Skip to main content
BMC Nutrition logoLink to BMC Nutrition
. 2026 Jul 23;12:155. doi: 10.1186/s40795-026-01390-5

Improving the nutritional quality, and contribution to recommended dietary allowances of cassava and orange-fleshed sweet potato fufu flour blends for adults and children

G K Elemuo 1,✉, C O Udemba 1, E G Njuwa 1,3, U A Onwuzuruike 2, J M Emetole 4
PMCID: PMC13445869  PMID: 42557590

Abstract

Cassava-based fufu is widely consumed but nutritionally limited, particularly in micronutrients. Incorporation of orange-fleshed sweet potato (OFSP) may enhance its nutritional value. This study evaluated the nutrient composition, microbial safety, functional properties and contribution to recommended dietary allowance (RDA) of cassava-orange-fleshed sweet potato composite fufu flour for adults and children. Four blends were formulated: CONTROL (100% CF, Control), CSF1 (90% CF:10% OFSPF), CSF2 (80% CF:20% OFSPF), and CSF3 (70% CF:30% OFSPF). Nutrient composition, functional properties, microbial safety, pasting behavior, carotene content, and sensory attributes were analyzed using standard methods. Moisture (5.54–6.41%), ash (1.05–2.10%), crude fiber (0.23–1.91%), fat (1.80–9.96%), protein (2.02–7.82%), and carbohydrates (77.60–87.32%) varied significantly (p < 0.05) across blends. Pasting properties revealed: peak time (46.4 -5.63 s), pasting temperature (74.47–77.53 °C). Peak viscosity (26.0–44.6 RVU), minimum viscosity (12.67–14.83RVU), Ultimate viscosity (18.1–31.5 RVU), Attenuation value (142.5–354.5 RVU), and regeneration value (63.0–208 BVU). These results indicate that the inclusion of OFSPF modifies starch gelatinization behavior and improves paste stability. Microbial counts remained within safe limits during storage, with sample CSF2 (80% CF:20% OFSPF) and CSF1 (90% CF:10% OFSPF) having no fungal growth at 35 days. Although CSF3 exhibited the highest carotene (276.87 µg/g) and protein contents (7.82%), CSF2 provided a more balanced combination of nutrient enhancement and functional properties, and was therefore considered the most suitable formulation. This product has potential as a food-based strategy to combat micronutrient deficiencies in vulnerable populations.

Keywords: Orange-fleshed sweet potatoes, Composite Fufu flour, Nutrient composition, Functional properties, Vitamin A, Pasting properties

Introduction

Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is a major staple crop in sub-Saharan Africa, serving as a primary source of calories for millions of people. One of its most popular products is fufu, a fermented flour or dough widely consumed across West and Central Africa. Despite its importance, cassava is predominantly composed of carbohydrates and contains limited amounts of protein, essential fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals [11]. Consequently, long-term reliance on cassava-based foods can contribute to micronutrient deficiencies, particularly vitamin A deficiency, which remains a major public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa [38].

Orange-fleshed sweet potato (OFSP, Ipomoea batatas) has been reported as a biofortification strategy for addressing vitamin A deficiency in several studies [34]. It is rich in β-carotene, a precursor of vitamin A, and contains significant levels of protein, fiber, and minerals [15]. Incorporating OFSP into traditional staples such as fufu could improve their nutritional quality without altering their cultural acceptability. Previous studies have demonstrated that composite flours made from cassava and OFSP enhance carotenoid retention, increase protein and fat content, and contribute to improved sensory properties of food products [18, 22, 31]. However, limited research has explored the integration of OFSP into fufu flour specifically, with emphasis on its proximate composition, functional characteristics, microbial safety, and sensory acceptability. Understanding these properties is critical to ensuring that nutritional improvements do not compromise product quality, storability, or consumer preference.

Orange-fleshed sweet potato was selected as a fortifying ingredient due to its high β-carotene content, affordability, adaptability to tropical agroecological conditions, and established role in food-based approaches for combating vitamin A deficiency in sub-Saharan Africa [22]. While OFSP has been incorporated into bakery and complementary foods, limited information exists on its utilization in fermented cassava fufu flour systems, particularly regarding the combined effects on nutrient density, pasting behavior, microbial stability, and dietary contribution to recommended nutrient intakes.

Therefore, the present study was designed to evaluate the chemical composition, physicochemical and pasting properties and microbial quality of cassava/OFSP composite fufu flours. The findings aim to promote the development of nutrient-enhanced, shelf-stable, and consumer-acceptable fufu flour blends, contributing to food diversification and the reduction of vitamin A deficiency in regions where cassava is a dietary staple.

Materials and methods

Materials

Fresh cassava roots of TME 419 variety (12 months maturity) and orange-fleshed sweet potato roots of UMUSPO3 (4 months maturity) were obtained from Eke-Ukwu Market, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria. Samples were transported under ambient conditions and processed within 24 h of procurement.

Methods

Preparation of flour samples

Cassava flour (CF): Traditionally, the unit operations of cassava blends are peeling, washing, grating, pressing and fermentation, sieving and roasting as described by [29]. Fresh cassava roots were peeled manually with sharp knives. The peels were dried for animal feed. The peeled roots were washed thoroughly and grated by rubbing on the rough surface of a perforated galvanized metal sheet fixed to a wooden board support. The grated cassava mash was packed into jute bags and the open ends tied securely with rope. The bags were placed on a wooden rack and heavy stones placed on them to press out the starch juice. The fermentation process lasted for a period of two days. The pressed fermented dough was oven-dried (model LBN-DO161, Labnic, USA-based Supplier) at 60 °C and cooled. Diagrammatic presentation of the process is shown below in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Processing of cassava/OFSP fufu

OFSP flour (OFSPF): Following the method described in [17], OFSP roots were washed, peeled manually with a sharp knife and sliced into thin pieces. The uniformity of the slices helps ensure consistent drying. The sliced sweet potatoes were dried in an oven (model LBN-DO161, Labnic, USA-based Supplier) at 60.0C for 12 h to reduce their moisture content. The dried slices were milled into a fine powder using milling machines. The flour was sieved with a wooden mesh (40 mesh sieve) to achieve a finer texture and remove any larger particles or impurities. The final sweet potato flour was packaged in high density polyethylene (HDPE) bag for storage. The dried cassava and OFSP flours attained moisture contents below 10%, suitable for shelf-stable flour production. Diagrammatic presentation of the process is shown below in Fig. 1

Formulations

Four (4) samples of the fufu flour were formulated by mixing two types of flour, Cassava flour (CF) and orange-fleshed sweet potato flour (OFSPF), into different ratios (CF: OFSPF). The samples formulated are as follows: CONTROL (100:0) Control, CSF1 (90:10), CSF2 (80:20) and CSF3 (70:30) as presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Composition (%) of Cassava flour (CF) and orange-fleshed sweet potato flour (OFSPF) (CF/OFSP) Fufu flour Samples

Samples CF OFSP
Control 100 0
CSF1 90 10
CSF2 80 20
CSF3 70 30

CSF Cassava flour (CF) and orange-fleshed sweet potato flour (OFSPF) fufu flour blend

Proximate analysis

The proximate analysis (moisture, ash, protein, fat, fiber, and carbohydrate) of the Fufu samples was determined using the official method of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [5].

Physicochemical properties

Physicochemical characteristics (bulk density, swelling capacity, water/oil absorption, pH) were assessed using the method described in [30]. The least gelation concentration was determined using the method described by Finney et al. [12].

Pasting properties

The method as described by [7] was used in determining the pasting properties of the fufu flour using Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA).

Determination of total carotene content

The Harvest Plus procedure for carotene analysis was used to analyze the total carotenoid content of fufu flour made from fresh cassava roots and orange-fleshed sweet potatoes with Spectrophotometry (λ = 450 nm) [29].

Total Carotenoid (μg/g) = Total Carotenoid (μg/g) = Inline graphic

Where, A = absorbance,

Volume = total volume of extract (50 ml),

A1% = absorption coefficient of β-carotene in P.E. (2592).

β-carotene to RAE

Conversion of β-carotene to RAE was done using WHO/FAO conversion which is 12 μg β-carotene = 1 μg RAE as described by [35].

Determination of viscosity

The viscosity of the samples was determined using the method described by [30]. 10% of each formulated sample was suspended in distilled water and mechanically stirred for 2 h at room temperature. Oswald-type viscometer was used to measure the viscosity of the mixture.

Microbial analysis of the samples

The microbial safety of the Fufu flour was evaluated by measuring the total bacteria count (TBC) and total fungal count (TFC) at different time points, including Days 0, 1, 14, 28, and 35 [23]. Total viable bacterial count and fungal count were determined using standard plate count procedures according to ISO 4833–1:2013 and ISO 21527–2:2008, respectively.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were conducted in duplicate and results expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS version 25.0 under a completely randomized design. Mean separation was performed using Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at p < 0.05 as described by [33]. Assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were verified prior to analysis.

Results and discussions

Nutrient and physicochemical composition of fufu flour blends

The proximate and physicochemical composition of cassava and OFSP blends (Table 2) shows significant changes (p > 0.05) with increasing OFSP levels. Moisture content increased slightly but remained below 10% in all samples, indicating good storage stability and low susceptibility to microbial spoilage [13]. The ash content which is an indication of the mineral content of the products (24), was highest (2.10%) in the 20% OFSP blend (CSF2). This value is higher than those reported for cassava granules by [2], but aligns with the high ash content (1.78%) reported for fermented OFSP flour by [28].

Table 2.

Nutrient and physicochemical composition of fufu flour blends (% dry weight)

Sample Moisture (%) Ash (%) Crude fiber (%) Crude fat (%) Protein (%) Carbohydrates (%) pH Total Carotene (µg/g)
Control 5.54b ± 0.04 1.52b ± 0.04 1.00b ± 0.04 6.12b ± 0.02 2.31b ± 0.00 83.52b ± 0.02 5.15c ± 0.07 8.86d ± 0.00
CSF1 5.77b ± 0.06 1.05c ± 0.02 0.62c ± 0.08 2.71c ± 0.31 2.54b ± 0.00 87.32a ± 0.18 4.90d ± 0.00 139.71c ± 0.28
CSF2 6.42a ± 0.08 2.10a ± 0.01 1.91a ± 0.06 9.96a ± 0.03 2.02b ± 0.01 77.60d ± 0.13 5.35b ± 0.07 255.13b ± 0.27
CSF3 6.39a ± 0.21 1.46b ± 0.04 0.23d ± 0.03 1.80d ± 0.26 7.82a ± 0.40 82.31c ± 0.34 7.05d ± 0.07 276.87a ± 0.40

Values are means ± standard deviation of duplicate determination. Means bearing different superscript within the same column are significantly (p ≤ 0.05) different

Crude fiber was highest (1.91%) in the CSF2 (80%CF, 20% OFSPF) blend. A low-fiber diet is undesirable and linked to colon diseases [16]. However, moderate fiber content is also desirable for young children, as excessive fiber can reduce energy density [32]. Sample CSF2 will contribute less than 8% of the RDA (25–30 g/day), indicating that while OFSP slightly boosts fiber, additional fiber-rich soup or sauce (such vegetables and legumes soups) is needed to balance the diet. The crude fat content more than doubled in the 20% OFSP blend (9.96%) compared to the control (6.12%), significantly enhancing the energy density of the fufu blend. Lipids are important for the absorption of beta-carotene abundant in OFSP [1]. The increased fat content may also facilitate formation of amylose–lipid complexes, which influence starch gelatinization and paste stability. RDA for adults and children in Table 3, shows that sample CSF3 with the highest OFSP blends (9.96 g/100 g) will supply 12–16% of daily fat needs for adults and 20–30% of daily fat requirement (10 g/100 g) for children.

Table 3.

Recommended daily nutrient requirements for adults and children

Nutrient WHO/FAO Adult Standard/RDA WHO/FAO Children (1–3) Standard/RDA
Protein (g) 50–60 g/day 13 g/day
Fat (g) 60–80 g/day 33–58 g/day
Fibre (g) 25–30 g/day 130–200 g/day
Carbohydrate (g) 225–325 g/day 10–14 g/day
Vitamin A (Beta carotene) 900–700 400 μg/day

WHO/FAO 39, 40, 38, UNICEF/WHO child feeding guidelines

Protein content showed the most notable improvement, protein content rose from 2.31% (Control) to 7.82% in CSF3 (30% OFSP), a 238% increase. Although still below RDA values, 200–300 g could cover 25–40% of adult protein needs, and smaller portions of 2–8 g per 100 g could meet 50% of needs for children. Cassava is especially low in protein, and this result demonstrates that OFSP fortification can effectively address this major nutritional limitation. Similar reports from Ojo and Akande [26] and [36] support that OFSP fortification enhances protein quality in cassava-based foods in sub-Saharan Africa.

As expected, the carbohydrate content decreased significantly as the proportion of nutrient-dense OFSP (with its higher protein, fat, and fiber) increased. The 20% OFSP blend (CSF2) had the lowest carbohydrate content at 77.60%. This indicates a shift from a purely high-energy cassava flour to a more nutritionally balanced composite flour. This inverse relationship between fortification level and carbohydrate content is an expected outcome, as documented in previous studies on composite flours [4] and [24]. The values for all blends, however, remain high, confirming that the product retains its primary function as a staple energy source. A 100 g portion would supply about one-third of the adult daily carbohydrate requirement, aligning with WHO’s guidance that 45–65% of energy should come from carbohydrates [38]. pH values (4.90–7.05) declined with OFSP inclusion, likely due to its organic acids. This would contribute to shelf stability [18]. Similarly, [17], also noticed that the pH values of sorghum/orange-fleshed sweet potato composite flour rose as the proportion of OFSP flour increased (5.72 −6.15). Total carotene content showed an obvious increase with OFSP substitution, ranging from 8.86 μg/g in the control to 276.86 μg/g in CSF3 (70:30). Based on β-carotene conversion factors, approximately 17–20 g of CSF3 would theoretically provide the daily vitamin A requirement of young children, excluding processing and bioavailability losses. This confirms OFSP as an effective pro-vitamin A enrichment source in fufu flour. Similar observations have been made in previous studies [6, 17, 19] for flour or complementary food substituted with OFSP. The significant rise in carotene content aligns with [10] reports and highlights the potential of OFSP to combat vitamin A deficiency through staple food fortification.

Functional properties of fufu flour blends

The Functional properties of cassava-OFSP blends (Table 4) showed significant variation with increasing OFSP levels. Bulk density ranged from 0.77–0.90 g/ml, highest in was observed in CSF3 (70:30) and the lowest in the Control. The higher values compared to cassava granules (0.57–0.65 g/cm3) in [2] for Bio-fortified and Traditionally Prepared Cassava Granules may be due to denser OFSP starch granules, reported in [17]. Higher bulk density supports packaging and transport efficiency [21].

Table 4.

Functional properties of fufu samples

Sample Bulk Density (g/ml) WAC (g/ml) OAC (g/ml) Least Gelation Conc. (°C) Gelation Temp (°C) Swelling Capacity (g/ml)
Control 0.77b ± 0.03 2.00b ± 0.00 1.50a ± 0.12 3.50a ± 0.71 69.00b ± 1.41 48.48c ± 2.78
CSF1 0.79b ± 0.01 1.85b ± 0.07 1.23b ± 0.00 3.00a ± 1.41 70.25b ± 1.06 31.26d ± 1.30
CSF2 0.80b ± 0.71 1.95b ± 0.07 1.54a ± 0.06 2.00a ± 0.00 72.25ab ± 0.35 79.04b ± 1.03
CSF3 0.90a ± 0.00 2.25a ± 0.07 1.63a ± 0.06 4.00a ± 0.00 74.25a ± 0.77 97.49a ± 1.16

Values are means ± standard deviation of duplicate determination. Means bearing different superscript within the same column are significantly (p ≤ 0.05) different

Water absorption capacity (1.85–2.25 g/g) and oil absorption capacity (1.23–1.63 g/g) increased with OFSP addition, reflecting greater hydrophilicity from starch/fiber hydroxyl groups [37]; [41] and more protein-lipid binding sites [8, 25]. These properties are desirable for dough reconstitution and flavor retention. The temperature at which gelatinization of starch take place is known as the gelatinization temperature [8]. Gelation temperature ranged from 69.00 to 74.25 °C, showing slight but consistent increase with increasing OFSP levels.

The swelling capacity of a flour sample, points at the collective effects of starch quality, specifically amylose/amylopectin ratio as reflected by the volume of gel formed when heated with an excess of water [24]. The increase in swelling capacity with OFSP inclusion may be associated with differences in amylopectin-rich starch fractions and enhanced water-binding capacity of OFSP starch granules. Results rose from 31.26–97.49 g/ml with OFSP content, indicating improved starch hydration and gelatinization [24]. This enhances dough elasticity and soft texture [18].

Effect of temperature on the extraction of phenolic compounds

Pasting properties of fufu samples

The pasting characteristics of cassava-OFSP fufu blends are shown in Table 5. Peak time (4.64–5.63 min) and peak temperature (74.47–77.53 °C) indicate that OFSP inclusion did not largely alter gelatinization onset but slightly reduced the time required to reach maximum viscosity. This is consistent with starch, protein and fiber interactions in composite flours [7]. Pasting temperature values suggest that OFSP blends gelatinize at lower energy input compared to cassava alone. The control had a lower pasting temperature (77.53 °C), while blends showed slightly higher values, likely due to amylose–amylose and amylose–lipid interactions. These temperatures were lower than those reported for instant yam fufu (81.57 °C; [37]) and unfermented cassava–guinea corn–plantain fufu (93.17 °C; [27]), indicating that the cassava-OFSP blends cook faster with reduced energy requirements.

Table 5.

Pasting properties of fufu flour blends

Samples Peak Time (s) Peak Temp (°C) Peak Viscosity (RVU) Minimum Viscosity (RVU) Ultimate Viscosity (RVU) Attenuation Value (RVU) Regeneration Value (BVU)
Control 5.63 77.53 26.0 14.17 31.5 142.5 208.0
CSF1 4.69 74.47 44.62 14.83 23.21 354.5 100.5
CSF2 4.64 75.03 39.12 12.67 20.92 317.5 99.0
CSF3 4.65 75.53 35.42 12.83 18.08 271.5 63.0

Peak viscosities ranged from 26–44.62 RVU, with the control recording the lowest (26 RVU). Higher peak viscosities in the blends reflect greater water absorption and starch swelling [37], leading to rapid dough formation which is desirable for consumer convenience. Attenuation was highest (354.5RVU) in sample CSF1 (90:10). Attenuation measures dough stability under shear, and higher values indicate susceptibility to structural collapse [8]. The higher breakdown in CSF1 (90:10) suggests that the partial inclusion of OFSP starch initially promotes greater swelling but leads to weaker granule integrity during continued heating. While the control exhibited the lowest breakdown, attributed to the relative stability of cassava starch. However, increasing OFSP to 20–30% in sample CSF2 and CSF3 reduced breakdown compared to CSF1 (90:10), indicating that paste stability may improve with higher OFSP proportions through starch, fiber, and protein interactions.

Regeneration values ranged between 63.0 and 208.0 BVU. It is also referred to as Setback, and it reflects the tendency of amylose molecules to reassociate during cooling [9, 17]. The high setback in the control suggests stronger retrogradation and firmer gel formation, which may yield less elastic fufu when reconstituted. The lower setback values in OFSP blends, especially in CSF3, indicate reduced retrogradation and softer gels. This attribute is desirable in fufu that is intended to be smooth and elastic. The reduction in setback viscosity with OFSP incorporation suggests reduced amylose reassociation during cooling, possibly due to interference from fiber and lipid components present in OFSP. These findings imply that OFSP substitution moderates’ starch retrogradation, improving the textural qualities of the product while reducing the tendency to harden during storage [25].

Microbial safety of the fufu samples

Table 6 shows the microbial activity in the fufu flour samples. Total fungi count and bacterial count ranges from 4 × 1010- 4.8 × 1010 and 6.55–7.12 × 1010 from week 1 to week 35. The microbial counts observed remained below the maximum acceptable limits for dried flour products (< 105 CFU/g) recommended by ICMSF and Codex Alimentarius standards, indicating acceptable microbiological safety during storage. It was observed that the microbial load of the fufu samples increases as the time extends but was still within the safe limit after 5 weeks. The total fungi and bacterial count were lowest in control at day 1 and 35. Lowest microbial count in the control may be attributed to the fermentation of cassava and no presence of OFSP. The fermentation (3 days) process applied in the production of 100% cassava (control) sample may have contributed to the low microbial growth count observed. Similar studies have reported that fermentation extends shelf life and level of safety of food products [1, 3]. also reported that the drying process involving heat also minimizes the microbial load in the fufu samples. At most times, shelf life is duration during which a product maintains acceptable quality before it deteriorates [20]. The fungi and bacterial growth counts observed in the fufu sample after a period of 5 weeks were found to be within acceptable limits for ready-to-eat foods [14].

Table 6.

Total fungi and microbial count of fufu flour blends

Sample WK1 Wk28 Wk35
Total Fungi count Total Bacterial count Total Fungi count Total Bacterial count Total Fungi count Total Bacterial count
Control 0 × 103 6.55 × 103 4 × 103 6.66 × 103 4.3 × 103 6.75 × 103
CSF1 4 × 103 6.85 × 103 4.3 × 103 6.94 × 103 4.3 × 103 6.86 × 103
CSF2 4 × 103 6.94 × 103 4 × 103 6.97 × 103 4.3 × 103 7.01 × 103
CSF3 0 × 103 6.89 × 103 4 × 103 7.11 × 103 4.8 × 103 7.12 × 103

Conclusions

Blending cassava with OFSP at optimal ratios (particularly 80:20 and 70:30) enhances the nutritional profile, functionality and storage stability of fufu flour. This study contributes to United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), by enhancing the nutritional quality of fufu staple and contributing to recommended dietary allowances for both adults and children. OFSP serves as a functional ingredient. The 70:30 cassava-OFSP blend (CSF3) demonstrated optimal nutritional enhancement (high carotenoids, protein), and desirable pasting properties while the 80:20 cassava-OFSP blend CSF2 had more balanced combination of nutrient enhancement and functional properties, and was therefore the more suitable blend. The formulated blends demonstrate potential as food-based approaches for improving dietary vitamin A intake. The microbial count of the fufu samples remained within a safe limit after a period of 5 weeks. Future work should explore industrial-scale production and consumer adoption strategies.

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge my research group assistants who helped the team a lot in laboratory, including Akpan Precious, Onuobia Nneoma and Obot Daniel.

Transparency statement

The lead author Godswill Kodili Elemuo affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant) have been explained.

Authors’ contributions

G.K.E and C.O.U. wrote the main manuscript text, J.M.E prepared Tables 1–5 and U.A.O supervised. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Abano EE, Quayson ET, Bosompem M, Quarm M. β-Carotene-fortified gari: Effect of processing variables on nutritional and sensory qualities. J Food Process Eng. 2020;43:e13322. 10.1111/jfpe. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adewole OA, Adeoye BK, Adewole SA, Aka DO, Ani IF, Olatunji O, Adaramola FB. Comparative Analysis of Functional Properties, Nutrient Composition and Sensory Quality of Bio-fortified and Traditionally Prepared Cassava Granules. Dutse J of Pure & Appl Sci. 2023; 9(1):1–10. 10.4314/dujopas.v9i1a.21. [DOI]
  • 3.Agugo UA, Asinobi CO, Afam-Anene C. Investigating the nutritional, sensory and storage qualities of substituted mungbean-garri diets. J Food Technol Preserv. 2019;3(1):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Akubor PI. Evaluation of the quality of instant fufu flours prepared from corn, cassava and soybean flour blends. South Asian J Food Technol Environ. 2019;5(1):785–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 16th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bello FA, Folademi MA, Iwok LJ. Development of pearl millet flour-based cookies supplemented with mung bean and orange-fleshed sweet potato flours. Ann Univ Dunarea de Jos of Galati, Fascicle VI: Food Technol. 2022;46(1):155–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bolaji OT, Awonorin SO, Sanni LO, Adepoju PA. Effect of processing techniques on pasting properties, colour and consumer acceptability of ogi produced from four varieties of maize. Food Res. 2022;6(2):389–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chandra S, Samsher K. Assessment of functional properties of different flours. Afr J Agric Res. 2013;8(38):4849–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Elemuo GK, Obasi NE. Evaluation and optimization of the physical and sensory properties of enhanced bread produced from wheat flour and chemically modified African yam bean and cassava starches. Intern J Res Scient Innov. 2022;9(4):110–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.FAO (2019). The State of Food and Agriculture (2019). Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. Rome https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/11f9288f-dc78-4171-8d02-92235b8d7dc7/content.
  • 11.FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius. (2013). Guidelines on formulated complementary foods for older infants and young children (CAC/GL 8–1991, Rev. 2013). Rome, Italy: FAO/WHO. https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCXG%2B8-1991%252FCXG_008e.pdf
  • 12.Finney KF, Dobraszczyk BJ. Least gelation concentration of flour suspensions: Effect of particle size and non-starch polysaccharides. Cereal Chem. 2006;83(2):189–96. 10.1094/CCHEM-83-2-0189. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ibeogu IH, David-Abraham FM, Ekwu FC, Eleje F. Proximate, antinutritional and pasting properties of fufu made from white flesh sweet potato and cocoyam (Colocasia esculentum) flour blends. Intern J Adv Engine Manage. 2022;4(5):1044–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods. Microorganisms in foods 5: Characteristics of microbial pathogens. London, England: Blackie Academic & Professional; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Islam SN, Nusrat T, Begum P, Ahsan M. Carotenoids and β-carotene in orange-fleshed sweet potato: A possible solution to vitamin A deficiency. Food Chem. 2016;199:628–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jan Y, Malik M, Yaseen M, Bashir O, Panda BP. Dietary fibers as a functional food and nutraceutical. In: Functional foods and nutraceuticals: Chemistry, health benefits and the way forward. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2024. p. 57–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jenfa MD, Adelusi OA, Aderinoye A, Coker OJ, Martins IE, Obadina OA. Physicochemical compositions, nutritional and functional properties, and colour qualities of sorghum–orange-fleshed sweet potato composite flour. Food Sci Nutr. 2024;12:2364–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kolawole FL, Oyeyinka SA, Balogun MA, Oluwabiyi FF. Chemical composition and consumer acceptability of agidi (maize gel) enriched with orange-fleshed sweet potato and soybean. Ceylon J Sci. 2020;49(4):463–9. 10.4038/cjs.v49i4.7826. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Korese JK, Chikpah SK, Hensel O, Pawelzik E, Sturm B. Effect of orange-fleshed sweet potato flour particle size and degree of wheat flour substitution on physical, nutritional, textural and sensory properties of cookies. Eur Food Res Technol. 2021;247(4):889–905. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moschopoulou E, Moatsou G, Syrokou MK, Paramithiotis S, Drosinos EH. Food quality changes during shelf life. In: Galanakis CM, editor. Food quality and shelf life. London, England: Academic Press; 2019. p. 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nani M, Krishnaswamy K. Physical and functional properties of ancient grains and flours and their potential contribution to sustainable food processing. Int J Food Prop. 2021;24(1):1529–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Neela S, Fanta SW. Review on nutritional composition of orange-fleshed sweet potato and its role in management of vitamin a deficiency. Food Sci Nutr. 2019;7(6):1920–45. 10.1002/fsn3.1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Neusley da-S, Martha H, Taniwaki, VCA, Junqueira NS, Margarete MO, Renato ARG. Microbiological Examination Methods of Food and Water. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2nd Edition. 2018:214–9.
  • 24.Obinna-Echem PC, Eke-Ejiofor J, Vito MB, Wordu GO. Proximate composition, mineral and sensory properties of orange-fleshed sweet potato starch, soybean and groundnut flour complementary food. Asian Food Science Journal. 2021;20(9):118–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Obomeghei AA, Olapade AA, Akinoso R. Evaluation of the chemical composition, functional and pasting properties of four varieties of Nigerian sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L) flour. Afr J Food Agri Nutr Dev. 2020;20(3):15764–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Odoh EN, Okafor RO, Ikegwu TM, Okolo CA, Mba JC, Ezegbe CC, et al. Quality evaluation of garri produced from cassava and sweet potato tuber mixes. Afr J Biotech. 2017;12(31):4920–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Odoh EN, Okafor RO, Ikegwu, TM. (2022). Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of Unfermented Fufu Composite Flour Made from Cassava Sievate, Guinea Corn and Unripe Plantain Flours Blend. Am J of Food Sci and Technol. 2022; 10(1):27–34. 10.12691/ajfst-10-1-4.
  • 28.Oluwole OB, Kosoko SB, Owolabi SO, Salami MJ, Elemo GN, Olatope SOA. Development and production of fermented flour from sweet potato (Ipeoma Batatas L.) as a potential food security product. J Food Sci Eng. 2012;2:257–62.
  • 29.Omodamiro RM, Oti E, Etudaiye HA, Egesi C, Olasanmi B, Ukpabi UJ. Production of fufu from yellow cassava roots using the odourless flour technique and the traditional method: Evaluation of carotenoid retention in the fufu. Adv Appl Sci Res. 2012;3(5):2566–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Onwuka GI, (2005). Food analysis and instrumentation: Theory and practice (pp. 179 - 231). Naphtali Prints.
  • 31.Selemani SY, Issa-Zacharia A, Chove LM. Nutritional evaluation of a complementary food based on dates, millet, orange-fleshed sweet potato and moringa leaf powder. Asian Food Sci J. 2023;22(10):100–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Snauwaert E, Paglialonga F, Vande Walle J, Wan M, Desloovere A, Polderman N, et al. The benefits of dietary fiber: The gastrointestinal tract and beyond. Pediatr Nephrol. 2023;38(9):2929–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Steel RGD, Torrie JH, (1980). Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • 34.Sunette ML, Mieke F, Nicole C. Incorporating orange-fleshed sweet potato into the food system as a strategy for improved nutrition: The context of South Africa. Food Res Int. 2018;104:77–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tang G. Bioconversion of dietary provitamin A carotenoids to vitamin A in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(5):1468S-1473S. 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28674G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tura DC, Belachew T, Tamiru D, Abate KH, (2025). Nutritional enrichment of traditional complementary foods using underutilized nutritious plant foods in sub-Saharan Africa: Nutritional potential and health benefits. Appl Food Res. 5:100726.
  • 37.Ufondu HE, Maziya‐Dixon B, Okoyeuzu CF, Okonkwo TM, Okpala COR. Effects of yam varieties on flour physicochemical characteristics and resultant instant fufu pasting and sensory attributes. Scientific reports, 2022;12:20276. 10.1038/s41598-022-22052-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 38.World Health Organization, &/Food and Agriculture Organization. (2010). Fats and fatty acids in human nutrition: Report of an expert consultation (FAO Food and Nutrition Paper No. 91). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/i1953e. [PubMed]
  • 39.World Health Organization. (2003). Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases (WHO Technical Report Series No. 916). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/924120916X. [PubMed]
  • 40.World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations University. (2007). Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition (WHO Technical Report Series No. 935). World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/items/78c03092-bcc2-40f5-90d1-60641ecdf6ea. [PubMed]
  • 41.Younge S. (2022). Drying kinetics of cassava and orange-fleshed sweet potato and the physico-nutritional characterization of their composite fufu flours Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Nutrition are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES