Abstract
Esophageal cancers predominantly metastasize through direct invasion, lymphatic dissemination, or hematogenous spread. Frequent metastatic locations comprise the liver, lymph nodes, lungs, and bones. However, direct bronchial metastases are extremely rare. We report a case of a 50-year-old male diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and subsequent esophagectomy with gastric pull-up reconstruction. Two years after surgery, follow-up imaging indicated suspicious bronchial lesion. On 18F-FDG PET/CT, the bronchial lesion exhibited only mild 18F-FDG uptake, which may underestimate its malignancy. Histopathological assessment verified metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, congruent with the primary esophageal tumor. This case illustrates the diagnostic limitations of 18F-FDG PET/CT in specific situations and emphasizes the necessity of incorporating clinical, endoscopic, and pathological findings in intricate cases.
Key Words: 18F-FDG PET/CT, Bronchial metastasis, Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Introduction
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is an aggressive malignancy known for its high propensity for both locoregional and distant metastases, most commonly affecting the lymph nodes, liver, lungs, and bones (1, 2). While pulmonary metastases from ESCC occur frequently, direct metastasis to the bronchial tree is exceptionally rare, with only sporadic cases reported in the literature (3). Such endobronchial involvement poses significant diagnostic challenges, as these lesions often lack distinctive clinical or imaging features and may be misinterpreted as primary bronchogenic tumors or other benign conditions (4). The clinical scenario becomes even more complex due to inherent limitations in current diagnostic modalities. Although 18F-FDG PET/CT has become invaluable in staging and detecting distant metastases of ESCC, the sensitivity for identifying small or atypically located metastases, including direct bronchial involvement, remains suboptimal. Factors such as lesion size, variable metabolic activity, and local physiological uptake can contribute to false-negative and false-positive results, some-times obscuring subtle malignant lesions and hindering accurate diagnosis. Therefore, histo-pathological confirmation is crucial for a definitive diagnosis in these atypical clinical scenarios (5). This case report illustrates a notably rare occurrence: isolated direct bronchial metastasis from ESCC, initially overlooked on 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging.
Case Reports
A 50-year-old male was diagnosed with ESCC, and an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan was performed in August 2022 for staging, revealing pT3N1M0. The patient subsequently received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, followed by esophagectomy and gastric pull-up reconstruction in November 2022. After surgery, he was monitored with regular follow-up every three months, including contrast-enhanced chest and abdominal CT scans and upper endoscopy. No recurrence and or metastases were detected during this period. In March 2025, the patient presented with hoarseness and mild shortness of breath. A contrast-enhanced chest CT performed during routine follow-up revealed a focal consolidation area with surrounding ground-glass opacity in the left lower lobe (Figure 1). 18F-FDG PET/CT scan was performed for restaging. Two areas of concern were identified: a mildly 18F-FDG-avid lesion infiltrating the left lower lobar bronchus with associated bronchial narrowing (SUVmax: 3.5) and another hypermetabolic soft-tissue lesion (SUVmax: 4.1) adjacent to the right upper trachea at the level of C7–T1 vertebrae, near the esophagogastric anastomosis (Figure 2). Bronchoscopy revealed diffuse mucosal infiltration of the left lower bronchus. Biopsy specimens demonstrated clusters of malignant squamous cells with irregular hyperchromatic nuclei infiltrating fibrous stroma.
Figure 1.
Axial non-contrast-enhanced CT images of the chest demonstrate a focal area of consolidation with surrounding ground-glass opacity (mediastinal window left panel, and lung window, right panel, arrows) in the left lower lobe, suggestive of either post-inflammatory change or malignant infiltration
Figure 2.

18F-FDG PET/CT fusion images demonstrate two distinct lesions: (A) A mildly 18F-FDG-avid lesion in the left lower lobe of the lung, infiltrating the left lower lobar bronchus with associated bronchial narrowing (arrowheads). (B) A hypermetabolic soft-tissue lesion in the right cervical region, adjacent to the upper trachea at the C7–T1 level, near the esophagogastric anastomosis (arrows)
Immunohistochemical staining was positive for CK7 and P40, and negative for Napsin A and TTF-1, consistent with squamous cell carcinoma (Figure 3A-E). Comparative review of prior histopathology confirmed similarity with the original esophageal tumor: keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma with keratin pearl formation in the pre-treatment biopsy, and deep invasion into the muscularis propria in the surgical specimen (Figure 3F–G). The multidisciplinary tumor board concluded that the bronchial lesion represented metastatic spread from the esophageal primary.
Figure 3.
(A, B) Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with keratin pearl formation and deep muscular invasion (H&E). (C) Lung biopsy showing malignant squamous cells infiltrating fibrous stroma (H&E, ×400). (D, G) Negative for TTF-1 and Napsin A. (E, F) Positive CK7 and P40 staining in bronchial lesion. (H, J, K) the hypermetabolic soft-tissue lesion (17 × 19 mm, SUVmax 4.1) adjacent to the right upper trachea (C7–T1 level), showing positivity for P40 and CKAE1/AE3
Importantly, the anatomical location of the lesion near the original tumor bed suggests the possibility of intraoperative tumor cell seeding (Figure 4). The tracheal-side lesion was also biopsied and confirmed as metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (positive for P40 and CKAE1/AE3; Figure 3I–K). The patient was diagnosed with recurrent metastatic disease affecting the lower left bronchus and the right paratracheal lymph node. Systemic therapy was initiated with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and pembrolizumab. After three cycles, the patient's voice and respiratory function improved, and his CT scan showed a reduction in the left lower lobe lung lesion as well as a decrease in the size of the right paratracheal lymph node. The patient was planned to complete three additional cycles of the regimen, followed by pembrolizumab consolidation for a total duration of two years.
Figure 4.

(A) Axial 18F-FDG PET/CT images from the initial staging scan (August 2022) demonstrate 18F-FDG-avid uptake in the mid-esophagus (arrow), corresponding to the primary tumor. (B) Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT performed in March 2025, after the patient had undergone esophagectomy with gastric pull-up reconstruction, shows a mildly hypermetabolic lesion in the left lower bronchus (arrow head), located adjacent to the previous tumor bed, suggestive of intraoperative tumor cell seeding
Discussion
This case report describes a rare occurrence of direct bronchial metastasis stemming from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, emphasizing significant diagnostic challenges, particularly regarding 18F-FDG PET/CT. Although 18F-FDG PET/CT is a well-established and essential tool for detecting recurrence and metastatic disease in esophageal cancer, the patient's case highlights its limitation in specific clinical scenarios.
The most challenging diagnostic finding was the mild 18F-FDG uptake (SUVmax: 3.5) detected in the left lower lobar bronchus. In a postoperative setting, this lower metabolic activity could be wrongly thought to be benign inflammatory responses, fibrotic changes, or primary lung cancer. Even though the lesion's infiltrative nature and mucosal involvement were apparent, these characteristics were inadequate for the differentiation between benign and malignant pathologies based only on imaging. Ultimately, bronchoscopy with histopathological confirmation was paramount in establishing the correct diagnosis. In this case, the infiltrative nature and mucosal involvement of the bronchial lesion made it difficult to distinguish from benign or malignant conditions on imaging. Diagnosis was made only by bronchoscopy and histopathological confirmation. Due to the close anatomical relationship between the bronchial lesion and the surgical site, surgical seeding or direct invasion by the primary tumor are possible explanations; however, this remains uncertain (6, 7). Though exceedingly rare, implantation
metastasis should be considered in patients with unusual recurrence patterns following upper gastrointestinal surgery (8, 9). This case serves as a reminder that 18F-FDG PET/CT, though powerful, is not infallible. Clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion and incorporate complementary diagnostic tools-especially endoscopic and pathological evaluation-to ensure accurate assessment and optimal patient management (10, 11).
Conclusion
Direct bronchial metastasis from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is exceptionally uncommon and presents diagnostic difficulties. 18F-FDG PET/CT may underestimate the magnitude or characteristics of such lesions, particularly when 18F-FDG uptake is minimal. This case demonstrates the importance of correlating imaging findings with clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological information.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the radiology staff, nuclear medicine team, and thoracic surgery department for their invaluable assistance in patient care and image acquisition. We are also grateful to our colleagues for their constructive clinical discussions that helped in interpreting the findings and preparing this report.
This work received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The case report was conducted as part of routine clinical practice and academic activity without external financial support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this work.
Ethical consideration
Consistent with local ethical guidelines, institutional review board (IRB) approval was not required for a single-patient case report. The patient provided written informed consent for the publication of clinical details and accompanying images.
Contribution of author
Mai Huy Thong, Chau Quynh Anh: Written manuscript; Bui Quang Bieu, Tran Ba Khoa, Le Thi Thu Nga, Paolo Castellucci, Jin Chun Paeng: Edited manuscript; Mai Hong Son: edited and submitted manuscript.
References
- 1.Oesophagus Fact Sheet. Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN 2022) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wu SG, Zhang WW, He ZY, Sun JY, Chen YX, Guo L. Sites of metastasis and overall survival in esophageal cancer: a population-based study. Cancer Management and Research. 2017;9:781–788. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S150350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Madariaga ML, Gaissert HA. Secondary tracheal tumors: a systematic review. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2018;7(2):183. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.02.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Neeraj Gupta. Endobronchial metastasis: The challenge continues. Lung India. 2019;36(3):181–182. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_84_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Goense L, Van Rossum PS, Reitsma JB, Lam MG, Meijer GJ, Van Vulpen M, et al. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT for the detection of recurrent esophageal cancer after treatment with curative intent: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2015;56(7):995–1002. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.155580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gresham E, Parsa FD. Iatrogenic implantation of cancer cells during surgery. Hawai'i Journal of Health & Social Welfare. 2020;79(1):4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kosugi SI, Kanda T, Nishimaki T, Nakagawa S, Yajima K, Ohashi M, et al. Successful treatment for esophageal carcinoma with lung metastasis by induction chemotherapy followed by salvage esophagectomy: Report of a case. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2006;12(25):4101. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i25.4101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu D, Lu M, Li J, Yang Z, Feng Q, Zhou M, et al. The patterns and timing of recurrence after curative resection for gastric cancer in China. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2016;14(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1042-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Takashima S, Okubo S, Ota M. An Iatrogenic Metastasis. The American Journal of Medicine. 2015;128(9):e15–6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ayaz S. The Situations Which May Cause False-Negative Results in Oncological FDG-PET/CT Practice. The Ulutas Medical Journal. 2017;3(1):23–4. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ, Wang HH, Longtine JA, Dvorak A, Dvorak HF. Role of the Surgical Pathologist in the Diagnosis and Management of the Cancer Patient. In: Kufe DW, Pollock RE, Weichselbaum RR, et al., editors. Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine. 6th edition. Hamilton (ON): BC Decker; 2003. [Google Scholar]


