Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1980 Sep;192(3):356–364. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198009000-00011

Prophylactic antibiotics in vascular surgery. Topical, systemic, or both?

H A Pitt, R G Postier, A W MacGowan, L W Frank, A J Surmak, J V Sitzman, D Bouchier-Hayes
PMCID: PMC1344917  PMID: 6998390

Abstract

A prospective, randomized, blinded study was performed to determine whether prophylactic antibiotics would reduce the incidence of infection in peripheral vascular surgery and whether the route of antibiotic administration was important. Patients undergoing a vascular procedure with a groin incision were allocated to one of four groups with respect to prophylactic antibiotics. Group I received no antibiotic. Group II had topical cephradine instilled in their incisions prior to closure. Group III received a 24-hour perioperative course of intravenous cephradine, and Group IV received both topical and intravenous cephradine. Groin and abdominal incisional infections were significantly reduced (p < 0.01) among patients who received prophylactic antibiotics by either the topical, systemic, or combined routes of administration. No significant differences were noted among the three antibiotic groups. Profundoplasty, femoral embolectomy, and femoral aneurysm repair were each associated with an increased incidence of infection (p < 0.01). Other risk factors were only important in patients not receiving antibiotics. Either intraoperative topical antibiotics or perioperative systemic antibiotics prevent infection in peripheral vascular surgery, but antibiotic administration by both routes is unnecessary.

Full text

PDF
356

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alexander J. W., Alexander N. S. The influence of route of administration on wound fluid concentration of prophylactic antibiotics. J Trauma. 1976 Jun;16(6):488–495. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197606000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chodak G. W., Plaut M. E. Use of systemic antibiotics for prophylaxis in surgery: a critical review. Arch Surg. 1977 Mar;112(3):326–334. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1977.01370030098018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Christenson J., Eklöf B. Synthetic arterial grafts. II. infection complications. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977;11(1):43–50. doi: 10.3109/14017437709167812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cruse P. J., Foord R. A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg. 1973 Aug;107(2):206–210. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1973.01350200078018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davidson A. E., Clark C., Smith G. Postoperative wound infection: a computer analysis. Br J Surg. 1971 May;58(5):333–337. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800580504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DiGiglia J. W., Leonard G. L., Ochsner J. L. Local irrigation with an antibiotic solution in the prevention of infection in vascular prostheses. Surgery. 1970 May;67(5):836–840. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards L. D. The epidemiology of 2056 remote site infections and 1966 surgical wound infections occurring in 1865 patients: a four year study of 40,923 operations at Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Hospital, Chicago. Ann Surg. 1976 Dec;184(6):758–766. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197612000-00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ernst C. B., Campbell H. C., Jr, Daugherty M. E., Sachatello C. R., Griffen W. O., Jr Incidence and significance of intra-operative bacterial cultures during abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy. Ann Surg. 1977 Jun;185(6):626–633. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197706000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Evans C., Pollock A. V., Rosenberg I. L. The reduction of surgical wound infections by topical cephaloridine: a controlled clinical trial. Br J Surg. 1974 Feb;61(2):133–135. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800610215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Evans C., Pollock A. V. The reduction of surgical wound infections by prophylactic parenteral cephaloridine. A controlled clinical trial. Br J Surg. 1973 Jun;60(6):434–437. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800600605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fry W. J., Lindenauer S. M. Infection complicating the use of plastic arterial implants. Arch Surg. 1967 May;94(5):600–609. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1967.01330110016003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldstone J., Moore W. S. Infection in vascular prostheses. Clinical manifestations and surgical management. Am J Surg. 1974 Aug;128(2):225–233. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(74)90097-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Halasz N. A. Wound infection and topical antibiotics: the surgeon's dilemma. Arch Surg. 1977 Oct;112(10):1240–1244. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1977.01370100094021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaiser A. B., Clayson K. R., Mulherin J. L., Jr, Roach A. C., Allen T. R., Edwards W. H., Dale W. A. Antibiotic prophylaxis in vascular surgery. Ann Surg. 1978 Sep;188(3):283–289. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197809000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Keighley M. R., Crapp A. R. Short-term prophylaxis with tobramycin and lincomycin in bowel surgery. Scott Med J. 1976 Apr;21(2):70–72. doi: 10.1177/003693307602100211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liekweg W. G., Jr, Greenfield L. J. Vascular prosthetic infections: collected experience and results of treatment. Surgery. 1977 Mar;81(3):335–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lindenauer S. M., Fry W. J., Schaub G., Wild D. The use of antibiotics in the prevention of vascular graft infections. Surgery. 1967 Sep;62(3):487–492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lord J. W., Rossi G., Daliana M. Intraoperative antibiotic wound lavage: an attempt to eliminate postoperative infection in arterial and clean general surgical procedures. Ann Surg. 1977 Jun;185(6):634–641. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197706000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Malone J. M., Moore W. S., Campagna G., Bean B. Bacteremic infectability of vascular grafts: the influence of pseudointimal integrity and duration of graft function. Surgery. 1975 Aug;78(2):211–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pollock A. V., Evans M. The prophylaxis of surgical wound sepis with cephaloridine-experiences in 2491 general surgical operations and reporting a controlled clinical trial against framycetin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1975;1(3 Suppl):71–83. doi: 10.1093/jac/1.suppl_3.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Richardson R. L., Jr, Pate J. W., Wolf R. Y., Ledes C., Hopson W. B., Jr The outcome of antibiotic-soaked arterial grafts in guinea pig wounds contaminated with E. coli or S. aureus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1970 May;59(5):635–637. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Scherr D. D., Dodd T. A. Brief exposure of bacteria to topical antibiotics. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1973 Jul;137(1):87–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shaw D., Doig C. M., Douglas D. Is airborne infection in operating-theatres an important cause of wound infection in general surgery? Lancet. 1973 Jan 6;1(7793):17–20. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)91225-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stone H. H., Haney B. B., Kolb L. D., Geheber C. E., Hooper C. A. Prophylactic and preventive antibiotic therapy: timing, duration and economics. Ann Surg. 1979 Jun;189(6):691–699. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197906000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Szilagyi D. E., Smith R. F., Elliott J. P., Vrandecic M. P. Infection in arterial reconstruction with synthetic grafts. Ann Surg. 1972 Sep;176(3):321–333. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197209000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES