Abstract
Miliary tuberculosis (TB) represents a potentially fatal form of disseminated TB resulting from the lymphohematogenous dissemination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Although accounting for approximately 1–2% of all TB cases in immunocompetent adults, its mortality rate exceeds 30%. This review screened peer-reviewed, original research studies via four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL) to synthesize up-to-date evidence. Key risk factors include human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection, anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) agents and chronic malnutrition. The clinical presentation of miliary TB is notoriously nonspecific, with fever, night sweats, weight loss, and constitutional symptoms predominating. Over 60% of patients have extrapulmonary complications, with central nervous system (CNS) involvement in 10–30%, abdominal involvement in 15–30%, and skeletal involvement in up to 17%. Laboratory abnormalities are common, including elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), anemia, lymphopenia, and nearly universal C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation. Diagnoses remain difficult due to paucibacillary lesions; novel molecular assays and a validated CNS prediction scoring system greatly improve diagnostic efficiency, while multiple microbiological and invasive tissue sampling modalities are briefly summarized for comprehensive clinical reference. Standard 6-month isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide ethambutol and isoniazid, rifampicin (HRZE-HR) regimens apply to isolated pulmonary miliary TB, whereas 9–12-month extended therapy plus adjunctive dexamethasone is required for CNS complications. Drug resistant cases demand 18–24-month individualized regimens with high blood-brain barrier penetration. Severe complications including tuberculous meningitis and high mortality acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are fully discussed, and TNF-α antagonists act as salvage therapy for steroid-refractory tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (TB-IRIS). Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccination provides substantial protection against miliary TB in children, with efficacy of approximately 77% and favorable cost-effectiveness. Existing reviews lack integrated post-pandemic epidemiological data, cutting-edge molecular diagnostics and modern extrapulmonary treatment algorithms; this paper fills such gaps to offer balanced clinical guidance for frontline clinicians.
Keywords: miliary tuberculosis, complications, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis
Introduction
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health problem, with an estimated 10.6 million people falling ill and 1.6 million deaths in 2021 alone.1,2 The World Health Organization (WHO) Global Tuberculosis Report 2023 indicated that approximately 7.5 million people were diagnosed with TB in 2022—the highest number since WHO began global monitoring in 1995—and an estimated 10 million new cases occurred in 2023.3 The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented disruption to TB services worldwide, leading to increased TB incidence and mortality for three consecutive years (2020–2023), reversing the previous downward trend and consequently setting back decades of efforts in the global fight against TB.2–4 TB has once again become the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent, with mortality more than twice that of HIV/AIDS.2 An estimated 1.26 million TB deaths occurred in 2023, with nearly 700,000 excess TB-related deaths during 2020–2023.3
Among the various forms of TB, miliary tuberculosis represents one of the most severe and potentially lethal manifestations, resulting from the massive lymphohematogenous dissemination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from a primary focus.5,6 The term “miliary,” derived from the Latin word miliarius meaning related to millet seed, was first coined by John Jacob Manget in 1700 to describe the resemblance of gross pathological findings to innumerable millet seeds in size and appearance.7,8
Historically considered predominantly a disease of infants and children in the pre-antibiotic era, miliary TB has undergone a significant epidemiological shift over the past three decades and is now increasingly recognized in adults as well.5,9 This changing demographic pattern reflects several factors, including the global HIV/AIDS pandemic, increased use of immunosuppressive therapies, organ transplantation, chronic hemodialysis programs, and the introduction of biological agents such as anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) therapies.10–12 The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated the TB burden through healthcare disruptions, delayed diagnoses, and increased vulnerability in affected populations.3,4
The clinical manifestations of miliary TB are notoriously protean and nonspecific, often leading to diagnostic delays that contribute to its substantial mortality. Fever, night sweats, weight loss, and constitutional symptoms predominate, but the disease can involve virtually any organ system, with extrapulmonary complications occurring in over 60% of cases.13,14 The central nervous system, abdomen, and skeletal system are particularly frequent sites of dissemination, each associated with significant morbidity and mortality.15–17 Additionally, ARDS is a rare but devastating complication that dramatically increases mortality.18–21
Diagnosis remains challenging due to the paucibacillary nature of the disease and the frequent absence of classic radiographic findings, particularly in early stages.22 While the classic miliary pattern on chest radiography is present in only 50–90% of cases, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) has substantially improved diagnostic sensitivity, revealing randomly distributed micronodules even when plain films appear normal.23,24 A recently developed scoring system utilizing readily available clinical and laboratory parameters offers a non-invasive approach to evaluate CNS involvement in miliary TB patients, potentially reducing the need for lumbar puncture and neuroimaging in selected cases.25
Despite the availability of effective anti-tuberculosis therapy, mortality from miliary TB remains substantial, ranging from 15–20% in children to 25–30% in adults, with even higher rates when complications such as ARDS or tuberculous meningitis supervene.26–29 Treatment follows standard anti-tuberculosis regimens, though the optimal duration remains debated, particularly when extrapulmonary involvement is present. Adjunctive corticosteroids have demonstrated benefit in specific complications, including tuberculous meningitis, pericarditis, and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS).30–32
Although previous reviews have summarized the epidemiology, clinical features, and management of miliary tuberculosis, most existing literatures were published prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and fail to address the evolving challenges of this severe disease in the post-pandemic era. The global disruption of tuberculosis healthcare services, delayed case detection, altered transmission dynamics, and worsened immunosuppressive comorbidities following the COVID-19 outbreak have substantially changed the clinical spectrum, diagnostic timeliness, and prognostic outcomes of miliary tuberculosis. Furthermore, recent advances in molecular diagnostics, individualized anti-tuberculosis regimens, complication-targeted interventions, and host-directed therapies have not been systematically consolidated in current reviews focused on miliary tuberculosis. Critical knowledge gaps remain regarding the early identification of high-risk populations, standardized diagnostic workflows for occult central nervous system involvement and acute respiratory distress syndrome, and optimized therapeutic strategies for drug-resistant cases and post-infectious inflammatory complications under modern post-COVID-19 clinical settings. Therefore, this updated review aims to comprehensively synthesize the latest evidence on the clinical characteristics, early diagnostic strategies, individualized management protocols, and prognostic evaluation of miliary tuberculosis, filling the post-pandemic research void and providing practical, up-to-date clinical guidance for the standardized diagnosis and treatment of this life-threatening tuberculosis subtype.
Epidemiology
Global Burden and Impact of COVID-19
Miliary tuberculosis accounts for approximately 1–2% of all tuberculosis cases in immunocompetent adults and up to 20% of all extrapulmonary TB cases in clinical studies.4,33,34 In autopsy studies, the proportion is considerably higher, with miliary TB documented in 0.3–13.3% of all autopsies and 11.9–40.5% of all TB cases.35–37 According to US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data from 2012–2014, miliary TB accounted for 3.5–3.8% of all reported TB cases and 11.2–12.2% of all reported extrapulmonary TB cases.38
In late HIV infection, extrapulmonary TB accounts for more than 50% of all TB cases, and miliary TB is encountered with substantially greater frequency.39,40 Among HIV-infected individuals with TB, disseminated disease occurs in up to 38% of cases, particularly when CD4+ T-cell counts fall below 200 cells/μL.41,42
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly altered the global TB landscape. The WHO 2022 and 2023 TB reports documented a rise in estimated new TB cases for three consecutive years post-2020, reversing the previous downward trend.2,3 In 2023 alone, over 1.26 million TB deaths occurred, and nearly 700,000 excess TB-related deaths were estimated during 2020–2023.3 The case fatality rate, which had been falling, rose again, particularly in high-burden countries.2,3 Although miliary TB is not separately reported in global statistics, it reflects the overall TB burden and is disproportionately affected by delays in diagnosis and treatment caused by pandemic-related healthcare disruptions.3,4
Demographic Trends
Age Distribution
In the pre-antibiotic era, miliary TB was predominantly a disease of infants and children.5,43 Currently, two distinct peaks are evident: one involving adolescents and young adults (20–40 years), and another later in life among elderly individuals (>60 years).6,9,44,45 A recent study comparing miliary TB patients with and without CNS involvement found that those with CNS disease were significantly younger (mean age 23.7 vs 30.5 years, P=0.046), suggesting that younger patients may be more susceptible to hematogenous dissemination to the CNS.25
Sex Distribution
Males appear to be more frequently affected by miliary TB in both pediatric and adult series, with male-to-female ratios ranging from 1.3:1 to 3:1 in various studies.45–48 However, in miliary TB patients with CNS involvement, a female preponderance has been observed (58% female vs 42% male).25 Some recent adult series have also described a female preponderance in overall miliary TB, possibly reflecting increased healthcare-seeking behavior or referral patterns.49,50
Geographic and Ethnic Variation
In the United States, a higher incidence of miliary TB has been described among African Americans in some earlier publications, though such trends are less evident in recent data.5,6,51 Whether this reflects true ethnic variation, socioeconomic factors, nutritional status, comorbid illnesses, or host genetic factors remains unclear. In regions with high TB incidence, such as Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, miliary TB constitutes a proportionally greater burden.52,53 These regions have also been disproportionately affected by COVID-19-related TB service disruptions.3
Predisposing Conditions
Multiple predisposing and associated conditions have been identified in patients with miliary TB (Table 1). In various series, 24–66% of patients have at least one identifiable predisposing condition.9,48,49,54,55
Table 1.
Predisposing and Associated Conditions in Miliary Tuberculosis
| Condition Category | Specific Conditions | Approximate Frequency* |
|---|---|---|
| Infectious | HIV/AIDS | 14-47% in endemic areas |
| Childhood infections (measles, pertussis) | Variable | |
| Immunosuppressive conditions | Malignancy (hematologic, solid organ) | 3-10% |
| Organ transplantation | 2-4% | |
| Chronic kidney disease/dialysis | 5-8.5% | |
| Connective tissue diseases | 3-10% | |
| Iatrogenic | Corticosteroid therapy | 7-18% |
| Immunosuppressive/cytotoxic drugs | 5-8% | |
| Anti-TNF-α therapy | 1-3% of treated patients | |
| Metabolic/nutritional | Diabetes mellitus | 5-38% |
| Malnutrition | Variable | |
| Alcoholism | 12-37% | |
| Other | Post-gastrectomy | Rare |
| Silicosis | Rare | |
| Pregnancy/postpartum | 2-5% |
The introduction of immunomodulatory biological agents, particularly anti-TNF-α therapies, has emerged as an important risk factor for miliary TB.10,59 In a prospective study from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register, disseminated and miliary TB accounted for 27.5% of all TB cases and 44% of extrapulmonary TB among patients receiving anti-TNF therapy.10 The rate of TB development was significantly higher for adalimumab (144 events/100,000 person-years) and infliximab (136/100,000 person-years) compared with etanercept (39/100,000 person-years). The median time to TB development was shortest for infliximab (5.5 months) compared with etanercept (13.4 months) and adalimumab (18.5 months).
Iatrogenic dissemination has also been associated with various procedures, including ureteral catheterization, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, laser lithotripsy, cardiac valve homograft replacement, and intravesical BCG therapy for bladder carcinoma.60–64
Pathogenesis and Immunopathology
Mechanisms of Dissemination
Miliary tuberculosis results from the massive lymphohematogenous dissemination of M. tuberculosis from a pulmonary or extrapulmonary focus, with subsequent embolization to the vascular beds of various organs.6,65 Organs with high blood flow and abundant phagocytic cells—particularly the spleen, liver, lungs, bone marrow, kidneys, and adrenals—are most frequently affected.35,36,66
Multiple distinct pathological pathways facilitate hematogenous and lymphatic dissemination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, as summarized in previous research.6,67 The first pathway refers to early generalization that takes place in the setting of primary tuberculosis infection, characterized by abrupt clinical onset and rapid disease advancement. The second mechanism is late generalization arising from post-primary tuberculosis lesions; this process can present as rapidly advancing acute miliary tuberculosis, intermittent episodic spread, or slow, long-standing chronic miliary tuberculosis. Thirdly, simultaneous reactivation of multiple latent mycobacterial foci distributed across different visceral organs triggers systemic bacterial dissemination. Reinfection constitutes another vital transmission pathway, which plays a prominent role in regions with extremely high tuberculosis endemicity. The final route involves direct vascular leakage of liquefied caseous necrotic substances originating from extrapulmonary tuberculous lesions, which directly enters the circulatory system and triggers widespread miliary lesions throughout the body.
Immunopathogenesis
The development of miliary TB reflects inadequate effector T-cell (Teff) response in containing M. tuberculosis.68–71 Current understanding suggests that miliary TB represents the Th2 end of the immunological spectrum, with chemokine-directed selective homing of Th2 cells playing a critical role.72,73
Role of Regulatory T Cells
Regulatory T cells (Treg cells; CD4(+)CD25(+)FoxP3(+)) appear to play a crucial role in the immunopathogenesis of miliary TB by suppressing effector immune responses at pathologic sites.70,73 In patients with miliary TB, FoxP3+ Treg cells obtained from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid predominantly produce interleukin-10 (IL-10) and suppress autologous T-cell proliferation in response to M. tuberculosis antigen.70 When the balance of homing shifts toward Treg cells, local immunosuppression occurs, facilitating disease dissemination.6,70,71
Th1/Th2 Balance
While Th1 responses characterize protective immunity, Th2 responses appear to exert counter-regulatory effects. Interleukin-4 (IL-4), through its ability to downregulate inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), and macrophage activation, may determine whether infection becomes latent or progressive.68,69,74,75
Probable Molecular Basis of Dissemination
Several molecular mechanisms have been implicated in the development and progression of miliary tuberculosis.6,72,73,76–87 An important immunological factor involves an immunomodulatory imbalance of γ/δ T-cells, which disrupts early immune recognition and containment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, thereby contributing to hematogenous dissemination.72,76 Inadequate generation and maturation of effective cell-mediated immunity also plays a critical role, as impaired cellular immune responses fail to control mycobacterial proliferation and prevent systemic spread.73
Specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes are closely associated with susceptibility or resistance to miliary TB. Disease susceptibility is significantly increased in individuals carrying HLA-Bw15, HLA-DRB1*15/16, DRB1*13, DQB1*050301, DQB1*0601, DQB1*0602, DQB1*0201 and DRB1*04.77,78,81,82,84,85,87 Conversely, protection against developing miliary tuberculosis is associated with the absence of HLA-Cw6, HLA-DRB1*10, DQA1*02:01, DQB1*0501, and DPB1*1501, suggesting that these genotypes may confer favorable immune regulation against disseminated disease.78,83,85 Additional pathogenic mechanisms include impaired major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-restricted target cell lysis, which reduces the ability of immune effector cells to eliminate infected macrophages.77,79 Conversely, over-exuberant lysis of target macrophages may trigger excessive tissue necrosis and promote uncontrolled mycobacterial release into the bloodstream, further accelerating dissemination.77,79 Furthermore, multiple gene polymorphisms have been linked to increased susceptibility, including LTA+368 G/A, IL10−1082/IL10−592, Interferon-γ gene+874T-A, NRAMP1 and vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms, all of which compromise protective anti-tuberculosis immune function.78,80,86
Pathological Findings
Gross examination reveals small, punctate, gray to reddish-brown, rounded lesions of relatively uniform size (approximately 2 mm in diameter) scattered throughout affected organs, resembling millet seeds.5,6 Histopathologically, the tubercle constitutes the hallmark of miliary TB, typically consisting of central caseous necrosis surrounded by epithelioid cells, Langhans giant cells, and lymphocytes.88–90
The nature and morphological characteristics of tuberculous lesions in miliary TB vary significantly depending on the tempo and severity of hematogenous dissemination.6,89,90 In cases of acute massive hematogenous dissemination, pathological examination typically reveals “soft” or “exudative” tubercles, which are characterized by active inflammation and easily detectable acid-fast bacilli (AFB) within the lesions. By contrast, in patients with chronic or episodic mycobacterial dissemination, the lesions predominantly consist of “hard” tubercles, often with a minority of admixed soft exudative lesions, and acid-fast bacilli are rarely detectable on microscopic examination. When miliary tuberculosis is complicated by ARDS, the pathological features include not only typical miliary granulomas but also prominent hyaline membrane formation accompanied by diffuse inflammatory cellular infiltration in the alveolar spaces. In individuals co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), miliary TB exhibits distinct pathological alterations characterized by poorly formed granulomas, minimal inflammatory cellular reaction, extensive tissue necrosis, and abundant acid-fast bacilli, reflecting severe impairment of host cellular immunity.
Organ System Involvement
The distribution of visceral lesions in miliary tuberculosis exhibits prominent discrepancies between autopsy series and prospective clinical cohort research, which can be largely attributed to differences in patient populations, disease progression timelines, and diagnostic accessibility during life.6,35,36,91 Organs with abundant microvascular perfusion and dense resident phagocyte populations bear the highest risk of hematogenous mycobacterial seeding, as circulating bacilli readily lodge within capillary beds to initiate granuloma formation; these organs include the lungs, spleen, and liver, which consistently rank at the top of involvement frequency in both autopsy and clinical datasets (Table 2). Nevertheless, Mycobacterium tuberculosis possesses the capacity to disseminate to nearly every human visceral organ system through systemic blood and lymphatic circulation, and less commonly affected sites such as the pancreas, reproductive organs, and adrenal glands still develop miliary granulomas in a notable subset of patients with prolonged untreated disease or severe immunosuppression. Autopsy specimens often capture full-spectrum multi-organ involvement that fails to be identified via ante-mortem imaging and laboratory testing, explaining why the detection rates of splenic, bone marrow, and adrenal lesions are markedly higher in post-mortem analyses compared with clinical observational data collected from living patients. This divergent pattern of organ lesion prevalence highlights the limitations of routine clinical evaluation in capturing the full pathological extent of disseminated miliary tuberculosis and underscores the value of cross-referencing clinical data with autopsy-derived epidemiological statistics to fully characterize the systemic spread pattern of this lethal disease.
Table 2.
Frequency of Organ Involvement in Miliary Tuberculosis
| Organ System | Autopsy Series (%)* | Clinical Series (%)† |
|---|---|---|
| Lungs | 63–100 | 87–96 |
| Liver | 55–100 | 72-88 |
| Spleen | 79–100 | 44 |
| Kidneys | 24–64 | 37 |
| Lymph nodes | 33–80 | 35 |
| Central nervous system | 22–73 | 10–30 |
| Bone marrow | 14–77 | 17 |
| Adrenals | 12–53 | 12 |
| Gastrointestinal tract | 11–28 | 11 |
| Pancreas | 12–20 | 8.5 |
| Reproductive organs | 5–13 | 7 |
Clinical Manifestations
General Features and Constitutional Symptoms
The clinical presentation of miliary TB is notoriously protean and nonspecific, often leading to diagnostic delays. Classically, patients present with fever of several weeks’ duration, anorexia, weight loss, weakness, and cough.5,6,98 Over 80% of patients present with fever, cough, and sputum production.13,14 Night sweats are common, occasionally so profuse as to produce the “damp shadow sign,” where sweat engraves the patient’s silhouette on the bed.99 Approximately 30% report symptoms such as headache and hemoptysis, and about 20% exhibit shortness of breath and fatigue.13,14,100
In a substantial proportion of patients, particularly the elderly, fever may be absent, and patients may present with progressive wasting strongly mimicking metastatic carcinoma-a presentation termed “cryptic miliary TB”.98,101,102 In the pre-CT era, such cases were often diagnosed only at autopsy; however, HRCT has substantially improved antemortem diagnosis.23,103
Table 3 summarizes the frequency of various symptoms and signs in miliary TB from major series, incorporating data from a recent study comparing patients with and without CNS involvement.25
Table 3.
Frequency of Clinical Manifestations in Miliary Tuberculosis
| Manifestation | MTB (%)* | MTB +CNS (%)† | Overall Adult Series (%)‡ | Pediatric Series (%)§ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symptoms | ||||
| Fever | 90 | 77 | 89–100 | 61–98 |
| Cough | 66 | 35 | 53–83 | 17–90 |
| Sputum | 34 | 19 | 30–50 | Variable |
| Night sweats | 16 | 13 | 50–100 | 8–75 |
| Fatigue | 20 | 23 | 48–91 | 14–54 |
| Weight loss | 6 | 3 | 47–100 | 4–60 |
| Headache | 22 | 68 | 18–43 | 2-8 |
| Nausea | 10 | 39 | 5–15 | 3–10 |
| Vomiting | 10 | 26 | 5–20 | 2–8 |
| Dyspnea | 22 | 13 | 13–79 | 7–25 |
| Chest pain | 6 | 0 | 4–79 | 1–3 |
| Abdominal pain | – | – | 5–19 | 3–15 |
| Hemoptysis | – | – | 2–16 | 1 |
| Signs | ||||
| Tachypnea | – | – | 30–47 | Variable |
| Rales/crackles | – | – | 28–50 | 34–72 |
| Hepatomegaly | – | – | 12-37 | 39–82 |
| Splenomegaly | – | – | 6–32 | 24–54 |
| Lymphadenopathy | – | – | 5–30 | 5–30 |
| Altered mental status | – | – | 8–32 | 2–8 |
| Meningeal signs | – | – | 3–21 | 19-–35 |
| Choroidal tubercles | – | – | 2-13 | 2–5 |
| Ascites | – | – | 4–9 | 6–9 |
Central Nervous System Involvement
CNS involvement represents one of the most devastating complications of miliary TB, occurring in 10–30% of adult patients and 20–40% of children.6,15,112 Conversely, approximately one-third of patients presenting with tuberculous meningitis (TBM) have underlying miliary TB.113 Patients with CNS involvement are significantly younger than those without (mean age 23.7 vs 30.5 years, P=0.046) and more frequently female.25
Tuberculous Meningitis
Results from the rupture of a subependymal or subpial Rich focus into the subarachnoid space, releasing mycobacterial antigens and initiating an intense inflammatory response.114,115 The resultant exudative arachnoiditis mainly targets the basal cisterns and triggers a series of pathological sequelae.116,117 Hydrocephalus represents another frequent complication, accounting for 80% communicating cases and 20% obstructive cases among patients with tuberculous meningitis.
The clinical progression of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) generally develops in three successive phases.118,119 The initial prodromal stage lasts for one to two weeks and is marked by general malaise, low-grade fever, persistent headache and altered personality. The subsequent meningitic stage presents with unrelenting headache, vomiting, meningeal irritation, confusion, cranial nerve paralysis and hemiparesis. In the final paralytic stage, patients develop stupor, coma, recurrent seizures, multiple cranial nerve impairments and hemiplegia.
Among patients with TBM, headache (68%), nausea (39%), and vomiting (26%) are significantly more common than in miliary TB without CNS involvement.25 Cranial nerve involvement occurs in 20–50% of patients, with the sixth nerve most commonly affected, followed by the third and fourth.120,121 Optic nerve involvement occurs in up to 35% of cases and carries a poor prognosis.122–128
Abdominal Involvement
Abdominal tuberculosis occurs in 15–30% of patients with miliary TB and represents the sixth most common form of extrapulmonary TB.16,129,130 The abdomen may be involved through several mechanisms: hematogenous dissemination, lymphatic spread, ingestion of infected sputum, or direct spread from contiguous infected lymph nodes or fallopian tubes.131,132 Table 4 summarized the frequency of abdominal involvement in miliary tuberculosis. The peritoneum, intestines, liver, spleen, and lymph nodes are frequently involved, with presentations ranging from ascites and abdominal pain to obstruction or hepatosplenomegaly. These manifestations are often nonspecific, underscoring the need for clinical vigilance to ensure timely diagnosis and management.
Table 4.
Frequency of Abdominal Involvement in Miliary Tuberculosis
| Site | Frequency (%)* | Clinical Features |
|---|---|---|
| Peritoneum | 10–15 | Abdominal pain, distension, ascites, low-grade fever, night sweats, weight loss |
| Intestines | 8–11 | Chronic abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, obstruction, perforation |
| Liver | 26–72 | Hepatomegaly, right upper quadrant pain, elevated alkaline phosphatase, jaundice (rare) |
| Spleen | 20–44 | Splenomegaly, left upper quadrant pain, hypersplenism |
| Mesenteric lymph nodes | 20–35 | Abdominal pain, palpable masses, obstructive symptoms |
| Pancreas | 2–8 | Abdominal pain, weight loss, jaundice, mass lesions mimicking malignancy |
| Genitourinary | 7–17 | Flank pain, dysuria, hematuria, sterile pyuria, menstrual abnormalities, infertility |
Skeletal Involvement
Skeletal tuberculosis complicates up to 17% of miliary TB cases, though it accounts for less than 5% of all TB cases overall.17,138,139 Hematogenous dissemination from pulmonary or extrapulmonary foci seeds the skeletal system, with the spine being the most common site (50% of skeletal TB), typically presenting with back pain, kyphosis, and paraspinal abscesses.140,141 Other sites include the hips, knees, and long bones. Although skeletal TB itself has low mortality, its presence signals disseminated disease and warrants prompt diagnosis to prevent deformities or neurological complications (Table 5).
Table 5.
Distribution of Skeletal Tuberculosis
| Site | Frequency (%)* | Clinical Features |
|---|---|---|
| Spine (Pott’s disease) | 50 | Back pain, gibbus deformity, paraplegia (10–30%), paraspinal cold abscess |
| Hip | 10–15 | Hip pain, limp, limitation of motion |
| Knee | 10–15 | Pain, swelling, effusion, synovial thickening |
| Sacroiliac joint | 5–10 | Buttock pain, sacroiliac tenderness |
| Ribs | 5–10 | Chest wall mass, pain |
| Long bones | 5–10 | Bone pain, pathologic fracture |
| Multiple sites | 10–15 | Variable |
Genitourinary Involvement
Genitourinary tuberculosis occurs in 7–17% of miliary TB patients and represents the most common form of extrapulmonary TB in some series.13,146,147 The kidney is usually infected hematogenously and is the most frequently affected site, with subsequent spread to the ureters, bladder, and genital organs (Table 6).148,149
Table 6.
Genitourinary Tuberculosis in Miliary TB
| Site | Frequency (%)* | Clinical Features |
|---|---|---|
| Kidney | 74–96 | Flank pain, hematuria, sterile pyuria, renal failure (bilateral disease) |
| Ureter | 8–29 | Stricture, hydronephrosis, obstruction |
| Bladder | 1–16 | Frequency, urgency, dysuria, contracture |
| Epididymis/testis | 4–13 | Scrotal swelling, pain, discharge, fistula |
| Prostate | 1–3 | Perineal pain, obstructive symptoms, nodularity |
| Female genital tract | 7 | Infertility, pelvic pain, menstrual abnormalities, tubo-ovarian masses |
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
ARDS is a rare but devastating complication of miliary TB, occurring in approximately 8% of patients, yet carrying a mortality rate of 40–80%.18,19,152,153 The pathogenesis involves diffuse alveolar damage from massive bacillary seeding and an intense inflammatory response, leading to increased alveolar-capillary permeability and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema.18,154
Clinical Features
Patients typically present with rapidly progressive dyspnea, hypoxemia, and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates evolving over days to weeks.19,155 The onset may be fulminant, occasionally preceding the classic miliary radiographic pattern.18,156 Risk factors for developing ARDS include alcoholism, cirrhosis, hypoalbuminemia, delayed diagnosis, and underlying immunosuppression.26,157
Radiographic Findings
Chest radiography shows diffuse bilateral alveolar or ground-glass opacities that may obscure the underlying miliary nodules.18,19 CT typically reveals diffuse ground-glass attenuation, consolidation, and septal thickening superimposed on a miliary pattern.158
Special Populations
HIV-Infected Individuals
Patients with advanced HIV infection, defined as CD4+ T-cell counts below 200 cells/μL, exhibit a distinct spectrum of clinical manifestations when complicated by miliary tuberculosis.39,40,159 These patients are prone to extrapulmonary lesions, including those occurring at rare atypical anatomical sites, and disseminated cutaneous miliary tuberculosis can be detected in 5% to 10% of cases. Intrathoracic lymphadenopathy is observed in 40%–60% of affected individuals, while tuberculin skin test anergy occurs in 60%–80% of this population. Sputum smear testing yields positive results at a lower rate of only 20%–30%, whereas mycobacteremia is far more prevalent, affecting 30%–40% of patients. Histopathological examination typically reveals inadequate granuloma formation. Collectively, these characteristic alterations contribute to faster disease deterioration and substantially elevated mortality among HIV-associated miliary TB patients.
Children
The clinical manifestations of childhood miliary tuberculosis differ markedly from those seen in adult patients.108–111,160 Children are less likely to develop chills, night sweats or hemoptysis compared with adult counterparts. Peripheral lymphadenopathy is far more prevalent in pediatric cases, occurring in 40% to 60% of patients, while hepatosplenomegaly can be identified in 60%–80% of affected children. Tuberculous meningitis develops in 20%–40% of children with miliary TB, a proportion higher than the 15%–30% observed in adults. BCG vaccination provides 73% protective efficacy against childhood miliary tuberculosis,161 and the overall mortality rate among pediatric patients ranges from 15% to 20%, which is substantially lower than that of adults.
Pregnancy and IVF-ET
An increasing number of cases have been reported in pregnant women after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET), often presenting with miliary TB during the first or second trimester.162–164 These patients have poor pregnancy outcomes, with high rates of spontaneous abortion and fetal loss.165,166 Risk factors include untreated prior pulmonary TB and tubal factor infertility.167,168
Anti-TNF-α Therapy
Patients receiving anti-TNF-α agents (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept) for inflammatory conditions are at increased risk of miliary TB, which may manifest as a paradoxical IRIS after treatment withdrawal.56,59,169 Management requires high-dose corticosteroids and careful monitoring.170
Laboratory Abnormalities
Hematological Findings
A wide spectrum of hematological abnormalities occurs in miliary TB, though their diagnostic significance is limited (Table 7).9,13,25,45,47,48,55,105 Table 7 summarizes the spectrum of hematological abnormalities observed in patients with miliary tuberculosis. The most frequent finding is elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (89–95%), reflecting systemic inflammation. Anemia is highly prevalent, affecting 76–86% of patients, followed by lymphopenia (48–76%), which may indicate impaired cell-mediated immunity. Leukocytosis and leukopenia occur in 11–27% and 17–26% of cases, respectively, while thrombocytosis (10–32%) and thrombocytopenia (8–24%) are also common. Less frequent abnormalities include monocytosis (8–30%), pancytopenia (3–12%), leukemoid reaction (1–5%), and disseminated intravascular coagulation (1–3%). These findings highlight the broad impact of miliary tuberculosis on the hematopoietic system. Their presence should prompt consideration of miliary TB in the appropriate clinical context, and they may serve as adjunctive markers for disease severity and prognosis.
Table 7.
Hematological Abnormalities in Miliary Tuberculosis
| Abnormality | Frequency (%)* |
|---|---|
| Elevated ESR | 89–95 |
| Anemia | 76–86 |
| Lymphopenia | 48–76 |
| Leukopenia | 17–26 |
| Thrombocytosis | 10–32 |
| Monocytosis | 8–30 |
| Leukocytosis | 11–27 |
| Thrombocytopenia | 8–24 |
| Pancytopenia | 3–12 |
| Leukemoid reaction | 1–5 |
| Disseminated intravascular coagulation | 1–3 |
Biochemical Abnormalities
Table 8 outlines the key biochemical derangements in miliary tuberculosis. Elevated C-reactive protein (>90%) is nearly universal, indicating a robust acute-phase response. Hypoalbuminemia (71–75%) serves as a negative prognostic marker and correlates with malnutrition and chronic inflammation. Hyponatremia (26–68%) is particularly important as it may signal tuberculous meningitis or syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion. Elevated alkaline phosphatase (32–67%) and transaminases (38–55%) suggest hepatic granulomatous involvement, often with disproportionate increases in alkaline phosphatase. Hyperbilirubinemia is uncommon (8–11%) and usually mild, whereas hypercalcemia (0–13%) results from extrarenal 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D production by activated macrophages within granulomas. These biochemical abnormalities, while nonspecific, provide valuable clues for diagnosing miliary tuberculosis and anticipating complications.
Table 8.
Biochemical Abnormalities in Miliary Tuberculosis
| Abnormality | Frequency (%)* | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Hyponatremia | 26–68 | May indicate tuberculous meningitis; predictor of mortality |
| Hypoalbuminemia | 71–75 | Negative prognostic factor |
| Elevated transaminases | 38–55 | Asymptomatic elevation common; correlates poorly with histology |
| Elevated alkaline phosphatase | 32–67 | Suggests hepatic involvement |
| Hyperbilirubinemia | 8–11 | Usually mild; fulminant hepatic failure rare |
| Hypercalcemia | 0–13 | Granulomatous production of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D |
| Elevated CRP | >90 | Nonspecific acute phase response |
Comparative Laboratory Parameters in Miliary TB with and Without CNS Involvement
A recent comparative study by Xiao et al25 provided detailed laboratory data comparing miliary TB patients with and without CNS involvement. This study of 81 patients (50 without CNS, 31 with CNS) revealed significant differences in several parameters (Table 9). Patients without CNS involvement had significantly lower hemoglobin and albumin levels, and significantly higher ESR and CRP levels, suggesting a more intense systemic inflammatory response. In contrast, patients with CNS involvement had relatively preserved nutritional status and less systemic inflammation, which may reflect different immunological mechanisms or timing of dissemination. These findings highlight the importance of considering CNS involvement when interpreting laboratory results in miliary TB patients. The scoring system derived from these parameters (see Molecular Diagnostics) provides a practical tool to integrate clinical and laboratory data for early identification of CNS complications.
Table 9.
Laboratory Parameters in Miliary Tuberculosis with and Without CNS Involvement
| Parameter | MTB without CNS (n=50) |
MTB with CNS (n=31) |
P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 115.6 ± 20.8 | 126.9 ± 18.1 | 0.015 |
| Serum albumin (g/L) | 31.7 ± 6.7 | 40.0 ± 6.4 | <0.001 |
| Total protein (g/L) | 60.9 ± 12.2 | 68.4 ± 11.8 | 0.015 |
| ESR (mm/h) | 49.8 ± 32.3 | 27.9 ± 24.3 | 0.005 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 29.0 ± 51.2 | 7.3 ± 12.7 | 0.013 |
| ALT (U/L) | 40.2 ± 33.8 | 51.3 ± 65.1 | 0.321 |
| AST (U/L) | 49.0 ± 74.7 | 48.1 ± 79.6 | 0.961 |
| GGT (U/L) | 69.5 ± 69.3 | 86.0 ± 88.7 | 0.392 |
| White blood cells (×109/L) | 6.81 ± 2.72 | 6.60 ± 2.80 | 0.737 |
| Platelets (×109/L) | 244.5 ± 104.1 | 223.7 ± 89.9 | 0.363 |
| ADA (U/L) | 29.0 ± 36.5 | 17.6 ± 7.9 | 0.134 |
Abbreviations: ADA, adenosine deaminase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GGT, gamma-glutamine transaminase.
Diagnostic Imaging
Chest Radiography
The radiographic hallmark of miliary TB is the miliary pattern—a collection of tiny (1–3 mm) discrete pulmonary opacities uniformly distributed throughout both lungs.176,177 This pattern is present in 50–90% of patients at presentation, though it may take 2–6 weeks to become radiographically apparent after symptom onset.9,23,45,47 However, as summarized in Table 10, chest radiographic findings can be variable. A classical miliary pattern is observed in 50–90% of cases, while 10–30% of patients may present with an asymmetrical nodular pattern. Nodular coalescence occurs in 10–20%, and reticulonodular or ground-glass opacities are seen in 5–15% of patients. Air-space consolidation and pleural effusion are less common, each occurring in 5–20% of cases. Intrathoracic lymphadenopathy is observed in 10–35% of patients, with higher frequencies in HIV-infected individuals. Importantly, 10–30% of patients may have a normal chest radiograph at presentation, underscoring the need for more sensitive imaging modalities such as high-resolution computed tomography when clinical suspicion remains high.
Table 10.
Chest Radiographic Findings in Miliary Tuberculosis
| Finding | Frequency (%)* |
|---|---|
| Classical miliary pattern | 50–90 |
| Asymmetrical nodular pattern | 10–30 |
| Coalescence of nodules | 10-20 |
| Reticulonodular pattern | 5–15 |
| Ground-glass opacities | 5–10 |
| Air-space consolidation | 5–15 |
| Intrathoracic lymphadenopathy | 10–35 (higher in HIV) |
| Pleural effusion | 5–20 |
| Normal chest radiograph | 10–30 |
High-Resolution Computed Tomography
HRCT is more sensitive than plain radiography and may demonstrate miliary nodules even when the chest radiograph appears normal.23,103,180 Multiple typical HRCT features can be identified in patients with miliary tuberculosis.24,181,182 Lesions present as nodules measuring 1 to 4 mm in diameter with either clear or indistinct borders, scattered randomly across bilateral lung fields accompanied by thickened intra- and interlobular septa. The tree-in-bud sign, defined as centrilobular nodules attached to branching linear opacities, is also a common manifestation, and ground-glass opacities tend to emerge during the acute phase of infection. Intrathoracic lymphadenopathy can be detected in 10% to 40% of cases, while air trapping may be observed on follow-up imaging examinations.
Abdominal Imaging
Ultrasonography
Serves as a valuable imaging modality for identifying multiple pathological lesions associated with abdominal miliary tuberculosis.183,184 It can visualize free or loculated ascites, as well as focal hypoechoic nodules within the liver and spleen. Intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy, which typically appears hypoechoic and may be complicated by central necrosis, can also be clearly recognized via ultrasound scanning. In addition, the technique enables detection of cold tuberculous abscesses and allows real-time guidance for diagnostic aspiration procedures to obtain lesion specimens.
Computed Tomography
Can demonstrate a series of characteristic abdominal manifestations of miliary tuberculosis.134,185–187 Diffuse heterogeneous hepatosplenomegaly is frequently observed, accompanied by numerous 1–5 mm small hypodense nodules scattered throughout the liver and spleen. Intra-abdominal lymph nodes often show peripheral contrast enhancement paired with central hypodensity indicative of caseous necrosis. Additional CT features include mesenteric thickening and omental caking, focal thickening of the intestinal wall predominantly at the ileocecal segment, free intraperitoneal ascites, and tubo-ovarian masses in female patients.
Central Nervous System Imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging is superior to CT for evaluating CNS involvement and should include the entire neuraxis.188–190 Table 11 summarizes the neuroimaging findings in patients with central nervous system tuberculosis. Basal meningeal enhancement is the most common abnormality, observed in 38–89% of cases, reflecting the intense exudative inflammation in the basal cisterns. Hydrocephalus occurs in 60–80% of patients and may require cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. Cerebral infarcts, seen in 15–41% of cases, typically involve the basal ganglia and internal capsule due to vasculitis. Tuberculomas appear in 5–27% of patients as ring-enhancing lesions with surrounding edema. Miliary brain tubercles, representing hematogenous dissemination, are visible in 5–15% of cases as multiple tiny enhancing nodules. Spinal arachnoiditis, seen in 10–20%, may cause nerve root clumping and CSF loculations. These findings underscore the importance of contrast-enhanced MRI for comprehensive evaluation of CNS tuberculosis, as early detection of these abnormalities guides timely intervention and improves outcomes.
Table 11.
Neuroimaging Findings in CNS Tuberculosis
| Finding | Frequency (%)* | MRI Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Basal meningeal enhancement | 38–89 | Post-contrast T1 enhancement of basal cisterns |
| Hydrocephalus | 60–80 | Ventricular dilatation, periventricular edema |
| Cerebral infarcts | 15–41 | Diffusion restriction, T2/FLAIR hyperintensity in basal ganglia, internal capsule |
| Tuberculomas | 5–27 | Ring-enhancing lesions, hypointense on T2 (caseous), hyperintense on T2 (non-caseous) |
| Miliary brain tubercles | 5–15 | Multiple tiny enhancing nodules |
| Spinal arachnoiditis | 10–20 | Clumping of nerve roots, CSF loculations |
Microbiological and Molecular Diagnosis
Sputum Examination
Though not all patients with miliary TB produce sputum, when available, it should be examined.6,195 Sputum examination, though readily available, has a relatively low sensitivity, with acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear positivity ranging from 26–36% and culture positivity from 49–76%. Bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial washings provide improved diagnostic yield, with culture positivity rates of 54–67%. Post-bronchoscopy sputum examination offers the highest yield, with culture positivity approaching 100%.
Bronchoscopy
Fiberoptic bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial washings, brushings, and transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) is useful when sputum examination is negative.196,197 The cumulative diagnostic yield in published studies is approximately 47–83%.9,47,198,199,200 TBLB reveals granulomas in 63–95% of cases.47,197,201
Bone Marrow Examination
Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy are valuable in miliary TB, particularly when hematological abnormalities are present.6,202 Granulomas are found in 41–82% of cases, and culture positivity ranges from 27–50%.9,13,45,47,105,203 The procedure is safer than liver or lung biopsy in patients with coagulation disorders or thrombocytopenia.6
Liver Biopsy
Liver biopsy has the highest diagnostic yield among invasive procedures, with granulomas found in 88–100% of cases, though AFB are demonstrated in only 0–44%.9,13,45,47,105,204 Elevated alkaline phosphatase, even without hepatomegaly or abnormal liver function tests, suggests hepatic involvement and increases biopsy yield.205,206
Lymph Node Biopsy
Peripheral lymph node biopsy reveals granulomas in 75–100% of cases, with caseation in 92% and culture positivity in 43–83%.9,13,45,47,105,207 It is particularly useful when lymphadenopathy is present.
Other Extrapulmonary Specimens Examination
Cerebrospinal fluid analysis, essential for diagnosing tuberculous meningitis, has limited sensitivity, with smear positivity in only 1–10% and culture positivity in 25–50%. Urine, pleural fluid, and ascitic fluid cultures may provide diagnostic confirmation in 25–70% of cases but require high clinical suspicion. In HIV-positive patients, blood cultures can detect mycobacteremia in 20–40% of cases. These findings underscore the importance of obtaining multiple specimen types and utilizing both microbiological and molecular techniques to maximize diagnostic yield in paucibacillary miliary tuberculosis. (Table 12).
Table 12.
Diagnostic Yield of Various Specimens in Miliary Tuberculosis
| Specimen | AFB Smear Positivity (%)* |
Culture Positivity (%)* |
|---|---|---|
| Sputum | 26–36 | 49–76 |
| Gastric aspirate | 25–50 | 61–75 |
| Bronchoalveolar lavage | 9–33 | 54–67 |
| Bronchial washings | 33 | 67 |
| Post-bronchoscopy sputum | 50 | 100 |
| Cerebrospinal fluid | 1–10 | 25–50 |
| Urine | 7–15 | 25–59 |
| Pleural fluid | 5–10 | 14–30 |
| Ascitic fluid | 3–5 | 30–70 |
| Blood (HIV-positive) | N/A | 20–40 |
| Bone marrow aspirate | 9–17 | 27–50 |
Modified Ziehl-Neelsen Staining
A modified Ziehl-Neelsen (MZN) staining technique incorporating cytospin preparation and Triton X-100 permeabilization was developed to enhance detection of intracellular mycobacteria in CSF.210,211 Initial studies from China reported remarkable sensitivity (82.9% vs 3.3% for conventional ZN staining) and modest specificity (85.0%).211 However, a subsequent prospective multicenter study in Vietnam, South Africa, and Indonesia involving 618 patients failed to replicate these findings, showing comparable sensitivity for conventional and modified ZN staining (33.9% vs 34.5%) with 100% specificity for both.212 The reasons for this discrepancy remain unclear but may relate to differences in patient populations, CSF volumes, and laboratory techniques.
Molecular Diagnostics
Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra
The Xpert MTB/RIF assay, an automated cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test, simultaneously detects M. tuberculosis complex and rifampicin resistance.213,214 Against a clinical gold standard, sensitivity in CSF ranges from 25–60%, with specificity approaching 100%.212,215,216 Xpert Ultra, with a 10-fold lower limit of detection, increases sensitivity to approximately 70%.217–219 The WHO recommends Xpert MTB/RIF as the initial diagnostic test for suspected TBM.220
Line Probe Assays (LPAs)
These assays detect M. tuberculosis and mutations conferring resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid within 24 hours, with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 95% for resistance detection.221,222
Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)/Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS)
Recent advances in genomic sequencing technologies have further strengthened the precision and comprehensiveness of tuberculosis molecular diagnosis, with next-generation sequencing (NGS) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) emerging as powerful adjunctive tools in clinical practice. Compared with conventional nucleic acid amplification tests that only target limited gene loci, NGS enables high-throughput, unbiased detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genetic variations, while WGS provides full genomic coverage of the pathogen. These cutting-edge techniques allow comprehensive identification of both known and novel mutations associated with drug resistance across first-line and second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs, facilitating early and accurate detection of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, which is particularly critical for optimizing individualized treatment for severe miliary TB cases. Furthermore, WGS offers high-resolution genomic typing capability, enabling differentiation between disease relapse and reinfection, tracing transmission chains, and clarifying epidemiological characteristics of sporadic or clustered miliary TB outbreaks. Despite superior diagnostic performance, the clinical application of NGS and WGS is still limited by higher costs and rigorous technical and bioinformatics requirements, restricting their widespread use in resource-limited endemic regions.
Scoring System for CNS Tuberculosis in Miliary TB Patients
A significant advance in the diagnostic approach to miliary TB with suspected CNS involvement is the development of a clinical scoring system by Xiao et al25 This system was derived from a retrospective analysis of 81 patients with confirmed miliary TB (50 without CNS involvement, 31 with CNS involvement). Using multivariate logistic regression, seven independent predictors of CNS involvement were identified: cough (negative predictor), nausea (positive), headache (positive), hemoglobin (positive at ≤131.5 g/L), serum albumin (positive at ≤38.85 g/L), ESR (negative at >38 mm/h), and CRP (negative at >5.35 mg/L). The scoring system assigns weighted scores based on regression coefficients (Table 13).
Table 13.
Scoring System for CNS Tuberculosis in Miliary TB Patients25
| Variable | Cutoff | Score Assigned |
|---|---|---|
| Cough | Present | −1.5 |
| Nausea | Present | +2 |
| Headache | Present | +2 |
| Hemoglobin | ≤131.5 g/L | +1.5 |
| Serum albumin | ≤38.85 g/L | +2.5 |
| ESR | >38 mm/h | −1.5 |
| CRP | >5.35 mg/L | −1.5 |
Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
The total score is calculated by summing the assigned values. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI 0.77–0.95). At a cutoff score of 0.75, the system achieved a sensitivity of 81.5% and specificity of 81.4% for confirming CNS involvement. A score ≥2.75 provided 95.3% specificity, while a score ≤-0.75 gave 88.9% sensitivity for excluding CNS involvement.
This clinical scoring system possesses multiple practical strengths in routine clinical practice. All variables incorporated within the model consist of routinely collected clinical indicators and standard laboratory test results that are easily accessible in general hospitals. Based on the total calculated score, clinicians can spare patients with extremely low or high risk from unnecessary invasive examinations including lumbar puncture and neuroimaging scans. Meanwhile, the scoring tool helps identify individuals who require urgent cerebrospinal fluid testing and cranial imaging for timely diagnosis. Overall, its application effectively shortens diagnostic waiting periods and cuts down relevant medical expenditures for patients suspected of miliary tuberculosis combined with central nervous system involvement.
However, the authors caution that this system is a statistical model and cannot replace definitive diagnostic tests. It requires prospective validation in larger, multicenter cohorts before widespread clinical adoption. Nevertheless, it represents an important step toward personalized diagnostic algorithms in miliary TB.
Adenosine Deaminase
Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is an enzyme produced by activated T lymphocytes that serves as an indirect marker of cell-mediated immunity.223,224 In tuberculous meningitis, a meta-analysis reported pooled sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 91% at a cutoff of 8 U/L, though significant heterogeneity across studies limits standardization.225 CSF ADA cannot reliably distinguish TBM from bacterial meningitis but may be useful as a rule-out test in high-prevalence settings.226 All summarized in Table 14.
Table 14.
Diagnostic Accuracy of CSF ADA in Tuberculous Meningitis
| Cutoff (U/L) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 93 | 80 |
| 8 | 79 | 91 |
| 10 | 81–92 | 86–97 |
| 15 | 58 | 86 |
Serodiagnostic Tests
Commercial serodiagnostic tests have poor and variable accuracy and should not be used for diagnosis of pulmonary or extrapulmonary TB, including miliary TB.231,232 The WHO strongly recommends against their use.233
The diagnostic algorithm for miliary tuberculosis is shown in the Figure 1 below.
Figure 1.

Diagnostic algorithm for miliary tuberculosis. This stepwise algorithm integrates clinical, radiological, and microbiological assessments to guide the diagnosis of miliary tuberculosis (TB). The diagnostic process begins when a patient presents with characteristic constitutional symptoms (fever ≥2 weeks, night sweats, weight loss, cough, fatigue), particularly in high-risk populations. Initial investigations include a chest radiograph, which may reveal a classic miliary pattern (1–3mm nodules) in 50–90% of cases, alongside routine laboratory tests and sputum AFB smear and culture. If the chest radiograph is negative but suspicion persists, HRCT is mandatory due to its superior sensitivity. For patients with confirmed or highly suspected miliary nodules on imaging, definitive microbiological confirmation is pursued through sputum examination, BAL, and, when indicated, biopsies (e.g, bone marrow, liver, lymph node) or CSF analysis. All specimens should undergo AFB smear, culture, and molecular testing using the Xpert MTB/RIF or Xpert Ultra assay. A confirmed positive laboratory result, or suspicious findings with high clinical probability, establishes the diagnosis. Conversely, the absence of miliary nodules on HRCT, along with negative laboratory results and low clinical probability, should prompt consideration of alternative diagnoses.
Treatment
Anti-Tuberculosis Chemotherapy
Miliary tuberculosis is uniformly fatal within 1 year if untreated.6,234 Standard anti-tuberculosis treatment is the cornerstone of management, though no randomized controlled trials have specifically evaluated regimens in miliary TB.235,236 The recommended treatment regimens for miliary tuberculosis provided has summarized in Table 15. Major guidelines uniformly recommend 6 months of anti-tuberculosis therapy for miliary TB without CNS involvement, consisting of a 2-month intensive phase (HRZE) followed by a 4-month continuation phase (HR). When CNS involvement is present, treatment is extended to 9–12 months (HRZE for 2 months, followed by HR for 7–10 months) due to poor penetration of some drugs across the blood-brain barrier and the higher risk of relapse. This distinction underscores the critical importance of accurately diagnosing CNS involvement in miliary TB patients, as it directly determines treatment duration and influences clinical outcomes.
Table 15.
Recommended Treatment Regimens for Miliary Tuberculosis
| Guideline | Intensive Phase | Continuation Phase | Total Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| WHO234/ ATS/CDC/IDSA235/ NICE (UK)236/ INDEX-TB (India)237 | 2 months HRZE | 4 months HR | 6 months |
| AAP238 | 2 months HRZE | 7–10 months HR | 9–12 months |
| With CNS involvement: | |||
| Guideline | Intensive Phase | Continuation Phase | Total Duration |
| WHO234/ ATS/CDC/IDSA235/ INDEX-TB237 | 2 months HRZE | 7–10 months HR | 9–12 months |
Abbreviations: CNS, central nervous system; E, ethambutol; H, isoniazid; R, rifampicin; Z, pyrazinamide.
Several core factors should be taken into account when designing therapeutic regimens for miliary tuberculosis with central nervous system involvement.31,239–242 First, differences in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration capacity among anti-tuberculosis agents are notable: isoniazid and pyrazinamide achieve CSF penetration rates of 80% to 100%, rifampicin only reaches a moderate penetration level of 10% to 20%, whereas ethambutol displays limited CSF penetration at merely 20% to 30%. Second, if isoniazid resistance is confirmed, the treatment course must maintain high-dose rifampicin at 15 mg/kg combined with levofloxacin and pyrazinamide throughout the whole therapy period. Third, patients diagnosed with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis necessitate second-line anti-tuberculosis medications that exhibit favorable central nervous system permeability, including levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, linezolid and ethionamide. Finally, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended for cases with suspected poor therapeutic response or gastrointestinal malabsorption of anti-tuberculosis drugs.
Corticosteroids
To date, there have been no systematic prospective or retrospective analyses regarding the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of miliary tuberculosis and its extrapulmonary complications; all current treatment recommendations for tuberculosis are based on data from guidelines or review articles.
Tuberculous Meningitis
A randomized controlled trial in 545 patients demonstrated that dexamethasone (0.4 mg/kg/day tapered over 6–8 weeks) reduced mortality from 41% to 32% (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62–0.98).30 Benefit was greatest in stage I disease, with no mortality benefit in stage III. A 2016 Cochrane review confirmed that corticosteroids reduce mortality in HIV-negative patients with TBM but not long-term neurological disability.32
Tuberculous Pericarditis
Corticosteroids reduce mortality and progression to constriction.243,244 The recommended regimen is prednisolone 60 mg/day tapered over 11 weeks.245
TB-IRIS
Corticosteroids are beneficial in both HIV-associated and anti-TNF-α-associated IRIS.246,247 In a case series of anti-TNF-α-induced TB-IRIS, 50% of patients received corticosteroids, with doses ranging from 0.5–1.0 mg/kg/day prednisolone equivalent.170
ARDS
No controlled trials exist, but corticosteroids are commonly used based on expert opinion.28,248 In a case series of miliary TB with ARDS, corticosteroid therapy (prednisolone 0.5–1.0 mg/kg/day or equivalent) was associated with rapid clinical improvement and resolution of pulmonary infiltrates.19,20,152
Table 16 summarizes the recommended corticosteroid regimens for managing complications associated with tuberculosis. For tuberculous meningitis, dexamethasone (0.4 mg/kg/day tapered over 6–8 weeks) is supported by randomized controlled trial evidence showing reduced mortality. Tuberculous pericarditis benefits from prednisolone (60 mg/day tapered over 11 weeks), also based on trial data. For TB-IRIS, prednisolone (0.5–1.5 mg/kg/day tapered over 4–12 weeks) is used, supported by case series. However, despite these well-established regimens for general TB complications, specific data on corticosteroid use in miliary tuberculosis (MTB) with extrapulmonary involvement remain extremely limited. In particular, for the most devastating complication—ARDS in the setting of MTB—evidence is scarce. A small retrospective study of 13 patients with MTB complicated by ARDS provides the only available data, demonstrating that steroid pulse therapy (methylprednisolone 500–1000 mg/day for 3 days) significantly improved short-term survival (HR 0.136, 95% CI 0.023–0.815), with 75% of treated patients surviving at 3 months compared to only 20% in the non-treatment group.248 These findings suggest that steroid pulse therapy may be a beneficial adjunctive treatment for MTB-ARDS, though larger prospective studies are urgently needed to confirm these results.
Table 16.
Corticosteroid Regimens in Miliary Tuberculosis Complications
| Indication | Drug | Dose | Duration | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBM (adults) | Dexamethasone | 0.4 mg/kg/day IV, taper over 6–8 weeks | 6–8 weeks | RCT30 |
| TBM (children) | Prednisolone | 2-4 mg/kg/day, taper over 6–8 weeks | 6–8 weeks | Expert opinion |
| Dexamethasone | 0.6 mg/kg | 6–8 weeks | Guideline (Review) | |
| TB pericarditis | Prednisolone | 60 mg/day, taper over 11 weeks | 11 weeks | RCTs243,244 |
| TB-IRIS | Prednisolone | 0.5–1.5 mg/kg/day, taper over 4–12 weeks | 4–12 weeks | Case series245,246 |
| ARDS | Methylprednisolone | 1 mg/kg/day or pulse therapy | Variable | Expert opinion |
| 500–1000 mg/d | 3 days | Small retrospective study248 |
Abbreviations: ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; TB, tuberculosis; TB-IRIS, tuberculosis-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome; TBM, tuberculous Meningitis.
Management of Specific Complications
Distinct management strategies are indicated for two subtypes of tuberculous hydrocephalus.249,250–252 Communicating hydrocephalus can be managed with acetazolamide, serial lumbar punctures, or external ventricular drainage as primary interventions. For obstructive hydrocephalus, ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement and endoscopic third ventriculostomy are the main therapeutic options recommended in existing studies.
Clinical management of hyponatremia complicating miliary tuberculosis relies on distinguishing two distinct underlying etiologies, namely syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) and cerebral salt wasting, as documented in prior literature.253,254 SIADH is characterized by euvolemia and concentrated urine, which is managed via fluid restriction; hypertonic saline infusion is reserved for severe cases. In contrast, cerebral salt wasting presents with hypovolemia and requires aggressive fluid resuscitation, sodium supplementation, and adjunctive fludrocortisone therapy.255
Multiple interventions are available to relieve elevated intracranial pressure. Intravenous mannitol at a dose of 0.25–1.0 g/kg and 3% hypertonic saline serve as first-line medical therapies.227 When concurrent hydrocephalus exists, cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures should be performed. For patients with severe intracranial hypertension, intracranial pressure monitoring may be considered to guide further treatment.256
Multiple standardized therapeutic strategies are applied for the management of ARDS secondary to miliary tuberculosis. Lung-protective ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg ideal body weight is adopted as a fundamental ventilation strategy, accompanied by conservative fluid management to alleviate pulmonary edema. Prone positioning is recommended for patients with severe ARDS, while extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be considered for those with refractory and critical conditions.228 Additionally, corticosteroids are administered as effective adjunctive therapy to improve patient outcomes.19,20,257
Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculous Meningitis
Multidrug-resistant TBM carries a catastrophic prognosis, with mortality approaching 100% in some series.229,230 According to the 2022 WHO drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment guidelines, the 6-month BPaLM regimen is not recommended for patients with central nervous system tuberculosis, including TBM, due to limited efficacy and safety data.258 Core principles for the management of drug-resistant miliary tuberculosis with CNS involvement cover multiple key aspects.113,241,258 Clinicians should prioritize rapid detection of drug resistance using molecular diagnostic tools including Xpert MTB/RIF and line probe assays to guide early individualized treatment. A well-tailored therapeutic regimen containing no fewer than five effective anti-tuberculosis drugs is required for optimal treatment efficacy. Priority should be given to medications with favorable central nervous system penetration, including levofloxacin or moxifloxacin with a CSF penetration rate of 70% to 80%, linezolid with a penetration rate ranging from 30% to 70%, ethionamide or prothionamide and cycloserine or terizidone both achieving 80% to 90% penetration. High-dose isoniazid can be adopted for cases with inhA mutation, and pyrazinamide should be administered throughout the entire treatment course. In terms of treatment course duration, a minimum treatment period of 18 to 24 months is recommended for such drug-resistant cases.
Prognosis and Predictors of Outcome
Mortality
Despite effective antimicrobial therapy, mortality associated with miliary tuberculosis remains considerable and varies widely by clinical presentation.6,9,47,48,55,105 Mortality rates range from 14% to 28% among patients with uncomplicated miliary TB, 30% to 50% for those with tuberculous meningitis, 40% to 80% for cases complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 35% to 60% in patients co-infected with HIV. Mortality reaches 100% in untreated cases and exceeds 80% in those with multidrug-resistant tuberculous meningitis.
Predictors of Poor Outcome
Table 17 summarizes the key predictors of poor outcome in patients with miliary tuberculosis, which span multiple domains. Demographic factors include advanced age and male sex. Clinical predictors encompass altered mental status, meningismus, dyspnea, high fever, coma, and seizures. Laboratory abnormalities associated with worse prognosis include hyponatremia, hypoalbuminemia, elevated transaminases and alkaline phosphatase, high neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio leukocyte abnormalities (leukopenia or leukocytosis), lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and pancytopenia. Radiological findings such as atypical chest radiographic patterns and extensive bilateral involvement also predict poorer outcomes. Treatment-related factors include delayed or absent therapy, while complications like ARDS, hydrocephalus, stroke, and IRIS significantly increase mortality risk. Finally, underlying comorbidities including chronic diseases, cirrhosis, and HIV infection further worsen prognosis. These predictors highlight the multifactorial nature of risk assessment in miliary tuberculosis and underscore the need for comprehensive evaluation and timely intervention.
Table 17.
Predictors of Poor Outcome in Miliary Tuberculosis
| Category | Factors |
|---|---|
| Demographic | Increasing age, male sex, female sex (variable) |
| Clinical | Altered mental status, meningismus, dyspnea, temperature >39.3°C, coma, seizures |
| Laboratory | Hyponatremia, hypoalbuminemia, elevated transaminases, elevated alkaline phosphatase, high neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, leukopenia, leukocytosis, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, pancytopenia |
| Radiological | Atypical chest radiographic pattern, extensive bilateral involvement |
| Treatment-related | Treatment delay, failure to treat |
| Complications | ARDS, hydrocephalus, stroke, IRIS |
| Comorbidities | Any underlying comorbid disease, cirrhosis, HIV infection |
In the scoring system study, patients with CNS involvement (higher scores) had significantly higher mortality risk, emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of this complication.25
Multiple scoring systems are available to evaluate the prognostic risk of patients with severe miliary tuberculosis and tuberculous meningitis. The APACHE II score greater than 18 serves as a predictive indicator of mortality in patients diagnosed with miliary tuberculosis complicated with ARDS.26 The MRC staging system is widely applied to stratify the mortality risk of tuberculous meningitis, with reported mortality rates of 15% for stage I, 30% for stage II, and 50% for stage III disease.30,31,118 Additionally, a nutritional risk score based on multiple laboratory and anthropometric parameters, including a body mass index below 18.5, serum albumin level lower than 30 g/L, serum cholesterol level less than 2.33 mmol/L, and lymphocyte count below 7×105/L, can effectively predict adverse clinical outcomes; a total score of 3 or higher is significantly correlated with increased mortality.263
Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome
HIV-Associated TB-IRIS
IRIS occurs in approximately 18–32% of HIV-infected patients starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) within days to weeks of anti-tuberculosis treatment.264,265 Two distinct phenotypes of IRIS have been identified in patients with tuberculosis following ART initiation.266 Paradoxical IRIS is characterized by the clinical deterioration of pre-existing tuberculosis lesions after the commencement of ART. In comparison, unmasking IRIS manifests as the newly emergent presentation of previously subclinical tuberculosis following ART initiation.
Clinical manifestations range from isolated fever to new or worsening lymphadenopathy, pulmonary infiltrates, serositis, cutaneous lesions, and CNS mass lesions.267,268 CSF analysis typically shows neutrophilic pleocytosis with elevated protein.269 Standard management strategies for tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome cover multiple core interventions.270 Continuous administration of anti-tuberculosis therapy and ongoing antiretroviral therapy are generally maintained, unless patients develop life-threatening adverse events that necessitate ART discontinuation. Corticosteroid treatment with prednisolone at a daily dose of 1.0–1.5 mg/kg, followed by a gradual dose tapering over 4 to 12 weeks, serves as a major therapeutic measure. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can be applied to alleviate symptoms in mild cases, and therapeutic abscess drainage is performed when clinically indicated.
Anti-TNF-α-Induced TB-IRIS
Anti-TNF-α-induced TB-IRIS was first described in 2005 and occurs in approximately 7% of patients developing TB during anti-TNF therapy.271,272 The mechanism involves immune reconstitution following drug withdrawal, analogous to HIV-associated IRIS.273,274
Table 18 summarizes 45 reported cases (15 adults, 30 children) of severe paradoxical reaction (PR) or IRIS during tuberculosis treatment managed with TNF-α antagonists. Neuromeningeal tuberculosis was predominant (84.4%), with PR/IRIS manifestations including new or enlarging tuberculomas (73.3%), cerebral vasculitis (17.8%), and hydrocephalus (6.7%). First-line treatment was high-dose corticosteroids in 95.6% of cases. TNF-α antagonists were used as salvage therapy: infliximab (66.7% of adults), adalimumab (20.0%), and thalidomide (26.7% of adults, 100% of children). Clinical improvement was observed in 88.9% of patients, though 33.3% had residual neurological sequelae and 6.7% died. Thalidomide was associated with peripheral neuropathy (10% of children), and its use has declined in favor of infliximab in recent years. Among these, 6 patients (13.3%) had miliary tuberculosis (4 adults and 2 children), all with associated neuromeningeal involvement. The miliary TB patients developed PR/IRIS manifestations including new or enlarging tuberculomas (n=5), cerebral vasculitis (n=3), and hydrocephalus (n=2). All miliary TB patients received first-line high-dose corticosteroids followed by TNF-α antagonists as salvage therapy: infliximab (n=4), thalidomide (n=1), and adalimumab (n=1). Clinical improvement was observed in all 6 miliary TB patients, though 3 (50%) had residual neurological sequelae (cognitive impairment, cranial nerve palsy, and limb paresis). No deaths occurred in the miliary TB subgroup. Notably, one miliary TB patient with HIV coinfection developed severe IRIS requiring sequential infliximab and adalimumab, ultimately achieving full recovery. These findings suggest that TNF-α antagonists, particularly infliximab, are effective salvage options for corticosteroid-refractory PR/IRIS in tuberculosis, though neurological sequelae remain common and close monitoring is required.
Table 18.
Summary of Reported Cases of Anti-TNF-α-Induced TB-IRIS
| Characteristic | Adults (n=15) | Children (n=30) | Total (N=45) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | |||
| Male sex, n/N (%) | 4/14 (28.6) | 14/29 (48.3) | 18/43 (41.9) |
| Age, median (range) | 40 years (19–63) | 6 years (8 months–14 years) | – |
| HIV infection, n/N (%) | 3/15 (20.0) | 7/30 (23.3) | 10/45 (22.2) |
| Tuberculosis characteristics | |||
| Neuromeningeal involvement, n/N (%) | 12/15 (80.0) | 26/30 (86.7) | 38/45 (84.4) |
| Pulmonary involvement, n/N (%) | 5/15 (33.3) | 8/30 (26.7) | 13/45 (28.9) |
| Miliary TB, n/N (%) | 4/15 (26.7) | 2/30 (6.7) | 6/45 (13.3) |
| Drug-susceptible TB, n/N (%) | 15/15 (100) | 28/28 (100) | 43/43 (100) |
| PR/IRIS characteristics | |||
| Time from TB treatment to PR/IRIS onset, median (IQR) | 6 weeks (4–9) | 4 weeks (2–8) | 5 weeks (3–8) |
| Time from ART start to IRIS onset (HIV+), median (range) | 2 weeks (2–3) | 3.5 days (2–7) | – |
| PR/IRIS manifestations, n (%) | |||
| New/enlarging tuberculomas | 8/15 (53.3) | 25/30 (83.3) | 33/45 (73.3) |
| Cerebral vasculitis/infarcts | 5/15 (33.3) | 3/30 (10.0) | 8/45 (17.8) |
| Hydrocephalus | 2/15 (13.3) | 1/30 (3.3) | 3/45 (6.7) |
| Leptomeningeal enhancement | 2/15 (13.3) | 7/30 (23.3) | 9/45 (20.0) |
| Lymphadenitis | 4/15 (26.7) | 0/30 (0) | 4/45 (8.9) |
| Treatment | |||
| First-line corticosteroids, n/N (%) | 14/15 (93.3) | 29/30 (96.7) | 43/45 (95.6) |
| TNF-α antagonist used, n (%) | |||
| Infliximab | 10/15 (66.7) | 0/30 (0) | 10/45 (22.2) |
| Adalimumab | 3/15 (20.0)* | 0/30 (0) | 3/45 (6.7) |
| Thalidomide | 4/15 (26.7) | 30/30 (100) | 34/45 (75.6) |
| Outcomes | |||
| Clinical improvement, n/N (%) | 15/15 (100) | 25/30 (83.3) | 40/45 (88.9) |
| No response, n/N (%) | 0/15 (0) | 2/30 (6.7) | 2/45 (4.4) |
| Full recovery, n/N (%) | 5/15 (33.3) | 17/30 (56.7) | 22/45 (48.9) |
| Alive with sequelae, n/N (%) | 8/15 (53.3) | 7/30 (23.3) | 15/45 (33.3) |
| Death, n/N (%) | 1/15 (6.7) | 2/30 (6.7) | 3/45 (6.7) |
| TNF-α antagonist-related severe AEs, n/N (%) | 2/15 (13.3)† | 3/30 (10.0)‡ | 5/45 (11.1) |
Notes: *One patient received infliximab followed by adalimumab †Peripheral neuropathy (thalidomide, n=1); hypersensitivity (infliximab, n=1) ‡Peripheral neuropathy (thalidomide, n=3) Data compiled from references.170,271–279
Abbreviations: AEs, adverse events; ART, antiretroviral therapy; PR/IRIS, Paradoxical reaction/ immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.
Prevention
BCG Vaccination
BCG vaccination is effective in reducing the incidence of miliary TB and tuberculous meningitis, particularly in children.161,280,281 A meta-analysis estimated that BCG vaccination prevents approximately 30,000 cases of childhood TBM annually, with a protective efficacy of 73% (95% CI 67–79%) against TBM and 77% (95% CI 58–87%) against miliary TB.161,282 The cost per DALY gained is approximately US$200 in high-burden settings, making BCG a highly cost-effective intervention.161
BCG vaccine provides substantial and consistent protection against miliary tuberculosis, with efficacy estimates ranging from 64% to 90% across multiple meta-analyses.161,280–282 Protection is highest when vaccination occurs in infancy (approximately 90% efficacy) and in individuals without prior sensitization to environmental mycobacteria.281,282 Global BCG vaccination programs prevent an estimated 11,500 cases of miliary tuberculosis annually among children under 5 years, at a cost of approximately US$206 per disability-adjusted life year gained, making it a highly cost-effective intervention.280 The vaccine’s efficacy against severe childhood tuberculosis has been consistently demonstrated across diverse geographic settings, supporting its continued use in high-incidence countries.161,280–282
Latent TB Infection Treatment
Targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI) is practiced in low-prevalence countries.232,283 However, anti-TB drug-induced hepatotoxicity is a potential risk.284 In candidates for anti-TNF therapy, screening and treatment of LTBI reduces TB risk by 74–89%.285,286
Infection Control
Miliary TB patients with pulmonary involvement are potentially infectious.287 Standardized infection control strategies cover both hospital-based clinical management and community-based public health interventions to block tuberculosis transmission comprehensively.288 In healthcare settings, core preventive measures include the placement of infectious patients in negative pressure isolation rooms, and mandatory use of N95 respirators by healthcare workers during clinical contact with infected individuals. All targeted infection prevention precautions should be continuously implemented until patients obtain negative sputum smear conversion results to terminate endogenous transmission risks. Beyond clinical environments, community-focused infection control is equally essential to reduce household and societal transmission. Active case screening and contact tracing for close household and social contacts of confirmed miliary TB patients enable early identification of undiagnosed latent or active infections, facilitating timely intervention and interrupting transmission chains. In addition, health education regarding respiratory hygiene, cough etiquette, and regular indoor ventilation should be widely promoted among patients and community residents. Infected individuals are advised to wear surgical masks during outdoor activities and avoid crowded public spaces during the infectious period. Targeted public health monitoring and standardized home isolation guidance further minimize community-wide dissemination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, forming a complete infection prevention system complementary to hospital management.
Conclusions and Future Directions
Miliary tuberculosis constitutes a rare yet highly fatal tuberculosis subtype, with poor clinical outcomes primarily attributed to atypical clinical manifestations, delayed diagnosis, and life-threatening complications, particularly CNS tuberculosis and ARDS. This review highlights clinically actionable strategies to improve early recognition, diagnosis, and management of the disease. Targeted identification of high-risk populations, including younger patients, female individuals, and people living with advanced HIV infection, enhances clinical vigilance and facilitates timely screening for severe complications. Integrative interpretation of characteristic laboratory abnormalities, typical chest and abdominal imaging features, and standardized prognostic scoring systems enables non-invasive, early recognition of CNS involvement and other critical complications, avoiding excessive invasive examinations while shortening diagnostic delays. Current standardized management regimens cover optimized anti-tuberculosis treatment tailored for drug resistance, CNS-penetrating antimicrobial agents, and targeted interventions for ARDS, intracranial hypertension, hyponatremia, and IRIS. Adjunctive therapies including corticosteroids and TNF-α antagonists serve as effective salvage strategies for refractory inflammatory complications. Despite these advances, miliary tuberculosis management remains constrained by limited pathogen load, insufficient disease-specific high-quality clinical evidence, and the lack of optimized short-course regimens, resulting in prolonged and complex treatment courses. Future prospective multicenter studies are essential to validate novel point-of-care diagnostic tools and refine individualized therapeutic protocols, while host-directed therapies represent a promising direction to further improve the survival and prognosis of patients with severe miliary tuberculosis.
Funding Statement
Gansu Provincial Natural Science Foundation (23JRRA542). Gansu Provincial Health Industry Research Plan Project (GSWSKY2021-053).
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Organization WH. Global TB Report 2022 TB incidence. WHO; 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 2.(2023) W. Global tuberculosis report 2023. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2023. Accessed July 16 2026 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Organization WH. Global TB Report 2024. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2024. Accessed July 16 2026 [Google Scholar]
- 4.Houben RM, Dodd PJ. The global burden of latent tuberculosis infection: a re-estimation using mathematical modelling. PLoS Med. 2016;13(10):e1002152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sharma SK, Mohan A, Sharma A, Mitra DK. Miliary tuberculosis: new insights into an old disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(7):415–31. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(05)70163-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sharma SK, Mohan A. Miliary Tuberculosis. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5(2). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0013-2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xlvii JJMO. Cramer and Perachon. London, England; 1700. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sahn SA, Neff TA. Miliary tuberculosis. Am J Med. 1974;56(4):494–505. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(74)90482-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kim JH, Langston AA, Gallis HA. Miliary tuberculosis: epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and outcome. Rev Infect Dis. 1990;12(4):583–590. doi: 10.1093/clinids/12.4.583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dixon WG, Hyrich KL, Watson KD, et al. Drug-specific risk of tuberculosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-TNF therapy: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR). Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(3):522–528. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.118935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Arkema EV, Jonsson J, Baecklund E, et al. Are patients with rheumatoid arthritis still at an increased risk of tuberculosis and what is the role of biological treatments? Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(6):1212–1217. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jung SM, Ju JH, Park MS, et al. Risk of tuberculosis in patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: a nationwide study in South Korea,a country with an intermediate tuberculosis burden. Int J Rheum Dis. 2015;18(3):323–330. doi: 10.1111/1756-185x.12530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang J-Y, Hsueh P-R, Wang S-K, et al. Disseminated Tuberculosis: a 10-Year Experience in a Medical Center. Medicine. 2007;86(1):39–46. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e318030b605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sharma SK, Mohan A, Pande JN, et al. Clinical profile, laboratory characteristics and outcome in miliary tuberculosis. Qjm. 1995;88(1):29–37. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.qjmed.a068979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang G, Liang R, Sun Q, et al. Extremely high levels of central nervous system involvement in miliary tuberculosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07390-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Awasthi S, Saxena M, Ahmad F, et al. Abdominal tuberculosis: a diagnostic dilemma. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(5):Ec01–3. doi: 10.7860/jcdr/2015/13350.5887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Elghoul N, Benchakroun M, Zaddoug O, et al. A report of two challenging cases of bone infection: mycobacterium tuberculosis. How to manage? Oxf Med Case Rep. 2020;2020(4):omaa025. doi: 10.1093/omcr/omaa025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bourbonnais JM, Sirithanakul K, Guzman JA. Fulminant miliary tuberculosis with adult respiratory distress syndrome undiagnosed until autopsy: a report of 2 cases and review of the literature. J Intensive Care Med. 2005;20(6):354–359. doi: 10.1177/0885066605279150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Aurangabadkar GM, Jadhav US, Choudhary SS, et al. Miliary tuberculosis with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a deadly combination. Cureus. 2023;15(1):e33944. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Singh K, Hyatali S, Giddings S, et al. Miliary tuberculosis presenting with ards and shock: a case report and challenges in current management and diagnosis. Case Rep Crit Care. 2017;2017:9287021. doi: 10.1155/2017/9287021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Boushab BM, Basco LK. Miliary tuberculosis and acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2019;16:100113. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2019.100113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee J, Lim JK, Seo H, et al. Clinical relevance of ground glass opacity in 105 patients with miliary tuberculosis. Respir Med. 2014;108(6):924–930. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kwong JS, Carignan S, Kang EY, et al. Miliary tuberculosis. Diagnostic accuracy of chest radiography. Chest. 1996;110(2):339–342. doi: 10.1378/chest.110.2.339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McGuinness G, Naidich DP, Jagirdar J, et al. High resolution CT findings in miliary lung disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992;16(3):384–390. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199205000-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xiao Y, Yu S, Xue Q, et al. A scoring system to effectively evaluate central nervous system tuberculosis in patients with military tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sharma SK, Mohan A, Banga A, et al. Predictors of development and outcome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006;10(4):429–435. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.05.0281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kim YJ, Pack KM, Jeong E, et al. Pulmonary tuberculosis with acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2008;32(6):1625–1630. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00070907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee K, Kim JH, Lee JH, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by miliary tuberculosis: a multicentre survey in South Korea. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15(8):1099–1103. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.10.0557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Muthu V, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome due to tuberculosis in a respiratory icu over a 16-year period. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(10):e1087–e90. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Thwaites GE, Nguyen DB, Nguyen HD, et al. Dexamethasone for the treatment of tuberculous meningitis in adolescents and adults. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1741–1751. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Heemskerk AD, Bang ND, Mai NT, et al. Intensified antituberculosis therapy in adults with tuberculous meningitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(2):124–134. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Prasad K, Singh MB, Ryan H. Corticosteroids for managing tuberculous meningitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4(4):Cd002244. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002244.pub4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Long R, O’Connor R, Palayew M, et al. Disseminated tuberculosis with and without a miliary pattern on chest radiograph: a clinical-pathologic-radiologic correlation. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1997;1(1):52–58. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.1997.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Noertjojo K, Tam CM, Chan SL, Chan-Yeung MM. Extra-pulmonary and pulmonary tuberculosis in Hong Kong. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002;6(10):879–886. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.2002.06.10.879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Slavin RE, Walsh TJ, Pollack AD. Late generalized tuberculosis: a clinical pathologic analysis and comparison of 100 cases in the preantibiotic and antibiotic eras. Medicine. 1980;59(5):352–366. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198009000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chapman CB, Whorton CM. Acute generalized miliary tuberculosis in adults. N Engl J Med. 1946;235:239–248. doi: 10.1056/nejm194608222350801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.ZD JJ. Pathology and insights into pathogenesis of tuberculosis. In: Rom WN, Garay SM, editors. Tuberculosis. 2004:323–344. [Google Scholar]
- 38.HIV/AIDS NCf, Hepatitis V, Elimination SaTPUSDoT. Reported tuberculosis in the United States, 2007, 2014. Tuberculosis/epidemiology/united States. 2015. Available from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/34447. Accessed July 16 2026
- 39.Sharma SK, Mohan A, Kadhiravan T. HIV-TB co-infection: epidemiology, diagnosis & management. Indian J Med Res. 2005;121(4):550–567. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70163-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Swaminathan S, Padmapriyadarsini C, Ponnuraja C, et al. Miliary tuberculosis in human immunodeficiency virus infected patients not on antiretroviral therapy: clinical profile and response to shortcourse chemotherapy. J Postgrad Med. 2007;53(4):228–231. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.37509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Havlir DV, Barnes PF. Tuberculosis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(5):367–373. doi: 10.1056/nejm199902043400507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hill AR, Premkumar S, Brustein S, et al. Disseminated tuberculosis in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome era. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;144(5):1164–1170. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.5.1164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lincoln EM, Hould F. Results of specific treatment of miliary tuberculosis in children; a follow-up study of 63 patients treated with antimicrobial agents. N Engl J Med. 1959;261(3):113–120. doi: 10.1056/nejm195907162610302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Munt PW. Miliary tuberculosis in the chemotherapy era: with a clinical review in 69 American adults. Medicine. 1972;51(2):139–155. doi: 10.1097/00005792-197203000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mert A, Bilir M, Tabak F, et al. Miliary tuberculosis: clinical manifestations, diagnosis and outcome in 38 adults. Respirology. 2001;6(3):217–224. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2001.00328.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Al-Jahdali H, Al-Zahrani K, Amene P, et al. Clinical aspects of miliary tuberculosis in Saudi adults. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000;4(3):252–255. doi: 10.1097/00007237-200006000-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Maartens G, Willcox PA, Benatar SR. Miliary tuberculosis: rapid diagnosis, hematologic abnormalities, and outcome in 109 treated adults. Am J Med. 1990;89(3):291–296. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90340-j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hussain SF, Irfan M, Abbasi M, et al. Clinical characteristics of 110 miliary tuberculosis patients from a low HIV prevalence country. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004;8(4):493–499. doi: 10.1097/00007237-200404000-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Vasankari T, Liippo K, Tala E. Overt and cryptic miliary tuberculosis misdiagnosed until autopsy. Scand J Infect Dis. 2003;35(11–12):794–796. doi: 10.1080/00365540310016961 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shamy ASE, Saidi FA, Baidas G, et al. Miliary tuberculosis in kuwait: clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment outcome. J Kuwait Med Assoc. 2008;40(4):288–292. doi: 10.5295/kdjj.2008.40.4.288 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Biehl JP. Miliary tuberculosis; a review of sixty-eight adult patients admitted to a municipal general hospital. Am Rev Tuberc. 1958;77(4):605–622. doi: 10.1164/artpd.1958.77.4.605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kang W, Yu J, Du J, et al. The epidemiology of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in China: a large-scale multi-center observational study. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kang W, Liu S, Du J, et al. Epidemiology of concurrent extrapulmonary tuberculosis in inpatients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis lesions in China: a large-scale observational multi-centre investigation. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;115:79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gelb AF, Leffler C, Brewin A, et al. Miliary tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1973;108(6):1327–1333. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1973.108.6.1327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Grieco MH, Chmel H. Acute disseminated tuberculosis as a diagnostic problem. A clinical study based on twenty-eight cases. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1974;109(5):554–560. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1974.109.5.554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Uthman I, Kanj N, El-Sayad J, Bizri AR. Miliary tuberculosis after infliximab therapy in Lebanon. Clin Rheumatol. 2004;23(3):279–280. doi: 10.1007/s10067-004-0873-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Malipeddi AS, Rajendran R, Kallarackal G. Disseminated tuberculosis after anti-TNFalpha treatment. Lancet. 2007;369(9556):162. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60078-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Toussirot E, Streit G, Wendling D. Infectious complications with anti-TNFalpha therapy in rheumatic diseases: a review. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2007;1(1):39–47. doi: 10.2174/187221307779815039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jung JH, Choi S, Kang Y, et al. Development of spinal tuberculosis in an adolescent with crohn’s disease after infliximab therapy: a case report with literature review. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:802298. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.802298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Anyanwu CH, Nassau E, Yacoub M. Miliary tuberculosis following homograft valve replacement. Thorax. 1976;31(1):101–106. doi: 10.1136/thx.31.1.101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Morano Amado LE, Amador Barciela L, Rodriguez Fernandez A, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy complicated with miliary tuberculosis. J Urol. 1993;149(6):1532–1534. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36437-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rabe J, Neff KW, Lehmann KJ, et al. Miliary tuberculosis after intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy for carcinoma of the bladder. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172(3):748–750. doi: 10.2214/ajr.172.3.10063874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Silverblatt A, Desimone JA, Babinchak TJ. Acute miliary tuberculosis following laser lithotripsy. Infect Med. 2002;19(2):80–82. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yekanath H, Gross PA, Vitenson JH. Miliary tuberculosis following ureteral catheterization. Urology. 1980;16(2):197–198. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(80)90084-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Moule MG, Cirillo JD. Mycobacterium tuberculosis dissemination plays a critical role in pathogenesis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:65. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Siakia UN, Vishwajeet V, Kumar R, et al. Disseminated TB in inpatient deaths at a tertiary care centre: an autopsy study over three decades. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2021;25(4):271–276. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.20.0802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lau A, Ferrara G. Disseminated TB: still being missed and misunderstood. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2021;25(4):255–257. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.21.0037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Collins HL, Kaufmann SH. The many faces of host responses to tuberculosis. Immunology. 2001;103(1):1–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2001.01236.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rook GA, Hernandez-Pando R, Dheda K, Teng Seah G. IL-4 in tuberculosis: implications for vaccine design. Trends Immunol. 2004;25(9):483–488. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2004.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sharma PK, Saha PK, Singh A, et al. FoxP3+ regulatory T cells suppress effector T-cell function at pathologic site in miliary tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179(11):1061–1070. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200804-529OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sharma SK, Mitra DK, Balamurugan A, et al. Cytokine polarization in miliary and pleural tuberculosis. J Clin Immunol. 2002;22(6):345–352. doi: 10.1023/a:1020604331886 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Barnes PF, Grisso CL, Abrams JS, et al. Gamma delta T lymphocytes in human tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 1992;165(3):506–512. doi: 10.1093/infdis/165.3.506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ellner JJ. Review: the immune response in human tuberculosis--implications for tuberculosis control. J Infect Dis. 1997;176(5):1351–1359. doi: 10.1086/514132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hernández-Pando R, Orozcoe H, Sampieri A, et al. Correlation between the kinetics of Th1, Th2 cells and pathology in a murine model of experimental pulmonary tuberculosis. Immunology. 1996;89(1):26–33. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1996.00227.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Thuong NT, Hawn TR, Thwaites GE, et al. A polymorphism in human TLR2 is associated with increased susceptibility to tuberculous meningitis. Genes Immun. 2007;8(5):422–428. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Dieli F, Ivanyi J, Marsh P, et al. Characterization of lung gamma delta T cells following intranasal infection with Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin. J Immunol. 2003;170(1):463–469. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.1.463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kumararatne DS, Pithie AS, Drysdale P, et al. Specific lysis of mycobacterial antigen-bearing macrophages by class II MHC-restricted polyclonal T cell lines in healthy donors or patients with tuberculosis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1990;80(3):314–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1990.tb03287.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Taype CA, Shamsuzzaman S, Accinelli RA, et al. Genetic susceptibility to different clinical forms of tuberculosis in the Peruvian population. Infect Genet Evol. 2010;10(4):495–504. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Goldfeld AE, Delgado JC, Thim S, et al. Association of an HLA-DQ allele with clinical tuberculosis. JAMA. 1998;279(3):226–228. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.3.226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Vejbaesya S, Chierakul N, Luangtrakool K, et al. Associations of HLA class II alleles with pulmonary tuberculosis in Thais. Eur J Immunogenet. 2002;29(5):431–434. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2370.2002.00352.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Al-Arif LI, Goldstein RA, Affronti LF, Janicki BW. HLA-Bw15 and tuberculosis in a North American black population. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979;120(6):1275–1278. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1979.120.6.1275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kettaneh A, Seng L, Tiev KP, et al. Human leukocyte antigens and susceptibility to tuberculosis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006;10(7):717–725. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.05.0321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Schurz H, Naranbhai V, Yates TA, et al. Multi-ancestry meta-analysis of host genetic susceptibility to tuberculosis identifies shared genetic architecture. Elife. 2024;13. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Balamurugan A. HLA-DR restriction of Th1/Th2 cytokine profile in tuberculosis: impact of genetic diversity (PhD thesis). All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Selvaraj P, Raghavan S, Swaminathan S, et al. HLA-DQB1 and -DPB1 allele profile in HIV infected patients with and without pulmonary tuberculosis of south India. Infect Genet Evol. 2008;8(5):664–671. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Sallakci N, Coskun M, Berber Z, et al. Interferon-gamma gene+874T-A polymorphism is associated with tuberculosis and gamma interferon response. Tuberculosis. 2007;87(3):225–230. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2006.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Wu F, Zhang W, Zhang L, et al. NRAMP1, VDR, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1 gene polymorphisms in susceptibility to tuberculosis among the Chinese Kazakh population: a case-control study. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:484535. doi: 10.1155/2013/484535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Tandon PN. Management of tuberculosis of the central nervous system: our experience. Natl Med J India. 2018;31(3):151–155. doi: 10.4103/0970-258x.255758 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Dastur DK, Manghani DK, Udani PM. Pathology and pathogenetic mechanisms in neurotuberculosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33(4):733–752. doi: 10.1016/S0033-8389(22)00616-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Sharma S, Nahar U, Das A, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in disseminated tuberculosis: an uncommon association. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016;20(2):271–275. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Savic I, Trifunovic-Skodric V, Mitrovic D. Clinically unrecognized miliary tuberculosis: an autopsy study. Ann Saudi Med. 2016;36(1):42–50. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2016.42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Ansari NA, Kombe AH, Kenyon TA, et al. Pathology and causes of death in a group of 128 predominantly HIV-positive patients in Botswana 1997-1998. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002;6(1):55–63. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.01.0011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Lewison M, Frelich EB, Ragins OB. Correlation of clinical diagnosis and pathological diagnosis with special reference to tuberculosis: analysis of autopsy findings in 893 cases. Am Rev Tuberc. 1931;24:152–171. doi: 10.1164/art.1931.24.2.152 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Jacques J, Sloan JM. The changing pattern of miliary tuberculosis. Thorax. 1970;25(2):237–240. doi: 10.1136/thx.25.2.237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Meira L, Chaves C, Araújo D, et al. Predictors and outcomes of disseminated tuberculosis in an intermediate burden setting. Pulmonology. 2019;25(6):320–327. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2018.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Gaifer Z. Epidemiology of extrapulmonary and disseminated tuberculosis in a tertiary care center in Oman. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2017;6(2):162–166. doi: 10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_31_17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Yousef Khan F. Cryptic disseminated tuberculosis: a secondary analysis of previous hospital-based study. Tanaffos. 2020;19(1):45–49. doi: 10.22038/tanaffos.2020.51716.1244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Mert A, Arslan F, Kuyucu T, et al. Miliary tuberculosis: epidemiologicaland clinical analysis of large-case series from moderate to low tuberculosis endemic Country. Medicine. 2017;96(5):e5875. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000005875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Flores-Franco RA, Ríos-Ortiz LA. The “damp shadow” sign: another clinical indicator of miliary tuberculosis. Heart Lung. 2010;39(1):87–88. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.06.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Liu X, Qiao G. Analysis of clinical characteristics and influencing factors of 86 cases of acute miliary tuberculosis. Henan J Prev Med. 2021;32(1):75–7,9. doi: 10.13515/j.cnki.hnjpm [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Proudfoot AT, Akhtar AJ, Douglas AC, Horne NW. Miliary tuberculosis in adults. Br Med J. 1969;2(5652):273–276. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5652.273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Yu YL, Chow WH, Humphries MJ, et al. Cryptic miliary tuberculosis. Q J Med. 1986;59(228):421–428. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.qjmed.a067970 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Pipavath SN, Sharma SK, Sinha S, et al. High resolution CT (HRCT) in miliary tuberculosis (MTB) of the lung: correlation with pulmonary function tests & gas exchange parameters in north Indian patients. Indian J Med Res. 2007;126(3):193–198. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.33848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Campbell IG. Miliary tuberculosis in British Columbia. Can Med Assoc J. 1973;108(12):1517–1519. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.108-12-1517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Prout S, Benatar SR. Disseminated tuberculosis. A study of 62 cases. S Afr Med J. 1980;58(21):835–842. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Teklu B, Butler J, Ostrow JH. Miliary tuberculosis. A review of 83 cases treated between 1950 and 1968. Ethiop Med J. 1977;15(2):39–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Onadeko BO, Dickinson R, Sofowora EO. Miliary tuberculosis of the lung in Nigerian adults. East Afr Med J. 1975;52(7):390–395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Gurkan F, Bosnak M, Dikici B, et al. Miliary tuberculosis in children: a clinical review. Scand J Infect Dis. 1998;30(4):359–362. doi: 10.1080/00365549850160648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Hussey G, Chisholm T, Kibel M, Kibel M. Miliary tuberculosis in children: a review of 94 cases. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10(11):832–836. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199111000-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Kim PK, Lee JS, Yun DJ. Clinical review of miliary tuberculosis in Korean children. 84 cases and review of the literature. Yonsei Med J. 1969;10(2):146–152. doi: 10.3349/ymj.1969.10.2.146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Aderele WI. Miliary tuberculosis in Nigerian children. East Afr Med J. 1978;55(4):166–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Leonard JM. Central nervous system tuberculosis. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5(2). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0044-2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Thwaites GE, van Toorn R, Schoeman J. Tuberculous meningitis: more questions, still too few answers. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(10):999–1010. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70168-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Davis AG, Rohlwink UK, Proust A, et al. The pathogenesis of tuberculous meningitis. J Leukoc Biol. 2019;105(2):267–280. doi: 10.1002/jlb.Mr0318-102r [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Donald PR, Schaaf HS, Schoeman JF. Tuberculous meningitis and miliary tuberculosis: the Rich focus revisited. J Infect. 2005;50(3):193–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2004.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Dastur DK, Lalitha VS, Udani PM, Parekh U. The brain and meninges in tuberculous meningitis-gross pathology in 100 cases and pathogenesis. Neurol India. 1970;18(2):86–100. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.246224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Schaller MA, Wicke F, Foerch C, Weidauer S. Central nervous system tuberculosis: etiology, clinical manifestations and neuroradiological features. Clin Neuroradiol. 2019;29(1):3–18. doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0726-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Kennedy DH, Fallon RJ. Tuberculous meningitis. JAMA. 1979;241(3):264–268. doi: 10.1001/jama.1979.03290290032021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Kent SJ, Crowe SM, Yung A, et al. Tuberculous meningitis: a 30-year review. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;17(6):987–994. doi: 10.1093/clinids/17.6.987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Sharma P, Garg RK, Verma R, et al. Incidence, predictors and prognostic value of cranial nerve involvement in patients with tuberculous meningitis: a retrospective evaluation. Eur J Intern Med. 2011;22(3):289–295. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Verdon R, Chevret S, Laissy JP, Wolff M. Tuberculous meningitis in adults: review of 48 cases. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22(6):982–988. doi: 10.1093/clinids/22.6.982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Moghtaderi A, Niazi A, Alavi-Naini R, et al. Comparative analysis of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase in tuberculous and non-tuberculous meningitis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010;112(6):459–462. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Tandon PN, Bhargava S. Effect of medical treatment on intracranial tuberculoma--a CT study. Tubercle. 1985;66(2):85–97. doi: 10.1016/0041-3879(85)90073-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Weisberg LA. Granulomatous diseases of the CNS as demonstrated by computerized tomography. Comput Radiol. 1984;8(5):309–317. doi: 10.1016/0730-4862(84)90043-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Bagga A, Kalra V, Ghai OP. Intracranial tuberculoma. Evaluation and treatment. Clin Pediatr. 1988;27(10):487–490. doi: 10.1177/000992288802701004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Harder E, Al-Kawi MZ, Carney P. Intracranial tuberculoma: conservative management. Am J Med. 1983;74(4):570–576. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91011-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Wasay M, Kheleani BA, Moolani MK, et al. Brain CT and MRI findings in 100 consecutive patients with intracranial tuberculoma. J Neuroimaging. 2003;13(3):240–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2003.tb00185.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Bargalló J, Berenguer J, García-Barrionuevo J, et al. The “target sign”: is it a specific sign of CNS tuberculoma? Neuroradiology. 1996;38(6):547–550. doi: 10.1007/bf00626095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Kapoor VK. Abdominal tuberculosis. Postgrad Med J. 1998;74(874):459–467. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.74.874.459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Sharma MP, Bhatia V. Abdominal tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res. 2004;120(4):305–315. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.148521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Marshall JB. Tuberculosis of the gastrointestinal tract and peritoneum. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88(7):989–999. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1993.tb04366.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Das P, Shukla HS. Clinical diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis. Br J Surg. 1976;63(12):941–946. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800631213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Dias N, Pina-Vaz T, Abreu-Mendes P, et al. Review of 175 cases of tuberculosis infections affecting the urogenital system. Turk J Urol. 2022;48(6):440–445. doi: 10.5152/tud.2022.22148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Selmani H, De Backer AI, Ilsen B. Miliary tuberculosis with diffuse pulmonary and extrapulmonary involvement. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2024;108(1):5. doi: 10.5334/jbsr.3440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Memiş KB, Korkmaz BB, Aydın S. Miliary tuberculosis with extrapulmonary tissue involvement. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2024;57:e009162024. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0101-2024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Yu RS, Zhang SZ, Wu JJ, Li RF. Imaging diagnosis of 12 patients with hepatic tuberculosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10(11):1639–1642. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i11.1639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Brusko G, Melvin WS, Fromkes JJ, Ellison EC. Pancreatic tuberculosis. Am Surg. 1995;61(6):513–515. doi: 10.1177/000313489506100614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Tuli SM. General principles of osteoarticular tuberculosis. Clin Orthop & Relat Res. 2002(398):11–19. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200205000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Tuli SM. Tuberculosis of the Skeletal System. 4th ed. ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 140.Rasouli MR, Mirkoohi M, Vaccaro AR, et al. Spinal tuberculosis: diagnosis and management. Asian Spine J. 2012;6(4):294–308. doi: 10.4184/asj.2012.6.4.294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Garg RK, Somvanshi DS. Spinal tuberculosis: a review. The J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(5):440–454. doi: 10.1179/2045772311y.0000000023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Lee KY. Comparison of pyogenic spondylitis and tuberculous spondylitis. Asian Spine J. 2014;8(2):216–223. doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.2.216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Turgut M. Spinal tuberculosis (Pott’s disease): its clinical presentation, surgical management, and outcome. A survey study on 694 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2001;24(1):8–13. doi: 10.1007/pl00011973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Moon MS, Kim SS, Lee BJ, Moon JL. Spinal tuberculosis in children: retrospective analysis of 124 patients. Indian J Orthop. 2012;46(2):150–158. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.93676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Rajasekaran S, Soundarapandian S. Progression of kyphosis in tuberculosis of the spine treated by anterior arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(9):1314–1323. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198971090-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Figueiredo AA, Lucon AM. Urogenital tuberculosis: update and review of 8961 cases from the world literature. Rev Urol. 2008;10(3):207–217. doi: 10.3909/ruol.10.207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Figueiredo AA, Lucon AM, Srougi M. Urogenital tuberculosis. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5(1). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0015-2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Eastwood JB, Corbishley CM, Grange JM. Tuberculosis and the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12(6):1307–1314. doi: 10.1681/asn.V1261307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Wise GJ, Shteynshlyuger A. An update on lower urinary tract tuberculosis. Curr Urol Rep. 2008;9(4):305–313. doi: 10.1007/s11934-008-0053-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Nzerue C, Drayton J, Oster R, Hewan-Lowe K. Genitourinary tuberculosis in patients with HIV infection: clinical features in an inner-city hospital population. Am J Med Sci. 2000;320(5):299–303. doi: 10.1097/00000441-200011000-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Kulchavenya E. Urogenital tuberculosis: definition and classification. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2014;2(5–6):117–122. doi: 10.1177/2049936115572064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Piqueras AR, Marruecos L, Artigas A, Rodriguez C. Miliary tuberculosis and adult respiratory distress syndrome. Intens Care Med. 1987;13(3). doi: 10.1007/BF00254701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Deng W, Yu M, Ma H, et al. Predictors and outcome of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by miliary tuberculosis: a retrospective study in Chongqing, China. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Penner C, Roberts D, Kunimoto D, et al. Tuberculosis as a primary cause of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151(3 Pt 1):867–872. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/151.3_Pt_1.867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Dyer RA, Chappell WA, Potgieter PD. Adult respiratory distress syndrome associated with miliary tuberculosis. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(1):12–15. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198501000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Mohan A, Sharma SK, Pande JN. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in miliary tuberculosis: a twelve year experience. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 1996;38(3):157–162. doi: 10.5005/ijcdas-38-3-157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Valade S, Raskine L, Aout M, et al. Tuberculosis in the intensive care unit: a retrospective descriptive cohort study with determination of a predictive fatality score. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2012;23(4):173–178. doi: 10.1155/2012/361292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Koegelenberg CF, Balkema CA, Jooste Y, et al. Validation of a severity-of-illness score in patients with tuberculosis requiring intensive care unit admission. S Afr Med J. 2015;105(5):389–392. doi: 10.7196/samj.9148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Lado FLL, Gómez EB, Arceo EC, de Barrón ACO. Clinical presentation of tuberculosis and the degree of immunodeficiency in patients with HIV infection. Scand J Infect Dis. 1999;31(4):387–391. doi: 10.1080/00365549950163842 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Rahajoe NN. Miliary tuberculosis in children. A clinical review. Paediatr Indones. 1990;30(9–10):233–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Trunz BB, Fine P, Dye C. Effect of BCG vaccination on childhood tuberculous meningitis and miliary tuberculosis worldwide: a meta-analysis and assessment of cost-effectiveness. Lancet. 2006;367(9517):1173–1180. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68507-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Gai X, Chi H, Cao W, et al. Acute miliary tuberculosis in pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a report of seven cases. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):913. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06564-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Ye R, Wang C, Zhao L, et al. Characteristics of miliary tuberculosis in pregnant women after in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2019;23(2):136–139. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.18.0223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Dong S, Zhou R, Peng E, He R. Analysis of clinical features and risk factors in pregnant women with miliary pulmonary tuberculosis after in vitro fertilization embryo transfer. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:885865. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.885865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Wang K, Ren D, Qiu Z, Li W. Clinical analysis of pregnancy complicated with miliary tuberculosis. Ann Med. 2022;54(1):71–79. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.2018485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Addis GM, Anthony GS, Semple PD, Miller AW. Miliary tuberculosis in an in-vitro fertilization pregnancy: a case report. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1988;27(4):351–353. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(88)90049-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Gai XY, Chi HB, Zeng L, et al. Untreated prior pulmonary tuberculosis adversely affects pregnancy outcomes in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a large retrospective cohort study. Biomed Environ Sci. 2021;34(2):130–138. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Gai X, Chi H, Zeng L, et al. Impact of positive interferon-gamma release assay on IVF-ET pregnancy outcomes in infertile patients with untreated prior tuberculosis: a prospective cohort study. Front Med. 2021;8:749410. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.749410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Koschny R, Junghanss T, Mischnik A, et al. Development of miliary tuberculosis under infliximab in a patient with spondyloarthritis and suspected Crohn’s disease. Z Gastroenterol. 2013;51(10):1177–1183. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Nabeya D, Kinjo T, Yamaniha K, et al. Use of steroids to treat anti-tumor necrosis factor α induced tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: case report and literature review. Medicine. 2020;99(43):e22076. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000022076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Singh KJ, Ahluwalia G, Sharma SK, et al. Significance of haematological manifestations in patients with tuberculosis. J Assoc Physicians India. 2001;49(788):90–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Glasser RM, Walker RI, Herion JC. The significance of hematologic abnormalities in patients with tuberculosis. Arch Intern Med. 1970;125(4):691–695. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1970.00310040115014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Kuo PH, Yang PC, Kuo SS, et al. Severe immune hemolytic anemia in disseminated tuberculosis with response to antituberculosis therapy. Chest. 2001;119(6):1961–1963. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.6.1961 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Chan CH, Chan TY, Shek AC, et al. Severe hypercalcaemia associated with miliary tuberculosis. J Trop Med Hyg. 1994;97(3):180–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Abbasi AA, Chemplavil JK, Farah S, et al. Hypercalcemia in active pulmonary tuberculosis. Ann Intern Med. 1979;90(3):324–328. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-90-3-324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Tuddenham WJ. Glossary of terms for thoracic radiology: recommendations of the nomenclature committee of the fleischner society. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;143(3):509–517. doi: 10.2214/ajr.143.3.50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Andreu J, Mauleón S, Pallisa E, et al. Miliary lung disease revisited. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2002;31(5):189–197. doi: 10.1067/mdr.2002.127634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Lee KS, Kim TS, Han J, et al. Diffuse micronodular lung disease: HRCT and pathologic findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999;23(1):99–106. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199901000-00022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Sharma SK, Mukhopadhyay S, Arora R, et al. Computed tomography in miliary tuberculosis: comparison with plain films, bronchoalveolar lavage, pulmonary functions and gas exchange. Australas Radiol. 1996;40(2):113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1996.tb00363.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Oh YW, Kim YH, Lee NJ, et al. High-resolution CT appearance of miliary tuberculosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994;18(6):862–866. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199411000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Voloudaki AE, Tritou IN, Magkanas EG, et al. HRCT in miliary lung disease. Acta Radiol. 1999;40(4):451–456. doi: 10.3109/02841859909177764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Jamieson DH, Cremin BJ. High resolution CT of the lungs in acute disseminated tuberculosis and a pediatric radiology perspective of the term ‘miliary’. Pediatr Radiol. 1993;23(5):380–383. doi: 10.1007/bf02011965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Jain R, Sawhney S, Bhargava DK, et al. Diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis: sonographic findings in patients with early disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(6):1391–1395. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.6.7484572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Malik A, Saxena NC. Ultrasound in abdominal tuberculosis. Abdom Imaging. 2003;28(4):574–579. doi: 10.1007/s00261-002-0061-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Hulnick DH, Megibow AJ, Naidich DP, et al. Abdominal tuberculosis: CT evaluation. Radiology. 1985;157(1):199–204. doi: 10.1148/radiology.157.1.4034967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Leder RA, Low VH. Tuberculosis of the abdomen. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33(4):691–705. doi: 10.1016/S0033-8389(22)00613-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Sinan T, Sheikh M, Ramadan S, et al. CT features in abdominal tuberculosis: 20 years experience. BMC Med Imaging. 2002;2(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-2-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Gupta RK, Kathuria MK, Pradhan S. Magnetization transfer MR imaging in CNS tuberculosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20(5):867–875. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Bathla G, Khandelwal G, Maller VG, et al. Manifestations of cerebral tuberculosis. Singapore Med J. 2011;52(2):124–30;quiz31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Bernaerts A, Vanhoenacker FM, Parizel PM, et al. Tuberculosis of the central nervous system: overview of neuroradiological findings. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(8):1876–1890. doi: 10.1007/s00330-002-1608-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Garg RK, Malhotra HS, Jain A. Neuroimaging in tuberculous meningitis. Neurol India. 2016;64(2):219–227. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.177608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Botha H, Ackerman C, Candy S, et al. Reliability and diagnostic performance of CT imaging criteria in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Andronikou S, Smith B, Hatherhill M, et al. Definitive neuroradiological diagnostic features of tuberculous meningitis in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34(11):876–885. doi: 10.1007/s00247-004-1237-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Ozateş M, Kemaloglu S, Gürkan F, et al. CT of the brain in tuberculous meningitis. A review of 289 patients. Acta Radiol. 2000;41(1):13–17. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0455.2000.041001013.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Willcox PA, Potgieter PD, Bateman ED, et al. Rapid diagnosis of sputum negative miliary tuberculosis using the flexible fibreoptic bronchoscope. Thorax. 1986;41(9):681–684. doi: 10.1136/thx.41.9.681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Charoenratanakul S, Dejsomritrutai W, Chaiprasert A. Diagnostic role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in suspected smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Respir Med. 1995;89(9):621–623. doi: 10.1016/0954-6111(95)90231-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Mondoni M, Repossi A, Carlucci P, et al. Bronchoscopic techniques in the management of patients with tuberculosis. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;64:27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Ahluwalia G, Sharma SK, Dattagupta S, et al. Role of transbronchial lung biopsy in diffuse pulmonary disease: a review of 25 cases during one year. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 1999;41(4):213–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Kamal R, Sharma R, Sahasrabuddhe T, et al. A prospective study to evaluate the utility of bronchoalveolar lavage by fiberoptic bronchoscopy in sputum smear negative patients with high suspicion of pulmonary tuberculosis. Med J Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth. 2012;5(1):43–46. [Google Scholar]
- 200.Wallace JM, Deutsch AL, Harrell JH, et al. Bronchoscopy and transbronchial biopsy in evaluation of patients with suspected active tuberculosis. Am J Med. 1981;70(6):1189–1194. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90826-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Aggarwal A, Gupta D, Joshi K, et al. Bronchoscopic lung biopsy for diagnosis of miliary tuberculosis. Lung India. 2005;22(4):116–118. [Google Scholar]
- 202.Riley UB, Crawford S, Barrett SP, et al. Detection of mycobacteria in bone marrow biopsy specimens taken to investigate pyrexia of unknown origin. J Clin Pathol. 1995;48(8):706–709. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.8.706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Lombard EH, Victor T, Jordaan A, et al. The detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in bone marrow aspirate using the polymerase chain reaction. Tuber Lung Dis. 1994;75(1):65–69. doi: 10.1016/0962-8479(94)90106-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Harrington PT, Gutiérrez JJ, Ramirez-Ronda CH, et al. Granulomatous hepatitis. Rev Infect Dis. 1982;4(3):638–655. doi: 10.1093/clinids/4.3.638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Maharaj B, Leary WP, Pudifin DJ. A prospective study of hepatic tuberculosis in 41 black patients. Q J Med. 1987;63(242):517–522. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.qjmed.a068121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Alvarez SZ. Hepatobiliary tuberculosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;13(8):833–839. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1998.tb00743.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Iles PB, Emerson PA. Tuberculous lymphadenitis. Br Med J. 1974;1(5899):143–145. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5899.143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Khan FY, Aladab AH. Role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the rapid diagnosis of sputum smear-negative disseminated tuberculosis with pulmonary miliary infiltrates. Oman Med J. 2020;35(1):e87. doi: 10.5001/omj.2020.05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Chaidir L, Annisa J, Dian S, et al. Microbiological diagnosis of adult tuberculous meningitis in a ten-year cohort in Indonesia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;91(1):42–46. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Chen P, Shi M, Feng GD, et al. A highly efficient Ziehl-Neelsen stain: identifying de novo intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis and improving detection of extracellular M. tuberculosis in cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(4):1166–1170. doi: 10.1128/jcm.05756-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Feng GD, Shi M, Ma L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of intracellular mycobacterium tuberculosis detection for tuberculous meningitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(4):475–481. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201309-1686OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Heemskerk AD, Donovan J, Thu DDA, et al. Improving the microbiological diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: a prospective, international, multicentre comparison of conventional and modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain, GeneXpert, and culture of cerebrospinal fluid. J Infect. 2018;77(6):509–515. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Boehme CC, Nabeta P, Hillemann D, et al. Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(11):1005–1015. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Lawn SD, Mwaba P, Bates M, et al. Advances in tuberculosis diagnostics: the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and future prospects for a point-of-care test. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(4):349–361. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70008-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Nhu NT, Heemskerk D, Thu Do DA, et al. Evaluation of GeneXpert MTB/RIF for diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(1):226–233. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01834-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Patel VB, Theron G, Lenders L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative PCR (Xpert MTB/RIF) for tuberculous meningitis in a high burden setting: a prospective study. PLoS Med. 2013;10(10):e1001536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Bahr NC, Nuwagira E, Evans EE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for tuberculous meningitis in HIV-infected adults: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):68–75. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30474-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Donovan J, Thu DDA, Phu NH, et al. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: a prospective, randomised, diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(3):299–307. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(19)30649-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Cresswell FV, Tugume L, Bahr NC, et al. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for the diagnosis of HIV-associated tuberculous meningitis: a prospective validation study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(3):308–317. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(19)30550-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Automated real-time nucleic acid amplification technology for rapid and simultaneous detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance: Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tb in adults and children: policy update. Geneva: World Health Organization Copyright © World Health Organization; 2013. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.World Health Organization. WHO policy statement. Molecular line probe assays for rapid screening of patients at risk of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, 2008. 2008.
- 222.Ling DI, Zwerling AA, Pai M. Rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant TB using line probe assays: from evidence to policy. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2008;2(5):583–588. doi: 10.1586/17476348.2.5.583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Riquelme A, Calvo M, Salech F, et al. Value of adenosine deaminase (ADA) in ascitic fluid for the diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis: a meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40(8):705–710. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200609000-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Sharma SK, Suresh V, Mohan A, et al. A prospective study of sensitivity and specificity of adenosine deaminase estimation in the diagnosis of tuberculosis pleural effusion. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2001;43(3):149–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Tuon FF, Higashino HR, Lopes MI, et al. Adenosine deaminase and tuberculous meningitis--a systematic review with meta-analysis. Scand J Infect Dis. 2010;42(3):198–207. doi: 10.3109/00365540903428158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Xu HB, Jiang RH, Li L, et al. Diagnostic value of adenosine deaminase in cerebrospinal fluid for tuberculous meningitis: a meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14(11):1382–1387. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.09.0537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Francony G, Fauvage B, Falcon D, et al. Equimolar doses of mannitol and hypertonic saline in the treatment of increased intracranial pressure. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(3):795–800. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181643b41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Vesteinsdottir E, Myrdal G, Sverrisson KO, et al. ARDS from miliary tuberculosis successfully treated with ECMO. Respir Med Case Rep. 2019;26:165–167. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2019.01.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Thwaites GE, Lan NT, Dung NH, et al. Effect of antituberculosis drug resistance on response to treatment and outcome in adults with tuberculous meningitis. The J Infect Dis. 2005;192(1):79–88. doi: 10.1086/430616 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Vinnard C, King L, Munsiff S, et al. Long-term mortality of patients with tuberculous meningitis in New York City: a cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(4):401–407. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Morris K. WHO recommends against inaccurate tuberculosis tests. Lancet. 2011;377(9760). doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60005-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Falk A. Veterans administration-armed Forces cooperative study on the chemotherapy of tuberculosis. XII. Results of treatment in military tuberculosis: a follow-up study of 570 adult patients. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1965;91(1):6–12. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1965.91.1.6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.World Health Organization. Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines for National Programmes. 3rd ed. ed. Geneva, Switzerland: 2003:108. [Google Scholar]
- 234.World Health Organization. Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines. 4rd ed. ed. Geneva, Switzerland: 2010:147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Nahid P, Dorman SE, Alipanah N, et al. Official American thoracic society/centers for disease control and prevention/infectious diseases society of America clinical practice guidelines: treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(7):e147–e95. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.National Collaborating Centre for Chronic C, Centre for Clinical Practice at N. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Guidance. Tuberculosis: Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Tuberculosis, and Measures for Its Prevention and Control. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (UK) Copyright © 2006, Royal College of Physicians of London. Updated text, Copyright © 2011, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 237.Sharma SK, Ryan H, Khaparde S, et al. Index-TB guidelines: guidelines on extrapulmonary tuberculosis for India. Indian J Med Res. 2017;145(4):448–463. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1950_16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Kimberlin D, Brady M, Jackson M, Long S. Red Book: 2015 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 30th Edition. 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 239.Donald PR. Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of antituberculosis agents in adults and children. Tuberculosis. 2010;90(5):279–292. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2010.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Ellard GA, Humphries MJ, Allen BW. Cerebrospinal fluid drug concentrations and the treatment of tuberculous meningitis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;148(3):650–655. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.3.650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.World Health Organization. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 4: Treatment - Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment. 4rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: 2020: 132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Alsultan A, Peloquin CA. Therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of tuberculosis: an update. Drugs. 2014;74(8):839–854. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0222-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Mayosi BM, Ntsekhe M, Bosch J, et al. Prednisolone and Mycobacterium indicus pranii in tuberculous pericarditis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(12):1121–1130. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Strang JI, Kakaza HH, Gibson DG, et al. Controlled clinical trial of complete open surgical drainage and of prednisolone in treatment of tuberculous pericardial effusion in Transkei. Lancet. 1988;2(8614):759–764. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92415-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Meintjes G, Wilkinson RJ, Morroni C, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of prednisone for paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Aids. 2010;24(15):2381–2390. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833dfc68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Meintjes G, Scriven J, Marais S. Management of the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2012;9(3):238–250. doi: 10.1007/s11904-012-0129-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Yang JY, Han M, Koh Y, et al. Effects of corticosteroids on critically ill pulmonary tuberculosis patients with acute respiratory failure: a propensity analysis of mortality. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(11):1449–1455. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw616 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Wakamatsu K, Nagata N, Kumazoe H, et al. Efficacy of steroid pulse therapy for miliary tuberculosis complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2022;29:100341. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2022.100341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Schoeman J, Donald P, van Zyl L, et al. Tuberculous hydrocephalus: comparison of different treatments with regard to ICP, ventricular size and clinical outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1991;33(5):396–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1991.tb14899.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Rajshekhar V. Management of hydrocephalus in patients with tuberculous meningitis. Neurol India. 2009;57(4):368–374. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.55572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Figaji AA, Fieggen AG, Peter JC. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in tuberculous meningitis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19(4):217–225. doi: 10.1007/s00381-003-0730-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Rizvi I, Garg RK, Malhotra HS, et al. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt surgery for tuberculous meningitis: a systematic review. J Neurol Sci. 2017;375:255–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Misra UK, Kalita J. Mechanism, spectrum, consequences and management of hyponatremia in tuberculous meningitis. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;4:189. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15502.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Misra UK, Kalita J, Bhoi SK, et al. A study of hyponatremia in tuberculous meningitis. J Neurol Sci. 2016;367:152–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Diringer MN, Zazulia AR. Hyponatremia in neurologic patients: consequences and approaches to treatment. Neurologist. 2006;12(3):117–126. doi: 10.1097/01.nrl.0000215741.01699.77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Figaji AA, Fieggen AG. The neurosurgical and acute care management of tuberculous meningitis: evidence and current practice. Tuberc (Edinb). 2010;90(6):393–400. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Sharma SK, Ahluwalia G. Effect of antituberculosis treatment on cardiopulmonary responses to exercise in miliary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res. 2006;124(4):411–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Vanino E, Granozzi B, Akkerman OW, et al. Update of drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment guidelines: a turning point. Int J Infect Dis. 2023;130 Suppl 1:S12-s5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Kim DK, Kim HJ, Kwon SY, et al. Nutritional deficit as a negative prognostic factor in patients with miliary tuberculosis. Eur Respir J. 2008;32(4):1031–1036. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00174907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Wang JY, Hsueh PR, Lee LN, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis inducing disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb Haemost. 2005;93(4):729–734. doi: 10.1160/th04-09-0562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Sharma SK, Mohan A. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis. 2004;120(4):316–353. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.15640549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Han Y, Kim SJ, Lee SH, et al. High blood neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio associated with poor outcomes in miliary tuberculosis. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(1):339–346. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.12.65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Kim HJ, Lee CH, Shin S, et al. The impact of nutritional deficit on mortality of in-patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14(1):79–85. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.09.0414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Lawn SD, Myer L, Bekker LG, et al. Tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution disease: incidence, risk factors and impact in an antiretroviral treatment service in South Africa. Aids. 2007;21(3):335–341. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328011efac [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Murdoch DM, Venter WD, Feldman C, et al. Incidence and risk factors for the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV patients in South Africa: a prospective study. Aids. 2008;22(5):601–610. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f4a607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Meintjes G, Lawn SD, Scano F, et al. Tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: case definitions for use in resource-limited settings. The Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8(8):516–523. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(08)70184-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Pepper DJ, Marais S, Maartens G, et al. Neurologic manifestations of paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: a case series. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(11):e96–107. doi: 10.1086/598988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Marais S, Meintjes G, Pepper DJ, et al. Frequency, severity, and prediction of tuberculous meningitis immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(3):450–460. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Marais S, Wilkinson KA, Lesosky M, et al. Neutrophil-associated central nervous system inflammation in tuberculous meningitis immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(11):1638–1647. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Meintjes G, Stek C, Blumenthal L, et al. Prednisone for the prevention of paradoxical tuberculosis-associated IRIS. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1915–1925. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Garcia Vidal C, Rodríguez Fernández S, Martínez Lacasa J, et al. Paradoxical response to antituberculous therapy in infliximab-treated patients with disseminated tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(5):756–759. doi: 10.1086/427941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Rivoisy C, Tubach F, Roy C, et al. Paradoxical anti-TNF-associated TB worsening: frequency and factors associated with IRIS. Joint Bone Spine. 2016;83(2):173–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.04.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Bourgarit A, Carcelain G, Martinez V, et al. Explosion of tuberculin-specific Th1-responses induces immune restoration syndrome in tuberculosis and HIV co-infected patients. Aids. 2006;20(2). doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000202648.18526.bf [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Wallis RS, van Vuuren C, Potgieter S Adalimumab treatment of life-threatening tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(10):1429–1432. doi: 10.1086/598504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Tanaka T, Sekine A, Tsunoda Y, et al. Central nervous system manifestations of tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome during adalimumab therapy: a case report and review of the literature. Intern Med. 2015;54(7):847–851. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.2828 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Rivoisy C, Amrouche L, Carcelain G, et al. Paradoxical exacerbation of tuberculosis after TNFα antagonist discontinuation: beware of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Joint Bone Spine. 2011;78(3):312–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2011.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Kawamoto H, Takasaki J, Ishii S, et al. Re-administration of abatacept for the control of articular symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis during anti-tuberculous therapy. Respir Med Case Rep. 2017;21:147–150. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2017.04.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Armange L, Lacroix A, Petitgas P, et al. The use of TNF-α antagonists in tuberculosis to control severe paradoxical reaction or immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: a case series and literature review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023;42(4):413–422. doi: 10.1007/s10096-023-04564-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Santin M, Escrich C, Majòs C, et al. Tumor necrosis factor antagonists for paradoxical inflammatory reactions in the central nervous system tuberculosis: case report and review. Med (Baltim). 2020;99(43):e22626. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000022626). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Rodrigues LC, Diwan VK, Wheeler JG. Protective effect of BCG against tuberculous meningitis and miliary tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22(6):1154–1158. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.6.1154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Lange C, Aaby P, Behr MA, et al. 100 years of Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guérin. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):e2–e12. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00403-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Colditz GA, Brewer TF, Berkey CS, et al. Efficacy of BCG vaccine in the prevention of tuberculosis: meta-analysis of the published literature. JAMA. 1994;271(9):698–702. doi: 10.1001/jama.1994.03510330076038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Society AT. Targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2000;49(Rr–6):1–51. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr4906a1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Saukkonen JJ, Cohn DL, Jasmer RM, et al. An official ATS statement: hepatotoxicity of antituberculosis therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(8):935–952. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200510-1666ST [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Carmona L, Gómez-Reino JJ, Rodríguez-Valverde V, et al. Effectiveness of recommendations to prevent reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(6):1766–1772. doi: 10.1002/art.21043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Gómez-Reino JJ, Carmona L, Angel Descalzo M. Risk of tuberculosis in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists due to incomplete prevention of reactivation of latent infection. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(5):756–761. doi: 10.1002/art.22768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Jensen PA, Lambert LA, Iademarco MF, et al. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care settings, 2005. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005;54(Rr–17):1–141. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr5417a1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Committee WGAbtGR. WHO Guidelines on Tuberculosis Infection Prevention and Control: 2019 Update. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2019. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
