ABSTRACT
β‐Lactams are of great importance in organic chemistry and medicinal science due to their essential biologically active and unique architectures. Herein, the facile photochemical synthesis of highly functionalized β‐lactams derivatives from easily accessible enamides, enabled by a Lewis acid‐catalyzed diradical hydrogen atom transfer (DHAT), is described. Notably, trisubstituted enamides with tertiary C(sp3)−H bonds can efficiently deliver adjacent all‐carbon quaternary β‐lactams. This effective protocol is compatible with a variety of functional groups and can be applied to the modification of bioactive molecules. Based on mechanistic evidences and computational studies, it is suggested that Lewis acid catalysis can lower the energy of the triplet excited state of enamides and modulate the reactivity of the readily formed 1,2‐diradical intermediate to unlock a carbon‐to‐carbon 1,5‐DHAT and consequent cyclization of the 1,4‐diradical intermediate that allows the functionalization of C(sp3)−H bonds to construct a variety of novel β‐lactams. This distinctive activation mode of Lewis acid catalysis paves a new way of DHAT reactions for the transformation of C(sp3)−H bonds.
Keywords: diradical hydrogen atom transfer reaction, enamides, Lewis acid‐catalyzed, visible‐light‐mediated, β‐lactams
The Lewis acid catalysis was crucial for the success of the DHAT reaction of enamides by lowering the energy of the triplet excited state and modulating the reactivity of the formed diradical intermediate in a carbon‐to‐carbon 1,5‐DHAT and consequent cyclization that allows the functionalization of C(sp3)−H bonds to construct a variety of novel β‐lactams.

1. Introduction
β‐Lactams have a crucial role in the fields of organic chemistry and medicinal science due to their prevalence in essential natural products, biologically active molecules, and pharmaceuticals [1, 2]. It is widely accepted that β‐lactams are extremely important architectures in a variety of antibiotics, such as penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems (Figure 1a) [3, 4]. In addition, β‐lactams were also extensively used as versatile synthetic intermediates in organic synthesis [5, 6, 7]. In this context, innovative methodologies to obtain β‐lactams with different physical properties and unexplored chemical space are of great importance and highly desirable. It was noted that the Staudinger ketene‐imine [2+2] cycloaddition is regarded as one of the most fundamental and versatile methods for the synthesis of such derivatives; however, the generation of substituted ketenes in the reaction limited its applications in some conditions [8, 9]. Despite the great interests and recent advances in the synthesis of these compounds, an alternative strategy involving C−H transformations represents an atom‐efficient route to access this motif in a straightforward manner (Figure 1b) [10, 11, 12, 13]. However, this strategy is likely not suitable for tertiary C(sp3)−H transformations and heterocycle‐containing β‐lactams. Considering the distinctive structural and bioactive properties imparted by heterocycles and quaternary carbons in pharmaceuticals [14, 15], the development of efficient strategies to incorporate these vital motifs into β‐lactam scaffolds is necessary to increase their potential in current drug design and therapy. Accordingly, the pursuit of modular and practical synthetic strategies toward highly functionalized β‐lactams remains an important issue to address.
FIGURE 1.

Background and photochemical DHAT reactions of enamides. (a) Pharmaceutically examples of β‐lactams; (b) Retrosynthesis of β‐lactams via C−H functionalization using transition metals; (c) Photochemical DHAT of enamides; (d) Our design.
On the other hand, enamide serves as a crucial synthetic building block for the synthesis of various nitrogen‐containing compounds [16]. Despite that, the excited‐state characteristics of enamides have significantly hampered the development of their photochemical applications [17]. In fact, the photochemical reactivity of excited enamides is significantly restricted by their ππ* character and the inherent instability of excited‐state intermediates due to the non‐ bonding electron pair on nitrogen [18]. Moreover, the excited isomerization greatly hampers the photochemical reactions of these species. In recent years, with the great renaissance and progress of energy transfer reactions [19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24], substantial research efforts have been directed toward expanding the boundaries of their reactivity via diradical intermediates.
However, in contrast to photochemical [2+2] reactions [25, 26], the development of other photochemical transformations of excited enamides is still in its early stages, especially diradical hydrogen atom transfer (DHAT) reactions [27]. In fact, the DHAT reactions featuring diradical species derived from excited states, which exhibit unique reactivity, can provide alternative reaction pathways for the transformation of C(sp3)−H bonds [28]. In particular, the DHAT and subsequent cyclization of photo‐excited enamides could offer a facile way to realize diverse functionalization of C(sp3)−H bonds to access various β‐lactams for exploring new chemical space. While some studies have reported transformations along this line for the construction of β‐lactams, strategies for modulating diradical reactivity and expanding the chemical space remain at a nascent stage [29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38]. Moreover, several elegant works suggested that upon UV or visible light irradiation, the excited state of enamides can undergo a 1,5‐DHAT via a 1,2‐diradical intermediate to form a new 1,4‐diradical intermediate. However, subsequent intramolecular cyclization is critically governed by the substrate nature due to the lack of precise control of the reactivity and relative stability of the diradical [30, 39]. It is assumed that the increased ππ* character, inherent instability of the excited‐state intermediates, and the reactivity of the involved two diradical intermediates in the processes are the crucial issues to be addressed (Figure 1c). Meanwhile, photochemical C(sp3)–H functionalization for the construction of quaternary carbon centers remains challenging because of the high steric hindrance involved. Nevertheless, the development of a visible light‐mediated methodology can greatly expand the scope and generality of this process and pave a practical way for the divergent synthesis of multi‐substituted β‐lactams via C(sp3)−H bond functionalization.
Moreover, it is widely accepted that Lewis acids can change the reactivity of excited‐state organic molecules [40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46]. Recently, Glorius, Brown, You, Feng, and other groups have found that Lewis acids play a vital role in photochemical dearomative cycloaddition reactions [47, 48, 49, 50]. However, to the best of our knowledge, the use of a Lewis acid catalyst to modulate diradical reactivity of excited enamides in DHAT reactions has not been previously reported. Based on our previous studies involving DHAT reactions [51, 52, 53, 54], we hypothesized that, upon a strategic combination of photosensitizer and Lewis acid, it would be possible to modulate the reactivity of the diradical intermediates in the process to unlock the triplet reactivity of enamides for an unprecedented DHAT/cyclization to access highly functionalized β‐lactams. Meanwhile, a flexible coordination with the substrates may allow this process to be catalyzed by a Lewis acid. This hypothesis would enable precise control over diradical reactivity, thereby offering a new concept to advance the general approach for such DHAT reactions (Figure 1d). Herein, we have studied the visible light‐mediated reaction of excited enamides for a Lewis acid‐catalyzed DHAT/cyclization. It is found that various C(sp3)−H bonds can be functionalized to provide an effective route to a variety of β‐lactams skeletons. Notably, trisubstituted Z/E enamides with tertiary C(sp3)−H bonds can efficiently deliver adjacent all‐carbon quaternary β‐lactams, unlocking a range of opportunities in biological applications. Mechanistic evidences and computational studies suggest that the Lewis acid catalyst indeed modulates the reactivity of the carbon diradical intermediates to unlock a carbon‐to‐carbon DHAT and its subsequent cyclization that allows the functionalization of C(sp3)−H bonds to construct a variety of β‐lactams.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Reaction Design and Development
In light of above considerations, we performed the optimization of the DHAT/cyclization reaction with N‐benzyl‐N‐(1‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)vinyl)‐cyclohex‐ane‐carboxamide a1 (Table 1, see Figure S1 for the synthesis method) [51] This model substrate features a cyclohexyl group at the α‐position to the carbonyl group for a possible DHAT and subsequent cyclization to form a β‐lactam with adjacent all‐carbon quaternary centers and the pyridine moiety the coordination site with the Lewis acid. We attempted to make a judicious choice of iridium triplet sensitizers and Lewis acids to get the desired product b1. To our delight, when [Ir(dFppy)2dtbbpy]PF6 and Sc(OTf)3 were used under visible light irradiation, product b1 was obtained (entry 1, Table 1). Various Lewis acids and Brønsted acids were also evaluated (entries 2–5, Table 1), and Zn(OTf)2 was found to give the product in the highest yield. Moreover, through a solvent screening process, DCM was identified as the solvent giving the highest yield (entries 6–8, Table 1). Furthermore, other photosensitizers were also tested but performed less efficiently (entries 9–11, Table 1). Lastly, several control experiments confirmed that the reaction requires the presence of the Lewis acid, the photocatalyst, and light (entries 12–14, Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Reaction development and optimization.
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry a | sens | Solvent | Acids | Yield b (%) |
| 1 | Ir‐1 | PhCF3 | Sc(OTf)3 | 65 |
| 2 | Ir‐1 | PhCF3 | Y(OTf)3 | 60 |
| 3 | Ir‐1 | PhCF3 | Zn(OTf)2 | 72 |
| 4 | Ir‐1 | PhCF3 | Mg(OTf)2 | 37 |
| 5 | Ir‐1 | PhCF3 | TsOH | 40 |
| 6 | Ir‐1 | CH2Cl2 | Zn(OTf)2 | 91/87 c |
| 7 | Ir‐1 | CH3CN | Zn(OTf)2 | 47 |
| 8 | Ir‐1 | THF | Zn(OTf)2 | 35 |
| 9 d | TXT | CH2Cl2 | Zn(OTf)2 | 58 |
| 10 | Ir‐2 | CH2Cl2 | Zn(OTf)2 | 6 |
| 11 | Ir‐3 | CH2Cl2 | Zn(OTf)2 | 70 |
| 12 | Ir‐1 | CH2Cl2 | — | 22 |
| 13 | — | CH2Cl2 | Zn(OTf)2 | — |
| 14 e | Ir‐1 | CH2Cl2 | Zn(OTf)2 | — |
a1 (0.2 mmol), photosensitizers (2 mol%), acid catalyst (20 mol%) in solvent (10 mL) under Ar, rt, blue LEDs λmax = 427 nm, 24 h.
The yield was determined by 1H‐NMR using CH2Br2 as the internal standard.
Isolated yield.
blue LEDs λmax = 420 nm.
Without light.
2.2. Reaction Scope
By using the optimized conditions (entry 6, Table 1), the scope of the reaction was then explored with a variety of enamides (Figure 2 and Figure S2). Initially, the transformations of tertiary C(sp3)−H bonds at the α‐position of the carbonyl group in enamides a2‐a8 were investigated. It was found that the systematic variation of cyclic substituents, ranging from four‐membered to seven‐membered rings, can access diverse spiro‐β‐lactams (b2‐b8) with continuous all‐carbon quaternary centres in good to excellent yields, being tolerant to functional groups such as fluoro, alkoxy, alkene, and amide. In particular, spiro‐β‐lactam b8 has a promising potential for application in chemical space exploration of Zelquistinel for NMDA receptor modulators [55]. Meanwhile, enamides a9‐a12 with acyclic substituents also proceeded efficiently to afford b9‐b12. The assignment of the product b10 was corroborated by single‐crystal x‐ray diffraction (CCDC2496582). It was found that the major diastereoisomer displays the phenyl group cis relative to the pyridine moiety. Notably, in the absence of the Lewis acid, the dr value of b10 was only 3:1, indicating that the addition of the Lewis acid modulates the reactivity of the reaction. Moreover, different substituents such as fluoro, chloro, bromo, and trifluoromethyl on the pyridine moiety can also undergo this transformation, thus delivering the corresponding products b13‐b17 in good yields. Furthermore, other N‐heteroaromatic units could also be successfully employed, affording the desired products b18‐b20. In addition, the reaction is also compatible with a variety of N‐substituted substrates, including alkyl, benzyl, benzoyl, and alkenoyl groups, leading to the DHAT/cyclization products b21‐b28, enabling subsequent diverse transformations of β‐lactams. Then, using this method, the secondary C(sp3)−H bonds with different substituents at the α‐position of the carbonyl group in the enamides were also effectively transformed into the corresponding β‐lactams b29‐b40 in 32%–80% yields and 2/1 to > 8/1 d.r. values 1. The reaction can tolerate a wide range of functional groups such as fluoro (b31), chloro (b32, b39), ether (b33, b35, b36), thiophenyl (b34), and alkyne(b40). Importantly, enamides a37‐a40, featuring stronger secondary C(sp3)−H bonds (according to Bond Dissociation Energies, BDEs) [56], can also attain the β‐lactams b37‐b40, albeit in lower yields. In sharp contrast, the primary C(sp3)−H bond substrates cannot work in the reaction, likely due to the relative reactivity of the diradical intermediates. Next, trisubstituted enamides, which are challenging substrates due to undesired E/Z isomerization [57] or a higher triplet energy [58]. were also employed. To our delight, it was found that such enamides efficiently produced the desired products (b41‐b45) in good yields, which highlights the distinctive reactivity imparted by Lewis acid catalysis in DHAT reactions. Lastly, to further showcase the practical utility of this strategy, molecules containing both biological and drug motifs were also investigated under the optimized conditions. Thus, the mandelic and oleic acids can be efficiently incorporated into the β‐lactam (b46 and b47) with satisfactory yield and d.r. via this method, thereby significantly expanding the accessible chemical space. The Ibuprofen and Ketoprofen derivatives, to our delight, were found to be effective substrates in the reactions, resulting in the corresponding β‐lactams in good yields (b48, 96 %; b49, 51 %) and diastereomeric ratio (5/1).
FIGURE 2.

The substrate scope. Reaction conditions: a (0.2 mmol), Ir‐1 (2 mol%), Zn(OTf)2 (20 mol%) in DCM (10 mL) under Ar, rt, blue LEDs, λmax = 427 nm, 24 h, for b10‐b12 (reaction time t = 12 h), isolated yield, diastereomeric ratio (d.r.) was determined by crude 1H NMR integration.
2.3. Mechanistic Studies
To elucidate the reaction mechanism involved in this novel transformation, different control experiments were undertaken (Figure 3). First, the UV/Vis absorption properties of a1 were studied (Figure 3a and Figure S3). The UV/Vis spectrum of a1 revealed an absorption maximum at 277 nm, ε277 nm = 2103.9 M−1cm−1, which can be tentatively assigned to a π‐π* transition [59]. Interestingly, upon adding different equiv. of Zn(OTf)2, the π‐π* transition did not lead to an obvious shift (see Figure S4 for details). Time‐dependent (TD) density functional theory (DFT) calculations were carried out to assign the nature of the absorption observed in the UV/Vis spectrum of a1. The calculations gave a vertical excitation energy of λcalc = 298 nm, which is in reasonably good agreement with the experimental values of ca. 275 nm. This absorption mainly results from the HOMO→LUMO vertical transition, which, as depicted in Figure 3b, mainly involves the C═C double bond, therefore confirming the π−π* nature of the absorption. Moreover, Stern–Volmer quenching experiments confirmed that the excited state of the photocatalyst was quenched by enamide a1 or Lewis acid‐enamide a1’ (Figure 3c). However, it was noted that the Lewis acid‐enamide a1’ has higher quenching efficiencies than enamide a1 (Figures S5 and S6), which might be a reason for the catalytic loading of Zn(OTf)2 in the reaction. Next, deuterium labeling and kinetic isotope effect (KIE) experiments were conducted to provide strong evidence about the DHAT process. It was found that product b10‐d 1, which was obtained from deuterated substrate a10‐d 1, exhibited one deuterium atom (D > 99%) specifically at the C1 position, a result consistent with the envisioned DHAT of the C1 position (Figure 3d). In addition, a primary KIE was supported by both intermolecular competition (kH/kD = 2.3) and parallel reactions (kH/kD = 2.9) experiments [60]. Moreover, under the standard reaction conditions, a50 remained stable and was recovered essentially unchanged, with no detectable formation of the β‐lactam b50 (Figure 3e), which highlights the crucial role of the coordinating pyridine nitrogen atom site in the photochemical transformation. Furthermore, a significant inhibition of the reaction was observed by adding 2,5‐dimethylhexa‐2,4‐diene, an efficient triplet quencher (Figure 3f), suggesting that the reaction proceeded through a triplet excited state [61].
FIGURE 3.

Mechanistic studies. Mechanistic experiments on the DHAT/cyclization cascade of enamides: S.C. is standard condition: Ir‐1 (2 mol%), Zn(OTf)2 (20 mol%), DCM (c = 20 mm), λmax = 427 nm. (a) UV/Vis spectrum for substrates a1. (b) Computed molecular orbitals (PCM(dichloromethane)‐TD‐B3LYP‐D3BJ/def2‐SVP//CPCM(dichloromethane)‐B3LYP‐D3BJ/def2‐SVP level) involved in the observed absorption (isosurface value of 0.04 a.u.). (c) Stern–Volmer quenching experiments. (d) The reaction of deuterated substrate a10‐d 1 and KIE. (e) photochemical experiment of a50. (f) Triplet energy quenching experiments of a1.
In addition, density functional theory (DFT) calculations at the dispersion‐corrected CPCM(dichloromethane)‐B3LYP‐D3BJ/def2‐TZVPP//CPCM(dichloromethane)‐B3LYP‐D3BJ/def2‐SVP level were carried out to gain more insight into the reaction mechanism and the influence of the Lewis acid catalyst on the process 2. To this end, we explored the transformation of substrate a19’ into the β‐lactam b19’ (where the cyclohexyl substituent was replaced by two methyl groups) both in the presence and absence of Zn(OTf)2 (Figure 4). Based on the above mechanistic studies and related transformations [51, 52], the uncatalyzed transformation begins with the energy transfer (EnT) from the excited photocatalyst to the C═C double bond of a19’, thus resulting in the formation of the triplet biradical a19’‐T1 (ΔGS‐T = 48.8 kcal/mol). Our calculations indicate that the spin density at the terminal carbon atom of the former alkene is higher than that at the adjacent carbon atom attached to the pyridyl group (1.03 e vs. 0.68 e). This facilitates the 1,5‐DHAT from the isopropyl group via transition state TS1‐T1 (ΔG≠ = 8.2 kcal/mol), leading to the exergonic formation (ΔG = −13.4 kcal /mol) of triplet intermediate INT1‐T1 . Subsequent intersystem crossing (ISC) produces the zwitterionic, closed‐shell singlet INT1‐S0 , which readily undergoes cyclization via transition state TS2‐S0 (ΔG≠ = 15.3 kcal/mol) to produce the observed β‐lactam b19’ in a highly exergonic transformation (ΔG = −30.1 kcal/mol). Therefore, the computed reaction profile strongly resembles that proposed very recently by Smith and co‐workers on the photochemical formation of β‐lactams from N‐acyl enaminones [39]. The reaction profile computed in the presence of Zn(OTf)2 is rather similar in the sense that it also involves an initial 1,5‐DHAT in the triplet state, followed by cyclization in the singlet hypersurface. Two possible coordination modes were explored, namely that involving the pyridyl nitrogen atom and the alternative mode involving the amide carbonyl group. Not surprisingly, the former coordination mode is preferred in both the ground state (ΔΔG = 3.1 kcal/mol) and the excited triplet state (ΔΔG = 6.9 kcal/mol). Thus, from the more stable a19’‐Zn‐T1 (ΔGS‐T = 47.6 kcal/mol), the 1,5‐DHAT process takes place through TS1‐Zn‐T1 (ΔG≠ = 4.6 kcal/mol) to produce intermediate INT1‐Zn‐T1 in a highly exergonic step (ΔG = −16.2 kcal /mol). Therefore, the catalyzed 1,5‐DHAT is favored both kinetically (ΔΔG≠ = 3.6 kcal/mol) and thermodynamically (ΔΔG = 2.8 kcal/mol) over the analogous uncatalyzed reaction, which supports the beneficial role of the Lewis acid. Subsequent ISC leads to the analogous zwitterionic intermediate INT1‐Zn‐S0, which lies 8.8 kcal/mol below INT1‐Zn‐T1 . From this species, the final cyclization step takes place via TS2‐Zn‐S0 (ΔG≠ = 15.1 kcal/mol) to produce the observed β‐lactam again in a strongly exergonic reaction (ΔG = −20.3 kcal/mol). These mechanistic evidences indicate that the Lewis acid catalysis coordination clearly modulates the reactivity of the initial triplet diradical intermediates formed upon EnT from the excited photocatalyst to facilitate the cascade 1,5‐DHAT/cyclization reaction.
FIGURE 4.

DFT studies. Computed reaction profiles for the transformation of a19’ and its Zn(OTf)2 counterpart a19’‐Zn. Relative free energies (ΔG, at 298 K) are given in kcal/mol, and spin density values are shown in green. All data have been computed at the CPCM(dichloromethane)‐B3LYP‐D3BJ/def2‐TZVPP//CPCM(dichloromethane)‐B3LYP‐D3BJ/def2‐SVP level. [Zn] referes to Zn(OTf)2.
2.4. Synthetic Applications
Lastly, considering that β‐lactams are valuable intermediates in organic synthesis and biologically active molecules in medicinal chemistry, we have studied further derivatization reactions of the prepared lactams to demonstrate the usefulness of our methodology (Figure 5).
FIGURE 5.

The transformations of β‐lactams. Reagents and conditions: (i) b9, LiAlH4, THF, 92%; (ii) b9, m‐CPBA, CH2Cl2, 90%; (iii) b9, Lawesson reagent, THF, 94%; (iv) b26, CAN, MeCN, 40%.
By using LiAlH4, β‐lactam b9 can be easily reduced to access the azetidine c1 for promising applications in modern medicinal chemistry and drug discovery [62]. Indeed, this approach provides a concise pathway for the chemical space exploration of azetidines. Meanwhile, the pyridine group in b9 can be oxidized to afford pyridine oxide c2 as a potential substrate for further valuable transformations [63]. Then, the carbonyl group of b9 can be efficiently converted into the corresponding thiocarbonyl group product c3 for convenient conversions upon treatment with the Lawesson reagent [64]. Furthermore, the benzyl protecting group on the nitrogen atom in b26 can be effectively removed to get the product c4, which enables further incorporation into diverse bioactive molecules.
3. Conclusion
In summary, we have discovered a Lewis acid‐catalysed intramolecular DHAT and cyclization cascade of enamides, which allows access to various β‐lactams by energy transfer under visible light irradiation. This method enables modular and practical construction of an array of β‐lactams containing quaternary carbon centers and heteroaromatic rings, facilitating efficient modification of drug molecules with tolerance for a wide range of functional groups. Based on mechanistic evidences and DFT calculations, it is shown that the Lewis acid catalysis was crucial for the success of the processes by modulating the reactivity of the diradical intermediates derived from the excited enamides in intramolecular DHAT of a variety of C(sp3)−H bonds and subsequent cyclization. This distinctive activation mode of Lewis acid catalysis paves a new way of DHAT reactions for the transformation of C(sp3)−H bonds, which offers a number of opportunities for applications in organic synthesis and pharmaceuticals.
Author Contributions
Yao Huang: methodology, software, data curation, investigation, formal analysis. Kexue Xia: conceptualization, software, formal analysis, Writing – review and editing, data curation. Baoyu Yang : methodology, software, data curation, investigation, formal analysis. Yang Xiong: conceptualization, methodology, software, data curation, supervision, formal analysis, investigation, funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, project administration. Xiang Zhou: methodology, software, data curation, formal analysis, validation, investigation. Israel Fernández: software, data curation, formal analysis, Writing – review and editing, conceptualization.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 22301026), the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (Grant No. CSTB2024NSCQ‐MSX0206), the Venture & Innovation Support Program for Chongqing Overseas Returnees (Grant No. cx2024125), the Hongshen Young Scholars Program from Chongqing University (Grant No. 02470011080002), and the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. KJQN202400483); PID2022‐139318NB‐I00 (funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Supporting File: advs76846‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.
Acknowledgements
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 22301026), the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (CSTB2024NSCQ‐MSX0206), the Venture & Innovation Support Program for Chongqing Overseas Returnees (cx2024125), the Hongshen Young Scholars Program from Chongqing University (02470011080002), and the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. KJQN202400483) are gratefully acknowledged for financial support. I. Fernández is grateful for financial support from grants PID2022‐139318NB‐I00, funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. The authors thank Mr. Xiang‐Nan Gong (Analytical and Testing Center of Chongqing University) for X‐ray crystallographic analysis.
ENDNOTES
The assignment of the product b29 was corroborated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (CCDC 2554983).
See computational details in the supporting information.
Contributor Information
Israel Fernández, Email: israel@quim.ucm.es.
Kexue Xia, Email: x201057@163.com, Email: kexuexia@cqmu.edu.cn.
Yang Xiong, Email: yxiong@cqu.edu.cn.
Data Availability Statement
The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.
References
- 1. Hamilton‐Miller J., “β‐Lactams: Variations on a Chemical Theme, With Some Surprising Biological Results,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 44, no. 6 (1999): 729–734, 10.1093/jac/44.6.729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Earl J. and Kirkpatrick P., “Ezetimibe,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2, no. 2 (2003): 97–98, 10.1038/nrd1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hamad B., “The Antibiotics Market,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 9, no. 9 (2010): 675–676, 10.1038/nrd3267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Galletti P. and Giacomini D., “Monocyclic β‐Lactams: New Structures for New Biological Activities,” Current Medicinal Chemistry 18, no. 28 (2011): 4265–4283, 10.2174/092986711797200480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Alcaide B., Almendros P., and Aragoncillo C., “β‐Lactams: Versatile Building Blocks for the Stereoselective Synthesis of Non‐β‐Lactam Products,” Chemical Reviews 107, no. 11 (2007): 4437–4492, 10.1021/cr0307300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Brandi A., Cicchi S., and Cordero F. M., “Novel Syntheses of Azetidines and Azetidinones,” Chemical Reviews 108, no. 9 (2008): 3988–4035, 10.1021/cr800325e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ye J., Bellotti P., Paulisch T. O., Daniliuc C. G., and Glorius F., “Visible‐Light‐Induced Cycloaddition of α‐Ketoacylsilanes With Imines: Facile Access to β‐Lactams,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60, no. 24 (2021): 13671–13676, 10.1002/anie.202102451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Pitts C. R. and Lectka T., “Chemical Synthesis of β‐Lactams: Asymmetric Catalysis and Other Recent Advances,” Chemical Reviews 114, no. 16 (2014): 7930–7953, 10.1021/cr4005549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hosseyni S. and Jarrahpour A., “Recent Advances in β‐lactam Synthesis,” Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 16, no. 38 (2018): 6840–6852, 10.1039/C8OB01833B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Premkumar E., Sreedharan R., Ghosh P., Pal T., Maiti D., and Gandhi T., “Synthesis of Lactones and Lactams via C(sp3)–H Bond Functionalization,” Chemical Society Reviews 54, no. 13 (2025): 6238–6281, 10.1039/D4CS01152J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. France S., Weatherwax A., Taggi E. A., and Lectka T., “Advances in the Catalytic, Asymmetric Synthesis of β‐Lactams,” Accounts of Chemical Research 37, no. 8 (2004): 592–600, 10.1021/ar030055g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Li W., Liu C., Zhang H., et al., “Palladium‐Catalyzed Oxidative Carbonylation of N ‐Allylamines for the Synthesis of β‐Lactams,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 53, no. 9 (2014): 2443–2446, 10.1002/anie.201309081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wu H., Wang Y., Sui S., et al., “Enantioselective Desymmetrization and Parallel Kinetic Resolution of Cyclopropanes via C–C Activation: Synthesis of chiral β‐lactams,” Chemistry 10, no. 11 (2024): 3503–3516, 10.1016/j.chempr.2024.08.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hiesinger K., Dar'In D., Proschak E., and Krasavin M., “Spirocyclic Scaffolds in Medicinal Chemistry,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 64, no. 1 (2021): 150–183, 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Talele T. T., “Opportunities for Tapping Into Three‐Dim Ensional Chemical Space Through a Quaternary Carbon,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 63, no. 22 (2020): 13291–13315, 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Matsubara R. and Kobayashi S., “Enamides and Enecarbamates as Nucleophiles in Stereoselective C–C and C–N Bond‐Forming Reactions,” Accounts of Chemical Research 41, no. 2 (2008): 292–301, 10.1021/ar700098d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Yang N. C. and Lenz G. R., “Photochemical Reactions of Enamides,” Tetrahedron Letters 8, no. 48 (1967): 4897–4900, 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)89627-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Campbell A. L. and Lenz G. R., “The Ground State and Excited State Reactions of Enamides,” Synthesis 1987, no. 05 (1987): 421–452, 10.1055/s-1987-27972. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Zhou Q. Q., Zou Y. Q., Lu L. Q., and Xiao W. J., “Visible‐Light‐Induced Organic Photochemical Reactions Through Energy‐Transfer Pathways,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 58, no. 6 (2019): 1586–1604, 10.1002/anie.201803102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Bellotti P., Huang H. M., Faber T., and Glorius F., “Photocatalytic Late‐Stage C–H Functionalization,” Chemical Reviews 123, no. 8 (2023): 4237–4352, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Strieth‐Kalthoff F., James M. J., Teders M., Pitzer L., and Glorius F., “Energy Transfer Catalysis Mediated by Visible Light: Principles, Applications, Directions,” Chemical Society Reviews 47, no. 19 (2018): 7190–7202, 10.1039/C8CS00054A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Strieth‐Kalthoff F. and Glorius F., “Triplet Energy Transfer Photocatalysis: Unlocking the Next Level,” Chem 6, no. 8 (2020): 1888–1903, 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.07.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Großkopf J., Kratz T., Rigotti T., and Bach T., “Enantioselective Photochemical Reactions Enabled by Triplet Energy Transfer,” Chemical Reviews 122 (2022): 1626–1653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Marzo L., Pagire S. K., Reiser O., and König B., “Visible‐Light Photocatalysis: Does It Make a Difference in Organic Synthesis?,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 57, no. 32 (2018): 10034–10072, 10.1002/anie.201709766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Poplata S., Tröster A., Zou Y. Q., and Bach T., “Recent Advances in the Synthesis of Cyclobutanes by Olefin [2 + 2] Photocycloaddition Reactions,” Chemical Reviews 116, no. 17 (2016): 9748–9815, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Dong T., Pan Y., Zhao X., Yin Y., and Jiang Z., “Chiral Lewis Acid‐Catalyzed Intramolecular [2+2] Photocycloaddition: Enantioselective Synthesis of Azaarene Functionalized Azabicyclo‐[2.1.1]hexanes and Bicyclo‐[1.1.1]pentanes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 147 (2025): 12410–12417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hoffmann N., “Electron and Hydrogen Transfer in Organic Photochemical Reactions,” Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry 28, no. 2 (2015): 121–136, 10.1002/poc.3370. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Mao B., Yan J., Wei Y., and Shi M., “Hydrogen Atom Transfer Promoted by Carbon‐Centered Biradicals via Energy Transfer Catalysis,” Accounts of Chemical Research 58 (2025): 2028–2045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Aoyama H., Hasegawa T., Okazaki M., and Omote Y., “Photochemical Reaction of N N‐dialkylmethacrylamides. An Olefin Analogue of the type II Photoelimination of Ketones,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 1 8 (1979): 263–265, 10.1039/p19790000263. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ikeda M., Uchino T., Ishibashi H., Tamura Y., and Kido M., “Photochemical Synthesis of Spiro‐β‐lactams,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications 16, no. 12 (1984): 758–759, 10.1039/C39840000758. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Blanc S. L., Pete J. P., and Piva O., “New Access to Spiranic β‐Lactams,” Tetrahedron Letters 33 (1992): 1993–1996. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Jesuraj J. L. and Sivaguru J., “Photochemical Type II Reaction of Atropchiral Benzoylformamides to Point Chiral Oxazolidin‐4‐ones. Axial Chiral Memory Leading to Enantiomeric Resolution of Photoproducts,” Chemical Communications 46, no. 26 (2010): 4791–4793, 10.1039/c0cc00470g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Ayitou A. J.‐L., Jesuraj J. L., Barooah N., Ugrinov A., and Sivaguru J., “Enantiospecific Photochemical Norrish/Yang Type II Reaction of Nonbiaryl Atropchiral α‐Oxoamides in Solution—Axial to Point Chirality Transfer,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 131, no. 32 (2009): 11314–11315, 10.1021/ja9050586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Vallavoju N., Sreenithya A., Ayitou A. J.‐L., Jockusch S., Sunoj R. B., and Sivaguru J., “Photoreactions with a Twist: Atropisomerism‐Driven Divergent Reactivity of Enones with UV and Visible Light,” Chemistry–A European Journal 22 (2016): 11339–11349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Xiong Y., Großkopf J., Jandl C., and Bach T., “Visible Light‐Mediated Dearomative Hydrogen Atom Abstraction/ Cyclization Cascade of Indoles,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61, no. 18 (2022): 202200555, 10.1002/anie.202200555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Oddy M. J. D., Kusza A., Epton R. G., Lynam J. M., Unsworth W. P., and Petersen W. F., “Visible‐Light‐Mediated Energy Transfer Enables the Synthesis of β‐Lactams via Intramolecular Hydrogen Atom Transfer,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61, no. 48 (2022): 202213086, 10.1002/anie.202213086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Amougay A., Letsch O., Pete J. P., and Piva O., “Photorearrangement of N‐alkanoyl β‐enaminones. Application to the Synthesis of α‐amino‐β,γ‐Unsaturated Acid Derivatives,” Tetrahedron 52, no. 7 (1996): 2405–2420, 10.1016/0040-4020(95)01090-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Sparascio S., Scarica G., Cerveri A., et al., “Synthesis of Vinyl Azetidines and β‐Lactams From Allenamides via Energy‐Transfer Relay,” ACS Catalysis 15, no. 16 (2025): 13799–13809, 10.1021/acscatal.5c04424. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Popescu M. V., Parker N. A., Jia Z., et al., “Photocatalysis as a Mechanistic Probe for the Staudinger β‐lactam Synthesis,” Chem Catalysis 5 (2025): 101493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Praetorius P. and Korn F., “Belichtung Ungesättigter Ketone bei Gegenwart von Uranylsalzen,” Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 43, no. 3 (1910): 2744–2746, 10.1002/cber.19100430326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Lewis F. D. and Oxman J. D., “Lewis Acid Enhancement of Photochemical trans .fwdarw. cis isomerization of .alpha.,.beta.‐unsaturated Esters,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 103, no. 24 (1981): 7345–7347, 10.1021/ja00414a056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Schwinger D. P. and Bach T., “Chiral 1,3,2‐Oxazaborolidine Catalysts for Enantioselective Photochemical Reactions,” Accounts of Chemical Research 53, no. 9 (2020): 1933–1943, 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Brenninger C., Jolliffe J. D., and Bach T., “Chromophore Activation of α,β‐Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds and Its Application to Enantioselective Photochemical Reactions,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 57, no. 44 (2018): 14338–14349, 10.1002/anie.201804006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Yoon T. P., “Photochemical Stereocontrol Using Tandem Photoredox–Chiral Lewis Acid Catalysis,” Accounts of Chemical Research 49, no. 10 (2016): 2307–2315, 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Zhang L. and Meggers E., “Steering Asymmetric Lewis Acid Catalysis Exclusively With Octahedral Metal‐centered Chirality,” Accounts of Chemical Research 50, no. 2 (2017): 320–330, 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Ma J. J., Chen S. M., Bellotti P., et al., “Photochemical Intermolecular Dearomative Cycloaddition of Bicyclic Azaarenes With alkenes,” Science 371, no. 6536 (2021): 1338–1345, 10.1126/science.abg0720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Guo R. Y., Adak S., Bellotti P., et al., “Photochemical Dearomative Cycloadditions of Quinolines and Alkenes: Scope and Mechanism Studies,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144, no. 38 (2022): 17680–17691, 10.1021/jacs.2c07726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Liu D. H., Nagashima K., Liang H., et al., “Chemoselective Quinoline and Isoquinoline Reduction by Energy Transfer Catalysis Enabled Hydrogen Atom Transfer,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 48 (2023): 202312203, 10.1002/anie.202312203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Li M., Huang X. L., Zhang Z. Y., et al., “Gd(III)‐Catalyzed Regio‐, Diastereo‐, and Enantioselective [4+2] Photocycloaddition of Naphthalene Derivatives,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146, no. 25 (2024): 16982–16989, 10.1021/jacs.4c05288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Hou L., Yang L., Yang G., et al., “Catalytic Asymmetric Dearomative [2 + 2] Photocycloaddition/Ring‐Expansion Sequence of Indoles With Diversified Alkenes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146, no. 33 (2024): 23457–23466, 10.1021/jacs.4c06780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Hu Y., Liu Q., Zhou X., Huang Y., Fernández I., and Xiong Y., “Lewis‐Acid‐Promoted Visible‐Light‐Mediated C(sp3)–H Bond Functionalization of Arylvinylpyridines via Diradical Hydrogen Atom Transfer,” Organic Letters 26, no. 38 (2024): 8005–8010, 10.1021/acs.orglett.4c02508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Liu Q., Huang Y., Zhou X., Fernández I., and Xiong Y., “Visible Light‐Mediated [4+2] Annulation of Silylimines With Olefins to 1‐Aminotetralins Enabled by Diradical Hydrogen Atom Transfer of C−H Bonds,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64, no. 11 (2024): 202421464, 10.1002/anie.202421464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Zhou X., You Z., Wang B., Huang Y., Fernández I., and Xiong Y., “Visible‐Light‐Mediated Lewis Acid‐Catalyzed Diradical Hydrogen Atom Transfer Reaction of Bicyclo[1.1.0]Butanes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 148, no. 6 (2026): 6270–6279, 10.1021/jacs.5c18500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Huang Y., Wang B., Yu Q., and Xiong Y., “Recent Advances in Photochemical Diradical Hydrogen Atom Transfer (DHAT) Reactions of C–H Bonds,” Chemical Communications 62, no. 14 (2026): 4173–4187, 10.1039/D5CC05891K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Khan M. A., Houck D. R., Gross A. L., et al., “NYX‐2925 Is a Novel NMDA Receptor‐Specific Spirocyclic‐β‐Lactam That Modulates Synaptic Plasticity Processes Associated with Learning and Memory,” International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 21 (2017): 242–254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Luo Y., Handbook of Bond Dissociation Energies in Organic Compounds (CRC Press, 2003). [Google Scholar]
- 57. Nevesely T., Wienhold M., Molloy J. J., and Gilmour R., “Advances in the E→Z Isomerization of Alkenes Using Small Molecule Photocatalysts,” Chemical Reviews 122, no. 2 (2022): 2650–2694, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Liu J. X., Hao T., Qian L., Shi M., and Wei Y., “Construction of Benzocyclobutenes Enabled by Visible‐light‐induced Triplet Biradical Atom Transfer of Olefins,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61 (2022): 20220515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Girvin Z. C., Cotter L. F., Yoon H., et al., “Asymmetric Photochemical [2+2]‐cycloaddition of Acyclic Vinylpyridines Through Ternary Complex Formation and an Uncontrolled Sensitization Mechanism,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144, no. 43 (2022): 20109–20117, 10.1021/jacs.2c09690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Westheimer F. H., “The Magnitude of the Primary Kinetic Isotope Effect for Compounds of Hydrogen and Deuterium,” Chemical Reviews 61, no. 3 (1961): 265–273, 10.1021/cr60211a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Huang J. J., Zhou T. P., Sun N. N., et al., “Accessing Ladder‐Shape Azetidine‐Fused Indoline Pentacycles Through Intermolecular Regiodivergent aza‐Paternò–Büchi Reactions,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 1431–1441, 10.1038/s41467-024-45687-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Marson C. M., “New and Unusual Scaffolds in Medicinal Chemistry,” Chemical Society Reviews 40, no. 11 (2011): 5514–5533, 10.1039/c1cs15119c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Habib I., Singha K., and Hossain M., “Recent Progress on Pyridine N‐oxide in Organic Transformations: A Review,” Chemistry Select 8 (2023): 20220409. [Google Scholar]
- 64. Jagodziński T. S., “Thioamides as Useful Synthons in the Synthesis of Heterocycles,” Chemical Reviews 103, no. 1 (2003): 197–228, 10.1021/cr0200015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting File: advs76846‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.
Data Availability Statement
The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.
