Skip to main content
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases logoLink to Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
. 2026 May 30;21:263. doi: 10.1186/s13023-026-04412-4

Paget’s disease of bone: pathogenesis, ocular manifestations, and therapeutic strategies

Bei Li 1,✉,#, Yifan Kang 1,2,#
PMCID: PMC13435521  PMID: 42218491

Abstract

Objective

Paget’s disease of bone (PDB) is a chronic, focal metabolic bone disorder characterized by increased bone destruction and disordered bone formation, and is a rare disease in Asian populations. This review aims to systematically summarize the pathogenesis, ocular manifestations, and treatment strategies for PDB, with the goal of enhancing the understanding of its multi-system involvement and exploring more effective clinical management approaches.

Methods

A systematic search of electronic databases, including PubMed, was conducted using Boolean operators to combine keywords such as “Paget’s disease of bone”, “osteitis deformans”, “pathogenesis”, “disease mechanism”, “ocular”, “oculus”, “ophthalmic”, “eye”, “treatment”, “pharmacotherapy”, “medication”, etc. Following an initial screening and the exclusion of duplicate records, relevant articles were selected for comprehensive analysis. The level of evidence was assessed.

Results

68 articles were included. This review elaborates on the roles of genetic and environmental factors in PDB and details its diverse ocular manifestations, including ptosis, cataract, macular disease, angioid streaks, optic neuropathy, and orbital disease. It also summarizes advances in current pharmacotherapy, primarily based on bisphosphonates, and other potential treatment strategies.

Conclusion

Abnormal bone remodeling, driven by a combination of genetic susceptibility and environmental factors, constitutes the common pathological basis for both systemic skeletal lesions and specific ocular complications in PDB. Management should be based on multidisciplinary collaboration, integrating pharmacological intervention with individualized ocular care to control disease progression and prevent visual impairment.

Keywords: Paget's disease of bone, Pathogenesis, Ocular manifestations, Treatment, Multidisciplinary management

Highlights

This review provides the first systematic synthesis of the full spectrum of ocular manifestations in Paget’s disease of bone (PDB), from ptosis to vision-threatening complications.

It integrates current genetic and molecular mechanisms of PDB with their clinical implications for eye involvement and future targeted therapies.

A novel, risk-stratified management algorithm is proposed to guide screening, monitoring, and intervention for ocular PDB.

The review emphasizes a paradigm shift toward preventive, multidisciplinary care to preserve vision and improve quality of life in PDB patients.

Search method

A combined systematic search of PubMed electronic database by using Boolean operators AND and OR was conducted, choosing the following keywords: “Paget’s disease of bone”, “osteitis deformans”, “pathogenesis”, “disease mechanism”, “ocular”, “oculus”, “ophthalmic”, “eye”, “treatment”, “pharmacotherapy”, “medication”, etc. Then all relevant articles in English focusing on Paget’s disease of bone were noticed. After the initial screening of these articles and repetitive literature excluded, only 68 articles were selected. The flow diagram for literature searching is depicted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The flow diagram for literature searching

Introduction

Paget’s disease of bone (PDB), or osteitis deformans, is a chronic focal metabolic bone disorder first described by Sir James Paget in 1876. It is characterized by excessive bone resorption coupled with disordered bone formation [1]. The disease exhibits striking geographical variation in prevalence. In Western populations, PDB is the second most common metabolic bone disease after osteoporosis, with prevalence rates as high as 5.4% reported in the United Kingdom. In contrast, the incidence is remarkably low across Asia, exemplified by rates of only 0.00028% in Japan and 0.38–1.26 per 100,000 individuals in South Korea [2]. Early-stage PDB is frequently asymptomatic. Bone pain is the most common presenting complaint, while other clinical features include bone deformity, pathological fractures, protrusio acetabuli, spinal stenosis, secondary osteoarthritis in adjacent joints, and neurosensory hearing loss. Less frequently, cardiovascular and metabolic complications occur, and rare sarcomatous transformation is documented [3]. As a systemic disorder, the ocular manifestations of PDB constitute a critically important yet often underestimated dimension of its diagnosis and comprehensive management.

Pathogenesis of PDB

The precise pathogenesis of PDB remains incompletely elucidated. Current research implicates a complex interplay of factors, as summarized in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The genetic pathogenesis of PDB

Genetic factors

Genetic predisposition plays a well-established role in PDB. An evaluation of familial clustering in 35 Spanish PDB patients revealed a positive family history in approximately 40%, noting that familial cases typically present earlier, with polyostotic involvement and a male predominance [4]. Another case-control study incorporating sociogenetic indicators (e.g., surnames, consanguinity) suggested that vascular calcification might serve as a biological marker for familial PDB, offering a potential tool for early identification [5]. Consequently, a comprehensive assessment integrating family history and phenotypic traits is clinically valuable for evaluating genetic susceptibility.

Sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1)

Mutations in the SQSTM1 gene are a major genetic cause of PDB. These mutations are identified in approximately 25%-40% of familial cases and 10%-15% of sporadic cases [4]. Common variants include missense and truncating mutations. The majority of these pathogenic mutations, predominantly clustered within the ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain of the encoded p62 protein, impairing its ubiquitin-binding function. This disruption interferes with p62’s role in autophagy and lead to constitutive activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby enhancing osteoclast activity [6]. Genotype-phenotype analyses indicate that nonsense mutations truncating the UBA domain are associated with more extensive and severe skeletal disease compared to missense mutations. Importantly, SQSTM1 mutations exhibit incomplete penetrance and significant phenotypic heterogeneity, even among family members carrying the identical variant [4].

Thus, SQSTM1 mutations account for only a proportion of PDB cases, particularly among sporadic patients, implying contributions from other genetic or environmental factors. Recent studies also link SQSTM1 mutations to multi-system disorders like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), indicating that p62 dysfunction has effects beyond the skeleton [7]. While SQSTM1 testing can aid in identifying at-risk individuals, its predictive utility is limited by incomplete penetrance and phenotypic heterogeneity.

Optineurin (OPTN)

OPTN is a multifunctional protein central to maintaining bone homeostasis. It bidirectionally regulates bone turnover by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and promoting osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), integrating key pathways including NF-κB, type I interferon (IFN-β), and the antioxidant NRF2 axis [8]. Reduced OPTN function is considered an independent risk factor for PDB.

Studies using systemic OPTN knockout mice have detailed the mechanism by which OPTN deficiency drives PDB-like pathology. OPTN loss disrupts type I interferon (IFN-I) signaling, which heightens osteoclast sensitivity to RANKL, promoting differentiation and hyper-resorptive activity, while simultaneously bone formation by inhibiting the key osteogenic transcription factor Osterix. Longitudinal analysis confirmed that OPTN deficiency induces age-dependent, progressive bone lesions mirroring human PDB [9].

Further research indicates that OPTN stabilizing the transcription factor NRF2 by competitively binding KEAP1, thereby activating the cellular antioxidant response. OPTN deficiency accelerates NRF2 ubiquitination and degradation, leading to reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation in bone tissue, which exacerbates bone resorption and aging. Notably, bone levels of both OPTN and NRF2 proteins are substantially higher in aged versus young wild-type mice (~ 8-fold and ~ 6-fold, respectively), confirming age-enhanced activation of this pathway and elucidating a mechanism for the age-dependent risk of PDB [10].

Additionally, advanced image analysis techniques have shown that OPTN mutation disrupts mitophagy, causing mitochondrial network fragmentation and impaired connectivity, revealing a pathogenic mechanism at the level of organelle quality control [11].

Collectively, these findings position OPTN as a core regulator of bone homeostasis. Its loss contributes to PDB through multiple intertwined mechanisms—disrupting immune signaling, antioxidant defenses, and organellar integrity. This understanding not only explains the age dependency of PDB but, more importantly, shifts the therapeutic paradigm from downstream osteoclast suppression to the potential for precise, early intervention targeting upstream signaling pathways.

TNFRSF11B, TNFRSF11A, and SP7

Juvenile Paget’s disease (JPD) and classic PDB share the hallmark of hyperactive osteoclasts leading to increased bone resorption and disorganized formation. However, JPD is typically an autosomal recessive disorder, with higher incidence in consanguineous populations, and presents in childhood with skeletal deformity, pathological fractures, and extra-skeletal features [12]. Its core etiology involves loss-of-function mutations in the TNFRSF11B gene encoding osteoprotegerin (OPG). These mutations render OPG incapable of inhibiting the RANKL/RANK pathway, resulting in excessive osteoclast activation that severely disrupts skeletal development and remodeling [13].

Not all JPD-like phenotypes are linked to TNFRSF11B mutations, highlighting significant genetic heterogeneity. For example, a clinically typical Bolivian girl lacked a TNFRSF11B mutation but harbored a heterozygous tandem duplication mutation (87dup15) in exon 1 of the TNFRSF11A, predicted to cause a pentapeptide extension in RANK and an expansive skeletal hyperphosphatasia phenotype. Another female infant presented with non-traumatic fractures, cranial deformities, and hearing loss, developing generalized osteosclerosis by age 15; exome sequencing revealed a de novo heterozygous missense mutation in SP7 (c.926 C > G; p.S309W). Based on such findings, Whyte et al. proposed a molecular classification: JPD-1 (TNFRSF11B, autosomal recessive); JPD-2 (TNFRSF11A signal peptide duplication, autosomal dominant); JPD-4 (SP7 missense mutation, autosomal dominant); and JPD-3 (unknown genetic basis) [14].

This classification expands understanding of RANK/RANKL/OPG-related disorders and reveals a polygenic background for JPD. It requires ongoing refinement as new gene-phenotype associations emerge. The divergent skeletal outcomes from different mutation types in the same gene (e.g., activating vs. inactivating TNFRSF11A mutations) underscore that the direction of functional impact critically shapes the phenotype. Most mutations lack thorough functional characterization; how they alter protein function, signaling, and cellular behavior, particularly the pathway from SP7 mutations to high bone turnover_remains unclear. The autosomal dominant inheritance of JPD-2 and JPD-4, contrasting with recessive JPD-1, indicate that diagnosis must integrate genetic testing and not rely solely on family history.

Valosin-containing protein (VCP)

Autosomal dominant missense mutations in the VCP gene cause VCP-associated multisystem proteinopathy (VCP-MSP), a degenerative condition that can include inclusion body myopathy (IBM), PDB, and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in various combinations [15]. Recent research focusing on lipid metabolism utilized a homozygous VCP< R155H/R155H> knock-in mouse model and patient iPSC-derived myoblasts to demonstrate that this mutation activates serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT), promoting de novo ceramide synthesis. The resulting ceramide accumulation triggers excessive autophagy and TDP-43 protein mislocalization. SPT inhibitors (e.g., L-cycloserine, myriocin, and ARN14494) effectively reduced levels of autophagy markers p62 and LC3B in these models [16].

While these studies offer important mechanistic insights into VCP-MSP, research on the ceramide pathway has primarily involved muscle models. Validation within the bone microenvironment, specifically in osteoclasts is lacking, and how VCP mutations specifically affect bone-remodeling cells remains unclear.

Other genes

Beyond SQSTM1 and VCP, other genes contribute to PDB’s polygenic background. Germline mutations in ZNF687 are associated with PDB co-occurrence with giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone. ZNF687 encodes a transcription factor involved in DNA damage response, particularly in suppressing gene expression near double-strand breaks and promoting homologous recombination repair [17]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified common variants in genes like CSF1, TNFRSF11A, and TM7SF4, which influence osteoclast differentiation/function and may modestly increase PDB risk [18]. A study of sporadic PDB in a Chinese population suggested potential novel susceptibility genes, including WNT16, RYR3, RYR1, NUP205, CAPN2, and NUP214, further broadening the genetic landscape [19].

These findings underscore the role of ploygenic interactions in PDB susceptibility, where variants in genes affecting DNA repair, osteoclast biology, and signaling may collectively predispose individuals, with disease triggered by environmental factors. However, many of these associations are preliminary and require independent replication andfunctional validation. Future integrated multi-omics studies are needed to define their precise roles in bone biology.

Environmental factors

Environmental factors are significant contributors to PDB pathogenesis, both independently and through interaction with genetic susceptibility.

A large study of 2,342 Spanish PDB patients found higher incidence in rural areas, with disease risk moderately with dairy cattle density. The sustained decline in PDB incidence over recent decades also parallels changes in human-livestock interactions, suggesting a non-genetic component [20]. However, this study relied on primary care records susceptible to bias, lacked a matched control group for sporadic cases, and its observational design cannot prove causality.

Vitamin D deficiency is another potential environmental risk, being more prevalent in PDB patients than in healthy populations [21]. This correlation does not establish causation, and confounding factorslike sunlight exposure were not fully assessed. Thus, a causal link requires validation through prospective studies and mechanistic investigations.

An investigation of 140 French-Canadian PDB patients (39 with the SQSTM1 p. Pro392Leu mutation, 113 controls) assessed air pollution and indoor pollutants (heating fuels, tobacco smoke). Cigarette smoke condensate and heavy metals inhibited osteoclast morphology and resorptive activity. Patient osteoclasts showed upregulated gene expression with cadmium, increased SQSTM1 protein with bismuth/tobacco smoke, and elevated oxidative stress [22]. This suggests environmental pollutantscan modulate osteoclast function and, by interacting with susceptibility genes like SQSTM1, induce oxidative stress and autophagy dysregulation. Historically, PDB emerge as prevalent in late-19th century industrialized Britain, its spatiotemporal distribution closely tied to domestic coal use. Incidence declined with reduced coal heating in the 20th century. Migration studies showing high PDB rates among UK migrants to North America/Australia, but rarity in indigenous populations, strongly implicate specific environmental triggers like coal combustion products [23].

In summary, environmental factors are key triggers in PDB. Their core mechanism likely involves interaction with a permissive genetic background, disrupting bone remodeling via induced oxidative stress and inflammation. The effect size depends strongly on individual genetics (e.g., SQSTM1 status), explaining why only some exposed individuals develop disease. Future prospective cohorts integrating exposomic and genetic data are needed to quantify risks and delineate molecular pathways, informing primary prevention and early intervention strategies.

Viral factors

An early etiological hypothesis implicated persistent paramyxoviral infection (e.g., measles virus, respiratory syncytial virus) in osteoclasts as a cause of PDB. However, recent serological evidence strongly refutes this. Visconti et al. found no significant difference in serum antibody levels against multiple paramyxoviruses between PDB patients and healthy controls [24]. It challenges the notion that persistent viral infection is a common cause, suggesting prior associations may have been incidental.

Early studies relied on less specific methods, such as identifyingviral inclusion-like structures in osteoclast nuclei or immunohistochemical detection of viral antigens, which are prone to false positives and cannot distinguish cause from effect. The negative serological data, derived from robust quantitative methods, are highly valuable. Consequently, future etiological research should move beyond the viral model to focus on interactions between other environmental triggers and genetic susceptibility.

In summary, the pathogenesis of PDB arises from the convergent interplay of genetic susceptibility and environmental exposures, with viral etiologies not supported by contemporary evidence. Genetic factors, primarily through germline mutations in genes such as SQSTM1, TNFRSF11B, OPTN, and VCP, establish a cell-autonomous dysfunction in bone cells, creating a necessary predisposing state. These mutations also function as primary determinants of disease phenotype, governing severity (e.g., SQSTM1 truncations), syndromic form (e.g., TNFRSF11B in JPD), and specific complication risks (e.g., ZNF687 with GCT).

Environmental factors are implicated as the principal disease triggers. Epidemiological and historical data associate specific agents (e.g., historical coal combustion products) with disease initiation, acting as a likely “second hit” in genetically primed individuals. Furthermore, in vitro evidence suggests that pollutants (e.g., heavy metals) may interact with susceptibility genotypes (e.g., SQSTM1), potentially modulating osteoclast activity through synergistic stress pathways, thereby influencing disease onset or local progression.

Thus, disease initiation appears to require the synergistic contribution of both genetic susceptibility and permissive environmental exposure. Once established, the specific genetic variant is the dominant driver of disease presentation, trajectory, and complication profile. This multi-factorial framework, summarizing the roles of genetic and environmental factors as susceptibility determinants, triggers, and phenotype modifiers, is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Relative roles of etiological factors in the initiation and progression of PDB

Factor Category Primary Role in Pathogenesis Mechanism of Contribution Nature of Role
(Trigger / Modifier)

Genetic

(SQSTM1, OPTN)

Susceptibility & Initiation Germline mutations cause inherent dysfunction in osteoclast/osteoblast signaling pathways (NF-κB, autophagy, IFN), lowering the threshold for abnormal remodeling Necessary Susceptibility Factor & Primary Phenotype Modifier
Genetic (TNFRSF11B, ZNF687) Phenotype Determination Specific mutations dictate distinct clinical syndromes (JPD) or complication risks (GCT), guiding disease expression Primary Phenotype Modifier

Environmental

(historical coal, livestock)

Disease Trigger Provide the external “second hit” that initiates focal osteoclast activation in a genetically primed skeletal site Primary Trigger

Environmental

(pollutants, smoking)

Risk & Severity Modifier May interact with susceptibility genes (SQSTM1), exacerbating oxidative stress/dysautophagy to modulate lesion onset or aggressiveness Interacting Trigger & Progression Modifier

Environmental

(rural residence, Vit D deficiency)

Population Risk Factor Associated with increased odds of disease, likely through broad, non-specific mechanisms or confounding Weak Correlative Modifier

Viral

(Measles, RSV)

Not Supported No serological evidence of causal association; historical links likely coincidental or artefactual Not a Trigger or Modifier

Abbreviations: Paget’s disease of bone (PDB), Sequestosome1(SQSTM1), Optineurin (OPTN), Nuclear Factor Kappa B (NF-κB), Interferon (IFN), Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily Member 11B (TNFRSF11B), Zinc Finger Protein 687 (ZNF687), Juvenile Paget’s Disease (JPD), Giant Cell Tumor (GGT), Vitamin D (Vit D), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)

Ocular manifestations of PDB

The diverse ocular manifestations of PDB necessitate a management approach that transcends specialty boundaries, relying on a multidisciplinary team (MDT) encompassing orthopedics, oncology, and ophthalmology. Figure 3 outlines this integrated diagnostic and therapeutic pathway. This flowchart delineates a stepwise diagnostic pathway to differentiate the causes of visual complaints and clarifies the decision-making criteria for initiating systemic anti-resorptive therapy versus proceeding with ocular-specific interventions.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The diagnostic and therapeutic pathway for PDB-related ocular complications. Key abbreviations used: Paget‘s disease of bone(PDB), Radionuclide Bone Scintigraphy(RBS), alkaline phosphatase(ALP), Upper Limit of Normal(ULN), intraocular pressure(IOP), Margin Reflex Distance (MRD), visual evoked potential(VEP), Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD), computed tomography(CT), magnetic resonance imaging(MRI), angioid streaks(AS), Phacoemulsification(Phaco), intraocular lens (IOL), optical coherence tomography angiography(OCTA), fluorescein fundus angiography(FFA), choroidal neovascularization(CNV), computed tomography angiography(CTA), digital subtraction angiography(DSA), magnetic resonance angiography(MRA), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(anti-VEGF)

Ptosis

Orbital bone involvement in PDB can cause ptosis. A specific mechanism is the formation of a PDB-related giant cell tumor (GCT) within the orbit, which directly compresses the levator palpebrae superioris muscle [25]. Thus, abnormal orbital bone remodeling or secondary neoplastic lesions constitute the direct pathological basis. The active pathological bone metabolism and associated chronic inflammatory microenvironment may further impair muscle structure and function through mass effect, tissue infiltration, or neurovascular compromise. Treatment focuses on addressing the underlying cause.

Cataract and maculopathy

A study by Dabbs et al. evaluating ocular complications in 70 PDB patients reported cataract and macular degeneration incidences of 39% and 24.3%, respectively [26]. However, this study did not establish a direct causal link between these intraocular pathologies and PDB.

Angioid streaks (AS)

AS are linear cracks in a calcified, brittle Bruch’s membrane, representing a rare retinal finding and a recognized ocular complication of PDB [27]. The principal visual threat is rupture or secondary choroidal neovascularization (CNV), leading to irreversible visual loss.

Historically, 8%-15% of PDB patients were reported to develop AS [26]. Conversely, among all patients presenting with AS, only about 0.3% have coexisting PDB [28]. This indicates that while PDB is an important etiology for AS, AS is more commonly associated with other systemic diseases like s pseudoxanthoma elasticum. It underscores the need for routine ocular screening in PDB patients and the importance of considering PDB in the differential diagnosis ofAS, especially in older patients or those with skeletal symptoms.

Notably, JPD also carries a retinopathy risk, characterized by progressive AS, potentially linked to Bruch’s membrane calcification from dysregulated osteoprotegerin signaling [29]. This suggests PDB and its ocular complications may share a common pathophysiological basis of “disordered connective tissue/extracellular matrix metabolism”.

Management of asymptomatic AS primarily involves observation. Upon CNV development, prompt intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is indicated. Combination therapy with photodynamic therapy and anti-VEGF agents (e.g., bevacizumab) can effectively suppress neovascular activity. Patients are also advised to wear protective eyewear and avoid ocular trauma to minimize Bruch’s membrane rupture risk [30].

Given these risks, a systematic, risk-stratified protocol encompassing screening, prevention, and intervention is warranted. For all PDB patients, the focus is “Screening and Prevention” via annual dilated fundus exams If asymptomatic AS is detected, management shifts to “Monitoring and Alert”, involving patient education and Amsler grid self-monitoring. New visual decline should prompt immediate optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescein angiography (FFA) to assess for CNV activity. Confirmed active CNV warrants immediate “Intervention and Rescue” with anti-VEGF therapy.

Optic neuropathy

The mechanisms of g optic neuropathy in PDB are multifaceted, extending beyond simple bony compression.

Bony compression is one established mechanism, particularly in JPD where cranial overgrowth can compress the orbital apex optic nerve, causing pallor and atrophy [29]. Studies also find visual field defects in approximately 40.9% of PDB patients, some with radiologic evidence of optic canal stenosis [31].

However, vascular mechanisms appear central. A pivotal case report described an adult PDB patient with severe progressive vision loss without canal stenosis, whose vision improved markedly after pamidronate and dexamethasone [32]. This response strongly implicates optic nerve ischemia from a vascular “steal” phenomenon rather than mechanical compression. Supporting this, only a minority of patients with field defects have definitive canal stenosis [31]. Another illustrative case involved a 73-year-old man with PDB-related orbital disease, decreased vision, proptosis, and periorbital swelling. Imaging showed stable bony lesions, but angiography confirmed hypervascularity. Ocular examination revealed “corkscrew” conjunctival vessels, serous choroidal/retinal detachment, optic disc hyperemia, and tortuous veins. Reducing this abnormal flow via vascular embolization resolved the subretinal fluid, demonstrating that a high-flow state alone can cause orbital congestion and visual impairment [33].

Thus, PDB-related optic neuropathy constitutes a spectrum involving vascular and compressive factors, with mechanisms like bony steal and vascular congestion likely predominant. Compression is more typical in severe craniofacial JPD or select adult cases. Direct invasion by pagetic tissue must also be considered. Critically, the mechanism dictates treatment: response to anti-resorptive/corticosteroids supports a hypermetabolic/vascular inflammatory basis, while embolization targets hyperperfusion, and surgical decompression is reserved for true mechanical compression. Therefore, evaluation must extend beyond structural imaging (CT/MRI) to include assessments of blood flow and function (e.g., angiography, OCT), guiding mechanism-based treatment.

Orbital disease

Orbital involvement in PDB leads to diverse structural and space-occupying lesions.Proptosis is the hallmark manifestation, primarily via: (1) Bony Compression: Craniofacial hyperostosis reduces orbital volume, mechanically displacing the globe forward (e.g., a case with 22 mm proptosis) [34]. (2) Hemodynamic Factors: The hypervascular pagetic lesions can cause orbital tissue congestion and volume increase(e.g., progressive proptosis with stable bone lesions but abnormal vasculature) [33].

PDB can also cause enophthalmos, theorized to result from anterior displacement of the superior orbital rim due to anterior cranial fossa thickening, creating a relative posterior globes position [35].

Localized orbital mass is another presentation, with cases reported of painless supraorbital swelling and proptosis confirmed as PDB by histopathology, indicating it can manifest as an isolated orbital mass [36].

Rapidly progressive proptosis (weeks to months) should raise high suspicion of secondary malignant (e.g., osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma) or, less often, benign tumors like GCT. A Japanese national study a bimodal age distribution for PDB-associated osteosarcoma (peaks: 10–20 and 70–80 years). Elderly patients often have axial (including craniofacial) tumors diagnosed at advanced stages with poor prognosis [37]. These malignancies, favoring elderly women, are frequently resistant to radio-chemotherapy, leading to death within months [38, 39]. Rarely, such malignancies occur in infancy, with report cases showing progressive drug resistance and inoperability despite aggressive therapy [40]. In contrast, benign GCTs generally have a good prognosis after resection, possibly arising from systemic stimulation of osteoclast precursors by PDB [25].

Therefore, orbital Therefore PDB spans a spectrum from benign structural change to lethal malignancy. Clinical management hinges on accurately identifying the dominant process: slow bone remodeling, active hemodynamic disturbance, or rapid malignant transformation. Future efforts should aim to develop better screening tools for early detection of malignancy and explore novel therapies for PDB-associated cancers.

The ocular complications in PDB arise not in isolation but through specific pathophysiological pathways originating from the systemic dysregulation of bone remodeling. These mechanisms can be categorized into direct mechanical effects, secondary vascular phenomena, and systemic metabolic dysregulation extending to ocular tissues. The predominant mechanism varies by the type of ocular involvement, which dictates appropriate clinical management. Table 2 summarizes the proposed molecular, cellular, and hemodynamic pathways linking pagetic bone disease to its major ocular manifestations.

Table 2.

Proposed pathophysiological mechanisms linking PDB to ocular complications

Ocular Complication Dominant Mechanism Pathophysiological Process Key Molecular/Cellular Pathways

Orbital Deformity

(Proptosis, Enophthalmos)

Bone Remodeling/

Mechanical

Disordered osteoclastic-osteoblastic activity leads to expansion and deformation of orbital bones, altering orbital volume and anatomy Dysregulation of osteoclast-osteoblast coupling (RANKL/OPG, SQSTM1/p62, OPTN signal paths)

Ptosis secondary

to Orbital GCT

Bone Remodeling/

Mechanical

(Mass Effect)

PDB-associated proliferation of osteoclast precursors forms a benign, space-occupying tumor that mechanically compresses the levator palpebrae superioris muscle Local clonal expansion of osteoclast precursors driven by the systemic PDB milieu; potential role of ZNF687 mutations

Compressive

Optic Neuropathy

(JPD)

Bone Remodeling/

Mechanical

Craniofacial hyperostosis, particularly of the sphenoid bone, results in stenosis of the bony optic canal, causing direct compression and ischemia of the optic nerve Uncontrolled osteoblastic bone formation at specific cranial sites

Vascular

Optic Neuropathy

Vascular/

Hemodynamic

Hypervascularity of pagetic bone creates a low-resistance shunt (“steal” phenomenon), diverting blood flow from the microvasculature of the optic nerve head and leading to ischemia VEGF-mediated pathological angiogenesis within pagetic bone; altered local hemodynamics

Orbital &

Conjunctival Congestion

Vascular/

Hemodynamic

Increased blood flow and vascular permeability from adjacent active pagetic bone cause venous engorgement and edema in orbital soft tissues and conjunctiva Inflammatory cytokine release (e.g., IL-6) and angiogenic drive from the bone microenvironment
AS

Metabolic/

Systemic

Systemic dysregulation of mineral homeostasis, due to loss of calcification inhibitors, results in pathological calcification and increased fragility of Bruch’s membrane Loss-of-function mutations in TNFRSF11B (encoding OPG), a key regulator of extracellular matrix mineralization

Cataract & Maculopathy

(Potential Association)

Other/Systemic

(Speculative)

A shared systemic milieu of chronic inflammation and oxidative stress may potentially accelerate age-related degenerative processes in the lens and retina Persistent activation of NF-κB and impairment of the NRF2 antioxidant pathway, as observed in pagetic bone biology

Abbreviations: Paget’s disease of bone (PDB), Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Ligand (RANKL), Osteoprotegerin (OPG), Sequestosome1 (SQSTM1), Optineurin (OPTN), Giant Cell Tumor (GGT), Zinc Finger Protein 687 (ZNF687), Juvenile Paget’s Disease (JPD), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Angioid Streak s(AS), Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily Member 11B (TNFRSF11B), Nuclear Factor Kappa B (NF-κB), Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2–Related Factor 2 (NRF2)

Pharmacological therapy for PDB

Pharmacological intervention is the cornerstone of managing PDB, a systemic disorder.

Bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates are the first-line therapy, potently inhibiting osteoclast activity. A retrospective cohort study of 101 PDB patients confirmed the efficacy and sustained biochemical response of zoledronic acid [41]. This class is also effective in JPD; pamidronate controls bone pain, suppresses turnover, improves motor function in children, and has a favorable side-effect profile [42]. Long-term data show a single zoledronic acid infusion can maintain remission for up to 10 years in 86% of treatment-naïve elderly patients, treatment-naïve patients, demonstrating durable control [43]. Given this safety and efficacy profile, the Italian Society for Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases (SIOMMMS) recommends treatment at diagnosis for most, if not all, cases [44].

Notably, bisphosphonates show promise in prevention. Prophylactic zoledronic acid in SQSTM1 mutations carriers significantly reduced new lesion risk safely, marking a shift from “symptom-driven” to “risk-predictive” management with potential to alter the disease course. Defining the optimal candidate and timing for preventive therapy remains a future challenge [45].

Ocular inflammatory adverse events require attention. Zoledronic acid, pamidronate, and others can induce acute anterior uveitis, scleritis, and orbital inflammation, presenting with eye pain, redness, and vision loss [46–49], possibly mediated by γ/δ T-cell dysregulation [50].

Beyond ocular events, an acute-phase reaction (self-limiting anemia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia) commonly follows zoledronic acid infusion [51]. Risedronate most often causes dyspepsia; rarer effects include facial edema, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, tongue edema, palpitations, and episcleritis [52]. Intravenous bisphosphonates also carry a risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), associated with potent antiresorptive therapy [53]. Thus, biomarker-based prediction of adverse reaction risk is an important consideration.

Preclinical insights suggest non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (e.g., etidronate, clodronate), though less potent, may mitigate the acute inflammation induced by nitrogen-containing agents via competitive inhibition of SLC20/SLC34 phosphate transporters, offering a rationale for exploring combination strategies to balance efficacy and safety [54].

Calcitonin

Human calcitonin (hCT), a 32-amino-acid hormone from thyroid parafollicular cells, has long been used to inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption [55]. It also suppresses osteoblast activity and bone turnover [56]. However, hCT is prone to amyloid aggregation in solution (reducing bioactivity), and long-term use may be linked to increased thyroid cancer risk. Targeted modification to reduce amyloidogenicity while preserving function is a promising strategy [57]. More stable, less immunogenic alternatives like salmon (sCT) and eel calcitonin are potential clinical substitutes. Despite advances in delivery (injection, nasal spray, novel oral systems like pectin-chitosan hydrogels), clinical efficacy remains limited [58]. Observational data indicate poor outcomes for patients on calcitonin monotherapy, most eventually requiring switch to more potent drugs like bisphosphonates [59]. Sequential strategies exist, e.g., initial calcitonin providing some symptom relief followed by definitive zoledronic acid therapy [60].

With the advent of potent bisphosphonates, calcitonin’s role has diminished. Its current value lies more in specific clinical scenarios: as bridging therapy when IV bisphosphonates are contraindicated (e.g., active infection, renal impairment), or for additional central analgesia for severe bone pain before bisphosphonates take full effect. If successfully developed, novel oral formulations might offer an alternative for the bisphosphonate-intolerant.

Denosumab

Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting RANKL, inhibits bone resorption and is used for PDB [61]. Case reports support its utility: an elderly woman with cranial PDB achieved headache relief and normalization calcium/ALP after 5 months; [62] two adult JPD patients with TNFRSF11B “Balkan” mutation and inadequate bisphosphonate response achieved sustained ALP normalization on long-term denosumab [63].

Denosumab also shows potential for PDB-related complications. A patient with PDB, extraosseous GCT, and calcitriol-mediated hypercalcemia experienced controlled hypercalcemia and significant tumor regression on denosumab [64].

Thus, denosumab is a potent option for bisphosphonate-resistant or -intolerant patients, with particular advantage in RANKL-driven complications like GCT. However, its reversible mechanism necessitates careful long-term management to mitigate rebound risk upon discontinuation [65]. Future research should optimize sequencing strategies with bisphosphonates.

Other potential therapeutic agents

Preclinical studies highlight several novel intervention avenues targeting diverse mechanisms.

Based on the OPTN-NRF2, axis in bone homeostasis, antioxidant therapy shows promise. OPTN deficiency-induced bone loss can be alleviated by NRF2 activators like curcumin. However, in aged Optn−/− mice, curcumin further suppressed osteoblast activity, suggesting a complex interplay in aging where antioxidant treatment might alleviate resorption but also affect compromised formation [10]. Restoring the NRF2 response may mitigate age-related bone loss, but combination strategies may be needed.

Since OPTN negatively regulates type I interferon signaling to restrain osteoclasts, targeted inhibition of this pathway could restore homeostasis, though requires rigorous safety evaluation to avoid immunodeficiency from systemic inhibition [9].

Broadly, gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids can regulate bone remodeling, exerting both anti-resorptive and anabolic effects [66]. Clinically, specific probiotic supplementation (e.g., Lactobacillus reuteri 6475) slowed bone loss in postmenopausal women, introducing the microbiome as a novel systemic modulator of bone metabolism [67, 68].

In summary, PDB drug discovery is evolving from traditional anti-resorptive towards precision, system-based strategies targeting multiple pathways. Future paradigms may involve combinations (e.g., probiotics for baseline homeostasis plus targeted agents for specific defects) to correct the abnormal remodeling program at its root. Systemic treatments can directly reverse specific, metabolism-driven ocular symptoms but primarily serve to control the systemic disease and prevent progression of structural damage. Ocular-specific therapies are necessary adjuncts to address localized, irreversible structural issues or distinct ocular vascular pathologies. Their interaction is best characterized as sequential and complementary, aiming for comprehensive disease control. (Table 3)

Table 3.

Therapeutic strategy for ocular complications in PDB based on pathogenic mechanism

Ocular Complication Dominant Mechanism Role of Systemic Therapy
(Bis/Denosumab)
Necessity of Ocular-Specific Therapy Therapeutic Synergy & Timing
Vascular Optic Neuropathy Vascular “Steal” / Hyperemia Direct & Primary: Suppresses pagetic hypermetabolism/hypervascularity to reverse ischemia Adjunct: Corticosteroids may be used acutely to reduce optic nerve edema/inflammation; severe cases may consider vascular embolization Concurrent/Sequential: Start systemic anti-resorptive urgently; consider short-term steroids for acute presentation
Compressive Optic Neuropathy Bony Stenosis / Mechanical Foundational/Preventive: Halts progression of hyperostosis; does not reverse existing compression Necessary & Definitive: Surgical decompression is indicated for progressive or severe compression Sequential: Optimize systemic control preoperatively to reduce bleeding risk; surgery addresses fixed anatomy
Orbital GCT causing Ptosis Mass Effect Variable/Adjuvant: Denosumab may induce tumor regression; bisphosphonates control background PDB activity Necessary & Definitive: Surgical excision is primary treatment for symptomatic mass effect Combined/Neoadjuvant: Consider denosumab to shrink tumor preoperatively; surgery for definitive removal
AS with CNV Local Neovascularization Indirect/Supportive: Manages systemic disease but has no direct effect on CNV Necessary & Primary: Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections are standard care for active CNV Parallel: Treat systemic disease and ocular CNV independently but concurrently
Cataract Age-related / Multifactorial No Role Necessary & Definitive: Cataract surgery when visually significant Independent: Ocular surgery proceeds based on ophthalmic indication, independent of PDB status if bone is inactive

Abbreviations: Paget’s disease of bone (PDB), Bisphosphonates (Bps), Giant Cell Tumor (GGT), Angioid Streaks (AS), Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV), Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (anti-VEGF)

Evaluation of evidence: causality versus correlation in PDB pathogenesis

To provide a critical appraisal of the associations discussed in this review and to explicitly address the distinction between correlation and causation, we have applied an evidence hierarchy framework centered on the strength of causal inference. This framework classifies the evidence linking genetic, environmental, and viral factors to both systemic PDB and its ocular complications into four distinct levels, as outlined in Table 4.

Table 4.

Evidence hierarchy and critical appraisal of key pathogenetic and clinico-pathological associations in PDB

Association Evidence Level Study Designs Supporting Association Supporting Rationale Major Confounders / Limitations Key References
Genetic factors
Severe, polyostotic PDB in SQSTM1 mutation carriers Level 2: Strong Mechanistic Family-based linkage studies; case-control genetic association studies; in vitro functional assays (osteoclast cultures, autophagy flux); genetically engineered mouse models (SQSTM1 knock-in/knockout) Well-defined molecular cascade (NF-κB/autophagy dysregulation) leading to the aggressive bone phenotype; orbital involvement is a direct secondary consequence Incomplete penetrance & significant phenotypic heterogeneity within families limit clinical predictive value. Majority of mechanistic data are derived from non-human models or cellular systems; direct validation in human bone in vivo remains partial. Potential ascertainment bias in studies focused on severe familial cases

Gennari

et al., 2022; Shaik

et al., 2021

AS in TNFRSF11B-related JPD Level 2: Strong Mechanistic Case series of genetically confirmed JPD patients with detailed ophthalmological phenotyping; genetic sequencing studies; mechanistic extrapolation from OPG’s known physiological role OPG’s known role in inhibiting vascular calcification provides a direct, plausible pathway from genetic defect to Bruch’s membrane pathology Evidence is based almost exclusively on the rare, monogenic JPD population; its direct applicability to the pathogenesis of AS in classic, late-onset PDB is less certain. Small sample sizes inherent to ultra-rare disorders

Kerr

et al., 2010

Environmental factors
Rural residence/cattle density and PDB risk Level 3/4: Primarily Correlative Ecological (population-level) studies; retrospective analyses of large primary care or administrative health databases Ecological association with no specified molecular mechanism; highly susceptible to confounding High risk of confounding: Association may be attributable to unmeasured factors correlated with rural residence (specific occupational exposures, diet, socioeconomic status). Ecological fallacy. Dependent on accuracy and consistency of diagnostic coding in electronic records

Rebollo-Najera

et al., 2025

Vit D deficiency and PDB. Level 4: Purely Correlative Cross-sectional observational studies comparing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels between PDB patients and healthy or disease controls Observational association only; high likelihood of reverse causality (reduced mobility in PDB) or confounding High probability of reverse causality: PDB-related skeletal pain and disability likely reduce outdoor activity and sun exposure. Confounding by age, season, latitude, body mass index, and chronic kidney disease. No prospective or interventional data to support a causal role

Rendina

et al., 2019

SQSTM1 mutation and pollutant (Cd, smoke) interaction Level 3: Correlative with Plausible Mechanism In vitro experiments using osteoclasts differentiated from PBMCs of SQSTM1 mutation carriers and controls, exposed to heavy metals or cigarette smoke condensate In vitro data shows altered osteoclast biology; proposed oxidative stress mechanism is plausible but lacks direct in vivo causal proof in humans Evidence is preclinical (in vitro only). Doses and exposure durations may not reflect real-world human environmental exposure Small patient-derived cell sample sizes. Lacks in vivo validation in animal or human studies to confirm this interaction causes clinical disease

Numan

et al., 2019

Historical coal exposure and PDB emergence Level 3: Correlative with Plausible Mechanism Historical ecological analyses examining spatial-temporal disease patterns alongside fuel use; migration studies comparing disease prevalence in migrants from high-risk areas to native populations Strong spatiotemporal correlation; coal-derived toxins (heavy metals, fluorides) are biologically plausible triggers, but direct evidence is historical/epidemiological Evidence is circumstantial and ecological; cannot establish causality at the individual level. Relies on the accuracy of historical disease and exposure data. The precise pathogenic constituent(s) of coal smoke remain unidentified

Cundy,

2024

Direct structural/compressive ocular lesions
Ptosis due to PDB-related orbital GCT Level 1: Causal Case reports and small surgical series with direct clinico-radiological-pathological correlation (imaging confirming mass, histopathology confirming GCT, surgery relieving symptoms) Direct mass effect confirmed clinically and radiologically; resection relieves symptoms Evidence limited to level IV/V case reports/series, subject to publication bias (only remarkable or surgically managed cases are reported). No population-based data on the incidence of this rare complication

Pecorella

et al., 2000

Compressive optic neuropathy from pagetic OCS Level 1: Causal Case series and individual case reports with direct correlation between high-resolution CT/MRI evidence of bony canal narrowing and corresponding clinical/functional optic nerve deficits Direct imaging evidence of bony compression at the exact site of neurological deficit Evidence primarily from severe, often syndromic (JPD) cases; may not represent the typical course in adult PDB. Small sample sizes and lack of prospective longitudinal data on progression

Kerr

et al., 2010; Eretto

et al., 1984

Vascular/metabolic ocular lesions
Vascular optic neuropathy from pagetic hypervascularity (“steal” phenomenon) Level 1/2: Causal / Strong Mechanistic

Level 1: Case reports demonstrating visual improvement following intervention (BP infusion, corticosteroids, or vascular embolization)

Level 2: Case reports with angiographic (e.g., DSA, MRA) confirmation of aberrant, high-flow vasculature adjacent to the ischemic nerve

Level 1: Intervention (BPs, embolization) reverses ischemia/edema.

Level 2: Angiographic confirmation of abnormal, high-flow vasculature adjacent to the nerve

Evidence is entirely from level IV/V case reports. The diagnosis of “vascular steal” is often inferential, based on a characteristic treatment response rather than direct, quantitative hemodynamic measurement. No controlled studies exist

Isasi

et al., 2002; Yuan

et al., 2010

Abbreviations: Paget’s disease of bone(PDB), Sequestosome1 (SQSTM1), Nuclear Factor Kappa B (NF-κB), Angioid Streaks (AS), Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily Member 11B (TNFRSF11B), Juvenile Paget’s Disease (JPD), Osteoprotegerin (OPG), Vitamin D (Vit D), Cadmium (CD), Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs), Giant Cell Tumor (GGT), optic canal stenosis (OCS), Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Bisphosphonate (BP), bisphosphonates (BPs), Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA), Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA)

  • Level 1: Direct Causal Evidence. This is established by a clear anatomical-mechanical link (e.g., tumor-induced nerve compression) or a consistent therapeutic response wherein intervening on the presumed cause (e.g., inhibiting bone turnover) directly reverses the clinical effect (e.g., restores vision)

  • Level 2: Strong Mechanistic Evidence Supporting Causality. This level encompasses evidence in which a well-characterized biological pathway connects an etiological factor to a pathological outcome, strongly implying a causal relationship. It includes robust data from genetic animal models (e.g., OPTN knockout mice) or detailed molecular studies that delineate the intervening pathological steps.

  • Level 3: Correlative with Plausible Mechanism. This category includes epidemiological or case-control associations supported by in vitro data or indirect biological plausibility. Such evidence suggests a link meriting further investigation but does not confirm causation, as potential confounding factors or reverse causality cannot be ruled out.

  • Level 4: Purely Correlative. This level refers to observational associations for which no established or strongly plausible intermediary biological mechanism has been demonstrated. These relationships may indicate shared underlying risk factors rather than a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

Applying this framework reveals that the most definitive causal links (Level 1) typically involve direct anatomical consequences of pagetic bone remodeling, such as compression of ocular structures. The pathogenic role of specific genetic mutations (e.g., TNFRSF11B in angioid streak formation) is supported by strong mechanistic evidence (Level 2). Conversely, most proposed gene-environment interactions and broader epidemiological risk factors (e.g., vitamin D deficiency, rural residence) are currently supported by evidence at the correlative levels (Levels 3–4). This distinction underscores these areas as critical targets for future hypothesis-driven research aimed at establishing causative pathways.

Limitations of the review

This systematic review synthesizes current evidence on PDB pathogenesis, ocular involvement, and treatment but has inherent limitations. First, much evidence derives from case reports, small series, and retrospective studies, lacking large prospective cohorts or RCTs, necessitating caution in inferring causality and efficacy Second, relevance evidence (level 3–4) far outweighs causal evidence (level 1–2), especially regarding direct links between genetic/environmental factors and specific ocular manifestations. Third, discussed treatment strategies often rely on individual case successes; their long-term efficacy, safety, and optimal regimens require broader clinical validation. Fourth, a significant gap persists in the understanding of the direct molecular and cellular mechanisms that connect systemic pagetic bone remodeling to specific ocular complications. While associations and plausible pathways are described (e.g., OPG dysfunction and Bruch’s membrane calcification for angioid streaks), the evidence remains largely indirect. Crucially, there is a paucity of studies directly analyzing affected human ocular tissues (e.g., histopathology of pagetic orbital bone with adjacent compressed nerve, molecular analysis of Bruch’s membrane in PDB) to validate proposed mechanisms. Furthermore, the relative contribution and potential synergy between different mechanisms (e.g., vascular steal versus direct compression in optic neuropathy) in individual patients are poorly defined, complicating personalized management. Finally, potential publication bias favoring positive results may skew the understanding of rare complications or overestimate treatment effectiveness.

Conclusion

This review delineates the connections between PDB pathogenesis, its diverse ocular manifestations, and therapeutic strategies. Evidence confirms that abnormal bone remodeling, driven by genetic susceptibility and environmental triggers, is the common pathology underlying both skeletal and specific ocular disease. Therefore, effective PDB management must transcend specialty silos, relying on multidisciplinary collaboration (MDT) among orthopedics, endocrinology, and ophthalmology. Integrating ocular assessment into the standard PDB care pathway and implementing mechanism-based individualized treatment are essential to control skeletal progression while preventingvisual impairment, ultimately enhancing patient quality of life.

To achieve this, future research must prioritize studies designed to establish definitive causal pathways. Key priorities include: (1) Longitudinal, prospective cohort studies of PDB patients with standardized ocular screening, to determine the true incidence and natural history of complications and identify risk factors; (2) Mechanistic studies employing advanced imaging (e.g., high-resolution angiography coupled with OCT), biofluid analysis, and, where possible, targeted histopathology of surgical specimens to bridge systemic biomarkers with local ocular pathology; and (3) Well-designed clinical trials to evaluate whether early, aggressive systemic therapy or novel pathway-targeted agents can prevent the development or progression of sight-threatening ocular complications, moving beyond retrospective case reports.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author contributions

Bei Li: Conceptualization, Writing-Original Draft, Writing-Review&Editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Yifan Kang: Writing-Original Draft. Both authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Bei Li and Yifan Kang contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.

References

  • 1.Paget J. On a form of chronic inflammation of bones (Osteitis Deformans). Med Chir Trans. 1877;60:37–64.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Wandzilak K, Renke M, Obołończyk Ł. Surprising diagnosis of Paget’s disease of bone during malignancy diagnosis. Endokrynol Pol. 2025;76(3):347–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tuck SP, Walker J. Adult Paget’s disease of bone. Clin Med (Lond). 2020;20(6):568–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gennari L, Rendina D, Merlotti D, Cavati G, Mingiano C, Cosso R, Materozzi M, Pirrotta F, Abate V, Calabrese M, Falchetti A. Update on the pathogenesis and genetics of Paget’s disease of bone. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:932065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Morales-Piga A, Bachiller-Corral J, Villaverde-Hueso A, Alonso-Ferreira V, Posada de la Paz M, López-Abente G. Further evidence supporting a genetic background for Paget’s disease of bone in Spain. Anthropol Anz. 2012;69(4):417–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shaik NA, Nasser KK, Alruwaili MM, Alallasi SR, Elango R, Banaganapalli B. Molecular modelling and dynamic simulations of sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1) missense mutations linked to Paget disease of bone. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2021;39(8):2873–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Singh N, Mishra D, Gomes J. Deleterious Sequestosome 1 mutations G262R and P438L in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis cause autophagy and oxidative stress imbalance. Neuroscience. 2025;581:233–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jin J, Huang R, Chang Y, Yi X. Roles and mechanisms of optineurin in bone metabolism. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;172:116258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wong SW, Huang BW, Hu X, Ho Kim E, Kolb JP, Padilla RJ, Xue P, Wang L, Oguin TH 3rd, Miguez PA, Tseng HC, Ko CC, Martinez J. Global deletion of Optineurin results in altered type I IFN signaling and abnormal bone remodeling in a model of Paget’s disease. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27(1):71–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hu X, Wong SW, Liang K, Wu TH, Wang S, Wang L, Liu J, Yamauchi M, Foster BL, Ting JP, Zhao B, Tseng HC, Ko CC. Optineurin regulates NRF2-mediated antioxidant response in a mouse model of Paget’s disease of bone. Sci Adv. 2023;9(4):eade6998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chung YM, Hu CS, Sun E, Tseng HC. Morphological multiparameter filtration and persistent homology in mitochondrial image analysis. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(9):e0310157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Horackova J, Taslerova R, Bayer M, Nekvindova J, Pavlikova L, Horacek JM, Palicka V. Juvenile Paget disease with unique compound heterozygous sequence variants in the TNFRSF11B gene. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025;20(1):409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Makaram NS, Ralston SH. Genetic Determinants of Paget’s Disease of Bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2021;19(3):327–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Whyte MP, Campeau PM, McAlister WH, Roodman GD, Kurihara N, Nenninger A, Duan S, Gottesman GS, Bijanki VN, Sedighi H, Veis DJ, Mumm S. Juvenile Paget’s Disease from Heterozygous Mutation of SP7 Encoding Osterix (Specificity Protein 7, Transcription Factor SP7). Bone. 2020;137:115364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Columbres RCA, Chin Y, Pratti S, Quinn C, Gonzalez-Cuyar LF, Weiss M, Quintero-Rivera F, Kimonis V. Novel Variants in the VCP Gene Causing Multisystem Proteinopathy 1. Genes (Basel). 2023;14(3):676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Weiss L, Jung KM, Nalbandian A, Llewellyn K, Yu H, Ta L, Chang I, Migliore M, Squire E, Ahmed F, Piomelli D, Kimonis V. Ceramide contributesto pathogenesis and may be targeted for therapy in VCP inclusion body myopathy. Hum Mol Genet. 2021;29(24):3945–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.di Scotto F, Whyte MP, Gianfrancesco F. The two faces of giant cell tumor of bone. Cancer Lett. 2020;489:1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Choi YJ, Sohn YB, Chung YS. Updates on Paget’s Disease of Bone. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2022;37(5):732–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tao X, Liu L, Yang X, Wei Z, Chen Z, Zhang G, Zhang Z, Yue H. Clinical Characteristics and Pathogenic Gene Identification in Chinese Patients with Paget’s Disease of Bone. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:850462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rebollo-Najera C, Usategui-Martín R, Lobato-Carrasco J, Domínguez-Gil-González M, Mirón-Canelo JA, Miramontes-González P, Ralston SH, Corral-Gudino L. Continuous decline in Paget’s disease of bone: a One Health perspective on 2342 new diagnoses and their association with rural livestock. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025;64(9):5081–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rendina D, De Filippo G, Merlotti D, Di Stefano M, Succoio M, Muggianu SM, Bianciardi S, D’Elia L, Coppo E, Faraonio R, Nuti R, Strazzullo P, Gennari L. Vitamin D Status in Paget Disease of Bone and Efficacy-Safety Profile of Cholecalciferol Treatment in Pagetic Patients with Hypovitaminosis D. Calcif Tissue Int. 2019;105(4):412–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Numan MS, Jean S, Dessay M, Gagnon E, Amiable N, Brown JP. MichouL. Gene-environment interactions in Paget’s disease of bone. Joint Bone Spine. 2019;86(3):373–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cundy T. The Decline of Paget’s Disease of Bone and Domestic Coal Use-A Hypothesis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2024;115(2):117–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Visconti MR, Usategui-Martín R, Ralston SH. Antibody Response to Paramyxoviruses in Paget’s Disease of Bone. Calcif Tissue Int. 2017;101(2):141–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kaisar, Haroon. Md. Shafiul Alam, Md. Nowfel Islam.Giant Cell Tumour in a Patient with Paget’s Disease of the Skull Bone - A Rare Case Report. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2024;50:111–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dabbs TR, Skjodt K. Prevalence of angioid streaks and other ocular complications of paget’s disease of bone. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74:579–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fasana R, Eriksen NS, Borrelli E, Pfau K, Subhi Y. Intravitreal faricimab treatment for traumatic choroidal rupture and macular neovascularization in angioid streaks: a case report. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2025 Dec;24:11206721251395518. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 28.Nadelmann JB, Li Y, McGeehan B, Yu Y, VanderBeek BL. Systemic disease associations with angioid streaks in a large healthcare claims database. Eye (Lond). 2023;37(8):1596–601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kerr NM, Cassinelli HR, DiMeglio LA, Tau C, Tüysüz B, Cundy T, Vincent AL. Ocular manifestations of juvenile Paget disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(6):698–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tripathy K, Quint JM. Angioid streaks. 2024 Mar 3. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan. [PubMed]
  • 31.Eretto P, Krohel GB, Shihab ZM, Wallach S, Hay P. Optic neuropathy in Paget’s disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;97(4):505–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Isasi C, Sanz J, Hijós M, Vaquero M, Saucedo G, Andreu JL. Successful treatment of optic neuropathy in osteitis deformans. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002;41(8):948–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yuan M, Chiou CA, Hu JCW, Zekavat SM, Eliott D, Patel AB, Lefebvre DR. Orbital and ocular venous congestion: a rare manifestation of hypervascular paget disease of the bone. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025 Sep-Oct 01;41(5): e154–7. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 34.Kheterpal S, Downes SM, Eagling EM. Paget’s disease presenting with exophthalmos. Eye (Lond). 1994;8(Pt 4):480–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hardy TG, McNab AA. Bilateral enophthalmos associated with paget disease of the skull: a case report. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;18(5):388–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tari AS, Fard MA. Solitary orbital paget disease: a case report. Orbit. 2010;29(4):219–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ogura K, Morizane C, Satake T, Iwata S, Toda Y, Muramatsu S, Takemori T, Kondo H, Kobayashi E, Arakawa A, Ogawa C, Katoh Y, Higashi T, Kawai A. Incidence and age- and site-specific characteristics of osteosarcoma: a population-based study using National Cancer Registry 2016–2019. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2025;55(9):1037–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Epley KD, Lasky JB, Karesh JW. Osteosarcoma of the orbit associated with Paget disease. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;14(1):62–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Goldberg S, Slamovits TL, Dorfman HD, Rosenbaum PS. Sarcomatous transformation of the orbit in a patient with Paget’s disease. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(8):1464–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Farhangi H, Farzadnia M, Alamdaran A. Childhood Facial Osteo Sarcoma: a Case Report. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015;3(2):141–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ayalon-Dangur I, Rudman Y, Tsvetov G, Slutzky-Shraga I, Akirov A, Shimon I, Hirsch D, Gorshtein A. Long-term effectiveness of zoledronic acid in patients with Paget’s disease of bone - a retrospective cohort study. Endocrine. 2024;85(2):873–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Höppner J, Steff K, Misof BM, Schündeln MM, Hövel M, Lücke T, Grasemann C. Clinical course in two children with Juvenile Paget’s disease duringlong-term treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates. Bone Rep. 2021;14:100762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cundy T, Maslowski K, Grey A, Reid IR. Durability of Response to Zoledronate Treatment and Competing Mortality in Paget’s Disease of Bone. J Bone Min Res. 2017;32(4):753–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rendina D, Falchetti A, Diacinti D, Bertoldo F, Merlotti D, Giannini S, Cianferotti L, Girasole G, Di Monaco M, Gonnelli S, Malavolta N, Minisola S, Vescini F, Rossini M, Frediani B, Chiodini I, Asciutti F, Gennari L. Diagnosis and treatment of Paget’s disease of bone: position paper from the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism and Skeletal Diseases (SIOMMMS). J Endocrinol Invest. 2024;47(6):1335–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Phillips J, Subedi D, Lewis SC, Keerie C, Cronin O, Porteous M, Moore D, Cetnarskyj R, Ranganath L, Selby PL, Turgut T, Hampson G, Chandra R, Ho S, Tobias J, Young-Min S, McKenna MJ, Crowley RK, Fraser WD, Tang JCY, Gennari L, Nuti R, Brandi ML, Del Pino-Montes J, Devogelaer JP, Durnez A, Isaia GC, Di Stefano M, Guanabens N, Blanch Rubio J, Seibel MJ, Walsh JP, Rea SL, Kotowicz MA, Nicholson GC, Duncan EL, Major G, Horne A, Gilchrist N, Ralston SH. Randomised trial of genetic testing and targeted intervention to prevent the development and progression of Paget’s disease of bone. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024;83(4):529–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ma D, Xiao C, Zhao D, Li G, Cheng W, Deng X, He D, Liu K. Posterior scleritis following a single infusion of zoledronate for osteoporosis: A case report and literature review. Clin Case Rep. 2024;12(6):e9068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jin X, Shou Z, Shao Y, Bian P. Zoledronate-induced acute anterior uveitis: a three-case report and brief review of literature. Arch Osteoporos. 2021;16(1):104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Anandasayanan K, Malaravan M, Suganthan N. Acute unilateral anterior uveitis following zoledronic acid infusion: A case report. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2020;8:2050313X20944305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liu A, Paulson C, Krauspe E, Perchik M, Desautels J, Crosby A. Orbital inflammation following zoledronic acid infusion. Arch Osteoporos. 2025;20(1):52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chartrand NA, Lau CK, Parsons MT, Handlon JJ, Ronquillo YC, Hoopes PC, Moshirfar M. Ocular side effects of bisphosphonates: a review of literature. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan-Feb;39(1):3–16. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 51.Karpuz S. Zoledronic acid-induced severe lymphopenia. Osteoporos Int. 2023;34(9):1653–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Barrera BA, Wilton L, Harris S, Shakir SA. Prescription-event monitoring study on 13,164 patients prescribed risedronate in primary care in England. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(12):1989–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Van Poznak C, Reynolds EL, Estilo CL, Hu M, Schneider BP, Hertz DL, Gersch C, Thibert J, Thomas D, Banerjee M, Rae JM, Hayes DF. Osteonecrosis of the jaw risk factors in bisphosphonate-treated patients with metastatic cancer. Oral Dis. 2022;28(1):193–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Shima K, Tsuchiya M, Oizumi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Sugawara S, Endo Y. Inflammatory Effects of Nitrogen-Containing Bisphosphonates (N-BPs): Modulation by Non-N-BPs. Biol Pharm Bull. 2017;40(1):25–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chang CC, Sivakumar G, Huang MC, Chen YH, Wu SR, Lai YJ, Lai CH, Tu LH. Both single mutation and molecular conjugation on the mutant prevent calcitonin from forming amyloid fibrils. Biochimie. 2025;242:1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Xie J, Guo J, Kanwal Z, Wu M, Lv X, Ibrahim NA, Li P, Buabeid MA, Arafa EA, Sun Q. Calcitonin and bone physiology: in vitro, in vivo, and clinical investigations. Int J Endocrinol. 2020;2020:3236828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 57.Huang F, Huang J, Yan J, Liu Y, Lian J, Sun Q, Ding F, Sun Y. Molecular Insights into the Effects of F16L and F19L Substitutions on the Conformation and Aggregation Dynamics of Human Calcitonin. J Chem Inf Model. 2024;64(11):4500–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Phan VHG, Nguyen BT, Nguyen NY, Tran CD, Nguyen QD, Luu CH, Manivasagan P, Jang ES, Yang DC, Yang DU, Li Y, Conde J, Thambi T. Longan-inspired chitosan-pectin core-shell hydrogel beads for oral delivery of biodrugs to enhance osteoporosis therapy. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;308(Pt 1):142254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Maatallah K, Rahmouni S, Miladi S, Rouached L, Ferjeni H, Fazaa A, Laatar A, Kaffel D, Hamdi W. Paget’s disease of bone in Tunisia: a study of 69 patients. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Sep-Oct;24(5):422–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 60.Elshafie O, Alsaffi N, Hussain S, Woodhouse N. Paget’s Disease in an Omani: Long-term Improvement Following a Single Injection of Zoledronic Acid. Oman Med J. 2016;31(2):146–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gkikopoulou E, Syrigos CC, Mantogiannakou I, Petraki CE, Stathopoulou M, Dragolia M, Rinotas V, Ntafis V, Rauner M, Douni E. RANKL Drives Bone Metastasis in Mammary Cancer: Protective Effects of Anti-Resorptive Treatments. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(11):4990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kamalumpundi V, Shams E, Torfah M, Correia ML. Amelioration of Paget Disease of Bone After Denosumab for Osteopenia. AACE Clin Case Rep. 2023;9(5):158–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Polyzos SA, Anastasilakis K, Cundy T, Kita M. Long-Term Denosumab Treatment in Adults with Juvenile Paget Disease. Calcif Tissue Int. 2025;116(1):60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Magvanjav O, Bergwitz C. Treatment of Extraosseous Giant Cell Tumor of Bone and Calcitriol-Mediated Hypercalcemia with Denosumab in Paget Disease. JCEM Case Rep. 2025;3(4):luaf031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pal R, Bhadada SK. Comment on Rebound hypercalcemia post-denosumab cessation in metastatic breast cancer: Waxing-Waning Serum Calcium following Denosumab use in a patient with Polyostotic Paget’s Disease of Bone. Osteoporos Int. 2022;33(10):2227–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Li JY, Yu M, Pal S, Tyagi AM, Dar H, Adams J, Weitzmann MN, Jones RM, Pacifici R. Parathyroid hormone-dependent bone formation requires butyrate production by intestinal microbiota. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(4):1767–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nilsson AG, Sundh D, Bäckhed F, Lorentzon M. Lactobacillus reuteri reduces bone loss in older women with low bone mineral density: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial. J Intern Med. 2018;284(3):307–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Jansson PA, Curiac D, Lazou Ahrén I, Hansson F, Martinsson Niskanen T, Sjögren K, Ohlsson C. Probiotic treatment using a mix of three Lactobacillusstrains for lumbar spine bone loss in postmenopausal women: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2019;1(3):e154–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES