ABSTRACT
Pseudomonas aeruginosa remains a critical global health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, owing to its high carriage of diverse virulence factor genes (VFGs) and multidrug resistance. Here, we analyzed the prevalence and genotype distribution of VFGs in P. aeruginosa isolated from Nanyang Central Hospital (NYCH), China, along with their antibiotic susceptibility profiles. The study involved 79 multidrug-resistant (MDR) and 96 non-MDR (nMDR) strains and the following 11 key VFGs (nan1, pilA, aprA, phzS, plcH, toxA, lasB, exoS, exoU, exoT, exoY). Antibiogram profiling showed near-universal resistance to at least one antibiotic class. MDR strains exhibited 23 distinct antibiotic resistance patterns, compared with 13 patterns in nMDR strains. A moderate negative correlation was observed between β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors and fluoroquinolone resistance. Moreover, statistical analysis revealed that the phzS gene displayed the most significant prevalence difference between MDR and nMDR subgroups (P < 0.001). Finally, 28 distinct genotypes were identified in nMDR isolates, and 26 genotypes appeared in MDR strains. There was a statistically significant correlation found between the presence of genotype XX (r = 0.481, P < 0.001) and genotype XXVIII (r = −0.320, P < 0.001) in two subgroups. Collectively, our findings provide data support for understanding the pathogenic mechanism of local P. aeruginosa, and are of great significance for guiding clinical anti-infection treatment and infection control.
IMPORTANCE
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen notorious for causing difficult-to-treat infections, particularly among hospitalized patients in resource-limited healthcare settings. This study analyzed clinical isolates from a major hospital in China to investigate the prevalence and genotypic distribution of virulence factor genes (VFGs) and antibiotic susceptibility profiles of P. aeruginosa. Our results showed that multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains displayed more complex and diverse resistance profiles than non-MDR (nMDR) strains. Both MDR and nMDR isolates exhibited high genotypic diversity. Notably, a statistically significant association was observed between genotype XX and genotype XXVIII across the two subgroups. These findings elucidate the molecular basis underlying the variable treatment difficulty of P. aeruginosa infections and offer valuable insights for guiding empirical antibiotic selection. Characterizing local bacterial features, including antibiotic susceptibility profiles and the distribution of clinically relevant virulence factors, may improve understanding of regional resistance trends and support antimicrobial stewardship and infection control efforts.
KEYWORDS: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, multidrug resistant, antibiotic susceptibility profile, virulence factor genes, genotype distribution
INTRODUCTION
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), as a Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen, frequently colonizes immunocompromised patients and causes severe acute and chronic infections (1, 2). The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), pan-drug-resistant, and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA) strains has raised global concern, with frequent outbreaks reported in critical care units, surgical wards, and burn units (3, 4). Recent epidemiological data from the European network for intensive care unit (ICU)-related respiratory infections secondary analysis indicates that P. aeruginosa was detected in 14.5% of nosocomial respiratory infection specimens among ICU patients (5). Recognizing the threat posed by P. aeruginosa, the World Health Organization classified P. aeruginosa as a critical priority pathogen requiring urgent development of new antibiotics (6–8). Besides, it is also recognized as a core member of the six “ESKAPE” pathogens (9), underscoring the urgent need for enhanced surveillance, early detection, infection control measures, and the development of novel therapeutic strategies against P. aeruginosa.
The high incidence and mortality of P. aeruginosa infections arise from its multidrug resistance and an array of virulence factor genes (VFGs) in its versatile genome (10, 11). This bacterium displays intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotic classes (e.g., β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides) and readily develops MDR or XDR strains via genetic mutations, horizontal gene transfer of resistance determinants (e.g., genes encoding extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases), and robust biofilm formation (3, 12–16). Its pathogenicity is driven by VFGs that collectively facilitate host tissue adhesion, invasion, immune evasion, and direct tissue damage, severely limiting therapeutic options and contributing to poor clinical outcomes in vulnerable patients (17, 18).
Examples of key VFGs include nan1, pilA, aprA, phzS, plcH, toxA, lasB, exoS, exoU, exoT, and exoY. These enable mucosal adhesion (e.g., via neuraminidase Nan1 and type IV pilus subunit PilA) (19–23), tissue destruction (e.g., zinc metalloproteinase LasB and AprA, hemolytic phospholipase C PlcH) (24–29), immune evasion (e.g., ExoS-mediated disruption of host cytoskeletal dynamics and phagocytosis inhibition) (30–32), cell lysis and cytotoxicity (e.g., phospholipase A2 ExoU) (33, 34), inhibition of host protein synthesis (e.g., exogenous toxin A ToxA) (23, 35), and oxidative damage (via pyocyanin biosynthesis involving the PhzS pathway) (35), severely limiting treatment efficacy of P. aeruginosa infections. Although the precise roles of ExoT and ExoY in P. aeruginosa are less well characterized, current evidence indicates that ExoT modulates host cell cycle progression (30, 36), whereas ExoY primarily functions as an adenylyl cyclase, elevating intracellular cAMP levels in target cells and disrupting normal signaling (37, 38). Antimicrobial resistance and virulence traits often co-evolve in high-risk P. aeruginosa clones, rather than being mutually exclusive, resulting in “superbug” strains with heightened pathogenicity and therapeutic challenges (14, 39). For example, the most representative high-risk clone ST235 frequently harbors both the exoU virulence gene and over 60 distinct β-lactamase variants, contributing to therapeutic failure and elevated patient mortality in invasive P. aeruginosa infections (14). A comprehensive understanding of the antibiotic susceptibility profiles and virulence factors of P. aeruginosa isolates is essential for developing targeted interventions against P. aeruginosa infections and improving clinical prognosis.
The dissemination of MDR P. aeruginosa strains harboring VFGs poses a major global public health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) across Africa and Asia, contributing significantly to increase the risk of hospital-acquired infections and the economic burden (40). Furthermore, the antibiotic susceptibility profiles and distribution of key VFGs in P. aeruginosa exhibit pronounced setting- and geography-specific patterns (41, 42), as evidenced by significant worldwide variation in the detection rates of the genes, including toxA (43, 44), pilA (44, 45), and exoU (44, 46). Updated information on antibiotic resistance patterns and virulence features in MDR strains remains limited in many hospital settings across LMICs. In this study, we compared the prevalence and genotype distribution of VFGs in MDR and non-MDR (nMDR) strains of P. aeruginosa from Nanyang Central Hospital (NYCH). The presence of 11 VFGs (nan1, pilA, aprA, phzS, plcH, toxA, lasB, exoS, exoU, exoT, exoY) of these strains was investigated. In addition, the antibiotic resistance patterns of these isolates were also analyzed.
RESULTS
The origin, prevalence, and antimicrobial resistance of P. aeruginosa isolates
The overall antibiogram profiles of the isolated P. aeruginosa strains are presented in Table S2. Based on the antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results detailed therein, this study included a total of 96 nMDR and 79 MDR clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. The origins (specimen types and unit origins) of the nMDR and MDR isolates are shown in Fig. 1, while Fig. S1 and S2 provide separate, detailed presentations of the nMDR and MDR isolate distributions, respectively.
Fig 1.
The specimen types (A) and departments (B) of P. aeruginosa included in this study (n = 175).
Antimicrobial resistance rates among the 175 isolates were as follows: β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLI) (n = 101, 57.7%), Fluoroquinolones (FQs) (n = 111, 63.4%), Monobactams (MBs) (n = 99, 56.6%), Cephalosporins (CEPs) (n = 50, 28.6%), Carbapenems (CBPs) (n = 46, 26.3%), Penicillins (PCNs) (n = 26, 14.9%), and Aminoglycosides (AGs) (n = 14, 8.0%). No resistance to polymyxins was observed in any isolate (Table S3). Nearly all isolates (n = 174, 99.4%) exhibited resistance to at least one antibiotic class. Moreover, 97.5% of the MDR isolates were resistant to BL/BLI (Table S2). The correlation analysis of resistance patterns revealed a moderate negative correlation between MBs and FQs (r = −0.474, P < 0.001). Moderate positive correlations were observed between CEPs and PCNs (r = 0.554, P < 0.001), CEPs and BL/BLI (r = 0.465, P < 0.001), and CEPs and AGs (r = 0.420, P < 0.001). Weak positive correlations were found in six additional pairs: BL/BLI and PCNs (r = 0.325, P < 0.001), BL/BLI and MBs (r = 0.370, P < 0.001), PCNs and FQs (r = 0.284, P < 0.001), CEPs and CBPs (r = 0.255, P = 0.001), AGs and CBPs (r = 0.302, P < 0.001), CBPs and BL/BLI (r = 0.327, P < 0.001) (Table S4).
In the group of MDR strains, the only moderate positive correlation observed was that of the CEPs and PCNs (r = 0.451, P < 0.001). Weak positive relationships were observed between the AGs and CEPs (r = 0.366, P = 0.001), PCNs and FQs (r = 0.305, P = 0.006), AGs and CBPs (r = 0.233, P = 0.038), MBs and BL/BLI (r = 0.259, P = 0.021). Weak negative correlations were noted between AGs and BL/BLI (r = −0.363, P = 0.001), AGs and MBs (r = −0.257, P = 0.022) (Table S5). In the group of nMDR strains, bivariate analysis exhibited that the MBs had a weak positive correlation with BL/BLI (r = 0.267, P = 0.009). In contrast, a strong negative correlation was found between MBs and FQs (r = −0.877, P < 0.001), accompanied by 2 weak negative correlations between FQs and BL/BLI (r = −0.361, P < 0.001), CBPs and MBs (r = −0.228, P = 0.026) (Table S6).
Antibiotic resistance patterns of P. aeruginosa isolates
Among the 175 P. aeruginosa isolates, a total of 36 distinct antibiotic resistance patterns were identified (Table S7). In the subgroup of 79 MDR isolates, 23 different resistance patterns were observed, with the combination of resistance to BL/BLI, FQs, and MBs being the most frequent (n = 12; 15.2%). Two isolates showed resistance to seven antimicrobial classes (PCNs, BL/BLI, CEPs, AGs, FQs, MBs, and CBPs). Additionally, 14 isolates exhibited resistance to more than six antibiotic classes, and 40 CRPA isolates were collected. In contrast, the 96 nMDR isolates displayed 13 distinct resistance patterns. Among these isolates, resistance was most frequently observed to FQs (38.5%), followed by MBs (25.0%). Table S7 summarizes the distribution of the antibiotic resistance patterns of P. aeruginosa collection.
The prevalence of VFGs amongst MDR and nMDR strains
Gene-specific simplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was employed to screen for VFGs in 175 P. aeruginosa isolates. Two outer membrane lipoprotein genes, oprL and oprI (47), together with the housekeeping gene gyrB (encoding DNA gyrase subunit B) (48, 49), were further used to confirm P. aeruginosa. One hundred percent of isolates were positive for the oprL, oprI, and gyrB genes. The analysis revealed a variable distribution of VFGs. The incidence of VFGs was as follows: the phzS gene was detected in 39.4% of strains, while toxA, aprA, and plcH showed high frequencies at 88.6%, 89.7%, and 97.1%, respectively. The lasB gene was detected in all the tested strains, whereas the pilA and nan1 genes exhibited the lowest detection rates, at only 4.6% and 6.9%, respectively. In the type III secretion system effector gene family, exoT was the most common (94.9%), followed by exoY (89.1%), exoS (77.7%), and exoU (16.6%) (Table S8). The gene prevalence pattern in the overall collection is similar to that observed when MDR and nMDR isolates are analyzed separately (Fig. 2). The prevalence of the phzS gene displayed the most significant difference between MDR and nMDR subgroups of strains (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2). The gel electrophoresis results of all tested genes in representative samples are presented in Fig. S3 and S4. The detailed incidence of the detected VFGs amongst the examined P. aeruginosa is provided in Table S9 for the MDR strains and Table S10 for the nMDR isolates.
Fig 2.
Prevalence of detected VFGs of P. aeruginosa included in the study according to the AST results (nMDR, n = 96 vs MDR, n = 79).
Prevalence of the observed genotypes amongst MDR and nMDR strains
Assessment of the detected VFGs in this study revealed considerable genotypic diversity among the clinical P. aeruginosa isolates. A total of 43 distinct genotypes (named I–XLIII) were identified across all examined strains, with their prevalence and distribution illustrated in Fig. 3 and detailed in Table 1. The most prevalent genotype, numbered XXVIII, including the genes aprA, plcH, exoS, exoT, exoY, toxA, lasB, oprL, oprI, and gyrB, was observed among 50 of the isolates. Of note, the highest number of VFGs co-occurring in a single isolate was 13, observed in 1 MDR strain.
Fig 3.

Characteristics of the genotypes detected amongst examined P. aeruginosa strains (nMDR, n = 96 vs MDR, n = 79). Dark color indicates the presence of the gene, white color indicates its absence.
TABLE 1.
Distribution of genotypes detected amongst examined MDR and nMDR P. aeruginosa strains
| Genotype | Number of MDR isolates | Number of nMDR isolates |
|---|---|---|
| I | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| II | 3 (3.8%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| III | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| IV | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| V | 3 (3.8%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| VI | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| VII | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (2.1%) |
| VIII | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| IX | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| X | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (2.1%) |
| XI | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| XII | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| XIII | 1 (1.3%) | 5 (5.2%) |
| XIV | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| XV | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| XVI | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| XVII | 3 (3.8%) | 5 (5.2%) |
| XVIII | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| XIX | 3 (3.8%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| XX | 28 (35.4%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| XXI | 2 (2.5%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| XXII | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| XXIII | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| XXIV | 1 (1.3%) | 3 (3.1%) |
| XXV | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| XXVI | 2 (2.5%) | 2 (2.1%) |
| XXVII | 1 (1.3%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| XXVIII | 10 (12.7%) | 40 (41.7%) |
| XXIX | 5 (6.3%) | 8 (8.3%) |
| XXX | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (3.1%) |
| XXXI | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| XXXII | 1 (1.3%) | 3 (3.1%) |
| XXXIII | 3 (3.8%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| XXXIV | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (3.1%) |
| XXXV | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| XXXVI | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| XXXVII | 2 (2.5%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| XXXVIII | 1 (1.3%) | 4 (4.2%) |
| XXXIX | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| XL | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| XLI | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| XLII | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) |
| XXLIII | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Among the 79 MDR isolates, 26 distinct genotypes were identified. The most prevalent genotype, designated XX, harboring the genes aprA, phzS, plcH, exoS, exoT, exoY, toxA, lasB, oprL, oprI, and gyrB, was detected in 28 isolates (35.4%). Genotype XXVIII was the second most common, occurring in 10 isolates (12.7%). Genotypes XXVI, XXVII, XXXIII, and XXXVII showed higher prevalence in MDR isolates compared with nMDR isolates. In the group of 96 nMDR isolates, 28 distinct genotypes were observed. The dominant genotype was XXVIII, which was detected in 40 isolates (41.7%). Genotype XXIX ranked second, occurring in eight isolates (8.3%). All other genotypes were relatively rare in both MDR and nMDR groups (Table 1). Overall, the presence of specific VFGs did not predetermine multidrug resistance among the isolates. There was a statistically significant correlation found between the presence of genotype XX (r = 0.481, P < 0.001) and genotype XXVIII (r = −0.320, P < 0.001) in the nMDR or MDR groups of strains.
In the group of MDR strains, correlation analysis revealed one moderate negative correlation between exoS and exoU (r = −0.532, P < 0.001). In contrast, a moderate positive correlation was found between plcH and exoT (r = 0.487, P < 0.001). Five additional weak positive correlations were identified: exoS and phzS (r = 0.258, P = 0.022), phzS and toxA (r = 0.321, P = 0.004), exoY and plcH (r = 0.330, P = 0.003), exoT and exoY (r = 0.330, P = 0.003), exoY and toxA (r = 0.305, P = 0.006) (Table 2). In the group of nMDR strains, a strong negative correlation was found between exoS and exoU (r = −0.758, P < 0.001). Weak negative correlations were noted between phzS and aprA (r = −0.290, P = 0.004), phzS and plcH (r = −0.329, P = 0.001), phzS and toxA (r = −0.242, P = 0.018), exoT and exoU (r = −0.225, P = 0.028). Additionally, a moderate positive significant correlation existed between toxA and exoY (r = 0.531, P < 0.001), and a weak positive correlation between exoT and exoS (r = 0.228, P = 0.025) (Table 3).
TABLE 2.
The Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for the particular gene pair in 79 MDR samplesa
| MDR (n = 79) | nan1 | pilA | aprA | phzS | plcH | exoS | exoU | exoT | exoY | toxA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nan1 | r | 1.000 | 0.13 | 0.082 | 0.08 | 0.051 | −0.052 | 0.074 | 0.051 | 0.073 | −0.19 |
| P | 0.255 | 0.474 | 0.489 | 0.658 | 0.654 | 0.517 | 0.658 | 0.525 | 0.096 | ||
| pilA | r | 0.13 | 1.000 | 0.06 | 0.191 | 0.037 | 0.121 | −0.112 | 0.037 | 0.053 | 0.078 |
| P | 0.255 | 0.599 | 0.093 | 0.745 | 0.288 | 0.327 | 0.745 | 0.641 | 0.497 | ||
| aprA | r | 0.082 | 0.06 | 1.000 | 0.209 | −0.042 | −0.01 | −0.007 | −0.042 | −0.06 | −0.087 |
| P | 0.474 | 0.599 | 0.064 | 0.714 | 0.933 | 0.953 | 0.714 | 0.599 | 0.444 | ||
| phzS | r | 0.08 | 0.191 | 0.209 | 1.000 | 0.031 | 0.258* | −0.192 | 0.195 | 0.162 | 0.321* |
| P | 0.489 | 0.093 | 0.064 | 0.785 | 0.022 | 0.090 | 0.085 | 0.153 | 0.004 | ||
| plcH | r | 0.051 | 0.037 | −0.042 | 0.031 | 1.000 | 0.112 | 0.078 | 0.487** | 0.330* | −0.054 |
| P | 0.658 | 0.745 | 0.714 | 0.785 | 0.327 | 0.494 | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.636 | ||
| exoS | r | −0.052 | 0.121 | −0.01 | 0.258* | 0.112 | 1.000 | −0.532** | 0.112 | 0.16 | 0.131 |
| P | 0.654 | 0.288 | 0.933 | 0.022 | 0.327 | <0.001 | 0.327 | 0.159 | 0.252 | ||
| exoU | r | 0.074 | −0.112 | −0.007 | −0.192 | 0.078 | −0.532** | 1.000 | 0.078 | −0.035 | 0.056 |
| P | 0.517 | 0.327 | 0.953 | 0.090 | 0.494 | <0.001 | 0.494 | 0.757 | 0.627 | ||
| exoT | r | 0.051 | 0.037 | −0.042 | 0.195 | 0.487** | 0.112 | 0.078 | 1.000 | 0.330* | −0.054 |
| P | 0.658 | 0.745 | 0.714 | 0.085 | <0.001 | 0.327 | 0.494 | 0.003 | 0.636 | ||
| exoY | r | 0.073 | 0.053 | −0.06 | 0.162 | 0.330* | 0.16 | −0.035 | 0.330* | 1.000 | 0.305* |
| P | 0.525 | 0.641 | 0.599 | 0.153 | 0.003 | 0.159 | 0.757 | 0.003 | 0.006 | ||
| toxA | r | −0.19 | 0.078 | −0.087 | 0.321* | −0.054 | 0.131 | 0.056 | −0.054 | 0.305* | 1.000 |
| P | 0.096 | 0.497 | 0.444 | 0.004 | 0.636 | 0.252 | 0.627 | 0.636 | 0.006 |
Types of correlation: r > 0, positive correlation; r = 0, lack of correlation; r < 0, negative correlation; the strength of relation: <0.2, lack of relation; 0.2–0.4, weak (*); 0.4–0.7, moderate (**); 0.7–0.9, quite strong (***); >0.9, very strong (****).
TABLE 3.
The Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for the particular gene pair in 96 nMDR samplesa
| nMDR (n = 96) | nan1 | pilA | aprA | phzS | plcH | exoS | exoU | exoT | exoY | toxA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nan1 | r | 1.000 | −0.043 | 0.083 | 0.009 | 0.037 | −0.01 | 0.062 | 0.058 | 0.09 | −0.079 |
| P | 0.674 | 0.424 | 0.930 | 0.717 | 0.920 | 0.551 | 0.571 | 0.385 | 0.445 | ||
| pilA | r | −0.043 | 1.000 | −0.07 | 0.009 | 0.037 | −0.134 | −0.086 | 0.058 | 0.09 | 0.079 |
| P | 0.674 | 0.499 | 0.930 | 0.717 | 0.192 | 0.404 | 0.571 | 0.385 | 0.445 | ||
| aprA | r | 0.083 | −0.07 | 1.000 | −0.290* | −0.071 | 0.002 | 0.077 | −0.111 | −0.17 | −0.15 |
| P | 0.424 | 0.499 | 0.004 | 0.491 | 0.988 | 0.454 | 0.282 | 0.097 | 0.146 | ||
| phzS | r | 0.009 | 0.009 | −0.290* | 1.000 | −0.329* | −0.189 | −0.073 | −0.036 | −0.173 | −0.242* |
| P | 0.930 | 0.930 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.067 | 0.480 | 0.728 | 0.094 | 0.018 | ||
| plcH | r | 0.037 | 0.037 | −0.071 | −0.329* | 1.000 | 0.187 | 0.074 | 0.18 | −0.077 | 0.113 |
| P | 0.717 | 0.717 | 0.491 | 0.001 | 0.068 | 0.472 | 0.079 | 0.454 | 0.272 | ||
| exoS | r | −0.01 | −0.134 | 0.002 | −0.189 | 0.187 | 1.000 | −0.758*** | 0.228* | −0.098 | −0.056 |
| P | 0.920 | 0.192 | 0.988 | 0.067 | 0.068 | <0.001 | 0.025 | 0.342 | 0.587 | ||
| exoU | r | 0.062 | −0.086 | 0.077 | −0.073 | 0.074 | −0.758*** | 1.000 | −0.225* | 0.015 | 0.067 |
| P | 0.551 | 0.404 | 0.454 | 0.480 | 0.472 | <0.001 | 0.028 | 0.883 | 0.517 | ||
| exoT | r | 0.058 | 0.058 | −0.111 | −0.036 | 0.18 | 0.228* | −0.225* | 1.000 | −0.01 | 0.136 |
| P | 0.571 | 0.571 | 0.282 | 0.728 | 0.079 | 0.025 | 0.028 | 0.920 | 0.185 | ||
| exoY | r | 0.09 | 0.09 | −0.17 | −0.173 | −0.077 | −0.098 | 0.015 | −0.01 | 1.000 | 0.531** |
| P | 0.385 | 0.385 | 0.097 | 0.094 | 0.454 | 0.342 | 0.883 | 0.920 | <0.001 | ||
| toxA | r | −0.079 | 0.079 | −0.15 | −0.242* | 0.113 | −0.056 | 0.067 | 0.136 | 0.531** | 1.000 |
| P | 0.445 | 0.445 | 0.146 | 0.018 | 0.272 | 0.587 | 0.517 | 0.185 | <0.001 |
Types of correlation: r > 0, positive correlation; r = 0, lack of correlation; r < 0, negative correlation; the strength of relation: <0.2, lack of relation; 0.2–0.4, weak (*); 0.4–0.7, moderate (**); 0.7–0.9, quite strong (***); >0.9, very strong (****).
DISCUSSION
P. aeruginosa is a major global pathogen responsible for hospital-acquired infections and exhibits multidrug resistance alongside the co-evolution of key VFGs, presenting a serious challenge to public health (50–52). This study conducted a comprehensive molecular screening of multiple VFGs and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles in a large collection of clinical isolates (175 samples), aiming to systematically monitor the variability of virulence genotypes in P. aeruginosa, thereby providing new insights to inform clinical surveillance and infection control strategies. Of these isolates, 74.9% were obtained from sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.
The VFGs were selected based on previous studies (30, 43–45). These genes encode a diverse range of factors with distinct biological activities, including components of the type III secretion system (30, 53–55), major enzymes (24–29), as well as various structural and adhesion-related factors (19–23). Both well-characterized genes and some less extensively studied ones were included. The identification of P. aeruginosa isolates from clinical samples by MS was further confirmed by PCR detection of oprL, oprI (47), and gyrB genes (48, 49). Previous studies have shown that oprL is nearly universally present (often 95%–100%) across diverse clinical and environmental settings, whereas oprI exhibits high but slightly more variable detection rates (56). Consistent with these findings, all isolates in the present study were positive for oprL, oprI, and gyrB, confirming their reliability as molecular markers for species identification.
To our knowledge, this represents one of the largest studies to date in terms of the number of VFGs simultaneously investigated. The frequency distribution of VFGs varied substantially among isolates, resulting in a remarkably high number of distinct genotypes, as anticipated. Of note, PCR-based detection may be affected by sequence variation within primer-binding regions, potentially resulting in false-negative results and underestimation of gene prevalence (57, 58). Although the primers have been widely validated and applied in previous studies (30, 43–45, 59–63), the presence of undetected variants cannot be excluded. Moreover, while PCR-based detection confirms gene presence, it does not provide information on gene functionality or expression. Future studies incorporating whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and phenotypic assessment of resistance mechanisms will be essential to evaluate sequence variations, potential inactivating mutations, and their impact on the pathogenicity and clinical behavior of P. aeruginosa.
P. aeruginosa infections are difficult to treat due to its intrinsic resistance mechanisms and remarkable ability to acquire resistance to multiple antibiotic classes (10, 43, 64, 65). In this study, we identified 79 MDR and 14 XDR P. aeruginosa isolates, underscoring a worrisome level of resistance to commonly used antipseudomonal agents. The XDR isolates were predominantly from surgical wards (50.0%), followed by ICUs (28.6%) and internal medicine departments (21.4%) (Tables S11 and S12). XDR P. aeruginosa infections are linked to elevated mortality, extended hospital stays, and markedly increased healthcare costs, especially when treatment options are severely restricted (66, 67). Compared to recent studies, the antimicrobial resistance profile observed in this study reflects both global trends and regional variation in P. aeruginosa. The high resistance rates to FQs (63.4%) and BL/BLI (57.7%) are consistent with reports from meta-analyses conducted in Asia and Africa (68), although they remain lower than those reported in EU/EEA countries, including Poland (69). Notably, resistance rates to CEPs (28.6%) and PCNs (14.9%) were lower than those described in meta-analyses from Asia and Africa (68). These differences may be attributable to variations in local antimicrobial prescribing practices, infection control measures, and the prevalence of high-risk resistant clones. Nevertheless, the observed CBP resistance rate (26.3%) remains clinically significant and aligns with intermediate levels reported in international surveillance programs, underscoring the ongoing threat posed by CRPA (70, 71). The high susceptibility rate to AGs shown in our study (92.0%), consistent with most previous findings (41, 42, 72), may reflect their relatively judicious use due to concerns regarding toxicity. Meanwhile, no resistance to polymyxins was detected, supporting their continued role as last-line agents against MDR organisms (42, 73). These findings highlight the need for stringent antimicrobial stewardship and infection control policies to optimize treatment outcomes, limit the emergence and spread of resistant strains, and facilitate ongoing surveillance through local antibiograms.
VFGs and antimicrobial resistance mechanisms act synergistically to enhance the pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa, enabling efficient adaptation, successful infection, and persistent colonization across diverse host and environmental niches (64). The lasB gene encodes LasB (elastase), a zinc-dependent metalloproteinase that degrades host extracellular matrix components, such as elastin and collagen, thereby promoting tissue invasion and destruction; high prevalence of lasB has been associated with more severe clinical outcomes in P. aeruginosa infections (24, 25). In the present study, all P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 175) carried at least three VFGs, a finding of considerable concern given its implications for treatment failure and severe disease. Remarkably, all isolates bore the lasB gene. This universal presence aligns with previous reports demonstrating consistently elevated proportions of lasB genes across MDR and nMDR isolates in multiple studies (45, 56). Furthermore, a high prevalence of these VFGs was observed across all MDR isolates, indicating their strong retention even under intense antibiotic pressure.
Unlike many other prevalent nosocomial pathogens, including Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa exhibits a remarkable ability to evade host immune responses and inflict tissue damage via its T3SS effectors (30, 53, 54, 74). In this work, the distribution of T3SS effector genes (exoT, exoS, exoY, and exoU) was evaluated in the 175 P. aeruginosa isolates. The observed distribution aligns with findings previously reported in cystic fibrosis (CF) cohorts from other groups (30). Consistent with prior studies, exoT and exoY genes are present in the majority of isolates and can therefore be regarded as core genomic elements (61). ExoU, a potent phospholipase A2 that induces rapid host cell lysis and membrane disruption, is well established as a marker of severe infections, MDR phenotypes, and poorer outcomes in both respiratory and bloodstream infections (33, 34, 74, 75). ExoS possesses dual ADP-ribosyltransferase and GTPase-activating protein activities that disrupt cytoskeletal integrity, inhibit phagocytosis, and promote immune evasion (30–32). ExoS and ExoU are the most clinically relevant T3SS effectors and are frequently used as typing genes for high-risk P. aeruginosa clones (55, 76). Interestingly, this study identified five isolates (2.9%) harboring a rare virulotype characterized by the simultaneous presence of exoU and exoS (i.e., exoU+/exoS+ virulotype), despite the well-established mutual exclusivity of exoS and exoU in most strains (Tables 2, 3, and 4). The existence of this genotype indicates the emergence of potentially hypervirulent isolates. It is necessary to conduct a comprehensive future characterization of this clinical isolate in the future to better provide information for prognosis and treatment strategies.
TABLE 4.
The Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for the particular gene pair in 175 samplesa
| All (n = 175) | nan1 | pilA | aprA | phzS | plcH | exoS | exoU | exoT | exoY | toxA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nan1 | r | 1.000 | 0.056 | 0.088 | 0.081 | 0.045 | −0.030 | 0.074 | 0.061 | 0.091 | −0.129 |
| P | 0.465 | 0.247 | 0.288 | 0.558 | 0.692 | 0.332 | 0.426 | 0.233 | 0.091 | ||
| pilA | r | 0.056 | 1.000 | −0.016 | 0.103 | 0.038 | −0.014 | −0.098 | 0.051 | 0.076 | 0.079 |
| P | 0.465 | 0.834 | 0.178 | 0.622 | 0.851 | 0.199 | 0.503 | 0.315 | 0.301 | ||
| aprA | r | 0.088 | −0.016 | 1.000 | −0.033 | −0.058 | −0.001 | 0.050 | −0.079 | −0.118 | −0.122 |
| P | 0.247 | 0.834 | 0.663 | 0.445 | 0.995 | 0.513 | 0.300 | 0.119 | 0.109 | ||
| phzS | r | 0.081 | 0.103 | −0.033 | 1.000 | −0.142 | 0.030 | −0.099 | 0.083 | 0.02 | 0.034 |
| P | 0.288 | 0.178 | 0.663 | 0.062 | 0.691 | 0.193 | 0.275 | 0.792 | 0.653 | ||
| plcH | r | 0.045 | 0.038 | −0.058 | −0.142 | 1.000 | 0.155 | 0.076 | 0.271* | 0.05 | 0.046 |
| P | 0.558 | 0.622 | 0.445 | 0.062 | 0.040 | 0.315 | 0.000 | 0.508 | 0.544 | ||
| exoS | r | −0.03 | −0.014 | −0.001 | 0.03 | 0.155 | 1.000 | −0.648** | 0.186 | −0.01 | 0.023 |
| P | 0.692 | 0.851 | 0.995 | 0.691 | 0.040 | <0.001 | 0.014 | 0.892 | 0.758 | ||
| exoU | r | 0.074 | −0.098 | 0.05 | −0.099 | 0.076 | −0.648** | 1.000 | −0.105 | 0.007 | 0.063 |
| P | 0.332 | 0.199 | 0.513 | 0.193 | 0.315 | <0.001 | 0.167 | 0.923 | 0.404 | ||
| exoT | r | 0.061 | 0.051 | −0.079 | 0.083 | 0.271* | 0.186 | −0.105 | 1.000 | 0.085 | 0.079 |
| P | 0.426 | 0.503 | 0.300 | 0.275 | 0.000 | 0.014 | 0.167 | 0.263 | 0.299 | ||
| exoY | r | 0.091 | 0.076 | −0.118 | 0.02 | 0.05 | −0.01 | 0.007 | 0.085 | 1.000 | 0.452** |
| P | 0.233 | 0.315 | 0.119 | 0.792 | 0.508 | 0.892 | 0.923 | 0.263 | <0.001 | ||
| toxA | r | −0.129 | 0.079 | −0.122 | 0.034 | 0.046 | 0.023 | 0.063 | 0.079 | 0.452** | 1.000 |
| P | 0.091 | 0.301 | 0.109 | 0.653 | 0.544 | 0.758 | 0.404 | 0.299 | <0.001 |
Types of correlation: r > 0, positive correlation; r = 0, lack of correlation; r < 0, negative correlation; the strength of relation: <0.2, lack of relation; 0.2–0.4 (*), weak; 0.4–0.7, moderate (**); 0.7–0.9, quite strong (***); >0.9, very strong (****).
We observed that the prevalence of the exoU gene was comparably low in both MDR and nMDR strains (19.0% and 14.6%, respectively) (Fig. 2). Meanwhile, the samples that carry the exoU gene are mainly derived from sputum (n = 25, 86.2%). Previous studies have demonstrated that ExoU expression is associated with poorer clinical outcomes in both respiratory and bloodstream infections (77). In addition, similar low distributions of the pilA (encoding the major pilin subunit for type IV pilus biogenesis, twitching motility, surface attachment, and epithelial invasion) (19–21) and nan1 (encoding neuraminidase, which enhances adhesion to host mucosal surfaces by cleaving sialic acid residues) (22) genes across MDR and nMDR strains were also reported in our work. In contrast to our finding, Mitov et al. documented a statistically significant difference in nan1 distribution, with the gene present in 40.2% of MDR strains versus 13.2% of nMDR strains (59). Our findings suggest that, in the present cohort, exoU, pilA, and nan1 may not serve as a dominant virulence marker differentiating MDR from nMDR strains, underscoring the need for further investigation into local epidemiology and host-pathogen dynamics.
In the MDR group, several gene pairs exhibited positive correlations, including plcH–exoT, phzS–exoS, phzS–toxA, exoY–plcH, exoT–exoY, and exoY–toxA. However, the nMDR group showed negative correlations between several pairs, notably exoS–exoU, phzS–aprA, phzS–plcH, phzS–toxA, and exoT–exoU. Although correlation-based observations do not directly inform therapeutic decision-making, which is primarily guided by isolate-specific susceptibility profiles, these correlation patterns suggest potential interactions or co-regulatory mechanisms within the virulence gene network of P. aeruginosa that may differ between MDR and nMDR strains (78, 79). Furthermore, the prevalence of the phzS gene differed significantly between MDR and nMDR isolates. The positive correlations observed between phzS and aprA, plcH, and toxA in MDR strains may contribute to enhanced overall pathogenicity. Compared with previous reports (43, 44), our findings reveal a notably high degree of genotypic diversity. Genotype XX, which was the dominant genotype among MDR isolates (35.4%) but was completely absent in nMDR strains, likely harbors a specific resistance-associated genetic background or compensatory mechanism that confers a selective advantage under multidrug pressure. Although present at lower frequencies, several additional genotypes were exclusive to MDR strains, further highlighting genotype-specific adaptations linked to resistance. Expanding the sample size and conducting longitudinal surveillance of gene prevalence and genotype dynamics in P. aeruginosa populations could enable the development of a predictive model based on the most discriminatory and commonly co-occurring genes in MDR versus nMDR patterns. Such a tool may facilitate early identification of high-risk strains and inform targeted infection control or therapeutic strategies.
The study has several relevant limitations. First, functional assessments of the pathogenic potential of P. aeruginosa strains with distinct genotypes were not analyzed, including evaluations of biofilm formation capacity and cytotoxicity. Recent studies have shown that P. aeruginosa harbors a large repertoire of resistance and virulence determinants, with more than 200 genes related to toxin production, biofilm formation, immune evasion, and stress adaptation (40). Future investigations should explore potential interactions among key virulence factors, such as exoA (encoding exotoxin A) (80) and algD (involved in alginate biosynthesis) (81), as well as key resistance determinants, such as β-lactam resistance genes (e.g., blaTEM, blaCMY, blaSHV, blaOXA, blaVIM, blaIMP, blaNDM) (82, 83), efflux pump systems, porin alterations (84–86), chaperone proteins (e.g., SpcU) (87), and regulators of quorum-sensing systems, such as LasR and its mutants (88). For instance, Wu et al. demonstrated that mutations in SpcU are critical for optimal ExoU secretion and cytotoxicity in highly virulent clinical isolates (87). Second, the association between specific genotypes and clinical prognosis warrants further investigation. Likewise, all samples were collected from a single center, restricting the generalizability of our findings to this specific patient population and geographic setting. Furthermore, the absence of detailed clinical characteristics of the P. aeruginosa infections (e.g., risk factors, management, and outcomes) precluded differentiation between true infection and colonization (42, 89). Such distinctions would provide important clinical context and help clarify whether specific genotypes are associated with pathogenicity or persistence. Future studies integrating WGS with well-annotated clinical metadata and medical imaging will be essential to clarify the clinical significance of these genotypes and to support evidence-based antimicrobial stewardship strategies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Biological samples and identification
A total of 175 non-duplicate clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa collected from the medical laboratory of NYCH were included in the study. The samples were received between July and November 2025. Samples were stored at 4°C for no more than 2 days prior to processing.
Clinical specimens were processed according to standard microbiological diagnostic procedures in our unit. Initial identification of P. aeruginosa cultured from clinical samples was based on the colony morphology and microscopic characteristics in Petri dishes with blood agar (Oxoid, USA), chocolate agar (Autobio, China), and Mac-Conkey agar (BD Difco, USA) plates at aerobic conditions for 18 h at 37°C. Definitive identification was performed using the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry system (Autof ms1000, Zhengzhou, China). After identification, all isolates were cryopreserved in 40% glycerol at −80°C for further analysis. All P. aeruginosa strains included in this study were obtained from distinct clinical specimens derived from different patients.
Antimicrobial susceptibility test
AST was conducted on 175 isolates using the following steps: an inoculum of each bacterial isolate was prepared by diluting an overnight culture of each isolate to a 0.5 McFarland standard (1.5 × 108 cfu/mL) in sterile Mueller–Hinton broth (Oxoid, USA); minimum inhibitory concentration for each antimicrobial agent was determined using the VITEK-2 Compact automated system with GN 335 cards (bioMérieux, Craponne, France). Any equivocal results were verified by the Kirby-Bauer agar disk diffusion method (90). Results were interpreted as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant according to the 2025 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and breakpoints specific to P. aeruginosa. The following 16 antibiotics from eight classes were evaluated: Aminoglycosides (AGs, tobramycin, amikacin), Penicillins (PCNs, piperacillin), Carbapenems (CBPs, meropenem, imipenem), Cephalosporins (CEPs, ceftazidime, cefepime), Fluoroquinolones (FQs, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin), Monobactams (MBs, aztreonam), Polymyxins (colistin B, colistin E), and β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLI, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, and ticarcillin/clavulanic acid). According to established recommendations by the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (3), MDR P. aeruginosa was defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories. In contrast, isolates not meeting these criteria were classified as nMDR (non-susceptible to no more than two antimicrobial classes) (91). P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used as the quality control strain.
Preparation of bacterial genomic DNA
Each confirmed P. aeruginosa isolate was streaked from single colonies and grown overnight in Luria-Bertani broth with constant shaking (180 rpm) at 37°C for 18 h. The overnight cultures were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C, and the supernatants were discarded. Genomic DNA was isolated and purified using the Genomic Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA concentration and purity were assessed using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) by measuring absorbance at 260 and 280 nm. All the DNA samples were stored at −20°C until used for PCR analysis.
VFGs detection
The prevalence of VFGs was determined by PCR, with a separate reaction performed for each gene. Briefly, each 20 µL PCR reaction contained 10 µL of 2× FastTaq PCR SuperMix (Servicebio, Wuhan, China), 0.4 µM each of forward and reverse primers specific to the target gene, 2 µL of template genomic DNA from each P. aeruginosa isolate, and nuclease-free water to complete the volume. Amplification was carried out in an Applied Biosystems 2720 thermal cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) under the following amplification conditions: 95°C, 5 min; followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 57°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30–50 s; and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The resulting PCR product was separated by electrophoresis on 1.0% agarose gels pre-stained with ethidium bromide in 1× TAE buffer using a Bio-Rad system (Feldkirchen, Germany) and visualized under the GS-800 (TM) Calibrated Densitometer (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). Almost all primer sequences used for the amplification of the VFGs were widely validated and applied in previous studies (30, 43–45, 59–63) (Table S1). Genomic DNA from P. aeruginosa reference strains ATCC 27853 and PAO1 isolate served as PCR positive controls for the investigation of particular genes. Initial positive PCR results were confirmed by DNA sequencing, which did not reveal significant mismatches affecting detection. Subsequent positive results were therefore considered validated based on PCR alone.
Statistical analysis
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the relationships between the presence of specific genes within the nMDR and MDR groups. Differences in the prevalence of individual genes and genotypes between nMDR and MDR strains were assessed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. All data were analyzed using RStudio (version 4.4.0) packages. A P value less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project (252102311173); the Henan Provincial Medical Science and Technology Tackling Program (SBGJ202503055); and the Nanyang City Science and Technology Research Project (25JCQY059).
Contributor Information
Fang-Hui Bai, Email: bfh1986@163.com.
Yong-Xing He, Email: heyx@lzu.edu.cn.
Jinshui Lin, Yan'an University, Yan'an, Shaanxi, China.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
ETHICS APPROVAL
The study was designed as a cross-sectional survey and was conducted at NYCH, Nanyang State. Ethical approval was obtained from the NYCH, Biosafety and Ethics Committee (approval number 20250620027). The only data required for the study were the source of the sample and the outcome. All participants were enrolled only after providing written informed consent.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00973-26.
Fig. S1 to S4; Tables S1 to S12.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Qin S, Xiao W, Zhou C, Pu Q, Deng X, Lan L, Liang H, Song X, Wu M. 2022. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pathogenesis, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, interaction with host, technology advances and emerging therapeutics. Sig Transduct Target Ther 7:199. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01056-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Weissfuss C, Li J, Behrendt U, Hoffmann K, Bürkle M, Tan C, Krishnamoorthy G, Korf IHE, Rohde C, Gaborieau B, Debarbieux L, Ricard JD, Witzenrath M, Felten M, Nouailles G. 2025. Adjunctive phage therapy improves antibiotic treatment of ventilator-associated-pneumonia with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nat Commun 16:4500. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59806-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist B, Paterson DL, Rice LB, Stelling J, Struelens MJ, Vatopoulos A, Weber JT, Monnet DL. 2012. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:268–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. McCracken MG, Adam HJ, Blondeau JM, Walkty AJ, Karlowsky JA, Hoban DJ, Zhanel GG, Mulvey MR, Canadian antimicrobial resistance alliance (CARA) and CANWARD . 2019. Characterization of carbapenem-resistant and XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Canada: results of the CANWARD 2007-16 study. J Antimicrob Chemother 74:iv32–iv38. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Serrano-Mayorga CC, Olivella-Gomez J, Sanabria-Herrera N, Nseir S, Torres A, Martin-Loeches I, Reyes LF, European network for ICU-related respiratory infections study group . 2026. Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with nosocomial respiratory infections: a secondary analysis of the European network for ICU-related respiratory infections. Chest 169:1240–1254. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.12.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sati H, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Hansen P, Garlasco J, Campagnaro E, Boccia S, Castillo-Polo JA, Magrini E, Garcia-Vello P, Wool E, Gigante V, Duffy E, Cassini A, Huttner B, Pardo PR, Naghavi M, Mirzayev F, Zignol M, Cameron A, Tacconelli E, WHO bacterial priority pathogens list advisory group . 2025. The WHO bacterial priority pathogens list 2024: a prioritisation study to guide research, development, and public health strategies against antimicrobial resistance. Lancet Infect Dis 25:1033–1043. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00118-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Jesudason T. 2024. WHO publishes updated list of bacterial priority pathogens. Lancet Microbe 5:100940. doi: 10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Harbarth S, Mendelson M, Monnet DL, Pulcini C, Kahlmeter G, Kluytmans J, Carmeli Y, Ouellette M, Outterson K, Patel J, Cavaleri M, Cox EM, Houchens CR, Grayson ML, Hansen P, Singh N, Theuretzbacher U, Magrini N, WHO Pathogens Priority List Working Group . 2018. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis 18:318–327. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30753-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Elmassry MM, Colmer-Hamood JA, Kopel J, San Francisco MJ, Hamood AN. 2023. Anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccines and therapies: an assessment of clinical trials. Microorganisms 11:916. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11040916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Letizia M, Diggle SP, Whiteley M. 2025. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: ecology, evolution, pathogenesis and antimicrobial susceptibility. Nat Rev Microbiol 23:701–717. doi: 10.1038/s41579-025-01193-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Horcajada JP, Montero M, Oliver A, Sorlí L, Luque S, Gómez-Zorrilla S, Benito N, Grau S. 2019. Epidemiology and treatment of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 32:e00031-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00031-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Correa A, Montealegre MC, Mojica MF, Maya JJ, Rojas LJ, De La Cadena EP, Ruiz SJ, Recalde M, Rosso F, Quinn JP, Villegas MV. 2012. First report of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate coharboring KPC and VIM carbapenemases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:5422–5423. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00695-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Cuzon G, Naas T, Villegas MV, Correa A, Quinn JP, Nordmann P. 2011. Wide dissemination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing beta-lactamase blaKPC-2 gene in Colombia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5350–5353. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00297-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Del Barrio-Tofiño E, López-Causapé C, Oliver A. 2020. Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic high-risk clones and their association with horizontally-acquired β-lactamases: 2020 update. Int J Antimicrob Agents 56:106196. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Darby EM, Trampari E, Siasat P, Gaya MS, Alav I, Webber MA, Blair JMA. 2023. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance revisited. Nat Rev Microbiol 21:280–295. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00820-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Logan LK, Weinstein RA. 2017. The epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae: the impact and evolution of a global menace. J Infect Dis 215:S28–S36. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Swart AL, Laventie BJ, Sütterlin R, Junne T, Lauer L, Manfredi P, Jakonia S, Yu X, Karagkiozi E, Okujava R, Jenal U. 2024. Pseudomonas aeruginosa breaches respiratory epithelia through goblet cell invasion in a microtissue model. Nat Microbiol 9:1725–1737. doi: 10.1038/s41564-024-01718-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Malhotra S, Hayes DJ, Wozniak DJ. 2019. Cystic fibrosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the host-microbe interface. Clin Microbiol Rev 32:e00138-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00138-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Doig P, Todd T, Sastry PA, Lee KK, Hodges RS, Paranchych W, Irvin RT. 1988. Role of pili in adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to human respiratory epithelial cells. Infect Immun 56:1641–1646. doi: 10.1128/iai.56.6.1641-1646.1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Zolfaghar I, Evans DJ, Fleiszig SMJ. 2003. Twitching motility contributes to the role of pili in corneal infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Immun 71:5389–5393. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.9.5389-5393.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Coggan KA, Higgs MG, Brutinel ED, Marden JN, Intile PJ, Winther-Larsen HC, Koomey M, Yahr TL, Wolfgang MC. 2022. Global regulatory pathways converge to control expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa type IV pili. mBio 13:e0369621. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03696-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Płókarz D, Czopowicz M, Bierowiec K, Rypuła K. 2022. Virulence genes as markers for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation in dogs and cats. Animals (Basel) 12:422. doi: 10.3390/ani12040422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Mansor MR, AL-Khalidi ZS, Almuhanna EH, Hussein HR, Almulla AF, Alnaji HA. 2023. Detection and study nan1 and tox a genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in isolates from otitis media patients considered as virulence factors %J Iranian. J Med Microbiol 17:81–89. doi: 10.30699/ijmm.17.1.81 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Everett MJ, Davies DT. 2021. Pseudomonas aeruginosa elastase (LasB) as a therapeutic target. Drug Discov Today 26:2108–2123. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.02.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Saint-Criq V, Villeret B, Bastaert F, Kheir S, Hatton A, Cazes A, Xing Z, Sermet-Gaudelus I, Garcia-Verdugo I, Edelman A, Sallenave JM. 2018. Pseudomonas aeruginosa LasB protease impairs innate immunity in mice and humans by targeting a lung epithelial cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator-IL-6-antimicrobial-repair pathway. Thorax 73:49–61. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Gorodetsky J, Monych N, Turner RJ, Haji-Ghassemi O, Booth SC. 2025. Role of AprA and pyocyanin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa on Staphylococcus aureus tolerance to silver. Microbiology 171:001596. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bardoel BW, van Kessel KPM, van Strijp JAG, Milder FJ. 2012. Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence: characterization of the AprA-AprI interface and species selectivity. J Mol Biol 415:573–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.11.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Mackinder JR, Hinkel LA, Schutz K, Eckstrom K, Fisher K, Wargo MJ. 2024. Sphingosine induction of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa hemolytic phospholipase C/sphingomyelinase (PlcH). J Bacteriol 206:e0038223. doi: 10.1128/jb.00382-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. DiGianivittorio P, Schutz K, Hinkel LA, Wargo MJ. 2025. Sphingosylphosphorylcholine is a substrate for the Pseudomonas aeruginosa phospholipase C/sphingomyelinase, PlcH. Microbiol Spectr 13:e0097225. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00972-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Nolasco-Romero CG, Prado-Galbarro FJ, Jimenez-Juarez RN, Gomez-Ramirez U, Cancino-Díaz JC, López-Marceliano B, Apodaca MR, Aguayo-Romero MA, Rodea GE, Pichardo-Villalon L, Parra-Ortega I, Santos FS, Moreno-Galván M, Velázquez-Guadarrama N. 2024. The exoS, exoT, exoU and exoY virulotypes of the type 3 secretion system in multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a death risk factor in pediatric patients. Pathogens 13:1030. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13121030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Rao L, De La Rosa I, Xu Y, Sha Y, Bhattacharya A, Holtzman MJ, Gilbert BE, Eissa NT. 2021. Pseudomonas aeruginosa survives in epithelia by ExoS-mediated inhibition of autophagy and mTOR. EMBO Rep 22:e50613. doi: 10.15252/embr.202050613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Reuven AD, Katzenell S, Mwaura BW, Bliska JB. 2025. ExoS effector in Pseudomonas aeruginosa hyperactive type III secretion system mutant promotes enhanced plasma membrane rupture in neutrophils. PLoS Pathog 21:e1013021. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1013021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Foulkes DM, McLean K, Sloniecka M, Rustidge S, Byrne DP, Haneef AS, Winstanley C, Berry N, Fernig DG, Kaye SB. 2022. Impact of fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides on P. aeruginosa virulence factor production and cytotoxicity. Biochem J 479:2511–2527. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20220527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Fontana L, Strasfeld L, Hakki M. 2023. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoU-associated virulence in HCT recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood Adv 7:4035–4038. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023009806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Ertugrul BM, Oryasin E, Lipsky BA, Willke A, Bozdogan B. 2018. Virulence genes fliC, toxA and phzS are common among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from diabetic foot infections. Infect Dis (Lond) 50:273–279. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2017.1393839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Wood SJ, Goldufsky JW, Bello D, Masood S, Shafikhani SH. 2015. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoT induces mitochondrial apoptosis in target host cells in a manner that depends on its GTPase-activating protein (GAP) domain activity. J Biol Chem 290:29063–29073. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.689950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Belyy A, Raoux-Barbot D, Saveanu C, Namane A, Ogryzko V, Worpenberg L, David V, Henriot V, Fellous S, Merrifield C, Assayag E, Ladant D, Renault L, Mechold U. 2016. Actin activates Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoY nucleotidyl cyclase toxin and ExoY-like effector domains from MARTX toxins. Nat Commun 7:13582. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Deruelle V, Dupuis G, Raoux-Barbot D, Lim E, Ponce-López R, Teixeira Nunes M, Ladant D, Renault L, Mechold U. 2025. Interplay between T3SS effectors, ExoY activation, and cGMP signaling in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Nat Commun 17:69. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-66674-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Pan Y, Zeng J, Li L, Yang J, Tang Z, Xiong W, Li Y, Chen S, Zeng Z. 2020. Coexistence of antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors deciphered by large-scale complete genome analysis. mSystems 5:e00821-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00821-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Egyir B, Tagoe R, Dayie N, Bentum J, Owusu-Nyantakyi C, Baka DK, Kofi Adu Tabi B, Labi A-K, Obeng-Nkrumah N, Behene E, et al. 2025. Global high-risk clones and multidrug-resistant serotype strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from surgical site infections in low-resource settings. Microbiol Spectr 13:e0031425. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00314-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Thabit AK, Alghamdi AM, Miaji MY, Alharbi FS, Jawah AF, Alturki F, Hosin N, Bazuqamah M, Almutairi MS, Alhamed H, Elhendawy A, Atallah D, Humadi AA, Alfifi KA, Alfadel K, Eljaaly K, Elfaky MA, Saudi AntiMicrobial Surveillance (SAMS) study group . 2024. Antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Saudi Arabia: a national antimicrobial resistance surveillance study. Front Public Health 12:1436648. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1436648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sastre-Femenia MÀ, Fernández-Muñoz A, Gomis-Font MA, Taltavull B, López-Causapé C, Arca-Suárez J, Martínez-Martínez L, Cantón R, Larrosa N, Oteo-Iglesias J, Zamorano L, Oliver A, GEMARA-SEIMC/CIBERINFEC Pseudomonas study Group . 2023. Pseudomonas aeruginosa antibiotic susceptibility profiles, genomic epidemiology and resistance mechanisms: a nation-wide five-year time lapse analysis. Lancet Reg Health Eur 34:100736. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Adenipekun EO, Akinleye EF, Tewogbade OA, Iwalokun BA. 2023. Detection of virulence genes and multidrug resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from a public hospital in Lagos, Nigeria. Scientific African 22:e01950. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01950 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Wang X, Gao K, Pan B, Wang B, Song Y, Guo W. 2025. The virulence trait and genotype distribution amongst the Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains. BMC Microbiol 25:82. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-03754-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Bogiel T, Depka D, Kruszewski S, Rutkowska A, Kanarek P, Rzepka M, Leitão JH, Deptuła A, Gospodarek-Komkowska E. 2023. Comparison of virulence-factor-encoding genes and genotype distribution amongst clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Int J Mol Sci 24:1269. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Hassuna NA, Mandour SA, Mohamed ES. 2020. Virulence constitution of multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Upper Egypt. Infect Drug Resist 13:587–595. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S233694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. De Vos D, Lim A Jr, Pirnay JP, Struelens M, Vandenvelde C, Duinslaeger L, Vanderkelen A, Cornelis P. 1997. Direct detection and identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in clinical samples such as skin biopsy specimens and expectorations by multiplex PCR based on two outer membrane lipoprotein genes, oprI and oprL. J Clin Microbiol 35:1295–1299. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.6.1295-1299.1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Martínez-Hidalgo P, Flores-Félix JD, Velázquez E, Brau L, Trujillo ME, Martínez-Molina E. 2020. High taxonomic diversity of micromonospora strains isolated from medicago sativa nodules in Western Spain and Australia. Syst Appl Microbiol 43:126043. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2019.126043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Liu Y, Pei T, Yi S, Du J, Zhang X, Deng X, Yao Q, Deng MR, Zhu H. 2021. Phylogenomic analysis substantiates the gyrB gene as a powerful molecular marker to efficiently differentiate the most closely related genera myxococcus, corallococcus, and pyxidicoccus. Front Microbiol 12:763359. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.763359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Horcajada JP, Gales A, Isler B, Kaye KS, Kwa AL, Landersdorfer CB, Montero MM, Oliver A, Pogue JM, Shields RK, Villegas MV, Yahav D, Paterson DL. 2025. How do i manage difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections? key questions for today’s clinicians. Clin Microbiol Infect 31:1797–1806. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. de Sales RO, Leaden L, Martins DS, Koga P, Toniolo A do R, Gatti de Menezes F, Mori MA, Martino MDV, Severino P. 2025. Genetic and virulence factors behind the success of high-risk Pseudomonas aeruginosa clones: insights from comparative genomics and an experimental infection model. Front Microbiol 16:1674635. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1674635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Dechathai T, Singkhamanan K, Yaikhan T, Chusri S, Pomwised R, Wonglapsuwan M, Surachat K. 2025. Comprehensive genomic analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PSU9449 isolated from a clinical case in Thailand. Antibiotics 14:530. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14060530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Jarjees KK. 2020. Molecular detection of type III secretory toxins in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 66:9–14. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2020.66.5.2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Feltman H, Schulert G, Khan S, Jain M, Peterson L, Hauser AR. 2001. Prevalence of type III secretion genes in clinical and environmental isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology (Reading) 147:2659–2669. doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-10-2659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Horna G, Ruiz J. 2021. Type 3 secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol Res 246:126719. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2021.126719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Nikbin VS, Aslani MM, Sharafi Z, Hashemipour M, Shahcheraghi F, Ebrahimipour GH. 2012. Molecular identification and detection of virulence genes among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from different infectious origins. Iran J Microbiol 4:118–123. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Whiley DM, Sloots TP. 2005. Sequence variation in primer targets affects the accuracy of viral quantitative PCR. J Clin Virol 34:104–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2005.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Chow CK, Qin K, Lau LT, Cheung-Hoi Yu A. 2011. Significance of a single-nucleotide primer mismatch in hepatitis b virus real-time PCR diagnostic assays. J Clin Microbiol 49:4418–4419; doi: 10.1128/JCM.05224-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Mitov I, Strateva T, Markova B. 2010. Prevalence of virulence genes among bulgarian nosocomial and cystic fibrosis isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Braz J Microbiol 41:588–595. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822010000300008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Petit SM, Lavenir R, Colinon-Dupuich C, Boukerb AM, Cholley P, Bertrand X, Freney J, Doléans-Jordheim A, Nazaret S, Laurent F, Cournoyer B. 2013. Lagooning of wastewaters favors dissemination of clinically relevant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Res Microbiol 164:856–866. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2013.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Bogiel T, Depka D, Rzepka M, Kwiecińska-Piróg J, Gospodarek-Komkowska E. 2021. Prevalence of the Genes associated with biofilm and toxins synthesis amongst the Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains. Antibiotics (Basel) 10:241. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10030241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Lanotte P, Watt S, Mereghetti L, Dartiguelongue N, Rastegar-Lari A, Goudeau A, Quentin R. 2004. Genetic features of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients compared with those of isolates from other origins. J Med Microbiol 53:73–81. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.05324-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. De Vos D, Lim A Jr, De Vos P, Sarniguet A, Kersters K, Cornelis P. 1993. Detection of the outer membrane lipoprotein i and its gene in fluorescent and non-fluorescent pseudomonads: implications for taxonomy and diagnosis. J Gen Microbiol 139:2215–2223. doi: 10.1099/00221287-139-9-2215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Alharbi MS, Moursi SA, Alshammari A, Aboras R, Rakha E, Hossain A, Alshubrumi S, Alnazha K, Khaja ASS, Saleem M. 2025. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pathogenesis, resistance mechanisms, and novel therapeutic strategies. Virulence 16:2580160. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2025.2580160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Miller WR, Arias CA. 2024. ESKAPE pathogens: antimicrobial resistance, epidemiology, clinical impact and therapeutics. Nat Rev Microbiol 22:598–616. doi: 10.1038/s41579-024-01054-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Tacconelli E, Cataldo MA, Dancer SJ, De Angelis G, Falcone M, Frank U, Kahlmeter G, Pan A, Petrosillo N, Rodríguez-Baño J, Singh N, Venditti M, Yokoe DS, Cookson B, European society of clinical microbiology . 2014. ESCMID guidelines for the management of the infection control measures to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in hospitalized patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 20 Suppl 1:1–55. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Kang Y, Zhang Z, Cui J. 2026. Clinical risk factors, antimicrobial therapy, and virulence-associated mortality in patients with extensively drug-resistant or pan-drug-resistant (XDR/PDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa pulmonary infections. Int J Infect Dis 162:108198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2025.108198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Salleh MZ, Nik Zuraina NMN, Deris ZZ, Mohamed Z. 2025. Current trends in the epidemiology of multidrug-resistant and beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Asia and Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ 13:e18986. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Serwacki P, Gajda M, Świątek-Kwapniewska W, Wałaszek M, Nowak K, Wójkowska-Mach J. 2024. Re-evaluating the suitability of using fluoroquinolones in the treatment of infections in the context of FQ consumption and correlating changes to microorganism resistance levels in EU/EEA countries between 2016 and 2021. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 397:795–805. doi: 10.1007/s00210-023-02622-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Ravella Venkatasubramanyam N, Easwaran S, Prabhakaran N. 2024. Retrospective analysis of antimicrobial resistance trends in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. Cureus 16:e69166. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Hu Z, Zhou L, Tao X, Li P, Zheng X, Zhang W, Tan Z. 2024. Antimicrobial resistance survey and whole-genome analysis of nosocomial P. Aeruginosa isolated from eastern Province of China in 2016–2021. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 23:12. doi: 10.1186/s12941-023-00656-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Sastre-Femenia MÀ, Fernández-Muñoz A, Gomis-Font MA, Taltavull B, López-Causapé C, Arca-Suárez J, Martínez-Martínez L, Cantón R, Larrosa N, Oteo-Iglesias J, Oliver A, GEMARA-SEIMC/CIBERINFEC Pseudomonas study Group . 2025. Spanish nationwide survey of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cefiderocol susceptibility and resistance mechanisms. Int J Antimicrob Agents 66:107563. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2025.107563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Alvarado-Orosco N, Gomis-Font MA, Sastre-Femenia MA, Ribera Ortiz S, Miranda Arce M, Araúz Barba ME, Navia Durán Md R, Vargas Nattez SG, Cabellos Astorga G, Villarroel Rodriguez PJ, Almaraz Roca DD, Castillo Cruz M, Chambi Condori JP, Quevedo Ribera P, Patino García SM, Contreras Otalora Y, Rosales Rea FM, Portugal Gutiérrez CM, Sánchez Serrano M, López-Causapé C, Oliver A. 2025. First nationwide survey on Pseudomonas aeruginosa in bolivia: susceptibility profiles, resistome, and genomic epidemiology. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 69:e0116325. doi: 10.1128/aac.01163-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Hardy KS, Tessmer MH, Frank DW, Audia JP. 2021. Perspectives on the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion system effector ExoU and its subversion of the host innate immune response to infection. Toxins (Basel) 13:880. doi: 10.3390/toxins13120880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Foulkes DM, McLean K, Haneef AS, Fernig DG, Winstanley C, Berry N, Kaye SB. 2019. Pseudomonas aeruginosa toxin ExoU as a therapeutic target in the treatment of bacterial infections. Microorganisms 7:707. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7120707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Horna G, Amaro C, Palacios A, Guerra H, Ruiz J. 2019. High frequency of the exoU+/exoS+ genotype associated with multidrug-resistant “high-risk clones” of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from Peruvian hospitals. Sci Rep 9:10874. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47303-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Juan C, Peña C, Oliver A. 2017. Host and pathogen biomarkers for severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. J Infect Dis 215:S44–S51. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Shao X, Yao C, Ding Y, Hu H, Qian G, He M, Deng X. 2023. The transcriptional regulators of virulence for Pseudomonas aeruginosa: therapeutic opportunity and preventive potential of its clinical infections. Genes Dis 10:2049–2063. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2022.09.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Sánchez-Jiménez A, Llamas MA, Marcos-Torres FJ. 2023. Transcriptional regulators controlling virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int J Mol Sci 24:11895. doi: 10.3390/ijms241511895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Pollack M. 1980. Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin a. N Engl J Med 302:1360–1362. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198006123022410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Guo N, Zhang Z, Qin Y, Zhang Z, Dong H, Mao X. 2026. Genetic and bioprocess engineering strategies for microbial alginate production. Carbohydr Polym 381:125164. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2026.125164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Islam R, Ferdous FB, Hoque MN, Asif NA, Rana ML, Siddique MP, Rahman MT. 2024. Characterization of β-lactamase and virulence genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from clinical, environmental and poultry sources in Bangladesh. PLoS One 19:e0296542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Correa A, del Campo R, Perenguez M, Blanco VM, Rodríguez-Baños M, Perez F, Maya JJ, Rojas L, Cantón R, Arias CA, Villegas MV. 2015. Dissemination of high-risk clones of extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Colombia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:2421–2425. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03926-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Fernández L, Hancock RE. 2012. Adaptive and mutational resistance: role of porins and efflux pumps in drug resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:661–681. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00043-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Nikaido H, Pagès JM. 2012. Broad-specificity efflux pumps and their role in multidrug resistance of gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36:340–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00290.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Ballestero S, Fernández-Rodríguez A, Villaverde R, Escobar H, Pérez-Díaz JC, Baquero F. 1996. Carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 38:39–45. doi: 10.1093/jac/38.1.39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Wu T, Zhang Z, Li T, Dong X, Wu D, Zhu L, Xu K, Zhang Y. 2024. The type III secretion system facilitates systemic infections of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the clinic. Microbiol Spectr 12:e0222423. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02224-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Zhao K, Yang X, Zeng Q, Zhang Y, Li H, Yan C, Li JS, Liu H, Du L, Wu Y, Huang G, Huang T, Zhang Y, Zhou H, Wang X, Chu Y, Zhou X. 2023. Evolution of lasR mutants in polymorphic Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations facilitates chronic infection of the lung. Nat Commun 14:5976. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41704-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Zheng C, Wang G, Qiu L, Luo X, Zhang X, Zhong L, Zhang C, Lin R, Chen Q. 2023. Clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of patients with polymicrobial Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections. J Chin Med Assoc 86:1066–1073. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Gautam V, Singhal L, Arora S, Jha C, Ray P. 2013. Reliability of kirby-bauer disk diffusion method for detecting carbapenem resistance in acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:2003–2004. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01450-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Schinas G, Skintzi K, De Lastic A-L, Rodi M, Gogos C, Mouzaki A, Akinosoglou K. 2023. Patterns, cost, and immunological response of MDR vs. non MDR-bacteremia: a prospective cohort study. Pathogens 12:1044. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12081044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Fig. S1 to S4; Tables S1 to S12.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.


