Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2026 Jun 22;14(8):e04124-25. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04124-25

The two-component regulator CvsR has a small core regulon in planta and modulates Pseudomonas syringae global gene expression with some overlap to the pattern-triggered immunity stimulon response

Hsiao-Chun Chen 1, Carter J Newton 1, Li Yang 1,2, Brian H Kvitko 1,2,✉
Editor: Kevin Loren Hockett3
PMCID: PMC13436366  PMID: 42390087

ABSTRACT

Pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) provides broad-spectrum protection in plants by activating defense responses upon perception of conserved microbial signatures such as bacterial flagellin. In vitro transcriptome profiling revealed that the Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 two-component regulator CvsR mirrors some of the broader regulatory patterns observed under the exposure to PTI in planta. Our analyses indicated that during infection in planta, CvsR primarily governs a small core regulon centered on carbonic anhydrase and its associated transporter. Comparative RNA-seq analyses between the ΔcvsR and wild-type strain further confirm this narrow regulatory scope. Moreover, the majority of bacterial transcriptional shifts appear to reflect indirect consequences of response to the host immune environment rather than direct CvsR-dependent regulation, including responses associated with sulfate starvation. Together, these findings suggest that PTI-driven bacterial transcriptional reprogramming is shaped predominantly by host immune status, with CvsR exerting modest, targeted control restricted to a limited set of genes.

IMPORTANCE

Pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) provides broad-spectrum disease resistance in plants by recognizing conserved microbial patterns such as bacterial flagellin. Activation of PTI alters the environment that pathogens encounter during infection, yet how bacteria respond to these immune-imposed conditions at the molecular level remains poorly understood. In this study, we profile the bacterial transcriptome directly in planta during infection with RNA-seq, providing a detailed view of pathogen responses under immune pressure. We focus on the previously identified two-component regulator CvsR and show that, despite widespread transcriptional changes induced by PTI, CvsR directly controls only a small core set of genes in planta. Instead, most bacterial transcriptional shifts reflect indirect responses to the immune-modified host environment. By capturing pathogen gene expression during infection, this work clarifies how plant immunity constrains bacterial physiology and provides insight that can inform sustainable strategies for crop protection.

KEYWORDS: pattern-triggered immunity (PTI), Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, two-component system, in planta transcriptome

INTRODUCTION

Plants rely on a tiered innate immune system network to fend off pathogen attacks. Pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) represent two functionally interdependent tiers of the plant immune systems (1, 2). PTI is activated when cell-surface pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) directly bind to the conserved microbial molecules, such as peptide epitopes of bacterial flagellin, elongation factor Tu, or cold shock proteins (3–6). Pathogens secrete specialized effector proteins that can suppress PTI or interfere with plant physiological responses. Resistant hosts harbor intracellular nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich-repeat receptors (NLRs) to recognize effectors directly or indirectly to trigger ETI. Core PTI signaling elements contribute to effective ETI, and ETI in turn enhances and sustains expression of PTI-associated genes (7). PRRs are typically ligand specific and form complexes with their co-receptors and trigger multiple signaling pathways including the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade, calcium-dependent protein kinases pathways, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (2). Pre-activation of PTI by flg22 peptide 12 to 24 h prior to bacterial infiltration results in potent immune outcomes by limiting bacterial infections, effector delivery, and proliferation (8, 9). Upon activation of PTI, the apoplast undergoes rapid immune remodeling, including the accumulation of antimicrobial proteins and secondary metabolites (10–14). Additionally, PTI induces apoplast alkalization and alters ionic composition, further altering the physicochemical environment (15–17). These immune-driven changes are modeled to create a hostile microenvironment, requiring pathogens to deploy adaptive mechanisms for survival.

The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pto DC3000) is one of the most extensively studied model pathogens in plant–microbe interactions, largely due to its ability to infect the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (18). Virulence determinants of Pto DC3000, including the type III secretion system (T3SS), its repertoire of 36 effector proteins, and the phytotoxin coronatine (19, 20), have been characterized in detail, establishing this strain as an ideal target for studying bacterial responses to PTI (21, 22). RNA-seq, in particular, has overcome prior limitations by enabling deep, unbiased detection of both abundant and rare transcripts (23–25).

While nutrient sequestration has been proposed as a component of PTI, direct evidence linking competition for these elements to bacterial growth inhibition remains limited. These studies suggest that bacterial survival during immune activation may depend on the ability to sense and respond to host-induced environmental shifts, triggering adaptive transcriptional programs. Two-component systems (TCSs) are widespread in Gram-negative bacteria, functioning as core signaling modules that coordinate responses to environmental stimuli. A canonical TCS includes a membrane-bound histidine kinase (HK) and a cytoplasmic response regulator (RR) that modulates gene expression upon phosphorylation. In P. syringae, the genomes encode over 60 TCS signaling modules (26). TCSs like PhoPQ, GacSA, RhpRS, CorRS, and CbrAB contribute to virulence and fitness in planta (27–31). The CvsRS system has been linked to transcriptional responses also seen in response to pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) (29, 32). Mutation of cvsR in Pto DC3000 shows reduced colonization and virulence in tomato and A. thaliana, along with downregulation of type III secretion system genes, altered motility gene expression, and increased expression of organosulfur uptake genes (29). These changes mirror transcriptional trends in PTI-exposed conditions of Pto DC3000 (32). To better understand the contribution of CvsR to bacterial gene regulation during host immune activation, we analyzed the CvsR regulon with and without exposure to PTI. In this study, we perform RNA-seq on wild-type Pto DC3000 and ΔcvsR under PTI-pre-activated and naïve apoplast conditions in A. thaliana to dissect the regulatory role of CvsR in bacterial response to PTI.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Wild-type and cvsR mutant strains showed similar transcriptome profiles in planta

Early-infection transcriptome profiling is difficult, as pathogen RNA represents only a minor proportion of the total RNA extracted from host tissues. However, recent advances in tissue isolation methods, library preparation strategies, and sequencing technologies have improved the ability to capture high-quality bacterial transcripts from infected plant tissues (12, 32, 33). Physical separation of bacterial cells prior to RNA extraction produced a consistently high proportion of reads mapping to the bacterial genome (32, 34). To assess how CvsR modulates Pto DC3000 transcription during PTI, we performed in planta RNA-seq on bacteria isolated from Arabidopsis leaves pretreated with flg22 or mock solution. Bacterial cells were enriched from infected tissues, and rRNA depletion of both plant and bacterial RNA substantially improved recovery of bacterial transcripts, yielding high bacterial read-mapping rates across libraries. This approach, adapted from previous protocols from Lovelace et al. (32), enabled robust detection of bacterial gene expression early during infection, including under PTI-activated conditions. Using this approach, 40%–97% of non-rRNA reads mapped to the Pto DC3000 genome across in planta libraries. On average, mock (naïve) “M” samples showed the higher mapping rate (93.5%) than flg22-pretreated PTI “F” samples (54%), while in vitro (pellet) “P” samples yielded 98.3% mapping (Fig. 1A; Table S1). Mapping rates to both bacterial and plant genomes were consistent across biological replicates. The reduced bacterial transcript mapping rate in PTI tissue relative to naïve tissue aligns with observations from Lovelace et al. (32). The decrease in bacterial recovery at 5 hpi in PTI conditions compared with naïve tissue likely explains this effect (26) and in our result (Fig. S1). Compared with the previous study in (32), the removal of plant rRNA was implemented and resulted in substantially higher bacterial mRNA portioned in the total detected transcripts. This modification represents the highest mapping efficiency reported to date for in planta bacterial transcriptomic studies (32–34) and holds potential promise for the transcriptome or genomic study of difficult patho-systems, such as Xylella spp., Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas), or Phytoplasma (35, 36). However, physical separation of bacterial cells requires the use of structurally intact leaf tissue, as the apoplastic extraction procedure is particularly sensitive to mechanical disruption, especially during vacuum infiltration with the RNA-stabilizing buffer containing high salt concentrations. Consequently, this method may not be suitable for experimental contexts involving extensive tissue damage, such as during effector-triggered immunity (ETI) or disease progression at the late infection stage. Together, these results demonstrate that optimized host rRNA depletion and careful bacterial enrichment enable reliable transcriptomic profiling of bacterial populations within plant tissues, even under immunity-activated states.

Fig 1.

Stacked bar chart and PCA scatter plot showing Pto DC3000 transcriptome. KB samples show highest bacterial reads. PCA separates mock, flg22, and KB conditions along PC1 at 61% variance, with WT and ΔcvsR clustering together.

Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pto DC3000) transcriptome profile in naïve and pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) condition of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves (A) The proportions of sequencing reads mapped to Pto DC3000 genome, the A. thaliana genome, and unmapped reads are shown for all samples. Total RNA was extracted from leaves pretreated to induce PTI or from untreated naïve leaves, followed by inoculation with either the wild-type (WT) or δcvsr mutant strain of Pto DC3000 at 5 h post inoculation (hpi) (n = 3). Additional RNA was isolated from bacterial starting inocula from King’s B medium for both WT and δcvsr strains (n = 3). (B) Pto DC3000 transcriptome profile in A. thaliana at 5 h post inoculation. Principal components analysis (PCA) of the gene-expression profile, measured in log-transformed bacterial gene counts (n = 3). Bacterial gene counts from sequenced total RNA samples inoculated pattern-triggered immunity-induced A. thaliana leaves (F: flg22) and inoculated naïve A. thaliana leaves (M:mock); in vitro bacterial culture from King’s B media (P).

Principal component analysis (PCA) of normalized bacterial gene counts by DESeq2 analysis revealed that in vitro “P” samples for both wild-type and ΔcvsR grown in KB medium were clearly distinct from in planta transcriptomes, suggesting a marked shift in bacterial gene expression between rich medium and the host environment (Fig. 1B). Within the in planta samples, host immune status was the primary driver of transcriptional divergence: flg22-pretreated “F” samples clustered separately from mock (naïve) “M” samples, reflecting strong transcriptional reprogramming of bacteria in response to PTI. In contrast, wild-type and cvsR mutant samples did not exhibit clear separation along the principal components and similar pattern was observed by sample distance clustering (Fig. 1B; Fig. S2), suggesting that host immunity exerts a stronger effect on bacterial transcriptional variation than the genetic factor of cvsR under these conditions. These global patterns (such as induction of motility genes) were consistent with previous in planta transcriptome studies from multiple laboratories, despite minor differences in duration of flg22 pre-treatment and bacterial inoculation (12, 32, 34).

The lack of pronounced transcriptomic shifts in the cvsR mutant, even under in vitro conditions, contrasts with the regulatory model proposed by Fishman et al. (29). However, variations in experimental conditions between the two studies may contribute to the difference. In the prior study, cvsR expression was induced by supplementation of nutrient broth with 5 mM calcium, whereas our analysis was performed under standard KB medium and in planta conditions. These differences in medium composition, particularly the lack of supplemental calcium, may account for the observed differences. Notably, cvsR expression was comparable between in planta conditions and cultures grown in King’s B (KB) medium (Fig. S2). In the leaf apoplast, cvsR mutation did not markedly alter the overall bacterial transcriptome despites the immune states of plant (Fig. 2A). The expression level of cvsR itself remained insignificant between mock and PTI tissue (Fig. S3). This observation supports that the host immune state remains the major determinant of bacterial gene expression during early stages of infection.

Fig 2.

Volcano plots show more DEGs in WF/WM and CF/CM than CM/WM and CF/WF. Venn diagrams highlight shared DEGs and gene clusters cvsS, cvsR, cynT. Overlap of 41 genes links flg22 and calcium-inducing conditions.

Comparison of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 transcriptomes from mock (M) or flg22 (F) treatments in wild-type (W) or ΔcvsR (C) strains. (A) Volcano plots display statistical significance (–log10 adjusted P value) versus expression fold change (log2-transformed read counts). Red and blue points indicate significantly up- and downregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Top DEGs were highlighted. (B) Venn diagram showing comparisons of up- (red) and downregulated (blue) DEGs between ΔcvsR and wild-type strains under both mock and flg22 treatments (C) Direct regulon of CVSR of two gene clusters. (D) The overlap between transcriptomic DEGs from Lovelace et al. (32) (blue; WF/WM, flg22 vs mock at five Hpi) and those from Fishman et al. (29) (yellow; CP/WP, ΔcvsR vs wild-type under calcium-inducing in vitro conditions)

Due to the large quantity of samples collected for RNA isolation, completion of the pre-treatment and bacterial inoculation procedures required approximately 3–4 h. Accordingly, flg22 and mock pre-treatments were initiated 1 day prior to bacterial inoculation, resulting in an effective pre-treatment window ranging from 16 to 20 h depending on sampling order. Bacterial inoculation was subsequently performed in the same sequential order for each individual plant. To evaluate whether variation in pre-treatment duration influenced bacterial infection outcomes or affected virulence comparisons between wild-type and mutant strains, bacterial populations were assessed from leaves receiving the earliest (16 h) and latest (20 h) pre-treatment intervals. Although bacterial loads were slightly higher at 5 hpi in leaves receiving the 16-h flg22 pre-treatment, no significant difference was observed at 24 hpi (Fig. S1A). Both 16 h and 20 h flg22 pre-treatments conferred protection against bacterial infection, as leaves remained intact at 24 hpi compared with the symptomatic leaves observed in mock-treated controls (WT-mock). Similarly, both 16- and 20-h flg22 pre-treated leaves remained intact at 72 hpi, whereas severe tissue wilting was observed in mock-treated leaves (Fig. S1C). No significant differences in bacterial populations were detected between wild-type and ΔcvsR strains at either 5 or 24 hpi under mock- or flg22-pre-treated conditions (Fig. S1B). Likewise, both strains caused similar disease symptoms in mock-treated leaves at 24 and 72 hpi (Fig. S1C). Although precise control of pre-treatment duration was challenging due to the scale of sample collection, these results indicate that variation in pre-treatment timing within the tested 16–20 h window did not measurably affect bacterial populations at 24 hpi or disease symptom development relative to mock treatment. Previous work by Fishman et al. (29) reported that deletion of cvsR reduced disease symptoms at 4 dpi when using a lower inoculum dose (3 × 104 CFU/mL). However, in our study, both strains exhibited similar phenotypes when inoculated at the substantially higher bacterial concentration (1 × 109 CFU/mL) required for RNA isolation.

The cvsR mutant has a reduced PTI stimulon response

To assess the role of CvsR in the bacterial PTI stimulon, we compared transcriptomic changes between wild-type “W” and ΔcvsR “C” strains under mock “M,” flg22-pretreated “F,” and KB medium “P” conditions. In wild-type Pto DC3000, the PTI stimulon (WF vs WM) triggered extensive transcriptional reprogramming, with 546 differentially expressed genes (DEGs; |log2FC| > 1, padj < 0.05), including 369 upregulated and 177 downregulated genes (Fig. 2A; Table S2.1). By contrast, the ΔcvsR mutant (CF vs CM) exhibited an attenuated PTI stimulon response, with only 277 DEGs (230 upregulated, 47 downregulated) (Fig. 2A; Table S2.2). The direct CvsR regulon, as previously determined based on the ChIP-seq analysis, revealed only very limited direct targets with the expression of CvsR in vitro (29). In naïve conditions (CM vs WM), ΔcvsR displayed just eight DEGs (four upregulated, four downregulated) (Fig. 2A; Table S2.3), whereas under PTI (CF vs WF), only six DEGs were identified (two upregulated, four downregulated) (Fig. 2A; Table S2.4). Venn diagram comparisons highlighted distinct sets of cvsR-dependent genes under naïve “M” versus PTI “F” conditions. Specifically, four genes (PSPTO_1491, PSPTO_1805, PSPTO_5062, and PSPTO_5517) were uniquely upregulated in the cvsR mutant under mock conditions, whereas two genes (PSPTO_2242 and PSPTO_3266) were specifically upregulated under PTI conditions (Fig. 2B). Conversely, two downregulated clusters (PSPTO_3382–3383 and PSPTO_5255–5256) were shared between naïve and PTI conditions, suggesting stable CvsR-dependent repression in both naïve and PTI tissue.

Among these, two directly regulated gene clusters—PSPTO_3382–3383 and PSPTO_5255–5256—were previously identified as direct CvsR targets via in vitro ChIP-seq experiments (29). Our data confirmed that these genes represent the core cvsR regulon. Gene schematic analysis showed that CvsS/CvsR directlyregulate a putative operon containing the β-carbonic anhydrase (cynT; PSPTO_5255) and an adjacent major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter PSPTO_5256 (Fig. 2C). Raw reads from RNA-seq indicated the depleted transcripts of both cvsS/cvsR and PSPTO_5255-5256 in ΔcvsR (Fig. S3). Notably, the co-transcribed MFS transporter with the carbonic anhydrases was hypothesized to function in bicarbonate or carbonic acid transport to prevent surface-associated calcium phosphate precipitation and promote swarming ability (37).

Despite the largely unchanged global transcriptome pattern between wild-type and ΔcvsR strains in planta, the reduced number of differentially expressed genes under PTI conditions (CF/CM) suggests that CvsR minorly contributes to the bacterial PTI stimulon response. This finding indicates that while cvsR deletion does not broadly alter transcriptional profiles, but rather likely modulates specific transcriptional responses important for adaptation to the host immune environment indirectly. Compared with the cvsR-dependent differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under calcium-induced in vitro conditions (29), only two CvsR directly-regulated clusters remained responsive in planta. These results also imply that cvsR and its direct regulon may play a more pronounced role in bacterial adaptation to environmental cues outside the plant apoplast. In planta, the CvsS/CvsR system appears to primarily control a core operon comprising cynT and its adjacent transporter. This operon represents the only consistently regulated CvsR-dependent locus detected in planta other than the cvsS/R cluster itself, supporting its designation as the core cvsR regulon during host interaction. Given the hypothesized role of these proteins in bicarbonate or carbonic acid transport (37), it would be informative to examine whether the global transcriptome profiles differ between cvsR and cynT mutants to further elucidate the functional significance of this regulatory module in bacterial adaptation to the host apoplast.

CvsR-dependent modulation of PTI-associated pathways

To gain a systems-level view of the CvsR contribution to the PTI stimulon, we conducted KEGG pathway enrichment analyses across all experimental groups (Fig. 3). The heatmap illustrates the strength of statistical confidence (–log₁₀ q-value) for each pathway rather than absolute gene expression levels, thereby emphasizing the robustness of enrichment rather than the magnitude of transcriptional change or the number of genes in individual pathways. Comparison of ΔcvsR and wild-type strains under in vitro conditions (CP/WP) revealed only two significantly depleted pathways—bacterial chemotaxis and flagellar assembly—indicating reduced expression of motility-related genes in the absence of CvsR. Notably, CvsR-dependent regulation of motility-associated pathways was not observed in planta, under either naïve (CM/WM) or PTI (CF/WF) conditions, suggesting that the suppression of bacterial motility genes in planta overrides the regulatory effect by CvsR under in vitro conditions. The second block of the heatmap highlighted KEGG pathways enriched in wild-type Pto DC3000 during PTI (WF/WM). Consistent with previous transcriptomic studies, PTI led to significant enrichment of metabolic and stress-response pathways, reflecting broad transcriptional reprogramming characteristic of the PTI stimulon. The third block summarized CvsR-dependent pathways under host-associated conditions. While the impact of CvsR was modest in naïve tissue (CM/WM), a stronger effect was observed during PTI (CF/WF), where pathway enrichment patterns were generally attenuated in the mutant relative to the wild type. This indicates that CvsR amplifies the magnitude and breadth of the PTI-responsive transcriptional network in planta.

Fig 3.

Heat map of FDR q-values for KEGG pathways across wild-type and ΔcvsR mutant comparisons under mock, flg22, and KB treatments, showing enriched and depleted pathways.

Differentially expressed KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways for various comparisons in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Heat map of q-values for KEGG pathways representing the differentially expressed genes in different comparisons of ΔcvsR (C), wild type (W), flg22 treatment (F), and mock control (M). Differentially expressed pathways were identified using the goseq function in the gage v.2.24.0 R package. Color scale corresponds to the FDR-adjusted q-values, with darker shades indicating higher statistical significance. Pathways are classified as upregulated (purple scale) or downregulated (green scale) based on differential gene expression patterns.

The in vitro study by Fishman et al. (29) identified CvsR-dependent transcriptome expression profiles under calcium-augmented nutrient broth. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) we observed (32) shared approximately 16% overlap with the PTI stimulon and 22% with the CvsR in vitro regulon (Fig. 2D; Table S3). Based on this similarity, we hypothesized that the PTI may suppress CvsR signaling. Thus, a cvsR mutant would have transcriptional responses mimicking those typically observed in response to the PTI stimulon. In the fourth block, we examined the ΔcvsR mutant in naïve tissue relative to the wild-type strain in PTI-activated tissue (CM/WF). If the ΔcvsR mutant showed PTI stimulon-like expression patterns under mock conditions, we would expect reduced transcriptional differences between ΔcvsR mock and wild-type flg22 conditions. However, a large number of significantly enriched pathways were still observed in the (CM/WF) comparison, and the expression pattern did not resemble that of the PTI regulon (WM/WF). This suggested that the regulatory network of CvsR makes only limited contributions to the bacterial response to PTI.

CvsR modulation of bacterial secretion systems

In our study, the type III secretion system (T3SS) genes are slightly upregulated during pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) as compared with naïve plant infections (Fig. 4) (WF/WM, and CF/CM). This result diverges somewhat from the findings of Lovelace et al. (32), where PTI induction prior to infection was associated with mildly reduced T3SS gene expression at 5 h post-inoculation but is consistent with patterns observed in Smith et al. (38), where T3SS expression is maintained at a higher level in PTI tissue than naïve tissue at later time points (24 h post-inoculation).

Fig 4.

Heatmap of log2FC for secretion system genes in P. syringae DC3000, showing T3SS genes like hrcJ and hrpE strongly upregulated, while T2SS and T6SS genes show modest changes across WT and delta cvsR comparisons.

Gene expression level of bacterial secretion system genes. Heat map displays the log2 fold change (log2FC) in mean normalized counts for Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 bacterial secretion genes from the KEGG in different comparisons of ΔcvsR (C), wild type (W), flg22 treatment (F), and mock control (M). Colored cells indicate significant differential expression: red corresponds to upregulation and blue to downregulation (adjusted P value < 0.05); white denotes genes not significantly changed (adjusted P value > 0.05).

There was an increased induction of T3SS genes in a cvsR mutant during PTI relative to the WT strain (WF/WM vs CF/CM). This suggested CvsR involved in suppression of these genes and contradict to the previous reported phenotype in reduced virulence of mutants (39). Paradoxically, in vitro basal expression of T3SS genes was lower in ΔcvsR than that in wild type (Fig. 4, block1, CP/WP), aligning with the in vitro setting from previous report by Fishman et al. (29). However, the reduction in T3SS genes in ΔcvsR was not observed in planta (Fig. 4, block 1, CF/WF; CM/WM). The expression of type II secretion system (T2SS) pathway genes remained largely unchanged in wild-type strains during in planta colonization, but in the absence of cvsR, T2SS gene are upregulated (Fig. 4, block 3).

Many plant-associated bacteria that possess the T6SS have strong competitive fitness when cultured with other bacteria, with few examples suggested T6SS contributed to the pathogen virulence (40, 41). In the PTI tissue, most genes associated with T6SS, including hcp-2, were downregulated in wild-type strain (Fig. 4, block2, WF/WM, WF/WP). Mutation of cvsR diminishes the degree of T6SS downregulation and was even elevated in naïve condition compared with in vitro culture (Fig. 4, block 3, CF/CP, CM/CP). Without cvsR, the PTI-induced suppression is lost, resulting in relatively sustained or less reduced levels of T6SS gene expression particularly in immune-challenged host tissue.

CvsR modulation of bacterial sulfate and sulfonate importers and sulfur metabolism genes

The CvsS/CvsR two component system were previously observed to contribute to regulation of sulfate and sulfonate importers and sulfur metabolism (29). While sulfur metabolism did not show significant changes at the pathway level in the in vitro comparison (Fig. 3, CP/WP), transcriptome data revealed modest downregulation of individual sulfur metabolism–associated genes (e.g., PSPTO_0109, FAD-dependent oxidoreductase) in the ΔcvsR under in vitro conditions (Fig. 5, block 1, CP/WP). However, this effect does not extend to the genes for sulfate and sulfonate periplasmic biding proteins sbp and sfbp (PSPTO_5316), contrasting with prior in vitro study by calcium augmentation (29). In planta, this repression largely disappears, as indicated by negligible changes in log2 fold-change for gene expression across the entire sulfur metabolism pathway. The only notable exception is PSPTO_2590, which encodes a dimethylsulfone monooxygenase sfnG. Strong induction of genes involved in sulfate import, including sbp and sfbp, was detected during plant infection, with this upregulation being even higher in PTI-induced tissue, consistent with previous findings by Lovelace et al. (32). The loss of cvsR further amplifies this response (Fig. S7).

Fig 5.

Heat map of log2FC for sulfur metabolism genes in Pseudomonas syringae DC3000, comparing wild-type and delta cvsR strains under mock, flg22, and KB treatments, showing upregulation of cys and ssu genes.

Gene expression level of sulfur metabolism genes. Heat map displays the log2 fold change (log2FC) in mean normalized counts for Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 sulfur metabolism genes from the KEGG in different comparisons of ΔcvsR (C), wild type (W), flg22 treatment (F), and mock control (M). Colored cells indicate significant differential expression: red corresponds to upregulation and blue to downregulation (adjusted P value < 0.05); white denotes genes not significantly changed (adjusted P value > 0.05).

Sulfate metabolism genes are among the most distinct DEGs during bacterial responses to PTI (32). Our in vitro data showed no major reduction in the expression of the sulfate metabolism pathway (KEGG) in King’s B media (CP/WP), although several genes exhibited mild downregulation, consistent with the in vitro study by Fishman et al. (29). However, this reduction was minor compared with the calcium-induced repression reported previously. Moreover, we did not observe strong suppression of sbp and sfbp, which were the least affected sulfate metabolism genes in the cvsR mutant. Sulfate metabolism genes exhibited higher expression under PTI stimulation (Fig. 5, WF/WM, WF/WP, CF/CM, CF/CP; Fig. S4), which likely explains the stronger induction observed in the cvsR mutant in planta compared with in vitro, reflecting cvsR-dependent downregulation of this pathway under in vitro conditions.

CvsR modulation of bacterial chemotaxis and flagellar regulation

Distinctive patterns of bacterial chemotaxis and flagella assembly genes under in vitro and in planta conditions provided evidence of limited impact of cvsR during plant infection (Fig. 6; Fig. S5 and S6). Under in vitro condition, chemotaxis and flagella pathways were downregulated in the ΔcvsR compared with the wild type (Fig. 6, block1, CP/WP), consistent with the impaired motility observed in ΔcvsR. This finding corroborates previous reports demonstrating a cvsR-dependent swarming phenotype and defect in motility upon cvsR disruption (29, 37). However, when these genes are examined in planta, regardless of immune status (Fig. 6, block 1, CM/WM and CF/WF), chemotaxis and motility gene expression do not significantly differ between ΔcvsR and wild type. Surprisingly, while flagella and chemotaxis genes are much less expressed in planta than in vitro in the wild-type strains (Fig. 6, block 2), the expression of many genes (e.g., motA-2, mot-B, fliC) displayed upregulation in planta than in vitro with the mutation of cvsR with higher expression level in PTI compared with naïve tissue (Fig. 6, block 3).

Fig 6.

Heat maps show log2FC of motility genes in Pseudomonas syringae DC3000, comparing WT and delta cvsR strains under flg22 and mock treatments, with flagellar and chemotaxis genes notably upregulated.

Gene expression level of motility genes. Heat map displays the log2 fold change (log2FC) in mean normalized counts for Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 sulfur metabolism genes from the KEGG in different comparisons of ΔcvsR (C), wild type (W), flg22 treatment (F), and mock control (M). Colored cells indicate significant differential expression: red corresponds to upregulation and blue to downregulation (adjusted P value < 0.05); white denotes genes not significantly changed (adjusted P value > 0.05).

In contrast to the inducing conditions under which 199 genes were reported as potential direct targets of CvsR (29), our data suggest that CvsR exhibits a highly restricted core regulon in planta. This regulon appears to be confined to autoregulation of the cvsS/cvsR two-component system and regulation of cynT (carbonic anhydrase) and its associated transporter PSPTO_5256, with no evidence for direct regulation of additional transcription factors. Thus, the subtle CvsR modulation of multiple pathways including motility and sulfur metabolism may be the results of altered expression of carbonic anhydrase expression. Carbonic anhydrase may reduce local pH on the surface of cells through production of carbonic acid (37). Thus, the reduced cynT expression in ΔcvsR may result in increased local pH around the colonization zone in the apoplast. During PTI, the apoplast undergoes a significant pH increase (17). Thus, the observed partial overlap between a cvsR-modulated genes and the response to the PTI stimulon may be attributable to bacterial responses to increased local pH.

Conclusion

In this study, we established an optimized in planta bacterial transcriptome profiling approach that achieves exceptionally high bacterial read recovery through combined host rRNA depletion and physical enrichment. This method enables reliable resolution of bacterial transcriptional dynamics under immunity-activated states. Our results demonstrate that while CvsR contributes minimally to global transcriptional reprogramming within the host, it retains distinct regulatory activity over a small, conserved regulon, primarily encompassing the β-carbonic anhydrase (PSPTO_5255) and its adjacent MFS transporter (PSPTO_5256) in planta (Fig. 7). Under in vitro conditions, CvsR regulates motility- and sulfur metabolism-associated pathways, consistent with previous reports, but these effects are largely attenuated in planta. The attenuated PTI stimulon responses observed in the ΔcvsR mutant further suggests that CvsR fine-tunes bacterial responses to immune-induced environmental cues rather than acting as a major transcriptional driver. Collectively, these findings indicate that CvsR functions as a context-dependent regulator with limited influence in the plant apoplast, yet its role may be more pronounced in mediating bacterial adaptation to external or pre-infection environments. Future characterization of the cognate histidine kinase CvsS activation, through the use of hybrid reporter systems (42), for example, can be useful for pinpointing the PTI-induced ligand perceived by this TCS and for elucidating the mechanistic basis of CvsSR signaling during host immune activation.

Fig 7.

Diagram showing CvsS and CvsR two-component signaling during PTI-induced high pH, where beta-CA generates low pH, activating cvsSR gene cluster and cynT or PSPTO_5256, while inhibiting T3SS, T2SS, motility, and sulfate importers.

Schematic model of function of CvsR of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in Arabidopsis during pattern-triggered immunity (PTI). Solid arrows represent known activation. Blunt arrows represent known inhibition. Dashed arrows represent hypothetical interactions. Created with BioRender.com

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant tissue preparation and growth condition

Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) seeds were sown under the mesh-covered pot, as described previously (32). Plants were grown in a growth chamber (Conviron A1000) for 4.5 weeks under long-day conditions at 23°C (14-h day and 10-h night) at 70-μmol light settings. One day prior to treatment, plants were removed from the growth chamber and were placed in a growth room under 12-h day and 12-h night conditions. Then, 3 to 5 fully expanded leaves on each plant on each plant were infiltrated with either 1 μM flg22 in 0.1% DMSO or with 0.1% DMSO by 1-mL blunt syringes on the abaxial surface 1 day prior to the bacterial inoculation. The pre-treatments ranged from 16 to 20 h prior to bacterial inoculation due to the large quantity of sample collection.

Bacterial inoculation

Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pto DC3000) was prepared as lawn, growing on King’s B (KB) (43) agar supplemented with 40 μg/mL rifampicin and was grown overnight at 28°C. Inoculum was harvested from plates by washing out bacterial smear from the plate surface and suspended and washed twice in 0.25 mM MgCl2.OD600 of 0.8 (1 × 109 CFU/mL) was reached as the final concentration for inoculum. Bacterial inoculum was infiltrated with a blunt-end syringe into treated leaves as described above. Plants were allowed to dry at ambient temperature (22°C) on bench for 5 h before sampling for RNA isolation.

Extraction of bacteria from infected plants

At 5 hpi, leaves from each treatment were harvested by cutting at the leaf blade junction. Isolation of bacteria from leaf apoplast was followed from the previous method (32) with modification. Briefly, 80–100 leaves were arranged on four sheets of parafilm, rolled and inserted into the barrels of four 20-mL syringes. An ice-cold RNA stabilizing buffer (Invitrogen) was poured into each syringe, which was sealed and vacuum infiltrated at 95 kPa for 2 min, followed by a slow release of the vacuum. The RNA stabilizing buffer was spun out from apoplast at 1,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C to isolate bacterial RNA.

The flow-through was pooled for each biological replicate from each treatment and was concentrated by syringe filtration, using a 0.20-μm Micropore membrane (Millipore). Filters were placed in homogenization tubes, were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and were stored at −80°C for RNA extraction.

Bacterial RNA isolation and sequencing

The filter membranes were homogenized in Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for 1 min at 1,750 Hz, using a Geno/Grinder (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) with 3 × 3 mm high density zirconium beads followed by the chloroform-ethanol isolation from manufacturer (TRIzol Reagent User Guide, Pub. No. MAN0001271 D). For in vitro samples, 1 mL of the 1 × 109 CFU/mL bacterial inoculum in 0.25 mM MgCl2 was pelleted, and RNA was extracted followed by the same procedure above.

RNA samples were additionally treated with TURBO DNase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to eliminate genomic DNA contamination. RNA was quantified using the NanoDrop OneC Microvolume Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Three independent bacterial suspensions started from three colonies were sampled for a total of three biological replicates. The plant samples were depleted of rRNA using the QIAseq FastSelect –rRNA Plant Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD), and bacteria samples were depleted of rRNA using the QIAGEN FastSelect rRNA HMR Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). Next, RNA sequencing libraries were constructed with the NEBNext Ultra II RNA Library Preparation Kit for Illumina by following the manufacturer’s recommendations (New England Biolabs, lpswich, MA). Paired-end 150-nt reads were sequenced using the Nova-seq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA).

RNA-Seq data analysis

Reads were quality trimmed using Trimmomatic (39) and were aligned to the RefSeq P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 genome (NC_004278.1, NC_004632.1, NC_004633.1), using Bowtie2 (44). Counts of RNA-Seq fragments were computed for each annotated gene, from reads per kilobase million values, using the StringTie script (45). DEGs were identified from gene counts for each sample, using the Bioconductor package DESeq2 version 3.21 (46). DEGs were selected based on log2-transformed and normalized mean counts that have an adjusted P value below a false discovery rate (FDR) cutoff of 0.05. DEGs set from each comparison were extracted with an additional cutoff of |log2FC| > 1.0.

Principal components analysis of log2-transformed normalized counts was performed for all treatments and replicates, using the rlog function in DESeq2. Volcano plot was performed on log2 fold changes in mean normalized counts between treatments using DESeq2, and heatmaps were generated using the R package pheatmap version 1.0.13.

KEGG analysis was conducted using log2 fold change values of normalized mean counts for annotated genes using the Bioconductor package, gage version 2.24.0 (47). Gene sets of metabolic pathways were obtained from the KEGG pathway database, using the organismal code “pst” for Pto DC3000. Significant gene sets were identified from log2 fold changes between treatments at similar time points and were selected based on an FDR q value cutoff of 0.05. The data represented enrichment of pathways rather than the expression level between the treatment pair.

Bacterial load quantification and symptom

Four replicates of 4.5-week-old A. thaliana Col-0 plants were treated with 1 μM flg22 in 0.1% DMSO or 0.1% DMSO 16 or 20 h prior to inoculation, as described above. Bacterial quantification was performed at 5/24 h post‐infection (hpi). Four 4‐mm‐diameter leaf discs (∼0.5 cm2 total area) per treatment were collected using a biopsy punch. Tissues were homogenized in 0.1 mL of 0.25 mM MgCl2 for 2 min using a SpeedMill Plus homogenizer (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany), with subsequent bacterial enumeration via serial dilution spot plating. For each genotype and treatment, four plants were used per replicate, and the experiment was independently repeated twice (n = 8). Bacterial load was expressed as mean log10 (CFU cm−2) ± standard error (SE). Statistical comparisons between mutants and Col‐0 wild type were performed using a paired two‐tailed Student’s t‐test, with significance defined as P < 0.05. Symptom of leaves was assessed at 24/72 hpi. qPCR analysis on selected genes of interest

Four replicates of 4.5-week-old A. thaliana Col-0 plants were treated with 1 μM flg22 in 0.1% DMSO or 0.1% DMSO 16 h prior to inoculation, as described above. The bacterial inoculum of Pto DC3000 wild type or cvsR mutant was prepared as described above and was further diluted to a final concentration of approximately 1 × 109 CFU/mL and was infiltrated into marked leaves of all plants. At 5 hpi, inoculated leaves from a single plant were harvested and homogenized. Ground tissues were set for RNA extraction using TriZol and TURBO-DNase cleanup, as described above. Four independent samples of pelleted initial inoculum were also flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen for RT-qPCR analysis. cDNA synthesis, RT-qPCR, and normalization were conducted based on previously described procedures (38).

Normalized cDNA was tested from four treatments, i.e., wild-type/cvsR mutant strain from KB, naïve host tissue, and PTI tissue. These samples were tested for relative expression of two genes of interest, sbp and sfbp. Samples were grouped by biological replicate set and were tested against five genes of interest, two previously validated, recA as a reference gene, inoculum, and Pto DC3000-specific 16S rRNA within the same plate (38). Relative expression of in planta samples normalized to the inoculum sample, measured as the NRQ of a gene of interest, was calculated as described previously (38). Relative expression of bacteria exposed to PTI relative to bacteria during naïve host infection, measured as the NRQ of a gene of interest, was calculated similarly to that above; a Student’s t-test was performed on log2 NRQ values for each gene of interest against the wild-type sample in naïve tissue (WM).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant 1844861 to B.H.K. L.Y. and C.J.N. were supported by the National Institutes of Health (R35GM143067 to L.Y.). We thank Dr. Melanie Filiatrault for providing Pto DC3000 DcvsR strain, and for providing helpful feedback and comments.

H.-C.C. and B.H.K. designed the research; H.-C.C. conducted experiments; H.-C.C. and C.J.N. analyzed the data; H.-C.C. and B.H.K. wrote the manuscript. All listed authors reviewed and approved draft and final versions of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Brian H. Kvitko, Email: bkvitko@uga.edu.

Kevin Loren Hockett, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The RNA-seq data used in this study are deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus database with accession number: GSE327564.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.04124-25.

Supplemental figures. spectrum.04124-25-s0001.docx.

Fig. S1 to S7.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.04124-25.SuF1
Supplemental tables. spectrum.04124-25-s0002.xlsx.

Tables S1 to S3.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.04124-25.SuF2

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Jones JDG, Dangl JL. 2006. The plant immune system. Nature 444:323–329. doi: 10.1038/nature05286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ngou BPM, Jones JDG, Ding P. 2022. Plant immune networks. Trends Plant Sci 27:255–273. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gómez-Gómez L, Bauer Z, Boller T. 2001. Both the extracellular leucine-rich repeat domain and the kinase activity of FLS2 are required for flagellin binding and signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13:1155–1163. doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.5.1155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chinchilla D, Bauer Z, Regenass M, Boller T, Felix G. 2006. The Arabidopsis receptor kinase FLS2 binds flg22 and determines the specificity of flagellin perception. Plant Cell 18:465–476. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.036574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kunze G, Zipfel C, Robatzek S, Niehaus K, Boller T, Felix G. 2004. The N terminus of bacterial elongation factor Tu elicits innate immunity in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell 16:3496–3507. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.026765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Felix G, Boller T. 2003. Molecular sensing of bacteria in plants. The highly conserved RNA-binding motif RNP-1 of bacterial cold shock proteins is recognized as an elicitor signal in tobacco. J Biol Chem 278:6201–6208. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209880200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Yuan M, Ngou BPM, Ding P, Xin X-F. 2021. PTI-ETI crosstalk: an integrative view of plant immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol 62:102030. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zipfel C, Robatzek S, Navarro L, Oakeley EJ, Jones JDG, Felix G, Boller T. 2004. Bacterial disease resistance in Arabidopsis through flagellin perception. Nature 428:764–767. doi: 10.1038/nature02485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Crabill E, Joe A, Block A, van Rooyen JM, Alfano JR. 2010. Plant immunity directly or indirectly restricts the injection of type III effectors by the Pseudomonas syringae type III secretion system. Plant Physiol 154:233–244. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.159723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Chen H-C, Newton CJ, Diaz G, Zheng Y, Kong F, Yao Y, Yang L, Kvitko BH. 2025. Proteomic snapshot of pattern triggered immunity in the Arabidopsis leaf apoplast. Plant J 123:e70498. doi: 10.1111/tpj.70498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lewis LA, Polanski K, de Torres-Zabala M, Jayaraman S, Bowden L, Moore J, Penfold CA, Jenkins DJ, Hill C, Baxter L, Kulasekaran S, Truman W, Littlejohn G, Prusinska J, Mead A, Steinbrenner J, Hickman R, Rand D, Wild DL, Ott S, Buchanan-Wollaston V, Smirnoff N, Beynon J, Denby K, Grant M. 2015. Transcriptional dynamics driving MAMP-triggered immunity and pathogen effector-mediated immunosuppression in Arabidopsis leaves following infection with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000. Plant Cell 27:3038–3064. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Nobori T, Velásquez AC, Wu J, Kvitko BH, Kremer JM, Wang Y, He SY, Tsuda K. 2018. Transcriptome landscape of a bacterial pathogen under plant immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:E3055–E3064. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800529115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zhou J-M, Zhang Y. 2020. Plant immunity: danger perception and signaling. Cell 181:978–989. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Miao P, Wang H, Wang W, Wang Z, Ke H, Cheng H, Ni J, Liang J, Yao Y-F, Wang J, Zhou J-M, Lei X. 2025. A widespread plant defense compound disarms bacterial type III injectisome assembly. Science 387:eads0377. doi: 10.1126/science.ads0377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yu K, Liu Y, Tichelaar R, Savant N, Lagendijk E, van Kuijk SJL, Stringlis IA, van Dijken AJH, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM, Haney CH, Berendsen RL. 2019. Rhizosphere-associated Pseudomonas suppress local root immune responses by gluconic acid-mediated lowering of environmental pH. Curr Biol 29:3913–3920. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Dora S, Terrett OM, Sánchez-Rodríguez C. 2022. Plant-microbe interactions in the apoplast: communication at the plant cell wall. Plant Cell 34:1532–1550. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Yang Z, Wang H, Keebler R, Lovelace A, Chen H-C, Kvitko B, Swingle B. 2024. Environmental alkalization suppresses deployment of virulence strategies in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. J Bacteriol 206:e0008624. doi: 10.1128/jb.00086-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Whalen MC, Innes RW, Bent AF, Staskawicz BJ. 1991. Identification of Pseudomonas syringae pathogens of Arabidopsis and a bacterial locus determining avirulence on both arabidopsis and soybean. Plant Cell 3:49–59. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.1.49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Buell CR, Joardar V, Lindeberg M, Selengut J, Paulsen IT, Gwinn ML, Dodson RJ, Deboy RT, Durkin AS, Kolonay JF, et al. 2003. The complete genome sequence of the Arabidopsis and tomato pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:10181–10186. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1731982100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Xin XF, Kvitko B, He SY. 2018. Pseudomonas syringae: what it takes to be a pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:316–328. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2018.17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Guo M, Tian F, Wamboldt Y, Alfano JR. 2009. The majority of the type III effector inventory of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 can suppress plant immunity. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22:1069–1080. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-9-1069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kvitko BH, Park DH, Velásquez AC, Wei C-F, Russell AB, Martin GB, Schneider DJ, Collmer A. 2009. Deletions in the repertoire of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 type III secretion effector genes reveal functional overlap among effectors. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000388. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lee SE, Gupta R, Jayaramaiah RH, Lee SH, Wang Y, Park S-R, Kim ST. 2017. Global transcriptome profiling of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae under in planta growth and in vitro culture conditions. Plant Pathol J 33:458–466. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.04.2017.0076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Liao Z-X, Ni Z, Wei X-L, Chen L, Li J-Y, Yu Y-H, Jiang W, Jiang B-L, He Y-Q, Huang S. 2019. Dual RNA-seq of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola infecting rice reveals novel insights into bacterial-plant interaction. PLoS One 14:e0215039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Luneau JS, Baudin M, Quiroz Monnens T, Carrère S, Bouchez O, Jardinaud M-F, Gris C, François J, Ray J, Torralba B, Arlat M, Lewis JD, Lauber E, Deutschbauer AM, Noël LD, Boulanger A. 2022. Genome-wide identification of fitness determinants in the Xanthomonas campestris bacterial pathogen during early stages of plant infection. New Phytol 236:235–248. doi: 10.1111/nph.18313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lavín JL, Kiil K, Resano O, Ussery DW, Oguiza JA. 2007. Comparative genomic analysis of two-component regulatory proteins in Pseudomonas syringae. BMC Genomics 8:397. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Chatterjee A, Cui Y, Yang H, Collmer A, Alfano JR, Chatterjee AK. 2003. GacA, the response regulator of a two-component system, acts as a master regulator in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 by controlling regulatory RNA, transcriptional activators, and alternate sigma factors. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 16:1106–1117. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.12.1106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Deng X, Liang H, Chen K, He C, Lan L, Tang X. 2014. Molecular mechanisms of two-component system RhpRS regulating type III secretion system in Pseudomonas syringae. Nucleic Acids Res 42:11472–11486. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Fishman MR, Zhang J, Bronstein PA, Stodghill P, Filiatrault MJ. 2018. Ca2+-induced two-component system CvsSR regulates the type III secretion system and the extracytoplasmic function sigma factor AlgU in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. J Bacteriol 200:e00538-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00538-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Shao X, Tan M, Xie Y, Yao C, Wang T, Huang H, Zhang Y, Ding Y, Liu J, Han L, Hua C, Wang X, Deng X. 2021. Integrated regulatory network in Pseudomonas syringae reveals dynamics of virulence. Cell Rep 34:108920. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sreedharan A, Penaloza-Vazquez A, Kunkel BN, Bender CL. 2006. CorR regulates multiple components of virulence in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19:768–779. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-19-0768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Lovelace AH, Smith A, Kvitko BH. 2018. Pattern-triggered immunity alters the transcriptional regulation of virulence-associated genes and induces the sulfur starvation response in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 31:750–765. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-01-18-0008-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Honda T, Yu S, Mai D, Baumgart L, Babnigg G, Yoshikuni Y. 2025. CRAGE-RB-PI-seq enables transcriptional profiling of rhizobacteria during plant-root colonization. Microbiology. doi: 10.1101/2024.11.19.624340 [DOI]
  • 34. Wang H, Smith A, Lovelace A, Kvitko BH. 2022. In planta transcriptomics reveals conflicts between pattern-triggered immunity and the AlgU sigma factor regulon. PLoS One 17:e0274009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. De Francesco A, Lovelace AH, Shaw D, Qiu M, Wang Y, Gurung F, Ancona V, Wang C, Levy A, Jiang T, Ma W. 2022. Transcriptome profiling of “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” in Citrus and Psyllids. Phytopathology 112:116–130. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-08-21-0327-FI [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Yang S, Lovelace AH, Yuan Y, Nie H, Chen W, Gao Y, Bo W, Nagel DH, Pang X, Ma W. 2025. A witches’ broom phytoplasma effector induces stunting by stabilizing a bHLH transcription factor in Ziziphus jujuba plants. New Phytol 247:249–264. doi: 10.1111/nph.70172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Fishman MR, Filiatrault MJ. 2019. Prevention of surface-associated calcium phosphate by the Pseudomonas syringae two-component system CvsSR. J Bacteriol 201:e00584-18. doi: 10.1128/JB.00584-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Smith A, Lovelace AH, Kvitko BH. 2018. Validation of RT-qPCR approaches to monitor Pseudomonas syringae gene expression during infection and exposure to pattern-triggered immunity. MPMI 31:410–419. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-11-17-0270-TA [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Wang N, Han N, Tian R, Chen J, Gao X, Wu Z, Liu Y, Huang L. 2021. Role of the type VI secretion system in the pathogenicity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae, the causative agent of kiwifruit bacterial canker. Front Microbiol 12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.627785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kim N, Kim JJ, Kim I, Mannaa M, Park J, Kim J, Lee H-H, Lee S-B, Park D-S, Sul WJ, Seo Y-S. 2020. Type VI secretion systems of plant-pathogenic Burkholderia glumae BGR1 play a functionally distinct role in interspecies interactions and virulence. Mol Plant Pathol 21:1055–1069. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Luu RA, Schomer RA, Brunton CN, Truong R, Ta AP, Tan WA, Parales JV, Wang Y-J, Huo Y-W, Liu S-J, Ditty JL, Stewart V, Parales RE. 2019. Hybrid two-component sensors for identification of bacterial chemoreceptor function. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e01626-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01626-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. King EO, Ward MK, Raney DE. 1954. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J Lab Clin Med 44:301–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM, Leek JT, Salzberg SL. 2016. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat Protoc 11:1650–1667. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Luo W, Friedman MS, Shedden K, Hankenson KD, Woolf PJ. 2009. GAGE: generally applicable gene set enrichment for pathway analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 10:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental figures. spectrum.04124-25-s0001.docx.

Fig. S1 to S7.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.04124-25.SuF1
Supplemental tables. spectrum.04124-25-s0002.xlsx.

Tables S1 to S3.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.04124-25.SuF2

Data Availability Statement

The RNA-seq data used in this study are deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus database with accession number: GSE327564.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES