Abstract
External hemipelvectomy is a radical procedure traditionally reserved for advanced malignancy, with its use in trauma being exceedingly rare. We report a 15-year-old female with severe pelvic trauma complicated by a missed external iliac artery occlusion following internal iliac artery embolization, resulting in irreversible limb ischemia and progressive soft-tissue necrosis. Despite fasciotomy, above-knee amputation, and repeated debridement, the infection advanced proximally with recurrent sepsis, ultimately necessitating a life-saving external hemipelvectomy. Reconstruction was achieved using a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap, followed by staged wound management and rehabilitation, leading to complete wound healing. At 28 months of follow-up, the patient was able to ambulate independently with a customized hemipelvic prosthesis. This case highlights a critical diagnostic pitfall in pelvic trauma and demonstrates that timely recognition, multidisciplinary management, and advanced reconstructive strategies can achieve meaningful functional recovery even after radical limb-sacrificing procedures.
Keywords: deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, external hemipelvectomy, limb ischemia, pelvic trauma, traumatic external iliac artery occlusion
Introduction
External hemipelvectomy is a radical, limb-sacrificing procedure traditionally reserved for advanced malignancy, uncontrollable infection, or catastrophic musculoskeletal destruction when limb salvage is no longer feasible (1–4). Its application in trauma settings is exceedingly rare (5), and typically represents a last-resort, life-saving intervention (4, 6).
In trauma settings, high-energy pelvic injuries may involve multisystem compromise, complex musculoskeletal disruption, and major vascular injury (7, 8). However, arterial injuries may be overlooked during initial resuscitation when hemodynamic instability limits comprehensive assessment (9, 10). Missed external iliac artery occlusion can rapidly progress to irreversible limb ischemia, extensive soft-tissue necrosis, and systemic deterioration (7, 11, 12), ultimately forcing the need for external hemipelvectomy as the only viable life-saving option (5, 13, 14).
Given the rarity of trauma-related external hemipelvectomy, its indications, surgical considerations, and functional outcomes remain poorly characterized. This case report describes a young patient who underwent life-saving external hemipelvectomy following missed external iliac artery occlusion after pelvic trauma and highlights a critical diagnostic pitfall as well as the potential for meaningful functional recovery through multidisciplinary management.
Case presentation
A 15-year-old, otherwise healthy female passenger on a motorcycle was involved in a collision with a car and was thrown onto another vehicle's roof. On arrival of the emergency room, she presented in profound hypovolemic shock with a heart rate of 158 bpm, unmeasurable blood pressure, and tachypnea (respiratory rate 30 breaths/min). Her Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was 9 (E2V2M5). Massive transfusion protocol was immediately initiated for resuscitation. Whole-body computed tomography (CT) scan revealed complex pelvic fractures involving the left sacral ala, right acetabulum, and bilateral ischium (Figure 1A), accompanied by pubic symphysis diastasis and a large retroperitoneal hematoma. There was contrast extravasation along the left pelvic sidewall, consistent with active arterial bleeding (Figure 1B). Retrospective review of the initial trauma CT angiography demonstrated complete occlusion of the left external iliac artery. However, this finding was not recognized during the initial assessment because clinical attention was primarily directed toward hemorrhage control and management of hemodynamic instability. Although gross limb perfusion was not initially recognized as compromised, a detailed vascular examination of the left lower extremity, including pulse assessment and Doppler ultrasonography, was not fully documented during the initial assessment.
Figure 1.
Initial contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan (A,B), transarterial embolization and subsequent emergent computed tomography angiography (C,D). (A) Bone window of the scan. The yellow arrowhead indicates a left pubic ramus fracture. The yellow arrow indicates a right acetabular fracture. (B) The white arrow indicates contrast extravasation from the left pelvic wall. The white asterisk marks the normal right external iliac artery and vein. The white arrowheads indicate a compromised left external iliac artery. (C) Angiography showing labeled vessels: common iliac artery (CIA), IIA and EIA. The yellow arrow indicates contrast extravasation. The yellow arrowhead indicates the initially neglected obstructed left external iliac artery. (D) The white arrowhead indicates a completely obstructed left external iliac artery.
The patient underwent emergent angiography, which confirmed hemorrhage from the left internal iliac artery (IIA). Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) of the left IIA was successfully performed to stabilize hemodynamics (Figure 1C), and she was transferred to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for postoperative monitoring. However, during reassessment approximately 8 h after the initial trauma CT examination, the patient's left lower extremity was noted to be cold and pulseless. Emergent CT angiography demonstrated complete occlusion of the left external iliac artery (EIA) (Figure 1D). A cardiovascular surgeon was consulted, and the estimated warm ischemia time was approximately 8.5 h, calculated from the time of the initial trauma CT examination to the time of cardiovascular surgical consultation as a conservative estimation. Given the prolonged ischemic duration and clinical evidence of irreversible limb ischemia, the limb was retrospectively classified as Rutherford category III acute limb ischemia, and revascularization was considered contraindicated. Surgical thrombectomy and bypass reconstruction were discussed but ultimately not pursued because restoration of blood flow was considered unlikely to salvage the limb and carried a substantial risk of severe reperfusion syndrome, potentially resulting in life-threatening systemic complications.
Despite aggressive supportive care, the patient developed rapidly progressive ischemic necrosis accompanied by severe sepsis, manifested by persistent hypotension, tachycardia, fever, lactic acidosis, leukocytosis and bandemia. Even fasciotomy and above-knee amputation couldn't avoid ischemic and infectious process extending proximally, leading to recurrent sepsis. A damage-control hip disarticulation was subsequently performed but failed to achieve viable margins. Given the extensive ischemic necrosis, uncontrolled necrotizing infection, and ongoing hemodynamic instability, definitive source control was considered necessary. After multidisciplinary discussion and detailed communication with the patient's family regarding the patient's young age and the possibility of meaningful functional recovery, aggressive treatment was pursued, and a life-saving left external hemipelvectomy was ultimately performed on post-injury day (PID) 24. Intraoperatively, extensive necrosis of the pelvic soft tissues was noted, with involvement of the gluteal maximus, gluteal medius, sciatic nerve, and lumbar nerve roots. A large purulent collection extending from the perineal region to the paraspinal space was also identified. The affected hemipelvis was resected en bloc (Supplementary Figure 1), and the left common iliac vessels were ligated. The wound was packed with wet dressings and left open for further wound management.
After hemipelvectomy, the wound was cared by serial debridement and negative pressure wound therapy with continuous irrigation. After the infection subsided, plastic surgeon performed extensive debridement and transposition of a pedicled deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) propeller flap on PID 59 for pelvic wound coverage. Preoperative CTA perforator mapping and intraoperative hand-held Doppler ultrasonography was used to assess perforator patency and identify three suitable left periumbilical perforators, and the largest one was chosen to faciliate the propeller rotation. A pedicled left DIEP flap measuring approximately 35 × 10 cm, based on the left rectus abdominis vascular territory, was elevated and rotated counterclockwise by approximately 120° to cover the pelvic defect while preserving pedicle perfusion. However, partial necrosis of the distal flap (at Hartrampf's Zones of Perfusion IV) developed, and it was successfully managed through local debridement and split-thickness skin grafts (Figure 2, Supplementary Video 1).
Figure 2.

Reconstruction of the wound of external hemipelvectomy. (A) Preoperative skin marking for flap design. Left periumbilical perforator (red dot) was used as pivot point with counter-clockwise propeller rotation (Supplementary Video 1). The white arrows indicate the direction of flap rotation. (B) Pedicled DIEP propeller flap after rotation. (C) Partial necrosis of the distal portion of the flap. (D) Wound condition after local debridement and split-thickness skin grafting.
Follow-up and outcomes
By PID 131, the pelvic wound had achieved complete epithelialization, and the patient was discharged. She subsequently underwent a comprehensive rehabilitation program focusing on core strengthening and prosthetic training. At the latest outpatient follow-up (post-injury 28 months), the patient demonstrated independent, full weight-bearing ambulation using a customized hemipelvic prosthesis, requiring no assistive devices (Figure 3, Supplementary Video 2). The clinical progression and therapeutic interventions are summarized in the timeline presented in Table 1.
Figure 3.

Wound condition at discharge and subsequent rehabilitation. (A) Complete epithelialization of the wound at the time of discharge. (B) Functional rehabilitation with a customized hemipelvic prosthesis (Supplementary Video 2).
Table 1.
Timeline of clinical events
| Time | Event |
|---|---|
| PID 0 | Traffic accident with pelvic fracture and retroperitoneal bleeding. |
| PID 0, 3 h after initial CT scan | TAE to IIA |
| PID 0, 8 h after initial CT scan | Left lower limb pulseless and cold. CTA found completely obstructed left external iliac artery |
| PID 0, 8.5 h after initial CT scan | Cardiovascular surgeon consultation, revascularization not pursued. Emergent fasciotomy |
| PID 3 | Above-knee amputation |
| PID 5 | Stump revision and debridement |
| PID 8 | Stump revision and debridement |
| PID 10 | Stump revision and debridement |
| PID 12 | Stump revision and debridement |
| PID 15 | Disarticulation of left hip |
| PID 24 | External hemipelvectomy |
| PID 30 | Debridement |
| PID 33 | Debridement |
| PID 39 | Debridement |
| PID 44 | Debridement |
| PID 59 | Debridement with pedicled DIEP propeller flap |
| PID 64 | Partial necrosis of the distal portion of the flap, debridement |
| PID 72 | Debridement |
| PID 80 | Debridement |
| PID 92 | Split-thickness skin graft for wound coverage |
| PID 131 | Discharge |
Discussion
External hemipelvectomy is an uncommon and radical operation performed predominantly in the management of advanced pelvic malignancies when limb preservation is no longer feasible (4, 15). Its use in trauma is exceedingly rare, and only isolated reports describe its role as a life-saving procedure in severe musculoskeletal destruction or overwhelming infection (5, 13). External hemipelvectomy is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Reported perioperative mortality rates (in-hospital) range from approximately 5% to 8.8% in some series (4, 16–18), underscoring the severe underlying conditions that typically necessitate this operation.
The reported incidence of missed injuries in trauma patients ranges widely from 0.6% to 39% (19). Vascular injuries remain challenging to detect during early resuscitation, particularly in profoundly unstable patients (19, 20). In such situations, priority is directed toward hemorrhage control, and distal perfusion may not be immediately reassessed. External iliac artery occlusion is uncommon and can be easily overlooked (10, 14, 21), especially when initial interventions temporarily stabilize hemodynamics. However, delayed recognition can lead to irreversible ischemia, rapid extension of soft-tissue necrosis, and systemic deterioration (14, 21). In our case, the external iliac artery occlusion was likely caused by traumatic thrombosis or intimal injury associated with pelvic ring disruption. While the pelvic collateral circulation is generally robust (22, 23), the combination of internal iliac artery embolization and external iliac artery occlusion created a watershed area of profound ischemia involving the gluteal muscles and the hip joint envelope. In this situation, hemipelvectomy became the only viable option to achieve surgical margins with bleeding, viable tissue (14).
Reconstruction following external hemipelvectomy poses significant challenges due to the magnitude of soft-tissue defects and high risk of contamination (2, 18, 24, 25). Unlike in elective tumor resections, a major reconstructive challenge in trauma cases is the unavailability of the “fillet flap” from the lower extremity (24–28), as the limb is often already compromised, as seen in this patient. Given the complete destruction of the ipsilateral external and internal iliac arteries, the local vascular environment was severely compromised, leaving no suitable recipient vessels for microvascular anastomosis. As a result, conventional free flap reconstruction was not feasible. Instead, a pedicled DIEP propeller flap was utilized, which allowed soft-tissue coverage without the need for microvascular anastomosis to the damaged pelvic vessels, thereby effectively bypassing the vascular limitation.
Although perfusion of the left deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) would be expected to be compromised due to external iliac artery occlusion, collateral flow from the superior epigastric artery may have helped maintain perfusion (29). This is also the reason we used propeller design and did not completely skeletonized the DIEA. This decision was critical not only for ensuring flap survival in a devascularized bed but also for providing the durable, bulky soft-tissue envelope required for prosthetic fitting (30). According to Hartrampf's perfusion zones, Zone IV represents the region farthest from the dominant perforators and is therefore most vulnerable to ischemia (31, 32). In this case, flap survival was likely supported by collateral retrograde inflow through the superior epigastric circulation despite complete interruption of the ipsilateral iliac inflow. The distal flap necrosis observed in Zone IV further supports this vascular pattern.
Despite the successful life-saving outcome and functional recovery observed in this case, several limitations must be acknowledged. As a single-patient case report, the clinical findings and the specific success of the pedicled DIEP propeller flap reconstruction may not be directly generalizable to all patients. Furthermore, although the patient achieved independent ambulation with a prosthesis at the latest follow-up, the long-term durability of the soft tissue reconstruction and the potential for late-onset prosthetic complications require extended clinical observation. Finally, the specific watershed ischemia caused by the combination of internal iliac artery embolization and neglected external iliac artery occlusion represents a rare and complex clinical scenario, which may limit the applicability of this specific surgical strategy to patients with different patterns of vascular injury.
Historically, a significant proportion of patients undergoing external hemipelvectomy remain permanently wheelchair-dependent for daily mobility (6, 16). However, this case illustrates that independent ambulation remains an attainable goal. The durable soft tissue coverage provided by the reconstruction created a stable interface for the prosthesis, allowing the patient to regain full weight-bearing capacity. This confirms that while hemipelvectomy is a radical procedure, effective reconstruction combined with rehabilitation can still yield an acceptable functional outcome.
Patient perspective
The patient reported that although the initial injury and subsequent surgeries were physically and emotionally challenging, she gradually adapted to her condition through rehabilitation. She expressed satisfaction with the surgical outcome, particularly her ability to regain independent ambulation with a prosthesis.
Conclusion
External hemipelvectomy serves as a formidable but necessary life-saving intervention when damage control amputation fails to arrest progressive sepsis. This case highlights a critical diagnostic pitfall in pelvic trauma: the combination of internal iliac artery embolization and an unrecognized external iliac artery occlusion may create a profound pelvic ischemic zone. Ultimately, while hemipelvectomy is a radical procedure often associated with permanent disability, this report demonstrates that decisive surgical management followed by robust orthoplastic reconstruction can provide a durable stump. Even in such catastrophic scenarios, an acceptable functional outcome with independent ambulation remains an attainable goal.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the colleagues in the Department of Orthopedics and Department of Plastic & Aesthetic Surgery at Far Eastern Memorial Hospital for their valuable discussions and contributions to the management of this patient. We also sincerely acknowledge the Department of Rehabilitation for their involvement in the patient's postoperative rehabilitation.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Footnotes
Edited by: Ovunc Akdemir, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Istanbul Aydın University, Türkiye
Reviewed by: Atilla Adnan Eyuboglu, Istanbul Arel University, Türkiye
Mehmet Sefik Oruc, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Istanbul Aydın University, Türkiye
Johann Müller, Universidade Estadual da Londrina Hospital Universitario da UEL, Brazil
Abbreviations CIA, common iliac artery; CT, computed tomography; DIEA, deep inferior epigastric artery; DIEP flap, deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap; EMT, emergency medical technician; EIA, external iliac artery; GCS, glasgow coma scale; ICU, intensive care unit; IIA, internal iliac artery; PID, post-injury day; TAE, transcatheter arterial embolization.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Far Eastern Memorial Hospital Research Ethics Review Committee, Approval No.: FEMH No.: 114254-C. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the minor(s)' legal guardian/next of kin for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
NW: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DC: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. YC: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. The authors used a generative AI tool (ChatGPT, OpenAI) solely for language editing and grammar improvement. No AI tools were used for data analysis, interpretation, or generation of scientific content. All authors take full responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1878507/full#supplementary-material
The resected hemipelvis and necrotic tissue.
Intraoperative demonstration of pedicled deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) propeller flap rotation and inset for coverage of the left pelvic defect.
Post-rehabilitation functional outcome showing stair ambulation using a customized hemipelvic prosthesis.
References
- 1.Karakousis CP, Emrich LJ, Driscoll DL. Variants of hemipelvectomy and their complications. Am J Surg. (1989) 158(5):404–8. 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90273-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Karaca MO, Ozbek EA, Ozyildiran M, Merter A, Basarir K, Yildiz HY, et al. External and internal hemipelvectomy: a retrospective analysis of 68 cases. Jt Dis Relat Surg. (2022) 33(1):132–41. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mayerson JL, Wooldridge AN, Scharschmidt TJ. Pelvic resection: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. (2014) 22(4):214–22. 10.5435/JAAOS-22-04-214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guder WK, Hardes J, Gosheger G, Henrichs MP, Nottrott M, Streitburger A. Analysis of surgical and oncological outcome in internal and external hemipelvectomy in 34 patients above the age of 65 years at a mean follow-up of 56 months. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2015) 16:33. 10.1186/s12891-015-0494-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kołodziejski L, Duber J, Pomykacz P, Komorowski AL. External hemipelvectomy: a last resort operation. Nowotwory Journal of Oncology. (2023) 73(2):81–4. 10.5603/NJO.a2023.0014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ramos Pascua LR, Casas Ramos P, De la Cruz Gutierrez L, Negri ME, Vilar Gonzalez E, Cordova Peralta JC, et al. External hemipelvectomy in soft tissue sarcomas: are they still needed? Cancers (Basel). (2024) 16(22):3828. 10.3390/cancers16223828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Aoki R, Nakajima K, Kobayashi Y, Sakai Y, Kamide H, Yamamoto T, et al. Common and uncommon vascular injuries and endovascular treatment associated with pelvic blunt trauma: a real-world experience. Jpn J Radiol. (2023) 41(3):258–65. 10.1007/s11604-022-01355-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Coccolini F, Stahel PF, Montori G, Biffl W, Horer TM, Catena F, et al. Pelvic trauma: wSES classification and guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. (2017) 12:5. 10.1186/s13017-017-0117-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Harris DG, Drucker CB, Brenner ML, Narayan M, Sarkar R, Scalea TM, et al. Management and outcomes of blunt common and external iliac arterial injuries. J Vasc Surg. (2014) 59(1):180–5. 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang S, Sheng H, Xu B, Lao Y. Acute external iliac artery thrombosis following pelvic fractures: two case reports. Medicine (Baltimore). (2021) 100(6):e24710. 10.1097/MD.0000000000024710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.de Castro-Santos G. The semantics of acute limb ischemia. J Vasc Bras. (2023) 22:e20210145. 10.1590/1677-5449.202101451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Galyfos G, Chamzin A, Intzes N, Matthaiou G, Spiliotopoulos S, Sotirakis D, et al. Acute limb ischemia. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). (2023) 64(4):396–405. 10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12536-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hernandez J, Rosenthal AA. Hemipelvectomy as a salvage procedure in massive pelvic trauma. Am Surg. (2022) 88(7):1568–9. 10.1177/00031348221084939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pascarella R, Del Torto M, Politano R, Commessatti M, Fantasia R, Maresca A. Critical review of pelvic fractures associated with external iliac artery lesion: a series of six cases. Injury. (2014) 45(2):374–8. 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Banskota N, Yang H, Fang X, Yuan D, Zhang W, Duan H. Comparative study of pelvic sarcoma patients undergoing internal and external hemipelvectomy: a meta-analysis study. Front Surg. (2022) 9:988331. 10.3389/fsurg.2022.988331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Apffelstaedt JP, Driscoll DL, Spellman JE, Velez AF, Gibbs JF, Karakousis CP. Complications and outcome of external hemipelvectomy in the management of pelvic tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. (1996) 3(3):304–9. 10.1007/BF02306287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Apffelstaedt JP, Zhang PJ, Driscoll DL, Karakousis CP. Various types of hemipelvectomy for soft tissue sarcomas: complications, survival and prognostic factors. Surg Oncol. (1995) 4(4):217–22. 10.1016/s0960-7404(10)80038-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Senchenkov A, Moran SL, Petty PM, Knoetgen J, Clay RP, Bite U, et al. Predictors of complications and outcomes of external hemipelvectomy wounds: account of 160 consecutive cases. Ann Surg Oncol. (2008) 15(1):355–63. 10.1245/s10434-007-9672-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pfeifer R, Pape HC. Missed injuries in trauma patients: a literature review. Patient Saf Surg. (2008) 2:20. 10.1186/1754-9493-2-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Perry MO. Complications of missed arterial injuries. J Vasc Surg. (1993) 17(2):399–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ahn J, Kim JW. External iliac artery injury with posterior pelvic ring injury in Korea: two case reports. J Trauma Inj. (2023) 36(2):137–41. 10.20408/jti.2022.0046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chait A, Moltz A, Nelson JH, Jr. The collateral arterial circulation in the pelvis. An angiographic study. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. (1968) 102(2):392–400. 10.2214/ajr.102.2.392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Usui R, Kondo H. Transcatheter arterial embolization for hemorrhagic pelvic fracture: review article. Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama). (2024) 9(3):156–63. 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2023-0015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mat Saad AZ, Halim AS, Faisham WI, Azman WS, Zulmi W. Soft tissue reconstruction following hemipelvectomy: eight-year experience and literature review. ScientificWorldJournal. (2012) 2012:702904. 10.1100/2012/702904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Senchenkov A, Moran SL, Petty PM, Knoetgen J, Tran NV, Clay RP, et al. Soft-tissue reconstruction of external hemipelvectomy defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. (2009) 124(1):144–55. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a80557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kuntscher MV, Erdmann D, Homann HH, Steinau HU, Levin SL, Germann G. The concept of fillet flaps: classification, indications, and analysis of their clinical value. Plast Reconstr Surg. (2001) 108(4):885–96. 10.1097/00006534-200109150-00011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kreutz-Rodrigues L, Mohan AT, Moran SL, Carlsen BT, Mardini S, Houdek MT, et al. Extremity free fillet flap for reconstruction of massive oncologic resection-surgical technique and outcomes. J Surg Oncol. (2020) 121(3):465–73. 10.1002/jso.25795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Foglio AM, McNamara CT, Lindeque BG, Greyson MA. Technical strategies for harvest of the subtotal pedicled fillet of thigh flap for reconstruction of external hemipelvectomy and hemicorporectomy defects. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. (2023) 11(6):e4993. 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Boyd JB, Taylor GI, Corlett R. The vascular territories of the superior epigastric and the deep inferior epigastric systems. Plast Reconstr Surg. (1984) 73(1):1–16. 10.1097/00006534-198401000-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wenny R, Schmidt M, Zaussinger M, Zucal I, Duscher D, Huemer GM. Microvascular free flaps from the lower abdomen for preservation of amputation length in the lower extremity. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. (2021) 78(3):283–90. 10.3233/CH-211112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Eric M, Ravnik D, Zic R, Dragnic N, Krivokuca D, Leksan I, et al. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: an anatomical study of the perforators and local vascular differences. Microsurgery. (2012) 32(1):43–9. 10.1002/micr.20944 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Holm C. Perfusion zones of the DIEP flap revisited: a clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. (2006) 118(4):1077. 10.1097/01.prs.0000233604.86936.e8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
The resected hemipelvis and necrotic tissue.
Intraoperative demonstration of pedicled deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) propeller flap rotation and inset for coverage of the left pelvic defect.
Post-rehabilitation functional outcome showing stair ambulation using a customized hemipelvic prosthesis.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

