Skip to main content
JAAD Case Reports logoLink to JAAD Case Reports
. 2026 May 25;74:256–258. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2026.04.073

Pediatric necrobiosis lipoidica: Adults and kids are not the same

Sophie-Anne Savard a, Juliette Charbonneau b, Elen Grigorchuk b, Afshin Hatami c, Danielle Marcoux c, Catherine McCuaig c, Isabelle Auger d, Julie Powell c, Jerome Coulombe c,∗
PMCID: PMC13445478  PMID: 42564673

Necrobiosis lipoidica (NL) is a rare cutaneous granulomatous disorder of unknown etiology.1 In adults, it has been variably associated with diabetes mellitus (DM).1 NL is less well described in pediatric patients due to its rarity.2 We conducted a descriptive retrospective chart review of NL pediatric cases from 1980 to 2025 at CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Canada. Patients were included who were younger than 18 years of age at the time NL was diagnosed clinically or by histology and supported by photography. Descriptive analyses were used. In our cohort of 10 children with NL (Table I), 8 were girls, and 90% of patients had type 1 diabetes (T1DM). The mean age at diagnosis of DM was 4.5 years old, and 12.7 years for NL. Eight had a poor control of their DM with a mean HbA1c at 10.3%. Seven patients had classic pretibial plaques (Fig 1). All our patients received a variety of topical treatments as first line therapy (high-potency corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, lactic acid, retinoid, or JAK-inhibitors). Topicals conferred improved control of symptoms with limited improvement in appearance. Four patients agreed to intralesional corticosteroid injections (triamcinolone acetonide 3-10 mg/mL) that provided partial improvement on disease activity, meaning a slight decrease in reported symptoms and the absence of enlargement of the skin lesions or avoiding progression to ulceration and/or induration. The mean duration of lesions was 3.8 years, with 90% of patients having ongoing NL activity at the time of last follow-up. Congruent with the limited literature in children,2 our patients with NL were predominantly teenage girls, had poorly controlled T1DM, and partial response to medical interventions. In contrast with NL in adults,1 pediatric NL incidence is lower, but more frequently associated with DM.2 Few diabetic end-organ damage were present in our adolescent patients with poorer glycemic control than in adult NL fueling the hypothesis that NL development might be more related to hyperglycemia than a microangiopathic pathophysiology process.3 There is no validated therapeutic management for pediatric NL.2 In our study, treatment responses were unsatisfactory with best results achieved through painful and unpopular intralesional corticosteroids. Many therapeutic options including phototherapy, immunosuppressants, and biologics have been described, again with limited success.2 Therapeutic breakthrough might be on the horizon with the use of topical and oral JAK inhibitors for classic and ulcerated NL respectively.4 Efficient, pain-free and safe drugs are always welcome for pediatric patients giving the NL treatment failure rate and long-standing activity of the disease into adulthood. Skin lesions with poorly controlled ulcerations have been recently associated with the development of squamous cell carcinomas in NL adult patients.5 The median time to skin cancer growth was 6 years.5 Only one of our patients had recurrent ulcerations. However, given the chronicity of NL and the risk of neoplasia in ulcerated NL, better treatments are needed. The limitations of our study include the small number of patients lacking statistical significance, retrospective design, loss of patient’s to follow-up at 18 years of age and a single medical center only. Nonetheless, pediatric NL differs from adult NL with its higher rate of DM association, poorer glycemic control in teenagers, and limitations in therapeutic option choice. Further studies of necrobiosis lipoidica in children are advisable.

Table I.

Characteristics of pediatric patients with necrobiosis lipoidica (NL)

Patient number Patients’ characteristics
DM control
Characteristics of NL lesions
Prognostic with treatments
Sex Age at NL diagnosis (y) Duration of NL (y) Age at DM diagnosis (y) HbA1c (mmol/mol) Duration of DM (y) Medical comorbidities Lesions count Lesions morphology Lesions distribution Treatment Response
1 F 12 9 2 0.097 21 None Multiple Y Pretibial T + I + S P
2 F 16 3 8 0.129 23 DKA
Nephropathy
Three Y Pretibial T + Pulse-dye laser P
3 F 14 1 NA 0.055 1 None Two N Thigh Weight loss + T D
4 M 16 1 4 0.130 1 DKA
Plaque psoriasis
Solitary Y Pretibial T + I P
5 F 13 1 5 0.089 1 DKA Solitary Y Hand T P
6 F 11 7 1 0.080 35 DKA
Localized alopecia
Multiple Y
Preceded by multiple GA
Pretibial T + I + S P
7 F 13 5 13 0.155 45 DKA
Nephropathy
Retinopathy
Thyroiditis
Multiple Y
Frequent ulcerations
Pretibial T + S P
8 F 14 4 NA Normal 4 None Three Y Pretibial T + I P
9 M 4 1 2 0.095 1 DKA Solitary Y Bicep T P
10 F 14 10 1 0.100 10 DKA Multiple Y Pretibial T P

D, Definitive improvement; DKA, diabetic ketoacidosis; DM, diabetes mellitus; F, female; GA, granuloma annulare; I, intralesional steroids; M, male; N, panniculitis nodules; NA, not available; NL, necrobiosis lipoidica; P, persistence of lesions at last visit; S, systemic drugs, consisting of aspirin and pentoxifylline; T, topical drugs, including topical corticosteroids [mid- to potent to very potent], with or without vitamin D analogues, calcineurin inhibitors, retinoids, lactic acid, and JAK inhibitors [1 and 2]; Y, yellowish telangiectatic atrophic plaques.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

A and B, Necrobiosis lipoidica (NL) in a pretibial distribution presenting as multiple yellowish telangiectatic atrophic plaques in 2 pediatric patients form our cohort.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

AI was not used.

Conflicts of interest

None disclosed.

Footnotes

Funding sources: None.

Patient consent: Patient’s parents gave consent for the patient’s photographs and medical information to be published in print and online and with the understanding that this information may be publicly available.

IRB approval status: Not applicable.

References

  • 1.Hashemi D.A., Brown-Joel Z.O., Tkachenko E., et al. Clinical features and comorbidities of patients with necrobiosis lipoidica with or without diabetes. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155(4):455–459. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schiefer-Niederkorn A., Sadoghi B., Binder B. Necrobiosis lipoidica in childhood: a review of literature with emphasis on therapy. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2023;21(10):1120–1129. doi: 10.1111/ddg.15137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hammer E., Llienthal E., Hofer S., et al. Risk factors for necrobiosis lipoidica in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2017;34(1):86–92. doi: 10.1111/dme.13138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hughes A.N., Li X., Lehman J.S., et al. Drug repurposing using molecular network analysis identifies Jak as targetable driver in necrobiosis lipoidica. JID Innov. 2024;4(6) doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harvey J.A., Severson K.J., Brumfiel C.M., et al. Necrobiosis lipoidica-associated cutaneous malignancy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86(6):1428–1429. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAAD Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES