Skip to main content
BMC Surgery logoLink to BMC Surgery
. 2026 Aug 1;26:507. doi: 10.1186/s12893-026-04101-w

Real-world data on patient-reported outcomes and potential factors associated with pain after thyroid/parathyroid surgery: a prospective QUIPS registry analysis of a large cohort – sparking new pain management concepts

Lilit Flöther 1,✉, Taras Shpyruk 1, Philipp Burow 1, Michael Bucher 1, Annett Christel 1, Rick Schneider 2, Kerstin Lorenz 2, Andreas Wienke 6, Lars Kurch 1,3, Winfried Meissner 4,5, Johannes Dreiling 4
PMCID: PMC13428440  PMID: 42542558

Abstract

Background

Although thyroid and parathyroid surgeries are common elective procedures in Germany, postoperative pain management remains unstandardized. This prospective study sought to quantify postoperative pain intensity after thyroid and parathyroid surgery and to examine factors associated with postoperative pain.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 217 adult inpatients undergoing non-oncologic thyroid or parathyroid surgery between September 2021 and September 2022 into the QUIPS (Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management) registry. On postoperative day one (POD1), patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the standardized QUIPS questionnaire, including an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10. Demographic, perioperative, and treatment-related variables were summarized descriptively, and associations with postoperative outcomes were examined using univariable, unadjusted group comparisons.

Results

Postoperative pain was reported by 96.8% of the patients, with a mean maximum NRS score of 4.89 ± 2.76 and a mean pain-on-exertion score of 3.88 ± 2.32. In the univariable, unadjusted analyses, higher maximum pain scores were observed among women, patients younger than 65 years, patients with pre-existing chronic pain, and patients classified as ASA I. Maximum pain scores differed according to the type of surgery and were highest after total thyroidectomy. Pain on exertion and pain-related mood impairment also differed across operative-duration groups, with the highest values observed after procedures lasting 121–180 min. Individualized preoperative information on postoperative pain management was associated with higher patient satisfaction and a lower reported desire for additional analgesia.

Conclusion

Moderate pain was frequently reported after thyroid and parathyroid surgery, with pain intensity varying according to patient- and procedure-related characteristics in unadjusted analyses.

Our findings support the implementation of standardized approaches to postoperative pain management and preoperative patient education.

Keywords: Thyroid/Parathyroid surgery, QUIPS, Perioperative pain management, Patient reported outcomes, Real-world data

Introduction

Benign thyroid disorders affect approximately 20–30% of the German population, while the prevalence of primary hyperthyroidism is around 1% [1, 2]. Approximately 100,000 thyroid surgeries are performed annually in Germany—four to six times more frequently than in many other countries [3]. Among patients with benign nodular thyroid disorders, approximately 50% undergo total thyroidectomy and around 40% hemithyroidectomy [4].

Approximately 10% of patients experience moderate to severe postoperative pain following thyroid surgery [5]. Persistent postoperative pain is recognized as a risk factor for the development of chronic pain, which can significantly impair quality of life [6, 7]. Effective perioperative pain management not only reduces postoperative pain but also contributes to reducing perioperative complications, shortens hospital stays, and lowers overall healthcare costs [8].

Procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations (PROSPECT) exist for many types of surgery [9]. However, such evidence-based guidelines are currently lacking for thyroid and parathyroid procedures.

The aim of this prospective study was to systematically analyze patient-reported outcomes following thyroid and parathyroid surgery and to examine possible associations between patient-, procedure-, and treatment-related characteristics as well as postoperative pain outcomes.

Methods

Patients

This prospective, non-interventional clinical observational trial was conducted at the Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine in collaboration with the Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery at the University Hospital of Halle (Germany).

Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee (identification number: 2021-094).

All adult inpatients who underwent total thyroidectomy, hemi-thyroidectomy, partial para-thyroidectomy and para-thyroidectomy between September 2021 and September 2022 were enrolled.

Patients with preoperative evidence of malignancy and/or intended neck dissection were excluded in order to obtain a more homogeneous study population and to minimize potential confounding associated with oncologic procedures. In particular, neck dissections and more extensive resections may substantially influence postoperative pain intensity and recovery patterns compared with surgery for benign disease.

All study patients gave their written informed consent.

Data

Data was collected within the QUIPS (Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management) registry (German Clinical Trials Register ID: DRKS00006153). The QUIPS registry collects multidimensional patient-reported outcomes (PROs), demographic variables, and processes variables in a standardized format [8]. The registry aims to enhance the quality of early postoperative pain management by implementing standardized data collection, evaluating PROs and process indicators, and providing feedback and benchmarking to the participating study centres. PROs and process variables were collected in a standardized way with the QUIPS questionnaire on postoperative day 1 (POD1) [8].

We primarily analyzed the main variables of the patient questionnaire: pain intensity (maximum, minimum, and during activities, 0–10 on the numeric rating scale [NRS]), pain-related interference (during movement, coughing/deep breathing, sleep, and mood; yes versus no) and side effects (drowsiness and nausea; yes versus no). Demographic (age, sex, chronic pain status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Classification) and process variables (e.g. type of anaesthesia, duration of surgery, postoperative pain management, and surgery specific complications) were extracted from the patient’s medical record.

Postoperative pain management was, however, organized by the ward responsible for further care.

Statistics

The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 29.0. Mean values and standard deviations were calculated for continuous variables. Chi-square tests were used for comparisons of categorical data. Continuous data were compared using the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. For comparisons involving more than two groups, analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference post hoc test was used. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. All analyses were univariable and unadjusted.

Results

Patient cohort

A total of 217 patients were enrolled, of whom 138 (63.6%) were female. The mean age was 55.6 ± 15.0 years, with a range from 19 to 85 years. Chronic pain conditions were reported by 38 patients (17.5%), five of whom were taking pain medication on a regular basis.

All surgeries were performed under general anesthesia. No additional local anesthetic was administered through wound margin infiltration. Total thyroidectomy was the most common procedure, accounting for 55.8% of cases (121/217). Nearly half of the procedures lasted between 61 and 120 min. Perioperative and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis was not routinely administered. No postoperative bleeding or other serious complications were observed in any patient.

Further patient- and procedure-specific characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Patient- and procedure-specific characteristics of the study cohort

Patient- and procedure-specific characteristics (n = 217)
Parameter (n) (%)
Age
 ≥ 65 years 88 40.6
 < 65 years 129 59.4
Sex
 male 79 36.4
 female 138 63.6
ASA physical status
 I 11 5.1
 II 152 70.0
 III 54 24.9
Chronic pain prior to surgery
 yes 38 17.5
 no 179 82.5
Operation type
 Total thyroidectomy OPS 5–063 121 55.8
 Hemithyroidectomy / partial thyroidectomy OPS 5–061/5–062 60 27.6
 (partial or total) OPS 5–066/5–067 36 16.6
Duration of surgery
 up to 60 min 33 15.2
 61 to 120 min 104 47.9
 121 to 180 min 54 24.9
 Longer than 180 min 26 12.0

QUIPS outcome parameters

The results of the survey on postoperative pain are summarized in Table 2; Fig. 1.

Table 2.

Outcome parameters from the QUIPS survey

Outcome parameters (n = 217)
Parameter mean ± SD (n) (%)
Pain on exertion (NRS) 3.88 ± 2.32
Maximum pain (NRS) 4.89 ± 2.76
Minimum pain (NRS) 1.88 ± 1.62
Satisfaction with pain therapy (NRSᵃ) 7.64 ± 2.77
Preoperative information on pain therapy Yes 123 56.7
Pain-related mobility impairment Yes 62 28.6
Pain-related respiratory impairment Yes 123 56.7
Pain-related sleep impairment Yes 80 36.9
Pain-related mood impairment Yes 36 16.6
Desire for more treatment Yes 33 15.2
Fatigue Yes 114 52.5
Nausea Yes 46 21.2
Vertigo Yes 56 25.8

NRS  Numerical Rating Scale, SD  standard deviation

a numerical 11-point scale, higher numbers indicate more patient satisfaction (0-no satisfaction, 10-maximum satisfaction)

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Distribution of patients with the strongest reported pain using the numerical rating scale (NRS); higher values indicate more pain (0-no pain, 10-maximum pain)

The intensity of maximum postoperative pain varied considerably, ranging from no pain to mild, moderate, and severe levels (Fig. 1).

Both exertional pain and maximum pain were, on average, rated as moderate, with maximum pain scores being only slightly higher than exertional pain scores (maximum pain: 4.89 ± 2.76; pain on exertion: 3.88 ± 2.32). In the subgroup of patients with pre-existing chronic pain, the average maximum NRS score was 5.66, compared to 4.73 in patients without chronic pain.

A total of 123 patients (56.7%) received preoperative information regarding postoperative pain management.

Pain-related respiratory impairment was the most frequently reported adverse effect, affecting 123 patients (56.7%). Mobility restrictions due to pain were reported by 62 patients (28.6%), and 80 patients (36.9%) complained of pain-related sleep impairment. Pain-related mood impairment was mentioned by 36 patients (16.6%). Nausea was reported by 46 patients (21.2%), and 56 patients (25.8%) reported vertigo.

Overall satisfaction with pain management was rated at an average of 7.64 ± 2.77 (on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 indicating highest satisfaction).

QUIPS process parameters

An overview of the perioperative and postoperative measures used for pain prevention and management is provided in Table 3.

Table 3.

Process parameters of the QUIPS survey

Parameter Category n Proportion (%)
Anaesthesia procedure General anaesthesia 217 100.0
Non-opioid analgesics (recovery room) None 32 14.7
Metamizole 163 75.1
Paracetamol 8 3.7
Metamizole + Paracetamol 14 6.5
Opioid analgesics (recovery room) None 20 9.2
Piritramide 74 34.1
Oxycodone 123 56.7
Analgesic treatment on the ward None 175 80.6
Non-opioids 35 16.1
Opioids 7 3.2
Non-pharmacological interventions on the ward Yes 66 30.4
Pain therapy instructions on the ward Yes 69 31.8
Standardized pain documentation on the ward Yes 217 100.0

All patients received sufentanil intraoperatively as part of general anesthesia. Ketamine was not used in any patient. In the recovery room, metamizole alone was administered to 163 patients (75.1%), paracetamol alone to 8 patients (3.7%), and a combination of metamizole and paracetamol to 14 patients (6.5%). A total of 32 patients (14.7%) received no non-opioid analgesic.

Intravenous oxycodone was administered to 123 patients (56.7%) and piritramide to 74 patients (34.1%), while 20 patients (9.2%) received no opioid in the recovery room.

Following transfer to the ward, 175 patients (80.6%) received no analgesic medication. Non-opioids were administered to 35 patients (16.1%), while 7 patients (3.2%) received opioids. A total of 69 patients (31.8%) had either an on-demand or a fixed-dose analgesic regimen prescribed. Pain intensity was recorded for all patients at eight-hour intervals.

Univariable associations between patient-, procedure-, and treatment-related characteristics and outcomes

The results from the univariable analyses of process and outcome parameters are shown in Tables 4, 5, 6 and 7.

Table 4.

Associations of patient and procedure characteristics with postoperative outcomes Continuous outcomes, mean ± SD

Characteristic Group Pain on exertion
NRS 0–10
Maximum pain
NRS 0–10
Minimum pain
NRS 0–10
Satisfaction with pain therapy
NRS 0–10
Sex Female 4.08 ± 2.41 5.25 ± 2.91 2.06 ± 1.75 7.43 ± 3.03
Male 3.54 ± 2.16 4.27 ± 2.39 1.56 ± 1.34 8.01 ± 2.23
p-value 0.115 0.007 0.065 0.411
Age < 65 years 4.10 ± 2.18 5.27 ± 2.67 2.00 ± 1.57 7.55 ± 2.76
≥ 65 years 3.57 ± 2.51 4.34 ± 2.83 1.69 ± 1.70 7.77 ± 2.79
p-value 0.083 0.016 0.074 0.325
ASA I 4.64 ± 2.20 6.00 ± 2.49 2.18 ± 0.98 7.45 ± 2.54
II 4.10 ± 2.30 5.22 ± 2.64 1.94 ± 1.62 7.65 ± 2.76
III 3.13 ± 2.31 3.74 ± 2.86 1.63 ± 1.73 7.65 ± 2.89
p-value 0.017 0.001 0.393 0.974
Surgery type Hemithyroidectomy 3.78 ± 2.23 5.17 ± 2.74 1.72 ± 1.34 7.70 ± 2.64
Total thyroidectomy 4.38 ± 2.27 5.33 ± 2.60 2.19 ± 1.72 7.60 ± 2.64
Parathyroidectomy 2.39 ± 2.06 2.97 ± 2.62 1.08 ± 1.42 7.67 ± 3.42
p-value < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.974
Duration of surgery ≤ 60 min 3.67 ± 2.71 4.79 ± 2.87 1.58 ± 1.77 7.70 ± 3.37
61–120 min 3.58 ± 2.18 4.63 ± 2.79 1.72 ± 1.32 7.34 ± 2.88
121–180 min 4.70 ± 2.30 5.48 ± 2.63 2.50 ± 1.90 7.85 ± 2.44
> 180 min 3.69 ± 2.19 4.85 ± 2.80 1.58 ± 1.68 8.35 ± 2.00
p-value 0.029 0.335 0.011 0.355
Chronic pain No 3.75 ± 2.27 4.73 ± 2.68 1.80 ± 1.53 7.80 ± 2.61
Yes 4.50 ± 2.53 5.66 ± 3.07 2.24 ± 2.01 6.87 ± 3.36
p-value 0.073 0.045 0.307 0.151

Table 5.

Binary outcomes, n (%) with outcome present

Characteristic Group Pain-related sleep impairment Pain-related mobility impairment Pain-related respiratory impairment Pain-related mood impairment Fatigue Vertigo Nausea Desire for more treatment
Sex Female 59 (42.8) 46 (33.3) 83 (60.1) 27 (19.6) 88 (63.8) 47 (34.1) 37 (26.8) 24 (17.4)
Male 21 (26.6) 16 (20.3) 40 (50.6) 9 (11.4) 26 (32.9) 9 (11.4) 9 (11.4) 9 (11.4)
p-value 0.018 0.040 0.174 0.119 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.007 0.236
Age < 65 years 53 (41.1) 43 (33.3) 82 (63.6) 25 (19.4) 78 (60.5) 37 (28.7) 33 (25.6) 23 (17.8)
≥ 65 years 27 (30.7) 19 (21.6) 41 (46.6) 11 (12.5) 36 (40.9) 19 (21.6) 13 (14.8) 10 (11.4)
p-value 0.119 0.060 0.013 0.181 0.005 0.241 0.056 0.193
ASA I 2 (18.2) 5 (45.5) 6 (54.5) 2 (18.2) 5 (45.5) 5 (45.5) 5 (45.5) 2 (18.2)
II 62 (40.8) 42 (27.6) 91 (59.9) 28 (18.4) 88 (57.9) 40 (26.3) 36 (23.7) 26 (17.1)
III 16 (29.6) 15 (27.8) 26 (48.1) 6 (11.1) 21 (38.9) 11 (20.4) 5 (9.3) 5 (9.3)
p-value 0.144 0.445 0.325 0.458 0.050 0.215 0.011 0.371
Surgery type Hemithyroidectomy 23 (38.3) 17 (28.3) 35 (58.3) 10 (16.7) 32 (53.3) 17 (28.3) 14 (23.3) 7 (11.7)
Total thyroidectomy 49 (40.5) 41 (33.9) 74 (61.2) 22 (18.2) 69 (57.0) 31 (25.6) 26 (21.5) 22 (18.2)
Parathyroidectomy 8 (22.2) 4 (11.1) 14 (38.9) 4 (11.1) 13 (36.1) 8 (22.2) 6 (16.7) 4 (11.1)
p-value 0.132 0.029 0.058 0.606 0.087 0.801 0.736 0.390
Duration of surgery ≤ 60 min 12 (36.4) 9 (27.3) 17 (51.5) 2 (6.1) 16 (48.5) 12 (36.4) 8 (24.2) 5 (15.2)
61–120 min 37 (35.6) 24 (23.1) 61 (58.7) 13 (12.5) 53 (51.0) 24 (23.1) 22 (21.2) 15 (14.4)
121–180 min 23 (42.6) 21 (38.9) 32 (59.3) 15 (27.8) 31 (57.4) 14 (25.9) 10 (18.5) 8 (14.8)
> 180 min 8 (30.8) 8 (30.8) 13 (50.0) 6 (23.1) 14 (53.8) 6 (23.1) 6 (23.1) 5 (19.2)
p-value 0.740 0.217 0.767 0.023 0.837 0.489 0.925 0.944
Chronic pain No 56 (31.3) 44 (24.6) 98 (54.7) 23 (12.8) 90 (50.3) 41 (22.9) 35 (19.6) 26 (14.5)
Yes 24 (63.2) 18 (47.4) 25 (65.8) 13 (34.2) 24 (63.2) 15 (39.5) 11 (28.9) 7 (18.4)
p-value < 0.001 0.005 0.212 0.001 0.149 0.034 0.198 0.544

NRS Numerical Rating Scale, SD Standard deviation. Two-group comparisons of continuous outcomes used the Mann–Whitney U test; comparisons involving more than two groups used one-way ANOVA. Binary outcomes were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test. All percentages use the respective group as denominator

Table 6.

Associations of perioperative process variables with postoperative outcomes Continuous outcomes, mean ± SD

Process variable Group Pain on exertion
NRS 0–10
Maximum pain
NRS 0–10
Minimum pain
NRS 0–10
Satisfaction with pain therapy
NRS 0–10
Preoperative information on pain therapy No 3.79 ± 2.28 4.95 ± 2.86 1.83 ± 1.45 6.64 ± 3.07
Yes 3.96 ± 2.37 4.85 ± 2.70 1.91 ± 1.75 8.41 ± 2.25
p-value 0.603 0.767 0.891 < 0.001
Non-opioids in recovery room Not given 3.22 ± 2.01 4.06 ± 2.66 1.53 ± 1.24 8.78 ± 1.54
Metamizole 4.04 ± 2.35 5.02 ± 2.71 1.93 ± 1.70 7.48 ± 2.82
Paracetamol 4.00 ± 2.51 5.75 ± 3.15 1.75 ± 1.16 7.25 ± 3.45
Metamizole + paracetamol 3.50 ± 2.62 4.79 ± 3.31 2.07 ± 1.69 7.07 ± 3.56
p-value 0.289 0.258 0.598 0.082
Opioids in recovery room Not given 2.50 ± 2.12 3.10 ± 2.69 1.20 ± 1.11 9.40 ± 0.99
Piritramide 3.86 ± 2.19 5.00 ± 2.64 1.92 ± 1.63 7.07 ± 3.24
Oxycodone 4.12 ± 2.38 5.12 ± 2.77 1.96 ± 1.68 7.70 ± 2.54
p-value 0.015 0.009 0.147 0.003
Non-pharmacological interventions on ward No 3.77 ± 2.28 4.72 ± 2.77 1.84 ± 1.58 7.59 ± 2.91
Yes 4.14 ± 2.43 5.29 ± 2.73 1.95 ± 1.74 7.76 ± 2.46
p-value 0.306 0.141 0.800 0.706
Pain therapy instructions on ward No 3.75 ± 2.31 4.76 ± 2.69 1.69 ± 1.49 7.82 ± 2.73
Yes 4.17 ± 2.37 5.19 ± 2.93 2.28 ± 1.82 7.25 ± 2.85
p-value 0.196 0.297 0.027 0.072
Pain therapy on ward Not given 3.74 ± 2.25 4.78 ± 2.68 1.74 ± 1.52 7.70 ± 2.72
Non-opioids 4.91 ± 2.41 5.91 ± 2.81 2.60 ± 1.85 7.89 ± 2.45
Opioids 2.29 ± 2.56 2.57 ± 3.21 1.57 ± 2.15 5.00 ± 4.43
p-value 0.004 0.006 0.015 0.034

Table 7.

Binary outcomes, n (%) with outcome present

Process variable Group Pain-related sleep impairment Pain-related mobility impairment Pain-related respiratory impairment Pain-related mood impairment Fatigue Vertigo Nausea Desire for more treatment
Preoperative information on pain therapy No 36 (38.3) 26 (27.7) 53 (56.4) 14 (14.9) 51 (54.3) 23 (24.5) 18 (19.1) 27 (28.7)
Yes 44 (35.8) 36 (29.3) 70 (56.9) 22 (17.9) 63 (51.2) 33 (26.8) 28 (22.8) 6 (4.9)
p-value 0.702 0.795 0.938 0.557 0.657 0.694 0.518 < 0.001
Non-opioids in recovery room Not given 10 (31.2) 7 (21.9) 14 (43.8) 1 (3.1) 15 (46.9) 8 (25.0) 8 (25.0) 3 (9.4)
Metamizole 60 (36.8) 49 (30.1) 97 (59.5) 28 (17.2) 85 (52.1) 38 (23.3) 31 (19.0) 25 (15.3)
Paracetamol 4 (50.0) 3 (37.5) 3 (37.5) 3 (37.5) 7 (87.5) 5 (62.5) 4 (50.0) 2 (25.0)
Metamizole + paracetamol 6 (42.9) 3 (21.4) 9 (64.3) 4 (28.6) 7 (50.0) 5 (35.7) 3 (21.4) 3 (21.4)
p-value 0.743 0.672 0.237 0.042 0.223 0.076 0.194 0.602
Opioids in recovery room Not given 5 (25.0) 4 (20.0) 9 (45.0) 1 (5.0) 9 (45.0) 2 (10.0) 5 (25.0) 1 (5.0)
Piritramide 22 (29.7) 19 (25.7) 43 (58.1) 13 (17.6) 32 (43.2) 20 (27.0) 15 (20.3) 14 (18.9)
Oxycodone 53 (43.1) 39 (31.7) 71 (57.7) 22 (17.9) 73 (59.3) 34 (27.6) 26 (21.1) 18 (14.6)
p-value 0.087 0.446 0.541 0.343 0.070 0.236 0.900 0.296
Non-pharmacological interventions on ward No 46 (30.5) 40 (26.5) 80 (53.0) 21 (13.9) 75 (49.7) 28 (18.5) 26 (17.2) 20 (13.2)
Yes 34 (51.5) 22 (33.3) 43 (65.2) 15 (22.7) 39 (59.1) 28 (42.4) 20 (30.3) 13 (19.7)
p-value 0.003 0.305 0.096 0.108 0.201 < 0.001 0.030 0.223
Pain therapy instructions on ward No 50 (33.8) 40 (27.0) 79 (53.4) 19 (12.8) 77 (52.0) 38 (25.7) 35 (23.6) 17 (11.5)
Yes 30 (43.5) 22 (31.9) 44 (63.8) 17 (24.6) 37 (53.6) 18 (26.1) 11 (15.9) 16 (23.2)
p-value 0.168 0.461 0.150 0.030 0.826 0.949 0.196 0.025
Pain therapy on ward Not given 62 (35.4) 47 (26.9) 97 (55.4) 28 (16.0) 92 (52.6) 45 (25.7) 37 (21.1) 21 (12.0)
Non-opioids 17 (48.6) 13 (37.1) 25 (71.4) 8 (22.9) 20 (57.1) 11 (31.4) 9 (25.7) 11 (31.4)
Opioids 1 (14.3) 2 (28.6) 1 (14.3) 0 (0.0) 2 (28.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (14.3)
p-value 0.153 0.470 0.015 0.297 0.385 0.222 0.315 0.014

NRS Numerical Rating Scale, SD Standard deviation. Two-group comparisons of continuous outcomes used the Mann–Whitney U test; comparisons involving more than two groups used one-way ANOVA. Binary outcomes were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test. All percentages use the respective group as denominator

Sex was associated with postoperative pain intensity and related outcomes. Women reported higher maximum pain scores and more frequent pain-related sleep and mobility impairment. Nausea, vertigo, and fatigue were also more frequent among women. Age group was also associated with postoperative pain and related outcomes. Patients younger than 65 years reported higher maximum pain scores and more frequent pain-related respiratory impairment and fatigue. Regarding ASA classification, otherwise healthy patients classified as ASA I reported higher maximum pain scores and greater pain on exertion. Patients classified as ASA II reported nausea and fatigue more frequently.

Patients undergoing total thyroidectomy reported a mean maximum pain score of 5.33 ± 2.60, compared with 5.17 ± 2.74 after hemithyroidectomy and 2.97 ± 2.62 after parathyroidectomy (p < 0.001). Pain-related mobility impairment was reported by 33.9%, 28.3%, and 11.1% of patients, respectively (p = 0.029). Pain-on-exertion scores differed across operative-duration groups (p = 0.029), with the highest mean score observed in patients whose procedures lasted 121–180 min (4.70 ± 2.30). Pain-related mood impairment also differed across duration groups (p = 0.023) and was most frequent after procedures lasting 121–180 min (27.8%).

Patients with pre-existing chronic pain reported higher maximum pain scores and more frequent pain-related mobility, sleep, and mood impairment, as well as vertigo.

Patients who received individualized preoperative information on postoperative pain management reported higher satisfaction than those who did not receive such information (8.41 ± 2.25 vs. 6.64 ± 3.07; p < 0.001). They also reported a lower desire for additional analgesia (4.9% vs. 28.7%; p < 0.001).

On postoperative day 1 (POD1), pain on exertion differed according to opioid treatment in the recovery room, with mean scores of 2.50 ± 2.12 in patients receiving no opioid, 3.86 ± 2.19 in those receiving piritramide, and 4.12 ± 2.38 in those receiving oxycodone (p = 0.015). The corresponding maximum pain scores were 3.10 ± 2.69, 5.00 ± 2.64, and 5.12 ± 2.77, respectively (p = 0.009), while the mean satisfaction scores were 9.40 ± 0.99, 7.07 ± 3.24, and 7.70 ± 2.54, respectively (p = 0.003).

Patients who received instructions on pain and pain treatment on the ward (69/217, 31.8%) reported higher minimum pain scores than those without such instructions (2.28 ± 1.82 vs. 1.69 ± 1.49; p = 0.027). Pain-related mood impairment (24.6% vs. 12.8%; p = 0.030) and the desire for additional analgesia (23.2% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.025) were also reported more frequently.

Pain outcomes differed among patients receiving no analgesia, non-opioids, or opioids on the ward. Mean pain-on-exertion scores were 3.74 ± 2.25, 4.91 ± 2.41, and 2.29 ± 2.56, respectively (p = 0.004). The corresponding maximum pain scores were 4.78 ± 2.68, 5.91 ± 2.81, and 2.57 ± 3.21 (p = 0.006), and minimum pain scores were 1.74 ± 1.52, 2.60 ± 1.85, and 1.57 ± 2.15 (p = 0.015). Satisfaction with pain therapy was 7.70 ± 2.72, 7.89 ± 2.45, and 5.00 ± 4.43, respectively (p = 0.034). Pain-related respiratory impairment was reported by 55.4%, 71.4%, and 14.3% of patients (p = 0.015), while the desire for additional analgesia was reported by 12.0%, 31.4%, and 14.3%, respectively (p = 0.014). The opioid group comprised seven patients.

Patients who received non-pharmacological interventions on the ward reported more frequent pain-related sleep impairment (51.5% vs. 30.5%; p = 0.003), vertigo (42.4% vs. 18.5%; p < 0.001), and nausea (30.3% vs. 17.2%; p = 0.030) than those who did not receive such interventions.

Discussion

In this prospective observational study, postoperative pain intensity, pain management, and associations with patient-, procedure-, and treatment-related characteristics were evaluated in 217 patients undergoing total thyroidectomy, hemithyroidectomy, or parathyroidectomy using the standardized QUIPS assessment tool. To the best of our knowledge, this cohort represents the largest prospective analysis to date focusing on postoperative pain in patients following thyroid or parathyroid surgery.

Over 96% of patients reported postoperative pain, with approximately 75% rating their pain intensity above 3 on the NRS, underscoring the clinical importance of effective pain management in this population. Particularly notable are the findings related to peak pain and pain during movement. Patients undergoing thyroid or parathyroid surgery reported moderate pain levels, with a mean maximum pain score of 4.89 and a mean pain-on-exertion score of 3.88 on the NRS. These pain intensities align closely with previous research, which has documented comparable peak pain levels ranging between 4 and 6 on the NRS after thyroid and parathyroid surgeries [10]. However, postoperative pain management is not mentioned in the procedure-specific guidelines for endocrine surgery. Even the recently published evidence-based guideline on the management of acute perioperative and post-traumatic pain does not account for the specific characteristics of different types of thyroid surgery necessary to adequately address procedure-specific pain management needs [11, 12].

Postoperative pain outcomes differed according to the type of surgery. Mean maximum pain scores were 5.33 after total thyroidectomy, 5.17 after hemithyroidectomy, and 2.97 after parathyroidectomy. Pain-related mobility impairment also differed across the three procedure groups. Pain on exertion and pain-related mood impairment differed across operative-duration groups, with the highest values observed after procedures lasting 121–180 min. As these analyses were unadjusted, they do not establish an independent effect of surgical extent or operative duration on postoperative pain. Nevertheless, previous studies have suggested that the extent of surgical trauma and the duration of the procedure may be relevant to postoperative pain intensity [13, 14].

In addition, patient positioning during surgery may also influence postoperative pain. The hyperextension of the neck required during thyroid surgery can lead to muscular strain or nerve irritation, particularly in the cervical and shoulder regions. Optimal intraoperative positioning and support (e.g., through soft padding and maintaining a neutral neck alignment) may therefore play a preventive role [15]. However, hyperextension of the neck was not assessed in our study, which represents a limitation that should be addressed in future research. Several recent studies suggest that bilateral superficial cervical plexus blocks can significantly reduce postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements after thyroidectomy [16, 17]. While this technique was not applied in our cohort, it represents a promising component of multimodal analgesia strategies and should be considered in future procedural guidelines.

Another finding of our research was the fact that maximum postoperative pain scores differed according to ASA classification, with the highest mean scores observed among patients classified as ASA I. This pattern is consistent with the findings of Wittekindt et al. [18], who reported higher postoperative pain among otherwise healthy patients with a lower ASA classification than among patients with greater comorbidity.

Furthermore, patients with pre-existing chronic pain reported higher peak pain levels, consistent with previous studies that highlighted increased pain sensitivity and impaired pain coping mechanisms within this population [19].

Our study findings reveal considerable variability in pain management on the postoperative ward compared to the recovery room, as evidenced by the differences in administered analgesics. While non-opioid analgesics were commonly administered in the recovery room, their use decreased substantially after patient transfer to the ward. This highlights the need for a standardized pain management protocol extending beyond the recovery room to ensure effective postoperative pain control until discharge. Such concepts have been proposed within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways for thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Lide et al. demonstrated that structured perioperative care emphasizing multimodal analgesia, patient education, and reduced opioid exposure can be successfully implemented while maintaining adequate pain control [20]. Our findings support these concepts and suggest that further standardization of postoperative pain management may improve patient outcomes and reduce unwarranted variations in clinical practice.

In the unadjusted analyses, individualized preoperative information on postoperative pain management was associated with higher patient satisfaction and a lower reported desire for additional analgesia. Similar associations between preoperative information and patient-reported outcomes have been described in previous studies [18, 21].

Furthermore, standardized pain management pathways may contribute to a more efficient use of healthcare resources by reducing unnecessary treatment variation and improving patient recovery.

Apart from pain intensity, postoperative symptoms such as respiratory impairment, fatigue, nausea, and vertigo were frequently reported. Although often considered secondary outcomes, these symptoms may substantially affect recovery, mobilization, sleep quality, and patient satisfaction. Therefore, postoperative care following thyroid and parathyroid surgery should address not only pain intensity but also these associated symptoms.

Besides the previously mentioned limitation related to intraoperative patient positioning, several other limitations warrant consideration. Most importantly, all analyses were univariable and unadjusted. Therefore, the observed associations may be affected by confounding and cannot be interpreted as independent effects or causal relationships. Furthermore, multiple group comparisons were conducted without adjustment for multiple testing; consequently, the findings should be regarded as exploratory. The very small number of patients receiving opioids on the ward (n = 7) further limits the robustness and interpretation of comparisons involving this subgroup. The assessment of postoperative pain at a single time point on postoperative day 1 (POD1) does not allow for a comprehensive understanding of pain trajectories after hospital discharge. No conclusions can be drawn regarding long-term pain outcomes or recovery patterns.

From a methodological perspective, the exclusion of patients with preoperative evidence of thyroid malignancy limits the generalizability of our findings to oncologic thyroid surgery. Furthermore, detailed surgical variables, such as the indication for surgery, reoperative procedures, substernal extension, hyperthyroidism, or division of the strap muscles, were not available within the QUIPS registry, but could be of high value for broader multidisciplinary analyses. Surgical characteristics may influence postoperative pain outcomes and, thus, need to be evaluated in future studies. Operative duration was the only available indirect measure of procedural complexity. However, it cannot adequately capture differences in surgical indications or intraoperative characteristics. Lastly, healthcare costs related to postoperative pain management were not part of this analysis. The economic implications of different pain management approaches could therefore not be quantified. Thus, future studies should include economic evaluations to assess whether standardized pain management pathways may contribute to a more efficient use of healthcare resources, for example, by reducing unnecessary treatment variation or improving patient recovery.

Conclusion

Patients undergoing thyroid or parathyroid surgery commonly experience acute postoperative pain.

In the unadjusted analyses, postoperative pain outcomes varied according to patient-, procedure-, and treatment-related characteristics. Maximum pain scores differed across procedure groups, with the lowest mean score observed after parathyroidectomy. Individualized preoperative information on postoperative pain management was associated with higher patient satisfaction and a lower reported desire for additional analgesia.

These findings support the implementation of standardized approaches to postoperative pain management and preoperative patient education in thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the patients for their participation in the study and for granting permission to use their data for scientific purposes.

Abbreviations

QUIPS

Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management

PROSPECT

Procedure-specific postoperative pain management

PROs

Patient-reported outcomes

POD1

Postoperative Day 1

Total-Tx

Total thyroidectomy

Hemi-Tx

Hemithyroidectomy

Para-Tx

Parathyroidectomy

ASA

American Society of Anesthesiologists

NRS

Numeric Rating Scale

max

Maximum

min

Minimum

n

Number of cases

SD

Standard deviation

ERAS

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization and study design: LF, JD.Data access and verification: TS, LF.Data curation: LF, PB.Formal analysis: LF, TS.Visualization: TS, LF, and AC.Methodology and statistical validation: LF, JD, AW and MB.Writing – original draft: LF, JD, RS, WM, MB, LK and KL.Writing – review and editing: JD, LF, MB, AC, PB, KL, WM, AW, LK, and RS.All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and revision of the manuscript, approved the final version of the manuscript, and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The QUIPS project was originally funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health (217–43794–6/3). The funding body had no role in the design of the study, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or the writing of this manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to data protection requirements but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (approval no. 2021-094). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to inclusion in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Völzke H, Ludemann J, Robinson DM, et al. The prevalence of undiagnosed thyroid disorders in a previously iodine-deficient area. Thyroid. 2003;13(8):803–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siggelkow H, Gollisch K. Primärer Hyperparathyreoidismus – Diagnostik und Therapie. Angew Nuklearmed. 2023;46(3):221–34. 10.1055/a-2030-6318. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dralle H, Encke A, Mann K, et al. Leitlinien zur Therapie der benignen Struma. Grundlagen der Chirurgie G80. Beilage zu den Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. 27. Jahrgang, Nr. 3. Stuttgart: Demeter; 1998.
  • 4.Bartsch DK, Dotzenrath C, Vorländer C, Zielke A, Weber T, Buhr HJ, et al. Current practice of surgery for benign goitre—an analysis of the prospective DGAV StuDoQ|Thyroid registry. J Clin Med. 2019;8(4):477. 10.3390/jcm8040477 . PMID:30965665; PMCID:PMC6517925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gell Dominik, Thomas C, Zimmer A, Meißner W. Chronifizierte Schmerzen nach operativen Eingriffen - der Stellenwert von lokoregionalen und systemischen Lokalanästhetika. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019;116:216–6. 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0261. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wu CL, Naqibuddin M, Rowlingson AJ, Lietman SA, Jermyn RM, Fleisher LA. The effect of pain on health-related quality of life in the immediate postoperative period. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(4):1078–85. table of contents. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wu CL, Rowlingson AJ, Partin AW, Kalish MA, Courpas GE, Walsh PC, et al. Correlation of postoperative pain to quality of recovery in the immediate postoperative period. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005;30(6):516–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Meissner W, Mescha S, Rothaug J, Zwacka S, Goettermann A, Ulrich K, et al. Quality improvement in postoperative pain management: results from the QUIPS project. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008;105:865–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Joshi GP. PROSPECT methodology for developing procedure-specific pain management recommendations: an update. Anaesthesia. 2023;78(11):1386–92. 10.1111/anae.16135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ochoa J, Socik A, Yeh M, Wu J. Perioperative pain management for thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2022;223(4):641–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Padur A, Kumar N, Guru A, Badagabettu S, Shanthakumar S, Virupakshamurthy M, et al. Safety and effectiveness of total thyroidectomy and its comparison with subtotal thyroidectomy and other thyroid surgeries: a systematic review. J Thyroid Res. 2016;2016:7594615. 10.1155/2016/7594615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.PPogatzki-Zahn E, Meißner W. Behandlung akuter perioperativer und posttraumatischen Schmerzen. AWMF S3-Leitlinie. Register No. 001-025. Version 4.1. September 1, 2021. Available at: https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/001-02.
  • 13.Hauch A, Al-Qurayshi Z, Randolph G, Kandil E. Total thyroidectomy is associated with increased risk of complications for low- and high-volume surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(12):3844–52. 10.1245/s10434-014-3846-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Caulley L, Jonson-Obaseki S, Luo L, Javidnia H. Risk factors for postoperative complications in total thyroidectomy. Med (Baltim). 2017;96(5):e5752. 10.1097/MD.0000000000005752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pagliaro S, Rossi L, Meligeni M, Costanzi F, Frosolini A, Molinaro E, et al. Correlation between surgical position and neck pain in patients undergoing thyroidectomy: a prospective observational study. Perioper Med (Lond). 2024;13(1):17. 10.1186/s13741-024-00428-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Woldegerima YB, Hailekiros AG, Fitiwi GL. The analgesic efficacy of bilateral superficial cervical plexus block for thyroid surgery under general anesthesia: a prospective cohort study. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13:42. 10.1186/s13104-020-4914-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ozgun M, Hosten T, Solak M. Effect of bilateral superficial cervical plexus block on postoperative analgesic consumption in patients undergoing thyroid surgery. Cureus. 2022;14(1):e21212. 10.7759/cureus.21212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wittekindt D, Wittekindt C, Meissner W, Guntinas-Lichius O. Postoperativer Schmerz nach Mittelohrchirurgie. HNO. 2012;60:974–84. 10.1007/s00106-012-2556-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jensen MP, Moore MR, Bockow TB, Ehde DM, Engel JM. Psychosocial factors and adjustment to chronic pain in persons with physical disabilities: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(1):146–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lide RC, Creighton EW, Yeh J, Troughton M, Hollowoa B, Merrill T, Robbins A, Orman G, Breckling M, Vural E, Moreno M, Stack BC Jr. Opioid reduction in ambulatory thyroid and parathyroid surgery after implementing enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Head Neck. 2021;43(5):1545–52. 10.1002/hed.26617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Poller K, Vollk G, Wittekindt C, Meissner W, Guntinas-Lichius O. Estimation of Postoperative Pain after Tonsillectomy in Adults using QUIPS: an Instrument to Improve Postoperative Pain Management. Laryngo-Rhino-Orol. 2011;90:82–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to data protection requirements but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Surgery are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES