Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2026 Jul 15;14(8):e03900-25. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03900-25

Rapid detection of treatment-emergent resistance to bedaquiline and pretomanid in Mycobacterium tuberculosis using TM4::GeNL reporter mycobacteriophages

Senamile L Ngema 1, Saranathan Rajagopalan 2, Rubeshan Perumal 1,3,4, Sashen Moodley 5, Kevin J Guzman 6, Adrie J C Steyn 5,7, William R Jacobs Jr 2, Kogieleum Naidoo 1,4, Max O'Donnell 6,8, Michelle H Larsen 2,✉
Editor: Sophia B Georghiou9
PMCID: PMC13436348  PMID: 42454942

ABSTRACT

There is an urgent need for rapid, affordable diagnostic tools capable of detecting baseline and treatment-emergent resistance among patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). Reporter mycobacteriophages provide a phenotypic solution enhanced by brighter luminescent reporters compatible with simple readouts. We applied the TM4::GeNL reporter mycobacteriophage for rapid phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) on serial Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from six DR-TB patients, including four with treatment-emergent resistance and two with baseline bedaquiline (BDQ)-resistant subpopulations. Susceptibility to BDQ, pretomanid (PMD), delamanid (DLM), and linezolid (LZD) was assessed by luminescence retention after TM4::GeNL infection compared to no-drug control, with conventional pDST and whole-genome sequencing as the reference standard. Isolates with baseline and treatment-emergent resistance to BDQ and PMD had a mean relative luminescence unit (RLU) retention of 83.8% (95% CI, 52.1–115.6), while susceptible clinical isolates retained 1.5% mean RLU (95% CI, 0.2–2.8). The TM4::GeNL DST results were consistent with conventional pDST in detecting BDQ and PMD resistance. Three patients with BDQ treatment-emergent resistance had mutations in mmpR5 (Rv0678), with a range of variant frequencies (12.6%–92.3%). One isolate with treatment-emergent DLM/PMD resistance had mutations in the fbiC gene, with A487fs and S534stop variants at 25.0% and 12.0%, respectively. Sequencing of serial isolates from one patient on a regimen that included LZD identified an emergent mutation in rrl (n.2814G > T, 53.8% frequency); however, the isolate was LZD susceptible by both TM4::GeNL DST and conventional pDST. TM4::GeNL reporter mycobacteriophage accurately detected baseline and treatment-emergent resistance to BDQ and PMD compared to conventional pDST. This rapid, phenotypic approach shows promise for accelerating detection of resistance to new and repurposed DR-TB drugs in clinical settings.

IMPORTANCE

Ongoing transmission of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB), combined with limited access to rapid diagnostics for resistance to key drugs in modern regimens, poses a major challenge to global TB control. We applied TM4::GeNL reporter mycobacteriophage for rapid phenotypic drug susceptibility testing on Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) clinical isolates with baseline and treatment-emergent resistance to DR-TB drugs (bedaquiline, pretomanid, and delamanid), generating results within 48 h from a positive culture. Our findings provide evidence on the utility of the TM4::GeNL mycobacteriophage to infect Mtb clinical isolates and distinguish between drug-susceptible and resistant isolates. TM4::GeNL reporter mycobacteriophage detected emerging resistance to bedaquiline and pretomanid within 48 h from a positive culture, with our results correlating well with conventional phenotypic drug susceptibility and whole-genome sequencing data. These findings support TM4::GeNL reporter mycobacteriophage as a rapid, multiplexed alternative drug-susceptibility test for DR-TB.

KEYWORDS: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, bedaquiline, delamanid, pretomanid, drug susceptibility testing, mycobacteriophages

INTRODUCTION

Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) represents a key obstacle to global TB control due to reduced effectiveness of the most potent anti-TB drugs (1). In 2023, among 10.8 million people who fell ill with TB, an estimated 400,000 had multi-drug-resistant or rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) (2). However, only 189,631 (47%) were microbiologically diagnosed, and only 175,923 (44%) initiated MDR-TB treatment (2). Expanding access to comprehensive resistance testing and improving access to appropriate TB treatment may narrow the diagnosis-treatment gap.

DR-TB treatment has historically been characterized by a high pill burden, prolonged therapy, severe side effects, and poor retention in care, any of which contribute to high rates of treatment failure and mortality (3, 4). However, significant progress has been made in the last decade, with the introduction of novel and repurposed drugs, including bedaquiline (BDQ), pretomanid (PMD), delamanid (DLM), and linezolid (LZD), as part of new all-oral short-course regimens (5–9). The most widely implemented 6–9 month all-oral regimen, comprising BDQ, PMD, LZD, and moxifloxacin (MFX) (BPaL/M), has been associated with reduced side effects and improved treatment outcomes (10–12). The remarkable progress in the introduction of new, highly effective, all-oral DR-TB treatment regimens is threatened by the rise in BDQ resistance, which may undermine recent gains in DR-TB treatment (13–15). The rise in acquired BDQ resistance has been attributed to suboptimal adherence or suboptimal pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters in complex TB lesions or disease sites (16–19). Delayed detection of BDQ-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) has been associated with ongoing community transmission of BDQ-resistant TB (20, 21).

Current molecular diagnostics for DR-TB are limited to well-characterized mutations and fail to detect resistance to newer drugs central to modern treatment regimens, rendering them inadequate (22). Resistance mechanisms for BDQ and PMD remain poorly defined, with mutations distributed across multiple genes, complicating an accurate and reliable molecular diagnostic development (23). In addition, there’s a significant gap in our understanding of which mutations in resistance-associated genes lead to phenotypic resistance to new TB drugs. As a result, resistance detection often relies on culture-based phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST), which can take up to 6 weeks, critically delaying treatment decisions. The World Health Organization (WHO) has emphasized the need for simple, rapid, and cost-effective phenotypic approaches to guide timely DR-TB treatment.

Reporter mycobacteriophages have previously been shown to rapidly and accurately determine drug susceptibility to new and repurposed anti-TB drugs, including BDQ, PMD, and LZD (24–27). The recently constructed TM4::GeNL mycobacteriophage carrying a green-enhanced nanoluciferase cassette (GeNL) has been shown to be ultrasensitive and able to perform DST on all Mtb lineage clinical isolates (28).

Early detection of treatment-emergent resistance, coupled with prompt therapeutic decision-making, is critical for providing upfront guidance to inform resistance-appropriate drug selection, limit the transmission of DR-TB strains, and improve outcomes (29). TM4::GeNL reporter mycobacteriophage was used for rapid (48 h) phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing of clinical Mtb isolates with baseline and treatment-emergent resistance, with results compared to conventional phenotypic and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates

This nested retrospective analysis used stored serial Mtb clinical isolates obtained from six participants enrolled in the CAPRISA 086-PRAXIS (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03162107), a prospective observational cohort study conducted in Durban, South Africa, to characterize medication adherence and retention in the DR-TB-HIV care continuum among patients receiving BDQ-based regimens. We screened for patients who had persistent positive cultures and had at least a baseline isolate and one or more on-treatment isolates presenting emerging resistance to novel drugs and/or baseline BDQ heteroresistance. We identified six patients, each with between two and six positive culture isolates. All baseline isolates and consecutive isolates were selected to represent a range of genotypic and phenotypic profiles relevant to assessing the performance of the assay. Written informed consent for specimen storage and future use was obtained at enrollment.

Within PRAXIS, extended pDST for BDQ, LZD, and CFZ was performed for isolates exhibiting fluoroquinolone or second-line injectable drug resistance. All isolates underwent comprehensive characterization, including WGS and routine culture-based pDST. BDQ minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for all isolates harboring mutations in mmpR5, atpE, pepQ, or Rv1979c (15). DLM MICs were determined for all isolates harboring mutations in ddn, fgd1, fbiA, fbiB, fbiC, or fbiD. All clinical isolates were grown in Middlebrook 7H9 medium supplemented with tyloxapol (0.05%) and OADC (10%) and cultured to mid-log phase (OD600 ~0.8). All cultures were checked for contamination by inoculating in 5% sheep blood agar plates.

Phenotypic DST methods

Conventional culture-based phenotypic drug susceptibility and MIC testing

All selected clinical isolates had pDST results, which were done routinely as a part of the parental study. Positive cultures were tested for pDST to first-line (rifampicin [1.0 µg/mL], isoniazid [0.2 and 1.0 µg/mL], and ethambutol [7.5 µg/mL]) and second-line (kanamycin [6.0 µg/mL] and ofloxacin [2.0 µg/mL]) anti-mycobacterial agents using 7H11 agar. Extended pDST was done on cultures with second-line resistance at critical concentrations using the agar proportion method on 7H11 for BDQ (0.25 µg/mL), CFZ (0.25 µg/mL), LZD (1.0 µg/mL), and MFX (0.5 and 2.0 µg/mL). All isolates whose genomes had an mmpR5 variant underwent BDQ MIC testing using the agar proportion method on 7H11. Furthermore, isolates with ddn, fgd1, fbiA, fbiB, fbiC, or fbiD variants were tested for DLM MICs using microtiter plates. Isolates were initially cultured in 7H9 liquid medium and adjusted to an optical density of 0.16 at 600 nm. Tenfold serial dilutions were prepared, and 10−2 and 10−4 suspensions were inoculated onto 7H11 plates containing BDQ concentrations of 0.03, 0.06, 0.12, 0.025, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 µg/mL (15).

Drug susceptibility testing using TM4::GeNL reporter mycobacteriophage

We performed DST on 15 Mtb clinical isolates using the TM4::GeNL reporter mycobacteriophage-based assay. All isolates were evaluated for phenotypic resistance to BDQ, PMD, and LZD, and 3 out of 15 isolates had additional DLM phenotypic resistance testing. The TM4::GeNL reporter mycobacteriophage was propagated and purified following the methods described previously (28). TM4::GeNL DST was performed on cultured isolates in 96-well plates for BDQ, PMD, LZD, and DLM, in technical triplicates, following a standard protocol (28). For each experiment, the Mtb H37Rv strain was included as a pan-susceptible control. Drug dilutions were prepared in Middlebrook 7H9 medium supplemented with OADC (10%) but not tyloxapol for each drug, with 50 µL dispensed into each drug treatment well. Middlebrook 7H9 medium with OADC was included as a no-drug control. Mtb cells were washed with 7H9 medium without detergents, and cell concentration was adjusted to 105 cells/50 μL based on optical density (OD600 nm). A volume of 50 µL of these washed cells was added to both drug-containing wells and control wells. After overnight incubation with drugs at 37°C, the TM4::GeNL reporter mycobacteriophage was added to all wells. The following day, luciferase substrate was added to the wells, and the relative luminescence units (RLUs) were measured using a luminescence plate reader (Hidex, Germany). The RLU retention percentage was calculated by comparing the signals from the no-drug control wells with those from the drug-containing wells. A luminescence reduction of ≥95% compared to no-drug control was interpreted as susceptible. Susceptibility, intermediate resistance, and resistance phenotypes were defined as RLU retention of <5%, 5%–10%, and >10%, respectively (28). The RLU percentage cutoff values were defined based on prior optimization and empirical performance of the assay (28). RLU of >100% was possible due to Mtb bacilli density and clumping, producing a baseline signal exceeding the no-drug control. This was treated as equivalent to RLU 100%.

Whole-genome sequencing and analysis

DNA was extracted from Mtb, and the genomic libraries were prepared using NEBNext Ultra II DNA (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 (San Diego, CA, USA). Adapter trimming was performed with Trim Galore v0.3.7. Reads were mapped to the Mtb H37Rv reference genome (NC_000962.3) using BBMap v38.32 with a 98% identity threshold. Duplicates were removed with Picard Tools v2.20, and mean genome coverage was assessed with Qualimap v2.21. Variant calling was conducted with FreeBayes v1.2, requiring ≥4 reads, including ≥1 on each strand, a mapping quality of ≥20, and a base quality of ≥30 (15).

Statistical methods

The two-sample, unpaired, Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess the difference in means between the susceptible and resistant groups. Given the exploratory nature and limited sample size, we did not apply multiple-comparison adjustments and did not treat P values as confirmatory.

RESULTS

The parent PRAXIS study screened 422 patients, of whom 200 DR-TB/HIV patients initiating bedaquiline-containing regimens were enrolled, with 199 available for analysis after exclusion of one ineligible participant (30). From this cohort, serial Mtb isolates were available only for a subset of participants with persistently positive cultures and adequate longitudinal sampling. All selected patient isolates had a pre-treatment isolate and at least one subsequent monthly isolate on treatment, with pDST indicating resistance to BDQ, DLM, PMD, or LZD, or WGS with mutations in resistance-associated variants for these drugs. A total of 15 longitudinal clinical isolates were included in this study. We identified six pre-treatment and nine on-treatment clinical isolates from six patients within the PRAXIS study who had treatment-emergent resistance to BDQ, DLM, PMD, or LZD, or pre-treatment BDQ heteroresistance. Of six patients, two had pre-treatment BDQ heteroresistance demonstrated by WGS, two had acquired BDQ resistance, one had acquired multi-drug (BDQ, DLM, and PMD) resistance, and one had an rrl mutation with an interim association with LZD resistance but was susceptible by conventional routine DST. Table 1 summarizes clinical characteristics for the six participants in this study, including BDQ adherence, treatment regimens, and treatment outcomes.

TABLE 1.

Bedaquiline adherence status, treatment regimens, and outcomes for six patients whose Mtb clinical isolates (n = 15) were tested using the TM4::GeNL DSTc

ID Lineage Time point BDQ adherence
(%)
Treatment regimena Outcome
P0027 4 BL n/ad PZA, FQ, BDQ, CFZ, ETO, LZD, TRZ, PAS Treatment failure
M6 70
P0082 2 BL n/a PZA, FQ, BDQ, CFZ, LZD, TRZ, PAS Death
M5 80
M6 76
P0150 4 BL n/a PZA, FQ, BDQ, CFZ, LZD, TRZ, PAS, IMP/CLN Death
M1 100
M2 100
P0200 2 BL n/a PZA, EMB, FQ, BDQ, CFZ, ETO, LZD, TRZ, PAS Lost to follow-up
M6 92
P3524 2 BL n/a PZA, FQ, BDQ, CFZ, ETO, LZD, TRZ, PAS, DLM Death
M2 100
M6 87
P3532 4 BL n/a INH, PZA, EMB, ETO, FQ, LZD, CFZ, BDQ, TRZ, DLM Cured
M2 n/ab
a

Anti-TB drugs in italics were added during the course of the treatment, while TB drugs in bold were stopped during the treatment duration.

b

P3532 was in the control arm, and therefore, BDQ adherence was not monitored.

c

BDQ, bedaquiline; BL, baseline; CFZ, clofazimine; DLM, delamanid; DST, drug susceptibility testing; ETO, ethionamide; IPM/CLN, imipenem/cilastatin; LZD, linezolid; M1, month 1; M2, month 2; M5, month 5; M6, month 6; PAS, para-aminosalicyclic acid; and TRZ, terizidone.

d

"n/a", not applicable.

Detection of treatment-emergent bedaquiline resistance

We performed TM4::GeNL DST for BDQ on 15 clinical isolates using BDQ 0.125 µg/mL as a concentration that reliably differentiates drug-resistant from susceptible isolates based on previous work (28). This concentration is specific to the reporter mycobacteriophage screening assay and is not interchangeable with the WHO-defined critical concentration (CC) for conventional DST platforms. At 0.125 µg/mL, BDQ-susceptible isolates had luminescence output of 1.5% (95% CI, 0.2–2.8) compared to the no-drug control, while resistant isolates showed a mean luminescence of 83.8% (95% CI, 52.1–115.6) (P = 0.0003) (Fig. 1A and B). Similarly, at 0.25 µg/mL, the relative luminescence was retained, and resistance was demonstrated (Fig. S1). The raw RLUs for each drug are shown in Fig. S2.

Fig 1.

Bar charts and dot plots show RLU percentage for bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid across Mtb isolates. Resistant isolates show markedly elevated RLU retention for bedaquiline and pretomanid, while all isolates remain linezolid susceptible.

RLU percentage retention of Mtb clinical isolates in response to BDQ, PMD, and LZD. (A) Detection of on-treatment emerging resistance at BDQ 0.125 μg/mL for three isolates, P0082 at month 5 (M5), P0200 at month 6 (M6), and P3524 at month 2 (M2), by the reporter mycobacteriophage. Baseline isolates (P0027 BL and P0150 BL) demonstrated increased RLU percentage retention, suggesting the presence of BDQ-resistant subpopulations. (B) BDQ at 0.125 μg/mL differentiated BDQ drug-resistant and susceptible isolates (P = 0.0003). (C) RLU percentage retention of Mtb clinical isolates in response to PMD at 0.5 μg/mL. P5324 demonstrated on-treatment emerging PMD resistance at month 6 (M6). (D) PMD at 0.5 μg/mL differentiated PMD drug-resistant and susceptible isolates (P < 0.0001). (E) RLU percentage retention of Mtb clinical isolates in response to LZD, with all isolates demonstrating LZD susceptible phenotype. Conventional pDST data of each isolate according to the agar proportional method are indicated in parentheses, where (S) and (R) represent susceptible and resistant phenotypes, respectively (A, C, and E). BDQ, bedaquiline; BL, baseline; DST, drug susceptibility testing; LZD, linezolid; M1, month 1; M2, month 2; M5, month 5; M6, month 6; PMD, pretomanid; (S), susceptible; (R), resistant; and RLU, relative luminescence units.

Patient P0082

The baseline sputum culture isolate demonstrated BDQ susceptibility with a mean RLU retention of 0.6%. Subsequent isolates obtained at months 5 and 6 demonstrated a mean RLU retention of 104.0% and 133.7%, respectively, consistent with the emergence of BDQ resistance (Fig. 1A).

WGS data demonstrated the emergence of BDQ resistance-associated variants (RAVs) in the mmpR5 gene (D47fs [53.3%] and C46fs [35.9%]), which correlated with the resistant phenotype identified by the phage DST (Table 2). Additionally, 7H11 agar-based MICs increased from 0.06 μg/mL at baseline (susceptible) to 1.0 μg/mL, a 16-fold MIC increase at months 5 and 6 (resistant).

TABLE 2.

Bedaquiline resistance-associated variants identified by whole-genome sequencing, alongside phenotypic bedaquiline susceptibility results for clinical isolates (n = 13) tested using the TM4::GeNL DSTa

ID Time point TM4::GeNL
Mean RLU%
(0.125 μg/mL)
Culture
(0.25 µg/mL)
BDQ MIC
(μg/mL)
mmpR5 RAV
(%)
WGS mean genome coverage
Emergent bedaquiline resistance
 P0082 BL 0.6 S 0.06 n/ab 106.6
M5 104.0 R 1.00 D47fs (53.3)
C46fs (35.9)
102.7
M6 133.7 R 1.00 D47fs (69.8) C46fs (23.1) 94.0
 P0200 BL 1.8 S 0.06 n/a 124.4
M6 102.3 R 0.50 D47fs (92.3) 191.0
 P3524 BL 1.8 S 0.03 n/a 215.6
M2 100.8 R 1.00 D47fs (12.6)
Q22P (85.1)
197.3
M6 130.5 R 0.50 D47fs (45.2) Q22P (9.8) A57E (10.6)
R72T (9.2) D88fs (12.0) D88A (13.0)
G121R (6.0) L122P (7.4)
165.0
Baseline bedaquiline heteroresistance
 P0027 BL 7.2 S 0.25 R109L (67.9) R156fs (25.8) 82.4
M6 92.7 S 0.25 R109L (23.9) R156fs (57.1) 117.0
 P0150 BL 25.3 S 0.03 E49fs (72.0) 175.5
M1 105.0 S ND E49fs (94.2) 184.4
M2 102.3 S 0.25 E49fs (96.7) 189.5
a

MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; ND, not done; R, resistant; RAV, resistance-associated variant; RLU, relative luminescence unit; S, susceptible. Other abbreviations can be found under Table 1.

b

n/a, not applicable.

Patient P0200

The baseline sputum culture isolate demonstrated BDQ susceptibility, with a mean RLU retention of 1.8%. For the isolate from month 6, the mean RLU retention increased to 37.0%, consistent with phenotypic resistance. These results were concordant with WGS, which demonstrated the emergence of a resistance-associated variant in mmpR5 (Asp47fs [92.3%]). On 7H11 agar, MICs increased from 0.06 (susceptible) to 0.5 µg/mL, an eightfold MIC increase (resistant) in the corresponding period (Fig. 1A; Table 2).

Patient P3524

The baseline sputum culture isolate demonstrated BDQ susceptibility, with a mean RLU retention of 1.8%. The isolates obtained at months 2 and 6 both exhibited a mean RLU retention of ≥100% (Fig. 1A; Table 2). Consistent with RLUs, WGS revealed the emergence of BDQ RAVs in mmpR5 at month 2 (D47fs [12.6%] and Q22P [85.1%]) and the emergence of further mutations in mmpR5 by month 6 (A57E [10.6%], R72T [9.2%], D88fs [12.0%], D88A [13.0%], G121R [6.0%], and L122P [7.4%]) (Table 2). On 7H11 agar, MICs increased from 0.03 μg/mL (susceptible) at baseline to 1.0 μg/mL (resistant) at month 2.

Identifying bedaquiline heteroresistant populations

We identified two patients who had baseline susceptibility to BDQ based on the WHO-defined CC in the 7H11 agar-based method (0.25 μg/mL). For these Mtb isolates, WGS identified subpopulations of BDQ RAVs in the mmpR5. We tested the baseline and available subsequent isolates for drug resistance using the TM4::GeNL reporter mycobacteriophage assay.

Patients P0027 and P015

Clinical isolates with baseline mmpR5 variants but BDQ susceptibility by pDST were selected for further testing with the TM4::GeNL assay. We observed RLU percentage retentions of 7.2% and 25.3% at 0.125 μg/mL in the baseline isolates from patients P0027 and P0150, respectively (Fig. 1A; Table 2), suggesting the presence of BDQ-resistant sub-populations. WGS showed mmpR5 variants (Arg109Leu and Arg156fs) for P0027 BL and Glu49fs for P0150 BL (Table 2). We observed increased BDQ resistance in P0150, where luminescence output increased at 0.125 μg/mL from 25.3% at baseline to >100% at months 1 and 2, with an eightfold increase in conventional phenotypic MIC (7H11 agar) from 0.03 to 0.25 (Table 2).

Detection of emergent delamanid and pretomanid cross-resistance in patient P3524

Based on previous work, which established 0.5 µg/mL PMD as a concentration that reliably differentiates drug-resistant and susceptible isolates (28), the baseline sputum culture isolate demonstrated PMD susceptibility, with a mean RLU retention of 0.1% at 0.5 µg/mL. At month 6, treatment-emergent PMD resistance was detected, with the isolate demonstrating a mean RLU retention of 52.5% (Fig. 1C and D).

We tested DLM in twofold increasing concentrations between 0.03 and 0.25 μg/mL for all three isolates from patient P3524. This was the only patient who exhibited emerging resistance to PMD. Since cross-resistance between the nitroimidazole class of drugs is common due to the nature of resistance mutations, our objective was to utilize this specific case to demonstrate the reporter mycobacteriophage’s efficiency in detecting cross-resistance between PMD and DLM. At 0.03 and 0.06 μg/mL, a positive control strain Mtb H37Rv, P3524 BL, and P3524 M2 maintained a mean RLU of <5%, while P3524 M6 retained a mean RLU of 44.2% and 40.9% at respective concentrations (Fig. S3; Table 3). The RLU retention for P3524 M6 was maintained throughout tested concentrations, with the highest concentration (0.25 μg/mL) demonstrating a mean RLU of 33.8%. WHO recommends a CC of 0.06 g/mL for DLM in mycobacteria growth inhibition tubes (MGIT), and the same CC can be used to define resistance in the reporter mycobacteriophage assay.

TABLE 3.

Delamanid/pretomanid resistance-associated variants obtained from whole-genome sequencing, conventional phenotypic drug susceptibility testing, and DLM minimum inhibitory concentrations for clinical isolates from patient P3524 tested using the TM4::GeNL DST (n = 3)a

ID (lineage) Time point TM4::GeNL
Mean RLU%
(0.06 μg/mL)
Culture
(0.06 µg/mL)
DLM MIC
(μg/mL)
fbiC RAV
(%)
P3524 (L2) BL 0.6 NDb 0.015 n/ac
M2 0.4 ND ND n/a
M6 40.9 R >0.5 A487fs (25.0)
S545stop (12.0)
a

Abbreviations can be found under Tables 1 and 2.

b

ND, not determined.

c

n/a, not applicable.

WGS confirmed the emergence of DLM/PMD RAVs in the fbiC gene (A487fs, 25.0%; S534stop, 12.0%), correlating with the resistance phenotype identified by the reporter mycobacteriophage DST assay (Table 3). There was an increase in DLM phenotypic MICs from 0.015 μg/mL (susceptible) at baseline to >0.5 µg/mL, a >33-fold MIC increase (resistant) at month 6.

Detection of emergent linezolid resistance in patient P3532

Similar to the WHO-recommended CC of 1.0 μg/mL LZD, previous work established 1.0 µg/mL LZD as a concentration that reliably differentiates drug-resistant and susceptible isolates using TM4::GeNL reporter mycobacteriophage (28). The baseline sputum culture isolate demonstrated LZD susceptibility, with a mean RLU retention of 3.2% (susceptible) at 1.0 μg/mL. At month 2, the isolate demonstrated a mean RLU retention of 0.8% (susceptible) (Fig. 1E).

WGS demonstrated that the isolate obtained at month 2 had a mutation in the rrl gene (n.2814G > T, 53.8%). There was no correlation between the genotype observed (suggesting resistance) and phenotype obtained (susceptible) from routine DST and TM4::GeNL mycobacteriophage assay. The MICs we performed in MGIT for both isolates confirmed the susceptibility by showing LZD MIC of ≤0.25 µg/mL (Table 4).

TABLE 4.

Linezolid resistance-associated variant obtained from whole-genome sequencing, conventional phenotypic drug susceptibility testing, and minimum inhibitory concentrations for isolates from patient P3532 tested using the TM4::GeNL DST (n = 2)a

ID (lineage) Sample TM4::GeNL
Mean RLU%
(1.0 μg/mL)
Culture
(1.0 µg/mL)
LZD MIC
(μg/mL)
rrl RAV
(%)
P3532 (L4) BL 3.2 S ≤0.25 None
M2 0.8 ND ≤0.25 n.2814G > T (53.8%)
a

Abbreviations can be found under Tables 1 and 2.

DISCUSSION

In our study, TM4::GeNL reporter mycobacteriophage enabled rapid phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and early detection of treatment-emergent resistance to novel anti-TB drugs, with performance comparable to conventional pDST. The assay identified emergent resistance to BDQ and PMD, key components of modern DR-TB regimens, and detected baseline BDQ resistance missed by conventional testing. Longitudinal increases in reporter signal were concordant with WGS evidence of selection and fixation of mmpR5 variants, supporting the ability of the TM4::GeNL assay to track resistance evolution in real time.

The resistance-associated mmpR5 variants identified in this study (Asp47fs, Cys46fs, Gln22Pro, and Gly121Arg) have previously been linked to BDQ resistance (15, 31). Frameshift and premature stop codon mutations in fbiC, also observed here, are known to confer cross-resistance to PMD and DLM (32). Consistent with this, emergent PMD resistance was detected at month 6 in a patient who initiated DLM at month 1. Although loss-of-function mutations across the nitroimidazole activation pathway (ddn, fgd1, and fbiA-D) are widely associated with PMD-DLM cross-resistance, exceptions have been reported (23, 33).

One isolate harbored an rrl n.2814G > T variant with an interim WHO association with LZD resistance (31); however, both the reporter mycobacteriophage assay and MGIT MIC testing demonstrated a susceptible phenotype. Similar genotype-phenotype discordance has been reported previously, where the isolate with an rrl m.2814G > T variant had an MIC of <1.0 µg/mL in MGIT (34). This may reflect the requirement for high allelic frequency or additional contextual factors to meaningfully elevate MICs. Together, these findings highlight challenges in interpreting resistance for drugs with incompletely characterized resistance mechanisms and underscore the need for additional evidence to link specific genotypes to phenotypic resistance.

Bedaquiline heteroresistance due to minor mmpR5 subpopulations (Arg109Leu and Arg156fs) was not detected by conventional pDST but was identified by WGS and the reporter mycobacteriophage assay, which showed elevated luminescence at the BDQ CC (0.125 µg/mL) in two patients with baseline mmpR5 variants. Importantly, these variants (Arg156fs and Glu49fs) have been associated with BDQ resistance according to the WHO catalog of mutations (31). Although the MICs remained within the wild-type range, overall susceptibility can mask resistant Mtb subpopulations (15). Reduced signal retention observed in heteroresistant isolates likely reflects the coexistence of susceptible and resistant subpopulations, resulting in overlap of RLU% values and limited discrimination from susceptible isolates. This highlights the utility of the reporter phage assay in detecting subtle phenotypic differences, which may be missed by conventional molecular and phenotypic methods. It is also important to select an optimal discriminatory concentration and provide additional supporting results from traditional methods to validate the reporter phage DST findings. We believe that future studies, including a larger number of heteroresistant isolates, will enable refining signal retention cutoffs and improve the accuracy of classification in such cases.

Consistent with prior reports linking mmpR5 mutations to poor outcomes despite phenotypic susceptibility (16, 19, 35), all five patients in this study with baseline or emergent mmpR5 variants experienced unfavorable outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of sensitive, rapid DST methods capable of detecting resistant subpopulations and support the reporter mycobacteriophage as a screening tool for emerging resistance to BDQ and other key drugs in modern DR-TB regimens.

The global rollout of BPaL/BPaLM regimens has proceeded despite limited data on resistance to PMD and DLM, largely due to the absence of rapid molecular diagnostics. Current frontline assays detect only known resistance mutations, rendering them inadequate for newer anti-TB drugs, while pDST requires up to 6 weeks for interpretable results. As a result, treatment is often initiated without susceptibility data, risking reduced regimen potency in patients with pre-existing resistance. Against this backdrop, our study provides interim evidence that a reporter mycobacteriophage assay can determine PMD and DLM susceptibility within 48 h of culture positivity, representing a promising rapid alternative that warrants validation in larger cohorts.

Extending previous findings (28–31), we demonstrate treatment-emergent resistance to novel anti-TB drugs using longitudinal clinical isolates, including heteroresistance that is difficult to detect with existing molecular or conventional DST methods. Longitudinal analyses of clinical isolates remain limited in the literature, largely due to challenges in isolate availability. By analyzing serial isolates from patients with persistently positive Mtb cultures, we show that reporter mycobacteriophage assays can rapidly identify emerging resistance, particularly for newer anti-TB drugs for which resistance detection tools are limited.

Study strengths include comprehensive characterization of longitudinal isolates using conventional pDST, TM4::GeNL DST, and WGS, with concordant discrimination of drug-susceptible and drug-resistant phenotypes across methods. This study also has several limitations: the sample size was small, and no independent validation cohort was included. Serial clinical isolates from patients with emerging resistance are uncommon, and isolates were, therefore, selected for proof-of-concept evaluation. Although longitudinal isolates were extensively characterized using pDST, TM4::GeNL DST, and WGS, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Prospective evaluation in larger, independent cohorts representing diverse DR-TB phenotypes will be necessary to establish diagnostic accuracy and generalizability. Given the slow doubling time of Mtb (16–24 h) and the difficulty in achieving complete metabolic inhibition within 48 h, we adopted normalization using mean RLU% retention to improve discrimination between susceptible and resistant isolates. This approach reduces technical variability and captures biologically relevant differences in metabolic activity.

This study supports TM4::GeNL DST as a practical alternative to conventional culture-based pDST, particularly in settings where timely resistance detection is critical. The assay provides results within 48 h of culture positivity and enables multiplexed assessment of susceptibility to drugs that form the backbone of contemporary all-oral RR/MDR-TB treatment regimens. This novel assay holds significant promise for low- and middle-income countries, requiring only a luminescence plate reader and minimal expertise for interpretation. By detecting emerging resistance to BDQ and PMD/DLM and BDQ heteroresistance in longitudinal isolates, this approach may facilitate earlier recognition of declining regimen potency and more timely treatment adjustment. Although assay performance depends on sufficient bacterial viability and active metabolism to support phage infection and subsequent luminescence generation via active transcription and translation of the luciferase reporter cassette and appropriate quality controls, these requirements are manageable within routine laboratory workflows. Adequate mycobacterial metabolic activity, maintained by incubation at 37°C, is essential for reliable reporter phage assay performance, as luminescence depends on viable bacteria capable of supporting phage infection and reporter expression. The inclusion of no-drug and quality-control (pan-susceptible) controls enables normalization of signal retention and ensures assay robustness by monitoring bacterial viability and drug potency. Further development to enable direct testing of clinical specimens would enhance clinical applicability. Overall, reporter mycobacteriophage-based DST has the potential to improve resistance detection and treatment outcomes for people with DR-TB.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge the PRAXIS study participants. We also thank Dr. Adrie J. C. Steyn and the Microbiology Laboratory staff at the African Health Research Institute (AHRI) for their assistance and support in performing the experiments, including the TM4::GeNL mycobacteriophage DST assays.

This study was supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (R21AI168940, R01AI124413, R01AI114900, and R37AI26170), the European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) Fellowship (TMA2018SF-2467), and the National Research Foundation Centre of Excellence (MND210624615487).

Contributor Information

Michelle H. Larsen, Email: michelle.larsen@einsteinmed.edu.

Sophia B. Georghiou, End TB Dx Consulting LLC, San Diego, California, USA

ETHICS APPROVAL

This substudy was approved by the University of KwaZulu-Natal Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (BREC/00005740/2024).

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03900-25.

Supplemental figures. spectrum.03900-25-s0001.docx.

Fig. S1 to S3.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03900-25.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Salari N, Kanjoori AH, Hosseinian-Far A, Hasheminezhad R, Mansouri K, Mohammadi M. 2023. Global prevalence of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Dis Poverty 12:57. doi: 10.1186/s40249-023-01107-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. World Health Organization . 2024. Global tuberculosis report 2024. https://wwwwhoint/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2024.
  • 3. Seung KJ, Keshavjee S, Rich ML. 2015. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 5:a017863. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. World Health Organization . 2019. WHO consolidated guidelines on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. World Health Organization . 2013. The use of bedaquiline in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis :: interim policy guidance. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. World Health Organization . 2016. WHO treatment guidelines for drug-re- sistant tuberculosis.
  • 7. D’Ambrosio L, Centis R, Sotgiu G, Pontali E, Spanevello A, Migliori GB. 2015. New anti-tuberculosis drugs and regimens: 2015 update. ERJ Open Res 1:00010-2015. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00010-2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. World Health Organization . 2018. Key changes to treatment of multi- drug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. Rapid communication. Geneva, Switzerland. WHO. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. World Health Organization . 2022. Key changes to the treatment of drug- resistant tuberculosis. Rapid communication. Geneva, Switzerland. WHO. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Dookie N, Ngema SL, Perumal R, Naicker N, Padayatchi N, Naidoo K. 2022. The changing paradigm of drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment: successes, pitfalls, and future perspectives. Clin Microbiol Rev 35:e0018019. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00180-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Conradie F, Diacon AH, Ngubane N, Howell P, Everitt D, Crook AM, Mendel CM, Egizi E, Moreira J, Timm J, McHugh TD, Wills GH, Bateson A, Hunt R, Van Niekerk C, Li M, Olugbosi M, Spigelman M, Nix-TB Trial Team . 2020. Treatment of highly drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 382:893–902. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Haley CA, Schechter MC, Ashkin D, Peloquin CA, Peter Cegielski J, Andrino BB, Burgos M, Caloia LA, Chen L, Colon-Semidey A, et al. 2023. Implementation of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid in the United States: experience using a novel all-oral treatment regimen for treatment of rifampin-resistant or rifampin-intolerant tuberculosis disease. Clin Infect Dis 77:1053–1062. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Omar SV, Ismail F, Ndjeka N, Kaniga K, Ismail NA. 2022. Bedaquiline-resistant tuberculosis associated with Rv0678 mutations. N Engl J Med 386:93–94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2103049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bloemberg GV, Keller PM, Stucki D, Trauner A, Borrell S, Latshang T, Coscolla M, Rothe T, Hömke R, Ritter C, Feldmann J, Schulthess B, Gagneux S, Böttger EC. 2015. Acquired resistance to bedaquiline and delamanid in therapy for tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 373:1986–1988. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1505196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Nimmo C, Millard J, van Dorp L, Brien K, Moodley S, Wolf A, Grant AD, Padayatchi N, Pym AS, Balloux F, O’Donnell M. 2020. Population-level emergence of bedaquiline and clofazimine resistance-associated variants among patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in southern Africa: a phenotypic and phylogenetic analysis. Lancet Microbe 1:e165–e174. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30031-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Perumal R, Khan A, Naidoo K, Ngema SL, Nandlal L, Padayatchi N, Dookie N. 2023. Mycobacterium tuberculosis intra-host evolution among drug-resistant tuberculosis patients failing treatment. Infect Drug Resist 16:2849–2859. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S408976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Wollenberg KR, Desjardins CA, Zalutskaya A, Slodovnikova V, Oler AJ, Quiñones M, Abeel T, Chapman SB, Tartakovsky M, Gabrielian A, Hoffner S, Skrahin A, Birren BW, Rosenthal A, Skrahina A, Earl AM. 2017. Whole-genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis provides insight into the evolution and genetic composition of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Belarus. J Clin Microbiol 55:457–469. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02116-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Chen X, He G, Lin S, Wang S, Sun F, Chen J, Zhang W. 2020. Analysis of serial multidrug-resistant tuberculosis strains causing treatment failure and within-host evolution by whole-genome sequencing. mSphere 5:e00884-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00884-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Trauner A, Liu Q, Via LE, Liu X, Ruan X, Liang L, Shi H, Chen Y, Wang Z, Liang R, Zhang W, Wei W, Gao J, Sun G, Brites D, England K, Zhang G, Gagneux S, Barry CE 3rd, Gao Q. 2017. The within-host population dynamics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis vary with treatment efficacy. Genome Biol 18:71. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1196-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ambaye GY, Tsegaye GW. 2021. Factors associated with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis among TB patients in selected treatment centers of Amhara region: a case-control study. Ethiop J Health Sci 31:25–34. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i1.4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Pradipta IS, Forsman LD, Bruchfeld J, Hak E, Alffenaar JW. 2018. Risk factors of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect 77:469–478. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Nandlal L, Perumal R, Naidoo K. 2022. Rapid molecular assays for the diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Infect Drug Resist 15:4971–4984. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S381643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kadura S, King N, Nakhoul M, Zhu H, Theron G, Köser CU, Farhat M. 2020. Systematic review of mutations associated with resistance to the new and repurposed Mycobacterium tuberculosis drugs bedaquiline, clofazimine, linezolid, delamanid and pretomanid. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:2031–2043. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Jain P, Hartman TE, Eisenberg N, O’Donnell MR, Kriakov J, Govender K, Makume M, Thaler DS, Hatfull GF, Sturm AW, Larsen MH, Moodley P, Jacobs WR Jr. 2012. ϕ2GFP10, a high-intensity fluorophage, enables detection and rapid drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum samples. J Clin Microbiol 50:1362–1369. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06192-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. O’Donnell MR, Pym A, Jain P, Munsamy V, Wolf A, Karim F, Jacobs WR Jr, Larsen MH. 2015. A novel reporter phage to detect tuberculosis and rifampin resistance in a high-HIV-burden population. J Clin Microbiol 53:2188–2194. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03530-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Yu X, Gu Y, Jiang G, Ma Y, Zhao L, Sun Z, Jain P, O’Donnell M, Larsen M, Jacobs WR Jr, Huang H. 2016. Evaluation of a high-intensity green fluorescent protein fluorophage method for drug- resistance diagnosis in tuberculosis for isoniazid, rifampin, and streptomycin. Front Microbiol 7:922. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Jain P, Garing S, Verma D, Saranathan R, Clute-Reinig N, Gadwa J, Peterson C, Hermansky G, Astashkina Fernandez A, Asare E, Weisbrod TR, Spencer E, Mulholland CV, Berney M, Bell D, Nichols KP, Le Ny A-L, Ordway D, Jacobs WR Jr, Somoskovi A, Minch KJ. 2020. Nanoluciferase reporter mycobacteriophage for sensitive and rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility. J Bacteriol 202:e00411-20. doi: 10.1128/JB.00411-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Rajagopalan S, Rourke AK, Asare E, Kohlerschmidt DJ, Das L, Ngema SL, Mulholland CV, Vilchèze C, Mahalingam V, Moodley S, Truebody B, Mackenzie J, Steyn AJC, Perumal R, Berney M, Larsen MH, O’Donnell MR, Escuyer VE, Jacobs WR Jr. 2025. Engineered mycobacteriophage TM4::GeNL rapidly determines bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, rifampicin, and clofazimine sensitivity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates. J Infect Dis 231:859–870. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Naidoo K, Perumal R, Ngema SL, Shunmugam L, Somboro AM. 2023. Rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis-opportunities and challenges. Pathogens 13:27. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13010027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. O’Donnell MR, Padayatchi N, Wolf A, Zelnick J, Daftary A, Orrell C, Nimmo C, Baldwin M, Boodhram R, Maharaj B, Amico KR, Naidoo K, Friedland G. 2022. Bedaquiline adherence measured by electronic dose monitoring predicts clinical outcomes in the treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 90:325–332. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. World Health Organization . 2023. Catalogue of mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and their association with drug resistance. 2nd ed [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Nguyen TVA, Anthony RM, Cao TTH, Bañuls A-L, Nguyen VAT, Vu DH, Nguyen NV, Alffenaar J-W. 2020. Delamanid resistance: update and clinical management. Clin Infect Dis 71:3252–3259. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Lee BM, Harold LK, Almeida DV, Afriat-Jurnou L, Aung HL, Forde BM, Hards K, Pidot SJ, Ahmed FH, Mohamed AE, Taylor MC, West NP, Stinear TP, Greening C, Beatson SA, Nuermberger EL, Cook GM, Jackson CJ. 2020. Predicting nitroimidazole antibiotic resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with protein engineering. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008287. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Banu S, Pholwat S, Foongladda S, Chinli R, Boonlert D, Ferdous SS, Rahman SMM, Rahman A, Ahmed S, Houpt ER. 2017. Performance of TaqMan array card to detect TB drug resistance on direct specimens. PLoS One 12:e0177167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Polsfuss S, Hofmann-Thiel S, Merker M, Krieger D, Niemann S, Rüssmann H, Schönfeld N, Hoffmann H, Kranzer K. 2019. Emergence of low-level delamanid and bedaquiline resistance during extremely drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment. Clin Infect Dis 69:1229–1231. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental figures. spectrum.03900-25-s0001.docx.

Fig. S1 to S3.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03900-25.SuF1

Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES