Abstract
Background
Despite recent advances, Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC)-a chronic obstructive biliary disease-still lacks effective therapies to prevent disease progression or the need for liver transplantation. Moreover, up to 30% of transplant recipients experience recurrence. Long non-coding RNA H19 (H19) has been implicated in promoting PSC progression, yet the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying its pathogenic role remain incompletely understood.
Results
Liver tissues from age- and sex-matched wild type (WT), H19 knockout (H19KO), Mdr2 knockout (Mdr2KO), and double-knockout (DKO; Mdr2KO/H19KO) mice were analyzed using single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) and GeoMx spatial transcriptomics to define the cell type and spatially specific effects of H19 deletion in cholestatic liver injury. Machine learning models were built to develop cell-type-specific gene prediction signatures and cross-validated using the human dataset GSE243981. A disease-associated cholangiocyte subcluster that increased in Mdr2KO but was markedly reduced in DKO mice was identified. SPP1 signaling was significantly dysregulated in cholestatic liver injury and mitigated following H19 deletion. Translationally conserved healthy (Clu, Spp1) and diseased (Csmd1, Slco3a1, Cftr) cholangiocyte markers were identified. When validated in a human patient dataset (GSE243981), our machine-learning prediction models achieved AUC values > 0.869. Finally, spatial analyses demonstrated that the mitigation of disease-associated gene expression following H19 deletion was specifically restricted to hepatocytes within the bile duct region.
Conclusions
H19 deletion mitigates cholestatic injury by suppressing pathogenic cholangiocyte states, normalizing Spp1-mediated signaling, and shifting transcriptional programs specifically within the periductal niche. Furthermore, our machine-learning signatures demonstrate robust cross-species translation and may benefit future post-transplant analytics and disease recurrence predictions.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13578-026-01590-3.
Keywords: Primary sclerosing cholangitis, Cholestasis, SPP1, Machine learning, H19, Long non-coding RNA
Introduction
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, progressive hepatobiliary disease characterized by biliary fibrosis, obstructive cholestasis, and inflammation of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts [1–3]. The disruption of bile acid homeostasis contributes to a cascade of metabolic and immune dysregulation, as bile acids are important signaling molecules. PSC progresses along a spectrum with eventual development of end-stage liver failure [4]. PSC is also associated with a markedly increased risk of malignancies, such as cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and colorectal carcinoma [5–10]. In the United States, PSC is the fifth leading indication for liver transplantation [11]. Furthermore, recurrence occurs in up to 30% of transplant recipients [11]. Despite the severity of the disease, no proven pharmacotherapies exist, largely due to an incomplete understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying PSC pathogenesis [11].
The long non-coding RNA H19 (H19) has emerged as an important regulator of PSC disease progression [12, 13]. Previous research in our lab and others has shown that H19, which is normally not expressed in healthy hepatic tissues, is upregulated in PSC and exacerbates disease progression in Mdr2KO mice (the gold standard mouse model for PSC) [12, 14–19]. Elucidating the mechanisms by which H19 deletion leads to transcriptional network and cellular function alterations is key to uncovering novel therapeutic targets. To achieve this, we leveraged single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) and spatial transcriptomic profiling. While single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) has advantages for profiling immune cells, snRNAseq offers several distinct benefits, including compatibility with frozen tissue, reduced dissociation-induced artifacts, and superior accuracy in profiling hepatocytes and cholangiocytes [20]. Spatial transcriptomic technology, such as GeoMx® Digital Spatial Profiler (DSP), allows transcriptomic analysis at specific regions based on histological morphology.
In our previous work, we demonstrated that genetic deletion of H19 significantly reduced liver fibrosis and slowed disease progression in Mdr2KO mice [15, 17]. To investigate the cell-type-specific and spatial transcriptomic alterations induced by H19-deletion, we performed snRNAseq and NanoString GeoMx DSP using the mouse Whole Transcriptome Atlas (WTA) panel with liver tissues from wild type (WT), Mdr2KO, H19KO, and Mdr2KO/H19KO (DKO) mice. To extend the translational relevance of our findings, we integrated publicly available scRNAseq and snRNAseq datasets from human patients with cholestatic liver diseases and applied machine learning approaches to identify disease-associated gene signatures to predict disease progression.
Materials and methods
Animal studies
C57BL/6J Mdr2KO mice were gifted by Dr. Daniel Goldenberg, Department of Pathology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. Maternal C57BL/6J H19ΔExon1/+ (H19KO) mice were generated and gifted by Dr. Karl Pfeifer at the NIH. Dr. Jian-Ying Wang at the University of Maryland (Baltimore, MD, USA) provided the H19KO mice. Mdr2KO and H19KO (DKO) mice were generated as previously described [17]. The gender and age-matched littermates of WT, H19KO, Mdr2KO and DKO (female, 6-month-old) were used. Mice were housed under 12 h/12 h light and dark cycle with unrestricted access to water and standard chow ad libitum. All animal experiments followed institutional guidelines for ethical animal studies and were approved by the VCU Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
For GeoMx spatial transcriptomics, eight liver samples were collected from 6-month-old female mice (four Mdr2⁻/⁻ and four DKO). For single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq), liver tissues from 6-month-old female mice (one per genotype: WT, H19KO, Mdr2KO, and DKO) were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until processing. To validate our key snRNA-seq findings and overcome the limitation of a single biological replicate for sequencing, independent qPCR validation was performed on a larger cohort of mice (n = 5–6 per group) to confirm the expression changes of key cluster markers. Region-of-interest (ROI) selection of GeoMx was guided by three fluorescent morphology markers-AF488-conjugated anti-αsmooth muscle actin (αSMA), AF594-conjugated anti-CD68, and AF647-conjugated anti-EpCAM-along with the nuclear dye Syto 83, enabling identification of hepatocyte-, macrophage-, and bile duct-containing regions. To eliminate potential selection bias, the region selector was blinded to the tissue samples’ genotype origin during ROI selection. Regions were strictly defined based on quantitative proximity to bile ducts: ‘close proximity’ was defined as hepatocytes within an approximately 400 µm radius centered on the adjacent bile duct, while ‘isolated’ hepatocytes were defined as those located outside of this 400µm radius. Tissue preparation and processing were performed following the manufacturer’s protocol.
scRNAseq and snRNAseq data analysis
scRNAseq and snRNAseq analyses of both our dataset and the GSE243981 dataset were performed in R (version 4.3.3) utilizing the R package Seurat (version 5.1.0) [21, 22]. For our mouse snRNA-seq data, nuclei with > 2.5% mitochondrial gene content were excluded. For GSE243981, mitochondrial content filters of 5% (snRNA-seq) and 25% (scRNA-seq) were applied. Data normalization and scaling were performed using Seurat’s SCTransform function and data integration was performed utilizing Harmony, accounting for known batch variables (i.e., different experimental techniques used: scRNAseq, snRNAseq, 3’ and 5’ sequencing) following the Seurat SCTransform workflow [23]. Predicted cell-cell communication were inferred using the R package CellChatv2 (version 2.1.0) [24]. Pseudotime analyses for cell type progression with disease was performed using Monocle3 (version 1.4.26) [25]. LASSO regression analysis was performed using the R package glmnet (version 4.1.10) [26, 27]. Data visualization and statistical analyses were performed with SeuratExtend (version 1.2.5) [28]. Statistical significance was determined using the MAST algorithm via Seurat’s FindMarkers function.
Machine learning modeling methods
To assess the robustness and predictive accuracy of input features, four supervised machine learning models were developed and evaluated: a multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network, an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) classifier, a random forest classifier, and a logistic regression model. For initial exploratory validation, models were trained and tested on mouse data using a 70/30 train–test split. For disease prediction, WT and H19KO mice were grouped versus Mdr2KO and DKO, while for H19 prediction, WT and Mdr2KO were grouped versus H19KO and DKO. To avoid potential data leakage artifacts inherent to train-test splits within our specific mouse cohort, we prioritized cross-species validation to determine the true generalizability of our disease prediction models. For cross-species validation, each model was trained on the complete mouse dataset and subsequently tested on the entire human dataset (GSE243981). Mouse gene symbols were converted to their human orthologs using the gorth function in the gprofiler2 R package to enable translational comparison [29]. All models were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) as the primary performance metric with the R package pROC [30]. For the human dataset cross-validation, binary health status ground-truth labels were explicitly defined as “Healthy” (0) for Neurologically Deceased Donor (NDD) samples, and “Diseased” (1) for both PSC and PBC patient samples.
GeoMx data analysis
GeoMx® data analysis was performed using the StandR R package following their pipeline [31]. QC was performed at both the region of interest (ROI) level and gene level to remove low-quality data. ROIs were filtered based on nuclear count, surface area, and library size using default thresholds. PCA was performed using the runPCA function from the scater package (version 1.36.0), and clustering was visualized using Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) [32]. Different normalization (TMM, CPM, Upper quartile) and batch correction methods (RUV4, LimmaRemoveBatch, SVA) were tested. Ultimately, TMM normalization and RUV4 batch correction were used based on PCA and cluster separation statistics. Differential gene expression (DGE) analysis was performed using the limma R package (version 3.64.3) [33]. Significance was also tested and confirmed using DESeq2 (Version 1.48.1) [34].
Results
Identification of a disease-specific cholangiocyte cluster
Initial clustering and cell type annotation of the snRNAseq data identified 16 distinct clusters from 35,488 nuclei across all four genotypes. UMAP visualization confirmed proper integration across all genotypes and experimental techniques (Fig. 1A). Cell identity was assigned based on the expression of canonical maker genes, demonstrating high-fidelity clustering (Fig. 1B). Compared to WT and H19KO, Mdr2KO and DKO mice exhibited drastic increases in cholangiocytes, cholangiocyte-like hepatocytes, lymphocytes, and monocyte-derived macrophages (MdMQs) in terms of numbers and percent cell composition, accompanied by a reduction in hepatocytes and Kupffer cells, compared to their healthy counterparts (cholangiocytes, cholangiocyte-like hepatocytes, and hepatocytes percentage of cells p < 0.05) (Fig. 1C). Subclustering of cholangiocytes identified a disease-associated cholangiocyte cluster (cluster 2) (Fig. 2A). Pseudotime trajectory analysis using monocle3 indicated that Cluster 2 corresponded to a late-stage disease state (Fig. 2B). Notably, H19 deletion in Mdr2KO mice significantly reduced both the number and percentage of cholangiocytes within this cluster (Fig. 2C). The top marker gene for cluster 2 was Csmd1 (CUB And Sushi Multiple Domains 1), which was markedly upregulated in disease and downregulated upon H19 deletion (Supp. Figs. 1 and 2D).
Fig. 1.

Single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of healthy and cholestatic mouse livers. A Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) visualization of the clustering of 35,488 nuclei sequenced from all samples, WT, H19KO, Mdr2KO and DKO, respectively). B Dot plot showing canonical marker genes used to assign cell-type identities to each cluster. C Bar plots depicting (i) the proportional representation of each cluster by genotype and (ii) the absolute nuclei counts for each cell type (Significance determined using Welch’s t-test comparing WT and H19KO percentages vs. Mdr2KO and DKO, * p < 0.05). Note: Mice only contained one mouse per-genotype. Primarily used for exploratory purposes
Fig. 2.
snRNAseq reveals disease-associated cholangiocyte subtype. A UMAP visualization of subclustered cholangiocytes across all genotypes, B Pseudotime trajectory of cholangiocyte subclusters, with color denoting progression along the disease axis from healthy (purple) to late-stage disease (yellow), C Bar plots showing the proportional distribution of cholangiocyte subtypes across samples, D Violin plots illustrating Csmd1 expression—the top marker of cluster 2—displayed (left) across all clusters, (middle) across clusters within each genotype, and (right) by cluster stratified by genotype. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; Wilcoxon test implemented via Seurat Extend). Note: Mice only contained one mouse per-genotype. Primarily used for exploratory purposes
Cellular pathways altered in PSC and ameliorated by H19 deletion
CellChatv2 analysis was performed to identify significant cell-cell signaling networks and crosstalk interactions altered in Mdr2KO mice and to evaluate pathways modulated by H19 deletion. The total number of inferred interactions identified for WT, H19KO, Mdr2KO, and DKO were 255, 180, 573, and 438, respectively (Supp. Fig. 2). Importantly, we opted not to artificially downsample the data to equalize cell proportions across genotypes prior to this analysis. A key feature of cholestatic disease progression is the shift in tissue cellular composition—driven by immune cell recruitment, cell death, and state transitions such as the ductular reaction. Because these compositional changes directly alter the probability of cell-cell contact and ligand-receptor engagement in vivo, retaining the true cell proportions preserves these biologically meaningful microenvironmental signals. However, because these interaction counts are derived from single biological replicates (n = 1 per genotype), the overall interaction numbers should be interpreted with caution as exploratory findings. Among the pathways examined, we focused specifically on Spp1 (osteopontin), collagen, laminin, and FN1 (fibronectin) signaling, as they are key components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) closely tied to the fibrotic pathology of PSC. While Spp1 was selected due to its known association with cholangiocytes, a primary cell type of interest in cholestatic injury. These pathways were all significantly upregulated in Mdr2KO compared to WT and were normalized toward WT in DKO mice (p-value < 0.05) (Fig. 3A-B, Supp. Figs. 3, 4 and 5). Notably, Spp1 emerged as a major signaling pathway dysregulated in cholestatic liver injury and restored by H19 deletion. In healthy liver, Spp1 expression is predominately observed in cholangiocytes, mediating signaling to Kupffer cells. In contrast, during disease progression, Spp1 expression shifts to mid-lobular hepatocytes, indicating altered paracrine signaling (Fig. 3C-D, Supp. Fig. 6A-B). H19 deletion significantly reduces Spp1 expression and outgoing Spp1-mediated signaling from mid-lobular hepatocytes (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3C-D). Ligand-receptor analysis revealed that the top predicted interactions in the Spp1 pathway were Spp1-Cd44, Spp1-(Itgav + Itgb6), and Spp1-(Itga4 + Itgb1). Notably, Spp1-Cd44 signaling between cholangiocytes and Kupffer cells was present only in healthy liver and was lost in Mdr2KO mice, whereas the other Spp1 interactions were uniquely predicted in Mdr2KO mice (Fig 4 A-B).
Fig. 3.
H19 deletion significantly ameliorates disease-associated cell-signaling alterations. Relative information flow plots showing pathways significantly altered between Mdr2KO and WT (A) or DKO (B) mice. Colored pathways denote significant changes (peach = increased, teal = decreased in Mdr2KO). Scatter (C)and circle (D) plots illustrating SPP1 signaling dynamics. In healthy mice, Spp1 is primarily expressed by cholangiocytes, but shifts to mid-lobular hepatocytes in Mdr2KO livers; H19 deletion markedly reduces this ectopic hepatocyte expression. Line color indicates ligand source, and line width represents interaction strength. Note: Mice only contained one mouse per-genotype. Primarily used for exploratory purposes
Fig. 4.
Altered signaling pathways and genes distinguishing cholangiocyte disease status. A (i) Relative contribution of the SPP1 signaling pathway of Mdr2KO mice. (ii) Net-signaling role dot plot showing predicted SPP1 ligand-receptor interactions; dot color indicates communication probability (brown = maximum, blue = minimum). Blue and peach labels denote interactions enriched in WT and Mdr2KO, respectively. B Chord plots depicting cell-to-cell communication for each predicted ligand-receptor pair, separated by WT (i) and Mdr2KO (ii). Line color indicates ligand source; line thickness reflects interaction strength. Differential expression and LASSO analyses identified six genes for disease-prediction modeling. C Violin plots showing expression of these genes in mice. H19 deletion significantly reversed expression of disease-associated genes (Slco3a1, Anxa3, Cftr, Cd44) toward WT levels, except Cd44. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; Wilcoxon test, SeuratExtend). Note: Mice only contained one mouse per-genotype. Primarily used for exploratory purposes
Diseased cholangiocyte gene prediction model and identification of novel healthy markers
Differential gene expression (DGE) analysis of subclustered cholangiocytes, combined with LASSO regression-based feature selection, identified six genes (Clu, Spp1, Slco3a1, Cd44, Anxa3, Cftr) for machine learning-based prediction modeling of cholangiocyte disease status (Fig. 4C). Among these, Clu and Spp1 were strongly associated with healthy cholangiocytes, whereas Slco3a1, Cd44, Anxa3, Cftr were enriched in diseased cholangiocytes in Mdr2KO and DKO mice (adj. p < 0.001) (Fig. 4C). Biologically, the emergence of this signature aligns with known cholestatic injury responses; for example, the upregulation of ion and anion transporters like Cftr and Slco3a1 likely reflects a compensatory mechanism by cholangiocytes to aid in fluid secretion and bile efflux during obstructive injury. Three of the disease associated genes (Slco3a1, Anxa3, Cftr) were significantly reduced towards WT levels in DKO mice, indicating that H19 deletion mitigates their dysregulation (Fig. 4C). A striking spatial shift was observed for Spp1 and Clu, which transitioned from cholangiocyte-restricted expression in healthy liver to ectopic expression in mid-lobular hepatocytes in diseased liver, suggesting substantial rewiring of cellular identity and intercellular signaling during disease progression (Supp. Fig. 6A–B). Cholangiocyte gene changes were confirmed in mouse and human liver tissue with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) (Supp. Fig. 7).
Cholangiocyte disease prediction model testing in humans
The expression patterns of six model genes (Clu, Spp1, Slco3a1, Cd44, Anxa3, Cftr) were evaluated in human cholangiocytes using the GSE243981 dataset (both scRNAseq and snRNAseq). To evaluate disease specificity, we compared expression trends among neurologically deceased donors (NDD, healthy controls), PSC, and PBC patients. Five of the six genes demonstrated the same significant expression trends in PSC patient cholangiocytes as observed in mice (p < 0.05). Importantly, these genes largely functioned as shared ‘cholestasis-associated’ markers, exhibiting similar directional trends in both PSC and PBC patients relative to healthy NDD controls, with two notable exceptions. Cftr and Cd44 were specifically increased in PSC patients when combining scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq datasets (Fig. 5). Cftr expression was significantly increased in the combined (sc/snRNA-seq) analysis (Fig. 5A) but did not reach significance in the scRNA-seq-only analysis (Fig. 5B). Cd44 was consistently and significantly elevated in PSC versus PBC patients; however, it was only significantly higher relative to healthy controls in the scRNA-seq-only dataset (Fig. 5B). These six genes were subsequently used to construct cholangiocyte disease prediction models using four supervised machine learning algorithms: multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network, XGBoost, random forest, and logistic regression. Applying our binary classification strategy (NDD as health control versus both PSC ad PBC), ROC–AUC analysis demonstrated robust performance, with AUC values > 0.873 in human cholangiocytes from GSE243981. This supports the translational relevance of the gene signatures and the predictive models across species (Fig. 5C).
Fig. 5.
Cross-species validation of cholangiocyte disease-prediction genes. Mouse-derived disease prediction model genes (WT and H19KO versus Mdr2KO and DKO) were tested on public human cholangiocyte data (GSE243981) subclustered from sc/snRNA-seq samples integrated with Harmony to correct for sequencing-method batch effects. A Violin plots showing expression of prediction-model genes across neurologically deceased donors (NDD), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients using combined sc/snRNA-seq data. B Violin plots showing expression using only scRNA-seq samples (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; Wilcoxon test, SeuratExtend). C ROC–AUC analysis showing machine-learning model performance in distinguishing healthy versus diseased cholangiocytes in human patients. Human data testing set contained both snRNAseq and scRNAseq samples
Diseased hepatocyte gene prediction model
Hepatocytes were subclustered, zonally differentiated, and UMAPs generated to visualize proper data clustering and integration (Fig. 6A-B, Supp. Fig. 8) [35, 36]. Differential gene expression combined with LASSO regression identified six translationally conserved genes: Spp1, C6, Cdh1, Npas2, Cd74, and Hamp, for the construction of a hepatocyte disease prediction model. In Mdr2KO hepatocytes, Spp1, C6, Npas2, Cdh1, and Cd74 were all significantly upregulated, while Hamp was significantly reduced relative to WT (adj. p < 0.001) (Fig. 6C). In DKO mice, Spp1, and Cd74 were significantly decreased and Hamp significantly increased toward WT levels (adj. p < 0.01), indicating that H19 deletion mitigates hepatocyte dysregulation (Fig. 6D). CellChat v2 pathway analysis further revealed that APP signaling was significantly reduced in DKO mice (Fig. 2). Across all genotypes, the dominant ligand–receptor interaction was App–Cd74, with mid-lobular hepatocytes showing increased CD74 expression and receiving App-derived signaling in disease states (Supp. Fig. 9). Hepatocyte gene changes were confirmed in mouse and human liver tissue with RT-qPCR (Supp. Fig. 7).
Fig. 6.
Hepatocyte disease status distinguishing genes. A UMAP of mouse snRNAseq subclustered hepatocytes with all samples combined and B split by genotype. C Violin plots showing significantly different expression of each gene in mice comparing WT and H19KO mice versus Mdr2KO and DKO mice. (D) Violin plots of hepatocyte disease prediction modeling genes split by genotype (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, significance determined by Wilcoxon test using SeuratExtend)
Hepatocyte disease prediction model testing in humans
Original model gene selection identified Gm13775 as a top performer in model prediction, but no known human homolog exists and was dropped due to lack of translatability (Supp. Fig. 10). The six genes used in the hepatocyte disease prediction model (Hamp, Spp1, C6, Cdh1, Npas2, and Cd74) demonstrated strong translational concordance in human hepatocytes from the GSE243981 dataset. To evaluate disease specificity, we compared expression trends among NDD, PSC, and PBC patients. All six genes showed consistent and significant expression changes in both the combined scRNAseq/snRNAseq dataset (Fig. 7A) and in the scRNAseq subset al.one (Fig. 7B). Importantly, these genes functioned primarily as shared cholestasis-associated markers, exhibiting similar directional changes in both PSC and PBC patients compared to NDD controls. When tested across four supervised machine learning algorithms, applying our binary classification strategy where NDD samples were labeled as healthy (0) and both PSC and PBC samples were grouped as diseased [1], these six genes achieved AUC values > 0.869 in public human datasets, confirming their cross-species robustness and strong predictive performance (Fig. 7C).
Fig. 7.
Cross-species validation of hepatocyte disease-prediction genes. Testing of hepatocyte disease prediction model genes (WT and H19KO versus Mdr2KO and DKO) derived from mouse snRNAseq data on public human dataset GSE243981. Data was integrated using Harmony for known batch variables including RNA sequencing methods (scRNAseq and snRNAseq). A Violin plots showing expression levels of hepatocyte disease prediction modeling genes in neurologically deceased donors (NDD), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients combining snRNAseq and scRNAseq data. B Violin plots depicting expression of hepatocyte prediction genes only using scRNAseq samples (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, significance determined by Wilcoxon test using SeuratExtend). C ROC-AUC analysis depicting machine learning models (MLMs) effectiveness in distinguishing healthy and diseased hepatocytes in human patients. Human data testing set contained both snRNAseq and scRNAseq samples
Deletion of H19 causes cell-type specific alterations in gene expression
Random forest modeling was performed across multiple cell types to identify gene expression patterns associated with H19 deletion. In hepatocytes, an 11 gene model (Gphn, Fga, Malat1, Ahsg, Apob, Ces1c, Spp1, Cers6, Cd74, Srsf1, and Hspa2) achieved an AUC score of 0.909 for distinguishing H19 deletion from WT mice (Supp. Fig. 11). In cholangiocytes, an 11-gene model (Csmd1, Chka, Frmd4b, Gnas, Npas2, Agmo, Ly6e, Gbp9, Sorbs3, Usp2, and 1600012H06Rik) achieved an AUC score of 0.867. In macrophages, a 10 gene model (Mat1a, Gm42418, Eef1a1, Rpl13a, Gm19951, Clec2d, Wwc1, Rnf128, Ugt2b5, and Tnfrsf12a) generated an AUC score 0.764. Importantly, several genes within these models overlapped with those reversed by H19 deletion-that is, genes upregulated (or downregulated) in Mdr2KO vs. WT and reversed toward WT levels in DKO mice, indicating mitigation of PSC-associated dysregulation. Notable examples include Spp1 and Cd74 in hepatocytes, and Frmd4b, Gnas, Chka, Csmd1, and Agmo in cholangiocytes (Supp. Tables 1 and 2).
Spatial transcriptomics reveal that H19 deletion-mediated amelioration in hepatocytes is restricted to hepatocytes in close proximity to bile ducts
Spatial transcriptomics was utilized to investigate spatially defined effects of H19 deletion on hepatic gene expression. ROIs were selected to compare differences in isolated hepatocytes and hepatocytes in close proximity to bile ducts (within approximately 400 μm radius centered on the bile duct) (Fig. 8A). DGE analysis of the different ROIs comparing DKO vs. Mdr2KO mice yielded several common and unique significant DEGs (Fig. 8B). Common genes decreased in DKO mice vs. Mdr2KO across both regions were genes associated with cellular stress responses, such as Hspa5, Hspa8, and Hsp90aa1 (p < 0.01 across both regions), and fatty acid synthesis gene Fasn (p < 0.01); however, several cholesterol metabolism genes were only significantly reduced in hepatocytes neighboring bile ducts (e.g., Apoa1, Apoa2, and Apoa5) (Fig. 8B). Several genes related to significant disease-associated pathways (APP, Collagen, FN1, LAMININ) mitigated following H19 deletion, as well as hepatocyte-to-cholangiocyte transition marker genes (Sox4 and Sox9), are only significantly reduced in regions with hepatocytes neighboring bile ducts (Fig. 8B). Four of the six hepatocyte disease-associated prediction modeling genes were only significantly mitigated in hepatocytes neighboring cholangiocytes (Spp1, C6, Cdh1, and Cd74) (Fig. 8C), demonstrating that H19 deletion-mediated transcriptional recovery is spatially restricted to periductal hepatocytes.
Fig. 8.
GeoMx spatial transcriptomics reveals H19 deletion’s amelioration of disease associated gene expression is spatially restricted. A Representative immunofluorescence images illustrating GeoMx DSP region-of-interest (ROI) selection. B Volcano plots showing genes significantly altered by H19 deletion in Mdr2KO mice within hepatocytes adjacent to bile ducts (left) or isolated hepatocytes (right). C Volcano plots showing differential expression of hepatocyte disease-prediction genes depending on proximity to bile ducts (left) versus non-adjacent regions (right). Significance thresholds: adjusted p < 0.05 and |log2C| > 0.5, determined by both DESeq2 and StandR limma-voom analyses with RUV4 batch correction; p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method
Discussion
A major gap in understanding PSC lies in elucidating how the disease progresses at the spatial and single-cell levels, and how different interventions influence these processes. While previous research has established that H19 exacerbates PSC disease progression, its in vivo effects at cellular and spatial transcriptomic resolution remain poorly understood [12, 14–19]. In this study, supported by recent findings from Andrews, et al., we utilized an integrative snRNAseq, spatial transcriptomic, and machine learning approach to elucidate cell type-specific and spatially restricted alterations in PSC [37]. Furthermore, we demonstrate how H19 deletion mitigates these pathogenic transcriptional states and shifts disease trajectories at both single-cell and spatial levels.
Our analysis identified a disease-specific cholangiocyte subcluster characterized by high expression of Csmd1, Ccdc141, and Lama4, which was significantly reduced following H19 deletion (Supp. Fig. 1). Lama4, a laminin family extracellular-matrix glycoprotein, provides a mechanistic link between H19 deletion and the attenuation of fibrosis in cholestatic liver disease. Using multimodal approaches, we identified six genes that robustly distinguished healthy from diseased cholangiocytes across scRNA-seq and combined sc/snRNA-seq datasets. Notably, the simplest model, logistic regression, achieved strong performance, suggesting these genes define a relatively linear health vs. disease axis. Several disease-specific genes (Anxa3, Slco3a1, and Cftr) were significantly reduced following H19 deletion (adj. p < 0.001, DKO vs. Mdr2KO) (Fig. 4C). Anxa3 encodes Annexin A3, a calcium-dependent phospholipid-binding protein elevated in liver cancers and explored as a diagnostic and therapeutic target [38, 39]. Its increase in PBC and PSC patients is likely linked to cholangiocyte proliferation tied to ductular reaction. Slco3a1 (OATP3A1), a sodium-independent organic anion transporter linked to Crohn’s disease and NF-κB activation [40], also mediates bile-acid efflux and has been proposed as a protective adaptive response in cholestasis [41]. Although Slco3a1 expression was reduced in DKO vs. Mdr2KO (adj. p < 0.001), it was unchanged in H19KO vs. WT (p > 0.05), indicating that its down-regulation likely reflects reduced cholestasis rather than direct H19 regulation. The increase in these ion transporters in cholestatic liver disease may be a compensatory mechanism to aid in fluid secretion into the canaliculi to promote improved bile flow and eliminate blockages.
Two healthy cholangiocyte markers, Clu and Spp1, exhibited striking shifts: both were downregulated in diseased cholangiocytes and ectopically expressed in hepatocytes in diseased livers. Reduced level of circulating CLU protein (clusterin) has been associated with worse outcomes in biliary atresia [42]. In our model, H19 deletion mitigated the ectopic increase in hepatocyte Spp1 expression (p < 0.05). In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Spp1 signaling sustains mesenchymal transition, while its inhibition decreases tumor burden and improves survival [43]. Cholangiocytes have the highest expression of Spp1 in healthy livers [44]. We find that during cholestatic injury, Spp1 signaling is elevated but primarily originates from disease-associated hepatocytes. RT-qPCR revealed that the total levels of Clu and Spp1 were significantly increased in Mdr2KO mouse livers (Supp. Fig. 7). Thus, suppressing hepatocyte-derived Spp1 may limit HSC-to-myofibroblast transition while sparing normal cholangiocyte Spp1 activity.
SnRNA-seq analysis revealed distinct cell-type–specific alterations driven by disease and mitigated by H19 deletion. Diseased hepatocytes showed ectopic expression of genes normally restricted to other healthy cell types, Spp1 and Clu (cholangiocytes) and Cd74 (antigen-presenting cells), which was reversed toward to WT levels following H19 deletion (Clu and Spp1 significantly increased in Mdr2KO vs. WT, and decreased in DKO vs. Mdr2KO; adj. p < 0.001) (Fig. 6, Supp. Fig. 6). Consistent with prior reports, hepatic Cd74 up-regulation has been linked to Ikbkb loss; accordingly, Mdr2KO hepatocytes showed reduced Ikbkb expression relative to WT (adj. p < 0.001) [45]. Both Cd74 and Ikbkb changes were reversed in DKO hepatocytes compared to Mdr2KO (adj. p < 0.001) (Supp. Table 3).
The predictive capabilities exhibited by these cell-type-specific models may aid in future mechanistic studies by prioritizing therapeutic targets at cellular resolution. Furthermore, as spatial and single-nucleus profiling are increasingly applied to clinical liver biopsies, incorporating these predictive signatures could improve prognostic capacity regarding time to graft failure or the risk of PSC recurrence following liver transplantation. However, future longitudinal studies incorporating these modeling measurements are needed to fully evaluate their clinical predictive value.
We also identified several cell type–specific differentially expressed genes associated with by H19. Predictive models distinguishing H19 WT from H19 knockout cells demonstrated strong performance across all cell types, confirming robust, cell type–specific transcriptional signatures. In hepatocytes, Spp1 and Cd74, both disease-associated genes, were restored towards WT levels with H19 deletion. The APP-CD74 signaling axis has previously been shown to promote fibrosis in the kidney [46], highlighting a potential conserved fibrogenic mechanism. Additional hepatocyte-specific H19-responsive genes included lipid metabolism regulators, Cers6, Ces1c, Apob, and Ahsg, all of which were reduced following H19 deletion. Elevated Ahsg expression has been linked to tumor proliferation [47]. In cholangiocytes, H19 deletion-associated genes included Frmd4b, Chka, Csmd1, Gnas, and Agmo. Although increased Csmd1 expression has been associated with HCC [48], other studies suggest it may function as tumor suppressor depending on context [49, 50].
GeoMx spatial transcriptomics demonstrated that the amelioration of hepatocyte disease-specific gene expression resulting from H19 deletion is confined to hepatocytes adjacent to bile ducts. This aligns with prior reports showing that cholangiocytes are the predominant source of H19 in cholestatic injury and that H19 is transferred to neighboring cell types through extracellular vesicles [14, 15, 17].
Taken together, these findings demonstrate that H19 deletion drives cell-type– and spatially specific transcriptomic remodeling, restoring healthy gene-expression programs across multiple hepatic lineages and mitigating PSC progression in both mouse and human datasets.
Short comings
While we successfully validated our disease-associated differential gene-expression patterns and predictive modeling results using an independent human dataset, we were unable to validate the H19-deletion-specific findings due to the lack of comparable datasets. Additionally, the use of one mouse per genotype may limit the generalizability of individual genotype-level comparisons. Moreover, the sequencing depth in both our mouse and publicly available human snRNA-seq datasets was insufficient to reliably capture H19 expression, and H19 was not included in the GeoMx Whole Transcriptome Atlas (WTA) panel. Collectively, these constraints limited our ability to perform direct cross-species validation of H19-deletion effects at either the single-cell or spatial resolution.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The data included in this study was generated at the Genomics Core facility at Virginia Commonwealth University.
Abbreviations
- AF
Alexa fluor
- aSMA
alpha Smooth Muscle Actin
- AUC
Area under the curveDEGs–differentially expressed genes
- DGE
Differential gene expression
- DKO
Mdr2KOH19–/–double knockout
- DSP
Digital spatial profiler
- FN1
Fibronectin
- HCC
Hepatocellular carcinoma
- H19
long non–coding RNA H19
- H19KO
H19 knockout
- LASSO
Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator
- Mdr2
Multidrug resistance 2
- MLM
Machine learning models
- NDD
Neurologically deceased donor
- PBC
Primary biliary cholangitis
- PSC
Primary sclerosing cholangitis
- RNA
Ribonucleic acid
- ROC
Receiver operating characteristic
- ROI
Regions of interest
- RT
qPCR–real–time quantitative polymerase chain reaction
- scRNAseq
Single cell RNA sequencing
- snRNAseq
Single nuclear RNA sequencing
- SPP1
Secreted phosphoprotein 1
- WT
Wild type
- WTA
Whole transcriptome atlas
Author contributions
Conceptualization and design, GWW, HZ; Methodology, GWW, XJ, HZ; Data Acquisition, GWW, XJ, HL, NW, DZ, YT, SB, XW; Data Analysis, GWW, XJ; Writing: Original Draft, GWW, XJ; Writing: Review & Editing, GWW, XJ, HZ; Funding Acquisition, HZ; Resources, HZ; Supervision, HZ.
Funding
This study was supported by VA Merit Award 5I01BX005730, VA ShEEP grants (1 IS1 BX004777-01 and 1IS1BX005517-01), National Institutes of Health Grant R01 DK115377, 2R56DK115377-05A1, 5R01AA030180, R01DK139587, NIH-NCI P01CA275740, 5T32AA029975. Dr. Zhou is the recipient of a Research Career Scientist Award from the Department of Veterans Affairs (IK6BX004477).
Data availability
All data and analysis methodology will be made available upon requests to the corresponding author. snRNAseq and spatial transcriptomic data has been uploaded to GEO, series GSE311100.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
Huiping Zhou is the corresponding author and is also an Editor for the journal.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All animal experiments were performed following institutional guidelines for ethical animal studies and approved by the Virginia Commonwealth University and Richmond VA Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Virginia, USA. All patient samples used followed Richmond VA Medical Center Institutional Review Board guidelines for de-identified consenting patients.
Consent for publication
All authors have given their consent for publication.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Angulo P, Lindor KD. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 1999;30:325–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hirschfield GM, Karlsen TH, Lindor KD, Adams DH. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Lancet. 2013;382:1587–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Karlsen TH, Folseraas T, Thorburn D, Vesterhus M. Primary sclerosing cholangitis - a comprehensive review. J Hepatol. 2017;67:1298–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Eaton JE, Talwalkar JA, Lazaridis KN, Gores GJ, Lindor KD. Pathogenesis of primary sclerosing cholangitis and advances in diagnosis and management. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:521–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tabibian JH, Ali AH, Lindor KD. Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis, Part 2: Cancer Risk, Prevention, and Surveillance. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2018;14:427–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chiang JYL, Ferrell JM. Bile Acids as Metabolic Regulators and Nutrient Sensors. Annu Rev Nutr. 2019;39:175–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chiang JYL, Ferrell JM. Bile acid receptors FXR and TGR5 signaling in fatty liver diseases and therapy. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2020;318:G554–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hylemon PB, Takabe K, Dozmorov M, Nagahashi M, Zhou H. Bile acids as global regulators of hepatic nutrient metabolism. Liver Res. 2017;1:10–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jackson KG, Way GW, Zhou H. Bile acids and sphingolipids in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Chin Med J. 2022;135(10):1163–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Way GW, Jackson KG, Muscu SR, Zhou H. Key Signaling in Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease: The Role of Bile Acids. Cells. 2022;11(8):1374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tabibian JH, Ali AH, Lindor KD. Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis, Part 1: Epidemiology, Etiopathogenesis, Clinical Features, and Treatment. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2018;14:293–304. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang Y, Hylemon PB, Zhou H. Long Noncoding RNA H19: A Key Player in Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2021;74:1652–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang Y, Zeng J, Chen W, Fan J, Hylemon PB, Zhou H. Long Noncoding RNA H19: A Novel Oncogene in Liver Cancer. Noncoding RNA. 2023;9(2):19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li X, Liu R, Huang Z, Gurley EC, Wang X, Wang J, He H, et al. Cholangiocyte-derived exosomal long noncoding RNA H19 promotes cholestatic liver injury in mouse and humans. Hepatology. 2018;68:599–615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li X, Liu R, Wang Y, Zhu W, Zhao D, Wang X, Yang H, et al. Cholangiocyte-Derived Exosomal lncRNA H19 Promotes Macrophage Activation and Hepatic Inflammation under Cholestatic Conditions. Cells. 2020;9(1):190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li X, Liu R, Yang J, Sun L, Zhang L, Jiang Z, Puri P, et al. The role of long noncoding RNA H19 in gender disparity of cholestatic liver injury in multidrug resistance 2 gene knockout mice. Hepatology. 2017;66:869–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu R, Li X, Zhu W, Wang Y, Zhao D, Wang X, Gurley EC, et al. Cholangiocyte-Derived Exosomal Long Noncoding RNA H19 Promotes Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Cholestatic Liver Fibrosis. Hepatology. 2019;70:1317–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang Y, Tai YL, Way G, Zeng J, Zhao D, Su L, Jiang X, et al. RNA binding protein HuR protects against NAFLD by suppressing long noncoding RNA H19 expression. Cell Biosci. 2022;12(1):172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xiao Y, Liu R, Li X, Gurley EC, Hylemon PB, Lu Y, Zhou H, et al. Long Noncoding RNA H19 Contributes to Cholangiocyte Proliferation and Cholestatic Liver Fibrosis in Biliary Atresia. Hepatology. 2019;70:1658–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu H, Kirita Y, Donnelly EL, Humphreys BD. Advantages of Single-Nucleus over Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Adult Kidney: Rare Cell Types and Novel Cell States Revealed in Fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30:23–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hao Y, Stuart T, Kowalski MH, Choudhary S, Hoffman P, Hartman A, Srivastava A, et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2024;42:293–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Team RC. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. In: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024.
- 23.Korsunsky I, Millard N, Fan J, Slowikowski K, Zhang F, Wei K, Baglaenko Y, et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat Methods. 2019;16:1289–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jin S, Guerrero-Juarez CF, Zhang L, Chang I, Ramos R, Kuan CH, Myung P, et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cao J, Spielmann M, Qiu X, Huang X, Ibrahim DM, Hill AJ, Zhang F, et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature. 2019;566:496–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. J Stat Softw. 2010;33:1–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tay JK, Narasimhan B, Hastie T. Elastic Net Regularization Paths for All Generalized Linear Models. J Stat Softw 2023;106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Hua Y, Weng L, Zhao F, Rambow F. SeuratExtend: streamlining single-cell RNA-seq analysis through an integrated and intuitive framework. Gigascience 2025;14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Kolberg L, Raudvere U, Kuzmin I, Vilo J, Peterson H. gprofiler2 -- an R package for gene list functional enrichment analysis and namespace conversion toolset g:Profiler. F1000Res 2020;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez JC, Muller M. pROC: an open-source package for R and S + to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liu N, Bhuva DD, Mohamed A, Bokelund M, Kulasinghe A, Tan CW, Davis MJ. standR: spatial transcriptomic analysis for GeoMx DSP data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.McInnes L, Healy J. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction. ArXiv. 2018. abs/1802.03426.
- 33.Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, Smyth GK. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rosenberger FA, Thielert M, Strauss MT, Schweizer L, Ammar C, Madler SC, Metousis A, et al. Spatial single-cell mass spectrometry defines zonation of the hepatocyte proteome. Nat Methods. 2023;20:1530–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cunningham RP, Porat-Shliom N. Liver Zonation - Revisiting Old Questions With New Technologies. Front Physiol. 2021;12:732929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Andrews TS, Nakib D, Perciani CT, Ma XZ, Liu L, Winter E, Camat D, et al. Single-cell, single-nucleus, and spatial transcriptomics characterization of the immunological landscape in the healthy and PSC human liver. J Hepatol. 2024;80:730–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yang L, Lu P, Yang X, Li K, Qu S. Annexin A3, a Calcium-Dependent Phospholipid-Binding Protein: Implication in Cancer. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:716415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhuang C, Wang P, Sun T, Zheng L, Ming L. Expression levels and prognostic values of annexins in liver cancer. Oncol Lett. 2019;18:6657–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wei SC, Tan YY, Weng MT, Lai LC, Hsiao JH, Chuang EY, Shun CT, et al. SLCO3A1, A novel crohn’s disease-associated gene, regulates nf-kappaB activity and associates with intestinal perforation. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e100515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pan Q, Zhang X, Zhang L, Cheng Y, Zhao N, Li F, Zhou X, et al. Solute Carrier Organic Anion Transporter Family Member 3A1 Is a Bile Acid Efflux Transporter in Cholestasis. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:1578–92. e1516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Udomsinprasert W, Poovorawan Y, Chongsrisawat V, Vejchapipat P, Honsawek S. Decreased circulating clusterin reflects severe liver complications after hepatoportoenterostomy of biliary atresia. Sci Rep. 2020;10:19736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li H, Lan L, Chen H, Zaw Thin M, Ps H, Nelson JK, Evans IM et al. SPP1 is required for maintaining mesenchymal cell fate in pancreatic cancer. Nature 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 44.Song Z, Chen W, Athavale D, Ge X, Desert R, Das S, Han H, et al. Osteopontin Takes Center Stage in Chronic Liver Disease. Hepatology. 2021;73:1594–608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Koch KS, Leffert HL. Ectopic expression of CD74 in Ikkbeta-deleted mouse hepatocytes. Acta Histochem. 2011;113:428–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Liu B, Li F, Wang Y, Gao X, Li Y, Wang Y, Zhou H. APP-CD74 axis mediates endothelial cell-macrophage communication to promote kidney injury and fibrosis. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1437113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Xing X, Cao F, Gao L, Song M. AHSG, a Gene Promoting Tumour Proliferation, Migration and Invasion, is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Poor Overall Survival in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Mol Biol Rep. 2023;50:7659–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhao Y, Yang B, Chen D, Zhou X, Wang M, Jiang J, Wei L, et al. Combined identification of ARID1A, CSMD1, and SENP3 as effective prognostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Aging. 2021;13:4696–712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Escudero-Esparza A, Bartoschek M, Gialeli C, Okroj M, Owen S, Jirstrom K, Orimo A, et al. Correction: Complement inhibitor CSMD1 acts as tumor suppressor in human breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2023;14:481–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Escudero-Esparza A, Bartoschek M, Gialeli C, Okroj M, Owen S, Jirstrom K, Orimo A, et al. Complement inhibitor CSMD1 acts as tumor suppressor in human breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:76920–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data and analysis methodology will be made available upon requests to the corresponding author. snRNAseq and spatial transcriptomic data has been uploaded to GEO, series GSE311100.







