Skip to main content
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1976 Nov;184(5):594–600. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197611000-00010

Graft adherence to de-epithelialized surfaces: a comparative study.

M J Tavis, J W Thornton, J H Harney, E A Woodroof, R H Bartlett
PMCID: PMC1345489  PMID: 791163

Abstract

Graft adherence may be divided into two distinct phases: Phase I, which is fibrin dependent and Phase II, which begins after 72 hours with fibro-vascular ingrowth or vascular anastomosis with the graft material. Adherence values for autograft, homograft, heterograft, silicone membrane and a modified collagen membrane were evaluated during the fibrin-dependent Phase I period at 5 and 72 hours on dermal, fascial and granulating surfaces on rats. Modified collagen membrane demonstrated a superior adherence at both times tested on dermal and fascial surfaces, while autograft and homograft were significantly more adherent on granulating surfaces at 72 hours. The inert silicone membrane was consistently the least adherent. Granulating surfaces produced the highest adherence values at 5 hours and fascial surfaces at 72 hours. The higher values found with collagen indicate that future research directed toward the production of a synthetic wound dressing or skin should be directed toward biologically derived materials, rather than inert materials. The data supports the concept of the role of fibrin as the bonding factor in Phase I adherence and implies that collagen, rather than elastin, is primarily responsible for early graft adherence.

Full text

PDF
594

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burleson R., Eiseman B. Effect of skin dressings and topical antibiotics on healing of partial thickness skin wounds in rats. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1973 Jun;136(6):958–960. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burleson R., Eiseman B. Nature of the bond between partial-thickness skin and wound granulations. Surgery. 1972 Aug;72(2):315–322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. EADE G. G. The relationship between granulation tissue, bacteria, and skin grafts in burned patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1958 Jul;22(1):42–55. doi: 10.1097/00006534-195807000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kornberg J., Burns N. E., Kafesjian R., Bartlett R. H. Ultra thin silicone polymer membrane: a new synthetic skin substitute. A preliminary study. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1972;18(0):39–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tavis M. J., Harney J. H., Thornton J. W., Bartlett R. H. Modified collagen membrane as a skin substitute: preliminary studies. J Biomed Mater Res. 1975 May;9(3):285–301. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820090305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES