Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2026 Jul 16;15(8):e00457-26. doi: 10.1128/mra.00457-26

The complete genome sequence of Caulobacter phages Senya and Shash

Enya M Hoxha 1,2, Gillian D Brown 1,2, Kaylyn A Niemiec 1,2, Jolene Ramsey 1,2,
Editor: Daria Van Tyne3
PMCID: PMC13459779  PMID: 42461135

ABSTRACT

Newly discovered Caulobacter phages Senya and Shash are temperate siphophages infecting C. crescentus and C. henricii. Their genomes of size 225,427 and 223,261 bp with 38 and 33 tRNAs, respectively, encode host takeover genes, including GcrA-like cell cycle regulators.

KEYWORDS: bacteriophages, Caulobacter, genomics

ANNOUNCEMENT

Caulobacter crescentus (taxonomic name Caulobacter vibrioides) is an environmental Gram-negative bacterial species that performs asymmetric cell division to produce motile swarmer cells from sessile stalked cells (13). Its relative, Caulobacter henricii, remains an understudied stalked bacterium (4, 5). Here, new Caulobacter phages Senya and Shash are described.

Phages Senya and Shash were isolated from stagnant pond water collected in College Station, TX (GPS coordinates 30º32′48.00″N, 96º16′58.90″W) and Navasota, TX (GPS coordinates 30º23′21.23″N, 96º03′58.88″W), respectively. After ambient temperature transport, samples were filtered through 0.22 µm polyethersulfone and stored between 4 and 8°C. Thirty-milliliter aliquots were enriched with saturated C. henricii CB4 (ATCC 15253) cultures. Senya and Shash phages also plaqued on C. crescentus CB15 (ATCC 19089). Both hosts were grown to saturation on peptone yeast extract (PYE) medium with the addition of 1.5% calcium chloride at 27 and 30°C, respectively. Isolated plaques underwent sterilization with 2% chloroform during three rounds of purification by the soft-agar overlay method (6). Lysate samples were negatively stained with 2% uranyl acetate and observed using a transmission electron microscope at the Texas A&M Microscopy and Imaging Center (Figure 1). Genomic DNA was purified using the Promega Wizard DNA clean-up system as previously described (7). SeqCoast Genomics (Portsmouth, NH) used an Illumina DNA Prep Tagmentation Kit for library preparation. The Illumina NextSeq 2000 platform with a 300-cycle flow cell kit sequenced the unique dual indexes with 2 × 150 bp reads. Reads from 882,226 (Senya) and 923,555 (Shash) spots were subject to quality control using FastQC v0.11.9 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). The contiguous genome was assembled from these reads using Shovill v1.1.0 at 29.8× (Senya) and 30.2× (Shash) coverage (8). These contigs were then closed by PCR, confirmed by Sanger sequencing, and reopened following the example of other phiCbk-like phages (9). Senya has 9,269 bp direct terminal repeats, while Shash has 11,098 bp repeats. The reopened genomes were annotated using the 2024 Galaxy release 24.2 and Apollo 4.2.13 pipeline at https://phage.usegalaxy.eu/ (1012). GLIMMER v3 and MetaGeneAnnotator v1.0 were used for protein-coding gene detection, and ARAGORN v2.36 was used for tRNA detection (1315). Functional prediction used BLAST v2.9.0, TMHMM v2.0 for transmembrane domain identification, and InterProScan v5.33 for conserved domain searches (1618). Supporting analysis was completed using HHpred, Foldseek, and Alphafold3 (1921). All tools used default settings.

Fig 1.

Transmission electron micrographs of two bacteriophages, each showing a rod-shaped prolate capsid with a single flexible tail extending from one end, consistent with siphophage morphology.

Transmission electron micrographs of bacteriophages (A) Senya and (B) Shash. Both phages display siphovirus morphology with flexible tails and prolate capsids. The scale markers each represent 200 nm.

Siphophages Senya and Shash (GenBank PX223409, PX223408) genome characteristics are summarized in Table 1. By BLASTn, they share 81.1% nucleotide identity between them. Senya is 79.8% identical at the nucleotide level with Caulobacter phage CcrRogue (GenBank NC_019408), but Shash shares 97.7% nucleotide identity with Caulobacter phage Magneto (GenBank JX100812). Notable characteristics of Senya and Shash include tyrosine integrases (GenBank YDS81042, YDS80702), suggesting they are temperate phages (22), and the presence of GcrA-like cell cycle regulators (GenBank YDS81106, YDS80791), which are σ70 cofactors involved in swarmer-to-stalked cell differentiation (23).

TABLE 1.

Summary of Senya and Shash genomic characteristics

Genomic characteristics Senya Shash
Genome size (bp) 225,427 223,261
GC content (%) 65 66
Protein-coding genes 335 329
Protein-coding genes assigned predicted functions 57 49
tRNAs 38 33
tmRNAs 0 1

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Research reported in this publication was supported by startup funding from the Department of Biology at Texas A&M University and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number R35GM155289 to J.R.

We are grateful for the technical assistance from Guadalupe Valencia-Toxqui, use of the FigureLab web-based application developed by Michael Baffour Awuah, and advice from other Ramsey lab members. We thank Yves Brun for the gift of the Caulobacter strains. The use of Texas A&M University Microscopy and Imaging Center Core Facility (RRID:SCR_022128) is acknowledged. Additional support came from staff at the Center for Phage Technology (CPT), an Initial University Multidisciplinary Research Initiative supported by Texas A&M University and Texas AgriLife. We further acknowledge the support of the Freiburg Galaxy Team who oversee the server resources used for genome annotation led by Björn Grüning, Bioinformatics, University of Freiburg (Germany), funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research BMBF grant 031 A538A de.NBI-RBC, and the Ministry of Science, Research, and the Arts Baden-Württemberg (MWK) within the framework of LIBIS/de.NBI Freiburg.

Contributor Information

Jolene Ramsey, Email: jolenerr@tamu.edu.

Daria Van Tyne, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The genomic sequence and associated data for Senya and Shash have been deposited under GenBank accession numbers PX223409 and PX223408, BioProject PRJNA222858, Sequence Read Archive entries SRR35158189 and SRR35158190, and BioSample accessions SAMN50750707 and SAMN50750706, respectively.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Schrader JM, Shapiro L. 2015. Synchronization of Caulobacter crescentus for investigation of the bacterial cell cycle. J Vis Exp:52633. doi: 10.3791/52633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Barrows JM, Goley ED. 2023. Synchronized swarmers and sticky stalks: Caulobacter crescentus as a model for bacterial cell biology. J Bacteriol 205:e0038422. doi: 10.1128/jb.00384-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wilhelm RC. 2018. Following the terrestrial tracks of Caulobacter-redefining the ecology of a reputed aquatic oligotroph. ISME J 12:3025–3037. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0257-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Poindexter JS. 1964. Biological properties and classification of the Caulobacter group. Bacteriol Rev 28:231–295. doi: 10.1128/br.28.3.231-295.1964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sly LI, Cox TL, Beckenham TB. 1999. The phylogenetic relationships of Caulobacter, Asticcacaulis and Brevundimonas species and their taxonomic implications. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 49:483–488. doi: 10.1099/00207713-49-2-483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Adams MH. 1956. Bacteriophages. Interscience Publishers, Inc, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Boeckman J, Liu M, Ramsey J, Gill J. 2024. Phage DNA extraction, genome assembly, and genome closure. In Methods in Molecular Biology. Springer US, New York, NY. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Seemann T. 2017. Shovill: faster SPAdes assembly of Illumina reads. https://github.com/tseemann/shovill.
  • 9. Gill JJ, Berry JD, Russell WK, Lessor L, Escobar-Garcia DA, Hernandez D, Kane A, Keene J, Maddox M, Martin R, Mohan S, Thorn AM, Russell DH, Young R. 2012. The Caulobacter crescentus phage phiCbK: genomics of a canonical phage. BMC Genomics 13:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ramsey J, Rasche H, Maughmer C, Criscione A, Mijalis E, Liu M, Hu JC, Young R, Gill JJ. 2020. Galaxy and Apollo as a biologist-friendly interface for high-quality cooperative phage genome annotation. PLoS Comput Biol 16:e1008214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Dunn NA, Unni DR, Diesh C, Munoz-Torres M, Harris NL, Yao E, Rasche H, Holmes IH, Elsik CG, Lewis SE. 2019. Apollo: democratizing genome annotation. PLoS Comput Biol 52:e1006790-W94. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Abueg LAL, Afgan E, Allart O, Awan AH, Bacon WA, Baker D, Bassetti M, Batut B, Bernt M, Blankenberg D, et al. 2024. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible, and collaborative data analyses: 2024 update. Nucleic Acids Res 52:W83–W94. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Noguchi H, Taniguchi T, Itoh T. 2008. MetaGeneAnnotator: detecting species-specific patterns of ribosomal binding site for precise gene prediction in anonymous prokaryotic and phage genomes. DNA Res 15:387–396. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsn027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong S-Y, Lopez R, Hunter S. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zimmermann L, Stephens A, Nam S-Z, Rau D, Kübler J, Lozajic M, Gabler F, Söding J, Lupas AN, Alva V. 2018. A completely reimplemented MPI bioinformatics toolkit with a new HHpred server at its core. J Mol Biol 430:2237–2243. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. van Kempen M, Kim SS, Tumescheit C, Mirdita M, Lee J, Gilchrist CLM, Söding J, Steinegger M. 2024. Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek. Nat Biotechnol 42:243–246. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Abramson J, Adler J, Dunger J, Evans R, Green T, Pritzel A, Ronneberger O, Willmore L, Ballard AJ, Bambrick J, et al. 2024. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630:493–500. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Groth AC, Calos MP. 2004. Phage integrases: biology and applications. J Mol Biol 335:667–678. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.09.082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Holtzendorff J, Hung D, Brende P, Reisenauer A, Viollier PH, McAdams HH, Shapiro L. 2004. Oscillating global regulators control the genetic circuit driving a bacterial cell cycle. Science 304:983–987. doi: 10.1126/science.1095191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genomic sequence and associated data for Senya and Shash have been deposited under GenBank accession numbers PX223409 and PX223408, BioProject PRJNA222858, Sequence Read Archive entries SRR35158189 and SRR35158190, and BioSample accessions SAMN50750707 and SAMN50750706, respectively.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES