Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1975 Jun;181(6):853–856. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197506000-00017

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in evaluating acute abdominal pain.

C L Barbee, R B Gilsdorf
PMCID: PMC1343908  PMID: 1138636

Abstract

A study was performed to determine the value of peritoneal lavage in the acute abdomen not related to trauma. Lavage was performed in 33 patients in the evaluation of abdominal pain of sufficient degree to warrant consideration for surgical intervention. Peritoneal lavage was truly positive or truly negative in 64% of the cases. It showed false negative results in 28% and false positive results in 8%. The lavage was most accurate in the evaluation of appendicitis, colonic disease, and intra abdominal bleeding. It was highly inaccurate in the evaluation of cholecystitis and peptic ulcer disease. It was concluded that the peritoneal lavage can be a useful adjunct in the evaluation of patients with abdominal pain and should be considered in difficult diagnostic problems but not routinely employed.

Full text

PDF
853

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ghanem M. A., Borner J. W., Goodale R. L. Chromatographic separation of a chemotactic factor in peritoneal fluid after mesenteric infarction. Surg Forum. 1970;21:328–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ghanem M., Goodale R. L., Spanos P., Tsung M. S., Wangensteen O. H. Value of leukocyte counts in the recognition of mesenteric infarction and strangulation of shorter intestinal lengths: an experimental study. Surgery. 1970 Oct;68(4):635–645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gjessing J., Dencker H. Abdominal paracentesis with a dialysis catheter and peritoneal lavage--a diagnostic test in acute abdominal conditions. Acta Chir Scand. 1968;134(5):351–352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KEITH L. M., Jr, ZOLLINGER R. M., McCLEERY R. S. Peritoneal fluid amylase determinations as an aid in diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. AMA Arch Surg. 1950 Nov;61(5):930–936. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1950.01250020938014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MORETZ W. H., ERICKSON W. G. Peritoneal tap as an aid in the diagnosis of acute abdominal disease. Am Surg. 1954 Apr;20(4):363–377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Olsen W. R., Hildreth D. H. Abdominal paracentesis and peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 1971 Oct;11(10):824–829. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197110000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Perry J. F., Jr, DeMeules J. E., Root H. D. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970 Oct;131(4):742–744. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Perry J. F., Jr, Strate R. G. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma: indications and results. Surgery. 1972 Jun;71(6):898–901. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. ROOT H. D., HAUSER C. W., MCKINLEY C. R., LAFAVE J. W., MENDIOLA R. P., Jr DIAGNOSTIC PERITONEAL LAVAGE. Surgery. 1965 May;57:633–637. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Root H. D., Keizer P. J., Perry J. F., Jr Peritoneal trauma, experimental and clinical studies. Surgery. 1967 Oct;62(4):679–686. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Waterman N. G., Walsky R. S. Transperitoneal absorption of amylase in acute experimental pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970 Oct;131(4):729–732. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES