Abstract
Nanocrystal surfaces generally undergo reconstructions that differentiate them from the bulk structures, often in nontrivial ways. Understanding these terminations is critical across diverse fields, from heterogeneous catalysis to the formation of topological states and the synthesis of semiconductor nanomaterials. Determining surface structures is currently an interdisciplinary task, most often involving high-resolution electron microscopy and surface electron diffraction. These methods, however, do not provide a global view of the ensemble of structures present in a sample. Here, we show how surface-sensitive solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) spectroscopy methods can bridge this gap. In this context, we investigated the surface structure of lanthanum aluminate (LaAlO3) perovskite nanoparticles. Four distinct surface terminations have previously been observed for this material, but their relative abundances were unknown. Using an array of double- and triple-resonance SSNMR methods probing the relative proximities of surface 1H, 27Al, 17O, and 139La nuclei, we conclude the surface to be majority terminated (80%) by AlO x with substantial (20%) LaO x terminated regions.


1. Introduction
Despite the high degree to which the bulk structures of crystalline materials are now understood, following over a century of crystallography, the surfaces of crystals remain largely a hinterland. It is often falsely assumed that crystalline materials undergo bulk truncations that mirror the periodic structure, but the reality is far more unsettling. Surfaces generally undergo complex reconstructions that may introduce new functionalities that are absent from the bulk and are, importantly, not unique. , For example, 30 distinct surface terminations have been observed experimentally for SrTiO3, − easily the material with the most extensively studied surface chemistry. This, of course, excludes nonperiodic termination structures that may be present in even larger quantities.
Being able to elucidate and quantify surface terminations of crystalline materials is an important frontier. Surface functionalities have direct implications for heterogeneous catalysis, for instance, where reconstructions can introduce Lewis or Brønsted acid sites that are absent from the bulk or necessary for metal-ion immobilization. − Surface structures are also implicated in the formation of trap states in semiconductor nanomaterials which hinder their luminosity and photovoltaic properties. − Surfaces and interfaces are also relevant for the formation of superconducting states, for example, at the interface of SrTiO3 and LaAlO3. −
Thus, far, the subject of surface termination has been largely approached from two directions. The first approach is from a purely computational posture. Computer programs such as MAGUS, and USPEX, attempt to predict the most likely surface termination for a given facet and supercell through algorithm-based structure searches. While these tools are critical for postulating possible structures in underexplored materials and provide better alternatives to bulk truncations, experimental evaluations of surface structures are needed. Electron microscopy and surface electron diffraction are the primary methods used to determine surface structures. , High-resolution electron microscopy provides direct visualization of surface morphology and defect structures, while electron diffraction offers complementary information on the surface’s long-range order and crystallographic orientation. These tools have been used to great success for determining the structures of some 2D periodic surfaces.
While this toolkit has enabled exquisite detail in experimentally determined facet structures in certain materials, chiefly perovskite oxides, there are obvious limitations. Microscopy methods characterize small regions of the surface, often with a bias toward focusing on the more well-defined and crystalline facets. Consequently, characterizing the entire surface is time prohibitive, and even then, remains blind to the significant fractions of the surfaces that could be disordered or dynamic. Therefore, alternative methods capable of viewing the entire surface as an ensemble are essential for establishing accurate structure–property relationships.
Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) spectroscopy has been used for decades to characterize surfaces. − The method is particularly applicable to the study of disordered surfaces because, as an ensemble-average method, it is equally sensitive to both periodic and amorphous solids. Surface sites are nevertheless dilute, which leads to low sensitivity. Common approaches used for the detection of surface sites include polarization transfer and indirect detection methods, for instance through abundant 1H spins. The advent of dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) , surface-enhanced NMR spectroscopy (SENS) , has revitalized the use of SSNMR for surface site detection, often leading to atomistic-level structural resolutions. −
Herein, we applied sensitivity-enhanced SSNMR methods to probe surface structures across the entire surface of lanthanum aluminate (LaAlO3) nanoparticles. LaAlO3 surfaces are relevant in heterogeneous catalysis and for the formation of topological superconducting states. − Several different terminations have been observed experimentally for this material , that can be categorized into four general families (Figure ). Namely, the particle can form an AlO x monolayer, an LaO x monolayer, an AlO x bilayer, or a mixed-metal termination. We sought to resolve which of these structures are present in the highest quantities, and whether their relative abundances could be estimated. Importantly, the tools developed as a part of this work enable the evaluation of how surface termination is impacted by external forces or synthetic approaches, which is challenging to gauge otherwise.
1.

Surface terminations of LaAlO3 obtained from prior electron microscopy and surface electron diffraction investigations. , The structures are representative of an (A) AlO x monolayer, (B) LaO x monolayer, (C) AlO x bilayer, and (D) mixed LaAlO x layer. Colored spheres represent H (white), O (red), Al (blue), and La (green) atoms.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Synthesis of LaAlO3
LaAlO3 nanoparticles were prepared via a two-line hydrosauna synthesis modified from a literature procedure for LaScO3 nanoparticles. , An equimolar solution of La3+ and Al3+ was prepared by dissolving La(NO3)3·6H2O (2.5 mmol, 1.082 g; Alfa Aesar, 99.9%) and Al(NO3)3·9H2O (2.5 mmol, 0.938 g; Fisher Chemical, 98.0 to 102.0%) in deionized water (25 mL). Concentrated NH4OH solution (50 mL; Fisher Chemical, 28.0 to 30.0% w/w) was preheated and stirred at 60–70 °C for 5–10 min to partially vent ammonia. The metal-ion solution was then added dropwise to the hot base solution, precipitating a mixed-cation hydrogel. The hydrogel was collected by centrifugation (7000 rpm, 7 min), redispersed, and washed with deionized water three times. The wet hydrogel was gently crumbled and loosely spread in an alumina boat, leaving gaps to enable gas flow. The material was then calcined in a tube furnace under a controlled, flowing, humid environment generated upstream of the furnace by mixing dry Ar gas and saturated Ar gas flowing through a water bubbler, setting a total inlet water vapor partial pressure of 1 Torr. Under this two-line hydrosauna reactor, the hydrogel was held at 700 °C for 48 h, followed by 400 °C for 24 h.
2.1.1. 17O-Surface Enrichment of LaAlO3
The LaAlO3 nanoparticles were surface-enriched with 17O by following analogous procedures reported in the literature. The LaAlO3 nanoparticles were heated to 300 °C for 8 h under vacuum, wetted with 39.3% 17O-labeled H2O (Cortecnet) and left overnight. The nanoparticles were then dried under vacuum at room temperature for 8 h.
2.2. Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD)
Powder X-ray diffraction measurements were acquired at room temperature using a Rigaku Ultima diffractometer featuring a Cu Kα radiation source. The PXRD patterns were acquired by scanning 2θ from 10° to 70° with a step size of 0.05°.
2.3. Electron Microscopy and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on a JEOL JEM-2100 microscope operating at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV to investigate the morphology and elemental distribution of the nanoparticles. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was performed in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) mode for compositional analysis. For TEM preparation, 0.2 mg of LaAlO3 was dispersed in 200 μL of ethanol and sonicated for 30 min. The resulting suspension was drop-cast onto a 200-mesh carbon-coated copper grid and dried under ambient conditions. The Cu and C signals observed in the EDS spectra are therefore attributed to the carbon-coated copper support grid rather than the LaAlO3 sample.
2.4. Solid-State NMR (SSNMR)
DNP-enhanced SSNMR experiments were acquired using a Bruker Avance III 400 MHz/263 GHz MAS-DNP NMR spectrometer equipped with a Bruker 3.2 mm low-temperature triple-resonance MAS probe. For these measurements, the sample was impregnated with a 16 mM solution of the TEKPol polarizing agent in perdeuterated 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane. −
Conventional SSNMR experiments were instead performed using a Bruker Avance III 600 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a Varian 3.2 mm triple-resonance MAS probe, or a JEOL 0.75 mm double-resonance fast-MAS probe with the exception of the 17O NMR spectrum, which was acquired using an Agilent DD2 400 MHz NMR spectrometer. Spectra and dipolar dephasing data were processed and simulated using SIMPSON, , INTERFACES, and ssNake V1.5. Chemical shifts were referenced using the universal shielding scale to TMS (δiso(1H) = 0 ppm) using the CH2 peak of adamantane (δiso (1H) = 1.82 ppm) as a secondary reference.
2.4.1. 1H SSNMR
2.4.1.1. 1H{27Al} and 1H{139La} RESPDOR
Rotational-echo saturation-pulse double-resonance (RESPDOR) , experiments were performed at 14.1 T using a 0.75 mm rotor and a MAS frequency of 71.419 kHz corresponding to a rotor period (t r) of 14 μs. The 1H π/2 and π pulse durations were 1.75 μs, and 3.5 μs, respectively. SR41 2 heteronuclear dipolar recoupling was applied to reintroduce the 1H–27Al or 139La dipolar interactions. The recoupling time for the RESPDOR experiments was incremented from 2t r to 178t r in 2t r increments. 27Al and 139La saturation pules were applied for 21 μs, corresponding to 1.5t r, and the RF amplitudes were optimized to provide maximum dephasing. Spectra were acquired in 256 scans with a 1 s recycle delay. The 1H{27Al} and 1H{139La} RESPDOR data were simulated using the INTERFACES program using structural models of the four possible surface terminations (Figure ) that considered all the atomic sites within 1.5 nm of the surface H atom(s). Owing to spurious recoupling of 1H chemical shift anisotropy and unavoidable rotor instabilities, , decay is observed at longer recoupling times. Uncertainties (2σ(t)) in the RESPDOR data were calculated by the following expression:
where ΔS(t) and S 0(t) are the dipolar difference and reference 1H signal intensities at recoupling time t and N is the noise.
2.4.2. 17O SSNMR
2.4.2.1. 17O{1H} QCPMG
A room temperature 17O SSNMR spectrum of the 17O-surface-enriched LaAlO3 nanoparticles was acquired at 9.4 T using the quadrupolar Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill (QCPMG) pulse sequence. The spectrum was acquired at an MAS frequency of 11.111 kHz and signal averaged over 131,072 scans using 10 and 20 μs 17O central transition-selective π/2 and π pulses, 25 kHz 1H decoupling, a spikelet spacing of 1.852 kHz (74 echoes), and a 1 s recycle delay.
2.4.2.2. 1H→17O PRESTO-QCPMG
A DNP-enhanced 17O SSNMR spectrum of the 17O-surface-enriched LaAlO3 nanoparticles was acquired using the phase-shifted recoupling effects a smooth transfer of order (PRESTO-II) , QCPMG pulse sequence at an MAS frequency of 11.111 kHz. The spectrum was acquired in 256 scans using 5 and 10 μs 17O central transition-selective π/2 and π pulses, 100 kHz 1H decoupling, a spikelet spacing of 1.111 kHz (54 echoes), and a 3 s recycle delay. A total of two rotor periods of R181 7 recoupling were applied with a 1H RF amplitude of 100 kHz.
2.4.2.3. 1H→17O{27Al} PRESTO-TRAPDOR-QCPMG
A DNP-enhanced PRESTO-II-transfer of population in a double-resonance (TRAPDOR) , -QCPMG experiment was performed on the 17O-surface-enriched LaAlO3 nanoparticles using the above parameters. 27Al TRAPDOR dephasing was incremented from 2t r to 112t r in 80 μs increments with an 27Al RF amplitude optimized to provide the maximum dephasing. Sixteen scans were acquired for each spectrum. The 17O{27Al} TRAPDOR dephasing curves were simulated using SIMPSON. , The simulation used 17O and 27Al quadrupolar coupling constants (C Q) of 4.6 and 3.8 MHz, respectively, corresponding to their average values yielded from experiment (vide infra, Table S1). Powder averaging was accomplished using a 2000-angle REPULSION set and 4 gamma angles. Effective 17O–27Al dipolar coupling constants of 468, 653, 970, and 1131 Hz were used for the LaO x monolayer, mixed LaAlO x layer, AlO x monolayer, and AlO x bilayers. These values correspond to the root-sum-squares dipolar coupling constants calculated from the surface hydroxyl O sites and all the Al sites within a 1.5 nm radius for the given model. Vertical scaling factors were applied to the simulated dephasing curves to obtain a reasonable match to the experimentally measured dephasing plateau. Uncertainties in the TRAPDOR dephasing curves were calculated following an analogous procedure as outlined in §2.4.1.
2.4.2.4. 1H→17O{1H, 27Al} PRESTO-HETCOR-TRAPDOR-QCPMG
DNP-enhanced 1H→17O{1H, 27Al} PRESTO-heteronuclear correlation (HETCOR)-TRAPDOR-QCPMG spectra were acquired, with and without 12t r of 27Al dephasing using the parameters listed above. The 1H chemical shift evolution period was incremented in 32 56.64 μs increments, for an indirect spectral width of 44.0907 ppm. Frequency-switched Lee–Goldberg (FSLG) homonuclear decoupling with a 1H RF amplitude of 100 kHz was applied to improve the resolution in the 1H dimension.
2.4.3. 27Al SSNMR
2.4.3.1. 27Al Hahn Echo
An 27Al SSNMR spectrum was acquired at 14.1 T using the Hahn echo pulse sequence at room temperature. A 3.2 mm triple-resonance probe was used with a MAS frequency of 20 kHz. The spectrum was acquired in 1024 scans using 5 and 10 μs central-transition selective π/2 and π pulses and a recycle delay of 5 s.
2.4.3.2. 1H→27Al PRESTO-III
A DNP-enhanced 1H →27Al SSNMR spectrum was acquired using the PRESTO-III pulse sequence on the 17O-surface-enriched LaAlO3 nanoparticles using a 3.2 mm triple-resonance probe and a MAS frequency of 11.111 kHz. The spectrum was acquired using π/2 and π CT-selective pulses with lengths of 5 and 10 μs, respectively, a 1H decoupling radiofrequency field of 100 kHz, a recycle delay of 6 s, and averaged using 4096 scans. 12t r of R181 7 recoupling were applied.
2.4.3.3. 27Al DQ-SQ
A 27Al double quantum–single quantum (DQ-SQ) spectrum was acquired at 14.1 T using a 3.2 mm triple-resonance probe and 100 kHz 1H decoupling. The spectrum was recorded using 32t r of BR21 2 recoupling with a 10 μs 27Al central transition selective π/2 pulse, a z-filter of 250 μs, and a 20 kHz MAS frequency. The recycle delay was set to 0.25 s, and 4800 scans were acquired for each of the 68 30 μs t 1 increments.
2.4.4. 139La SSNMR
2.4.4.1. 139La QCPMG
A 139La SSNMR spectrum was acquired at 14.1 T using the QCPMG pulse sequence at room temperature, a 3.2 mm triple-resonance probe, and a MAS frequency of 20 kHz. 139La CT-selective π/2 and π pulse lengths were 2.5 and 5 μs, respectively. A spikelet spacing of 1 kHz (49 echoes) and a recycle delay of 2 s were used. A total of 1024 scans were acquired.
2.4.4.2. 1H→139La D-RINEPT-SR41 2(tt)-QCPMG
A DNP-enhanced 1H→139La D-RINEPT- SR41 2(tt)-QCPMG , spectrum was acquired using the variable-offset cumulative spectra (VOCS) approach. This approach was needed owing to the much larger quadrupolar interactions of the surface sites when compared to the near cubic environments of the bulk sites. The MAS rate was set to 12.5 kHz and 139La π/2 and π pulse lengths were set to 7.5 and 15 μs, respectively, with a spikelet spacing of 3125 Hz, a recycle delay of 13 s, and 80 kHz 1H decoupling. The adiabatic SR41 2(tt) pulses used a 1H RF amplitude of 125 kHz, and a shaped pulse profile with a sweep width of 4 MHz, a peak amplitude parameter of 20, and a frequency modulation parameter of 10. The 1H square pulses used a RF power of 100 kHz. VOCS spectra were collected by stepping the transmitter by 31.25 kHz from 218.75 kHz to −218.75 kHz for a total of 21 subspectra. Each subspectrum consisted of 128 scans.
2.5. Density Functional Theory Calculations
Plane-wave density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using CASTEP in Materials Studio 2018. Geometry optimizations and NMR tensor calculations employed the PBE functional with a planewave energy cutoff of 630 eV, a k-point spacing of 0.07, on-the-fly generated ultrasoft pseudopotentials, and scalar relativistic effects treated using the zeroth-order regular approximation (ZORA). Convergence was reached using a maximum change in energy of 5.0 × 10–6 eV atom–1, in force of 0.01 eV Å–1, in stress of 0.02 GPa, and in displacement of 5.0 × 10–4 Å. Nuclear electric quadrupole moments of – 25.58, 146.6, and 206 mb were used for 17O, 27Al, and 139La, respectively. Calculated 17O, 27Al, and 139La magnetic shielding values were converted to chemical shifts using the calculated magnetic shielding values from the R3̅c crystal structure of LaAlO3. This corresponded to absolute shielding values of 76.18, 545.14, and 4543.39 ppm for 17O, 27Al, and 139La, respectively.
3. Research and Discussion
In the following sections, we discuss the morphology and bulk of the LaAlO3 nanoparticles (§ ) and finally the sensitivity-enhanced NMR investigations of the nanoparticles (§ ). Surface-selective internuclear dipolar coupling measurements are compared directly to predictions from the surface terminations observed in references Kienzle et al., and Lanier et al., and to combinations of these structures to gain a complete picture of the mean surface termination of the particles.
3.1. LaAlO3 Nanoparticles
The morphology and bulk structure of the LaAlO3 particles were characterized by PXRD, TEM, and EDS (Figure ). The PXRD pattern revealed a crystalline bulk corresponding to LaAlO3 (Figure A), however, additional peaks observed between 27° and 30° indicate a La4Al2O9 component (second phase) of ∼10 wt %, as estimated by the relative intensities of the most intense peak observed between the two phases. The TEM images revealed the LaAlO3 sample consists of nanoparticles with a broad distribution of shapes and sizes (Figures and S1), and the EDS elemental mapping images showed that the LaAlO3 phases are dopant-free (Figures and S2). As also depicted in Figure at a higher magnification, the particles are well-defined and exhibit significant relatively sharp-edged facets. We also observed additional phases in the EDS mapping images that were not detected by PXRD (Figures S2 and S3), suggesting that they are rather minor in abundance.
2.
(A) PXRD patterns, (B, C) TEM images, and (D–F) EDS mapping images of LaAlO3 nanoparticles. (A) The experimental PXRD pattern of LaAlO3 is in black, and simulated PXRD patterns of LaAlO3 and La4Al2O9 are in red. The EDS mapping images parts D, E, and F correspond to elemental maps of O, Al, and La, respectively. The white background in part E is shown to increase the contrast for the red color representing Al.
To address whether these additional phases would hinder the upcoming SSNMR analysis, the crystal structures of the dominate phases LaAlO3 and La4Al2O9 were obtained from the Materials Project structure database (MP-2920 and MP-781707, respectively) and used as starting points for calculating their NMR tensors (Table S1). Simulated 27Al and 139La SSNMR spectra using those calculated NMR tensor values and the weight-percentage from the PXRD data, revealed that the La4Al2O9 phase would not complicate the NMR analysis (Figures S4 and S5). In this context, 27Al and 139La SSNMR spectra were acquired (Figure ). The 27Al SSNMR spectrum contained three signals, corresponding to four-, five-, and six-coordinate Al (AlIV, AlV, AlVI). To aid in the assignment, a 27Al DQ-SQ SSNMR spectrum was acquired (Figure B). Correlations were observed between the AlVI and AlIV resonances suggesting that those sites are spatially proximate. Prior literature by Kentgens et al., attributed this AlIV site to surface sites. The relatively high abundance is consistent with the high surface-to-bulk ratios of these small nanoparticles. The AlV site may originate from the La4Al2O9 phase, however, it is important to note that some LaAlO3 termination structures include AlV. Regardless, the signal represents a minor species. The 139La SSNMR spectrum (Figure C) revealed a powder pattern that was best reproduced using a Czjzek model with an average C Q of 8 MHz, which is consistent with NMR tensor calculations from the LaAlO3 crystal structure (Table S1). The use of the Czjzek model is justified as the amorphous outer layers lead to a distribution of 139La environments. The 139La SSNMR signals from the La4Al2O9 phase were not observed; these are low in weight-percentage and are expected to possess relatively large C Q values (Figure S5), which diminishes its spectral intensity and severely broadens its powder pattern. Collectively, these data provide strong evidence that the sample contains mostly LaAlO3 nanoparticles that feature a crystalline core and a potentially disordered surface.
3.

SSNMR spectra of LaAlO3: (A) 27Al Hahn echo, (B) 27Al DQ-SQ, and (C) 139La QCPMG. Spectral fitting of the 139La SSNMR spectrum is in red. Roman numerals in (A) are used to refer to the aluminum coordination numbers.
3.2. Surface Sites on LaAlO3 Nanoparticles
DNP SENS data were acquired on the LaAlO3 nanoparticles after 17O-surface enrichment (§2.1) to probe the local Al, La, and O atomic environments at the surface. To detect surface 27Al sites, we applied the 1H→27Al PRESTO-III method which has been shown to excite surface 27Al sites with a relatively high uniformity. , The spectrum (Figure A) features resonances from AlIV, AlV, and AlVI surface sites, suggesting that all three are present at the surface.
4.
DNP-enhanced SENS spectra of LaAlO3 acquired using (A) 1H→27Al PRESTO and (B) 1H→139La D-RINEPT-SR41 2(tt)-QCPMG. Roman numerals in (A) are used to refer to the aluminum coordination numbers.
To detect surface 139La sites, we instead applied the 1H→139La D-RINEPT-SR41 2(tt)-QCPMG experiment , which we recently applied together with a VOCS approach to study LaScO3. The spectrum we measured for the LaAlO3 nanoparticles is shown in Figure B and features a broad lineshape that is consistent with a distribution of La environments.
The 1H→17O PRESTO-QCPMG spectrum is shown in Figure A and contains a broad resonance from all the surface hydroxyls found in the material. Note that owing to dipolar truncation, PRESTO-II is uniquely sensitive to hydroxyls and does not excite oxide sites from the bulk. A room temperature direct excitation 17O QCPMG spectrum was also acquired (Figure S6). This spectrum featured an analogous signal from surface hydroxyls with the addition of a shoulder from the bulk oxide sites at ∼ 170 ppm, as previously observed, and some increased intensity to higher frequency likely originating from surface or subsurface oxide sites; however, no La-oxide signals were detected. , Because the signals arising from the surface hydroxyls may contain distinct signals from Al–OH and La–OH species from different surface reconstructions, we acquired a 2D 1H→17O{1H} PRESTO-HETCOR-QCPMG spectrum (Figure B) to improve the resolution. This spectrum features an asymmetric correlation map for the 1H and 17O spin pairs at the surface suggesting that multiple sites may be present; however, they were not resolved.
5.

17O-DNP SENS spectra of LaAlO3 nanoparticles: (A) 1H→17O{1H} PRESTO-QCPMG and 1H→17O{1H, 27Al} PRESTO-HETCOR-TRAPDOR-QCPMG (B) without and (C) with a 27Al dephasing pulse. (D) The difference spectrum between the 1H→17O{1H, 27Al} PRESTO-HETCOR-TRAPDOR-QCPMG without and with 27Al dephasing, referred to as the Al–OH spectrum. (E) The difference spectrum between the 1H→17O{1H, 27Al} PRESTO-HETCOR-TRAPDOR-QCPMG without 27Al dephasing and the Al–OH spectrum, referred to as the La–OH spectrum. Spectral simulations are shown in red, and dotted red lines are the deconvoluted simulations. Asterisk indicates spinning side bands.
To disentangle these sites, we performed a modified HETCOR experiment wherein dipolar dephasing through 27Al was introduced via the TRAPDOR method. The resulting 1H→17O{1H, 27Al} PRESTO-HETCOR-TRAPDOR-QCPMG spectrum is depicted in Figure C and is expected to have a lower contribution from Al–OH hydroxyls, given their strong 17O–27Al dipolar interactions. Therefore, by subtracting the 1H→17O{1H, 27Al} PRESTO-HETCOR-TRAPDOR-QCPMG spectrum (S, Figure C) from the reference 1H→17O{1H} PRESTO-HETCOR-QCPMG spectrum (S 0, Figure B), a 1H→17O{1H} HETCOR spectrum was produced featuring only signal intensity from 27Al–17O-1H sites (Figure D). This difference spectrum produced a notably different, and narrower, 17O NMR lineshape, confirming the multisite nature of the spectrum and that La–OH species must also be present at the surface.
We were unable to perform 17O{139La} TRAPDOR to obtain a La–OH spectrum directly because of the two isotopes’ similar resonance frequencies. Difference spectroscopy could nevertheless be used to produce a La–OH 1H→17O{1H} HETCOR spectrum by subtracting the aluminol spectrum from the reference spectrum. To achieve this, a vertical scaling was applied to visually cancel the Al–OH correlation from the HETCOR spectrum. While this is highly qualitative, the resulting spectrum, which is expected to feature uniquely the La–OH sites displays a narrower lineshape and higher 17O chemical shift. The increase in chemical shift is expected from a La metal-induced shift. , Qualitatively, this reveals that there are both Al- and La-terminated portions on the surface.
Collectively, these spectra (Figures and ) revealed the surface of LaAlO3 to be terminated by four-, five- and six-coordinate Al, La, and hydroxyl groups that are bound to both Al and La. The relative spectral intensities of the Al–OH and La–OH environments in the 17O spectra suggest that the surface is terminated mostly by Al–OH. These spectra, however, are not quantitative and it is possible that the surface reconstructions may have been modified by the 17O enrichment procedure. Moreover, it remains unclear whether the surface is terminated by mixed LaAlO x layers or by distinct facets of monolayers (or bilayers) of AlO x and LaO x (Figure ). ,
3.3. Surface Termination of LaAlO3 Nanoparticles
The different proposed surface termination structures may be differentiated by the effective dipolar couplings between the metal sites (27Al, 139La) and the atoms from the surface hydroxyl groups (1H, 17O). Because hydroxyls are only found at external surfaces, their dipolar couplings inherently probe the depth of the nearest Al and La layers. Furthermore, because dipolar recoupling experiments are quantitative, and can be accurately predicted in silico from a given surface model, they can in principle be applied toward the quantification of the four surface terminations (Figure ).
To this end, we measured the 17O{27Al} TRAPDOR dephasing of the surface sites as well as their 1H{27Al} and 1H{139La} S-RESPDOR dephasing. While the former may have undergone additional reconstruction during treatment, the latter probes the surface of untreated LaAlO3 nanoparticles. The three experimental dephasing curves are shown in Figure together with numerical simulations calculated using each of the four terminations depicted in Figure . None of these calculated dephasing curves reproduced the initial rise in the experimental S-RESPDOR data, suggesting that the surface is composed of a number of distinct terminations.
6.
(Black dots) Experimental 17O{27Al} TRAPDOR, 1H{27Al} RESPDOR, and 1H{139La} RESPDOR dephasing curves. The simulated dephasing curves (solid-colored lines) correspond to simulations employing the individual surface terminations. A legend correlating the color of the simulated dephasing curves to the structural models used is provided on the left.
To find the best-fit to the experimental dephasing curves, simulated dephasing curves were calculated by employing pairwise combinations of the four surface terminations (Figures S7–S12), in relative population increments of 1%. Of the six pairwise combinations, only two yielded models with simulated dipolar dephasing within 1σ of uncertainty (Figure ), as determined by χ2 analysis, with the best-fit corresponding to 67% monolayer AlO x and 33% mixed LaAlO x termination. The average surface populations of AlO x and LaO x for the models within 1σ of uncertainty were 82 ± 5% AlO x and 18 ± 5% LaO x , indicating that the surface is largely terminated by AlO x .
7.
Calculated χ2 values (blue curve) obtained from pairwise combinations of the surface terminations. The black line corresponds to the minimum χ2 value, and the green line corresponds to 1σ of uncertainty.
Since multiple pairwise combinations yielded models within 1σ of uncertainty, an extension of this methodology was employed to consider combinations that included all four surface terminations (ternary plots, that show the edges of the quaternary phase space, are included in Figure ), yielding a total of 176,851 surface termination models. The ternary plots revealed that many models with various combinations of surface terminations fell within 1σ of uncertainty. Interestingly, despite the inclusion of multiple surface terminations, the best-fit model was still the pairwise combination of AlO x monolayer and mixed LaAlO x termination. The average of the relative populations of the four surface terminations for all models within 1σ uncertainty were 62 ± 10% monolayer AlO x , 11 ± 7% monolayer LaO x , 8 ± 6% bilayer AlO x , and 19 ± 12% mixed LaAlO x terminations. This average corresponds to the surface being terminated by 80 ± 4% Al and 20 ± 4% La, in agreement with the results from the pairwise combinations. However, since the uncertainties (i.e., ±6 to 12%) for monolayer AlO x , monolayer LaO x , bilayer AlO x , and mixed LaAlO x termination are smaller than their respective average, it is not possible to rule out any of them entirely given the complexity and limited resolution of the experiment. Nonetheless, the average of these models revealed that the surfaces of these LaAlO3 nanoparticles are mostly AlO x -terminated.
8.
Ternary plots correlating calculated χ2 values to the relative amounts of each surface termination and the simulated dipolar dephasing curves for the best-fit model, corresponding to 67% monolayer AlO x and 33% mixed LaAlO x termination. The best-fit model is indicated by a red star, and all models within the black lines are within 1σ of uncertainty.
4. Conclusion
Nanocrystalline materials undergo intricate and often puzzling surface reconstructions that are important for guiding their catalytic, optical, or other properties. At present, there are no general methods that may reveal the full surface structural landscape present in a sample. This work has demonstrated a substantial leap toward this goal, revealing that surface-selective double- and triple-resonance SSNMR methods can be applied to estimate the proportions, of the most important surface terminations in a bulk nanocrystalline sample. Specifically, we demonstrated using LaAlO3 nanoparticles that spectral edited triple-resonance methods could be applied to measure surface-selective heteronuclear correlation spectra, in this case separating the La–OH and Al–OH 17O{1H} correlation spectra from La- and Al-terminated reconstructions. Surface-enhanced 27Al and 139La SSNMR spectra further revealed these to be composed of surface four-, five-, and six-coordinate Al, and La. Surface-selective dipolar dephasing experiments probing distances between 1H and 17O to the Al and La layers of the material were used to reveal that the surface is terminated by Al and La-terminated layers, in relative amounts of 80 ± 4% and 20 ± 4%, respectively, providing the first estimate for the relative abundances of different surface terminations in a material from experiment.
While highly promising, this approach does struggle to differentiate similar surface terminations, such as distinct AlO x monolayer reconstructions, and it is limited to surface terminations that contain surface-bound hydroxyl groups. The highest-resolution structures are still obtained from surface electron microscopy and diffractions methods. SSNMR is nevertheless useful in disentangling competing structures measured in small surface regions and help lead to a description of the ensemble surface. We envision this approach to be valuable to understand how different surface terminations are impacted by synthetic treatment conditions. In the case of materials for which the surface has not been studied using electron microscopy, surface structure prediction codes, such as CALYPSO, MAGUS, or USPEX, may be used to generate reasonable structures as starting points as these codes have been successful in reproducing complex surface terminations. −
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported as part of the Institute for Cooperative Upcycling of Plastics (iCOUP), an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES). Ames National Laboratory is operated by Iowa State University for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC-02-07CH11358. This work made use of the Northwestern University Jerome B. Cohen X-ray Diffraction Core Facility (RRID:SCR_017866) supported by the MRSEC program of the National Science Foundation (DMR-2308691) at the Materials Research Center of Northwestern University and the Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource (NSF ECCS-2025633).
Raw data, simulated RESPDOR and TRAPDOR data, and structure files are available at https://zenodo.org (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21360645).
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.6c03759.
Experimental and calculated NMR tensors, TEM images, EDS elemental analysis, simulated NMR spectra, and simulated RESPDOR and TRAPDOR data (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Zangwill, A. Physics at Surfaces; Cambridge University Press, 1988; 10.1017/CBO9780511622564. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Woodruff, D. P. ; Delchar, T. A. . Surface Crystallography and Diffraction. In Modern Techniques of Surface Science; Cambridge University Press, 1994; pp 15–104; 10.1017/CBO9780511623172.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Andersen T. K., Fong D. D., Marks L. D.. Pauling’s Rules for Oxide Surfaces. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2018;73(5):213–232. doi: 10.1016/j.surfrep.2018.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Castell M. R.. Nanostructures on the SrTiO3(001) Surface Studied by STM. Surf. Sci. 2002;516(1–2):33–42. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6028(02)02053-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Marks L. D., Chiaramonti A. N., Rahman S. U., Castell M. R.. Transition from Order to Configurational Disorder for Surface Reconstructions on SrTiO3 (111) Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;114(22):226101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.226101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z., Loon A., Subramanian A., Gerhold S., McDermott E., Enterkin J. A., Hieckel M., Russell B. C., Green R. J., Moewes A., Guo J., Blaha P., Castell M. R., Diebold U., Marks L. D.. Transition from Reconstruction toward Thin Film on the (110) Surface of Strontium Titanate. Nano Lett. 2016;16(4):2407–2412. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen B. R., Crosby L. A., George C., Kennedy R. M., Schweitzer N. M., Wen J., Van Duyne R. P., Stair P. C., Poeppelmeier K. R., Marks L. D., Bedzyk M. J.. Morphology and CO Oxidation Activity of Pd Nanoparticles on SrTiO3 Nanopolyhedra. ACS Catal. 2018;8(6):4751–4760. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b04173. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peczak I. L., Kennedy R. M., Hackler R. A., Wang R., Shin Y., Delferro M., Poeppelmeier K. R.. Scalable Synthesis of Pt/SrTiO3 Hydrogenolysis Catalysts in Pursuit of Manufacturing-Relevant Waste Plastic Solutions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;13(49):58691–58700. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c18687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peczak I. L., Kennedy R. M., Hackler R. A., Lee B., Meirow M., Luijten E., Poeppelmeier K. R., Delferro M.. Treasuring Trash: Pt/SrTiO3 Catalysts Process Plastic Waste into High-Value Materials. Matter. 2023;6(10):3296–3321. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2023.06.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- McCullough K. E., Peczak I. L., Kennedy R. M., Wang Y. Y., Lin J., Wu X., Paterson A. L., Perras F. A., Hall J., Kropf A. J., Hackler R. A., Shin Y., Niklas J., Poluektov O. G., Wen J., Huang W., Sadow A. D., Poeppelmeier K. R., Delferro M., Ferrandon M. S.. Synthesis of Platinum Nanoparticles on Strontium Titanate Nanocuboids via Surface Organometallic Grafting for the Catalytic Hydrogenolysis of Plastic Waste. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2023;11(3):1216–1231. doi: 10.1039/D2TA08133D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hines M. A., Guyot-Sionnest P.. Synthesis and Characterization of Strongly Luminescing ZnS-Capped CdSe Nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. 1996;100(2):468–471. doi: 10.1021/jp9530562. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peng X., Manna L., Yang W., Wickham J., Scher E., Kadavanich A., Alivisatos A. P.. Shape Control of CdSe Nanocrystals. Nature. 2000;404(6773):59–61. doi: 10.1038/35003535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamat P. V.. Quantum Dot Solar Cells. Semiconductor Nanocrystals as Light Harvesters. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008;112(48):18737–18753. doi: 10.1021/jp806791s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ohtomo A., Hwang H. Y.. A High-Mobility Electron Gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 Heterointerface. Nature. 2004;427(6973):423–426. doi: 10.1038/nature02308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thiel S., Hammerl G., Schmehl A., Schneider C. W., Mannhart J.. Tunable Quasi-Two-Dimensional Electron Gases in Oxide Heterostructures. Science (1979). 2006;313(5795):1942–1945. doi: 10.1126/science.1131091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo H., Saidi W. A., Zhao J.. Tunability of the Two-Dimensional Electron Gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 Interface by Strain-Induced Ferroelectricity. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016;18(41):28474–28484. doi: 10.1039/C6CP04769F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J., Gao H., Han Y., Ding C., Pan S., Wang Y., Jia Q., Wang H.-T., Xing D., Sun J.. MAGUS: Machine Learning and Graph Theory Assisted Universal Structure Searcher. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2023;10(7):nwad128. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwad128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glass C. W., Oganov A. R., Hansen N.. USPEXEvolutionary Crystal Structure Prediction. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2006;175(11–12):713–720. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2006.07.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Subramanian A., Marks L. D.. Surface Crystallography via Electron Microscopy. Ultramicroscopy. 2004;98(2–4):151–157. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2003.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leslie C., Landree E., Collazo-Davila C., Bengu E., Grozea D., Marks L. D.. Electron Crystallography in Surface Structure Analysis. Microsc. Res. Tech. 1999;46:160–177. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19990801)46:3<160::AID-JEMT2>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perras F. A., Pruski M.. Advances in Solid-State NMR for the Studies of Mesoporous Solids: Fast Magic Angle Spinning and Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2025;150–151:101573. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2025.101573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Engelhardt, G. ; Michel, D. . High Resolution Solid State NMR of Silicates and Zeolites; John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Blanc F., Copéret C., Lesage A., Emsley L.. High Resolution Solid State NMR Spectroscopy in Surface Organometallic Chemistry: Access to Molecular Understanding of Active Sites of Well-Defined Heterogeneous Catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008;37(3):518–526. doi: 10.1039/B612793M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonhomme C., Coelho C., Baccile N., Gervais C., Azaïs T., Babonneau F.. Advanced Solid State NMR Techniques for the Characterization of Sol-Gel-Derived Materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007;40(9):738–746. doi: 10.1021/ar600030j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rankin A. G. M., Trébosc J., Pourpoint F., Amoureux J.-P., Lafon O.. Recent Developments in MAS DNP-NMR of Materials. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2019;101:116–143. doi: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2019.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Becerra L. R., Gerfen G. J., Temkin R. J., Singel D. J., Griffin R. G.. Dynamic Nuclear Polarization with a Cyclotron Resonance Maser at 5 T. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993;71(21):3561–3564. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maly T., Debelouchina G. T., Bajaj V. S., Hu K.-N., Joo C.-G., Mak-Jurkauskas M. L., Sirigiri J. R., van der Wel P. C. A., Herzfeld J., Temkin R. J., Griffin R. G.. Dynamic Nuclear Polarization at High Magnetic Fields. J. Chem. Phys. 2008;128(5):052211. doi: 10.1063/1.2833582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lesage A., Lelli M., Gajan D., Caporini M. A., Vitzthum V., Miéville P., Alauzun J., Roussey A., Thieuleux C., Mehdi A., Bodenhausen G., Copéret C., Emsley L.. Surface Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132(44):15459–15461. doi: 10.1021/ja104771z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rossini A. J., Zagdoun A., Lelli M., Lesage A., Copéret C., Emsley L.. Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Surface Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013;46(9):1942–1951. doi: 10.1021/ar300322x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagashima H., Trébosc J., Lafon O., Amoureux J.-P.. DNP-Enhanced NMR of Half-Integer Quadrupolar Nuclei in Solids. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2026;152–153:101585. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2025.101585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao P., Ji Y., Hou G.. Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for Surface Characterization of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: State of the Art and Perspectives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(4):2919–2937. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c10468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee D., Kaushik M., Coustel R., Chenavier Y., Chanal M., Bardet M., Dubois L., Okuno H., Rochat N., Duclairoir F., Mouesca J., De Paëpe G.. Solid-State NMR and DFT Combined for the Surface Study of Functionalized Silicon Nanoparticles. Chem.Eur. J. 2015;21(45):16047–16058. doi: 10.1002/chem.201502687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berruyer P., Lelli M., Conley M. P., Silverio D. L., Widdifield C. M., Siddiqi G., Gajan D., Lesage A., Copéret C., Emsley L.. Three-Dimensional Structure Determination of Surface Sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139(2):849–855. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b10894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santhiran A., Quinn F., Gi E., Chen Y., Lee W., Pavel M. R. S., Perras F. A., Biswas R., Vela J., Rossini A. J.. Probing the Surface Structure of Amine/Chloride-Passivated CdSe Nanocrystals Using Dynamic Nuclear Polarization-Enhanced 15N, 35Cl, 77Se, and 113Cd Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026;148:2563. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c18223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao T. Y., Greenstein E. P., Peczak I. L., Poeppelmeier K. R., Perras F. A.. Observing the Surface Termination of LaScO3 Perovskite Using Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146(33):23487–23496. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c07055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perras F. A., Arroyave A., Southern S. A., Lamb J. V., Li Y., LaPointe A., Delferro M.. Double-Resonance 17O NMR Experiments Reveal Unique Configurational Information for Surface Organometallic Complexes. Chem. Commun. 2023;59(31):4604–4607. doi: 10.1039/D3CC00899A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perras F. A., Kanbur U., Paterson A. L., Chatterjee P., Slowing I. I., Sadow A. D.. Determining the Three-Dimensional Structures of Silica-Supported Metal Complexes from the Ground Up. Inorg. Chem. 2022;61(2):1067–1078. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perras F. A., Paterson A. L., Syed Z. H., Kropf A. J., Kaphan D. M., Delferro M., Pruski M.. Revealing the Configuration and Conformation of Surface Organometallic Catalysts with DNP-Enhanced NMR. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021;125(24):13433–13442. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y., Smock S. R., Flintgruber A. H., Perras F. A., Brutchey R. L., Rossini A. J.. Surface Termination of CsPbBr3 Perovskite Quantum Dots Determined by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142(13):6117–6127. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b13396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Batista A. T. F., Pigeon T., Meyet J., Wisser D., Rivallan M., Gajan D., Catita L., Diehl F., Gay A. S., Chizallet C., Lesage A., Raybaud P.. Structure, Location, and Spatial Proximities of Hydroxyls on γ-Alumina Crystallites by High-Resolution Solid-State NMR and DFT Modeling: Why Edges Hold the Key. ACS Catal. 2023;13(10):6536–6548. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c00495. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rankin A. G. M., Webb P. B., Dawson D. M., Viger-Gravel J., Walder B. J., Emsley L., Ashbrook S. E.. Determining the Surface Structure of Silicated Alumina Catalysts via Isotopic Enrichment and Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Surface-Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017;121(41):22977–22984. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jabbour R., Renom-Carrasco M., Chan K. W., Völker L., Berruyer P., Wang Z., Widdifield C. M., Lelli M., Gajan D., Copéret C., Thieuleux C., Lesage A.. Multiple Surface Site Three-Dimensional Structure Determination of a Supported Molecular Catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144(23):10270–10281. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c01013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y., Dorn R. W., Hanrahan M. P., Wei L., Blome-Fernández R., Medina-Gonzalez A. M., Adamson M. A. S., Flintgruber A. H., Vela J., Rossini A. J.. Revealing the Surface Structure of CdSe Nanocrystals by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization-Enhanced 77Se and 113Cd Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143(23):8747–8760. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c03162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smock S. R., Chen Y., Rossini A. J., Brutchey R. L.. The Surface Chemistry and Structure of Colloidal Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021;54(3):707–718. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terlecki M., Badoni S., Leszczyński M. K., Gierlotka S., Justyniak I., Okuno H., Wolska-Pietkiewicz M., Lee D., De Paëpe G., Lewiński J.. ZnO Nanoplatelets with Controlled Thickness: Atomic Insight into Facet-Specific Bimodal Ligand Binding Using DNP NMR. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021;31(49):2105318. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202105318. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Muñoz H. J., Korili S. A., Gil A.. Progress and Recent Strategies in the Synthesis and Catalytic Applications of Perovskites Based on Lanthanum and Aluminum. Materials. 2022;15(9):3288. doi: 10.3390/ma15093288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kienzle D., Koirala P., Marks L. D.. Lanthanum Aluminate (110) 3 × 1 Surface Reconstruction. Surf. Sci. 2015;633:60–67. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2014.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lanier C. H., Rondinelli J. M., Deng B., Kilaas R., Poeppelmeier K. R., Marks L. D.. Surface Reconstruction with a Fractional Hole: (5 × 5)R26.6° LaAlO3 (001) Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;98(8):086102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.086102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenstein E. P., Poeppelmeier K. R., Marks L. D.. Wet to Dry Controls Lanthanide Scandate Synthesis. Inorg. Chem. 2023;62(12):4853–4860. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c04107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zagdoun A., Casano G., Ouari O., Schwarzwälder M., Rossini A. J., Aussenac F., Yulikov M., Jeschke G., Copéret C., Lesage A., Tordo P., Emsley L.. Large Molecular Weight Nitroxide Biradicals Providing Efficient Dynamic Nuclear Polarization at Temperatures up to 200 K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135(34):12790–12797. doi: 10.1021/ja405813t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kobayashi T., Perras F. A., Chaudhary U., Slowing I. I., Huang W., Sadow A. D., Pruski M.. Improved Strategies for DNP-Enhanced 2D 1H-X Heteronuclear Correlation Spectroscopy of Surfaces. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2017;87:38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2017.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perras F. A., Goh T. W., Wang L. L., Huang W., Pruski M.. Enhanced 1H-X D-HMQC Performance through Improved 1H Homonuclear Decoupling. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2019;98:12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2019.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bak M., Rasmussen J. T., Nielsen N. C.. SIMPSON: A General Simulation Program for Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 2000;147(2):296–330. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2000.2179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Juhl D. W., Tošner Z., Vosegaard T.. Versatile NMR Simulations Using SIMPSON. Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 2020;100:1–59. doi: 10.1016/bs.arnmr.2019.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cunningham J., Perras F. A.. INTERFACES. A Program for Determining the 3D Structures of Surfaces Sites Using NMR Data. J. Magn. Reson. Open. 2022;12–13:100066. doi: 10.1016/j.jmro.2022.100066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- van Meerten S. G. J., Franssen W. M. J., Kentgens A. P. M.. SsNake: A Cross-Platform Open-Source NMR Data Processing and Fitting Application. J. Magn. Reson. 2019;301:56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2019.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris R. K., Becker E. D., Cabral De Menezes S. M., Granger P., Hoffman R. E., Zilm K. W.. Further Conventions for NMR Shielding and Chemical Shifts IUPAC Recommendations 2008. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2008;33(3):41–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2008.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gan Z.. Rotary Resonance Echo Double Resonance for Measuring Heteronuclear Dipolar Coupling under MAS. J. Magn. Reson. 2006;183(2):235–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen L., Wang Q., Hu B., Lafon O., Trébosc J., Deng F., Amoureux J. P.. Measurement of Hetero-Nuclear Distances Using a Symmetry-Based Pulse Sequence in Solid-State NMR. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010;12(32):9395–9405. doi: 10.1039/b926546e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brinkmann A., Kentgens A. P. M.. Proton-Selective 17O-1H Distance Measurements in Fast Magic-Angle-Spinning Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy for the Determination of Hydrogen Bond Lengths. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128(46):14758–14759. doi: 10.1021/ja065415k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Venkatesh A., Luan X., Perras F. A., Hung I., Huang W., Rossini A. J.. T1-Noise Eliminated Dipolar Heteronuclear Multiple-Quantum Coherence Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020;22(36):20815–20828. doi: 10.1039/D0CP03511D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Atterberry B. A., Carnahan S. L., Chen Y., Venkatesh A., Rossini A. J.. Double Echo Symmetry-Based REDOR and RESPDOR Pulse Sequences for Proton Detected Measurements of Heteronuclear Dipolar Coupling Constants. J. Magn. Reson. 2022;336:107147. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2022.107147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larsen F. H., Skibsted J., Jakobsen H. J., Nielsen N. C.. Solid-State QCPMG NMR of Low-γ Quadrupolar Metal Nuclei in Natural Abundance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122(29):7080–7086. doi: 10.1021/ja0003526. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao X., Hoffbauer W., Schmedt Auf Der Günne J., Levitt M. H.. Heteronuclear Polarization Transfer by Symmetry-Based Recoupling Sequences in Solid-State NMR. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2004;26(2):57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2003.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Beek J. D., Dupree R., Levitt M. H.. Symmetry-Based Recoupling of 17O-1H Spin Pairs in Magic-Angle Spinning NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 2006;179(1):38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2005.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grey C. P., Veeman W. S., Vega A. J.. Rotational Echo 14N/<13C/1H Triple Resonance Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: A Probe of 13C-14N Internuclear Distances. J. Chem. Phys. 1993;98(10):7711–7724. doi: 10.1063/1.464579. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Grey C. P., Vega A. J.. Determination of the Quadrupole Coupling Constant of the Invisible Aluminum Spins in Zeolite HY with 1H/27Al TRAPDOR NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117(31):8232–8242. doi: 10.1021/ja00136a022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Perras F. A., Wang Z., Kobayashi T., Baiker A., Huang J., Pruski M.. Shedding Light on the Atomic-Scale Structure of Amorphous Silica-Alumina and Its Brønsted Acid Sites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019;21(35):19529–19537. doi: 10.1039/C9CP04099D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bak M., Nielsen N. C.. REPULSION, A Novel Approach to Efficient Powder Averaging in Solid-State NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 1997;125(1):132–139. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1996.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bielecki A., Kolbert A. C., Levitt M. H.. Frequency-Switched Pulse Sequences: Homonuclear Decoupling and Dilute Spin NMR in Solids. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989;155(4–5):341–346. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(89)87166-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Perras F. A., Kobayashi T., Pruski M.. PRESTO Polarization Transfer to Quadrupolar Nuclei: Implications for Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015;17(35):22616–22622. doi: 10.1039/C5CP04145G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baldus M., Rovnyak D., Griffin R. G.. Radio-Frequency-Mediated Dipolar Recoupling among Half-Integer Quadrupolar Spins. J. Chem. Phys. 2000;112(13):5902–5909. doi: 10.1063/1.481187. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Q., Hu B., Lafon O., Trébosc J., Deng F., Amoureux J. P.. Double-Quantum Homonuclear NMR Correlation Spectroscopy of Quadrupolar Nuclei Subjected to Magic-Angle Spinning and High Magnetic Field. J. Magn. Reson. 2009;200(2):251–260. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagashima H., Trebosc J., Kon Y., Sato K., Lafon O., Amoureux J.-P.. Observation of Low-ΓQuadrupolar Nuclei by Surface-Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142(24):10659–10672. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b13838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagashima H., Trébosc J., Kon Y., Lafon O., Amoureux J. P.. Efficient Transfer of DNP-Enhanced 1H Magnetization to Half-Integer Quadrupolar Nuclei in Solids at Moderate Spinning Rate. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2021;59(9–10):920–939. doi: 10.1002/mrc.5121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Medek A., Frydman V., Frydman L.. Central Transition Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in the Presence of Large Quadrupole Couplings: Cobalt-59 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Cobaltophthalocyanines. J. Phys. Chem. A. 1999;103(25):4830–4835. doi: 10.1021/jp990410d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Clark S. J., Segall M. D., Pickard C. J., Hasnip P. J., Probert M. I. J., Refson K., Payne M. C.. First Principles Methods Using CASTEP. Z. KRISTALLOGR. 2005;220(5–6):567–570. doi: 10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Iuga D., Simon S., De Boer E., Kentgens A. P. M.. A Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Study of Amorphous and Crystalline Lanthanum-Aluminates. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1999;103(36):7591–7598. doi: 10.1021/jp991257q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- d’Espinose de Lacaillerie J.-B., Fretigny C., Massiot D.. MAS NMR Spectra of Quadrupolar Nuclei in Disordered Solids: The Czjzek Model. J. Magn. Reson. 2008;192(2):244–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Avadhut Y. S., Weber J., Hammarberg E., Feldmann C., Schmedtaufder Günne J.. Structural Investigation of Aluminium Doped ZnO Nanoparticles by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012;14(33):11610–11625. doi: 10.1039/c2cp41139c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blanc F., Middlemiss D. S., Buannic L., Palumbo J. L., Farnan I., Grey C. P.. Thermal Phase Transformations in LaGaO3 and LaAlO3 Perovskites: An Experimental and Computational Solid-State NMR Study. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2012;42:87–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2012.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bastow T. J., Dirken P. J., Smith M. E., Whitfield H. J.. Factors Controlling the 17O NMR Chemical Shift in Ionic Mixed Metal Oxides. J. Phys. Chem. 1996;100(47):18539–18545. doi: 10.1021/jp9622694. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Merle N., Trébosc J., Baudouin A., Del Rosal I., Maron L., Szeto K., Genelot M., Mortreux A., Taoufik M., Delevoye L., Gauvin R. M.. 17O NMR Gives Unprecedented Insights into the Structure of Supported Catalysts and Their Interaction with the Silica Carrier. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134(22):9263–9275. doi: 10.1021/ja301085m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Djanashvili K., Platas-Iglesias C., Peters J. A.. The Structure of the Lanthanide Aquo Ions in Solution as Studied by 17O NMR Spectroscopy and DFT Calculations. Dalton Trans. 2008;(5):602–607. doi: 10.1039/B714801A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perras F. A., Culver D. B.. Determining the Conformation of Supported Complexes Using an 17O TEDOR-like NMR Experiment. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2025;129(38):17069–17079. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c04236. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Press, W. H. ; Teukolsky, S. A. . Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Lv J., Zhu L., Ma Y.. CALYPSO: A Method for Crystal Structure Prediction. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2012;183(10):2063–2070. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.05.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang K., Li G., Zou C., Chen S., Li S., Han Z.-K., Jiang Y., Yuan W., Yang H., Ganduglia-Pirovano M. V., Wang Y.. A CeO2 (100) Surface Reconstruction Unveiled by in Situ STEM and Particle Swarm Optimization Techniques. Sci. Adv. 2024;10(32):eadn7904. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn7904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han Y., Wang J., Ding C., Gao H., Pan S., Jia Q., Sun J.. Prediction of Surface Reconstructions Using MAGUS. J. Chem. Phys. 2023;158(17):174109. doi: 10.1063/5.0142281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zakaryan H. A., Kvashnin A. G., Oganov A. R.. Stable Reconstruction of the (110) Surface and Its Role in Pseudocapacitance of Rutile-like RuO2 . Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):10357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10331-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw data, simulated RESPDOR and TRAPDOR data, and structure files are available at https://zenodo.org (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21360645).





