Skip to main content
Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine logoLink to Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine
. 1994 Dec;11(4):223–226. doi: 10.1136/emj.11.4.223

Assessment of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for undergraduate students in accident and emergency medicine.

G Johnson 1, K Reynard 1
PMCID: PMC1342450  PMID: 7894806

Abstract

Conventional techniques for assessing the knowledge and clinical competence of undergraduate medical students are widely acknowledged as being unsatisfactory. We introduced an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for our fourth year medical students at the end of their accident and emergency (A&E) medicine attachment. This paper outlines the organisation of the examination and the results of a comparison of marks obtained from the OSCE, from a multiple choice type examination and from a subjective rating of the students performance by their teachers. We found the OSCE to be an acceptable form of examination to both medical students and examiners. Our results show significant correlation between marks obtained on the OSCE exam and subjective rating of the students ability. There was no statistically significant relationship to marks obtained on a multiple choice questionnaire exam. The OSCE format is particularly appropriate to A&E medicine where the participation of patients in traditional clinical examinations is impractical.

Full text

PDF
223

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burdick W. P. Emergency medicine's role in the education of medical students: directions for change. Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Jun;20(6):688–691. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82397-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harden R. M., Gleeson F. A. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ. 1979 Jan;13(1):41–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Harden R. M., Stevenson M., Downie W. W., Wilson G. M. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. Br Med J. 1975 Feb 22;1(5955):447–451. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5955.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lowry S. Assessment of students. BMJ. 1993 Jan 2;306(6869):51–54. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6869.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Newble D. I. Eight years' experience with a structured clinical examination. Med Educ. 1988 May;22(3):200–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1988.tb00007.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Newble D. I., Hoare J., Elmslie R. G. The validity and reliability of a new examination of the clinical competence of medical students. Med Educ. 1981 Jan;15(1):46–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1981.tb02315.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Newble D. I., Jaeger K. The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students. Med Educ. 1983 May;17(3):165–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1983.tb00657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES