Abstract
Purpose:
To estimate the associations of prevalent vertebral fracture (PVFx) and abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) with incident ASCVD (myocardial infarction, fatal or non-fatal cerebrovascular accident, or coronary heart disease death).
Methods:
2799 older men (mean [SD] age 76.3 [5.5] years) enrolled in the MrOS sleep ancillary study had PVFx (SQ grade 2 or 3) assessed by human reader and AAC by automated convolutional neural networks on baseline lateral spine radiographs. Auto-AAC was categorized as low, moderate, or high (24-point scale score <2, 2 to <6, or ≥6). Men were contacted every 4 months for ascertainment of possible ASCVD events over a mean (SD) follow-up of 8.4 (3.1) years. Associations of PVFx and auto-AAC category with incident ASCVD were estimated with modified proportional hazards models accounting for non-CVD mortality.
Results:
PVFx was present in 7.3% of the cohort; 34.5% had moderate auto-AAC, 28.8% had high auto-AAC, and 396 (14.1%) had an incident ASCVD event. Compared to men with low auto-AAC, those with moderate (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01, 1.77) and high (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.16, 2.06) auto-AAC had increased risk of ASCVD events adjusted for PVFx and other risk factors. Compared to men with no PVFx, those with PVFx had a higher risk of ASCVD events (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.07, 2.14) adjusted for auto-AAC level and other risk factors.
Conclusion:
AAC assessed by automated methods and PVFx are independently associated with incident ASCVD events and may aid in ASCVD risk stratification in older men, but confirmatory studies are needed.
Keywords: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, ASCVD, major adverse cardiovascular events, MACE, abdominal aortic calcification, AAC, vertebral fracture
1. Introduction
Prevalent vertebral fracture (PVFx) and abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) can be simultaneously ascertained on lateral spine images, and are associated with incident hip, vertebral, and major osteoporotic fractures in older men[1] and women,[2, 3] adjusted for each other and other fracture risk factors. In addition, AAC is a robust predictor of incident cardiovascular disease events in middle-aged and older women and men.[4–7] Low bone mass,[8] high fracture risk,[9] and PVFx[8, 10, 11] are also associated with incident cardiovascular disease events in older women. PVFx is also associated with vascular calcification in patients with hemodialysis patients,[12] and lower limb arterial insufficiency in patients with CKD stages 3 to 5.[13]
However, it remains unclear if PVFx predicts incident cardiovascular disease events in older men, and if that association remains after accounting for clinical cardiovascular disease risk factors and the competing risk of non-cardiovascular mortality. It is also unknown whether both PVFx and AAC predict cardiovascular disease events independent of each other. Our primary aim was to estimate, in a large cohort of older community-dwelling men, the association of PVFx and AAC with incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular events (a composite outcome of myocardial infarction, fatal and non-fatal stroke, and coronary heart disease death), adjusted for each other and clinical cardiovascular disease risk factors. Our secondary aims were to estimate the associations of PVFx and AAC with incident ischemic congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease events, and any incident cardiovascular disease event, adjusted for each other and clinical cardiovascular disease risk factors.
2. Materials and Methods
The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study enrolled 5994 men at six U.S. study sites (Birmingham AL, Minneapolis MN, Palo Alto CA, Pittsburgh PA, Portland OR, and San Diego CA) between the years 2000 and 2002, as described in prior publications, after signing informed consent documents approved by the Institutional Review Board review at each of the six sites. Eligible men were 65 years of age or older, were community dwelling and able to walk without assistance, and had not had bilateral hip arthroplasties. All men had lateral lumbar and thoracic spine x-rays taken at their baseline visit. Among them, a mean (SD) 3.4 (0.5) years later, 3135 men were enrolled in the MrOS sleep substudy (Figure 1). Those who did not enroll in the Sleep Substudy were excluded, because they were not rigorously followed up prospectively for incident cardiovascular disease events. Characteristics of men who enrolled in the sleep study at baseline were showed they were slightly younger and healthier than men who did not (Supplemental Table 1), although the differences in these characteristics were slight. Among those in the Sleep Substudy, 2799 men with baseline visit lateral thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs of sufficient quality to allow adequate adjudication for prevalent vertebral fracture status and scoring of abdominal aortic calcification comprise the analytical cohort for this study (Figure 1).
Figure 1 – Flow Diagram for Analytic Cohort.

2.1. Ascertainment of Prevalent Vertebral Fracture
Lateral spine thoracic and lumbar spine x-rays were adjudicated for PVFx using a two-stage process.[14] First, technicians triaged the x-rays for the presence of any vertebrae with an abnormal appearance. Participants for whom all vertebrae were judged to be clearly normal were classified as having no prevalent vertebral fracture. The remaining x-rays were read by one expert reader (author JTS) for prevalent vertebral fracture. The Genant semi-quantitative method was used with one modification, that grade 1 vertebral deformities had to exhibit broad endplate depression in order to be considered fractured. Tests of intra-rater reliability were done at three timepoints and showed kappa scores of 0.79 to 0.93. For the primary analysis, those with ≥ 1 SQ grade 2 or 3 vertebral fractures were considered to have PVFx, and the others to have no prevalent vertebral fracture. A secondary analysis was done defining PVFx as having any SQ grade (1 through 3) vertebral fracture.
2.2. Ascertainment of Abdominal Aortic Calcification (AAC)
Baseline lateral spine x-rays were semi-quantitatively scored using the Kauppila method developed in the Framingham study.[15] The anterior and posterior aortic walls are scored with each segment of the aorta anterior to each of lumbar vertebrae 1 through four are scored on a scale of 0 to 3 for proportion of the length of the aorta within that segment. The scores for all 8 segments are summed, yielding a possible score range of 0 to 24. One reader (PS) scored all x-rays for AAC, and for a subset of 40 individuals inter-rater agreement with a clinician expert (JTS) was excellent (ICC 0.94 [95% C.I 0.88 to 0.97]).[16] For the purposes of the primary analyses, AAC scores were categorized as low (score 0 or 1), moderate (score 2 to 5), or high (score ≥ 6).
We have used convolutional neural networks to develop an automated algorithm to score AAC on lateral spine radiographs in the MrOS, with very good to excellent agreement with AAC scores generated by a human reader (spearman correlation 0.92, kappa agreement between expert and auto-AAC categories 0.74).[17] Readings of AAC are time-consuming and require trained experts, and it is possible that widespread scoring of AAC on lateral spine imaging will require automated methods. For this reason, we chose to use the CNN-generated auto-AAC (also referred to as ML-AAC) score categories (low [<2], moderate [2 to <6], and high [≥ 6]) as the AAC predictor variable in our primary analyses. Secondary analyses were also done using AAC score categories generated by human reader as the AAC predictor.
2.3. Ascertainment of Covariate Predictors
All covariate predictors were measured at the first Sleep Substudy visit, unless otherwise noted below. Height and weight were measured on a wall-mounted Harpenden stadiometer and on a balance beam scale, respectively, and body mass index calculated as weight divided by height squared. Waist circumference was measured with a flexible tape measure three times and averaged. Systolic blood pressure was measured in the sitting posture in both arms and averaged. Smoking status and past physician diagnosis of coronary heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, or cerebrovascular disease was assessed by self-report. Self-reported physical activity was assessed with the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Diabetes mellitus was defined at the first MrOS Sleep Substudy visit as fasting (>8 hours) glucose>126 mg/dl OR self-reported diagnosis of diabetes OR using hypoglycemic medications or insulin use. Oxidized LDL cholesterol was measured at the first Sleep Substudy visit with a Beckman Coulter Biomek NXp (Beckman Coulter, Inc, Fullerton, CA) using direct sandwich enzyme immunoassay and Oxidized LDL ELISA (manufacturer Mercodia AB, Uppsala, Sweden). HDL and LDL cholesterol and triglycerides were not assessed at the first Sleep Substudy visit, and hence values from the main baseline MrOS visit years 2000–2002 were used. These were measured using a Roche COBAS Integra 800 automated analyzer (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN). Total cholesterol values were calculated from HDL, LDL, and triglyceride levels. Participants were instructed to bring to their first Sleep Study visit bottles for all currently used prescription and over the counter medications. Those using a statin or anti-hypertensive medication (calcium channel blocker, beta blocker, angiotensin receptor blocker, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, thiazide diuretic, hydralazine, aliskeren, or prazosin) were identified.
2.4. Ascertainment of Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events
MrOS Sleep Substudy enrollees were contacted by postcard (and if necessary, by phone) every four months to ask if they had any adverse heart or blood vessel health events since they were last contacted. Physician and hospital records were obtained for those that indicated they may have had a cardiovascular health event. For in-hospital fatal events, the death certificate was also obtained, and for out of hospital fatal events an interview with next of kin was conducted and records from the most recent hospital stay obtained. All records were reviewed and adjudicated by a physician according to a pre-specified protocol using criteria that have been used for cardiovascular intervention trials.[18] An expert cardiologist was available for additional review of equivocal cases.
The primary outcome was incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events, defined by the American Heart Association as myocardial infarction, stroke (fatal or non-fatal), or coronary heart disease death. Secondary outcomes were incident ischemic congestive heart failure, incident peripheral vascular disease (peripheral arterial surgery, acute arterial dissection, occlusion, or rupture), and any cardiovascular event. Any cardiovascular event was defined as ASCVD, incident CHF, PVD or hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary artery bypass surgery, mechanical coronary revascularization, transient ischemic attack, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or sudden death (due to coronary heart disease or not otherwise specified).
2.5. Statistical Analysis
All analyses were conducted using Stata version 18.0 (College Station, TX). Baseline characteristics were described stratified by auto-AAC level, and statistical tests across auto-AAC level were done using Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables and chi-square statistics for categorical variables.
Proportional subhazards models, modified by the method of Lambert[19] to account for the competing risk of non-CVD mortality, were used to assess associations of predictor variables with the primary outcome (ASCVD events). Model 1 estimated the association of PVFx (Genant SQ grade 2 or 3) with incident ASCVD adjusted for study site, age, and self-reported past cardiovascular disease. Model 2 added auto-AAC category as an additional covariate.
Other candidate covariates (Supplemental Table 2), were tested individually in separate models for their association with incident ASCVD, adjusted for PVFx, auto-AAC, age, past CVD, and study site, accounting for competing risk of non-CVD mortality. The initial full multivariable model included the additional covariates associated with incident ASCVD at a p-value <0.20 along with Model 2 covariates. For the final multivariable model (Model 3), those covariates with a fully adjusted p-value >0.2 were removed. Model 4 was the same as Model 3 but excluded those with a previous history of CVD. We also tested the significance of interactions terms between PVFx status and past CVD, as well as between auto AAC category and past CVD, by adding these interaction terms separately to Model 3. The proportional hazards assumption was tested and was not violated for any model.
Cumulative incidence curves for ASCVD over 5-years were generated from Model 3 for subsets defined by PVFx status and auto-AAC level. The relative variable importance for each covariate in Model 3 was calculated as the increase of log-likelihood chi-square value when that covariate was singly removed from Model 3.
Secondary analyses with incident ischemic congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and any cardiovascular disease as the outcome were performed including all of the covariates of the Model 4. Secondary analyses were also performed defining prevalent vertebral fracture as any SQ grade (1, 2, or 3), and substituting human reader AAC score categories for those of auto-AAC.
3. Results
Baseline characteristics of the cohort stratified by auto-AAC level are shown in Table 1. Those with higher levels of auto-AAC were older, more likely to have a self-reported physician diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, to have a current or past history of smoking, to have diabetes mellitus, and to be baseline users of statin and/or anti-hypertensive medication. Those with higher levels of auto-AAC also had higher systolic blood pressure and waist circumference, and modestly lower HDL, oxidized LDL, and total cholesterol levels.
Table 1:
Baseline Characteristics Stratified by Auto-AAC Category
| Auto-AAC24 Score Category | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
| Characteristic | Low (<2) | Moderate (2 to <6) | High ≥ 6 | p-value |
|
| ||||
| Number (%) | 1,027 (36.7%) | 965 (34.5%) | 807 (28.8%) | |
|
| ||||
| Prevalent Vertebral Fracture (SQ 2 or 3), N (%) | 58 (5.6%) | 75 (7.8%) | 71 (8.8%) | 0.028* |
|
| ||||
| Age, years (SD) | 74.5 (4.8) | 76.5 (5.4) | 78.4 (5.8) | <0.001† |
|
| ||||
| Past Diagnosis of CVD‡, N (%) | 252 (24.5%) | 386 (40.0%) | 437 (54.2%) | <0.001* |
|
| ||||
| Systolic Blood Pressure, mmHg (SD) | 124.8 (15.6) | 127.7 (15.8) | 129.6 (17.4) | <0.001† |
|
| ||||
| Body Mass Index, kg/m2 (SD) | 27.0 (3.7) | 27.1 (3.8) | 27.1 (3.9) | 0.737† |
|
| ||||
| Waist Circumference, cm (SD) | 98.9 (10.8) | 99.8 (11.1) | 100.1 (11.0) | 0.051† |
|
| ||||
| Smoking Status, N (%) | ||||
| Never | 495 (48.2%) | 373 (38.7%) | 240 (29.7%) | |
| Past | 513 (50.0%) | 577 (59.9%) | 541 (67.0%) | <0.001* |
| Current | 18 (1.8%) | 14 (1.5%) | 26 (3.2%) | |
|
| ||||
| HDL Cholesterol, mg/dl (SD) | 49.8 (13.9) | 48.3 (14.0) | 49.1 (14.9) | 0.011† |
|
| ||||
| Oxidized LDL Cholesterol Units/L (SD) | 44.6 (11.9) | 43.9 (11.8) | 42.8 (12.6) | <0.001† |
|
| ||||
| Total Cholesterol, mg/dl (SD) | 195.1 (34.5) | 194.2 (33.1) | 191.1 (34.6) | 0.018† |
|
| ||||
| Diabetes Mellitus, N (%) | 139 (13.5%) | 146 (15.1%) | 154 (19.1%) | 0.005* |
|
| ||||
| PASE Score (SD) | 156.8 (73.7) | 144.7 (72.6) | 135.3 (69.8) | <0.001† |
|
| ||||
| Baseline Statin Use, N (%) | 212 (20.6%) | 282 (29.2%) | 274 (34.0%) | <0.001* |
|
| ||||
| Baseline Anti-Hypertensive Medication Use, N (%) | 412 (40.1%) | 475 (49.2%) | 493 (61.1%) | <0.001* |
Likelihood Ratio Chi2
Kruskal-WaNis test
Self-reported physician diagnosis of coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral vascular disease
Among candidate covariates, systolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol, oxidized LDL cholesterol, body mass index, baseline statin use, anti-hypertensive medication use, and aspirin use met criteria for inclusion in the initial multivariable model (Supplemental Table 2). However, oxidized LDL cholesterol (p = 0.57), BMI (p=0.31), and aspirin use (p=0.37) had p-values above 0.20 for the association with incident ASCVD in the initial full model, and hence were removed from the final multivariable model.
3.1. Primary Analyses
Adjusted only for age, previous history of cardiovascular disease, and study enrollment site, men with PVFx (SQ grade 2 or 3) compared to those with SQ grade 0 or 1 had a subhazard ratio of 1.62 (95% C.I. 1.18, 2.22) for incident ASCVD (Table 2). This subhazard ratio did not meaningfully change with the addition of auto-AAC category (Model 2, Table 2). Compared with men with low or no AAC, those with moderate (SHR 1.38, 95% C.I. 1.08, 1.61) and high levels of AAC (SHR 1.62, 95% C.I. 1.23, 2.13), had increased risks of incident ASCVD, accounting for age, PVFx, and past CVD. These associations were only slightly attenuated, and remained significant, with further adjustment for systolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol, baseline statin use, and anti-hypertensive medication use (Model 3, Table 2). Interaction terms of self-reported past CVD with PVFx and with autoAAC category were insignificant (p-values 0.97, 0.30, and 0.50 for PVFx, moderate auto-AAC, and high auto-AAC, respectively).
Table 2 -.
Associations Prevalent Vertebral Fracture & Auto-AAC with Incident ASCVD
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Number of observations (Number of outcome events) | N=2740 (381) | N=2740 (381) | N=2528 (353) | N=1561 (171) |
|
| ||||
| HR (95% C.I.) | HR (95% C.I.) | HR (95% C.I.) | HR (95% C.I.) | |
|
| ||||
| Prevalent Vertebral Fracture (SQ 2 or 3) | 1.62 [1.18 2.22] | 1.60 [1.17 2.20] | 1.51 [1.07 2.14] | 1.52 [0.90 2.57] |
|
| ||||
| Auto-AAC Category | ||||
| Low (<2) | Reference | Reference | Reference | |
| Moderate (2 to <6) | 1.38 [1.06 1.81] | 1.34 [1.01 1.77] | 1.44 [1.00 2.08] | |
| High (≥6) | 1.62 [1.23 2.13] | 1.55 [1.16 2.06] | 1.47 [0.98 2.21] | |
|
| ||||
| Past Cardiovascular Diagnosis | 1.61 [1.32 1.98] | 1.49 [1.21 1.84] | 1.55 [1.23 1.94] | |
|
| ||||
| Age (per 5 year increase) | 1.34 [1.23 1.47] | 1.29 [1.18 1.41] | 1.28 [1.16 1.41] | 1.46 [1.27 1.68] |
|
| ||||
| Systolic Blood Pressure (per SD increase) | 1.22 [1.11 1.35] | 1.27 [1.09 1.47] | ||
|
| ||||
| HDL Cholesterol (per SD increase) | 0.86 [0.77 0.97] | 0.87 [0.73 1.02] | ||
|
| ||||
| Baseline Statin Use | 0.83 [0.65 1.06] | 0.82 [0.54 1.25] | ||
|
| ||||
| Baseline Anti-Hypertensive Medication Use | 1.18 [0.94 1.47] | 1.32 [0.97 1.80] | ||
Excluding those with past physician diagnosis of cardiovascular diagnosis (coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and/or peripheral vascular disease)
Hazard Ratios with p-value of association <0.05 are in Bold
Predicted ASCVD-free survival curves generated from Model 3 showed that the 5-year ASCVD-free survival varied from 0.93 in men without grade 2–3 PVFx and low auto-AAC to 0.84 in those with both PVFx and a high level of auto-AAC (Figure 2). Men with PVFx had lower ASCVD-free survival compared to those without grade 2–3 PVFx. Within each category of PVFx status, men with moderate auto-AAC vs those with low auto-AAC had a lower ASCVD-free survival, and men with high auto-AAC appeared to have a lower ASCVD-free survival than men with moderate auto-AAC. ASCVD-free survival appeared very similar in men without grade 2–3PVFx but with high auto-AAC and men with grade 2–3 PVFx but low auto-AAC. Increasing age was the most important ASCVD predictor, followed by systolic blood pressure and past history of CVD (Figure 3). Auto-AAC and PVFx were the fourth and sixth most important predictors, of similar magnitude to HDL cholesterol.
Figure 2 – Cumulative ASCVD-Free Survival in Subsets of Men Defined by auto-AAC level and Prevalent Vertebral Fracture Status.

Figure 3 – Relative Variable Importance for Prediction of Incident ASCVD Events.

*SQ grade 2 or 3 prevalent vertebral fracture
†calcium channel blocker, beta blocker, angiotensin receptor blocker, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, thiazide diuretic, hydralazine, aliskeren, or prazosin
When men with self-reported previous CVD diagnoses were excluded from the analysis, the sample size was substantially from 2528 to 1561. The point estimates of association between PVFx and auto-AAC category were similar those in to model 3, but 95% confidence intervals around the point estimates of associations all crossed 1.00 (Model 4, Table 2).
3.1. Secondary Analyses
The associations of PVFx and AAC with incident ASCVD events did not meaningfully change when human reader AAC score categories were used in place of auto-AAC score categories (Supplemental Table 3). However, the associations of PVFx with incident events were much weaker in magnitude when PVFx expressed as any SQ grade (1, 2, or 3, Supplemental Table 4) rather than SQ grade 2 or 3.
The associations of PVFx (SQ grade 2 or 3) with incident ischemic congestive heart failure events and any cardiovascular disease event were smaller in magnitude than its association with incident ASCVD and not significant (Supplemental Table 5).Men with PVFx grade 2 or 3 versus PVFx grade 0 or 1 appeared to have a higher risk incident peripheral vascular disease events, but the 95% confidence interval crossed 1.00 (HR 1.54, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.68). On the other hand, men with a high level of auto-AAC compared with men with a low level of auto-ACC had increased risks of incident ischemic congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease events, and any cardiovascular disease events (Supplemental Table 5).
4. Discussion
In this study of older men, prevalent moderate or severe vertebral fracture (PVFx) and higher auto-AAC were associated with increased risks of incident ASCVD events, adjusted for each other and other cardiovascular risk factors. Our findings suggest that both PVFx and auto-AAC may contribute to ASCVD risk stratification among older men, and indicate their potential for refining estimates of ASCVD risk and guiding clinical cardiovascular risk management decisions.
Men who have already been diagnosed with CVD are already known to be at high risk of incident ASCVD events. Hence, identifying prevalent vertebral fracture and/or auto-AAC has the potential to influence cardiovascular disease risk management decisions primarily in the subset of older men who do not have known clinical cardiovascular disease. When our analyses were restricted to men without a prior clinical CVD diagnosis, the point estimates of associations of PVFx and auto-AAC with incident ASCVD events were similar in magnitude to those in the entire analytic sample, but the confidence intervals around the point estimates of association crossed 1.00. Hence, additional studies with larger numbers of older men who do not have any prior clinical cardiovascular disease events are warranted to examine the associations of PVFx and auto-AAC with risk of ASCVD events in men without a clinical history of CVD.
Moreover, it is noteworthy that we did not find an association between PVFx and incident congestive heart failure, incident peripheral vascular disease, or any cardiovascular disease event. These results may in part be due to the low prevalence (approximately 7%) of moderate to severe vertebral fracture in our cohort of community dwelling men unselected for fracture risk factors. In a very large cohort using national insurance claims data in Taiwan, Lee and colleagues reported that those with clinical vertebral fracture had a subsequent higher incidence of hospitalization for CHF.[20] Larger studies of older men selected for higher fracture risk, with a higher prevalence of vertebral fracture, are needed to investigate if PVFx is associated with incident congestive heart failure or incident peripheral vascular disease in older men.
Our study findings nonetheless indicate that prior findings of an association between prevalent vertebral fracture and incident major adverse cardiovascular disease events in older women[10, 11, 21, 22] are also true for older men. Our results are consistent with prior analyses of older men enrolled in the STRAMBO study that reported an association of prevalent vertebral fracture with greater AAC severity.[23] Prevalent vertebral fracture in other studies has also been found to be associated with iliac[24] and coronary artery calcification.[25] Other studies in women have found associations of other indicators of bone fragility (such as high FRAX fracture risk estimates[9] or very low bone mineral density[8, 26]) with incident cardiovascular disease events, and with coronary artery calcification.[27] Our findings are broadly consistent with these other studies. With respect to AAC, our findings are also consistent with a large number of studies in middle-aged men showing that severe AAC predicts a variety of incident cardiovascular disease events after accounting for other cardiovascular disease risk factors.[4, 6, 7]
Osteoporosis and associated fractures and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease share many clinical risk factors (such as smoking and alcohol abuse), pathogenic mechanisms such as activation of inflammatory pathways and oxidative stress, and expression of matrix proteins in both vascular walls and bone such as osteopontin, osteoprotegerin, and bone morphogenetic proteins.[28] Altered microvascular circulation related to atherosclerosis and increased arterial stiffness may also directly impair bone perfusion, bone mineral density, and strength.[29, 30] However, the complex causal web that links these conditions is not fully elucidated or understood.[28, 31]
We recognize limitations to our study. The MrOS population is 90% Caucasian, community dwelling, and slightly healthier than the age-matched general US older male population. Hence, our findings may not be generalizable to those of non-white ethnicity, long-term care residents, or older men with a high level of multimorbidity. Our finding of an association between PVFx and incident ASCVD events does not establish that PVFx is a causal factor for ASCVD events. There may be residual confounding from measured and unmeasured variables accounting at least in part for our findings. The Kaupila scale to score AAC is semiquantitative not as precise as fully quantitative ascertainment.[32] However, imprecision in our AAC measure would tend to bias the associations of AAC with incident ASCVD toward the null. Finally, prior cardiovascular disease was assessed by self-report, which has high specificity but moderate sensitivity compared to claims data for ascertainment of prior clinical cardiovascular disease events.[33]
However, there are important strengths to our study. In particular, both PVFx and AAC were ascertained with high intra- and inter-rater reliability. Incident ASCVD events were ascertained by expert review of medical records, consistent with adjudication of events in randomized controlled trial of cardiovascular disease interventions.
In conclusion, prevalent vertebral fracture and automated assessments of AAC are associated with incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events in older men, after accounting for each other and other cardiovascular disease risk factors. Further studies are needed in older men without a history of clinical cardiovascular disease and in study populations of older men with a higher prevalence of radiographic vertebral fracture.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
Prevalent vertebral fractures (PVFx) predict incident ASCVD, adjusted for AAC.
AAC predict incident ASCVD, adjusted for PVFx and other clinical ASCVD risk factors
Confirmatory studies are needed in older men with no prior cardiovascular disease
Study Funding
The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study is supported by National Institutes of Health funding. The following institutes provide support: the National Institute on Aging (NIA), the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research under the following grant numbers: U01 AG027810, U01 AG042124, U01 AG042139, U01 AG042140, U01 AG042143, U01 AG042145, U01 AG042168, U01 AR066160, and UL1 TR000128. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) provides funding for the MrOS Sleep ancillary study “Outcomes of Sleep Disorders in Older Men” under the following grant numbers: R01 HL071194, R01 HL070848, R01 HL070847, R01 HL070842, R01 HL070841, R01 HL070837, R01 HL070838, and R01 HL070839.
Footnotes
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Credit Authorship Contribution Statement
John T. Schousboe: study conceptualization and design, data analysis, data interpretation, original drafting of manuscript, review and editing of manuscript
Joshua R. Lewis: study conceptualization and design, data interpretation, review and editing of manuscript
Lisa Langsetmo: data interpretation, review and editing of manuscript
Afsah Saleem: data interpretation, review and editing of manuscript
S. Zulquainan Gilani: data interpretation, review and editing of manuscript
Zaid Ilyas: data interpretation, review and editing of manuscript
Pawel Szulc: data interpretation, review and editing of manuscript
William D. Leslie: data interpretation, review and editing of manuscript
Kristine E. Ensrud: data curation, data interpretation, review and editing of manuscript
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form. As such, this version is no longer the Accepted Manuscript, but it is not yet the definitive Version of Record; we are providing this early version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that Elsevier’s sharing policy for the Published Journal Article applies to this version, see: https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/sharing#4-published-journal-article. Please also note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- [1].Schousboe JT, Langsetmo L, Szulc P, Lewis JR, Taylor BC, Kats AM, Vo TN, Ensrud KE, Joint Associations of Prevalent Radiographic Vertebral Fracture and Abdominal Aortic Calcification With Incident Hip, Major Osteoporotic, and Clinical Vertebral Fractures, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 36(5) (2021) 892–900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Schousboe JT, Lewis JR, Monchka BA, Reid SB, Davidson MJ, Kimelman D, Jozani MJ, Smith C, Sim M, Gilani SZ, Suter D, Leslie WD, Simultaneous automated ascertainment of prevalent vertebral fracture and abdominal aortic calcification in clinical practice: role in fracture risk assessment, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 39(7) (2024) 898–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Lewis JR, Eggermont CJ, Schousboe JT, Lim WH, Wong G, Khoo B, Sim M, Yu M, Ueland T, Bollerslev J, Hodgson JM, Zhu K, Wilson KE, Kiel DP, Prince RL, Association Between Abdominal Aortic Calcification, Bone Mineral Density, and Fracture in Older Women, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 34(11) (2019) 2052–2060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].van der Meer IM, Bots ML, Hofman A, del Sol AI, van der Kuip DA, Witteman JC, Predictive value of noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis for incident myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study, Circulation 109(9) (2004) 1089–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Hollander M, Hak AE, Koudstaal PJ, Bots ML, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, Witteman JC, Breteler MM, Comparison between measures of atherosclerosis and risk of stroke: the Rotterdam Study, Stroke 34(10) (2003) 2367–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Walsh CR, Cupples LA, Levy D, Kiel DP, Hannan M, Wilson PW, O'Donnell CJ, Abdominal aortic calcific deposits are associated with increased risk for congestive heart failure: the Framingham Heart Study, Am Heart J 144(4) (2002) 733–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Wilson PW, Kauppila LI, O'Donnell CJ, Kiel DP, Hannan M, Polak JM, Cupples LA, Abdominal aortic calcific deposits are an important predictor of vascular morbidity and mortality, Circulation 103(11) (2001) 1529–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].von der Recke P, Hansen MA, Hassager C, The association between low bone mass at the menopause and cardiovascular mortality, Am J Med 106(3) (1999) 273–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Ye C, Schousboe JT, Morin SN, Lix LM, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Harvey NC, Kanis JA, Leslie WD, FRAX predicts cardiovascular risk in women undergoing osteoporosis screening: the Manitoba bone mineral density registry, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 39(1) (2024) 30–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Tanko LB, Christiansen C, Cox DA, Geiger MJ, McNabb MA, Cummings SR, Relationship between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women, J Bone Miner Res 20(11) (2005) 1912–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Schousboe JT, Monchka BA, Davidson JM, Kimelman D, Gilani SZ, Ilyas Z, Reid S, Lewis JR, Leslie WD, Prevalent vertebral fracture is associated with incident cardiovascular disease events in older individuals referred for bone densitometry, Bone 200 (2025) 117601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Fusaro M, Tripepi G, Noale M, Vajente N, Plebani M, Zaninotto M, Guglielmi G, Miotto D, Carbonare LD, D'Angelo A, Ciurlino D, Puggia R, Miozzo D, Giannini S, Gallieni M, High prevalence of vertebral fractures assessed by quantitative morphometry in hemodialysis patients, strongly associated with vascular calcifications, Calcified Tissue International 93(1) (2013) 39–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Castro-Alonso C, D'Marco L, Pomes J, Conill MDA, Garcia-Diez AI, Molina P, Puchades MJ, Valdivielso JM, Escudero V, Bover J, Navarro-Gonzalez J, Ribas B, Pallardo LM, Gorriz JL, Prevalence of vertebral fractures and their prognostic significance in the survival in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3–5 not on dialysis, Journal of Clinical Medicine 9(5) (2020) 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Cawthon PM, Haslam J, Fullman R, Peters KW, Black D, Ensrud KE, Cummings SR, Orwoll ES, Barrett-Connor E, Marshall L, Steiger P, Schousboe JT, Osteoporotic G Fractures in Men Research, Methods and reliability of radiographic vertebral fracture detection in older men: The osteoporotic fractures in men study, Bone 67 (2014) 152–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Kauppila LI, Polak JF, Cupples LA, Hannan MT, Kiel DP, Wilson PW, New indices to classify location, severity and progression of calcific lesions in the abdominal aorta: a 25-year follow-up study, Atherosclerosis 132(2) (1997) 245–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Szulc P, Blackwell T, Schousboe JT, Bauer DC, Cawthon P, Lane NE, Cummings SR, Orwoll ES, Black DM, Ensrud KE, High hip fracture risk in men with severe aortic calcification: MrOS study, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 29(4) (2014) 968–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Salim A, Gilani SZ, Langsetmo L, Szulc P, Suter D, Sim M, Lewis JR, Leslie WD, Ensrud KE, Schousboe JT, Associations of Automated Abdominal Aortic Calcification Scores with Incident Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Events [Abstract 1023], Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 39 (2024) 70. [Google Scholar]
- [18].Grady D, Applegate W, Bush T, Furberg C, Riggs B, Hulley SB, Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS): design, methods, and baseline characteristics, Control Clin Trials 19(4) (1998) 314–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Lambert P, The estimation and modelling of cause-specific cumulative incidence functions using time-dependent weights, Stata Journal 17(1) (2017) 181–207. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Lee FY, Chen WK, Lin CL, Kao CH, Yang TY, Lai CY, Risk of aortic dissection, congestive heart failure, pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with clinical vertebral fracture: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan, BMJ Open 9(11) (2019) e030939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Buckens CF, de Jong PA, Verkooijen HM, Verhaar HJ, Mali WP, van der Graaf Y, Vertebral fractures on routine chest computed tomography: relation with arterial calcifications and future cardiovascular events, International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 31(2) (2015) 437–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Chen YC, Wu JC, Liu L, Huang WC, Cheng H, Chen TJ, Thien PF, Lo SS, Hospitalized osteoporotic vertebral fracture increases the risk of stroke: a population-based cohort study, J Bone Miner Res 28(3) (2013) 516–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Szulc P, Samelson EJ, Sornay-Rendu E, Chapurlat R, Kiel DP, Severity of aortic calcification is positively associated with vertebral fracture in older men - A densitometry study in the STRAMBO cohort, Osteoporosis International 24(4) (2013) 1177–1184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Fusaro M, Tripepi G, Plebani M, Politi C, Aghi A, Taddei F, Schileo E, Zaninotto M, Manna GL, Cianciolo G, Gallieni M, Cosmai L, Messa P, Ravera M, Nickolas TL, Ferrari S, Ketteler M, Iervasi G, Mereu MC, Vettor R, Giannini S, Gasperoni L, Sella S, Brandi ML, Cianferotti L, Caterina RD, The vessels-bone axis: Iliac artery calcifications, vertebral fractures and vitamin k from viki study, Nutrients 13(10) (no pagination) (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Driessen J, Van Dort M, Geusens P, Romme E, Smeenk F, Rahel B, Wouters E, Van Den Bergh J, The association between prevalent vertebral fractures and coronary artery calcification on chest CT in smokers with and without COPD, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 33(Supplement 1) (2018) 391. [Google Scholar]
- [26].Avramovski P, Avramovska M, Sikole A, Bone Strength and Arterial Stiffness Impact on Cardiovascular Mortality in a General Population, J. Osteoporos. 2016 (2016) 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Barengolts EI, Herman M, Kukreja SC, Kouznetsova T, Lin C, Chomka EV, Osteoporosis and coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic postmenopausal women, Calcified Tissue International 62(3) (1998) 209–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Sharafi MH, Nazari A, Cheraghi M, Souri F, Bakhshesh M, The link between osteoporosis and cardiovascular diseases: a review of shared mechanisms, risk factors, and therapeutic approaches, Osteoporos Int 36(7) (2025) 1129–1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Qiu X, Fu Y, Chen J, Ye Y, Wang Z, Ming X, The Correlation between Osteoporosis and Blood Circulation Function Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging, J Med Syst 43(4) (2019) 91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Tomiyama H, Yamashina A, Non-invasive vascular function tests: their pathophysiological background and clinical application, Circ J 74(1) (2010) 24–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Szulc P, Abdominal aortic calcification: A reappraisal of epidemiological and pathophysiological data, Bone 84 (2016) 25–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Fusaro M, Schileo E, Crimi G, Aghi A, Bazzocchi A, Barbanti Brodano G, Girolami M, Sella S, Politi C, Ferrari S, Gasperini C, Tripepi G, Taddei F, A Novel Quantitative Computer-Assisted Score Can Improve Repeatability in the Estimate of Vascular Calcifications at the Abdominal Aorta, Nutrients 14(20) (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Zeynalova S, Worringen P, Bassler S, Martin A, Czech K, Greulich L, Reusche M, Enders U, Reyes N, Yahiaoui-Doktor M, Collier M, Loeffler M, Stegmann T, A comparison between the self-report of chronic cardiovascular diseases with health insurance data: insights from the population-based LIFE-Adult study, Arch Public Health 83(1) (2025) 124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
