Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine logoLink to Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine
. 1997 Nov;14(6):363–365. doi: 10.1136/emj.14.6.363

Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules by nurses working in an accident and emergency department.

P Salt 1, M Clancy 1
PMCID: PMC1342974  PMID: 9413774

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether accident and emergency (A&E) nurses using the Ottawa Ankle Rules could detect all ankle fractures. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: A&E department of a university teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: All patients who presented with ankle injuries who were initially assessed by a nurse taught the Ottawa Ankle Rules. OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) The numbers of patients referred by the nurse for ankle radiography; (2) of these, the number with ankle fractures; (3) of those not sent for radiography initially by the nurse, the number who subsequently had x rays (ordered by the doctor) and had a fracture; (4) of those having no x rays, the number who reattended later. RESULTS: 324 patients were eligible; 238 had x rays at the request of the nurse (73%); 48 of these (20%) were diagnosed as having a fracture. Of those 86 patients not sent for radiography by the nurse, 19 subsequently had x ray examinations at the request of a doctor and no fracture was detected. Of the 67 not sent for radiography, none returned within the subsequent eight weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses can apply the Ottawa Ankle Rules safely without missing acute fractures; that is, of those who were not sent for radiography by nurses, none subsequently reattended the A&E department or the trauma service of the Bristol Royal Infirmary during the following two months.

Full text

PDF
363

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brand D. A., Frazier W. H., Kohlhepp W. C., Shea K. M., Hoefer A. M., Ecker M. D., Kornguth P. J., Pais M. J., Light T. R. A protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need x-rays. N Engl J Med. 1982 Feb 11;306(6):333–339. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198202113060604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dunlop M. G., Beattie T. F., White G. K., Raab G. M., Doull R. I. Guidelines for selective radiological assessment of inversion ankle injuries. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Sep 6;293(6547):603–605. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6547.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gleadhill D. N., Thomson J. Y., Simms P. Can more efficient use be made of x ray examinations in the accident and emergency department? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Apr 11;294(6577):943–947. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6577.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lloyd S. Selective radiographic assessment of acute ankle injuries in the emergency department: barriers to implementation. CMAJ. 1986 Nov 1;135(9):973–974. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McCaig L. F. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1992 emergency department summary. Adv Data. 1994 Mar 2;(245):1–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stiell I. G., Greenberg G. H., McKnight R. D., Nair R. C., McDowell I., Reardon M., Stewart J. P., Maloney J. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation. JAMA. 1993 Mar 3;269(9):1127–1132. doi: 10.1001/jama.269.9.1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stiell I. G., Greenberg G. H., McKnight R. D., Nair R. C., McDowell I., Worthington J. R. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Apr;21(4):384–390. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82656-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stiell I. G., McDowell I., Nair R. C., Aeta H., Greenberg G., McKnight R. D., Ahuja J. Use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: physicians' attitudes and practice. CMAJ. 1992 Dec 1;147(11):1671–1678. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stiell I. G., McKnight R. D., Greenberg G. H., McDowell I., Nair R. C., Wells G. A., Johns C., Worthington J. R. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules. JAMA. 1994 Mar 16;271(11):827–832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stiell I. G., McKnight R. D., Greenberg G. H., Nair R. C., McDowell I., Wallace G. J. Interobserver agreement in the examination of acute ankle injury patients. Am J Emerg Med. 1992 Jan;10(1):14–17. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(92)90117-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stiell I., Wells G., Laupacis A., Brison R., Verbeek R., Vandemheen K., Naylor C. D. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group. BMJ. 1995 Sep 2;311(7005):594–597. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7005.594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES