Abstract
Consistent with differences in behaviors between sexes, studies reveal sex differences in the organization of neural circuits, synaptic function, and neuronal excitability, as well as sex-dependent recruitment of specific neuronal subtypes during behavior. These studies demonstrate sex differences in cell numbers, brain region volumes, cellular composition of brain areas, and density and strength of synapses in many brain regions, innervation of neuronal subtypes, receptor-mediated transduction mechanisms, neurotransmitter and neuropeptide release, and the influence of neuronal growth factors. Beyond insights into the mechanisms of sex differences in behaviors, understanding sex-typical circuit, cellular, and synaptic processes is crucial for identifying the causes of sex-typical vulnerabilities to nervous system disorders, such as the high prevalence of autism spectrum disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in males, and the higher incidence of affective, anxiety, and trauma-related disorders in females. Because these disorders often emerge during various developmental stages, it is essential to understand how development interacts with genetic, epigenetic, metabolic, hormonal, and environmental factors to affect the nervous system across sexes. Consequently, future research that examines the interaction between the nervous system and these critical factors is expected to elucidate the mechanisms underlying nervous system disorders. Additionally, targeting sex-specific mechanisms involved in these disorders could open new opportunities for more effective treatments in both sexes.
Keywords: Sex differences, Synapses, Neuronal subtypes, Organizational effects, Neural circuitry, Activational effects, Sex chromosomes, Sex hormones
Highlights
Sex-dependent recruitment of specific neurons in behavior.
Sex differences in synaptic function and neuronal excitability.
Sex-specific organization of neural circuits.
Sex differences in synaptic, cellular, and circuit effects are mediated by the organizational effects of sex chromosomes and sex hormones, as well as the activational effects of sex hormones.
Recent advances in sex differences in the nervous system and behavior lay a foundation for future studies to reveal sex-specific mechanisms in behavior and nervous system disorders.
Background
For a long time, studies on sex differences in nervous system organization, sex-typical engagement of brain regions and neuronal subtypes, and their effects on behavior have been very limited. Recent interest in sex as a biological variable, along with new data, has drawn significant attention to sex differences in neural circuitry, cellular mechanisms, synapses, and their involvement in behavior. Consistent with sex-exclusive behaviors and differences in behavioral strategies and in the magnitude of various behaviors between females and males, sex differences have been observed in the organization of brain structures, synaptic function, and the involvement of specific neuronal subtypes in behavior. The sex difference in brain organization could be attributed to sex hormones and sex chromosomes, including the presence of Y chromosomal genes in males and dosage differences in some X chromosomal genes in females and males due to escape from X chromosome inactivation [1–6]. In addition to the effects of chromosomal, hormonal, and environmental factors during development on the sex-typical organization of the nervous system, fluctuating hormone levels are expected to dynamically modulate neuronal function, thereby influencing behavior. Therefore, sex differences in behaviors are mediated through sex-typical establishment of synapses and neuronal circuits, the dynamic effects of molecular signaling involving hormones, neurotransmitters, and neuropeptides, or differences in gene expression [7]. Besides driving sexually dimorphic or exclusive behaviors, these mechanisms might also create quantitative differences in specific behaviors between females and males. The terms “sex-specific”, “sex-typical”, and “sex differences” are used throughout this review to denote a characteristic occurring in only one sex, more common in one sex, and group-level differences, respectively.
Sex differences in the organization of the nervous system are evident in human studies. Apart from the higher brain mass in males than in females, studies show sex differences in various brain structures [8]. For example, the number of neurons in the occipital cortex is higher in men than in women, whereas women show higher neuronal density in the frontal cortex (8). Males show a larger amygdala, but studies on the hippocampus show no conclusive size difference between women and men [9, 10]. Males exhibit greater within-hemispheric connectivity, while females show predominant inter-hemispheric connectivity, suggesting possible mechanisms behind sex differences in motor and spatial abilities, memory, and social cognition [11]. During development, males exhibit greater variability in brain volumes compared to females [12]. However, males tend to show greater homogeneity across regional brain volumes than females [12]. With advances in experimental tools, future research is expected to uncover additional significant differences, including differences at the cellular and synaptic levels, in male and female brains. While identifying sex differences in the human nervous system is important for understanding behavioral differences between females and males and sex-dependent vulnerabilities to nervous system disorders, advanced animal studies are necessary to clarify the mechanisms underlying sex differences in behavior and associated disorders.
To advance the field of mechanisms underlying sex differences in behaviors and to inform the development of future therapeutic strategies for nervous system disorders, it is crucial to appraise the current understanding of the roles of specific neuronal subtypes, synapses, and brain circuits in behavior in both sexes (Fig. 1). Consistent with many sex-typical behaviors that facilitate reproduction, parental care, resource acquisition, social network establishment, and protection against threats, which are essential for the survival of the species, recent studies have begun to elucidate the cellular, synaptic, and circuit mechanisms underlying these sex-typical behaviors. Unlike human studies, which are limited by technical constraints and preclude in-depth investigation of the mechanisms underlying sex differences in behaviors, animal studies have provided significant insights into the specific roles of cell types, synapses, and molecular mechanisms in behavior in females and males. Studies show that specific cell types mediate sexually dimorphic behaviors, suggesting sex-typical recruitment of particular neuronal cell types in the regulation of behavior [13, 14]. In addition, synapses, membrane receptors, and ion channels, along with their downstream signaling pathways, play a critical role in sex differences in behaviors [15, 16]. Effects of sex hormones on synapses and neuronal excitability suggest their dynamic role in shaping behavioral sex differences [16, 17]. Consistently, neurons in many brain regions exhibit sex differences in synaptic responses that depend on sex hormone levels [16, 18]. Another key neural mechanism underlying behavioral differences between females and males is sex differences in the organization of brain structures, with studies demonstrating sex differences in volume, cellular distribution, and cellular density, as well as in the roles these mechanisms play in sex-typical behaviors.
Fig. 1.
The effect of sex chromosomes and sex hormones on synaptic, cellular, and circuit mechanisms guides sex-specific behaviors. The interaction of these mechanisms with developmental,immune, genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors might lead to sex-specific vulnerabilities to nervous system disorders. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms involved in sex-specific behaviors might provide opportunities for developing therapeutic strategies to alleviate nervous system disorders
Therefore, this review summarizes the sex-dependent roles of specific neurons, sex differences in synaptic function, and sex-typical organization of brain circuits, and their relevance to behavior.
Sex differences in the recruitment of neuronal subtypes in behavior
Studies show that engagement of specific neuronal subtypes in behavior differs between sexes. For example, there are sex differences in the behavioral effects of activating oxytocin receptor-expressing gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex [19]. This effect is evident at the single-cell level, as oxytocin preferentially enhances action potentials in oxytocin receptor-expressing GABAergic neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex of female mice, compared with male mice [19]. Consistently, oxytocin receptor-expressing interneurons in the medial prefrontal cortex play a crucial role in male-directed social behavior in females during the sexually responsive phase of the estrous cycle [19]. Oxytocin receptor-expressing interneurons in the medial prefrontal cortex mediate anxiolytic effects in male but not female mice by releasing corticotropin-releasing hormone binding protein, which blocks the effect of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) [20]. The male-specific effect of oxytocin receptor neurons on anxiety also involved heightened sensitivity of layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons to CRH, which was blocked by corticotropin-releasing hormone-binding protein. This sex-specific effect mediated by oxytocin receptor-expressing neurons in the cortex might enable sex-typical regulation of downstream brain regions. Unlike oxytocin, which is released from hypothalamic neurons, medial prefrontal cortical 5-HT3aR-expressing neurons release CRH [21]. These CRH-expressing neurons are connected to oxytocin receptor-expressing neurons and layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons through inhibitory synapses [21]. Interestingly, this synaptic connectivity is significantly higher in males compared to females [21]. Similarly, optogenetically induced release of CRH elicits sex differences in responses in layer 2/3 pyramidal cells [21]. Furthermore, activation of local CRH release in the medial prefrontal cortex modulates novelty exploration in males without affecting anxiety behaviors in males or females [21]. Thus, oxytocin receptor neurons and CRH-expressing neurons mediate sex differences in social, novelty, and emotional behaviors through distinct mechanisms in the medial prefrontal cortex.
The sex-dependent role of dorsal medial prefrontal cortical parvalbumin GABAergic neurons has been demonstrated in social hierarchy and winner effect [22, 23]. Female mice show higher excitability in dorsal medial prefrontal cortical parvalbumin-expressing interneurons, which negatively regulate thalamo-cortical plasticity involved in the ability to form social hierarchies and winner effect [24]. Neurons in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), referred to as the extended amygdala, and the lateral habenula that express 5-HT2C receptors show sex differences in their role in rewarding and aversive behaviors [25]. BNST 5-HT2C neurons in males show higher activation during social interaction and in response to acoustic stimuli than in females [25]. In contrast, these neurons in males show higher inhibition in response to alcohol and water consumption [25]. Unlike males, 5-HT2C neurons in females exhibit a differential response to water and alcohol consumption [25]. The BNST 5-HT2C neurons in females play a predominant role in reward consumption compared to males [25]. Similarly, studies show that specific neuronal subtypes can play a role in sex-specific impairment in cognitive performance [26].
Recent studies show sex differences in the neuromodulation of the forebrain. For example, the median raphe nucleus modulates the medial prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus by activating local GABAergic neurons in a sex-dependent manner [27, 28]. The vesicular glutamate transporter 3 (VGLUT3)-expressing median raphe neurons play an important role in forebrain functions [27–29]. Activation of median raphe VGLUT3 neurons suppresses fear memory only in females, and this behavioral effect involves a selective enhancement of GABAergic transmission and a suppression of glutamatergic transmission in the prelimbic medial prefrontal cortical pyramidal neurons of female mice [27]. On the other hand, activation of median raphe VGLUT3 neurons selectively enhances GABAergic transmission onto dorsal hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in male but not female mice [28]. This sex-specific effect on GABAergic transmission also leads to selective impairment of hippocampal plasticity in males [28]. Similarly, dopamine neurons in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray and dorsal raphe selectively mediate pain suppression in males while selectively promoting locomotion in females through dopaminergic transmission to the BNST [30]. These findings are significant given the disproportionate experience of pain in females and our lack of insights into the underlying mechanisms [31]. The ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopaminergic neurons are sex-specifically modulated by stress. Subchronic stress suppresses tonic firing of VTA dopaminergic neurons in females but not males, as males show higher glutamatergic input to these neurons, a likely mechanism that offsets the suppression of tonic firing [32]. These sex-specific effects in dopaminergic neurons might contribute to sex differences in stress responses. Similar to dopamine neurons, sex differences are observed in serotonin modulation of neurons. Serotonin release on 5-HT2C-expressing BNST neurons is greatly reduced in females compared to males during water and alcohol consumption [25]. It was also shown that the experience of social isolation affects the excitability of serotonin neurons in a sex-specific manner, suggesting that targeting serotonin signaling to reverse stress-induced effects requires a sex-based approach [33]. The serotonergic neurons in females are less excitable than in males, suggesting a potential role of neuronal excitability in permitting sex-specific recruitment of neurons in behavior [34]. In addition, sex differences are observed in serotonin neuron responses to CRH, further supporting the sex-typical role of serotonin neurons in stress responsivity and their potential role in the high incidence of affective disorders in females [34]. Sex-typical expression of serotonin receptors also might contribute to sex differences in serotonin neuromodulation [35]. Serotonin regulates dopamine-dependent cortico-striatal plasticity in a sex-specific manner [36]. As with dopamine and serotonin, the release of norepinephrine from the brainstem nucleus locus coeruleus plays a critical role in stress-related behaviors, with sex-typical effects. Females show increased dendritic density in locus coeruleus neurons [37], a potential mechanism for enhanced response to synaptic inputs associated with stress-related behaviors. Females also show higher stimulation of locus coeruleus neurons following hypotensive stress [38]. In addition, locus coeruleus neurons in females exhibit higher sensitivity to CRH compared to males [38]. It has been shown that females, not males, recruit the noradrenergic system during active defense coping to interoceptive and exteroceptive threats [39]. Thus, sex differences in neuromodulation mediated by serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine, along with their interaction with signaling mechanisms associated with stress, might be a key factor in sex differences in stress-related disorders, anxiety, and affective disorders.
Given the high incidence of anxiety- and fear-related disorders in females, understanding sex differences in the amygdala, a brain region involved in mediating fear, is of great significance [40, 41]. Neurons in the lateral amygdala show higher activity in female rats compared to males [18]. This increased activity is influenced by endogenous estradiol levels, with higher activity during low-estradiol stages than during high-estradiol stages [18]. Although the basal nucleus of the amygdala shows a similar sex difference in neuronal activity, the effect of endogenous estradiol was the opposite, as low estradiol stages showed lower neuronal activity compared to high estradiol stages [18]. However, the mechanism by which endogenous estradiol exerts this region-specific differential modulation of neuronal activity is unclear. The sex difference in neuronal activity in both the lateral and basal nuclei coincided with the number of dendritic spines in females [18]. Therefore, estradiol might play a role in regulating sex-typical neuronal engagement across brain regions, leading to sex differences in behaviors. The BNST is a sexually dimorphic structure located in the basal forebrain. Interestingly, the BNST is involved in the expression of contextual fear memory in males but not in females [42]. The BNST shows sex differences in its neurochemical profile and volume [43–45]. The female anterolateral BNST contains more neurons, including CRH-expressing neurons [46, 47]. Also, knockdown of the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor in the BNST selectively enhances contextual fear memory expression in males, and this effect coincides with increased excitability in BNST neurons [48]. Expression of contextual fear memory involves upregulation of the immediate early genes ARC and c-Fos in male BNST neurons projecting to the central amygdala, but not in females, suggesting a sex-specific engagement of the BNST-central amygdala pathway in contextual fear memory [49]. This study also suggests that a different subtype of BNST neurons is responsible for contextual fear memory in females [49]. Given the role of the amygdala and BNST in anxiety and fear-related behaviors, future studies are needed to understand how these sex differences contribute to the high incidence of anxiety and fear-related disorders in females.
While these studies show remarkable differences in the roles of neurons in behaviors between the sexes, further research is needed to understand how the sex-dependent engagement of specific neurons translates into sex-typical behaviors. In addition, it is crucial to understand the mechanisms that enable sex-typical engagement of neurons in behavior. Mechanisms such as sex-typical expression of receptors and ion channels that are activated by neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, and neuromodulators released by upstream brain regions, sex-typical organization of upstream synaptic inputs, leading to sex differences in pre-synaptic function, sex-specific downregulation of local inhibitory mechanisms, sex-specific structural plasticity that permits modification of dendritic spine density, dendritic branching and length, axonal growth, and number of synapses, and the dynamic effects of sex hormones on neuronal excitability and synaptic function might play a role in sex differences in the recruitment of neurons in behavior (Fig. 2). Thus, sex differences at both sides of the synapse are a major mechanism that permits differences in the engagement of specific neuronal subtypes in behavior in females and males. Consistent with the potential role of synapses in sex-dependent recruitment of neurons in behavior, studies have demonstrated notable differences in synaptic function between females and males.
Fig. 2.
The sex-specific recruitment of neurons in behavior might involve sex-dependent pre-synaptic and post-synaptic function, local inhibitory mechanisms, structural plasticity, and the activational effects of hormones on neuronal excitability and synaptic function
Sex differences in synaptic function and behavior
Sex differences in synaptic function are mainly reflected in synaptic density and molecular organization [50]. Other factors, such as the size and location of synapses, may also influence differences in synaptic responses between females and males. The sex-typical organization of synapses and its relevance to behavior are evident in vertebrates and invertebrates [16, 50, 51]. In addition to sex differences in the organization of synapses due to sex-chromosomal and sex-hormonal effects, synapses are dynamically influenced by fluctuations in sex hormone levels.
Given the sex difference in threat-related behaviors and their relevance to the high incidence of anxiety and affective disorders in females, many studies have addressed sex differences in synapses in brain areas relevant to the regulation of fear and threat behaviors [40, 41]. Given the role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex in fear extinction, an inhibitory learning that attenuates conditioned fear and is implicated in anxiety behaviors, an extensive analysis of synaptic transmission in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex pyramidal neurons during high- and low-estradiol stages in mice showed that low estradiol stages show higher alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor transmission [16, 52]. An analysis of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor transmission showed that during low-estradiol stages, NMDA receptor activity is altered, with GluN2B subunit-mediated transmission reduced in ventral medial prefrontal cortical pyramidal neurons [16]. Consistent with these results, low-estradiol mice show diminished GluN2B-dependent plasticity in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex, suggesting specific synaptic mechanisms that might underlie reduced fear extinction in females during low-estradiol stages [16, 53]. Given the role of neurotrophins in the effect of estradiol, an altered neurotrophin activation downstream of estradiol signaling might be responsible for the diminished GluN2B-dependent plasticity [54, 55]. Estrogen receptor beta activation modulates AMPA receptor transmission in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex in an endogenous estradiol-dependent manner, i.e., suppressing and enhancing glutamatergic transmission, respectively, during low- and high-estradiol stages [16]. Importantly, comparable ventromedial prefrontal cortex plasticity in high estradiol females and males supports the suggestion that endogenous estradiol might play a critical role in sex differences in fear extinction [16, 53]. Thus, endogenous estradiol-dependent plasticity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and, hence, robust top-down regulation of the amygdala might be crucial for enhanced fear extinction during high-estradiol stages [56, 57]. It is also possible that fear extinction in females and males involves a differential modulation of downstream amygdala by the ventromedial prefrontal cortex [58]. A sex difference is also observed in glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the medial prefrontal cortex, with higher AMPA receptor expression in females [59]. The median raphe nucleus, a brain region that suppresses fear memory in females but not males, selectively enhances GABAergic transmission in prelimbic medial prefrontal cortical pyramidal neurons of females [27]. In addition, VGLUT3-expressing median raphe nucleus neurons respond to fear learning in a sex-specific manner, as only female median raphe neurons show enhancement of excitatory transmission after fear conditioning [27]. Also, the excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the prelimbic medial prefrontal cortex, a major target of VGLUT3-expressing median raphe neurons, exhibit sex-typical responses to activation of local VGLUT3-expressing neurons that release both glutamate and GABA [27]. These studies demonstrate robust sex differences in synaptic function within the medial prefrontal cortex, which plays a critical role in regulating anxiety and emotional behaviors that disproportionately affect females compared with males.
In addition to the medial prefrontal cortex, the amygdala, a brain area necessary for mediating fear behavior, exhibits sex differences in synaptic transmission. Female rats show higher glutamatergic transmission in the principal neurons of the lateral and basal amygdala compared to male rats, suggesting a potential role for glutamatergic synaptic inputs in sex differences in neuronal activity [18]. These studies also showed increased GABAergic synaptic input to lateral and basal amygdala principal neurons in females compared with males, suggesting that the excitatory-to-inhibitory ratio of synaptic inputs to these neurons might be critical for their sex-specific role in fear behaviors [18]. Basolateral amygdala neurons that project to the BNST mediate a male-specific anticipatory anxiety-like behavior, as these neurons exhibit higher excitability in males than in females [60]. Given the robust effect of estradiol signaling on sex-specific synaptic plasticity in the basolateral amygdala, future studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the amygdala’s sex-specific role in behaviors, particularly fear- and anxiety-related behaviors [61].
Similarly, in the hippocampus, sex differences in synaptic transmission have long been recognized. Despite having fewer dentate gyrus granule cells, females show a higher density of synapses on CA3 pyramidal cells than males [62]. The hippocampus plays a critical role in contextual fear memory [63]. Consistent with higher contextual fear learning in males compared to females, both the long-term potentiation (LTP) and NMDA receptor activity at the perforant path-dentate gyrus synapses of the hippocampus are diminished in females compared to males [64]. Studies also show consistently higher spatial learning and memory performance and robust perforant pathway-dentate gyrus LTP in males compared to females [65]. Chronic intermittent theta-burst stimulation increases the size of mossy fiber terminals that synapse onto CA3 pyramidal neurons in male but not female mice, suggesting sex differences in hippocampal structural plasticity in response to activity [66]. Sex difference in Schaffer collateral-CA1 LTP in the hippocampus was also reported [28, 67]. These findings are supported by other studies showing diminished contextual fear learning in females [68, 69]. Studies also show that synaptic inputs from other brain regions modulate hippocampal synaptic transmission and plasticity in a sex-specific manner. Activation of median raphe VGLUT3 neurons enhances GABAergic transmission onto CA1 pyramidal neurons and selectively suppresses LTP in males, suggesting that the median raphe glutamatergic input might selectively modulate hippocampus-mediated behaviors in males [28]. Studies suggest that estradiol plays a key role in sex-specific effects on synapses in the hippocampus. Estradiol selectively suppresses GABAergic transmission in the hippocampus of female mice [70, 71]. Although estradiol enhances glutamatergic transmission in the hippocampus of both females and males, this effect is mediated by distinct mechanisms involving different estrogen receptors in females and males [72]. Sex differences in mechanisms other than hormones could also affect hippocampal synapses. Endocannabinoids contribute to sex differences in hippocampal synaptic function [73]. Despite the correlation between behaviors and sex-specific synaptic activity in the hippocampus, future studies are needed to understand how these synaptic changes shape sex differences in hippocampus-dependent behaviors.
The aforementioned sex differences in synaptic transmission and plasticity in fear circuitry, comprised of the medial prefrontal cortex, the amygdala, and the hippocampus, are particularly interesting given the high incidence of anxiety and fear-related disorders in females compared to males. In healthy individuals, awareness of potential threats, often acquired through past experiences, plays a critical role in detecting future threats and taking appropriate safety measures. Suppressing the memory of these threats in safe environments is equally essential for enabling other survival functions. However, anxiety and psychological trauma-related disorders show a maladaptive recall of fear memory and fear responses when there are no apparent threats. Studies based on the Pavlovian fear conditioning paradigm and associated changes in the medial prefrontal cortex, the amygdala, and the hippocampus have provided significant insights into mechanisms, specifically, circuit, cellular, and synaptic processes underlying the regulation of fear behavior. Consistent with sex differences in synaptic function in these brain areas, many studies have shown remarkable sex differences in behaviors relevant to fear and the underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, as with the role of sex hormones, particularly estradiol, in synaptic function, estradiol signaling also plays a critical role in augmenting fear extinction, a key mechanism in relieving anxiety behavior [53]. These findings lay the foundation for future studies to inform evidence-based approaches for managing anxiety and fear-related disorders in both sexes. Similarly, despite the strong evidence for sex differences in hippocampal synaptic transmission, synaptic plasticity, presynaptic machinery, neurogenesis, and dendritic complexity, which are highly relevant to cognitive function, a direct role for these mechanisms in sex differences in cognitive behaviors and disorders associated with cognitive impairment has yet to be established [74–77]. Given the complex mechanisms underlying cognitive behaviors, future studies are needed to demonstrate how sex-specific mechanisms at the synaptic and cellular levels regulate sex-typical cognitive behaviors and, hence, their role in disorders involving cognitive dysfunction.
Similar to notable sex differences in synaptic properties, studies have shown sex differences in membrane excitability, a possible mechanism underlying sex-specific recruitment of neurons that mediates behavior [78, 79]. Thus, differences in synaptic properties and membrane excitability arising from the activational effects of sex hormones and the organizational effects of both sex chromosomes and sex hormones could play a critical role in sex-specific behaviors (Fig. 3). Beyond these specific sex differences in synaptic and cellular functions that affect behavior, sex chromosomes and sex hormones might exert a profound effect on the development of brain regions, leading to remarkable sex differences in the organization of brain circuitry, including neuronal density, regional size, and neural circuit architecture. These developmental effects play a critical role in sex-specific behaviors, including reproduction, parenting, and the regulation of emotional behavior.
Fig. 3.
Sex differences in membrane excitability, synaptic transmission, and synaptic plasticity, driven by sex chromosomal and hormonal effects, play a critical role in sex differences in behavior
Sex-specific organization of brain circuitry and behavior
Sex-specific organization of brain circuitry plays a critical role in sex-typical behaviors. A robust example of sex differences in the organization of a brain area is the medial amygdala (MeA), as it has been well described in rodent studies. The MeA is a crucial player in social behavior, affecting aggression, parental care, and reproduction. The MeA, which is anatomically distinct from the amygdala regions involved in fear regulation, is located two synapses away from the vomeronasal organ (VNO), a sensory epithelium involved in pheromonal signaling [80, 81]. The VNO axons project to the accessory olfactory bulb (AOB), upstream of the MeA, and play a critical role in pheromone-mediated signaling and, hence, social behaviors [81]. Consistent with the sex difference in social behaviors, males show significantly higher volume of MeA compared to females [82]. The higher MeA volume in males is consistent with the increased dendritic branching in males compared to females [83]. In addition, neuron number and dendritic branching in the MeA are lateralized in males but not in females, suggesting potentially enhanced processing of MeA-mediated social behaviors that are critical in males [83]. In prepubertal male mice, the left hemisphere MeA exhibits more excitatory synapses than in age-matched female mice [84]. However, the number of GABAergic synapses is similar between females and males [84]. This higher MeA volume depends on androgen levels [82]. The MeA contains a significant number of aromatase-expressing neurons, suggesting aromatase-dependent conversion of testosterone to estrogen in the MeA [85]. Interestingly, males have more aromatase neurons than females [85]. The aromatase-induced conversion of testosterone to estradiol in males is critical for sex-specific development of the MeA and male-specific territorial behaviors [85–87]. The connectivity between AOB and the aromatase-expressing MeA neurons plays a critical role in social behaviors, including parenting, aggression, and mating [14, 88, 89]. Consistent with MeA-dependent sex-specific behaviors, the sex-typical organization of inputs to the MeA aromatase neurons has been demonstrated. For example, the synaptic convergence of AOB onto individual aromatase-expressing MeA neurons is significantly higher in males than in females [90]. While the MeA neurons respond strongly to the opposite sex stimuli in both sexes [91], the MeA response to predator stimuli is dominant in females [91]. This sexual dimorphism of sensory representation is mediated by the MeA [91]. The MeA-mediated sexually dimorphic responses depend on estrogen signaling, resulting from aromatase-induced conversion of testosterone to estrogen [91]. Apart from the early developmental steroid-dependent organization of the MeA circuit, further sex hormone-dependent circuit organization during puberty is necessary for the sexually dimorphic role of the MeA [91]. Although the adult MeA is significantly larger in males, the MeA cell proliferation is significantly higher in neonatal females [45, 92, 93]. In addition to the sex hormone-mediated organization of the MeA, suppression of endocannabinoid levels due to high expression of endocannabinoid-degrading enzymes maintains elevated cell proliferation in the female MeA, as endocannabinoids suppress cell proliferation via CB2 receptors, selectively in females [92]. Consistent with the notion that endocannabinoids mediate sex differences in MeA cell proliferation, cannabinoids masculinized juvenile play behavior in females without affecting males [92]. These effects are similar to those induced by neonatal estradiol or testosterone in females [94, 95].
Recent studies shed more light on the sex- and cell-type-specific functions of MeA in different social behaviors. MeA GABAergic neurons promote parental behavior in females, whereas in males, they influence both parental and infanticidal behavior, depending on their activity levels: high activity in MeA GABAergic neurons resulted in infanticidal behavior, whereas lower activity led to parental behavior [96]. This sexually dimorphic effect is not attributed to sex differences in cell types, neuronal subtype identity, or their relative abundance [96]. However, glutamatergic neurons in both females and males promote non-social self-grooming behavior [96]. Consistently, GABAergic neurons but not glutamatergic neurons in MeA show sex differences in gene expression [96]. These findings are in agreement with the role of MeA GABAergic projections in lordosis, a female-specific behavior, while activation of glutamatergic MeA neurons enhances non-social self-grooming behavior [97]. Aromatase-expressing MeA neurons, which are primarily GABAergic, play a key role in aggressive behaviors in males [14]. Similarly, maternal aggression in females depends on the activation of aromatase-expressing MeA neurons [14]. Among the different subtypes of MeA neurons, two different subtypes deriving from progenitor populations expressing Dbx1 and Foxp2 show sex differences in their activation during mating [98]. Furthermore, membrane properties and gene expression, particularly expression of ion channels involved in membrane excitability, show sex differences, suggesting that both cell-type-specific activation and intrinsic properties of MeA neurons play a critical role in MeA-mediated sex-specific behaviors [99].
Another brain area that shows remarkable sex-specific organization is the BNST, which is critical for stress-related responses, anxiety, and social behavior [100]. The BNST plays a key role in contextual fear memory [101]. Unlike the amygdala, which is critical for the expression of phasic fear, the BNST is believed to play a critical role in responses to unpredictable threats and in mediating sustained fear [100]. Similar to the MeA, males show a higher number of aromatase neurons in the BNST than females [85]. In addition, males show higher levels of axonal output from the aromatase-expressing neurons [85]. These studies suggest that the target cells are sex-specifically innervated by the aromatase-expressing neurons. As in the case of the MeA, the aromatase-mediated conversion of testosterone to estrogen is critical for BNST neuronal survival in males [85]. Consistent with the sex-specific organization of the BNST, the BNST is involved in contextual fear memory expression in males but not females [42]. The BNST shows sex differences in its neurochemical profile and volume [43–45]. The female anterolateral BNST shows a higher number of neurons, including CRH-expressing neurons [46, 47]. Also, the BNST shows sex-specific serotonin-dependent behaviors as knockdown of the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor in the BNST enhances contextual fear memory expression selectively in males, and this effect coincides with enhanced excitability in BNST neurons [48]. Expression of contextual fear memory involves upregulation of the immediate-early genes ARC and c-Fos in male BNST neurons that project to the central amygdala, but not in females, suggesting a sex-specific engagement of the BNST-central amygdala pathway in contextual fear memory [49]. This study also suggests that a different subtype of BNST neurons is responsible for contextual fear memory in females [49]. Thus, sex-specific circuit, synaptic, and intrinsic neuronal mechanisms contribute to the sex-dependent role of BNST in fear behavior.
Similar to the MeA and the BNST, the sexually dimorphic nucleus of the preoptic area (SDN-POA) exhibits robust sex differences in its organization, a feature consistent across multiple species [102]. The volume of SDN-POA is remarkably higher in males compared to females [102]. Studies show the role of higher apoptosis in females in the sex-specific development of SDN-POA [103]. The phagocytic microglia plays a critical role in establishing sex-specific organization of SDN-POA, and this developmental process depends upon the aromatase-mediated conversion of androgens to estrogens [104, 105]. Sexual dimorphism in the SDN-POA is thought to contribute to male-typical mating preferences [106].
In addition to the MeA, BNST, and SDN-POA, studies suggest that other brain regions, such as the lateral septum and the anteroventral periventricular nucleus, show sex-specific organization and play robust sexually dimorphic roles [107–109]. Thus, plasticity in several brain areas encompassing changes in volume, neuronal density, dendritic and axonal plasticity, cell proliferation, and apoptosis, primarily driven by the organizational effects of sex chromosomes and sex hormones as well as the activational effects of sex hormones, regulates social and emotional behaviors in females and males (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
Sex-specific organization of brain areas such as MeA, BNST, and SDN-POA mediated by sex chromosomes, sex hormones, and endocannabinoids results in sex-typical social and emotional behaviors
Concluding remarks
Studies show that sex chromosomes and sex hormones play a critical role in shaping sex differences in behavior. Sex differences in the recruitment of neuronal subtypes during behavior might be a key mechanism underlying sex-typical behavior. Sex-specific modulation of pre- and postsynaptic function, local GABAergic inhibition, membrane excitability, and structural plasticity might be key to sex differences in the recruitment of neuronal subtypes during behavior. Similarly, sex differences in the trafficking and expression of neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels might result in sex-typical synaptic and neuronal activation, leading to selective engagement of brain circuits and behavioral differences between females and males. In addition, sex-specific organizational effects on brain circuitry, resulting in sex differences in neuronal density, dendritic branching, and connectivity, could underlie sex-specific behaviors. The activational effects of sex hormones might further enhance sex-typical effects of brain regions that undergo sex-specific organization. Recent progress in understanding sex-typical synaptic, cellular, and circuit mechanisms provides a strong basis for future research to deepen our knowledge of the underlying causes of sexually exclusive and dimorphic behaviors, as well as the magnitude-based differences in shared behaviors. Additionally, future studies exploring sex-specific nervous system mechanisms such as neuroimmune interactions, neuroendocrinology, metabolic factors, and interactions with peripheral physiology, including the gut microbiome and the gut-brain axis, will significantly improve our understanding of sex-typical behaviors. These advances, primarily through animal studies, are expected to facilitate evidence-based approaches to human conditions given the substantial evidence for sex-typical vulnerabilities to nervous system disorders, such as autism spectrum disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity, affective and anxiety disorders, neuroinflammatory disorders, pain, and neurocognitive disorders. Studying sex differences in cellular, synaptic, and circuit mechanisms in animal models of central nervous system disorders is expected to provide critical insights into sex-typical vulnerabilities to these disorders. Understanding how sex differences in cellular, synaptic, and circuitry functions develop with age may be key to learning about sex-specific patterns in neurodegenerative and neurocognitive disorders. Therefore, future multidisciplinary efforts to uncover sex-specific mechanisms in the nervous system will be crucial for understanding sex-dependent behaviors and for informing the development of therapeutic strategies for nervous system disorders.
Abbreviations
- AMPA
Alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid
- AOB
Accessory olfactory bulb
- BNST
Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis
- CRH
Corticotropin-releasing hormone
- GABA
Gamma-aminobutyric acid
- LTP
Long-term potentiation
- MeA
Medial amygdala
- NMDA
N-methyl-D-aspartate
- SDN-POA
Sexually dimorphic nucleus of the preoptic area
- VGLUT3
Vesicular glutamate transporter 3
- VNO
Vomeronasal organ
- VTA
Ventral tegmental area
Author contributions
I.N. wrote the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grant R56MH139698.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Arnold AP. The end of gonad-centric sex determination in mammals. Trends Genet. 2012;28(2):55–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Raznahan A, Disteche CM. X-chromosome regulation and sex differences in brain anatomy. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;120:28–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Berletch JB, Yang F, Xu J, Carrel L, Disteche CM. Genes that escape from X inactivation. Hum Genet. 2011;130(2):237–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yeung J, DeYoung T, Spring S, de Guzman AE, Elder MW, Beauchamp A, et al. Sex chromosomes and hormones independently influence healthy brain development but act similarly after cranial radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024;121(36):e2404042121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Skuse DH. X-linked genes and mental functioning. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(Spec 1):R27–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Laumonnier F, Cuthbert PC, Grant SG. The role of neuronal complexes in human X-linked brain diseases. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;80(2):205–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xu X, Coats JK, Yang CF, Wang A, Ahmed OM, Alvarado M, et al. Modular genetic control of sexually dimorphic behaviors. Cell. 2012;148(3):596–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Castro-Fonseca E, Morais V, da Silva CG, Wollner J, Freitas J, Mello-Neto AF, et al. The influence of age and sex on the absolute cell numbers of the human brain cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2023;33(13):8654–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ritchie SJ, Cox SR, Shen X, Lombardo MV, Reus LM, Alloza C, et al. Sex Differences in the Adult Human Brain: Evidence from 5216 UK Biobank Participants. Cereb Cortex. 2018;28(8):2959–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tan A, Ma W, Vira A, Marwha D, Eliot L. The human hippocampus is not sexually-dimorphic: Meta-analysis of structural MRI volumes. NeuroImage. 2016;124(Pt A):350–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ingalhalikar M, Smith A, Parker D, Satterthwaite TD, Elliott MA, Ruparel K, et al. Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(2):823–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wierenga LM, Sexton JA, Laake P, Giedd JN, Tamnes CK. A Key Characteristic of Sex Differences in the Developing Brain: Greater Variability in Brain Structure of Boys than Girls. Cereb Cortex. 2018;28(8):2741–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yang CF, Chiang MC, Gray DC, Prabhakaran M, Alvarado M, Juntti SA, et al. Sexually dimorphic neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus govern mating in both sexes and aggression in males. Cell. 2013;153(4):896–909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Unger EK, Burke KJ Jr., Yang CF, Bender KJ, Fuller PM, Shah NM. Medial amygdalar aromatase neurons regulate aggression in both sexes. Cell Rep. 2015;10(4):453–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rey CD, Lipps J, Shansky RM. Dopamine D1 receptor activation rescues extinction impairments in low-estrogen female rats and induces cortical layer-specific activation changes in prefrontal-amygdala circuits. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39(5):1282–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Galvin C, Ninan I. Regulation of the mouse medial prefrontal cortical synapses by endogenous estradiol. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39(9):2086–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yu M, Yin N, Feng B, Gao P, Yu K, Liu H, et al. Identification of an ionic mechanism for ERα-mediated rapid excitation in neurons. Sci Adv. 2024;10(40):eadp0696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Blume SR, Freedberg M, Vantrease JE, Chan R, Padival M, Record MJ, et al. Sex- and Estrus-Dependent Differences in Rat Basolateral Amygdala. J Neurosci. 2017;37(44):10567–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nakajima M, Görlich A, Heintz N. Oxytocin modulates female sociosexual behavior through a specific class of prefrontal cortical interneurons. Cell. 2014;159(2):295–305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li K, Nakajima M, Ibanez-Tallon I, Heintz N. A Cortical Circuit for Sexually Dimorphic Oxytocin-Dependent Anxiety Behaviors. Cell. 2016;167(1):60–72. e11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Riad MH, Park K, Ibañez-Tallon I, Heintz N. Local production of corticotropin-releasing hormone in prefrontal cortex modulates male-specific novelty exploration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(49):e2211454119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Smith NMT, Dukas R. Winner and loser effects in humans: evidence from randomized trials. Anim Behav. 2024;207:101–7. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Oyegbile TO, Marler CA. Winning fights elevates testosterone levels in California mice and enhances future ability to win fights. Horm Behav. 2005;48(3):259–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zheng D, Xin Q, Jin S, Zhou A, Jia X, Tan Y, et al. Neural mechanism of the sexually dimorphic winner effect in mice. Neuron. 2025;113(24):4217–e316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Flanigan ME, Hon OJ, D’Ambrosio S, Boyt KM, Hassanein L, Castle M, et al. Subcortical serotonin 5HT(2c) receptor-containing neurons sex-specifically regulate binge-like alcohol consumption, social, and arousal behaviors in mice. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Goodwill HL, Manzano-Nieves G, LaChance P, Teramoto S, Lin S, Lopez C, et al. Early Life Stress Drives Sex-Selective Impairment in Reversal Learning by Affecting Parvalbumin Interneurons in Orbitofrontal Cortex of Mice. Cell Rep. 2018;25(9):2299–e3074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Collins SA, Stinson HE, Himes A, Nestor-Kalinoski A, Ninan I. Sex-specific modulation of the medial prefrontal cortex by glutamatergic median raphe neurons. Sci Adv. 2023;9(45):eadg4800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stinson HE, Ninan I. Median raphe glutamatergic neuron-mediated enhancement of GABAergic transmission and suppression of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Heliyon. 2024;10(19):e38192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Varga V, Losonczy A, Zemelman BV, Borhegyi Z, Nyiri G, Domonkos A, et al. Fast synaptic subcortical control of hippocampal circuits. Science. 2009;326(5951):449–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yu W, Pati D, Pina MM, Schmidt KT, Boyt KM, Hunker AC, et al. Periaqueductal gray/dorsal raphe dopamine neurons contribute to sex differences in pain-related behaviors. Neuron. 2021;109(8):1365–e805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bartley EJ, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(1):52–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bouarab C, Wynalda M, Thompson BV, Khurana A, Cody CR, Kisner A, et al. Sex-Specific Adaptations to VTA Circuits Following Subchronic Stress. Eur J Neurosci. 2025;61(11):e70153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Oliver DK, Intson K, Sargin D, Power SK, McNabb J, Ramsey AJ, et al. Chronic social isolation exerts opposing sex-specific consequences on serotonin neuronal excitability and behaviour. Neuropharmacology. 2020;168:108015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Howerton AR, Roland AV, Fluharty JM, Marshall A, Chen A, Daniels D, et al. Sex differences in corticotropin-releasing factor receptor-1 action within the dorsal raphe nucleus in stress responsivity. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;75(11):873–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Goel N, Bale TL. Sex differences in the serotonergic influence on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress axis. Endocrinology. 2010;151(4):1784–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Campanelli F, Marino G, Barsotti N, Natale G, Calabrese V, Cardinale A, et al. Serotonin drives striatal synaptic plasticity in a sex-related manner. Neurobiol Dis. 2021;158:105448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bangasser DA, Zhang X, Garachh V, Hanhauser E, Valentino RJ. Sexual dimorphism in locus coeruleus dendritic morphology: a structural basis for sex differences in emotional arousal. Physiol Behav. 2011;103(3–4):342–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Curtis AL, Bethea T, Valentino RJ. Sexually dimorphic responses of the brain norepinephrine system to stress and corticotropin-releasing factor. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31(3):544–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ahlbrand R, Wilson A, Woller P, Sachdeva Y, Lai J, Davis N, et al. Sex-specific threat responding and neuronal engagement in carbon dioxide associated fear and extinction: Noradrenergic involvement in female mice. Neurobiol Stress. 2024;30:100617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wesselhoeft R, Pedersen CB, Mortensen PB, Mors O, Bilenberg N. Gender-age interaction in incidence rates of childhood emotional disorders. Psychol Med. 2015;45(4):829–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Stein MB, Walker JR, Forde DR. Gender differences in susceptibility to posttraumatic stress disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2000;38(6):619–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Urien L, Bauer EP. Sex differences in BNST and amygdala activation by contextual, cued, and unpredictable threats. eNeuro. 2022;9(1):0233–21.2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.del Abril A, Segovia S, Guillamón A. The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in the rat: regional sex differences controlled by gonadal steroids early after birth. Brain Res. 1987;429(2):295–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Allen LS, Gorski RA. Sex difference in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis of the human brain. J Comp Neurol. 1990;302(4):697–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hines M, Allen LS, Gorski RA. Sex differences in subregions of the medial nucleus of the amygdala and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis of the rat. Brain Res. 1992;579(2):321–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Uchida K, Otsuka H, Morishita M, Tsukahara S, Sato T, Sakimura K, et al. Female-biased sexual dimorphism of corticotropin-releasing factor neurons in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Biol Sex Differ. 2019;10(1):6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Guillamón A, Segovia S, del Abril A. Early effects of gonadal steroids on the neuron number in the medial posterior region and the lateral division of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in the rat. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1988;44(2):281–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Marcinkiewcz CA, Bierlein-De La Rosa G, Dorrier CE, McKnight M, DiBerto JF, Pati D, et al. Sex-Dependent Modulation of Anxiety and Fear by 5-HT(1A) Receptors in the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019;10(7):3154–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Urien L, Stein N, Ryckman A, Bell L, Bauer EP. Extended amygdala circuits are differentially activated by context fear conditioning in male and female rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2021;180:107401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Salzberg Y, Haque R, Oren-Suissa M. The synaptic basis for sexual dimorphism in the invertebrate nervous system. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2023;82:102757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cover KK, Maeng LY, Lebron-Milad K, Milad MR. Mechanisms of estradiol in fear circuitry: implications for sex differences in psychopathology. Transl Psychiatry. 2014;4:e422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ressler KJ. Translating Across Circuits and Genetics Toward Progress in Fear- and Anxiety-Related Disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2020;177(3):214–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Milad MR, Zeidan MA, Contero A, Pitman RK, Klibanski A, Rauch SL, et al. The influence of gonadal hormones on conditioned fear extinction in healthy humans. Neuroscience. 2010;168(3):652–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Levine ES, Kolb JE. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor increases activity of NR2B-containing N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in excised patches from hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci Res. 2000;62(3):357–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Toran-Allerand CD, Miranda RC, Bentham WD, Sohrabji F, Brown TJ, Hochberg RB, et al. Estrogen receptors colocalize with low-affinity nerve growth factor receptors in cholinergic neurons of the basal forebrain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(10):4668–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pare D, Quirk GJ, Ledoux JE. New vistas on amygdala networks in conditioned fear. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92(1):1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Adhikari A, Lerner TN, Finkelstein J, Pak S, Jennings JH, Davidson TJ, et al. Basomedial amygdala mediates top-down control of anxiety and fear. Nature. 2015;527(7577):179–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gruene TM, Roberts E, Thomas V, Ronzio A, Shansky RM. Sex-specific neuroanatomical correlates of fear expression in prefrontal-amygdala circuits. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;78(3):186–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Knouse MC, McGrath AG, Deutschmann AU, Rich MT, Zallar LJ, Rajadhyaksha AM, et al. Sex differences in the medial prefrontal cortical glutamate system. Biol Sex Differ. 2022;13(1):66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Vantrease JE, Avonts B, Padival M, DeJoseph MR, Urban JH, Rosenkranz JA. Sex Differences in the Activity of Basolateral Amygdalar Neurons That Project to the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis and Their Role in Anticipatory Anxiety. J Neurosci. 2022;42(22):4488–504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bender RA, Zhou L, Vierk R, Brandt N, Keller A, Gee CE, et al. Sex-Dependent Regulation of Aromatase-Mediated Synaptic Plasticity in the Basolateral Amygdala. J Neurosci. 2017;37(6):1532–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Madeira MD, Sousa N, Paula-Barbosa MM. Sexual dimorphism in the mossy fiber synapses of the rat hippocampus. Exp Brain Res. 1991;87(3):537–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Holt W, Maren S. Muscimol inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus impairs contextual retrieval of fear memory. J Neurosci. 1999;19(20):9054–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Maren S, De Oca B, Fanselow MS. Sex differences in hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) and Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats: positive correlation between LTP and contextual learning. Brain Res. 1994;661(1–2):25–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Safari S, Ahmadi N, Mohammadkhani R, Ghahremani R, Khajvand-Abedeni M, Shahidi S, et al. Sex differences in spatial learning and memory and hippocampal long-term potentiation at perforant pathway-dentate gyrus (PP-DG) synapses in Wistar rats. Behav Brain Funct. 2021;17(1):9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zhang TR, Askari B, Kesici A, Guilherme E, Vila-Rodriguez F, Snyder JS. Intermittent theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation induces hippocampal mossy fibre plasticity in male but not female mice. Eur J Neurosci. 2023;57(2):310–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Le AA, Lauterborn JC, Jia Y, Wang W, Cox CD, Gall CM, et al. Prepubescent female rodents have enhanced hippocampal LTP and learning relative to males, reversing in adulthood as inhibition increases. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25(2):180–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wiltgen BJ, Sanders MJ, Behne NS, Fanselow MS. Sex differences, context preexposure, and the immediate shock deficit in Pavlovian context conditioning with mice. Behav Neurosci. 2001;115(1):26–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kudo K, Qiao CX, Kanba S, Arita J. A selective increase in phosphorylation of cyclic AMP response element-binding protein in hippocampal CA1 region of male, but not female, rats following contextual fear and passive avoidance conditioning. Brain Res. 2004;1024(1–2):233–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Tabatadze N, Huang G, May RM, Jain A, Woolley CS. Sex Differences in Molecular Signaling at Inhibitory Synapses in the Hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2015;35(32):11252–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Huang GZ, Woolley CS. Estradiol acutely suppresses inhibition in the hippocampus through a sex-specific endocannabinoid and mGluR-dependent mechanism. Neuron. 2012;74(5):801–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Oberlander JG, Woolley CS. 17β-Estradiol Acutely Potentiates Glutamatergic Synaptic Transmission in the Hippocampus through Distinct Mechanisms in Males and Females. J Neurosci. 2016;36(9):2677–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ferraro A, Wig P, Boscarino J, Reich CG. Sex differences in endocannabinoid modulation of rat CA1 dendritic neurotransmission. Neurobiol Stress. 2020;13:100283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Koss WA, Frick KM. Sex differences in hippocampal function. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95(1–2):539–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Markham JA, McKian KP, Stroup TS, Juraska JM. Sexually dimorphic aging of dendritic morphology in CA1 of hippocampus. Hippocampus. 2005;15(1):97–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Duarte-Guterman P, Yagi S, Chow C, Galea LA. Hippocampal learning, memory, and neurogenesis: Effects of sex and estrogens across the lifespan in adults. Horm Behav. 2015;74:37–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kim SR, Eom Y, Lee SH. Comprehensive analysis of sex differences in the function and ultrastructure of hippocampal presynaptic terminals. Neurochem Int. 2023;169:105570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Dorris DM, Cao J, Willett JA, Hauser CA, Meitzen J. Intrinsic excitability varies by sex in prepubertal striatal medium spiny neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2015;113(3):720–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zhang W, Li SS, Han Y, Xu XH. Sex Differences in Electrophysiological Properties of Mouse Medial Preoptic Area Neurons Revealed by In Vitro Whole-cell Recordings. Neurosci Bull. 2021;37(2):166–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Swanson LW, Petrovich GD. What is the amygdala? Trends Neurosci. 1998;21(8):323–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Dulac C, Torello AT. Molecular detection of pheromone signals in mammals: from genes to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4(7):551–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Cooke BM, Tabibnia G, Breedlove SM. A brain sexual dimorphism controlled by adult circulating androgens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(13):7538–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Cooke BM, Stokas MR, Woolley CS. Morphological sex differences and laterality in the prepubertal medial amygdala. J Comp Neurol. 2007;501(6):904–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Cooke BM, Woolley CS. Sexually dimorphic synaptic organization of the medial amygdala. J Neurosci. 2005;25(46):10759–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wu MV, Manoli DS, Fraser EJ, Coats JK, Tollkuhn J, Honda S, et al. Estrogen masculinizes neural pathways and sex-specific behaviors. Cell. 2009;139(1):61–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.MacLusky NJ, Naftolin F. Sexual differentiation of the central nervous system. Science. 1981;211(4488):1294–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.McCarthy MM. Estradiol and the developing brain. Physiol Rev. 2008;88(1):91–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Ferguson JN, Aldag JM, Insel TR, Young LJ. Oxytocin in the medial amygdala is essential for social recognition in the mouse. J Neurosci. 2001;21(20):8278–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Yao S, Bergan J, Lanjuin A, Dulac C. Oxytocin signaling in the medial amygdala is required for sex discrimination of social cues. Elife. 2017;6:e31373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 90.Billing A, Henrique Correia M, Kelly DA, Li GL, Bergan JF. Synaptic connections of aromatase circuits in the medial amygdala are sex specific. eNeuro. 2020;7(3):0489–19.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 91.Bergan JF, Ben-Shaul Y, Dulac C. Sex-specific processing of social cues in the medial amygdala. Elife. 2014;3:e02743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Krebs-Kraft DL, Hill MN, Hillard CJ, McCarthy MM. Sex difference in cell proliferation in developing rat amygdala mediated by endocannabinoids has implications for social behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(47):20535–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Nishizuka M, Arai Y. Organizational action of estrogen on synaptic pattern in the amygdala: implications for sexual differentiation of the brain. Brain Res. 1981;213(2):422–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Olesen KM, Jessen HM, Auger CJ, Auger AP. Dopaminergic activation of estrogen receptors in neonatal brain alters progestin receptor expression and juvenile social play behavior. Endocrinology. 2005;146(9):3705–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Meaney MJ, McEwen BS. Testosterone implants into the amygdala during the neonatal period masculinize the social play of juvenile female rats. Brain Res. 1986;398(2):324–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Chen PB, Hu RK, Wu YE, Pan L, Huang S, Micevych PE, et al. Sexually Dimorphic Control of Parenting Behavior by the Medial Amygdala. Cell. 2019;176(5):1206–e2118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Johnson CS, Hong W, Micevych PE. Posterodorsal Medial Amygdala Regulation of Female Social Behavior: GABA versus Glutamate Projections. J Neurosci. 2021;41(42):8790–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Lischinsky JE, Sokolowski K, Li P, Esumi S, Kamal Y, Goodrich M et al. Embryonic transcription factor expression in mice predicts medial amygdala neuronal identity and sex-specific responses to innate behavioral cues. Elife. 2017;6:e21012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 99.Matos HY, Hernandez-Pineda D, Charpentier CM, Rusk A, Corbin JG, Jones KS. Sex differences in biophysical signatures across molecularly defined medial amygdala neuronal subpopulations. eNeuro. 2020;7(4):0035–20.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 100.Lebow MA, Chen A. Overshadowed by the amygdala: the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis emerges as key to psychiatric disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21(4):450–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Sullivan GM, Apergis J, Bush DE, Johnson LR, Hou M, Ledoux JE. Lesions in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis disrupt corticosterone and freezing responses elicited by a contextual but not by a specific cue-conditioned fear stimulus. Neuroscience. 2004;128(1):7–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Gorski RA, Gordon JH, Shryne JE, Southam AM. Evidence for a morphological sex difference within the medial preoptic area of the rat brain. Brain Res. 1978;148(2):333–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Davis EC, Popper P, Gorski RA. The role of apoptosis in sexual differentiation of the rat sexually dimorphic nucleus of the preoptic area. Brain Res. 1996;734(1–2):10–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.McCarthy MM, Schlenker EH, Pfaff DW. Enduring consequences of neonatal treatment with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to estrogen receptor messenger ribonucleic acid on sexual differentiation of rat brain. Endocrinology. 1993;133(2):433–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Pickett LA, VanRyzin JW, Marquardt AE, McCarthy MM. Microglia phagocytosis mediates the volume and function of the rat sexually dimorphic nucleus of the preoptic area. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120(10):e2212646120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Houtsmuller EJ, Brand T, de Jonge FH, Joosten RN, van de Poll NE, Slob AK. SDN-POA volume, sexual behavior, and partner preference of male rats affected by perinatal treatment with ATD. Physiol Behav. 1994;56(3):535–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Gorski RA, Harlan RE, Jacobson CD, Shryne JE, Southam AM. Evidence for the existence of a sexually dimorphic nucleus in the preoptic area of the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1980;193(2):529–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Simerly RB, Zee MC, Pendleton JW, Lubahn DB, Korach KS. Estrogen receptor-dependent sexual differentiation of dopaminergic neurons in the preoptic region of the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(25):14077–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.De Vries GJ, Best W, Sluiter AA. The influence of androgens on the development of a sex difference in the vasopressinergic innervation of the rat lateral septum. Brain Res. 1983;284(2–3):377–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.




