Skip to main content
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1976 May;183(5):476–487. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197605000-00004

Sphincteroplasty and choledochoduodenostomy for benign biliary obstructions.

R H Rutledge
PMCID: PMC1344328  PMID: 1275589

Abstract

Both sphincteroplasty and choledochoduodenostomy are valuable for choledocholithiasis, stenosis of the terminal bile duct, and occasional cases of pancreatitis. Selection of patients, technical details, and advantages and limitations of both operative procedures are presented. In a personal series of 600 benign biliary operations 73 patients had a sphincteroplasty or choledochoduodenostomy. Sixty of these had a sphincteroplasty without operative mortality, serious complication, or recurrence of biliary problems although 5 still have pain. A positive morphine-prostigmine test was a prime indication for surgery in these 5 patients. The evocative tests are now negative. Thirteen patients had a choledochonduodenostomy without mortality or significant complication. Twelve are symptom free but one has a "sump syndrome." Sphincteroplasty has been preferred because it gives dependent drainage, direct inspection of the ampullary area, and facilitates removal of impacted stones and debris. It is not always applicable and choledochoduodenostomy has been chosen in elderly poor risk patients or in those with pancreatic inflammation or periampullary duodenal diverticula. Both operations have specific advantages and limitations such that the surgeon should not use one to the exclusion of the other.

Full text

PDF
476

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Acosta J. M., Civantos F., Nardi G. L., Castleman B. Fibrosis of the papilla of Vater. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1967 Apr;124(4):787–794. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BARTLETT M. K., NARDI G. L. Treatment of recurrent pancreatitis by transduodenal sphincterotomy and exploration of the pancreatic duct. N Engl J Med. 1960 Mar 31;262:643–648. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196003312621302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BOYDEN E. A. The anatomy of the choledochoduodenal junction in man. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1957 Jun;104(6):641–652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CAPPER W. M. External choledochoduodenostomy. An evaluation of 125 cases. Br J Surg. 1961 Nov;49:292–300. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18004921512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chessick K. C., Black S., Hoye S. J. Spasm and operative cholangiography. Arch Surg. 1975 Jan;110(1):53–57. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360070053009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DROUIN J. P. CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH ROUTINE SPHINCTEROPLASTY. Can J Surg. 1964 Oct;7:367–377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Degenshein G. A., Hurwitz A. The techniques of side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy. Surgery. 1967 Jun;61(6):972–974. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edmunds R., Katz S., Garciano V., Finby N. The common duct after cholecystectomy. Interval report. Arch Surg. 1971 Jul;103(1):79–81. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1971.01350070105025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FERRIS D. O., VIBERT J. C. The common bile duct: significance of its diameter. Ann Surg. 1959 Feb;149(2):249–251. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195902000-00011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Farrar T., Painter M. W., Betz R. Choledochoduodenostomy. In the treatment of stenosis in the distal common duct. Arch Surg. 1969 Apr;98(4):442–446. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1969.01340100074008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ham J. M., Sorby W. Measurement of stoma size following choledochoduodenostomy by transduodenal cholangiography. Br J Surg. 1973 Dec;60(12):940–943. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800601207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hardy E. G., Davenport T. J. The transduodenal approach to the common bile-duct. Br J Surg. 1969 Sep;56(9):667–671. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800560907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoerr S. O., Hermann R. E. Side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy. Surg Clin North Am. 1973 Oct;53(5):1115–1122. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)40140-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. JONES S. A., SMITH L. L. Transduodenal sphincteroplasty for recurrent pancreatitis; a preliminary report. Ann Surg. 1952 Dec;136(6):937–947. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195212000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnson A. G., Rains A. J. Choledochoduodenostomy. A reappraisal of its indications based on a study of 64 patients. Br J Surg. 1972 Apr;59(4):277–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnson A. G., Stevens A. E. Importance of the size of the stoma in choledocho-duodenostomy. Gut. 1969 Jan;10(1):68–70. doi: 10.1136/gut.10.1.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones S. A., Smith L. L. A reappraisal of sphincteroplasty (not sphincterotomy). Surgery. 1972 Apr;71(4):565–575. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jones S. A. Sphincteroplasty (not sphincterotomy) in the treatment of biliary tract disease. Surg Clin North Am. 1973 Oct;53(5):1123–1137. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)40141-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kozloff L., Joseph W. L. Transduodenal sphincteroplasty for biliary tract disease. Am Surg. 1975 Mar;41(3):125–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Leslie D. The width of the common bile duct. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1968 Apr;126(4):761–764. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Longmire W. P., Jr, Mandiola S. Nonobstructive dilatation of the common duct. Surg Clin North Am. 1970 Oct;50(5):1099–1106. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)39247-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Longo M. F., Hodgson J. R., Ferris D. O. Size of the common bile duct following cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1967 Feb;165(2):250–253. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196702000-00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Madden J. L., Chun J. Y., Kandalaft S., Parekh M. Choledochoduodenostomy: an unjustly maligned surgical procedure? Am J Surg. 1970 Jan;119(1):45–54. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(70)90010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Madden J. L., Vanderheyden L., Kandalaft S. The nature and surgical significance of common duct stones. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1968 Jan;126(1):3–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Magarey J. R. The postfenestration syndrome. Med J Aust. 1971 Jul 17;2(3):129–132. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1971.tb50462.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. McBurney C. VIII. Removal of Biliary Calculi from the Common Duct by the Duodenal Route. Ann Surg. 1898 Oct;28(4):481–486. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mullen J. L., Rosato F. E., Rosato E. F., Miller W. T., Sullivan M. The diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1971 Nov;133(5):774–778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nardi G. L., Acosta J. M. Papillitis as a cause of pancreatitis and abdominal pain: role of evocative test, operative pancreatography and histologic evaluation. Ann Surg. 1966 Oct;164(4):611–621. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196610000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Puente J. L., Potel J. Pathology of stenosis of the papilla of vater. Int Surg. 1970 Jun;53(6):411–419. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. SCHWARTZ F., BENSHIMOL A., HURWITZ A. Choledochoduodenostomy in the treatment of stenosis of the lower portion of the common bile duct. Surgery. 1959 Dec;46:1020–1026. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. SMITH R. B., 3rd, CONKLIN E. F., PORTER M. R. A five year study of choledocholithiasis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1963 Jun;116:731–740. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sanders R. L. Indications for and Value of Choledochoduodenostomy. Ann Surg. 1946 May;123(5):847–855. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Shingleton W. W., Gamburg D. Stenosis of the sphincter of Oddi. Am J Surg. 1970 Jan;119(1):35–37. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(70)90008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shore J. M., Berci G. Operative management of calculi in the hepatic ducts. Am J Surg. 1970 Jun;119(6):625–631. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(70)90229-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shore J. M. The prevention of residual biliary calculi. Calif Med. 1971 May;114(5):1–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sparkman R. S., Lovett V. F. Preoperative Cholangiography. Ann Surg. 1961 Jul;154(1):75–84. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196107000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Stuart M., Hoerr S. O. Late results of side to side choledochoduodenostomy and of transduodenal sphincterotomy for benign disorders. A twenty year comparative study. Am J Surg. 1972 Jan;123(1):67–72. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(72)90313-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Thomas C. G., Jr, Nicholson C. P., Owen J. Effectiveness of choledochoduodenostomy and transduodenal sphincterotomy in the treatment of benign obstruction of the common duct. Ann Surg. 1971 Jun;173(6):845–856. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197106010-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. WRIGHT A. D. Surgery of the biliary tract. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1960 Dec;27:373–387. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wakim K. G., Mahour G. H. Pathophysiologic consequences of cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1971 Jul;133(1):113–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Way L. W., Admirand W. H., Dunphy J. E. Management of choledocholithiasis. Ann Surg. 1972 Sep;176(3):347–359. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197209000-00011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. White T. T. Indications for sphincteroplasty as opposed to choledochoduodenostomy. Am J Surg. 1973 Aug;126(2):165–170. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(73)80148-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Williams R. D., Fish J. C., Williams D. D. The significance of biliary pressure. Arch Surg. 1967 Sep;95(3):374–379. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1967.01330150050008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES