Skip to main content
Emerging Microbes & Infections logoLink to Emerging Microbes & Infections
. 2026 Jul 24;15(1):2709847. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2026.2709847

Development and characterization of a recombinant Bundibugyo virus expressing a fluorescent reporter protein

Shilpi Jain 1,CONTACT, Éric Bergeron 1, Mike Flint 1, Joel M Montgomery 1, Christina F Spiropoulou 1, César G Albariño 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13435268  PMID: 42496613

ABSTRACT

Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD), caused by Bundibugyo virus (BDBV), is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, with previous outbreaks reporting case fatality rates of 30%–50%. The ongoing BDBV outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda highlights the urgent need for virus-specific research tools and medical countermeasures. Unlike Ebola virus disease caused by Zaire ebolavirus, no licensed vaccines or specific therapeutics are currently available for BVD. The lack of research tools has limited studies with BDBV. To facilitate antiviral testing and neutralization studies, we developed the first recombinant BDBV expressing the fluorescent reporter protein ZsGreen (rBDBV-ZsG). As a proof of concept, we tested a set of previously characterized antiviral compounds and demonstrated comparable inhibitory profiles between rBDBV-ZsG and the wild-type BDBV parental strain. Furthermore, the utility of rBDBV-ZsG was successfully evaluated in neutralization assays, demonstrating robust sensitivity and specificity using monoclonal antibodies and convalescent serum samples.

KEYWORDS: Bundibugyo virus, BDBV, Ebola virus, neutralization, antivirals, outbreak

Introduction

The Bundibugyo virus (BDBV; Orthoebolavirus bundibugyoense) was first identified in 2007 during an outbreak in Uganda [1]. A subsequent BDBV outbreak occurred in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in 2012 [2]. In these outbreaks, the reported case fatality rate (CFR) for BDBV has ranged from 30% to 50% [3]. In May 2026, an outbreak of Ebola disease caused by BDBV emerged in the DRC and Uganda and rapidly escalated to a WHO-declared Public Health Emergency of International Concern [4]. Unlike Ebola virus disease caused by Zaire ebolavirus (ZEBOV), there is currently no licensed vaccine or specific therapeutic available for Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD) [5]. Despite urgent international efforts, the basic research tools needed to respond effectively to this outbreak remain limited. Previously, we and others developed various filoviruses expressing the reporter protein [6–12]. However, no published reverse genetics system currently exists for BDBV, severely limiting mechanistic studies and therapeutic development.

Here, we describe the first recombinant BDBV expressing the fluorescent reporter protein ZsGreen (rBDBV-ZsG), based on the BDBV 2012 strain. As proof of concept, we first tested a panel of previously described antiviral compounds effective for ZEBOV in our BSL-4 laboratories and evaluated their specificity using both rBDBV-ZsG and wild-type BDBV 2012 strain. We further assessed the utility of rBDBV-ZsG for neutralization studies.

Results

Design and rescue of a reporter BDBV

The full-length BDBV clone was generated and rBDBV-ZsG was successfully rescued as described in Materials and Methods (Figure 1A and Supp Figure 1). Since the functional compatibility of EBOV and BDBV polymerase complex has been well-demonstrated [13], we used our previously developed EBOV support plasmids to rescue rBDBV-ZsG. Virus rescue was confirmed by IFA using a polyclonal rabbit anti-EBOV antibody (Figure 1B) and by next-generation sequencing (Illumina MiniSeq System). rBDBV-ZsG exhibited growth kinetics similar to those of the corresponding wild-type virus (Figure 1C).

Figure 1.

Eight visuals: one genome diagram, one microscopy image grid and six line graphs showing Bundibugyo virus constructs and assay curves. The figure shows eight visuals summarizing recombinant Bundibugyo virus experiments. The first visual is a schematic genome diagram comparing wild type Bundibugyo virus, labeled BDBV, and recombinant Bundibugyo virus with ZsGreen, labeled rBDBV ZsG. Rectangular gene blocks for NP, VP35, VP40, GP, VP30, VP24, and L are arranged between 5 prime and 3 prime ends, with an added ZsGreen block and P2A element inserted near the front of the recombinant genome. The second visual is a grid of fluorescence microscopy images of Vero CCL 81 cells, with one row for BDBV and one for rBDBV ZsG, and four columns labeled DAPI, R anti EBOV, ZsG, and overlap, showing nuclear stain, anti Ebola virus antibody signal, ZsGreen signal, and merged images. The third visual is a line graph of virus growth in Huh7 cells with days post infection on the horizontal axis from 0 to 4 and tissue culture infectious dose per milliliter on the vertical logarithmic axis from 10 to 10 to the power of 8, comparing rBDBV ZsG and BDBV WT curves that rise over time. The fourth group contains six concentration response line graphs for antiviral compounds ribavirin, remdesivir, 6 AzaU, 2 prime dFC, and 4 prime FIU, each plotting compound concentration in micromolar on a logarithmic horizontal axis from about 0.001 to 100, percent of control on the left vertical axis from 0 to 150, and cell viability on the right vertical axis from 0 to 120, with curves for BDBV WT and rBDBV ZsG decreasing as concentration increases. The fifth group has two line graphs of neutralization in Vero CCL 81 cells infected with rBDBV ZsG. The left graph labeled mAbs shows antibody concentration in nanogram per milliliter on the horizontal axis from about 1 to 10000 and percent of control on the vertical axis from 0 to 150, with separate curves for ADI 15878 Filo Ab and 8A1 CCHF Ab. The right graph labeled convalescent sera shows dilution factor on the horizontal axis from about 10 to 100000 and percent of control on the vertical axis from 0 to 150, with curves for BDBV SS 1, BDBV SS 2, BDBV SS 3, and Neg. All data are approximate.

(A) Schematic representation of the genomes of recombinant Bundibugyo virus (rBDBV) with or without ZsGreen (ZsG) protein. (B) Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) showing Vero-CCL-81 cells infected with wild-type BDBV (BDBV) or rBDBV-ZsG (magnification 20 X; EVOS microscope). (C) Growth curves of indicated viruses in Huh7 cells (Multiplicity of Infection: 0.1). (D) Concentration-response curves in Huh7 cells infected with BDBV-WT (blue circles) or rBDBV-ZsG (green triangles) after treatment with various antiviral compounds. (E) Left panel: Concentration-response curves in Vero-CCL-81 cells infected with rBDBV-ZsG after neutralization with anti-filovirus (ADI-15878; green line) and anti-CCHFV (8A1; blue line) antibodies. Right panel: Concentration-response curves in Vero-CCL-81 cells infected with rBDBV-ZsG after neutralization with the archived human serum samples.

Testing of rBDBV-ZsG in the presence of antiviral compounds

To evaluate antiviral compounds, we tested a panel of well-characterized compounds with both rBDBV-ZsG and BDBV-WT. The viruses were used to compare antiviral activity in the presence or absence of the reporter protein. To assess the suitability of rBDBV-ZsG for antiviral screening, we used 50 µM ribavirin as the positive control and DMSO vehicle-only treatment as the negative control. The Z’ score for rBDBV-ZsG was calculated to be 0.57, indicating that the reporter virus is suitable for antiviral compound screening. The signal-to-noise ratios for rBDBV-ZsG and BDBV-WT were 254:1 and 34:1, respectively.

A concentration-dependent reduction was observed in cells infected with rBDBV-ZsG across a range of ribavirin concentrations, and a comparable reduction in infected cells was observed with BDBV-WT. The EC₅₀ values for rBDBV-ZsG and BDBV-WT were 2.5 and 1 µM, respectively (Supp Figure 3A), with no loss of cell viability at the concentrations tested. These values are similar to those previously reported for Zaire ebolavirus [7,8]. We next tested additional viral polymerase inhibitors, including remdesivir, 2′-deoxy-2′-fluorocytidine (2’-dFC), 6-azauridine (6-AzaU), and 4′-fluorouridine (4′-FlU; EIDD-2749). All compounds tested produced dose-dependent inhibition curves (Figure 1D).

Pan-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficiently neutralizes rBDBV-ZsG

We tested rBDBV-ZsG in a neutralization assay using the well-characterized monoclonal antibody ADI-15878, which targets multiple ebolavirus species [14]. ADI-15878 efficiently neutralized rBDBV-ZsG, whereas no neutralizing activity was detected with the control antibody targeting Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV). In addition, quantification of ZsGreen expression showed that ADI-15878 neutralized rBDBV-ZsG in a dose-dependent manner, with an IC50 value of 28 ng/mL (Figure 1E). This IC50 is comparable to the value reported previously [14] for BDBV, confirming the utility of the reporter virus for doing neutralization studies.

Neutralization assays using archived clinical sera

After confirming the utility of rBDBV-ZsG for neutralization studies, we tested archived human serum samples collected during the 2007 BDBV outbreak in Uganda for neutralizing activity against rBDBV-ZsG. All archived human serum samples tested exhibited neutralizing activity against rBDBV-ZsG, whereas no neutralizing activity was observed with the control serum sample (Figure 1E).

Discussion

The ongoing BDBV outbreak in the DRC and Uganda represents the largest recorded outbreak caused by BDBV. The public health response is particularly challenging because no vaccines or therapeutics are currently approved specifically for BDBV [15]. In addition, the limited availability of experimental tools for studying BDBV has hindered efforts to characterize viral replication, evaluate antibody-mediated neutralization, and screen antiviral compounds. In this study, we developed a recombinant BDBV reverse-genetics system based on the 2012 BDBV strain. Because the 2012 strain is closely related to the currently circulating BDBV strain (Supp Figure 2), we used this backbone to generate a recombinant reporter virus expressing the fluorescent protein ZsGreen.

Although our previously developed support plasmids for EBOV allowed a highly efficient rescue of the homologous virus, we observed a lower rescue efficiency for BDBV. In our next studies, we are planning to develop homologous support plasmids to potentially improve the efficiency of our BDBV reverse genetics system.

Here, we demonstrate that viral polymerase inhibitors previously reported to be effective against ZEBOV are also active against BDBV. In this study, we confirmed the potent antiviral activity of remdesivir against BDBV, with an EC₅₀ of approximately 10 nM as previously reported [7].

Our study further shows that archived serum samples from 2007 BDBV outbreak neutralized BDBV-ZsG efficiently, suggesting that these individuals have BDBV-specific neutralizing antibody activity. Due to the high similarity between all BDBV strains, we anticipate that these samples neutralize even 2026 BDBV strain. However, this possibility requires further evaluation using a larger number of samples and, ideally, neutralization assays performed directly against the 2026 strain. Overall, these findings suggest that cross-neutralization may occur among different BDBV strains. Additional studies are needed to define the breadth and durability of BDBV-specific neutralizing antibody responses.

In conclusion, we describe the development of a recombinant BDBV reporter virus expressing ZsG. It is a useful tool for studying BDBV replication and pathogenesis. The findings from this study may help inform the development and evaluation of medical countermeasures for the ongoing BDBV outbreak.

Institutional review board statement

This research was approved by CDC Institutional Review Board (IRB Protocol #7276).

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC. The mention of company names or products does not constitute endorsement by CDC.

Supplementary Material

SuppFig2 GP alignment.pdf
TEMI_A_2709847_SM3043.pdf (443.9KB, pdf)
SuppFig1 cloning strategy.pdf
TEMI_A_2709847_SM3042.pdf (145.7KB, pdf)
SuppFig3 tables.pdf
Materials and Methods_revision1_clean.docx

Funding Statement

This work was supported by CDC Emerging Infectious Disease Research Core funds.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Use of generative artificial intelligence

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools were used to support language refinement and clarity in manuscript preparation. Specifically, ChatGPT (OpenAI; GPT-5) was used to assist with improving grammar, structure, and readability of text drafted by the authors. These tools were not used for data analysis, interpretation of results, generation or manipulation of figures, creation of original research data, or development of scientific conclusions.

All outputs were critically reviewed, edited, and verified by the authors, who take full responsibility for the originality, accuracy, and integrity of the content.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2026.2709847.

References

  • 1.Towner JS, Sealy TK, Khristova ML, et al. Newly discovered Ebola virus associated with hemorrhagic fever outbreak in Uganda. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4(11):e1000212. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Albariño CG, Khristova ML, Wamala JF, et al. Genomic analysis of filoviruses associated with four viral hemorrhagic fever outbreaks in Uganda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2012. Virology. 2013;442:97–100. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.04.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wamala JF, Lukwago L, Malimbo M, et al. Ebola hemorrhagic fever associated with novel virus strain, Uganda, 2007–2008. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(7):1087–1092. doi: 10.3201/eid1607.091525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/17-05-2026-epidemic-of-ebola-disease-in-the-democratic-republic-of-the-congo-and-uganda-determined-a-public-health-emergency-of-international-concern
  • 5.Mwamba D, Akilimali P, Mboussou F, et al. Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak in Ituri, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Lancet. 2026;407(10546):2367–2369. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)01072-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fletcher P, Feldmann F, Takada A, et al. Pathogenicity of Lloviu and Bombali viruses in type I interferon receptor knockout mice. J Infect Dis. 2023;228(Suppl 7):S548–S553. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McMullan LK, Flint M, Chakrabarti A, et al. Characterisation of infectious Ebola virus from the ongoing outbreak to guide response activities in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a phylogenetic and in vitro analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(9):1023–1032. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30291-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Welch SR, Guerrero LW, Chakrabarti AK, et al. Lassa and Ebola virus inhibitors identified using minigenome and recombinant virus reporter systems. Antiviral Res. 2016;136:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Albarino CG, Guerrero W, Lo L, et al. Development of a reverse genetics system to generate a recombinant Ebola virus Makona expressing a green fluorescent protein. Virology. 2015;484:259–264. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.06.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Albarino CG, Guerrero W, Spengler L, et al. Recombinant Marburg viruses containing mutations in the IID region of VP35 prevent inhibition of host immune responses. Virology. 2015;476:85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Uebelhoer LS, Albarino CG, McMullan LK, et al. High-throughput, luciferase-based reverse genetics systems for identifying inhibitors of Marburg and Ebola viruses. Antiviral Res. 2014;106:86–94. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.03.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Towner JS, Paragas J, Dover JE, et al. Generation of eGFP expressing recombinant Zaire ebolavirus for analysis of early pathogenesis events and high-throughput antiviral drug screening. Virology. 2005;332(1):20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.10.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Levine BC, Mire EC, Geisbert WT.. Comparison of Zaire and Bundibugyo ebolavirus polymerase complexes and susceptibility to antivirals through a newly developed Bundibugyo minigenome system. J Virol. 2021;95(20):1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wec AZ, Herbert AS, Murin CD, et al. Antibodies from a human survivor define sites of vulnerability for broad protection against ebolaviruses. Cell. 2017;169(5):878–890 e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zomahoun LDB AM, Honein AM, Montgomery MJ, et al. CDC 2026 Ebola response. Notes from the field: outbreak of Ebola disease caused by Bundibugyo virus – democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda, May 2026. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2026;75(22):293–294. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7522e3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SuppFig2 GP alignment.pdf
TEMI_A_2709847_SM3043.pdf (443.9KB, pdf)
SuppFig1 cloning strategy.pdf
TEMI_A_2709847_SM3042.pdf (145.7KB, pdf)
SuppFig3 tables.pdf
Materials and Methods_revision1_clean.docx

Articles from Emerging Microbes & Infections are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES