Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1980 Sep;192(3):325–337. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198009000-00008

Long-term Results of Emergency Portacaval Shunt for Bleeding Esophageal Varices in Unselected Patients with Alcoholic Cirrhosis

Marshall J Orloff, Richard H Bell Jr, Paul V Hyde, William P Skivolocki
PMCID: PMC1344911  PMID: 6968181

Abstract

A prospective evaluation of emergency protacaval shunt has been conducted in 180 unselected, consecutive patients with cirrhosis and bleeding varices who were operated on between 1963 and 1978. An extensive diagnostic work-up was completed within three to seven hours of admission to the emergency department, and the shunt operation was undertaken within a mean of 7.81 hours. A program of lifelong follow-up was conducted such that the current status of 97% of the patients is known. On each patient, 220 categories of data were collected and entered into a computer program for analysis. On admission, 49% of the patients had jaundice, 53% had ascites, 19% had encephalopathy, 30% had severe muscle wasting and 100% had abnormal BSP retention. Administration of a bolus dose of vasopressin by the systemic intravenous route temporarily controlled the varix hemorrhage in 95% of patients, and emergency shunt permanently controlled the bleeding in 98%. Maximum perfusion pressure in the portal vein prior to shunt did not correlate with survival rate or incidence of encephalopathy after shunt. The operative survival rate was 58%, the five-year actuarial survival rate is 38% and the 12-year actuarial survival rate is 30%. Encephalopathy was observed in 31.5% of the patients, but was severe enough to require chronic dietary protein restriction in only 7%. The portacaval shunt remained patent in 99% of patients. Of the survivors, 48% abstained from alcohol, 60% resumed gainful employment or housekeeping, and two-thirds were judged to be in excellent or good condition after one and five years. Preoperative factors that adversely influenced survival rate were ascites, SGOT ≥ 100 units, BSP retention >50%, hypokalemic alkalosis, blood transfusion requirement ≥ 5 L, and consumption of alcohol within seven day[unk] of admission. In comparison with our previous prospective studies, emergency portacaval shunt produced a significantly ġreater long-term survival rate than either emergency medical therapy or emergency varix ligation, followed by elective shunt. During the past four years, 80% of 49 unselected patients have survived emergency shunt, and the four year actuarial survival rate is 69%.

Full text

PDF
325

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ATIK M., SIMEONE F. A. Massive gastrointestinal bleeding; study of two hundred ninety-six patients at City Hospital of Cleveland. AMA Arch Surg. 1954 Sep;69(3):355–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burchell A. R., Moreno A. H., Panke W. F., Nealon T. F., Jr Hemodynamic variables and prognosis following portacaval shunts. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974 Mar;138(3):359–369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burchell A. R., Moreno A. H., Panke W. F., Nealon T. F., Jr Hepatic artery flow improvement after portacaval shunt: a single hemodynamic clinical correlate. Ann Surg. 1976 Sep;184(3):289–302. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197609000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CUTLER S. J., EDERER F. Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis. 1958 Dec;8(6):699–712. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charters A. C., 3rd, Brown B. N., Sviolka S. C., Knox D. G., Orloff M. J. The influence of portal perfusion on the response to portacaval shunt. Am J Surg. 1975 Aug;130(2):226–232. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(75)90375-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Charters A. C., 3rd, Chandler J. G., Condon J. K., Grambort D. E., Levin S. E., Modafferi T. R., Orloff M. J. Spontaneous reversal of portal flow in patients with bleeding varices treated by emergency portacaval shunt. Am J Surg. 1974 Jan;127(1):25–29. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(74)90006-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GARCEAU A. J., CHALMERS T. C. The natural history of cirrhosis. I. Survival with esophageal varices. N Engl J Med. 1963 Feb 28;268:469–473. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196302282680905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jackson F. C., Perrin E. B., Smith A. G., Dagradi A. E., Nadal H. M. A clinical investigation of the portacaval shunt. II. Survival analysis of the prophylactic operation. Am J Surg. 1968 Jan;115(1):22–42. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(68)90127-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MERIGAN T. C., Jr, HOLLISTER R. M., GRYSKA P. F., STARKEY G. W., DAVIDSON C. S. Gastrointestinal bleeding with cirrhosis. A study of 172 episodes in 158 patients. N Engl J Med. 1960 Sep 22;263:579–585. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196009222631203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mikkelsen W. P. Therapeutic portacaval shunt. Preliminary data on controlled trial and morbid effects of acute hyaline necrosis. Arch Surg. 1974 Mar;108(3):302–305. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1974.01350270036007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Moreno A. H., Burchell A. R., Reddy R. V., Panke W. F., Nealon T. F., Jr The hemodynamics of portal hypertension revisited: determinants and significance of occluded portal pressures. Surgery. 1975 Feb;77(2):167–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. ORLOFF M. J. A comparative study of emergency transesophageal ligation and nonsurgical treatment of bleeding esophageal varices in unselected patients with cirrhosis. Surgery. 1962 Jul;52:103–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Orloff M. J., Charters A. C., 3rd, Chandler J. G., Condon J. K., Grambort D. E., Modafferi T. R., Levin S. E., Brown N. B., Sviokla S. C., Knox D. G. Portacaval shunt as emergency procedure in unselected patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975 Jul;141(1):59–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Orloff M. J., Duguay L. R., Kosta L. D. Criteria for selection of patients for emergency portacaval shunt. Am J Surg. 1977 Jul;134(1):146–152. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90298-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Orloff M. J. Emergency portacaval shunt: a comparative study of shunt, varix ligation and nonsurgical treatment of bleeding esophageal varices in unselected patients with cirrhosis. Ann Surg. 1967 Sep;166(3):456–478. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196709000-00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Price J. B., Jr, Voorhees A. B., Jr, Britton R. C. Operative hemodynamic studies in portal hypertension. Significance and limitations. Arch Surg. 1967 Nov;95(5):843–852. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1967.01330170151019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Resnick R. H., Chalmers T. C., Ishihara A. M., Garceau A. J., Callow A. D., Schimmel E. M., O'Hara E. T. A controlled study of the prophylactic portacaval shunt. A final report. Ann Intern Med. 1969 Apr;70(4):675–688. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-70-4-675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Resnick R. H., Iber F. L., Ishihara A. M., Chalmers T. C., Zimmerman H. A controlled study of the therapeutic portacaval shunt. Gastroenterology. 1974 Nov;67(5):843–857. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith G. W. Use of hemodynamic selection criteria in the management of cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. Ann Surg. 1974 May;179(5):782–790. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197405000-00034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES