Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Jul 27;148(30):31621–31626. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6c01477

Green Ammonia Generation with a Polypyridine Cobalt Complex and Visible Light

Andrea Mantovani ‡, Federico Droghetti ‡, Andreu Tortajada , Lubomír Rulíšek ⧫, Florian Lemken ⧫, Albert Ruggi ¶,*, Mirco Natali ‡,*
PMCID: PMC13449952  PMID: 42557714

Abstract

The use of a first-row transition metal complex and visible light was exploited to promote the photosynthesis of ammonia from nitrite ions. This is achieved in neutral aqueous solution by employing a cobalt polypyridine complex (CoL) within a light-driven catalytic scheme involving [Ru­(bpy)3]2+ (where bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) as the sensitizer and ascorbate as the electron donor. Under visible light irradiation, the resulting photosystem produces NH3 with a quantum yield up to 3% and a selectivity approaching 100%, achieving a maximum turnover number (TON) up to 2150. Transient absorption spectroscopy and density functional theory provided a robust mechanistic picture, showing that binding of the NO2 – substrate occurs at the one-electron reduced metal complex, while also ascertaining the energetic feasibility of subsequent elementary reaction steps. All in all, this work uncovers the great potential of first-row transition metal polypyridine complexes toward the synthesis of chemicals of industrial relevance.


graphic file with name ja6c01477_0006.jpg


Ammonia (NH3) is one of the most important industrial chemicals worldwide, both in terms of production volume and breadth of applications. − Industrial synthesis is, however, dominated by the Haber-Bosch process that still relies on fossil fuels. Decarbonizing NH3 synthesis has thus become a critical challenge. − Recently, the nitrite reduction reaction (NO2 –RR) has emerged as a viable alternative for the production of NH3. − Cobalt complexes (Scheme a) have been employed as molecular catalysts to promote the NO2 –RR from neutral aqueous solutions mainly resulting in the formation of NH3. − However, the investigation of the activity has been solely limited to electrochemical conditions with the catalysts either used as homogeneous species in solution − or immobilized onto solid-state supports. − Notably, to the best of our knowledge, no transposition of this reactivity under light-driven conditions has been documented with only one reported molecular system employed for light-driven generation of NH3 based on a rare-earth element.

1. (a) Structures of Co Complexes Reported for Electrocatalytic NO2 –RR and (b) Structure of CoL and Mechanism of Light-Driven NO2 –RR to NH3 Presented in This Work .

1

a PS = Photosensitizer; ED = Electron Donor.

In recent years, we reported the use of metal complexes bearing the redox-active, hexadentate DBPy-PyA ligand (DBPy-PyA = (1-([2,2′-bipyridin]-6-yl)-N-([2,2′-bipyridin]-6-ylmethyl)-N-(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)­methanamine)) and related derivatives as catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) − and CO2 reduction. − Their great performance mainly stems from the redox-active nature of the ligand and its ability to dissociate under turnover conditions, creating internal proton relays for efficient proton transfer (PT) to the catalytic site, which is pivotal for achieving efficient catalysis. Herein, we show that the cobalt polypyridine complex (CoL) (Scheme b) can be a competent catalyst for selective reduction of NO2 – to NH3 in neutral aqueous solution. Its catalytic activity can also be transposed under light-driven conditions using [Ru­(bpy)3]2+ (where bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) as the photosensitizer (PS) and ascorbate as the electron donor (ED), providing the first example of NH3 photosynthesis from aqueous NO2 – solution using a first-row transition metal complex.

CoL was obtained following a reported protocol, and the spectroscopic properties perfectly match the reported data. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed in a phosphate buffer solution (0.25 M) at pH 7 (Figure a and SI for further details). Under these conditions, a hexacoordinate species, following removal of the monodentate ligand (i.e., a solvent molecule), is expected upon dissolution of CoL. , DFT calculations indeed predict endergonic binding of a seventh ligand at the Co­(II) center. During the cathodic scan, a reduction process can be observed at −1.30 V vs SCE, which can be assigned, for comparison with the CV in acetonitrile, to a formal Co­(II)/Co­(I) electron transfer (ET) step. A current increase is then observed upon further cathodic scan without any apparent observation of clear reduction waves. This can be explained because, at more negative potentials than −1.40 V vs SCE, the expected reduction process, involving a formal Co­(I)/Co(0) step, is presumably coupled with PT to result in HER catalysis. This is indeed anticipated considering the reactivity of CoL in acetonitrile with weak organic acids. During the return scan, a sharp anodic peak is detected at −1.15 V vs SCE. Similar features were found in electrochemical studies in aqueous solutions for related cobalt complexes and attributed to stripping upon reoxidation of the neutral Co(0) complex adsorbed onto the electrode during the cathodic sweep. − This feature disappears at more acidic pH (Figure S6), as Co­(I) protonation inhibits formation (and adsorption) of Co(0). ,

1.

1

(a) CV of 1 mM CoL in 0.25 M phosphate buffer at pH 7 with 0–0.2 M NaNO2 at a scan rate of 0.1 V/s; (b) FEs of NH3 and H2 formation from CPE of 1 mM CoL in 0.25 M phosphate buffer at pH 7 with 0.05 M NaNO2 and control experiments (applied potential of −1.4 V vs SCE).

The electrochemical response of CoL was further assessed in the presence of nitrite to infer its catalytic ability toward the NO2 –RR. Under these conditions, the comparison of the absorption spectra of CoL in 0.25 M phosphate buffer at pH 7 in the presence of NaNO2 (Figure S19) indicates that nitrite does not coordinate to Co­(II). Nevertheless, the addition of NO2 – triggers a current enhancement at the Co­(II)/Co­(I) reduction (Figure a), consistent with nitrite binding at the one-electron reduced species and ensuing catalysis. The current measured slightly increases with the concentration of the substrate leading to an i c/i p ratio up to 17.6 with 0.2 M NaNO2. At fixed NO2 – content, the current increases with decreasing pH and increasing phosphate buffer concentration (Figures S9 and S10), supporting the key role of proton delivery in the catalytic process. ,, Control tests (Figure S11) finally confirm that CoL is necessary to trigger any current enhancement.

Controlled-potential electrolysis (CPE) was performed to determine and quantify the reduction products. The results (Figure b) show that NH3 is formed as virtually the sole reduction product with a faradaic efficiency (FE) of 83%. No NH2OH is detected, while H2 is generated with an FE of only 0.4%. Importantly, when CPE was conducted in the absence of CoL, the FE for NH3 formation drastically decreased to only 16%, whereas the FE for H2 increased to 36% (Figure b). Furthermore, an FE of 28% for NH3 and a parallel FE of 23% for H2 were measured during electrolysis of a catalyst-free solution using the electrode previously employed in the CPE with CoL (unpolished electrode). All of these controls confirm that selective NH3 production requires the presence of CoL and does not originate from heterogeneous species formed on the electrode. Notably, the large FE for NH3 production is in good agreement with the constant current response (Figure S12), supporting the stability of CoL under operation.

We then examined the possibility of extending this reactivity under light-driven conditions. To this purpose, we combined CoL with [Ru­(bpy)3]2+ as the sensitizer and ascorbate as the electron donor. We first started by evaluating the effect of the concentration of CoL under 460 nm irradiation of 0.25 M phosphate buffer solutions at pH 7 containing 0.5 mM [Ru­(bpy)3]2+, 0.1 M ascorbate, and 0.05 M NaNO2. Figure a collects the results in terms of amount of NH3 produced after 23 h of irradiation within a concentration range spanning from 2 μM up to 100 μM CoL. The activity in terms of product formation peaks at intermediate concentrations (Figure a), while the turnover number (TON) maximizes at 2 μM CoL, achieving a remarkable value of 2150 (Figure S15). We next selected a concentration of 25 μM CoL for further assays. Figure b depicts the kinetics of NH3 formation as a function of the irradiation time. Production of NH3 is appreciably linear in time within the first 10 h, and a quantum yield of 3% can be estimated (see SI). NH3 photogeneration then starts slowing down at longer irradiation times and finally reaches a plateau producing up to 43 μmol of NH3 after 72 h. NH3 is produced with nearly 100% selectivity, as no NH2OH is detected via 1H NMR and only 0.1 μmol of H2 is measured by GC after 23 h.

2.

2

(a) Amount of NH3 generated after 23 h of irradiation (LED @460 nm) of 0.25 M phosphate buffer solution (5 mL) at pH 7 containing 0.5 mM [Ru­(bpy)3]­Cl2·6H2O, 0.1 M sodium ascorbate, 0.05 M NaNO2, and 2–100 μM CoL; (b) kinetics of NH3 formation at [CoL] = 25 μM and comparison of the 1H NMR signal associated with NH4 + measured with 0.05 M Na14NO2 or Na15NO2 (inset).

Notably, addition of fresh [Ru­(bpy)3]2+ after 23 h of irradiation fully restores the activity, leading to a cumulative NH3 production of 72 μmol after 46 h of irradiation (Figure S16). These findings confirm catalyst stability and identify degradation of the sensitizer as the main limiting factor. Comparison of the absorption spectra before and after photocatalysis shows a marked attenuation of the MLCT transition of the chromophore (Figure S17), thus corroborating this interpretation.

NH3 photogeneration after 23 h of irradiation is maximized at pH 7 (Table S1) and, at this pH, is only weakly dependent on both NO2 – and phosphate buffer concentrations (Tables S2 and S3). The similar performance recorded at different nitrite loadings is consistent with the modest NO2 – conversion recorded at the plateau (17%), whose value points out how substrate consumption does not represent a limiting factor herein. Control experiments (Table S4) confirm that CoL, [Ru­(bpy)3]2+, and ascorbate are all simultaneously required for the effective generation of NH3. Furthermore, experiments conducted with Na15NO2 show the formation of isotopically labeled 15NH3 (Figure b, inset), thus demonstrating that it unequivocally originates from the reduction of nitrite. As a final remark, the NH3 photoproduct can also be quantitatively separated in the form of NH4Cl salt, devoid of impurities from the photolyzed solution (Figure S18), upon vacuum transfer of the photolyzed mixture into a 3 M HCl aqueous solution, highlighting how the homogeneous approach used herein can also lead to clean and quantitative product capture.

We next performed spectroscopic studies to attain mechanistic insights. Figure a depicts the laser flash photolysis (LFP) experiments conducted on a 0.25 M phosphate buffer solution at pH 7 with [Ru­(bpy)3]2+, ascorbate, and CoL.

3.

3

(a) Transient absorption spectra between 1 and 50 μs measured by LFP (excitation at 532 nm) of an N2-purged 0.25 M phosphate buffer solution at pH 7 containing 70 μM [Ru­(bpy)3]­Cl2·6H2O, 0.1 M sodium ascorbate, and 100 μM CoL and (b) kinetic traces at 700 nm with 0–50 mM NaNO2.

The transient spectrum measured at 1 μs (Figure a, top) features an absorption band at 500 nm which corresponds to the reduced [Ru­(bpy)3]+ species , obtained by reductive quenching of the excited sensitizer with the ascorbate donor. , This absorption progressively decreases in the following 10 μs (Figure a, top), leading to the concomitant formation of a broad transient absorption characteristic of the reduced CoL, ,,− which is identified as a triplet ground state via the Evans method (Figure S24), in agreement with the calculations (Tables S5–S7). , This residual absorption finally decays to the baseline within 50 μs (Figure a, bottom) mainly due to recombination between Co­(I) and the ascorbate radical. , Interestingly, the transient absorption signal at 700 nm, associated with the reduced CoL, undergoes a faster decay in the presence of NaNO2 (Figure b). This evidence can be explained by assuming binding of NO2 – to the formal Co­(I) generated upon ET from [Ru­(bpy)3]+. UV–vis spectroelectrochemistry (SEC) in acetonitrile confirms the abatement of the absorption characteristic of reduced CoL in the presence of 0.05 M TBANO2 (Figure S22), supporting the proposed mechanistic hypothesis. Interestingly, the rate of this reaction increases with NO2 – concentrations for values below 0.01 M, finally reaching a plateau above 0.05 M. Fitting of the observed rate k as a function of [NO2 –] was attempted using an empirical saturation model (Figure S23), which allows one to extract an apparent maximum velocity of 3.5·105 s–1 for nitrite coordination at the reduced CoL under conditions relevant to the photocatalytic assays. The apparent saturation attained at larger NO2 – concentrations corroborates the experimental observation of a light-driven catalytic activity independent of substrate loading in the range of 0.05–0.5 M (Table S3).

DFT-D3//COSMO-RS calculations (see SI for computational details) were finally conducted to propose a catalytic mechanism. A schematic representation, with relevant structures and free energy changes of key chemical steps, is presented in Scheme , while details of structural and energetic parameters are provided in Scheme S1 and Figure S26. As confirmed by LFP, nitrite binding occurs at Co­(I) (+12.4 kcal·mol–1). The complex then evolves through several intermediates, whose formation, implying PT and dehydration steps, is generally thermodynamically favorable (see SI). All these processes ultimately lead to a Co-amino species from which NH3 release can occur. This step is exergonic by −8.0 kcal·mol–1, supporting efficient product release. In contrast, computations predict an endergonic NH2OH release (+8.3 kcal·mol–1), mainly ascribed to favorable H-bonding interactions with a dangling pyridine, corroborating the selective formation of NH3, as experimentally observed.

2. Proposed Catalytic Mechanism for NO2 –RR to NH3 by CoL with Structures of Relevant Intermediates and Free Energy Changes (in kcal·mol–1) Associated with Key Chemical Steps .

2

a See SI for details.

In conclusion, we reported for the first time the integration of molecular catalysis by a first-row transition metal complex and visible light to promote selective conversion of NO2 – into NH3. This is achieved in aqueous solution at neutral pH by combining the cobalt complex CoL with [Ru­(bpy)3]2+ as the photosensitizer and ascorbate as the electron donor. This work underscores the great potential of polypyridine complexes for advancing sustainable synthetic methods relevant to high-value industrial products.

Supplementary Material

ja6c01477_si_001.pdf (2.6MB, pdf)
ja6c01477_si_002.zip (26MB, zip)

Acknowledgments

Marco Carmosino (University of Ferrara) and Ján Tarábek (IOCB, Prague) are gratefully acknowledged for their assistance and helpful discussions. M.N. gratefully acknowledges financial support from the University of Ferrara (FAR 2024). A.R. acknowledges financial support from the Université de Fribourg. F.L. acknowledges funding from the European Union via the MSCA PF program (ID 101209173). F.L. and L.R. acknowledge the support of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (MSMT CR, LUAUS24230), including computational resources provided by the e-INFRA CZ project (ID: 90254).

Glossary

Abbreviations

NO2 –RR

nitrite reduction reaction

HER

hydrogen evolution reaction

PT

proton transfer

ET

electron transfer

PS

photosensitizer

ED

electron donor

CV

cyclic voltammetry

CPE

controlled potential electrolysis

LFP

laser flash photolysis

GC

gas chromatography

SEC

spectroelectrochemistry

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.6c01477.

  • Experimental and computational methodologies, additional electrochemical measurements, additional photochemical studies, additional mechanistic data, and detailed catalytic mechanism (PDF)

  • Computational data: coordinates of all stationary points and their respective energies (ZIP)

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Ghavam S., Vahdati M., Grant Wilson I. A., Styring P.. Sustainable Ammonia Production Processes. Front. Energy Res. 2021;9:580808. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.580808. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bicer Y., Dincer I., Vezina G., Raso F.. Impact, Assessment and Environmental Evaluation of Various Ammonia Production Processes. Environ. Management. 2017;59:842–855. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0831-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mingolla S., Rosa L.. Low-Carbon Ammonia Production is Essential for Resilient and Sustainable Agriculture. Nat. Food. 2025;6:610–621. doi: 10.1038/s43016-025-01125-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mateo D., Sousa A., Zakharzhevskii M., Gascon J.. Challenges and Opportunities for the Photo-(thermal) Synthesis of Ammonia. Green. Chem. 2024;26:1041–1061. doi: 10.1039/D3GC02996D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Soloveichik G.. Electrochemical Synthesis of Ammonia as a Potential Alternative to the Haber-Bosch Process. Nat. Catal. 2019;2:377–380. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0280-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rouwenhorst K. H. R., Engelmann Y., Van’t Veer K., Postma R. S., Bogaerts A., Lefferts L.. Plasma-driven Catalysis: Green Ammonia Synthesis with Intermittent Electricity. Green Chem. 2020;22:6258–6287. doi: 10.1039/D0GC02058C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhao X., Jiang Y., Wang M., Huan Y., Cheng Q., Qian Y., He T., Yan C.. Comprehensive Understanding of the Thriving Electrocatalytic Nitrate/Nitrite Reduction to Ammonia under Ambient Conditions. J. Energy Chem. 2024;92:459–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2023.12.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhu X., Fan X., Lin H., Li S., Zhai Q., Jiang Y., Chen Y.. Highly Efficient Electroenzymatic Cascade Reduction Reaction for the Conversion of Nitrite to Ammonia. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023;13:2300669. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202300669. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Li H., Yan C., Guo H., Shin K., Humphrey S. M., Werth C. J., Henkelman G.. CuxIr1‑x Nanoalloy Catalysts Achieve Near 100% Selectivity for Aqueous Nitrite Reduction to NH3 . ACS Catal. 2020;10:7915–7921. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c01604. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu S., Zhou F., Shen W., Shi W., Shen X., Wang J., Ge M., Wang M., Yuan X., Yan C., Qian T.. Highly Efficient Ammonia Synthesis via Electrochemical Nitrite Reduction Using a Nitrite Reductase-Mimicking Heterostructured Catalyst. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2026;36:e14967. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202514967. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Xu S., Kwon H. Y., Ashley D. C., Chen C. H., Jakubikova E., Smith J. M.. Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonding Facilitates Electrocatalytic Reduction of Nitrite in Aqueous Solutions. Inorg. Chem. 2019;58:9443–9451. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b01274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Partovi S., Xiong Z., Kulesa K. M., Smith J. M.. Electrocatalytic Reduction of Nitrogen Oxyanions with a Redox-Active Cobalt Macrocycle Complex. Inorg. Chem. 2022;61:9034–9039. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Braley S. E., Kwon H. Y., Xu S., Dalton E. Z., Jakubikova E., Smith J. M.. Buffer Assists Electrocatalytic Nitrite Reduction by a Cobalt Macrocycle Complex. Inorg. Chem. 2022;61:12998–13006. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Partovi S., Dalton E. Z., Smith J. M.. Buffer-Induced Electrocatalytic Nitrite Reduction: Impact on Catalytic Rate and Product Selectivity. ACS Catal. 2024;14:7756–7761. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c05583. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guo Y., Stroka J. R., Kandemir B., Dickerson C. E., Bren K. L.. Cobalt Metallopeptide Electrocatalyst for the Selective Reduction of Nitrite to Ammonium. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:16888–16892. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b09612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Taniguchi I., Nakashima N., Matsushita K., Yasukouchi K.. Electrocatalytic Reduction of Nitrate and Nitrite to Hydroxylamine and Ammonia Using Metal Cyclams. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interface Electrochem. 1987;224:199–209. doi: 10.1016/0022-0728(87)85092-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferguson J., Brown J., Richeson D.. Electrocatalytic Nitrite Reduction in Neutral Water with Ni­(II) and Co­(II) Macrocycle Complexes: Catalytic Evaluation and Mechanistic Elucidation. ChemCatChem. 2024;16:e202301168. doi: 10.1002/cctc.202301168. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Verma R. K., Kumari A., Bera A. K., Das A., Pandey D., Ghosh D., Paria S.. Selective Catalytic Conversion of Nitrite to Ammonium by an Oxygen-Tolerant Molecular Cobalt Complex. ACS Catal. 2025;15:12715–12727. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5c03677. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Meng S. L., Zhang C., Ye C., Li J. H., Zhou S., Zhu L., Li X. B., Tung C. H., Wu L. Z.. Cobaloximes: Selective Nitrite Reduction Catalysts for Tandem Ammonia Synthesis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2023;16:1590–1596. doi: 10.1039/D2EE03956G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Braley S. E., Xie J., Losovyj Y., Smith J. M.. Graphite Conjugation of a Macrocyclic Cobalt Complex Enhances Nitrite Electroreduction to Ammonia. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:7203–7208. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c03427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Han J., Sun H., Tian F., Zhang W., Zhang Z., She P., Qin J., Rao H.. Modulating the Coordination Environment of Cobalt Porphyrins for Enhanced Electrochemical Nitrite Reduction to Ammonia. Carbon Energy. 2025;7:e657. doi: 10.1002/cey2.657. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wei Y., Chen L., Shi H., Man W. L., Chen G., Li C., Lau T. C.. A Cobalt Biphenanthroline Complex/Carbon Nanotubes Hybrid as Robust and Efficient Electrocatalyst for Nitrite Reduction to Ammonia. ACS Catal. 2024;14:14012–14020. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c03214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bhimpuria R., Charaf R., Ye K., Thapper A., Sathyan H., Ahlquist M., Hammarström L., Borbas K. E.. A Sm­(II)-Based Catalyst for the Reduction of Dinitrogen, Nitrite, and Nitrate to Ammonia or Urea. Chem. 2025;11:102547. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2025.102547. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lucarini F., Pastore M., Vasylevskyi S., Varisco M., Solari E., Crochet A., Fromm K. M., Zobi F., Ruggi A.. Heptacoordinate CoII Complex: A New Architecture for Photochemical Hydrogen Production. Chem.Eur. J. 2017;23:6768–6771. doi: 10.1002/chem.201701427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lucarini F., Bongni D., Schiel P., Bevini G., Benazzi E., Solari E., Fadaei-Tirani F., Scopelliti R., Marazzi M., Natali M., Pastore M., Ruggi A.. Rationalizing Photo-Triggered Hydrogen Evolution Using Polypyridine Cobalt Complexes: Substituent Effects on Hexadentate Chelating Ligands. ChemSusChem. 2021;14:1874–1885. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202100161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Orlando A., Lucarini F., Benazzi E., Droghetti F., Ruggi A., Natali M.. Rethinking Electronic Effects in Photochemical Hydrogen Evolution Using CuInS2@ZnS Quantum Dots Sensitizers. Molecules. 2022;27:8277. doi: 10.3390/molecules27238277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lucarini F., Fize J., Morozan A., Droghetti F., Solari E., Scopelliti R., Marazzi M., Natali M., Pastore M., Artero V., Ruggi A.. Electro- and Photochemical H2 Generation by Co­(II) Polypyridyl-Based Catalysts Bearing Ortho-Substituted Pyridines. Sustainable Energy Fuels. 2023;7:3384–3394. doi: 10.1039/D3SE00295K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Droghetti F., Amati A., Pascale F., Crochet A., Pastore M., Ruggi A., Natali M.. Catalytic CO2 Reduction with Heptacoordinated Polypyridine Complexes: Switching the Selectivity via Metal Replacement. ChemSusChem. 2024;17:e202300737. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202300737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Droghetti F., Lemken F., Rulíšek L., Ruggi A., Natali M.. Selective and Efficient Light-Driven CO2 Reduction to CO with a Heptacoordinated Polypyridine Iron­(II) Catalyst. ACS Catal. 2024;14:16920–16935. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c04290. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Droghetti F., Villa L., Sartorel A., Dell’Amico L., Ruggi A., Natali M.. Boosting Light-Driven CO2 Conversion into CO by a Polypyridine Iron­(II) Catalyst Using an Organic Sensitizer. ChemSusChem. 2025;18:e202402627. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202402627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Droghetti F., Lemken F., Castellani F., Rulíšek L., Ruggi A., Natali M.. Electronic Effects Drive Selectivity in CO2 Reduction Catalysis by Heptacoordinated Cobalt Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2026;65:12678–12692. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6c01633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Droghetti F., Amati A., Ruggi A., Natali M.. Bioinspired Motifs in Proton and CO2 Reduction with 3d-Metal Polypyridine Complexes. Chem. Commun. 2024;60:658–673. doi: 10.1039/D3CC05156K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lucarini F., Fize J., Morozan A., Marazzi M., Natali M., Pastore M., Artero V., Ruggi A.. Insight into the Mechanism of Photosynthetic H2 Evolution Catalyzed by a Heptacoordinate Cobalt Complex. Sustainable Energy Fuels. 2020;4:589–599. doi: 10.1039/C9SE00434C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schnidrig S., Bachmann C., Müller P., Weder N., Spingler B., Joliat-Wick E., Mosberger M., Windisch J., Alberto R., Probst B.. Structure-Activity and Stability Relationships for Cobalt Polypyridyl-Based Hydrogen-Evolving Catalysts in Water. ChemSusChem. 2017;10:4570–4580. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201701511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tong L., Kopecky A., Zong R., Gagnon K. J., Ahlquist M. S. G., Thummel R. P.. Light-Driven Proton Reduction in Aqueous Medium Catalyzed by a Family of Cobalt Complexes with Tetradentate Polypyridine-Type Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2015;54:7873–7884. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b00915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tong L., Zong R., Thummel R. P.. Visible Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution from Water Catalyzed by a Molecular Cobalt Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:4881–4884. doi: 10.1021/ja501257d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shahaf Y., Slot T. K., Avidan S., Dick J. E., Eisenberg D.. Buffer Effects on Nitrite Reduction Electrocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2025;15:7254–7262. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c07765. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Droghetti F., Lucarini F., Molinari A., Ruggi A., Natali M.. Recent Findings and Future Directions in Photosynthetic Hydrogen Evolution Using Polypyridine Cobalt Complexes. Dalton Trans. 2022;51:10658–10673. doi: 10.1039/D2DT00476C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Khnayzer R. S., Thoi V. S., Nippe M., King A. E., Jurss J. W., El Roz K. A., Long J. R., Chang C. J., Castellano F. N.. Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of Visible-Light Photogeneration of Hydrogen from Water Using Cobalt­(II) Polypyridyl Catalysts. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014;7:1477–1488. doi: 10.1039/C3EE43982H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kelly L. A., Rodgers M. A. J.. Reductive Quenching of Novel Mixed-Ligand Tris­(bipyridyl)­ruthenium­(II) Complexes in Aqueous Solution and Inert Colloidal Suspensions. J. Phys. Chem. 1994;98:6377–6385. doi: 10.1021/j100076a023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Natali M.. Elucidating the Key Role of pH on Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution by a Molecular Cobalt Catalyst. ACS Catal. 2017;7:1330–1339. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Reynal A., Pastor E., Gross M. A., Selim S., Reisner E., Durrant J. R.. Unravelling the pH-Dependence of a Molecular Photocatalytic System for Hydrogen Production. Chem. Sci. 2015;6:4855–4859. doi: 10.1039/C5SC01349F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Singh W. M., Mirmohades M., Jane R. T., White T. A., Hammarström L., Thapper A., Lomoth R., Ott S.. Voltammetric and Spectroscopic Characterization of Early Intermediates in the Co­(II)-Polypyridyl-Catalyzed Reduction of Water. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:8638–8640. doi: 10.1039/c3cc44655g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Basu D., Mazumder S., Niklas J., Baydoun H., Wanniarachchi D., Shi X., Staples R. J., Poluektov O., Schlegel H. B., Verani C. N.. Evaluation of the Coordination Preferences and Catalytic Pathways of Heteroaxial Cobalt Oximes towards Hydrogen Generation. Chem. Sci. 2016;7:3264–3278. doi: 10.1039/C5SC04214C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hu X., Brunschwig B. S., Peters J. C.. Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution at Low Overpotentials by Cobalt Macrocyclic Glyoxime and Tetraimine Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:8988–8998. doi: 10.1021/ja067876b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ja6c01477_si_001.pdf (2.6MB, pdf)
ja6c01477_si_002.zip (26MB, zip)

Articles from Journal of the American Chemical Society are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES