Skip to main content
Parasite logoLink to Parasite
. 2026 Aug 6;33:43. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2026042

Genetic characterisation of Cryptosporidium spp., Encephalitozoon spp., and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in European brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in Central Europe

Caractérisation génétique de Cryptosporidium spp., Encephalitozoon spp. et Enterocytozoon bieneusi chez le lièvre d'Europe (Lepus europaeus) en Europe centrale

Alena Konvalinová 1,2, Marie Křesťanová 3,4, Nikola Holubová 3, Jana Fenclová 1,3, Marta Kicia 5, Matúš Rajský 6,7, Pavel Beran 1, Bohumil Sak 3, Martin Kváč 1,3,*
PMCID: PMC13446113  PMID: 42560080

Abstract

The European brown hare (Lepus europaeus) is an ecologically important small game mammal whose populations have declined in many European countries. A total of 370 faecal samples collected between 2022 and 2024 from hares in the Czechia and Slovakia were molecularly screened for the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. (18S rRNA, gp60), Giardia intestinalis (TPI), Encephalitozoon spp., and Enterocytozoon bieneusi (ITS). qPCR analysis confirmed the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. (n = 15; 4.1%; CI: 2.5–6.6%), Encephalitozoon spp. (n = 34; 9.2%; CI: 6.7–12.6%), and E. bieneusi (n = 16; 4.3%; CI: 2.6–6.9%). Sequence analyses revealed the presence of C. parvum (n = 2), C. sciurinum (n = 3), C. ubiquitum (n = 5), and Cryptosporidium sp. deer mouse genotype IV (n = 5). At the gp60 locus, C. parvum belonged to subtypes IIaA15G1R1 and IIaA23G1R1, C. sciurinum to subtypes VIIIcA10G2R1 (n = 2) and VIIIbA11G1R1 (n = 1), and C. ubiquitum to subtypes XIIa (n = 3) and XIId (n = 2). Five E. bieneusi genotypes were identified: D (n = 8), CHALT1 (n = 1), WildBoar3 (n = 1), CHN-F1 (n = 2), and C (n = 4). Encephalitozoon sequencing revealed E. cuniculi genotypes I (n = 6), II (n = 26), and III (n = 1), and E. hellem (n = 1). Giardia intestinalis was not detected. Cryptosporidium sp. deer mouse genotype IV is reported here for the first time in Europe.

Keywords: PCR, Hare, Genotyping, Geographic distribution, Infection intensity, Giardia intestinalis

Introduction

The European brown hare (Lepus europaeus), originally native to the Eurasian steppes, now inhabits many countries worldwide and is an important small game species. In Europe, it mainly occupies agricultural landscapes, where it shares habitats with humans, livestock, and a wide range of wild animal species [14, 40, 41]. This ecological overlap creates opportunities for the transmission of environmentally transmitted pathogens, and the hare can serve as a natural reservoir. While information on the occurrence of Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum, Sarcocystis, Eimeria, and larval stages of cestodes and nematodes in European brown hares is relatively abundant [12, 20, 52, 58], data on several other potentially pathogenic and zoonotic parasites, such as Cryptosporidium spp., microsporidia, and Giardia intestinalis, remain limited and are entirely absent in some regions.

In Czechia and Slovakia, molecular surveys have documented the occurrence of enteric microeukaryotes including T. gondii, N. caninum, Sarcocystis, Eimeria, Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia intestinalis, Encephalitozoon spp., and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in a variety of free-living wildlife hosts, including insectivores, bats, rodents, carnivores, ungulates or birds [2–4, 33, 36, 39, 43, 59]. Several of the detected species and genotypes have been recognized as zoonotic and may contribute to environmental transmission cycles. Despite the increasing knowledge of these pathogens in wildlife populations of Central Europe, information on their occurrence and genetic diversity in lagomorphs, particularly in the European brown hare, remains very limited.

Cryptosporidium is a genus of obligate parasitic apicomplexan protozoa that infects a wide range of vertebrates, including mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, and amphibians. With the exception of C. parvum and C. ubiquitum, which infect a broad range of mammalian hosts, and C. baileyi and C. meleagridis, which infect numerous avian species, most Cryptosporidium species show narrow host specificity [27, 45]. Nevertheless, more than twenty Cryptosporidium species and genotypes are considered to pose a potential infection risk to humans [37, 55].

Giardia intestinalis is an obligate intestinal parasite of humans and many animal species and consists of eight genetically distinct assemblages (A–H) that differ in their host ranges. While assemblages A and B have low host specificity and are associated with zoonotic potential, the other assemblages are predominantly host-specific [15, 48].

Of the more than 1,200 microsporidian species described to date, infections in mammals are primarily caused by Enterocytozoon bieneusi and members of the genus Encephalitozoon (E. intestinalis, E. cuniculi, and E. hellem). These species infect a wide range of mammalian hosts, including livestock, wildlife, companion animals, and humans, and most of their genotypes show broad host specificity with significant zoonotic potential [49]. Within the genus Encephalitozoon, four genotypes of E. cuniculi (I–IV), six genotypes of E. hellem (1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B and 2C), and a single genotype of E. intestinalis have been distinguished based on sequence polymorphisms within the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the rRNA gene and additionally analysing the polar tube protein gene. Although E. cuniculi genotypes were originally designated as rabbit (genotype I), mouse (genotype II), dog (genotype III), and human (genotype IV) strains, they exhibit low host specificity and have been detected in a wide range of mammalian hosts. Similarly, although E. hellem is most commonly associated with avian hosts, its genotypes have also been reported in mammals [35, 49, 61]. Enterocytozoon bieneusi exhibits considerably greater genetic diversity. To date, more than 500 genotypes have been described based on sequence polymorphisms within the ITS region of the rRNA gene. Phylogenetic analyses have grouped these genotypes into at least 15 distinct genetic groups. Genotypes belonging to groups 1 and 2 are considered to have the greatest zoonotic significance, as they have been detected in a broad range of hosts, including humans, livestock, companion animals, and wildlife, whereas the remaining groups are generally regarded as host-adapted and exhibit a narrower host range [30, 51].

Compared with other lagomorphs, particularly rabbits, knowledge about the occurrence of these parasites in hares is limited [16, 21, 46]. Only a few studies have investigated the presence of Cryptosporidium in hares, and most of them reported negative findings, likely due to inappropriate diagnostic methodologies or the low number of animals examined. A similar situation applies to Giardia and microsporidia [3, 6, 10, 14, 33, 38, 56].

The aim of the present study is to address the existing knowledge gaps regarding the geographical distribution and genetic variability of Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and microsporidia in European brown hares in Czechia and Slovakia, using molecular genotyping approaches and qPCR quantification of infection.

Material and methods

Ethics approval

Hares admitted to wildlife rescue centres were handled in accordance with Act No. 114/1992 Coll. on Nature and Landscape Protection (Czechia). Hunted animals were legally harvested in accordance with Act No. 449/2001 Coll., Low on Hunting (Czechia), and Act No. 274/2009 Coll. on Hunting and on the Amendment of Certain Acts, as amended (Slovakia). Faecal samples were collected as part of routine parasitological examinations, and only faecal material was subsequently provided for scientific purposes. No animals were captured, handled, or subjected to any experimental procedures specifically for this study, in accordance with Act No. 246/1992 Coll. on the Protection of Animals against Cruelty (Czechia). The use of the collected material for research purposes was approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of the Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences.

Area and specimens studied

A cross-sectional molecular epidemiological study was conducted in Czechia and Slovakia between 2022 and 2024. Samples were collected from several localities in Czechia and Slovakia, representing the typical habitat of the European brown hare (Fig. 1). Czech samples originated from two main landscape types: the lowland agricultural region of the Elbe basin (180–250 m a.s.l.) and the more elevated, heterogeneous agricultural landscapes of Central Bohemia and the Bohemian-Moravian Highlands (300–600 m a.s.l.). Slovak sampling sites were mainly in the lowland and hilly agricultural regions of southwestern Slovakia (approximately 100–300 m a.s.l.). In all regions, habitats consisted mainly of arable land interspersed with grasslands, field margins, hedgerows, and woodland patches. Faecal samples were collected from European brown hares (Lepus europaeus) that were temporarily kept in wildlife rescue centres or were hunted. Faecal samples from hares admitted to rescue centres were collected immediately after arrival and always within 24 h before transfer to holding facilities. In hunted hares, faecal samples were collected directly from the large intestine. Each faecal sample was placed in a sterile plastic vial labelled with the sample ID and stored at 4–8 °C without fixative until laboratory processing within two weeks of collection. During handling in rescue centres or at the time of hunting, the general health status of each animal was assessed, including body condition and faecal consistency. Detailed information on sampling localities, the number of samples collected at each locality, and all available metadata for individual animals, including age and origin, are in Supplementary Table S1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Map of the geographical distribution of Cryptosporidium spp., Encephalitozoon spp., and E. bieneusi in European brown hares (Lepus europaeus) in Czechia and Slovakia.

Molecular analyses

Total genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from 200 mg of faeces using the Exgene™ Stool DNA mini kit (GeneAll Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Seoul, South Korea), following the manufacturer’s instructions with slight modification. Specifically, sterile 0.5 mm glass beads were added to the microtubes up to the 100 μL mark, followed by the addition of 10 sterile zirconia beads (2 mm in diameter; Next Advance, Troy, NY, USA) to each tube containing the sample and lysis buffer. The samples were then homogenised for 60 s at 5.5 m/s using a FastPrep®-24 device (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) [50]. The purified DNA was stored at −20 °C before being used for PCR. The positivity of samples for the presence of specific DNA of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia intestinalis, Encephalitozoon spp., and E. bieneusi was tested using qPCR. Parasite infection intensity was expressed as the number of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts (oocysts per gram – OPG), E. bieneusi and Encephalitozoon spp. spores (spores per gram – SPG), and G. intestinalis cysts (cyst per gram – CPG) per gram of the faeces. For detection and quantification of E. bieneusi, a commercial qPCR kit YSLqP-IC-E.biene-100 was used according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (YouSeq Ltd., Winchester, UK). Cryptosporidium spp., G. intestinalis, and Encephalitozoon spp. were quantified using a TaqMan-based qPCR assay and previously published protocols [18, 25, 60]. Briefly, each 20 μL reaction contained 2 μL gDNA, 400 nM forward and reverse primers, 200 nM 5′ FAM and 3′ BHQ1-labelled TaqMan probe and 10 μL Luna Universal Probe qPCR master Mix (New England BioLabs Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA). A list of all primers and probes used in this study is given in Supplementary Table S2. A standard (calibration) curve was constructed using 107 isolated Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts, G. intestinalis assemblage D cysts, and E. intestinalis spores, which were subjected to a series of tenfold serial dilutions (101–107) to determine assay sensitivity and efficiency.

Samples that tested positive by qPCR were genotyped using nested PCR targeting a fragment of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) gene for Cryptosporidium, the triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) gene for Giardia intestinalis, and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the small ribosomal subunit for Encephalitozoon spp. and E. bieneusi, following previously published protocols [9, 13, 24, 57, 62]. To investigate the genetic diversity among Cryptosporidium spp. isolates, additional PCR assays were conducted targeting the 60-kDa glycoprotein gene (gp60) in 18S rDNA-positive sample. For gp60 subtyping, C. sciurinum-positive samples were analysed using the protocol described by Alves et al. [1], while C. ubiquitum-positive samples were analysed according to Li et al. [29]. The PCR reaction was carried out in a total volume of 30 μL. The reaction mixture contained 2 μL of gDNA as template, or 2 μL of the primary PCR product in case of a secondary reaction, 200 μM each of deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), 1× PCR buffer (DreamTaq™ Green Buffer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 3.0 mM MgCl2, 1 U of Taq polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 10 μg of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 200 nM of each primer. Cryptosporidium hominis, G. intestinalis assemblage D, E. intestinalis, and E. bieneusi genotype PtEbIX DNA and molecular grade water were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Secondary PCR amplicons were visualised on 1.5% agarose gels (SERVA Agarose for DNA Electrophoresis, SERVA Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) stained with ethidium bromide and purified using a GenElute Gel Extraction Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) prior to Sanger sequencing performed by a commercial company (SeqMe s.r.o, Dobříš, Czechia). Each positive sample was independently sequenced twice using both forward and reverse primers (bidirectional sequencing), and consensus sequences were generated from the resulting chromatograms.

Phylogenetic and statistical analyses

Nucleotide sequences obtained for each gene were edited and processed in ChromasPro v2.4.1 (Technelysium Pty Ltd., South Brisbane, QLD, Australia). All chromatograms were manually inspected to assess sequence quality and identify potential ambiguous positions. Sequence alignments were generated using the MAFFT online platform (version 7; [http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/]) with the automatic alignment mode option, comparing both study sequences and GenBank references. Phylogenetic reconstruction and model selection were performed in MEGA X using the maximum likelihood (ML) approach. The Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) was applied to determine the best-fitting nucleotide and protein substitution models, and node reliability was evaluated by performing 1,000 bootstrap replicates [17, 26]. Resulting trees were exported from MEGA X and manually refined using CorelDRAW X7. Sequences obtained in this study were deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: for 18S rDNA [PX629147–PX629150], for gp60 [PX619180–PX619185], and for ITS [PX627779–PX627782 and PX627774–PX627778]. Prevalence values of detected parasites were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using the Wilson Score Interval in R version 4.2.2. All analyses were conducted in R (version 4.2.2) with a significance threshold of α = 0.05.

Results

A total of 370 faecal samples collected from European brown hares were analysed, including 130 samples from Czechia and 240 from Slovakia. qPCR analysis confirmed the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. (n = 15; 4.1%; CI: 2.5–6.6%), Encephalitozoon spp. (n = 34; 9.2%; CI: 6.7–12.6%), and Enterocytozoon bieneusi (n = 16; 4.3%; CI: 2.6–6.9%), with infection intensities ranging from 1.0 × 102 to 9.8 × 103 for Cryptosporidium spp., from 0.9 × 102 to 6.4 × 102 for E. bieneusi, and from 1.5 × 102 to 7.6 × 103 for Encephalitozoon spp. (Table 1). No samples tested positive for Giardia intestinalis. In subsequent nested PCR using genus-specific primers, all qPCR-positive samples were successfully amplified and sequenced by Sanger sequencing. Analysis of the 18S rRNA gene sequences of Cryptosporidium spp. revealed the presence of C. parvum (n = 2), C. sciurinum (n = 3), C. ubiquitum (n = 5), and Cryptosporidium sp. deer mouse genotype IV (n = 5). All sequences within each species or genotype were identical and showed 100% similarity to the corresponding sequences deposited in the GenBank database. Manual inspection of all chromatograms revealed no ambiguous nucleotide positions or consistent double peaks indicating mixed infections.

Table 1.

Occurrence, infection intensity, and genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp., Encephalitozoon spp., and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in European brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in the Czech Republic (CZE) and Slovakia (SVK). Infection intensity is expressed as the number of oocysts (OPG) and spores per gram of faeces (SPG).

Country Locality ID sample Cryptosporidium spp. Encephalitozoon spp. E. bieneusi
Genotyping OPG Genotyping SPG Genotyping SPG
CZE Bollinka-Loreta 53700 – – E. cuniculi II 2.1 × 102 – –
Čestín 53709 – – – – CHN-F1 1.3 × 102
Domašín 53677 C. sciurinum VIIIb 6.5 × 102 E. cuniculi II 1.7 × 102 – –
Hrusice 53654 – – – – D 4.2 × 102
Jínošov 53685 – – – – CHALT-1 3.3 × 102
Kácov 53696 C. sciurinum VIIIc 3.9 × 102 – – – –
Libeznice 53644 – – – – D 4.6 × 102
Maršovice 53662 – – – – D 3.8 × 102
Nesperská Lhota 53681 – – E. cuniculi I 1.1 × 101 D 2.9 × 102
Netřebice 53640 – – – – D 6.1 × 102
Pacov 54620 C. ubiquitum XIId 2.7 × 102 – – – –
Poděbrady 53645 – E. cuniculi II 1.3 × 102 – –
Podveky 53693 C. sciurinum VIIIc 1.0 × 102 – – – –
Prostějov 57265 – – E. cuniculi II 2.7 × 102 – –
Přední Lhota 53646 – – E. cuniculi II 4.2 × 102 – –
Skalka 53704 C. ubiquitum XIId 9.8 × 103 – – – –
Sulice 53665 – E. cuniculi II 2.4 × 102 – –
Vracovice 53708 – – – – CHN-F1 2.5 × 102
Záhornice 53638 – – E. cuniculi II 5.4 × 102 – –
Vlašim 53673 – – E. cuniculi II 6.5 × 101 – –
53676 – – E. cuniculi I 1.1 × 101 – –
53697 – – E. cuniculi II 1.6 × 102 – –
58354 – – E. cuniculi II 1.3 × 101 – –
SVK Baloň 55632 – – E. cuniculi III 1.9 × 101 – –
55635 C. parvum IIa 3.7 × 101 – – – –
Dolné Lovčice 54915 – – – C 5.7 × 102
54918 – – E. hellem 5.3 × 101 –
54922 – – – – C 3.1 × 102
54924 – – E. cuniculi II 1.1 × 101 – –
Gabčíkovo 55770 – – E. cuniculi II 4.7 × 102 – –
Krakovany 55828 – – E. cuniculi II 8.3 × 102 – –
Kráľová pri Senci 55212 – – E. cuniculi II 9.2 × 101 – –
55213 – – E. cuniculi I 6.7 × 101 – –
Malé Dvorníky 55154 – – E. cuniculi II 3.3 × 103 –
Okoč 54799 – – – – D 5.9 × 102
54802 deer mouse IV 6.9 × 101 – – – –
54805 – – – – C 3.7 × 102
Prašník 55829 – – – C 6.4 × 102
Skalica 57310 – – – WildBoar3 9.2 × 101
Sklabiná 55274 – – E. cuniculi II 1.0 × 101 D 1.3 × 102
Starý Háj 55268 – – E. cuniculi I 7.2 × 101 – –
Topoľnica 55131 – – E. cuniculi II 4.1 × 102 – –
55132 – – E. cuniculi II 2.3 × 103 – –
55133 – – E. cuniculi II 1.1 × 102 – –
55135 – – E. cuniculi II 8.5 × 102 – –
55136 – – E. cuniculi II 3.4 × 102 – –
Topoľníky 54833 C. ubiquitum XIIa 9.6 × 102 E. cuniculi II 3.5 × 102 – –
Trnava 54635 – – E. cuniculi II 7.5 × 103 – –
54637 C. ubiquitum XIIa 5.2 × 103 – – – –
Váh 55265 – – E. cuniculi II 3.6 × 102 – –
55266 – – E. cuniculi II 1.8 × 103 – –
55267 – – E. cuniculi I 3.7 × 101 – –
55270 – – E. cuniculi I 5.9 × 101 – –
Veľké Kosihy 54808 deer mouse IV 6.7 × 102 – – – –
54809 C. parvum IIa 6.7 × 101 – – – –
54813 deer mouse IV 8.7 × 101 – – – –
54817 deer mouse IV 2.9 × 101 – – – –
Vlčany 54926 C. ubiquitum XIIa 4.1 × 103 – – – –
54929 – – E. cuniculi II 6.1 × 102 – –
54933 deer mouse IV 8.2 × 102 – – – –
54934 – – – – D 1.5 × 102

Cryptosporidium sciurinum was detected only in Czechia, in three European brown hares from three different localities (Figs. 1 and 2). Cryptosporidium parvum was found in two individuals from different sites, while Cryptosporidium sp. deer mouse genotype IV was identified in five hares from three localities in Slovakia. Cryptosporidium ubiquitum was detected in hares from both Czechia and Slovakia (Figs. 1 and 2). Subsequent gp60 subtyping revealed two C. parvum subtypes (IIaA15G1R1 and IIaA23G1R1), two C. sciurinum subtypes (VIIIcA10G2R1 [n = 2] and VIIIbA11G1R1 [n = 1]), and two C. ubiquitum subtypes (XIIa [n = 3] and XIId [n = 2]; Fig. 3). While subtype XIIa of C. ubiquitum originated solely from Slovakia, subtype XIId was found exclusively in Czechia (Fig. 3; Table 1). Cryptosporidium sciurinum subtype VIIIb was detected in a hare from a locality near the Czech–German border (Fig. 1). In contrast, subtype VIIIc was identified in two hares from two localities approximately 10 km apart in central Czechia. The infection intensity of Cryptosporidium spp. ranged from 2.9 × 101 to 9.8 × 103 OPG with the highest infection intensities observed in C. ubiquitum isolates (Table 1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cladogram illustrating the phylogenetic relationships of Cryptosporidium spp. detected in this study, together with other Cryptosporidium species and genotypes, based on a partial nucleotide sequence of the small subunit rDNA (18S rDNA) gene and constructed using the Maximum Likelihood method. Sequences obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. The GenBank accession number is given in square brackets. The locality and country of origin for each sample (CZE – Czechia, SVK – Slovakia) are indicated after the isolate identification number.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cladogram illustrating the phylogenetic relationships of Cryptosporidium spp. detected in this study, together with other Cryptosporidium species and genotypes, based on a partial nucleotide sequence of the 60 kDa glycoprotein (gp60) gene and constructed using the Maximum Likelihood method. Sequences obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. The GenBank accession number is given in square brackets. The locality and country of origin for each sample (CZE – Czechia, SVK – Slovakia) are indicated after the isolate identification number.

In the analysed samples, five different genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi were identified. Phylogenetic analyses revealed the presence of E. bieneusi genotype D (n = 8), genotype CHALT1 (n = 1), genotype WildBoar3 (n = 1), genotype CHN-F1 (n = 2), and genotype C (n = 4; Fig. 4). Genotypes C and WildBoar3 were detected exclusively in hares from Slovakia, while genotypes CHN-F1 and CHALT1 were found only in animals from Czechia Republic. The most frequently detected genotype D was identified in samples from both countries (Table 1; Fig. 4). The infection intensity of Encephalitozoon spp. ranged from 1.0 × 101 to 7.5 × 103 SPG (Table 1).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Cladogram illustrating the phylogenetic relationships of Enterocytozoon bieneusi detected in this study and other E. bieneusi genotypes, based on the complete nucleotide sequence of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the rRNA gene, constructed using the Maximum Likelihood method. Sequences obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. The GenBank accession number is provided in square brackets. The locality and country of origin of each sample (CZE – Czechia, SVK – Slovakia) are indicated after the isolate identification number. Detected genotypes were assigned to phylogenetic groups according to Li et al. [30] based on their host specificity.

Phylogenetic analyses of Encephalitozoon spp. complete ITS sequences identified E. cuniculi genotype I (n = 6), E. cuniculi genotype II (n = 26), E. cuniculi genotype III (n = 1), and E. hellem (n = 1). The infection intensity of E. bieneusi genotypes ranged from 9.2 × 101 to 6.4 × 102 SPG. Genotypes D and C were detected most frequently and showed infection intensities similar to those of other genotypes detected sporadically. All sequences within each species/genotype were identical to each other and showed identity with sequences deposited in the GenBank database (Table 1; Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Cladogram illustrating the phylogenetic relationships of Encephalitozoon spp. detected in this study and other Encephalitozoon species and genotypes, based on the complete nucleotide sequence of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the rRNA gene, constructed using the Maximum Likelihood method. Sequences obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. The GenBank accession number is provided in square brackets. The locality and country of origin of each sample (CZE – Czechia, SVK – Slovakia) are indicated after the isolate identification number.

Animals kept in wildlife rescue centres were in good general condition, and faecal consistency was appropriate for their age and diet. No clinical signs commonly associated with Cryptosporidium or microsporidia infections, such as diarrhoea or neurological disorders, were observed. Hunted hares were also in good body condition, and all collected faecal samples were normally formed, with no evidence of diarrhoeal disease.

Discussion

This study examined the occurrence and genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium spp., G. intestinalis, Encephalitozoon spp., and E. bieneusi in European brown hares in Czechia and Slovakia. We did not detect any hares infected with G. intestinalis, consistent with findings from Czechia, Croatia, and Italy, where no Giardia were found [6, 8, 33].

The low prevalence of Cryptosporidium detected in our study (4.1%) is consistent with previously published data on hare populations. Rego et al. (2022) identified C. cuniculus in 2% of Granada hare (Lepus granatensis) in Spain, while Li et al. reported Cryptosporidium sp. skunk genotype in 7.7% of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) in North America. In European brown hares, Cryptosporidium has been reported only by Lukešová et al. (2012), who microscopically detected five positive cases out of 360 examined individuals, although the isolates were not genotyped. The low microscopic positivity observed in these studies aligns with our results, in which oocysts were identified microscopically in only three out of 370 European brown hares. For the first time, we reported the occurrence of four distinct Cryptosporidium species/genotypes in European brown hares. The detected species C. ubiquitum and C. parvum are characterised by broad host specificity, so their presence in hares is not unexpected. Subtyping of both species at the gp60 locus revealed the presence of subtypes XIIa and XIId in C. ubiquitum and subtype IIa in C. parvum, all of which are commonly found in wild and domestic ruminants [27, 45]. These hosts show considerable ecological overlap with hares, sharing the same permanent grasslands, field margins and pastures [53]. Habitat overlap of this type increases the likelihood of indirect contact and may facilitate the environmental transmission of these Cryptosporidium species. In contrast, C. sciurinum, another species detected in our study, is host-specific for squirrels, with which hares have only limited ecological overlap. Because all hares positive for C. sciurinum originated from rescue centres, where this species had previously been detected in squirrels, environmental contamination or pseudoparasitism resulting from the passive passage of oocysts through the gastrointestinal tract cannot be completely ruled out. However, faecal samples from rescue animals were collected immediately upon arrival at the rescue centres, or within 24 h, before transfer to animal holding facilities, which substantially reduces the likelihood of contamination occurring within the centres. In addition, the three C. sciurinum-positive hares originated from three different localities and two independent rescue centres, and two distinct gp60 subtypes (VIIIb and VIIIc) were identified. Therefore, the present findings should be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, natural transmission in the wild cannot be fully ruled out, as C. sciurinum is commonly found in free-living squirrels in Europe [22, 42, 43]. Both gp60 C. sciurinum subtypes detected in hares in this study have previously been identified in squirrels within Czechia [43]. The detection of C. sciurinum DNA in European brown hares suggests that this species may occasionally infect or pass through this host, but further studies are needed to confirm true infection and determine its host range. The last detected Cryptosporidium, the deer mouse genotype IV, represents an unexpected finding. This genotype has so far been reported only in the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) in the United States and Canada [31, 32, 47, 54]. Although pseudoparasitism cannot be entirely ruled out, the repeated detection of deer mouse genotype IV in several hares from different localities, together with the observed infection intensities, supports the hypothesis of true infection rather than passive passage of oocysts through the gastrointestinal tract. However, even if these findings represent pseudoparasitism, the presence of this genotype in Central Europe remains unexplained. Unlike C. mortiferum, whose introduction into Europe has been linked to the spread of grey squirrels from North America [42, 59], there is currently no information on the origin, transmission routes, or potential reservoir hosts of deer mouse genotype IV in Europe. Whether the detected hares were true hosts or merely accidental carriers, the present findings indicate that this genotype circulates in the Central European environment and requires further investigation. Interestingly, the species composition of Cryptosporidium detected in European brown hares differs substantially from that reported in rabbits. In both domestic and wild rabbits, C. cuniculus is considered the predominant species and has been reported worldwide [27, 45]. In contrast, C. cuniculus has not been detected in European brown hares to date, including in the present study. This observation may suggest differences in host susceptibility among lagomorph species. However, given the limited number of molecular studies conducted in hares, the apparent absence of C. cuniculus should be interpreted with caution.

The number of studies and confirmed cases of parasites of the genus Encephalitozoon in hares is limited. Only two studies have reported Encephalitozoon infections in hares based on PCR detection. De Bosschere et al. [10] identified E. intestinalis and E. hellem in a single European brown hare, while Martínez-Padilla et al. [34] detected E. intestinalis in three Iberian hares. Other studies have reported only the presence of specific antibodies in European brown hares [3, 38]. The prevalences reported in these studies (0.5–3.8%) were lower than in our study (8.1%). However, this difference may be attributable to the larger number of examined animals in our dataset. Another difference lies in the species composition of microsporidia of the genus Encephalitozoon. In our study, E. cuniculi was the dominant species, with genotype II being the most frequently detected, followed by genotypes I and III. Genotype II is a common genotype reported in both domestic and wild animals, whereas genotypes I and III occur less frequently and are detected only in a small proportion of cases [19]. Only one E. hellem isolate was detected in our study, a finding that is consistent with the observations of Martínez-Padilla et al. [34], as this species is predominantly associated with avian hosts and is only sporadically reported in mammals. Interestingly, the detected isolate does not match any sequence published to date. It most likely represents a novel subtype within the species E. hellem. The predominance of E. cuniculi observed in the present study is consistent with previous findings in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Molecular investigations in rabbits have reported prevalences ranging from (4.0–60%) in wild, domestic, and farmed rabbits by PCR [5, 7, 11, 34]. Higher prevalences have been reported when urine or tissue samples were analysed [5, 7, 64]. Although E. cuniculi genotype I is commonly referred to as the rabbit genotype, genotype II has also been reported relatively frequently in rabbit populations [5, 11].

In contrast to previous studies where no E. bieneusi in hares was detected, we found E. bieneusi in 4% of animals [34, 44]. The dominant genotypes were C and D, both of which have previously been reported in a wide range of domestic and wild animals as well as in humans [23, 49]. Their presence in the examined hares is therefore not unexpected, as environmental contamination with these genotypes is likely common due to their low host specificity. The detection of the wild-boar genotype, originally identified in wild boar populations, is also unsurprising given the increasing overlap of wildlife habitats [36]. The identification of two additional genotypes, CHN-F1 and CHALT1, previously reported in raccoon dogs and foxes, and tigers in China, respectively, suggests that transmission to hares may occur through contact with wild carnivores [28, 63]. Compared with rabbits, for which numerous E. bieneusi genotypes have been reported worldwide, the genotype diversity observed in European brown hares appears relatively limited. However, previous studies in rabbits have demonstrated considerable geographical variation in genotype composition, suggesting that local epidemiological conditions may influence the observed diversity [5, 11]. As molecular data on E. bieneusi in hares remain scarce, caution is warranted when comparing genotype richness between the two lagomorph hosts, and further studies from different geographic regions will be necessary before broader conclusions can be drawn.

Several of the species and genotypes identified in this study have recognised zoonotic potential. Both C. parvum and C. ubiquitum, including the detected subtype families IIa, XIIa, and XIId, have previously been reported in humans. Similarly, E. cuniculi genotypes I–III and E. bieneusi genotypes C, D, CHN-F1, WildBoar3, and CHALT1, all belonging to phylogenetic group 1, which comprises most zoonotic genotypes [29, 30, 49]. These findings suggest that European brown hares may contribute to the environmental circulation of zoonotic protists.

Cryptosporidium spp. and microsporidia are recognised enteric pathogens capable of causing clinical disease in a wide range of hosts. Cryptosporidium and E. bieneusi infections are mostly associated with diarrhoea and gastrointestinal disorders, particularly in young, immunocompromised, or stressed individuals [45]. In contrast, infections caused by Encephalitozoon spp. may affect not only the gastrointestinal tract but also other organs, and in severe cases can be associated with neurological manifestations, renal lesions, or ocular disease [49]. No clinical signs of disease associated with the detected parasites were observed in any of the animals, especially those housed in rescue centres. Based on these findings, it can be inferred that the infections were asymptomatic and had no apparent impact on the animals’ health. These results are consistent with numerous studies showing that wild animals are commonly infected with Cryptosporidium spp. and microsporidia, which, however, typically do not cause clinically significant disease in these hosts [27, 49].

Conclusions

To date, this study provides the most comprehensive molecular analysis to date of Cryptosporidium spp., Encephalitozoon spp., and E. bieneusi in European brown hares from Czechia and Slovakia. We identified four Cryptosporidium spp., including the deer mouse genotype IV, which we reported here for the first time in Europe. Within the genus Encephalitozoon, E. cuniculi genotype II was predominant. Unlike previous studies, we also detected five different genotypes of E. bieneusi. The higher prevalence and diversity observed in this study are likely due to the larger number of animals examined and the use of highly sensitive molecular methods. Overall, our results significantly expand current knowledge of parasitic protist infections in hares.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, grant number GACR 21-23773S and by a Polish Ministry of Health subvention according to number SUBZ.A060.25.102 from the IT Simple system of Wroclaw Medical University.

Cite this article as: Konvalinová A, Křesťanová M, Holubová N, Fenclová J, Kicia M, Rajský M, Beran P, Sak B & Kváč M. 2026. Genetic characterisation of Cryptosporidium spp., Encephalitozoon spp., and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in European brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in Central Europe. Parasite 33, 43. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2026042.

Edited by Jean-Lou Justine

Footnotes

⋆

These authors contributed equally.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

parasite-33-43-s1.zip (25.4KB, zip)

Table S1. Detailed information on sampling localities, the number of samples collected at each locality, and all available metadata for individual animals, including age and origin.

parasite-33-43-s2.pdf (261.6KB, pdf)

Table S2. Primers and probes sequences used for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Encephalitopzoon spp. and Giardia intestinalis.

The supplementary material of this article is available at https://www.parasite-journal.org/10.1051/parasite/2026042/olm.

References

  • 1.Alves M, Xiao LH, Sulaiman I, Lal AA, Matos O, Antunes F. 2003. Subgenotype analysis of Cryptosporidium isolates from humans, cattle, and zoo ruminants in Portugal. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 41(6), 2744–2747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Antolová D, Stanko M, Jarošová J, Miklisová D. 2023. Rodents as sentinels for Toxoplasma gondii in rural ecosystems in Slovakia – seroprevalence study. Pathogens, 12(6), 826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bártová E, Marková J, Sedlák K. 2015. Prevalence of antibodies to Encephalitozoon cuniculi in European hares (Lepus europaeus). Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 22(4), 674–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bartová E, Sedlák K, Literák I. 2006. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum antibodies in wild boars in the Czech Republic. Veterinary Parasitology, 142(1-2), 150–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baz-Gonzalez E, Martin-Carrillo N, Garcia-Livia K, Abreu-Acosta N, Foronda P. 2022. Molecular detection of microsporidia in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. Biology, 11(12), 1796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Beck R, Sprong H, Lucinger S, Pozio E, Caccio SM. 2011. A large survey of Croatian wild mammals for Giardia duodenalis reveals a low prevalence and limited zoonotic potential. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 11(8), 1049–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Breuninger K, Rinder M, Korbel R. 2024. Occurrence of Encephalitozoon cuniculi and Encephalitozoon hellem in European wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in Southern Germany (Bavaria). Animals, 14(19), 2880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brustenga L, Franciosini MP, Diaferia M, Rigamonti G, Musa L, Russomanno BL, Veronesi F. 2023. Parasitological survey in European brown hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) breeding facilities in southern Italy. Pathogens, 12(2), 208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Buckholt MA, Lee JH, Tzipori S. 2002. Prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in swine: an 18-month survey at a slaughterhouse in Massachusetts. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(5), 2595–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.De Bosschere H, Wang Z, Orlandi PA. 2007. First diagnosis of Encephalitozoon intestinalis and E. hellem in a European brown hare (Lepus europaeus) with kidney lesions. Zoonoses and Public Health, 54(3–4), 131–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Deng L, Chai Y, Xiang L, Wang W, Zhou Z, Liu H, Zhong Z, Fu H, Peng G. 2020. First identification and genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon spp. in pet rabbits in China. BMC Veterinary Research, 16(1), 212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Diakou A, Sokos C, Papadopoulos E. 2014. Endoparasites found in European brown hares (Lepus europaeus) hunted in Macedonia, Greece. Helminthologia, 51(4), 345–351. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Didier ES, Vossbrinck CR, Baker MD, Rogers LB, Bertucci DC, Shadduck JA. 1995. Identification and characterization of three Encephalitozoon cuniculi strains. Parasitology, 111, 411–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ebani VV, Poli A, Rocchigiani G, Bertelloni F, Nardoni S, Papini RA, Mancianti F. 2016. Serological survey on some pathogens in wild brown hares (Lepus europaeus) in Central Italy. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 9(5), 465–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Feng YY, Xiao LH. 2011. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and giardiasis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 24(1), 110–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ghorbani A, Asghari A, Mohammadi MR, Badri M, Shamsi L, Hanifeh F, Mohammadi-Ghalehbin B, Bastaminejad S. 2025. Cryptosporidium in rabbits: A global systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, species/genotypes distribution and zoonotic significance. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 11(2), e70309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology, 52(5), 696–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hill VR, Kahler AM, Jothikumar N, Johnson TB, Hahn D, Cromeans TL. 2007. Multistate evaluation of an ultrafiltration-based procedure for simultaneous recovery of enteric microbes in 100-liter tap water samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(13), 4218–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hinney B, Sak B, Joachim A, Kváč M. 2016. More than a rabbit's tale – Encephalitozoon spp. in wild mammals and birds. International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife, 5(1), 76–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hughes K. 2024. Endoparasites of rabbits and hares. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 36(5), 599–616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen HL, Zhang QT, Qi R. 2025. Global prevalence of lagomorpha coccidiosis from 1951 to 2024: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Research in Veterinary Science, 183, 105519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ježková J, Holubová N, Kvičerová J, Matejů J, Sak B, Kváč M. 2023. European ground squirrels Spermophilus citellus (Linnaeus) do not share identical Cryptosporidium spp. with North American ground squirrels. Folia Parasitologica, 70, 2023.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jian J, Zi J, Wang Y, Yang Y, Su Y, Yao L, Li B, Peng X, Cao J, Shen Y, Liu A. 2024. Occurrence and genetic characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pet dogs in Yunnan Province, China. Parasite, 31, 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Katzwinkel-Wladarsch S, Lieb M, Helse W, Loscher T, Rinder H. 1996. Direct amplification and species determination of microsporidian DNA from stool specimens. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 1(3), 373–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Klotz C, Radam E, Rausch S, Gosten-Heinrich P, Aebischer T. 2021. Real-Time PCR for molecular detection of zoonotic and non-zoonotic Giardia spp. in wild rodents. Microorganisms, 9(8), 1610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35(6), 1547–1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kváč M, McEvoy J, Stenger B, Clark M. 2014. Cryptosporidiosis in other vertebrates, in: Cryptosporidium: Parasite and Disease, Cacciò SM, Widmer G, Eds. Springer: Wien. p. 237–326. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li J, Qi M, Chang Y, Wang R, Li T, Dong H, Zhang L. 2015. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in captive wildlife at Zhengzhou Zoo, China. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 62(6), 833–839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Li N, Xiao L, Alderisio K, Elwin K, Cebelinski E, Chalmers R, Santin M, Fayer R, Kváč M, Ryan U, Sak B. 2014. Subtyping Cryptosporidium ubiquitum, a zoonotic pathogen emerging in humans. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 20(2), 217–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li W, Feng Y, Santin M. 2019. Host Specificity of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and public health implications. Trends in Parasitology, 35(6), 436–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li XD, Atwill ER. 2021. Diverse genotypes and species of in wild rodent species from the West Coast of the USA and implications for raw produce safety and microbial water quality. Microorganisms, 9(4), 867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li X, Nguyen T, Xiao C, Levy A, Akagi Y, Silkie S, Atwill ER. 2020. Prevalence and genotypes of Cryptosporidium in wildlife populations co-located in a protected watershed in the Pacific Northwest, 2013 to 2016. Microorganisms, 8(6), 914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lukešová D, Langrová I, Vadlejch J, Jankovská I, Hlava J, Válek P, Čadková Z. 2012. Endoparasites in European hares (Lepus europaeus) under gamekeeping conditions in the Czech Republic. Helminthologia, 49(3), 159–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Martínez-Padilla A, Caballero-Gómez J, Magnet Á, Gómez-Guillamón F, Izquierdo F, Camacho-Sillero L, Jiménez-Ruiz S, Del Águila C, García-Bocanegra I. 2020. Zoonotic microsporidia in wild lagomorphs in Southern Spain. Animals, 10(12), 2218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mathis A, Tanner I, Weber R, Deplazes P. 1999. Genetic and phenotypic intraspecific variation in the microsporidian Encephalitozoon hellem. International Journal for Parasitology, 29(5), 767–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Němejc K, Sak B, Květoňová D, Hanzal V, Janiszewski P, Forejtek P, Rajský D, Kotková M, Ravaszová P, McEvoy J, Kváč M. 2014. Prevalence and diversity of Encephalitozoon spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Central Europe. Parasitology Research, 113(2), 761–767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ortega YR, Kváč M. 2013. Foodborne protozoa, in: Guide to Foodborne Pathogens, Labbé RG, García S, Eds. John Wiley & Sons: Oxford. p. 303–316. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Özkan Ö, Yücesan B, Babür C, Orkun Ö. 2021. Seroprevalence of Encephalitozoon cuniculi, Francisella tularensis and Toxoplasma gondii in zoonotic diseases in European Hares (Lepus europaesus). Türkiye Parazitoloji Derneği, 45(3), 171–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Perec-Matysiak A, Leśniańska K, Buńkowska-Gawlik K, Čondlová Š, Sak B, Kváč M, Rajský D, Hildebrand J. 2019. The opportunistic pathogen Encephalitozoon cuniculi in wild living Murinae and Arvicolinae in Central Europe. European Journal of Protistology, 69, 14–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pikula J, Adam V, Bandouchova H, Beklova M, Horakova J, Horakova H, Kizek R, Krizkova S, Skocovska B, Supalkova V, Svoboda M. 2007. Blood coagulation times in the European brown hare (Lepus europaeus). Veterinary Clinical Pathology, 36(4), 361–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pikula J, Beklová M, Holesovská Z, Treml F. 2004. Ecology of European brown hare and distribution of natural foci of tularaemia in the Czech Republic. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 73(2), 267–273. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Prediger J, Horčičková M, Hofmannova L, Sak B, Ferrari N, Mazzamuto MV, Romeo C, Wauters LA, McEvoy J, Kváč M. 2017. Native and introduced squirrels in Italy host different Cryptosporidium spp. European Journal of Protistology, 61(Pt A), 64–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Prediger J, Ježková J, Holubová N, Sak B, Konečný R, Rost M, McEvoy J, Rajský D, Kváč M. 2021. Cryptosporidium sciurinum n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris). Microorganisms, 9(10), 2050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rego L, Castro-Scholten S, Cano C, Jiménez-Martín D, Köster PC, Caballero-Gómez J, Bailo B, Dashti A, Hernández-Castro C, Cano-Terriza D, Vioque F. 2023. Iberian wild Leporidae as hosts of zoonotic enteroparasites in Mediterranean ecosystems of Southern Spain. Zoonoses Public Health, 70(3), 223–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Robertson LJ, Björkman C, Axén C, Fayer R. 2014. Cryptosporidiosis in farmed animals, in: Cryptosporidium: Parasite and Disease, Cacciò SM, Widmer G, Eds. Springer. p. 149–236. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Robinson G, Chalmers RM. 2010. The European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), a source of zoonotic cryptosporidiosis. Zoonoses and Public Health, 57(7-8), E1–E13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ruecker NJ, Matsune JC, Lapen DR, Topp E, Edge TA, Neumann NF. 2013. The detection of Cryptosporidium and the resolution of mixtures of species and genotypes from water. Infection Genetics and Evolution, 15, 3–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ryan U, Cacciò SM. 2013. Zoonotic potential of Giardia. International Journal for Parasitology, 43(12–13), 943–956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sak B, Kváč M. 2022. Chronic infection in mammals due to microsporidia, in: Microsporidia: Current Advances in Biology Weiss LM, Reinke AW, Eds. Springer: Switzerland. p. 319–372. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sak B, Kváč M, Hanzlíková D, Cama V. 2008. First report of Enterocytozoon bieneusi infection on a pig farm in the Czech Republic. Veterinary Parasitology, 153(3–4), 220–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Santín M, Fayer R. 2009. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotype nomenclature based on the internal transcribed spacer sequence: a consensus. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 56(1), 34–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sergi V, Romeo G, Serafini M, Torretta E, Macchioni F. 2018. Endoparasites of the European hare (Lepus europaeus) (Pallas, 1778) in central Italy. Helminthologia, 55(2), 127–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sliwinski K, Ronnenberg K, Jung K, Strauss E, Siebert U. 2019. Habitat requirements of the European brown hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas 1778) in an intensively used agriculture region (Lower Saxony, Germany). BMC Ecology, 19(1), 31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Stenger BLS, Clark ME, Kváč M, Khan E, Giddings CW, Prediger J, McEvoy JM. 2015. North American tree squirrels and ground squirrels with overlapping ranges host different Cryptosporidium species and genotypes. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 36, 287–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Stensvold CR, Larsen TG, Grüttner J, Nielsen L, Engberg J, Lebbad M. 2024. Rodent-adapted infection in humans: Seven new cases and review of the literature. One Health, 18, 100682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sturdee AP, Chalmers RM, Bull SA. 1999. Detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in wild mammals of mainland Britain. Veterinary Parasitology, 80(4), 273–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sulaiman IM, Fayer R, Bern C, Gilman RH, Trout JM, Schantz PM, Das P, Lal AA, Xiao L. 2003. Triosephosphate isomerase gene characterization and potential zoonotic transmission of Giardia duodenalis. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 9(11), 1444–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Treml F, Pikula J, Bandouchova H, Horakova J. 2007. European brown hare as a potential source of zoonotic agents. Veterinarni Medicina, 52(10), 451–456. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tůmová L, Ježková J, Prediger J, Holubová N, Sak B, Konečný R, Květoňová D, Hlásková L, Rost M, McEvoy J, Xiao L, Santín M, Kváč M. 2023. Cryptosporidium mortiferum n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae), the species causing lethal cryptosporidiosis in Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris). Parasites & Vectors, 16(1), 235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wolk DM, Schneider SK, Wengenack NL, Sloan LM, Rosenblatt JE. 2002. Real-time PCR method for detection of Encephalitozoon intestinalis from stool specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 40(11), 3922–3928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Xiao L, Li L, Moura H, Sulaiman I, Lal AA, Gatti S, Scaglia M, Didier ES, Visvesvara GS. 2001. Genotyping Encephalitozoon hellem isolates by analysis of the polar tube protein gene. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 39(6), 2191–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Xiao L, Escalante L, Yang C, Sulaiman I, Escalante AA, Montali RJ, Fayer R, Lal AA.1999. Phylogenetic analysis of Cryptosporidium parasites based on the small-subunit rRNA gene locus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65(4), 1578–1583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 63.Zhao W, Zhang W, Yang Z, Liu A, Zhang L, Yang F, Wang R, Ling H. 2015. Genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in farmed blue foxes (Alopex lagopus) and raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in China. PLoS One, 10(11), e0142611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ziętek J, Adaszek Ł, Dzięgiel B, Kalinowski M, Bartnicki M, Kalinowska A, Jarosz Ł, Winiarczyk S. 2014. Diagnosis of the Encephalitozoonosis cuniculi infections in pet rabbits with neurological symptoms. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 17(17), 361–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

parasite-33-43-s1.zip (25.4KB, zip)

Table S1. Detailed information on sampling localities, the number of samples collected at each locality, and all available metadata for individual animals, including age and origin.

parasite-33-43-s2.pdf (261.6KB, pdf)

Table S2. Primers and probes sequences used for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Encephalitopzoon spp. and Giardia intestinalis.

The supplementary material of this article is available at https://www.parasite-journal.org/10.1051/parasite/2026042/olm.


Articles from Parasite are provided here courtesy of EDP Sciences

RESOURCES