Abstract
Type 1 and type 3 γδ T cells develop in the embryonic thymus, yet it is not known whether they continue to differentiate after birth in tissues. Here, we show that in the first week of life, intestinal γδ T cells up-regulated many T cell activation and type 3 genes, while the postweaning period was dominated by induction of genes related to effector function, type 1 immunity, and cytotoxicity. During this period, γδ T cells protected the gut from fungal infection. In the adult intestine, type 3 interleukin-17–producing γδ T cells (γδT17 cells) had a distinct phenotype, a Tbet-dependent type 1 immune profile and enhanced T cell receptor (TCR) signaling. Last, we found a γδT17 cell–like population in the neonatal human gut. Collectively, our data suggest that γδ T cells continue to mature after they leave the thymus and, upon localization to the gut, a dynamic temporal differentiation program reshapes type 3 cells into Tbet+ type 1 effectors with heightened TCR activity.
Intestinal γδ T cells undergo temporal immunological maturation during neonatal, postnatal, and adult life.
INTRODUCTION
In the mouse, there are at least two functionally distinct innate γδ T cell subsets: a type 1 that produces interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and expresses the lineage transcription factor Tbet (γδT1) and a type 3 that produces interleukin-17 (IL-17) and expresses the lineage transcription factor retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor gamma t (RORγt) (γδT17) (1, 2). Type 1 and type 3 bifurcation occurs in the embryonic thymus and is coordinated by the strength of the T cell receptor (TCR) signal, such that weak TCR signaling promotes type 3 programming, while strong signaling promotes type 1 programming (3–6). A number of animal studies have implicated γδT17 cells as pathogenic in inflammatory disease models (7–9) and cancer (10), which has drawn particular attention to this subset. These cells additionally undertake tissue-specific homeostatic roles, such as thermoregulation in adipose tissue (11) or the regulation of memory and anxiety in the brain (12, 13).
The vast majority of murine γδT17 cells expresses either the Vγ6 or Vγ4 TCR chains [nomenclature according to Heilig and Tonegawa (14)] and can be found in most mucosal and barrier tissues as well as secondary lymphoid organs (15, 16). In healthy humans, IL-17–producing γδ T cells are scarce in the blood (17, 18) and tissues (19, 20); however, they have been reported in inflammatory and infectious diseases such as psoriasis (8, 21), multiple sclerosis (22), spondyloarthritis (23), candidiasis (24), and cancer (20). Recent single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data have provided evidence for the presence of precommitted type 3 Vγ9Vδ2 γδ T cells in the human embryonic thymus (17, 25). In addition to Vδ2, both Vδ1+ and Vδ3+ cells have been shown to be able to produce IL-17 (24, 26).
Despite the undisputed importance of neonatal life in imprinting life-long immunity (27), data linking γδ T cell functional and molecular maturation with temporal neonatal events are scarce. We know, for example, that the transcription factor signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) and the noncanonical nuclear factor κB pathway sustain the survival, proliferation, and function of neonatal γδT17 populations, and this affects subsequent adult immunity (28, 29). Beyond γδT17 cells, the neonatal gut supports the maturation of Vγ7+ intraepithelial cells (30), while an interaction between γδ T cells and the microbiota is important to prevent type 2–driven inflammation in the lung and skin (31, 32). The neonatal period appears to also support human γδ T cells with type 3 potential, which can be expanded from cord but not adult blood (33, 34), while other human subsets rapidly expand and acquire effector function after birth (35, 36). These data indicate a key role for early life signals in directing γδ T cell development and functional maturation. However, what are these signals, when is their temporal inclusion, and how they imprint tissue specific properties are not yet clear.
In the present study, we show that γδ T cells localize to the embryonic and neonatal gut, and we provide evidence that intestinal Vγ6 (γδT17 only) and Vγ4 (γδT17 and γδT1) cells undergo temporal transcriptional changes during the neonatal and postneonatal period characterized by vigorous immunological maturation during the first week of life and after weaning. Moreover, Vγ4 cells up-regulate expression of type 3 signature genes during the first week of life and type 1 and cytotoxicity effector genes after weaning. During this neonatal maturation period, intestinal γδ T cells could protect against fungal infection. In the adult intestine, γδT17 cells diversify from their lymph node (LN) counterparts by acquiring a type 1 transcriptional profile and the distinct phenotype Tbet+ICOS+P2RX7+ITGA1+SLAMF7+. Tbet is responsible for a major part of this type 1 programming and additionally regulates production of IFN-γ and IL-17A/F in response to IL-23 and IL-12. Tbet could be induced in newborn thymic γδT17 cells by a combination of TCR and cytokine signaling. We also found that unlike in the LN, γδT17 cells in the gut have an active TCR leading to productive signaling upon engagement. Last, we provide evidence that the human neonatal intestine contains a type 3 γδ T cell population resembling mouse intestinal γδT17 cells.
RESULTS
Neonatal but not embryonic intestinal γδT17 cells express Tbet and protect from infection
We previously demonstrated that intestinal lamina propria (LP) γδT17 cells up-regulate Tbet during the first week of life (28). This raised the hypothesis that γδT17 cells may localize in the gut before birth and mature in situ thereafter. To test this, we analyzed embryonic and neonatal tissue from mice that transgenically expressed green fluorescent protein (GFP) and AmCyan under the control of the RORγt or Tbet promoters, respectively (RORγtGFPTbetAmCyan). We used these mice so that we can trace both type 1 (Tbet+) and type 3 (RORγt+) populations, as well as the expression of Tbet in gut γδT17 cells (Fig. 1A). We found that ∼10% of all embryonic day 18.5 (E18.5) small intestinal LP (siLP) γδ T cells expressed RORγt, while, on average, 60% expressed Tbet (Fig. 1B). Thus, γδT17 cells seed the intestine already during embryonic life. To test whether the gut could also be seeded by γδT17 cells after birth, we isolated newborn thymocytes from RORγtGFPTbetAmCyan mice that were depleted of CD4+, CD8+, and TCRβ+ cells and transferred them into either adult or 2-day-old recombination activating gene 1-deficient (RAG1−/−) mice (Fig. 1C). After transfer, we analyzed siLP populations and could identify intestinal RORγt+ γδ T cells that had up-regulated Tbet (Fig. 1C). In these experiments, however, we could recover very few Tbet+RORγt− cells, perhaps reflecting impaired capacity to migrate to the gut after transfer. In addition, treatment of newborn mice with fingolimod (FTY720), which blocks egress from the thymus, reduced the numbers and frequencies of RORγt+Tbet+ γδ T cells (Fig. 1D), suggesting contribution of the neonatal thymus toward the numbers of intestinal γδT17 cells. As γδ T cells have been linked before with protective responses against fungal infections (37), we tested whether they could protect the neonatal intestine from Candida albicans. Oral infection of neonatal wild-type (WT) and TCRδ−/− mice showed that γδ T cells were required for optimal protection against C. albicans (Fig. 1E). Therefore, our data suggest that γδT17 cells home to the intestine during embryonic and neonatal life, after which they up-regulate Tbet and, together with other γδ T cell subsets, could play a protective role against early life fungal infections. What exactly triggers induction of Tbet after birth remains unknown. Using germ-free (GF) mice and mice sourced from a local pet store, we show that induction of Tbet was independent of the microbiota (fig. S1, A to D). However, Tbet could be induced in newborn thymic γδT17 cells when TCR activation was combined with the cytokines IL-1β, IL-7, and IL-23 (Fig. 1F). It is plausible that the cytokine milieu of the neonatal gut, together with putative TCR ligands, supports Tbet expression.
Fig. 1. Neonatal but not embryonic intestinal γδT17 cells express Tbet and protect from infection.
(A) Representative plots showing RORγt and Tbet expression in the siLP of RORγtGFPTbetAmCyan neonatal mice at the indicated day (d) after birth (two experiments, with six mice). (B) Representative plots and quantification of RORγt+ and Tbet+ γδ T cells from the siLP of E18.5 RORγtGFPTbetAmCyan embryos (three experiments, with 12 or 8 mice). (C) Schema of the experimental design and representative plots with corresponding quantification of the indicated siLP γδ T cell populations following transfer into neonatal or adult RAG1−/− hosts (two neonatal and three adult experiments, with 5 or 10 mice). (D) Representative plots of RORγt and Tbet expression in siLP γδ T cells and quantification of numbers and frequencies of RORγt+Tbet+ cells after treatment with FTY720 (three experiments, with five to six mice). (E) Quantification of fungal burden in the siLP, expressed as colony-forming units (CFU) per gram of tissue, in mice orally infected with C. albicans and analyzed 4 days postinfection (two experiments, with 11 or 18 mice). (F) Representative histograms of Tbet expression in γδT17 cells from newborn thymus after 2-day stimulation under the indicated conditions and quantification (three experiments, each consisting of a pool of 9 or 12 newborn mice); numbers in histograms indicate frequency of positive cells from one representative experiment. In all graphs, each symbol represents a mouse and line the median. In (D) and (E) *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 using the Mann-Whitney test. In (F), each symbol denotes the following statistical comparisons: * versus control; # versus IL-1β; + versus IL-7; • versus IL-23; ⊗ versus GL3; # versus IL-1β/IL-7; + versus IL-7/IL-23 (*,#,+,•,⊗, #,+P < 0.05; **,##,++,••,⊗⊗, ++P < 0.01; ***,###,+++,•••P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001), calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons correction.
Immunological maturation of intestinal γδ T cells in early life
The induction of Tbet shortly after birth suggested that there is differentiation of γδT17 cells in the intestine during neonatal life. To gain mechanistic insight regarding the molecular changes that occur throughout neonatal life, we isolated γδ T cells from the siLP of newborn (day 0), 7-, 21-, and 42-day-old mice and performed scRNA-seq. We used Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) analysis to visualize γδ T cells by integrating all time points. Unsupervised clustering identified 13 clusters of which 7 (c0, c2, c5, c6, c7, c10, c11) were Trgv6 (Vγ6+) and 4 (c1, c3, c4, c8) were Trgv4 (Vγ4+), while a proliferating cluster (c9) was a mix of Vγ6+ and Vγ4+ cells (Fig. 2, A and B, and table S1). Of the Vγ4+ clusters, one was only Trdv2-2+ (c4), while the rest expressed a mix of Trdv2-2 and Trdv5 chains (Fig. 2B). All Vγ6+ clusters were type 3 as shown by expression of Rorc and Il23r, while Vγ4+ clusters were split into type 1 (shown by Tbx21 and Cd27 expression) and type 3 cells (Fig. 2C), as is the case in other organs (38). Temporal analysis showed that some clusters were absent or nearly absent at day 0 but appeared or expanded after birth (Fig. 2D). In particular, the Vγ6+ clusters c0, c5, c10, and c11 were only evident from day 7 onward, and the Vγ4+ cluster c4 expanded after weaning by day 42 (Fig. 2D). Of the top 10 genes that defined these clusters, many were associated with T cell activation and effector function, such as cytokines (e.g., Il22), chemokines (e.g., Ccl5), interferon-inducible genes (ISGs) (e.g., Gbp6), and cytotoxicity-related molecules (e.g., Gzma) (Fig. 2E and table S1).
Fig. 2. Immunological maturation of intestinal γδ T cells in early life.
(A) γδ T cells were sorted from day 0 (10 mice; 1832 cells), day 7 (9 mice; 3294 cells), day 21 (3 mice; 4260 cells), and day 42 (2 mice; 5915) siLP, and the UMAP represents clustering of the cells after integration of all time points. (B and C) Feature plots showing expression of Trgv and Trdv chains (B) and representative type 3– and type 1–associated genes (C). (D) UMAP representation of γδ T cells across all time points, highlighting clusters c0, c4, c5, c10, and c11. (E) Heatmap showing expression of the top 10 genes for each cluster shown in (D). (F and H) Plots indicating selected DEGs and their log2 fold change (log2FC) between the indicated time points of Vγ6 (F) and Vγ4 (H) γδ T cells. (G and I) Feature plots showing expression of Il22 and Bhlhe40 (G) and Gzma and Itga1 (I) across all time points. All shown genes were significantly expressed (P < 0.05) with a cutoff expression of log2FC of ≥1. P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. d, day.
The above suggested active maturation of the γδ T cell compartment during neonatal life and the postweaning period and prompted us to investigate in more detail temporal gene expression changes in Vγ6- and Vγ4-expressing cells. Therefore, we compared differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in a time-wise manner: days 0 to 7, days 7 to 21, and days 21 to 42. Within the first week of life Vγ6 cells up-regulated many genes related to immune function such as cytokines and cytokine receptors (e.g., Il22, Il2ra, Il1r1, and Il18r1), cell activation and tissue residency molecules (e.g., Cd69 and Cd44), chemokines and chemokine receptors (e.g., Cxcl10 and Cxcr6), signaling molecules including many associated with TCR activation (e.g., Nr4a1, Nr4a2, Nr4a3, Dusp1, and P2rx7), the RORγt target genes Tmem176a and Tmem176b (39), and transcription factors such as Rora, Bhlhe40, Jun, and Junb (Fig. 2F, fig. S2A, and table S2). Notable immune-related DEGs at day 0 included Pdcd1, the gut homing molecules Itgae and Ccr9, the tissue egress molecules S1pr1 and Klf2, and the cytokine Mif, Il21r, and Tnfrsf9 (4-1BB) (Fig. 2F, fig. S2A, and table S2). To substantiate these findings, we additionally sorted intestinal RORγt+ γδ T cells from 0- and 7-day-old RORγtGFP mice and performed bulk RNA-seq. We found that at day 7, the cells had up-regulated many genes indicative of immunological maturation including the transcription factors Tbx21, Bhlhe40, and Nr4a1, the adhesion/migration molecules Cxcr3, Ccl20, Cd44, and Cd69, the cytokines Tnf and Csf2 (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor), and the signaling molecules Tnfaip3 and Map3k14 (fig. S2E and table S3), in agreement with our scRNA-seq data.
Between days 7 and 21, there were much fewer new induced genes, while day 7 genes retained their higher expression (Fig. 2F, fig. S2A, and table S2). This was also the case in the transition between days 21 and 42, although we noted induction of the cytokines Il17a, Il22, and Csf2, as well as Ptgs2 (cyclooxygenase-2, COX-2) (Fig. 2F, fig. S2A, and table S2). These data suggested that the bulk of transcriptional maturation occurs during the first week of life, while later stages are more focused on sustaining and inducing genes related to effector function. Comparison of day 7 and day 42 cells showed that the latter had higher expression levels of a number of genes associated with effector function, ISGs, and the inhibitory receptors Lilrb4a and Lilrb4b (Fig. 2F, fig. S2C, and table S2). The high expression of at least some of these genes correlated with the clusters that appeared and expanded from day 7 onward, further demonstrating the presence of temporal maturation events (Fig. 2G).
When we interrogated Vγ4 cells, we found that their transition from birth to adulthood was similar to Vγ6 cells. Hence, by day 7, they had up-regulated the same genes or groups of genes, while from days 7 to 21, induction of new immune-related genes was reduced (Fig. 2H, fig. S2B, and table S2). An important difference between the two populations was the clear induction of type 3 genes at day 7 (e.g., Rorc, Il17a, Maf, Il23r, and Blk) in Vγ4 cells (Fig. 2H, fig. S2B, and table S2), indicating that part of their type 3 programming occurs during the first week of life. After weaning at day 42, Vγ4 cells up-regulated many type 1 and cytotoxicity-related genes (e.g., Nkg7, Klrd1, Themis, Itga1, Gzma, and Cd8a) (Fig. 2H; fig. S2, B and D; and table S2). Expression of at least some of these genes correlated with the Trdv2-2 cluster c4, which expanded between days 21 and 42 (Fig. 2I). Collectively, our data suggest that type 3 intestinal Vγ6 cells undergo a rigorous immunological maturation during the first week of life, while their effector function is further induced during the weeks following weaning. Although similar molecular changes occur in Vγ4 cells, they additionally undergo type 3 programming after birth and type 1 programming, including cytotoxicity-related genes, after weaning.
Tissue restricted adaptation of intestinal γδT17 cells
As the neonatal microenvironment in the gut is specialized in imprinting distinct immunological characteristics among cell lineages (40), we reasoned that intestinal LP γδ T cells would have considerably diversified from their LN counterparts. To test this, we used RORγtGFPTbetAmCyan mice to sort and perform bulk RNA-seq from cells residing in either the LN or the LP [both siLP and colonic LP (cLP)] that were of the γδT1 (RORγt−Tbet+) or γδT17 (RORγt+Tbet+ in LP and RORγt+Tbet− in LN) subset (fig. S3A). Principal components analysis clustered the six populations based on cell type (γδT1 V γδT17) and organ (LN V gut). There was a clear diversification of LN from intestinal γδT17 cells, as well as from non-γδT17 populations (fig. S3B), suggesting a distinct organ-specific transcriptional identity. There were 2802 DEGs between siLP and LN γδT17 cells, of which 1416 were significantly higher in siLP and 1386 were significantly higher in LN (Fig. 3A and table S3). Similar differences were observed when comparing cLP LN γδT17, although the number of DEGs was considerably lower (1790 DEGs; 1140 higher in cLP and 650 higher in LN) (fig. S3C and table S3). The differences between siLP and cLP γδT17 cells amounted to only 454 genes, of which 206 were higher in siLP and 248 were higher in cLP (fig. S3D and table S3).
Fig. 3. Tissue and Tbet-dependent imprinting of intestinal γδT17 cells.
(A) Volcano plot indicating DEGs between siLP and LN γδT17 cells following bulk RNA-seq; selected genes enriched in either siLP or LN are indicated. (B and C) Representative plots (B) and quantification (C) of ITGA1, Ly6a, ICOS, P2RX7, SLAMF7, and CXCR3 levels in RORγt+ and RORγt− γδ T cells from siLP or LN. (D) Heatmap showing the expression of the listed genes across γδ T cell subsets. (E) Enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways when comparing gut γδT17 cells from day 7 versus day 0 mice (blue) or adult siLP and LN γδT17 (orange). NES, normalized enrichment score. (F) Volcano plot indicating DEGs between Tbet-deficient (TbetKO) and WT γδT17 cells from siLP; selected genes enriched in either TbetKO or WT are indicated. (G) Representative plots of SLAMF7 and ITGA1 levels in RORγt+ and RORγt− γδ T cells from the siLP of TbetF/F (Cre−) or RORγtCRE-TbetF/F (Cre+) mice. (H) Schema of the genetic design used to lineage trace ex RORγt+ cells. (I) Representative analysis of the lineage tracing experiment indicating the expression of RORγtGFP and RORγtRFP in the indicated cells; ex RORγt+ cells express only RORγtRFP; representative of many mice over many different litters. In (A) and (D) to (F), three biological repeats, each consisting of a pool of four to six mice. In (A) and (F), each dot represents a gene. NS, not significant. In (B) and (C), three experiments, with five to eight mice. In (G), two experiments, with six mice. In (A), (D), and (F), P values were calculated using a quasi-likelihood ratio test with the R package edgeR and in (E) with R package fgsea v1.28.0. For (C), in all graphs, each symbol represents a mouse and line the median; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001, calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons correction.
We noticed a number of immune-relevant genes that were highly and differentially expressed in the siLP compared to LN γδT17 cells, including cytokines (e.g., Ifng and Il22), chemokines (e.g., Ccl20 and Cxcl3), transcription factors (e.g., Tbx21 and Bhlhe40), immunoinhibitory receptors (e.g., Ctla4 and Tigit), and effector (e.g., Slamf7 and Fasl) and signaling molecules (e.g., Dusp8 and Nfkbid) (Fig. 3A and table S3). LN cells expressed high levels of S1pr1, Sell, and Ccr7, reminiscent of their location, as well as the chemokine receptors Ccr6 and Ccr10 and the immunoregulatory receptors Btla and Nrp1 (Fig. 3A and table S3). To validate the protein levels of some of the above genes, we decided to stain for surface molecules whose transcripts were highly expressed in adult intestinal γδT17 cells as well as some molecules that were detected in neonatal cells, which included CD49a (ITGA1), ICOS, CXCR3, Ly6a, P2RX7, and SLAMF7 (Fig. 3, B and C). RORγt+ cells in the gut differentially expressed high levels of ITGA1, ICOS, and P2RX7 when compared to either RORγt− in the gut or all γδ T cells in the LN (Fig. 3, B and C). SLAMF7 was differentially expressed in the gut; however, both RORγt+ and RORγt− cells had similar levels (Fig. 3, B and C). In contrast, levels of Ly6a were significantly higher in RORγt+ LN cells compared to all other subsets (Fig. 3, B and C). CXCR3 could only be detected in RORγt− LN cells (Fig. 3, B and C). When we compared expression levels of these molecules in Vγ4+ and Vγ6+ intestinal RORγt+ γδ T cells, we found that ITGA1, P2RX7, and SLAMF7 were higher in Vγ6+, whereas Ly6a was higher in Vγ4+ cells (fig. S3E). In the LN, the only noticeable difference was the higher levels of ICOS in Vγ6+ cells (fig. S3E). Hence, besides Tbet, γδT17 cells in the gut also express ITGA1, SLAMF7, ICOS, and P2RX7.
Next, we wanted to define a gene signature that could discern intestinal γδT17 cells from their LN counterparts and also from intestinal γδT1 cells. Hence, we chose genes that were differentially expressed in the gut when compared to LN and also genes that were specific for the γδT17 lineage. We chose the following 22 genes: Ctla4, Ifng, Ptgs2, Cxcl3, Lif, Il22, Nr4a1, Nr4a2, Nr4a3, Areg, Slamf7, Fasl, Itga1, Junb, Fosl2, Bhlhe40, Ccl20, Osgin1, Litaf, Tbx21, Rorc, and Maf (Fig. 3D). It was obvious that in the gut, γδT17 and γδT1 cells shared a lot of these genes, pointing toward a substantial impact of the tissue and not lineage on transcriptional imprinting (Fig. 3D). For example, while all gut subsets expressed Tbx21, Slamf7, Fasl, and Ifng, only γδT1 cells did so in the LN (Fig. 3D). As a group, these genes were significantly more enriched in gut γδT1 than in LN γδT17 cells (fig. S3F), further suggesting a closer relationship between type 1 and type 3 γδ T cell lineages in the gut than between type 3 cells when these were residing at different tissues. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) based on Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways showed that the TCR, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), Janus kinase (JAK)–STAT, chemokine signaling, and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction pathways were among the most highly enriched in siLP compared to LN γδT17 cells (Fig. 3E). GSEA analysis of our day 0 versus day 7 bulk RNA-seq dataset (fig. S2E) showed enrichment of the same pathways (Fig. 3E), substantiating our previous findings that the first week of life is a key period for γδ T cell maturation. Collectively, our data suggest that the gut microenvironment imprints γδ T cells with a tissue-specific phenotype and transcriptional profile that is initiated during early neonatal life, making gut γδT17 more similar to type 1 than to their type 3 counterparts in the LN.
Tbet-dependent imprinting of intestinal γδT17 cells
We reasoned that one of the key drivers of the type 1 characteristics in gut γδT17 was Tbet. To test its role, we crossed RORγt-Cre with Tbet-flox (TbetF/F) mice (RORγtCRE-TbetF/F) and analyzed LP γδ T cells. Deletion of Tbet was confirmed by flow cytometry (fig. S4A). There was no difference in the numbers of total γδ T cells; however, there was a significant loss of Tbet+ γδ T cells in both siLP and cLP (fig. S4, B and C), whereas numbers of RORγt+ γδ T cells were unchanged (fig. S4, B and C). To get a better understanding about the impact of Tbet, we crossed TbetF/F with RORγtCRE-R26LSLRFP mice, where red fluorescent protein (RFP) expression in the ROSA26 locus was induced by RORγt-driven Cre recombinase (fig. S4D). We sorted TCRγδ+RORγtRFP (i.e. Tbet-deficient γδT17) cells from the siLP and cLP, performed bulk RNA-seq, and compared them to the gene sets we had generated earlier from Tbet-expressing cells. There were 504 DEGs between Tbet-deficient and Tbet-sufficient γδT17 cells in the siLP (Fig. 3F and table S3) and 595 in the cLP (fig. S4E and table S3). Many of the immune-relevant genes that were down-regulated in gut (siLP + cLP) Tbet-deficient cells included type 1 signature genes such as Tbx21, Ifng, Ccr5, Cxcr3, Itga1, Ctsw, Ccl4, Xcl1, Nkg7, and Slamf7, in addition to Nr4a3, Nr4a1, and Fasl, while Il17a and Il17f were significantly up-regulated (Fig. 3F and fig. S4E). We confirmed Tbet-dependent expression of ITGA1 and SLAMF7 by flow cytometry in both Vγ4+ and Vγ6+ cells (Fig. 3G and fig. S4, F and G). In contrast, some of the genes that were up-regulated in Tbet-deficient cells were also highly enriched in LN γδT17, such as S1pr1, Ccr7, Ccr6, Ccr8, Ccr10, Itgae, Nrp1, and Btla (Fig. 3, A and F). Thus, Tbet promotes type 1 imprinting of intestinal γδT17 cells.
It was plausible that Tbet marked type 3 to type 1 plasticity, so that, at some point, intestinal γδT17 cells would lose RORγt expression and acquire a Tbet-only identity, similar to group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3) (41, 42). To test this, we performed a lineage tracing experiment by crossing RORγtGFP to RORγtCRE-R26LSLRFP mice (Fig. 3H). As opposed to CD4+ T cells and ILC3, we could not detect any GFP−RFP+ “ex” RORγt+ γδ T cells (Fig. 3I), in agreement with previously published data (43). This suggested that at steady-state and in the absence of immunogenic and activation signals, although intestinal γδT17 cells express Tbet and acquire a type 1 program, they do not lose their type 3 identity.
A key functional feature of type 1 immune cells is the production of IFN-γ, which is regulated by Tbet. We therefore tested whether this was also the case in γδT17 cells. To induce IFN-γ, we first activated siLP cells with anti-CD3 (αCD3) or a combination of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and ionomycin but could only measure negligible IFN-γ levels (Fig. 4, A and B). However, IFN-γ was induced in a Tbet-dependent manner when PMA and ionomycin were combined with IL-23 (Fig. 4, C and D). We then compared IL-23 and IL-12 stimulations, as the latter is a known type 1–inducing cytokine. We found that IFN-γ could be induced more potently by IL-23 than by IL-12 (Fig. 4, E and F) and, as expected, IL-23 was also better at inducing IL-17A and IL-17F (Fig. 4, E and G, and fig. S5, A and B). IL-23 was particularly effective at supporting cells coproducing IFN-γ with IL-17A and IL-17F (Fig. 4, E and H, and fig. S5, A and C). Frequencies of IFN-γ+IL-17A− cells were similar between IL-12 and IL-23 (Fig. 4H), while frequencies of IFN-γ+IL-17F− cells were only slightly higher following IL-23 stimulation (fig. S5C). Notably, lack of Tbet resulted in high proportions of cells producing IL-17A or IL-17F (Fig. 4, E and G, and fig. S5, A and B), in agreement with the high Il17a and Il17f expression levels in Tbet-deficient cells (Fig. 3F). IL-22 could not be induced by IL-12 and was Tbet independent (fig. S5D). In summary, these data show that Tbet promotes type 1 and suppresses type 3 functional properties in intestinal γδT17 cells.
Fig. 4. Tbet differentially regulates IFN-γ and IL-17A production.
(A and B) Representative flow cytometry analysis of IFN-γ production in siLP RORγt+ γδ T cells stimulated with αCD3 or PMA + ionomycin (P/I); in (A), cells are pregated as RORγt+; (three experiments, with 11 mice); in (B), two experiments, with seven mice. (C and D) Representative plots (C) and quantification (D) of IFN-γ levels in siLP RORγt+ γδ T cells after stimulation with IL-23 + PMA + ionomycin from TbetF/F (Cre−) or RORγtCRE-TbetF/F (Cre+) mice; in (D), cells are pregated as RORγt+ (four experiments, with 11 to 12 mice). (E) Representative plots of IFN-γ and IL-17A production in Cre− and Cre+ siLP RORγt+ γδ T cells after stimulation with IL-23 or IL-12. (F and G) Quantification of IFN-γ and IL-17A levels in Cre− and Cre+ siLP RORγt+ γδ T cells after stimulation with IL-23 or IL-12. (H) Frequencies of IL-17A+IFN-γ+ (red) and IL-17A−IFN-γ+ (blue) RORγt+ γδ T cells after stimulation with IL-23 or IL-12. In (E) to (H), two experiments, with six mice. In all graphs, each symbol represents a mouse and line the median; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001 calculated using the Mann-Whitney test in (D) and a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons correction in (F) to (H).
Heightened TCR signaling capacity in intestinal γδT17 cells
Contrary to their need for TCR signaling during thymic development, adult γδT17 cells in the LN have been shown to be hypo-responsive to TCR stimuli (44). However, our earlier observation that the TCR contributes to the expression of Tbet (see Fig. 1F) made us hypothesize that in the gut, where Tbet expression is evident, the γδT17 TCR cells may be more active. This was reinforced by the fact that TCR signaling was one the most highly enriched pathways in day 7 and adult intestinal γδT17 cells (Fig. 3E) and that some of the most highly expressed genes were those coding the orphan nuclear receptors Nr4a1, Nr4a2, and Nr4a3 (Fig. 3A), which function as transcription factors and can be directly induced by the TCR (45). To test whether intestinal γδT17 cells had increased TCR signaling capacity, we activated LN and siLP lymphocytes with αCD3 in the absence of other stimuli and assessed expression of Nur77 (Nr4a1) and production of IL-17A and IL-17F 3 hours later. We found that Nur77 was induced at higher levels in the siLP than the LN and that Nur77+ cells expressed both IL-17A and IL-17F (Fig. 5, A and B). Production of IL-17A and IL-17F was significantly higher in the siLP following αCD3 stimulation (Fig. 5B). Induction of Nur77 in the gut was similar between Vγ4+ and Vγ6+ cells (fig. S6A). We reasoned that the higher activity of the TCR in the gut could be attributed to the presence of the microbiota. However, induction of Nur77 was similar between GF and specific pathogen-free (SPF) mice (fig. S6B). Since P2RX7 was highly expressed in intestinal γδT17 cells and this receptor has been shown to amplify TCR-mediated Ca2+ signaling through adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) (46), we reasoned that it might be involved in determining the higher TCR reactivity of intestinal γδT17 cells. To test this, we repeated the above experiments in the presence of apyrase, which hydrolyses and depletes ATP, and found that it reduced significantly the induction of Nur77 following αCD3 stimulation (Fig. 5, C and D). However, induction of Nur77 in siLP cells deficient for P2RX7 was not changed (fig. S6C). Thus, in intestinal γδT17 cells, TCR stimulation leads to functional signaling.
Fig. 5. Heightened TCR signaling capacity in intestinal γδT17 cells.
(A and B) Representative plots (A) and quantification (B) of Nur77 expression and IL-17A/F production in siLP and LN γδT17 cells after a 3-hour culture with or without αCD3 [three experiments, with 11 mice (siLP) or 8 mice (LN)]; in (B) (left plot), total Nur77+ cells are the addition of Nur77+Cytokine+ and Nur77+Cytokine− cells shown in the flow cytometry plots in (A). (C and D) Quantification (C) and representative histograms (D) of Nur77 expression in siLP and LN γδT17 cells after a 3-hour stimulation under the indicated conditions (four experiments, with 10 to 12 mice). (E and F) Representative plots (E) and quantification (F) of FT Blue+ (early Nur77 activation), FT Red+ (late Nur77 activation) and FT Blue+Red+ in siLP and LN γδT17 cells isolated from Tempo mice (two experiments, with six mice). (G and H) Representative plots (G) and quantification (H) of RORγt+Tbet+ γδ T cells in the siLP (G) and siLP or cLP (H) of WT and CD3g+/-CD3d+/− mice (two experiments, with four or six mice). In all graphs, each symbol represents a mouse and line the median; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001 using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons correction in (B), (C), and (F) or the Mann-Whitney test in (H).
Next, we wanted to test whether intestinal γδT17 cells are actively engaging their TCR in situ. To directly test this, we used Nur77–timer rapidly expressed in lymphocytes (Tempo) mice, which report a fluorescent timer (FT) protein under the control of Nur77 (47). In these mice, a FT Blue signal denotes recent TCR-driven Nur77 expression, while FT conversion to a Red signal indicates accumulated past signaling (47). We found that siLP γδT17 cells had significantly higher levels of FT Blue and FT Blue/Red signal compared to their LN counterparts suggesting active and recent TCR activation (Fig. 5, E and F). In contrast, LN γδT17 and γδT1 cells had higher levels of FT Red suggestive of past TCR signaling (Fig. 5, E and F). Last, we investigated intestinal γδT17 cells in the CD3 double haploinsufficient CD3g+/−CD3d+/− mice, which have impaired TCRγδ signaling and γδ T cell subset development (5). Numbers of RORγt+Tbet+ γδ T cells in the gut were significantly reduced in these mice, further supporting the importance of the TCR (Fig. 5, G and H); however, this may reflect signaling requirements in the thymus and not TCR-driven homeostasis or maintenance in the tissue. In summary, these data suggest that in the gut, γδT17 cells actively engage their TCR resulting in heightened signaling capacity, which can be sufficient to induce cytokine production and which is partly dependent on ATP.
Presence of type 3 γδ T cells in the human neonatal intestine
Last, we explored whether the human gut contained γδ T cells resembling mouse intestinal γδT17. As there is evidence suggesting that neonatal blood and thymus in humans are enriched in type 3 γδ T cells (33, 34), we analyzed human neonatal siLP and cLP from 13 infants who were undergoing either primary or secondary (anastomosis) surgery for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or unrelated noninflammatory conditions (Table 1). To test for the presence of putative γδT17 populations, we considered cells that were CD19−CD14−CD11b−HLA-DR−CD4−CD45+CD3+TCRγδ+ and expressed or not RORγt. We found that RORγt+ cells were present in varying frequencies but not in all donors (Fig. 6, A and B, and fig. S7, A and B) and, in one case, only in the proximal but not distal part of the resected tissue (donor 8 in Fig. 6, B and C). However, when present, RORγt+ cells were always CD69+CD161+ (Fig. 6, A and C), and they expressed CD127 (IL-7Rα) but no detectable Tbet (Fig. 6, A and D). A CD69+CD161+ population was evident in all donors (fig. S7C).
Table 1. Clinical information of neonatal donors with intestinal disorders.
For each donor, it is listed diagnosis, gestational age (GA), type of surgery at sample collection [primary (1) or secondary (2)], and postnatal age (age) when the sample was collected (d, days; m, months). Term status was defined on the basis of the corrected age (gestational age plus postnatal age at the time of sample collection) and classified as preterm (<37 weeks), term (37 to 42 weeks), or postterm (>42 weeks). SI, small intestine.
| Donor | Diagnosis | GA (week) | Surgery | Age | Term status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meconium plug at ileocecal site | 24 | 2 | 3 m | Term |
| 2 | Perforation in colon descendant | 31 | 2 | 2 m | Term |
| 3 | SI atresia | 39 | 2 | 1 m | Postterm |
| 4 | Resection of rectum and sigmoid colon | 38 | 1 | 2 m | Postterm |
| 5 | Colon atresia | 40 | 1 | 2d | Term |
| 6 | NEC | 28 | 2 | 2 m | Preterm |
| 7 | Other | 33 | 1 | 27d | Term |
| 8 | NEC | 27 | 2 | 4 m | Postterm |
| 9 | SI atresia | 37 | 1 | 1d | Term |
| 10 | NEC | 28 | 1 | 12d | Preterm |
| 11 | SI atresia | 38 | 1 | 1d | Term |
| 12 | Other | 27 | 2 | 2 m | Term |
| 13 | SI atresia | 33 | 1 | 1d | Preterm |
Fig. 6. Presence of RORγt-expressing type 3 γδ T cells in the human neonatal intestine.
(A) Representative flow cytometry analysis of human neonatal siLP from donor 9 (d9) indicating the presence of CD69+CD161+, CD69+CD161−, and CD69−CD161− γδ T cells and their expression of RORγt and Tbet. (B) Quantification of RORγt+ γδ T cells across all donors. (C) Quantification of RORγt+ cells within CD69+CD161+ γδ T cells across all donors (except donor 1). [(B) and (C)] Red, detectable RORγt+ cells; blue, not detectable RORγt+ cells. (D) Representative flow cytometry analysis of human neonatal siLP (donor 3) indicating the presence of RORγt+CD69+ and RORγt−CD69− γδ T cells and their expression of CD127 and Tbet. (E) UMAP showing how γδ T cell populations cluster in the human neonatal siLP and feature plots showing log-normalized expression levels of TRDV1, TRDV2, TRDV3, RORC, MAF, CCR6, KLRB1, and TBX21 among these clusters. (F) Heatmap showing the top 10 DEGs for each γδ T cell cluster in the human neonatal siLP; all shown genes were significantly expressed for each cluster (P < 0.05; calculated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test) with a cutoff expression of log2FC of ≥1; gene names in red indicate relevance to type 3 immunity. (G) Graphical representation of the frequency of RORC+ cells expressing the indicated genes in human neonatal siLP; bars indicate the percentage of RORC-expressing cells with measurable (>0 counts) expression of each gene; genes are ordered by decreasing prevalence. (H) Heatmap showing, for each cluster, the expression level of the human ortholog genes of the mouse intestinal γδT17 signature that we defined in Fig. 3D.
To get a more unbiased and detailed overview of γδ T cells in the human neonatal LP, we performed scRNA-seq from sorted TCRγδ+ cells derived from two different donors, one siLP and one cLP. We identified four clusters in the siLP (Fig. 6E and table S4) and five clusters in the cLP (fig. S7D and table S4), which contained all the three major γδ T cell populations based on the expression of TRDV1 (Vδ1+), TRDV2 (Vδ2+), and TRDV3 (Vδ3+) (Fig. 6E and fig. S7D). Whereas Vδ1+ cells were distributed among most clusters, Vδ2+ cells were mostly constrained within cluster c2 in both siLP and cLP (Fig. 6E and fig. S7D). Vδ3+ cells were less frequent and had a similar distribution to Vδ1+ cells (Fig. 6E and fig. S7D). We then examined the top DEGs among the clusters (table S4) in an attempt to identify groups of genes that may reveal putative functions, in particular those related to type 3 immunity. In this regard, we observed that cluster c2 in both siLP (Fig. 6F) and cLP (fig. S7E) expressed genes previously related with type 3 immune cells including RORA, KLRB1 (CD161), CCR6, ZBTB16, and CXCR6 (25), as well as GPR183 (Fig. 6F and fig. S7E), which is linked to mouse γδT17 cell development and function (48).
Next, we looked for RORC-expressing cells and could find them concentrated in cluster c2 in both siLP and cLP with few cells also present in cluster c3 (Fig. 6E and fig. S7D). RORC+ cells colocalized with cells expressing the type 3–associated genes MAF, CCR6, and KLRB1, while coexpression with TBX21 was weaker (Fig. 6E and fig. S7D). We then focused on RORC+ cells and the top genes that they expressed in siLP and cLP and identified many that have been previously described as being signature γδT17 or type 3 genes in both mouse and human (fig. S8, A and B). We selected some of these type 3 genes (MAF, CCR6, KLRB1, DPP4, RORA, IL23R, CXCR6, BLK, BHLHE40, and ZBTB16) together with TBX21 and plotted their frequency of expression in RORC+ cells (Fig. 6G and fig. S7F). We found that to a varying degree, human gut neonatal RORC+ γδ T cells expressed all the above type 3 signature genes in addition to TBX21, albeit the latter at low levels (Fig. 6G and fig. S7F). Many human orthologs of the genes that comprised the mouse intestinal γδT17 signature (Fig. 3D) were also expressed at medium or high levels by RORC+ cluster c2 cells (Fig. 6H and fig. S7G). Collectively, these data suggest that the human neonatal intestine contains γδ T cells with type 3 characteristics closely resembling mouse intestinal γδT17 cells.
DISCUSSION
In the present study, we show that γδ T cells localize to the gut in embryonic and neonatal life, during which they begin expressing Tbet most likely in response to cytokine and TCR activation signals. Both γδT17 and γδT1 populations undergo temporal immunological maturation from birth to adulthood, including type 3 and type 1 programming, with the first week of life and the postweaning period being key time points in this process. Subsequently, γδT17 cells become imprinted with type 1 properties in a Tbet-dependent manner and assume a distinct transcriptional, phenotypical, and functional profile. Compared to cells in the LN, intestinal γδT17 cells had more active TCR signaling that was partly dependent on ATP and was sufficient to induce cytokine production (fig. S9). We also provide evidence that the human neonatal gut contains γδ T cells that are RORγt+CD69+CD161+ and share a transcriptional profile similar to mouse intestinal γδT17 cells.
The cellular and molecular changes that occur during neonatal life together with bacterial colonization and introduction of diet imprint the immune system permanently and irreversibly (27, 40, 49). There is evidence that many innate and adaptive immune cell subsets undergo extensive immunological maturation and functional alterations during neonatal life (50). Moreover, there are specialized neonatal αβ T and B cells, which are tailored for that specific time period and which persist to adult life (51, 52). As innate γδ T cells develop their basic functional properties in the thymus, they will enter neonatal tissues to encounter a rapidly changing environment, with which they interact and receive signals from. For example, butyrophilin-like molecules in mice shape the maturation of intraepithelial Vγ7+ cells during neonatal life, and this is independent of the microbiota or diet (30). The data presented herein provide evidence that in the intestinal LP, γδ T cells have a biphasic response to the neonatal microenvironment, one during the first week of life characterized by type 3 programming and immunological maturation and one after weaning characterized by type 1 programming and enhanced effector function. These neonatal and organ-specific imprinting diversified intestinal type 3 populations instilling distinct transcriptional and phenotypical properties. Thus, neonatal life is a fundamental period for innate γδ T cells, and remains to be seen what are the sensors and triggers that imprint their biology. This notwithstanding, their vigorous and rapid tissue adaptation in early life may help explain their acquisition of specialized functions within organs (11–13).
A hallmark of intestinal type 3 γδ T cells is their expression of Tbet, which guides their transition toward a type 1 effector program, while, at the same time, inhibiting IL-17 production. The importance of Tbet as a master transcription factor for type 1 T cells is undisputed (53), while it is also well documented that it can modulate the development and function of both innate and adaptive type 3 lymphocytes (54, 55), although this appears to be cell and model specific. Thus, in ILC3, Tbet induces their differentiation into natural cytotoxicity triggering receptor 1 (NKp46+)IFN-γ–producing cells important for clearing intestinal infections (54), whereas in T helper 17 (TH17) cells, it is more important for their transition into “ex TH17” TH1 cells rather than IFN-γ production (55–57). Furthermore, Tbet was not required for pathogenesis in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis or Helicobacter hepaticus–induced intestinal inflammation models (56, 57), and its absence correlated with high amounts of IL-17 production in the cell transfer colitis model (55). The data herein suggest that the importance of Tbet in γδ T cells is reminiscent of both innate and adaptive lymphocytes. Thus, IFN-γ production was strictly Tbet dependent as in ILC3 (54), but its induction was more IL-23 dependent as in TH cells (56). Furthermore, Tbet suppressed IL-17 production similar to TH cells but not ILC3 (54, 55). Ultimately, Tbet generated an ITGA1+SLAMF7+RORγt+ intestinal γδ T cell population with a clear type 1 transcriptional and functional makeup that diversified from other type 3 γδ T cells. RORγt+Tbet+ intestinal γδ T cells do not transition into “ex RORγt” like ILC3 or TH17 at steady state; however, in the context of infection, they can switch off IL-17 to become IFN-γ–producing-only, a process that is regulated by the activating protein 1 family of transcription factors (43). Whether γδT17 plasticity is also imprinted by their specific tissue microenvironment remains to be elucidated.
A key determinant of the “innateness” of γδT17 and other γδ T cell populations is their ability to produce effector molecules and to proliferate in response to cytokines only, without the need for TCR engagement (15). It has been shown that innate type 1 and type 3 γδ T cells from the LN are very hyporesponsive to TCR stimulation (44). This is in marked contrast with their requirement for active TCR signaling, albeit weak, during thymic development (3, 5, 6). Hence, it appears that as they develop, innate γδ T cells attenuate their TCR responsiveness. However, in the gut, γδT17 cells had an active and responsive TCR whose engagement, at least ex vivo, was sufficient to induce IL-17 but not IFN-γ. This is in line with dermal Vγ6+ γδT17 cells that had constitutive expression of Nr4a1 and its protein product Nur77 (58). Our transcriptional data are suggestive that the TCR develops the propensity for activation during the first week of life. Whether this is the default mechanism for the gut and other nonlymphoid tissues and when cells end up in the LN miss a TCR activation signal is not known. It is also not known whether increased TCR activity at barrier tissues, such as the gut and skin, is due to the presence of high concentrations of specific ligands that are absent from or at low levels in LNs. In this regard, we found that both Vγ4 and Vγ6 TCRs were active in the gut, indicating the presence of ligands for both receptors, or that there is TCR promiscuity for the same ligand(s). These putative ligands could function in a similar way as butyrophilin-like molecules for Vγ5 and Vγ7 cells and select and/or sustain γδT17 cells in the LP. Alternatively, the TCRs remain minimally engaged in all organs, but other factors promote a stronger signaling in the gut and skin. To this end, we found that the extracellular ATP sensor P2RX7 and the costimulatory receptor ICOS, both of which can enhance TCR signaling (46, 59), were highly and differentially expressed in the gut providing a plausible explanation for the increased TCR activity. Depletion of ATP reduced intestinal TCR responses; however, P2RX7 deficiency did not have any effect. Combined, the data suggest that in the gut, innate γδT17 cells have a responsive TCR, which can be sufficient to activate them and induce production of cytokines.
The presence of bona fide γδT17 cell populations in humans has been in doubt and with contradictory data. For example, although clearly present in the psoriatic skin (8, 21), they are absent from the healthy skin (19). Similarly, a study of a cohort of patients with colon carcinoma showed plentiful γδT17 cells in the diseased gut (20); however, a study of a different patient cohort did not find evidence for IL-17 production by gut γδ T cells (60). Whereas human IL-17–producing γδ T cells are very rare in the adult blood (17, 18), they are more prevalent in the cord blood (33, 34). Moreover, scRNA-seq studies in the neonatal cord blood and human embryonic thymus showed the presence of RORγt-expressing γδ T cells with a type 3 transcriptome that delineates them from other γδ T cell subsets (17, 25). The team of Vermijlen (25) additionally found that the embryonic human thymus contains a Vδ2+ cell with a hybrid type 1/3 transcriptional profile. Here, we report the presence of type 3 γδ T cells in the human neonatal gut. When present, these neonatal cells were always RORγt+CD161+CD69+, expressed CD127 (IL-7Rα), and they could be derived from both the small intestine and colon. Moreover, scRNA-seq data from two donors showed the presence of γδ T cells coexpressing transcripts for Vδ2, RORγt, and many type 3–associated molecules, as well as genes we identified in mouse intestinal γδT17 cells. However, expression of Tbet could only be detected at the transcriptional level and at low levels, which could be explained by the young age of the infants we studied. Alternatively, besides an apparent evolutionary conservation between mouse and human innate type 3 γδ T cells in the gut, there are specific fundamental differences. We cannot exclude, however, that interdonor variability and clinical context, such as inflammatory status and gestational age, contributed to these results.
Collectively, innate γδ T cell populations in the intestinal LP undergo intensive immunological maturation during neonatal life, resulting in the imprinting of distinct transcriptional, phenotypical, and functional characteristics that merge type 1 and type 3 lineages to generate cells specific to their microenvironment. It would be intriguing to test whether neonatal acquisition of tissue residency is a common process across organs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice
With the exception of CD3 double-haploinsufficient (CD3DH), P2RX7−/−, and Tempo mice, all other mouse strains were bred and maintained in-house at the Technical University of Denmark BioFacility under the breeding license 2024-15-0202-00220 approved by the Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate. All experiments with mice were performed with the approval of the Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate under the licenses 2019-15-0201-00385 and 2022-15-0201-01171. RORγtCRE mice were provided by G. Eberl (Pasteur Institute, Paris, France) (61). TbetF/F mice were provided by B. J. Lindbom (Lund University, Lund, Sweden). RORγtGFPTbetAmCyan mice were previously described (28). ROSA26-floxSTOPflox-RFP mice were from the Swiss Immunological Mouse Repository. For fate mapping experiments, RORγtCRE-R26LSLRFP were crossed to RORγtGFPTbetAmCyan mice. CD3DH mice were provided by N. Gonçalves-Sousa and B. Silva-Santos (Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal) (5). P2RX7−/− mice were provided by A. Nicke and J. D. S. Marquez (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universtät, München). Tempo mice were generated as previously described (47), and experiments were performed at the University of Birmingham, approved by the local animal welfare and ethical review body, and authorized under the authority of the Home Office (62). GF mice were generated and maintained at the National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark. GF status was confirmed by inoculation of feces from all mice into brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (25° and 37°C, aerobic incubation), modified gifu anaerobic medium (GAM) broth (37°C, anaerobic incubation), and plating on blood agar (37°C, aerobic incubation) and evaluation after 24 hours and 2 weeks of incubation.
Human tissue
As reported in (62), neonatal human tissue was obtained from the Department of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen under the ethical permit S-20220057 approved by the Ethical Committee of Southern Denmark. Tissue was donated after verbal consent and collected at primary or secondary surgery. Donor and sample information are detailed in Table 1.
Cell culture media and buffers
All cell cultures and single-cell suspensions were prepared using RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco), 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.4) (Gibco), 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM l-glutamine (Gibco), and penicillin-streptomycin (p/s; 100 U/ml; Gibco).
Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS; 10×; Gibco) was diluted to 1× with sterile Milli-Q water and supplemented with 15 mM Hepes to prepare HBSS-Hepes or supplemented with 2 mM EDTA (Gibco), 15 mM Hepes, gentamycin (50 μg/ml; Gibco), p/s (100 U/ml), and 2% FBS to prepare HBSS-EDTA. Isotonic Percoll was prepared by mixing 90% Percoll (GE Healthcare) with 9% 10× HBSS and 1% Hepes and then diluted with HBSS-EDTA to the desired concentration. Human tissue was washed in R5 buffer [RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated FBS and p/s (100 U/ml)]. Dithiothreitol (DTT) buffer was prepared by mixing R5 buffer with DTT (4 μl/ml; Roche). Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer was prepared by supplementing Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS; Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 3% heat-inactivated FBS. Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) buffer was prepared by supplementing DPBS with 2% heat-inactivated FBS and 1 mM EDTA (62).
C. albicans strain and infection model
For infections, we used C. albicans strain 101 (63) grown in yeast extract, peptone, and dextrose (YPD) medium at 30°C and 250 rpm for 16 to 18 hours. Pregnant female mice were treated with a mix of streptomycin (5 mg/ml) and ampicillin (1 mg/ml) (both from Sigma-Aldrich) in their drinking water supplemented with 2% sucrose, starting 1 week before delivery and continuing until the pups were euthanized. The antibiotic-containing water was replaced every 2 to 3 days. Six- to 10-day-old pups of these females were infected by oral gavage with 3.5 × 105 to 4.7 × 105 C. albicans yeast cells and euthanized 4 days postinfection. For determination of the fungal burden, the small intestine and colon were collected in cold PBS, cleaned, and homogenized in sterile 0.05% NP-40 for 3 min at 25 Hz using a TissueLyser (QIAGEN). Homogenates were plated on YPD agar containing penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) and incubated at 37°C for 2 days.
Lymphocyte isolation from mouse organs
Peripheral LNs (axial, brachial, and inguinal) from adult mice and thymic lobes from E18.5 or newborn mice were dissected, cleared of fat, and crushed against a 70-μm cell strainer. Cell suspensions were then washed and filtered through a 40-μm cell strainer. For siLP and cLP lymphocytes, small intestines and colons were dissected from adult mice and were flushed with 20 ml of HBSS-Hepes to remove intestinal contents. Fat and Peyer’s patches were removed, and the tissues were opened longitudinally and cut into small pieces of ∼1 cm. Tissue was washed four times in HBSS-EDTA buffer at 37°C while shaking at 400 rpm and then digested using Liberase (60 μg/ml; Roche) and deoxyribonuclease (DNase; 40 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) per sample in supplemented RPMI 1640 for 45 min at 37°C on a magnetic stirrer (800 rpm). The resulting cell suspensions were filtered through 70-μm cell strainers and washed once in supplemented RPMI 1640. Lymphocytes were separated on a 40/70 Percoll gradient. Cells from the interphase were collected and washed once before use. For neonatal gut samples, the Percoll gradient was omitted. For embryonic gut samples, tissue was digested immediately after dissection, and cell suspensions were then filtered through 40-μm cell strainer, washed, and used in downstream applications (62).
Ex vivo culturing of lymphocytes
For staining of cytokines from lymphocytes isolated from LP, cell suspensions were stimulated with IL-23 (40 ng/ml) or IL-12 (20 ng/ml) (R&D Systems) for 3 hours, followed by PMA (50 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich), ionomycin (750 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich), and BD GolgiStop (1 μl/ml; containing monensin) for an additional 3.5 hours. For detection of IL-17A/F production in Nur77+ cells, peripheral LN lymphocytes (5 × 106 cells/ml) or siLP suspensions were cultured for 3 hours in a precoated plate with αCD3 (5 μg/ml; clone 145-2C11), and BD GolgiStop (1 μl/ml) was added to all conditions. When indicated, apyrase (10 U/ml) was also added. Thymocytes (2 × 106 cells/ml) from newborn mice were cultured for 48 hours with IL-7 (20 ng/ml), IL-23 (40 ng/ml), IL-1β (20 ng/ml), or their combinations, in the presence or absence of GL3-coated plate (1 μg/ml). In all cases, after incubations, the cells were harvested and used for flow cytometry staining (62).
Transfer in RAG1−/− mice and treatment with FTY720
Thymocytes from newborn (0- to 1-day-old) RORγtGFPTbetAmCyan mice were prepared and transferred into RAG1−/− hosts. The procedure has been described in detail before (29). Reconstitution of γδ T cells in intestinal LP was analyzed 6 weeks after transfer in neonatal recipients and 3 weeks after transfer in adult RAG1−/− recipients. For FTY720 treatments, neonatal mice were group weighed immediately after birth and injected intraperitoneally with 50 μl of FTY720 (1 mg/kg; Cayman Chemical). Injections continued once daily for 1 week (62).
Lymphocyte isolation from human tissue
After washing in R5 buffer, removing visible fat, and dissecting out muscle under a stereoscope, the gut tissue was rinsed with DTT buffer twice for 10 min at 37°C in a shaking incubator (320 rpm), followed by four washes with HBSS-EDTA buffer at 37°C (320 rpm, 10 min each wash). Tissue was cut in small pieces (1 to 2 mm2) and digested using collagenase D (25 μl/ml; Roche) and DNase (50 U/ml; Roche) on a magnetic stirrer (800 rpm) for 45 min at 37°C. LP was subsequently dissociated with a Pasteur pipette and crushed against a 70-μm cell strainer. Cell suspensions were washed, filtered through a 40-μm cell strainer, and used for experiments (62).
Flow cytometry staining
As reported in (62), both mouse and human cells were stained with Fixable Viability Stain 700 (1:1000; BD Horizon) or Fixable Viability Dye eFluor 780 (1:2000; Invitrogen) in PBS for 10 min on ice. Surface antigens, intracellular cytokines, and transcription factors were stained for flow cytometry as previously described (29). Cells were acquired using BD LSRFortessa or BD FACSymphony A5 SE for spectral acquisitions, and data were analyzed using FlowJo version 10.8.0 software (BD Biosciences). The following antibodies were used herein at 1:200 dilution, unless otherwise specified:
1) Mouse: anti-CD19 [6D5; fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)], anti-CD27 (LG.3A10; FITC), anti-CD8α (53-6.7; FITC), anti-TCRβ (H57-597; FITC), anti-CD4 (RM4-5; FITC), anti-Cxcr3 (CXCR3-173; RB744), anti-Nur77 (12.14; PerCP–eFluor 710), anti–IL-22 (1H8BWSR; PerCP–eFluor 710), anti-TCRVγ2 (UC3-10A6; PerCP–eFluor 710), anti-CCR6 (29-2 L17; allophycocyanin (APC); 1:100), anti-CD3ε (145-2C11; APC), anti–IFN-γ (XMG1.2; APC), anti-CD44 (IM7; Alexa Fluor 700; 1:100), anti-TCRβ (H57-597; APC–eFluor 780), anti-CD11b (M1/70; APC–eFluor 780), anti-TCRVγ6 [1C10-1F7; phycoerythrin (PE)], anti-RORγt (B2D; PE), anti-CD3ε (145-2C11; PE-CF594), anti–IL-17F (O79/289; PE-CF594), anti-RORγt (B2D; PE–eFluor 610), anti-CD27 (LG.3A10; PE-Cy7), anti-Tbet (4B10; PE-Cy7), anti-TCRγδ (GL3; PE-Cy7), anti-TCRγδ (GL3; BV421), anti-CD44 (IM7; V500), anti-CD45 (30F11; V500), anti-ICOS (C398.4A; BV605), anti-CD45.2 (104; BV650), anti-P2x7 (1F11/TSLPR; BV650), anti–IL-17A (TC11-18H10; BV-786), anti-Slamf7 (4G2; BV786), anti-CD4 (GK1.5; BUV-395), anti-CD45 (30F11; BUV-395), anti-CD49a (Ha31/8; BUV496), anti-Ly6A/E (E13 to E161.7; BUV563), anti-CD127 (SB/199; BUV-737; 1:100), and anti-CD3ε (145-2C11; BUV-737).
2) Human: αCD3 (OKT3; FITC; 1:50), anti-CD11b (M1/70; PerCP Cy5.5; 1:50), anti-RORγt (AFKJS-9; PE; 1:100), anti-Tbet (4B10; PE-Cy7; 1:100), anti-CD14 (MφP9; PE-CF594; 1:100), anti-CD19 (HIB19; APC; 1:20), anti-TCRVδ1 (TS8.2; APC, 1:20); anti-CD161 (HP-3G10; APC-Cy7; 1:20), anti-TCRγδ (11F2; BV421; 1:50), anti-CD4 (SK3; BV510; 1:50), anti-CD45 (HI30; BV605; 1:80), anti-CD127 (HIL-7R-M21; BV-650; 1:25), anti–human leukocyte antigen (HLA)–DR (L243; BV650; 1:100), anti-CD69 (FN50; BUV-395; 1:20), and anti–HLA-DR (L243; BUV737; 1:160).
Gating strategies
Following FSC-A/SSC-A, FSC-H/FSC-W, SSC-H/SSC-W and Live/Dead gating, LN mouse γδ T cells were identified as CD8−CD4−CD19−TCRβ−CD11b−TCRγδ+ and thereafter γδT17 as RORγtGFP or CD27−CD44+ or CD27−CD44+CCR6+ and γδT1 cells as TbetAmCyan or CD27+. Thymic γδ T cells were identified as CD8−CD4−TCRβ−TCRγδ+ and thereafter γδT17 as CD27−CD44+. LP mouse γδ T cells were identified as CD4−CD8−CD19−TCRβ−CD45+CD3+TCRγδ+ and thereafter γδT1 cells as RORγtGFPnegTbetAmCyan or RORγt−Tbet+ or CD45+IL-7Rα−, and γδT17 as RORγtGFP or RORγt+ or CD45intIL-7Rα/CD127hi. ILC3 were identified as CD45+CD3−CD8−CD19−TCRβ−TCRγδ−CD127+. CD4 cells were identified as CD45+CD3+CD4+. For Tempo mice, FT Blue signal was detected in BV421 channel, and FT Red signal was detected in Texas Red channel. LP human γδ T cells were identified as CD19−CD11b−CD14−HLA-DR−CD4−CD45+CD3+TCRγδ+ and subsequently CD69+RORγt+CD127+/−Tbet+/− and CD69−RORγt−CD127+/−Tbet+/− (donor 3) or CD69+CD161+RORγt+/−Tbet+/− and CD69−CD161−RORγt+/−Tbet+/− (donors 9, 6, and 8) (62).
Bulk RNA-seq
RORγtGFP and/or TbetAmCyan, RORγtRFPTbetF/F (Tbet-deficient), and neonatal (days 0 and 7) RORγtGFP γδ T cells were sorted using a BD FACSAria Fusion III (BD Biosciences). Target populations were sorted directly in RNAprotect Cell Reagent (QIAGEN). Total RNA was extracted with the QIAGEN RNeasy Plus Micro Kit. The “Clontech SMARTer Ultra Low Input RNA v4” and the “Illumina Nextera XT” kits were used to generate mRNA-seq libraries, which were sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 or 2000 instrument. RNA extraction, library preparation, and RNA-seq were performed at the Genomics Core Facility “KFB - Center of Excellence for Fluorescent Bioanalytics” (University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; www.kfb-regensburg.de) (62).
Bulk RNA-seq analysis
As reported in (62), all samples passed quality control with FastQC v0.11.2 (www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). Reads were mapped to GRCm39 Ensembl release 109 (36318249) using kallisto v0.48.0 (27043002). Gene quantifications were imported into R using tximport v1.26.1 (26925227), and differential expression was calculated using a quasi-likelihood test with edgeR v3.40.2 (19910308). GSEA (16199517) was performed using fgsea v1.28.0 (https://doi.org/10.1101/060012) using weighted signed −log10 differential expression P values as test statistic. Single-sample GSEA (19847166) was performed using gene set variation analysis v1.46.0 (23323831). Visualizations were generated using ggplot2 v3.4.4 (64) and ComplexHeatmap v2.14.0 (27207943) using R version 4.2.2 (65).
Single-cell RNA sequencing
A total of 30,000 human γδ T cells were sorted from siLP, and 28,000 were sorted from cLP. Before sorting, single-cell suspensions were resuspended in MACS buffer at 108 cells/ml containing 1:100 biotinylated anti-CD19 (HIB19), anti-TCRαβ (IP26), anti-CD14 (HCD14), and anti-CD11c (3.9). The cells were incubated for 15 min at room temperature and subsequently incubated with EasySep RaphidSphere streptavidin beads (75 μl/ml) for 2.5 min and transferred to an EasySep magnet for 2.5 min. Remaining cells were collected and stained with anti-CD45, anti-TCRγδ, anti–HLA-DR, anti-CD14, αCD3, and anti-CD19; sorted as HLA-DR−CD19−CD14−CD45+CD3+TCRγδ+ using a BD FACSAria Fusion III in cold PBS containing bovine serum albumin (0.5%); and diluted to the desired concentration following the 10x Genomics guidelines [Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 5′ v2 (Dual Index) User Guide, CG000331 Rev. E]. For the mouse samples, cells were sorted from Cre− and Cre+ RORγtCRE-cIAP1F/F-cIAP2KO mice (29), and each genotype was differentially hashed with TotalSeq anti-mouse antibodies (C0304 and C0305; 1 μg per 106 cells; BioLegend). Cre− (WT) cells were further analyzed as described below, whereas data from Cre+ cells were irrelevant to this project. Cells were sorted as total γδ T cells. scRNA-seq libraries were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions using Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 5′ Kit v2 (PN-1000265, 10x Genomics), Chromium Next GEM Chip K Single Cell Kit (PN-1000287, 10x Genomics), and Dual Index Kit TT Set A (PN-1000215, 10x Genomics) with the Chromium Controller (PN-120223) or the Chromium Single Cell Controller (PN-120263). Library quality control and quantification were performed using KAPA Library Quantification Kit for Illumina Platforms (KK4824, Kapa Biosystems) and the 2100 Bioanalyzer equipped with a High Sensitivity DNA kit (5067-4626, Agilent). Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument at the Flow Cytometry & Single Cell Core Facility at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark (62).
scRNA-seq analysis
All human samples passed quality control with Fastqc v0.11.2. CellRanger v7.1.0 was used to align the reads to the GRCh38 version 2020-A reference genome, as well as for filtering cell and unique molecular identifier barcodes and quantifying gene expression per cell. Seurat v5.0.1 was used for further quality control and processing (66). Samples taken from the colon and the small intestine were analyzed separately but followed the same processing workflow. Cells with a mitochondrial count exceeding 4% were removed from both samples and cells expressing more than 5% of heat shock proteins (colon sample) and more than 2% (small intestine sample). To further remove low-quality cells and possible doublets, cells with less than 200 genes and cells with more than 4000 genes were discarded from both samples. Count matrices were normalized and scaled using Seurat’s SCTransform function. The first 15 principal components (colon sample) and the first 20 principal components (small intestine sample) were used for clustering as they captured over 70% of variance. K-nearest neighbor clustering was then applied to identify distinct cell clusters. Visualization of these clusters was done through UMAP graphs with a resolution of 0.1.
For the mouse dataset, samples were aligned to the GRCm39-2024-A reference genome using CellRanger v8.0.0. Seurat v5.1.0 was used for further preprocessing and analysis. Data from each time point were processed individually. HTODemux was used to demultiplex cells from each genotype (Cre− and Cre+) and to remove doublets and nonhashed cells. For this manuscript, only data from Cre− mice were included in the analysis. Cells with mitochondrial counts higher than 5% and those with low or high number of RNA molecules and genes were excluded. In addition, all ribosomal genes were removed. Afterward, preprocessed objects were merged (days 0, 7, 21, and 42). The data were log normalized, the effect of cell cycle was regressed out, and Harmony was used for integration. We found contamination from myeloid and other non–γδ T cells in our samples, and these were removed. Then, Vγ4 and Vγ6 cells were subsetted on the basis of the condition that cells express at least one transcript of Trgv4 or Trgv6, respectively. After subsetting, the data were rescaled and reintegrated. Unsupervised clustering was run with Seurat’s default parameters.
Cluster identities were found running Seurat’s “FindAllMarkers” function. Expression of the selected genes per cluster was quantified through Seurat’s AverageExpression function and further illustrated using the DoHeatmap function. DEGs were identified using Seurat’s “FindMarkers” function. Only genes expressed in at least 25% of cells and with a log2 fold change (log2FC) of >1 and an adjusted P value of <0.05 (determined using a Wilcoxon rank sum test) were considered. In addition, coexpression analysis for human RORC was conducted computing the Pearson correlation coefficient and P value for each gene against the selected two genes. Multiple testing correction was applied using Bonferroni correction, considering genes with a corrected P value less than 0.05 as statistically significant. The top 35 genes exhibiting the most significant coexpression with RORC were visually presented in a bar chart. Subsequently, the percentage of cells in RORC+ cell populations expressing the genes (MAF, CCR6, KLRB1, DPP4, RORA, IL23R, CXCR6, BLK, BHLHE40, and ZBTB16) was calculated and visually represented (62).
Statistics
Unless otherwise stated, all the data were statistically analyzed using GraphPad Prism v9 or v10. Statistical tests depended on the nature of the data and are indicated in the figure legend.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank everyone at the BioFacility at the Technical University of Denmark for continuous support with animal studies. We thank I. Prinz, Hamburg Center for Translational Immunology, Germany for providing us with the GL3 antibody.
Funding:
The study was funded by the Lundbeck Foundation, R366-2021-104 (V.B.); the Novo Nordisk Foundation, NNF20OC0065160 (V.B.) and NNF22OC0071681 (L.R.O. and A.S.); the UK Research and Innovation Medical Research Council, MR/V009052/1 (D.B. and A.C.); and the Joined Research Fund–OUH and Rigshospitalet A5947 (L.A.) and 160-A639 (M.B.E.).
Author contributions:
Conceptualization: M.V.B., M.G.F.F.d.S., E.C.-T., S.S.K., J.O., G.Z., L.A., and V.B. Methodology: M.V.B., M.G.F.F.d.S., A.S., M.F.L., D.B., and V.B. Software: L.R.O. Validation: M.V.B., M.G.F.F.d.S., E.C.-T., M.F.L., and V.B. Formal analysis: M.V.B., M.G.F.F.d.S., A.S., D.B., L.R.O., and V.B. Investigation: M.V.B., M.G.F.F.d.S., J.R., A.C., E.C.-T., D.S., P.P.-S., S.S.K., J.O., L.A., D.B., and V.B. Resources: M.F.L., S.S.K., J.O., M.B.E., L.A., D.B., and V.B. Data curation: M.V.B., M.G.F.F.d.S., L.R.O., and V.B. Visualization: M.V.B., M.G.F.F.d.S., A.S., L.R.O., and V.B. Supervision: L.R.O. and V.B. Project administration: S.S.K., G.Z., L.A., and V.B. Funding acquisition: M.B.E., L.A., and V.B. Writing—orginal draft: M.V.B., A.S., L.R.O., and V.B. Writing—review and editing: M.V.B., M.G.F.F.d.S., M.F.L., S.S.K., J.O., M.B.E., L.A., D.B., L.R.O., and V.B.
Competing interests:
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Data, code, and materials availability:
All data and code needed to evaluate and reproduce the results in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials or at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18877631. Raw data from mouse RNA sequencing are deposited in the BioStudies database (www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/) under the accession numbers: E-MTAB-16689, E-MTAB-16690, E-MTAB-16691, and E-MTAB-16692. Raw data from human scRNA-seq are deposited at the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA; https://ega-archive.org/) under the accession number EGAS50000001917. This study did not generate new materials.
Supplementary Materials
The PDF file includes:
Figs. S1 to S9
Legends for tables S1 to S4
Legend for data S1
Other Supplementary Material for this manuscript includes the following:
Tables S1 to S4
Data S1
REFERENCES
- 1.Ribot J. C., deBarros A., Pang D. J., Neves J. F., Peperzak V., Roberts S. J., Girardi M., Borst J., Hayday A. C., Pennington D. J., Silva-Santos B., CD27 is a thymic determinant of the balance between interferon-γ- and interleukin 17-producing γδ T cell subsets. Nat. Immunol. 10, 427–436 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Haas J. D., Ravens S., Duber S., Sandrock I., Oberdorfer L., Kashani E., Chennupati V., Fohse L., Naumann R., Weiss S., Krueger A., Forster R., Prinz I., Development of interleukin-17-producing γδ T cells is restricted to a functional embryonic wave. Immunity 37, 48–59 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sumaria N., Grandjean C. L., Silva-Santos B., Pennington D. J., Strong TCRγδ signaling prohibits thymic development of IL-17A-secreting γδ T cells. Cell Rep. 19, 2469–2476 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sumaria N., Martin S., Pennington D. J., Constrained TCRγδ-associated Syk activity engages PI3K to facilitate thymic development of IL-17A-secreting γδ T cells. Sci. Signal. 14, eabc5884 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Munoz-Ruiz M., Ribot J. C., Grosso A. R., Goncalves-Sousa N., Pamplona A., Pennington D. J., Regueiro J. R., Fernandez-Malave E., Silva-Santos B., TCR signal strength controls thymic differentiation of discrete proinflammatory γδ T cell subsets. Nat. Immunol. 17, 721–727 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Turchinovich G., Hayday A. C., Skint-1 identifies a common molecular mechanism for the development of interferon-γ-secreting versus interleukin-17-secreting γδ T cells. Immunity 35, 59–68 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sutton C. E., Lalor S. J., Sweeney C. M., Brereton C. F., Lavelle E. C., Mills K. H., Interleukin-1 and IL-23 induce innate IL-17 production from γδ T cells, amplifying Th17 responses and autoimmunity. Immunity 31, 331–341 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cai Y., Shen X., Ding C., Qi C., Li K., Li X., Jala V. R., Zhang H. G., Wang T., Zheng J., Yan J., Pivotal role of dermal IL-17-producing γδ T cells in skin inflammation. Immunity 35, 596–610 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bekiaris V., Sedy J. R., Macauley M. G., Rhode-Kurnow A., Ware C. F., The inhibitory receptor BTLA controls γδ T cell homeostasis and inflammatory responses. Immunity 39, 1082–1094 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rei M., Goncalves-Sousa N., Lanca T., Thompson R. G., Mensurado S., Balkwill F. R., Kulbe H., Pennington D. J., Silva-Santos B., Murine CD27− Vγ6+ γδ T cells producing IL-17A promote ovarian cancer growth via mobilization of protumor small peritoneal macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, E3562–E3570 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kohlgruber A. C., Gal-Oz S. T., LaMarche N. M., Shimazaki M., Duquette D., Koay H. F., Nguyen H. N., Mina A. I., Paras T., Tavakkoli A., von Andrian U., Uldrich A. P., Godfrey D. I., Banks A. S., Shay T., Brenner M. B., Lynch L., γδ T cells producing interleukin-17A regulate adipose regulatory T cell homeostasis and thermogenesis. Nat. Immunol. 19, 464–474 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ribeiro M., Brigas H. C., Temido-Ferreira M., Pousinha P. A., Regen T., Santa C., Coelho J. E., Marques-Morgado I., Valente C. A., Omenetti S., Stockinger B., Waisman A., Manadas B., Lopes L. V., Silva-Santos B., Ribot J. C., Meningeal γδ T cell-derived IL-17 controls synaptic plasticity and short-term memory. Sci. Immunol. 4, eaay5199 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alves de Lima K., Rustenhoven J., Da Mesquita S., Wall M., Salvador A. F., Smirnov I., Martelossi Cebinelli G., Mamuladze T., Baker W., Papadopoulos Z., Lopes M. B., Cao W. S., Xie X. S., Herz J., Kipnis J., Meningeal γδ T cells regulate anxiety-like behavior via IL-17a signaling in neurons. Nat. Immunol. 21, 1421–1429 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Heilig J. S., Tonegawa S., Diversity of murine γ genes and expression in fetal and adult T lymphocytes. Nature 322, 836–840 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Agerholm R., Bekiaris V., Evolved to protect, designed to destroy: IL-17-producing γδ T cells in infection, inflammation, and cancer. Eur. J. Immunol. 51, 2164–2177 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ribot J. C., Lopes N., Silva-Santos B., γδ T cells in tissue physiology and surveillance. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 221–232 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tan L., Fichtner A. S., Bruni E., Odak I., Sandrock I., Bubke A., Borchers A., Schultze-Florey C., Koenecke C., Forster R., Jarek M., von Kaisenberg C., Schulz A., Chu X., Zhang B., Li Y., Panzer U., Krebs C. F., Ravens S., Prinz I., A fetal wave of human type 3 effector γδ cells with restricted TCR diversity persists into adulthood. Sci. Immunol. 6, (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ryan P. L., Sumaria N., Holland C. J., Bradford C. M., Izotova N., Grandjean C. L., Jawad A. S., Bergmeier L. A., Pennington D. J., Heterogeneous yet stable Vdelta2(+) T-cell profiles define distinct cytotoxic effector potentials in healthy human individuals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 14378–14383 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wu Y., Kyle-Cezar F., Woolf R. T., Naceur-Lombardelli C., Owen J., Biswas D., Lorenc A., Vantourout P., Gazinska P., Grigoriadis A., Tutt A., Hayday A., An innate-like Vδ1+ γδ T cell compartment in the human breast is associated with remission in triple-negative breast cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu P., Wu D., Ni C., Ye J., Chen W., Hu G., Wang Z., Wang C., Zhang Z., Xia W., Chen Z., Wang K., Zhang T., Xu J., Han Y., Zhang T., Wu X., Wang J., Gong W., Zheng S., Qiu F., Yan J., Huang J., γδT17 cells promote the accumulation and expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in human colorectal cancer. Immunity 40, 785–800 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Laggner U., Di Meglio P., Perera G. K., Hundhausen C., Lacy K. E., Ali N., Smith C. H., Hayday A. C., Nickoloff B. J., Nestle F. O., Identification of a novel proinflammatory human skin-homing Vγ9Vδ2 T cell subset with a potential role in psoriasis. J. Immunol. 187, 2783–2793 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schirmer L., Rothhammer V., Hemmer B., Korn T., Enriched CD161high CCR6+ γδ T cells in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 70, 345–351 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Venken K., Jacques P., Mortier C., Labadia M. E., Decruy T., Coudenys J., Hoyt K., Wayne A. L., Hughes R., Turner M., Van Gassen S., Martens L., Smith D., Harcken C., Wahle J., Wang C. T., Verheugen E., Schryvers N., Varkas G., Cypers H., Wittoek R., Piette Y., Gyselbrecht L., Van Calenbergh S., Van den Bosch F., Saeys Y., Nabozny G., Elewaut D., RORγt inhibition selectively targets IL-17 producing iNKT and γδ-T cells enriched in Spondyloarthritis patients. Nat. Commun. 10, 9 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fenoglio D., Poggi A., Catellani S., Battaglia F., Ferrera A., Setti M., Murdaca G., Zocchi M. R., Vδ1 T lymphocytes producing IFN-γ and IL-17 are expanded in HIV-1-infected patients and respond to Candida albicans. Blood 113, 6611–6618 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sanchez Sanchez G., Papadopoulou M., Azouz A., Tafesse Y., Mishra A., Chan J. K. Y., Fan Y., Verdebout I., Porco S., Libert F., Ginhoux F., Vandekerckhove B., Goriely S., Vermijlen D., Identification of distinct functional thymic programming of fetal and pediatric human γδ thymocytes via single-cell analysis. Nat. Commun. 13, 5842 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mangan B. A., Dunne M. R., O’Reilly V. P., Dunne P. J., Exley M. A., O’Shea D., Scotet E., Hogan A. E., Doherty D. G., Cutting edge: CD1d restriction and Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokine secretion by human Vδ3 T cells. J. Immunol. 191, 30–34 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Torow N., Hornef M. W., The neonatal window of opportunity: Setting the stage for life-long host-microbial interaction and immune homeostasis. J. Immunol. 198, 557–563 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kadekar D., Agerholm R., Rizk J., Neubauer H. A., Suske T., Maurer B., Vinals M. T., Comelli E. M., Taibi A., Moriggl R., Bekiaris V., The neonatal microenvironment programs innate γδ T cells through the transcription factor STAT5. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 2496–2508 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rizk J., Morbe U. M., Agerholm R., Baglioni M. V., Catafal Tardos E., Fares da Silva M. G. F., Ulmert I., Kadekar D., Vinals M. T., Bekiaris V., The cIAP ubiquitin ligases sustain type 3 γδ T cells and ILC during aging to promote barrier immunity. J. Exp. Med. 220, e20221534 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Di Marco Barros R., Roberts N. A., Dart R. J., Vantourout P., Jandke A., Nussbaumer O., Deban L., Cipolat S., Hart R., Iannitto M. L., Laing A., Spencer-Dene B., East P., Gibbons D., Irving P. M., Pereira P., Steinhoff U., Hayday A., Epithelia use butyrophilin-like molecules to shape organ-specific γδ T cell compartments. Cell 167, 203–218.e17 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Papotto P. H., Yilmaz B., Pimenta G., Mensurado S., Cunha C., Fiala G. J., Gomes da Costa D., Goncalves-Sousa N., Chan B. H. K., Blankenhaus B., Domingues R. G., Carvalho T., Hepworth M. R., Macpherson A. J., Allen J. E., Silva-Santos B., Maternal γδ T cells shape offspring pulmonary type 2 immunity in a microbiota-dependent manner. Cell Rep. 42, 112074 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Spidale N. A., Malhotra N., Frascoli M., Sylvia K., Miu B., Freeman C., Stadinski B. D., Huseby E., Kang J., Neonatal-derived IL-17 producing dermal γδ T cells are required to prevent spontaneous atopic dermatitis. eLife 9, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Moens E., Brouwer M., Dimova T., Goldman M., Willems F., Vermijlen D., IL-23R and TCR signaling drives the generation of neonatal Vγ9Vδ2 T cells expressing high levels of cytotoxic mediators and producing IFN-γand IL-17. J. Leukoc. Biol. 89, 743–752 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Michel M. L., Pang D. J., Haque S. F., Potocnik A. J., Pennington D. J., Hayday A. C., Interleukin 7 (IL-7) selectively promotes mouse and human IL-17-producing γδ cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 17549–17554 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ravens S., Fichtner A. S., Willers M., Torkornoo D., Pirr S., Schoning J., Deseke M., Sandrock I., Bubke A., Wilharm A., Dodoo D., Egyir B., Flanagan K. L., Steinbruck L., Dickinson P., Ghazal P., Adu B., Viemann D., Prinz I., Microbial exposure drives polyclonal expansion of innate γδ T cells immediately after birth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 18649–18660 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Papadopoulou M., Dimova T., Shey M., Briel L., Veldtsman H., Khomba N., Africa H., Steyn M., Hanekom W. A., Scriba T. J., Nemes E., Vermijlen D., Fetal public Vγ9Vδ2 T cells expand and gain potent cytotoxic functions early after birth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 18638–18648 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Conti H. R., Peterson A. C., Brane L., Huppler A. R., Hernandez-Santos N., Whibley N., Garg A. V., Simpson-Abelson M. R., Gibson G. A., Mamo A. J., Osborne L. C., Bishu S., Ghilardi N., Siebenlist U., Watkins S. C., Artis D., McGeachy M. J., Gaffen S. L., Oral-resident natural Th17 cells and γδ T cells control opportunistic Candida albicans infections. J. Exp. Med. 211, 2075–2084 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wiesheu R., Edwards S. C., Hedley A., Hall H., Tosolini M., Fares da Silva M. G. F., Sumaria N., Castenmiller S. M., Wardak L., Optaczy Y., Lynn A., Hill D. G., Hayes A. J., Hay J., Kilbey A., Shaw R., Whyte D., Walsh P. J., Michie A. M., Graham G. J., Manoharan A., Halsey C., Blyth K., Wolkers M. C., Miller C., Pennington D. J., Jones G. W., Fournie J. J., Bekiaris V., Coffelt S. B., IL-27 maintains cytotoxic Ly6C+ γδ T cells that arise from immature precursors. EMBO J. 43, 2878–2907 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Drujont L., Lemoine A., Moreau A., Bienvenu G., Lancien M., Cens T., Guillot F., Beriou G., Bouchet-Delbos L., Fehling H. J., Chiffoleau E., Nicot A. B., Charnet P., Martin J. C., Josien R., Cuturi M. C., Louvet C., RORγt+ cells selectively express redundant cation channels linked to the Golgi apparatus. Sci. Rep. 6, 23682 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Al Nabhani Z., Eberl G., Imprinting of the immune system by the microbiota early in life. Mucosal Immunol. 13, 183–189 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vonarbourg C., Mortha A., Bui V. L., Hernandez P. P., Kiss E. A., Hoyler T., Flach M., Bengsch B., Thimme R., Holscher C., Honig M., Pannicke U., Schwarz K., Ware C. F., Finke D., Diefenbach A., Regulated expression of nuclear receptor RORγt confers distinct functional fates to NK cell receptor-expressing RORγt+ innate lymphocytes. Immunity 33, 736–751 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Parker M. E., Barrera A., Wheaton J. D., Zuberbuehler M. K., Allan D. S. J., Carlyle J. R., Reddy T. E., Ciofani M., c-Maf regulates the plasticity of group 3 innate lymphoid cells by restraining the type 1 program. J. Exp. Med. 217, e20191030 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Parker M. E., Mehta N. U., Liao T. C., Tomaszewski W. H., Snyder S. A., Busch J., Ciofani M., Restriction of innate Tγδ17 cell plasticity by an AP-1 regulatory axis. Nat. Immunol. 26, 1299–1314 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wencker M., Turchinovich G., Di Marco Barros R., Deban L., Jandke A., Cope A., Hayday A. C., Innate-like T cells straddle innate and adaptive immunity by altering antigen-receptor responsiveness. Nat. Immunol. 15, 80–87 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bending D., Zikherman J., Nr4a nuclear receptors: Markers and modulators of antigen receptor signaling. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 81, 102285 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Brock V. J., Wolf I. M. A., Er-Lukowiak M., Lory N., Stahler T., Woelk L. M., Mittrucker H. W., Muller C. E., Koch-Nolte F., Rissiek B., Werner R., Guse A. H., Diercks B. P., P2X4 and P2X7 are essential players in basal T cell activity and Ca2+ signaling milliseconds after T cell activation. Sci. Adv. 8, eabl9770 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Elliot T. A. E., Jennings E. K., Lecky D. A. J., Rouvray S., Mackie G. M., Scarfe L., Sheriff L., Ono M., Maslowski K. M., Bending D., Nur77-Tempo mice reveal T cell steady state antigen recognition. Discov. Immunol. 1, kyac009 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Frascoli M., Ferraj E., Miu B., Malin J., Spidale N. A., Cowan J., Shissler S. C., Brink R., Xu Y., Cyster J. G., Bhandoola A., Kang J., Reboldi A., Skin γδ T cell inflammatory responses are hardwired in the thymus by oxysterol sensing via GPR183 and calibrated by dietary cholesterol. Immunity 56, 562–575.e6 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Torow N., Marsland B. J., Hornef M. W., Gollwitzer E. S., Neonatal mucosal immunology. Mucosal Immunol. 10, 5–17 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Henneke P., Kierdorf K., Hall L. J., Sperandio M., Hornef M., Perinatal development of innate immune topology. eLife 10, e67793 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rudd B. D., Neonatal T cells: A reinterpretation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 38, 229–247 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Vergani S., Muleta K. G., Da Silva C., Doyle A., Kristiansen T. A., Sodini S., Krausse N., Montano G., Kotarsky K., Nakawesi J., Akerstrand H., Vanhee S., Gupta S. L., Bryder D., Agace W. W., Lahl K., Yuan J., A self-sustaining layer of early-life-origin B cells drives steady-state IgA responses in the adult gut. Immunity 55, 1829–1842.e6 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lazarevic V., Glimcher L. H., Lord G. M., T-bet: A bridge between innate and adaptive immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13, 777–789 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Klose C. S., Kiss E. A., Schwierzeck V., Ebert K., Hoyler T., d’Hargues Y., Goppert N., Croxford A. L., Waisman A., Tanriver Y., Diefenbach A., A T-bet gradient controls the fate and function of CCR6−RORγt+ innate lymphoid cells. Nature 494, 261–265 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Krausgruber T., Schiering C., Adelmann K., Harrison O. J., Chomka A., Pearson C., Ahern P. P., Shale M., Oukka M., Powrie F., T-bet is a key modulator of IL-23-driven pathogenic CD4+ T cell responses in the intestine. Nat. Commun. 7, 11627 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Duhen R., Glatigny S., Arbelaez C. A., Blair T. C., Oukka M., Bettelli E., Cutting edge: The pathogenicity of IFN-γ-producing Th17 cells is independent of T-bet. J. Immunol. 190, 4478–4482 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Brucklacher-Waldert V., Ferreira C., Innocentin S., Kamdar S., Withers D. R., Kullberg M. C., Veldhoen M., Tbet or continued RORγt expression is not required for Th17-associated immunopathology. J. Immunol. 196, 4893–4904 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tan L., Sandrock I., Odak I., Aizenbud Y., Wilharm A., Barros-Martins J., Tabib Y., Borchers A., Amado T., Gangoda L., Herold M. J., Schmidt-Supprian M., Kisielow J., Silva-Santos B., Koenecke C., Hovav A. H., Krebs C., Prinz I., Ravens S., Single-cell transcriptomics identifies the adaptation of Scart1+ Vγ6+ T cells to skin residency as activated effector cells. Cell Rep. 27, 3657–3671.e4 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Riley J. L., Mao M., Kobayashi S., Biery M., Burchard J., Cavet G., Gregson B. P., June C. H., Linsley P. S., Modulation of TCR-induced transcriptional profiles by ligation of CD28, ICOS, and CTLA-4 receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 11790–11795 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Meraviglia S., Lo Presti E., Tosolini M., La Mendola C., Orlando V., Todaro M., Catalano V., Stassi G., Cicero G., Vieni S., Fournie J. J., Dieli F., Distinctive features of tumor-infiltrating γδ T lymphocytes in human colorectal cancer. Onco Targets Ther 6, e1347742 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lochner M., Peduto L., Cherrier M., Sawa S., Langa F., Varona R., Riethmacher D., Si-Tahar M., Di Santo J. P., Eberl G., In vivo equilibrium of proinflammatory IL-17+ and regulatory IL-10+ Foxp3+ RORγt+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 205, 1381–1393 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.M. Fares da Silva, “Transcriptional, phenotypical and functional characterization of embryonic, neonatal and neuropathogenic γδ T cells,” thesis, Technical University of Denmark (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 63.Schonherr F. A., Sparber F., Kirchner F. R., Guiducci E., Trautwein-Weidner K., Gladiator A., Sertour N., Hetzel U., Le G. T. T., Pavelka N., d’Enfert C., Bougnoux M. E., Corti C. F., LeibundGut-Landmann S., The intraspecies diversity of C. albicans triggers qualitatively and temporally distinct host responses that determine the balance between commensalism and pathogenicity. Mucosal Immunol. 10, 1335–1350 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.H. Wickham, Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (Springer, 2009), pp. viii, 212 p.
- 65.R. C. Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, The R Foundation (2021); www.R-project.org/.
- 66.Stuart T., Butler A., Hoffman P., Hafemeister C., Papalexi E., Mauck W. M. III, Hao Y., Stoeckius M., Smibert P., Satija R., Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e21 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Figs. S1 to S9
Legends for tables S1 to S4
Legend for data S1
Tables S1 to S4
Data S1
Data Availability Statement
All data and code needed to evaluate and reproduce the results in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials or at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18877631. Raw data from mouse RNA sequencing are deposited in the BioStudies database (www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/) under the accession numbers: E-MTAB-16689, E-MTAB-16690, E-MTAB-16691, and E-MTAB-16692. Raw data from human scRNA-seq are deposited at the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA; https://ega-archive.org/) under the accession number EGAS50000001917. This study did not generate new materials.






