Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1976 Jun;183(6):636–644. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197606000-00004

Total duodenal diversion for treatment of reflux esophagitis uncontrolled by repeated antireflux procedures.

J L Herrington Jr, B Mody
PMCID: PMC1344262  PMID: 973751

Abstract

The operations of Nissen, Hill, and Belsey are adequate in controlling esophaegeal reflux in the majority of patients. In a small percentage however, objective and subjective evidence of esophagitis persists in spite of repeated operations to restore lower esophageal sphincter competency. These failures are then usually treated by operative procedures of great magnitude involving organ interposition. Repeated antireflux operations directed to the gastroesophageal area may in some instances result in impairment of blood supply with an increased risk of both esophageal and gastric fistulae. In the past many observers have felt that reflux esophagitis resulted solely from the effects of acid-pepsin secretions bathing the distal esophagus. Recently experimental and clinical data have indicated the importance of duodenal contents in the etiology and perpetuation of reflux esophagitis. During a recent two year period, 6 patients with persistent reflux esophagitis uncontrolled by repeated antireflux procedures have been seen on our service. These 6 patients, underwent 12 unsuccessful antireflux operations elsewhere. Three of the 6 patients had also been subjected to vagotomy-antrectomy for a coexisting duodenal ulcer. A marked lowering of gastric acidity took place but esophageal reflux and esophagitis persisted. These three patients were treated on our service by takedown of the Billroth I anastomosis, closure of the duodenal stump and diversion of the duodenal contents into a Roux-en-Y limb. Three other patients who had undergone unsuccessful antireflux procedures alone were subjected to antral resection, Roux-en-Y diversion and transthoracid vagotomy. This simplified appraoch to the treatment of persistent esophageal reflux uncontrolled by repeated antireflux procedures has given satisfactory results. The operation should be considered when technical considerations preclude further surgical attempts to perform another effective antireflux operation. Total duodenal diversion should, however, not be considered as the primary operation for the patient suffering from reflux esophagitis. However, in circumstances discussed above this direct approach appears preferable to major resectional procedures.

Full text

PDF
636

Images in this article

638Fig. 3.
on p.638
639Fig. 4.
on p.639
640Fig. 5.
on p.640
641Fig. 6.
on p.641

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANDERSEN H. A., CLAGETT O. T., ELLIS F. H., Jr Surgical management of the complications of reflux esophagitis. AMA Arch Surg. 1956 Oct;73(4):578–589. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1956.01280040034004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BARRETT N. R. Chronic peptic ulcer of the oesophagus and 'oesophagitis'. Br J Surg. 1950 Oct;38(150):175–182. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18003815005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BARRETT N. R. The lower esophagus lined by columnar epithelium. Surgery. 1957 Jun;41(6):881–894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burgess J. N., Payne W. S., Andersen H. A., Weiland L. H., Carlson H. C. Barrett esophagus: the columnar-epithelial-lined lower esophagus. Mayo Clin Proc. 1971 Nov;46(11):728–734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. COX K. R. Oesophageal stricture after partial gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 1961 Nov;49:307–313. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18004921515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CROSS F. S., KAY E. B. The etiology and treatment of peptic esophagitis. Ann Surg. 1956 Mar;143(3):360–368. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195603000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. CROSS F. S., WANGENSTEEN O. H. Role of bile and pancreatic juice in production of esophageal erosions and anemia. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1951 Aug;77(4):862–866. doi: 10.3181/00379727-77-18950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cenni L. J., Cox W. F., Hands S. Gastric surgery. The Roux-en-Y procedure for bile esophagitis. J Kans Med Soc. 1966 Aug;67(8):421–425. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. DRAPANAS T., HALE H. W., Jr Reflux esophagitis. Am J Surg. 1957 Feb;93(2):228–233. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(57)90771-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Demeester T. R., Johnson L. F., Kent A. H. Evaluation of current operations for the prevention of gastroesophageal reflux. Ann Surg. 1974 Oct;180(4):511–525. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197410000-00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dragstedt L. R., Woodward E. R., Seito T., Isaza J., Rodriguez J. R., Samiian R. The question of bile regurgitation as a cause of gastric ulcer. Ann Surg. 1971 Oct;174(4):548–559. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197110000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. ELLIS F. H., Jr A physiologic operation for ulceration and stricture of the terminal esophagus. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin. 1956 Nov 14;31(23):615–619. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. ELLIS F. H., Jr Experimental aspects of the surgical treatment of reflux esophagitis and esophageal stricture. Ann Surg. 1956 Apr;143(4):465–470. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195604000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. FERGUSON D. J., SANCHEZ-PALOMERA E., SAKO Y., CLATWORTHY H. W., Jr, TOON R. W., WANGENSTEEN O. H. Studies on experimental esophagitis. Surgery. 1950 Dec;28(6):1022–1039. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gillison E. W., Capper W. M., Airth G. R., Gibson M. J., Bradford I. Hiatus hernia and heartburn. Gut. 1969 Aug;10(8):609–613. doi: 10.1136/gut.10.8.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gillison E. W., De Castro V. A., Nyhus L. M., Kusakari K., Bombeck C. T. The significance of bile in reflux esophagitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1972 Mar;134(3):419–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gillison E. W., Kusakari K., Bombeck C. T., Nyhus L. M. The importance of bile in reflux oesophagitis and the success in its prevention by surgical means. Br J Surg. 1972 Oct;59(10):794–798. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800591013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. HELSINGEN N., Jr Oesophagitis following total gastrectomy: a follow-up study on 9 patients 5 years or more after operation. Acta Chir Scand. 1960 Jan 30;118:190–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Himal H. S., MacLean L. D. Bile esophagitis. Can J Surg. 1973 Jan;16(1):17–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Holt C. J., Large A. M. Surgical Management of Reflux Esophagitis. Ann Surg. 1961 Apr;153(4):555–562. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196104000-00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. KELLY W. D., MACLEAN L. D., PERRY J. F., WANGENSTEEN O. H. A study of patients following total and near-total gastrectomy. Surgery. 1954 Jun;35(6):964–982. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. LAMBERT R. Relative importance of biliary and pancreatic secretions in the genesis of esophagitis in rats. Am J Dig Dis. 1962 Nov;7:1026–1033. doi: 10.1007/BF02231905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McKEOWN K. C. Oesophageal stenosis after partial gastrectomy. Br Med J. 1958 Oct 4;2(5100):819–823. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5100.819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Moffat R. C., Berkas E. M. Bile esophagitis. Arch Surg. 1965 Dec;91(6):963–966. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1965.01320180097021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. PAYNE W. S., ANDERSEN H. A., ELLIS F. H., Jr REAPPRAISAL OF ESOPHAGOGASTRECTOMY AND ANTRAL EXCISION IN THE TREATMENT OF SHORT ESOPHAGUS. Surgery. 1964 Feb;55:344–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Payne W. S. Surgical treatment of reflux esophagitis and stricture associated with permanent incompetence of the cardia. Mayo Clin Proc. 1970 Aug;45(8):553–562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. REDO S. F., BARNES W. A., DE LA SIERRA A. O. Perfusion of the canine esophagus with secretions of the upper gastro-intestinal tract. Ann Surg. 1959 Apr;149(4):556–564. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195904000-00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. REDO S. F., BARNES W. A. Effects of the secretions of the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, and colon on the esophagus of the dog. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1958 Mar;106(3):337–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Royston C. M., Dowling B. L., Spencer J. Antrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis in the treatment of peptic oesophagitis with stricture. Br J Surg. 1975 Aug;62(8):605–607. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800620805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. WINDSOR C. W. GASTRO-OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX AFTER PARTIAL GASTRECTOMY. Br Med J. 1964 Nov 14;2(5419):1233–1234. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5419.1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Weaver A. W., Large A. M., Walt A. J. Surgical management of severe reflux esophagitis. Eight to seventeen year follow-up study. Am J Surg. 1970 Jan;119(1):15–18. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(70)90004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wickbom G., Bushkin F. L., Linares C., Dragstedt L. R. On the corrosive properties of bile and pancreatic juice on living tissue in dogs. Arch Surg. 1974 May;108(5):680–684. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1974.01350290044006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wickbom G., Bushkin F. L., Woodward E. R. Alkaline reflux esophagitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974 Aug;139(2):267–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES