Skip to main content
Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition logoLink to Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition
editorial
. 2026 Jul 24;15(4):116. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-2026-0609

Protein S-sulfhydration: an emerging regulatory layer with therapeutic potential in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

Mingchang Pang 1, Huayu Yang 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13449737  PMID: 42569299

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has emerged as the most prevalent chronic liver disorder worldwide and represents a key hepatic manifestation of systemic metabolic imbalance (1-3). Driven by excess energy intake, adipocyte dysfunction, and insulin resistance, the prevalence of MASLD continues to rise in parallel with the growing burden of metabolic syndrome, posing a substantial challenge to public health systems (4,5). Characterized by excessive hepatic lipid accumulation, MASLD encompasses a broad disease spectrum ranging from simple steatosis to steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis (6,7). The molecular mechanisms that coordinate hepatic lipid metabolism under fluctuating metabolic and redox conditions remain incompletely understood. In particular, regulatory layers beyond transcriptional control and metabolite availability, including post-translational and redox-sensitive mechanisms, are increasingly appreciated as critical determinants of disease susceptibility and progression (8).

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) provide rapid and reversible means to fine-tune protein function in response to cellular cues, thereby enabling dynamic adaptation of cellular signaling networks to metabolic and environmental changes. Among these, protein S-sulfhydration—a cysteine-based modification mediated by hydrogen sulfide (H2S)—has recently gained attention as a redox-sensitive regulatory mechanism with broad implications for metabolic homeostasis (9,10). Unlike many irreversible oxidative modifications, S-sulfhydration is reversible and context-dependent, allowing it to act as a finely tunable regulatory switch in redox signaling. Accumulating evidence indicates that protein S-sulfhydration modulates enzyme activity, protein-protein interactions, subcellular localization, as well as transcriptional and signaling functions, thereby exerting pleiotropic effects on cellular metabolism (11,12). As the biochemical donor of this modification, H2S is endogenously generated primarily through conserved enzymatic pathways involving cystathionine β-synthase (CBS), cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE), and 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (3-MST), which together constitute the major enzymatic sources of H2S in mammalian cells (13). These enzymes exhibit tissue-specific expression patterns and metabolic regulation, thereby linking sulfur amino acid metabolism to cellular redox status. Importantly, all three enzymes are expressed in the liver, reflecting its central role in systemic H2S homeostasis. As a major hub for sulfur amino acid metabolism, the liver possesses substantial capacity for H2S production and turnover, enabling precise spatial and temporal control of protein S-sulfhydration. Accordingly, the liver serves not only as a target of H2S signaling but also as a key regulatory organ in systemic redox homeostasis. Dysregulation of hepatic H2S metabolism may therefore contribute to metabolic disorders characterized by redox imbalance, including MASLD.

Against this background, emerging evidence identifies disruption of H2S-mediated protein S-sulfhydration as a key pathogenic mechanism linking redox imbalance to hepatic lipid metabolic dysregulation in MASLD. In the liver, H2S signaling suppresses de novo lipogenesis through S-sulfhydration of metabolic and transcriptional regulators such as sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and the nuclear receptor farnesoid X receptor (FXR), leading to inhibition of SREBP-1-driven lipogenic gene expression and attenuation of excessive fatty acid synthesis (14,15). This regulatory axis integrates redox sensing with transcriptional control of lipid metabolism, thereby constraining metabolic overactivation under physiological conditions. In contrast, loss of H2S bioavailability derepresses lipogenic programs, enhances the activity of canonical lipogenic enzymes, and accelerates hepatic lipid accumulation, thereby promoting steatotic transformation. In parallel, H2S-mediated protein S-sulfhydration facilitates hepatic lipid clearance by sustaining autophagic flux and lipophagy, processes essential for lipid droplet turnover and intracellular lipid quality control. Mechanistically, reduced H2S availability impairs ULK1 activation, disrupts autophagosome formation, and compromises lipid droplet degradation, ultimately exacerbating steatotic injury under metabolic stress (16). This highlights autophagy as a key redox-sensitive effector pathway downstream of H2S signaling in hepatic lipid homeostasis. Moreover, disruption of H2S signaling further perturbs hepatic cholesterol homeostasis in metabolic disease states by attenuating Keap1-Nrf2 signaling and downstream LRP1 expression, thereby limiting hepatic clearance of cholesterol-rich lipoproteins and aggravating hepatic lipid burden (9). Collectively, H2S-dependent protein S-sulfhydration functions as an integrative redox-sensitive regulatory network that coordinates lipid synthesis, degradation, and cholesterol handling. By coupling sulfur metabolism to multiple layers of hepatic lipid regulation, this pathway critically shapes hepatic lipid homeostasis, disease susceptibility, and the progression of MASLD, and represents a potential therapeutic target.

Beyond hepatic contexts, protein S-sulfhydration has emerged as a conserved redox-sensitive mechanism regulating lipid metabolic processes across extrahepatic tissues. Although direct evidence in the liver remains limited, accumulating studies in metabolic tissues provide compelling proof-of-concept that protein S-sulfhydration can fine-tune distinct steps of lipid handling in a highly context-dependent manner. In the heart, S-sulfhydration limits fatty acid uptake by modulating vesicle trafficking-dependent membrane localization of the predominant fatty acid transporter CD36, thereby restraining lipid influx and attenuating cardiomyocyte lipotoxic stress (10). Given the evolutionary conservation of vesicular trafficking machinery and lipid transport systems, similar redox-sensitive regulatory mechanisms may operate in hepatocytes to dynamically control fatty acid uptake under metabolic stress. Likewise, protein S-sulfhydration has emerged as an important regulator of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation (FAO), as impaired S-sulfhydration of key β-oxidation enzymes is associated with defective FAO, mitochondrial dysfunction, and heightened metabolic stress in diabetic kidney disease (17). These observations highlight a critical role for sulfur-dependent redox modifications in maintaining mitochondrial metabolic competence across tissues with high energetic demand. In parallel, studies in cardiomyocytes demonstrate that S-sulfhydration restrains triglyceride synthesis by promoting the turnover of key triglyceride-synthesizing enzymes, thereby limiting lipid droplet expansion and preventing excessive intracellular lipid storage (18). Together, the conservation of these regulatory principles across metabolically active tissues supports the concept that protein S-sulfhydration functions as a fundamental redox-sensitive mechanism coordinating lipid uptake, utilization, and storage. Extrapolated to the liver, these findings suggest that analogous S-sulfhydration-dependent pathways may critically influence hepatic lipid homeostasis, and that their disruption could contribute to the multifaceted metabolic disturbances underlying MASLD pathogenesis.

From a translational perspective, therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring H2S-mediated protein S-sulfhydration have attracted increasing attention as potential interventions for lipid metabolic disorders, particularly MASLD. Exogenous H2S donors are the most extensively explored pharmacological tools, yet they differ markedly in kinetics, bioavailability, tissue distribution, and safety. Fast-releasing sulfide salts such as sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS) enable acute S-sulfhydration modulation and are useful for proof-of-concept studies; however, their rapid H2S burst often leads to supraphysiological exposure and dose-dependent toxicity, limiting translational applicability (19). In contrast, slow-releasing donors such as GYY4137 provide sustained and more physiologically relevant H2S delivery, resulting in more stable modulation of redox signaling and conferring metabolic benefits in preclinical models of metabolic dysfunction (20). More recently, mitochondria-targeted H2S donors have further expanded the therapeutic landscape by enabling spatially restricted enhancement of S-sulfhydration within key metabolic organelles, thereby improving efficacy while reducing off-target effects (21).

To date, clinical evaluation of H2S donors has been limited to early-phase studies of compounds such as SG1002 and ATB-346, which have demonstrated modest anti-inflammatory or cytoprotective effects in cardiovascular and inflammatory settings (22,23). However, these studies have not assessed metabolic endpoints, and no clinical trials have specifically investigated their efficacy in MASLD or other lipid metabolic diseases. Consequently, there remains a substantial gap between extensive mechanistic evidence supporting the role of H2S-mediated S-sulfhydration in metabolic regulation and its clinical translation. This gap is further compounded by incomplete understanding of tissue-specific H2S pharmacodynamics, variability in endogenous sulfur metabolism, and the lack of biomarkers to monitor S-sulfhydration in vivo, all of which hinder rational dose optimization and patient stratification. Despite these challenges, the convergence of preclinical metabolic benefits and early clinical safety data suggests that targeting H2S signaling may represent a promising but still largely untapped therapeutic avenue for MASLD.

Collectively, protein S-sulfhydration emerges as a dynamic redox-sensitive regulatory layer that integrates lipid metabolic processes across synthesis, utilization, and storage, thereby maintaining hepatic lipid homeostasis under physiological conditions. In the context of MASLD, disruption of H2S signaling leads to coordinated impairment of multiple metabolic nodes, including lipogenesis, FAO, autophagy-mediated lipid clearance, and cholesterol handling, ultimately promoting hepatic lipid overload and disease progression. Importantly, evidence from extrahepatic metabolic tissues further supports the concept that S-sulfhydration functions as a conserved mechanism linking redox state to lipid metabolic control. Although direct hepatic evidence remains limited, these findings collectively suggest that restoring physiological S-sulfhydration represents a promising strategy to re-establish metabolic balance in MASLD. Future studies are warranted to define liver-specific regulatory targets, improve spatial and temporal control of H2S delivery, and translate these mechanistic insights into clinically viable therapeutic approaches.

Supplementary

The article’s supplementary files as

hbsn-15-04-116-coif.pdf (227.2KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-2026-0609

Acknowledgments

None.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Footnotes

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, HepatoBiliary Surgery and Nutrition. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (No. 32271470), and Peking Union Medical College Hospital Talent Cultivation Program (Category C, No. UBJ10452).

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://hbsn.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/hbsn-2026-0609/coif). H.Y. serves as an unpaid editorial board member of HepatoBiliary Surgery and Nutrition. The other author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Lai P, Miao G, Zhao Y, et al. SR-A3 suppresses AKT activation to protect against MAFLD by inhibiting XIAP-mediated PTEN degradation. Nat Commun 2025;16:2430. 10.1038/s41467-025-57585-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yan Y, Zhang K, Li F, et al. The gut-liver axis links the associations between serum carotenoids and non-alcoholic fatty liver in a 7.8-year prospective study. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2025;14:16-32. 10.21037/hbsn-23-526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Luo L, Ye J, Zhuo S, et al. Specific metabolic impairments indicate loss of sustained liver improvements in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease treatment. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2024;13:632-49. 10.21037/hbsn-23-393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tilg H, Petta S, Stefan N, et al. Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Adults: A Review. JAMA 2026;335:163-74. 10.1001/jama.2025.19615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Steinberg GR, Valvano CM, De Nardo W, et al. Integrative metabolism in MASLD and MASH: Pathophysiology and emerging mechanisms. J Hepatol 2025;83:584-95. 10.1016/j.jhep.2025.02.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Heo JH, Lee MY, Kim SH, et al. Comparative associations of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease with risk of incident chronic kidney disease: a cohort study. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2024;13:801-13. 10.21037/hbsn-23-558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Makary A, Rojo D, Pagès L, et al. Opportunistic case-finding of liver fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) by leveraging integrated care pathways of type 2 diabetes. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2025;14:824-8. 10.21037/hbsn-2025-324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Feng T, Zhang H, Zhou Y, et al. Roles of posttranslational modifications in lipid metabolism and cancer progression. Biomark Res 2024;12:141. 10.1186/s40364-024-00681-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhao S, Song T, Gu Y, et al. Hydrogen Sulfide Alleviates Liver Injury Through the S-Sulfhydrated-Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1/Nuclear Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2/Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 1 Pathway. Hepatology 2021;73:282-302. 10.1002/hep.31247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yu M, Du H, Wang B, et al. Exogenous H(2)S Induces Hrd1 S-sulfhydration and Prevents CD36 Translocation via VAMP3 Ubiquitylation in Diabetic Hearts. Aging Dis 2020;11:286-300. 10.14336/AD.2019.0530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Luo C, Ji D, Li Y, et al. Abnormal nitration and S-sulfhydration modification of Sp1-CSE-H(2)S pathway trap the progress of hyperhomocysteinemia into a vicious cycle. Free Radic Biol Med 2021;164:20-33. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.12.440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhu J, Wang Y, Rivett A, et al. Deficiency of cystathionine gamma-lyase promotes aortic elastolysis and medial degeneration in aged mice. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2022;171:30-44. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2022.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pang M, Chen H, Li S, et al. H2S-mediated protein S-sulfhydration: a novel regulatory module in lipid metabolism. Front Cell Dev Biol 2026;14:1866744. 10.3389/fcell.2026.1866744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dong B, Sun Y, Cheng B, et al. Activating transcription factor (ATF) 6 upregulates cystathionine β synthetase (CBS) expression and hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S) synthesis to ameliorate liver metabolic damage. Eur J Med Res 2023;28:540. 10.1186/s40001-023-01520-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xu W, Cui C, Cui C, et al. Hepatocellular cystathionine γ lyase/hydrogen sulfide attenuates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by activating farnesoid X receptor. Hepatology 2022;76:1794-810. 10.1002/hep.32577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nguyen TTP, Kim DY, Lee YG, et al. SREBP-1c impairs ULK1 sulfhydration-mediated autophagic flux to promote hepatic steatosis in high-fat-diet-fed mice. Mol Cell 2021;81:3820-3832.e7. 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang JX, Chen PP, Li XQ, et al. Deficiency of thiosulfate sulfurtransferase mediates the dysfunction of renal tubular mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation in diabetic kidney disease. Cell Death Differ 2024;31:1636-49. 10.1038/s41418-024-01365-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sun Y, Zhang L, Lu B, et al. Hydrogen sulphide reduced the accumulation of lipid droplets in cardiac tissues of db/db mice via Hrd1 S-sulfhydration. J Cell Mol Med 2021;25:9154-67. 10.1111/jcmm.16781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Szabo C, Papapetropoulos A. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CII: Pharmacological Modulation of H2S Levels: H2S Donors and H2S Biosynthesis Inhibitors. Pharmacol Rev 2017;69:497-564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Magli E, Perissutti E, Santagada V, et al. H(2)S Donors and Their Use in Medicinal Chemistry. Biomolecules 2021;11:1899. 10.3390/biom11121899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Powell CR, Dillon KM, Matson JB. A review of hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S) donors: Chemistry and potential therapeutic applications. Biochem Pharmacol 2018;149:110-23. 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.11.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Glanville JRW, Jalali P, Flint JD, et al. Potent anti-inflammatory effects of an H(2) S-releasing naproxen (ATB-346) in a human model of inflammation. FASEB J 2021;35:e21913. 10.1096/fj.201902918RR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Polhemus DJ, Li Z, Pattillo CB, et al. A novel hydrogen sulfide prodrug, SG1002, promotes hydrogen sulfide and nitric oxide bioavailability in heart failure patients. Cardiovasc Ther 2015;33:216-26. 10.1111/1755-5922.12128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

The article’s supplementary files as

hbsn-15-04-116-coif.pdf (227.2KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-2026-0609

Articles from Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition are provided here courtesy of AME Publications

RESOURCES