Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2026 Jul 21;17:1757903. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1757903

Genomic characterization of Bacillus velezensis BP5 and BP103: insights into biocontrol potential against bacterial leaf spot on pepper

Le Uyen Thanh 1,*, Vu Nhat Tan 2, Tran Thi Ngoc Huyen 1, To Lan Phuong 3, Huynh Ngoc Tam 1, Luu Phuc Loi 4,*
PMCID: PMC13433461  PMID: 42553232

Abstract

Bacillus velezensis strains BP5 and BP103, isolated from pepper rhizosphere soil in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, displayed potent antagonistic activity against Xanthomonas euvesicatoria, which causes pepper bacterial spot. In dual-culture assays, BP5 formed the largest inhibition zone (36.7 mm), outperforming BP103 (32.1 mm) and oxolinic acid (31.3 mm). Both Gram-positive, rod-shaped strains produced extracellular protease, lipase, amylase, cellulase, and siderophores. Whole-genome sequencing revealed compact and genetically stable genomes: BP5 (4.08 Mb, 46.04% GC, 4,047 protein-coding genes, 5 prophages) and BP103 (3.91 Mb, 46.46% GC, 3,793 genes, 2 prophages). Phylogenetic reconstruction and average nucleotide identity (ANI of more than 98%) confirmed their assignment to B. velezensis, with closest relatedness to strain 160. Orthologous gene analysis across 28 B. velezensis genomes and B. subtilis DSM10 identified 2,593 single-copy genes. Compared to BP103, BP5 harbors greater numbers of multi-copy orthologs, other orthologs, and unique paralogs (388, 910, and 5 in BP5 with 336, 763, and 1 in BP103, respectively). Pangenome analysis showed that the core genome size decreased progressively with the addition of new genomes; BP5 showed more pronounced genetic divergence driven by expanded unique paralogs and shell gene families (with 456 in BP5 compared with 203 in BP103). Both strains encode 13 secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters, including surfactin, fengycin, bacillaene, macrolactin, difficidin, bacilysin, bacillibactin, mersacidin, and locillomycin, plus four previously undescribed terpene/PKS. The CAZyme repertoire was richest in BP5 (133 genes), exceeding BP103 and the commercial strain FZB42 (both 129 genes), thereby enhancing adhesion and adhesion and rhizosphere colonization. These findings establish BP5 and BP103 as highly promising biocontrol agents, combining high genetic stability with diverse secondary metabolite profiles, suitable for development into sustainable microbial bio-bactericides.

Keywords: antagonistic activity, Bacillus velezensis, carbohydrate-active enzymes, pangenome, secondary metabolites, whole-genome sequencing

1. Introduction

Vietnam is a key pepper producer and exporter in the Asia–Pacific region, ranking seventh in production (Subedi et al., 2024), with the Mekong Delta as the main growing region supplying most pepper for domestic use and export. Although long-term data on global pepper acreage are limited, experimental studies indicate that warming- and drought-like conditions increase disease pressure in pepper, particularly anthracnose, bacterial wilt and, most notably, bacterial spot (BSP), which is expected to negatively affect pepper yield and production in many regions (Shin and Yun, 2010; Jang et al., 2019). BSP can cause yield losses exceeding 50% under unfavorable conditions (Dhakal et al., 2019; Utami et al., 2022), especially during the rainy season, thereby reducing marketable yield, fruit quality and export value. In Vietnam, no biological management strategy for BSP is currently available that is both sustainable and specifically tailored to pepper; therefore, growers rely heavily on chemical pesticides, which increases production costs and promotes resistance development, environmental contamination and health risks. Against this background, the development and deployment of effective biological control agents, such as indigenous Bacillus strains antagonistic to Xanthomonas euvesicatoria (Milovanović et al., 2025), are urgently needed to support sustainable pepper production in the Mekong Delta.

Plant diseases significantly reduce global crop yields and have accelerated the search for sustainable biological control alternatives to chemical pesticides (Köhl et al., 2019). In soil, the rhizosphere, and internal plant tissues (the endosphere), Bacillus is recognized as one of the most common and important bacterial genera. Many species within this genus have been demonstrated to benefit plants, particularly by protecting them against infection by pathogenic agents (Etesami et al., 2023). Among these microbial agents, B. velezensis is a Gram-positive, rod-shaped, facultatively anaerobic, endospore-forming bacterium of the B. subtilis species complex (Rabbee et al., 2019; Fan et al., 2017). According to Dunlap et al. (2016), this species has been proposed as a heterotypic synonym of B. amyloliquefaciens and B. siamensis and is treated as an operational group by some authors (Fan et al., 2017). This species excels as a biocontrol agent, promoting plant growth and suppressing pathogens (Fan et al., 2018; Choi et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2023; Xie et al., 2023).

B. velezensis commonly inhabits plant-associated niches, frequently isolated from rhizospheres of ginger, black pepper, and watermelon (Wang K. X. et al., 2022; Wang Q. et al., 2022; Blumenscheit et al., 2022), and as endophytes in rice, olive, coffee, and poplar (Shi et al., 2022; Spantidos et al., 2025; de Castro et al., 2025; Sachin et al., 2021). It excels in root colonization through flagellar motility and biofilm formation, while tolerating abiotic stresses, oxidative pressure, and acidity (Fan et al., 2018; Teixeira et al., 2021; Shen et al., 2023). Furthermore, enzyme secretion that enhances nutrient uptake and plant growth also contributes to plant growth-promoting (PGP) activity (Sibponkrung et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2024).

Recent studies have confirmed that Bacillus represents a rich source of antimicrobial compounds, including volatile compounds, peptides (both ribosomal and non-ribosomal), polyketides, and hybrid metabolites, which are highly effective in the biological control of Xanthomonas diseases (Caulier et al., 2019). For example, Bacillus strain D13 has been reported to produce 12 volatile compounds, among which decyl alcohol and 3,5,5-trimethylhexanol exhibit strong inhibitory activity against X. oryzae pv. oryzae in the rice bacterial blight pathosystem (Xie et al., 2018). Moreover, the surfactin-homolog AXLP14 from B. amyloliquefaciens B014 demonstrates potent activity against Xoo (Li et al., 2016), highlighting the broader potential of Bacillus-derived volatiles against Xanthomonas species.

Numerous B. velezensis strains control plant pathogens via direct antagonism (Cai et al., 2017; Grady et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2022), nutrient competition (Fan et al., 2018; Rabbee et al., 2019). This efficacy stems from secondary metabolites like lipopeptides (surfactin and fengycin), synthesized by non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) gene clusters, and the polyketide (bacillaene), which together contribute to antibacterial activity (Kim et al., 2022). In addition, they produce of surfactin and enzymes (cellulase, lysozyme, protease) that degrade fungal cell walls (Grady et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2023). Siderophores enhance iron competition, and acetoin reduces virulence of Fusarium spp. (Spantidos et al., 2025). These traits make B. velezensis a more environmentally friendly alternative to chemical fungicides (Köhl et al., 2019; Fira et al., 2018).

Genomic sequencing elucidates the genetic and biochemical basis underlying the beneficial traits of B. velezensis. Moreover, it possesses a circular genome of approximately 3.9–4.2 Mb, with a GC content approximately of 45.8–47%, encoding 3,700–4,200 proteins-coding genes approximately 12–21 biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) for secondary metabolites across strains (Pan et al., 2017; Choi et al., 2021; Sachin et al., 2021; Pei et al., 2023; González-Léon et al., 2024). AntiSMASH analysis of strains EB14, HNA3 revealed 12–14 BGCs for surfactin, bacillibactin, bacillaene, difficidin, and bacilysin (Sachin et al., 2021; Zaid et al., 2022). Consistently, strain FZB42 harbors 13 BGCs, supporting ISR and biofilm formation (Fan et al., 2018). Strain 9912D contains 13 BGCs for surfactin, fengycin, bacillomycin, bacillaene, and difficidin (Pan et al., 2017). In contrast, CMRP 4490 contains eight BGCs that produce similar compounds but also include macrolactin H, bacillibactin, and bacilysin (Teixeira et al., 2021). Similarly, strain VJH504 has 12 BGCs for multiple metabolites and CAZymes, aiding fungal cell wall degradation, biofilm formation and plant immunity (Yang et al., 2023). Together, these findings highlight the multifaceted genetic and biochemical capacities of B. velezensis as a sustainable biocontrol and plant growth-promoting bacterium, offering valuable prospects for environmentally friendly agricultural management (Fira et al., 2018; Marin et al., 2019).

Beyond strain level genomic features, pan-genomic studies have extensively characterized species within the genus Bacillus, with B. velezensis and B. subtilis serving as models (Kim et al., 2017; Zeng et al., 2021; Kadiri et al., 2023; Neal et al., 2024). At the species level, comparative pangenome analyses of B. velezensis reported core gene cluster counts of 3,566–3,592 among strains VJH504, FZB42, G341, and BvL03, with 3,295 clusters shared across all four, indicating a relatively conserved core genome (Yang et al., 2023). Furthermore, an expanded dataset of 54 B. velezensis strains, including VB7, identified 2,226 core genes, while the accessory genome ranged from 666 to 1,797 genes and strain-specific genes from 30 to 179, with VB7 carrying 30 unique genes, largely hypothetical or related to sporulation (Kadiri et al., 2023). In parallel, a pan-genome-scale metabolic model of 481 B. subtilis genomes captured strain-level variation in nutrient use and metabolic traits, allowing the classification of strains into five metabolically distinct groups (Neal et al., 2024). Finally, cross-species analysis of 238 strains from five Bacillus species (including B. amyloliquefaciens, B. anthracis, B. cereus, B. subtilis, and B. thuringiensis) highlighted consistent functional contrasts between core and strain-specific genes (Kim et al., 2017).

Previous genomic studies on B. velezensis have focused on individual strains, lacking synchronized comparisons among strains from the same ecosystem. This has limited insights into gene functions related to environmental adaptation. Pan-genome and functional gene network analyses remain preliminary, with core and accessory genes not yet clearly defined. AntiSMASH data have primarily identified common lipopeptide biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs).

This study presents the first intra-species genomic comparison between two B. velezensis strains, BP5 and BP103, isolated from the pepper rhizosphere. Previous studies have frequently reported the antagonistic activity of this species against fungi. In the present research, both BP5 and BP103 exhibited strong antagonistic activity against X. euvesicatoria, the causal agent of leaf spot disease on pepper in Vietnam. Genomic analyses of the two strains revealed their genetic diversity and determinants of antagonism in B. velezensis, distinguished core and accessory genes, highlighted strain-specific paralogs, and identified putative gene clusters potentially associated with their antagonistic abilities.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Isolation, pathogenicity testing, and identification of Xanthomonas strain

The bacterial strain was isolated from symptomatic pepper leaves showing leaf spot symptoms, collected from fields in Đống Tháp Province. Diseased tissue from the margin of necrotic lesions was streaked onto King’s B (KB) agar (HiMedia, India) and incubated at 28°C for 3–5 days. Characteristic yellow colonies typical of Xanthomonas spp. were selected and repeatedly streaked for purification on KB agar. Pure cultures were preserved long-term at –20°C in 30% (v/v) glycerol. The isolate was designated XP10, based on the sample code stored in the Biotechnology Laboratory at Dong Thap University.

Pathogenicity of the Xanthomonas sp. strain (XP10) was confirmed by infiltrating a bacterial suspension (5 × 108 CFU/mL in 0.01 M MgSO4) into the abaxial surface of developing pepper leaves using a needleless syringe. Inoculated plants were incubated at 25°C for the first 2 days to promote infection, then maintained in a net-house. Typical leaf spot symptoms developed on infiltrated leaves. The bacterium was re-isolated from the margin of symptomatic lesions by streaking onto KB agar, confirmed by characteristic yellow colonies, thereby fulfilling Koch’s postulates.

Genomic DNA was extracted from bacterial colonies using the AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen). The near-full-length 16S rRNA gene was amplified with primers 27F and 1492R following Weisburg et al. (1991). PCR products were sequenced on the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platform. Raw fast5 data were basecalled to fastq format using Guppy v6.5.7 (ONT). Read quality was evaluated with NanoQ v0.10.0 (Steinig and Clarke, 2022), and low-quality reads were filtered and trimmed using Filtlong v0.2.1.

Full-length 16S rRNA consensus sequences were generated from Nanopore amplicon reads using Medaka (ONT) after basecalling with Guppy. Taxonomic assignment was performed by BLASTn alignment of the consensus sequences against the NCBI GenBank database (Camacho et al., 2009). The 16S rRNA sequence of XP10 has been deposited in GenBank with the corresponding accession number (PX836769).

2.2. Bacterial strains, incubation parameters, antagonistic activity assay, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis

Rhizosphere soil samples (collected at a depth of 20 cm) were obtained from twenty pepper fields in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Five grams of each soil sample were suspended in 50 mL of sterile saline peptone solution (0.85% NaCl) and shaken at 200 rpm for 15 min. Serial dilutions were prepared, and 50 μL aliquots from appropriate dilutions were spread onto Luria-Bertani (LB) plates (HiMedia, India). Plates were incubated at 30°C for 48 h. Well-isolated colonies were selected and purified by repeated streaking on LB. Purified isolates were preserved at –20°C in 30% (v/v) sterile glycerol, and working cultures used in all antagonism assays were freshly revived from these glycerol stocks and re-purified prior to testing.

Antibacterial activity assay against Xanthomonas sp. XP10 was performed using strain XP10 as the indicator bacterium. King’s B agar plates (100 mm in diameter) (King et al., 1954) were poured with approximately 15 mL of medium, which produced a uniform but not excessively thick XP10 lawn suitable for clear inhibition zone measurements. After that, bacterial suspensions of rhizobacterial isolates (OD600 = 0.3) were used to soak sterile filter paper disks (5 mm diameter) and placed on the disease plates, respectively. Plates were incubated at 30°C for 48 h. Sterile saline peptone solution was used as the negative control, and oxolinic acid (commercial 20% WP formulation, applied at a final concentration of 200 μg/mL) (Sang et al., 2015) served as the positive control (a locally applied bactericide commonly used for this purpose). Antibacterial activity was evaluated by measuring the diameters of inhibition zones, which were calculated by measuring the total zone diameter (including the bacterial colony) and subtracting the disk diameter (5 mm) (Thanh, 2022). The data were analyzed using MINITAB version 16.1. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for each data set. Significant differences among means were determined using Tukey’s multiple comparison test at a significance level of 0.05.

Strains BP5 and BP103 were cultured on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar at 30°C for 48 h. Bacterial colonies from each strain were then harvested and separately suspended in sterile distilled saline solution (0.9% NaCl) to prepare bacterial suspensions (approximately 109 CFU/mL). A 5 μL aliquot of each bacterial suspension was pipetted onto a glass coverslip using a micropipette and air-dried at 60°C for 15 min to thermally inactivate, rapidly dehydrate, and immobilize the cells on the surface. The dried coverslips were mounted onto SEM stubs using conductive carbon adhesive tape. Subsequently, the samples were sputter-coated with a thin layer of platinum (approximately 8–12 nm) at a current of 30 mA for 30 s to enhance electrical conductivity, minimize charging effects. SEM observation and imaging of overall surface morphology were performed at the Nano-Electrochemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Can Tho University, using a JEOL JCM-7000 NeoScope™ benchtop scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Japan) under high-vacuum mode with secondary electron (SE) detection and standard accelerating voltage settings.

2.3. Biochemical traits and enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism

The hydrolytic enzyme activities and hydrocarbon utilization capacities of strains BP5 and BP103 were evaluated through their protease, lipase, amylase, and cellulase activities. Amylase activity was determined on starch agar (Sonar and Halami, 2014), whereas protease activity was assessed on 1% casein-supplemented agar (Rawaliya et al., 2022). Lipase activity was evaluated on LB medium containing Tween 20, Tween 80, and CaCl2.2H2O (Ramnath et al., 2017), while cellulase activity was detected using carboxymethyl-cellulose (CMC) agar (Ariffin et al., 2006).

Experiments involved applying 5-mm diameter sterile paper discs saturated with bacterial suspensions (OD600 ≈ 1.0) onto the respective media and incubating at 30°C for 72 h. Post incubation, casein plates were treated with 10% TCA for 10 min at room temperature to precipitate proteins and visualize protease zones; starch plates were stained with Lugol’s solution for amylase activity; CMC plates were stained with 1 mol/L Congo red for 30 min and subsequently destained with 1 mol/L NaCl for 30 min to detect cellulase activity. Extracellular enzymatic activities were assessed using specific agar plate assays, with all tests performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility. Specifically, protease activity was indicated by the formation of clear hydrolysis zones (clear zones) around colonies on casein agar. In addition, lipase activity was detected by the appearance of white precipitate zones (or opaque halos) surrounding the colonies on lipid-containing medium. Furthermore, amylase activity was observed through transparent halos on starch agar after flooding with Lugol’s iodine solution. Moreover, cellulase activity was visualized as distinct degradation halo zones on carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) agar following Congo red staining and destaining.

Furthermore, Siderophore production was evaluated by inoculating antagonistic strains on CAS medium (Schwyn and Neilands, 1987). Strains were incubated at 30°C for 3–5 days. Siderophore synthesis was indicated by the formation of an orange-yellow halo surrounding bacterial growth. All assays were performed in triplicate (technical replicates) using the same bacterial suspension under identical conditions.

2.4. Genome sequencing and annotation

B. velezensis strains BP5 and BP103 were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at 37°C for 24 h. Genomic DNA was isolated from the bacterial cells using the Monarch® Spin gDNA Extraction Kit (NEB, United States). The DNA concentration was quantified with the QuantiFluor® dsDNA System (Promega), while DNA integrity was evaluated by capillary electrophoresis on the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer based on fragment size distribution profiles.

Sequencing libraries were constructed using the Illumina TruSeq Nano DNA kit targeting an average insert size of 350 bp. Quality assessment of libraries was performed by analyzing PCR amplicon size distribution on the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Qualified libraries were subjected to sequencing on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (paired-end 150 bp reads) at Macrogen Corporation (Seoul, South Korea), yielding high sequencing coverage (∼733 × for BP5 and ∼577 × for BP103).

Raw paired-end sequencing generated 2.991 Gbp and 2.253 Gbp of data for strains BP5 and BP103, respectively. To ensure optimal accuracy for downstream analyses, the raw datasets underwent rigorous quality control and preprocessing using fastp (Chen S. et al., 2018). Although initial standard scanning detected no explicit adapters, the tool’s paired-end overlap analysis and poly-G trimming algorithms successfully removed adapter and artifact sequences from 17,770 reads in BP5 and 5,954 reads in BP103. Additionally, strict filtering parameters resulted in the removal of 139,656 low-quality reads, 294 N-rich reads, and 22,350 overly short reads from the BP5 dataset, while 85,626 low-quality reads, 5,500 N-rich reads, and 9,988 overly short reads were discarded from the BP103 dataset. Following this comprehensive preprocessing, the retained high-quality clean datasets comprised 2.965 Gbp for BP5 and 2.237 Gbp for BP103.

The quality of raw sequencing reads was initially checked with FastQC (v0.12.1) and then aggregated using MultiQC (v1.26). Genome assembly was carried out de novo using Unicycler v0.5.1 in short-read mode, which utilizes SPAdes as the underlying assembler for Illumina data. Assembly quality was then assessed by QUAST, referencing the closest available genome, B. velezensis 160 (GenBank: CP119675.1).

Subsequent de novo assembly utilizing these clean reads yielded draft genomes of 4,078,673 bp for BP5 and 3,906,643 bp for BP103, indicating that the BP103 genome is more compact, being 172,030 bp (4.22%) smaller than that of BP5.

Protein-coding sequences were predicted using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP), which served as the sole reference for downstream genomic analyses. The draft genome was visualized through Proksee, a web-based tool for prokaryotic genome annotation and visualization.1

2.5. Gene function clustering

Gene functions were annotated by querying multiple protein databases. Clusters of Orthologous Genes (COG) were assigned using eggNOG-mapper (v5.0.1). Functional annotation relied on GO terms via InterPro (v5.75) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway mapping via KAAS (Zhou et al., 2023; Xie et al., 2023). Pfam-based protein family annotation was performed with Pfam_Scan (v1.6) against Pfam (v37.1) (Finn et al., 2014).

2.6. Analysis of average nucleotide identity (ANI)

ANI analysis was used to assess genome-wide similarity to infer genetic relationships and species delineation at the genome level. In this study, the sequenced genomes of Bacillus strains BP5 and BP103 were compared with reference genomes using MUMmer v4.0.1 to quantify similarity and assess genetic diversity among strains. Given that MUMmer-based ANIm remains a widely used baseline for evaluating the accuracy of alignment-free methods, this approach provides high-resolution and reliable estimates of genome-wide nucleotide identity (Jain et al., 2018). A reference strain, B. subtilis DSM10 (CP120681.2), was included as an outgroup to represent a more distant relationship within B. subtilis species complex, along with 25 closely related B. velezensis genomes retrieved from GenBank/RefSeq: TZS01 (CP141828.1), SRCM123422 (CP128503.1), LOH112 (NZ_CP092110.1), 77-E7 (CP197347.1), 77-E7-BHI (CP197348.1), 77-E7-A5 (CP197349.1), PD9 (CP142142.1), 10075 (CP025939.1), XRD006 (CP118911.1), 12Y (CP120711.1), PEBA20 (CP046145.1), Lzh-a42 (CP025308.1), CIMT3 (NZ_CP169570.1), ID-A04 (CP066379.1), ID-A03 (CP066378.1), CBMB205 (NZ_CP011937.1), YJ11-1-4 (CP011347.1), FS3 (CP195723.1), FZB42 (NC_009725.2), BP1 (NZ_CP165606.1), 160 (CP119675.1), AP46 (CP160229.1), GJJK74 (CP137890.1), DSYZ (NZ_CP030150.1), and 11640 (NZ_CP026610.1). Three very closely related genomes (77-E7, 77-E7-BHI, and 77-E7-A5) from the same study were intentionally retained to capture fine-scale variation within the same lineage.

2.7. Phylogenetic analysis throught pangenome

Pangenome analysis of B. velezensis BP5 and BP103 was performed using two independent tools. PPanGGOLiN v2.2.3 was run with an identity threshold of 0.90 and a coverage threshold of 0.90, and Roary v3.13.0 was run with identically matched BLASTP parameters (90% sequence identity and 90% coverage), a core gene threshold of 99% (-cd 99), and an MCL inflation value of 1.5 (-iv 1.5), in order to define the core, shell, and cloud gene clusters. Subsequently, orthologous gene families (orthogroups) were inferred using OrthoFinder v3.1.0 across 28 Bacillus genomes, including multiple B. velezensis strains, B. subtilis DSM10, and the representative isolates BP5 and BP103. Single-copy orthologs, defined as orthogroups containing exactly one gene from each genome, were extracted and concatenated into a single amino acid alignment, which was used as input for constructing a maximum-likelihood phylogenomic tree in IQ-TREE v3.0.1. The best-fitting amino acid substitution model, LG++F+I+G4, was selected by ModelFinder. Branch support was assessed using both the SH-like approximate likelihood ratio test (SH-aLRT; 1,000 replicates) and ultrafast bootstrap (1,000 replicates). The resulting tree was visualized and annotated using iTOL v7 (Interactive Tree of Life).

2.8. Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters analysis

Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters in the genomes of B. velezensis BP5 and BP103 were predicted using antiSMASH v8.0.1. The putative products and their chemical scaffolds were inferred by homology-based comparison of the predicted clusters against entries in the MIBiG database (Wang et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2023; Xie et al., 2023).

2.9. Identification of carbohydrate active enzyme (CAZymes)

Genes encoding CAZyme enzymes from families GH, PL, CE, GT, AA, and CBM in BP5 and BP103 genomes were identified with dbCAN v5.1.2 (utilizing HMMER, Hotpep, and DIAMOND) (Zhang et al., 2024). The predicted protein sequences were then queried against the Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes (CAZy) database by BLAST to assign enzyme families.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation, pathogenicity, and identification of Xanthomonas strain

From typical symptomatic leaf samples, the isolated strain formed smooth, round, convex colonies with entire margins, buttery (mucoid) consistency, and pale yellow pigmentation (Figure 1). This mucoid, buttery appearance is characteristic of Xanthomonas species (Garrity, 2005; Ryan et al., 2011).

FIGURE 1.

Panel A shows a green leaf with yellow and brown spots indicating disease symptoms. Panel B presents a petri dish with yellow bacterial colonies streaked on the surface. Panel C displays two healthy green leaves with visible veins. Panel D shows two leaves with faint yellow discoloration near the center, marked by blue arrows, indicating early disease symptoms. All panels include a 2-centimeter scale bar.

Symptoms of leaf spot caused by Xanthomonas sp. on pepper. (A) Leaf spot symptoms in the field. (B) Colony morphology of Xanthomonas sp. isolated from the diseased sample. (C) Pathogenicity test via leaf infiltration: adaxial (upper) and abaxial (lower) surfaces of the inoculated pepper leaf. (D) Negative control (infiltration with MgSO4 alone).

Infiltration of the bacterial suspension into pepper leaves using the needleless syringe method resulted in water-soaked lesions delimited by veins, progressing to necrosis, with mild chlorosis surrounding the necrotic areas. Microscopic examination of wet mounts from excised lesions revealed bacterial streaming, and re-isolation by streaking onto King’s B medium yielded yellow, mucoid colonies with morphology identical to the original XP10 isolate, typical of Xanthomonas. Taken together, these results strongly support the identification of XP10 as the causal agent of bacterial leaf spot on pepper.

The 16S rRNA gene of strain XP10 was sequenced. BLASTn comparison (NCBI, latest version) of the pepper strain sequence against GenBank showed the closest match to X. euvesicatoria DSM 19128 (accession NR_114773), with 99.93% identity. High-identity matches were also observed with other Xanthomonas spp. (e.g., X. perforans, X. citri, X. alfalfae, X. vasicola), confirming placement within the genus Xanthomonas. It has been identified as the X. euvesicatoria strain. The 16S rRNA sequence data for XP10 have been deposited in GenBank under accession number PX836769 (NCBI).2

3.2. Antagonistic and morphological features of the BP5 and BP103 strains

A dual-culture antagonism assay was performed with 283 bacterial isolates collected from rhizosphere soil to evaluate their activity against Xanthomonas sp. XP10, the causal agent of bacterial leaf spot on pepper. Among these 283 isolates, 25 (8.8%) showed potential antagonistic effects, and 12 of them exhibited inhibition zones over 20 mm in diameter, with BP5 and BP103 showing the strongest inhibition of pathogen growth (Figure 2 and Table 1). Notably, BP5 produced the largest inhibition zone (36.7 mm), which was significantly greater than that of the positive control, oxolinic acid (31.3 mm). In contrast, BP103 (32.1 mm) showed a comparable level of inhibition to oxolinic acid, with no statistically significant difference observed between them. Both strains are Gram-positive, short rod-shaped bacteria (Figure 2) that form milky white, circular, and irregular colonies on LB agar plates. The other antagonistic isolates were not further characterized at the species level within the scope of this study, and thus our subsequent analyses focused on BP5 and BP103.

FIGURE 2.

Panel A shows a petri dish with clear zones around BP5, BP103, and oxolinic acid, indicating antimicrobial activity, while the control does not show inhibition. Panels B and C display bacterial colonies on two separate agar plates, with panel C showing fewer colonies than B. Panel D presents close-up photographs of BP5 and BP103 colonies. Panels E and F are electron microscope images, likely showing bacterial cells at high magnification, with similar distribution in both images.

Antagonistic and morphological characteristics of B. velezensis BP5 and BP103. (A) Inhibition zones indicating growth suppression of BP5 and BP103 compared with oxolinic acid. (B,C) Colony morphology of BP5 and BP103, respectively. (D) Close-up of a bacterial colony: BP5 (above), BP103 (below). (E) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of BP5 (scale bar = 5 μm; magnification = 3,000×). (F) SEM images of BP103 (scale bar = 5 μm; magnification = 3,000×).

TABLE 1.

Diameters of inhibition zones (mm) against Xanthomonas sp. XP10 by 25 rhizobacterial isolates with antagonistic activity after 48 h of incubation.

Antagonistic bacteria Diameter of the inhibition zone (mm)
BP5 36.7a
BP11 24de
BP18 23def
BP27 25.7cd
BP65 22.7def
BP78 20ef
BP103 32.1b
BP111 26cd
BP135 20ef
BP207 26,3cd
BP234 26.3cd
BP277 26.1cd
Positive Control 31.3b

Means in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Tukey’s test (P ≤ 0.05) using Minitab (v16.1). Each value represents the mean of three replicates. Positive control: Filter paper disks were impregnated with 20% oxolinic acid solution instead of bacterial suspensions.

3.3. Determination of the biochemical activity of the BP5 and BP103 strains

The biochemical characteristics of strains BP5 and BP103 were evaluated through in vitro assays. Both strains demonstrated the ability to produce several extracellular enzymes, including protease, lipase, amylase, and cellulase, as evidenced by the formation of hydrolysis zones, white precipitates, and degradation halos on the respective media (Figures 3A–D). The formation of yellow halos on CAS medium (Figure 3E) indicated the production of siderophores by these strains, based on the qualitative CAS assay. These results are based on qualitative observations from plate assays, and no quantitative measurements or statistical analyses were performed. Therefore, no comparative assessment between the two strains was made. Overall, the findings suggest that both BP5 and BP103 possess metabolic capabilities related to the production of extracellular enzymes and bioactive compounds. Furthermore, future work could investigate how these metabolites contribute to survival and biocontrol efficacy through complementary in vitro assays.

FIGURE 3.

Panel A shows two clear zones around labeled discs BP5 and BP103 on a pale agar plate. Panel B presents white colonies indicated by yellow arrows on a similar plate. Panel C displays two orange halos around the discs on a dark background. Panel D features colonies on a reddish medium, while panel E shows colonies on a blue-green plate, both labeled BP5 and BP103. Each dish measures approximately two centimeters in radius.

Detection of antagonistic enzymes and secondary metabolites in strains BP5 and BP103. (A) Protease activity with clear zones on casein agar. (B) Lipase activity with white precipitates around colonies. (C) Amylase production with transparent halos after Lugol’s treatment. (D) Cellulase activity with degradation halo zone after congo red staining. (E) Siderophore production with yellow halos on CAS medium.

3.4. Genomic features of BP5 and BP103

Whole-genome sequencing of Bacillus velezensis strains BP5 and BP103 generated raw data of 2.991 Gbp (Q30 = 92.69%) and 2.253 Gbp (Q30 = 92.37%), respectively. After quality filtering, the clean data reached 2.964 Gbp (Q30 = 93.00%) for BP5 and 2.237 Gbp (Q30 = 92.48%) for BP103. De novo assembly using QUAST yielded high-quality draft genomes, with BP5 having a total length of 4,078,673 bp, N50 of 564,984 bp, 31 contigs, and GC content of 46.04%, while BP103 achieved a total length of 3,906,643 bp, N50 of 1,000,639 bp, 16 contigs, and GC content of 46.46%. The 172 kb (4.2%) difference in genome size between BP5 and BP103 is consistent with the high genomic plasticity of B. velezensis (typically 3.9–4.2 Mb), which is largely driven by the accessory genome. Our data reveal that BP5 possesses more mobile elements (5 prophages vs. 2 in BP103) and strain-specific genes (456 vs. 203 shell gene families), accounting for most of this extra genomic content. Additionally, since these are Illumina-based draft genomes, unresolved assembly gaps in highly repetitive regions may also marginally contribute to this size variation. Furthermore, based on the high-quality clean data utilized for the de novo assembly, the estimated sequencing coverage was exceptionally high, reaching approximately 727 × for BP5 and 573 × for BP103 (2.965 Gbp/4.078 Mbp and 2.237 Gbp/3.906 Mbp, respectively). This deep coverage effectively ensures the reliability, completeness, and high accuracy of the resulting draft genomes, thereby providing a robust foundation for subsequent downstream genomic analyses, including comparative studies.

The key genomic features of B. velezensis strains BP5 and BP103 are outlined in Figure 4 and Table 2. Both strains share identical ncRNA (4) and rRNA (3) counts, with similar tRNA numbers (BP5: 74; BP103: 76), reflecting conserved gene regulation and translation mechanisms. It should be emphasized that the annotation of only 3 rRNA sequences in both BP5 and BP103 primarily reflects technical limitations associated with Illumina short-read data rather than a biological anomaly. The closely related reference strain B. velezensis 160 (GenBank: CP119675.1), although reported as a complete continuous genome and sequenced using Illumina technology (González-Léon et al., 2024), is likewise annotated with only 5 rRNA sequences. To accurately determine the copy number and structural organization of these repetitive rRNA operons, future updates of these genome records will require long-read sequencing data. BP5, with a larger genome (4,223 total genes, 4,047 protein-coding genes) and 5 prophage elements, contrasts with BP103 (3,877 total genes, 3,793 protein-coding genes, 2 prophage), despite fewer pseudogenes (64 compared with 66), indicating potential genomic and evolutionary divergence, as well as differences in the conservation of horizontally acquired genes between the two strains. Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge that predicting prophage regions (5 in BP5 and 2 in BP103) is inherently constrained by the fragmentation typical of short-read assemblies. To mitigate this technical limitation and maximize prediction accuracy, we cross-validated our findings using multiple robust prophage identification tools, specifically the PHASTER web server and the locally executed PhiSpy algorithm (Akhter et al., 2012). PhiSpy enhances detection by combining similarity- and composition-based search strategies. Despite employing these rigorous cross-checks, unresolvable repetitive sequences in Illumina data mean these regions may still be fragmented. Therefore, the reported counts should be strictly interpreted as predicted prophage-like regions rather than completely resolved intact viral genomes. As with the rRNA operons, future incorporation of long-read sequencing technologies will be necessary to accurately reconstruct the complete architecture of these mobile genetic elements.

FIGURE 4.

Circular genome maps for BP5 and BP103 display annotated genomic features in concentric rings, each color-coded according to a legend on the right indicating elements such as CDS, tRNA, rRNA, regulatory regions, GC content, pseudogenes, and Cas clusters, with genome coordinates marked in megabase pairs around each circle.

Circular genome maps of Bacillus velezensis strains BP5 (A) and BP103 (B). The outer rings show the distribution of predicted coding sequences (CDSs) on the forward and reverse strands, while RNA genes (tRNA, rRNA, tmRNA, and ncRNA) and other annotated features are indicated by different colors as shown in the legend. The genome scale (Mbp) is displayed around the map. Genome maps were generated using the Proksee.

TABLE 2.

Genomic comparative features among B. velezenis BP5, BP103, 160, and B. subtilis DSM10.

Genome characteristics B.velezensis BP5 B.velezensis BP103 B.velezensis 160 B.subtilis DSM10
Accession number CDRNYM010000000 (ENA) CDRNYL010000000 (ENA) CP119675.1 (NCBI) CP120681.2 (NCBI)
Size (base pairs) 4,078,673 3,906,643 4,296,610 4,295,479
DNA G+C (%) 46.04% 46.46% 45.85% 43.34%
Total genes 4223 3877 4337 4534
Protein encoding genes 4047 3793 4239 4411
Prophage 5 2 11 4
Pseudo genes 64 66 71 124
rRNA 3 3 5 30
ncRNA 4 4 4 4
tRNA 74 76 88 88

The whole genomic data obtained in the Data availability statement.

Compared to B. velezensis 160, BP5 and BP103 exhibit smaller genomes, higher G+C content, and reduced counts of genes, prophages, pseudogenes, rRNA, and tRNA, indicating a more constrained functional capacity. Notably, all four strains (BP5, BP103, 160, and B. subtilis DSM10) share 4 ncRNA genes, highlighting conserved regulatory mechanisms, yet BP5 and BP103 have fewer tRNA genes (74 and 76) than DSM10 and 160 (both 88), alongside smaller genomes and lower gene counts, implying a lower degree of functional diversity and evolutionary differentiation.

3.5. Bacillus velezensis BP5 and BP103: identification via phylogenetic and ANI analysis

The phylogenetic tree constructed from whole-genome sequences of B. velezensis strains, with B. subtilis DSM10 (CP120681.2) as an outgroup, revealed a close evolutionary relationship among BP5, BP103, and B. velezensis 160 (Supplementary Figure S1). Average nucleotide identity (ANI) values (Figure 5) ranged from 84.1% relative to the outgroup B. subtilis DSM10 to 99.4% among the B. velezensis strains, indicating high genetic similarity within this species. The genomes of BP5 and BP103 showed 98.6% ANI to each other, while BP5 and BP103 exhibited ANI values of 99.4 and 98.6%, respectively, to B. velezensis 160. These high ANI values are consistent with their classification as B. velezensis, and only minor differences in relatedness to strain 160 were observed.

FIGURE 5.

Heatmap showing average nucleotide identity (ANI) percentages between various Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus velezensis strains, with values color-coded from purple to yellow based on similarity, and strain names listed along horizontal and vertical axes.

Heatmap of average nucleotide identity (ANI) values for whole-genome comparisons of antagonistic strains BP5 and BP103, B. subtilis DSM10 (outgroup), 25 closely related B. velezensis strains.

3.6. Gene function and protein domain annotation

Genomic functional analysis revealed a very high degree of similarity between BP5 and BP103. In the COG classification (Supplementary Figures S2A,B), the largest category corresponded to functions unknown (941 families in BP5 and 931 in BP103), followed by transcription and amino acid transport and metabolism. BP5 contained a slightly higher number of COG families related to DNA replication, recombination, and repair (approximately 20 more families), secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism (about 10 more families), and cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis (about 9 more families) than BP103. GO (Supplementary Figures S2C,D) primarily distributes between BP5 and BP103 in biological process (765 families in BP5 and 755 families in BP103), molecular function (738 vs. 736 families), and cellular component (655 vs. 653 families), with metabolic process, catalytic activity, and cellular process prominent; BP5 slightly leads in biological/cellular process (more 6–10 families). KEGG (Supplementary Figures S2E,F) shows similarity in metabolic pathways, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites/antibiotics, and microbial metabolism in diverse environments. Comparison with reference strains BP5 and BP103 have fewer genes than YC89 but excel in antibiotic biosynthesis, secondary metabolites, and microbial metabolism functions, while Lzh-5 is rich in carbohydrate, amino acid, cofactor, and vitamin metabolism, and membrane transport. In future work, statistical tests could be applied to assess the significance of these differences.

Within the secondary metabolite biosynthesis/transport/catabolism category from COG analysis, which is more abundant in BP5 than in BP103 (Supplementary Table S1), BP5 harbored several gene families associated with secondary metabolite biosynthesis. These included genes annotated as srfAA and srfAB, encoding subunits of surfactin synthase belonging to a nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) system and involved in the biosynthesis of the lipopeptide surfactin; two genes encoding type I polyketide synthases that catalyze polyketide biosynthesis, a diverse group of secondary metabolites; and a gene annotated as yoaI, assigned to COG2368, which is predicted to encode an aromatic ring hydroxylase/dioxygenase based on sequence homology and COG classification. The specific role of this gene in BP5 will need to be further confirmed experimentally in future studies.

Protein counts for the 20 most common Pfam domains in BP5 and BP103 (Figure 6A) are highly conserved, with most Pfams differing by fewer than two proteins between strains. Only the “Phosphopantetheine attachment site” domain showed a small difference, with BP103 (96 proteins) exceeding BP5 (91 proteins). This domain is typically associated with NRPS and PKS enzymes; however, the functional relevance of this minor difference remains unclear and needs to be further verified by additional analyses, such as biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) analysis.

FIGURE 6.

Bar chart labeled A compares the number of proteins with specific functional domains in BP5 (orange) and BP103 (blue), showing the highest counts for Phosphopantetheine attachment site, ABC transporter, and Major Facilitator Superfamily. Scatter plot labeled B visualizes the relationship between protein length and domain count for BP5 and BP103, indicating a positive correlation for both datasets.

Protein domain characteristics between B. velezensis BP5 and BP103. (A) Comparison of Top 20 Pfam Domains between B. velezensis BP5 and BP103. (B) Scatter Plot Comparing Protein Length and Domain Count in BP5 and BP103.

The relationship between protein length and domain count in BP5 and BP103 (Figure 6B) follows a linear trend: longer proteins tend to contain more domains. The data distribution is quite consistent, as indicated by nearly overlapping regression lines, reflecting a high similarity in domain structure between the two strains. Outlier proteins in BP103 suggest that this strain has greater potential for enzyme functional diversity, especially in complex secondary biosynthetic processes. The comparison of large proteins ( > 2000 aa) between BP5 and BP103 reveals only a few notable differences, mainly involving NRPSs and domain-rich proteins (Supplementary Table S3). Bacillomycin-like NRPS proteins are generally conserved in length and domain architecture, with BamB-like NRPS/PKS proteins being almost identical between BP5 and BP103, whereas a single NRPS protein with similarity to BamC at the protein/domain level was detected only in BP103. However, the presence of a complete bacillomycin biosynthetic gene cluster still needs to be investigated further. In addition, BP103 harbors an extra large NRPS (3591 aa) and an NTTRR-F1 domain-containing protein (approximately 2294 aa) that are not detected in BP5, suggesting BP103-specific large proteins. Conversely, BP5 possesses a large, domain-rich protein (approximately 2343 aa) that is absent from BP103, indicating a BP5-specific large protein. These subtle, strain-specific differences may underlie fine-scale variation in secondary metabolite repertoires or environmental adaptation of BP5 and BP103, but functional confirmation will require more detailed domain-level analyses.

3.7. Genetic diversity analysis based on ortholog genes and pangenome

BP5 and BP103 each possess 2,593 single-copy orthologs, comparable to other B. velezensis strains in the dataset, reflecting a high level of species-level genetic conservation. In the phylogenomic tree (Figure 7A), BP5 and BP103 are part of a closely related sub-cluster within the B. velezensis clade; the internal branch lengths separating BP5, BP103, and strain 160 range from approximately 4 × 10−3 to 6.7 × 10−3 substitutions per site, indicating a much closer evolutionary relationship among BP5, BP103, and 160 than between this group and the other B. velezensis genomes (Figure 7A). However, BP103 has fewer multi-copy orthologs (336) and other orthologs (763) compared to BP5 (388 and 910, respectively) and most other strains (Supplementary Table S3). In contrast, BP5 has a higher number of unique paralogs (5) than BP103 (1), suggesting that BP5 has acquired a small set of strain-specific genes, although these still represent only a minor fraction of the genome (Figure 7C). The pan-genome analysis of BP5, BP103, B. subtilis DSM10 and 25 additional B. velezensis strains showed a decreasing core-genome curve and an increasing pan-genome curve as more genomes were added (Figure 7B). The core-genome size gradually decreased while the pan-genome size increased as more genomic data were added. This reflects the increasing number of gene families with each addition of B. velezensis genomic data to the analysis. Overall, BP5 and BP103 maintain a closely related orthogroup structure, but BP5 exhibits a more pronounced trend toward genetic divergence.

FIGURE 7.

Panel A presents a phylogenetic tree of Bacillus species on the left, each with a corresponding bar to the right categorizing gene families as single-copy orthologs (purple), multi-copy orthologs (blue), other orthologs (cyan), and unique paralogs (green) using a horizontal stacked bar chart. Panel B displays a line chart with the number of gene families on the y-axis and the number of genomes on the x-axis, showing pan-genome (blue line) and core-genome (red line) sizes, each with shaded confidence intervals. Panel C features a circular diagram presenting 2,593 core genes at the center, surrounded by spiked edges labeled with Bacillus strains.

Orthology-based genetic diversity and pan-genome structure of B. velezensis strains BP5 and BP103. (A) Orthogroup classification of genomes from B. velezensis BP5, BP103 and related strains. (B) Analysis of pan-genome and core-genome of 28 Bacillus strains. (C) Consistent with the flower plot, BP5 contained five unique paralogous orthogroups (10 CDS total; two copies per orthogroup), whereas BP103 contained one unique paralogous orthogroup (2 CDS total). Functional annotation of these unique paralogs showed that BP5-specific orthogroups include a phage-associated tail tape measure protein (OG0005197; two copies), a cell-wall remodeling enzyme annotated as a transglycosylase carrying an SLT domain together with a hypothetical protein harboring a DUF/hydrolase-like region (OG0005203; one copy each), and proteins with predicted secondary-metabolism–related domains, including a ketoreductase (OG0005209; two copies) and condensation domain-containing proteins (OG0005210; two copies), as well as an additional hypothetical protein orthogroup (OG0005211; two copies). In contrast, BP103 harbored a single unique paralogous orthogroup annotated as condensation domain-containing proteins (OG0005183; two copies), but a direct functional link between these phage-related paralogs and prophage content has not yet been demonstrated.

The distribution of gene families across the genomes of B. velezensis BP5 and BP103 and related B. velezensis strains (Supplementary Figure S3) reveals that most genes belong to the persistent group (core genes), indicating a high degree of conservation between the two microbial strains. Gene families unique to each genome are represented, corresponding to cloud or shell genes (Figure 8A). Specifically, BP5 contains 456 shell gene families absent in BP103, whereas BP103 has 203 shell gene families (Figure 8B). Overall, while BP5 and BP103 share a highly conserved orthogroup structure, BP5 shows a slightly greater tendency toward genetic divergence driven by unique paralogs and cloud genes.

FIGURE 8.

Panel A shows a heat map of gene families across BP5 and BP103 genomes, color-coded by presence, absence, and multicopy, and classified by family partition into cloud, shell, and persistent groups. Panel B is a Venn diagram illustrating shared and unique gene families: BP5 has 456 unique genes, BP103 has 203 unique genes, and 3,522 genes are shared between both, with respective percentages shown in each section.

Distribution and comparison of gene families in B. velezensis strains BP5 and BP103. (A) Heatmap of orthogroup in B. velezensis BP5 and BP103 genomes, with gene family and strain-specific annotations. (B) The Venn diagram depicts the core and unique gene families between B. velezensis BP5 and BP103.

Genome analysis of strains BP5 and BP103 reveals that they share 3,593 core gene families, indicating high conservation of essential functions and strong genetic similarity (Table 3), and this value is comparable in magnitude to previously reported core genome sizes for B. velezensis, suggesting that BP5 and BP103 are representative members of the species complex, although no formal statistical comparison was performed. Among these, the hypothetical/unknown (844 genes, 23.96%) and Other (792 genes, 22.49%) groups account for nearly 50%, highlighting that many fundamental genes remain insufficiently annotated. Although the “hypothetical/unknown” fraction appears large, it mainly reflects the presence of widely conserved hypothetical proteins in the B. velezensis pan-genome, many of which are also annotated as hypothetical in reference genomes and curated databases. In addition, the “Miscellaneous functional classes” (Other) category aggregates diverse low-frequency functional classes that do not fit into the major groups defined in our manual classification scheme. Together, these categories indicate that a substantial proportion of core genes in B. velezensis remain incompletely characterized at the functional level. Genes related to energy/central metabolism (408 genes, 11.58%), Protein secretion/export (359 genes, 10.19%), transcriptional regulation (215 genes, 6.10%), DNA replication/repair (121 genes, 3.44%), and transporters (81 genes, 3.30%) are highly represented, supporting the core functions of B. velezensis. Additionally, cell wall proteins (50 genes, 1.42%), stress response/chaperones (37 genes, 1.05%), and anti-phage defense (9 genes, 0.26%) contribute to basic adaptive capabilities. Notably, the sporulation group (352 genes, 9.99%) and secondary metabolites (NRPS/PKS, 55 genes, 1.56%) enhance survival and biocontrol potential in B. velezensis.

TABLE 3.

Distribution of functional groups in the core genome.

Functional group Number of core families Percentage in core (%)
Hypothetical/unknown 844 23.96
Miscellaneous functional classes 792 22.49
Energy and central metabolism 408 11.58
Protein secretion/export 359 10.19
Sporulation 352 9.99
Transcription/Regulation 215 6.10
Translation/Ribosome 149 4.23
DNA replication/repair 121 3.44
Transporters 81 2.30
Secondary metabolites (NRPS/PKS) 55 1.56
Cell wall/envelope 50 1.42
Membrane proteins 37 1.05
Stress response/chaperones 30 0.85
Cell division 20 0.57
Defense (anti-phage) 9 0.26

Analysis of the distribution of functional genes within the unique gene sets of strains BP5 and BP103 (Supplementary Tables S4, S5) revealed a similar overall pattern, which was dominated by genes encoding hypothetical or uncharacterized proteins. This category accounted for 365 genes in BP5 and 132 genes in BP103. Meanwhile, the remaining unique genes of both strains were assigned to several fundamental functional groups. Specifically, BP5 contained higher numbers of genes involved in genetic information processing (28 vs. 13 genes in BP103), metabolism/secondary metabolites (23 vs. 15 genes), and mobile genetic elements/phages (5 vs. 1 gene). In contrast, BP103 possessed more genes related to signal transduction/defense mechanisms (22 vs. 18 genes in BP5) and cellular processes/transport (20 vs. 17 genes). Although BP5 harbors a larger number of unique genes (456 vs. 203 in BP103), the two strains still exhibit distinct functional characteristics. While our analysis of the functional categories of these unique genes is based only on manual functional classification, the observed differences are purely descriptive and will require further validation through a formal functional enrichment test.

Consistent with these functional assignments, the genes involved in secondary metabolite biosynthesis in both BP5 and BP103 indicate that these strains possess substantial potential for producing antibacterial peptides. In BP5, the presence of BP5_CDS_2286 (tyrocidine synthase 3) together with BP5_CDS_2287 (linear gramicidin synthase subunit D) suggests the capacity to generate both cyclic and linear peptides with strong antibiotic activity. Notably, tyrocidine and gramicidin are primarily known from Brevibacillus brevis, and the presence of homologous genes in B. velezensis BP5 may reflect acquisition through horizontal gene transfer, which will require further functional validation in future studies. By contrast, BP103 carries biosynthetic genes associated with the lantibiotic mersacidin and enzymes involved in its post-translational modification and maturation. In addition, genes related to the synthesis of linear gramicidin-like peptides were also detected, together with a gene currently annotated as an indolmycin-related methyltransferase homolog. The presence of these homologous genes and the putative genetic basis for the synthesis of mersacidin, gramicidin, and indolmycin will require confirmation by future comparative genomics and functional/metabolomic analyses.

3.8. Prediction of secondary metabolite gene clusters in B. velezensis BP5 and BP103

The biosynthetic gene clusters of B. velezensis BP5 and BP103 were identified using antiSMASH. Both BP5 and BP103 carry 13 secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters with conserved genetic organization (Table 4 and Supplementary Table S6). In line with this species-wide pattern, BP5 and BP103 each harbor 13 BGCs, positioning them toward the lower end of the reported BGC range for B. velezensis. Based on these predictions, the two strains display broad biosynthetic potential for characteristic Bacillus antibiotics, including surfactin, fengycin, bacillaene, macrolactin, difficidin, bacilysin, mersacidin, bacillibactin, and locillomycin. BP5 and BP103 also contain four distinct terpene and PKS-type gene clusters (clusters 4, 5, 9, and 11) that show no significant similarity to known BGCs. Consistent with this, genome mining using antiSMASH did not reveal a canonical, complete bacillomycin biosynthetic gene cluster in either BP5 or BP103. Overall, the presence of these predicted BGCs indicates substantial biosynthetic potential, which will require experimental validation of the corresponding metabolite production through LC-MS analyses and bioassay-guided fractionation.

TABLE 4.

Comparative analysis of secondary metabolite gene clusters among B. velezensis BP5, BP103.

Gene cluster Type Size (nt) Most similar cluster Bioactivity Presence (+) or absence (−)
BP103 BP5
1 NRPS + betalactone 86,792 Fengycin Antibacterial and antifungal + +
2 TransAT-PKS + NRPS + NRPS-like + T3PKS 110,124 Bacillaene Antibacterial and antifungal + +
3 TransAT-PKS 88,201 Macrolactin H Antibacterial + +
4 Terpene 20,740 –a –a + +
5 PKS-like 41,245 – – + +
6 Terpene-precursor + NRP-metallophore + NRPS + RiPP 65,361 Bacillibactin Ron-acquisition and antibacterial + +
7 Other 41,419 Bacilysin Antibacterial + +
8 Lanthipeptide-class-II 23,189 Mersacidin Antibacterial + +
9 T3PKS 41,101 – – + +
10 TransAT-PKS 106,167 Difficidin Antibacterial + +
11 Terpene-precursor 20,891 – – + +
12 NRPS 65,411 Surfactin Antibacterial + +
13 NRPS + transAT-PKS 77,727 Locillomycin (B/C) Antifungal + +

The “Type” column was standardized using the “A + B” notation for hybrid/multi-class BGCs, and genomic coordinates together with homology metrics (antiSMASH/MIBiG similarity, %) were added for the four previously unassigned terpene/PKS-related clusters (clusters 4, 5, 9, and 11).

aNo matching items.

3.9. Characterization of the CAZyme repertoire in the genomes of Bacillus velezensis BP5 and BP103

Among the six Bacillus strains examined, B. velezensis BP5 possesses 133 CAZyme genes, slightly more than the commercial strain FZB42 (129 genes), while BP103 has 129 genes, equivalent to FZB42 (Supplementary Table S7 and Figure 9). BP5 exceeds BP103 by exactly four genes due to higher numbers of GH (2), CBM (1), and CE (1), mainly reflecting additional assignments to GH23, CE12, and CBM50; meanwhile, the GT, PL, and AA families are identical across all three strains. The number of CBMs is also noteworthy, with BP5 (29) and BP103 (28) both exceeding the commercial strain FZB42 (27 CBMs). Overall, BP5 and BP103 display CAZyme profiles that are broadly comparable to FZB42. The enzymatic potential of these genes will need to be verified through enzyme activity assays and in planta performance tests.

FIGURE 9.

Bar chart comparing the counts of six gene categories (GH, GT, CE, PL, AA, CBM) across six Bacillus strains, with total counts above each group; GH and GT have the highest counts throughout.

CAZyme family composition in the genomes of B. velezensis BP5, BP103, and related strains. The six major enzyme families are displayed with different colors with GH (glycoside hydrolases), GT (glycosyltransferases), CE (carbohydrate esterases), PL (polysaccharide lyases), AA (auxiliary activities), CBM (carbohydrate-binding modules).

4. Discussion

In recent years, biological control has become a major research focus in sustainable agriculture due to its safety, environmental friendliness, and potential to replace chemical pesticides (Yang et al., 2023). Among biological control agents, B. velezensis is widely recognized for its high genetic stability, broad environmental distribution, and important roles in promoting plant growth and suppressing pathogens (Ye et al., 2018). Furthermore, this species is capable of synthesizing diverse array of bioactive compounds, including lipopeptides, polyketones, antimicrobial peptides, and volatile compounds, which contribute to increased crop yields and reduction of diseases caused by microorganisms. In addition, the pathogen suppression mechanisms of B. velezensis are further supported by extracellular enzymes such as protease, cellulase, and amylase, which can degrade and disrupt the cell wall structure of pathogens. Finally, genome analysis of novel strains provides genetic insights into these traits (Shen et al., 2013).

In the present study, two B. velezensis strains, BP5 and BP103, isolated from the rhizosphere of healthy pepper plants, exhibited strong antagonism against Xanthomonas sp., the primary causal agent of bacterial leaf spot on pepper in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. In vitro screening revealed that both BP5 and BP103 possess a broad spectrum of biological activities, including the production of hydrolytic enzymes (protease, lipase, amylase, and cellulase) and iron mobilization via siderophores. These traits are known to support metabolic functions and iron competition (Maheshwari, 2013); however, their specific quantitative contribution to the Xanthomonas inhibition observed for BP5 and BP103 still requires further validation. Previous studies have consistently highlighted the efficacy of Bacillus strains in suppressing plant-associated bacterial pathogens (Marin et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2023; Chandwani et al., 2024). Moreover, accumulating evidence further underscores B. velezensis as a species with substantial potential in integrated pest management (Rabbee et al., 2023). In future studies, in vitro and in planta assays could be conducted using cell-free extracts of hydrolytic enzymes and siderophores derived from BP5 and BP103 to more directly assess their potential role in antagonism against Xanthomonas pathogens. In addition, mutant strains lacking relevant genes could be generated to investigate the antagonistic role of these compounds.

Whole-genome analysis of BP5 and BP103 confirmed their taxonomic identity. Compared to the reference strains B. velezensis FZB42 and B. subtilis DSM10, the genomes of BP5 and BP103, in terms of length, G+C content, number of protein-coding genes, and prophage regions, appear more compact, with fewer predicted prophages and pseudogenes. Although this genomic pattern is consistent with a tendency toward increased genetic stability and a potential reduction in horizontal gene transfer events, additional experimental validation is still required. Moreover, whole-genome-based phylogenetic analysis placed BP5, BP103, and strain 160 (González-Léon et al., 2024) within the same clade, confirming their close genetic relatedness within B. velezensis.

Comparative genome analysis indicated that BP5 and BP103 share typical B. velezensis features, with genome sizes ranging from 3.9 to 4.2 Mb, G+C content of 46–47%, 3,900–4,200 protein-coding genes, and 2–19 prophage regions (Tang et al., 2025). These findings are consistent with reports for other strains such as K12 (Tang et al., 2025), S141 (Sibponkrung et al., 2017), EB14 (Sachin et al., 2021), and HNA3 (Zaid et al., 2022). In contrast, BP5 and BP103 possess fewer genes than FZB42 (4,231–4,337 genes) (Fan et al., 2018). The low numbers of predicted prophages (5 in BP5; 2 in BP103) indicate relatively compact genomes. These observations support the view that B. velezensis forms a relatively cohesive genetic group (Dunlap et al., 2016; Fan et al., 2017).

Moreover, Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) analysis and orthologous gene comparison confirmed that ANI values for BP5 and BP103 against 25 other B. velezensis strains are all above 97%, unequivocally supporting their assignment to this species. Pan-genome analysis of 28 genomes, including the two study strains, B. subtilis DSM10, and 25 B. velezensis representatives, indicated with core-gene numbers decreasing as new genomes were added (Kadiri et al., 2023).

Besides, genomic functional analyses (COG, GO, KEGG, Pfam) showed that BP5 and BP103 have highly similar functional profiles. The genomic features of BP5, as inferred from functional annotation, are consistent with a relatively greater potential for genetic stability, secondary metabolite synthesis, and cell wall biogenesis, whereas BP103 generally encodes longer proteins with greater domain diversity, suggesting an enhanced potential for complex enzymes. Compared with other B. velezensis strains, BP5 and BP103 displayed functional profiles similar to HNA3 in amino acid transport/metabolism, transcription, carbohydrate metabolism, and secondary metabolite synthesis, while harboring fewer annotated genes in these categories (Zaid et al., 2022), indicating a more compact genetic repertoire. Similar to B. velezensis YC89 (Xie et al., 2023), and D103 (Yang et al., 2023), both strains also harbor a substantial number of genes with unknown function.

BP5, BP103, and the other B. velezensis strains in the dataset share 3,593 core gene families across the 28 genomes analyzed. Of these, 2,593 are present as single-copy orthologous genes in each genome, representing a conservative core genome, while the remaining core families include genes with multiple copies per genome. BP5 contains more multi-copy orthologs and unique orthologs than BP103, indicating higher genetic diversity in BP5. Among these core gene families, two functional groups, sporulation and secondary metabolites (NRPS/PKS), support biocontrol in B. velezensis (Zeriouh et al., 2014; Kadiri et al., 2023). Specifically, the spo0A_1 gene, which encodes Spo0A (and its promoter site 0A1) at loci BP5_CDS_1743 (BVE_01762) and BP103_CDS_2422 (BVE_02442), regulates sporulation initiation and may directly or indirectly control over 500 genes during the early stages of sporulation (Jun et al., 2025), while also influencing antagonism against other Bacillus strains (Shao et al., 2022). Recent genome and pan-genome studies have clarified the distribution of core, accessory, and unique genes across B. velezensis strains, providing a foundation for exploiting antagonistic traits to improve plant disease management through biocontrol bacteria (Kadiri et al., 2023).

Based on the unique genes, both BP5 and BP103 exhibit strong potential for antimicrobial peptide biosynthesis but with different characteristic configurations. In BP5, genes annotated as tyrocidine synthase 3 and as a subunit of a linear gramicidin–like synthetase system were identified based on sequence homology. However, tyrocidine and gramicidin are typically produced by Brevibacillus brevis and have not been reported in B. velezensis. Therefore, these annotations likely reflect homologous NRPS-related genes, and their functional roles require further experimental validation. These two types of peptides are typically produced by Brevibacillus brevis, contributing to broad-spectrum antibacterial and antifungal antagonistic activity (Nakano and Zuber, 1990; Yang et al., 2025). In contrast, BP103 possesses a diverse “reservoir” of biosynthetic genes, including those associated with the lantibiotic mersacidin and enzymes involved in its post-translational modification and maturation. In addition, genes related to linear gramicidin–like peptide synthesis and an indolmycin-related methyltransferase homolog, require confirmation by future comparative genomics and functional/metabolomic analyses.

In addition, secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) analysis revealed that both BP5 and BP103 possess 13 complete clusters encoding potent antimicrobial compounds, including surfactin (Gao et al., 2017), fengycin (Pajčin et al., 2020; Medeot et al., 2023), bacillaene (Patel et al., 1995; Butcher et al., 2007), macrolactin (Rabbee et al., 2019), difficidin (Chen et al., 2006, 2007; Wu et al., 2015), bacilysin (Wu et al., 2015; Özcengiz and Öğülür, 2015), bacillibactin (Miethke et al., 2006; Wen et al., 2011), mersacidin, and locillomycin. The repertoire of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) varies among B. velezensis strains and contributes to their antimicrobial activity (Palazzini et al., 2016). Although many BGCs are shared across the Bacillus genus, certain clusters are strain-specific within B. velezensis (Cai et al., 2017). The presence of clusters encoding difficidin, macrolactin, and bacillaen, macrolactin, and bacillaene gene clusters reaffirms the genetic signatures of B. velezensis (Fan et al., 2017; Sachin et al., 2021; González-Léon et al., 2024). Four unidentified terpene and PKS clusters could potentially contribute to antibacterial effects or other bioactive roles (Spantidos et al., 2025). They require isolation, extraction, and further inhibition assays in future studies.

Notably, both strains harbor distinct clusters for mersacidin and locillomycin (B/C), which are absent in strain FZB42 [lacking locillomycin (B/C)] (Herzner et al., 2011; Fan et al., 2018), and 160 (lacking mersacidin) (González-Léon et al., 2024). Mersacidin, a class II lanthipeptide, inhibits Gram-positive bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding lipid II and blocking glycosyl transfer during peptidoglycan formation (Brötz et al., 1995; Viel et al., 2021). Locillomycins are cyclic lipopeptides with potent antibacterial activity (Luo et al., 2015, 2019). Lipopeptides produced by related Bacillus and Virgibacillus strains that harbor locillomycin gene clusters show significant biosurfactant properties, strong reduction of oil–water interfacial tension and 100% emulsification index (Pereira et al., 2019; Essghaier et al., 2024). As no canonical, complete bacillomycin biosynthetic gene cluster was identified, BP5 and BP103 are considered to lack gene clusters for iturin family members (Cao et al., 2018; Choi et al., 2021; Zaid et al., 2022), as well as amylocyclicin, plantazolicin, kijanimicin, butirosin, and certain other bacteriocins reported in different B. velezensis strains (Chen L. et al., 2018; Wang K. X. et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2023; Zaid et al., 2022), highlighting distinct secondary metabolite profiles among strains.

Regarding polymer degradation capacity, BP5 encodes 133 carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), only slightly more than the commercial strain FZB42 (129 genes), while BP103 has 129 genes, equivalent to FZB42. These enzymes cleave polysaccharide bonds in plant- and soil-derived polymers and enable utilization of diverse carbon sources, thereby contributing to nutrient acquisition in the rhizosphere environment, rather than directly lysing the peptidoglycan-based cell walls of bacterial pathogens (Hibbing et al., 2010). Biochemical assays independently confirmed the production of extracellular protease, lipase, amylase, cellulase, and siderophores, supporting the contribution of multiple enzymatic activities and nutritional competition mechanisms to antagonism, in addition to the CAZyme repertoire. Notably, BP5 exhibits a somewhat higher abundance of GH, CE, and CBM family genes than BP103, which may provide additional capacity for surface adhesion and carbohydrate turnover; however, the functional impact of this difference remains uncertain. Specifically, BP5 shows a net increase of four CAZyme modules relative to BP103 (GH +2, CE +1, CBM +1; Figure 8), mainly reflecting additional assignments to GH23, CE12, and CBM50. These families are consistent with potential enhancement of carbohydrate binding/adhesion (CBM50) and hydrolytic activity toward cell wall–associated or extracellular carbohydrate substrates (GH23/CE12), but such links are currently hypothetical and require experimental validation, and no direct competition assays with Xanthomonas have yet been performed.

Overall, the two B. velezensis strains BP5 and BP103 possess 13 biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) for secondary metabolites, which encode characteristic antimicrobial compounds capable of inhibiting plant pathogens. Moreover, BP5 is distinguished by 133 CAZymes (four more modules than BP103), which are consistent with potential hydrolytic activity toward carbohydrate substrates, as well as with enhanced rhizosphere adhesion and nutrient acquisition, although these ecological roles currently remain hypothetical and require experimental verification.

In future studies, the functions inferred from the CAZyme repertoire, secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), and hydrolytic enzymes and siderophores of BP5 and BP103 should be experimentally validated. Specifically, they should be evaluated through in vitro and in planta assays using cell-free extracts, combined with the construction of mutant strains lacking the corresponding genes to clarify their roles in suppressing Xanthomonas. In parallel, metabolites encoded by the predicted BGCs, particularly tyrocidine/gramicidin-like clusters, should be identified by LC–MS analysis and bioassays to confirm their biosynthetic capacity and associated biological functions. Comprehensive genomic characterization of promising strains such as BP5 and BP103 will support the design of more precise disease management strategies and the development of safe, effective microbial-based agents; overall, these two strains represent promising candidates for managing bacterial leaf spot on pepper, with potential applications as bacterial biomass or as sources of bioactive metabolites.

5. Conclusion

This study comprehensively characterized the genomes of two B. velezensis strains, BP5 and BP103, isolated from the rhizosphere soil of peppers in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. The results strongly confirm their promising biocontrol potential against X. euvesicatoria, the causal agent of BSP in peppers. Dual-culture antagonism assays revealed the largest inhibition zones for BP5, surpassing both BP103 and oxolinic acid. Both strains produce abundant extracellular enzymes (protease, lipase, amylase, cellulase) and siderophores, facilitating nutrient competition and nutrient competition.

Whole-genome sequencing demonstrated compact, genetically stable genomes with high nucleotide similarity to B. velezensis, most closely related to reference strain 160. Ortholog analysis showed BP5 enriched in multi-copy orthologs and unique paralogs; the pangenome further highlighted pronounced genetic divergence in BP5, suggesting potential for environmental adaptability. Notably, both strains encode numerous secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), including BGCs encoding mersacidin and locillomycin (B/C) clusters, along with four previously undescribed terpene/PKS clusters. BP5 possesses a more abundant CAZyme repertoire than both BP103 and the commercial reference strain FZB42.

These findings establish BP5 and BP103 as highly promising, genetically stable biocontrol agents with diverse secondary metabolite profiles. Future studies should prioritize field efficacy trials and functional characterization of the novel bioactive compounds to fully realize their agricultural potential.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Education and Training for their financial support.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research is supported by the project B2023.SPD.05.

Edited by: Mubasher Hussain, Guangdong Pest control Engineering and Technology Center, China

Reviewed by: Mariela I. Monteoliva, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Argentina

Sonia Irigoyen, Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Weslaco, United States

Meenakshi Agarwal, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, United States

Agustín Luna Bulbarela, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/GCA_977019115; https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/GCA_977019105.

Author contributions

LT: Conceptualization, Resources, Validation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Methodology, Data curation. VT: Formal analysis, Validation, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Visualization. TH: Validation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Visualization. TP: Writing – review & editing. HT: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. LL: Investigation, Validation, Conceptualization, Supervision, Resources, Visualization, Writing – review & editing, Software, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Methodology.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1757903/full#supplementary-material

Image_1.tif (11.6MB, tif)
Image_2.tif (261.9KB, tif)
Image_3.tif (732.9KB, tif)
Table_1.docx (1.6MB, docx)
Table_2.docx (83.6KB, docx)
Table_3.xlsx (58.5KB, xlsx)

References

  1. Akhter S., Aziz R. K., Edwards R. A. (2012). PhiSpy: A novel algorithm for finding prophages in bacterial genomes that combines similarity-and composition-based strategies. Nucleic Acids Res 40 e126–e126. 10.1093/nar/gks406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ariffin H., Abdullah N., Md Shah U. K., Shirai Y., Hassan M. A. (2006). Production and characterization of cellulases by Bacillus pumilus EB3. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 3 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  3. Blumenscheit C., Jähne J., Schneider A., Blom J., Schweder T., Lasch P., et al. (2022). Genome sequence data of Bacillus velezensis BP1.2A and BT2.4. Data Brief. 41:107978. 10.1016/j.dib.2022.107978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brötz H., Bierbaum G., Markus A., Molitor E., Sahl H. G. (1995). Mode of action of the lantibiotic mersacidin: Inhibition of peptidoglycan biosynthesis via a novel mechanism? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39 714–719. 10.1128/aac.39.3.714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Butcher R. A., Schroeder F. C., Fischbach M. A., Straight P. D., Kolter R., Walsh C. T., et al. (2007). The identification of bacillaene, the product of the PksX mega complex in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 104 1506–1509. 10.1073/pnas.0610503104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cai X. C., Liu C. H., Wang B. T., Xue Y. R. (2017). Genomic and metabolic traits endow Bacillus velezensis CC09 with a potential biocontrol agent in control of wheat powdery mildew disease. Microbiol. Res. 196 89–94. 10.1016/j.micres.2016.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Camacho C., Coulouris G., Avagyan V., Ma N., Papadopoulos J., Bealer K., et al. (2009). BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cao Y., Pi H., Chandrangsu P., Li Y., Wang Y., Zhou H., et al. (2018). Antagonism of two plant-growth promoting Bacillus velezensis isolates against Ralstonia solanacearum and Fusarium oxysporum. Sci. Rep. 8:4360. 10.1038/s41598-018-22782-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Caulier S., Nannan C., Gillis A., Licciardi F., Bragard C., Mahillon J. (2019). Overview of the antimicrobial compounds produced by members of the Bacillus subtilis group. Front. Microbiol. 10:302. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chandwani S., Dewala S., Chavan S. M., Paul D., Kumar K., Amaresan N. (2024). Genomic, LC-MS, and FTIR Analysis of plant probiotic potential of Bacillus albus for managing Xanthomonas oryzae via different modes of application in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 16 1541–1552. 10.1007/s12602-023-10120-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen L., Heng J., Qin S., Bian K. (2018). A comprehensive understanding of the biocontrol potential of Bacillus velezensis LM2303 against Fusarium head blight. PLoS One 13:e0198560. 10.1371/journal.pone.0198560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen S., Zhou Y., Chen Y., Gu J. (2018). fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34 i884–i890. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen X. H., Koumoutsi A., Scholz R., Eisenreich A., Schneider K., Heinemeyer I., et al. (2007). Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Nat. Biotechnol. 25 1007–1014. 10.1038/nbt1325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen X. H., Vater J., Piel J., Franke P., Scholz R., Schneider K., et al. (2006). Structural and functional characterization of three polyketide synthase gene clusters in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J. Bacteriol. 188 4024–4036. 10.1128/JB.00052-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Choi J., Nam J., Seo M. H. (2021). Complete genome sequence of Bacillus velezensis NST6 and comparison with the species belonging to operational group B. amyloliquefaciens. Genomics 113 380–386. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. de Castro M. T., de Lima Ferreira A. D. C., do Nascimento I. N., Rocha G. T., Celestino M. F., Freire ÍA., et al. (2025). Endophytic Bacillus spp. of coffee plants (Coffea arabica L.) and its potential in the biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi and Lepidoptera larvae. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 35:8. 10.1186/s41938-025-00846-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dhakal U., Dobhal S., Alvarez A. M., Arif M. (2019). Phylogenetic analyses of Xanthomonads causing bacterial leaf spot of tomato and pepper (Xanthomonas euvesicatoria) revealed homologous populations despite distant geographical distribution. Microorganisms 7:462. 10.3390/microorganisms7100462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dunlap C. A., Kim S. J., Kwon S. W., Rooney A. P. (2016). Bacillus velezensis is not a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; Bacillus methylotrophicus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum and ‘Bacillus oryzicola’ are later heterotypic synonyms of Bacillus velezensis based on phylogenomics. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 66 1212–1217. 10.1099/ijsem.0.000858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Essghaier B., Naccache C., Ben-Miled H., Mottola F., Ben-Mahrez K., Khemakhem M., et al. (2024). Discovery and characterization of novel lipopeptides produced by Virgibacillus massiliensis with biosurfactant and antimicrobial activities. 3 Biotech 14:41. 10.1007/s13205-024-04100-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Etesami H., Jeong B. R., Glick B. R. (2023). Biocontrol of plant diseases by Bacillus spp. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 126:102048. 10.1016/j.pmpp.2023.102048 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fan B., Blom J., Klenk H. P., Borriss R. (2017). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus velezensis, and Bacillus siamensis form an “operational group B. amyloliquefaciens” within the B. subtilis species complex. Front. Microbiol. 8:22. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fan B., Wang C., Song X., Ding X., Wu L., Wu H., et al. (2018). Bacillus velezensis FZB42 in 2018: The Gram-positive model strain for plant growth promotion and biocontrol. Front. Microbiol. 9:2491. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Finn R. D., Bateman A., Clements J., Coggill P., Eberhardt R. Y., Eddy S. R., et al. (2014). Pfam: The protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 42 D222–D230. 10.1093/nar/gkt1223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fira D., Dimkic I., Beric T., Lozo J., Stankovic S. (2018). Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species. J. Biotechnol. 285 44–55. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.07.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gao L., Han J., Liu H., Qu X., Lu Z., Bie X. (2017). Plipastatin and surfactin coproduction by Bacillus subtilis pB2-L and their effects on microorganisms. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 110 1007–1018. 10.1007/s10482-017-0874-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Garrity G. M. (2005). Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology: Volume Two: The Proteobacteria (Part C, eds Brenner D. J., Krieg N. R., Staley J. T. (New York: Springer; ). [Google Scholar]
  27. González-Léon Y., De la Vega-Camarillo E., Ramírez-Vargas R., Anducho-Reyes M. Á, Mercado-Flores Y. (2024). Whole genome analysis of Bacillus velezensis 160, biological control agent of corn head smut. Microbiol. Spectr. 12:e03264-23. 10.1128/spectrum.03264-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Grady E. N., MacDonald J., Ho M. T., Weselowski B., McDowell T., Solomon O., et al. (2019). Characterization and complete genome analysis of the surfactin-producing, plant-protecting bacterium Bacillus velezensis 9D-6. BMC Microbiol. 19:195. 10.1186/s12866-018-1380-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Herzner A. M., Dischinger J., Szekat C., Josten M., Schmitz S., Yakéléba A., et al. (2011). Expression of the lantibiotic mersacidin in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. PLoS One 6:e22389. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hibbing M. E., Fuqua C., Parsek M. R., Peterson S. B. (2010). Bacterial competition: Surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8 15–25. 10.1038/nrmicro2259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jain C., Rodriguez-R L. M., Phillippy A. M., Konstantinidis K. T., Aluru S. (2018). High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 9:5114. 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jang J. O., Kim B., Lee J. B., Joa J., Koh A. (2019). Evaluation of bacterial spot disease of Capsicum annuum L. in drought stress environment by high temperature. Res. Plant Dis. 25 62–70. 10.5423/rpd.2019.25.2.62 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jun J. S., Kang S. J., Hong K. W. (2025). Time-resolved analysis of Bacillus subtilis DB104 Spo0A-mutant transcriptome profile and enhancement of recombinant protein release. J. Microbiol. 63:e2411032. 10.71150/jm.2411032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kadiri M., Sevugapperumal N., Nallusamy S., Ragunathan J., Ganesan M. V., Alfarraj S., et al. (2023). Pan-genome analysis and molecular docking unveil the biocontrol potential of Bacillus velezensis VB7 against Phytophthora infestans. Microbiol. Res. 268:127277. 10.1016/j.micres.2022.127277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kim J.-A., Song J.-S., Kim P. I., Kim D.-H., Kim Y. (2022). Bacillus velezensis TSA32-1 as a promising agent for biocontrol of plant pathogenic fungi. J. Fungi 8:1053. 10.3390/jof8101053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim Y., Koh I., Young Lim M., Chung W. H., Rho M. (2017). Pan-genome analysis of Bacillus for microbiome profiling. Sci. Rep. 7:10984. 10.1038/s41598-017-11385-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. King E. O., Ward M. K., Raney D. E. (1954). Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 44 301–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Köhl J., Kolnaar R., Ravensberg W. J. (2019). Mode of action of microbial biological control agents against plant diseases: Relevance beyond efficacy. Front. Plant Sci. 10:845. 10.3389/fpls.2019.00845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Li S. B., Xu S. R., Zhang R. N., Liu Y., Zhou R. C. (2016). The antibiosis action and rice-induced resistance, mediated by a lipopeptide from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B014, in controlling rice disease caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26 748–756. 10.4014/jmb.1510.10072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Luo C., Chen Y., Liu X., Wang X., Wang X., Li X., et al. (2019). Engineered biosynthesis of cyclic lipopeptide locillomycins in surrogate host Bacillus velezensis FZB42 and derivative strains enhance antibacterial activity. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 103 4467–4481. 10.1007/s00253-019-09784-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Luo C., Liu X., Zhou X., Guo J., Truong J., Wang X., et al. (2015). Unusual biosynthesis and structure of locillomycins from Bacillus subtilis 916. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81 6601–6609. 10.1128/aem.01639-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Maheshwari D. K. (2013). Bacteria in Agrobiology: Disease Management. Berlin: Springer, 10.1007/978-3-642-33639-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Marin V. R., Ferrarezi J. H., Vieira G., Sass D. C. (2019). Recent advances in the biocontrol of Xanthomonas spp. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35:72. 10.1007/s11274-019-2646-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Medeot D., Sannazzaro A., Estrella M. J., Torres Tejerizo G., Contreras-Moreira B., Pistorio M., et al. (2023). Unraveling the genome of Bacillus velezensis MEP218, a strain producing fengycin homologs with broad antibacterial activity: Comprehensive comparative genome analysis. Sci. Rep. 13:22168. 10.1038/s41598-023-49194-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Miethke M., Klotz O., Linne U., May J. J., Beckering C. L., Marahiel M. A. (2006). Ferri-bacillibactin uptake and hydrolysis in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 61 1413–1427. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05319.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Milovanović T., Jelušić A., Iličić R., Trkulja N., Damnjanović J., Adžić S., et al. (2025). Biocontrol potential of indigenous pepper seed Bacillus strains against Xanthomonas euvesicatoria. Pest Manag. Sci. 81:8843. 10.1002/ps.8843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Nakano M. M., Zuber P. (1990). Molecular biology of antibiotic production in Bacillus. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 10 223–240. 10.3109/07388559009038209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Neal M., Brakewood W., Betenbaugh M., Zengler K. (2024). Pan-genome-scale metabolic modeling of Bacillus subtilis reveals functionally distinct groups. MSystems 9:e00923-24. 10.1128/msystems.00923-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Özcengiz G., Öğülür I. (2015). Biochemistry, genetics and regulation of bacilysin biosynthesis and its significance more than an antibiotic. N. Biotechnol. 32 612–619. 10.1016/j.nbt.2015.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pajčin I., Vlajkov V., Frohme M., Grebinyk S., Grahovac M., Mojićević M., et al. (2020). Pepper bacterial spot control by Bacillus velezensis: Bioprocess solution. Microorganisms 8:1463. 10.3390/microorganisms8101463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Palazzini J. M., Dunlap C. A., Bowman M. J., Chulze S. N. (2016). Bacillus velezensis RC 218 as a biocontrol agent to reduce Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol accumulation: Genome sequencing and secondary metabolite cluster profiles. Microbiol. Res. 192 30–36. 10.1016/j.micres.2016.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Pan H. Q., Li Q. L., Hu J. C. (2017). The complete genome sequence of Bacillus velezensis 9912D reveals its biocontrol mechanism as a novel commercial biological fungicide agent. J. Biotechnol. 257 1–10. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.02.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Patel P. S., Huang S., Fisher S., Pirnik D., Aklonis C., Dean L., et al. (1995). Bacillaene, a novel inhibitor of prokaryotic protein synthesis produced by Bacillus subtilis: Production, taxonomy, isolation, physicochemical characterization and biological activity. J. Antibiot. 48 997–1003. 10.7164/antibiotics.48.997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pei D., Zhang Q., Zhu X., Yao X., Zhang L. (2023). The complete genome sequence resource of rhizospheric soil-derived Bacillus velezensis Yao, with biocontrol potential against Fusarium solani induced pepper root rot. Phytopathology 113 580–583. 10.1094/PHYTO-03-22-0101-A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Pereira J., Ritter A., Cibulski S., Brandelli A. (2019). Functional genome annotation depicts probiotic properties of Bacillus velezensis FTC01. Gene 713:143971. 10.1016/j.gene.2019.143971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rabbee M. F., Ali M. S., Choi J., Hwang B. S., Jeong S. C., Baek K. H. (2019). Bacillus velezensis: A valuable member of bioactive molecules within plant microbiomes. Molecules 24:1046. 10.3390/molecules24061046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rabbee M. F., Hwang B. S., Baek K. H. (2023). Bacillus velezensis: A beneficial biocontrol agent or facultative phytopathogen for sustainable agriculture. Agronomy 13:840. 10.3390/agronomy13030840 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ramnath L., Sithole B., Govinden R. (2017). Identification of lipolytic enzymes isolated from bacteria indigenous to Eucalyptus wood species for application in the pulping industry. Biotechnol. Rep. 15 114–124. 10.1016/j.btre.2017.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rawaliya R. K., Patidar P., Sharma S., Hajela K. (2022). Purification and biochemical characterization of protease from the seeds of Cyamopsis tetragonoloba. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol. 10 172–180. 10.7324/JABB.2022.100223 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ryan R. P., Vorhölter F.-J., Potnis N., Jones J. B., Van Sluys M.-A., Bogdanove A. J., et al. (2011). Pathogenomics of Xanthomonas: Understanding bacterium-plant interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9 344–355. 10.1038/nrmicro2558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sachin N., Tsang A., Uma Shaanker R., Dayanandan S. (2021). Genome sequence resource of Bacillus velezensis EB14, a native endophytic bacterial strain with biocontrol potential against the poplar stem canker causative pathogen, Sphaerulina musiva. Phytopathology 111 890–892. 10.1094/PHYTO-09-20-0433-A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sang M. K., Dutta S., Park K. (2015). Influence of commercial antibiotics on biocontrol of soft rot and plant growth promotion in Chinese cabbages by Bacillus vallismortis EXTN-1 and BS07M. Res. Plant Dis. 21 255–260. 10.5423/RPD.2015.21.4.255 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Schwyn B., Neilands J. B. (1987). Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal. Biochem. 160 47–56. 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Shao J., Liu Y., Xie J., Štefanič P., Lv Y., Fan B., et al. (2022). Annulment of bacterial antagonism improves plant beneficial activity of a Bacillus velezensis consortium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 88:e0024022. 10.1128/aem.00240-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Shen X., Hu H., Peng H., Wang W., Zhang X. (2013). Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas. BMC Genomics 14:271. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Shen Y., Shi Z., Zhao J., Li M., Tang J., Wang N., et al. (2023). Whole genome sequencing provides evidence for Bacillus velezensis SH-1471 as a beneficial rhizosphere bacterium in plants. Sci. Rep. 13:12158. 10.1038/s41598-023-48171-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Shi Z., Hong W., Wang Q. (2022). Complete genome resource of Bacillus velezensis J17-4, an endophyte isolated from stem tissues of rice. Plant Dis. 106 727–729. 10.1094/PDIS-05-21-0996-A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Shin J. W., Yun S. C. (2010). Elevated CO2 and temperature effects on the incidence of four major chili pepper diseases. Plant Pathol. J. 26 178–184. 10.5423/PPJ.2010.26.2.178 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sibponkrung S., Kondo T., Tanaka K., Tittabutr P., Boonkerd N., Teaumroong N., et al. (2017). Genome sequence of Bacillus velezensis S141, a new strain of plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium isolated from soybean rhizosphere. Genome Announc. 5:e01312-17. 10.1128/genomeA.01312-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sonar N. R., Halami P. M. (2014). Phenotypic identification and technological attributes of native lactic acid bacteria present in fermented bamboo shoot products from North-East India. J. Food Sci. Technol. 51 4143–4148. 10.1007/s13197-014-1456-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Spantidos T.-N., Douka D., Katinakis P., Venieraki A. (2025). Genomic insights into plant growth promotion and biocontrol of Bacillus velezensis Amfr20, an olive tree endophyte. Horticulturae 11:384. 10.3390/horticulturae11040384 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Steinig E., Clarke L. (2022). Nanoq: Ultra-fast quality control for nanopore reads. J. Open Source Softw. 7:2991. 10.21105/joss.02991 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Subedi A., Nga N. T. T., Tien D. T. K., Minsavage G. V., Roberts P. D., Goss E. M., et al. (2024). Draft genomes announcement of Vietnamese Xanthomonas euvesicatoria strains causing bacterial spot on pepper. Access Microbiol. 6: 741. 10.1099/acmi.0.000741.v3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Tang Y., Li T., Huang Y., Wu L., Liu X., Yue R., et al. (2025). Comprehensive phenotypic characterization and genomic analysis unveil the probiotic potential of Bacillus velezensis K12. Animals 15:798. 10.3390/ani15060798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Teixeira G. M., Mosela M., Nicoletto M. L. A., Ribeiro R. A., Hungria M., Youssef K., et al. (2021). Genomic insights into the antifungal activity and plant growth-promoting ability in Bacillus velezensis CMRP 4490. Front. Microbiol. 11:618415. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.618415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Thanh U. L. (2022). Isolation and identification of the antagonistic bacteria against Xanthomonas spp. causing the leaf spot from Rosa spp. CTU J. Innov. Sustain. Dev. 14 68–73. 10.22144/ctu.jen.2022.030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Utami D., Meale S. J., Young A. J. (2022). A pan-global study of bacterial leaf spot of chilli caused by Xanthomonas spp. Plants 11:2291. 10.3390/plants11172291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Viel J., Van Tilburg A., Kuipers O. (2021). Characterization of leader processing shows that partially processed mersacidin is activated by AprE after export. Front. Microbiol. 12:765659. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.765659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wang C., Zhao D., Qi G., Mao Z., Hu X., Du B., et al. (2019). Effects of Bacillus velezensis FKM10 for promoting the growth of Malus hupehensis Rehd. and inhibiting Fusarium verticillioides. Front. Microbiol. 10:2889. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Wang K. X., Xu W. H., Chen Z. N., Hu J. L., Luo S. Q., Wang Z. G. (2022). Complete genome sequence of Bacillus velezensis WB, an isolate from the watermelon rhizosphere: Genomic insights into its antifungal effects. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 30 424–429. 10.1016/j.jgar.2022.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Wang Q., Gong Y., Yang Y., Hu H., Zhou R. (2022). Complete genome sequence of antibiotic-producing Bacillus velezensis H208 isolated from ginger rhizosphere in Laifeng County. China. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 11:e00551-22. 10.1128/mra.00551-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Weisburg W. G., Barns S. M., Pelletier D. A., Lane D. J. (1991). 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 173 697–703. 10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Wen Y., Wu X., Teng Y., Qian C., Zhan Z., Zhao Y., et al. (2011). Identification and analysis of the gene cluster involved in biosynthesis of paenibactin, a catecholate siderophore produced by Paenibacillus elgii B69. Environ. Microbiol. 13 2726–2737. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02542.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Wu L., Wu H., Chen L., Yu X., Borriss R., Gao X. (2015). Difficidin and bacilysin from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 have antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae rice pathogens. Sci. Rep. 5:12975. 10.1038/srep12975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Xie L., Liu L., Luo Y., Rao X., Di Y., Liu H., et al. (2023). Complete genome sequence of biocontrol strain Bacillus velezensis YC89 and its biocontrol potential against sugarcane red rot. Front. Microbiol. 14:1180474. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1180474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Xie S., Zang H., Wu H., Uddin Rajer F., Gao X. (2018). Antibacterial effects of volatiles produced by Bacillus strain D13 against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19 49–58. 10.1111/mpp.12494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Yang F., Jiang H., Ma K., Wang X., Liang S., Cai Y., et al. (2023). Genome sequencing and analysis of Bacillus velezensis VJH504 reveal biocontrol mechanism against cucumber Fusarium wilt. Front. Microbiol. 14:1279695. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1279695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Yang W., Bao Q., Wang Y., Xiao L., Zeng Z., Zhou L., et al. (2025). Comparative Genomic Analysis of Brevibacillus brevis: Insights into Pan-Genome Diversity and Biocontrol Potential. Microorganisms 13:2456. 10.3390/microorganisms13112456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Ye M., Tang X., Yang R., Zhang H., Li F., Tao F., et al. (2018). Characteristics and application of a novel species of Bacillus: Bacillus velezensis. ACS Chem. Biol. 13 500–505. 10.1021/acschembio.7b00874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Zaid D. S., Cai S., Hu C., Li Z. (2022). Comparative genome analysis reveals phylogenetic identity of Bacillus velezensis HNA3 and genomic insights into its plant growth promotion and biocontrol effects. Microbiol. Spectr. 10:e02169-21. 10.1128/spectrum.02169-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Zeng Q., Xie J., Li Y., Chen X., Gu X., Yang P., et al. (2021). Organization, evolution and function of fengycin biosynthesis gene clusters in the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens group. Phytopathol. Res. 3:26. 10.1186/s42483-021-00103-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Zeriouh H., de Vicente A., P´erez-García A., Romero D. (2014). Surfactin triggers biofilm formation of Bacillus subtilis in melon phylloplane and contributes to the biocontrol activity. Environ. Microbiol. 16 2196–2211. 10.1111/1462-2920.12271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Zhang Y., Zhang N., Bi X., Bi T., Baloch F. B., Miao J., et al. (2024). Growth promotion on maize and whole-genome sequence analysis of Bacillus velezensis D103. Microbiol. Spectr. 12:e01147-24. 10.1128/spectrum.01147-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Zhou Z., Tang X., Peng L., Ding H. (2023). Complete genome sequence of Bacillus velezensis GUAL210, a potential biocontrol agent isolated from pepper rhizosphere. Plant Dis. 107 915–918. 10.1094/PDIS-07-22-1585-A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Image_1.tif (11.6MB, tif)
Image_2.tif (261.9KB, tif)
Image_3.tif (732.9KB, tif)
Table_1.docx (1.6MB, docx)
Table_2.docx (83.6KB, docx)
Table_3.xlsx (58.5KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/GCA_977019115; https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/GCA_977019105.


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES