Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Jul 10;148(29):31088–31098. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6c06538

Photoinduced Enhancement of Chemical Shift Sensitivity to Local Vibrations

Ana Martínez Gutiérrez †, Oliver Alexander ‡, Pablo Estévez Alonso †, Lorenzo Paoloni †, Terry Mullins §, André Al-Haddad ∥, Thomas M Baumann §, Rebecca Boll §, Christoph Bostedt ⊥,∥, Simon Dold §, Alberto De Fanis §, Gianluca Geloni §, Markus Ilchen #, Iyas Ismail ∇, Björn Lautenschlager §, Tommaso Mazza §, Dooshaye Moonshiram †, Solène Oberli ⊥,○, Dawei Peng ∇, Ralph Püttner ◆, Svitozar Serkez §, Marc Simon ∇, Florian Trinter , Sergey Usenko §, Michael Meyer §, Jonathan P Marangos ‡, Jesús González-Vázquez ▲, Daniel E Rivas §,*, Antonio Picón †,*
PMCID: PMC13426258  PMID: 42429308

Abstract

The advent of novel free-electron laser sources enabling time-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (tr-XPS) provides a unique opportunity to monitor local chemical environments in real time by measuring sub-eV shifts in core-electron binding energies. These shifts reflect the interplay between electronic excitation and nuclear motion, an interplay that remains largely unexplored. In our combined theoretical and experimental study of fluoropyridine (C5H4FN), we investigate this link by monitoring the evolving chemical environment at the N and F atomic sites as the photoexcited S1 state relaxes to the ground state via a conical intersection. We find that the F site responds primarily to vibrational relaxation, showing minimal sensitivity to the electronic excited state. In contrast, excitation to S1 induces a measurable energy shift at the N site and significantly enhances its sensitivity to local vibrations within the ring. This behavior arises from a photoinduced redistribution of charge, which also increases the Coulomb interaction between the 1s electron at the N atom and the atomic partial charge at an adjacent C atom. This insight opens new avenues for exploring ultrafast dynamics and conical intersection pathways in more complex systems, from photostable DNA bases to light-harvesting materials.


graphic file with name ja6c06538_0005.jpg


graphic file with name ja6c06538_0006.jpg

I. Introduction

When a molecule is in low-temperature equilibrium, all of its atomic constituents end up at defined average internuclear distances and charge is distributed according to the shared molecular orbitals. The chemical environment around each individual atomic site depends on the average charge around that site, which strongly varies depending on the electronegativity of the neighboring species. This was directly measured in early works on high-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) where the shifts of the binding energy of core electrons were linked to their local chemical environment. Today, this is a widespread tool for investigating surfaces and materials with atomic sensitivity. − In addition to chemical information, XPS can also reveal vibrational effects, particularly those arising from the formation of core-hole states. − Upon ionization, the creation of a core vacancy induces significant valence electron redistribution to screen the hole, typically leading to a reduction in bond lengths and the onset of vibrational motion. Although the probing does not involve a time-resolved scheme and the initial system is in equilibrium, it remains sensitive to vibrational effects in the final states. These effects have been extensively studied and are now well understood.

Recently, with the availability of ultrashort X-ray pulses from free-electron lasers (FELs), this technique can be extended to out-of-equilibrium systems. When a femtosecond (10–15 s) vis/UV pump pulse induces a reaction, the evolving chemical shifts can now be tracked in real time through the photoelectron spectra at different time delays with respect to this pump pulse, the so-called time-resolved XPS (tr-XPS). In this case, the picture may deviate from the well-established knowledge of chemical energy shifts as both excited states and nuclear motion may considerably change the charge distribution with respect to the ground state of the system. Several excitation-induced dissociation processes have already been investigated with tr-XPS, such as Fe­(CO)5, CH3I, 1-iodo-2-methylbutane, CO, and CS2. Moreover, rapid electron redistribution following femtosecond excitation has been shown to manifest as measurable changes in chemical shifts.

If electronic excitations and nuclear distortions both influence real-time chemical shifts, an important question is how these effects evolve during dynamics governed by strong electron–nuclear coupling, for example near conical intersections (CIs). CIs are points of degeneracy between two or more potential energy surfaces, where the Born–Oppenheimer approximation breaks down and strong coupling between electronic and nuclear motion becomes critical. Such couplings play a central role in fundamental processes, including proton transfer and isomerization, − photostability of DNA, photosynthesis, vision, and electronic-to-vibrational energy conversion. , Tracking CI dynamics therefore requires a technique sensitive to both electronic excitation and nuclear motion. This poses a particular challenge for tr-XPS, as recognized in early theoretical works. , Spectral and temporal resolution, combined with high photon energies, are required to overcome this limitation. Furthermore, probing multiple sites can provide complementary information about the dynamics. In this context, two recent experiments in uracil and CS2 reported real-time chemical shifts evolving through a conical intersection with high spectral and temporal resolution. In uracil, for example, the measurements are both sensitive to the excited state and to dynamics after CI, which returns to a vibrational hot electronic ground state. As a result, the observable captures contributions from both vibrational motion and electronic excitation, making them challenging to disentangle. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether these effects on chemical shifts act independently, i.e., simply added together, or they are intertwined. It is reasonable to expect that electronic excitation could transiently alter the chemical environment sensitivity to local nuclear distortions at specific atomic sites.

In this work, we address this question by investigating time-resolved chemical shifts along a CI passage at multiple atomic sites, combining theory and experiment. Our study focuses on a prototypical aromatic heterocycle, 3-fluoropyridine (C5H4FN), which is chosen as a system known for its ultrafast relaxation after electronic excitation. , The presence of fluorine and nitrogen atoms provides distinct chemical markers located outside and within the molecular ring, respectively, enabling site-specific insight into the subsequent electronic and nuclear dynamics. A UV photon promotes the molecule to the first excited state, from which the system shows a relaxation pathway back to the ground state (S0) via a CI (see Figure a). Through ab initio simulations, we show that the chemical shifts at the nitrogen site within the ring are strongly influenced by the electronic excited state and its associated nuclear dynamics, whereas the fluorine site outside the ring is primarily sensitive to molecular vibrations and largely unaffected by electronic excitation. We employ this prediction to capture the CI passage through a pump–probe experiment where we are able to independently observe this coupled electron–nuclear motion in real time and associate a decay time of approximately 1.5 ps. Finally, an analysis based on a partial charges (PC) model reveals the interplay effects between electronic excitations and local vibrations. This shows that the chemical environment at the N atom, directly involved in the excitation, alters its sensitivity to vibrations, while more distant atoms could serve as indicators of vibrational dynamics, independently of the excited state.

1.

1

Chemical shifts during conical intersection passage. (a) Schematic representation of the photoinduced vibrational relaxation of 3-fluoropyridine upon UV excitation. The UV pump pulse (cyan pulse) excites the molecule to the first excited state (before CI). The excitation is localized mainly within the ring, as evidenced by regions of increased (orange) and decreased (light blue) electron density relative to the equilibrium structure. This excitation leads to a loss of planarity that allows a CI passage back into the ground state (after CI), through which the electronic energy is converted into vibrational motion. Throughout this process, the local chemical environment at either the N atom (blue) or the F atom (red) is probed by X-rays (magenta pulse), which removes electrons from their respective 1s orbitals, highlighted by circles around them. Within the schematic, the potential energy surfaces of S1 and S0 states are represented as functions of two nuclear degrees of freedom: the ring puckering amplitude (Q), which captures out-of-plane distortions of the ring, and the bond-length alternation (BLA), which reflects bond elongation at the N site. The locations of the Franck–Condon (FC) region and the conical intersection (CI) are indicated for reference. (b) Calculated time evolution of selected nuclear degrees of freedom during the relaxation process, including the dihedral angle defined between the N–C2–C3 plane (where C3 denotes the carbon atom bonded to fluorine) and the mean molecular plane (blue line), the internal angle at the nitrogen atom formed with its two adjacent carbon atoms (green line), the ring puckering Q (red line), and the BLA (purple line). Both Q and the mean molecular plane are defined according to the original Cremer–Pople formalism. (c, d) Ab initio calculations of the binding energies for geometries before the CI (S1 electronic state, red line), after the CI (S0 electronic state, blue line), and the unpumped molecule (black line) at the N and F sites, respectively. Vertical dashed lines in (c) and (d) indicate the integration regions used to quantify the evolution of the S1 and S0 states, respectively.

II. Results and Discussion

A sketch of the process under investigation is shown in Figure a. A UV (264 nm wavelength) pump pulse excites the molecule mainly to the S1 excited state. In the S1 state, the excitation primarily corresponds to either a π → π* or an n → π* transition, which depends on the initial molecular geometry. Here n denotes the nonbonding orbital of the nitrogen atom and π and π* represent bonding and antibonding delocalized orbitals of the conjugated ring, respectively. After excitation, the increase in the electronic density in the π* orbital destabilizes the molecule, leading to its loss of planarity. When this occurs, the molecule may undergo a ring-puckering motion around the nitrogen atom. Figure a shows the calculated potential energy surfaces (PESs) of the ground and first excited states. These PESs indicate that access to the conical intersection (CI) proceeds through an initial increase in the puckering amplitude (Q), defined in terms of the out-of-plane displacements of the ring atoms, followed by an increase in the bond-length alternation (BLA), which reflects bond-length changes within the molecular ring, including those involving the nitrogen atom. This breaking of the plane symmetry causes the degeneracy of the S0 and S1 states at a given geometry, enabling the conical intersection passage, i.e., a radiationless transition from the S1 to the S0 electronic state. Based on our ab initio simulations of the relaxation process, we analyze the key nuclear degrees of freedom. Their mean values and standard deviations over the first 350 fs are shown in Figure b. In particular, at early times, before CI, we observe a progressive increase in the puckering amplitude as the system evolves toward the CI. An example of a calculated trajectory during the CI is given in Supporting Information (SI) section S5. At later times, once the system returns to the S0 state, the electronic energy is transformed into vibrational energy that leads to large amplitudes in the vibrational motion.

Both the evolving electronic configurations and the subsequent onset of the vibrational motion play a significant role in the localization of the transient charge, which affects the binding energies of core electrons within the system. As illustrated in Figure a, we consider a tr-XPS scheme in which an ultrashort X-ray probe pulse (1.3-keV photon energy) ionizes the 1s electronic shells, far above the ionization threshold of N (∼404 eV) and F (∼694 eV) atoms. Through these photoelectrons, we obtain site-specific insight into the evolving chemical environments surrounding the F and N atoms by tracking time-dependent shifts in their binding energies.

We first focus on the N site. Here we probe within the ring, at the site of the delocalized π orbitals, which plays a fundamental role in the ring puckering toward the CI. We perform advanced ab initio calculations of the excited-state dynamics and separately calculate the corresponding binding energy of this atom at each time step. The static XPS calculations are benchmarked with synchrotron measurements performed at the GALAXIES beamline of Synchrotron SOLEIL, see details in SI section S3C. Our theory is based on a semiclassical approach that treats the nuclear motion classically, while the electronic structure is treated at the quantum level (see section D of Methods for more details). We run several semiclassical trajectories starting in the S1 state, modeling the UV excitation, and simulate the dynamics that accounts for nonadiabatic couplings, up to 1000 fs. At the end of the simulation, we obtain a set of trajectories, some of which have undergone the CI passage. For each trajectory, we group all instantaneous geometries as “before CI” and “after CI”, separated by the time step when the CI passage occurred. The respective calculated average binding energies at the N site for these groups, together with the binding energy of the ground-state molecule, are shown in Figure c.

On the one hand, for the geometries corresponding to “before CI”, we observe a strong depletion of the main peak around 404.5 eV and an increase of signal around 406.5–408 eV with respect to the ground state (see Figure c). The ground-state broadening reflects the nuclear distribution of the equilibrium wave function. When compared with this ground-state width (1.25 eV fwhm), the widening of binding energy shifts before reaching the CI is particularly striking. The region around 409 and 412 eV is primarily attributed to photoelectron satellites, arising from core ionization accompanied by valence excitations. Throughout the excited-state S1 dynamics, the S1 and S2 states remain energetically close, and nonadiabatic coupling mixes them during propagation (see an example in SI section S6A). These states exhibit ππ* and nπ* electronic character, which becomes strongly mixed during evolution. Vibrations “before CI” are less pronounced than “after CI”, see illustration Figure a; therefore, the observed energy-shift widening is attributed to an intertwined effect of the electronic configuration change and the vibrational motion. Consequently, the binding energies in the 406.5–408.0 eV range (indicated by the red vertical dashed lines in Figure c) can be directly associated with the S1 dynamics. On the other hand, for the geometries labeled “after CI”, although the system ends up at the ground electronic level (S0), we predict a depletion of the main peak, a slight shift toward higher binding energies, and a broadening from 1.25 to 1.5 eV relative to the ground state. We attribute this broadening to vibrations arising from relaxation to the vibrationally hot S0 state. However, disentangling this broadening from the large contribution of S1 is challenging, making direct measurement of the S0 population at the N site difficult. As we shall show in the next paragraph, this is not the case at the F site.

Similarly to the N site, we calculate the F binding energy for the simulated trajectories and then group the geometries into “before CI” and “after CI” (see Figure d). Now, in the “before CI” trace, we observe a slight broadening and energy shift toward lower binding energies. Additionally, there is a slight increase at 697 eV associated with a chemical shift of the satellite. However, in the “after CI” case, the broadening is stronger than in the “before CI” case. As this broadening is associated with molecular vibrations, the spectral region 690.6–691.7 eV (as indicated by the blue vertical dashed lines in Figure d) will be sensitive to observe the onset of energy conversion to nuclear degrees of freedom.

From this theoretical modeling, we rationalize the distinct effects of the CI passage at two atomic sites. Although the calculated XPS signals strongly overlap, we identify that an increased signal toward higher binding energies near 406.5–408.0 eV at the N site can be mainly associated with the excited-state population S1 and an increased signal near 690.6–691.7 eV at the F site is associated with the vibrationally excited ground-state population S0 . At both edges, we also observe significant changes in satellite features at larger binding energies (above 409 eV for N and above 695 eV for F). While these satellite states are not explored further here, we predict that such signals could be used to disentangle dynamics in more complex systems; see, for example,. We now turn to see how this concept is applied to an experiment.

We performed the experiment at the Small Quantum System (SQS) instrument of the European XFEL. UV laser pulses of 264 nm central wavelength were used to excite the molecules, and monochromatized X-ray pulses of 1.3 keV photon energy and a bandwidth of 0.67 eV were used as a probe (see section A of Methods for additional details). The X-ray pulses ionize the 1s orbitals of both nitrogen and fluorine (binding energies of around 405 and 693 eV, respectively) allowing to investigate both atomic sites without varying the X-ray parameters. Both the pump and probe lasers are polarized along the horizontal axis. The photoelectron spectrum along the polarization direction is measured with an electron time-of-flight spectrometer in the Atomic-like Quantum Systems (AQS) end-station. A retardation potential of 850 and 570 V was applied to the spectrometer, decelerating the electrons to obtain a high-energy resolution at either the nitrogen or the fluorine edge, respectively. By varying the time delay between pump and probe pulses, we obtain the tr-XPS traces.

For better interpretation of the evolving transient XPS signals with respect to the ground state, we show the normalized difference, ΔS, between the photoelectron spectra of the pumped and unpumped molecules (see section B of Methods for additional details). The obtained ΔS traces for the N and F sites are shown in Figure a,b, respectively.

2.

2

tr-XPS measurements at the N and F edges. (a, b) Measured differential tr-XPS traces (ΔS) up to 4 ps at the N and F sites, respectively. For the F site, an additional measurement extending to 10 ps is shown above the main trace (note the different y-axis scale). Red and blue vertical dashed lines depict the integration regions chosen in order to characterize the evolution of S1 and S0 , respectively (same regions as in Figure a,b) Colored arrows mark the corresponding time-delay intervals. (c) Integrated time-resolved difference signals within the two regions of interest indicated in (a) and (b). Dots represent the experimental data, while solid lines show the fit accounting for the photoexcited dynamics, see main text. Shaded areas denote the standard deviation at each time delay. (d, e) Difference XPS lineouts over selected time-delay ranges at the N and F sites, respectively.

We begin by discussing the measurement at the N site. When pump and probe pulses overlap in time (delay = 0 fs), we observe a strong depletion centered around 405 eV accompanied by an increase in signal at ±4.7 eV from the main photoline. This is due to the dressing effect of the optical laser, a nonlinear process in which the outgoing electron gains or loses a single quanta of energy from the laser field. From the effective duration of the dressing effect, we obtain an experimental temporal resolution of 64.8 ± 1.3 fs, which is mainly determined by the duration of the UV pulse (see Figure S4b). For positive time delays (pump before probe) we recognize a strong shift toward larger binding energies, seen as a depletion between 405 and 406 eV and an increase of signal between 406.5 and 408 eV. To better visualize these features, we perform lineouts of the evolving ΔS at selected time delays (see Figure d). We observe that both the positive and negative signals decrease in amplitude over time. Based on the results of our theoretical model, we understand that this behavior corresponds to evolving population of the S1 state, as described in Figure b. There we predict that the region between 406.5 and 408 eV (between the red dashed lines shown in Figure a) would be a good representation of the S1 population, so we integrate ΔS in that region for each time step. The results (red dots in Figure c) show the decreasing signal in time, representative of the S1 population. However, from the results presented in Figure c, we can see that some small contribution from the S0 state could be present. We therefore perform a fit that considers the decreasing S1 population and increasing S0 population, assigning initial weights to each state (see section D of Methods for details). Based on this fit, we obtain a time constant of 1530 ± 390 fs for the CI passage, consistent with values reported previously for pyridine and related heteroaromatic systems. ,, We emphasize that this approach provides unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution in resolving the dynamics through the conical intersection. Furthermore, from the fitted relative population weights, we find that the S0 state only contributes 2% to the difference in the chosen spectral region, which confirms our initial prediction based on the theoretical ab initio calculations.

Now turning to the F site (see Figure b), we observe a chemical shift in the opposite direction for positive time delays, as predicted by our theoretical modeling. The differential signal is dominated by a negative signal between 693 and 694 eV and positive signals between 690 and 693 eV. We perform lineouts of selected time windows for better visualization of the evolving trace (see Figure e), where we note that these signals increase in amplitude over time. Based on the theoretical model shown in Figure d, we associate these traces with the buildup of S0 population in time. At each time step, we integrate ΔS over the 690.6–691.7 eV range, indicated by the blue dashed lines shown in Figure b (also region highlighted in blue in Figure d). The results (blue dots in Figure e) now show a signal that increases over time. Again considering possible contributions from both increasing S0 population and decreasing S1 population, we perform the same fitting procedure used for the N site. From this fit, we obtain a time constant of 1210 ± 280 fs, consistent with the result obtained from the N site. Hence, most of the excited population ultimately returns to S0 . The relative contribution of S1 to this signal is 23%. We note that while the integration windows could, in principle, be broadened, we deliberately restrict them to regions that remain predominantly sensitive to the “after-CI” population without compromising the signal statistics. At higher binding energies, the “before-CI” state contributes more strongly, as illustrated in Figure d.

We demonstrate that tr-XPS can successfully capture features arising from S1 and S0 dynamics during passage through a CI. Our results highlight the advantage of high spectral resolution for resolving time-dependent chemical shifts and isolating the relevant dynamics. As shown, accurate modeling of these dynamics is essential to guide and interpret the measurements. However, ab initio calculations of binding energies are computationally demanding. In the next section, we will show that further insight on the dynamics can be obtained using a partial charges model, a significantly less computationally intensive approach. So far, we attribute the broad spectral features at the N site to the S1 dynamics, which ab initio calculations suggest arise from an intertwined effect of electronic excitation and vibrational motion. In contrast, this effect is absent at the F site, where time-dependent features appear to evolve primarily due to the excitation of a larger number of vibrational levels, with minimal influence from the change of electronic state when the system goes through the CI. In the following section, we further explore this phenomenon by using the methodology detailed in ref.

Chemical shifts, in equilibrium systems, are effectively captured by a partial charges model. , A PC model estimates chemical energy shifts through an electrostatic potential, whose form depends mainly on the effective partial charges at each atomic site and the distances between the ionized site and its neighboring atoms (see section E of Methods for more details). This model is well-known for its application to static XPS, but in a previous work we showed that a PC model is also able to capture dynamical chemical shifts, see ref. For 3-fluoropyridine, there is also a remarkably good agreement between ab initio binding energies and those calculated from a PC model, see more details in SI section S4. Using the PC model, we identify that the most influential parameters governing the chemical shifts are the terms that depend on the ionized site and its nearest neighbors. This indicates that the main trends in dynamical chemical shifts can be captured by accounting solely for vibrations of neighboring bonds and their associated partial charges.

We observe a pronounced charge redistribution immediately after photoexcitation around the N atom, whereas no significant change occurs near the F atom, as depicted in Figure a. The loss of electron density at the N site, accompanied by an increase on an adjacent C atom, alters the sensitivity of the local chemical environment, where Coulomb interactions between neighboring atomic charges also become more relevant. Figure b shows the evolution of partial charges at the F, N, and their adjacent C atoms for one selected trajectory. At the F atom and its neighboring C atom (C3), the partial charges oscillate around −0.4e and +0.4e, respectively, and remain on average unchanged after the CI passage at 350 fs. The only noticeable effect is an increase in the oscillation amplitude, driven by bond-length variations associated with the higher vibrational energy acquired upon return to the S0 state. In contrast, the N atom exhibits a different behavior: after photoexcitation at 0 fs, its atomic charge increases by +0.2e in S1 from its initial value −0.4e in S0, losing this excess of positive charge after the CI passage (note that S0 retains the same average partial charge distribution as S0). Among the adjacent C atoms, one remains nearly unaffected (C6), while the other (C2) receives approximately −0.1e immediately after photoexcitation, which returns to zero following the CI passage. This transient charge flow between the N and C6 atoms enables the Coulomb interaction between them, thereby enhancing the sensitivity of the N-site chemical environment to internuclear distances exclusively in the S1 state. Notably, variations in the partial charges at the nitrogen and adjacent carbon atoms are already evident after 300 fs, as the system evolves toward the CI and the molecular geometry undergoes significant puckering distortion.

3.

3

Photoinduced enhancement of chemical shift sensitivity to local vibrations. (a) Illustration of the atomic charge distribution in 3-fluoropyridine during the photoexcited dynamics, where blue denotes positive charge (lower electron density) and red denotes negative charge (higher electron density). Upon excitation from the S0 to the S1 state, electron density flows from the nitrogen atom toward the adjacent carbon atom (C2). After passage through the conical intersection, this charge redistribution is reversed, restoring the ground-state pattern. (b) Time evolution of the partial atomic charges for the most relevant atoms contributing to the chemical shifts at the F and N sites, shown for a representative semiclassical trajectory. The passage through the conical intersection occurs at approximately 350 fs, as indicated by the vertical dashed black line. A simplified PC model that considers only neighboring atoms is used to calculate binding energies for each trajectory. (c, d) Binding energies as a function of the relevant bond-length coordinates for all computed trajectories that undergo relaxation at (c) the N site with neighboring carbons C2 and C6 and (d) the F site with carbon C3. Geometries before and after CI are distinguished. These plots show that chemical shifts at the F site do not depend on the electronic state, whereas at the N site their sensitivity to nuclear distortions strongly depends on the electronic excitation.

To highlight the sensitivity of chemical shifts to vibrational motion, we analyze the variation of the binding energy across all semiclassical trajectories, separating between before and after CI, as a function of the neighboring bond lengths of the ionized site, see Figures c and d for the N site and F site, respectively. At the N site, there is a pronounced difference between molecules that have crossed the CI and those that have not. Before the CI passage, changes in the C–N bond length lead to significant variations in chemical shifts. After the CI passage, this sensitivity becomes much weaker. Although vibrations increase after passing the CI, the PC model indicates that they no longer drive substantial changes in local charges, and the Coulomb interaction term for the neighboring atom is practically zero, unlike in the state S1. This change in sensitivity is linked to the S1 excitation, which involves molecular orbitals within the ring where the N atom resides. This also explains the broader signal observed in Figure c for the “before CI” case compared to the ground state or the “after CI” signal. At the F site, there is a direct correlation between the C–F bond length and the chemical shift. Here, vibrations consistently influence local charge and the Coulomb interaction term in the PC model, regardless of the electronic state. Notably, the local charge at the F site varies strongly with bond length, but the chemical shift is unaffected by the excitation. This confirms the expectation that F serves as a reliable marker outside the ring for tracking the return to the vibrationally excited state S0 .

III. Conclusions

In summary, we have investigated the ultrafast passage through a conical intersection in a prototypical heterocyclic compound, 3-fluoropyridine, through multisite tr-XPS. Upon UV excitation, the molecule is promoted to the first excited state S1, and our experimental data reveals that the excited population returns to a vibrationally hot ground state S0 with a decay time of approximately 1.5 ps. Our theoretical modeling of these results reveal that the time-dependent chemical shifts at the F site are strongly influenced by C–F bond length variations and its sensitivity is largely unaffected by the electronic state. In contrast, shifts at the N site during S1 evolution stem from an interplay between electronic state and vibrational motion that redistributes electron density. This leads to larger chemical shifts before the conical intersection than after, even though vibrational amplitudes are significantly greater following the CI passage. This effect is attributed to a charge flow between the N site and an adjacent carbon following light excitation, which involves molecular orbitals within the ring with n and π character. This charge redistribution increases the sensitivity to C–N bond length variations, in which the Coulomb interactions between neighbor atomic charges play an important role. By demonstrating sensitivity to neighboring vibrational motion at electronically excited active sites, this study opens new avenues for probing coupled nuclear-electronic dynamics in increasingly complex environments.

IV. Methods

A. Experimental Setup

The XFEL was tuned such that the FEL gain process is not saturated, aiming to produce pulses below 10 fs. An energy of approximately 2 mJ is delivered before the monochromator. The bandwidth is later reduced to 0.67 ± 0.1 eV with the dedicated grating-based soft X-ray monochromator located in the SASE3 beamline of the European XFEL, leading to an energy of approximately 1.5 μJ being delivered to the SQS beamline. At the interaction point, a focal spot of a few micrometers is expected, much smaller than the UV focal spot of 96 ± 10 μm fwhm. The 264 nm UV pulses were generated by first frequency doubling the fundamental wavelength of the dedicated optical laser, and then generating the third harmonic via sum-frequency generation. A set of dispersive mirrors providing −145 fs2 per bounce (DM100, Ultrafast Innovations) were employed to compensate for the chirp added in the UV-generation beam path. A total energy of 3.2 ± 0.1 μJ is delivered to the interaction region.

From the delay dependence of sidebands in the photoelectron spectra, which are proportional to the overlap between the UV-laser and X-ray pulses, we can determine that the overall temporal resolution is approximately 65 fs. This is mainly due to the UV pulse duration, but also has contributions from the XFEL pulse duration and the residual time jitter after bunch-arrival corrections (see SI section S1C for further details).

The fluoropyridine molecules, liquid at room temperature, are directly delivered to the chamber via a needle, whose exit is positioned a few millimeters from the interaction point. The low vapor pressure of the sample allows it to be degassed by directly pumping on it at room temperature. A needle valve is used to control the sample delivery, maintaining a background pressure of 2 × 10–6 mbar in the interaction chamber.

B. Differential Photoelectron Spectra

The XFEL was operated such that trains of electron bunches were produced at a repetition rate of 10 Hz. Each train contained 134 lasing bunches, producing X-ray pulses with an intrabunch repetition rate of 376 kHz. This was chosen as double the repetition rate of the UV laser in order to have an equal number of pump–probe versus “unpumped” measurements. Doing this in an interleaved way allows any systematic drifts that might occur along the XFEL pulse train to be minimized.

For each X-ray pulse that coincides with a UV pulse (every other event), the delay between the X-ray and UV pulses is determined by combining measurements on a bunch arrival monitor, the delay stage, and referencing to the sidebands produced in the photoelectron spectra at temporal overlap (see SI section S1B for additional information).

We define delay bins i with delays τ i at the centers of the bins and sum the photoelectron spectra of all X-ray-UV pulse pairs to retrieve total photoelectron kinetic energy (KE, directly related to the binding energy) spectra for each delay bin, S pump(E KE; τ i ). The same is done for X-ray pulses that do not coincide with UV pulses, using the delay of the pulse pair immediately preceding each pulse, to find the analogous total photoelectron kinetic energy spectra, S 0(E KE; τ i ).

We obtain the differential tr-XPS trace at τ i delay by normalizing the pumped and unpumped total photoelectron spectra to the total pulse energy contributing to them, I pump/0, and taking their difference:

ΔS(EKE;τi)=Spump(EKE;τi)Ipump(τi)−S0(EKE;τi)I0(τi) 1

More details can be found in SI section S1.

C. Fitting of Differential tr-XPS Traces

To quantify the transitions between states following excitation, we integrate regions of the XPS traces and fit to their time dependence. Changes in the spectra are caused by time dependence of the population in the ground state, before the CI and after the CI.

To understand the choice of function, we first consider an infinitely short pump pulse. In regions of binding energy where there is a difference between the ground state and before-CI photoelectron spectra, we expect a step change in the spectrum at temporal overlap, followed by an exponential decay of this change as the molecules pass through the CI. In regions of the binding energy where there is a difference between the ground state and after-CI spectra, we expect a step change in the gradient at temporal overlap followed by the onset of signal of the form 1 – e–τ as the population passes through the conical intersection. In general, each region of the spectrum can have contributions from both S1 (before) and S0 (after) and is described by

f(τ)={0τ<τ0Abeforee−(τ−τ0)/τCI+Aafter(1−e−(τ−τ0)/τCI)τ≥τ0 2

where τCI is the rate of population transfer through the conical intersection, τ0 is the offset in the change from temporal overlap, and A before and A after are the differences in amplitude in that region of the XPS from the ground state for states before and after the conical intersection, respectively.

To account for temporal broadening due to the finite time resolution of the experiment, we fit to the data a convolution of this function with a Gaussian function with width matching the resolution (i.e., 64.8 fs fwhm):

g(τ)=∫1(38.9fs)2πexp[−τ′2(38.9fs)2]f(τ−τ′)dτ′ 3

where A before, A after, τCI, and τ0 are free parameters.

D. Ab Initio Model for Transient Chemical Shifts

We developed an ab initio model to describe the dynamics and calculate the XPS spectra based on a semiclassical surface-hopping model. In our model, the electron motion is described at the quantum level, while the nuclear dynamics is treated classically using a swarm of trajectories to mimic the nuclear wavepacket motion, see more details in SI section S2C. We use a version implemented in SHARC to perform the semiclassical nuclear dynamics.

The electronic structure calculations for the ground and low-lying excited states were performed using a multireference approach, specifically the complete-active-space self-consistent field method with an active space of eight electrons and seven orbitals (CASSCF­(8,7)). Dynamical electron correlation effects were accounted for by applying energy corrections using the complete active space second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2) method. The electronic calculations during the dynamics are performed at the CASPT2 level of theory with the cc-PVTZ Dunning basis set using the BAGEL software.

The absorption of the UV photon is modeled by the excitation of the vibrational ground state into the S1 and S2 electronic excited states. The excited states are populated by considering first-order perturbation theory, in which the S1 is mainly populated (see more details in SI section S5). The trajectories start then in an excited state and are propagated using a surface-hopping algorithm, which incorporates nonadiabatic couplings in order to describe the conical intersection. A total of 68 trajectories with different initial conditions are propagated to ensure good statistics and capture the main dynamics for approximately 1 ps. Within 800 fs, around 20% of the trajectories relaxed to the ground state (see Figure S15b in SI section S5). The initial conditions, comprising coordinates and velocities for each trajectory, are sampled from an harmonic Wigner distribution in the ground electronic state, which reproduces quantum distributions in both position and momentum space.

The electronic calculations of core-hole or core-ionized states, in which the 1s orbital is included in the active space, are performed to determine the binding energies and Dyson intensities. The 1s orbital is incorporated in the first restricted active space (RAS1) via a restricted active space self-consistent field (RASSCF) calculation, carried out using the OpenMolcas software. , Energies are corrected at the CASPT2 level of theory. We performed a state average over 30 states and 50 states for the F edge and N edge respectively, in order to achieve maximum accuracy in both the main and satellites signals. We evaluated the accuracy of this level of theory by calculating the static XPS of 3-fluoropyridine and comparing it with experimental data acquired at the SOLEIL synchrotron at the GALAXIES beamline. This enables us to establish the use of a cc-PVTZ Dunning basis set with an excellent agreement with the static XPS experiment (see the calculated static XPS in Figure S10).

For each trajectory obtained during the nuclear propagation, an incoherent sum of the ionization intensities is computed over all geometries to construct the transient XPS signal. The ionization yield is evaluated using Dyson intensities, defined as the norm of the Dyson orbitals between the lowest-energy states and the core-ionized states. These orbitals are calculated at the CASPT2 level using the OpenMolcas software package. In all computed ab initio binding energies we apply an absolute energy shift of 1.1 and 0.7 eV at the F and the N edges, respectively, to compare with the experimental data. In those trajectories propagated in the ground state to compute Figure we apply an additional relative shift of −0.2 eV at the F edge.

Figures of the molecular structure, electron density, and molecular orbitals were generated using the Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD) software package.

E. Partial Charge Model

We analyze the transient charge distribution in the 3-fluoropyridine molecule. Out-of-equilibrium chemical shifts can be accurately described using a partial charge model expressed as in ref :

ΔEAi=kAi·qA+∑B≠AqBRAB+lAi

where A denotes the core-ionized atom, B represents any other atom in the molecular system, and R AB is the distance between atoms A and B. The term q A is the partial charge on atom A, and i refers to the core-ionized orbital of atom A. The quantity ΔE A i corresponds to the chemical shift of the core orbital i relative to a reference level. The constant k A i represents the average Coulomb repulsion between the core electron i of atom A and its valence electrons, while l A i introduces an absolute energy offset. Mulliken or Löwdin partial charges provide a reasonable description at the F site but fail at the N site due to basis set delocalization within the ring. To address this limitation, we perform a natural population analysis (NPA) using the JANPA software on the natural orbitals from the ab initio dynamical simulations at the level of CASSCF­(8,7) theory, which allows us to extract reliable atomic partial charges in both sites. We use k = 32.5 eV/C at the F site and k = 27.0 eV/C at the N site. These values remain essentially constant during the dynamics because the core orbitals are highly localized.

Supplementary Material

ja6c06538_si_001.pdf (11.5MB, pdf)
Download video file (27.3MB, mov)

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support teams at European XFEL and DESY for their assistance in conducting this experiment under proposal reference 2862. A.M.G., P.E.A., L.P., D.M., and A.P. acknowledge the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and the State Research Agency through Grants PID2021-126560NB-I00, PID2024-157663NB-I00, CNS2022-135803, PID2022-143013OB-100, and CNS2023-145046 (MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE), the “Severo Ochoa” Programme for Units of Excellence in R&D (CEX2024-001445-S), and computer resources and assistance provided by the Red Española de Supercomputación (RES) under Projects FI-2024-3-0011, FI-2024-2-0034, FI-2023-2-0012, FI-2023-1-0035, FI-2022-3-0022, and FI-2022-1-0031. This publication is based upon work from COST Action NEXT, CA22148 supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). S.O. ackowledges support from the Swiss National Science Foundation, National Center of Competence in Research - Molecular Ultrafast Science and Technology NCCR - MUST. T.M. and M.M. acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Project 170620586, SFB-925). M.I. acknowledges support by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) Grant 13K22CHA, the Cluster of Excellence “Advanced Imaging of Matter” of DFG-EXC 2056Project ID 390715994, and DFG Project 328961117-SFB 1319 ELCH (“Extreme light for sensing and driving molecular chirality”). O.A. and J.P.M. acknowledge funding from UK EPSRC Grants EP/X026094/1 and EP/V026690/1. F.T. acknowledges funding by the DFG, Project 509471550, Emmy Noether Programme.

The data underlying the results presented in this work are available at 10.20350/digitalCSIC/18337 and 10.22003/XFEL.EU-DATA-002862-00.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.6c06538.

  • Additional experimental details, calculations, analysis, and methods, including additional Figures S1–S27 (PDF)

  • Movie showing a representative trajectory (MOV)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Cremer D., Pople J. A.. General definition of ring puckering coordinates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975;97(6):1354–1358. doi: 10.1021/ja00839a011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Siegbahn K.. Electron Spectroscopy for Atoms, Molecules, and Condensed Matter. Science. 1982;217(4555):111–121. doi: 10.1126/science.217.4555.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fadley C. S.. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Progress and perspectives. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2010;178–179:2–32. doi: 10.1016/j.elspec.2010.01.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Greczynski G., Hultman L.. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Towards reliable binding energy referencing. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2020;107:100591. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100591. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Greczynski G., Hultman L.. Binding energy referencing in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2025;10(1):62–78. doi: 10.1038/s41578-024-00743-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gelius U.. Recent progress in ESCA studies of gases. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1974;5(1):985–1057. doi: 10.1016/0368-2048(74)85064-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hergenhahn U.. Vibrational structure in inner shell photoionization of molecules. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 2004;37(12):R89–R135. doi: 10.1088/0953-4075/37/12/R01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mendolicchio M., Baiardi A., Fronzoni G., Stener M., Grazioli C., de Simone M., Barone V.. Theory meets experiment for unravelling the C1s X-ray photoelectron spectra of pyridine, 2-fluoropyridine, and 2,6-difluoropyridine. J. Chem. Phys. 2019;151(12):124105. doi: 10.1063/1.5122310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leitner T., Josefsson I., Mazza T., Miedema P. S., Schröder H., Beye M., Kunnus K., Schreck S., Düsterer S., Föhlisch A., Meyer M., Odelius M., Wernet Ph.. Time-resolved electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis of photodissociation: Photoelectron spectra of Fe­(CO)5, Fe­(CO)4, and Fe­(CO)3 . J. Chem. Phys. 2018;149(4):044307. doi: 10.1063/1.5035149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brauße F., Goldsztejn G., Amini K., Boll R., Bari S., Bomme C., Brouard M., Burt M., de Miranda B. C., Düsterer S., Erk B., Géléoc M., Geneaux R., Gentleman A. S., Guillemin R., Ismail I., Johnsson P., Journel L., Kierspel T., Kockert H., Küpper J., Lablanquie P., Lahl J., Lee J. W. L., Mackenzie S. R., Maclot S., Manschwetus B., Mereshchenko A. S., Mullins T., Olshin P. K., Palaudoux J., Patchkovskii S., Penent F., Piancastelli M. N., Rompotis D., Ruchon T., Rudenko A., Savelyev E., Schirmel N., Techert S., Travnikova O., Trippel S., Underwood J. G., Vallance C., Wiese J., Simon M., Holland D. M. P., Marchenko T., Rouzée A., Rolles D.. Time-resolved inner-shell photoelectron spectroscopy: From a bound molecule to an isolated atom. Phys. Rev. A. 2018;97(4):043429. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.043429. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Allum F., Music V., Inhester L., Boll R., Erk B., Schmidt P., Baumann T. M., Brenner G., Burt M., Demekhin P. V., Dörner S., Ehresmann A., Galler A., Grychtol P., Heathcote D., Kargin D., Larsson M., Lee J. W. L., Li Z., Manschwetus B., Marder L., Mason R., Meyer M., Otto H., Passow C., Pietschnig R., Ramm D., Schubert K., Schwob L., Thomas R. D., Vallance C., Vidanović I., von Korff Schmising C., Wagner R., Walter P., Zhaunerchyk V., Rolles D., Bari S., Brouard M., Ilchen M.. A localized view on molecular dissociation via electron-ion partial covariance. Commun. Chem. 2022;5(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s42004-022-00656-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Al-Haddad A., Oberli S., González-Vázquez J., Bucher M., Doumy G., Ho P., Krzywinski J., Lane T. J., Lutman A., Marinelli A., Maxwell T. J., Moeller S., Pratt S. T., Ray D., Shepard R., Southworth S. H., Vázquez-Mayagoitia A., Walter P., Young L., Picón A., Bostedt C.. Observation of site-selective chemical bond changes via ultrafast chemical shifts. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):7170. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34670-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gabalski I., Allum F., Seidu I., Britton M., Brenner G., Bromberger H., Brouard M., Bucksbaum P. H., Burt M., Cryan J. P., Driver T., Ekanayake N., Erk B., Garg D., Gougoula E., Heathcote D., Hockett P., Holland D. M. P., Howard A. J., Kumar S., Lee J. W. L., Li S., McManus J., Mikosch J., Milesevic D., Minns R. S., Neville S., Atia-Tul-Noor, Papadopoulou C. C., Passow C., Razmus W. O., Röder A., Rouzée A., Simao A., Unwin J., Vallance C., Walmsley T., Wang J., Rolles D., Stolow A., Schuurman M. S., Forbes R.. Time-Resolved X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy: Ultrafast Dynamics in CS2 Probed at the S 2p Edge. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2023;14(31):7126–7133. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c01447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mayer D., Lever F., Picconi D., Metje J., Alisauskas S., Calegari F., Düsterer S., Ehlert C., Feifel R., Niebuhr M., Manschwetus B., Kuhlmann M., Mazza T., Robinson M. S., Squibb R. J., Trabattoni A., Wallner M., Saalfrank P., Wolf T. J. A., Gühr M.. Following excited-state chemical shifts in molecular ultrafast x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):198. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27908-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lennox J. C., Kurtz D. A., Huang T., Dempsey J. L.. Excited-State Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer: Different Avenues for Promoting Proton/Electron Movement with Solar Photons. ACS Energy Lett. 2017;2(5):1246–1256. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen C.-L., Chen Y.-T., Demchenko A. P., Chou P.-T.. Amino proton donors in excited-state intramolecular proton-transfer reactions. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2018;2(7):131–143. doi: 10.1038/s41570-018-0020-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gozem S., Luk H. L., Schapiro I., Olivucci M.. Theory and Simulation of the Ultrafast Double-Bond Isomerization of Biological Chromophores. Chem. Rev. 2017;117(22):13502–13565. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pathak S., Ibele L. M., Boll R., Callegari C., Demidovich A., Erk B., Feifel R., Forbes R., Di Fraia M., Giannessi L., Hansen C. S., Holland D. M. P., Ingle R. A., Mason R., Plekan O., Prince K. C., Rouzée A., Squibb R. J., Tross J., Ashfold M. N. R., Curchod B. F. E., Rolles D.. Tracking the ultraviolet-induced photochemistry of thiophenone during and after ultrafast ring opening. Nat. Chem. 2020;12(9):795–800. doi: 10.1038/s41557-020-0507-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kang H., Lee K. T., Jung B., Ko Y. J., Kim S. K.. Intrinsic Lifetimes of the Excited State of DNA and RNA Bases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124(44):12958–12959. doi: 10.1021/ja027627x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cheng Y.-C., Fleming G. R.. Dynamics of Light Harvesting in Photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2009;60:241–262. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physchem.040808.090259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Polli D., Altoè P., Weingart O., Spillane K. M., Manzoni C., Brida D., Tomasello G., Orlandi G., Kukura P., Mathies R. A., Garavelli M., Cerullo G.. Conical intersection dynamics of the primary photoisomerization event in vision. Nature. 2010;467(7314):440–443. doi: 10.1038/nature09346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. El-Sayed M. A.. SpinOrbit Coupling and the Radiationless Processes in Nitrogen Heterocyclics. J. Chem. Phys. 1963;38(12):2834–2838. doi: 10.1063/1.1733610. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chergui M.. Ultrafast Photophysics of Transition Metal Complexes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015;48(3):801–808. doi: 10.1021/ar500358q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Neville S. P., Chergui M., Stolow A., Schuurman M. S.. Ultrafast X-Ray Spectroscopy of Conical Intersections. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;120(24):243001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.243001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Inhester L., Li Z., Zhu X., Medvedev N., Wolf T. J. A.. Spectroscopic Signature of Chemical Bond Dissociation Revealed by Calculated Core-Electron Spectra. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019;10(21):6536–6544. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rivas D. E., Paoloni L., Boll R., De Fanis A., Gutiérrez A. M., Mazza T., Oberli S., Alexander O., Al-Haddad A., Baumann T. M., Bostedt C., Dold S., Geloni G., Ilchen M., Moonshiram D., Rolles D., Rudenko A., Schmidt P., Serkez S., Usenko S., Pendás Á. M., Meyer M., González-Vázquez J., Picón A.. Unraveling real-time chemical shifts in the ultrafast regime. Phys. Rev. X. 2026;16:011051. doi: 10.1103/y6dt-1sfw. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Faccialà D., Bonanomi M., Tenorio B. N. C., Avaldi L., Bolognesi P., Callegari C., Coreno M., Coriani S., Decleva P., Devetta M., Došlić N., De Fanis A., Di Fraia M., Lever F., Mazza T., Meyer M., Mullins T., Ovcharenko Y., Pal N., Piancastelli M. N., Richter R., Rivas D. E., Sapunar M., Senfftleben B., Usenko S., Vozzi C., Gühr M., Prince K. C., Plekan O.. Unraveling the Relaxation Dynamics of Uracil: Insights from Time-Resolved X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(34):30694–30707. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c04874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Thompson H. J., Bonanomi M., Pedersen J., Plekan O., Pal N., Grazioli C., Prince K. C., Tenorio B. N. C., Devetta M., Faccialà D., Vozzi C., Piseri P., Danailov M. B., Demidovich A., Brynes A. D., Simoncig A., Zangrando M., Coreno M., Feifel R., Squibb R. J., Holland D. M. P., Allum F., Rolles D., Decleva P., Schuurman M. S., Forbes R., Coriani S., Callegari C., Minns R. S., Di Fraia M.. Shake-Down Spectroscopy as State- and Site-Specific Probe of Ultrafast Chemical Dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(36):32851–32860. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c09162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yang J., Zhu X., F. Nunes J. P., Yu J. K., Parrish R. M., Wolf T. J. A., Centurion M., Gühr M., Li R., Liu Y., Moore B., Niebuhr M., Park S., Shen X., Weathersby S., Weinacht T., Martinez T. J., Wang X.. Simultaneous observation of nuclear and electronic dynamics by ultrafast electron diffraction. Science. 2020;368(6493):885–889. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Céolin D., Ablett J. M., Prieur D., Moreno T., Rueff J. P., Marchenko T., Journel L., Guillemin R., Pilette B., Marin T., Simon M.. Hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy on the GALAXIES beamline at the SOLEIL synchrotron. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2013;190:188–192. doi: 10.1016/j.elspec.2013.01.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. De Fanis A., Ilchen M., Achner A., Baumann T. M., Boll R., Buck J., Danilevsky C., Esenov S., Erk B., Grychtol P., Hartmann G., Liu J., Mazza T., Montaño J., Music V., Ovcharenko Y., Rennhack N., Rivas D., Rolles D., Schmidt P., Sotoudi Namin H., Scholz F., Viefhaus J., Walter P., Ziółkowski P., Zhang H., Meyer M.. High-resolution electron time-of-flight spectrometers for angle-resolved measurements at the SQS Instrument at the European XFEL. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2022;29(3):755–764. doi: 10.1107/S1600577522002284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Helle N., Raeker T., Grotemeyer J.. Studies of the First Electronically Excited State of 3-Fluoropyridine and Its Ionic Structure by Means of REMPI, Two-Photon MATI, One-Photon VUV-MATI Spectroscopy and Franck–Condon Analysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022;24(4):2412–2423. doi: 10.1039/D1CP04636E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Feng B., Yang D., Min Y., Gao Q., Fang B., Wu G., Yang X.. Excitation wavelength dependent S1-state decay dynamics of 2-aminopyridine and 3-aminopyridine. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2023;25(26):17403–17409. doi: 10.1039/D3CP01487H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gelius U., Hedén P. F., Hedman J., Lindberg B. J., Manne R., Nordberg R., Nordling C., Siegbahn K.. Molecular Spectroscopy by Means of ESCA III.Carbon compounds. Phys. Scr. 1970;2(1–2):70–80. doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2/1-2/014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gelius U.. Binding Energies and Chemical Shifts in ESCA. Phys. Scr. 1974;9(3):133–147. doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/9/3/001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gerasimova N., La Civita D., Samoylova L., Vannoni M., Villanueva R., Hickin D., Carley R., Gort R., Van Kuiken B. E., Miedema P., Le Guyarder L., Mercadier L., Mercurio G., Schlappa J., Teichman M., Yaroslavtsev A., Sinn H., Scherz A.. The soft X-ray monochromator at the SASE3 beamline of the European XFEL: from design to operation. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2022;29(5):1299–1308. doi: 10.1107/S1600577522007627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tully J. C.. Molecular dynamics with electronic transitions. J. Chem. Phys. 1990;93(2):1061–1071. doi: 10.1063/1.459170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Richter M., Marquetand P., González-Vázquez J., Sola I., González L.. SHARC: ab Initio Molecular Dynamics with Surface Hopping in the Adiabatic Representation Including Arbitrary Couplings. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011;7(5):1253–1258. doi: 10.1021/ct1007394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shiozaki T., Győrffy W., Celani P., Werner H.-J.. Communication: Extended multi-state complete active space second-order perturbation theory: Energy and nuclear gradients. J. Chem. Phys. 2011;135(8):081106. doi: 10.1063/1.3633329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shiozaki T.. BAGEL: Brilliantly Advanced General Electronic-structure Library. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 2018;8(1):e1331. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1331. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ortiz J. V.. Dyson-orbital concepts for description of electrons in molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2020;153(7):070902. doi: 10.1063/5.0016472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Fdez. Galván I., Vacher M., Alavi A., Angeli C., Aquilante F., Autschbach J., Bao J. J., Bokarev S. I., Bogdanov N. A., Carlson R. K., Chibotaru L. F., Creutzberg J., Dattani N., Delcey M. G., Dong S. S., Dreuw A., Freitag L., Frutos L. M., Gagliardi L., Gendron F., Giussani A., González L., Grell G., Guo M., Hoyer C. E., Johansson M., Keller S., Knecht S., Kovačević G., Källman E., Li Manni G., Lundberg M., Ma Y., Mai S., Malhado J. P., Malmqvist P. Å., Marquetand P., Mewes S. A., Norell J., Olivucci M., Oppel M., Phung Q. M., Pierloot K., Plasser F., Reiher M., Sand A. M., Schapiro I., Sharma P., Stein C. J., Sørensen L. K., Truhlar D. G., Ugandi M., Ungur L., Valentini A., Vancoillie S., Veryazov V., Weser O., Wesołowski T. A., Widmark P.-O., Wouters S., Zech A., Zobel J. P., Lindh R.. OpenMolcas: From Source Code to Insight. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019;15(11):5925–5964. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Aquilante F., Autschbach J., Baiardi A., Battaglia S., Borin V. A., Chibotaru L. F., Conti I., De Vico L., Delcey M., Fdez. Galván I., Ferré N., Freitag L., Garavelli M., Gong X., Knecht S., Larsson E. D., Lindh R., Lundberg M., Malmqvist P. Å., Nenov A., Norell J., Odelius M., Olivucci M., Pedersen T. B., Pedraza-González L., Phung Q. M., Pierloot K., Reiher M., Schapiro I., Segarra-Martí J., Segatta F., Seijo L., Sen S., Sergentu D.-C., Stein C. J., Ungur L., Vacher M., Valentini A., Veryazov V.. Modern quantum chemistry with [Open]­Molcas. J. Chem. Phys. 2020;152(21):214117. doi: 10.1063/5.0004835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Humphrey W., Dalke A., Schulten K.. VMD: Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics. 1996;14(1):33–38. doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Saha S., Roy R. K., Ayers P. W.. Are the Hirshfeld and Mulliken population analysis schemes consistent with chemical intuition? Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2009;109(9):1790–1806. doi: 10.1002/qua.21901. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Nikolaienko T. Y., Bulavin L. A., Hovorun D. M.. JANPA: An open source cross-platform implementation of the Natural Population Analysis on the Java platform. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2014;1050:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.comptc.2014.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Davis D. W., Shirley D. A., Thomas T. D.. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of fluorinated benzenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972;94(19):6565–6575. doi: 10.1021/ja00774a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Brown R. S., Tse A.. N1s core binding energies for 2-, 3-, and 4-substituted pyridines determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Correlations with theoretical models, substituent parameters, and gas phase basicities. Can. J. Chem. 1980;58(7):694–703. doi: 10.1139/v80-106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ja6c06538_si_001.pdf (11.5MB, pdf)
Download video file (27.3MB, mov)

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying the results presented in this work are available at 10.20350/digitalCSIC/18337 and 10.22003/XFEL.EU-DATA-002862-00.


Articles from Journal of the American Chemical Society are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES