Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Jun 9;65(33):e1326350. doi: 10.1002/anie.1326350

Boosting Natural Rubber Performance by Backbone Rigid Functionalization

Minghang Ji 1, Shan Tang 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13452513  PMID: 42261992

ABSTRACT

Natural rubber relies on irreversible vulcanization to enhance material performance, but the resulting densely crosslinked networks resist breakdown, rendering conventional physical recycling methods ineffective. Developing backbone‐level functionalization strategies that simultaneously improve performance and enable controlled deconstruction remains a fundamental challenge. Here we develop a backbone rigid functionalization (BRF) strategy to install rigid, polar cyclobutane units directly into natural rubber via catalyst‐free [2+2] photocycloaddition. Incorporation of cyclobutane‐fused succinimide units substantially enhances tensile strength and toughness. Simply varying the reaction time enables continuous tuning of material behavior from viscoelastic polymers to elastomers and plastomers. When combined with vulcanization, the polar‐functionalized natural rubber yields high‐performance thermosets with a five‑fold improvement in stress, Young's modulus and toughness relative to conventional vulcanizates. Notably, the cyclobutane‐fused succinimide units undergo force‐triggered cycloreversion upon bulk ball‐milling, enabling vulcanized rubber with on‐demand hydrolytic degradability. This single‐step BRF process provides a practical pathway for accessing high‐performance rubbers with on‐demand degradability.

Keywords: [2+2] photocycloaddition, backbone rigid functionalization, ball‐milling, natural rubber, polymer upcycling


A backbone rigid functionalization (BRF) strategy is developed to install rigid, polar cyclobutane units directly into natural rubber via catalyst‐free [2+2] photocycloaddition. Incorporation of cyclobutane‐fused succinimide units substantially enhances tensile strength and toughness. This single‐step BRF process provides a practical pathway for accessing high‐performance rubbers with on‐demand hydrolytic degradability.

graphic file with name ANIE-65-e1326350-g004.jpg

1. Introduction

Natural rubber, composed predominantly of cis‐1,4‐polyisoprene, is intrinsically soft, tacky, and thermally sensitive, exhibiting limited elastic recovery and mechanical robustness [1]. Traditionally, these deficiencies are overcome through sulfur‐based vulcanization, which permanently converts linear chains into densely crosslinked networks [2]. The incorporation of sulfur crosslinks, inorganic fillers, and metal additives markedly improves mechanical property, durability, and heat resistance (Figure 1a) [3, 4, 5, 6]. However, postconsumer vulcanized rubbers persist in the environment and are notoriously difficult to recycle or reprocess [7, 8], as cleavage of strong C–S and S–S bonds typically requires harsh conditions and generates hazardous byproducts [9]. These limitations highlight a fundamental dilemma: How to enhance the performance of natural rubber while preserving its ability to be reprocessed or degraded. Addressing this challenge demands molecular‐level strategies that reengineer elastomer backbones beyond conventional irreversible crosslinking to create tunable, deconstructable rubbers [10, 11].

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Strategies for natural rubber functionalization. (a) Conventional vulcanization of natural rubber. (b) Polar functionalization of rubber via amination. (c) Concept and challenges of polar functionalization of natural rubber via [2+2] photocycloaddition. (d) BRF of natural rubber.

Introducing polar functionality into non‐polar polymer backbones offers a powerful route to diversify material properties and introduce controlled chemical responses [12, 13, 14, 15]. Beyond irreversible vulcanization, incorporating polar functional groups provides opportunities to enhance the material performance of rubber materials [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21]. In this context, controlled amine functionalization of polyolefins has attracted growing interest for improving tensile strength, toughness, adhesion, wettability, and so on [22, 23, 24]. Emerging catalytic methods, such as direct C–H amination and alkene hydroamination, have been applied to modify rubber backbones [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31] (Figure 1b). Generally, these approaches install flexible, non‐stereoregular substituents that only modestly perturb chain entanglements, offering limited improvement in mechanical properties. What is needed are robust, backbone‐level polar motifs that both reinforce polymer chain interactions and provide a predictable, stimulus‐responsive route to deconstruction [32].

The [2+2] photocycloaddition is a well‐established and powerful method for constructing cyclobutane rings [33]. Given that natural rubber consists of repeating cis‐alkene units, we envisaged its direct [2+2] photocycloaddition with a polar alkene as a route to introduce polar functional groups (Figure 1c). Beyond imparting polarity, this method simultaneously incorporates rigid cyclobutane units into the polymer backbone. Introducing four‐membered rings into polyolefin repeat units has been demonstrated to restrict bond rotation along the backbone, thereby enhancing thermal and mechanical properties by reducing the conformational freedom (entropy) of polymer chains [34, 35]. To date, only one example has demonstrated the use of UV‐induced Paterno–Büchi [2+2] cycloaddition with aldehydes to introduce oxetane groups into the side chains of an unsaturated styrene–isoprene–styrene copolymer [36]. However, applying [2+2] photocycloaddition to the polar functionalization of unsaturated polymer backbones remains unexplored, primarily due to the tendency of photoirradiation to induce uncontrolled interchain cross‐linking [37, 38]. Therefore, achieving selective [2+2] photocycloaddition with polar olefins while suppressing self‐crosslinking of the rubber backbone is critical.

Here we report a backbone rigid functionalization (BRF) strategy that utilizes a [2+2] photocycloaddition of maleimides to introduce rigid, polar cyclobutane‐fused succinimide units into the backbone of natural rubber (Figure 1d). The reaction proceeds at room temperature, reaches up to 28 mol% functionalization in 10 min, and requires no catalyst or sacrificial reagents. Incorporation of these bicyclic polar units substantially enhances tensile strength and toughness. Simply varying the reaction time enables continuous tuning of material behavior from viscoelastic polymers to elastomers and plastomers. When combined with vulcanization, the polar‐functionalized natural rubber yields high‐performance thermosets with five‐fold improved strength and toughness relative to conventional vulcanizates. Moreover, because the bicyclic cyclobutane units are mechanoresponsive and undergo force‐triggered cycloreversion [39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44], the resulting materials exhibit on‐demand degradability upon bulk ball‐milling. This single‐step BRF process therefore provides a practical pathway to high‐performance, on‐demand degradable rubbers.

2. Results and Discussion

Initially, we explored [2+2] photocycloaddition for natural rubber functionalization (Table S1). In the presence of a photocatalyst, rapid gelation of natural rubber solution occurred. To suppress homocoupling of the cis‐alkene moieties in natural rubber, we subsequently investigated catalyst‐free [2+2] photocycloaddition. Among various polar olefins screened, only N‐alkyl maleimides exhibited both high reactivity and effective suppression of excessive cross‐linking, attributed to their distinctive triplet self‐excitation capability upon irradiation [45, 46]. A small‐molecule model reaction of 2‐methyl‐2‐butene with N‐methyl maleimide (M1) confirmed the efficient [2+2] photocycloaddition to form cyclobutane‐fused succinimide units (Figures S1–S4). For systematic evaluation of reaction parameters on functionalization efficiency and material properties, we selected commercially available cis‐1,4‐polyisoprene (PI) and M1 as model substrates (Figure 2a). A solution of PI and M1 (0.50 equiv to the cis‐alkene units) in DCM was irradiated in a photoreactor with a 500 W medium‐pressure mercury lamp. Polymers obtained at different irradiation times were purified and subsequently characterized to determine their degree of functionalization ratios (DOF by 1H NMR) and molecular weight (M w by size exclusion chromatography, SEC). Prolonged irradiation time from 2 to 10 min increased the polar functionalization ratio from 6 to 28 mol%, with a concomitant increase in M w and Đ (Figure 2b, and Table S2). Notably, this fast BRF strategy proceeds in high reaction efficiency without requiring any catalysts or additives at room temperature. Replacing the 500 W mercury lamp with a 10 W 365 nm LED still afforded a substantial DOF of 21 mol% for PI, which is beneficial for the operation and scalability of this BRF strategy (Table S3). For the rubber with a functionalization ratio of 28 mol% (PIF‐28), the formation of cyclobutane‐fused succinimide structure on the polymer backbone was confirmed by NMR and fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy attenuated total reflectance (FTIR‐ATR) analyses. The 1H NMR spectrum showed characteristic resonance of the N–CH3 signal at 2.98 ppm (s), while carbonyl (C═O) resonances of cyclic imides appeared in the range of 174–180 ppm of its 13C NMR spectrum (Figure 2c). The FTIR‐ATR spectrum of PIF‐28 exhibited two characteristic absorption bands at 1765 and 1693 cm−1 (Figure S5), which are assigned to the C═O stretching vibration of the cyclic imide groups [43].

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

BRF of natural rubber with N‐methyl maleimide. (a) Reaction scheme and property evolution upon BRF. (b) Evolution of DOF and M w with reaction time. (c) 1H and 13C NMR of PIF‐28. (d) DSC traces. (e) Rheological frequency sweeps. (f) Stress‐strain curves of PIF‐12, PIF‐19, PIF‐23, and PIF‐28. (g) SEM images of PI and PIF‐28.

The rubbers with varied functionalization ratios (PIF‐6 to PIF‐28) exhibit an evident transition from a viscous, flowable state to a tough, solid‐state material. This transformation may originate from two complementary factors: (1) main‐chain stiffening induced by the rigid four‐membered cyclobutane rings [34]; and (2) the physical cross‐linking resulting from non‐covalent interactions among polar units [47, 48]. Recognizing that rubber can cross‐link upon light irradiation, we conducted light‐induced experiments on PI in the absence of M1 (Table S4). By varying the reaction time, we obtained two rubbers with increased M w (PI‑C‑1 and PI‑C‑2). To quantitatively elucidate the influence of this polar functionalization on material properties, the thermal and mechanical behaviors of the polymers were systematically characterized using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), rheometer, and uniaxial tensile tests. DSC analyses were first conducted on the series of polymers, including pristine PI and PIF‐6 to PIF‐28 (Figure 2d). The glass transition temperature (T g) of PI was observed at −61.5 °C. Despite their different M w, PI‑C‑1 and PI‑C‑2 exhibited neglectable T g changes compared to PI (Figure S6). The T g of the functionalized rubbers exhibited a continuous increase, ranging from −56.8 to 19.6 °C with increasing functionalization ratio. This systematic increase in T g originates from the reduced chain segmental mobility, which is caused by the rigid cyclobutane structures and the non‐covalent interactions introduced by the polar units.

Small‐amplitude oscillatory shear tests performed at 25 °C and 1% strain further confirmed the improvement in material properties, which may be attributed to the enhancement of chain rigidity and/or non‐covalent interactions [49]. The frequency dependence of the storage modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G′′) are shown in Figure 2e. For pristine PI, G′′ predominated over G′ across the entire frequency range, characteristic of a viscoelastic liquid. PIF‐6 exhibited a crossover point where G′ surpassed G′′ at approximately 20 rad/s, signaling the onset of elastic dominance at higher frequencies. With increasing functionalization, the elastic behavior becomes more pronounced, as evidenced by the downward shift of the crossover point to 1 rad/s in PIF‐12. Notably, for PIF‐19, PIF‐23, and PIF‐28, G′ consistently exceeded G′′ throughout the frequency sweep, demonstrating solid‐like, elastic behavior. Comparison of the modulus values and trends for PI‑C‑1, PI‑C‑2, PIF‑6, and PIF‑28 shows that the high M w PI‑C‑2 exhibits a lower modulus than that of PIF‑6 and substantially lower than that of PIF‑28 (Figure S7), indicating that slight cross‐linking contributes only marginally to the enhancement of mechanical properties. The plateau value of G′ increased markedly from 104 to 106 Pa with increasing polar unit content. The observed rheological transition from viscous (PI and PIF‐6) to elastic (PIF‐12 and PIF‐28) behavior demonstrates that main‐chain rigid polar units effectively restrict polymer chain mobility, resulting in a markedly enhanced storage modulus.

PIF‐12, PIF‐19, PIF‐23, and PIF‐28 were molded into dumbbell‐shaped specimens via melt‐pressing for uniaxial tensile testing. The corresponding stress‐strain curves are presented in Figures 2f and S8. PIF‐12 exhibited a stress of 0.04 ± 0.01 MPa with a strain at break of 2278% ± 96%. As the polar unit content increased, PIF‐19 demonstrated an enhanced strength of 0.65 ± 0.02 MPa accompanied by a reduced strain of 1978% ± 49%. To investigate the elastic properties, PIF‐19 was extended step by step up to different strains (Figure S9). After a strain of 700%, the strain recovery value (SR) was 54%. A further increase to 23 mol% resulted in a substantial improvement in tensile stress to 3.30 ± 0.15 MPa, accompanied by a decrease in strain to 976% ± 93% and a reduction in elasticity, with an SR of 50% (Figure S10). Further increasing the functionalization ratio to 28 mol% shifted the material behavior from an elastomer toward a plastomers, achieved a fracture stress of 6.11 ± 0.22 MPa with a strain of 709% ± 30%. The thermal reprocessability of PIF‐28 is evidenced by the repeatable stress‐strain curves and retained mechanical properties after multiple processing cycles (Figure S11). The fracture surfaces of PI and PIF‐28 were examined using cryogenic high‐resolution scanning electron microscopy (Figure 2g). The fracture surface of unfunctionalized PI appeared smooth and featureless. In contrast, PIF‐28 exhibited a wavy, ductile fracture morphology with no evidence of macroscopic phase separation.

Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was conducted on PIF‐19, PIF‐23, and PIF‐28 over a range of temperatures (Figure S12). At low temperatures, PIF‐19 and PIF‐23 exhibited comparable storage modulus (E′), whereas PIF‐28 showed a higher modulus. With increasing temperature, the moduli of all samples decreased, but followed distinct trends, indicating that the rigid cyclobutane units effectively restrict segmental mobility. Notably, PIF‐19 displayed a crossover where the loss modulus (E′′) exceeded E′ at high temperatures, characteristic of a viscoelastic liquid. In contrast, PIF‐23 and PIF‐28 maintained E′ > E′′ across the entire temperature range, which might be attributable to the physical cross‐linking effect of the polar succinimide units that reinforce the network via noncovalent interactions. These observations strongly indicate that the polar bicyclic cyclobutane units substantially enhance non‐covalent interactions, thereby increasing the cohesive energy and toughness of PI. Additionally, the polar units significantly enhanced surface hydrophilicity. Water contact angle (WCA) measurements confirmed this trend, with the WCA decreasing from 108.8° (pristine PI) to 82.9° (PIF‐28) as functionalization increases (Figure S13).

The catalyst‐ and additive‐free [2+2] photocycloaddition relies on the triplet activation of N‐alkyl maleimides upon irradiation, leading to the incorporation of succinimide groups in high yields and stereoselectivity (Figure 3a) [46]. To evaluate the versatility of this functionalization protocol, we extended its application to a series of maleimide derivatives bearing n‐octyl (M2), cyclohexyl (M3), benzyl (M4), 2‑methoxyethyl (M5), and 2‑hydroxyethyl (M6) substituents (Figure 3b and Table S5). Saturated alkyl derivatives M2 and M3 achieved a functionalization ratio of 23 mol%, suggesting the high reactivity reported for N‑alkyl maleimides. In contrast, M4‐M6 showed lower degrees of functionalization, which can be explained by the potential quenching of triplet intermediates by phenyl group and heteroatoms [45]. DSC analyses of the functionalized rubbers demonstrated that substituent structure influences thermal properties (Figure 3c). Low functionalization ratios (PIFc, PIFd, and PIFe) have only a slight effect on T g. For PIFa‐23 and PIFb‐23, T g rose markedly to −22.1 and −11.4 °C, respectively. To establish the correlation between substituent structure and mechanical properties, uniaxial tensile tests were performed on rubbers with identical functionalization levels, including PIF‐23 (methyl), PIFa‐23 (n‐octyl), and PIFb‐23 (cyclohexyl) (Figures 3d, S14, and S15). Extending the N‐alkyl groups from methyl to n‑octyl enhanced chain flexibility, lowering stress, increasing strain, and slightly reducing toughness. In contrast, the cyclohexyl substituent in PIFb‑23 introduced steric hindrance and rigidity, which enlarged inter‑chain spacing and simultaneously improved toughness and strain while preserving tensile strength and Young's modulus. These findings confirm this BRF strategy as a versatile route compatible with diverse maleimide monomers. It enables the tuning of PI mechanical properties by varying N‐alkyl groups and offers a foundation for developing graft copolymers via hydroxyl‐functionalized units [50].

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Diverse BRF of rubbers. (a) Reaction scheme for the [2+2] photocycloaddition between rubbers and maleimide monomers. (b) Functionalization efficiency of PI using various maleimide monomers. (c) DSC traces of the rubbers functionalized with different maleimide monomers. (d) Mechanical performance comparison of PIF‐23/PIFa‐23/PIFb‐23. (e) Functionalization efficiency of synthetic rubbers. (f) Comparison of DSC traces for commercial rubbers pristine and functionalized with M1. (g) Comparison of toughness of pristine and functionalized rubbers.

The presence of abundant unsaturated C═C bonds in other commercial synthetic rubbers also provides opportunities for extending our BRF strategy beyond natural rubber. Three major synthetic rubbers, cis‐polybutadiene (PBD), polychloroprene (CR), and styrene‐butadiene‐styrene triblock copolymer (SBR) were tested under the optimized reaction conditions. Each rubber was mixed with M1 in DCM and irradiated for 10 min under the standard conditions (Table S6). 1H NMR analyses revealed characteristic N–CH3 signals, confirming the successful occurrence of the [2+2] photocycloaddition (Figures S16–S18). It has been reported that the differences in chain‐entanglements and viscosities may affect the efficiency of a post‐polymerization modification reaction [24]. However, high functionalization ratios were achieved in all three cases: 15 mol% for PBD (PBDF‑15), 20 mol% for CR (CRF‑20), and 16 mol% for SBR (SBRF‑16) (Figure 3e). DSC analysis revealed dramatic changes in thermal behavior (Figure 3f). While PBD showed a melting transition (T m) at −9.5 °C, the functionalized rubber (PBDF‑15) only showed a T g at 63.8 °C. Similarly, the T m of CR disappeared after polar cyclobutane functionalization, leaving a single T g at 24.0 °C. The pristine SBR showed no clear thermal transition in the measured range, whereas the functionalized rubber SBRF‑16 observed a well‐defined T g at 23.1 °C. The observed changes in the DSC traces originate from rigid, polar cyclobutane‐fused succinimide units, which enhance interactions through polarity and disrupt chain packing via their four‐membered ring structure.

The significant differences in backbone structures would lead to different responses in thermal transitions and mechanical reinforcement after BRF. To evaluate the impact of the M1 functionalization on mechanical properties, rubber samples (before and after reaction) were melt‐processed into specimens for uniaxial tensile testing (Figures S19–S21). The functionalization led to substantial mechanical enhancements: PBDF‑15 exhibited a 23.2‑fold increase in stress, a 10.6‑fold increase in Young’s modulus, and a 11.6‐fold increase in toughness; CRF‑20 showed the most dramatic improvements (141‑fold in Young's modulus, 2.3‑fold in toughness); and SBRF‑16 achieved over 3.0‑fold increases in both stress and toughness (Figures 3g and S22). These experimental results collectively demonstrate the broad applicability of this BRF strategy across different commercial rubbers. The incorporated polar cyclobutane units are crucial for the property enhancement. They simultaneously strengthen intermolecular interactions and alter chain conformation, leading to improved mechanical performance.

To investigate how polar cyclobutane functionalization affects vulcanized rubber, we selected PI and PIF‑12 for vulcanization using a standard industrial formulation [51] (Figure 4a and Table S7). A slight increase in T g was observed in both cases after vulcanization (Figure S23). The mechanical properties of vulcanized samples (V‐PI and V‐PIF‑12) were then compared with PIF‑12 via uniaxial tensile testing (Figures 4b and S24). The stress‑strain curves reveal that PIF‑12 is weak and highly extensible. Both vulcanized samples show similar elongation at break, as chain mobility is constrained by the permanent chemical cross‑links introduced during vulcanization. Remarkably, V‐PIF‑12 outperforms V‐PI by more than six‑fold in stress, Young's modulus and toughness. Although strand extension by force‐coupled cycloreversion of nonscissile mechanophores may contribute to the network toughening [52, 53, 54], we attribute the substantial enhancement primarily to additional physical cross‑links via non‐covalent interactions by the polar units (Figure 4a, red dashed lines). Toluene equilibrium swelling experiments further confirmed the formation of a network structure. The gel fractions of V‐PI and V‐PIF‐12 were comparable (0.93 and 0.87, respectively). Meanwhile, V‐PIF‐12 exhibited increased cross‐link density and decreased swelling ratio with increasing polar functionalization (Table S8). These results indicate that the introduced polar groups have minimal impact on vulcanization while effectively enhancing interchain interactions. These physical cross‑links synergize with the chemical vulcanization network, leading to a comprehensive reinforcement of the material. Therefore, the BRF strategy represents a viable route to enhance the performance of vulcanized rubber.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Vulcanization and on‐demand degradation. (a) Comparison of the network structures before and after vulcanization: PI and PIF‑12. (b) Mechanical performance comparison of V‐PI/PIF‐12/ V‐PIF‐12. (c) General method for chemical degradation of polar cyclobutane unit. (d) Photographs of V‐PI and V‐PIF‐12 before ball‐milling. (e) Photographs of V‐PI′ and V‐PIF‐12′ after ball‐milling. (f) Photographs of V‐PI′ and V‐PIF‐12′ after hydrolysis and dissolved in THF. (g) Quantitative analysis of remaining insoluble network V‐PI′ and V‐PIF‐12′ after acid hydrolysis at different ball‐milling activation times. (h) SEC traces of V‐PI′ and V‐PIF‐12′ after acid hydrolysis at different ball‐milling activation times. (i) 1H NMR spectra of V‐PI′ and V‐PIF‐12′ after hydrolysis.

The stable three‐dimensional network formed through vulcanization is highly resistant to breakdown, rendering conventional physical recycling methods ineffective. Therefore, efforts have been devoted to utilizing the unsaturated C═C bonds for the chemical deconstruction of rubbers [10, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60]. Cyclobutane‐fused succinimide units are known to be mechanoresponsive, and hydrolysable imide groups can be introduced into the backbone via mechanochemical activation [42, 43, 61, 62]. Therefore, the fused succinimide units in V‐PIF‑12 could undergo force‐induced cycloreversion to introduce cleavable imide groups into the main chain, enabling subsequent acid hydrolysis to efficiently degrade the cross‑linked polymer into telechelic oligomers (Figure 4c). To evaluate this BRF strategy for degrading waste vulcanized rubber, control ball‐milling experiments were performed on V‐PI and V‐PIF‑12 (Figure 4d, e). After ball‐milling at 60 Hz for 120 min, the activated polymer network V‐PI′ yielded an insoluble residue in THF after acid treatment. In contrast, hydrolysis of the activated polymer network V‐PIF‑12′ produced a clear THF solution (Figure 4f).

The degradation efficiency was quantified by analyzing the insoluble solid residues and soluble products (Figures S25, S26, Tables S9 and S10). Under identical hydrolysis conditions, the insoluble fraction of V‐PI remained nearly constant with increasing ball‐milling time, whereas that of V‐PIF progressively decreased. After 120 min of ball‐milling, the insoluble fraction of V‐PI′ remained >96% (Figure 4g, orange line). In sharp contrast, the insoluble content of V‐PIF‑12′ dropped to 16%, attributable mainly to inorganic additives from the vulcanization recipe (Figure 4g, green line). The SEC profile of V‐PI′ products showed negligible change over time (Figure S28). For V‐PIF‑12′, the increasing intensity of oligomer peaks in the low‑molecular‑weight region with longer ball‑milling time resulted from the sustained force‐induced cycloreversion of cyclobutane units (Figures 4h and S29). Moreover, 1H NMR of hydrolyzed V‐PIF‑12′ revealed characteristic olefinic resonances at 6.56 and 7.00 ppm (m), and carboxylic acid proton at 10.87 ppm (bs) (Figure 4i). Quantitative 1H NMR analysis revealed 59% ring‐opening of the cyclobutane‐fused succinimide mechanophores in V‐PIF‑12′ (Figure S30). Moreover, high‐resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HR‐ESI‐MS) analysis of the small‐molecule products identified several characteristic telechelic oligomers (A1‐A6) derived from hydrolyzed acyclic imide units of V‐PIF‑12′ (Table S11 and Figure S31). These results confirm the efficient hydrolytic degradation to telechelic oligomers, providing direct evidence for the mechanophore activation in the vulcanized rubber backbone. Overall, the polar cyclobutane units installed via the BRF strategy enable the controllable, on‑demand degradation of vulcanized rubber.

3. Conclusion

We have demonstrated a tunable and efficient method for the direct BRF of natural and synthetic rubbers via [2+2] photocycloaddition with maleimides. This strategy installs rigid, polar cyclobutane‐fused succinimide units into the polymer backbone, which substantially enhances the mechanical properties of rubbers. Meanwhile, such units are mechanoresponsive and undergo force‐triggered cycloreversion upon bulk ball‐milling, enabling vulcanized rubber with on‐demand hydrolytic degradability. We anticipate that this functionalization protocol will offer a novel and practical solution for enhancing the performance of rubber materials.

Author Contributions

Minghang Ji: investigation, writing – original draft, and validation. Shan Tang: supervision, funding acquisition, writing – review and editing, conceptualization, and writing – original draft.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Supporting File: anie73099‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.pdf.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52473097, 22401187), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (25X010202131). The authors thank Dr. F. Zhou and Mr. Z. Li for helpful suggestions, and thank Ms. M. Jiang for assistance with WCA measurements.

Dedicated to the 130th anniversary of Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supporting information of this article.

References

  • 1. Cornish K., Chemistry, Manufacture and Applications of Natural Rubber, ed. Kohjiya S. and Ikeda Y. (Woodhead Publishing, 2014), 3. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Flory P. J., “Network Structure and the Elastic Properties of Vulcanized Rubber,” Chemical Reviews 35 (1944): 51–75, 10.1021/cr60110a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gent A. N., American Chemical Society. Rubber Division., Engineering With Rubber: How to Design Rubber Components, 2nd ed. (Hanser, Munich; Cincinnati, 2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Guo B., Tang Z., and Zhang L., “Transport Performance in Novel Elastomer Nanocomposites: Mechanism, Design and Control,” Progress in Polymer Science 61 (2016): 29–66, 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Steck J., Kim J., Kutsovsky Y., and Suo Z., “Multiscale Stress Deconcentration Amplifies Fatigue Resistance of Rubber,” Nature 624 (2023): 303–308, 10.1038/s41586-023-06782-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Nian G., Chen Z., Bao X., Tan M. W. M., Kutsovsky Y., and Suo Z., “Natural Rubber With High Resistance to Crack Growth,” Nature Sustainability 8 (2025): 692–701, 10.1038/s41893-025-01559-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lim Z., “Microplastics Are Everywhere — But are They Harmful?,” Nature 593 (2021): 22–25, 10.1038/d41586-021-01143-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Strokal M., Vriend P., Bak M. P., Kroeze C., van Wijnen J., and van Emmerik T., “River Export of Macro‐ and Microplastics to Seas by Sources Worldwide,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 4842, 10.1038/s41467-023-40501-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chittella H., Yoon L. W., Ramarad S., and Lai Z.‐W., “Rubber Waste Management: A Review on Methods, Mechanism, and Prospects,” Polymer Degradation Stability 194 (2021): 109761, 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2021.109761. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Wu P., Hu Q., Ogunfowora L. A., et al., “Toward Sustainable Polydienes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 147 (2025): 2960–2977, 10.1021/jacs.4c12730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zhang G., Guo B., and Zhang L., “Significant Trends in Rubber Research Driven by Environment, Resource, and Sustainability,” Macromolecules 58 (2025): 5883–5903, 10.1021/acs.macromol.5c00494. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Franssen N. M. G., Reek J. N. H., and de Bruin B., “Synthesis of Functional ‘Polyolefins’: State of the Art and Remaining Challenges,” Chemical Society Reviews 42 (2013): 5809, 10.1039/c3cs60032g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Tan C., Si G., Zou C., and Chen C., “Functional Polyolefins and Composites,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): e202424529, 10.1002/anie.202424529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Fazekas T. J., Alty J. W., Neidhart E. K., Miller A. S., Leibfarth F. A., and Alexanian E. J., “Diversification of Aliphatic C–H Bonds in Small Molecules and Polyolefins Through Radical Chain Transfer,” Science 375 (2022): 545–550, 10.1126/science.abh4308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Zhou Y., Xu Z., and Moore J. S., “Dual C–H Functionalization of Polyolefins for Covalent Adaptable Network Formation via Cooperative Electrolysis,” Nature Synthesis 4 (2025): 1546–1555, 10.1038/s44160-025-00876-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Mohanty S., Parameswaran B., and Sarkar S., et al., Click Chemistry in Polymer Science: Designs to Applications, ed. Singha N. K., Mondal P., and Hoogenboom R., (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2024), 280, 10.1039/9781839169885. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Phinyocheep P. and Duangthong S., “Ultraviolet‐Curable Liquid Natural Rubber,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science 78 (2000): 1478–1485, 10.1002/1097-4628(20001121)78:8<1478::AID-APP30>3.0.CO;2-K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Tessanan W., Daniel P., and Phinyocheep P., “Development of Photosensitive Natural Rubber as a Mechanical Modifier for Ultraviolet‐Curable Resin Applied in Digital Light Processing‐Based Three‐Dimensional Printing Technology,” ACS Omega 6 (2021): 14838–14847, 10.1021/acsomega.1c00418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Cooper W., Vaughan G., Miller S., and Fielden M., “Graft Copolymers From Natural Rubber Latex Using Visible, Ultraviolet, and γ‐Ray Initiation,” Journal of Polymer Science 34 (1959): 651–670, 10.1002/pol.1959.1203412743. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Shanmugharaj A. M., Kim J. K., and Ryu S. H., “Modification of Rubber Surface by UV Surface Grafting,” Applied Surface Science 252 (2006): 5714–5722, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.07.069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Anancharungsuk W., Tanpantree S., Sruanganurak A., and Tangboriboonrat P., “Surface Modification of Natural Rubber Film by UV‐Induced Graft Copolymerization with Methyl Methacrylate,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science 104 (2007): 2270–2276, 10.1002/app.25661. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ciccia N. R., Shi J. X., Pal S., et al., “Diverse Functional Polyethylenes by Catalytic Amination,” Science 381 (2023): 1433–1440, 10.1126/science.adg6093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zhou S., Wang S., Yu C., Ma P., Rao B., and Zeng R., “C─H Amination of Polypropylene with Sodium N‐Chloro‐Amides,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): e202516324, 10.1002/anie.202516324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ciccia N. R., McFadden M. E., Haber S., et al., “Illuminating the Effects of Interchain Interactions on the Catalytic Amidation of C–H Bonds in Polyethylenes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 148 (2026): 2239–2248, 10.1021/jacs.5c13501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hodges M. N., Elardo M. J., Seo J., Dohoda A. F., Michael F. E., and Golder M. R., “Upcycling of Polybutadiene Facilitated by Selenium‐Mediated Allylic Amination,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (2023): e202303115, 10.1002/anie.202303115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Scott S. S., Kaur B., Zheng C. H. M., Brant P., Gilmour D. J., and Schafer L. L., “Amine‐Functionalized Polybutadiene Synthesis by Tunable Postpolymerization Hydroaminoalkylation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 22871–22877, 10.1021/jacs.3c07564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Gitter S. R., Teh W. P., Yang X., Dohoda A. F., Michael F. E., and Boydston A. J., “C−H Functionalization and Allylic Amination for Post‐Polymerization Modification of Polynorbornenes,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (2023): e202303174, 10.1002/anie.202303174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Fried A. D., Wilson B. J., Galan N. J., and Brantley J. N., “Electroediting of Soft Polymer Backbones,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144 (2022): 8885–8891, 10.1021/jacs.2c02098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Tanasi P., Hernández Santana M., Carretero‐González J., Verdejo R., and López‐Manchado M. A., “Thermo‐Reversible Crosslinked Natural Rubber: A Diels‐Alder Route for Reuse and Self‐Healing Properties in Elastomers,” Polymer 175 (2019): 15–24, 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.04.059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Fang S., Wu S., Huang J., et al., “Notably Improved Dispersion of Carbon Black for High‐Performance Natural Rubber Composites via Triazolinedione Click Chemistry,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 59 (2020): 21047–21057, 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c04242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Towell S. E., Ratushnyy M., Cooke L. S., Lewis G. M., and Zhukhovitskiy A. V., “Deconstruction of Rubber via C–H Amination and Aza‐Cope Rearrangement,” Nature 640 (2025): 384–389, 10.1038/s41586-025-08716-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Jeschke J. and Mutlu H., “From Waste Rubber to Value Polybutadiene Modification for Circular Materials,” Nature Communications 17 (2026): 1487, 10.1038/s41467-026-69032-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Poplata S., Tröster A., Zou Y.‐Q., and Bach T., “Recent Advances in the Synthesis of Cyclobutanes by Olefin [2 + 2] Photocycloaddition Reactions,” Chemical Reviews 116 (2016): 9748–9815, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Seo J., Lee S. Y., and Bielawski C. W., “Hydrogenated Poly(Dewar benzene): A Compact Cyclic Olefin Polymer With Enhanced Thermomechanical Properties,” Macromolecules 53 (2020): 3202–3208, 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c00342. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Nie C., Maguire S. M., Zheng C. W., et al., “A Butadiene‐Derived Semicrystaline Polyolefin with Two‐Tiered Chemical Recyclability,” Chem 10 (2024): 698, 10.1016/j.chempr.2023.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Arslan M., Ceylan O., Arslan R., and Tasdelen M. A., “Facile UV‐Induced Covalent Modification and Crosslinking of Styrene–Isoprene–Styrene Copolymer via Paterno–Büchi [2 + 2] Photocycloaddition,” RSC Advances 11 (2021): 8585, 10.1039/D1RA00033K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Junkers T., “[2+2] Photo‐Cycloadditions for Polymer Modification and Surface Decoration,” European Polymer Journal 62 (2015): 273–280, 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.08.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Galan N. J. and Brantley J. N., “General Access to Allene‐Containing Polymers Using the Skattebøl Rearrangement,” ACS Macro Letters 9 (2020): 1662–1666, 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Lin Y., Kouznetsova T. B., and Craig S. L., “Mechanically Gated Degradable Polymers,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 142 (2020): 2105–2109, 10.1021/jacs.9b13359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Hsu T.‐G., Zhou J., Su H.‐W., Schrage B. R., Ziegler C. J., and Wang J., “A Polymer With “Locked” Degradability: Superior Backbone Stability and Accessible Degradability Enabled by Mechanophore Installation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 142 (2020): 2100–2104, 10.1021/jacs.9b12482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Yang J. and Xia Y., “Mechanochemical Generation of Acid‐Degradable Poly(enol ether)s,” Chemical Science 12 (2021): 4389–4394, 10.1039/D1SC00001B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Liu P., Jimaja S., Immel S., et al., “Mechanically Triggered On‐Demand Degradation of Polymers Synthesized by Radical Polymerizations,” Nature Chemistry 16 (2024): 1184–1192, 10.1038/s41557-024-01508-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Zhang X., Zhao Y., Chen M., et al., “Polyethylene Materials With Tunable Degradability by Incorporating In‐Chain Mechanophores,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (2024): 24024–24032, 10.1021/jacs.4c07445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Xu M., Liu P., Chen C., and Choi T.‐L., “Mechanically Triggered Chemical Recyclable Polyethylene‐Like Materials,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 65 (2026): e22618, 10.1002/anie.202522618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. von Sonntag J., Beckert D., Knolle W., and Mehnert R., “Electron Transfer as the Initiation Mechanism of Photocurable Maleimide–Vinyl Ether Based Resins,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry 55 (1999): 609–613, 10.1016/S0969-806X(99)00256-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Skolia E. and Kokotos C. G., “Photochemical [2 + 2] Cycloaddition of Alkenes With Maleimides: Highlighting the Differences Between N ‐Alkyl vs N ‐Aryl Maleimides,” ACS Organic & Inorgonic Au 3 (2023): 96–103, 10.1021/acsorginorgau.2c00053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Webber M. J. and Tibbitt M. W., “Dynamic and Reconfigurable Materials from Reversible Network Interactions,” Nature Reviews Materials 7 (2022): 541–556, 10.1038/s41578-021-00412-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Wang H., Yang Y., Nishiura M., Higaki Y., Takahara A., and Hou Z., “Synthesis of Self‐Healing Polymers by Scandium‐Catalyzed Copolymerization of Ethylene and Anisylpropylenes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 141 (2019): 3249–3257, 10.1021/jacs.8b13316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Cui K., Wang D., Zhang H., et al., “Preparation of Recyclable Polybutadiene Rubber Based on Acid–Base Complexation,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science 134 (2017): 45280, 10.1002/app.45280. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Zou C., Chen J., Khan M. A., Si G., and Chen C., “Stapler Strategies for Upcycling Mixed Plastics,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (2024): 19449–19459, 10.1021/jacs.4c05828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Wang X., Zhao Y.‐H., Yao Y.‐F., and Xu Y.‐X., “Biomimetic Design of Polyisoprene Rubber with Terminal Synergistic Effects Leading to Mechanical Properties and Creep Resistance Boost,” Polymer 309 (2024): 127426, 10.1016/j.polymer.2024.127426. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Wang Z., Zheng X., Ouchi T., et al., “Toughening Hydrogels Through Force‐Triggered Chemical Reactions That Lengthen Polymer Strands,” Science 374 (2021): 193–196, 10.1126/science.abg2689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Zheng X., Chiou C.‐Y., Ekim S. D., et al., “Tuning the Ultimate Strain of Single and Double Network Gels Through Reactive Strand Extension,” ACS Central Science 11 (2025): 1882–1891, 10.1021/acscentsci.5c00932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Li Z. and Tang S., “Cycloreversion‐Enhanced Toughness and Degradability in Mechanophore‐Embedded End‐Linked Polymer Networks,” Nature Communications 17 (2026): 1546, 10.1038/s41467-025-68268-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Ibrahim S., Othman N., Sreekantan S., Tan K. S., Mohd Nor Z., and Ismail H., “Preparation and Characterization of Low‐Molecular‐Weight Natural Rubber Latex via Photodegradation Catalyzed by Nano TiO2 ,” Polymers 10 (2018): 1216, 10.3390/polym10111216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Wisetkhamsai K., Patthaveekongka W., and Arayapranee W., “Study on Degradation of Natural Rubber Latex Using Hydrogen Peroxide and Sodium Nitrite in the Presence of Formic Acid,” Polymers 15 (2023): 1031, 10.3390/polym15041031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Zhang J., Kwak M. K., van Wesel L., and Choi T.‐L., “Degradation of Postconsumer Thermoset Rubbers via Photo‐Oxidation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 147 (2025): 43973–43980, 10.1021/jacs.5c16666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Park B., Cho K., Choi K., and Hong S. H., “Catalytic and Selective Chemical Recycling of Post‐Consumer Rubbers Into Cycloalkenes,” Chem 11 (2025): 102625, 10.1016/j.chempr.2025.102625. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Chen L., Wang Z., Fang E., Fan Z., and Song S., “Probing the Catalytic Degradation of Unsaturated Polyolefin Materials via Fe‐Based Lewis Acids‐Initiated Carbonyl–Olefin Metathesis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): e202503408, 10.1002/anie.202503408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Sun Z., Zhang X., Wang X., et al., “Upcycling of Vulcanized Rubber via Controlled Backbone Cleavage and Functionalization,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 148 (2026): 10640–10648, 10.1021/jacs.5c20016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Li Z., Zhang X., Zhao Y., and Tang S., “Mechanochemical Backbone Editing for Controlled Degradation of Vinyl Polymers,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63 (2024): e202408225, 10.1002/anie.202408225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Zhang X., Miao Y., and Tang S., “High‐Density Polyethylenes with Dual Degradability Enabled by In‐Chain Photolyzable and Mechanoresponsive Units,” ChemSusChem 18 (2025): e202501601, 10.1002/cssc.202501601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting File: anie73099‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.pdf.

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supporting information of this article.


Articles from Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES