Abstract
Introduction:
Perinatal women need continuous, individualized, accessible care, which traditional models often fail to provide. Chatbots can offer education, symptom tracking, and psychological support, but evidence is fragmented and requires systematic synthesis to assess effectiveness.
Aim:
To understand the current studies on the application of chatbots in the perinatal period and to explore their contributions, limitations, and future directions in this field.
Methods:
Relevant studies were systematically identified through a comprehensive search of major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Joanna Briggs Institute, Cochrane Library, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP, and WanFang, covering all records up to June 2025. Two independent researchers screened and evaluated the retrieved citations, and data were extracted in a structured format to maintain methodological rigor and inter-reviewer consistency.
Results:
A total of 17 studies were included in this review, which indicated that chatbots offer a range of functionalities: optimizing follow-up and revisit processes, monitoring health status, providing psychological and counseling support, offering educational resources, and serving as interactive tools. Most of the included studies demonstrated that chatbots offer beneficial effects, including disease monitoring, enhanced parenting self-efficacy, mental health support, facilitation of role adaptation, improved health literacy and health behaviors, and increased user engagement and satisfaction.
Conclusion:
Most of the included studies indicate that chatbots have a positive impact on pregnancy and postpartum care outcomes. However, the majority of these studies remain in the preliminary stages, and further validation of chatbot effectiveness in this context is still needed through large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trials.
Impact:
Deepening knowledge of perinatal chatbots’ uses and limits enables targeted digital health strategies to improve care quality and maternal, neonatal, and family experiences.
Patient and Public Contribution:
Chatbot could be a potentially valuable tool in perinatal care to enhance health education, psychological support, and communication between care providers and women.
Keywords: chabtbot, pregnancy, postpartum care, health care, scoping review
Introduction
Pregnancy and postpartum care encompasses medical and nursing services during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period, with the aim of ensuring maternal and infant health.1,2 During this critical period, women undergo not only profound physiological changes but also face considerable psychological stress and emotional challenges. 3 World Health Organization reports about 300,000 annual maternal deaths from pregnancy- or childbirth-related complications, about 80% of which are preventable with timely, adequate care. 4 About 10%–13% of women during pregnancy and postpartum are affected globally, with higher rates in developing regions.5–7
Previous studies have shown that personalized care has a positive impact on pregnancy and postpartum outcomes, 8 including improved maternal satisfaction and psychological well-being, enhanced adherence to prenatal and postpartum care, and better clinical outcomes such as early identification and management of postpartum complications, reduced hospital readmissions, and improved breastfeeding.9–12 At present, pregnancy and postpartum care mainly consists of face-to-face, telecommunication counseling, home care by nurses, group seminars, and so on.13–15 However, these traditional care models face several limitations, including shortages of health care personnel, uneven regional distribution of services, and inadequate timeliness in doctor–patient communication. 16 These challenges hinder continuous, personalized health support in pregnant and postpartum care.
As an emerging digital health technology, 17 chatbots have demonstrated considerable potential in pregnancy and postpartum care. They are mostly powered by rule-based artificial intelligence (AI) and utilize natural language processing (NLP) to interact with users conversationally. 18 Characterized by their high feasibility, scalability, and relatively low cost, chatbots offer a practical solution for expanding access to health care services, particularly in resource-constrained settings. 19 Previous studies have highlighted their effectiveness in various domains, including enhanced chronic disease management, better health promotion, increased access to patient education, and improved patient self-management capabilities.20,21
Chatbots have been used in perinatal care, offering continuous, tailored, timely information, and psychosocial support to improve pregnancy and postpartum well-being. However, some research focuses on individual functional modules,22–27 which do not systematically evaluate the overall system architecture or the interactive effects of multi-module integration. 28 Additionally, while 17 included studies demonstrated the potential of chatbots to improve medical accessibility and enhance user engagement, their long-term impact, sustainability, and user acceptance have not been fully validated.25,29–33
Given that pregnancy and postpartum care span multiple stages, existing evidence tends to be fragmented and lacks a comprehensive perspective on the full continuum of care. 29 Therefore, this review summarizes evidence on chatbots in perinatal care, examining their effectiveness and evaluation.
Methods
Study design
The review process was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework was followed to ensure transparent reporting.10,34 As the review relied on previously published studies, ethical approval was not required.
Research question
The research questions were identified as follows:
-
1.
What chatbots currently exist for supporting pregnant and postpartum women?
-
2.
What features do these chatbots provide during the perinatal period?
-
3.
How about the effectiveness of the chatbots in supporting pregnancy and postpartum care?
Search methods
Eligibility criteria
Following the methodological framework of the JBI, the study established its eligibility criteria by referencing the three core dimensions of population, concept, and context. 34 (1) Population: Pregnant individuals at any gestational stage or postpartum individuals. Participants were required to be ≥18 years; (2) Concept: The chatbot is defined as a software application designed to interact with humans through text-or speech-based interfaces. Its primary objective is to simulate human conversation and provide real-time responses to user inquiries. 28 (3) Context: Settings providing pregnancy and postpartum health care, including hospitals, centers, and communities. (4) Types of evidence sources: Peer-reviewed articles published in English or Chinese language, including randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, observational studies, development studies, and mixed-method studies.
Studies were excluded if they (1) focused solely on technical development or optimization of chatbot systems without clinical application; (2) were non-primary sources such as conference or workshop papers, reviews, commentaries, letters, or protocols; (3) were duplicates or had incomplete, irrelevant, or inaccessible data.
Search strategy
A comprehensive search was performed across 11 electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, JBI, Cochrane Library, CNKI, SinoMed, WanFang, and VIP, from their inception to June 2025. To refine the search strategy, preliminary searches were first conducted in PubMed for English publications and in CNKI for Chinese studies. The final search terms were developed through this pilot phase and further validated in consultation with university librarians to ensure both precision and completeness. In PubMed, the strategy incorporated a combination of free-text keywords and Medical Subject Headings, with equivalent adaptations made for other databases according to their specific indexing structures. To maximize coverage, reference lists of the included studies were also screened using a snowballing approach to capture additional relevant records. Details of the database-specific search terms, strategies, and retrieval results are provided in Supplementary Appendices A1 and A2.
Data management
Data selection
All search results were imported into Zotero for reference management, and duplicate records were automatically identified and removed. Two reviewers (R.H. and Y.J.), both trained in evidence-based research methods, independently screened the titles and abstracts against the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Full-text articles that satisfied these criteria were subsequently examined to confirm eligibility in relation to the research questions. Any discrepancies between reviewers were resolved through discussion or, when necessary, consultation with a third reviewer (J.L.).
Data extraction
Data extraction was performed using Microsoft Excel (version 7). R.H. and Y.J. developed the extraction template and pilot tested it: R.H., Y.J., and J.L. independently extracted data from two studies (representing ∼10% of the total) to refine fields (title, year, authors, country, chatbot name, platform, interaction type, study design, objectives, population, sample size, intervention/control details, data collection time points, intervention duration, outcomes, and statistics). The remaining 15 studies were independently extracted by R.H. and Y.J. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or by adjudication from a third reviewer (J.L.) when consensus could not be reached.
Data synthesis and analysis
Data were analyzed descriptively in accordance with the aims of this scoping review. Given the heterogeneity of study designs, findings were integrated using a narrative synthesis approach to provide an overall summary of the evidence. Quantitative data were extracted and tabulated to provide a descriptive overview of study characteristics and key findings. Final findings were reviewed by the full research team to ensure coherence, transparency, and consistency with the study objectives.
Results
Search strategy results
From 11 databases, 5,170 records were identified. After duplicates were removed, 3,885 records underwent title and abstract screening, leaving 33 for full-text review. Of these, 17 did not meet the eligibility criteria, and one additional study was located through reference searching, resulting in a total of 17 included studies. The PRISMA flow of study selection is presented in Figure 1.
FIG. 1.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram of study selection. JBI, Joanna Briggs Institute.
Characteristics of included studies
Publication years of included studies ranged from 2020 to 2025. Among the 17 studies included in the analysis, 15 studies22–25,27,29–33,35–37 were published in English journals, while the remaining 2 studies were from Chinese journals.38,39 Most were conducted in United States (n = 6)26,30–33,40 and Singapore (n = 3),27,36,37 while the remaining studies were conducted in China (n = 2),38,39 Brazil (n = 2),23,24 Norway (n = 1), 25 Sri Lanka (n = 1), 29 Italy (n = 1), 22 and Korea (n = 1). 35
These studies were classified into five categories based on their design, including mixed methods (n = 8),22–24,30,31,35,36,40 randomized controlled trial (n = 4),26,32,33,37 quasi-experimental study (n = 3),27,38,39 development study (n = 1), 29 and observational study design (n = 1). 25 Among them, the largest proportion of participants were pregnant women during the antenatal period (n = 7),22–26,29,39 parents/couples (n = 4),27,35–37 perinatal women (n = 5),30,31,33,38,40 and postnatal women (n = 1). 32 Sample sizes ranged from 5 to 258; one study 25 did not report sample size. More details are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the Included Studies (N = 17)
| First author | Year | Country | Study design | Sample size | Participant characteristics | Chatbot name | Interactive type | Rule-based versus AI chatbot | Platforms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chua | 2024 | Singapore | RCT | 236 | Heterosexual couples, gestational age >24 weeks | Parentbot | Text | Rule-based | Mobile app |
| Chua | 2024 | Singapore | Mixed methods | 118 | Heterosexual parents | Parentbot | Text | Rule-based | Mobile app |
| Wong | 2021 | Singapore | Quasi-experimental study | 26 | Parents | ClaimIt | Dialogue | Rule-based | ClaimIt app |
| Mancinelli | 2024 | Italy | Mixed methods | 5 | General pregnant women | Juno | Buttons, links, images | Rule-based | Telegram |
| Li | 2023 | China | Quasi-experimental study | 92 | Pregnant women with gestational diabetes | NR | Voice | Rule-based | NA |
| Kang | 2020 | China | Quasi-experimental study | 199 | Pregnant women | NR | NA | Rule-based | NA |
| Chung | 2021 | Korea | Mixed methods | 15 | Perinatal women/partners | Dr. Joy | Text, buttons | Rule-based | Kakao Talk |
| Montenegro | 2023 | Brazil | Mixed methods | 25 | Pregnant women and health care professionals | BotMaria | Predefined buttons, open-ended questions | Rule-based | Facebook Messenger |
| Montenegro | 2022 | Brazil | Mixed methods | 13 | Pregnant women and health care professionals | NA | Buttons | Rule-based | App |
| Suharwardy | 2023 | United States | RCT | 152 | Women (≥18 years) with a live birth and access to a smartphone | Woebot | Text | Rule-based | App |
| Nguyen | 2024 | United States | RCT | 29 | Minority women (≥14 years, pregnant/postpartum ≤6 months) | Rosie | Text | Rule-based | App |
| Mane | 2023 | United States | Mixed methods | 109 | Women of color (≥14 years, pregnant/having child ≤3 years) | Rosie | Text | Rule-based | App |
| Inkster | 2023 | United States | Mixed methods | 61 | Postpartum women (≤1 year) | Wysa | Text | Rule-based | App |
| Sagstad | 2022 | Norway | Observational study | NA | GDM patients | Dina | Text, buttons | Rule-based | Digital health platform |
| Maduwantha | 2021 | Sri Lanka | Development study | 6 | Pregnant women | Baby Chatbot | Text | Rule-based | App |
| McAlister | 2025 | United States | Mixed methods | 181 | Pregnant or Postpartum women (<1 year); perinatal women | Moment for Parents | Dialogue | Rule-based | Web app |
| B.Su | 2025 | United States | RCT | 258 | One live fetus was present, weeks of gestation (<20 weeks); 18–35 years (up to delivery) | iPrenatal | Text, decision buttons, images and videos | Rule-based | App |
GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; RCT, randomized controlled trial; NA, not available; NR, not reported.
Characteristics of chatbots
Among the interactive types, chatbots in 16 studies had two or more mixed forms “Text and buttons” (n = 8)22–27,30,32 was the most prevalent, followed by “text, images, audio, video, and buttons” (n = 2),36,37 “text, buttons, and text message” (n = 2),31,33 “text, images, buttons, and artificial response” (n = 1), 39 “voice, image, video, and buttons” (n = 1), 38 “text, images, and buttons” (n = 1), 35 and “text and voice” (n = 1). 29 However, one study of chatbots had only one form of interaction: text (n = 1). 40 Regarding the form of support, app-based platforms were the most commonly utilized (n = 11),24,26,27,29–33,36,37,40 comprising app (n = 7),24,29–33,40 mobile apps (n = 2),36,37 Claimlt application (n = 1), 27 and web app (n = 1). 26 Messaging platforms represented the second most frequent category (n = 3),22,23,35 including Telegram (n = 1), 22 Kakao Talk (n = 1), 35 and Facebook Messenger (n = 1). 23 The remaining studies employed a digital health platform (n = 1), 25 while two studies38,39 did not specify the platform used. More details are presented in Table 1.
Features of chatbots in supporting pregnancy and postpartum care
Chatbots were categorized into five domains: follow-up and revisit (n = 3),33,38,39 health status monitoring (n = 8),25,27,30,33,35,36,38,39 psychological support (n = 13),22,24,27,29–33,35–37,39,40 consulting support (n = 14),22–24,26,29–33,35–39 and educational support (n = 16).22–26,29–33,35–40 More details are presented in Figure 2 and Table 2.
FIG. 2.
Features of chatbots in supporting pregnancy and postpartum care.
Table 2.
Outcome Measures of Chatbots Supporting Pregnancy and Postpartum Care (N = 17)
| First author | Year | Country | Study design | Outcome measurements | The main outcome results in the intervention group | Statistical value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Function | User experience | Post-use evaluation indicators | ||||||
| Chua | 2024 | Singapore | RCT | Self-efficacy (primary outcome), stress, depression, anxiety, social support, parent–child bonding, and parenting Satisfaction (secondary outcomes) | Education enter: Multimedia resources (text, audio, video). Smile enter: Gratitude/reflection journals, mindfulness videos. Rule-based chatbot: Answers common questions; transfers unresolved queries to “Ask an Expert” platform. Accessible 24 weeks of gestation until 1-month postpartum | The intervention had a generally positive effect on parents’ well-being and could significantly improve parenting self-efficacy at one month postpartum and mothers’ state of anxiety at 3 months postpartum. | Improving parenting self-efficacy (primary outcome), stress, depression, anxiety, social support, parent–child bonding, and parenting satisfaction (secondary outcomes) among parents across the perinatal period. | p: Parenting self-efficacy (p = 0.04), mother anxiety state (p = 0.03) |
| Chua | 2024 | Singapore | Mixed methods | User experience | Answers common questions; transfers unresolved queries to “Ask an Expert” platform. Accessible from 24 weeks of gestation until 1-month postpartum. | The PDA provided parents with informational, socioemotional, and psychological support and could be used to supplement the perinatal care provided for future parents. | New babies, new troubles, and new wonders; support system for the parents; reshaping perinatal support for future parents | p: NA |
| Wong | 2021 | Singapore | Quasi-experimental study | Anxiety/depression changes; user experience and engagement; user satisfaction and feedback to Juno | Chatbot interactions in stress, sleep, and feeding domains | Parents who completed the study gave positive feedback on their user experience with the chatbot as a tool to express their thoughts and concerns | Real-time conversation data on stress, sleep, and infant feeding from a group of 45 parents. | p: NA |
| Mancinelli | 2024 | Italy | Mixed methods | Anxiety/depression changes; user experience and engagement; user satisfaction and feedback to Juno | 6-week behavioral activation intervention via Juno, with post-interview 10–14 days after | Focusing on the app itself, women all agreed on the convenience (convenient app) of Telegram as an interface, allowing them to avoid downloading another app and describing it as an optimal channel that they already knew and that is easy to use. | The tool’s capacities, risks, and limitations need to be clearly reported (point 5). In addition, safety measures were limited to self-reported depression, anxiety, and stress levels. | p: NA |
| Li | 2023 | China | Quasi-experimental study | Blood glucose control; Self-management; Health literacy and compliance | Disease monitoring (blood glucose, blood pressure, weight). Provide diet/exercise guidance and health education. Capable of providing intelligent consultation and continuous self-management support services. The back-end can collect usage data | Users gave a positive overall evaluation of the use experience of AI robots in home management of gestational diabetes mellitus, especially in terms of ease of use, practicality and relevance of content. | Ease of use; satisfaction | p: Pregnant women’s self-management ability (p < 0.01); FBG pass rate (p = 0.043); 2 h PBG pass rate (p = 0.012); weight control rate (p = 0.023); the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes (p < 0.05); pregnant women are anxious (p < 0.01). |
| Kang | 2020 | China | Quasi-experimental study | Knowledge of health knowledge; satisfaction; follow-up times of pregnant women | Including voice-based vital sign input, follow-up management, and intelligent Q&A for health management. | Users have a good experience with the robot, and their satisfaction is significantly higher than that of the traditional telephone follow-up group | Satisfaction; users’ subjective experience | p: Maternal health care awareness was significantly better than traditional telephone follow-up (p < 0.01) |
| Chung | 2021 | Korea | Mixed methods | USE Questionnaire | 7-day usability test: ≥3 questions/day to Dr. Joy | To satisfy user intent by monitoring both male and female user utterances. | Produce both utilitarian and hedonistic value during the 7-day contextual UT period. | p: The correlation between usefulness (USE), ease of use (EOU), satisfaction (SAT), and total availability (Total) (p < 0.01), association between perceived benefits and SEE (p < 0.001), association between perceived benefits and SHA (p = 0.004 |
| Montenegro | 2023 | Brazil | Mixed methods | Satisfaction, usability, content reliability, perceived educational impact | BotMaria provides nutrition education | Ensure positive support for pregnant women, clarify certain issues for the public, and remove some knowledge barriers. | To satisfy user intent by monitoring both male and female user utterances. | p: No significant statistical differences were found |
| Montenegro | 2022 | Brazil | Mixed methods | Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology | Health education information was provided, covering topics including prenatal and postnatal care, dietary guidelines, minor complications, and physical activity. | The intended design could ensure positive support for pregnant women, clarify certain issues for the public, and remove some knowledge barriers. | The highest level of agreement was Expectation of Performance, in which pregnant women agreed that the chatbot had taught them something new. | p: NR |
| Suharwardy | 2023 | United States | Randomized controlled trial | Assessed by anxiety and depression scale, Degree of satisfaction PHQ-9 and EPDS | To optout of daily check-ins, in addition to usual care by their obstetric care team | 80% of study participants reported being comfortable with the use of a mobile smartphone application for mood management. | A change in depression symptoms at 6 weeks: PHQ-9 and EPDS. Anxiety symptoms: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and satisfaction and acceptability using validated scales. | p: PHQ-9 scores (p = 0.025) |
| Nguyen | 2024 | United States | Randomized controlled trial | Changes in depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score); frequency of infant emergency department visits. User satisfaction with Rosie and usage frequency. | Personalized health information, covering topics, infant development, daily health tips, and stores the most recent 7 days’ tips. Provides resource information and triggers. | Provide a personalized, flexible tool to increase the timeliness and accessibility of high-quality health information to individuals during a period of elevated health risks for the mother and child. | Pregnancy outcomes (birth weight and gestational age), emergency room visits for infants, PHQ-9 depression scale, and group-specific questions. How often they used Rosie and the following issues. | p: Depression symptoms improved (p = 0.008) |
| Mane | 2023 | United States | Mixed methods | User willingness, satisfaction, and acceptance of Rosie | To provide Q&A services on pregnancy, postnatal health, infant health, and care. Enhance user engagement and experience through in-app features. | About 75% of mothers said they searched online for maternal and infant health information at least weekly. More than 96% of participants expressed likely or very likely to use Rosie. | NA | p: NA |
| Inkster | 2023 | United States | Mixed methods | Changes in PHQ-9 depressive symptom scores; Themes of user-chatbot interaction behaviors. | Users engage with the chatbot to articulate emotions, explore concerns, and obtain personalized recommendations. Users may choose to complete the PHQ-9 depressive symptom assessment, with biweekly reminders provided. | These users also provided feedback sessions within the app with overall sessions seeing 97% of users with high or mid-satisfaction. | As a post hoc analysis, we explored depressive symptom reductions between the groups across increasing PHQ-9 severity. | p: Depression symptoms improved (p < 0.05) |
| Sagstad | 2022 | Norway | Observational study | NA | Dina provides information related to GDM, including blood glucose, diet, diagnosis, and exercise. | The chatbot was able to answer about 9 out of 10 of all questions from the users. | NA | p: The difference between the two phases (p = 0.013) |
| Maduwantha | 2021 | Sri Lanka | Development study | Satisfaction | Simulate conversations; pregnancy calendar; reminder system; Kick counter; emergency dial system; relaxation mini-games; pregnancy health tips. | NA | Complete a survey about their opinions about the MumCare, what they liked and disliked about it, the drawbacks and then the features they willing to have in the future. | p: NA |
| McAlister | 2025 | United States | Mixed methods | Chatbot usability, engagement and user experience | Emotional personalization intervention; Mental health support | The chatbot effectively alleviates the psychological isolation of women in the perinatal period through lightweight interaction, emotion-matching exercises, and staged support. | Overall participation data, participation rate, relevance and applicability, user demand satisfaction, content and scene adaptability | p: NA |
| B.Su | 2025 | United States | Randomized controlled trial | Knowledge score after education, patient satisfaction, patient consultation time, and visit time | Provide education on the availability of prenatal genetic screening and diagnostic testing options. | The positive experience of users on chatbots is demonstrated in terms of user satisfaction, ease of use and interface design, information quality, willingness to use, and information acceptance. | Knowledge level assessment, satisfaction assessment, education experience feedback, consultation time, and visit time. | p: Knowledge level score of the two groups after education (p < 0.001) |
AI, artificial intelligence; EOU, Perceived Ease of Use Questionnaire; EPDS, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; FBG, fasting blood glucose; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; NA, not available; PBG, postprandial glucose; PDA, Parentbot-A Digital health care Assistant; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; Q&A, question and answer; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SAT, Satisfaction Assessment Test; SEE, seek health information; SHA, share health information; USE, Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire.
Health status monitoring
Chatbot implementation was summarized, covering monitoring dimensions, technology application, intervention mechanisms, collection of user information, and feedback. Among the 17 studies, 8 studies25,27,30,33,35,36,38,39 reported the health monitoring features, which included a total of 14 health monitoring indicators, including sleep quality monitoring,27,35,38 blood glucose monitoring,25,38,39 sports monitoring,25,35,38 diet monitoring,25,35,38 weight monitoring,38,39 blood pressure monitoring,38,39 temperature monitoring,38,39 monitoring of breastfeeding, 27 heart rate monitoring, 38 height monitoring, 38 vision monitoring, 38 adverse outcome monitoring, 39 abdominal condition monitoring, 35 and drug safety monitoring. 35
Psychological support
Thirteen studies22,24,29–33,35–37,39,40 reported the feature of psychological support, covering four indicators: anxiety reduction support (n = 12),22,24,29–33,35–37,39,40 depression reduction support (n = 11),22,29–33,35–37,39,40 psychological stress reduction support (n = 4),27,36,37,39 and suicide prevention support. 31
Educational support
A total of 16 studies22–26,29–33,35–40 reported the feature of education. It involved 14 educational functions, including perinatal care (n = 11),22,24,25,30,31,33,35–39 health reminders (n = 11),22–25,30,31,35–39 diet and nutrition (n = 11),23–25,29–31,35–39 physical activity (n = 10),24,25,29–31,35–39 medication safety (n = 8),24,25,29,31,35–37,39 mild complications and contraindications (n = 7),24,29–31,37–39 pregnancy calendar (n = 6),24,29,31,36,37,39 pregnancy health guidance (n = 5),22,25,26,30,38 digital health support (n = 2),36,37 fetal kick counter (n = 2),24,29 parenting care (n = 2),24,33 cultivation of emotional competence (n = 2),32,37 and fetal development (n = 1). 29
Follow-up and revisit
Three studies33,38,39 featured chatbots with the function of follow-up and revisit processes. The schemes implemented in different regions exhibit distinct strategic emphases in optimizing follow-up and reexamination processes. Two studies conducted in China38,39 primarily focus on the overall workflow through intelligent and automated mechanisms, including intelligent task allocation, personalized scheduling, feedback systems, convenient appointment booking, report delivery, and health assessment functionalities. In contrast, one study 33 mainly focuses on responding to health emergencies.
Consultation support
Among the 17 chatbots, the majority (n = 14)22–24,26,29–33,35–39 provided consultation services. It uses rule-based AI and NLP systems to analyze maternal input, identify key parameters, retrieve personalized data from the database, and generate humanized responses. The remaining three chatbots (n = 3)25,27,40 did not offer this function: one as data collection tool 27 and two were information-retrieval only.25,40
Effect of chatbots in pregnancy and postpartum
Of the included studies, effect of chatbots can be classified into the following six categories, including disease monitoring (n = 6),30–33,38,39 parenting self-efficacy (n = 8),22,24,27,33,36–39 mental health (n = 13),22,24,27,29–33,35–37,39,40 role adaptation (n = 13),22–24,27,29–33,35–37,39 health literacy and health behavior (n = 15),22–25,27,29–33,35–39 and engagement and satisfaction (n = 17).22–26,29–33,35–40 More details are presented in Figure 3.
FIG. 3.
Effect of chatbots in pregnancy and postpartum.
Mental health
Among all included studies, a total of 13 studies reported the effect of improving the mental health of pregnant and postpartum women.22–24,29–33,35–37,39,40 Among them, seven studies analyzed the intervention effects,22,24,29–32,40 including three studies30,32,33 had control groups and experimental groups for comparative research, while the other four studies24,29,31,40 did not have control groups but conducted pre- and post-comparisons on their own. Chatbots showed significant effects in improving depressive symptoms, especially for highly engaged users. The average reduction in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores ranged from 1.32 to 3.25 points, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to large. Additionally, four studies24,29,31,40 did not have control groups and mainly evaluated effectiveness through qualitative feedback and usage rates, with users having better acceptance and information acquisition capabilities. Improving the following five major mental health issues of pregnant and postpartum women: anxiety (n = 10),24,29–32,35–37,39,40 psychological stress (n = 8),22,27,29,31–33,35,36 depression (n = 8),22,25,29,32,33,35,36,40 emotion management (n = 3),29,30,32 and preventing suicide (n = 2).22,32
Health literacy and health behavior
Among included studies, a total of 15 studies22–25,27,29–33,35–39 reported that chatbots could enhance the health literacy of pregnant and postpartum women and support changes in their health behaviors. However, in most studies (n = 10),25,27,29–32,35–37,40 chatbots have indirectly enhanced the health literacy and supported changes in healthy behaviors. Only a few (n = 6)22–24,33,38,39 showed direct improvements.
Disease monitoring
Some of the chatbots in studies (n = 6)30–33,38,39 could enhance the disease monitoring ability of pregnant and postpartum women. Through voice interaction, they can efficiently collect individual vital sign data (such as blood sugar levels and weight),38,39 thereby improving the efficiency of follow-up and personal health management capabilities. At the same time, this technology can effectively help reduce the incidence of infant emergencies. 33 Studies show that user groups with higher engagement have more obvious effects, but there is still room for further improvement in the overall user acceptance. 30
User engagement and satisfaction
All included studies (n = 17)22–27,29–33,35,36,38–40 reported high chatbot engagement and high participant satisfaction. In terms of satisfaction, 14 studies used survey instruments: researcher-developed questionnaire (n = 9)23,24,26,29–31,33,39,40; Mobile App Rating Scale (n = 1) 22 ; electronic usability questionnaires (n = 1) 27 ; Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (n = 1) 32 ; Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use (n = 1) 35 ; and What Being the Parent of a Baby is Like–Revised (n = 1) 37 ; three studies did not mention the survey tool.25,36,38 After analyzing scale scores and user suggestions,22–27,29–33,35,36,38–40 all included studies indicate that users are satisfied with functional utility and interactive experience, while 12 studies also show user satisfaction with emotional support (n = 12).22–24,29,30,32,33,35–37,39,40
Parenting self-efficacy
Among all included studies, most studies (n = 9)22,24,25,27,33,36–39 on chatbots suggested that they can enhance the parenting self-efficacy. Studies indicate chatbots directly or indirectly enhance parenting self-efficacy: five studies25,33,36,37,39 reported direct feedback, and four studies22,24,27,38 reported indirect feedback.
Role adaptation
Most studies (n = 13)22–24,27,29–33,35–37,39 on chatbots suggested that they can enhance the role adaptation ability of perinatal women. Except for the following four studies,25,26,38,40 none of them mentioned enhancing the role adaptation ability of perinatal women. These studies (n = 13)22–24,27,29–33,35–37,39 show that the chatbot directly or indirectly provides feedback to enhance the role adaptation of perinatal women. Five studies30,33,36,37,39 reported direct feedback, and eight studies22–24,27,29,31,32,35 reported indirect feedback.
Discussion
This scoping review finally included a total of 17 studies, systematically reviewing recent research on chatbot support for pregnancy and postpartum care, revealing their design characteristics, functionalities, and application effects. In general, chatbots facilitate interaction and offer a variety of functions and intelligent services.
Chatbots demonstrate significant potential in the field of pregnancy and postpartum care. Their functions encompass not only pregnancy and postpartum health monitoring,22,23,25,26,29,33,35,37 psychological support,22–27,30–33,35–38,40 and educational roles,23–27,29–33,35–40 but also optimization of follow-up processes between hospitals and pregnant women.24,29,33 A review of previous studies indicates that the technological advancement of chatbot applications in health care continues to progress, 41 with their clinical value in pregnancy and postpartum care increasing substantially. 31 However, chatbots continue to face several practical challenges at the functional level despite relative technological advancements. For instance, effective health monitoring depends on high-quality sensors and advanced data analysis algorithms, yet the associated hardware costs and technical complexity may limit their widespread implementation. 42 Additionally, pregnant women have diverse and individualized psychological needs, which chatbots may struggle to address adequately due to limited capacity for personalized emotional support. 22 Educational functions also present difficulties, as chatbots must continuously update their knowledge base to ensure that the information they deliver is accurate, evidence-based, and aligned with the latest scientific guidelines. 43 Moreover, follow-up functions require deep integration with existing health care systems, which raises concerns about patient privacy, data security, and regulatory compliance. 44 Future research could explore ways to enhance chatbot design by improving multilingual and cultural adaptability, 45 incorporating multimedia content such as videos and animations to make information more accessible, and applying machine learning techniques to dynamically optimize knowledge bases. Additionally, establishing robust auditing mechanisms is essential to ensure accuracy, timeliness, and credibility of information provided. 46
Improvement in mental health is one of the most prominent and frequently reported outcomes associated with chatbot interventions. 47 More than half of the reviewed studies demonstrated that chatbots can effectively reduce anxiety, depression, and psychological stress among pregnant and postpartum women.22–27,30–33,35–38,40 These positive outcomes are primarily supported by participants’ self-reports and validated psychological scales, suggesting the potential value of chatbots in delivering psychological support. However, some studies reported no significant improvements, indicating that effectiveness of such interventions may depend on design quality, usage frequency, and user adherence.
In terms of health literacy and behavior change, current chatbot-based health education programs primarily focus on pregnancy weight management and blood glucose control.44,48–50 Most studies have shown that chatbots can enhance pregnancy and postpartum health literacy and promote positive health behavior.22–27,29–33,35–38,40 However, these interventions are often short term and lack long-term follow-up data to assess the sustainability of behavioral change, suggesting that existing interventions are predominantly supportive and motivational in nature. 35 Future research should incorporate direct measures and longitudinal tracking to better evaluate the long-term effectiveness of chatbot-driven behavioral interventions.51–53
Evaluation of chatbots in pregnancy and postpartum care primarily involves user engagement, satisfaction, and technical performance. Most satisfaction assessments rely on qualitative interviews and rating scales, yet they often lack in-depth exploration of emotional support and cultural adaptability. 54 Technical performance evaluations serve as a critical component of chatbot assessment, with current advancements demonstrating strong capabilities in language comprehension and voice interaction technologies. 55 However, chatbots still face limitations in handling offline scenarios and open-ended queries, which restricts their ability to address more complex user needs. Future evaluations could establish multidimensional and systematic assessment frameworks that integrate both quantitative and qualitative methods, enabling a comprehensive understanding of the practical functions and real-world impact of chatbots in pregnancy and postpartum health care.
Limitations
This review has several limitations. First, the included studies were primarily published in English and Chinese, which may have introduced language and selection bias. Second, most studies relied on quantitative designs,22–24,26,27,30–33,35–40 with few qualitative studies, limiting deeper understanding of users’ psychological needs, lived experiences, and contextual factors influencing engagement with chatbot-based interventions. Third, the applicability of chatbot interventions may depend on users having sufficient technical literacy and access to an appropriate digital device and a stable internet connection, which could create barriers for some populations, particularly older adults or socioeconomically disadvantaged groups.56–58 Fourth, some studies also provided limited reporting on negative user experiences, such as frustration or dissatisfaction, and on instances where chatbots may have delivered inaccurate, incomplete, or potentially misleading information.59,60 These issues should be more explicitly acknowledged when interpreting the findings. Fifth, the confidentiality and privacy of users’ health information require clearer consideration, as chatbot-based interventions often involve collection, transmission, and storage of sensitive personal data.56,57,61 Future research should prioritize large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trials and longer follow-up periods to generate more robust evidence, while also incorporating qualitative methods to better capture user experience, accessibility challenges, safety concerns, and privacy implications.
Conclusion
This study examines the role of chatbots in supporting pregnant and postpartum women, highlighting their potential to improve self-management, offer emotional support, and enhance access to educational resources. By establishing a systematic evaluation framework and strengthening privacy protections, chatbots can increase user trust and engagement, thereby narrowing health service gaps in pregnancy and postpartum care.
Authors’ Contributions
R.H.: Study design, search strategy formulation, data collection and analysis, writing original draft, and writing review and editing. Y.J.: Study design and search strategy formulation. J.L.: Data collection and analysis. J.Z.: Search strategy formulation. M.M. and W.H.: Writing—review and editing. J.Y.-H.W.: Project administration, supervision, and methodological guidance.
Abbreviations
- AI
artificial intelligence
- CINAHL
Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature
- CNKI
China National Knowledge Infrastructure
- EPDS
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
- EOU
Perceived Ease of Use Questionnaire
- FBG
fasting blood glucose
- GDM
gestational diabetes mellitus
- JBI
Joanna Briggs Institute
- NA
not available
- NLP
natural language processing
- NR
not reported
- PBG
postprandial blood glucose
- PDA
Parentbot-A Digital health care Assistant
- PHQ-9
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
- PRISMA
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses
- Q&A
question and answer
- RCT
randomized controlled trial
- SAT
Satisfaction Assessment Test
- SEE
seek health information
- SHA
share health information
- SinoMed
Chinese BioMedical Literature Database
- UNICEF
United Nations Children's Fund
- UNFPA
United Nations Population Fund
- USE
Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire
- VIP
VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals Database
- WHO
World Health Organization
Footnotes
The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Funding Information: No funding was received for this article.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-whr-10.1177_26884844261453447 for Role of Chatbots on Supporting Women in Perinatal Period: A Scoping Review by Ran Huo, Yuting Jiang, Jing Lei, Jinyang Zhou, Miaoling Miu, Wanqin Hu, and Janet Yuen-Ha Wong
Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-2-whr-10.1177_26884844261453447 for Role of Chatbots on Supporting Women in Perinatal Period: A Scoping Review by Ran Huo, Yuting Jiang, Jing Lei, Jinyang Zhou, Miaoling Miu, Wanqin Hu, and Janet Yuen-Ha Wong
Cite this article as: Huo R, Jiang Y, Lei J, Zhou J, Miu M, Hu W, Wong JYH (2026) Role of chatbots on supporting women in perinatal period: A scoping review, Women’s Health Reports 7, 1–15, DOI: 10.1177/26884844261453447.
References
- 1.A comprehensive integrative review on maternal healthcare services accessibility in Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh, in healthcare horizons: exploring management practices. Kaav Publications; 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Robson SE, Waugh J. Midwifery Care and Medical Disorders, in Medical Disorders in Pregnancy C2. Wiley; 2008; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shilpa S, Thenveer Banu K, Muhammed Shameem K. Level of Stress and Coping Strategies used during third trimester of pregnancy among Primi Antenatal mothers. International Journal of Nursing Education and Research, 2021:275–280. [Google Scholar]
- 4.WHO. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2020: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the UNDESA/Population Division. World Health Organization: Geneva: 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hutner LA, Yeaton-Massey A, Toscano M, et al. Cultivating mental health education in obstetrics and gynecology: A call to action. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM, 2021; 3(6):100459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bertram G, Becuzzi N, Wilson E. Trends in perinatal mental health within a tertiary institution from 2013 to 2022. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2023; 63(6):821–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.WHO. Perinatal mental health. 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/mental-health-and-substance-use/promotion-prevention/maternal-mental-health
- 8.Amasha HA, Abdel-Haleem SA, Gamal AM. Assessing the competence of nurses in rendering postpartum care and its effect on women’s satisfaction. MJN, 2020; 11(4):99–100. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Agbi FA, Lulin Z, Asamoah EO. Quality of communication between healthcare providers and pregnant women: Impact on maternal satisfaction, health outcomes, and shared decision-making. UJOG, 2023; 2(1):3–10. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dahab AA, Miski SS, Hajjaj AM, et al. A review on the role of postpartum homecare program in identification, managing and preventing common complications. Int J Community Med Public Health, 2024; 11(11):4480–4485. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nguyen‐Hoang L, Smith GN, Bergman L, et al. FIGO pregnancy passport: A useful tool for women and their healthcare providers on health risks following pregnancy complications. Intl J Gynecology & Obste, 2023; 162(3):787–791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mobin A, Obeid A, El-Kebbi I, et al. Beyond one size fits all: Probing patient choices in gestational diabetes management, from screening to postpartum. Chronic Dis Transl Med, 2025; 11(1):33–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Makwana L. Reports, physical therapy in maternal care: Prenatal and postnatal approaches for health and recovery. Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Studies & Reports, 2024; 6(9). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kern-Goldberger AR, Hirshberg A. Reducing disparities using telehealth approaches for postdelivery preeclampsia care. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2021; 64(2):375–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Levine A, Souter V, Sakala C. Are perinatal quality collaboratives collaborating enough? How including all birth settings can drive needed improvement in the United States maternity care system. Birth, 2022; 49(1):3–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gorshkov MD. Simulation in addressing the problem of inappropriate and disrespectful assistance in childbirth hospitals. jour, 2024; 1(1):8–14. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hamdoun S, Monteleone R, Bookman T, et al. AI-based and digital mental health apps: Balancing need and risk. IEEE Technol Soc Mag, 2023; 42(1):25–36. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee Yand, Kim SY. Potential applications of ChatGPT in obstetrics and gynecology in Korea: A review article. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2024; 67(2):153–159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dutt V, Sasubilli SM, Yerrapati AE. Dynamic information retrieval with chatbots: A review of artificial intelligence methodology. In: 2020 4th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA) C1—Coimbatore, India C3—2020. IEEE; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Islam J, Hasan M, Hasan MM. A Systematic Review of Chatbot-Enabled Chronic Disease Management Interventions and mHealth. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE); 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Haque A, Chowdhury MN-U-R, Soliman H. Transforming chronic disease management with chatbots: Key use cases for personalized and cost-effective care. In: International Symposium on Computer, Consumer and Control (IS3C). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE); 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mancinelli E, et al. A Chatbot to engage parents of preterm and term infants on parental stress, ploy a behavioral activation intervention to pregnant women: Qualitative evaluation using a multiple case study. JMIR Form Res, 2024; 8:e58653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Montenegro JLZ, da Costa CA, da Rosa Righi R, et al. Development and validation of conversational agent to pregnancy safe-education. J Med Syst, 2023; 47(1):7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Montenegro JLZ, Da Costa CA, Janssen LP. Evaluating the use of chatbot during pregnancy: A usability study. Healthcare Analytics, 2022; 2:100072. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sagstad MH, Morken N-H, Lund A, et al. Quantitative user data from a chatbot developed for women with gestational diabetes mellitus: Observational study. JMIR Form Res, 2022; 6(4):e28091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Su B, Jones R, Chen K, et al. Chatbot for patient education for prenatal aneuploidy testing: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns, 2025; 131:108557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wong J, Foussat AC, Ting S, et al. A Chatbot to engage parents of preterm and term infants on parental stress, parental sleep, and infant feeding: Usability and Feasibility Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent, 2021; 4(4):e30169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Analysis of Chatbots: History, Use Case, and Classification. In: Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics. IGI Global; 2024; pp. 62–81. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Maduwantha MC, Vithana VN. “MumCare”: An artificial intelligence based assistant. IJECER, 2021; 1(1):21–28. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Inkster B, Kadaba M, Subramanian V. Understanding the impact of an AI-enabled conversational agent mobile app on users’ mental health and wellbeing with a self-reported maternal event: A mixed method real-world data mHealth study. Front Glob Womens Health, 2023; 4:1084302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mane HY, Channell Doig A, Marin Gutierrez FX, et al. Practical guidance for the development of rosie, a health education question-and-answer chatbot for new mothers. J Public Health Manag Pract, 2023; 29(5):663–670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Suharwardy S, Ramachandran M, Leonard SA, et al. Feasibility and impact of a mental health chatbot on postpartum mental health: A randomized controlled trial. AJOG Glob Rep, 2023; 3(3):100165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nguyen QC, Aparicio EM, Jasczynski M, et al. Rosie, a health education question-and-answer chatbot for new mothers: Randomized pilot study. JMIR Form Res, 2024; 8:e51361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Implement, 2021; 19(1):3–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chung K, Cho HY, Park JY. A Chatbot for perinatal women’s and partners’ obstetric and mental health care: Development and usability evaluation study. JMIR Med Inform, 2021; 9(3):e18607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chua JYX, Choolani M, Chee CYI, et al. Parents’ perceptions of their parenting journeys and a mobile app intervention (Parentbot—A Digital Healthcare Assistant): Qualitative process evaluation. J Med Internet Res, 2024; 26:e56894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chua JYX, Choolani M, Chee CYI, et al. The effectiveness of Parentbot—a digital healthcare assistant—on parenting outcomes: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud, 2024; 160:104906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kang J, Ding L, Wang Y, et al. Design and implementation of an intelligent follow-up system for maternal and child health based on an educational robot. Chin Digit Med. 2020;15(11):67–71. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li G, Wang H, Zhu Y, et al. Application of an artificial intelligence robot in home self-management among pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Chin Nurs Manag. 2023;23(8):1220–1224. [Google Scholar]
- 40.McAlister K, Baez L, Huberty J, et al. Chatbot to support the mental health needs of pregnant and postpartum women (moment for parents): design and pilot study. JMIR Form Res, 2025; 9:e72469-e72469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Melnyk O, Ismail A, Ghorashi NS, et al. Generative artificial intelligence terminology: A primer for clinicians and medical researchers. Cureus, 2023; 15(12):e49890; doi: 10.7759/cureus.49890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sharp M, Weiss BA. Hierarchical modeling of a manufacturing work cell to promote contextualized PHM information across multiple levels. Manuf Lett, 2018; 15(A):46–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Alfaris E, Alhazzani Y, Alkhenizan A, et al. Assessing the validity of health messages used by the Saudi public in WhatsApp. Patient Prefer Adherence, 2023; 17:67–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.García Abejas A, Serra Trullás A, Sobral MA, et al. Improving the understanding and managing of the quality of life of patients with lung cancer with electronic patient-reported outcome measures: Scoping review. J Med Internet Res, 2023; 25:e46259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Potts C, Lindström F, Bond R, et al. A multilingual digital mental health and well-being Chatbot (ChatPal): Pre-Post Multicenter Intervention Study. J Med Internet Res, 2023; 25:e43051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Narendran M, Sathya A, Annoosh R, et al. HealthBot analytics: Optimizing healthcare efficiency through intelligent integration. In: 2024 International Conference on Advances in Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing Systems (ADICS). IEEE; 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Anaduaka US, Oladosu AO, Katsande S, et al. Leveraging artificial intelligence in the prediction, diagnosis and treatment of depression and anxiety among perinatal women in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. BMJ Ment Health, 2025; 28(1):e301445; doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sodré WDSM, Duarte JC. Chatbot optimization using sentiment analysis and timeline navigation. RITA, 2023; 30(1):32–43. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dave T, Athaluri SA, Singh S. ChatGPT in medicine: An overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations. Front Artif Intell, 2023; 6:1169595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Laymouna M, Ma Y, Lessard D, et al. Roles, users, benefits, and limitations of chatbots in health care: Rapid review. J Med Internet Res, 2024; 26:e56930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Buran G, Aksu H. Effect of hypnobirthing training on fear, pain, satisfaction related to birth, and birth outcomes: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Nurs Res, 2022; 31(5):918–930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hao J, Yang L, Wang Y, et al. Mobile prenatal education and its impact on reducing adverse pregnancy outcomes: Retrospective real-world study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2023; 11:e46910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kehinde J, O’Donnell, Grealish A. The effectiveness of prenatal breastfeeding education on breastfeeding uptake postpartum: A systematic review. Midwifery, 2023; 118:103579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kurniawan MH, Handiyani H, Nuraini T, et al. A systematic review of artificial intelligence-powered (AI-powered) chatbot intervention for managing chronic illness. Ann Med, 2024; 56(1):2302980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.IJRASET Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. AI ChatBot for Cybersecurity with Text to Voice Assistant. IJRASET Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology; 2025. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bekker MN, Stephansson O, Maiz N, et al. Digital healthcare as a solution for global challenges: A call for action. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2025; 104(2):250–252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sugandh F, Chandio M, Raveena F, et al. Advances in the management of diabetes mellitus: A focus on personalized medicine. Cureus, 2023; 15(8):e43697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Asadollahi F, Zagami SE, Eslami S, et al. Barriers and facilitators for mHealth utilization in pregnancy care: A qualitative analysis of pregnant women and stakeholder’s perspectives. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2025; 25(1):141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Asadollahi F, Zagami SE, Roudsari RL. Understanding pregnant women’s intention to use mobile health apps and its determinants: Applying the UTAUT model in a mixed-methods study. BMC Prim Care, 2025; 26(1):252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Djouma Nembot F, Collins B, Nang Nang FD, et al. Perceived usefulness and satisfaction of pregnant women with a WhatsApp-based education intervention aiming to improve access to pregnancy care: A mixed-methods evaluation. BMJ Public Health, 2026; 4(1):e004507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Asadollahi F, Zagami SE, Roudsari RL. Designing, validation and evaluation of an mHealth app for prenatal health promotion based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A mixed methods study protocol. Sci Rep, 2025; 15(1):27603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-whr-10.1177_26884844261453447 for Role of Chatbots on Supporting Women in Perinatal Period: A Scoping Review by Ran Huo, Yuting Jiang, Jing Lei, Jinyang Zhou, Miaoling Miu, Wanqin Hu, and Janet Yuen-Ha Wong
Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-2-whr-10.1177_26884844261453447 for Role of Chatbots on Supporting Women in Perinatal Period: A Scoping Review by Ran Huo, Yuting Jiang, Jing Lei, Jinyang Zhou, Miaoling Miu, Wanqin Hu, and Janet Yuen-Ha Wong



