Abstract
Good communication at the accident and emergency (A&E)-general practice interface is important. Such communication will be affected by the attitudes of A&E staff towards local general practitioners (GPs). The objectives of this study were to establish and compare, using a questionnaire, the attitudes of Dublin A&E doctors and nurses towards the services offered by local GPs. A questionnaire was sent to all nurses and non-consultant doctors working in four of the six Dublin A&E departments. Completed questionnaires were received from 57 (61%) nurses and 35 (81%) doctors. Only two activities (being accessible to patients during normal surgery hours and providing family planning services) were rated by more than one-fifth of doctors and nurses as being performed 'well'. Six activities (being accessible to patients outside surgery hours, providing long-term care for the chronically ill and debilitated, providing appropriate care for 'difficult' patients, advising patients about the appropriate use of services and performing first aid) were rated by more than 40% of both doctors and nurses as being performed 'badly'. For all activities the nurses consistently rated the performance of the 'average GP' more critically than the doctors. These results must be interpreted cautiously. The implications of these findings and how best they can be addressed are discussed.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BLACKWELL B. Why patients come to a casualty department. Lancet. 1962 Feb 17;1(7225):369–371. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(62)91319-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dale J., Green J. How do nurses working in hospital accident and emergency departments perceive local general practitioners? A study in six English hospitals. Arch Emerg Med. 1991 Sep;8(3):210–216. doi: 10.1136/emj.8.3.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dale J. Primary care: the old bugbear of accident and emergency services. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Mar;42(356):90–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Driscoll P. A., Vincent C. A., Wilkinson M. The use of the accident and emergency department. Arch Emerg Med. 1987 Jun;4(2):77–82. doi: 10.1136/emj.4.2.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foroughi D., Chadwick L. Accident and emergency abusers. Practitioner. 1989 May 8;233(1468):657–659. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hallam L. Primary medical care outside normal working hours: review of published work. BMJ. 1994 Jan 22;308(6923):249–253. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6923.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenkins C., Bartholomew J., Gelder F., Morrell D. Arranging hospital admission for acutely ill patients: problems encountered by general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jun;44(383):251–254. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrison W. G., Pennycook A. G., Makower R. M., Swann I. J. The general practitioner's use and expectations of an accident and emergency department. J R Soc Med. 1990 Apr;83(4):237–240. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reilly P. M. Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Apr;31(225):223–230. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stein L. I. The doctor-nurse game. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1967 Jun;16(6):699–703. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1967.01730240055009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood T. C., Cliff K. S. Accident and emergency departments--why people attend with minor injuries and ailments. Public Health. 1986 Jan;100(1):15–20. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(86)80081-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]