A wide range of parasites has been associated with respiratory disorders in these animals, with several studies reporting their clinical and epidemiological importance. The main respiratory manifestations associated with D. arnfieldi infection, such as coughing, nasal discharge, increased respiratory rate, dyspnea, reduced exercise tolerance, and general weakness, particularly in heavily infected animals (3, 4). Among these parasites, species of the genus Dictyocaulus are recognized as the most important contributors to respiratory disease. This is largely attributed to the fact that equines serve as natural reservoirs for the parasite, combined with its widespread and ubiquitous distribution in diverse ecological environments (5–7).

D. arnfieldi is the primary lungworm species affecting equines, including donkeys, horses, ponies, and zebras, and is distributed worldwide (8). Donkeys and their hybrids, such as mules, serve as the natural hosts for this parasite, and infections in horses are most commonly observed when they are kept in close contact with donkeys or mules (9, 10). The adult worms are slender, medium-sized nematodes, typically whitish to grayish in appearance. Morphologically, D. arnfieldi possesses both a digestive and a nervous system; however, it lacks a distinct excretory system (11, 12).

Equines acquire lungworm infection primarily through grazing on contaminated pastures; however, transmission can also occur indoors via infected hay or bedding materials (13, 14). The pathological changes associated with lungworm infection in equines are typically categorized into three phases: prepatent, patent, and post-patent. The severity and manifestation of these pathological effects are influenced by several factors, including the specific location of the parasites within the respiratory tract, the number of infective larvae ingested, and the host’s immune competence. Additionally, the body condition, nutritional status, and age of the animal play crucial roles in determining susceptibility and disease outcome (15, 16).

The prevalence of D. arnfieldi infection in equines varies considerably across different regions, ranging from low to high levels depending on management and environmental conditions. Studies have consistently reported a higher prevalence in donkeys than in horses and mules, as donkeys act as the principal reservoir host and often remain asymptomatic while shedding infective larvae. Several risk factors have been identified, including species, age, body condition, grazing practices, and deworming history. Equines kept under extensive grazing systems, those with poor body condition, older animals, and those lacking regular anthelmintic treatment show significantly higher infection rates. Mixed grazing of horses with donkeys has also been recognized as an important factor facilitating parasite transmission and maintaining infection within equine populations (17, 18).

Despite the large equine population in Egypt, research on equine lungworm remains scarce. Furthermore, potential risk factors such as age, body condition, and sex, and their association with lungworm infection in equines, have not been adequately investigated.

Therefore, the present study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of lungworm infection among equines in three Egyptian governorates and to evaluate the related risk factors contributing to dictyocaulosis in this population.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Ethical statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, and received formal approval (Approval Nr: FVTM02-04-2023) from the committee. Informed consent was obtained from all animal owners prior to the commencement of the experimental procedures, ensuring their understanding and agreement to participate in the study. Furthermore, all procedures were carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

2.2. Study area

The study was carried out between January and December 2023 across three Egyptian governorates: Giza, Kafr El-Sheikh, and Qalyubia (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Map of Egypt highlighting three governorates in northern Egypt: Giza in gray, Kafr Elsheikh in black, and Qalyubia in dark gray, with all other governorates outlined but unshaded. Legend and scale bar included.

MAP showed governorates under the study (MAP generated by QGIS software).

The three governorates under study including Giza, Kafr El Sheikh, and Qalyubia—are located in the northern part of Egypt and share a predominantly subtropical to arid climate. Giza is characterized by hot, dry summers and mild winters with low rainfall, while Kafr El-Sheikh, being part of the Nile Delta, experiences relatively higher humidity and moderate temperatures due to its proximity to the Mediterranean Sea. Qalyubia, situated in the central Nile Delta, has a climate intermediate between the two, with warm summers and mild winters, accompanied by moderate humidity levels. These climatic variations can influence the prevalence of lungworm infection in horses.

2.3. Sampling and sample size

The present investigation was designed as a cross-sectional study, aiming to estimate the prevalence of lungworm infection and assess associated risk factors in equines. A simple random sampling technique was employed to ensure that each individual animal within the study population had an equal chance of being selected, thereby minimizing selection bias and enhancing the representativeness of the sample. The required sample size was determined using the standard formula described by Thrusfield (19). In this calculation, an expected prevalence of 50% was assumed in order to maximize the sample size and achieve the highest precision. The confidence level was set at 95%, and the margin of error was maintained at 5%, ensuring reliable statistical power. Based on this calculation, the minimum sample size required for the current study was estimated to be 384 equines.

2.4. Fecal examination

Fecal samples were obtained directly from the rectum of each animal using sterile gloves to avoid contamination. The samples were then transferred into appropriately labeled vials and immediately transported to the Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University. During sampling in the field, all fecal samples were clearly labeled with the date of sampling, the origin, and the animal species. All fecal samples were processed on the same day of collection to ensure sample integrity. Parasitological examination was carried out using the modified Baermann technique, as described by Foreyt (20). The recovered larvae of Dictyocaulus arnfieldi were identified based on their morphological characteristics, including body length, shape of the anterior end, structure of the esophagus, and tail morphology, in accordance with the available identification keys (21). In addition, the number of larvae per 1 g of faeces (LPG) was determined according to study carried out by Thienpont et al. (46), Kiszely et al. (47) and the level of infection was determined according to Seyoum et al. (22) as none, mild <500 egg per gram (EPG), moderate (500–1,000 EPG) and high (>1,000 EPG).

2.5. Questionnaire

During the sampling process, a structured questionnaire was used to record potential risk factors associated with lungworm infection. Information was collected on several variables, including the locality, sex (male or female), age category, species of the equine (donkey, horse, or mule), body condition score (poor, medium, or good), and deworming history (whether the animal had previously received anthelmintic treatment or not). Assessing Body Condition Score (BCS) in horses involves evaluating fat cover and muscle tone at specific anatomical sites. The most widely used system is the Henneke 9-point scale (23), but simplified 3-category scoring (poor, medium, good). These data were gathered directly from animal owners and were systematically documented for subsequent analysis of their association with lungworm prevalence.

2.6. Data analysis

The collected data were systematically recorded on pre-designed data collection forms and subsequently entered into Microsoft Excel for preliminary organization and cleaning. The primary outcome variable was the detection of lungworm D. arnfieldi larvae during fecal examination, categorized as positive (1) or negative (0). Descriptive statistical analysis were performed to determine the overall prevalence of lungworm infection and to calculate the proportion of infected animals within each equine species.

To further explore potential associations, logistic regression analysis was applied to evaluate the relationship between identified risk factors and the presence of infection. For each variable, odds ratios (ORs) were computed to measure the strength and direction of the association. Statistical significance was assessed at a 95% confidence interval (CI) with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software, version 24 (IBM, USA).

3. Results

Out of a total of 415 examined equines, 170 animals tested positive for lungworm infection, corresponding to an overall prevalence of 41%. When analyzed by species, the prevalence from the positive samples was 51.3% in donkeys, 20% in mules, and 39% in horses. Statistical analysis, however, revealed no significant association between animal species and prevalence of infection (p > 0.05). 82 Out of 210 infected horses, 33 (15.7%) were affected mildly,26 (12.4%) moderately and 22 (10.5%) highly.

The intensity of infection showed a clear relationship with the health status of the examined animals. Higher infection intensities were observed in animals with poor body condition.

With respect to the locality and the sex, no statistically significant differences were observed in the prevalence of lungworm infection. The highest prevalence by locality was recorded in Kafr El-sheikh (45.7%), while by sex, females (42.3%) showed a slightly higher prevalence compared to males (Table 1).

Table 1.

Prevalence of lungworm infection in equine in relation to factors studied.

Variable No of examined animals No of positive % of positive 95% CI Statistic
Locality
Giza 120 51 42.5 34.02–51.44 χ2 = 3.348, df = 2, p = 0.187
Kafr El-Sheikh 140 64 45.7 37.68–53.97
Qalyubia 155 55 35.5 28.38–43.28
Sex
Male 110 41 37.3 28.81–46.59 χ2 = 0.843, df = 1, p = 0.358
Female 305 129 42.3 36.89–47.91
Age
<3 years 143 41 28.7 21.89–36.56 χ2 = 19.811, df = 2, P < 0.0001***
3–8 years 133 53 39.8 31.93–48.34
>8 years 139 76 54.7 46.39–62.72
Species
Mule 55 11 20.0 11.55–32.36 χ2 = 16.983, df = 2, p < 0.0001***
Horse 210 82 39.0 32.7–45.79
Donkey 150 77 51.3 43.4–59.2
Seasons
Winter 125 55 52.4 44.35–60.29 χ2 = 0.850 df = 3 p = 0.838
Spring 130 53 40.8 32.71–49.36
Summer 110 42 38.2 29.65–47.51
Autumn 50 20 40 27.61–53.82
Body condition
Poor 147 77 52.4 44.35–60.29 χ2 = 13.908, df = 2, p = 0.001**
Medium 135 52 38.5 30.74–46.94
Good 133 41 30.8 23.61–39.12
Deworming history
Dewormed 155 28 18.1 12.8–24.86 χ2 = 53.646, df = 2, P < 0.0001***
Non-dewormed 260 142 54.6 48.54–60.56
Total 415 170 41.0 36.33–45.75

*Results are significant if p < 0.05.

The prevalence of lungworm infection was varied seasonally (p = 0.838), with higher infection rates recorded during winter (52.4%), while the lower value were observed during summer season (38.2%).

The prevalence of lungworm infection was significantly associated with age, species, body condition, and deworming history. Higher infection rates were recorded in animals over 8 years of age (54.7%), donkeys (51.3%), animals with poor body condition (52.4%), and those without a history of deworming treatment (54.6%) (Table 1).

The prevalence of lungworm infection was significantly associated with age, species, body condition, and deworming history (Table 1). The highest prevalence was observed in animals older than 8 years (54.7%), followed by donkeys (51.3%), animals with poor body condition (52.4%), and animals with no history of deworming (54.6%). These associations were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

The multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between lungworm infection and several risk factors, including age, species, body condition, and deworming history (p < 0.05). Animals over 8 years of age were more likely to be infected (OR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.57–4.58) compared to those younger than 3 years. Donkeys also showed a significantly higher likelihood of infection (OR = 2.8; 95% CI: 1.24–6.21) compared to other equine species. Similarly, animals with poor body condition were at greater risk (OR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.30–3.86) than those with good body condition. The strongest predictor was deworming history, as non-dewormed animals were substantially more likely to be infected (OR = 4.6; 95% CI: 2.80–7.59) compared to those that had received deworming treatment, Table 2.

Table 2.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis for risk factors related to lungworm infection in equine.

Variables B S.E. OR 95% CI for OR p value
Lower Upper
Age
<3 years Ref.
3–8 years 0.474 0.280 1.6 0.93 2.78 0.091
>8 years 0.984 0.274 2.7 1.57 4.58 0.000
Species
Mule Ref.
Horse 0.572 0.400 1.8 0.81 3.89 0.153
Donkey 1.019 0.412 2.8 1.24 6.21 0.013
Body condition
Good Ref.
Poor 0.809 0.277 2.2 1.30 3.86 0.003
Medium 0.189 0.282 1.2 0.69 2.10 0.503
Deworming history
Dewormed Ref.
Non-dewormed 1.528 0.255 4.6 2.80 7.59 0.000

B, Logistic regression coefficient; SE, Standard error, OR, Odds ratio, 95%CI, Confidence interval.

Table 3 presents the prevalence of lungworm infection according to various risk factors in equines. The findings revealed higher infection rates among older animals and females, with the greatest prevalence observed in individuals with poor body condition across all examined equine species.

Table 3.

Prevalence of lungworm in association with risk factors of equines.

Variables Giza Kafr El-Sheikh Qalyubia Total
Examined Infected (%) Examined Infected (%) Examined Infected (%) Examined Infected (%)
Horse
Age
<3 years 12 2 (16.7) 12 2 (16.7) 12 2 (16.7) 36 6 (16.7)
3–8 years 31 8 (25.8) 27 8 (29.6) 20 8 (40) 78 24(30.8)
>8 years 37 20 (54.1) 31 23 (74.2) 28 20 (71.4) 96 53 (65.6)
Sex
Male 35 9 (25.7) 23 6 (26.1) 17 5 (29.4) 75 20 (26.7)
Female 75 31 (41.3) 43 20 (46.5) 17 11 (64.7) 135 62 (46)
Body condition
Poor 32 18 (56.3) 22 15 (68.2) 19 12 (63.2) 73 45 (61.7)
Medium 25 12 (48) 21 9 (42.8) 18 8 (44.4) 64 28 (43.8)
Good 36 4 (11.1) 24 3 (12.5) 13 2 (15.4) 73 9 (13.3)
Donkey
Age
<3 years 5 2 (40) 8 2 (25) 8 1 (12.5) 21 7 (23.8)
3–8 years 7 6 (85.7) 22 10 (45.5) 26 12 (46.2) 55 28 (51)
>8 years 8 7 (87.5) 31 13 (42) 35 12 (34.3) 74 42 (43.2)
Sex
Male 9 2 (22.2) 14 8 (57.1) 11 5 (45.5) 34 15 (44.1)
Female 17 15 (88.2) 66 28 (42.4) 33 19 (57.6) 116 62 (53.4)
Body condition
Poor 12 8 (66.6) 24 20 (83.3) 12 9 (75) 48 37 (77.1)
Medium 9 7 (77.8) 26 13 (50) 13 9 (69.2) 48 29 (60.4)
Good 11 2 (18.2) 28 6 (21.4) 15 3 (20) 54 11 (20.4)
Mules
Age
<3 years 2 1 (50) 1 0 2 0 5 1 (20)
3–8 years 6 2 (33.3) 3 2 (66.7) 12 1 (8.3) 21 4 (23.8)
>8 years 12 3 (25) 5 3 (60) 12 2 (16.7) 29 6 (27.6)
Sex
Male 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0
Female 1 0 22 4 (18.2) 30 7 (23.3) 53 11 (20.7)
Body condition
Poor 3 1 (33.3) 10 3 (30) 9 2 (22.2) 22 6 (27.3)
Medium 3 1 (33.3) 11 1 (9.1) 9 1 (11.1) 23 3 (13.1)
Good 1 0 3 1 (33.3) 6 1 (16.7) 10 2 (20)

4. Discussion

The overall prevalence of lungworm infection in the present study was 41% (170/415), with the highest prevalence observed in donkeys (51.3%) and the lowest in mules (20%). These findings are considerably higher than those reported in previous studies. For instance, Getahun (24) documented an overall prevalence of 20% in Bale, while Shiferaw (25) reported 23.2% in Wonchi, Ethiopia. Similarly, Feye and Bekele (26) reported 11.2% in southwest Ethiopia, and Negasa et al. (6) observed 20.1% in the Ambo district of the Oromia region, Ethiopia. The discrepancies between these studies and the present findings may be attributed to variations in environmental conditions, sample sizes, timing of sample collection, and management practices, all of which can influence the survival and transmission dynamics of the parasite larvae Tihitna (27).

In the present study, donkeys exhibited a relatively higher overall prevalence of D. arnfieldi infection (51.3%) compared to mules and horses. This finding is consistent with the observations of Legese (28), who reported a prevalence ranging between 30.5 and 32.8% in Dire Dawa and Eastern Ethiopia, as well as with the results of Tihitna Solomon et al. (27), who documented a prevalence of 35.3% in and around Jimma town. The higher infection rate recorded in donkeys can be explained by their role as the primary reservoir host for lungworms, which facilitates continuous transmission of the parasite to other equines sharing the same environment (10). Moreover, this elevated prevalence may also be linked to the comparatively limited veterinary care and management attention given to donkeys despite their heavy workload and significant contribution to transportation and agricultural activities. Such neglect increases their susceptibility to parasitic infections and supports the persistence of lungworm infection within donkey populations (29–31). Moreover, the highest prevalence by locality was recorded in Kafr El-sheikh. The higher humidity and mild temperatures in Kafr El-Sheikh and Qalyubia create favorable conditions for the survival and development of infective larvae on pastures, thereby increasing the risk of infection. In contrast, the drier conditions of Giza may limit larval survival outdoors, but irrigated agricultural areas and shaded animal shelters may still provide microenvironments suitable for transmission. Thus, the interaction between climate, environmental conditions, and equine management practices in these governorates plays a critical role in shaping the epidemiology of lungworm infection (32).

The present study demonstrated that age was a significant determinant in the variation of lungworm infection prevalence among equines (p < 0.0001). The infection rate increased with age, being 28.7% in animals younger than 3 years, 39.8% in those aged between 3 and 8 years, and reaching its highest prevalence of 54.7% in animals older than 8 years. These findings are consistent with the results reported by Tihitna Solomon et al. (27), who observed prevalence rates of 18, 10.98, and 22.95% in young, adult, and old animals, respectively. The higher infection rate in older equines could be attributed to prolonged exposure to infective larvae over time, which increases the likelihood of acquiring and harboring the parasite. On the other hand, younger animals, particularly those under 3 years, may also exhibit heightened susceptibility due to their underdeveloped immune systems and limited acquired resistance (27, 33, 34). This aligns with the observations of Feye and Bekele (26), who highlighted that both older and younger age groups tend to have reduced immunity, making them less capable of effectively combating parasitic infections. Additionally, the role of stress, nutritional status, and management practices may further contribute to this age-related difference in prevalence (35, 36).

Consequently, both younger and older equines are considered more susceptible to lungworm infection, as their immune defenses are comparatively weaker, limiting their ability to effectively combat infections (27, 37).

The prevalence of lungworm infection showed seasonal variation; however, the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.838). The highest infection rate was observed during the winter season (52.4%), whereas the lowest prevalence was recorded during the summer (38.2%). The relatively higher occurrence in winter may be attributed to environmental conditions such as lower temperatures and increased humidity, which can enhance the survival and transmission of infective larvae in the environment. In contrast, the lower prevalence observed during summer may be related to high temperatures and dry conditions that reduce larval survival and development (38, 39).

In the current study, body condition was identified as an important factor influencing the prevalence of lungworm infection in equines. The highest infection rate was observed in animals with poor body condition (52.4%), followed by those with medium (38.5%) and good (30.8%) body condition scores. These findings are in close agreement with the results of Tihitna Solomon et al. (27), who reported prevalence rates of 50, 16.3, and 5.2% in animals with poor, medium, and good body condition, respectively. The higher susceptibility of poorly conditioned horses to lungworm infection is likely attributable to inadequate nutrition, which impairs immune function and diminishes the host’s capacity to mount effective defenses against parasitic invasion and clearance (40, 41).

In contrast, equines with medium or good body condition demonstrated comparatively lower infection rates. This may be attributed to their better nutritional state, which supports a stronger immune response and enhances resistance to infection. Additionally, as suggested by Tolossa and Ashenafi (42), animals in better body condition are more frequently engaged in labor activities such as transport or farm work during daytime. Consequently, they spend fewer hours grazing pastures, which decreases their exposure to infective larvae on contaminated grass.

The deworming history of animals was found to be a significant risk factor influencing the prevalence of D. arnfieldi infection, with statistical analysis showing a highly significant variation (p < 0.0001). A markedly higher prevalence (54.6%) was recorded in equines that had no history of deworming compared to only 18.1% in those that had received anthelmintic treatment. This finding underscores the protective effect of deworming, although the persistence of infection in some treated animals suggests several possible explanations. One reason may be that the commonly used anthelmintics in the area temporarily suppress egg production by adult worms rather than eliminating them completely. Alternatively, resistance of the parasite to the available drugs could be emerging, or the poor quality of some locally used anthelmintic preparations might limit their efficacy (33, 43).

Interestingly, despite the absence of treatment, 46.8% of non-dewormed animals were not infected with lungworms. This could be attributed to the development of acquired immunity following repeated prior exposures, which helps to limit reinfection (7, 44). Another explanation may be the lack of recent contact with infective larvae in their grazing environment. Moreover, at the time of sampling, some animals could have harbored infections that were not yet patent; since the prepatent period of D. arnfieldi is approximately 4 weeks, larvae may have been present in the lungs without egg shedding. In addition, larvae can undergo hypobiosis (dormancy) for up to 5 months under unfavorable conditions, thereby preventing detection during routine fecal examination. Despite providing valuable insights, this study was limited by its relatively small sample size and geographic coverage, which may not fully represent the national epidemiological situation. Additionally, molecular identification of D. arnfieldi was not performed which could have enhanced the diagnostic accuracy and allowed for the detection of subclinical or mixed infections.

This study has certain limitations that should be acknowledged. Morphological and histopathological examinations were not performed, as the primary objective was to investigate the prevalence and associated risk factors of D. arnfieldi infection under field conditions. Consequently, the absence of these analyses limited our ability to correlate parasitological findings with tissue-level pathological alterations. Future studies should incorporate detailed morphological characterization and histopathological evaluation to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the pathological effects of D. arnfieldi infection in equines.

5. Conclusion

The current study demonstrated a notably high prevalence of D. arnfieldi infection (41%) among equines in Egypt, with donkeys exhibiting the highest rate of infection, confirming their crucial role as the main reservoir host for lungworms. The results highlighted that factors such as age, species, body condition, and deworming history significantly influenced infection risk, with older, poorly conditioned, and non-dewormed animals being more vulnerable. These findings emphasize the importance of adopting enhanced management strategies, implementing routine and efficient deworming programs, and providing focused veterinary care—particularly for donkeys—to minimize the impact of lungworm infections and promote better health and productivity in equine populations. Although the observed prevalence may raise concerns regarding the effectiveness of current control measures, the possible roles of anthelmintic resistance or drug quality cannot be determined from the present data and warrant further investigation in future studies.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The project was funded by KAU Endowment (WAQF) at king Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks WAQF and the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) for technical and financial support. The authors would like to acknowledge the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (Proposal number KFU263492).

Footnotes

Edited by: Cecilia Ana Langellotti, National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Argentina

Reviewed by: Sara Mohamed, Assiut University, Egypt

Abdullah Al Bayazid, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The animal studies were approved by Benha University, faculty of veterinary medicine. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s)’ legal guardian/next of kin, for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

HG: Resources, Formal analysis, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation. MM: Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Validation, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Supervision. MA: Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft. HI: Conceptualization, Data curation, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Resources. AA: Visualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Formal analysis, Data curation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Investigation. AS: Software, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Investigation, Visualization, Funding acquisition, Validation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.Elsawy BS, Mahmoud MS, Suarez CE, Alzan HF. Impact of equine and camel piroplasmosis in Egypt: how much do we know about the current situation? Pathogens. (2023) 12:1318. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12111318, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sapakota C. (2009) A Report on Prevalence of Helminthes Parasites in Mules of Brick Kiln.
  • 3.Esch KJ, Petersen CA. Transmission and epidemiology of zoonotic protozoal diseases of companion animals. Clin Microbiol Rev. (2013) 26:58–85. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00067-12, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mulate B. Preliminary study on helminthosis of equines in south and north Wollo zones. J Vet Assoc. (2005) 9:25–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abd Elmohsen M, Selim A, Abd Elmoneim AE. Prevalence and molecular characterization of lumpy skin disease in cattle during period 2016-2017. Benha Vet Med J. (2019) 37:173–6. doi: 10.21608/bvmj.2019.18293.1118 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Negasa T, Dilbato T, Gudeta D. Cross-sectional study on equine lung worm and associated risk factor in ambo district, Oromia region, Ethiopoia. Int J Res Granthaalayah. (2017) 5:312–9. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.802336 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Urquhart G.M. (1996) Veterinary Parasitology 2nd edition, Blackwell Ltd, Oxford, 224–234.
  • 8.Smith BP. Large Animal Internal Medicine-E-Book: Large Animal Internal Medicine-E-Book.Elsevier Health Sciences; (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barrandeguy ME, Carossino M. Infectious diseases in donkeys and mules: an overview and update. J Equine Vet Sci. (2018) 65:98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.02.026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rose R.J., Hodgson D.R. (1993). Equine Veterinary Education, 5:221–221.
  • 11.Bowman D. (1999). Georgis' Parasitology for Veterinarians. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.
  • 12.Mandal S. "Veterinary nematology". In: Textbook of Veterinary Parasitology Springer; (2025). p. 221–384. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Junquera P. "Dictyocaulus species, parasitic lungworms of cattle, sheep, goats and other livestock. Biology, prevention and control. Dictyocaulus filaria, Dictyocaulus viviparus, Dictyocaulus arnfieldi". In: Merck Veterinary Manual. Whitehouse Station: Merck and Co, Inc; (2014). p. 14–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Patel R, Chauhan T, Srivastava S, Mishra P, Jain P. "Parasitism in farm animals". In: Prospects of Fungal Biotechnologies for Livestock Volume 1: Fungal Bioengineering in Livestock Health Management (2025). p. 1–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104915 [DOI]
  • 15.Abera G. Prevalence of Lungworm Infection and Associated Risk Factors among Sheep with Respiratory Signs and Evaluation of Public Intervention for Control and Prevention in North Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia.Haramaya University; (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fraser C.M. (1991). The Merck Veterinary Manual: A Handbook of Diagnosis, Therapy, and Disease Prevention and Control for the Veterinarian.
  • 17.Saadi A, Tavassoli M, Dalir-Naghadeh B, Samiei AJ. A survey of Dictyocaulus arnfieldi (Nematoda) infections in equids in Urmia region, Iran (2018) 64:235–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sazmand A, Bahari A, Papi S, Otranto DJ. Parasitic diseases of equids in Iran (1931–2020): a literature review. Parasit Vectors. (2020) 13:586. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04472-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thrusfield M. Veterinary Epidemiology. Wiley-Blackwell: John Wiley & Sons, 896. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Foreyt WJ. Veterinary Parasitology Reference Manual. John Wiley & Sons; (5th edition), 256. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cameron TW. On the morphology of the adults and the free living larvae of Dictyocaulus arnfieldi, the lung-worm of equines. J Helminthol. (1926) 4:61–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Seyoum Z, Tesfaye M, Derso S. Prevalence, intensity and risk factors of infestation with major gastrointestinal nematodes in equines in and around Shashemane, southern Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. (2015) 47:1515–21. doi: 10.1007/s11250-015-0893-5, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pyrek P, Siwinska N, Zak-Bochenek A. Reproducibility of the body condition score assessment in Silesian horses, using the 9-point BCS scale. Vet Res Commun. (2023) 47:273–8. doi: 10.1007/s11259-022-09916-5, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Getahun F. (1993) Helminths and External Parasites of Equines Species in Bale Administrative Region, Ehiopia.
  • 25.Shiferaw Y. (1993) "Preliminary Survey on Heliminthosis and Management Practice of equine in Wenchi Awraga, Ethiopia. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.802336 [DOI]
  • 26.Feye A, Bekele T. Prevalence of equine lung worm (Dictyocaulus arnfieldi) and its associated risk factors in Jimma town, south West Ethiopia. Adv Life Sci Technol. (2016) 40:26–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Solomon T, Bogale B, Chanie M, Melaku A. Occurrence of lungworm infection in equines and their associated risk factors. Glob Vet. (2012) 8:35–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Legese Y. (1996) Preliminary Survey on Management Aspects and Health problem of Donkey in Dire Dawa and East Oromia, Ethiopia.
  • 29.Selim A, Abdelhady A. Neosporosis among Egyptian camels and its associated risk factors. Trop Anim Health Prod. (2020) 52:3381–5. doi: 10.1007/s11250-020-02370-y, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Selim A, El-Haig M, Galila ES, Gaede W. Direct detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratuberculosis in bovine milk by multiplex real-time PCR. Anim Sci Paper Rep. (2013) 31:291–302. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tesfaye A, Curran MM. A longitudinal survey of market donkeys in Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. (2005) 37:87–100. doi: 10.1007/s11250-005-9010-5, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Selim A, Khater HJCI. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with equine piroplasmosis in North Egypt. Microbiol Dis. (2020) 73:101549. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Abdulkadir K, Ibrahim N, Deneke Y. Prevalence of equine lungworm and associated risk factors in Sudie district, Oromia region, south eastern Ethiopia. Afr J Agric Res. (2017) 12:1526–31. doi: 10.5897/AJAR2016.11683 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Selim A.M., Elhaig M.M., Gaede W. (2014) Development of Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for the Detection of Brucella Spp., Leptospira Spp. and Campylobacter Foetus. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 35.Selim A, Abdelrahman A, Thiéry R, Sidi-Boumedine K. Molecular typing of Coxiella burnetii from sheep in Egypt. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. (2019) 67:101353. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.101353, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Selim A, Attia KA, Alsubki RA, Kimiko I, Sayed-Ahmed MZ. Cross-sectional survey on Mycobacterium avium Subsp. paratuberculosis in dromedary camels: Seroprevalence and risk factors. Acta Trop. (2022) 226:106261. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.106261, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Alshammari A, Gattan HS, Marzok M, Salem M, Al-Jabr OA, Selim AJ. Fasciola hepatica infection in horses in three governorates in northern Egypt: prevalence and risk factors. J Equine Vet Sci. (2023) 130:104915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Alshammari A, Gattan HS, Marzok M, Selim AJSR. Seroprevalence and risk factors for Neospora spp. infection in equine in Egypt. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:20242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47601-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Selim A, Shoulah S, Abdelhady A, Alouffi A, Alraey Y, Al-Salem WSJVS. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with canine leishmaniasis in Egypt. Vet Sci. (2021) 8:236. doi: 10.3390/vetsci8100236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fekete SG, Kellems R. Interrelationship of feeding with immunity and parasitic infection: a review. Vet Med. (2007) 52:131–43. doi: 10.17221/2028-vetmed [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Weatherhead JE, Gazzinelli-Guimaraes P, Knight JM, Fujiwara R, Hotez PJ, Bottazzi ME, et al. Host immunity and inflammation to pulmonary helminth infections. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:594520. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.594520, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tolossa Y, Ashenafi H. Epidemiological study on gastrointestinal helminths of horses in Arsi-bale highlands of Oromiya region, Ethiopia. Ethiop Vet J. (2013) 17:51–62. doi: 10.4314/evj.v17i2.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Selim A, Weir W, Khater HJVW. Prevalence and risk factors associated with tropical theileriosis in Egyptian dairy cattle. Vet World. (2022) 15:919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Radostits OM, Blood DC, Gay CC. (1997). Veterinary Medicine: A Textbook of the Diseases of Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats and Horses. Elsevier.
  • 45.Tihitna Solomon TS, Basaznew Bogale BB, Mersha Chanie MC, Achenef Melaku A.M. Ocuurrence of Lungworm Infection in Equines and their Associated Risk Factors. Global Veterinaria, (2012) 8:35–38.
  • 46.Thienpont D, Rochette F, Vanparljs OFJ. (1986) Diagnosing Helminthiasis by Coprological Examination. Janssen Reseach Foundation, Beerse Belgium. (1986). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kiszely S, Gyurkovszky M, Solymosi N, Farkas R. Survey of lungworm infection of domestic cats in Hungary. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica, (2019) 67:407–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Veterinary Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES