Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 May 28;110(3):369–373. doi: 10.1111/cge.70188

Novel Postzygotic Variants Associated With Hypomelanosis of Ito Expand the ACTB‐Related Neurocutaneous Disease Spectrum

Estella Castillon 1,✉, Paul Rollier 2, Didier Bessis 3, Laurent Pasquier 4, Caroline Racine 1, Alexis Praga 5, Pierre Vabres 6, Bertille Bonniaud 6, Paul Kuentz 5,7, Laurence Faivre 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13431713  PMID: 42206741

ABSTRACT

Several clinical entities are associated with ACTB pathogenic variants. Most notably, constitutional missense gain‐of‐function variants are linked to Baraitser‐Winter cerebrofrontofacial syndrome, and recurrent somatic gain‐of‐function Arg147 variants are reported in Becker's nevus or in smooth muscle hamartomas. We describe three individuals with mosaic hypopigmentation following Blaschko's lines, associated or not with neurodevelopmental features, with postzygotic ACTB variants identified with deep next‐generation sequencing on skin biopsy from an affected area. We identified the same missense p.(Arg335His) variant in individuals #1 and #3, already reported in a constitutional state in a fetus. Individual #2 carried an unreported in‐frame insertion–deletion (p.(Ser348_Leu349insPheHisLeuProProSerIle)). Thus, we describe a previously unreported phenotype related to postzygotic ACTB variants with hypopigmentation associated or not with neurodevelopmental features, distinct from Becker presentations, bridging constitutional neurodevelopmental and somatic cutaneous phenotypes.

Keywords: ACTB, Blaschko's lines, deep next‐generation sequencing, hypomelanosis of Ito, hypopigmentation, neurocutaneous phenotype, pigmentary mosaicism


We describe a previously unreported phenotype related to postzygotic ACTB variants with hypomelanosis of Ito, characterized by hypopigmentation associated or not with neurodevelopmental features, distinct from Becker presentations, bridging constitutional neurodevelopmental and somatic cutaneous phenotypes.

graphic file with name CGE-110-369-g001.jpg

1. Introduction

ACTB is located on the short arm of chromosome 7, encoding beta‐actin. Molecules from the actin family are components of the actin cytoskeleton and play a central role in the cytoplasm, with several housekeeping functions such as regulation of cell shape and migration. Beta‐actin is ubiquitous and expressed in the nucleus as well, where it regulates gene expression, cell division, and proliferation [1, 2].

Multiple clinical entities have been described in association with ACTB pathogenic variants. Baraitser‐Winter cerebrofrontofacial syndrome (BRWS) (MIM#243310) is an autosomal dominant disorder usually caused by constitutional missense de novo gain‐of‐function pathogenic variants in ACTB or ACTG1 (encoding the paralog gamma‐actin) [2, 3]. It is a rare developmental disorder with recognizable craniofacial features (prominent metopic ridge, highly arched eyebrows with widely spaced eyes, bilateral ptosis, bulbous nose with broad tip, long and smooth philtrum) and developmental delay (DD)/intellectual disability (ID) in almost all patients. Other features are frequent but inconstant, including pachygyria, microcephaly, seizures (correlated to structural brain anomalies), genitourinary abnormalities, gastrointestinal dysfunction, congenital heart defects, hearing loss, iris or retinal coloboma and neuromuscular abnormalities [3].

ACTB deletions and constitutional loss‐of‐function variants cause another malformative syndrome, with inconstant and milder DD/ID than in BRWS. Features include morphological brain abnormalities, congenital cardiac and renal anomalies, inconstant growth delay, and facial features distinct from BRWS [2, 4]. Other specific constitutional loss‐of‐function variants, clustering in exons 5 and 6 and expected to escape nonsense RNA mediated decay, are associated with syndromic thrombocytopenia (MIM#620475) [1].

Moreover, the particular missense c.547C>T; p.(Arg183Trp) variant is associated with dystonia‐deafness syndrome (MIM#607371), with drug‐resistant dystonia, early‐onset sensorineural deafness, variable morphologic features, DD/ID, scoliosis and epilepsy [3, 4, 5, 6]. Molecular studies have shown that this variant has a gain‐of‐function effect [7].

ACTB somatic gain‐of‐function variants have been described in several cutaneous phenotypes, including the recurrent p.(Arg147Ser/Cys) variants in Becker's nevus (MIM#604919) and smooth muscle hamartomas (MIM#620470). Becker's nevus is a type of cutaneous hamartoma, with circumscribed hyperpigmentation and hypertrichosis [8]. In rare cases, it is associated with musculoskeletal anomalies, unilateral breast hypoplasia, cardiomyopathy and developmental delay, termed Becker's nevus syndrome [8]. The same p.(Arg147Ser/Cys) somatic variants and others (c.411G>T; p.(Gln137His) and c.331A>G; p.(Asn111Asp)) were identified in patients presenting with smooth muscle hamartomas [9].

Here, we describe a new clinical entity, observed in three individuals, with molecular and clinical features distinct from the phenotypes previously described in association with ACTB. They present with mosaic hypopigmentation following Blaschko's lines, associated or not with neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD).

2. Material and Methods

All three individuals were identified during routine clinical care in the same reference laboratory through sequencing of a gene panel targeting mosaic skin disorders. Deep next‐generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on DNA extracted from skin biopsies from the affected area and blood samples for all individuals and from saliva for individual #2.

Targeted sequencing was performed using a custom 55‐gene panel (SOPHiA Genetics (Lausanne, Switzerland)) covering the coding exons and flanking intronic regions of ACTB (NM_001101.5). Libraries were prepared by targeted capture and sequenced using paired‐end reads (~300‐bp) on a MiSeq platform (Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA)). Reads were aligned to the GRCh38 reference genome, with a mean coverage depth of ~2500×.

Clinical and molecular data were collected for all three individuals.

Written consent was obtained for all three individuals.

3. Results

We identified the c.1004G>A; p.(Arg335His) variant in Individuals #1 and #3, with a variant allele fraction (VAF) of 13.8% (292/2114 reads) and 25.1% (795/3168 reads), respectively. In Individual #2, we identified an unreported in‐frame insertion/deletion c.1044delinsCTTCCACCTTCCACCTTCCATC; p.(Ser348_Leu349insPheHisLeuProProSerIle) in 26.6% of reads (451/1695). A saliva sample showed the variant in 83/3786 reads (2.2%), thus confirming its mosaic nature. Blood was negative for all three individuals.

The p.(Arg335His) variant identified in individuals #1 and #3 has already been reported once in a heterozygous fetus with large cystic hygroma and omphalocele, cystic kidneys and small bladder [10]. To the best of our knowledge, the p.(Ser348_Leu349insPheHisLeuProProSerIle) variant has never been reported.

Individual #1 (Table S1) was a 5‐year‐old boy, born from nonconsanguineous parents, and referred for developmental delay and hypopigmented skin lesions. An adult relative on his mother's side presented with NDD. There was no familial history of skin lesions. From 1 month old, his parents noticed hypopigmented streaks on the right side of his body (inner thigh, torso and armpit), following Blaschko's lines, with a “splashing” pattern (Figure 1). He also presented with macrocephaly (+2.9 SD at 5 years), without notable morphological features. He had astigmatism, hypermetropia and strabismus. He had no dental history. Moderate axial hypotonia was noted during his childhood. He held his head at 8 months, sat at 14 months, crawled at 18 months, and started walking between 2 and 2.5 years of age. He presented with speech development delay and global learning delay. He benefited from speech therapy, physical therapy and psychomotor therapy and a dedicated school aide. At 17 months, brain MRI was normal.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

(A and B) Individual #1 at 18 months. (C–E) Individual #2 at 9 years. (F–H) Individual #3 at 9 years.

Individual #2 (Table S1) was a 10‐year‐old girl, born in Eritrea from nonconsanguineous parents, and referred for developmental delay and hypopigmented skin lesions. Her siblings, including her twin brother, were free from medical concern. Since birth, she had linear or whorled streaks of hypopigmentation following Blaschko's lines, on the torso, abdomen and four limbs, as well as facial features including hypertelorism, broad tip and base of the nose, malar hypoplasia, sparse eyebrows and small, round ears (Figure 1). She also had ectopic teeth, a small and narrow jaw, narrow palate, and dental malocclusion, requiring orthodontic care. She had asymmetric development of breasts. Cardiac ultrasound showed moderate tricuspid regurgitation, with a morphologically normal valve. She walked around 2 years of age (later than her twin) but did not present speech delay. She benefited from speech therapy for pronunciation difficulties, but there was no formal diagnosis of language delay or impairment. Brain MRI was normal.

Individual #3 (Table S1) was a 9‐year‐old girl, referred by dermatology. Her personal and familial history was unremarkable. She presented with isolated hypopigmentation on the limbs and torso (Figure 1). She attended mainstream school. Given her molecular results, a brain MRI and cardiac ultrasound were performed at 10 years old and were unremarkable.

4. Discussion

Here, we report three individuals with postzygotic variants in ACTB distinct from the recurrent p.(Arg147Ser/Cys) variants. Beta‐actin plays a crucial role in the cytoplasmic cytoskeleton as well as in the nucleus, where it regulates gene expression. Several clinical entities have been associated with ACTB pathogenic variants. We describe here a previously unreported mosaic neurocutaneous phenotype, including hypopigmentation along Blaschko's lines.

Hypopigmentation following Blaschko's lines has been described in the context of neurocutaneous disorders, where the skin condition is associated with a variety of multisystem abnormalities, notably involving the nervous system [11]. Such pigmentary mosaicism can occur in the context of nonrecurrent mosaic chromosomal anomalies [12], but monogenic postzygotic variants have also been identified. Alterations of cytoskeletal dynamics are expected to impair melanogenesis, as melanosomes rely on an intact cytoskeletal network for their transfer to keratinocytes [13]. Genes that have been shown to be involved are part of cell growth, cytoskeletal dynamics, and cell cycle control, such as MTOR [14], RHOA [15], or X‐linked TFE3, USP9X, PHF6, and DDX3X [16].

One plausible hypothesis for the distinct pigmentary phenotypes associated with ACTB variants involves timing‐ and tissue‐specific effects of the variant during embryonic development. Early postzygotic events could affect melanocyte migration or survival along Blaschko's lines, potentially leading to hypopigmentation, whereas later, more localized somatic events may lead to clonal melanocyte expansion or altered melanocyte–keratinocyte interactions, which could account for hyperpigmented lesions. Additionally, variant‐specific effects on actin cytoskeleton dynamics may differentially impact melanocyte function, including melanosome transport, cell adhesion, and proliferation, thereby modulating pigmentation outcomes.

In addition to developmental timing, hypopigmentation in mosaic ACTB disorders may involve cellular interference between wild‐type and mutant populations, similar to the mechanism described in PCDH19‐related epilepsy [17]. A dominant‐negative effect within the actin cytoskeleton could disrupt melanocyte function or survival along Blaschko's lines. Alternatively, a transdominant‐negative mechanism—analogous to collagenopathies—might occur if mutant beta‐actin impairs the dynactin complex. This would hinder dynein‐mediated transport, leading to a more severe phenotype than loss‐of‐function alone through disrupted intracellular trafficking and cytoskeletal dynamics at the tissue level [18].

In conclusion, postzygotic ACTB variants are associated with a novel neurocutaneous phenotype. These findings support a mechanistic continuum between constitutional and mosaic disease and highlight ACTB as a key diagnostic target for neurocutaneous mosaic disorders, illustrating how cytoskeletal gene‐related phenotypes depend on spatiotemporal variant distribution.

Author Contributions

E.C. wrote the manuscript. L.F. and P.K. supervised the study. P.R., D.B., L.P., L.F., C.R. and E.C. collected patient clinical data. P.K. and A.P. performed genetic sequencing. P.V. and B.B. provided dermatological expertise and critical review. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the European Union through the FEDER programs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Table S1: Clinical, molecular and imaging features of the three reported individuals.

CGE-110-369-s001.docx (24.3KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the patients and their families for their participation in this study. Several authors of this publication are members of the European Reference Network for Developmental Anomalies and Intellectual Disability (ERN‐ITHACA). Open access publication funding provided by COUPERIN CY26.

Contributor Information

Estella Castillon, Email: estella.castillon@chu-dijon.fr.

Laurence Faivre, Email: laurence.faivre@chu-dijon.fr.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Latham S. L., Ehmke N., Reinke P. Y. A., et al., “Variants in Exons 5 and 6 of ACTB Cause Syndromic Thrombocytopenia,” Nature Communications 9 (2018): 4250, 10.1038/s41467-018-06713-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Cuvertino S., Stuart H. M., Chandler K. E., et al., “ACTB Loss‐Of‐Function Mutations Result in a Pleiotropic Developmental Disorder,” American Journal of Human Genetics 101, no. 6 (2017): 1021–1033, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Verloes A., Drunat S., Pilz D., and Di Donato N., “Baraitser‐Winter Cerebrofrontofacial Syndrome,” in GeneReviews [Internet], ed. Adam M. P., Feldman J., Mirzaa G. M., Pagon R. A., Wallace S. E., and Amemiya A. (University of Washington, Seattle, 1993), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK327153/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Baumann M., Beaver E. M., Palomares‐Bralo M., et al., “Further Delineation of Putative ACTB Loss‐Of‐Function Variants: A 4‐Patient Series,” Human Mutation 41, no. 4 (2020): 753–758, 10.1002/humu.23970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zavala L., Ziegler G., Morón D. G., and Garretto N., “Dystonia‐Deafness Syndrome: ACTB Pathogenic Variant in an Argentinean Family,” Movement Disorders Clinical Practice 9, no. 1 (2021): 122–124, 10.1002/mdc3.13358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Skogseid I. M., Røsby O., Konglund A., et al., “Dystonia‐Deafness Syndrome Caused by ACTB p.Arg183Trp Heterozygosity Shows Striatal Dopaminergic Dysfunction and Response to Pallidal Stimulation,” Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders 10, no. 1 (2018): 17, 10.1186/s11689-018-9235-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hundt N., Preller M., Swolski O., et al., “Molecular Mechanisms of Disease‐Related Human β‐Actin Mutations p.R183W and p.E364K,” FEBS Journal 281, no. 23 (2014): 5279–5291, 10.1111/febs.13068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Dai S., Wang H., and Lin Z., “ACTB Mutations Analysis and Genotype–Phenotype Correlation in Becker's Nevus,” Biomedicine 9, no. 12 (2021): 1879, 10.3390/biomedicines9121879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Atzmony L., Ugwu N., Zaki T. D., Antaya R. J., and Choate K. A., “Post‐Zygotic ACTB Mutations Underlie Congenital Smooth Muscle Hamartomas,” Journal of Cutaneous Pathology 47, no. 8 (2020): 681–685, 10.1111/cup.13683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhang K., Cox E., Strom S., Xu Z. L., Disilvestro A., and Usrey K., “Prenatal Presentation and Diagnosis of Baraitser‐Winter Syndrome Using Exome Sequencing,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A 182, no. 9 (2020): 2124–2128, 10.1002/ajmg.a.61725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Syed H. A. and Goldin J., “Hypomelanosis of Ito,” in StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, 2025), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538268/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Navarrete‐Meneses M. P., Ochoa‐Mellado I., Gutiérrez‐Álvarez R., et al., “Cytogenomic Characterization of Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes in Patients With Pigmentary Mosaicism,” Frontiers in Genetics 15 (2024): 1356786, 10.3389/fgene.2024.1356786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ohbayashi N. and Fukuda M., “Recent Advances in Understanding the Molecular Basis of Melanogenesis in Melanocytes,” F1000Research 9 (2020): 608, 10.12688/f1000research.24625.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Carmignac V., Mignot C., Blanchard E., et al., “Clinical Spectrum of MTOR‐Related Hypomelanosis of Ito With Neurodevelopmental Abnormalities,” Genetics in Medicine 23, no. 8 (2021): 1484–1491, 10.1038/s41436-021-01161-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Vabres P., Sorlin A., Kholmanskikh S. S., et al., “Postzygotic Inactivating Mutations of RHOA Cause a Mosaic Neuroectodermal Syndrome,” Nature Genetics 51, no. 10 (2019): 1438–1441, 10.1038/s41588-019-0498-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Saida K., Chong P. F., Yamaguchi A., et al., “Monogenic Causes of Pigmentary Mosaicism,” Human Genetics 141, no. 11 (2022): 1771–1784, 10.1007/s00439-022-02437-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Park J., Lee E., Kim C. H., Ohk J., and Jung H., “Mosaicism‐Independent Mechanisms Contribute to Pcdh19‐Related Epilepsy and Repetitive Behaviors in Xenopus,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 121, no. 21 (2024): e2321388121, 10.1073/pnas.2321388121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Veitia R. A., Caburet S., and Birchler J. A., “Mechanisms of Mendelian Dominance,” Clinical Genetics 93, no. 3 (2018): 419–428, 10.1111/cge.13107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1: Clinical, molecular and imaging features of the three reported individuals.

CGE-110-369-s001.docx (24.3KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Clinical Genetics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES