Skip to main content
Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine logoLink to Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine
. 1996 Mar;13(2):123–126. doi: 10.1136/emj.13.2.123

Do the national performance tables really indicate the performance of accident and emergency departments?

J A Edhouse 1, J Wardrope 1
PMCID: PMC1342654  PMID: 8653236

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To determine the current practice of nurse triage in accident and emergency departments in England, and to examine the relation between triage systems and performance in the Department of Health comparative performance guide. DESIGN--A postal questionnaire was sent to all consultants in accident and emergency medicine in England. RESULTS--151 responses were analysed, representing 72% of the departments seeing at least 15,000 new patients annually. Triage systems vary widely throughout departments, ranging between advanced triage, partial triage, and "eyeballing". There is no standardisation of the process or duration of triage. There appears to be no standard method of measuring the time to immediate assessment. There is no correlation between the quality of initial assessment and performance in the tables. CONCLUSION--The national performance figures do not correlate with the quality of the initial assessment; comparisons based on these figures are therefore misleading. More effective performance indicators are available, which would provide a truer indication of the quality of accident and emergency services.

Full text

PDF
123

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bache J. Nurse triage in accident and emergency departments. BMJ. 1992 May 23;304(6838):1378–1379. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6838.1378-b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cruickshank R. A. Nurse triage in accident and emergency departments. BMJ. 1992 May 23;304(6838):1378–1378. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6838.1378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dale J. Nurse triage in accident and emergency departments. BMJ. 1992 May 23;304(6838):1378–1379. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6838.1378-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Estrada E. G. Triage systems. Nurs Clin North Am. 1981 Mar;16(1):13–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. George S., Read S., Westlake L., Williams B., Fraser-Moodie A., Pritty P. Evaluation of nurse triage in a British accident and emergency department. BMJ. 1992 Apr 4;304(6831):876–878. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6831.876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Heyworth J., Pledge M. Nurse triage in accident and emergency departments. BMJ. 1992 May 23;304(6838):1378–1379. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6838.1378-c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McMillan J. R., Younger M. S., DeWine L. C. Satisfaction with hospital emergency department as a function of patient triage. Health Care Manage Rev. 1986 Summer;11(3):21–27. doi: 10.1097/00004010-198601130-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Porter J. E. Nurse triage in accident and emergency departments. BMJ. 1992 May 23;304(6838):1378–1379. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6838.1378-d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. St George D. Nurse triage in accident and emergency departments. BMJ. 1992 May 23;304(6838):1379–1379. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6838.1379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wright B. Hostility in accident and emergency departments. Nurs Mirror. 1985 Oct 2;161(14):42–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES