Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1980 Apr;191(4):397–403. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198004000-00002

Determinants of adverse reaction following postoperative T-tube cholangiogram.

E P Dellinger, G Kirshenbaum, M Weinstein, M Steer
PMCID: PMC1344558  PMID: 7369805

Abstract

The incidence, nature, and mechanisms of adverse reaction following postoperative T-tube cholangiogram have received little attention in the medical literature. This paper presents the experience at one hospital over a 30-month period (1975--1977) covering 139 patients who had 170 cholangiograms. Factors examined included intraoperative and postoperative cultures of bile, the use of antibiotics prior to the performance of the cholangiogram, the technique of cholangiography, the interval between operation and cholangiogram. Eleven (6.5%) cholangiograms were followed by an adverse reaction. Two of these reactions were severe, manifested by signs of septic shock. The administration of antibiotics was not associated with a reduction in adverse reactions. The cholangiographic technique of gravity infusion of dye, which effectively limits the amount of pressure generated during the study, was associated with a significant reduction in adverse reactions. No severe reactions occurred following any study performed by the gravity technique. There was no significant correlation between the age of the patient or the number of days postoperative with adverse reaction. A review of the literature suggests that the mechanism for these severe reactions is cholangiovenous reflux. The avoidance of high intraductal pressures (above 25 cm of water) during the performance of postoperative T-tube cholangiogram should significantly reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.

Full text

PDF
397

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERNARD H. R., COLE W. R. THE PROPHYLAXIS OF SURGICAL INFECTION: THE EFFECT OF PROPHYLACTIC ANTIMICROBIAL DRUGS ON THE INCIDENCE OF INFECTION FOLLOWING POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED OPERATIONS. Surgery. 1964 Jul;56:151–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BUEMANN J. C., GERTZ T. CL. Risk of liver damage in cholangiography; a clinical and animal investigation. Acta Chir Scand. 1953;105(1-4):104–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bilbao M. K., Dotter C. T., Lee T. G., Katon R. M. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology. 1976 Mar;70(3):314–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blumgart L. H. Guest oration: Biliary tract obstruction: new approaches to old problems. Am J Surg. 1978 Jan;135(1):19–31. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(78)90004-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burhenne H. J. Nonoperative instrument extraction of retained bile duct stones. World J Surg. 1978 Jul;2(4):439–445. doi: 10.1007/BF01563670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burke J. F. The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery. 1961 Jul;50:161–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chande S., Devitt J. E. T tubes, the surgical amulet after choledochotomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1973 Jan;136(1):100–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chetlin S. H., Elliott D. W. Biliary bacteremia. Arch Surg. 1971 Apr;102(4):303–307. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1971.01350040065012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chetlin S. H., Elliott D. W. Preoperative antibiotics in biliary surgery. Arch Surg. 1973 Aug;107(2):319–323. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1973.01350200179037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Collins P. G. Further experience with common bile-duct suture without intraductal drainage following choledochotomy. Br J Surg. 1967 Oct;54(10):854–856. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800541014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Elias E., Hamlyn A. N., Jain S., Long R. G., Summerfield J. A., Dick R., Sherlock S. A randomized trial of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography with the Chiba needle versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for bile duct visualization in jaundice. Gastroenterology. 1976 Sep;71(3):439–443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Elson C. O., Hattori K., Blackstone M. O. Polymicrobial sepsis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 1975 Aug;69(2):507–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Goldberg H. I. Operative and postoperative cholecystocholangiography. Semin Roentgenol. 1976 Jul;11(3):203–211. doi: 10.1016/0037-198x(76)90052-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldstein L. I., Kadell B. M., Weiner M. Thin needle cholangiography: experience with 50 patients. Ann Surg. 1977 Nov;186(5):602–606. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197711000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Griffiths D. A., Simpson R. A., Shorey B. A., Speller D. C., Williams N. B. Single-dose peroperative antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal surgery. Lancet. 1976 Aug 14;2(7981):325–328. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)92588-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. HULTBORN A., JACOBSSON B., ROSENGREN B. Cholangiovenous reflux during cholangiography. An experimental and clinical study. Acta Chir Scand. 1962 Feb;123:111–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang T., Bass J. A., Williams R. D. The significance of biliary pressure in cholangitis. Arch Surg. 1969 May;98(5):629–632. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1969.01340110121014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Höjer H., Wetterfors J. Systemic prophylaxis with doxycycline in surgery of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg. 1978 Apr;187(4):362–368. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197804000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. JACOBSSON B., KJELLANDER J., ROSENGREN B. Cholangiovenous reflux. An experimental study. Acta Chir Scand. 1962 Apr;123:316–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jain S., Long R. G., Scott J., Dick R., Sherlock S. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography using the "Chiba" needle--80 cases. Br J Radiol. 1977 Mar;50(591):175–180. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-50-591-175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Keighley M. R., Baddeley R. M., Burdon D. W., Edwards J. A., Quoraishi A. H. A controlled trial of parenteral prophylactic gentamicin therapy in biliary surgery. Br J Surg. 1975 Apr;62(4):275–279. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800620406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Keighley M. R., Crapp A. R., Burdon D. W., Cooke W. T., Alexander-Williams J. Prophylaxis against anaerobic sepsis in bowel surgery. Br J Surg. 1976 Jul;63(7):538–541. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800630711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Keighley M. R., Graham N. G. Infective complications of choledochotomy with T-tube drainage. Br J Surg. 1971 Oct;58(10):764–768. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800581013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Keighley M. R., Lister D. M., Jacobs S. I., Giles G. R. Hazards of surgical treatment due to microorganisms in the bile. Surgery. 1974 Apr;75(4):578–583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Keighley M. R., Wilson G., Kelly J. P. Fatal endotoxic shock of biliary tract origin complicating transhepatic cholangiography. Br Med J. 1973 Jul 21;3(5872):147–148. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5872.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kozower M., Norton R. A., Paul R. E., Jr, Fawaz K. A., Miller H. H., Robbins A. H., Schimmel E. M., Sugarman H. J., Tomas J. G. Preoperative endoscopic cannulation of pancreatic and biliary ducts. Ann Surg. 1973 Aug;178(2):197–199. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197308000-00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kune G. A., Schutz E. Bacteria in the billary tract. A study of their frequency and type. Med J Aust. 1974 Feb 23;1(8):255–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Levin J., Poore T. E., Zauber N. P., Oser R. S. Detection of endotoxin in the blood of patients with sepsis due to gran-negative bacteria. N Engl J Med. 1970 Dec 10;283(24):1313–1316. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197012102832404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Maddocks A. C., Hilson G. R., Taylor R. The bacteriology of the obstructed biliary tree. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1973 May;52(5):316–319. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mason G. R. Bacteriology and antibiotic selection in biliary tract surgery. Arch Surg. 1968 Oct;97(4):533–537. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1968.01340040029002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mazzariello R. M. A fourteen-year experience with nonoperative instrument extraction of retained bile duct stones. World J Surg. 1978 Jul;2(4):447–455. doi: 10.1007/BF01563671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Polk H. C., Jr, Lopez-Mayor J. F. Postoperative wound infection: a prospective study of determinant factors and prevention. Surgery. 1969 Jul;66(1):97–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rösch J., Lakin P. C., Antonovic R., Dotter C. T. Transjugular approach to liver biopsy and transhepatic cholangiography. N Engl J Med. 1973 Aug 2;289(5):227–231. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197308022890501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. SWEDBERG J. Routine cholangiography at operations for gall stones. Acta Chir Scand. 1952 Jun 10;103(3):175–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shipps F. C. Current status and usefulness of operative cholangiography. CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med. 1976 Feb;7(3):243–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Silen W., Wertheimer M., Kirshenbaum G. Bacterial contamination of the biliary tree after choledochostomy. Am J Surg. 1978 Mar;135(3):325–327. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(78)90060-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tylén U., Hoevels J., Vang J. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography with external drainage of obstructive biliary lesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1977 Jan;144(1):13–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vennes J. A., Jacobson J. R., Silvis S. E. Endoscopic cholangiography for biliary system diagnosis. Ann Intern Med. 1974 Jan;80(1):61–64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-80-1-61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. WAUGH J. M., WALTERS W., GRAY H. K., PRIESTLEY J. T. Annual report on surgery of the biliary system and pancreas for 1951. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin. 1952 Dec 31;27(27):578–584. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. White T. T., Waisman H., Hopton D., Kavlie H. Radiomanometry, flow rates, and cholangiography in the evaluation of common bile duct disease. A study of 220 cases. Am J Surg. 1972 Jan;123(1):73–79. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(72)90314-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yamakawa T., Komaki F., Shikata J. Experience with routine postoperative choledochoscopy via the T-tube sinus tract. World J Surg. 1978 May;2(3):379–385. doi: 10.1007/BF01561526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES