Skip to main content
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1975 Dec;182(6):722–723. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197512000-00011

Is modified radical mastectomy adequate for axillary lymph node dissection?

T Nemoto, T L Dao
PMCID: PMC1343968  PMID: 1190875

Abstract

The effectiveness of axillary dissection by modified radical mastectomy was assessed by a comparison of the total axillary nodes removed by this operation to that by radical mastectomy. In a series of 121 consecutive radical mastectomies performed during the period of 1964 to 1969, we found that the number of axillary nodes removed ranged from 3 to 63 with a median of 22 and a mean of 23.4 per patient. In a subsequent series of 111 consecutive modified radical mastectomies performed between 1969 and 1973, the total axillary nodes removed ranged from 6 to 77 with a median of 24 and mean of 25.7 nodes in each mastectomy specimen. These results strongly suggest that axillary dissection in modified radical mastectomy is as complete as that in the Halsted radical mastectomy.

Full text

PDF
722

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hultborn A., Hultén L., Roos B., Rosencrantz M., Rosengren B Ahrén C. Effectiveness of axillary lymph node dissection in modified radical mastectomy with preservation of pectoral muscles. Ann Surg. 1974 Mar;179(3):269–272. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197403000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Madden J. L., Kandalaft S., Bourque R. A. Modified radical mastectomy. Ann Surg. 1972 May;175(5):624–634. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197205000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Nemoto T. Treatment of early breast cancer. Survey of surgeons. N Y State J Med. 1973 Jul 15;73(14):1901–1904. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. PICKREN J. W., RUBE J., AUCHINCLOSS H., Jr MODIFICATION OF CONVENTIONAL RADICAL MASTECTOMY; A DETAILED STUDY OF LYMPH NODE INVOLVEMENT AND FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION TO SHOW ITS PRACTICALITY. Cancer. 1965 Aug;18:942–949. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196508)18:8<942::aid-cncr2820180804>3.0.co;2-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES