ABSTRACT
We analyzed 320 Salmonella enterica isolates recovered from patients with diarrhea in northern Gyeonggi Province, Korea, between 2015 and 2022. Resistance was most frequent to ampicillin, tetracycline, and nalidixic acid, and 26.6% of isolates exhibited multidrug resistance (MDR). Extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant isolates mainly carried blaCTX-M and blaDHA, whereas plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants, such as qnrS and qnrB, were also detected. Mutations in quinolone resistance-determining regions, predominantly gyrA mutations corresponding to the predicted D87N substitution, were frequent. PFGE and MLST supported relatedness within major resistant serotypes; ST34 and ST11 were the most frequent sequence types among the MLST-analyzed isolates. Resistance to nalidixic acid and colistin was significantly higher in S. Enteritidis than in S. I 4,[5],12:i:-, whereas S. I 4,[5],12:i:- showed higher resistance to tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (all P < 0.001). Whole-genome sequencing of two representative isolates (GGN-BG-22, ST34; GGN-BG-25, ST11) identified distinct resistance- and virulence-related genomic features, including plasmid-associated resistance determinants. SNP-based phylogenetic analyses using selected publicly available genomes placed these two representative lineages in a broader genomic context. Together, these findings provide regional surveillance-based insights into antimicrobial resistance in clinical Salmonella isolates and focused genomic insights into two clinically relevant lineages.
IMPORTANCE
Multidrug-resistant Salmonella poses an increasing challenge to both patient care and public health. This study integrates regional antimicrobial resistance surveillance with focused comparative genomic analysis of two representative clinical isolates, providing context for major resistant lineages identified in northern Gyeonggi Province, Korea. Our findings highlight lineage-specific resistance and genomic features and support the continued use of molecular surveillance to monitor high-risk clones and resistance-associated mobile genetic elements in clinical and public health settings.
KEYWORDS: WGS, Salmonella enterica, PMQR, PFGE, MLST, ESBL
INTRODUCTION
Salmonella enterica remains a major foodborne pathogen causing substantial morbidity worldwide and is commonly associated with diarrheal illness in humans (1). The increasing emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella, particularly isolates resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, has become an important challenge for both clinical treatment and public health control (2–4). The dissemination of extended-spectrum β-lactamase genes and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) determinants, along with the accumulation of mutations in quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs), has further limited available treatment options (5, 6).
Molecular subtyping methods, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST), have been widely used to assess clonal relatedness and track the dissemination of resistant Salmonella lineages (7–9). More recently, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has enabled higher-resolution characterization of antimicrobial resistance determinants, mobile genetic elements, and virulence-associated loci (10, 11). Used together, these approaches can provide complementary information on the population structure and genomic features of clinically important lineages.
In Korea, previous studies have described the serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Salmonella isolates, and recent reports have increasingly incorporated WGS-based analyses (12–14). Building on these approaches, we investigated Salmonella enterica isolates recovered from patients with diarrhea in northern Gyeonggi Province, Korea, between 2015 and 2022.
The aims of this study were to determine the serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance profiles of the isolates, identify β-lactamase genes and PMQR determinants together with QRDR mutations, and assess clonal relationships using PFGE and MLST.
In addition, WGS of two representative MDR isolates was performed to provide focused comparative genomic context for major resistant lineages identified in this regional clinical collection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial isolates
Between January 2015 and December 2022, 320 Salmonella isolates were obtained from rectal swab specimens of patients with diarrhea in northern Gyeonggi Province, Korea. Specimens were collected by local public health centers during outbreak investigations and submitted to the Gyeonggi Province Institute of Health and Environment under the Infectious Disease Control and Prevention Act. The specimens were used solely for diagnostic purposes, and all identifiers and residual materials were discarded after pathogen confirmation. Only the isolates were retained in a de-identified form for analysis.
Isolation and culture
Rectal swab specimens were inoculated into 9 mL of tryptic soy broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. Aliquots were streaked onto Salmonella-Shigella (SS) agar (Difco Laboratories) and cultured at 37°C for 18 h. Presumptive colonies were purified, and confirmation of Salmonella-specific genes was performed using a PowerChek Gram-Negative Multiplex Detection PCR kit (Kogene Biotech, Seoul, Korea). Biochemical identification was conducted using a VITEK 2 COMPACT system (BioMérieux, Lyon, France).
Isolates were serotyped and preserved in CryoCare Bacterial Preservation vials (Key Scientific Products, Stamford, TX, USA) at −75°C until further use.
Serotyping
Serotyping was performed according to the Kauffmann–White classification scheme using O antigen antisera and H antigen antisera (Difco Laboratories) (15). O antigens were determined using slide agglutination, while H antigens (phases 1 and 2) were identified using motility GI medium and veal infusion broth, followed by formalin fixation and agglutination testing with specific antisera. Final serotypes were assigned based on combinations of O and H antigen patterns.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined for all 320 isolates using a Sensititre KRCDC2F custom plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (M100, 35th ed., 2025) (16). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using broth microdilution. Bacteria were grown on tryptic soy agar (Difco Laboratories) for 18 h at 37°C, suspended to 0.5 McFarland turbidity, diluted in cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth (CA-MHB; TREK), and inoculated into microtiter wells. Plates were incubated at 36°C for 20 h, and MICs were recorded as the lowest concentration inhibiting visible growth. For quality control, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was included. The antibiotics tested included ciprofloxacin (CIP), imipenem (IPM), ampicillin (AMP), tetracycline (TET), gentamicin (GEN), nalidixic acid (NAL), cefoxitin (FOX), colistin (COL), cefotaxime (CTX), ceftriaxone (CRO), ceftazidime (CAZ), chloramphenicol (CHL), amikacin (AMK), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT).
Detection of AMR genes
Isolates resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (n = 24) were screened for blaCTX-M, blaTEM, blaOXA, blaSHV, blaCMY, and blaDHA genes using PCR (17). Genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and PCR amplification was performed using an AccuPower Gold Multiplex PCR PreMix Kit (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea).
Products were analyzed using gel electrophoresis, and representative amplicons were sequenced (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea). Sequences were analyzed using NCBI BLAST for allele identification. Among the isolates, 110 with resistance or intermediate resistance to NAL or CIP were analyzed for mutations in gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE (QRDRs) (18), as well as for PMQR determinants, including qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrS, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, oqxA, oqxB, and qepA (19–23). Primer sequences and PCR conditions are provided in Tables S1 and S2.
Statistical analysis
To assess differences in antimicrobial resistance between S. Enteritidis and S. I 4,[5],12:i:-, isolates were categorized into resistant and non-resistant groups for each drug, with intermediate and susceptible categories combined as non-resistant where applicable. The resulting 2 × 2 contingency tables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test, with statistical significance defined as a P value < 0.05. All analyses were conducted in R software (version 4.3.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
PFGE analysis
PFGE was performed according to the KCDA protocol (2022) (24) to evaluate genetic relatedness. Briefly, bacterial cells were immobilized in agarose plugs, lysed with proteinase K in ES buffer, and subsequently treated with XbaI (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) for 6 h at 37°C. The resulting DNA fragments were separated on a CHEF-DR III System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, USA) under the following parameters: switch times from 2.16 to 63.8 s, 6 V cm⁻1, 14°C, for 18 h. Gels were stained with SYBR Gold (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), destained, and visualized using UV illumination. S. Braenderup (ATCC BAA-664) served as the molecular size standard, and banding patterns were analyzed using BioNumerics (BioMérieux).
MLST analysis
MLST followed the Salmonella enterica scheme based on seven housekeeping loci (aroC, dnaN, hemD, hisD, purE, sucA, and thrA). PCR amplicons were sequenced by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea), and allele numbers and sequence types (STs) were assigned using the PubMLST Salmonella database (25). Two alleles (hisD and thrA) that did not match existing entries were identified as novel alleles; however, official numbers were not assigned under the updated PubMLST policy requiring WGS submission. The concatenated sequences were subjected to MUSCLE alignment, and phylogenies were reconstructed in MEGA version 12 using the neighbor-joining approach with the Tamura–Nei model and 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Only bootstrap values of 70% or above were considered to indicate robust support.
Whole-genome sequencing and in silico analyses
WGS was applied to two MDR isolates (GGN-BG-22 and GGN-BG-25), which were selected as representative isolates based on their resistance phenotypes and epidemiological significance. Salmonella enterica serovar I 4,[5],12:i:- is the monophasic variant of S. Typhimurium. In this study, GGN-BG-22 was identified as an ST34 isolate of this serovar, whereas GGN-BG-25 was an ST11 S. Enteritidis isolate. These isolates were sequenced using the PacBio Sequel II and Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platforms by Macrogen. Assembled genome sequences were submitted to GenBank with the accession numbers CP196701 (chromosome) and CP196702 (plasmid 1) for GGN-BG-22 and CP196402 (chromosome) and CP196403 (plasmid 1) for GGN-BG-25.
Genomic characterization, including MLST, cgMLST, wgMLST, rMLST, and in silico serotyping, was performed using EnteroBase (26). Genome annotation was conducted using the Bakta annotation tool implemented in Proksee (27, 28), with database version 5.0, incorporating CARD RGI 6.0.3, ResFinder 4.7.2, MobileElementFinder 1.0.3, MobileOG-db beatrix-1.6, and VirulenceFinder 2.0 resources (29–33). Plasmid replicon typing was performed using PlasmidFinder 2.1 (34), and plasmid maps were visualized and annotated using Proksee. To assess the genomic context of chromosomal sopE, prophage-associated regions were additionally analyzed using PHASTEST (35). Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based phylogenetic trees were generated using CSI Phylogeny 1.4 (Center for Genomic Epidemiology, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark), with USDA15WA-1 (CP040686) and P125109 (NC_011294) used as reference strains for S. I 4,[5],12:i:- and S. Enteritidis, respectively (36). Comparator genomes were selected from publicly available GenBank records for the corresponding sequence types that were available at the time of analysis. The comparator genomes and their metadata are listed in Tables S3 and S4.
The phylogenetic trees were visualized using Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) (37). In total, 445 and 463 high-quality core SNPs were identified for the monophasic variant of S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis data sets, respectively.
RESULTS
Serotype distribution of Salmonella isolates
As shown in Table 1, S. Enteritidis (n = 89, 27.8%) and S. I 4,[5],12:i:- (n = 65, 20.3%) were the most common serotypes, followed by S. Bareilly (n = 24, 7.5%), S. Typhimurium (n = 22, 6.9%), S. Infantis (n = 21, 6.6%), S. Thompson (n = 18, 5.6%), and S. Agona (n = 13, 4.1%). The remaining 68 isolates (≤3.0% each) comprised 25 additional serotypes, including S. Newport, S. Stanley, S. Saintpaul, and S. Virchow.
TABLE 1.
Annual distribution of major Salmonella serotypes among 320 isolates recovered from patients with diarrhea in northern Gyeonggi Province, Korea, 2015–2022
| Year | Enteritidis | I 4,[5],12:i:- | Bareilly | Typhimurium | Infantis | Thompson | Agona | Othersa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 2016 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| 2017 | 3 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| 2018 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
| 2019 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 10 |
| 2020 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 2021 | 53 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 25 | 24 | 10 | 13 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 29 |
| Total (%) |
89 (27.8) |
65 (20.3) |
24 (7.5) |
22 (6.9) |
21 (6.6) |
18 (5.6) |
13 (4.1) |
68 (21.2) |
Others include 25 additional serotypes, each accounting for <3.0% of the 320 isolates.
Antimicrobial susceptibility and MDR profiles
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the 320 isolates, as shown in Table 2, revealed the highest resistance to AMP (41.3%) and TET (34.4%), followed by NAL (30.6%), COL (10.6%), CHL (10.3%), CTX (7.5%), CRO (7.2%), and CAZ (6.3%). All isolates remained susceptible to IPM and AMK, while >98% were susceptible to FOX and >94% to GEN. In total, 85 isolates (26.6%) were classified as multidrug resistant, defined as resistance to three or more antimicrobial classes. Among MDR isolates, the most frequent MDR profile was NAL–AMP–TET (22.4%); detailed MDR combinations are provided in Table S5.
TABLE 2.
Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 320 Salmonella isolates recovered from patients with diarrhea in northern Gyeonggi Province, Koreaa
| Antimicrobial agent | Susceptible, n (%) | Intermediate, n (%) | Resistant, n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ciprofloxacin | 297 (92.8) | 20 (6.3) | 3 (0.9) |
| Nalidixic acid | 222 (69.4) | 0 (0.0) | 98 (30.6) |
| Colistin | – | 286 (89.4) | 34 (10.6) |
| Imipenem | 320 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Cefotaxime | 295 (92.2) | 1 (0.3) | 24 (7.5) |
| Ceftriaxone | 297 (92.8) | 0 (0.0) | 23 (7.2) |
| Ceftazidime | 299 (93.4) | 1 (0.3) | 20 (6.3) |
| Cefoxitin | 314 (98.1) | 4 (1.3) | 2 (0.6) |
| Ampicillin | 188 (58.8) | 0 (0.0) | 132 (41.3) |
| Tetracycline | 210 (65.6) | 0 (0.0) | 110 (34.4) |
| Chloramphenicol | 286 (89.4) | 1 (0.3) | 33 (10.3) |
| Gentamicin | 302 (94.4) | 3 (0.9) | 15 (4.7) |
| Amikacin | 320 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole | 301 (94.1) | 0 (0.0) | 19 (5.9) |
Values are presented as number (%) of isolates among 320 total isolates. –, not applicable. For colistin, MIC values were interpreted as intermediate (≤2 μg/mL) or resistant (≥4 μg/mL) because no susceptible category is defined for Enterobacterales.
When resistance profiles of S. Enteritidis (n = 89) and S. I 4,[5],12:i:- (n = 65) were compared, clear differences emerged (Table 3). Resistance to NAL and COL was substantially higher in S. Enteritidis (84.3% and 37.1%) than in S. I 4,[5],12:i:- isolates (10.8% and 1.5%; both P < 0.001). Conversely, S. I 4,[5],12:i:- isolates exhibited greater resistance to TET (73.8% vs 46.1%), CHL (27.7% vs 2.2%), and SXT (20.0% vs 1.1%), with all comparisons reaching statistical significance (P < 0.001).
TABLE 3.
Comparison of antimicrobial resistance between S. Enteritidis (n = 89) and S. I 4,[5],12:i:- (n = 65) isolatesa
| Antimicrobial agent | S. Enteritidis resistant, n (%) | S. I 4,[5],12:i:- resistant, n (%) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ciprofloxacin | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.5) | 0.422 |
| Nalidixic acid | 75 (84.3) | 7 (10.8) | 6.8 × 10⁻²¹ |
| Colistin | 33 (37.1) | 1 (1.5) | 1.9 × 10⁻⁸ |
| Imipenem | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1.000 |
| Cefotaxime | 6 (6.7) | 10 (15.4) | 0.109 |
| Ceftriaxone | 6 (6.7) | 9 (13.8) | 0.173 |
| Ceftazidime | 6 (6.7) | 7 (10.8) | 0.394 |
| Cefoxitin | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.5) | 0.422 |
| Ampicillin | 59 (66.3) | 51 (78.5) | 0.108 |
| Tetracycline | 41 (46.1) | 48 (73.8) | 8.8 × 10⁻⁴ |
| Chloramphenicol | 2 (2.2) | 18 (27.7) | 3.2 × 10⁻⁶ |
| Gentamicin | 8 (9.0) | 2 (3.1) | 0.192 |
| Amikacin | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1.000 |
| Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole | 1 (1.1) | 13 (20.0) | 5.8 × 10⁻⁵ |
Values are presented as resistant isolates, n (%). P values were calculated using Fisher’s exact test comparing resistant and non-resistant isolates. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
β-lactamase genes, QRDR mutations, and PMQR determinants
Among the 24 isolates that were resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, blaCTX-M genes were identified in 23, including blaCTX-M-55 (47.8%), blaCTX-M-15 (34.8%), blaCTX-M-65 (13.0%), and blaCTX-M-14 (4.3%). blaDHA-33 was detected in a single isolate, whereas blaTEM-1 was additionally identified in three isolates (Table 4). Among 110 isolates with reduced susceptibility to NAL or CIP, QRDR mutations were observed in 97 (88.2%). The most common QRDR finding involved mutations in gyrA corresponding to the predicted D87N substitution, followed by mutations corresponding to the predicted D87Y, D87G, S83Y, and S83F substitutions. Detailed QRDR mutation patterns and PMQR determinants are presented in Tables S6 and S7.
TABLE 4.
Distribution of β-lactamase genes and subtypes among 24 extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Salmonella isolates
| β-lactamase gene | Gene subtype | Serotype | No. of isolates |
|---|---|---|---|
| blaCTX-M (Group I) | bla CTX-M-15 | S. Enteritidis | 6 |
| S. Virchow | 2 | ||
| bla CTX-M-55 | S. I 4,[5],12:i:- | 7 | |
| S. Typhimurium | 2 | ||
| S. Bareilly | 1 | ||
| S. Infantis | 1 | ||
| blaCTX-M (Group IV) | bla CTX-M-14 | S. I 4,[5],12:i:- | 1 |
| bla CTX-M-65 | S. I 4,[5],12:i:- | 1 | |
| S. Typhimurium | 1 | ||
| S. Thompson | 1 | ||
| blaCTX-M (Group II) | Not detected | Not detected | 0 |
| bla TEM | bla TEM-1 | S. I 4,[5],12:i:- | 2a |
| S. Thompson | 1a | ||
| bla SHV | Not detected | Not detected | 0 |
| bla OXA | Not detected | Not detected | 0 |
| bla CMY | Not detected | Not detected | 0 |
| bla DHA | bla DHA-33 | S. I 4,[5],12:i:- | 1 |
The blaTEM-1-positive isolates also carried blaCTX-M genes and were therefore counted in both gene categories.
PFGE and MLST analyses
Thirty-five isolates showing resistance to third-generation cephalosporins and/or reduced susceptibility to nalidixic acid or ciprofloxacin were analyzed using PFGE. The major PFGE clusters of S. I 4,[5],12:i:- and S. Enteritidis are shown in Fig. 1, whereas PFGE patterns of additional serotypes are presented in Fig. S1.
Fig 1.
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis dendrogram of S. I 4,[5],12:i:- and S. Enteritidis isolates showing resistance to third-generation cephalosporins and/or reduced susceptibility to nalidixic acid or ciprofloxacin. Isolates are clustered by serotype, with accompanying metadata indicating resistance genes, QRDR mutations, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles (R, resistant; I, intermediate; S, susceptible), and year of isolation. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-related genes and cephalosporin resistance are highlighted in red, whereas quinolone resistance-related genes, QRDR mutations, and quinolone/fluoroquinolone non-susceptibility are shown in blue.
MLST of 38 isolates identified 12 STs. The most common STs were ST34 (39.5%) and ST11 (15.8%), followed by ST203 (13.2%), ST323 (5.3%), and ST16 (5.3%). S. I 4,[5],12:i:- isolates were predominantly ST34, whereas S. Enteritidis and S. Bareilly were assigned to ST11 and ST203, respectively. Detailed ST assignments are provided in Table S8, and an MLST-based phylogenetic tree of 35 selected isolates representing five major serotypes is provided in Fig. S2.
WGS of representative isolates
WGS was performed on two MDR isolates, S. I 4,[5],12:i:- GGN-BG-22 and S. Enteritidis GGN-BG-25, using PacBio Sequel II and Illumina platforms (Macrogen). Assembled genome sequences and in silico typing results are summarized in Table 5, and raw sequencing reads are available under the corresponding SRA accessions. EnteroBase typing confirmed ST34 (eBG1) and ST11 (eBG4), with cgMLST demonstrating phylogenetic divergence (GGN-BG-22: HC10 359668; GGN-BG-25: HC10 58360).
TABLE 5.
Genomic features and in silico typing results of two representative multidrug-resistant Salmonella isolates, GGN-BG-22 and GGN-BG-25a
| Features | GGN-BG-22 | GGN-BG-25 |
|---|---|---|
| Chromosome length (bp) | 4,971,900 | 4,680,720 |
| Plasmid length (bp) | 107,357 | 109,440 |
| Plasmid replicon type | IncFIB(AP001918) | IncFIB(S); IncFII(S) |
| wgMLST ST | ST741476 | ST741475 |
| cgMLST ST | ST636237 | ST636236 |
| HC0 | 636,237 | 636,236 |
| HC10 | 359,668 | 58,360 |
| HC100 | 2 | 87 |
| 7-gene MLST ST | ST34 (eBG1) | ST11 (eBG4) |
| 7-gene allele profile | 10-19-12-9-5-9-2 | 5-2-3-7-6-6-11 |
| rMLST ST | ST1369 (eBG1) | ST1425 (eBG4.1) |
| In silico serovar (SISTR) | S. I 4,[5],12:i:- | S. Enteritidis |
| EnteroBase assembly ID | SAL_KE5983AA_AS | SAL_KE5982AA_AS |
| GenBank accession | CP196701, CP196702 | CP196402, CP196403 |
| SRA accession | SRR34534925; SRR34539401 | SRR34534924; SRR34541762 |
| BioProject | PRJNA1290791 | PRJNA1290791 |
| BioSample | SAMN49937988 | SAMN49937989 |
ST, sequence type; MLST, multilocus sequence typing; wgMLST, whole-genome MLST; cgMLST, core genome MLST; rMLST, ribosomal MLST; eBG, eBurst Group; HC, hierarchical cluster (e.g., HC0, identical alleles; HC100, ≤100 allelic differences); SISTR, Salmonella in silico serotyping resource.
Chromosomal and plasmid features
Selected chromosomal and plasmid-associated virulence features of the two representative isolates are summarized in Tables S9 and S10, whereas representative plasmid structures and AMR-associated regions are shown in Fig. 2 and 3. Comparative circular chromosome maps are provided in Fig. S3. GGN-BG-22 harbored a putative SGI-4-like chromosomal region containing clustered sil and pco metal tolerance genes together with multiple ICE-associated mobility genes. This region included the sil locus (silE-silS-silR-silC-silB-silA-silP) and the pco locus (pcoA-pcoB-pcoC-pcoD-pcoR-pcoS), along with an integrase domain-containing protein, a tyrosine-type recombinase/integrase, a TraI domain-containing protein, TraD, a TraG N-terminal domain-containing protein, a PilL N-terminal domain-containing protein, and additional conjugation-associated proteins. Collectively, these features support the interpretation of this locus as an SGI-4-associated ICE-like chromosomal region rather than an isolated metal tolerance locus.
Fig 2.
Comparative circular plasmid maps of S. I 4,[5],12:i:- isolate GGN-BG-22 and S. Enteritidis isolate GGN-BG-25. The maps show coding sequences, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, mobile genetic element-associated genes, conjugative transfer genes, virulence-associated genes, and GC skew. The GGN-BG-22 plasmid carried an IncFIB(AP001918) replicon and harbored blaCTX-M-55, qnrS1, floR, catA2, and lnu(F), together with an ant(3″)-IIa-like aminoglycoside resistance gene annotated as a pseudogene, whereas the GGN-BG-25 plasmid carried IncFIB(S) and IncFII(S) replicons and harbored blaCTX-M-15, tet(A), and aac(3)-IId. AMR regions in both plasmids were associated with mobile genetic element-related genes.
Fig 3.
Genetic organization of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) regions in plasmids of Salmonella isolates GGN-BG-22 and GGN-BG-25. Genetic contexts of AMR genes with adjacent mobile genetic element-associated genes are shown for GGN-BG-22 (upper panel) and GGN-BG-25 (lower panel). AMR genes are indicated in cyan, whereas insertion sequences, transposases, and integrases are indicated in orange. These resistance regions were associated with mobile genetic contexts in both plasmids. The ant(3″)-IIa-like aminoglycoside resistance gene in GGN-BG-22 was annotated as a pseudogene.
The complete plasmid sequence of GGN-BG-22 (CP196702.1) was a 107,357-bp circular plasmid carrying an IncFIB replicon [IncFIB(AP001918); 97.65% identity, 682/682 bp]. This plasmid harbored multiple resistance-associated genes, including blaCTX-M-55, qnrS1, floR, catA2, and lnu(F), whereas an ant(3″)-IIa-like aminoglycoside resistance gene was present as a pseudogene. In addition, the plasmid retained substantial transfer-associated gene content, with most tra genes and several trb genes identified, together with finO. Multiple mobile genetic elements were also present, including IS26 copies, numerous transposase-related genes, and several integrase-associated genes, including an intI1 pseudogene.
The characteristic virulence loci of classical S. Typhimurium virulence plasmids, including spv, pef, and rck, were not identified.
In the chromosome of GGN-BG-25, sopE was located at 1,969,915–1,970,637 within a Gifsy_2-like region that was classified as intact by PHASTEST and spanned 1,953,154–1,984,776. This region contained multiple phage- and recombination-associated genes, including a tyrosine-type recombinase/integrase, excisionase, bacteriophage antitermination protein Q, phage holin, lysozyme, lysis protein, phage minor tail protein L, phage tail tip fiber protein, and a phage terminase large subunit family protein, along with several pseudogenized recombinase- and tail/fiber-related genes. sopE2, however, was located outside this predicted region.
The GGN-BG-25 plasmid carried IncFIB(S) and IncFII(S) replicons and harbored blaCTX-M-15, tet(A), and aac(3)-IId. It also carried plasmid-associated virulence determinants, including pef, spv, rck, and mig-5.
SNP-based phylogeny
Core genome SNP analysis was performed using 445 high-quality SNPs for the S. I 4,[5],12:i:- data set and 463 for the S. Enteritidis data set (Fig. 4 and 5, respectively). Using selected publicly available genomes, GGN-BG-22 was positioned within a broader ST34 background and showed closer relatedness to Korean isolates (Fig. 4). GGN-BG-25 clustered most closely with several Korean ST11 isolates, including food-associated isolates (Fig. 5). The accompanying AMR annotations facilitated comparison of resistance-associated features across the analyzed genomes. Metadata and associated antimicrobial resistance gene profiles for the genomes included in these analyses are summarized in Tables S3 and S4.
Fig 4.
Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based phylogenetic tree of S. I 4,[5],12:i:- isolate GGN-BG-22 within a selected ST34 comparative genomic data set. The maximum-likelihood tree was generated from core genome SNPs using USDA15WA-1 as the reference strain. Publicly available comparator genomes were selected from the corresponding sequence type. Isolates are annotated by country or reference-strain status, source, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene presence using label color, node color, and outer-ring annotations, respectively. This tree provides comparative genomic context for GGN-BG-22 within the available comparison set. Metadata for comparator genomes included in the analysis are summarized in Table S3. The scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site.
Fig 5.
Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based phylogenetic tree of S. Enteritidis isolate GGN-BG-25 within a selected ST11 comparative genomic data set. The maximum-likelihood tree was generated from core genome SNPs using P125109 as the reference strain. Publicly available comparator genomes were selected from the corresponding sequence type. Isolates are annotated by country or reference-strain status, source, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene presence using label color, node color, and outer-ring annotations, respectively. This tree provides comparative genomic context for GGN-BG-25 within the available comparison set. Metadata for comparator genomes included in the analysis are summarized in Table S4. The scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we characterized 320 clinical Salmonella enterica isolates obtained from patients with diarrhea in northern Gyeonggi Province, Korea, between 2015 and 2022. Among the isolates selected for molecular typing, the major multidrug-resistant lineages included S. I 4,[5],12:i:- ST34 and S. Enteritidis ST11, suggesting that these lineages represented important resistant groups in this regional clinical collection. Although these lineages have been reported in other settings, the present findings should be interpreted primarily in the context of regional surveillance rather than broader global dissemination (38–41).
Resistance was highest to ampicillin, tetracycline, and nalidixic acid, and 26.6% of isolates exhibited MDR. Extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistance was mainly associated with blaCTX-M and blaDHA, whereas plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants, such as qnrS and qnrB, were also detected. Clear serotype-specific differences were also observed, with S. Enteritidis showing significantly higher resistance to nalidixic acid and colistin and S. I 4,[5],12:i:- showing higher resistance to tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The high resistance observed in S. I 4,[5],12:i:- is consistent with previous reports describing this monophasic variant as a lineage frequently associated with multidrug resistance (42).
The coexistence of β-lactamase genes, plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants, and QRDR alterations highlights the complexity of resistance evolution in these isolates (4–6, 17–23). In particular, the frequent detection of mutations in gyrA corresponding to the predicted D87N substitution, together with other QRDR variants and PMQR genes, suggests an increased risk of reduced fluoroquinolone susceptibility (43). In addition, isolates carrying blaCTX-M-65 remained susceptible to CAZ, indicating that CTX-M allele identity should be interpreted together with phenotypic susceptibility profiles rather than assuming uniform cephalosporin resistance patterns (44, 45).
PFGE suggested genetic relatedness within major resistant serotypes, while MLST assigned selected resistant isolates to major sequence types. WGS further provided higher-resolution genomic context for two representative isolates. Together, these complementary approaches linked population-level surveillance findings with isolate-level genomic features.
GGN-BG-22 carried a putative SGI-4-like chromosomal region containing clustered sil and pco metal tolerance genes together with multiple ICE-associated mobility genes, consistent with genomic features previously described in monophasic ST34-associated mobile chromosomal regions (46). Although the canonical full-length SGI-4 structure could not be unequivocally resolved, the coexistence of clustered metal tolerance genes and mobility-associated loci supports interpretation of this region as an SGI-4-associated ICE-like chromosomal locus.
The GGN-BG-22 plasmid was genetically distinct from the classical S. Typhimurium virulence plasmid pSLT and is better interpreted as a multidrug resistance-associated IncFIB plasmid (47, 48). The absence of spv, pef, and rck is inconsistent with a classical virulence plasmid architecture, whereas the presence of blaCTX-M-55, qnrS1, floR, catA2, and lnu(F) indicates accumulation of clinically relevant resistance determinants (47, 48). The retention of most tra genes together with several trb genes and finO further suggests preservation of a substantial transfer-associated backbone, although conjugation was not experimentally confirmed.
In GGN-BG-25, the chromosomal context of sopE suggests that this effector is embedded within a phage-derived or prophage-like chromosomal segment rather than a typical core genomic region (49, 50). This interpretation is supported by the PHASTEST prediction of a Gifsy_2-like region and by the presence of recombination-, lysis-, and tail/fiber-associated genes flanking sopE. However, because canonical structural and boundary-associated features of a fully intact prophage were not clearly identified, a conservative interpretation of this locus is warranted.
The GGN-BG-25 plasmid also carried IncFIB(S) and IncFII(S) replicons together with blaCTX-M-15, tet(A), and aac(3)-IId. The coexistence of these resistance determinants with plasmid-associated virulence genes, including pef, spv, rck, and mig-5, suggests that this ST11-associated plasmid may provide genetic potential for both antimicrobial resistance and virulence-associated traits (47).
The SNP-based phylogenetic analyses shown in Fig. 4 and 5 provided comparative genomic context for the two representative isolates within selected publicly available comparison data sets. Within this framework, GGN-BG-22 was positioned within a broader ST34 background and showed closer relatedness to Korean comparator isolates. GGN-BG-25 clustered most closely with several Korean ST11 comparator isolates, including food-associated strains. The accompanying AMR annotations further supported interpretation of relatedness in the context of shared or distinct resistance-associated profiles. These analyses should be interpreted as comparative placement within the available comparison set rather than as a comprehensive reconstruction of global population structure.
A few limitations of this study should be noted. First, all isolates were collected from a single geographic region, although the predominant serotypes and resistance profiles were broadly consistent with previous clinical surveillance data from Korea. Second, WGS was performed for only two representative isolates, which limits broader genomic inference. Third, detailed clinical metadata were not available for all patients. Future studies including a larger number of complete genomes from diverse serotypes and settings will be needed to strengthen genomic epidemiological interpretation.
In conclusion, among molecularly typed MDR Salmonella isolates from northern Gyeonggi Province, ST34 and ST11 were major lineages associated with diverse β-lactamase genes, quinolone resistance determinants, and mobile genetic elements. The combined use of PFGE, MLST, and focused comparative genomics showed that these molecularly characterized lineages were associated with distinct resistance- and virulence-related genomic features. These findings support the continued need for molecular surveillance and antimicrobial stewardship to monitor and control MDR Salmonella in clinical and public health settings.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank the staff of the Gyeonggi Province Institute of Health and Environment for their valuable assistance with this study.
This study was supported by the institutional resources of the Gyeonggi Province Institute of Health and Environment. No external funding was received.
Bu-Geon Lim: conceptualization, investigation, data curation, project administration, writing – original draft, writing – review & editing; Kyung-A Kim, Mi-Jung Jang, Hee-Cheon Moon, Myung-Jin Lee, and Bo-Yeon Kweon: investigation and methodology; Ga-Yeon Kim: supervision, writing – review & editing.
Contributor Information
Ga-Yeon Kim, Email: sysnhj77@gmail.com.
Dirk Tischler, Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The complete genome sequences generated in this study have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under accession numbers CP196701–CP196702 (GGN-BG-22) and CP196402–CP196403 (GGN-BG-25). Raw sequencing reads are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA1290791.
ETHICS APPROVAL
Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Dankook University, Korea (exemption no. DKU 2025-07-031-001), and informed consent was not required because isolates were obtained through routine surveillance and patient data were anonymized before analysis.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03400-25.
Tables S1: Primers used for β-lactamase genes and QRDR-associated genes in Salmonella isolates. Tables S2: Primers used for PCR amplification of PMQR genes in Salmonella isolates. Tables S3: AMR gene profiles of selected ST34 S. enterica serovar I 4,[5],12:i:- comparators for GGN-BG-22 phylogeny. Tables S4: AMR gene profiles of selected ST11 S. Enteritidis comparators for GGN-BG-25 phylogeny. Tables S5: Summary of major multidrug resistance profiles among 85 MDR Salmonella isolates. Tables S6: QRDR mutation patterns among 110 Salmonella isolates. Tables S7: PMQR gene patterns detected among 20 PMQR-positive Salmonella isolates. Tables S8: STs of 38 Salmonella isolates selected for MLST analysis. Tables S9: Selected chromosomally encoded virulence-associated genes in GGN-BG-22 and GGN-BG-25. Tables S10: Selected plasmid-associated virulence-related genes in GGN-BG-22 and GGN-BG-25. Fig. S1: Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis dendrogram of S. Bareilly, S. Typhimurium, and S. Virchow isolates. Fig. S2: Phylogenetic tree of multilocus sequence typing housekeeping gene sequences from 35 selected Salmonella isolates. Fig. S3: Comparative circular chromosome maps of S. I 4,[5],12:i:- isolate GGN-BG-22 and S. Enteritidis isolate GGN-BG-25.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Kumar R, Adeyemi NO, Chattaraj S, Alloun W, Thamarsha A, Anđelković S, Mitra D, Gautam P. 2025. Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella: One Health perspective on global food safety challenges. Sci One Health 4:100117. doi: 10.1016/j.soh.2025.100117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Peruzy MF, Murru N, Carullo MR, La Tela I, Rippa A, Balestrieri A, Proroga YTR. 2025. Antibiotic-resistant Salmonella circulation in the human population in Campania region (2010–2023). Antibiotics (Basel) 14:189. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14020189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bush K, Jacoby GA. 2010. Updated functional classification of β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:969–976. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01009-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Harris PNA, Tambyah PA, Paterson DL. 2015. β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in the treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae: time for a reappraisal in the era of few antibiotic options? Lancet Infect Dis 15:475–485. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70950-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bao D, Chen L, Shen W, Xu X, Zhu L, Wang Y, Wu Y, He X, Zhu F, Li H. 2024. Genomic epidemiology of ceftriaxone-resistant non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica strain in China. BMC Genomics 25:974. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10890-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Zhang Z, Zhao H, Shi C. 2025. Clonal spread and genetic mechanisms underpinning ciprofloxacin resistance in Salmonella enteritidis. Foods 14:289. doi: 10.3390/foods14020289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bender JB, Hedberg CW, Boxrud DJ, Besser JM, Wicklund JH, Smith KE, Osterholm MT. 2001. Use of molecular subtyping in surveillance for Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium. N Engl J Med 344:189–195. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101183440305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zou W, Chen HC, Hise KB, Tang H, Foley SL, Meehan J, Lin WJ, Nayak R, Xu J, Fang H, et al. 2013. Meta-analysis of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis fingerprints based on a constructed Salmonella database. PLoS One 8:e59224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bell RL, González-Escalona N, Stones R, Brown EW. 2011. Phylogenetic evaluation of the “Typhimurium” complex of Salmonella strains using a seven-gene multi-locus sequence analysis. Infect Genet Evol 11:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Carroll LM, Wiedmann M, den Bakker H, Siler J, Warchocki S, Kent D, Lyalina S, Davis M, Sischo W, Besser T, et al. 2017. Whole-genome sequencing of drug-resistant Salmonella enterica isolates from dairy cattle and humans in New York and Washington states reveals source and geographic associations. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e00140-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00140-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Miller EA, Elnekave E, Flores-Figueroa C, Johnson A, Kearney A, Munoz-Aguayo J, Tagg KA, Tschetter L, Weber BP, Nadon CA, et al. 2020. Emergence of a novel Salmonella enterica serotype Reading clonal group is linked to expansion in commercial turkey production, resulting in unanticipated human illness in North America. mSphere 5:e00056-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00056-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Shin E, La T-M, Yoo J, Kim J, Hyeon J-Y. 2025. Emergence of distinct Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis lineage since 2020, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis 31:1386–1393. doi: 10.3201/eid3107.250043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kim KG, Jung J, Shin JH, Park HJ, Kim MJ, Seo JJ, Kim YO, Lee SY, Cho CY, Kim TS. 2022. Trends in ESBLs and PABLs among enteric Salmonella isolates from children in Gwangju, Korea: 2014-2018. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 55:199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2021.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lee W, Kim E, Zin H, Sung S, Woo J, Lee MJ, Yang SM, Kim SH, Kim SH, Kim HY. 2022. Genomic characteristics and comparative genomics analysis of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Thompson isolated from an outbreak in South Korea. Sci Rep 12:20553. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22168-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Korea National Institute of Health . 2017. Protocol for serotyping of Salmonella spp. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Osong, Korea. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute . 2025. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. In CLSI Supplement M100, 35th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kim J, Jeon S, Rhie H, Lee B, Park M, Lee H, Lee J, Kim S. 2009. Rapid detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) for Enterobacteriaceae by use of a multiplex PCR-based method. Infect Chemother 41:181. doi: 10.3947/ic.2009.41.3.181 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Giraud E, Brisabois A, Martel JL, Chaslus-Dancla E. 1999. Comparative studies of mutations in animal isolates and experimental in vitro- and in vivo-selected mutants of Salmonella spp. suggest a counterselection of highly fluoroquinolone-resistant strains in the field. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:2131–2137. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.9.2131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Jacoby GA, Gacharna N, Black TA, Miller GH, Hooper DC. 2009. Temporal appearance of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:1665–1666. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01447-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Pribul BR, Festivo ML, de Souza MMS, Rodrigues D dos P. 2016. Characterization of quinolone resistance in Salmonella spp. isolates from food products and human samples in Brazil. Braz J Microbiol 47:196–201. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2015.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kim HB, Wang M, Park CH, Kim EC, Jacoby GA, Hooper DC. 2009. oqxAB encoding a multidrug efflux pump in human clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:3582–3584. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01574-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Cavaco LM, Hasman H, Xia S, Aarestrup FM. 2009. qnrD, a novel gene conferring transferable quinolone resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky and Bovismorbificans strains of human origin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:603–608. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00997-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kim HB, Park CH, Kim CJ, Kim EC, Jacoby GA, Hooper DC. 2009. Prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants over a 9-year period. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:639–645. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01051-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency . 2022. Protocol for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of Salmonella. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Osong, Korea. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. 2018. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res 3:124. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zhou Z, Alikhan NF, Mohamed K, Fan Y, Achtman M. 2020. The EnteroBase user’s guide, with case studies on Salmonella transmissions, Yersinia pestis phylogeny, and Escherichia core genomic diversity. Genome Res 30:138–152. doi: 10.1101/gr.251678.119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA, Beyvers S, Blom J, Goesmann A. 2021. Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb Genom 7:000685. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Grant JR, Enns E, Marinier E, Mandal A, Herman EK, Chen C, Graham M, Van Domselaar G, Stothard P. 2023. Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 51:W484–W492. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M, Edalatmand A, Huynh W, Nguyen A-LV, Cheng AA, Liu S, et al. 2020. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D517–D525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Johansson MHK, Bortolaia V, Tansirichaiya S, Aarestrup FM, Roberts AP, Petersen TN. 2021. Detection of mobile genetic elements associated with antibiotic resistance in Salmonella enterica using a newly developed web tool: MobileElementFinder. J Antimicrob Chemother 76:101–109. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Brown CL, Mullet J, Hindi F, Stoll JE, Gupta S, Choi M, Keenum I, Vikesland P, Pruden A, Zhang L. 2022. mobileOG-db: a manually curated database of protein families mediating the life cycle of bacterial mobile genetic elements. Appl Environ Microbiol 88:e0099122. doi: 10.1128/aem.00991-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kleinheinz KA, Joensen KG, Larsen MV. 2014. Applying the ResFinder and VirulenceFinder web-services for easy identification of acquired antibiotic resistance and E. coli virulence genes in bacteriophage and prophage nucleotide sequences. Bacteriophage 4:e27943. doi: 10.4161/bact.27943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Møller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Wishart DS, Han S, Saha S, Oler E, Peters H, Grant JR, Stothard P, Gautam V. 2023. PHASTEST: faster than PHASTER, better than PHAST. Nucleic Acids Res 51:W443–W450. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kaas RS, Leekitcharoenphon P, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2014. Solving the problem of comparing whole bacterial genomes across different sequencing platforms. PLoS One 9:e104984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Letunic I, Bork P. 2024. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 52:W78–W82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. De Sousa Violante M, Feurer C, Michel V, Romero K, Mallet L, Mistou M-Y, Cadel-Six S. 2024. Genomic diversity of Salmonella Typhimurium and its monophasic variant in pig and pork production in France. Microbiol Spectr 12:e0052624. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00526-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Trachsel JM, Bearson BL, Brunelle BW, Bearson SMD. 2022. Relationship and distribution of Salmonella enterica serovar I 4,[5],12:i:- strain sequences in the NCBI pathogen detection database. BMC Genomics 23:268. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08458-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Hyeon JY, Li S, Mann DA, Zhang S, Kim KJ, Lee DH, Deng X, Song CS. 2021. Whole-genome sequencing analysis of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis isolated from poultry sources in South Korea, 2010–2017. Pathogens 10:45. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10010045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Aung KT, Khor WC, Ong KH, Tan WL, Wong ZN, Oh JQ, Wong WK, Tan BZY, Maiwald M, Tee NWS, et al. 2022. Characterisation of Salmonella Enteritidis ST11 and ST1925 associated with human intestinal and extra-intestinal infections in Singapore. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19:5671. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Qin X, Yang M, Cai H, Liu Y, Gorris L, Aslam MZ, Jia K, Sun T, Wang X, Dong Q. 2022. Antibiotic resistance of Salmonella Typhimurium monophasic variant 1,4,[5],12:i:- in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antibiotics (Basel) 11:532. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11040532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Hopkins KL, Davies RH, Threlfall EJ. 2005. Mechanisms of quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: recent developments. Int J Antimicrob Agents 25:358–373. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Cantón R, González-Alba JM, Galán JC. 2012. CTX-M enzymes: origin and diffusion. Front Microbiol 3:110. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Jiang Q, Ke B, Wu D, Wang D, Fang L, Sun R, Wang M, Lei J, Shao Z, Liao X. 2022. Epidemiology of blaCTX-M-positive Salmonella Typhimurium from diarrhoeal outpatients in Guangdong, China, 2010–2017. Front Microbiol 13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.865254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Branchu P, Charity OJ, Bawn M, Thilliez G, Dallman TJ, Petrovska L, Kingsley RA. 2019. SGI-4 in monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium ST34 is a novel ICE that enhances resistance to copper. Front Microbiol 10:1118. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Rychlik I, Gregorova D, Hradecka H. 2006. Distribution and function of plasmids in Salmonella enterica. Vet Microbiol 112:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.10.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. García P, Hopkins KL, García V, Beutlich J, Mendoza MC, Threlfall J, Mevius D, Helmuth R, Rodicio MR, Guerra B, Med-Vet-Net WP21 Project Group . 2014. Diversity of plasmids encoding virulence and resistance functions in Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium monophasic variant 4,[5],12:i:- strains circulating in Europe. PLoS One 9:e89635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Mirold S, Rabsch W, Tschäpe H, Hardt WD. 2001. Transfer of the Salmonella type III effector sopE between unrelated phage families. J Mol Biol 312:7–16. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4950 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Pelludat C, Mirold S, Hardt WD. 2003. The SopEΦ phage integrates into the ssrA gene of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium A36 and is closely related to the Fels-2 prophage. J Bacteriol 185:5182–5191. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.17.5182-5191.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Tables S1: Primers used for β-lactamase genes and QRDR-associated genes in Salmonella isolates. Tables S2: Primers used for PCR amplification of PMQR genes in Salmonella isolates. Tables S3: AMR gene profiles of selected ST34 S. enterica serovar I 4,[5],12:i:- comparators for GGN-BG-22 phylogeny. Tables S4: AMR gene profiles of selected ST11 S. Enteritidis comparators for GGN-BG-25 phylogeny. Tables S5: Summary of major multidrug resistance profiles among 85 MDR Salmonella isolates. Tables S6: QRDR mutation patterns among 110 Salmonella isolates. Tables S7: PMQR gene patterns detected among 20 PMQR-positive Salmonella isolates. Tables S8: STs of 38 Salmonella isolates selected for MLST analysis. Tables S9: Selected chromosomally encoded virulence-associated genes in GGN-BG-22 and GGN-BG-25. Tables S10: Selected plasmid-associated virulence-related genes in GGN-BG-22 and GGN-BG-25. Fig. S1: Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis dendrogram of S. Bareilly, S. Typhimurium, and S. Virchow isolates. Fig. S2: Phylogenetic tree of multilocus sequence typing housekeeping gene sequences from 35 selected Salmonella isolates. Fig. S3: Comparative circular chromosome maps of S. I 4,[5],12:i:- isolate GGN-BG-22 and S. Enteritidis isolate GGN-BG-25.
Data Availability Statement
The complete genome sequences generated in this study have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under accession numbers CP196701–CP196702 (GGN-BG-22) and CP196402–CP196403 (GGN-BG-25). Raw sequencing reads are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA1290791.

![PFGE dendrograms of Salmonella I 4,[5],12:i:- and Salmonella Enteritidis isolates display clusters with resistance genes, QRDR mutations, and susceptibility profiles for CIP, NAL, CTX, CRO, and CAZ.](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e79/13436367/9cfa25effc33/spectrum.03400-25.f001.jpg)


![SNP-based phylogenetic tree of selected ST34 Salmonella I 4,[5],12:i:- genomes displays GGN-BG-22 with country, source, and antimicrobial resistance gene presence annotations.](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e79/13436367/6db98fdb7726/spectrum.03400-25.f004.jpg)
