Skip to main content
Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine logoLink to Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine
. 1996 Mar;13(2):108–110. doi: 10.1136/emj.13.2.108

"Fast tracking" patients with a proximal femoral fracture.

J Ryan 1, M Ghani 1, P Staniforth 1, G Bryant 1, S Edwards 1
PMCID: PMC1342649  PMID: 8653231

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To assess the management of elderly patients presenting to the accident and emergency (A&E) department with a proximal femoral fracture. METHODS--A retrospective audit carried out on 30 patients with proximal femoral fracture showed an unacceptably long waiting time in the A&E department. A new "fast track" system for managing these patients, involving the use of a flow chart for expediting admission, was devised. A prospective study of 100 patients > 60 years of age with proximal femoral fracture admitted by fast track system was then carried out. RESULTS--Implementation of the fast track system resulted in earlier admission to the ward (median time to admission 2.5 h v 4.5 h in the retrospective audit, P < 0.001). Eighteen patients were not admitted by fast track during the study period, in some cases because of inconclusive diagnosis or because there was no identifiable orthopaedic bed; mean admission time for this group was 4 h 8 min. CONCLUSIONS--The fast track system was of benefit to all involved, including the patient, A&E staff, ward staff, and orthopaedic personnel.

Full text

PDF
108

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clark R. B. Fast track. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 May;17(5):543–544. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80256-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fox H. J., Hughes S. J., Pooler J., Prothero D., Bannister G. C. Length of hospital stay and outcome after femoral neck fracture: a prospective study comparing the performance of two hospitals. Injury. 1993 Aug;24(7):464–466. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(93)90151-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lord S. R., Sinnett P. F. Femoral neck fractures: admissions, bed use, outcome and projections. Med J Aust. 1986 Nov 17;145(10):493–496. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1986.tb139447.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Meislin H. W., Coates S. A., Cyr J., Valenzuela T. Fast Track: urgent care within a teaching hospital emergency department: can it work? Ann Emerg Med. 1988 May;17(5):453–456. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80235-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pell A. C., Miller H. C., Robertson C. E., Fox K. A. Effect of "fast track" admission for acute myocardial infarction on delay to thrombolysis. BMJ. 1992 Jan 11;304(6819):83–87. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6819.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wallace W. A. The increasing incidence of fractures of the proximal femur: an orthopaedic epidemic. Lancet. 1983 Jun 25;1(8339):1413–1414. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92358-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wright S. W., Erwin T. L., Blanton D. M., Covington C. M. Fast Track in the emergency department: a one-year experience with nurse practitioners. J Emerg Med. 1992 May-Jun;10(3):367–373. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(92)90345-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES