Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2026 Jun 12;17:7612. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-74127-4

Retrograde mitochondrial transport is required for mitochondrial biogenesis in zebrafish neurons

Angelica E Lang 1,2, Chris Stein 1, Roger Schultz 1,3, Catherine M Drerup 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC13424364  PMID: 42285932

Abstract

To maintain a functional mitochondrial population in a long-lived cell like a neuron, mitochondria must be continuously replenished through the process of mitochondrial biogenesis. Because most mitochondrial proteins are nuclear encoded, mitochondrial biogenesis requires communication between mitochondria and the nucleus. This can be a challenge in a large, compartmentalized cell like a neuron in which a significant portion of the mitochondrial population is in neuronal compartments far from the nucleus. Using in vivo assessments of mitochondrial biogenesis in zebrafish neurons, we determined that mitochondrial transport between distal axonal compartments and the cell body is required for sustained mitochondrial biogenesis. Estrogen-related receptor transcriptional activation links transport with nuclear expression of mitochondrial genes. Together, our data support a role for retrograde feedback between axonal mitochondria and the nucleus for regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis in neurons.

Subject terms: Cellular neuroscience, Mitochondria, Transcription


Lang et al. use larval zebrafish neurons to show that the axonal retrograde transport of mitochondria is required to activate mitochondrial biogenesis through NAD + /Sirt1/Estrogen-related receptor mediated nuclear transcription of mitochondrial genes.

Introduction

Mitochondria are critical for neuronal function and survival. These organelles have many essential roles, including the production of ATP, calcium buffering, and the production of metabolites that can function as signaling molecules1. For a neuron to maintain a functional mitochondrial population, mitochondria must be replenished through the process of mitochondrial biogenesis2. In other cell types, such as myocytes and adipocytes, indicators of mitochondrial health and function like AMP/ATP and NAD + /NADH ratios, as well as calcium signaling stimulate the transcriptional control of mitochondrial biogenesis in the nucleus36. These upstream signals can activate transcriptional regulators like the PGC-1 (Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator 1) family of transcriptional coactivators7. PGC-1α, considered the master regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis, can be activated by phosphorylation or de-acetylation by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) or Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), respectively3,4,6. AMPK activity is stimulated by increases in the AMP/ATP ratio, while SIRT1 activity depends on local NAD+ levels. Once activated, PGC-1α can induce the expression of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial proteins through the activation of transcription factors like the nuclear respiratory factors (NRF1/2) or the estrogen-related receptors (ERRα/β/γ)710. How neurons, with mitochondrial populations spread throughout dendritic and axonal arbors, oftentimes large distances from the nucleus, sense mitochondrial health and function to activate these transcriptional pathways is an open and critical question2.

Mitochondrial biogenesis requires the division and expansion of existing organelles to increase mitochondrial mass. This requires the coordination of several cellular processes. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) must be replicated and the mtDNA nucleoids segregated, after which mitochondrial fission occurs at or near the middle of the organelle11,12. Daughter mitochondria are expanded through transcription, translation, and mitochondrial import of nuclear encoded gene products as well as cellular and mitochondrial derived lipids2,13. Mitochondria also synthesize proteins encoded by mtDNA (thirteen in vertebrates) in the mitochondrial matrix. Given the dependence on coordinated mitochondrial and nuclear gene expression, it is unsurprising that a substantial amount of mitochondrial biogenesis occurs in the perinuclear region in non-neuronal cells14,15. In neurons, evidence of mitochondrial biogenesis, including mtDNA replication and synthesis of mitochondrial proteins, has been observed in both the neuronal cell body and in axons of chick, rat, and drosophila13,1619. Local mitochondrial biogenesis is thought to support short-term, local changes in energy need at the synapse16,19,20. The respective contributions of cell body-based versus local mitochondrial biogenesis for support of synaptic mitochondrial populations are still a subject of investigation. For both, however, nuclear expression of mitochondrial genes would be required to produce the >1000 proteins necessary for functional organelles.

Mitochondria are actively transported between the cell body and axon terminal by microtubule-based transport. In neuronal axons, kinesin motor proteins are responsible for axon terminal directed (anterograde) mitochondrial transport, while the Cytoplasmic dynein motor transports mitochondria from the periphery back to the cell body (retrograde)2124. A complement of proteins, including Trak1/2 and Miro1/2, have been shown to scaffold mitochondria to these motors for transport2531. Disrupting mitochondrial transport into the axon impairs axon development and regeneration after injury3234. Inhibition of retrograde mitochondrial transport from neurites back to the cell body causes mitochondrial accumulation in axonal and dendritic processes and impaired mitochondrial health at the synapse3537. However, the role of retrograde mitochondrial transport in mitochondrial population maintenance in neurons remained undefined.

We hypothesized that transport of mitochondria from distal regions of the neuron to the cell body could link mitochondrial population surveillance and regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis frequency in neurons. Using zebrafish neurons, we show that reducing mitochondrial retrograde transport from the axon terminal back to the cell body reduces markers of mitochondrial biogenesis, including mtDNA replication, nuclear transcription of mitochondrial genes, and the production of mitochondrial biomass in the cell body. mtDNA replication is also reduced in the axon terminal, suggesting both local and cell body-based mitochondrial biogenesis may be disrupted. Analysis of mitochondrial turnover at the synapse revealed that reduced mitochondrial biogenesis correlates with reductions in cell body-derived mitochondrial material transported to the axon terminal. Widespread disruption to mitochondrial gene expression in neurons lacking mitochondrial retrograde transport suggests that transport plays an important role in the regulation of transcriptional programs necessary for mitochondrial biogenesis. We present evidence that this crosstalk is mediated by NAD + /SIRT1-mediated deacetylation of estrogen-related receptors (ERR), which regulates ERR-dependent transcriptional activity. Together, our work supports a model in which the retrograde transport of mitochondria is a powerful signaling mechanism to regulate mitochondrial biogenesis in neurons.

Results

Inhibiting mitochondrial retrograde transport disrupts markers of mitochondrial biogenesis in neuronal cell bodies

We used larval zebrafish posterior lateral line (pLL) sensory neurons to study the dynamics of mitochondrial biogenesis in vivo. The pLL system is composed of afferent neurons and sensory organs called neuromasts situated along the trunk38. The cell bodies of pLL neurons are clustered in a ganglion (pLLg) near the head while the afferent axons extend down the body and branch into axon terminals that innervate neuromasts (Fig. 1a). Axon extension and synapse formation occurs by 4 days post fertilization (dpf;39), allowing us to use this system to study mitochondrial populations in a fully formed neuronal circuit in the translucent zebrafish larva.

Fig. 1. Mitochondrial cell body density and biogenesis markers are reduced in actr10 mutants.

Fig. 1

a 4 dpf zebrafish transgenic larva carrying the TgBAC(neurod:egfp)nl1 transgene, which labels neurons with eGFP. The posterior lateral line ganglion (pLLg) and a pLL axon terminal are boxed and magnified. b 4 dpf pLLg cell body and pLL axon terminal expressing cytosolic eGFP and mitochondria-localized TagRFP (MitoTagRFP, magenta) in wild type and actr10 mutants. c Quantification of mitochondrial density (mitochondrial area/cytosolic area; ANOVAs). d HCR RNA FISH labeling of pgc1a and tfam mRNA in the pLLg of wild type and actr10 mutants carrying the TgBAC(neurod:egfp)nl1 transgene (white outline). e pLLg mean fluorescence intensity of pgc1a and tfam normalized to background (ANOVAs) in wild type, actr10, nudc, p150, and wild type/actr10 larvae expressing Actr10 in neurons (+rescue). f pLL cell body (outlined) expressing POLG2-eGFP and mitoTagRFP (Mito, Magenta). h SSBP1 immunostaining in pLL cell body mitochondria, visualized with mitochondria-localized eGFP (Mito, magenta; cell outlined). g, i Number of POLG2 or SSBP1 puncta normalized to mitochondrial volume (Wilcoxon). Scale bars: a full larva = 200 μm, insets = 10 μm; b, f, h = 5 μm; d = 10 μm. All data are mean ± SEM, and points represent individual larvae. Sample sizes: c Cell body n = 14 WT, 13 actr10; Terminal n = 12 WT, 10 actr10; e pgc1a left to right n = 30 WT, 31 actr10, 25 WT, 27 nudc, 25 WT, 26 p150, 11 WT + rescue, 9 actr10 + rescue; tfam left to right n = 30 WT, 31 actr10, 25 WT, 27 nudc, 25 WT, 26 p150, 25 WT + rescue, 22 actr10 + rescue; g n = 18 WT, 16 actr10; i n = 13 WT, 14 actr10.

To disrupt retrograde mitochondrial transport in pLL neurons, we used an existing mutant line with a unique loss of function mutation in the gene encoding Actr10 (actr10nl15; hereafter referred to as actr10;35,37). Actr10 is a component of the Cytoplasmic dynein accessory complex dynactin. Complete loss of Actr10 function results in failed cell division, likely due to loss of all dynein motor function40. In contrast, the actr10nl15 mutation in zebrafish causes loss of mitochondrial interaction with the dynein motor, leading to loss of retrograde (cell body-directed) mitochondrial transport and accumulation of mitochondria in axon terminals (35; Fig. 1b, c). This disruption is specific to mitochondria, as other retrogradely moving cargos, including late endosomes, lysosomes, and signaling molecules, are transported normally. Additionally, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis showed accumulations of only mitochondria in axon terminals35. Intriguingly, in addition to mitochondrial accumulation in the distal axons, we found a severe reduction in mitochondrial density (mitochondrial area/cytosolic area) in the cell body of actr10 pLL neurons (Fig. 1b, c). We asked if this loss of mitochondrial density could be due to loss of mitochondrial biogenesis in actr10 mutants.

Mitochondrial biogenesis requires coordinated transcription of nuclear encoded mitochondrial genes. This is largely controlled by the PGC-1 family of transcriptional coactivators and their associated transcription factors, including NRF-1/2. Downstream of this transcriptional activation is a plethora of nuclear encoded mitochondrial genes, including tfam7,10. We first assessed the expression of pgc1a, pgc1b, nrf1, and tfam using colorimetric in situ hybridization and found that all were noticeably reduced in actr10 mutants (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). To quantify gene expression of biogenesis markers in the pLLg, we turned to hybridization chain reaction RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (HCR RNA FISH;41). We assessed pgc1a and tfam expression and confirmed both were significantly reduced in actr10 mutants (Fig. 1d, e). Neuronal rescue of Actr10 in a stable transgenic line (Tg(5kbneurod:mRFP-actr10)nl22;35) rescued neuronal mitochondrial density (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d) as well as pgc1a and tfam expression (Fig. 1e), confirming that loss of Actr10 in neurons underlies this phenotype. To determine if the changes to gene expression in actr10 mutants could be explained by general disruptions to retrograde cargo transport, we quantified gene expression in control mutant strains with loss of function mutations in p150a/b (duplicated gene in teleost fish requiring double knockout) and nudc35,42. p150 is a component of the dynactin complex that, when mutated, disrupts all retrograde cargo transport, including mitochondrial transport35,4345. NudC is a dynein regulator that, when mutated in zebrafish neurons, disrupts the retrograde transport of late endosomes and autophagosomes without altering the localization or transport of mitochondria42. pgc1a and tfam expression were reduced in p150 mutants but unaffected in nudc mutants, further suggesting the decreased expression of these mitochondrial biogenesis markers was due to the loss of retrograde mitochondrial transport (Fig. 1e).

We next analyzed a critical step during biogenesis, mtDNA replication, using POLG2-eGFP, a fluorescently tagged version of the processivity subunit of the mitochondrial DNA polymerase. POLG2-eGFP has been previously shown to specifically localize to mtDNA nucleoids actively undergoing replication12,46. We expressed POLG2-eGFP in pLL neurons and quantified the number of puncta, indicative of replicating mtDNA nucleoids, relative to mitochondrial volume. The number of POLG2 puncta was significantly reduced in actr10 pLL cell body mitochondria, indicative of reduced mtDNA replication (Fig. 1f, g). To confirm these results, we performed immunolabeling for single-stranded binding protein 1 (SSBP1), which transiently associates with mtDNA to facilitate replication47. The number of SSBP1 puncta relative to mitochondrial volume was significantly reduced in actr10 pLL cell bodies (Fig. 1h, i). This phenotype is not due to loss of mtDNA, as the density of nucleoids labeled with the mtDNA nucleoid protein TFAM (transcription factor A, mitochondria;48) is not decreased in actr10 cell body mitochondria (Supplementary Fig. 1e, f). As expected, due to the reduced mitochondrial density in the cell body and in line with loss of tfam mRNA based on HCR RNA FISH quantification, the overall number of TFAM puncta is reduced in actr10 mutant cell bodies (Supplementary Fig. 1g). mtDNA nucleoid size was unchanged between wild type and actr10 mutants (Supplementary Fig. 1h). Together with our previous results demonstrating no deficits in measures of mitochondrial health and function in actr10 mutant pLL neuronal cell bodies37, this suggests decreases in mtDNA replication are not due to mitochondrial stress. Mitochondrial biogenesis has also been demonstrated to occur in the distal axon through assessment of mtDNA replication16,19,20. To determine if local mitochondrial biogenesis was also affected in actr10 mutants, we quantified mtDNA replication in the pLL axon terminal. Both POLG2 and SSBP1 puncta were significantly reduced in actr10 mutants, suggesting both cell body and axon terminal mitochondrial biogenesis are disrupted by loss of retrograde mitochondrial transport (Supplementary Fig. 1i–l).

Nuclear transcription of mitochondrial genes is disrupted in actr10 mutant neurons

Given the changes to mtDNA replication and transcription of mitochondrial biogenesis-related genes, we decided to look more broadly at how nuclear gene expression of mitochondrial proteins may be altered in actr10 mutants. We isolated pLL neurons using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) from a transgenic line which expresses eGFP in pLL neurons (Tg(hsp70:eGFP-SILL)uwd12Tg; Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). FACS gating parameters were optimized to sort true eGFP-expressing cells and exclude autofluorescence, particularly apparent in the yolk (Supplementary Fig. 2c). We then performed bulk RNA-sequencing on FACS-sorted cells to analyze the transcriptomes of wild type and actr10 mutant neurons (Fig. 2a). Differential gene expression analysis and cross comparisons to the MitoCarta database confirmed that mitochondrial genes are significantly downregulated in actr10 mutants compared to wild type siblings (Fig. 2b, c;49). In contrast, there were only 3 mitochondrial genes significantly upregulated (p = 0.999, Fisher’s exact test). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) of Gene Ontology terms identified Mitochondrial Protein Complexes to be the most significantly de-enriched term in the dataset (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Fig. 2d), and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showed strong enrichment for mitochondrial pathways in downregulated genes (Supplementary Fig. 2e). To confirm our RNA-seq results, we used HCR RNA FISH to quantify pLLg expression of ten downregulated genes and two genes that were not altered in our dataset. These analyses aligned with our RNA-seq data, confirming loss of these mitochondrial transcripts in actr10 mutants (Fig. 2e–h). Additionally, we confirmed these results using colorimetric in situ hybridization of a subset of these genes, showing reduced expression of atp5md and cox5ab but not the controls polb and tomm40 (Supplementary Fig. 2f, g). Finally, to assess the specificity of the transcriptomic changes, we included positive and negative control mutant strains p150 and nudc described above35,42. As predicted, p150 but not nudc mutants have a loss of cox5ab expression (Fig. 2e, f). Together, this transcriptomic analysis suggests that mitochondrial retrograde transport modulates nuclear expression of a subset of mitochondrial genes.

Fig. 2. Mitochondrial gene expression is downregulated in actr10 mutants.

Fig. 2

a RNA-sequencing strategy. b Volcano plot showing differential gene expression between wild type and actr10 mutants. The plot shows -log10(adjusted p-value) vs. log2(Fold Change). Blue dots represent genes significantly downregulated, while red dots represent genes significantly upregulated in actr10 mutants. Genes selected for secondary analysis using HCR RNA FISH are labeled. c Overlap between downregulated genes and the MitoCarta3.0 database of the mitochondrial proteome (Fisher’s exact test). Human homologs of downregulated zebrafish genes were used for analysis. Duplicated zebrafish paralogues were only counted once. d GSEA plot for Mitochondrial Protein Complexes, the most significantly de-enriched gene ontology term in actr10 mutants relative to wildtype. e Representative images of HCR RNA FISH labeling of cox5ab mRNA in the pLLg (outlined in white) for wild type, actr10, nudc, and p150 mutants. Scale bar = 10 μm. f pLLg mean fluorescence intensity of cox5ab normalized to background (ANOVAs). g pLLg mean fluorescence intensity normalized to background for downregulated mitochondrial genes in wild type vs. actr10 mutants (ANOVAs). h pLLg mean fluorescence intensity normalized to background for control genes in wild type vs. actr10 mutants (ANOVAs). fh Data plot lines represent the median and quartiles; data points represent individual larvae. Sample sizes: f cox5ab left to right n = 31 WT, 32 actr10, 31 WT, 28 nudc, 30 WT, 30 p150; g atp5md n = 34 WT, 29 actr10; cox6c n = 33 WT, 33 actr10; cox7c n = 31 WT, 31 actr10; cox8a n = 28 WT, 29 actr10; efhd1 n = 31 WT, 31 actr10; ndufb3 n = 34 WT, 33 actr10; ndufa5 n = 26 WT, 32 actr10; spry4 n = 34 WT, 29 actr10; uqcrq n = 33 WT, 33 actr10; h polb n = 34 WT, 31 actr10; tomm40 n = 50 WT, 49 actr10.

Impaired mitochondrial biogenesis decreases the contribution of cell body-derived mitochondria to the axon terminal

We next wanted to determine if these changes in measures of mitochondrial biogenesis translated into a decrease in the production of new organelles. In neurons, we predicted that at least a subset of mitochondria produced by biogenesis in the cell body would be transported in the anterograde direction to support the population of mitochondria in the axon terminal2. To test this, we used photo-labeling strategies to assess the rate of cell body-derived mitochondrial addition to the axon terminal in wild-type animals. We expressed photoactivatable GFP (PA-GFP) localized to the mitochondrial matrix in pLL neurons and locally activated the GFP only in the cell body. Then, we quantified the addition of cell body derived mitochondrial material to the axon terminal at multiple time points after photo-activation. We found that by 4 to 8 h post-activation (hpa), ~50% of the mitochondrial density in the axon terminal contained material that was cell body-derived (Supplementary Fig. 3a–d). Next, we asked if the amount of cell body derived mitochondrial material transported to the axon terminal correlated with the turnover of the axon terminal mitochondrial population. Published data have shown that axon terminal mitochondria are consistently lost over a period of hours in pLL axon terminals37. Using precise activation of matrix localized PA-GFP in axon terminal mitochondria followed by post-activation imaging, we determined that ~50% of the labeled mitochondrial density is absent from the axon terminal by 8 hpa (Supplementary Fig. 3e–g). This complements the estimated rate of mitochondrial entrance into the axon terminal from the cell body and suggests that cell body derived mitochondria may play a significant role in the maintenance of the axon terminal mitochondrial population.

Given the role of cell body derived mitochondria in axon terminal turnover, we predicted that decreased biogenesis in the cell body would result in a progressive loss of mitochondrial addition to the axon terminal. To test this, we assessed changes to mitochondrial biogenesis and transport in actr10 mutants across multiple timepoints post-axon extension (2, 3, and 4 dpf). Initial axon extension of primary pLL axons is complete by 2 dpf, with functional synapses apparent by 4 dpf38,39,50. Assessment of mitochondrial density in axon terminals and cell bodies of actr10 mutants demonstrated that mitochondrial density was elevated in axon terminals as early as 2 dpf (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b) and cell body mitochondrial density was notably depleted by 3 dpf (Supplementary Fig. 4c, d). Quantification of the biogenesis markers pgc1a and tfam using HCR RNA FISH demonstrated that loss of cell body mitochondrial density at 3 dpf corresponded with loss of pgc1a expression, followed by loss of tfam expression by 4 dpf (Fig. 1d, e, Supplementary Fig. 4e, f). This time course confirms that loss of cell body mitochondrial density correlates with decreased markers of mitochondrial biogenesis.

We predicted that the progressive loss of cell body mitochondrial biogenesis in actr10 mutants would result in reduced anterograde mitochondrial transport. Live imaging of mitochondrial movement in pLL axons demonstrated that retrograde transport was disrupted at 3 dpf, while anterograde transport frequency was not altered until 4 dpf (Supplementary Fig. 4g, h, Supplementary Movies 14). This time series demonstrated retrograde mitochondrial transport is lost first in actr10 mutants, leading to mitochondrial accumulation in the axon terminal. Only after retrograde mitochondrial transport is inhibited does mitochondrial biogenesis fail, leading to loss of cell body mitochondria and reduced anterograde transport of mitochondria towards axon terminals (summarized in Supplementary Fig. 4i).

Together, our data suggest that anterograde mitochondrial transport supplies the axon terminal with cell body derived mitochondria produced through biogenesis. To test this, we directly stimulated mitochondrial biogenesis and analyzed axon terminal mitochondrial addition. To increase mitochondrial biogenesis, we used a stable transgenic zebrafish line overexpressing human PGC-1α in neurons (Tg(5kbneurod1:PGC1α−2pa-mRFP)uwd9Tg;51). PGC-1α overexpression in this line increased tfam expression in pLL neurons and has been previously shown to increase mitochondrial density in the axon terminal, confirming increased mitochondrial biogenesis (Supplementary Fig. 4j;51). To determine if increased mitochondrial biogenesis increases the addition of cell body derived mitochondria to the axon terminal, we used photoconversion and mitochondrial tracking. For this, we used a dual transgenic line expressing PGC-1α (Tg(5kbneurod1:PGC1α−p2a-mRFP)uwd9Tg) and mEos, a photoconvertible protein, localized to the mitochondrial matrix (Tg(5kbneurod1:mito-mEos)y586Tg;37,52). We photoconverted the mitochondrial population in the pLLg at 4 dpf and imaged axon terminals 4 h post-conversion (hpc; Fig. 3a). By 4 hpc, cell body derived mitochondrial density in the axon terminal was significantly increased in PGC-1α transgenics, confirming that mitochondrial biogenesis in the cell body impacts mitochondrial addition to the axon terminal population (Fig. 3b, c). Next, we assessed the density of cell body derived mitochondria in actr10 mutant axon terminals using the same photoconversion strategy. This demonstrated a 50% reduction in the contribution of cell body-derived mitochondria to the axon terminal population in actr10 mutants compared to wild type (Fig. 3b, c).

Fig. 3. Cell body-derived mitochondrial density in the axon terminal is reduced in actr10 mutants.

Fig. 3

a Photoconversion strategy. Mitochondrial matrix localized mEos in the pLLg was locally converted using 405 nm laser. An axon terminal in the mid-trunk (neuromast 3 - NM3) was imaged 4 hpc (b) or every minute for 6 h (d). b NM3 4 hpc in wild type, actr10, and transgenic overexpressing (OE) PGC-1α in neurons (Tg(5kbneurod1:PGC1α-p2a-mRFP)uwd9). c Mean fluorescence intensity of cell body-derived mitochondria (Converted) in the axon terminal population (Steel-Dwass). d Representative timepoint of a pLL axon terminal from 6 h time-lapse video (Supplementary Movies 5, 6). Cell body-derived mitochondria are indicated with white arrowheads. e, f Quantification of the number (e, ANOVA) and size (f, Wilcoxon) of converted mitochondria entering the axon terminal. Scale bars = 5 μm. All data are mean ± SEM. Data points represent individual larvae in (c, e), and individual mitochondria measured from 4 wild type and 3 actr10 axon terminals in (f). Sample sizes: c n = 20 WT, 8 PGC-1α, 13 actr10; e n = 4 WT, 4 actr10; f n = 207 WT, 71 actr10.

Reduced cell body-derived mitochondrial material in the axon terminal could be due to either fewer mitochondria or smaller mitochondria being transported to the terminal. To differentiate this, we tracked mitochondrial addition to the axon terminal using time-lapse imaging. Mitochondria in the pLL ganglion carrying matrix-localized mEos were photoconverted, and the axon terminal was imaged every minute for 6 h (Supplementary Movies 5, 6). actr10 mutants had both fewer and smaller cell body derived mitochondria entering the terminal per hour (Fig. 3d–f). Together, this suggests mitochondrial biogenesis in the cell body contributes to both the number and size of new mitochondria transported to the axon terminal.

Disrupted mitochondrial fission does not alter mitochondrial biogenesis signatures

At the light microscopy level, mitochondria in actr10 mutant pLL cell bodies appear to have a more circular and aggregated morphology, which can be indicative of impaired fission (see Fig. 1b;53,54). To better understand the structure of pLL neuron cell body mitochondria, we used transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to assess their ultrastructure in actr10 mutants. In wild type pLL cell bodies, mitochondria were evenly distributed throughout the cytosol (Supplementary Fig. 5a). In actr10 mutants, cell body mitochondrial density and morphology were variable: some cell bodies had fewer but significantly enlarged mitochondria (Supplementary Fig. 5b; 5/12 cell bodies), some showed a more even distribution similar to wild type (Supplementary Fig. 5c; 1/12 cell bodies), and some showed no visible mitochondria (Supplementary Fig. 5d; 6/12 cell bodies). In contrast, even wild type cell bodies with little visible cytosolic area still had mitochondria present (Supplementary Fig. 5e; 0/10 cell bodies with no visible mitochondria). On average, mitochondria were significantly larger with a reduced number in actr10 cell bodies (Supplementary Fig. 5f, g). Altered mitochondrial structure could suggest impaired mitochondrial health. However, previous work has shown actr10 mutants have normal mitochondrial health measures in the cell body, and our TEM images show normal cristae even in the enlarged mitochondria (Supplementary Fig. 5b;37). Together, these data show that actr10 mutant mitochondria are larger and rounder than those in wild type siblings, despite not showing altered measures of health and productivity37.

Altered mitochondrial fission can result in large, circular organelles53,54. Given the relationship between mitochondrial fission and mitochondrial biogenesis, we asked if disrupted mitochondrial fission in actr10 mutants could underlie disrupted mitochondrial biogenesis11,12. First, we assessed the length of moving and stationary mitochondria in pLL axons in actr10 mutants and wild-type siblings as a proxy for fission dynamics. These data showed no change in mitochondrial length, suggesting no major changes in fission or fusion dynamics in the axon (Supplementary Fig. 5h). The cell body mitochondria are too dense for us to directly measure their length or assess fission frequency. Instead, we disrupted mitochondrial fission and assessed measures of mitochondrial biogenesis. To disrupt mitochondrial fission, we expressed a dominant negative form of Drp1, which mimics a constitutively GDP-bound form of the enzyme (Drp1K38A;54,55). In cultured cells, expression of Drp1K38A disrupts mitochondrial fission54,55. When expressed in pLL neurons, Drp1K38A causes clustering of mitochondria to the perinuclear region of the cell body and reduces mitochondrial density in both wild type and actr10 cell bodies (Fig. 4a, b). However, Drp1K38A expression does not change measures of mitochondrial biogenesis, including tfam expression or the number of SSBP1 labeled replicating mtDNA nucleoids (Fig. 4c–f). These data argue that loss of fission is not causal in the actr10 mutant mitochondrial biogenesis phenotype.

Fig. 4. Disrupting mitochondrial fission does not alter tfam expression or mtDNA replication.

Fig. 4

a Single pLL cell bodies (outlined) expressing mitoTagRFP in wild type and actr10 mutant larvae expressing Drp1K38A-mRFP or mRFP (control). b Quantification of mitochondrial density (mitochondrial area/cytosolic area; Steel-Dwass). c HCR RNA FISH labeling of tfam mRNA in a pLL cell body (outlined). d Mean fluorescence intensity of tfam normalized to background (Steel-Dwass). e SSBP1 immunostaining in pLL cell body mitochondria, visualized with mitochondria-localized eGFP (Mito, magenta; cell outlined). f Number of SSBP1 puncta normalized to mitochondrial volume (ANOVA). All data are mean ± SEM. Data points represent individual larvae. Sample sizes: b n = 46 WT, 41 WT + Drp1K38A, 32 actr10, 19 actr10 + Drp1K38A; d n = 45 WT, 41 WT + Drp1K38A, 32 actr10, 19 actr10 + Drp1K38A; f n = 34 WT, 29 WT +  Drp1K38A.

MitoTruck-mediated disruption of mitochondrial transport inhibits mitochondrial biogenesis

Our data demonstrate that inhibiting mitochondrial return to the cell body impairs mitochondrial biogenesis. To test this in another model, we engineered a synthetic tether, similar to one previously described in C. elegans, to constitutively move mitochondria out of the cell body and inhibit their ability to return to the cell body from the distal axon (MitoTruck;56). For this, we tethered mitochondria to a constitutively active kinesin motor domain derived from KIF1A using the OMP25 outer mitochondrial membrane localization sequence (Fig. 5a;57,58). When expressed in pLL neurons, MitoTruck localizes to mitochondria and ectopically concentrates these organelles to axon ends, demonstrating anterograde transport bias (Fig. 5b). Constitutive expression of MitoTruck caused failed axon extension and neuronal death by 4 dpf. To avoid any phenotypes due to failed neuronal health, we analyzed mitochondrial parameters after 24 h of MitoTruck expression, at 2 dpf. Mitochondria in the cell body are significantly depleted in MitoTruck expressing neuron cell bodies by 2 dpf (Fig. 5c, d). This depletion is similar to that observed in actr10 mutants at 4 dpf (mitochondrial density: WT 2 dpf 0.57 ± 0.018, MitoTruck 2 dpf 0.33 ± 0.016, WT 4 dpf 0.55 ± 0.027, actr10 4 dpf 0.26 ± 0.028). Analyses of mtDNA replication and tfam expression demonstrated that MitoTruck significantly decreased these markers of mitochondrial biogenesis (Fig. 5e–h). Together, our actr10 mutant and MitoTruck analyses demonstrate that inhibiting mitochondrial return to the cell body from the axon is sufficient to impair markers of mitochondrial biogenesis.

Fig. 5. MitoTruck expression decreases cell body mitochondrial density and markers of mitochondrial biogenesis.

Fig. 5

a Schematic of the MitoTruck construct. The constitutively active KIF1A motor domain was tethered to mitochondria with the OMP25 outer mitochondrial membrane localization signal (MLS) and visualized with eGFP. b, c pLL axon (b) and cell body (c; outlined) expressing MitoTruck (green) and MitoTagRFP (Mito, magenta). d Quantification of pLL cell body mitochondrial density (mitochondrial area/cytosolic area; Wilcoxon). e Representative images of HCR RNA FISH labeling of tfam mRNA in a single pLL cell body (outlined) without and with MitoTruck expression. f Mean fluorescence intensity of tfam normalized to background (ANOVA). g SSBP1 immunostaining in a single pLL cell body (outlined). Mitochondria visualized with mitochondrially localized TagRFP (Mito, magenta). h Number of SSBP1 puncta normalized to mitochondrial volume (ANOVA). Scale bars = 5 μm. All data are mean ± SEM, and points represent individual larvae. Sample sizes: d n = 22 WT, 26 MitoTruck; f n = 44 WT, 30 MitoTruck; h 15 WT, 15 MitoTruck.

Estrogen-related receptors bridge mitochondrial transport with transcriptional regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis

Our data indicate retrograde transport is required to promote mitochondrial biogenesis through the regulation of upstream factors, including nuclear gene expression. Several nuclear transcription factors have been identified that bind the promoters of a wide range of mitochondrial genes, allowing for coordinated expression of these genes during biogenesis10,59,60. We hypothesized that a key transcription factor could link mitochondrial retrograde transport to mitochondrial biogenesis. To identify this transcription factor, we performed transcription factor enrichment analysis using significantly downregulated genes from our RNA-seq dataset. This in silico analysis identified Estrogen-related receptors (ERRs) as top candidates (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Fig. 6a). ERRs have been shown to be coactivated by PGC-1α to regulate mitochondrial biogenesis59,6163. Other transcription factors regulated by PGC-1α, such as NRF1/2 or PPARα, were not found to be enriched in our analysis, suggesting ERRs specifically may be affected in actr10 mutants. To validate this result, we used gene set enrichment analysis of transcription factor binding targets and identified the ERR binding motif ERR1 enriched near downregulated genes (Supplementary Fig. 6b). Finally, we took a more targeted approach by comparing our list of downregulated genes to ESRRG targets identified by ChIP-seq in cultured neurons63. We found significant enrichment for known neuronal ESRRG target genes in our data set (Fig. 6b). In contrast, there was only one target gene from the Chip-seq dataset that was significantly upregulated in our dataset (p = 0.885, Fisher’s exact test). Together, these in silico analyses suggest ERR-dependent transcription is reduced in actr10 mutants.

Fig. 6. ERR activity links mitochondrial transport and mitochondrial biogenesis.

Fig. 6

a Transcription factor enrichment analysis for genes significantly downregulated in actr10 mutants. Plot shows log2(Odds Ratio) vs. log10(adjusted p-value). Top 10 enriched genes based on Euclidean distance from log2(OR)/log10(adj. p-value) to the origin are labeled. Box indicates ERR transcription factors identified in the dataset. b Overlap between downregulated genes and ESRRG neuronal ChIP-seq targets (Fisher’s exact test). Human homologs of downregulated zebrafish genes were used for transcription factor analyses. Duplicated zebrafish paralogues were only counted once in the analysis. c Mitochondria in wild type and actr10 pLL cell bodies (outlined) expressing Esrra or Esrra4KR. d Quantification of mitochondrial density (ANOVAs; Tukey HSD). e Mitochondria in wild type and actr10 pLL cell bodies (outlined) with and without resveratrol ( + res.) treatment. f Quantification of mitochondrial density (ANOVAs; Tukey HSD). g Heat map of mRFP-Esrra or mRFP-Esrra4KR in wild type and actr10 pLL cell bodies (outlined). h Mean fluorescence intensity of nuclear mRFP-Esrra/cytosolic mRFP-Esrra (Steel-Dwass). i SSBP1 immunostaining in pLL cell body mitochondria, visualized with mitochondria-localized eGFP (Mito, magenta; cell outlined). j Number of SSBP1 puncta normalized to mitochondrial volume (ANOVAs; Tukey HSD). d, f, h, j Data points represent individual larvae; data are mean ± SEM. Scale bars = 5 μm. Mitochondrial density = mitochondrial area/cytosolic area. Sample sizes: d n = 21 WT + Esrra, 23 WT + 4KR, 16 actr10 + Esrra, 16 actr10 + 4KR; f n = 19 WT, 17 WT + res., 18 actr10, 26 actr10 + res.; h n = 21 WT + Esrra, 20 WT + 4KR, 17 actr10 + Esrra, 15 actr10 + 4KR; j n = 19 WT + Esrra, 25 WT + 4KR, 20 actr10 + Esrra, 26 actr10 + 4KR.

If disruption of ERR-dependent transcription underlies decreased mitochondrial biogenesis in actr10 mutant neurons, increasing ERR activity should rescue this defect. To test this, we overexpressed Esrra in pLL neurons and assessed mitochondrial density and biogenesis transcriptional programs. Similar to PGC-1α overexpression (see Supplementary Fig. 4j;51), Esrra overexpression significantly increased tfam expression (Supplementary Fig. 6c, e). Furthermore, Esrra overexpression in actr10 mutants rescued tfam expression to wild type levels (Supplementary Fig. 6d, f). However, overexpression of Esrra was unable to rescue the loss of cell body mitochondrial density in actr10 mutants, suggesting additional levels of ERR regulation are required for optimal mitochondrial biogenesis activation (Fig. 6c, d). Activation of ERR-dependent transcription is modulated by ERR or PGC-1α post-translational modifications (PTMs). We hypothesized that PTMs are required for full Esrra activity. The most well-studied modifications that activate this pathway are SIRT1-dependent deacetylation of ERR and/or PGC-1α and AMPK-dependent phosphorylation of PGC-1α6468. To determine if SIRT1 or AMPK activation were upstream of ERR-dependent mitochondrial biogenesis in neurons, we treated wild type and actr10 mutant zebrafish with resveratrol (activator of SIRT1) or AICAR (activator of AMPK) at concentrations previously optimized for use in zebrafish larvae64,69,70. Resveratrol, but not AICAR, treatment was sufficient to rescue cell body mitochondrial density in actr10 mutant neurons (Fig. 6e, f, Supplementary Fig. 6g, h), suggesting SIRT1-mediated deacetylation of ERRs may be disrupted in actr10 mutants.

SIRT1 has been shown to deacetylate human ESRRA at 4 conserved lysine residues (amino acids 129, 138, 160, and 162) within the DNA-binding domain. This deacetylation can be mimicked by mutating the 4 lysine residues to arginine (4KR), which conserves the basic charge of lysine but prevents acetylation67. Overexpression of Esrra4KR in pLL neurons was able to rescue actr10 cell body mitochondrial density (Fig. 6c, d), similar to rescue by resveratrol, suggesting deacetylation is critical for upregulation of mitochondrial biogenesis by Esrra. This was further supported by the localization of the Esrra protein. Wild-type Esrra did not display a canonical nuclear localization71 and instead remained largely cytosolic. In contrast, Esrra4KR displayed strong nuclear localization, suggesting deacetylation is critical for nuclear localization to subsequently activate mitochondrial biogenesis pathways (Fig. 6g, h). Further supporting a role for deacetylation in Esrra-dependent mitochondrial biogenesis, overexpression of Esrra4KR fully rescues SSBP1 punctal density in actr10 mutants (Fig. 6i, j). These data demonstrate that ERR deacetylation is critical for the regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis in pLL neurons.

SIRT1 is a nuclear-localized protein that is activated by elevated NAD+ levels72. To determine if NAD+ levels were altered in actr10 nuclei, we used a genetically encoded NAD+ sensor localized to the nucleus73. Analysis of steady state NAD+ levels revealed a significant reduction in nuclear NAD+ in actr10 mutants (Fig. 7a, b). A significant pool of cellular NAD+ is stored in mitochondria, and changes to NAD + /NADH levels in mitochondria can affect the cytosolic/nuclear pool7476. We reasoned that altered mitochondrial transport could change local mitochondrial NAD+ levels, leading to a reduction in local SIRT1 activation in the cell body. To test this, we assessed mitochondrial NAD+ in the cell body and axon terminal of pLL neurons by localizing the genetically encoded biosensor to the mitochondrial matrix. We found significantly elevated NAD+ levels in axon terminal mitochondria in actr10 mutants, while cell body mitochondria have a significant reduction in mitochondrial NAD+ levels compared to wild type controls (Fig. 7c–e). Finally, we asked if retrograde transport was responsible for moving mitochondria with higher NAD+ measures from the axon terminal to the cell body. Using live imaging, we assessed mitochondrial NAD+ levels in moving and stationary organelles using the same NAD+ sensor. These experiments demonstrated that retrogradely moving mitochondria have significantly higher NAD+ levels than either stationary or anterogradely moving mitochondria (Fig. 7f, g). Together, our data support a model in which the mitochondria with high levels of NAD+ returning to the cell body from the axon elevate local NAD+ levels to activate SIRT1-dependent ERR transcriptional activity necessary for sustained mitochondrial biogenesis in neurons (Fig. 7h). We propose that disrupting retrograde mitochondrial transport locks mitochondria with high NAD+ in the axon terminal, blocking this critical signaling step for the positive regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis.

Fig. 7. NAD+ levels are altered in actr10 mutants.

Fig. 7

a pLL cell body expressing a nuclear-localized NAD+ sensor. Black outline surrounds single pLL cell body. Dotted blue outline surrounds the nucleus. c pLL cell body and axon terminal expressing a mitochondrial matrix localized NAD+ sensor. Black outline surrounds a single pLL cell body and axon terminal. A dotted blue outline surrounds mitochondria. f Kymograph of pLL axon expressing a mitochondrial matrix-localized NAD+ sensor. a, c, f An inverted heat map indicates levels of NAD + . b, d, e, g Mean fluorescence intensity of NAD+ sensor normalized to cytosolic mRFP (b, d, e) or mitochondrial matrix-localized TagRFP (g). Data inverted to reflect the direction of change in NAD+ levels as fluorescence intensity decreases in the presence of NAD+ (b, d: Wilcoxon; e: ANOVA; g: Steel-Dwass). h Model of mitochondrial retrograde transport regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis. Scale bars = 5 μm. All data are mean ± SEM. b, d, e Data points represent individual larvae. g Data points represent individual mitochondria from 14 wild type larvae. Sample sizes: b n = 21 WT, 22 actr10; d n = 22 WT, 21 actr10; e n = 19 WT, 15 actr10; g n = 30 Anterograde, 23 Retrograde, 48 Stationary.

Discussion

Mitochondrial population maintenance is essential for neuronal health and function. These organelles are critical for a variety of functions, including ATP production and calcium buffering, particularly in axon terminals1,2. Through these functions, mitochondria accrue damage. Damaged organelles must be replaced through the process of mitochondrial biogenesis. Markers of mitochondrial stress such as an increased AMP/ATP or NAD+/NADH ratio as well as increased cellular calcium can activate mitochondrial biogenesis transcriptional programs in the nucleus35,60,7678. However, it was unclear how these cellular signals could be transmitted long distances in the neuron to monitor mitochondrial populations in more distal regions of the neuron, like the axon terminal. We identified a required role for retrograde return of axonal mitochondria to the cell body to sustain mitochondrial biogenesis transcriptional programs. We show that the return of axonal mitochondria to the cell body stimulates ERR-dependent nuclear gene transcription to regulate expression of mitochondrial genes, mtDNA replication, and ultimately increase mitochondrial biomass in the neuron. This provides a mechanism by which mitochondria in more distal regions of the neuron, like the axon terminal, can communicate with the nucleus to regulate mitochondrial density and mitochondrial population turnover.

The estrogen-related receptors (ERRα/β/γ) are a family of orphan nuclear receptors first identified due to sequence similarity with estrogen receptors71,79,80. The three ERR proteins bind the ERR response element (ERRE), which is found in the promoter of many mitochondrial genes59,71. Because of this, increased ERR activity is associated with increased mitochondrial biogenesis in a number of tissues, including neurons61,62,73,81. Despite their similarity to estrogen receptors, ERRs do not have the capacity to bind estrogen, but rather are thought to be constitutively active82. Their activity can be regulated through expression level, PTMs, or interaction with co-activators like PGC-1α8,9,81. PGC-1α regulates ERR transcription and also interacts with ERRs as a coactivator to induce the transcription of mitochondrial biogenesis genes8,9,62.

ERRs serve as mediators between mitochondrial signals and biogenesis transcriptional programs. In non-neuronal cells, signs of mitochondrial depletion or failed health, like reduced cellular energy or increased cytosolic calcium, have been shown to activate ERR-dependent transcription, either directly or through PGC-1α activation13,83. These upstream signals of cellular and mitochondrial health act through enzymes that can directly modify ERR and PGC-1α via PTMs, including phosphorylation and acetylation. Two of the most well-studied upstream regulatory factors are AMPK and SIRT1, which serve as energy sensors for the cell6. AMPK is activated by an increased AMP to ATP ratio and can activate mitochondrial biogenesis through PGC-1α phosphorylation4,84. SIRT1 is activated by an increased NAD+ to NADH ratio and can activate mitochondrial biogenesis through PGC-1α and/or ERR de-acetylation3,67. AMPK and SIRT1 can be artificially activated through AICAR and resveratrol treatment, respectively, to induce mitochondrial biogenesis64,65,69,84,85. In our experiments, resveratrol, but not AICAR, treatment was able to rescue actr10 biogenesis defects, suggesting SIRT1-dependent mitochondrial biogenesis is lost. SIRT1 has been shown to deacetylate human ESRRA at four lysine residues to increase ESRRA transcriptional activity67. Overexpression of an Esrra mutant mimicking deacetylation at these sites was able to rescue markers of mitochondrial biogenesis in actr10 mutants, including mitochondrial density and mtDNA replication. Together, this suggests retrograde transport of axonal mitochondria may stimulate ERR-dependent mitochondrial biogenesis through activation of SIRT1, though we cannot rule out other upstream modulators that could function with SIRT1 in this process.

SIRT1 requires NAD+ as a co-substrate for the removal of acetyl groups from lysines, making NAD+ levels a direct regulator of SIRT1 enzymatic activity72. Increased NAD+ levels have been shown to increase SIRT1-mediated de-acetylation of PGC-1α, increasing its transcriptional activity 77,85. Therefore, local NAD+ levels are a likely signaling mechanism by which non-neuronal cells are able to sense energy levels and respond with transcriptional regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis. However, it was unclear how the predominantly nuclear-localized SIRT1 could sense and respond to levels of NAD+ in mitochondrial populations spread throughout the expansive dendritic and axonal arbors of neurons86. Our data suggest that retrograde transport is required to move mitochondria with high levels of NAD+ to the cell body to stimulate biogenesis. We show retrogradely transported mitochondria have higher NAD+ levels and that the NAD+ levels in axon terminal mitochondria are increased when retrograde transport of mitochondria is impeded. We find that failure to return mitochondria with elevated NAD+ levels to the cell body in actr10 mutants leads to reduced nuclear and cell body mitochondrial NAD+ levels. Based on this, we propose that local SIRT1 activity in the cell body requires increases in the local NAD+ levels, which is accomplished by the movement of mitochondria with elevated NAD+ from the axon back to the cell body. Consequent activation of SIRT1 in the cell body then promotes mitochondrial biogenesis through de-acetylation of transcriptional regulators like PGC-1α or ERRs. In support of this, treatment with resveratrol, which circumvents the requirement for NAD+, can rescue mitochondrial density in actr10 mutant cell bodies. It is likely that additional energy-sensing pathways work with NAD+/SIRT1 to control mitochondrial biogenesis through additional transcription factor PTMs. Further work on transcription factor PTMs and associated modulatory pathways will clarify the role of energy sensing through NAD+ and other signaling molecules on the control of mitochondrial biogenesis in neurons.

In conclusion, our work demonstrates that transport of mitochondria from the axon back to the cell body is a positive regulator of neuronal mitochondrial biogenesis through regulation of ERR-dependent gene transcription. Mitochondria derived from biogenesis in the neuronal cell body are critical for maintaining cell body mitochondrial density as well as supplying the anterogradely transported mitochondria that support the axon terminal mitochondrial population. Unsurprisingly, impaired mitochondrial biogenesis can diminish neuronal health and has been linked to diseases like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases8790. However, regulatory mechanisms that govern this critical process in the neuron remain poorly understood. Here, we show that neurons in zebrafish larvae require mitochondrial retrograde transport for effective mitochondria-nuclear communication to regulate mitochondrial biogenesis through ERRs. This mechanism provides insight into how neurons regulate mitochondrial population health and density in response to changing demands on the organelle in distal compartments.

Methods

Zebrafish husbandry

All zebrafish (Danio rerio) work was done in accordance with the University of Wisconsin-Madison Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Adult zebrafish were kept at 28 °C, and embryos were spawned according to established protocols91. Embryos and larvae were kept in embryo media (995 μM MgSO4, 154 μM KH2PO4, 42 μM Na2HPO4, pH 7.2, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 503 μM KCl, 15 mM NaCl, 714 μM NaHCO3), maintained at 28 °C, and developmentally staged using established methods92. All experiments were performed at 4 dpf unless otherwise specified. Sex is not determined at this stage. Zebrafish strains used for these experiments are listed in Supplementary Table 1. The Tg(hsp70l:EGFP-en.sill)uwd12 transgenic was derived using Tol2-mediated transgenesis and the hsp70:eGFP-SILL plasmid93. Genotyping for actr10nl1535, p150ay62537, p150bnl1635, and nudcnl2142 was done using the primers in Supplementary Table 2.

Cloning

The DNA expression plasmids used in this paper are listed in Supplementary Table 1. DNA expression constructs were constructed using Gateway cloning93 or Gibson cloning with oligonucleotides listed in Supplementary Table 294. 5kbneurod:POLG2-GFP-p2a-mitoTagRFP was created from a human POLG2-GFP template plasmid12,46. 5kbneurod1:kif1a-egfp-omp25 [“MitoTruck”] was created using the zebrafish outer membrane protein 25 (OMP25) mitochondrial localization sequence (MLS) cloned from 4 dpf zebrafish cDNA. The truncated constitutively active rat ortholog of KIF1A was cloned from pBA-kif1a393-tdTomato-FKBP95. 5kbneurod1:cox8a-cox8a-halotag was created by fusing two copies of the cox8a MLS to a HaloTag. 5kbneurod1:mRFP-esrra was created using the zebrafish esrra sequence derived from 4 dpf zebrafish cDNA and an existing mRFP plasmid93. Esrra4KR expression plasmid was created using consecutive site-directed mutagenesis reactions with the Agilent QuikChange Lightning Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit. Lysines at amino acid 129, 138, 160, and 162 in the zebrafish ortholog of Esrra were converted to arginines. 5kbneurod1:cox8a-cox8a-NAD-p2a-mRFP was created from plasmids containing a double cox8a MLS, a NAD+ biosensor (Addgene plasmid 186791;96) and a p2a-mRFP. 5kbneurod1:H2B-NAD-p2a-mRFP and 5kbneurod1:cox8a-cox8a-NAD-p2a-mitoTagRFP were created from the 5kbneurod1:cox8a-cox8a-NAD-p2a-mRFP plasmid and either a plasmid containing an H2B nuclear localization signal or a p2a-mitoTagRFP.The NAD+ biosensor consists of a circularly permuted Venus fluorescent protein (cpVenus) with a bipartite NAD+-binding domain modeled from bacterial DNA ligase96. 5kbneurod1:cox8a-cox8a-paGFP-p2a-mitoTagRFP was created from plasmids containing a double cox8a MLS, a photo-activatable GFP, and a p2a-mitoTagRFP. hsp70l:EGFP-en.sill was created using existing plasmids containing the hsp70 minimal promoter, eGFP, and the 3’ SILL enhancer element that limits expression to the pLL ganglion93,97. hsp70l:POLG2-GFP-p2a-mitoTagRFP was created from the 5kbneurod:POLG2-GFP-p2a-mitoTagRFP plasmid and the hsp70 minimal promoter. For all expression plasmids except the hsp70-driven constructs, expression was controlled by a 5kb portion of the neurod promotor93,98. All DNA expression plasmids were sequenced and verified prior to use.

Live imaging acquisition and analysis

For live imaging of pLL neurons, we used a combination of transient transgenesis and stable transgenic expression. For transient transgenesis, 3–25 pg of plasmid DNA was microinjected into zebrafish zygotes35,99,100. Plasmids used for these experiments are listed in Supplementary Table 1. For imaging, zebrafish larvae were sorted to identify larvae with expression in a subset of pLL neuron cell bodies using an AxioZoom V.16 Zeiss microscope. For HaloTag constructs, larvae were treated with Janelia Fluor 635 in embryo media at 1 μM for 1–2 h or 0.1 μM overnight at 28.5 °C in the dark. For all live imaging, larvae were anesthetized in 0.02% tricaine, mounted in 1.5% low melt agarose in embryo media, and imaged with an Olympus FV3000 confocal microscope with a 40x (NA 1.25) silicone oil objective. An optimal interslice interval was used for all imaging.

Larval TgBAC(neurod:egfp)nl1 (Fig. 1a) and Tg(hsp70:eGFP-SILL)uwd12Tg (Supplementary Fig. 1a) transgenic zebrafish images were created by stitching overlapping regions of the larvae imaged using the Olympus FV3000 with a 10X objective using the pairwise stitching plugin in ImageJ101,102. Non-linear adjustment to midtones to show the full nervous system was done using the levels function in Adobe Photoshop. For TgBAC(neurod:egfp)nl1, a brightfield image of the full larva was taken using the AxioZoom V.16 Zeiss microscope with a Zeiss Axio 506 color camera and overlaid using Adobe Photoshop with opacity adjusted to 10%. For Tg(hsp70:eGFP-SILL)uwd12Tg, brightfield images from the Olympus FV3000 were stitched and overlaid with an opacity of 30%.

To quantify mitochondrial density in the pLL cell body and axon terminal, the area was measured from standard deviation z-projections in ImageJ. Mitochondrial area was measured using a manually applied threshold, while cytosolic area was measured by manual tracing or an applied threshold of a cytosolic fill. Mitochondrial density was calculated as mitochondrial area divided by cytosolic area. To quantify mitochondrial or cell volume, the 3D objects counter was used in ImageJ using a manually applied threshold102.

For POLG2 axon terminal analysis, 5kbneurod:POLG2-GFP-p2a-mitoTagRFP was transiently expressed in pLL neurons by zygotic microinjection100 and terminal regions were imaged as described above. POLG2+ puncta were manually counted, and mitochondrial volume was quantified as described above.

Mitochondrial axonal transport analyses were done according to established protocols100. Transient transgenesis of 5kbneurod1:mitotagRFP was used to visualize mitochondria in pLL axons. 30–100 μm lengths of axon were imaged as a single z-plane at a rate of 300 ms per frame for 1000 frames. Kymographs were generated using the ImageJ Multi Kymograph function102. Anterograde, retrograde, and bidirectional mitochondria numbers were quantified using kymographs, while stationary mitochondria number was quantified by visual analysis of transport videos. Mitochondrial length was manually measured from transport movies using the line selection tool in ImageJ.

For NAD+ quantification, NAD sensor constructs were transiently expressed in pLL neurons by zygotic microinjection. For single-timepoint imaging, larvae were mounted live as described above, and cell body and axon terminal regions were imaged at 4 dpf with consistent laser power and detector gain for all images. Transport analysis was done as described above with sequential imaging of cpVenus and mRFP channels35,100. For cell body and axon terminal mitochondria analysis (5kbneurod1:cox8a-cox8a-NAD-p2a-mRFP), cell body and axon terminal regions were isolated using the mRFP cytosolic signal as a mask and the image subtraction function in ImageJ102. cpVenus and mRFP mean fluorescence intensity were then quantified from sum projections of the isolated region. For nuclear analysis (5kbneurod1:H2B-NAD-p2a-mRFP), sum projections were created for cpVenus and mRFP. Nuclear cpVenus mean fluorescence intensity was quantified by manual outlining of the nuclear area. mRFP mean fluorescence intensity was quantified by manual outlining of the cytosolic area. For transport analysis (5kbneurod1:cox8a-cox8a-NAD-p2a-mitoTagRFP), mitochondria were identified as moving anterogradely, retrogradely, or stationary by visual analysis of transport videos. cpVenus and mRFP mean fluorescence intensity were quantified by manual outlining of individual mitochondria. For all analyses, the mean fluorescence intensity of cpVenus was normalized to the mean fluorescence intensity of TagRFP to control for differences in expression level. NAD+ binding to the bipartite NAD+-binding domain in the biosensor decreases cpVenus fluorescence intensity in a dose-dependent manner96. The images in Fig. 7 were generated using the fire lookup table in ImageJ, and the images/data are inverted to appropriately reflect the direction of change in NAD+ levels.

Drug treatment

Resveratrol and AICAR (5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide) stocks (200 mM and 27.5 mM, respectively) were diluted in embryo media to concentrations previously shown to be effective in larval zebrafish (Resveratrol 300 μM, AICAR 1 mM;70). At 3 dpf, transient transgenic larval zebrafish expressing cytosolic GFP and mitochondrially localized tagRFP (see Supplementary Table 1 for DNA constructs) were placed in a 6-well plate and incubated overnight (18–24 h) in drug or an equal amount of drug solvent (DMSO for resveratrol, sterile H2O for AICAR) in embryo media. After treatment, larvae were mounted live, pLL neuronal cell bodies were imaged, and mitochondrial density was analyzed as described above.

Heat shock-induced expression of Drp1K38A and POLG2-GFP

For DRP-1 analysis, Hsp701:Drp1K38A-mRFP35 or 5kbneurod1:mRFP35 (control) was transiently expressed with 5kbneurod1:mito-eGFP in pLL neurons by zygotic microinjection100. At 4 dpf, larvae of both groups were placed in PCR strip tubes (2–3 larvae per tube) with approximately 200 μl of embryo media. Larvae were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h in a PCR machine (BioRad), then returned to 28 °C. Larvae were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) 7 h post-heat shock for subsequent HCR RNA FISH or immunolabeling as described below.

For POLG2-GFP cell body puncta analysis, Hsp701:POLG2-GFP-p2a-mitoTagRFP was transiently expressed in pLL neurons by zygotic microinjection100. At 4 dpf, embryo media was pre-heated to 37 °C in 50 mL conical tubes. Larvae were transferred to the pre-heated embryo media in 50 mL conical tubes and kept at 37 °C for 1 h. Larvae were then returned to 28 °C media. Larvae were fixed in 4% PFA/0.25% Triton X-100 7 h post-heat shock for subsequent imaging. Fixed larvae were mounted between glass slides and a #1.5 coverslip with Fluoromount mounting medium prior to imaging with an Olympus FV3000 confocal microscope with a 60x (NA1.42) oil objective. Punctal quantification was done as described above for axon terminals.

Nuclear localization analysis

5kbneurod1:mRFP-esrra or 5kbneurod1:mRFP-esrra4KR was transiently expressed in pLL neurons by zygotic microinjection100. At 4 dpf, larvae were fixed in 4% PFA/0.25% Triton X-100 and co-incubated with DAPI (1:500) at 4 °C overnight. Larvae were imaged as described above for cell body POLG2-GFP. DAPI was used to mask out the nuclear RFP signal. Mean fluorescence intensity was then quantified from the sum projections of the nuclear and cytosolic regions.

Photolabeling

5kbneurod1:cox8a-cox8a-paGFP-p2a-mitoTagRFP was transiently expressed in pLL neurons by zygotic microinjection100. Cell body or axon terminal mitochondrial-matrix localized PA-GFP was specifically photoactivated by illuminating with a 405 nm laser using a region of interest (ROI) defined around the structure. For each larva, a pre-activation image was taken (488 nm and 561 nm lasers), the region was scanned for 1 to 5 s with 1% 405 nm laser power using the stimulation function for conversion, and a post-activation image (488 nm and 561 nm lasers) was taken to confirm activation. The axon terminal was then re-imaged at set timepoints post-conversion. Due to transient expression, PA-GFP was not expressed in every axon terminal. To reduce variability due to differences in axon length, only axon terminals innervating sensory organs in the center of the trunk (neuromasts 2, 3, or 4) were used for analysis. PA-GFP and MitoTagRFP mitochondrial area were quantified as described earlier. “Proportion original mitochondria” for terminal activation and “proportion of cell body-derived mitochondria” for cell body activation were quantified as PA-GFP area/MitoTagRFP area (see Supplementary Fig. 3).

Photoconversion of mitochondrially localized mEos was performed using the stable transgenic Tg(−5kbneurod1:mito-mEos)y586Tg 37. The pLL ganglion was specifically converted by illuminating with a 405 nm laser through a z-stack of the entire ganglion, with regional restriction using a region of interest (ROI) defined around this structure. For each larva, a preconversion image was taken (488 nm and 561 nm lasers), the stack was scanned with 1% 405 nm laser power for conversion, and a postconversion image (488 nm and 561 nm lasers) was taken to confirm complete green to red conversion of mEos in pLL cell bodies. For 4 h timepoint analysis, the axon terminal of a sensory organ in the center of the trunk (NM3) was imaged 4 h post-pLL ganglion conversion. All microscope settings were kept consistent for all images. For axon terminal analysis, the red and green channels were merged, and a mask was created by thresholding a standard deviation projection of the axon terminal z-stack. The mask was applied to a sum projection of the red channel, and mean fluorescence was quantified. For time-lapse analysis, a z-stack through an ROI surrounding NM3 was scanned every minute for 6 h. Image analysis was performed by manually scanning through standard deviation z-stack projections from the time series. Cell body-derived (red photoconverted) mitochondria were counted, and volume was measured using the 3D objects counter in ImageJ.

In situ hybridization and hybridization chain reaction RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (HCR RNA FISH)

Colorimetric in situ hybridization was done according to established protocols99,103. To generate probes for in situ hybridization, we amplified 200–600 base pair regions of relevant cDNA within the open reading frames of genes of interest to use as a template for probe synthesis (104; Supplementary Table 2). Zebrafish were fixed overnight in 4% PFA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 4 °C. Fixed larvae were washed in PBS/0.1% Tween−20 and dehydrated in a methanol series. Larvae were stored in methanol at −20 °C. Larvae were rehydrated with PBS/0.1% Tween-20 in a reverse methanol series. Larvae were treated with 10 μg/ml proteinase K in PBS/0.1% Tween-20 for 15 min, then immediately fixed for 20 min in 4% PFA at room temperature (RT). Larvae were washed with PBS/0.1% Tween-20, then prehybridized for 1–2 h at 65 °C. Larvae were incubated overnight at 65 °C with probe diluted 1:200 in hybridization buffer (10 mM citric acid, 0.1% Tween-20, 50 μg/ml heparin, 5× saline sodium citrate (SSC), 50% formamide). Larvae were washed at 65 °C with a hybridization buffer-SSC buffer series (2:1 buffer:2x SSC 15 min; 1:2 buffer:2x SSC 15 min; 2x SSC 15 min; 0.2x SSC 30 min twice). Larvae were then washed at RT with 2:1 and then 1:2 0.2x SSC:PBS/0.1% Tween-20 for 5 min. Larvae were blocked in block solution (2% goat serum, 10% bovine serum albumin in PBS/0.1% Tween-20) for 2 h at RT, and then incubated in sheep anti-digoxigenin (1:10,000) in block solution overnight at 4 °C. Larvae were washed 6 times 15 min in PBS/0.1% Tween-20, 3 × 5 min in coloration buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 9.5, 50 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20), then stained with 0.45% nitro blue tetrazolium, 0.35% 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate in a coloration buffer in the dark until color development. Larvae were washed with PBS/0.1% Tween-20, fixed for 20 min in 4% PFA at RT, dehydrated in a methanol series, and rehydrated for imaging and sorting of RNA expression. WT and actr10 mutant zebrafish were kept in the same tube for processing, then blindly sorted based on RNA expression into two groups (high and low-expressing). Representative larvae were mounted in 1.5% low melt agarose in embryo media and imaged with a Zeiss Axio Imager.M2 microscope with a Zeiss Axio 506 color camera. Sorted larvae were genotyped using the oligonucleotides in Supplementary Table 2.

HCR RNA FISH was performed according to established protocols51. An mRNA transcript-specific probe set for each gene of interest was designed by Molecular Instruments (Supplementary Table 3). Larvae fixation, methanol dehydration/rehydration, and Pro K treatment were performed as described for colorimetric in situ hybridization with modification in the Pro K treatment for larvae less than 4 dpf. 2 dpf larvae were treated with Pro K for 5 min, 3 dpf for 10 min, and 4 dpf for 15 min, followed by post-fixation. Larvae were incubated with a manufacturer-supplied hybridization buffer at 37 °C for 1 h and then incubated in 4 nM (pgc1a and tfam) or 16 nM (others) probe in hybridization buffer at 37 °C overnight. Larvae were washed with a manufacturer-supplied wash buffer and then SSC/0.1% Tween-20. Then, larvae were incubated in a manufacturer-supplied amplification buffer at RT for 30 min, during which manufacturer-supplied reporter-labeled fluorescent hairpins were individually heated at 95 °C and then cooled to RT for 30 min in the dark. Larvae were placed in fresh amplification buffer with 60 nM hairpins. B1 probes were labeled with 546 nm wavelength hairpins, while B2 probes were labeled with 647 nm wavelength hairpins, combined in the same tube. Larvae were incubated overnight in the dark at RT. Larvae were mounted between glass slides and a #1.5 coverslip with Fluoromount mounting medium prior to imaging with an Olympus FV3000 confocal microscope with a 60x (NA1.42) oil objective. For each probe, laser power and detector gain were kept consistent for all images.

To quantify the HCR signal in the whole pLL ganglion in TgBAC(neurod:eGFP)nl1 larvae, a mask was created using the GFP channel threshold using the default auto thresholding algorithm in ImageJ and the image subtraction function was used to remove non-neuronal signal. After using the mask to exclude signal outside the pLLg, a sum projection of the probe signal was created, and the mean fluorescence intensity was measured. To quantify the HCR signal in single cell bodies, a substack was created around the cell of interest, and a sum intensity z-projection of the probe signal was created. The cell body was manually outlined, and the mean fluorescence intensity of the probe signal within the cell body was measured. To quantify the background signal, a region outside the pLLg or cell body was selected and the sum intensity of the probe signal was measured. The background mean signal was subtracted from the pLL mean signal to get the normalized mean fluorescence intensity.

Immunolabeling

For SSBP1 and TFAM immunolabeling, transient transgenesis of either 5kbneurod1:mito-eGFP or 5kbneurod1:mitotagRFP was used to localize pLL cell body mitochondria. Larvae were fixed in 4% PFA/0.25% Triton X-100 at 4 °C overnight, then incubated in water at RT overnight. Larvae were kept in a block (0.1% Triton X-100, 1% dimethyl sulfoxide, 0.02% sodium azide, 0.5% bovine serum albumin, 5% goat serum) at RT for 2 h, then incubated with antibody in the block overnight at 4 °C. Antibodies were validated by western blot (Supplementary Fig. 1m). Larvae injected with 5kbneurod1:mito-eGFP were incubated with chicken anti-GFP (1:2000) to amplify the signal. Larvae were incubated with either rabbit anti-SSBP1 (1:500) or rabbit anti-TFAM (1:100). Larvae were then washed in PBS/0.1% Triton X-100 before incubation in goat anti-chicken AlexaFluor 488 (1:1000) and goat anti-rabbit AlexaFluor 568 (1:1000) or goat anti-rabbit AlexaFluor 647 (1:1000) at 4 °C overnight. Larvae were washed in PBS/0.1% Triton X-100 prior to imaging as described for HCR. For analysis, a mask was created from the mitochondrial channel using the default auto thresholding algorithm in ImageJ and the image subtraction function was used to remove signal outside the pLL cell body. For TFAM quantification, the 3D objects counter function in ImageJ and manual thresholding were used to quantify the volume of TFAM puncta and mitochondria (mitochondrial volume used for normalization). For SSBP1 quantification, SSBP1 puncta were manually counted and normalized to mitochondrial volume.

Transmission electron microscopy

4 dpf wild-type and actr10 mutant larvae samples were dissected by removing the trunks posterior to the pLLg and then fixed in Karnovsky’s fixative (2.5% glutaraldehyde/2.0% formaldehyde in 0.1 M NaPO4 buffer (PB), pH = 7.2) at 4 °C overnight. All remaining steps were performed on the specimens in glass scintillation vials on a rotator unless specified. The fixative was removed, and the samples were washed 5 × 5 min in PB at RT. Post-fixation was performed on the samples in 1% OsO4 in PB for 1 h at RT. The samples were again washed in PB, 7 × 5 min at RT. Dehydration was performed with a graded series of EtOH (35%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 5 × 5 min, 95% for 10 min, 100% for 3 × 10 min) at RT. Specimens were transitioned from EtOH by rinsing 2 × 7 min in acetone at RT. Samples were infiltrated and embedded in EMBed 812 resin (EMS Hatfield, PA 19440) using a graded series of 2:1 Acetone / EMBed812 1 h RT, 1:1 Acetone / EMBed812 overnight RT, 1:2 Acetone / EMBed812 2 h RT. 100% EMBed 812 resin infiltrations continued in uncapped vials for 1 h at 65 °C in a laboratory microwave, with a fresh change of resin for 1 h at 75 °C. Final embedding was done in EMBed 812 resin in aluminum weighing dishes placed in a 60 °C drying oven and allowed to polymerize for 2 days. Polymerized samples had the aluminum dishes stripped, with the target specimen area sawed out with a jeweler's saw and glued to blank polymerized stubs of EMBed 812 resin. Specimens were sectioned on a Reichert-Jung Ultracut E ultra-microtome with sections collected on formvar-coated, Cu 2 × 1 slot grids. Grids were post-stained in uranyl acetate and Reynolds lead citrate and viewed on a Philips CM120 at 80 kV. Images were collected on a BioSprint12 digital camera. One section of the pLLg was imaged for a WT and an actr10 mutant larva. All cells visible within the section were analyzed. Images were calibrated in ImageJ and analyzed by manual counting of mitochondria and manual outlining of mitochondrial, cell, and nuclear areas. Cytosolic area was calculated as cell area minus nuclear area.

Western blot

Western blot of TFAM and SSBP1 protein was done according to established protocols35. Protein lysates of 4 dpf wild type larvae were run on a 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel. After transfer to the polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, the blots were blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk in 1X PBS/0.1% Tween for 1–4 h before incubation with anti-TFAM (1:1000) or anti-SSBP1 (1:500) overnight in block at 4 °C. Membranes were then washed in 1X PBS, 0.1% Tween20 and incubated with secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase for 90 min at RT. The blot was developed with a Western Sure Chemiluminescent Substrate (LiCor) on a C-DiGit Blot Scanner.

Embryo dissociation and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)

20–30 4 dpf Tg(hsp70:eGFP-SILL)uwd12 larvae were collected in 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes. Embryo media was removed, and larvae were incubated in 100 μL sterile, calcium-free Ringer’s solution (116 mM NaCl, 2.6 mM KCl, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.0) at RT for 5 min. 600 μL of sterile protease solution (0.25% trypsin, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, PBS) was warmed to 28 °C, and 27 μl of Collagenase P (100 mg/mL in HBSS) was added to the tube and mixed. Larvae were incubated at 28 °C. Every 30 s, larvae were homogenized for 30 s by pipetting first with a P1000 pipette until partially dissociated, then with a P200 pipette until fully dissociated. Once dissociated, 100 μl of sterile stop solution (30% calf serum, 6 mM CaCl2, PBS) was added and mixed. The cells were spun down at 350 x g at 4 °C for 5 min. The supernatant was removed and replaced with 500 μl sterile suspension solution (1% FBS, 0.8 mM CaCl2, 50 U/mL penicillin, 0.05 mg/mL streptomycin, DMEM) chilled to 4 °C. Cells were spun at 350 x g at 4 °C for 5 min. The supernatant was removed, and 500 μl of chilled sterile suspension solution was used to resuspend cells. Resuspended cells were passed through a 40 μm cell strainer into a FACS tube and stored on ice until sorting. Immediately prior to sorting, DAPI (1:1000) was added to sort out dead cells. GFP + DAPI- cells were sorted on a BD FACSAria™ III Cell Sorter with a 100 μm nozzle into 500 μL TRIzol LS in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube.

Bulk RNA sequencing and analysis

Sorted pLL neurons were pooled into 3 replicates each for wild-type and actr10 samples. RNA was isolated using TRIzol. The SMART-Seq® v4 Ultra® Low Input RNA Kit was used for poly(A)+ selection, cDNA synthesis and amplification, followed by Illumina 150-bp paired-end sequencing performed by Azenta Life Sciences (South Plainfield, NJ). Sequence reads were trimmed to remove possible adapter sequences and nucleotides with poor quality using Trimmomatic v.0.36105. The trimmed reads were mapped to the Danio rerio GRCz10.89 reference genome available on ENSEMBL using the STAR aligner v.2.5.2b106. Unique gene hit counts were calculated by using FeatureCounts from the Subread package v.1.5.2107. Only unique reads that fell within exon regions were counted. Using DESeq2108, a comparison of gene expression between WT and actr10 samples was performed. The Wald test was used to generate p-values and log2 fold changes. Genes with an adjusted p-value < 0.05 and absolute log2 fold change > 1 were called as differentially expressed genes for each comparison. Alignment and differential expression analysis were performed by Azenta Life Sciences (South Plainfield, NJ).

KEGG pathway enrichment was performed for genes that were called as significantly upregulated or significantly downregulated using the ShinyGO (v0.82) webserver (84–86). Danio rerio gene IDs were used as input, and background genes were defined as all genes that were detectable in the RNA-sequencing dataset. Default parameters were maintained. KEGG pathway plots were downloaded directly from the ShinyGO webserver. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) for differentially expressed genes was performed using the clusterProfiler R package with all gene ontology terms included, using the genome-wide annotation for Zebrafish (org.Dr.eg.db v3.19.1;109). Zebrafish gene IDs were converted to their closest human gene orthologues using the g:Profiler g:Orth webserver110. Fisher’s exact test enrichment analysis was performed using the fisher.test function in R to test overlap between significantly upregulated or significantly downregulated genes and either the MitoCarta database or the ESRRG ChipSeq targets49,63. Transcription factor enrichment analysis was performed using the TFEA.ChIP webserver, which uses information derived from the ChIP-seq datasets available from the ENCODE project, GEO Datasets, GeneHancer, ReMap 2018, and ReMap 2022 databases111. The significantly downregulated genes were used with background genes defined as all genes that were detectable in the RNA-sequencing dataset. Wilcoxon rank-sum was used for transcription factor ranking. Over-representation analysis of transcription factor target motifs was performed using the Webgestalt webserver with the functional database identified as “network: transcription factor target”112. The significantly downregulated genes were used with background genes defined as all genes that were detectable in the RNA-sequencing dataset. Default parameters were maintained. Volcano plots of differentially expressed genes and transcription factor enrichment were created using the ggplot2 R package113.

Experimental design, statistical analysis, and figure assembly

All image analysis was performed using ImageJ102. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP18, and data plots were made using GraphPad Prism 10, unless indicated otherwise in the method section. Sample size estimated based on previous work and determined by power analyses. Imaging and analysis were done blind to genotype, allowing inherent randomization and blinding to experimental condition. All experiments were replicated no less than two times (experimental replicates) with a sample size for each experiment representing biological replicates. Statistical tests/post hoc analyses and other statistical details for each data set are indicated in the text or figure legends. For parametric data, ANOVAs were used with Tukey HSD post-hoc contrasts for multiple pairwise comparisons within a dataset. For nonparametric data, single comparisons were done using the Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis analysis, and multiple comparisons using the Steel-Dwass test. Images were created using ImageJ, and linear adjustments to brightness/contrast were made equally for the images being compared. Figures were compiled in Adobe Illustrator, and supplementary movies were handled in Adobe After Effects.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

41467_2026_74127_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (42.3KB, pdf)

Descriptions of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1 (3.9MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 2 (4.6MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 3 (2.9MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 4 (2.8MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 5 (2.5MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 6 (2.3MB, mp4)
Reporting Summary (1.9MB, pdf)

Source data

Source data (3.1MB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge members of the Drerup lab and Dr. Samantha Lewis for their thoughtful discussions of the work and critique of the manuscript. The constitutively active KIF1A motor domain construct was provided by Dr. Marvin Bentley. We would like to thank the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Laboratory, supported by P30 CA014520, for the use of its facilities and assistance with fluorescence-activated cell sorting. We would like to thank Randall Massey and the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Electron Microscopy Facility for assistance with Transmission Electron Microscopy.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: A.E.L. and C.M.D. Data acquisition and analysis: A.E.L., C.S., R.S., and C.M.D. Funding acquisition: A.E.L. and C.M.D. Writing – original draft: A.E.L. Writing – review & editing: C.M.D.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Andrew Grierson and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Funding

National Institutes of Health grant R01NS124692 (CMD). National Science Foundation grant DEG-2137424 (AEL). National Institutes of Health grant T32GM007133 (University of Wisconsin-Madison Predoctoral Training Program in Genetics; AEL). University of Wisconsin-Madison Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research (CMD). Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (CMD).

Data availability

All data and materials are available upon request from the corresponding author. Data used for graphs/statistical analysis are provided in the Supplementary Information/Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-026-74127-4.

References

  • 1.Suomalainen, A. & Nunnari, J. Mitochondria at the crossroads of health and disease. Cell187, 2601–2627 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Misgeld, T. & Schwarz, T. L. Mitostasis in neurons: maintaining mitochondria in an extended cellular architecture. Neuron96, 651–666 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gerhart-Hines, Z. et al. Metabolic control of muscle mitochondrial function and fatty acid oxidation through SIRT1/PGC-1α. EMBO J.26, 1913–1923 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jäger, S., Handschin, C., St.-Pierre, J. & Spiegelman, B. M. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) action in skeletal muscle via direct phosphorylation of PGC-1α. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.104, 12017–12022 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ojuka, E. O., Jones, T. E., Han, D. H., Chen, M. & Holloszy, J. O. Raising Ca 2+ in L6 myotubes mimics effects of exercise on mitochondrial biogenesis in muscle. FASEB J.17, 675–681 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cantó, C. et al. AMPK regulates energy expenditure by modulating NAD+ metabolism and SI RT1 activity. Nature458, 1056–1060 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Scarpulla, R. C. Metabolic control of mitochondrial biogenesis through the PGC-1 family regulatory network. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) - Mol. Cell Res.1813, 1269–1278 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schreiber, S. N. et al. The estrogen-related receptor α (ERRα) functions in PPARγ coactivator 1α (PGC-1α)-induced mitochondrial biogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.101, 6472–6477 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schreiber, S. N., Knutti, D., Brogli, K., Uhlmann, T. & Kralli, A. The Transcriptional coactivator PGC-1 Regulates the Expression and Activity of the Orphan Nuclear Receptor Estrogen-Related Receptor α (ERRα). J. Biol. Chem.278, 9013–9018 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Virbasius, J. V. & Scarpulla, R. C. Activation of the human mitochondrial transcription factor A gene by nuclear respiratory factors: a potential regulatory link between nuclear and mitochondrial gene expression in organelle biogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.91, 1309–1313 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kleele, T. et al. Distinct fission signatures predict mitochondrial degradation or biogenesis. Nature593, 435–439 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lewis, S. C., Uchiyama, L. F. & Nunnari, J. ER-mitochondria contacts couple mtDNA synthesis with mitochondrial division in human cells. Science353, aaf5549 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cardanho-Ramos, C. & Morais, V. A. Mitochondrial biogenesis in neurons: how and where. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 13059 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Davis, A. F. & Clayton, D. A. In situ localization of mitochondrial DNA replication in intact mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol.135, 883–893 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schultz, R. A. et al. Differential expression of mitochondrial DNA replication factors in mammalian tissues. J. Biol. Chem.273, 3447–3451 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Amiri, M. & Hollenbeck, P. J. Mitochondrial biogenesis in the axons of vertebrate peripheral neurons. Dev. Neurobiol.68, 1348–1361 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cioni, J. M. et al. Late Endosomes Act As mRNA translation platforms and sustain mitochondria in axons. Cell176, 56–72 e15 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kuzniewska, B. et al. Mitochondrial protein biogenesis in the synapse is supported by local translation. EMBO Rep.21, e48882 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Van Laar, V. S. et al. Evidence for compartmentalized axonal mitochondrial biogenesis: mitochondrial DNA replication increases in distal axons as an early response to parkinson’s disease-relevant stress. J. Neurosci.38, 7505–7515 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cardanho-Ramos, C. et al. Local mitochondrial replication in the periphery of neurons requires the eEF1A1 protein and the translation of nuclear-encoded proteins. iScience27, 109136 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hollenbeck, P. J. & Saxton, W. M. The axonal transport of mitochondria. J. Cell Sci.118, 5411–5419 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pilling, A. D., Horiuchi, D., Lively, C. M. & Saxton, W. M. Kinesin-1 and Dynein are the primary motors for fast transport of mitochondria in Drosophila motor axons. Mol. Biol. Cell17, 2057–2068 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Saxton, W. M. & Hollenbeck, P. J. The axonal transport of mitochondria. J. Cell Sci.125, 2095–2104 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schnapp, B. J. & Reese, T. S. Dynein is the motor for retrograde axonal transport of organelles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA86, 1548–1552 (1989). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Canty, J. T., Hensley, A., Aslan, M., Jack, A. & Yildiz, A. TRAK adaptors regulate the recruitment and activation of dynein and kinesin in mitochondrial transport. Nat. Commun.14, 1376 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Glater, E. E., Megeath, L. J., Stowers, R. S. & Schwarz, T. L. Axonal transport of mitochondria requires Milton to recruit kinesin heavy chain and is light chain independent. J. Cell Biol.173, 545–557 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Stowers, R. S., Megeath, L. J., Gorska-Andrzejak, J., Meinertzhagen, I. A. & Schwarz, T. L. Axonal transport of mitochondria to synapses depends on Milton, a novel Drosophila protein. Neuron36, 1063–1077 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Guo, X. et al. The GTPase dMiro is required for axonal transport of mitochondria to Drosophila synapses. Neuron47, 379–393 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fenton, A. R., Jongens, T. A. & Holzbaur, E. L. F. Mitochondrial adaptor TRAK2 activates and functionally links opposing kinesin and dynein motors. Nat. Commun.12, 4578 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.MacAskill, A. F., Brickley, K., Stephenson, F. A. & Kittler, J. T. GTPase-dependent recruitment of Grif-1 by Miro1 regulates mitochondrial trafficking in hippocampal neurons. Mol. Cell Neurosci.40, 301–312 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.MacAskill, A. F. & Kittler, J. T. Control of mitochondrial transport and localization in neurons. Trends Cell Biol.20, 102–112 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Han, S. M., Baig, H. S. & Hammarlund, M. Mitochondria localize to injured axons to support regeneration. Neuron92, 1308–1323 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhou, B. et al. Facilitation of axon regeneration by enhancing mitochondrial transport and rescuing energy deficits. J. Cell Biol.214, 103–119 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Campbell, P. D. et al. Unique function of Kinesin Kif5A in the localization of mitochondria in axons. J. Neurosci.34, 14717–14732 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Drerup, C. M., Herbert, A. L., Monk, K. R. & Nechiporuk, A. V. Regulation of mitochondria-dynactin interaction and mitochondrial retrograde transport in axons. eLife6, e22234 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Joshi, D. C. et al. Inappropriate intrusion of an axonal mitochondrial anchor into dendrites causes neurodegeneration. Cell Rep.29, 685–696.e685 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mandal, A. et al. Retrograde mitochondrial transport is essential for organelle distribution and health in zebrafish neurons. J. Neurosci.41, 1371–1392 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Metcalfe, W. K., Kimmel, C. B. & Schabtach, E. Anatomy of the posterior lateral line system in young larvae of the zebrafish. J. Comp. Neurol.233, 377–389 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kindt, K. S., Finch, G. & Nicolson, T. Kinocilia mediate mechanosensitivity in developing zebrafish hair cells. Dev. Cell23, 329–341 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Eckley, D. M. & Schroer, T. A. Interactions between the evolutionarily conserved, actin-related protein, Arp11, actin, and Arp1. Mol. Biol. Cell14, 2645–2654 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Choi, H. M. T. et al. Third-generation in situ hybridization chain reaction: multiplexed, quantitative, sensitive, versatile, robust. Development145, dev165753 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kawano, D. et al. NudC-regulated Lis1 stability is essential for the maintenance of dynamic microtubule ends in axon terminals. iScience25, 105072 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lloyd, T. homasE. et al. The p150Glued CAP-Gly domain regulates initiation of retrograde transport at synaptic termini. Neuron74, 344–360 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.McGrail, M. et al. Regulation of cytoplasmic dynein function in vivo by the Drosophila Glued complex. J. Cell Biol.131, 411–425 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Moughamian, A. rmenJ. & Holzbaur, E. RikaL. F. Dynactin is required for transport initiation from the distal axon. Neuron74, 331–343 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Young, M. J., Humble, M. M., DeBalsi, K. L., Sun, K. Y. & Copeland, W. C. POLG2 disease variants: analyses reveal a dominant negative heterodimer, altered mitochondrial localization and impaired respiratory capacity. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, 5184–5197 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rajala, N., Gerhold, J. M., Martinsson, P., Klymov, A. & Spelbrink, J. N. Replication factors transiently associate with mtDNA at the mitochondrial inner membrane to facilitate replication. Nucleic Acids Res.42, 952–967 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kaufman, B. A. et al. The mitochondrial transcription factor TFAM coordinates the assembly of multiple DNA molecules into nucleoid-like structures. Mol. Biol. Cell18, 3225–3236 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rath, S. et al. MitoCarta3.0: an updated mitochondrial proteome now with sub-organelle localization and pathway annotations. Nucleic Acids Res.49, D1541–D1547 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ghysen, A. & Dambly-Chaudiere, C. The three-sided romance of the lateral line: glia love axons love precursors love glia. Bioessays27, 488–494 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wong, H.-T. C., Lang, A. E., Stein, C. & Drerup, C. M. ALS-linked VapB P56S mutation alters neuronal mitochondrial turnover at the synapse. J. Neurosci.44, e0879242024 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mandal, A., Pinter, K. & Drerup, C. M. Analyzing neuronal mitochondria in vivo using fluorescent reporters in zebrafish. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.6, 144 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kageyama, Y. et al. Mitochondrial division ensures the survival of postmitotic neurons by suppressing oxidative damage. J. Cell Biol.197, 535–551 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Smirnova, E., Griparic, L., Shurland, D. L. & van der Bliek, A. M. Dynamin-related protein Drp1 is required for mitochondrial division in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell12, 2245–2256 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhu, P. P. et al. Intra- and intermolecular domain interactions of the C-terminal GTPase effector domain of the multimeric dynamin-like GTPase Drp1. J. Biol. Chem.279, 35967–35974 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Renken, C. J., Kim, S., Wu, Y., Hammarlund, M., and Yogev, S. Cytoplasmic ribosomes hitchhike on mitochondria to dendrites. 10.1101/2024.09.13.612863 (2024).
  • 57.Horie, C., Suzuki, H., Sakaguchi, M. & Mihara, K. Characterization of Signal That Directs C-Tail–anchored Proteins to Ma mmalian Mitochondrial Outer Membrane. Mol. Biol. Cell13, 1615–1625 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yang, R., Bentley, M., Huang, C.-F., and Banker, G. Analyzing kinesin motor domain translocation in cultured hippocampal neurons. In Methods in Cell Biology. 217–232. (Elsevier, 2016), [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 59.Eichner, L. J. & Giguère, V. Estrogen-related receptors (ERRs): A new dawn in transcriptional control of mitochondrial gene networks. Mitochondrion11, 544–552 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hock, M. B. & Kralli, A. Transcriptional control of mitochondrial biogenesis and function. Annu. Rev. Physiol.71, 177–203 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fan, W. et al. ERRγ promotes angiogenesis, mitochondrial biogenesis, and oxidative remodeling in PGC1α/β-deficient muscle. Cell Rep.22, 2521–2529 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Huss, J. M., Torra, I. P., Staels, B., Giguère, V. & Kelly, D. P. Estrogen-related receptor α directs peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α signaling in the transcriptional control of energy metaboli sm in cardiac and skeletal muscle. Mol. Cell. Biol.24, 9079–9091 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Pei, L. et al. Dependence of Hippocampal Function on ERRγ-Regulated Mitochondrial Metabolism. Cell Metab.21, 628–636 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Howitz, K. T. et al. Small molecule activators of sirtuins extend Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan. Nature425, 191–196 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lopes Costa, A. et al. The beneficial effects of resveratrol on respiratory chain defects in patients’ fibroblasts involve estrogen receptor and estrogen-related receptor alpha signaling. Hum. Mol. Genet.23, 2106–2119 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sopariwala, D. H. et al. Estrogen-related receptor alpha is an AMPK -regulated factor that promotes ischemic muscle revascularization and recovery in diet-induced obese mice. FASEB Bioadv.4, 602–618 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wilson, B. J., Tremblay, A. M., Deblois, G., Sylvain-Drolet, G. & Giguère, V. An acetylation switch modulates the transcriptional activity of Estrogen-related receptor α. Mol. Endocrinol.24, 1349–1358 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Yan, M. et al. Chronic AMPK activation via loss of FLCN induces functional beige adipose tissue through PGC-1α/ERRα. Genes Dev.30, 1034–1046 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Corton, J. M., Gillespie, J. G., Hawley, S. A. & Hardie, D. G. 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside. a specific method for activating AMP-activated protein kinase in intact cells? Eur. J. Biochem.229, 558–565 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mosser, E. A. et al. Identification of pathways that regulate circadian rhythms using a larval zebrafish small molecule screen. Sci. Rep.9, 12405 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Johnston, S. D. et al. Estrogen-related receptor α1 functionally binds as a monomer to extended half-site sequences, including ones contained within estrogen-response elements. Mol. Endocrinol.11, 342–352 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Blander, G. & Guarente, L. The Sir2 family of protein deacetylases. Annu Rev. Biochem. 73, 417–435 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.McMeekin, L. J. et al. Estrogen-related Receptor Alpha (ERRα) is required for PGC-1α-dependent gene expression in the mouse brain. Neuroscience479, 70–90 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Alano, C. C. et al. Differences among cell types in NAD(+) compartmentalization: a comparison of neurons, astrocytes, and cardiac myocytes. J. Neurosci. Res.85, 3378–3385 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hu, Q. et al. Genetically encoded biosensors for evaluating NAD(+)/NADH ratio in cytosolic and mitochondrial compartments. Cell Rep Methods1. 10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100116 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 76.Wareski, P. et al. PGC-1α and PGC-1Β regulate mitochondrial density in neurons. J. Biol. Chem.284, 21379–21385 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., Yang, Y., Huang, X. & Sun, C. SIRT1 protects dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson’s disease models via PGC-1α-mediated mitochondrial biogenesis. Neurotox. Res.39, 1393–1404 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hatsuda, A. et al. Calcium signals tune AMPK activity and mitochondrial homeostasis in dendrites of developing neurons. Development150, dev201930 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Eudy, J. D. et al. Isolation of a gene encoding a novel member of the nuclear receptor superfamily from the critical region of Usher syndrome type IIa at 1q41. Genomics50, 382–384 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Giguère, V., Yang, N., Segui, P. & Evans, R. M. Identification of a new class of steroid hormone receptors. Nature331, 91–94 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Huss, J. M., Garbacz, W. G. & Xie, W. Constitutive activities of estrogen-related receptors: transcriptional regulation of metabolism by the ERR pathways in health and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) - Mol. Basis Dis.1852, 1912–1927 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Lydon, J. P., Power, R. F. & Conneely, O. M. Differential modes of activation define orphan subclasses within the steroid/thyroid receptor superfamily. Gene Expr.2, 273–283 (1992). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Vernier, M. & Giguère, V. Aging, senescence and mitochondria: the PGC-1/ERR axis. J. Mol. Endocrinol.66, R1–R14 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Yu, L. & Yang, S. J. AMP-activated protein kinase mediates activity-dependent regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α and nuclear respiratory factor 1 expression in rat visual cortical neurons. Neuroscience169, 23–38 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lagouge, M. et al. Resveratrol improves mitochondrial function and protects against metabolic disease by activating SIRT1 and PGC-1α. Cell127, 1109–1122 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Michishita, E., Park, J. Y., Burneskis, J. M., Barrett, J. C. & Horikawa, I. Evolutionarily conserved and nonconserved cellular localizations and functions of human SIRT proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell16, 4623–4635 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Qin, W. et al. PGC-1α expression decreases in the Alzheimer disease brain as a function of dementia. Archives of Neurology66, 10.1001/archneurol.2008.588 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 88.Sheng, B. et al. Impaired mitochondrial biogenesis contributes to mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: impaired mitochondrial biogenesis in AD. J. Neurochem.120, 419–429 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Shin, J.-H. et al. PARIS (ZNF746) repression of PGC-1α contributes to neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Cell144, 689–702 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Stevens, D. A. et al. Parkin loss leads to PARIS-dependent declines in mitochondrial mass and respiration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.112, 11696–11701 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Westerfield, M. The zebrafish book: a guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio, 1993).
  • 92.Kimmel, C. B., Ballard, W. W., Kimmel, S. R., Ullmann, B. & Schilling, T. F. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn.203, 253–310 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kwan, K. M. et al. The Tol2kit: a multisite gateway-based construction kit for Tol2 transposon transgenesis constructs. Dev. Dyn.236, 3088–3099 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Gibson, D. G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods6, 343–345 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Huang, C. F. & Banker, G. The translocation selectivity of the kinesins that mediate neuronal organelle transport. Traffic13, 549–564 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Cambronne, X. A. et al. Biosensor reveals multiple sources for mitochondrial NAD(+). Science352, 1474–1477 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Zhang, Q. et al. Synaptically silent sensory hair cells in zebrafish are recruited after damage. Nat. Commun.9, 1388 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Mo, W. & Nicolson, T. Both pre- and postsynaptic activity of nsf prevents degeneration of hair-cell synapses. PLoS ONE6, e27146 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Drerup, C. M. & Nechiporuk, A. V. JNK-interacting protein 3 mediates the retrograde transport of activated c-Jun N-terminal kinase and lysosomes. PLoS Genet.9, e1003303 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Drerup, C. M. & Nechiporuk, A. V. In vivo analysis of axonal transport in zebrafish. Methods Cell Biol.131, 311–329 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Preibisch, S., Saalfeld, S. & Tomancak, P. Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions. Bioinformatics25, 1463–1465 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods9, 676–682 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Thisse, C. & Thisse, B. High-resolution in situ hybridization to whole-mount zebrafish embryos. Nat. Protoc.3, 59–69 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Logel, J., Dill, D. & Leonard, S. Synthesis of cRNA probes from PCR-generated DNA. BioTechniques13, 604–610 (1992). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics30, 2114–2120 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics29, 15–21 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general-purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics30, 923–930 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol.15, 550 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Yu, G. Thirteen years of clusterProfiler. Innovation5, 100722 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kolberg, L. et al. g:Profiler—interoperable web service for functional enrichment analysis and gene identifier mapping (2023 update). Nucleic Acids Res.51, W207–W212 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Puente-Santamaría, L., Wasserman, W. W. & Del Peso, L. TFEA.ChIP: a tool kit for transcription factor binding site enrichment analysis, capitalizing on ChIP-seq datasets. Bioinformatics35, 5339–5340 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Elizarraras, J. M. et al. WebGestalt 2024: faster gene set analysis and new support for metabolomics and multi-omics. Nucleic Acids Res.52, W415–W421 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis, 2nd 2016 Edition (Springer International Publishing: Imprint: Springer, 2016).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

41467_2026_74127_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (42.3KB, pdf)

Descriptions of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1 (3.9MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 2 (4.6MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 3 (2.9MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 4 (2.8MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 5 (2.5MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 6 (2.3MB, mp4)
Reporting Summary (1.9MB, pdf)
Source data (3.1MB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All data and materials are available upon request from the corresponding author. Data used for graphs/statistical analysis are provided in the Supplementary Information/Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES