Abstract
A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to compare early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Patients entering early (n = 83) or delayed (n = 82) surgery groups were comparable with regard to prerandomization data. One patient in the early group and five in the delayed group refused surgery (p < 0.1) and two misdiagnoses occurred in each group. (2.4%). There was no difference in the incidence of technical difficulty measured by operative complications and duration of operations between the two groups. The same number of patients with common duct stones and perforations of the gallbladder were in each group. There was one death in the delayed group and none in the early group. Postoperative morbidity was 13.8% in the early group and 17.3% in the delayed surgery group (p > 0.1). Wound complications were slightly more common in the early surgery group (p > 0.1). In the delayed surgery group 13% of the patients had to be operated on before the planned date of surgery because conservative management failed. In addition, 15% of the patients had clear recurrent symptoms. Early surgery reduced total hospital stay by a mean of 7.5 days and the period of the patient's incapacity for work by 14.4 days. The data suggest that in acute cholecystitis early surgery is preferable when performed by an experienced surgeon with adequate pre- and intraoperative aids. Besides lower costs it offers the advantage of avoiding recurrent attacks and emergency operations without increasing mortality or morbidity.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Burnett W. The management of acute cholecystitis. Aust N Z J Surg. 1971 Aug;41(1):25–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Essenhigh D. M. Management of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 1966 Dec;53(12):1032–1038. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800531206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glenn F. Acute cholecystitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976 Jul;143(1):56–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halasz N. A. Counterfeit cholecystitis, a common diagnostic dilemma. Am J Surg. 1975 Aug;130(2):189–193. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(75)90369-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Järvinen H., Hästbacka J., Turunen M. I. The treatment of acute cholecystitis. A series of 497 consecutive patients. Acta Chir Scand. 1979;145(6):399–404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Järvinen H., Standertskjöld-Nordenstam C. G., Hästbacka J. Die intravenöse Cholegraphie bei akuter Cholezystitis. Rofo. 1978 Nov;129(5):551–554. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1231158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mallet-Guy P., Welch C., Ungeheur E., Encke A. Chirurgie der akuten Cholecystitis. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1976 Sep 23;341(3):151–160. doi: 10.1007/BF01257364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McArthur P., Cuschieri A., Sells R. A., Shields R. Controlled clinical trial comparing early with interval cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 1975 Oct;62(10):850–852. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800621025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raine P. A., Gunn A. A. Acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 1975 Sep;62(9):697–700. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800620907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SEIRO V., KOHLER R. Operative needle cholangiography. Acta Chir Scand. 1960 Sep 26;119:411–416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taavitsainen M., Järvinen H., Tallroth K. Cholescintigraphy in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Ann Clin Res. 1978 Aug;10(4):227–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WRIGHT H. K., HOLDEN W. D. The risks of emergency surgery for acute cholecystitis. Arch Surg. 1960 Sep;81:341–347. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1960.01300030001001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- du Plessis D. J., Jersky J. The management of acute cholecystitis. Surg Clin North Am. 1973 Oct;53(5):1071–1077. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)40136-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Linden W., Sunzel H. Early versus delayed operation for acute cholecystitis. A controlled clinical trial. Am J Surg. 1970 Jul;120(1):7–13. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(70)80133-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]