Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Aug 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychiatr Res. 2026 Jan 9;194:287–293. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2026.01.017

Stimulant and Non-Stimulant ADHD Medication Prescriptions for Homeless Veteran Service Users with Mental Illness

Katherine A Koh 1,2, Dorota Szymkowiak 3, Jack Tsai 3,4,5
PMCID: PMC13433006  NIHMSID: NIHMS2199069  PMID: 41534506

Abstract

Objective:

Prescribing of ADHD medications has not been examined in the US homeless population. This study examined frequency of prescriptions for stimulant and non-stimulant ADHD medications, as well as risky and potentially inappropriate prescribing (RPIP) of stimulants, in three groups of veterans with mental illness.

Methods:

Using 2021–2022 national VA administrative data, we compared frequency of stimulant and non-stimulant ADHD medication prescriptions using logistic regression between homeless veterans (n = 105,062), veterans in the Department of Housing and Urban Development-VA Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH; n = 33,884), and independently housed (IH) veterans (n = 1,875,083). We also compared indicators of RPIP of stimulants using chi-square tests between the three groups.

Results:

Adjusted for sociodemographic, clinical, and health care utilization characteristics, homeless veterans were less likely to be prescribed stimulants (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.80, 99% CI = 0.76–0.85) relative to IH veterans and more likely to be prescribed non-stimulants (aOR = 1.12, CI = 1.06–1.18). However, among veterans prescribed stimulants, homeless veterans had more indicators of RPIP, including being prescribed stimulants in the presence of a psychotic disorder (7.9% vs. 6.4% for HUD-VASH vs. 2.2% for IH, p <.001).

Conclusion:

Homeless veterans with mental illness were less likely to be prescribed stimulants and more likely to be prescribed non-stimulant ADHD medications relative to IH veterans with mental illness. However, RPIP of stimulant prescriptions was more common for homeless and HUD-VASH veterans relative to IH veterans.

Keywords: Homeless, veterans, ADHD, stimulants

Background

Despite a burden of psychiatric illness that is among the highest of any group (Gutwinski et al., 2021), little is known about psychiatric medication prescribing in homeless populations. In particular, though evidence suggests high rates of inattention and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in homeless populations (Lomas et al. 1997, Burra et al. 2009), no U.S. study has examined prescribing of stimulant and non-stimulant ADHD medications among this group. This question is especially relevant given that stimulant prescribing and misuse has increased nationally among the general population in recent decades (Danielson et al., 2023; Han et al., 2025).

Stimulant medications, including amphetamine/dextroamphetamine (Adderall) and methylphenidate (Ritalin), are medications approved for ADHD by the FDA. Stimulants are also FDA-approved to treat narcolepsy and used off-label for treatment-resistant depression (Corp et al., 2014). These medications have effectiveness and tolerability (Wilens et al., 2008), but also potential for misuse, owed to higher degrees of euphorigenic effects relative to non-stimulant ADHD medications (Jasinski et al., 2008). Prescribed stimulant misuse poses substantial health risks including myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular complications such as stroke, psychosis, and seizures (NIH National Library of Medicine, 2025; Batki et al., 2023; Moran et al. 2024). As a result of these risks, clinicians often consider non-stimulant ADHD medications including atomoxetine, clonidine, guanfacine, and bupropion (Chai et al., 2024).

When prescribing for homeless patients, clinicians need to be especially prudent to maximize appropriate treatment in the context of high rates of substance use. Evidence suggests that illicit stimulant use, such as cocaine and methamphetamine, is common and increasing among homeless populations (Assaf et al., 2025), perhaps related to its ability to improve alertness and productivity while homeless (Damon et al., 2019; Fast et al. 2014). Prescribed stimulants have been found to increase the effects of crystal meth or cocaine (Kecojevic et al., 2015). Caution in prescribing stimulants is therefore advised for people with methamphetamine use disorder, stimulant use disorder, and psychotic disorders (NIH National Library of Medicine, 2024), which are already high in the homeless population (Gutwinski et al., 2021), as well as in people with certain medical conditions such as cardiovascular disease, hyperthyroidism, glaucoma, motor tics, agitated states, tourette’s disorder, and a concurrent MAO-I prescription (Corp et al., 2014; NIH National Library of Medicine, 2025; Tadrous et al., 2021). This risky and potentially inappropriate prescribing (RPIP) of stimulants can increase adverse outcomes for homeless patients who are already psychiatrically, medically, and socially vulnerable.

A greater understanding of ADHD medication prescribing and RPIP can help inform safe medication prescribing for this population. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is the country’s largest provider of homeless services (Tsai et al., 2021). The current study therefore used national VA medical records from 2021 and 2022 to 1) compare frequency of prescribing of stimulant and non-stimulant ADHD medications in three groups of veterans with mental illness: those currently homeless, those in supported housing through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development-VA Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) program, and independently housed (IH) veterans and 2) identify RPIP of stimulants among these groups. Having three groups allows for comparisons of veterans in incremental stages of housing stability and testing of graded hypotheses. We hypothesized that homeless veterans would be prescribed stimulants at a higher rate than the two groups of housed veterans, given that they may be more likely to ask for stimulants as well as the clinical complexity in caring for homeless veterans (Weber et al., 2017; Tsai et al., 2019). We also hypothesized that RPIP would be most likely in homeless veterans, followed by veterans in supported housing, with IH veterans least likely to experience RPIP.

Methods

National VA data were extracted from the Corporate Data Warehouse, which contains the medical record, and the Homeless Operations Management Evaluation System (HOMES), which contains information on use of VA homeless services. Three groups of veterans with mental illness were identified:

  1. Homeless veterans: using a VA operational definition (Tsai et al., 2022), this included anyone who had a) International Classification of Disease (ICD) 10 diagnostic code Z59.0 in inpatient and outpatient records OR b) clinical encounters with any of the following programs in 2021 or 2022: Grant and Per Diem program, Health Care for Homeless Veterans program, Domiciliary Care for Homeless Veterans, Compensated Work Therapy/Transitional Residence OR c) a positive screen on part 2 of an annual VA’s universal homeless screening clinical reminder. We removed anyone with a HUD-VASH encounter from this group to avoid duplicated cases.

  2. Veterans in supported housing: a) anyone with a HUD-VASH encounter or HUD-VASH form in HOMES in 2021 or 2022, i.e. a history of homelessness, subsidized housing, and supportive case management services. We removed anyone who also met criteria for the homeless group over the study period to avoid duplicated cases.

  3. IH veterans: a) anyone who screened negative on the homeless screening clinical reminder in 2021 or 2022 and b) had no indication of homelessness as outlined above.

Mental illness was defined as having a primary or secondary mental health diagnosis based on ICD-10 codes during 2021 or 2022. The index date was the first use of a VA homeless program in the homeless group, first interaction with HUD-VASH in the supported housing group, and the first visit for a mental health diagnosis in the IH group in 2021 or 2022. Veterans were considered to be prescribed stimulant and non-stimulant medications if they received at least 1 outpatient prescription fill, regardless of quantity, dosage form, or type of prescriber (e.g. primary care vs. psychiatric prescriber) during the study period.

Analysis

First, chi-square tests were used to compare sociodemographic, clinical, and military characteristics among homeless, HUD-VASH, and IH veterans. Analysis of variance was used to compare group differences in healthcare utilization within 1 year of the index date.

Second, chi-square tests were used to compare the frequency of prescriptions for amphetamines, methylphenidates, other stimulants typically used to treat narcolepsy, non-stimulants, and bupropion among homeless, HUD-VASH, and IH veterans.

Third, logistic regression was used to examine characteristics associated with any prescriptions (amphetamines, methylphenidates, other stimulants, and non-stimulants), any stimulant prescription, any amphetamine prescription, any methylphenidate prescriptions, other stimulant prescriptions, and non-stimulant prescriptions. We included in the logistic regression only variables that had at least one inter-group difference above 5% (Tsai et al., 2020).

Fourth, chi-square tests were conducted among homeless, HUD-VASH, and IH veterans with a prescription for any stimulant use to examine the extent to which RPIP was present. RPIP of stimulants was defined via literature and expert recommendations, including patients who have a stimulant use disorder due to risk of misuse; patients with psychotic disorders due to risk of worsening psychosis; as well as in people with certain medical conditions such as cardiovascular disease, hyperthyroidism, glaucoma, motor tics, agitated states, tourette’s disorder, and a concurrent MAO-I prescription, due to risk of medical adverse events (Corp et al., 2014; Tadrous et al., 2021).

These analyses, performed under the auspices of the national VA Homeless Programs Office using SAS/STAT version 9.2, were considered quality improvement and exempt from the VA institutional review board.

Results

Characteristics of the Population

The sample consisted of 105,062 homeless veterans, 33,884 veterans in HUD-VASH, and 1,875,083 IH veterans (Table 1). In addition to demographic differences, homeless veterans were more likely than IH and HUD-VASH veterans to be diagnosed with every mental illness. Homeless veterans were more likely to have the highest healthcare utilization among the 3 groups in every category, except for medical specialty visits.

Table 1.

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of homeless, HUD-VASH, and independently housed (IH) U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) service users with mental illness, 2021–2022.

Variable Homeless (N=105,062) HUD-VASH (N=33,884) IH (N=1,875,083) Chi-square p HUD-VASH vs. Homeless IH vs homeless IH vs HUD-VASH
N %
Age 24313.59 <.001
 17–29 7,369 7.0% 897 2.7% 94,053 5.0% −4.4% −2.0% 2.4%
 30–39 22,108 21.0% 4,522 13.4% 297,402 15.9% −7.7% −5.2% 2.5%
 40–49 17,022 16.2% 4,475 13.2% 281,281 15.0% −3.0% −1.2% 1.8%
 50–59 19,945 19.0% 6,937 20.5% 320,659 17.1% 1.5% −1.9% −3.4%
 60–69 25,129 23.9% 12,435 36.7% 331,114 17.7% 12.8% −6.3% −19.0%
 70+ 13,489 12.8% 4,617 13.6% 550,558 29.4% 0.8% 16.5% 15.7%
Race/ethnicity 19582.82 <.001
 Non-Hispanic white 50,420 48.0% 16,072 47.4% 1,167,500 62.3% −0.6% 14.3% 14.8%
 Non-Hispanic black 35,219 33.5% 12,070 35.6% 353,789 18.9% 2.1% −14.7% −16.8%
 Hispanic 8,740 8.3% 2,667 7.9% 171,216 9.1% −0.4% 0.8% 1.3%
 Mixed race/other 4,151 4.0% 1,383 4.1% 72,148 3.9% 0.1% −0.1% −0.2%
 Missing 6,532 6.2% 1,691 5.0% 110,414 5.9% −1.2% −0.3% 0.9%
Sex 325.46 <.001
 Male 88,511 84.3% 28,105 83.0% 1,604,906 85.6% −1.3% 1.3% 2.6%
 Female 16,551 15.8% 5,778 17.1% 270,161 14.4% 1.3% −1.3% −2.6%
Marital status 47524.67 <.001
 Married 28,432 27.1% 7,021 20.7% 1,033,337 55.1% −6.3% 28.1% 34.4%
 Single/never married 29,826 28.4% 10,237 30.2% 316,483 16.9% 1.8% −11.5% −13.3%
 Divorced/separated 44,107 42.0% 15,591 46.0% 473,679 25.3% 4.0% −16.7% −20.8%
 Widowed 2,697 2.6% 1,034 3.1% 51,568 2.8% 0.5% 0.2% −0.3%
Percent service-connected disability 12176.89 <.001
 None/0% 26,477 25.2% 12,481 36.8% 346,558 18.5% 11.6% −6.7% −18.4%
 10–40% 13,112 12.5% 5,565 16.4% 214,303 11.4% 3.9% −1.1% −5.0%
 50–100% 65,473 62.3% 15,837 46.7% 1,314,206 70.1% −15.6% 7.8% 23.4%
Combat exposure 13,894 13.2% 3,272 9.7% 291,742 15.6% 1274.27 <.001 −3.6% 2.3% 5.9%
MST 16,294 15.5% 5,173 15.3% 175,000 9.3% 5499.37 <.001 −0.2% −6.2% −5.9%
Diagnosesa
 Alcohol use disorder 29,529 28.1% 7,108 21.0% 226,119 12.1% 24494.09 <.001 −7.1% −16.1% −8.9%
 Drug use disorder 30,006 28.6% 6,855 20.2% 123,853 6.6% 72352.51 <.001 −8.3% −22.0% −13.6%
 Major depression 48,188 45.9% 13,285 39.2% 702,414 37.5% 3009.86 <.001 −6.7% −8.4% −1.8%
 Bipolar spectrum disorder 12,583 12.0% 3,423 10.1% 93,316 5.0% 10962.65 <.001 −1.9% −7.0% −5.1%
 Other mood disorder 30,992 29.5% 6,672 19.7% 377,366 20.1% 5360.41 <.001 −9.8% −9.4% 0.4%
 Schizophrenia spectrum disorder 8,269 7.9% 2,217 6.5% 48,642 2.6% 11293.23 <.001 −1.3% −5.3% −4.0%
 Other psychosis 4,847 4.6% 867 2.6% 17,430 0.9% 12488.77 <.001 −2.1% −3.7% −1.6%
 GAD 12,282 11.7% 3,329 9.8% 193,924 10.3% 206.31 <.001 −1.9% −1.4% 0.5%
 Anxiety-related disorder 33,489 31.9% 8,134 24.0% 529,611 28.2% 967.05 <.001 −7.9% −3.6% 4.2%
 PTSD 47,892 45.6% 12,317 36.4% 815,547 43.5% 890.33 <.001 −9.2% −2.1% 7.1%
 Other stress and adjustment disorder 19,520 18.6% 4,341 12.8% 219,632 11.7% 4429.86 <.001 −5.8% −6.9% −1.1%
 Other MH 23,351 22.2% 5,716 16.9% 299,376 16.0% 2864.43 <.001 −5.4% −6.3% −0.9%
 Self harm 13,481 12.8% 1,396 4.1% 42,912 2.3% 39871.99 <.001 −8.7% −10.5% −1.8%
 Narcolepsy 168 0.2% 48 0.1% 3,482 0.2% 6.92 .031 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%
 ADHD 5,393 5.1% 1,172 3.5% 79,712 4.3% 245.57 <.001 −1.7% −0.9% 0.8%
Charlson Comorbidity Index 387.12 <.001
 0 67,867 64.6% 20,919 61.7% 1,163,650 62.1% −2.9% −2.5% 0.3%
 1 16,703 15.9% 6,036 17.8% 330,958 17.7% 1.9% 1.8% −0.2%
 2 6,994 6.7% 2,536 7.5% 141,556 7.6% 0.8% 0.9% 0.1%
 3+ 13,498 12.9% 4,392 13.0% 238,903 12.7% 0.1% −0.1% −0.2%
−2.9% −2.5%
Healthcare utilizationb Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD F p
Hospital admissions
 Medical/surgical 0.28 0.96 0.17 0.68 0.12 0.55 3802.77 <.001 −0.11 −0.16 −0.05
 Mental health 0.17 0.67 0.04 0.27 0.02 0.16 24585.78 <.001 −0.13 −0.15 −0.02
 Substance use 0.03 0.22 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.05 12494.35 <.001 −0.02 −0.03 −0.01
 Long-term care 0.05 0.25 0.01 0.13 0.01 0.10 6511.05 <.001 −0.04 −0.04 0.00
Inpatient days
 Medical/surgical 1.72 11.46 0.75 4.60 0.51 4.51 2810.95 <.001 −1.21 −0.24 −1.21
 Mental health 2.93 22.13 0.45 6.20 0.16 4.16 8999.96 <.001 −2.77 −0.29 −2.77
 Substance use 1.21 9.60 0.21 3.43 0.04 1.47 9747.04 <.001 −1.17 −0.17 −1.17
 Long-term care 3.55 34.14 0.70 14.74 0.51 16.52 1437.92 <.001 −3.04 −0.19 −3.04
Emergency Dept/urgent care 1.61 3.48 0.94 2.13 0.68 1.66 13341.09 <.001 −0.67 −0.93 −0.26
Outpatient visits
 Primary care 12.24 16.96 11.30 12.90 10.84 11.79 686.14 <.001 −0.94 −1.40 −0.46
 Medical specialty 8.39 16.36 8.63 17.31 7.99 14.21 68.51 <.001 0.24 −0.40 −0.64
 Mental health 28.04 56.14 13.76 30.58 7.91 16.88 46072.96 <.001 −14.28 −20.13 −5.85
 Substance abuse 14.01 47.09 4.49 21.18 1.01 9.51 41209.27 <.001 −9.52 −13.00 −3.48
 Rehabilitation 5.13 21.91 2.93 11.40 2.81 15.09 1120.61 <.001 −2.20 −2.32 −0.12
 Ancillary/diagnostic 33.36 37.51 28.60 32.07 24.82 27.61 4756.41 <.001 −4.76 −8.54 −3.78
a

Participants could have more than one diagnosis.

b

The index date was the first use of a VA homeless program in the homeless group, first interaction with HUD-VASH in the supported housing group, and the first visit for a mental health diagnosis in the housed group in the 2021–2022 study period.

Stimulant and Non-Stimulant Prescribing

Amphetamine medications were the most commonly prescribed stimulant class, followed by methylphenidates (table 2). Of the non-stimulant medications, clonidine was most often prescribed. In unadjusted analyses, homeless veterans were more likely to be prescribed amphetamines overall relative to the IH group and HUD-VASH group (2.52% for homeless vs. 1.89% for HUD-VASH vs. 2.47% for IH), p < .001). However, homeless and HUD-VASH veterans were less likely to be prescribed methylphenidates than the IH group (0.91% for homeless vs. 0.76% for HUD-VASH vs. 1.01% for IH). Homeless veterans were more likely to be prescribed non-stimulant medications (atomoxetine, clonidine, guanfacine) relative to the HUD-VASH and IH groups (3.46% for homeless vs. 2.46% for HUD-VASH vs. 1.83% for IH, p <.001).

Table 2.

Frequency of stimulant prescriptions among homeless, HUD-VASH, and independently housed VA service users with mental illness, 2021–2022.

Medication Homeless (N=105,062) HUD-VASH (N=33,884) Independently Housed (N=1,875,083) Chi-square p
Amphetamines 2,651 2.52% 641 1.89% 46,379 2.47% 48.32 <.001
 Amphetamine 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 0.00% 0.22 .895
 Amphetamine resin complex 1,527 1.45% 335 0.99% 26,102 1.39% 42.97 <.001
 Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine 1,257 1.20% 321 0.95% 22,018 1.17% 15.39 <.001
 Dextroaphmetamine 236 0.22% 81 0.24% 4,618 0.25% 1.96 0.376
 Lisdexamfetamine 317 0.30% 69 0.20% 4,816 0.26% 11.78 0.003
Methylphenidates 955 0.91% 261 0.77% 19,020 1.01% 30.16 <.001
 Dexmethylphenidate 3 0.00% 4 0.01% 50 0.00% 9.82 0.007
 Methylphenidate 953 0.91% 258 0.76% 18,985 1.01% 31.36 <.001
Other stimulants 454 0.43% 153 0.45% 9,972 0.53% 22.51 <.001
 Armodafinil 134 0.13% 46 0.14% 2,976 0.16% 7.14 0.028
 Modafinil 347 0.33% 117 0.35% 7,550 0.40% 15.55 <.001
Non-stimulants 3,638 3.46% 834 2.46% 34,399 1.83% 1444.82 <.001
 Atomoxetine 925 0.88% 161 0.48% 7,727 0.41% 502.01 <.001
 Clonidine 2,656 2.53% 662 1.95% 26,011 1.39% 961.75 <.001
 Guanfacine 159 0.15% 29 0.09% 1,243 0.07% 102.38 <.001
Bupropion 12,726 12.11% 3,696 10.91% 232,707 12.41% 76.11 <.001
Any (excluding bupropion) 7,047 6.71% 1,758 5.19% 101,662 5.42% 323.10 <.001
Any (including bupropion) 18,186 17.31% 5,081 15.00% 312,360 16.66% 99.53 <.001

Based on logistic regression, adjusted for sociodemographic, clinical, and health care utilization characteristics, there was no significant difference in likelihood of homeless veterans being prescribed any overall medication (stimulant or non-stimulant) relative to IH veterans (Table 3) (aOR = 0.97, CI = 0.92–1.01). However, when looking at stimulants specifically, homeless veterans were less likely to be prescribed any stimulant overall relative to IH veterans (aOR = 0.80, CI = 0.76–0.85), including amphetamines, methylphenidates and other stimulant medications. Homeless veterans were also more likely to be prescribed non-stimulant medications (aOR = 1.12, CI = 1.06–1.18). For HUD-VASH veterans, there was no significant difference in likelihood of prescribed stimulants (aOR = .90, CI = 0.80–1.01), but HUD-VASH veterans more likely to be prescribed non-stimulants (aOR = 1.12, CI = 1.02–1.23) relative to the IH group.

Table 3.

Characteristics associated with receiving or not receiving a stimulant or non-stimulant prescription, 2021–2022.

Variable Any Any stimulant Amphetamines Methylphenidates Other stimulants Non-stimulants
OR 99% CI p OR 99% CI p OR 99% CI p OR 99% CI p OR 99% CI p OR 99% CI p
Housing status (ref independently housed)
 HUD-VASH 1.03 (0.95–1.12) .419 0.90 (0.80–1.01) .061 0.93 (0.82–1.06) .294 0.87 (0.73–1.03) .109 1.05 (0.84–1.30) .676 1.12 (1.02–1.23) .017
 Homeless 0.97 (0.92–1.01) .125 0.80 (0.76–0.85) <.001 0.89 (0.83–0.95) <.001 0.80 (0.73–0.88) <.001 0.85 (0.74–0.97) .018 1.12 (1.06–1.18) <.001
Age (ref 60–69)
 17–29 1.15 (1.09–1.21) <.001 1.56 (1.46–1.66) <.001 2.64 (2.44–2.85) <.001 0.85 (0.77–0.94) .001 0.65 (0.56–0.76) <.001 0.93 (0.87–1.00) .041
 30–39 1.46 (1.41–1.52) <.001 2.03 (1.93–2.14) <.001 3.07 (2.88–3.27) <.001 0.91 (0.85–0.98) .019 1.12 (1.02–1.24) .017 1.01 (0.96–1.06) .793
 40–49 1.40 (1.35–1.45) <.001 1.90 (1.81–2.00) <.001 2.50 (2.34–2.67) <.001 1.07 (1.00–1.16) .066 1.45 (1.32–1.59) <.001 1.03 (0.99–1.09) .161
 50–59 1.22 (1.18–1.26) <.001 1.51 (1.43–1.58) <.001 1.73 (1.62–1.86) <.001 1.10 (1.02–1.19) .018 1.40 (1.28–1.53) <.001 1.02 (0.98–1.07) .348
 70+ 0.73 (0.70–0.76) <.001 0.64 (0.60–0.67) <.001 0.50 (0.46–0.55) <.001 0.83 (0.76–0.90) <.001 0.61 (0.56–0.67) <.001 0.85 (0.81–0.89) <.001
Race/ethnicity (ref non-Hispanic white)
 Non-Hispanic black 0.82 (0.79–0.84) <.001 0.55 (0.53–0.58) <.001 0.64 (0.60–0.67) <.001 0.61 (0.57–0.66) <.001 0.53 (0.49–0.58) <.001 1.10 (1.07–1.14) <.001
 Hispanic 0.77 (0.75–0.80) <.001 0.76 (0.72–0.79) <.001 0.84 (0.80–0.89) <.001 0.89 (0.83–0.96) .001 0.54 (0.48–0.60) <.001 0.83 (0.79–0.88) <.001
 Mixed race/other 0.92 (0.87–0.97) .001 0.91 (0.85–0.97) .002 0.95 (0.88–1.02) .152 0.97 (0.88–1.07) .592 0.80 (0.70–0.91) <.001 0.93 (0.86–1.00) .037
 Missing 0.88 (0.85–0.92) <.001 0.82 (0.78–0.87) <.001 0.90 (0.84–0.96) <.001 0.85 (0.78–0.93) <.001 0.80 (0.71–0.90) <.001 1.00 (0.94–1.06) .910
Marital status (ref married)
 Single/never married 1.01 (0.98–1.04) .436 1.04 (1.01–1.08) .018 1.09 (1.04–1.13) <.001 1.05 (1.00–1.10) .074 0.85 (0.78–0.91) <.001 0.97 (0.93–1.01) .135
 Divorced/separated 1.02 (1.00–1.05) .101 1.01 (0.97–1.04) .707 1.13 (1.09–1.18) <.001 0.96 (0.91–1.01) .092 0.77 (0.72–0.82) <.001 1.03 (1.00–1.06) .072
 Widowed 0.92 (0.85–1.00) .049 0.75 (0.66–0.85) <.001 0.95 (0.80–1.14) .581 0.69 (0.56–0.85) <.001 0.63 (0.50–0.79) <.001 1.04 (0.95–1.15) .374
Percent service-connected (ref none/0%)
 10–40% 0.99 (0.95–1.03) .675 1.04 (0.98–1.09) .168 1.02 (0.96–1.08) .606 0.99 (0.92–1.07) .839 1.14 (1.00–1.29) .046 0.94 (0.89–1.00) .034
 50–100% 1.23 (1.19–1.27) <.001 1.30 (1.24–1.35) <.001 1.15 (1.09–1.21) <.001 1.10 (1.03–1.17) .003 1.92 (1.74–2.11) <.001 1.12 (1.08–1.17) <.001
Combat exposure 1.02 (0.99–1.05) .154 1.03 (0.99–1.07) .093 1.00 (0.96–1.05) .858 1.05 (0.99–1.11) .098 1.01 (0.94–1.09) .791 0.99 (0.95–1.03) .600
Military sexual trauma 1.04 (1.01–1.08) .009 1.04 (1.00–1.09) .034 1.06 (1.01–1.11) .017 1.04 (0.98–1.11) .165 0.96 (0.89–1.04) .360 1.02 (0.98–1.06) .324
Diagnosesa
 Alcohol use disorder 0.79 (0.77–0.82) <.001 0.61 (0.58–0.63) <.001 0.69 (0.66–0.73) <.001 0.69 (0.64–0.74) <.001 0.58 (0.53–0.65) <.001 1.05 (1.01–1.10) .010
 Drug use disorder 1.19 (1.15–1.24) <.001 0.64 (0.61–0.67) <.001 0.70 (0.66–0.74) <.001 0.72 (0.67–0.78) <.001 0.80 (0.72–0.90) <.001 1.90 (1.82–1.97) <.001
 Major depression 1.21 (1.19–1.24) <.001 1.22 (1.19–1.26) <.001 1.02 (0.98–1.05) .311 1.26 (1.21–1.31) <.001 1.71 (1.62–1.81) <.001 1.18 (1.15–1.22) <.001
 Bipolar spectrum disorder 1.09 (1.05–1.14) <.001 0.93 (0.89–0.98) .008 0.84 (0.80–0.89) <.001 1.04 (0.96–1.12) .321 1.40 (1.27–1.55) <.001 1.31 (1.25–1.38) <.001
 Other mood disorder 1.03 (1.00–1.06) .018 1.03 (1.00–1.06) .092 0.90 (0.87–0.94) <.001 1.11 (1.06–1.16) <.001 1.38 (1.30–1.46) <.001 1.05 (1.02–1.08) .003
 Schizophrenia spectrum disorder 0.65 (0.61–0.70) <.001 0.40 (0.35–0.45) <.001 0.38 (0.33–0.45) <.001 0.57 (0.47–0.69) <.001 0.63 (0.51–0.78) <.001 0.96 (0.89–1.05) .369
 Anxiety-related disorder 0.97 (0.95–0.99) .007 0.82 (0.80–0.85) <.001 0.84 (0.81–0.86) <.001 0.94 (0.90–0.98) .002 0.95 (0.90–1.01) .098 1.22 (1.19–1.26) <.001
 Post-traumatic stress disorder 1.21 (1.18–1.24) <.001 1.07 (1.04–1.10) <.001 1.08 (1.04–1.11) <.001 1.06 (1.01–1.10) .015 0.98 (0.92–1.04) .469 1.37 (1.33–1.41) <.001
 Non-PTSD stress disorder 0.84 (0.81–0.86) <.001 0.80 (0.77–0.83) <.001 0.81 (0.78–0.85) <.001 0.89 (0.84–0.94) <.001 0.93 (0.86–1.00) .060 0.94 (0.90–0.98) .001
 Other mental health disorder 1.35 (1.31–1.39) <.001 1.36 (1.29–1.42) <.001 1.54 (1.43–1.65) <.001 1.24 (1.13–1.36) <.001 1.28 (1.19–1.38) <.001 1.31 (1.26–1.37) <.001
 Suicidality/self-harm 0.78 (0.73–0.82) <.001 0.61 (0.56–0.66) <.001 0.65 (0.59–0.71) <.001 0.72 (0.64–0.81) <.001 0.72 (0.61–0.84) <.001 1.00 (0.94–1.07) .969
 Narcolepsy 47.15 (42.97–51.74) <.001 110.94 (100.83–122.08) <.001 17.68 (15.20–20.57) <.001 16.60 (13.91–19.81) <.001 133.33 (121.25–146.62) <.001 0.98 (0.75–1.30) .911
 Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 54.77 (52.87–56.74) <.001 90.82 (86.55–95.30) <.001 95.32 (89.07–102.02) <.001 54.03 (49.27–59.25) <.001 1.56 (1.40–1.74) <.001 5.54 (5.28–5.81) <.001
Hospital daysb
 Medical/surgical 0.98 (0.98–0.98) <.001 0.96 (0.95–0.96) <.001 0.95 (0.94–0.96) <.001 0.97 (0.96–0.98) <.001 0.97 (0.96–0.98) <.001 0.99 (0.98–0.99) <.001
 Mental health 0.99 (0.99–0.99) <.001 0.98 (0.98–0.99) <.001 0.98 (0.98–0.99) <.001 0.99 (0.98–0.99) <.001 0.99 (0.98–1.00) .008 1.00 (0.99–1.00) <.001
 Substance use 0.99 (0.99–0.99) <.001 0.98 (0.97–0.98) <.001 0.98 (0.97–0.99) <.001 0.98 (0.97–0.99) .003 0.99 (0.97–1.00) .079 1.00 (0.99–1.00) .004
 Long-term care 1.00 (0.99–1.00) <.001 0.99 (0.99–1.00) <.001 0.99 (0.99–1.00) .001 0.99 (0.99–1.00) .010 0.99 (0.99–1.00) .006 1.00 (1.00–1.00) <.001
Outpatient visits
 Mental health 1.01 (1.01–1.01) <.001 1.01 (1.01–1.01) <.001 1.01 (1.01–1.01) <.001 1.01 (1.01–1.01) <.001 1.01 (1.00–1.01) <.001 1.00 (1.00–1.00) <.001
 Substance use 1.00 (1.00–1.00) <.001 0.99 (0.99–0.99) <.001 0.99 (0.99–0.99) <.001 0.99 (0.99–1.00) <.001 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .018 1.00 (1.00–1.00) <.001
 Rehabilitation 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .106 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .011 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .003 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .040 1.00 (1.00–1.00) <.001 1.00 (1.00–1.00) <.001
 Ancillary/diagnostic 1.01 (1.01–1.01) <.001 1.01 (1.01–1.01) <.001 1.01 (1.01–1.01) <.001 1.00 (1.00–1.01) <.001 1.01 (1.01–1.01) <.001 1.01 (1.01–1.01) <.001
a

The reference is the absence of a given diagnosis.

b

The reference is the absence of a particular type of visit or admission.

Risky and Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing

As shown in Table 4, homeless veterans exhibited the highest rate of stimulants prescribed in the presence of a psychotic disorder (7.9% vs. 6.4% for HUD-VASH vs. 2.2% for IH, p <.001), cocaine use disorder (11.8% vs. 6.1% for HUD-VASH vs. 1.0% for IH, p < .001), stimulant disorder (13.4% vs. 6.0% for HUD-VASH vs. 1.3% for IH, p < .001), and agitated states (0.7% vs. 0.1% for HUD-VASH vs. 0.1% for IH, p < .001). There was no difference in rates of stimulant prescribing for other categories of RPIP.

Table 4.

Risky and potentially inappropriate prescribing of stimulants among homeless, HUD-VASH, and independently housed VA service users with mental illness and contraindicating or complicating factors, 2021–2022.

Contraindication/complicating factor Homeless (N=7,047) HUD-VASH (N=1,758) Independently Housed (N=101,662) Chi-square p
N % N % N %
Psychotic disorder 554 7.9% 112 6.4% 2,182 2.2% 959.335 <.001
Cocaine use disorder 828 11.8% 108 6.1% 980 1.0% 4701.852 <.001
Other stimulant use disorder 943 13.4% 106 6.0% 1,304 1.3% 4757.850 <.001
Hyperthyroidism 16 0.2% 4 0.2% 980 1.0% 0.936 .626
Glaucoma 115 1.6% 35 2.0% 1,304 0.2% 3.307 .191
Cardiac condition 2,019 28.7% 513 29.2% 184 0.2% 0.926 .629
Tourette’s/other tic disorder 15 .2% 2 .1% 286 .3% 2.812 .245
Agitated state 52 .7% 2 .1% 97 .1% 199.355 <.001
Concurrent MAOI 11 .2% 1 .1% 91 .1% 3.390 .184

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first national study to examine stimulant and non-stimulant ADHD medication prescriptions in a US homeless population. We found in adjusted analyses that overall, homeless veterans were less likely to be prescribed stimulants and more likely to be prescribed non-stimulant ADHD medications relative to IH veterans with mental illness. However, we also found a higher rate of RPIP of prescribing stimulants in homeless and HUD-VASH veterans compared to IH veterans.

The finding that homeless veterans were not prescribed stimulants more frequently relative to the IH and HUD-VASH groups was contrary to our first hypothesis. This finding cannot be easily explained away by differences in diagnoses of ADHD or healthcare utilization since they were higher among homeless veterans. Other explanations may therefore explain these results. First, because homeless patients within the VA system may have better access to outpatient mental health services relative to those outside the VA system as shown by the higher number of outpatient mental health visits, their mental health may be better managed. Patients therefore may not seek stimulants as much as would be if their mental health were more acute with less access to outpatient care. Second, it is possible that VA providers, who operate in a national healthcare system with academic detailing initiatives that provide targeted educational outreach, may be more hesitant to prescribe stimulants to homeless relative to housed individuals due to perceived risks or stereotypes that they will misuse or divert the stimulant—supported by the finding that non-stimulant medications were more likely to be prescribed for the homeless group. Third, as many homeless veterans manage a range of medical and psychiatric comorbidities, it is possible that ADHD went undiagnosed in the face of competing clinical and social priorities. Further study is required to determine which of these explanations is most plausible.

Our second study hypothesis was supported as we found RPIP of stimulants was most likely in homeless veterans, followed by HUD-VASH veterans, with IH veterans least likely to experience RPIP. The high rate of RPIP in the context of a psychotic disorder (7.9%) among homeless patients is especially clinically noteworthy. Clinical practice guidelines caution against stimulant use among veterans with psychotic disorders, given risk of exacerbating psychosis (Moran et al., 2024), which in the homeless population heightens their risk of remaining homeless. Non-stimulant medications can be considered as alternative treatments in this context. It therefore seems that although homeless veterans are less likely to be prescribed stimulants, they are more likely to be prescribed them under RPIP circumstances—perhaps supporting reasons that prescribers are less likely to prescribe stimulants to homeless veterans. That HUD-VASH veterans were also more likely to receive RPIP prescriptions relative to the IH group suggests that this group is viewed by clinicians differently than both the homeless and IH group, with more prudent prescribing for this population needed.

It is worth noting that stimulants were prescribed for homeless veterans in high rates in the presence of a cocaine use disorder (11.8%) and stimulant use disorder (13.4%). Though this may qualify as inappropriate prescribing given risks of combining stimulants with ongoing illicit stimulant use, the higher prevalence could also partly reflect an informed approach to try to treat an underlying stimulant use disorder. Although availability of pharmacotherapies for stimulant use is more limited than treatment for opioid addiction, recent evidence has suggested that prescribed psychostimulants can support the management of cravings and withdrawal symptoms in patients with stimulant use disorder and reduce illicit stimulant use (Tardelli et al., 2020). This approach has been increasing in recent years and may be considered. However, prescribing stimulants for stimulant use disorder must also be balanced with the health risks of excess stimulant use in the case of continued illicit use. Clinicians should prioritize evidence-based psychosocial interventions for stimulant use disorders, including contingency management and cognitive behavioral therapy (Minozzi et al., 2024).

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, we could not tell the diagnoses for which these scripts were specifically prescribed, thus it is not clear to what extent these medications were prescribed specifically for ADHD vs another indication such as stimulant use disorder. Second, the data do not measure the total dose prescribed. Third, the observed higher RPIP of stimulants found in homeless veterans may partly reflect their poorer mental and physical health relative to their housed counterparts since they were more likely to have contraindicating/complicating factors. Our analysis of RPIP was not focused on adjusting for these factors but rather to describe the extent of RPIP as is applicable to real-world practice. Fourth, homeless veterans may have had additional prescription medication refills provided through non-VA pharmacies that could not be captured in the VA medical record. Future research could compare stimulant prescribing in a non-veteran homeless and housed population to determine to what extent these findings are generalizable outside of the VA.

Conclusion

This study provides a novel evaluation of stimulant prescribing in a national sample of homeless veterans, a population at high risk for psychiatric disorders, substance use disorders, medical illness, and death. This study motivates the need for heightened attention and further examination of safe prescribing of stimulants for homeless veterans and those in supported housing.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Declaration of Interest

Katherine Koh: I have nothing to declare.

Dorota Szymkowiak: I have nothing to declare.

Jack Tsai: I have nothing to declare.

References

  1. American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry, 2023. Management of Stimulant Use Disorder. https://downloads.asam.org/sitefinity-production-blobs/docs/default-source/quality-https://downloads.asam.org/sitefinity-production-blobs/docs/default-source/quality-science/stud_guideline_document_final.pdf/science/stud_guideline_document_final.pdf/ (accessed 19 July 2025).
  2. Assaf RD, Morris MD, Straus ER, Martinez P, Philbin MM, Kushel M, 2025. Illicit Substance Use and Treatment Access Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness. JAMA. 333 (14): 1222–1231. 10.1001/jama.2024.27922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burra TA, Stergiopoulos V, Rourke SB, 2009. A systematic review of cognitive deficits in homeless adults: implications for service delivery. Can J Psychiatry. 54 (2), 123–133. 10.1177/070674370905400210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chai G, Xu J, Goyal S, Woods C, Ho A, Song J, Dal Pan G, 2024. Trends in Incident Prescriptions for Behavioral Health Medications in the US, 2018–2022. JAMA Psychiatry. 81 (4), 396–405. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.5045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Corp SA; Gitlin MJ, Altshuler LL, 2014. A Review of the Use of Stimulants and Stimulant Alternatives in Treating Bipolar Depression and Major Depressive Disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 75 (9), 1010–1018. 10.4088/JCP.13r08851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Danielson ML, Bohm MK, Newsome K, Claussen AH, Kaminski JW, Grosse SD, Siwakoti L, Arifkhanova A, Bitsko RH, Robinson LR, 2023. Trends in Stimulant Prescription Fills Among Commercially Insured Children and Adults — United States, 2016–2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 72, 327–332. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7213a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Damon W, McNeil R, Milloy MJ, Nosova E, Kerr T, Hayashi K, 2019. Residential eviction predicts initiation of or relapse into crystal methamphetamine use among people who inject drugs: a prospective cohort study. J Public Health (Oxf). 41 (1), 36–45. 10.1093/pubmed/fdx187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fast D, Kerr T, Wood E, Small W, 2014. The multiple truths about crystal meth among young people entrenched in an urban drug scene: a longitudinal ethnographic investigation. 110, 41–48. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gutwinski S, Schreiter S, Deutscher K, Fazel S, 2021. The prevalence of mental disorders among homeless people in high-income countries: An updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis. PLoS Med. 18 (8), e1003750. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Han B, Jones CM, Volkow ND, Rikard SM, Dowell D, Einstein EB, Guy GP, Tomoyasu N, Ko J, Baldwin G, Olsen Y, Compton WM, 2025. Prescription Stimulant Use, Misuse, and Use Disorder Among US Adults Aged 18 to 64 Years. JAMA Psychiatry. 82 (6), 572–581. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Huskamp HA, Busch AB, Frank RG, 2025. Recent Trends in Medication Treatment for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Psychiatr Serv. 76 (9), 782–787. 10.1176/appi.ps.20240574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jasinski DR, Faries DE, Moore RJ, Schuh LM, Allen AJ, 2008. Abuse liability assessment of atomoxetine in a drug-abusing population. Drug Alcohol Depend. 95 (1–2), 140–146. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kecojevic A, Corliss HL, & Lankenau SE, 2015. Motivations for prescription drug misuse among young men who have sex with men (YMSM) in Philadelphia. International Journal of Drug Policy. 26 (8), 764–771. 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lomas B, Gartside PS, 1997. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder among homeless veterans. Psychiatr Serv. 48 (10), 1331–1333. 10.1176/ps.48.10.1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moran LV, Skinner JP, Shinn AK, Nielsen K, Rao V, Taylor ST, Cohen TR, Erkol C, Merchant J, Mujica CA, Perlis RH, Ongur D, 2024. Risk of Incident Psychosis and Mania With Prescription Amphetamines. Am J Psychiatry. 181 (10), 901–909. 10.1176/appi.ajp.20230329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Minozzi S, Saulle R, Amato L, Traccis F, Agabio R, 2024. Psychosocial interventions for stimulant use disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2 (2), CD011866. 10.1002/14651858.CD011866.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. NIH National Library of Medicine, 2024. Adderall. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=35744538-https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=35744538-1704-4ee0-954d-52710cf3456d1704-4ee0-954d-52710cf3456d (accessed 19 July 2025).
  18. NIH National Library of Medicine, 2025. Methylphenidate Hydrochloride. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=ed004cf0-eb23-43d2-96dc-20c4ad63824f/ (accessed 19 July 2025).
  19. NIH National Library of Medicine, 2025. Vyanse. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=a310fc51-https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=a310fc51-2743-4755-8398-fed5402283f62743-4755-8398-fed5402283f6 (accessed 19 July 2025).
  20. Tadrous M, Shakeri A, Chu C, Watt J, Mamdani MM, Juurlink DN, Gomes T, 2021. Assessment of Stimulant Use and Cardiovascular Event Risks Among Older Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 4 (10), e2130795. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tardelli VS, Bisaga A, Arcadepani FB, Gerra G, Levin FR, Fidalgo TM, 2020. Prescription psychostimulants for the treatment of stimulant use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 237 (8), 2233–2255. 10.1007/s00213-020-05563-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tsai J, Blue-Howells J, & Nakashima J, 2019. Needs of homeless veterans: 5 years of the CHALENG Survey 2012–16. J Public Health (Oxford), 41 (1), e16–e24. 10.1093/pubmed/fdy076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tsai J, Szymkowiak D, & Radhakrishnan R, 2020. Antipsychotic medication prescriptions for homeless and unstably housed veterans in the veterans affairs health care system. J Clin Psychiatry, 82 (1), 1137. 10.4088/JCP.20m13372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tsai J, Pietrzak RH, & Szymkowiak D, 2021. The problem of veteran homelessness: An update for the new decade. Am J Prev Med. 60 (6), 774–780. 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tsai J, Szymkowiak D, Jutkowitz E, 2022. Developing an operational definition of housing instability and homelessness in Veterans Health Administration's medical records. PLoS One. 17 (12), e0279973. 10.1371/journal.pone.0279973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Weber J, Lee RC, & Martsolf D, 2017. Understanding the health of veterans who are homeless: A review of the literature. Public Health Nurs. 34 (5), 505–511. 10.1111/phn.12338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wilens TE, Adler LA, Adams J, Sgambati S, Rotrosen J, Sawtelle R, Utzinger L, Fusillo S, 2008. Misuse and diversion of stimulants prescribed for ADHD: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 47 (1), 21–31. 10.1097/chi.0b013e31815a56f1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES