Skip to main content
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1976 Aug;184(2):174–178. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197608000-00007

The sutureless aortic valve prosthesis: experience with and technical considerations for replacement of the early model.

S M Scott, G K Sethi, M W Flye, T Takaro
PMCID: PMC1344427  PMID: 133642

Abstract

Reoperation was performed in seven (16%) of 43 patients with early models of Magovern sutureless aortic valve prostheses, because of thromboembolism and ball variance. All patients survived reoperation with no major complications. Removal of the sutureless prosthesis was not difficult when an insertion tool of proper size was used. A scarred annulus remained which was favorable for the suturing of a new prosthesis. The incidence of disabling thromboembolism (42%) and poppet failure (21%) is high with these early models. When these complications occur, replacement of the prosthesis is recommended to prevent death or recurrent embolic episodes.

Full text

PDF
174

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bonnabeau R. C., Jr, Mantini E. L., Wang Y., Lillehei C. W. Replacement of the aortic valve with the Starr-Edwards and sutureless (Magovern) prosthesis. Comparative recatherization results. Am J Cardiol. 1967 Sep;20(3):314–323. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(67)90052-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hylen J. C., Kloster F. E., Starr A., Griswold H. E. Aortic ball variance. Diagnosis and treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1970 Jan;72(1):1–8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-72-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Londe S., Sugg W. L. The challenge of reoperation in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1974 Feb;17(2):157–162. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)65627-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MAGOVERN G. J., KENT E. M., CROMIE H. W., CUSHING W. B., SCOTT S. SUTURELESS AORTIC AND MITRAL PROSTHETIC VALVES. CLINICAL RESULTS AND OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE ON SIXTY PATIENTS. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1964 Sep;48:346–361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rees J. R., Miscall B. G., Holswade G. R., Castaneda A., Lillehei C. W. Late results of valve replacement. Surgery. 1970 Jan;67(1):141–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Roman T. P., Schattenberg T. T., Oxman H. A., Wallace R. B. Magovern-Cromie ball valve prosthesis for aortic valve replacement. Mayo Clin Proc. 1973 Aug;48(8):537–540. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SCOTT S. M., FISH R. G., TAKARO T., SEWELL W. H. AORTIC VALVE SURGERY USING THE MAGOVERN PROSTHESIS. Ann Thorac Surg. 1965 Jul;1:463–465. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)66783-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wisheart J. D., Ross D. N., Ross J. K. A review of the effect of previous operations on the results of open-heart surgery. Thorax. 1972 Mar;27(2):137–142. doi: 10.1136/thx.27.2.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES